alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1657 

Congratulating Ichiro Suzuki, outfielder for the Seattle Mariners, for becoming the first player in the history of Major League Baseball with at 

least 200 base hits in 10 consecutive seasons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 

Mr. MCDERMOTT (for himself, Mr. HONDA, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. 

SMITH of Washington, Mr. DICKS, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. 

TITUS, Mr. WU, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. WOOLSEY, Ms. CHU, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. 

SPEIER, and Ms. TSONGAS) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Ichiro Suzuki, outfielder for the Seattle Mariners, for becoming the first player in the history of 

Major League Baseball with at least 200 base hits in 

10 consecutive seasons. 

Whereas, on September 23, 2010, Ichiro Suzuki, outfielder 

for the Seattle Mariners, became the first player in the 

history of Major League Baseball with at least 200 base 

hits in 10 consecutive seasons, breaking a record of 8 

consecutive seasons by Willie Keeler that had stood for 

108 years; 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1657 IH 

Whereas Ichiro Suzuki was previously tied with Ty Cobb, who 

recorded at least 200 hits in 9 seasons between 1907 and 

1924; 

Whereas Ichiro Suzuki set the record with a line-drive single 

to center field in the fifth inning against the Toronto 

Blue Jays; 

Whereas only Pete Rose, with 10 200-hit seasons ties Ichiro 

Suzuki in the number of 200-hit seasons, although that 

feat was not accomplished in consecutive seasons; 

Whereas Ichiro Suzuki moved to the United States in 2001 

to play for the Seattle Mariners, after playing 9 years for 

the Orix Blue Wave in Japan; 

Whereas Ichiro Suzuki became the first fielder in Major 

League Baseball who was born in Japan; 

Whereas Ichiro Suzuki has played outfield for the Seattle 

Mariners since April 2, 2001, has earned 9 consecutive 

Gold Glove awards, and has made 10 consecutive All-Star 

Game appearances; and 

Whereas Ichiro Suzuki is the first Major League Baseball 

player to be inducted into the Japanese Baseball Hall of 

Fame: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and congratulates Ichiro Suzuki, outfielder for the 

3 Seattle Mariners, for becoming the first player in the his4 tory of Major League Baseball with at least 200 base hits 

5 in 10 consecutive seasons. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Walter Leroy MOODY, Jr., petitioner, v. Cynthia STEWART, Warden.

No. 17-8564 (17A1145).

Supreme Court of the United States

April 19, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. The order *1591heretofore entered by Justice THOMAS is vacated.
# C_2012032EN.01000902.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 December 2011 — Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon v European Commission

(Case C-386/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for copper plumbing tubes - Fines - Size of the market, duration of the infringement and cooperation capable of being taken into consideration - Effective judicial remedy)

2012/C 32/15

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon (represented by: I. Forrester QC)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Grippini Fournier and S. Noë, Agents, B. Doherty, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2010 in Case T-21/05 Chalkor v Commission by which the Court reduced the fine imposed on the appellant by Commission Decision 2006/485/EC of 3 September 2004 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/38.069 — Copper Plumbing Tubes) (notified under document number C(2004) 2826), concerning a system for the allocation of production volume and market shares and the establishment of objectives and price increases in the European market for copper plumbing tubes

Chalkor

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

1

---
Sam Autry FLETCHER, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-7370.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, First District denied.
Exhibit 21
                                                         ----------

        Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries of Commonwealth Industries, Inc.


     Name                                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation
     -----                                        -----------------------------
     Commonwealth Financing Corp. (1)                                 Delaware

     Commonwealth Aluminum Lewisport, Inc. (1)                        Delaware

     Commonwealth Aluminum Sales Corporation (2)                      Delaware

     Commonal Corporation (2)                                         Barbados

     Alflex Corporation (1)                                           Delaware

     Alflex E1 LLC (5)                                                Delaware

     Commonwealth Aluminum Concast, Inc. (3)                          Ohio

     Commonwealth Aluminum Corporation (4)                            Delaware
     --------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (1)  Subsidiary of Commonwealth Industries, Inc.

         (2)  Subsidiary of Commonwealth Aluminum Lewisport, Inc.

         (3)  Subsidiary of Alflex Corporation.

         (4)  Subsidiary of Commonwealth Aluminum Concast, Inc.

         (5) Limited Liability Company 100% owned by Alflex Corporation.
**FIDELITY**®**ADVISOR DIVERSIFIED INTERNATIONAL FUND**
Open Meeting of the Commission – Thursday, February 20, 2020

AGENDA

1. Call to Order

2. Opening Statements

Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

Commissioner Brian D. Quintenz

Commissioner Rostin Behnam

Commissioner Dawn D. Stump

Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz

3. Matters for Consideration

• Proposed Rule: Amendments to the Real-Time Public Reporting Requirements (Part 43) 

• Proposed Rule: Amendments to the Swap Data Recordkeeping and Reporting 

Requirements (Part 45) 

• Reopening of Comment Period: Certain Swap Data Repository and Data Reporting 

Requirements (Part 49 Verification)

Staff Presentation

Dorothy DeWitt, Division of Market Oversight (DMO) 

Meghan Tente, DMO David Aron, DMO 

Benjamin DeMaria, DMO Richard Mo, DMO 

Matthew Jones, DMO 

John Coughlan, Office of the Chief Economist (OCE) John S. Roberts, OCE 

Kate Mitchel, Office of Data and Technology

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Votes 

4. Closing Statements

5. Adjournment
II-00943

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Roz Boyd <rozboyd@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:48 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Roz Boyd

3 Washington Square Village

New York, NY 10012
Brady SMITH, petitioner, v. Amanda SMITH.

No. 17-1100.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District denied.
XIU JIAN SUN, petitioner, v. KIN CHEUNG.

No. 17-1070.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3806 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit the grounds of 

deportability for certain relatives of members of the Armed Forces and 

veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2019 

Mr. GALLEGO (for himself, Mr. SOTO, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GONZALEZ of 

Texas, and Ms. ESCOBAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit 

the grounds of deportability for certain relatives of members of the Armed Forces and veterans, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Immigrant 

5 Gold Star and Military Families Act’’. 


dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3806 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITING GROUNDS OF DEPORTABILITY FOR REL2 ATIVES OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES AND VETERANS. 

4 Section 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

5 (8 U.S.C. 1227) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(e) ALIEN RELATIVES OF MEMBERS OF THE

8 ARMED FORCES AND VETERANS.—The provisions of this 

9 section shall not apply to an alien who— 

10 ‘‘(1) is— 

11 ‘‘(A) the spouse, widow or widower, parent, 

12 son or daughter, or sibling of— 

13 ‘‘(i) a member of the Armed Forces of 

14 the United States; or 

15 ‘‘(ii) a veteran (as that term is de16 fined in section 101 of title 38, United 

17 States Code); or 

18 ‘‘(B) eligible for the Gold Star lapel button 

19 under section 1126 of title 10, United States 

20 Code; and 

21 ‘‘(2) has not been convicted of— 

22 ‘‘(A) a felony; 

23 ‘‘(B) a significant misdemeanor (as such 

24 term is defined in section 2 of the Restoring 

25 Respect for Immigrant Service in Uniform Act); 

26 or 


dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3806 IH

1 ‘‘(C) three or more misdemeanors that are 

2 not significant misdemeanors, each of which oc3 curred on a different date, and arose out of sep4 arate conduct; and 

5 ‘‘(3) is not otherwise a threat to national secu6 rity or public safety.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with BILLS
**Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 April 2011 – Smart Technologies v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH)**

**(Case T-523/09)**

Community trade mark – Application for Community word mark WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of distinctive character (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 33-37, 40)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2009 (Case R 554/2009-2), concerning an application for the word sign WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH as a Community trade mark. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Smart Technologies ULC |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH for goods in Class 9 – Application No 7355902 |
| Decision of the examiner: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Smart Technologies ULC to pay the costs. |
Humberto Bucio DELGADO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7859.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-23-00070-CV 

 

MUNSON SEED COMPANY, LLC, APPELLANT 

V. 

LEGEND SEEDS, INC., APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 72nd District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. DC-2022-CV-0903, Honorable Ann-Marie Carruth, Presiding 

April 21, 2023 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Appellant, Munson Seed Company, LLC, appeals from the trial court’s Default 

Judgment. Appellant’s brief was originally due March 27, 2023, but was not filed. By 

letter of April 3, 2023, we notified Appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal for 

want of prosecution, without further notice, if a brief was not received by April 13. To 

date, Appellant has neither filed a brief nor had any further communication with this Court.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Per Curiam
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3684 

To repeal certain obsolete laws relating to Indians. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2019 

Mr. O’HALLERAN (for himself, Mr. COLE, and Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To repeal certain obsolete laws relating to Indians. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘An Act Repealing Existing 

5 Substandard Provisions Encouraging Conciliation with 

6 Tribes’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE LAWS RELATING 

8 TO INDIANS. 

9 (1) Section 2080 of the Revised Statutes (25 

10 U.S.C. 72) is repealed. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3684 IH

1 (2) Section 2100 of the Revised Statutes (25 

2 U.S.C. 127) is repealed. 

3 (3) Section 2 of the Act of March 3, 1875 (18 

4 Stat. 449, chapter 132; 25 U.S.C. 128), is repealed. 

5 (4) The first section of the Act of March 3, 

6 1875 (18 Stat. 424, chapter 132; 25 U.S.C. 129), 

7 is amended under the heading ‘‘CHEYENNES 

8 AND ARAPAHOES.’’ by striking ‘‘; that the Sec9 retary of the Interior be authorized to withhold, 

10 from any tribe of Indians who may hold any captives 

11 other than Indians, any moneys due them from the 

12 United States until said captives shall be surren13 dered to the lawful authorities of the United 

14 States’’. 

15 (5) Section 2087 of the Revised Statutes (25 

16 U.S.C. 130) is repealed. 

17 (6) Section 3 of the Act of March 3, 1875 (18 

18 Stat. 449, chapter 132; 25 U.S.C. 137), is repealed. 

19 (7) Section 2101 of the Revised Statutes (25 

20 U.S.C. 138) is repealed. 

21 (8) Section 7 of the Act of June 23, 1879 (21 

22 Stat. 35, chapter 35; 25 U.S.C. 273), is repealed. 

23 (9) The first section of the Act of March 3, 

24 1893 (27 Stat. 612, chapter 209), is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3684 IH

1 (A) under the heading ‘‘MISCELLA2 NEOUS SUPPORTS.’’ (27 Stat. 628; 25 

3 U.S.C. 283), by striking the last 2 undesig4 nated paragraphs; and 

5 (B) under the heading ‘‘FOR SUPPORT 

6 OF SCHOOLS.’’ (27 Stat. 635; 25 U.S.C. 

7 283), by striking the second undesignated para8 graph. 

9 (10) Section 18 of the Act of June 30, 1913 

10 (38 Stat. 96, chapter 4; 25 U.S.C. 285), is amended 

11 by striking the tenth undesignated paragraph. 

12 (11) The Act of June 21, 1906 (34 Stat. 325, 

13 chapter 3504), is amended under the heading 

14 ‘‘COMMISSIONER.’’ under the heading ‘‘I. GEN15 ERAL PROVISIONS.’’ (34 Stat. 328; 25 U.S.C. 

16 302) by striking the fourth undesignated paragraph. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2009282EN.01005701.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/57

---

Action brought on 28 September 2009 — Lorenz Shoe Group v OHIM — Fuzhou Fuan Leather Plastics Clothing Making (Ganeder)

(Case T-374/09)

2009/C 282/106

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lorenz Shoe Group AG (Taufkirchen, Austria) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Fuzhou Fuan Leather Plastics Clothing Making Co. Ltd (Fujian, People’s Republic of China)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 16 July 2009 in Case R 1289/2008-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 16 July 2009 in Case R 1289/2008-1;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Fuzhou Fuan Leather Plastics Clothing Making Co. Ltd

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Ganeder’ for goods in Classes 14, 18 and 25 (Application No 5 108 774)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Lorenz Shoe Group AG (formerly shoe fashion group LORENZ AG)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘Ganter’ for goods in Class 25 (Community trade mark No 469 262), in respect of opposition only to the registration for goods in that class

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Dismissal of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), since there is a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with
the Annual Report of Empyrean Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert L. Lee,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Robert L.
Lee_ Robert L. Lee,
President and CEO   Dated:
 November 4, 2009
# C_2011211EN.01000702.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/7

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium)) — Dai Cugini NV v Rijkdienst voor Sociale Zekerheid

(Case C-151/10) (1)

1

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 97/811/EC - Equal treatment of part-time and full-time workers - Discrimination - Administrative obstacle likely to limit the opportunities for part-time work - Mandatory publication and retention of contracts and work-schedules)

2011/C 211/12

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeidshof te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Dai Cugini NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Rijkdienst voor Sociale Zekerheid

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Afdeling Hasselt) — Interpretation of Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC (OJ 1998 L 14, p. 9) — National legislation providing for a system for the publication and monitoring of work schedules of part-time workers, consisting of the mandatory compilation and retention, subject to criminal or administrative penalties, of documents recording the exact duration of work performed by each worker

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement annexed to Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which makes employers responsible for the obligations of retention and publication of the contracts and work-schedules of part-time workers if it is established that such legislation does not lead to them being treated less favourably than full-time workers in a similar situation or, if such there is such a difference in treatment, it is established that it is justified on objective grounds and does not go beyond what is necessary to attain the objectives thus pursued.

It is for the referring court to perform the necessary factual and legal investigation, particularly with regard to the applicable national law, in order to determine whether that is so in the case before it.

In the event that the referring court were to conclude that the national legislation at issue is incompatible with Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement on part-time work annexed to Directive 97/81, Clause 5(1) thereof would have to be interpreted as precluding such legislation

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---