alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16252]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-2111-001]


Allegheny Energy Service Corporation, on Behalf of Allegheny 
Energy Supply Company, LLC (AE Supply); Notice of Filing

June 22, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 22, 2001, Allegheny Energy Service 
Corporation on behalf of Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC (AE 
Supply), filed an amendment to First Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 4 
(First Revised Schedule) filed at Docket No. ER01-2111-000. The 
amendment is filed at the request of Commission Staff.
    Copies of the filing have been provided to all parties on the 
service list in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC, 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before July 2, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-16252 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Beverly JACKSON, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, et al.

No. 17-999.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

*1327Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GSI Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn E. Davis, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    GLENN E. DAVISGlenn E. DavisPrincipal Financial Officer


October 1, 2010

This Certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, or incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to GSI Group Inc. and will be retained by GSI Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Helmer BRIGHTLEY, petitioner, v. Michael CAPRA, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

No. 16-6568.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
II-00205

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Linda Andersson <llandersson4@gmail.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 6:06 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

How do we stop gambling with our innocent investments that we’ve been told were the best way to make money in this

country?

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Linda Andersson

2424 79th Ave NE

Medina, WA 98039
Rostin Behnam 

Acting Chair 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

To: All CFTC Employees 

From: Acting Chair Rostin Behnam {Jl.1J. 

Date: February 2, 2021 

Subject: CFTC Anti-Harassment Statement 

(202) 418-5575 

RBehnam@CFTC.gov 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") is committed to maintaining a 

work environment that is free of unlawful harassment. It is expected that all employees be treated 

with dignity and respect and free from unwanted interference. Harassment can undermine 

employee performance, the efficiency of government operations, and may be unlawful. 

Harassment of any kind simply will not be tolerated. 

Harassment is unwelcome conduct that is based on race, color, religion, sex (including 

pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender identity), national origin, age (40 or older), disability, 

reprisal, or genetic information. Unlawful harassment is a form of employment discrimination 

that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment 

Act of 1967, or the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Harassment becomes unlawful 

where enduring the offensive conduct becomes a condition of continued employment, or the 

conduct is severe or pervasive enough to create a work environment that a reasonable person 

would consider intimidating, hostile, or abusive. 
Any CFTC employee who believes they have been the victim of harassment or believes 

they have observed it should advise their supervisor, any member of management, and/or the 

CFTC's Director of the Office of Minority and Women Inclusion (OMWI). Allegations of 

workplace harassment will be promptly, thoroughly, and impartially investigated and, where 

appropriate, corrective action will be taken. 

2
EXHIBIT
32.1





WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with Amendment No. 4 to Annual Report of China 3C Group and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, Zhenggang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      May 7, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Zhenggang WangName:
            Zhenggang
      WangTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer and Chairman
# C_2012073EN.01002603.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2012 — Carrols v OHIM — Gambettola (Pollo Tropical CHICKEN ON THE GRILL)

(Case T-291/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative Community mark Pollo Tropical CHICKEN ON THE GRILL - Absolute grounds for refusal - No bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 73/51

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carrols Corp. (Dover, Delaware, United States) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Giulio Gambettola (Los Realejos, Spain) (represented by: F. Brandolini Kujman, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 May 2009 (Case R 632/2008-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Carrols Corp. and Mr Giulio Gambettola.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Carrols Corp. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Carrols Corp. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.

1

---
II-00735

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

tito saubidet <saubidet@club-internet.fr>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:53 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

tito saubidet

8 avenue du chateau

abondant, CT 28410
```

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement of Everlast  Worldwide,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February
25, 2002 except note 11, as to which the date is March 19,  2002,  on our audits
of the financial statements of Everlast Worldwide,  Inc. as of December 31, 2001
and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000,  which report appears in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

/s/ Berenson & Company LLP

New York, NY
March 28, 2002
```
Maqsood HAROON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8095.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Francine SILVER, petitioner, v. RESCAP BORROWER CLAIMS TRUST.

No. 17-8126.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.1

 

GOVERNMENT PROPERTIES INCOME TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Government Properties Income Trust (the “Company”) for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee of the Board, as applicable:

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $50,000 for services as a Trustee, plus a fee of $1,250 for each meeting attended. Up to two $1,250 fees are paid if a Board meeting and one or more Board committee meetings, or two or more Board committee meetings, are held on the same date. The annual fee for any new Independent Trustee is prorated for the initial year.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee who serves as a committee chair of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional annual fee of $15,000, $10,000 and $10,000, respectively. The committee chair fee for any new Independent Trustee is prorated for the initial year.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 3,000 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first Board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first Board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM (A) THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SERV-TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF MARCH
31,1 997, AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,837,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               46,913,217
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,534,298)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,006,432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,443,885
<PP&E>                                      46,479,875
<DEPRECIATION>                            (21,851,915)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,484,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,771,770
<BONDS>                                     13,835,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,434,855
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,481,459
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,484,793
<SALES>                                     70,110,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            70,110,008
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               56,504,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             707,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,156,797
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,357,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,799,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,799,797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit3.16.1**

 

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

of

DECRANE CABIN INTERIORS CANADA, INC.

 

FIRST:  The name of this corporation shall be:DECRANE CABIN INTERIORS CANADA, INC.

 

SECOND: Its registered office in the State of Delaware is to be located at 2711Centerville Road, Suite 400, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castleand its registered agent at such address is CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY.

 

THIRD:  The purpose or purposes of the corporationshall be to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may beorganized under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.

 

FOURTH:  The total number of shares of stock whichthis corporation is authorized to issue is:

1,000 shares with a par valueof $.01.

 

FIFTH:  The name and address of the incorporator isas follows:

 

Richard J. Kaplan

DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc.

2361 Rosecrans Ave., Suite 180

El Segundo, CA  90245

 

SIXTH:  The Board of Directors shall have the powerto adopt, amend or repeal the by-laws.

 

SEVENTH:  No director shall be personally liable tothe Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach offiduciary duty by such director as a director. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a director shall be liable tothe extent provided by applicable law, (i) for breach of the director’s duty ofloyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions notin good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation oflaw, (iii) pursuant to Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law or(iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personalbenefit.  No amendment to or repeal ofthis Article Seventh shall apply to or have any effect on the liability oralleged liability of any director of the Corporation for or with respect to anyacts or omissions of such director occurring prior to such amendment.

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the undersigned, being the incorporator herein before named, hasexecuted signed and acknowledged this certificate of incorporation this 1 dayof January, A.D. 2004.

 
|   | s/s Richard  J. Kaplan |               |
|--------|------------------------|--------------------|
|   | Name:                  | Richard J.  Kaplan |
|   | Incorporator           |
|        |                        |                    |  |

 

----
# C_2010037EN.01002103.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/21

---

Action brought on 1 December 2009 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-493/09)

2010/C 37/25

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and M. Afonso, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by taxing the dividends obtained by non-resident pension funds at a rate higher than the dividends obtained by pension funds resident in Portuguese territory, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by taxing the dividends obtained by non-resident pension funds at a rate higher than the dividends obtained by pension funds resident in Portuguese territory, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement.

| — | Order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Under the provisions of the Portuguese Estatuto dos Benefícios Fiscais (Tax Relief Regulations) and the Código do Imposto sobre o Rendimento das Pessoas Colectivas (the Corporation Tax Code), the dividends paid to pension funds set up and operating in accordance with the Portuguese legislation are wholly exempt from the imposto sobre o rendimento das pessoas colectivas (corporation tax). By contrast, the dividends paid to non-resident pension funds are subject to corporation tax at a rate of between 10 % and 20 %, depending on whether there is a bilateral agreement between Portugal and the State of residence and the terms thereof. That corporation tax is collected by being withheld at source.

The detrimental difference in treatment by the Portuguese tax legislation of the non-resident pension funds makes the investment by those funds in Portuguese companies less profitable and attractive. The tax rules referred to therefore constitute a restriction prohibited by Article 63 TFEU and by Article 40 of the EEA Agreement.

The discriminatory treatment of non-resident pension funds, which has harmful consequences on the competitiveness of the financial markets of the European Union and on the revenue from the investments made by the pension funds, cannot be justified by any of the grounds put forward by the Portuguese Republic.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0308 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ZECHARIAH JUSTIN DANIEL SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 1 2 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 5 2023

06/05/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0308
MFX: What we do 

Connecting Micro-SME lenders to commercial hedging markets and exotic currency 

hedging 

• Products: Cross currency swaps, interest rate swaps, and forward contracts 

geared to micro-SME market · 

Swap/forward 

Swap/ 

forward Loan 
MFX Operational Structure 

Investors 

(incl. MIV clients) 

MSME 

lenders 

Local currency 

loans 

*Only TCX received MFX investment 

MFX 

Swaps 

$40M 

guarantee 

TCX* 

Banks 

OPIC/ 

FMO