alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00193

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

johnny bel <johnnyboybypieter@yahoo.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 9:13 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

johnny bel

p.o. box 1038

selden, NY 11784
II-00435

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Tim Wheeler <timwwheeler@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:35 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Tim Wheeler

598 S Clarion Dr

Pueblo, CO 81007-1525
Willie SANDERS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7426.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

*1296Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 151 

Honoring the life and expressing condolences of the House of Representatives 

on the passing of Paul M. Weyrich. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2009 

Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin (for himself, Mr. TIAHRT, Ms. FALLIN, Mr. PITTS, 

Mr. HARPER, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mrs. 

SCHMIDT, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. PENCE, Mr. COLE, Mr. 

BROUN of Georgia, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. JORDAN

of Ohio, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. AKIN, Mr. 

CULBERSON, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, 

Mr. POSEY, Mr. WOLF, Mr. PETRI, and Mr. SENSENBRENNER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and expressing condolences of the House 

of Representatives on the passing of Paul M. Weyrich. 

Whereas Paul Weyrich was born and raised in Racine, Wisconsin, and became enamored with the political system as 

a student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison; 

Whereas, after a short stint as a news reporter, Mr. Weyrich 

came to Congress in 1966 to serve on the staffs of Senators Gordon L. Allot, of Colorado, and Carl T. Curtis, 

of Nebraska, handling press relations and other assignments; 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 151 IH 

Whereas, as the original President of the Heritage Foundation, Mr. Weyrich established a respectable and reasoned 

conservative voice in American public policy and political 

debates; 

Whereas, as a pioneer of the modern conservative movement, 

Mr. Weyrich stood as a vocal defender of economic and 

religious freedom, and established the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation to rally conservatives 

to the defense of traditional Judeo-Christian values; 

Whereas Mr. Weyrich was a true visionary in outreach efforts, launching a television network, training grassroots 

activists, and influencing both politics and policy; and 

Whereas Mr. Weyrich’s perseverance in the promotion of his 

philosophy inspired thousands of Americans to dedicate 

their own cause to protect liberty and secure America’s 

future: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses— 

3 (1) gratitude to Paul M. Weyrich’s for his sig4 nificant contributions to the conservative movement 

5 and for promoting a capitalist, democratic vision for 

6 the world; and 

7 (2) profound sorrow at the death of Mr. 

8 Weyrich and condolences to the family, friends, and 

9 colleagues of Mr. Weyrich. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
II-00798

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

lou csigay <lou.csigay@purchase.edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:15 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

lou csigay

12 Spring st

Pleasantville, NY 10570
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,714
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             102
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     53,176
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        143,095
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,295
<DEPOSITS>                                     164,091
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,947
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,765
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 214,925
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,099
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,978
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   263
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,340
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,533
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,054
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,286
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      103
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  52
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,032
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,032
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,873
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.26
<LOANS-NON>                                        709
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    208
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,128
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       46
<RECOVERIES>                                       404
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,589
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,105
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,484
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-2354-000]

Take notice that on June 15, 2001, pursuant to Section 2.11 of the Settlement Agreement filed on November 1, 2000, in Docket No. ER00-980-000, and accepted and modified by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) on February 26, 2001, Bangor-Hydro Electric Company (Bangor Hydro) submits this informational filing showing the implementation of Bangor Hydro's open access transmission tariff formula rate for the charges that became effective on June 1, 2001.

Copies of this filing were sent to Bangor Hydro's open access transmission tariff  customers that have requested to receive a copy (Indeck Maine Energy, L.L.C.), the Commission Trial Staff, the Maine Public Utilities Commission, and the Maine Public Advocate.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before July 6, 2001. Protests will be  considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a  party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web  site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-16418  Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fountain Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 1, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Brendon K. Rennert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Brendon K. Rennert
-------------------------
Brendon K. Rennert
Chief Executive Officer
August 1, 2002
Butch JOHNSON, petitioner, v. PALMETTO CITIZENS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION.

No. 16-5177.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2009180EN.01006102.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/61

---

Action brought on 8 June 2009 — CLARO v OHIM — Telefónica (Claro)

(Case T-225/09)

2009/C 180/113

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CLARO, SA (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Telefónica, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 February 2009, in Case R 1079/2008-2, remit the case to that board for it to decide on it afresh, and order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 February 2009, in Case R 1079/2008-2, remit the case to that board for it to decide on it afresh, and order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: BCP S/A, now trading as CLARO, S.A., the applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Three-dimensional trade mark containing the word element “CLARO” (application for registration No 5 229 241), for goods and services in Classes 9 and 38.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Telefónica S.A.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: earlier Community word mark “CLARO” (No 2 017 341), for, inter alia, goods and services in Classes 9 and 38.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed as inadmissible, since the applicant had not filed the relevant statement of grounds for the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant submits that the contested decision is contrary to the principle of functional continuity between the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal. It argues that it was obvious that its appeal was against the Opposition Division’s decision in its entirety, and that the appeal was based on the misinterpretation by the Opposition Division of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2011362EN.01000902.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 October 2011 — Freixenet SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Joined Cases C-344/10 P and C-345/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Applications for registration of Community trade marks representing a frosted white bottle and a frosted black matt bottle - Refusal to register - Lack of distinctive character)

2011/C 362/13

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Freixenet SA (represented by: F. de Visscher, E. Cornu and D. Moreau, avocats)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 27 April 2010 in Case T-109/08 Freixenet v OHIM, by which that court dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 October 2007 (Case R 97/2001-1), concerning an application for registration of a sign representing a frosted white matt bottle as a Community trade mark — Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 73 and 38(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) (now Articles 7(1)(b), 75 and 37(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)) — Infringement of the rights of the defence and the right to a fair hearing — Refusal to register a trade mark — Absence of distinctive character

Freixenet

OHIM

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgments of the General Court of the European Union of 27 April 2010 in Case T-109/08 Freixenet v OHIM (Frosted white bottle), and in Case T-110/08 Freixenet v OHIM (Frosted black matt bottle); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgments of the General Court of the European Union of 27 April 2010 in Case T-109/08 Freixenet v OHIM (Frosted white bottle), and in Case T-110/08 Freixenet v OHIM (Frosted black matt bottle);

| 2. | Annuls the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 October 2007 (case R 97/2001-1) and of 20 November 2007 (Case R 104/2001-1); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 October 2007 (case R 97/2001-1) and of 20 November 2007 (Case R 104/2001-1);

| 3. | Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the costs both at first instance and in the appeals. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the costs both at first instance and in the appeals.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.

1

---
# C_2009113EN.01004702.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/47

---

Action brought on 9 March 2009 — Marie-Hélène Willigens v Council

(Case F-22/09)

2009/C 113/100

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marie-Hélène Willigens (Glabais, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, of the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the appointing authority’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the appointing authority’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---