alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011282EN.01001701.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/17

---

Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Tecnoprocess v Commission and EU Delegation to the Kingdom of Morocco

(Case T-264/09) (1)

1

(Action for failure to act - Invitation to act - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Causal link - Loss - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2011/C 282/30

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Technoprocess Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Majoli, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes and L. Prete, Agents); and EU Delegation to the Kingdom of Morocco

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION firstly, for a declaration that the European Commission and the EU Delegation to the Kingdom of Morocco have failed to act and secondly, for damages to compensate for the loss allegedly suffered as a result of, inter alia, that failure to act.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as in part inadmissible and in part manifestly without foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as in part inadmissible and in part manifestly without foundation in law.

| 2. | Technoprocess Srl is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Technoprocess Srl is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.

1

---
No. 558.

#### United States ex rel. Phelps *v.*Maiatico Construction Co., Inc.

December 9, 1935.

*Mr. Foster Wood*for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
Kenneth RIVERA, petitioner, v. Bryan STIRLING, et al.

No. 16-9356.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*118Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          90,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  386,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,533
<PP&E>                                         439,165
<DEPRECIATION>                                 387,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 573,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          334,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              786
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,226
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   573,055
<SALES>                                        672,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               736,025
<CGS>                                          253,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  796,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,236
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (69,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (69,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                408,255
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   339,003
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
Brandon Che LEE, petitioner, v. Claude MAYE, Warden.

No. 16-6376.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1
                     Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

Certification

I, Robert Petty, Chief Executive Officer of Virilitec Industries, Inc., certify
that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Virilitec
Industries, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

      4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:

            a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
      ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;

            b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

            c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
      registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
      reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting; and

      5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

            a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize, and report financial information; and

            b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.


Date: February 17, 2004                 By: /s/ Robert Petty
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert Petty
                                           Chief Executive Officer
II-00597

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dixie Lopez <dixielopez@mac.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:46 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dixie Lopez

440 N. Rengstorff Ave

Mountain View, CA 94043
Victor LEBRON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7525.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2009180EN.01006303.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/63

---

Action brought on 15 April 2009 — van Heuckelom v Europol

(Case F-43/09)

2009/C 180/117

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carlo van Heuckelom (the Hague, the Netherlands) (represented by: J. Damminghs and D Dane, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 14 July 2008 awarding the applicant a single step of classification in grade and the decision of 19 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 19 January 2009 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decision of 14 July 2008, and annul also that latter decision of 14 July 2008 awarding the applicant a singe step from 1 April 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 19 January 2009 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decision of 14 July 2008, and annul also that latter decision of 14 July 2008 awarding the applicant a singe step from 1 April 2008;

| — | order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to pay the costs.

---
SPEEDWAY LLC, et al., petitioners, v. Zachary WILSON, et al.

No. 17-1030.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Motion of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of National Conference on Weights and Measures for leave to file a Brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO and Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.
Daryl Deon EVERETT, petitioner, v. Eric D. WILSON, Warden.

No. 17-7617.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Fermin G. ESQUIVEL, petitioner, v. Joel MARTINEZ, Warden.

No. 17-7204.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jeffrey Blake ELLIS, aka Jealous, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7712.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Frederic SANAI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

No. 16-6901.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors, Finance Committee

TIME AND DATE: The Finance Committee of the Legal Services Corporation 
Board of Directors will meet on June 30, 2001. The meeting will begin 
at 8:30 a.m. and continue until the Committee concludes its agenda.

LOCATION: Sheraton Harborside Hotel, 250 Market Street, Portsmouth, NH.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
1. Approval of agenda.
2. Approval of the minutes of the Committee's meeting of January 26, 
2001.
3. Review of the LSC's Consolidated Operating Budget, Expenses and 
Other Funds Available through April 30, 2001.
4. Review the projected operating expenses for fiscal year 2001 based 
on operating experience through March 31, 2001 and the required 
internal budgetary adjustments due to shifting priorities.
5. Consider and act on the President's recommendation for Consolidated 
Operating Budget reallocations.
6. Report on internal budgetary adjustments by the President and 
Inspector General.
7. Report on LSC's budgetary needs for fiscal year 2003.
8. Consider and act on other business.
9. Public comment.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for 
Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, at (202) 336-
8800.
    Special Needs: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available 
in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Elizabeth S. Cushing, at (202) 336-8800.

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate 
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-16065 Filed 6-22-01; 9:30 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED STEVEN SHAREK

,

Petitioner

,

v. Case No. 5D 1 8

- 1044

S TATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Steven Sharek, Bonifay

, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, At torney General

, Tallahassee, and Marjor ie Vincent

- Tripp

, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the Sept e mber 8, 2016

judgment and sentence rendered in C ase N o. 2016

- CF

- 18435

- A, in the Circuit Court in

and for Brevard County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

PETITION GRANTED

.
PALMER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE

, JJ., concur.
Tyrone Eugene JORDAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9462.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*138Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2010134EN.01003501.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/35

---

Order of the General Court of 24 March 2010 — Lind v Commission

(Case T-5/09) (1)

1

(Action for damages - Public health implications of the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland) - Directive 96/29/Euratom - Commission’s failure to adopt measures against a Member State - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2010/C 134/59

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Brigit Lind (Greve, Denmark) (represented by: I. Anderson, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. White and M. Patakia, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for compensation for damage suffered as a result of the Commission’s alleged failure to adopt the measures necessary to ensure that the Kingdom of Denmark adopted the legislative and administrative provisions enabling it to comply with Council Directive 96/29/Euratom of 13 May 1996 laying down basic safety standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiation (OJ 1996 L 159, p. 1) and applied those provisions to workers involved in the nuclear accident at Thule (Greenland).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Brigit Lind to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Brigit Lind to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 377 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 377

   To establish new ZIP codes for certain communities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

   Mr. Diaz-Balart (for himself, Mr. Zeldin, Ms. Meng, Mr. Rooney of 
  Florida, and Mrs. Demings) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To establish new ZIP codes for certain communities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHING NEW ZIP CODES.

    Not later than 270 days after enactment of this Act, the United 
States Postal Service shall designate a single, unique ZIP code for, as 
nearly as practicable, each of the following communities:
            (1) Miami Lakes, Florida.
            (2) Flanders, Northampton, and Riverside in the Town of 
        Southampton, New York.
            (3) Ocoee, Florida.
            (4) Oakland, Florida.
            (5) Glendale, New York.
            (6) Village of Estero, Florida.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009220EN.01004301.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/43

---

Action brought on 2 July 2009 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-65/09)

2009/C 220/89

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s claim for 100 % reimbursement of certain medical expenses.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision rejecting the claim of 25 November 2002, if necessary and appropriate by not applying to this dispute, pursuant to Article 241 EC, Article 72 of the Staff Regulations, the rules [on sickness insurance] and, lastly, the alleged opinion of the Medical Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision rejecting the claim of 25 November 2002, if necessary and appropriate by not applying to this dispute, pursuant to Article 241 EC, Article 72 of the Staff Regulations, the rules [on sickness insurance] and, lastly, the alleged opinion of the Medical Council;

| — | annul the memorandum of 5 August 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the memorandum of 5 August 2008;

| — | in so far as necessary, annul the measure rejecting the complaint of 1 November 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul the measure rejecting the complaint of 1 November 2008;

| — | in so far as necessary, annul the memorandum of 4 March 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul the memorandum of 4 March 2009;

| — | order the Commission to pay to the applicant, by way of compensation for the damage resulting from the measures annulment of which is sought in this application, the sum of EUR 25 000 or such greater or lesser sum the Tribunal may consider fair and just in that regard. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay to the applicant, by way of compensation for the damage resulting from the measures annulment of which is sought in this application, the sum of EUR 25 000 or such greater or lesser sum the Tribunal may consider fair and just in that regard.

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
II-00953

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Thomas Baxter <124c4u@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:43 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Thomas Baxter

378 Saint Angelo Road

Tallahassee, FL 32312