alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13(a).2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CDC Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for
the period ended December 31, 2006, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F/A) I, Peter Yip, chief executive officer of the Company,
certify that:

(1) The Form 20-F/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael Latimore   
|Michael Latimore       
|Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CDC Corporation and will be retained by CDC Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.(a).2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of chinadotcom
corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I, Daniel Widdicombe, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 16, 2003



/s/ Daniel WiddicombeDaniel WiddicombeChief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to chinadotcom corporation and will be retained by
chinadotcom corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In Re Joseph M. ARPAIO, petitioner.

No. 16-1422.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Burhan CULCULOGLU, petitioner, v. Michelle L. CULCULOGLU.

No. 17-7593.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
II-00954

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Patricia Wilson <pwilsontchr@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:43 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK6! SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Patricia Wilson

PO Box 7516

Spreckels, CA 93962
Kenneth Robert SIMPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7786.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
II-00063

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rosemary French <desertrosef44@yahoo.com>

Tuesday, December 7, 2010 12:55 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Rosemary French

6666 Evans Creek Dr.

Reno, NV 89519
Motion Granted; Order filed September 21, 2017. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-17-00646-CV

NO. 14-17-00721-CV

____________

BRENDA PEABODY, M.D., ST. LUKE'S LAKESIDE HOSPITAL, LLC, 

CHARLES SIMS, M.D., AND GREATER HOUSTON PHYSICIAN'S 

MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, PLLC, Appellants

V.

CHRISTY MANCHAC, INDIVIDUALLY, AS NEXT FRIEND OF 

MEREDITH MANCHAC AND MALLORY MANCHAC, MINORS, 

AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF THAD 

MANCHAC, DECEDENT, PAT MANCHAC AND PATRICIA 

WATSON, Appellees

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-01332

ORDER
On August 4, 2017, Brenda Peabody, M.D. and St. Luke’s Lakeside Hospital, 

LLC filed a notice of appeal from an order signed July 17, 2017, and the appeal was 

assigned to this court under our appellate number 14-17-00646-CV. On September 

8, 2017, Charles Sims, M.D. and Greater Houston Physician’s Medical Association, 

PLLC filed a notice of appeal from an order in the same trial court cause number, 

which was assigned to this court under our appellate number 14-17-00721-CV. On, 

September 13, 2017, the parties filed an agreed motion to consolidate the related 

appeals. The motion is GRANTED and we issue the following order:

We order the appeals pending under our appellate case numbers 14-17-00646-

CV and 14-17-00721-CV CONSOLIDATED. The record in cause number 14-17-

00721-CV is due on or before September 18, 2017. After the record is filed in cause 

number 14-17-00721-CV, the existing filing deadlines for briefs in case number 14-

17-00721-CV will apply to both cases.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jewell.
II-00522

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Robin Vosburg <rvosburg@bak.rr.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:41 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Robin Vosburg

912 Rockwood Avenue

Bakersfield, CA 93308
(LOGO)

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 2300
333 Clay Street
Houston, Texas 77002-4196

Telephone (713) 756-2000
Facsimile: (713) 756-2001

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors of Bank United:

We have examined management's  assertion about Bank United and its subsidiaries'
(the "Bank") compliance with the minimum servicing  standards  identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage  Bankers  ("USAP") as of and for the period  ended  September  30, 1998
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
the Bank's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's  assertion about the Bank's  compliance
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test  basis,  evidence  about the  Bank's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such   other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on  the  Bank's  compliance  with  the  minimum  servicing
standards.

In  our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that  the  Bank  complied  with  the
aforementioned  minimum  servicing  standards  as of and  for the  period  ended
September 30, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

October 21, 1998

(LOGO)
Exhibit 12.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Daniel Widdicombe, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of chinadotcomcorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRuler 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
     Date: May 7, 2004     /s/Daniel Widdicombe   Daniel Widdicombe Chief Financial Officer
II-00970

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Marla Grundhoefer <galena7@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:35 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Marla Grundhoefer

900 Park Ave

Galena, IL 61036
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE> 5

  <S>                             <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
  <PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
  <CASH>                                           2,054
  <SECURITIES>                                         0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                        0
  <ALLOWANCES>                                         0
  <INVENTORY>                                          0
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,054
  <PP&E>                                         178,000
  <DEPRECIATION>                                       0
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,054
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,800
  <BONDS>                                        160,200
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
  <PREFERRED>                                          0
  <COMMON>                                         2,990
  <OTHER-SE>                                       (936)
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,054
  <SALES>                                              0
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
  <CGS>                                                0
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
  <INCOME-TAX>                                         0
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
  <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
  <CHANGES>                                            0
  <NET-INCOME>                                         0
  <EPS-BASIC>                                        0
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
In Re James RUDNICK, petitioner.

No. 17-7887.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# C_2010051EN.01002301.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/23

---

Action brought on 18 December 2009 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-533/09)

2010/C 51/37

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and P. Guerra e Andrade, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by requiring Portuguese nationality as a condition of access to the notarial profession, in accordance with the decision of the Ministry of Justice of 12 December 1991 which endorsed the opinion of the Conselho Consultivo da Procuradoria-Geral da República (the Consultative Council of the Attorney General’s Office) on Article 15 of the Portuguese Constitution, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU, since the requirement laid down in Article 51 TFUE has not been satisfied. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by requiring Portuguese nationality as a condition of access to the notarial profession, in accordance with the decision of the Ministry of Justice of 12 December 1991 which endorsed the opinion of the Conselho Consultivo da Procuradoria-Geral da República (the Consultative Council of the Attorney General’s Office) on Article 15 of the Portuguese Constitution, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU, since the requirement laid down in Article 51 TFUE has not been satisfied.

| — | Order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In Portugal, the interests pursued by a notary are not State interests, a notary is not directly and specifically involved in the exercise of official authority, and does not form part of public administration. The exception provided for in Article 51 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is not applicable to the notarial profession in Portugal. The consultative opinion of the Attorney General’s Office endorsed on 12 December 1991 does not state that the profession of notary falls within the scope of Article 15(2) of the Portuguese Constitution. The functions of a notary in Portugal are exclusively technical in nature. They are based on professional competence, and not on political trust.

---