alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

          - 7 CFR Part 319
          - [Docket No. 00-068-2]

# AGENCY:

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        We are correcting an error in the preamble portion of a proposed rule to add the maritime port of Corpus Christi, TX, to the list of ports that are designated as approved locations for cold treatment of imported fruit. The proposed rule was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on June 1, 2001.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donna L. West, Import Specialist, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 140, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-6799.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On June 1, 2001, we published in the                     **Federal Register**                     (66 FR 29735-29739, Docket No. 00-068-1) a proposed rule to add the maritime port of Corpus Christi, TX, to the list of ports that are designated as approved locations for cold treatment of imported fruit.                

                    In the preamble portion of that proposed rule, in the section titled                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                    , we provided an incorrect phone number. The correct phone number for the person listed under                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     is (301) 734-6799. This document corrects that error.                

## Correction

                    In FR Doc. 01-13758, published on June 1, 2001 (66 FR 29735-29739), make the following correction: On page 29735, in the second column, in the section titled                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                    , correct “(301) 734-5007” to read “(301) 734-6799”.                

Done in Washington, DC, this 25th day of June 2001.

Bobby R. Acord,

Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

[FR Doc. 01-16400 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
Bill STOLLER, petitioner, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, et al.

No. 17M80.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
for the periods reflected therein.



| |  |                         |  |                                                     
| |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  | Date: February 16, 2009 |  | /s/ George M. Davis                                 
| |  |                         |  | George M. Davis                                     
| |  |                         |  | Chief Executive Officer                             
| |  |                        
| |  |                         |  | /s/ Lawrence Rychlak                                
| |  |                         |  | Lawrence Rychlak                                    
| |  |                         |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-31299

Summary Calendar

 

JOHN GARNER; JOAN GARNER; MARGARET GARNER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

EDWARD ENGOLIO, Judge, 18th JDC, ET AL.,

Defendants,

JAY C. PENNINGTON, Director of

Greenwell Springs Hospital, ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 91-CV-883

- - - - - - - - - -

July 15, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Garners assert that the district court erred in granting

summary judgment in favor of defendants Pennington, Mendoza, and

Patin. The Garners do not challenge the district court’s

judgment with respect to defendant Landry. This court reviews 
No. 95-31299

- 2 -

the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Weyant

v. Acceptance Ins. Co., 917 F.2d 209, 209-12 (5th Cir. 1990). 

The district court did not err in considering the discovery

depositions in granting summary judgment because all inferences

were drawn in the light most favorable to the Garners. Newell v.

Oxford Management, Inc., 912 F.2d 793, 795 (5th Cir. 1990). 

The Garners have not produced any evidence to create a

genuine issue of fact that either Pennington, Mendoza, or Patin

is not entitled to qualified immunity. The Garners did not show

that any of the defendants violated a clearly established

constitutional right. Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S. 226, 232

(1991). 

With respect to Patin, the Garners did not allege a

constitutional violation, rather they simply asserted a state law

tort. Harper v. Harris County, Tex., 21 F.3d 597, 600 (5th Cir.

1994). With respect to Pennington and Mendoza, the Garners have

not rebutted the summary judgment evidence showing that both

Pennington and Mendoza personally examined Joan before certifying

her as gravely disabled. See Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d

1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2011063EN.01001101.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf, Germany) — Lecson Elektromobile GmbH v Hauptzollamt Dortmund

(Case C-12/10) (1)

1

(Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Section XVII - Transport equipment - Chapter 87 - ‘Vehicles other than railway or tramway rolling stock, and parts and accessories thereof’ - Headings 8703 and 8713 - Three or four-wheeled electric vehicles designed for the transport of one person, reaching a maximum speed of 6 to 15 km/h and having a separate, adjustable steering column, known as ‘electric mobility scooters’)

2011/C 63/19

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lecson Elektromobile GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Dortmund

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of Annex 1 to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1810/2004 of 7 September 2004 (OJ 2004 L 327, p. 1) — Three or four-wheeled electric vehicles designed for the transport of one person and reaching a maximum speed of 6 to 15 km/h — Classification under heading 8713 or heading 8703 of the Combined Nomenclature?

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Heading 8703 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex 1 to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1810/2004 of 7 September 2004 must be interpreted as covering three or four-wheeled vehicles designed for the transport of one person who is not necessarily a disabled person, powered by a battery-operated electric motor, reaching a maximum speed of 6 to 15 km/h and equipped with a separate, adjustable steering column, known as electric ‘mobility scooters’, such as those at issue in the main proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.03.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of ACL Semiconductors Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kenneth Lap-Yin Chan,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
          as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
          the Company for the periods presented.

           Date:    April 14, 2004  /s/ Kenneth Lap-Yin Chan
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Kenneth Lap-Yin Chan
                                   Chief Financial Officer of
                                   ACL Semiconductors Inc.

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ACL Semiconductors, Inc. and will be retained by ACL Semiconductors
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,439
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,039
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,825
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     57,502
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          11,375
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            11,370
<LOANS>                                        200,326
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,653
<DEPOSITS>                                     262,895
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,808
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,259
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 315,653
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,398
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  803
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   384
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,585
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,171
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,240
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,145
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,148
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         748
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       748
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.75
<LOANS-NON>                                        721
<LOANS-PAST>                                        94
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,875
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      147
<RECOVERIES>                                        75
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,003
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,003
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
1233.

#### STAPLES *v.*THE STATE.

The evidence authorizes the verdict; no reversible error of law appears.

Indictment for burglary, from Polk superior court — Judge Edwards. April 21, 1908.

Argued June 30,

Decided July 31, 1908.

W. *A. James,*for plaintiff in error.

W. *K. Fielder, solicitor-general,*contra.

Powell, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary; and the evidence is ample to sustain -the conviction. Several of the grounds ( of the motion for a new trial, especially those relating to rulings upon testimony, are not stated with that accuracy essential to a review by this court. None of the other exceptions are meritorious; at least none of them present any error of sufficient importance to justify a reversal. *Judgment affirmed.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         July 23, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 am to 5:00 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Richard J. Bartlett, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Natcher Bldg./Bldg. 45, Room 5As37B, (301) 594-4952.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 21, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-16357  Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Jessie HILL, petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 17-7097.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2011160EN.01001901.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — United States Polo Association v OHIM — Textiles CMG (U.S. POLO ASSN.)

(Case T-228/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark U.S. POLO ASSN. - Earlier Community and national word marks POLO-POLO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 160/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: United States Polo Association (Lexington, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, I. Rohr and T. Melchert, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Textiles CMG, SA (Onteniente, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2009 (Case R 886/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Textiles CMG, SA and United States Polo Association.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders United States Polo Association to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders United States Polo Association to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 1.8.2009.

1

---
# C_2012109EN.01000804.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/8

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 20 January 2012 — European Commission v Hungary

(Case C-575/10) (1)

1

2012/C 109/17

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.

1

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re Phillip Jason Tong, * From the 106th District Court

of Gaines County,

Trial Court No. 15-05-17045.

No. 11-15-00129-CV * August 6, 2015

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered the State of Texas’s motion for dismissal of this 

appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs 

incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the State of Texas.
II-00591

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Trevor Pierce <tpierce@wanprc.org>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:51 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Trevor Pierce

3528 NE 97th ST

Seattle, WA 98115