alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3854 

To allow the Coast Guard to issue a certificate of documentation with a 

coastwise endorsement for the vessel Oliver Hazard Perry, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Mr. CICILLINE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To allow the Coast Guard to issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement for the vessel Oliver 

Hazard Perry, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) In 2018, the Tall Ship SSV Oliver Hazard 

6 Perry was named the Official Flagship and Tall 

7 Ship Ambassador of Rhode Island. 

8 (2) At 200 feet long, the 3-masted Tall Ship 

9 SSV Oliver Hazard Perry is the largest civilian SailVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:28 Jul 18, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3854.IH H3854

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3854 IH

1 ing School Vessel in the United States and serves as 

2 Rhode Island’s Official Education Sailing Vessel. 

3 (3) The mission of the Tall Ship SSV Oliver 

4 Hazard Perry is to provide innovative and empow5 ering education-at-sea programs that promote per6 sonal and professional growth. 

7 (4) The Tall Ship SSV Oliver Hazard Perry is 

8 named after Commodore Oliver Hazard Perry, from 

9 Rhode Island, who led United States forces to vic10 tory in the decisive Battle of Lake Erie in the War 

11 of 1812. 

12 SEC. 2. JONES ACT WAIVER FOR THE OLIVER HAZARD 

13 PERRY. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 

15 12112(a)(2) of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary 

16 of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating 

17 may issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise 

18 endorsement for the vessel Oliver Hazard Perry (IMO 

19 number 8775560; United States official number 

20 1257224). 

21 (b) TERMINATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF ENDORSE22 MENT.—The coastwise endorsement authorized under sub23 section (a) for the vessel Oliver Hazard Perry (IMO num24 ber 8775560; United States official number 1257224) 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3854 IH

1 shall expire on the first date on which any of the following 

2 apply: 

3 (1) The vessel is sold to a person, including an 

4 entity, that is not related by ownership or control to 

5 the person, including an entity, that owned the ves6 sel on the date of enactment of this Act. 

7 (2) The vessel is rebuilt and not rebuilt in the 

8 United States (as defined in section 12101(a) of 

9 title 46, United States Code). 

10 (3) The vessel is no longer operating in primary 

11 service as a sailing school vessel or an educational 

12 sailing vessel. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Michael GEMMA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6207.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, MBRS Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 25, 2001.
    Time: 1 pm to 3 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIGMS, Office of 
Scientific Review, Natcher Building, Room 1AS-13, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Helen R. Sunshine, Chief, Office of Scientific 
Review, NIGMS, Natcher Building, Room 1AS-13, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-2881.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biiomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16332 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2009297EN.01003201.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/32

---

Action brought on 9 October 2009 — Deutsche Bahn v OHIM (Combination of the colours grey and red)

(Case T-405/09)

2009/C 297/48

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Bahn AG (represented by U. Hildebrandt, K. Schmidt-Hern and B. Weichhaus)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 July 2009 (Case R 379/2009-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 July 2009 (Case R 379/2009-1);

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: A trade mark consisting of the combination of the colours grey and red for services in Class 39 (Application No 6 735 401)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: In its assessment of the mark applied for, the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market applied criteria which are inconsistent with the case-law of the Court of First Instance; it was, in particular, ignored that different criteria are applicable to the registration of colour marks for services than for goods.

Pleas in law:

---
Christopher Brown CORNETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6301.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GSI Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sergio Edelstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sergio EdelsteinDr. Sergio EdelsteinPresident and Chief Executive Officer


April 13,
2010

This Certification shall not be deemed part of the Report or incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to GSI Group Inc. and will be retained by GSI Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-12-00467-CV

_________________

TERRY SOZANSKI, TRUSTEE, Appellant

V.

ERNEST ROGER CLEMMENSEN, HIGHLAND CAPITAL LENDING, INC. 

AND ALL OTHER PARTIES SHARING IN THE INTEREST OF HIGHLAND 

CAPITAL LENDING, INC., Appellees

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 9th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-01-00205-CV

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court signed the judgment on June 1, 2012, and the appellate timetables 

were not extended by the filing of a post-judgment motion within thirty days of 

judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1; Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a). Notice of appeal was due to 

be filed on July 2, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant filed notice of appeal on

September 28, 2012, more than thirty days from the date of judgment and outside the 

time for which we may grant an extension of time to perfect a regular appeal. See Tex. R. 
2

App. P. 26.1; Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. On October 11, 2012, we notified the parties that the 

appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant amended his notice of appeal to show that 

he was pursuing a restricted appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 30. No response has been filed. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 

________________________________

 DAVID GAULTNEY

 Justice

 

Opinion Delivered November 15, 2012

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15968]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362]


Southern California Edison Co.; San Onofre Nuclear Generating 
Station, Unit Nos. 2 and 3; Correction to Environmental Assessment and 
Finding of No Significant Impact

    In notice document 01-15370 beginning on page 32964, in the issue 
of Tuesday, June 19, 2001, make the following corrections:
    In the second full paragraph, in the third column, on page 32964, 
in line seven, the number ``3448 MWt,'' should be corrected to read 
``3438 MWt.''
    In the fourth full paragraph, in the third column, on page 32964, 
in line three, the number ``3448 MWt,'' should be corrected to read 
``3438 MWt.''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of June 2001.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph E. Donoghue,
Senior Project Manager, Section 2, Project Directorate IV, Division of 
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 01-15968 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
# C_2011186EN.01002101.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Olymp Bezner v OHIM — Bellido (OLYMP)

(Case T-204/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark OLYMP - Earlier national figurative mark OLIMPO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 186/38

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG (Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) (represented by: M. Eck and J. Dönch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Miguel Bellido, SA (Manzanares, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2009 (Case R 598/2008-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Miguel Bellido SA and Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
Ladarrius O'Brian WALKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7983.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
906 CERTIFICATION

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of APO Health, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Jan Stahl, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                        /s/ Dr. Jan Stahl
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Dr. Jan Stahl

Date: January 2, 2004


                                       18
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability and intent.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the malting barley variety designated “Garnet” is available for licensing and that the Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Conagra Malting of Vancouver, Washington, an exclusive license to this variety in selected countries outside the United States where breeder's rights are available.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before September 25, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1158, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

June Blalock of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 301-504-5257.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's intellectual property rights to this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public interest to so license this invention as Conagra Malting has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within ninety (90) days from the date of this published Notice, Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Michael D. Ruff,

Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 01-16133 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
Phillip BYRD, petitioner, v. Joseph McFADDEN, Warden.

No. 16-9570.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Craig Victor COLEMAN, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 17-7457.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two denied.
# C_2011211EN.01000603.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/6

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Wuppertal — Germany) — Dieter May v AOK Rheinland/Hamburg — Die Gesundheitskasse

(Case C-519/09) (1)

1

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Social policy - Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Scope ratione personae - Annual leave coinciding with sick leave - Compensation payment in respect of sickness - Concept of worker - Employees subject to the regulations concerning annual leave of public servants (‘Dienstordnungsangestellte’))

2011/C 211/10

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeitsgericht Wuppertal (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Dieter May

Applicant:

Defendant: AOK Rheinland/Hamburg — Die Gesundheitskasse

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Arbeitsgericht Wuppertal — Interpretation of Articles 1(3) and 7(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9) — Entitlement to a compensatory payment for annual leave that has not been taken in full because of illness — Scope ratione personae of Directive 2003/88/EC — Employees of social security institutions performing tasks comparable to those of the public service and who are subject to the working-time rules of public servants (‘Dienstordnungsangestellte’).

ratione personae

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 7(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/88 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘worker’ includes an employee of a public-law body in the social security sector subject to, in particular as regards their entitlement to paid annual leave, rules applicable to public servants.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
Storm Michael BLANTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7942.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
| 1.                              | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                             |
|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |
| 2.                              |  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|                                      |                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |
|                                      |                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |
| /s/ Robert M. Van Patten                  |                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |
| Name:  Robert M. Van Patten     |                                                                                                                                                          |
| Title:  Chief Executive Officer |                                                                                                                                                          |
| Date:  November 12, 2010        |                                                                                                                                                          |

----