alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1624 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1624

 Recognizing the 40th anniversary of the Coastal States Organization, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2010

 Mr. Farr (for himself, Mr. Baird, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. Bordallo, Mrs. 
Capps, Ms. Edwards of Maryland, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Honda, Mr. Jones, 
   Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Pierluisi, Mr. 
Thompson of California, Mr. Wu, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Doggett, Ms. 
Woolsey, Mr. George Miller of California, and Mr. McDermott) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the 40th anniversary of the Coastal States Organization, 
                        and for other purposes.

Whereas the Coastal States Organization, also known as CSO, in 2010 is 
        celebrating its 40th anniversary representing the Governors of the 
        Nation's 35 coastal States, commonwealths, and territories on issues 
        related to the sound management of coastal, ocean, and Great Lakes 
        resources;
Whereas the CSO was created by a resolution, endorsed unanimously, by the 
        National Governors Conference in 1969;
Whereas the CSO held its first meeting in Savannah, Georgia, in January 1970;
Whereas the CSO will celebrate its 40th anniversary in Monterey, California, in 
        October 2010;
Whereas the CSO was empowered to contribute to the development and operation of 
        the National Coastal Zone Management Program, established by the Coastal 
        Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.);
Whereas the CSO is a nonpartisan organization, comprised of economically, 
        environmentally, geographically, and socially diverse States, 
        territories, and commonwealths;
Whereas the CSO serves as a communicator for the governors to Congress and the 
        executive branch on coastal, ocean, and Great Lakes policy, programs, 
        and affairs; and
Whereas the States, territories, and commonwealths have a responsibility to work 
        with the Federal Government to manage and conserve the public trust in 
        coastal and ocean ecosystems and the quality of life in coastal 
        communities for the benefit of current and future generations: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 40th anniversary of the Coastal States 
        Organization; and
            (2) supports the role of States, territories, and 
        commonwealths in the stewardship of coastal, ocean, and Great 
        Lakes resources.
                                 <all>
```
Troy K. SCHEFFLER, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

No. 15-9467.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
1 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

____________________________________________ 

In the Matter of the Application of 

Bitnomial Clearinghouse LLC 

For Registration as a Derivatives Clearing Organization 

____________________________________________ 

ORDER OF REGISTRATION 

Bitnomial Clearinghouse LLC (“Bitnomial”), has submitted to the Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission (the “Commission”), pursuant to Section 5b of the Commodity Exchange 

Act (the “Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 7a-1, an application for registration as a derivatives clearing 

organization (“DCO”). 

The Commission has reviewed the application and finds that Bitnomial has demonstrated 

compliance with the requirements of the Act and applicable Commission regulations thereunder. 

In light of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 5b of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 

§ 7a-1, that Bitnomial is granted registration as a DCO, subject to the terms and conditions 

specified herein: 

(1) Cleared Products. Bitnomial is permitted to clear, in its capacity as a registered 

DCO, futures contracts and options on futures contracts traded on or subject to the rules of a 

designated contract market. 

(2) Compliance with the Act and Commission Regulations. Bitnomial shall comply, 

and shall demonstrate compliance as requested by the Commission, with applicable provisions of 

the Act, including the core principles set forth in Section 5b of the Act (“Core Principles”), and 

Commission regulations, as may be amended or adopted from time to time. Bitnomial shall
NEW JERSEY, petitioner, v. Ricky ZUBER, et al.

No. 16-1496.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey denied.
Raymond SEVERSON, petitioner, v. HEARTLAND WOODCRAFT, INC.

No. 17-1001.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
DuJuan THOMAS, petitioner, v. Jordan HOLLINGSWORTH, Warden.

No. 17-7955.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34277-34278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16095]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on July 10, 2001, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and 
information the release of which would

[[Page 34278]]

constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Tuesday, July 10, 2001, 3:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m.

    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related 
matters. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze 
relevant issues and facts, and to formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. A 
portion of this meeting may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) 
and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and 
information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 
invasion of personal privacy.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff person named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has been 
canceled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John 
T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised of any changes in schedule, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
James E. Lyons,
Associate Director for Technical Support, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 01-16095 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
LaVan YANKTON, petitioner, v. Raymond BYRD, Warden.

No. 17-7515.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
TO: All CFTC Registrants 

FROM: Joshua B. Sterling, Director 

 Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight 

DATE: May 22, 2020 

RE: Delivery of DSIO Alerts via GovDelivery 

The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO) is interested in keeping the lines of 

communication open with all of our registrants. This memorandum describes how we intend to communicate 

directly with all registrants on important issues of general applicability in the form of DSIO Alerts.

DSIO will endeavor to continue limiting DSIO Alerts to issues that we believe may warrant your immediate 

attention. For example, we recently sent several DSIO Alerts on cyber security developments that we considered 

to be serious and time-sensitive. While we view DSIO Alerts as an important tool for direct communication with 

registrants, given their intended purpose and scope, we expect that they will not be issued routinely.

Going forward, you will receive DSIO Alerts via email directly from the CFTC via GovDelivery. GovDelivery 

is a third-party email subscription service provided by Granicus. For information about Granicus’s privacy 

policies, visit https://granicus.com/privacy-policy/. For information about CFTC’s privacy program more 

generally, visit www.cftc.gov/privacy.

DSIO Alerts will be sent to the email address(es) you provided as part of your registration filing.

Accordingly, should you wish to update your contact information, please do so by updating your registration 

filing with the National Futures Association. Please bear in mind that we would expect DSIO Alerts to receive 

your prompt attention.

If you have any questions about this matter, please contact Barry McCarty, Special Counsel, at 

cmccarty@cftc.gov, or Helene Schroeder, Special Counsel, at hschroeder@cftc.gov. 

Joshua B. Sterling

Director

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-6700 

Facsimile: (202) 418-5407 

jsterling@cftc.gov

Division of Swap Dealer and 

Intermediary Oversight

Joshua B. Sterling 

Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8090

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior

District Judge. (2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district court’s order 

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion for a sentence 

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 20196 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ISRAEL LARA AVILA, also known as Jorge Camacho Guiterrez, also known as Misael Lara

- Avila, also known as Ismael Daniel Medina, also known as Juan Daniel Lara Avila,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 24

- 2

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Israel Lara Avila has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Avila has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Avila ’ s response . We agree

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 27, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-20196 Document: 00514364860 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2018No. 17

- 20196

2 with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-20196 Document: 00514364860 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/27/2018
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Magtron International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Martin
Nielson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


/s/ Martin Neilson
-----------------------
Martin Neilson
Chief Executive Officer
May 1, 2006
Jesus J. SURIS, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 15-9378.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21246-21247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07638]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 530]


Delegation of Authority to the Assistant Secretary for East Asian 
and Pacific Affairs Relating to Oversight of the American Institute in 
Taiwan

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
laws of the United States, including the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), the Taiwan Relations Act 
(22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.), E.O. 13014, and the Foreign Service Act of 
1980, as amended (22 U.S.C. 3983(d)), I hereby delegate to the 
Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, to the extent 
authorized by law, oversight authority over the American Institute in 
Taiwan (AIT), including but not limited to approving staffing changes 
that require national interest determinations for assignments or 
details of U.S. government employees as the case may be.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time. 
Authorities delegated herein may be re-delegated, to the extent 
authorized by law.
    The Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for 
Management and Resources, the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, 
and the Under

[[Page 21247]]

Secretary for Management may also exercise the authorities delegated 
herein. Nothing in this delegation shall be deemed to supersede or 
otherwise affect any other delegation of authority.
    Any actions related to the functions described herein that may have 
been taken prior to the date of this delegation are hereby confirmed 
and ratified. Such actions shall remain in force as if taken under this 
delegation of authority, unless or until such actions are rescinded, 
amended, or superseded.
    This document shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 17, 2022.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-07638 Filed 4-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
II-00176

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kheiri Gandi <kheirig@hotmail.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 12:29 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kheiri Gandi

605 S Adams St Apt C

Glendale, CA 91205
# C_2009113EN.01004102.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/41

---

Action brought on 19 March 2009 — Icebreaker v OHIM — Gilmar (ICEBREAKER)

(Case T-112/09)

2009/C 113/83

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Icebreaker Ltd (Wellington, New Zealand) (represented by: L. Prehn, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gilmar SpA (San Giovanni in Marignano (Rimini), Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Reverse the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 January 2009 in case R 1536/2007-4 and approve for registration for goods in class 25 the Community trade mark concerned; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Reverse the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 January 2009 in case R 1536/2007-4 and approve for registration for goods in class 25 the Community trade mark concerned; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ICEBREAKER’, for goods in classes 9, 24 and 25 — application No 3 205 523

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Italian trade mark registration of the word mark ‘ICEBERG’ for goods in class 25; International trade mark registration of the word mark ‘ICEBERG’ for goods in class 25; Spanish trade mark registration of the word mark ‘ICEBERG’ for goods in class 25; Italian trade mark registration of the word mark ‘ICE’ for goods in class 25; International trade mark registration of the word mark ‘ICE’ for goods in class 25

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially allowed the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly concluded that there is a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.

Pleas in law:

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Micahel  Dodak,  the Chief  Executive  Officer of Global Axcess,  Corp.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the  fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements
of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)       the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 4, 2003

                                      /s/ Michael Dodak
                                      Name: Michael Dodak
                                      Title: Chief Executive
                                            Officer