Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2022 / Notices 21133 

survival of the species. This notification 

is for a single import. 

IV. Next Steps 

After the comment period closes, we 

will make decisions regarding permit 

issuance. If we issue permits to any of 

the applicants listed in this notice, we 

will publish a notice in the Federal 

Register. You may locate the notice 

announcing the permit issuance by 

searching https://www.regulations.gov 

for the permit number listed above in 

this document. For example, to find 

information about the potential issuance 

of Permit No. 12345A, you would go to 

regulations.gov and search for 

‘‘12345A’’. 

V. Authority 

We issue this notice under the 

authority of the Endangered Species Act 

of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 

seq.), and its implementing regulations. 

Brenda Tapia, 

Supervisory Program Analyst/Data 

Administrator, Branch of Permits, Division 

of Management Authority. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07647 Filed 4–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

[OMB Control Number 1010–0106; Docket 

ID: BOEM–2017–0016] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Oil Spill Financial 

Responsibility 

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of information collection; 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

(BOEM) is proposing to renew an 

information collection request (ICR). 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before June 10, 

2022. 

ADDRESSES: Send your comments on 

this ICR by mail to the BOEM 

Information Collection Clearance 

Officer, Anna Atkinson, Bureau of 

Ocean Energy Management, 45600 

Woodland Road, Sterling, Virginia 

20166; or by email to anna.atkinson@

boem.gov. Please reference Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) control 

number 1010–0106 in the subject line of 

your comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

request additional information about 

this ICR, contact Anna Atkinson by 

email at anna.atkinson@boem.gov, or by 

telephone at 703–787–1025. Individuals 

in the United States who are deaf, 

deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a 

speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, 

TDD, or TeleBraille) to access 

telecommunications relay services. 

Individuals outside the United States 

should use the relay services offered 

within their country to make 

international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States. You may 

also view the ICR at http://

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, BOEM provides 

the general public and other Federal 

agencies with an opportunity to 

comment on new, proposed, revised, 

and continuing collections of 

information. This helps BOEM assess 

the impact of its information collection 

requirements and minimize the public’s 

reporting burden. It also helps the 

public understand BOEM’s information 

collection requirements and provide the 

requested data in the desired format. 

BOEM is soliciting comments on the 

proposed ICR described below. BOEM is 

especially interested in public 

comments addressing the following 

issues: (1) Is the collection necessary to 

the proper functions of BOEM; (2) what 

can BOEM do to ensure that this 

information is processed and used in a 

timely manner; (3) is the burden 

estimate accurate; (4) how might BOEM 

enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 

of the information to be collected; and 

(5) how might BOEM minimize the 

burden of this collection on the 

respondents, including minimizing the 

burden through the use of information 

technology? 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice are a matter of public record. 

BOEM will include or summarize each 

comment in its request to OMB for 

approval of this ICR. You should be 

aware that your entire comment— 

including your address, phone number, 

email address, or other personally 

identifiable information included in 

your comment—may be made publicly 

available. You may request that BOEM 

withhold from disclosure your 

personally identifiable information. 

Your request must identify any 

information contained in your comment 

that, if released, would constitute a 

clearly unwarranted invasion of your 

personal privacy. You also must briefly 

describe any possible harmful 

consequences of disclosure of that 

information, such as embarrassment, 

injury, or other harm. While you can ask 

in your comment that your personally 

identifiable information be withheld 

from public disclosure, BOEM cannot 

guarantee that it will be able to do so 

under the law. 

BOEM protects proprietary 

information in accordance with the 

Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 

552), the Department of the Interior’s 

implementing regulations (43 CFR part 

2), and 30 CFR parts 550 and 552 

promulgated pursuant to the Outer 

Continental Shelf (OCS) Lands Act (43 

U.S.C. 1352(c)). 

Title of Collection: 30 CFR part 553, 

‘‘Oil Spill Financial Responsibility for 

Offshore Facilities.’’ 

Abstract: This ICR concerns the 

paperwork requirements in 30 CFR part 

553, including any supplementary 

notices to lessees and operators that 

provide clarification, description, or 

explanation of these regulations, and 

forms BOEM–1016 through –1023, and 

BOEM–1025. 

BOEM uses forms to collect 

information to ensure proper and 

efficient administration of its oil spill 

financial responsibility requirements. 

BOEM collects information to: 

• Provide a standard method for 

establishing whether a party is required 

to demonstrate oil spill financial 

responsibility for offshore facilities; 

• Identify and maintain a record of 

those offshore facilities that have a 

potential oil spill liability requiring the 

demonstration of oil spill financial 

responsibility; 

• Establish and maintain a 

continuous record of evidence of oil 

spill financial responsibility to assure 

payment of claims for oil spill cleanup 

and damages resulting from operations 

conducted on covered offshore facilities 

and from the transportation of oil from 

covered offshore facilities; 

• Establish and maintain a 

continuous record of responsible 

parties, as defined in title I of the Oil 

Pollution Act of 1990, and their agents 

or authorized representatives for oil 

spill financial responsibility for covered 

offshore facilities; and 

• Establish and maintain a 

continuous record of persons to contact 

and U.S. agents for service of process for 

claims associated with oil spills from 

covered offshore facilities. 

OMB Control Number: 1010–0106. 

Type of Review: Renewal of a 

currently approved information 

collection. 

Respondents/Affected Public: 

Designated applicants and holders of 

leases, permits, right-of-way grants, and 

right-of-use and easement grants on the 

OCS and in State coastal waters who are 

responsible parties. Other respondents 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
21134 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2022 / Notices 

may be designated applicants’ insurance 

agents and brokers, bonding companies, 

and guarantors. Some respondents may 

also be claimants. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 2,233 responses. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 34,695 hours. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Frequency of Collection: On occasion 

or annual. 

Total Estimated Annual Non-Hour 

Burden Cost: There is no non-hour cost 

burden associated with this collection. 

Estimated Reporting and 

Recordkeeping Hour Burden: The 

current annual burden for this 

collection is 22,133 hours. BOEM 

proposes to increase the annual burden 

to 34,695 hours to account for changes 

in industry operations due to COVID 

and remote work. As COVID restrictions 

ease and continue to be lifted, BOEM 

expects an increase in the number of 

respondents annually due to industry 

practices developed during the 

pandemic as companies resume 

production and re-establish oil spill 

financial responsibility coverage. 

Remote work led to changes in how 

industry reviews and processes required 

documents. Prior to COVID, in-person 

meetings with a group of reviewers were 

held to complete the task quickly and 

efficiently. Now with many employees 

working from home, document 

preparation, review, and editing are 

taking longer as the documents move 

through several individual reviewers. 

Companies have provided this feedback 

through our outreach efforts. Therefore, 

BOEM is increasing hour burdens to 

account for the additional review and 

editing time. This increase in 

respondents and burden hours may be 

temporary and will be revisited by 

BOEM during future reviews of U.S. 

OCS supply and demand patterns. 

The following table details the 

individual components and respective 

hour burden estimates of this ICR. In the 

table, the term ‘‘oil spill financial 

responsibility’’ has been shortened to 

‘‘OSFR.’’ 

BURDEN BREAKDOWN

Citation 30 CFR part 553 Reporting requirement * Hour burden 

Average number of annual 

reponses 

Annual burden 

hours 

Various sections ..................... The burdens for all references to submitting evidence of OSFR, as well as required or supporting information, are covered with the forms below. 0 

Applicability and Amount of OSFR 

11(a)(1); 40; 41 ....................... Form BOEM–1016—Designated Applicant Information Certification.3 250 750 

11(a)(1); 40; 41 ....................... Form BOEM–1017—Appointment of Designated Applicant .. 10 750 7,500 

11(a)(1); (2) ............................. Form BOEM–1025—Independent Designated Applicant Information Certification.2 200 400 

12, 45 ...................................... Request for determination of OSFR applicability. Provide required and supporting information.2 5 10 

15 ............................................ Notify BOEM of change in ability to comply .......................... 1 1 1 

15(f) ......................................... Provide claimant written explanation of denial ...................... 1 15 15 

Subtotal ............................ ............................................................................................ ........................ 1,221 8,676 

Methods for Demonstrating OSFR 

21–28; 40 ................................ Form BOEM–1018—Self-Insurance Information, including 

renewals.

3 50 150 

30; 40; 41; 43 ......................... Form BOEM–1023—Financial Guarantee ............................. 2 50 100 

29; 40; 41; 43 ......................... Form BOEM–1019—Insurance Certificate ............................. 120 150 18,000 

31; 40; 41; 43 ......................... Form BOEM–1020—Surety Bond .......................................... 24 4 96 

32 ............................................ Proposal and supporting information for alternative method 

to evidence OSFR (anticipate no proposals, but regulations provide the opportunity).

120 1 120 

Subtotal ............................ ............................................................................................ ........................ 255 18,466 

Requirements for Submitting OSFR Information 

14; 40; 41; 43 ......................... Form BOEM–1021—Covered Offshore Facilities .................. 10 255 2,550 

40–42 ...................................... Form BOEM–1022—Covered Offshore Facility Changes ..... 10 500 5,000 

Subtotal ............................ ............................................................................................ ........................ 755 7,550 

Claims for Oil-Spill Removal Costs and Damages 

Subpart F ................................ Claims: BOEM is not involved in the claims process. Assessment of burden for claims against 

the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (33 CFR parts 135, 136, 137) falls under the responsibility 

of the U.S. Coast Guard. 

0 

60(d) ........................................ Claimant request for BOEM assistance to determine whether a guarantor may be liable for a claim.2 1 2 

62 ............................................ Within 15-calendar days of claim, designated applicant must 

notify the guarantor and responsible parties of the claim.

1 1 1 

Subtotal .................... ............................................................................................ ........................ 2 3 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2022 / Notices 21135 

BURDEN BREAKDOWN—Continued 

Citation 30 CFR part 553 Reporting requirement * Hour burden 

Average number of annual 

reponses 

Annual burden 

hours 

Total Burden ............. ................................................................................................. ........................ 2,233 34,695 

* In the future, BOEM may require electronic filing of financial and bonding submissions. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. 

The authority for this action is the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Peter Meffert, 

Acting Chief, Office of Regulations. 

[FR Doc. 2022–07634 Filed 4–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1196] 

Certain In Vitro Fertilization Products, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing the Same; Notice of 

Commission Final Determination To 

Issue a Limited Exclusion Order and a 

Cease and Desist Order; Termination 

of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to issue a 

limited exclusion order (‘‘LEO’’) barring 

entry of certain in vitro fertilization 

products, components thereof, and 

products containing the same, that 

infringe Complainant’s asserted 

trademarks and that are imported by or 

on behalf of respondents FastIVF of 

Scottsdale, Arizona (‘‘FastIVF’’) and 

Hermes Ezcanesi of Istanbul, Turkey 

(collectively, the ‘‘Defaulting 

Respondents’’). The Commission has 

further determined to issue a cease and 

desist order (‘‘CDO’’) directed to 

Defaulting Respondent FastIVF. The 

investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Houda Morad, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–4716. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 

16, 2020, the Commission instituted this 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based on a 

complaint filed by complainant EMD 

Serono, Inc. of Rockland, Massachusetts 

(‘‘Complainant’’). See 85 FR 21267–68 

(Apr. 16, 2020). The complaint, as 

amended and supplemented, alleges a 

violation of section 337 based on the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain in vitro fertilization products, 

components thereof, and products 

containing same (collectively, ‘‘Gray 

Market IVF Products’’), by reason of 

infringement of U.S. Trademark 

Registration Nos. 4,689,651; 1,772,761; 

3,777,170; 3,389,332; 3,816,320; 

1,972,079; 3,604,207; and 3,185,427 

(collectively, ‘‘the Asserted 

Trademarks’’); unfair methods of 

competition and unfair acts in the 

importation and sale of Gray Market IVF 

Products by reason of false designation 

of source; and unfair methods of 

competition and unfair acts in the 

importation and sale of the Gray Market 

IVF Products by reason of false 

advertising. See id. In addition to the 

Defaulting Respondents, the notice of 

investigation names General Plastik 

Drug Stores (‘‘Unserved Respondent’’) of 

Istanbul Suadiye, Turkey as a 

respondent in this investigation. See id. 

The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a party to 

the investigation. See id. 

On September 1, 2020, the Chief ALJ 

issued an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

finding each of the Defaulting 

Respondents in default. See Order No. 

6 (Sept. 1, 2020), unreviewed by 

Comm’n Notice (Sept. 24, 2020). On 

October 13, 2020, the Chief ALJ also 

issued an ID terminating Unserved 

Respondent from the investigation 

based on the withdrawal of the 

complaint allegations as to that 

respondent. See Order No. 8 (Oct. 13, 

2020), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice 

(Oct. 26, 2020). 

On April 16, 2021, the Chief ALJ 

issued an ID (Order No. 10) (‘‘SD’’) 

granting in part Complainant’s motion 

for summary determination of violation 

of section 337 by the Defaulting 

Respondents with respect to 

Complainant’s claim under section 

337(a)(1)(C) (infringement of the 

Asserted Trademarks) but denied the 

motion with respect to Complainant’s 

unfair competition claims under section 

337(a)(1)(A). In addition, the Chief ALJ 

recommended that the Commission 

issue a general exclusion order (‘‘GEO’’) 

and set a bond at 100 percent during the 

period of Presidential review. 

On May 18, 2021, the Commission 

determined to review the SD (Order No. 

10) in part. See Comm’n Notice (May 18, 

2021). Specifically, the Commission 

determined to review the SD’s findings 

with respect to the economic prong of 

the domestic industry requirement. See 

id. The Commission determined not to 

review any other findings in the SD. 

On October 6, 2021, the Commission 

determined to vacate the SD in part. 

Specifically, the Commission vacated 

the SD’s finding that Complainant has 

satisfied the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement. 

Consequently, the Commission also 

vacated the SD’s finding of a violation 

of section 337 and remanded the 

investigation to the Chief ALJ. Because 

Complainant requested a GEO, the 

Commission found that Complainant 

failed to establish a violation by 

‘‘substantial, reliable, and probative 

evidence’’ and that genuine issues of 

material fact remained as to whether the 

economic prong of the domestic 

industry requirement was satisfied. See 

Comm’n Op. at 8 n.9, 25 (Oct. 6, 2021) 

(citing 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(2)). 

Commissioners Karpel and Schmidtlein 

dissented from the Commission’s 

decision that Complainant had failed to 

satisfy the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement and 

would have found a violation of section 

337 based on substantial, reliable, and 

probative evidence. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1