alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.01


                            Broadbase Software, Inc.

                      Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Jurisdiction of
     Company Name                                         Incorporation
     ------------                                         --------------
<S>                                                         <C>
     Panopticon, Inc.                                        California
     Aperio, Inc.                                            Delaware
     Decisionism, Inc.                                       Delaware
     Internet Business Advantages, Inc.                      Delaware
     Rubric, Inc.                                            Delaware
     Servicesoft, Inc.                                       Delaware
     Internet Security Advantages, Inc.                      Massachusetts
     Servicesoft Europe NV                                   Belgium
     Broadbase Software Canada Ltd.                          Canada
     Servicesoft Technologies, Inc.                          Canada
     Broadbase Software International Ltd.                   Cayman Islands
     Broadbase Software SARL                                 France
     Servicesoft SARL                                        France
     Broadbase Software GmbH                                 Germany
     Servicesoft Deutschland GmbH                            Germany
     Balisoft Ltd.                                           Israel
     Servicesoft (Rosh) Ltd.                                 Israel
     Broadbase Software KK                                   Japan
     Broadbase Software BV                                   Netherlands
     Broadbase Software CV                                   Netherlands
     Broadbase Software Ltd.                                 United Kingdom
     Servicesoft Technologies                                United Kingdom
</TABLE>
# C_2009193EN.01003201.xml

| 15.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/32

---

Action brought on 26 June 2009 — Société des Pétroles Shell v Commission

(Case T-251/09)

2009/C 193/50

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Société des Pétroles Shell (Colombes, France) (represented by: P. Hubert, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul, in its entirety or in part, the implied negative response of the Commission of 9 May 2009 to the request for access to documents held by the Commission (reference GESTDEM 372/2009) and draw all the appropriate conclusions therefrom with regard to the applicant’s access to the documents requested; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, in its entirety or in part, the implied negative response of the Commission of 9 May 2009 to the request for access to documents held by the Commission (reference GESTDEM 372/2009) and draw all the appropriate conclusions therefrom with regard to the applicant’s access to the documents requested;

| — | In the alternative, should the Court consider it a decision, annul, in its entirety or in part, the letter of 7 May 2009 from the Secretariat General of the Commission stating that it is not possible to reply to the applicant’s request for access to the Commission documents (reference GESTEDEM 372/2009) and draw all the appropriate conclusions therefrom with regard to the applicant’s access to the documents requested; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, should the Court consider it a decision, annul, in its entirety or in part, the letter of 7 May 2009 from the Secretariat General of the Commission stating that it is not possible to reply to the applicant’s request for access to the Commission documents (reference GESTEDEM 372/2009) and draw all the appropriate conclusions therefrom with regard to the applicant’s access to the documents requested;

| — | Order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the applicant seeks annulment of the implied decision of the Commission refusing it access to all the correspondence, relating to the enquiry into practices on the jet fuel supply market in La Réunion, held by the Commission or exchanged by the Commission and the French competition authority, in particular under Article 11(4) of Regulation No 1/2003. In the alternative, should the Court consider it an express decision of refusal, the applicant seeks annulment of the letter of the Secretariat General which states that the Commission is not in a position to reply to the request made by the applicant for access to the documents.

In support of its action, the applicant raises pleas in law identical or similar to those raised in Case T-245/09 Shell Hellas v Commission.

Shell Hellas

Commission

---
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Donald R. Walsh, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Avatech Solutions, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald R. Walsh    
|                        |  |  |  | Donald R. Walsh        
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Glynn T. MURPHY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7449.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., nka Corizon, petitioner, v. Alma GLISSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Nicholas L. Glisson

No. 16-1406.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# C_2013063EN.01001802.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2013 — Reber v OHIM — Wedl & Hofmann (Walzer Traum)

(Case T-355/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community mark Walzer Traum - Earlier national word mark Walzertraum - Lack of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Equal treatment)

2013/C 63/35

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Reber Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Bad Reichenhall, Germany) (represented by: O. Spuhler and M. Geitz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schenider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Wedl & Hofmann GmbH (Mils/Hall in Tirol, Austria) (represented by: T. Raubal, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 July 2009 (Case R 623/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Reber Holding GmbH & Co. KG and Wedl & Hofmann GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Reber Holding GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Reber Holding GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.

1

---
II-00398

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Angela Fazzari <angie951 @aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:30 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Angela Fazzari

16822 se powell blvd. #!04

portland, OR 97236-1791
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Michael J. Loiacono, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of
Global Axcess Corp (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the first quarter ended March
31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May 5, 2009





/s/
      Michael J. LoiaconoName:
      Michael J. LoiaconoTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
  Officer
CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Annual Report of International Commercial Television Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Kelvin Claney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Patrick
Lavin,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that,  to  the  best  of  our  knowledge  and  belief:

1.   the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                 Date:  April 13, 2004


                                    Signed:  /s/  Kelvin  Claney
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                    Signed:  /s/  Patrick  Lavin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
# C_2014039EN.01001502.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2013 — HSE v Commission

(Case T-399/09) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Presumption of innocence - Fines - Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - 2006 guidelines on the method of setting fines - Mitigating circumstances - Infringement committed as a result of negligence - Infringement authorised or encouraged by the public authorities)

2014/C 39/25

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Holding Slovenske elektrarne d.o.o. (HSE) (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: F. Urlesberger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Bourke and N. von Lingen, and subsequently by N. von Lingen and R. Sauer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 5791 final of 22 July 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 (EC) and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.396 — Calcium carbide and magnesium based reagents for the steel and gas industries), in so far as it relates to the applicant, and, in the alternative, for the reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Holding Slovenske elektrarne d.o.o. (HSE) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Holding Slovenske elektrarne d.o.o. (HSE) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---
Terry Darrell SMITH, petitioner, v. Troy BOWSER, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution.

No. 17-7386.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
SIENA AT OLD ORCHARD, L.L.C., et al., petitioners, v. SIENA AT OLD ORCHARD CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 17-922.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
# C_2009141EN.01004301.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/43

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 24 April 2009 — Nycomed Danmark v EMEA

(Case T-52/09 R)

(Application for interim measures - Marketing authorisation for a medicinal product - Ultrasound echocardiographic imaging agent for diagnostic purposes (perflubutane) - Refusal by the EMEA to grant a waiver from the obligation to submit a paediatric investigation plan - Application for suspension of operation of a measure and interim measures - No urgency)

2009/C 141/91

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nycomed Danmark ApS (Roskilde, Denmark) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek and H. Speyart van Woerden, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMEA) (represented by: V. Salvatore and N. Rampal Olmedo, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION, first, for suspension of the operation of the EMEA’s decision of 28 November 2008 rejecting the application for a product-specific waiver concerning perflubutane and, secondly, for the grant of interim measures.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
II-00236

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Wilma Ellis <wde@saber.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 12:41 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Wilma Ellis

Royal Oaks Dr

Oroville, CA 95966
Addendum No. 4







Dated May 23, 2018 to that certain agreement originally dated as of the 15th day of April 2014 by and between HCi Viocare, a Nevada corporation, with offices at Kintyre House, 209 Govan Road, Glasgow, Scotland, UK G51 1HJ (the "Company"), and Dr. Christos Kapatos, resident of 66 Stewarton Drive, Cambuslang, Glasgow G72 8DG, Scotland, UK (the "Advisor"), hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement".







The Section 2. Term; Subsection 2.1 Term of that certain Agreement is amended as follows:







"The term of this Agreement (the "Term") shall be from and including April 15, 2014, to and including April 15, 2019, unless this Agreement is earlier terminated in accordance with Section 5".







This Addendum No. 4 shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective assigns, successors and personal representative(s).


 


The terms and conditions and provisions as contained in the Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 


This Addendum No. 4 shall be appended to and form a part of the Agreement.


 


	
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Addendum No. 4 to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first written above.





 


	
 


The Company


 


 


/s/Sotirios Leontaritis 


HCi Viocare


By its President


Sotirios Leontaritis

	
 


The Advisor


 


 


/s/Dr. Christos Kapatos  


Dr. Christos Kapatos