alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Rafael Torres, Chief Financial Officer of PLX Technology, Inc.,certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form
10-Q of PLX Technology, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 3, 2004



/s/ Rafael Torres	  Rafael Torres
   Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16352]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 24, 2001.
    Time: 8:00 am to 6:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Virginian Suites, 1500 Arlington Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22209.
    Contact Person: Stanley C. Oaks, Jr., Scientific Review Branch, 
Division of Extramural Research, Executive Plaza South, Room 400C, 
6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16352 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Michael HIGGINS, petitioner, v. Kimberly J. ZION, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Conor Zion.

No. 17-1083.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

*1549Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### J. D. Spears *v.*The State.

1. Assault.—A. threatening gesture, though made under circumstances indicating an immediate intent to commit a battery, does not constitute an assault, unless it be coupled with an ability to inflict injury.

2. Hew Trial on the Evidence.—Anew trial was refused below, and there-is testimony supporting the conviction ; but such testimony was contradicted in its material features, and a decided and unmistakable preponderance of evidence disproves the *corpus delicti. Held,*that a new trial must be allowed.

3. Reasonable Doubt.—The evidence was conflicting, and the accused asked a charge presenting the doctrine of reasonable doubt. *Held,*error to-refuse the charge, in view of such evidence.

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. George H. Noonan.

The indictment was for assault with, intent to murder A. J. Rhodes. The verdict found the accused guilty of a. simple assault, and assessed against him a fine of $100.

*245Rhodes was the only witness for the state, and his testimony was somewhat vague and inconclusive. Two witnesses testified for the accused, and they concurred in contradicting the most material statements of the prosecuting witness.

*B.*Coopwood, for the appellant.

*George*McCormick, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Winkler, J.

The appellant, after conviction, moved the court to grant him a new trial, for the reason that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law as given by the court, and to the evidence before the jury.

On the trial below, the court was requested by the defendant’s counsel to charge as follows : “If the jury have a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant, they will give him the benefit of it and acquit him.”

From the evidence as we find it set out in the transcript we are of opinion the court should have granted a new trial on the grounds set out in the motion. Three witnesses testified on the trial; the person upon whom the assault is alleged to have been made, and two others—one for the state and one for the defendant.

We have carefully examined the statement of facts without being able to discover that the defendant committed any assault upon the person of the prosecuting witness. Agreeably to the Penal Code, “any attempt to commit a battery, or any threatening gesture, showing in itself, or by words accompanying it, an immediate intention, coupled with an ability, to commit a battery, is an assault.” The intention and the ability to inflict injury must concur, to constitute an assault.

We would hesitate to reverse a conviction supported by any uncontradicted testimony, when the court below had *246refused a new *trial;*but when, as in this case, there is such an unmistakable preponderance of evidence in faVor of the' accused in the material points necessary to constitute an assault, we think the verdict should have been set aside. ' The charge asked by the defendant, and refused, the-accused was entitled to, and it was error to refuse it under the evidence.

For these errors the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
Exhibit 13(a).1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CDC Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for
the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I, Peter Yip, chief executive officer of the Company, certify that:

(1) The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: June 30, 2009    
|                       
|/s/ Peter Yip          
|Peter Yip              
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CDC Corporation and will be retained by CDC Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010024EN.01002903.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/29

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany), lodged on 18 November 2009 — Reinhard Prigge, Michael Fromm and Volker Lambach v Deutsche Lufthansa AG

(Case C-447/09)

2010/C 24/55

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Reinhard Prigge, Michael Fromm and Volker Lambach

Appellants:

Respondent: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 2(5), Article 4(1) and/or Article 6(1), first sentence, of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (1) and/or the general Community-law principle which prohibits discrimination on grounds of age be interpreted as precluding rules of national law which recognise an age-limit of 60 for pilots established by collective agreement for the purposes of ensuring air safety?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.

1

---
II-O0102

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

John Doucette <freethinker 1012000@yahoo.com>

Sunday, December 5, 2010 7:13 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

John Doucette

17 Rosebank Ave

Providence, RI 02908
# C_2009244EN.01001202.xml

| 10.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/12

---

Action brought on 30 July 2009 — Val’hor v Commission

(Case T-306/09)

2009/C 244/20

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Val’hor (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Ledoux and B. Néouze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final (1) of 10 December 2008 in which the Commission found that the umbrella scheme likely to be run by the inter-branch organisations of French farmers (organisations interprofessionnelles agricoles françaises), consisting in aids for technical assistance; for the production and marketing of high-quality agricultural products; for research and development, and for advertising which promotes primary producers and undertakings active in the processing and marketing of agricultural products, financed by voluntary levies made compulsory by ministerial decree, levied on members of those inter-branch organisations, constitutes State aid which is compatible with the common market.

1

The pleas and principal submissions relied upon the by the applicant are substantially the same as, or similar to, those put forward in the context of Cases T-293/09 CNIEL v Commission, and T-302/09 CNIPT v Commission.

CNIEL

Commission

CNIPT

Commission

---

(1)  OJ 2009 C 116, p. 14.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Dodak, the Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 12, 2004                          By: /s/ Michael J. Dodak
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Michael J. Dodak
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Scott Long, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 15, 2005



/s/ Scott LongScott Long Chief Financial Officer


|
|
Marcos Andres PICO, petitioner, v. OREGON.

No. 16-9518.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  George  Q  Horowitz,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Everlast
Worldwide Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to
his knowledge, that:

The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  December  31, 2002 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                       /s/ George Q Horowitz
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       George Q Horowitz
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                                       March 27, 2003
```
Brandon COLE, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 16-9358.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
<PAGE>

32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
         Officer of Ravenwood Bourne, Ltd. pursuant to Section 906 of the
         Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAVENWOOD BOURNE (the
"Company") for the year ended October 31,  2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Ravenwood Bourne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 15, 2009

                                      /s/Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Financial Officer
Michael Joseph DERROW, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7720.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Gregory Shawn MERCER, petitioner, v. Tricia W. POWERS.

No. 17-6072.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Kenneth W. Powell, President and Chief Executive Officer of Titan Trading Analytics Inc. (the Company) , hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

a.

the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



b.

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Dr. Kenneth W. Powell





Name:

Dr. Kenneth W. Powell

Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:

April 26, 2006

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.