alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   11-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-17-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            2437
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2437
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1600
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3437
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 18563
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18563)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned, Darren Holm, Chief Executive Officer of Silver  Bow Antique Aviation, (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his  knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 30, 2007  Of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.

Date:       December 31, 2004

/s/Darren J. Holm-------------------------Darren J. HolmChief Executive Officer

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned, Dempsey Mork, Chief Financial Officer of Silver  Bow Antique Aviation, (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to hisknowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 30, 2007  of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  December 31, 2004

/s/Dempsey K. Mork  -------------------------  Dempsey K. Mork  Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel Workgroup.
    Date: June 25, 2001.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: 6100 Executive Blvd., 5th Floor, Rockville, MD 20852, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Hameed Khan, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive 
Blvd., Room 5E01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 18, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-15759 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 375 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 375

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2019

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 
 Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian Tribes, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY REAFFIRMED.

    (a) Reaffirmation.--Section 19 of the Act of June 18, 1934 
(commonly known as the ``Indian Reorganization Act''; 25 U.S.C. 5129), 
is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``The term'' and inserting 
                ``Effective beginning on June 18, 1934, the term''; and
                    (B) by striking ``any recognized Indian tribe now 
                under Federal jurisdiction'' and inserting ``any 
                federally recognized Indian Tribe''; and
            (2) by striking the third sentence and inserting the 
        following: ``In said sections, the term `Indian tribe' means 
        any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, 
        village, or community that the Secretary of the Interior 
        acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly known as 
the ``Indian

              

 Reorganization Act''; 25 U.S.C. 5129), on the date of the enactment of 
that Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 8.1

The following is a list of the significant subsidiaries of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. as of December 31, 2015, including the name of each subsidiary and its
country of incorporation.



1. Cemex Colombia S.A.

COLOMBIA2. Cemex (Costa Rica), S.A.

COSTA RICA3. CEMEX Hrvatska d.d.

CROATIA4. Assiut Cement Company

EGYPT5. Cemex Ready Mix

EGYPT6. Cemex Guatemala, S.A.

GUATEMALA7. CEMEX México, S.A. de C.V.

MEXICO8. Cemex Nicaragua, S.A.

NICARAGUA9. Cemento Bayano, S.A.

PANAMA10. APO Cement Corporation

PHILIPPINES11. Solid Cement Corporation

PHILIPPINES12. CEMEX Polska Sp. ZO.O.

POLAND13. New Sunward Holding B.V.

THE NETHERLANDS14. Cemex UK Operations Limited

UNITED KINGDOM15. CEMEX Construction Materials Florida, LLC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA16. CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA17. CEMEX Construction Materials South, LLC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA18. CEMEX Materials LLC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7056

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GLENN D. HERRON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-93-44, CA-97-629-2) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron Peter Buda, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Glenn D. Herron seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Herron’s motion fora certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Herron , Nos. CR-93- 44; CA-97-629-2 (M.D.N.C. May 18, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2014202EN.01001701.xml

| 30.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2014 — Donau Chemie v Commission

(Case T-406/09) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Fines - Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation during the administrative procedure - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Ability to pay))

2014/C 202/20

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Donau Chemie AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: S. Polster, W. Brugger and M. Brodey, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, N. von Lingen and M. Kellerbauer, acting as Agents, and by T. Eilmansberger, Professor, and subsequently by N. von Lingen and M. Kellerbauer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2009) 5791 final of 22 July 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.396 – Calcium carbide and magnesium-based reagents for the steel and gas industries), in so far as it relates to the applicant, and, in the alternative, for reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on it by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Donau Chemie AG under Article 2(c) of Commission Decision C(2009) 5791 final of 22 July 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.396 – Calcium carbide and magnesium-based reagents for the steel and gas industries) at EUR 4,35 million; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Donau Chemie AG under Article 2(c) of Commission Decision C(2009) 5791 final of 22 July 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.396 – Calcium carbide and magnesium-based reagents for the steel and gas industries) at EUR 4,35 million;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Donau Chemie to bear 90 % of its own costs and to pay 90 % of the European Commission’s costs, and the Commission to bear 10 % of its own costs and to pay 10 % of the costs incurred by Donau Chemie. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Donau Chemie to bear 90 % of its own costs and to pay 90 % of the European Commission’s costs, and the Commission to bear 10 % of its own costs and to pay 10 % of the costs incurred by Donau Chemie.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---
II-00994

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kathy Koloze <koloze@mindspring.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:22 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kathy Koloze

1711 Hubert St

Dallas, TX 75206
1 The Honorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-2893

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Ollie Brown, Jr., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 14, 2005 Filed: May 9, 2005

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ollie Brown, Jr., appeals the revocation by the district court 1 of his term of supervised release and the sentence of ten months' imprisonment that the court imposed upon him for violating the conditions of his release. We affirm. Mr. Brown challenges the district court's order only on constitutional grounds, arguing that the logic of Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), renders-2- unconstitutional the United States Sentencing Guidelines, including its provisions regarding supervised release. Mr. Brown presses this argument under the assumption that the "guidelines created supervised release." But that assumption is incorrect. Supervised release finds its genesis in statute, not in the guidelines. See18 U.S.C. § 3583. After the appellant filed his brief, the Supreme Court indeed held the Sentencing Reform Act unconstitutional, but it did not discard the guidelines wholesale. See United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738, 758, 764-65 (2005). Instead, as we noted in United States v. Coleman , the Court "excised from the Sentencing Reform Act only those provisions that made application of the sentencing guidelines mandatory and thus were contrary to the sixth amendment. Among the remaining provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act that the Court recognized as constitutionally valid was the supervised release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3583." Coleman , No. 04-3377, 2005 WL 937269, at *1 (8th Cir. Apr. 25, 2005) (citing Booker, 125 S. Ct. at 764). Mr. Brown, moreover, admitted the facts that provided the basis for the revocation of his supervised release. Mr. Brown's sixth amendment challenge therefore fails.
Affirmed.

______________________________
Jackie STETSON, petitioner, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.

No. 16-9561.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
BNP PARIBAS 

September 9, 2020 

The bank 

for a changing worlcJ 

To: Market Risk Advisory Committee (MRAC), Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (CFTC) 

Re: "Managing Climate Risk in the U.S. Financial System" Report 

Dear Market Risk Advisory Committee, 

It was a privilege to serve as a member of the Climate-Related Market Risk 

Subcommittee of the Market Risk Advisory Committee, in particular to contribute our 

experience with regard to financing opportunities to accelerate the transition 

towards a net zero carbon emission economy. 

BNP Paribas would like to particularly congratulate Commissioner Behnam's 

leadership on convening various private sector perspectives that has culminated in 

this first-of-its-kind U.S. government-sponsored climate finance report. We also 

would like to commend all subcommittee members for their tireless dedication and 

rich expertise that supported our discussions and subsequent efforts. 

BNP Paribas is unequivocally committed to responsible and sustainable growth by 

financing the economy and advising clients according to the highest ethical 

standards. As a leading global bank on these issues, it is our hope that this report 

will help move policy conversations forward to address climate change as a systemic 

risk. 

The financial sector has an important role to play in accelerating the transition to 

clean energy and addressing climate risks to help protect the planet for future 

generations - and this report is a milestone in advancing the necessary national and 

global policy discussions on how best to achieve these goals. 

Very truly yours, 

Herve Duteil 

Chief Sustainability Officer Americas
Contract

Average 2010 All Months Combined Month‐

End Open Interest, All Referenced Contracts

(delta‐adjusted)

Non‐Spot Month‐Position Limit

Using the Proposed Formula*

Prop

M

Cocoa 142,119 5,500 Sam

Coffee 194,108 6,800 SamCorn 1,781,963 46,500 Cotton No. 2 302,429 9,500 

Feeder Cattle 41,567 3,000 Sam

Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice 39,795 2,900 SamLean Hogs 235,011 7,800 Sam

Live Cattle 417,291 12,400 Sam

Milk Class III 42,183 3,000 Sam

Oats 15,037 2,500 Rough Rice 18,398 2,500 SamSoybeans 685,585 19,100 Soybean Meal 221,778 7,500 Soybean Oil 356,944 10,800 Sugar No. 11 945,999 25,600 SamSugar No. 16 12,447 2,500 SamWheat (CBOT) 571,939 16,200 

Wheat, Hard Red Spring 55,413 3,300 

Wheat, Hard Winter 189,326 6,700 

Copper Grade #1 143,086 5,500 Sam

Gold 755,167 20,800 SamPalladium 23,301 2,500 SamPlatinum 34,911 2,800 SamSilver 164,812 6,000 SamCrude Oil, Light Sweet 4,243,439 108,000 Sam

Gasoline Blendstock 342,930 10,500 Sam

Natural Gas 4,715,746 119,800 SamNo. 2 Heating Oil, New York Harbor 539,809 15,400 Sam

* Note: These levels were computed using 2010 open interest for the contracts and swaps listed on the sheets that follow in this 

These levels would be higher if additional swap open interest data was available.

Agricultural Contracts

Base Metal ContractsPrecious Metal Contracts

Energy Contracts
Exhibit
      23.1








**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 pertaining to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan of China 3C Group of our report
      dated December 1, 2005 with respect to the financial statements of Yiwu Yong
      Xin
      Communication Co., Limited and Hangzhou Wang Da Electronic Co., Limited as
      of
      December 31, 2004 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year
      ended
      December 31, 2005.





//Lichter,
      Yu and Associates








Lichter,
      Yu and Associates


San
      Diego, CA





April
      7,
      2006
Carlos CLEMONS, petitioner, v. DELTA AIRLINES, INC.

No. 17-597.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, petitioner, v. Beverly McMAHON.

No. 17-1124.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
----

|   | (1) | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oconee Financial Corporation (the “Company”)      for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/      Steven A.      Rogers              Steven      A. RogersVice      President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----