alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Public Hearings on the Draft Environment Impact Statement and 
Draft Management Plan for the Proposed San Francisco Bay National 
Estuarine Research Reserve in California

AGENCY: The Estuarine Reserves Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal 
Resource Management, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce

ACTION: Public hearing notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Estuarine Reserves Division, 
of the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National 
Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
(NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce, will hold public hearings for the 
purpose of receiving comments on the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement and Draft Management Plan (DEIS/DMP) prepared on the proposed 
designation of the San Francisco Bay National Estuarine Research 
Reserve in California. The DEIS/DMP addresses research, monitoring, 
education and resource protection needs for the proposed reserve.
    The Estuarine Reserves Division will hold public hearings at 7:00 
p.m. on July 9th, at Suisun City Hall, City Council Chambers, 701 Civic 
Center Blvd., Suisun, CA 94585, and 7:00 p.m. On July 11 2001 at the 
Romberg Tiburon Center, Bay Conference Center, San Francisco Bay Room, 
3152 Paradise Drive, Tiburon, CA 94920.
    The views of interested persons and organizations on the adequacy 
of the DEIS/DMP are solicited, and may be expressed orally and/or in 
written statements. Presentations will be scheduled on a first-come, 
first-heard basis, and may be limited to a maximum of five (5) minutes. 
The time allotment may be extended before the hearing when the number 
of speakers can be determined. All comments received at the hearing 
will be considered in the preparation of the Final Environmental Impact 
Statement (FEIS) and Final Management Plan.
    The comment period for the DEIS/DMP will end on August 17, 2001. 
All written comments received by this deadline will be considered in 
the preparation of the FEIS.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurie McGilvray (301) 713-3155 
extension 158, Estuarine Reserves Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal 
Resource Management, National Ocean Service, NOAA, 1305 East West 
Highway, N/ORM2, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Copies of the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement/Draft Management Plan are available upon 
request to the Estuarine Reserves Division.

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.420 (Coastal Zone 
Management) Research Reserves)

    Dated: June 8, 2001.
Ted I. Lillestolen,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone 
Management.
[FR Doc. 01-16005 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                          1,600,000
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                  40,179,000
<ALLOWANCES>                    2,008,000
<INVENTORY>                    57,370,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               98,399,000
<PP&E>                         85,297,000
<DEPRECIATION>                 11,463,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                185,913,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          83,696,000
<BONDS>                        35,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           78,000
<OTHER-SE>                     31,508,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  185,913,000
<SALES>                        92,599,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               92,599,000
<CGS>                          63,287,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  63,287,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               10,867,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 (110,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              3,652,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                14,856,000
<INCOME-TAX>                    5,690,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             9,166,000
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                    9,166,000
<EPS-BASIC>                        1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .87



</TABLE>
Joseph SAM, petitioner, v. Jerry GOODWIN, Warden.

No. 16-6137.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, King T.
Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Dated: May 17, 2004

                                                     /s/ King T. Moore
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     King T. Moore
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
Edward H. FLINT, petitioner, v. McKay CHAUVIN, Judge, Circuit Court of Kentucky, Jefferson County.

No. 16-426.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2009113EN.01004601.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/46

---

Action brought on 27 February 2009 — Meister v OHIM

(Case F-17/09)

2009/C 113/95

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Herbert E. Meister (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: H.-J. Zimmermann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the dismissal of the applicant’s complaint regarding the calculation of promotion points for the year 2008 and application for damages for infringement of the principles of proper personnel management

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the negative decision of the president of 20 December 2008 taken in relation to the internal complaint brought by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of 20 August 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the negative decision of the president of 20 December 2008 taken in relation to the internal complaint brought by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of 20 August 2008;

| — | order the defendant to pay damages to the applicant, of an amount to be determined by the court; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay damages to the applicant, of an amount to be determined by the court;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of K&F Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
M. Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ KENNETH M. SCHWARTZ
-----------------------
Kenneth M. Schwartz
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 15, 2005
# C_2010328EN.01001001.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court (Ireland)) — J. McB. v L. E.

(Case C-400/10 PPU) (1)

1

(Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility - The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the civil aspects of international child abduction - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Children whose parents are not married - Father’s rights of custody - Interpretation of ‘rights of custody’ - General principles of law and Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

2010/C 328/15

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: J. McB.

Applicant:

Defendant: L. E.

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Supreme Court — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1) — Child whose parents are not married — Father’s rights of custody — National legislation requiring the father to obtain an order from the court with jurisdiction in order to have rights of custody in respect of the child which render wrongful the child’s removal or retention outside the child’s country of habitual residence.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, must be interpreted as not precluding a Member State from providing by its law that the acquisition of rights of custody by a child’s father, where he is not married to the child’s mother, is dependent on the father’s obtaining a judgment from a national court with jurisdiction awarding such rights to him, on the basis of which the removal of the child by its mother or the retention of that child may be considered wrongful, within the meaning of Article 2(11) of that regulation

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.

1

---
II-00636

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mary L. <mar3356@citynet.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:03 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mary L.

Washington St.

Charleston, WV 25301
ESTATE OF Helen B. BROOKS, et al., petitioners, v. CONNECTICUT COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SERVICES.

No. 17-608.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Katherine B. ROBINSON, petitioner, v. CHESAPEAKE BANK OF MARYLAND, et al.

No. 15-9346.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
II-00093

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kathy Shimata <kshimata@hawaii.rr.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 12:15 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kathy Shimata

3453 Pawaina St.

Honolulu, HI 96822
Gloria SADLOWSKI, petitioner, v. TOWN OF MIDDLEFIELD, CONNECTICUT.

No. 16-9285.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jerry A. Dukes, President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 13, 2004



/s/ Jerry A. DukesJerry A. DukesPresident
# C_2009129EN.01002103.xml

| 6.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/21

---

Action brought on 31 March 2009 — Chaouch v Commission

(Case F-30/09)

2009/C 129/37

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dhikra Chaouch (Oetrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Moyse and A. Salerno, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the appointing authority not to grant the applicant the installation allowance.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Find that there was an infringement of Article 5 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations in relation to Article 20 and, consequently, annul the decisions of the appointing authority of 2 July 2008 and 8 December 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

Find that there was an infringement of Article 5 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations in relation to Article 20 and, consequently, annul the decisions of the appointing authority of 2 July 2008 and 8 December 2008;

| — | Declare that the applicant has a right to the installation allowance laid down in Article 5(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations plus default interest from the date at which the indemnity was due until the date of actual payment at the interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations during the period concerned plus two percentage points; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the applicant has a right to the installation allowance laid down in Article 5(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations plus default interest from the date at which the indemnity was due until the date of actual payment at the interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations during the period concerned plus two percentage points;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George
A. McQuain, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp.
(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the second quarter ended June
30, 2010  (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  January
27, 2011





/s/ George A. McQuainName:  George
      A. McQuainTitle:  President
      and Chief Executive
Officer
SIGHTSOUND TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, petitioner, v. APPLE INC.

No. 16-483.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 11, 2011
By: /s/ Randy ButlerRandy ButlerChief Financial Officer
Michael A. FALANA, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 16-6131.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.