alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
GIDDINGS & LEWIS' CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 29, 1997 AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                          82,318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  195,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,121
<INVENTORY>                                     85,883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               394,934
<PP&E>                                         237,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                 122,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 726,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,712
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,518
<OTHER-SE>                                     440,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   726,833
<SALES>                                        304,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,319
<CGS>                                          220,275
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  220,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,562
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,087
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,087
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
        

</TABLE>
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI, petitioner, v. Eric FEDER, Clerk, Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania, First Judicial District.

No. 16-5860.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Wayne Gordon GRACEY.

No. D-2906.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
II-01154

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Stefan Gnapp <s.gnapp@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:47 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Stefan Gnapp

1362 Holt Rd.

Perry, FL 32348
II-00651

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ivan Olsen <yapar@att.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:54 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ivan Olsen

P.O. Box 449

Gonzales, CA 93926
Exhibit 32.1

EX-32.1 CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL J. PECORA

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unilens Vision Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Pecora, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|Date: December 28, 2010          
|                                 
|/s/ Michael J. Pecora            
|Michael J. Pecora                
|President/Chief Executive Officer
II-00692

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jeffrey Harrington <fuzzfart@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:23 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jeffrey Harrington

15445 County Road 537

Nashwauk, MN 55769
II-00460

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Toni Garmon <tgarmon3 @windstream.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:08 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Toni Garmon

103 Honeysuckle Trl.

Dawssonville, GA 30534
In Re Elmer SCHECKEL, petitioner.

No. 17-6150.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00342-CR

No. 10-19-00343-CR

IN RE REGINALD BERNARD HATTON

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In combined petitions for writ of mandamus, Reginald Bernard Hatton requests 

this Court to compel the trial court to modify two judgments in final felony convictions 

which stack each of Hatton’s sentences.1 There are numerous procedural problems with 

Hatton’s petitions, such as no prayer, no certification, no appendix, and no record, as 

required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(i), (j), (k); 52.7. The 

1 This new filing is, for all practical purposes, the same as two previously filed petitions for writ of 

mandamus. SeeIn re Hatton, Nos. 10-18-00121-CR, 10-18-00122-CR, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 2726 (Tex. App.—

Waco Apr. 18, 2018, orig. proceedings).
In re Hatton Page 2

petitions were also not properly served. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5. However, we use Rule 2 

to dispense with these requirements and proceed to a timely disposition of the petitions.

 Although the courts of appeals have mandamus jurisdiction over criminal law 

matters concurrent with the mandamus jurisdiction of the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals, Dickens v. Second Court of Appeals, 727 S.W.2d 542, 548 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987), 

Hatton has an adequate remedy at law: a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Ater 

v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). And only the Texas 

Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings. 

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015); Ater, 802 S.W.2d at 243; In re McAfee, 

53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, because Hatton complains about final felony convictions and only 

the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction regarding Hatton’s complaints, Hatton’s 

petitions for writ of mandamus are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Hatton also presented motions for leave to file his petitions for writ of mandamus. 

A motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus is required when relief is sought 

from the Court of Criminal Appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 72.1. But the requirement for leave 

to file a petition at the court of appeals level was eliminated in 1997. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52, Notes and Comments. Thus, under the applicable rules, if mandamus relief is sought 

from an intermediate court of appeals, such as the Tenth Court of Appeals, a motion for 
In re Hatton Page 3

leave to file the petition is unnecessary. Accordingly, Hatton’s motions for leave to file a

writ of mandamus are dismissed as moot. 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petitions dismissed

Motions dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 16, 2019

Do not publish 

[OT06]
# C_2011362EN.01000501.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2011 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-549/09) (1)

1

(Failure to fulfil obligations - State aid - Aid granted to fish farmers and fishermen - Decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market - Obligation to recover immediately the aid declared unlawful and incompatible and to inform the Commission - Non-compliance - Absolute impossibility of compliance)

2011/C 362/06

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and K. Walkerová, acting as Agent(s))

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and J. Gstalter, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take the measures necessary to comply with Commission Decision 2005/239/EC of 14 July 2004 concerning certain aid measures applied by France to assist fish farmers and fishermen (OJ 2005, L 74, p. 49) — Obligation to recover immediately the aid declared unlawful and incompatible and to inform the Commission.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to comply, within the prescribed time-limits, with Commission Decision 2005/239/EC of 14 July 2004 concerning certain aid measures applied by France to assist fish farmers and fishermen, by recovering from the recipients of the aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Articles 2 and 3 of that decision, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the fourth paragraph of Article 288 TFEU and Article 4 of that decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to comply, within the prescribed time-limits, with Commission Decision 2005/239/EC of 14 July 2004 concerning certain aid measures applied by France to assist fish farmers and fishermen, by recovering from the recipients of the aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Articles 2 and 3 of that decision, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the fourth paragraph of Article 288 TFEU and Article 4 of that decision.

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of PLXTechnology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Rafael Torres,****Chief Financial Officer****ofthe Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of myknowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,"filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: August 3, 2004
                          /s/ RafaelTorres	 
Rafael Torres, Chief FinancialOfficer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3747 

To require the Federal Government to acquire mineral rights, and prohibit 

disturbance, of the subsurface of federally owned sites listed on the 

National Priorities List to the extent necessary to protect cleanup remedies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2019 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Government to acquire mineral rights, 

and prohibit disturbance, of the subsurface of federally 

owned sites listed on the National Priorities List to 

the extent necessary to protect cleanup remedies, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘On or Under Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3747 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISTURBANCE OF THE SUB2 SURFACE OF NPL SITES. 

3 (a) ACQUISITION OF MINERAL RIGHTS.—Upon the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Government 

5 shall acquire all the current existing mineral rights, in6 cluding lease interests, that exist in the subsurface of fed7 erally owned sites listed on the National Priorities List 

8 under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com9 pensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et 

10 seq.). 

11 (b) PROHIBITION.—Upon acquiring such subsurface 

12 mineral rights, unless for the purposes of site clean-up, 

13 the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agen14 cy shall prohibit, through restrictive covenant or other ap15 propriate mechanism, any drilling, excavation, or other 

16 disturbance of the federally owned subsurface beneath a 

17 site listed on the National Priorities List under the Com18 prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

19 Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
David CHACON, petitioner, v. Clark E. DUCART, Warden.

No. 15-9511.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15810]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1380-DR]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana, (FEMA-1380-DR), dated June 11, 2001, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 14, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of June 11, 2001:

    Beauregard, Iberia, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, St. 
Charles, St. James, St. John the Baptist, St. Mary, St. Tammany, 
Tangipahoa, and Washington Parishes for Individual and Public 
Assistance.
    East Feliciana for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-15810 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P