alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012089EN.01002301.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/23

---

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2012 — Ayadi v Commission

(Case T-527/09) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban - Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 - Removal of the interested party from the list of persons and entities concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 89/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Chafiq Ayadi (Dublin (Ireland)) (represented by: initially B. Emmerson QC, S. Cox, Barrister, and H. Miller, Solicitor, and subsequently by E. Grieves, Barrister, and H. Miller)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Paasivirta, T. Scharf and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Finnegan and R. Szostak, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 954/2009 of 13 October 2009 amending for the 114th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban (OJ 2009 L 269, p. 20), in so far as that act concerns the applicant

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, shall pay those incurred by Mr Chafiq Ayadi and shall be required to refund to the cashier of the General Court the sums advanced by way of legal aid. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, shall pay those incurred by Mr Chafiq Ayadi and shall be required to refund to the cashier of the General Court the sums advanced by way of legal aid.

| 3. | The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
Anthony L. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Thomas E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor.

No. 15-1374.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 01-30731

BARBARA BAILEY PICHON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

MURPHY OIL USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

April 15, 2002

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In its petition for rehearing, petitioner complains that our

opinion did not consider its argument that this suit was barred by

an earlier arbitration. The district court thoroughly discussed

Murphy’s argument on this point and for reasons stated by the

district court in its May 30, 2001 order and reasons, we also

reject this argument. The petition for panel rehearing is
2

therefore DENIED. No member of this panel nor judge in regular

active service on the court having requested that the court be

polled on Rehearing En Banc, (Fed. R. App. P and 5

th Cir. R. 35) the

Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.
Calvin Caron CARTER, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 17-7193.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Maryland, Anne Arundel County denied.
Ricky Jovan GRAY, petitioner, v. David ZOOK, Warden.

No. 15-9474.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Christopher READ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7225.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Niku Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-31318, 333-44988, 333-50184, 333-54404, 333-56402, 333-69196,
333-85918,333-90224, 333-90554, 333-102891 and 333-104860) on Forms S-8 and
S-3 of Niku Corporation of our report dated February 21, 2003, except as to
Note 12, which is as of March 16, 2003, and Note 18, which is as of April 15,
2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Niku Corporation and
subsidiaries as of January 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
January 31, 2003, and the related schedule, which report appears in the
January 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10K of Niku Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Mountain View, California
June 2, 2003
Faith DONCHEV, petitioner, v. Dennis DeSIMONE.

No. 17-6375.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
DRYWALL DYNAMICS, INC., petitioner, v. SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS.

No. 16-455.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38, 303; TA-W-38, 303A]

      ( print page 34260)    
                    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on December 28, 2000, applicable to workers of CMI Industries, Inc., Geneva, Alabama. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 11, 2001 (66 FR 2450).                

At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows that worker separations occurred at the New York Sales Offices, Greige Division Sales of CMI Industries, New York, New York. Workers at the New York Sales Offices, Greige Division Sales provide administrative services to support the production of greige woven fabric at the subject firms' manufacturing facilities.

Based on these findings, the Department is amending the certification to include workers of the New York Sales Offices, greige Division Sales, CMI Industries, Inc., New York, New York.

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of CMI Industries, Inc. who were adversely affected by increased imports of greige woven fabric.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-38, 303 is hereby issued as follows;

All workers of CMI Industries, Inc., Geneva, Alabama (TA-W-38, 303) and New York Sales Offices, Greige Division Sales, New York, New York (TA-W-38, 303A) who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 27, 1999, through December 28, 2002 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of June, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-16151  Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
II-00067

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ana Claybourne <kitties 101 @yahoo.com>

Tuesday, December 7, 2010 2:59 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ana Claybourne

6 Palen Court

Sacramento, CA 95838
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Registration of Intermediaries 

What is the purpose of the proposed rulemaking? 

The notice of proposed rulemaking proposes certain substantive and technical revisions to Part 3 of the 

Commission’s regulations regarding the registration of intermediaries. The proposed revisions would provide that 

registration requirements applicable to intermediaries engaged in certain commodity interest transactions, i.e., 

futures, commodity option and retail foreign exchange extend to intermediaries engaged in swaps transactions. 

What is the intention of the proposed revisions to Part 3? 

The Commission previously issued other rulemakings pursuant to the Dodd-Frank that created new categories of 

Commission registrants for persons engaged in swap transactions – swap dealers (SDs) and major swap participants 

(MSPs) – and a new category for market designation – swap execution facilities (SEFs). The proposed rulemaking 

would amend Part 3 so that SDs and MSPs are subject to the same registration requirements as other intermediaries. 

Because swaps transactions may be executed on both designated contract markets (DCMs) and SEFs, the proposed 

rulemaking would amend Part 3 to incorporate references to SEFs, where applicable, in a manner consistent with 

references to DCMs. In addition, the proposal also would extend exemptions from registration to be consistent 

with exemptions available to intermediaries in other commodity interest transactions. 

Do the proposed revisions to Part 3 address any non-conforming amendments? 

In anticipation of an influx of new registrants unfamiliar with Part 3 requirements, the Commission proposes to 

modernize and streamline Part 3 to make it more user-friendly. Among other improvements, the proposal would 

amend Part 3 to: (1) reflect current registration practices of the National Futures Association, the registered futures 

association responsible for effecting and maintaining registration for intermediaries, (2) consolidate multiple 

references into a single location, (3) improve the consistency of terms, and (4) update cross-references to other 

regulations. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
Ahmed M. NURI, petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

No. 17-7532.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Scott Long, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 11, 2005



/S/     SCOTT
LONGScott Long Chief Financial Officer
Artemio GONZALEZ-ANDRADE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9412.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-00715

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Martha Mattes <m2violin@hotmail. corn>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:11 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Martha Mattes

3202 S. 147th East Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74134
II-00169

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jack Rappa <j ack.rappa@gmail.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 4:17 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jack Rappa

6850 Sharlands Ave.,H2045

Reno, NV 89523
Sundiata ACOLI, fka Clark Edward Squire, petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD.

No. 15-1436.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey denied.
# C_2011152EN.01000701.xml

| 21.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 31 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht (Germany)) — Ulrich Schröder v Finanzamt Hameln

(Case C-450/09) (1)

1

(Free movement of capital - Direct taxation - Taxation of income from the letting of immovable property - Deductibility of annuities paid to a relative in the context of an anticipated succession inter vivos - Condition of being subject to unlimited tax liability in the Member State at issue)

2011/C 152/11

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ulrich Schröder

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Hameln

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht — Interpretation of Articles 12 and 56 EC — Taxation on income deriving from the leasing or letting of immovable property — Legislation of a Member State making the possibility of deducting the allowances paid to the former owner of those properties in the context of anticipatory succession subject to the condition of being wholly liable to tax in that state

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which, while allowing a resident taxpayer to deduct the annuities paid to a relative who transferred to him immovable property situated in the territory of that State from the rental income derived from that property, does not grant such a deduction to a non-resident taxpayer, in so far as the undertaking to pay those annuities results from the transfer of that property.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Karl R. Wyss, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 14, 2003

                                            By: /s/ Karl R. Wyss
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                Karl R. Wyss
                                                Chairman of the Board and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR the ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE, et al., petitioners, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, et al.

No. 16-404.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Matthew WARMUS, petitioner, v. Christopher LaROSE, Warden.

No. 17-953.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Aidan A. SMITH, petitioner, v. Michael HOGAN, President of the University of Connecticut, et al.

No. 15-1512.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United State Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Micahel Dodak, the Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 3, 2003

                                      /s/ Michael Dodak
                                          ---------------
                                          Name: Michael Dodak
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer