alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,117,193
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         111,511
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,825,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,458,718
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         949,391
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           942,369
<LOANS>                                     50,223,342
<ALLOWANCE>                                    321,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,473,275
<DEPOSITS>                                  44,504,591
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            251,335
<LONG-TERM>                                 11,440,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       232,991
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,044,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              61,473,275
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,120,283
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               50,655
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                51,518
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,222,456
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             482,762
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             653,480
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          568,976
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   15,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                444,248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                187,712
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   126,355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.18
<LOANS-NON>                                    337,296
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               307,918
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              321,918
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           321,918
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
John R. WHIRTY, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-7288.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Julian OKEAYAINNEH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7128.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 6703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1601]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-271]

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
a request by Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (VYNPC, the 
licensee) to withdraw its December 21, 1999, as supplemented on 
September 12 and 19, 2000, application for an amendment to Facility 
Operating License No. DPR-28, for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power 
Station, located in Windham County, Vermont.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical 
Specifications (TS) to change the control rod block requirements 
consistent with the BWR/4 Standard Technical Specifications.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment on January 26, 2000 (65 FR 4291). However, by 
letter dated December 26, 2000, the licensee withdrew the proposed 
change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated December 21, 1999, as supplemented on 
September 12 and 19, 2000, and the licensee's letter dated December 26, 
2000, which withdrew the application for license amendment. Documents 
may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document 
room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first 
floor), Rockville, Maryland, and accessible electronically through the 
ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room link at the NRC Web site (http://
www.nrc.gov).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of January 2001.
    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert M. Pulsifer,
Project Manager, Section 2, Project Directorate I, Division of 
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 01-1601 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
Robert F. DUGAN, petitioner, v. Scott MIDDLEBROOKS, Warden, et al.

No. 16-9328.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2009167EN.01001802.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/18

---

Action brought on 13 May 2009 — Lan Airlines v OHIM — Air Nostrum (LÍNEAS AÉREAS DEL MEDITERRÁNEO LAM)

(Case T-194/09)

2009/C 167/36

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lan Airlines, SA (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo, SA (Manises, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare, in view of the lodging of this pleading and the documents attached to it, that the action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office of 19 February 2009 in Case R 0107/2008-4 has been lodged within the prescribed period and in the correct form and, following the appropriate procedural steps, deliver judgment annulling the said decision and expressly order the Office to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare, in view of the lodging of this pleading and the documents attached to it, that the action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office of 19 February 2009 in Case R 0107/2008-4 has been lodged within the prescribed period and in the correct form and, following the appropriate procedural steps, deliver judgment annulling the said decision and expressly order the Office to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo, SA

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘LÍNEAS AÉREAS DEL MEDITERRÁNEO LAM’ (Application No 4 448 061) for services in class 39.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Lan Airlines, SA.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘LAN’ (No 3 350 899) for services in classes 35, 39 and 43; and the Community figurative mark constituted by the word ‘LAN’ flanked by a star (No 3 694 957) for services in class 39.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition in its entirety.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (replaced by Regulation No 207/2009).

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 23



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
Central Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on Form
S-8 (333-71165, 333-87005 and 333-49264) of Central Bancorp, Inc. of our report,
dated May 9,  2001,  relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of  Central
Bancorp,  Inc.  and  subsidiary  as of March 31, 2001 and 2000,  and the related
consolidated  statements  of income,  changes in  stockholders'  equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2001, which
report is included herein.




                                                         /s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
June 25, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, William Whittle, President,
Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of General Gold Corporation, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of General Gold Corporation for the year ended
          April 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of General Gold
          Corporation
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 11, 2004

/s/ William WhittleWilliam
Whittle President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to General Gold
Corporation and will be retained by General Gold Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- FSSCC Cybersecurity Profile -

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Technology Advisory Committee

October 3, 2019
A Graphical Depiction of the Reconciliation Process: Topical 

Overlap, Difference in Phrasing

Supervisory Issuances NIST Subcategories NIST Categories NIST Functions
ions

Straightening the Wires: The FSSCC Cybersecurity Profile’s Two 

Components

• 9 Questions.

• Scaled according to an institution’s impact on the global, national, and local 

economies.

• Questions based on global methodologies, such as Basel Committee 

determinations for G-SIBs, transaction volume, and interconnectedness. 

Scaling through an Impact Questionnaire

Architecture, Diagnostic Statements, 

and Example Regulations
Documented Agency Statements of Support

 FFIEC: The FFIEC “emphasized the benefits of 

using a standardized approach to assess and 

improve cybersecurity preparedness,” and named 

the Profile along with NIST, CAT, and the CIS 20 

(formerly SANS 20) as those standardized 

assessment approaches. 

 NIST: “...[O]ne of the more detailed Cybersecurity 

Framework-based, sector regulatory harmonization 

approaches to-date.” 

 Federal Reserve: “... we'll welcome any financial 

institution to provide information to us using the 

structure and taxonomy of the profile, we see that 

as a boon for harmonization.”

 OCC: “If the industry moves to use this 

cybersecurity profile, that is what we will base our 

assessments on....”

 FDIC: “That was one of the things, at the FDIC, that 

we were most interested in is looking at the tiering.”

 SEC: “...to the extent that we can rationalize and 

cut down on that duplication, allowing those scarce 

resources to start driving toward protecting the 

enterprise, I think we're in a good space.”

 CPMI-IOSCO: “The [FSSCC’s Cybersecurity 

Profile] is a customisation of the NIST Cybersecurity 

Framework that financial institutions can use for 

internal and external cyber risk management 

assessment and as evidence for compliance, 

encompassing relations between Cyber 

frameworks, including the Core Standards. Further, 

the FSSCC’s Cybersecurity Profile tool 

encompasses all three of the Core Standards of this 

report, as well as others....”
II-00531

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Betty King <bettykingl @gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:27 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Betty King

4233 ROYAL PALM AVE

Miami Beach, FL 33140
OFFICE OF

FINANCIAL RESEARCH

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

SDR Data Collection: 

Coordinating and Moving Forward

CFTC Technical Advisory Committee

September 12, 2013
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH

9/20/2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

1

Why collect granular swap data?

• Goal is to assess exposures, interconnectedness, and 

concentration. 

• Need transactions-level and position data on swaps 

and other derivatives in a range of asset classes.

• New trade/swap data repositories (SDRs) will change 

the game.

• The ability to compare and aggregate data across 

SDRs is critical to the analysis and monitoring of 

threats to financial stability.

• Data sharing needed with global regulators to complete 

the picture.
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH

9/20/2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

2

The Potential of SDRs and Need for Standards

The potential of SDRs

• SDRs are low-cost, high-quality data collection points.

• SDRs allow us efficiently and coherently to collect 

granular data that are essential for financial stability 

analysis and monitoring.

• Transactions-level and positions

• Terms and Conditions

Complications arising from an absence of data 

standards:

• Inability to aggregate, compare, analyze, process, or 

report

• Inability to assess data quality
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

3

Data standards allow

• Coherent collection of data in any SDR

• Aggregation and comparison of data across SDRs

Early implementation critical

• Legal Entity Identifiers/CICIs

• Instrument/Product Identifiers

• Hierarchies

OFR has a statutory mandate to promote standards and 

to assist the Council in developing them

Standards are the Remedy; Early Implementation Critical
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Guiding Principles for Data Collection 

• Define the reason for the data collection

• Understand the data needed and the supply chain to 

produce them

• Use the right tools—electronic data collection 

• Leverage industry data standards

• Define and publish specifications (a guidebook) 

• Implement data quality controls

• Conduct integration testing with industry

• Gather feedback and respond by making appropriate 

changes

4
MID-CITY NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF JOLIET, ILLINOIS.

No. 16-485.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Verod WOODARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7608.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Rufus Deon WILSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7005.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2011298EN.01000501.xml

| 8.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Germany)) — Criminal proceedings against Andreas Michael Seeger

(Case C-554/09) (1)

1

(Road transport - Obligation to use recording equipment - Derogations for vehicles transporting materials - Meaning of ‘materials’ - Carriage of empty bottles in the vehicle of a wine and drinks merchant)

2011/C 298/07

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart

Party in the main proceedings

Party in the main proceedings

Andreas Michael Seeger

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart — Interpretation of the second indent of Article 13(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 1) — System of exceptions exempting, inter alia, vehicles used for carrying materials for the driver’s use in the course of his work from the obligation to have a tachograph — Applicability of that exception to the carriage of empty returnable bottles in the vehicle of a wine and drinks merchant — Meaning of ‘materials’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The expression ‘materials’ appearing in Article 13(1)(d), second indent, of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 must be interpreted as not covering packaging materials, such as empty bottles, carried by a wine and drinks merchant who runs a shop, makes deliveries to his customers once a week and, while doing so, collects the empty bottles to take them to his wholesaler.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
II-00573

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Casey <david@casey.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:32 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Casey

4233 Thackeray PL NE

Seattle, WA 98105
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Craig Sessions, M.D., P.A. and Craig Sessions, M.D., Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00010

- CV v.
TH Healthcare, Ltd., d/b/a Nacogdoches Medical Center, Appellee Appeal from the 145th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. C1127428 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the
judgment of the court below. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s denial of Sessions’ motion
for partial summary judgment, reverse the trial court’s grant of the Hospital’s motion for
summary judgment, and remand to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
We further order that the appellant and appellee shall each pay one half of all costs of
appeal.

R ENDERED AUGUST 28 , 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Alvin WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-7331.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.