alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   9
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3,530
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             5
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               1,850
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    5,642
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         3,099
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           3,052
<LOANS>                                       55,533
<ALLOWANCE>                                      360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                72,844
<DEPOSITS>                                    66,002
<SHORT-TERM>                                       0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              381
<LONG-TERM>                                      403
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       3,007
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                72,844
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1,319
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                125
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  39
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1,483
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               625
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               631
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            852
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   (98)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  343
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       343
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     214
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  8.98
<LOANS-NON>                                      156
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 431
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     21
<RECOVERIES>                                      46
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                360
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             360
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        

</TABLE>
II-O0911

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

colleen keating <tomiokakeating@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:07 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK6! SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

colleen keating

Franklin Ave

Ridgewood, NJ 7450
# C_2011130EN.01000502.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland)) — Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Nowym Sączu v Stanisława Tomaszewska

(Case C-440/09) (1)

1

(Social security for migrant workers - Article 45(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Minimum period required by national law for acquisition of entitlement to a retirement pension - Account to be taken of the period of contribution completed in another Member State - Aggregation - Rules for calculation)

2011/C 130/09

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Nowym Sączu

Applicant:

Defendant: Stanisława Tomaszewska

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sąd Najwyższy — Interpretation of Article 45(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 416) and of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of the Council of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (OJ, English Special Edition 1972 (I), p. 159) — Early retirement pension based on the duration of contribution periods — Method of calculating benefits — Aggregation of contribution periods completed in another Member State and those completed in the Member State concerned prior to or after the addition of the additional periods provided for under national law and amounting to one third of the contribution periods

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1992/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that, in the determination of the minimum insurance period required by national law for the purpose of the acquisition by a migrant worker of entitlement to a retirement pension, the competent institution of the Member State concerned must take into consideration, for the purposes of determining the limit which non-contribution periods may not exceed in relation to contribution periods, as provided for by the legislation of that Member State, all insurance periods completed in the course of the migrant worker’s career, including those completed in other Member States.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.

1

---
SCPR-15-0000962

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE LIZANNE T. PASQUARETTE, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner Lizanne T.

Pasquarette’s petition to resign and surrender her license to

practice law in the State of Hawai#i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10

of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH),

and of the affidavits and exhibits in support thereof, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted, nunc

pro tunc to December 31, 2015. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g),

that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and

record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Lizanne T. Pasquarette, attorney number 10291, 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-15-0000962

15-JAN-2016

03:36 PM
from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective

with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 15, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
----

|   | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oconee Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Steven A. RogersSteven A. RogersVice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL REPORTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                      19,432,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,925,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,125,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,053,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,000,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,877,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       903,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,877,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,044,000
<CGS>                                        2,814,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,570,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,340,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,340,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,340,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Legal Services Corporation

# CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:

Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, at (202) 336-8800. 

*Special Needs:*                         Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend the meeting may notify Elizabeth S. Cushing, at (202) 336-8800.                     

Dated: June 21, 2001.

Victor M. Fortuno,

Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-16064  Filed 6-22-01; 9:30 am]

BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
Richard MONTGOMERY, petitioner, v. Joe COAKLEY.

No. 17-7815.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
971.

#### TAYLOR *v.*FUTCH.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Complaint, from pity court of Nashville — Judge Peeples. January 10, 1908.

Submitted February 25,

Decided May 7, 1908.

*Hendriclcs &*Christian, for plaintiff in error.

*Alexander & Cary,*contra.

Russell, J.

Futch sued Taylor on a promissory note. The defendant pleaded, that he paid the note, by reason of the fact that he was garnished on a fi. fa. in a justice’s court, obtained by L. H. Warlick against W. R. and J. E. Futch, and he paid the garnishment judgment by giving his note to Warlick, the plaintiff in fi. fa. He further pleaded, that in the sale of some land to the plaintiff, it was part of the consideration that he was to pay off this fi. fa. and that the plaintiff was, to turn over to him the note sued upon. The jury found in' favor of the plaintiff. The assignment of error presented by the bill of exceptions is upon the judgment overruling the defendant’s motion for new trial. The motion is based upon the general grounds only.

The evidence is conflicting, and no reason appears why the court erred in refusing a new trial. The execution of the note was not denied, nor the justice of the 'indebtedness which it represented. The defendant claimed that the note was given for an interest in a mill and certain timber, and the plaintiff denied this. The plaintiff also testified to the defendant’s admission that the note he was sued upon was for labor. Without rehearsing the testimony, it is sufficient to say that every material point was placed squarely at issue by the conflicting statements of the plaintiff and the defendant. It was the prerogative of the jury to settle this conflict, and, in the absence of any error of law, their verdict, approved by the trial judge, will not be disturbed. *Judgment affirmed.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MEARL TRAPPER CLARK,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 39 WM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 12th day of May, 2016, the “Application for Re consideration” is** 

DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 32.2

                                                                  ----------------

 

ALPHATRADE.COM

A Nevada corporation

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the "Company")on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Katharine Johnston, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

        Dated: June 22, 2010                        /s/Katharine Johnston

----------------------------------------------

Principal Financial Officer, 

Vice-President, Business Operations, Director
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Sierra Resource Group,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Paul W.  Andre,  Treasurer  and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Company,  hereby  certifies for the purpose of complying  with Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange  Act") and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: March 12, 2007                     By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Paul W. Andre
                                          Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
                                          and Director


A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SIERRA RESOURCE  GROUP,  INC., AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY SIERRA RESOURCE GROUP, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
II-00929

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Duane J. Matthiesen <djma@alum.mit.edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:57 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from

the clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Duane J. Matthiesen

10 Seaborn Place

Lexington, MA 2420
# C_2011340EN.01002101.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/21

---

Order of the General Court of 19 September 2011 — Matkompaniet v OHIM — DF World of Spices (KATOZ)

(Case T-473/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 340/43

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Matkompaniet AB (Borås, Sweden) (represented by: J. Gulliksson and J. Olson, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: DF World of Spices GmbH (Dissen, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller and S. Schmüser, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 September 2009 (Case R 1023/2008-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Matkompaniet AB and DF World of Spices GmbH

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and each of them shall pay half the costs of the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and each of them shall pay half the costs of the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---