34312 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices

Information Collection Request

1. Title: Voyage-Planning for TankBarge Transits in the Northeast United

States.

OMB Control Number: 2115–0637.

Summary: The information collected

for a voyage plan serves as a preventive

measure and assists in ensuring the

successful execution and completion of

a voyage in the First Coast Guard

District. This rule [33 CFR 165.100]

applies primarily to towing vessels

engaged in towing certain tank barges

carrying petroleum oil in bulk as cargo.

Need: The information for a voyage

plan will provide a mechanism for

assisting vessels towing tank barges to

identify those specific risks, potential

equipment failures, or human errors that

may lead to accidents.

Respondents: Owners and operators

of towing vessels.

Frequency: On occasion.

Burden Estimate: The estimated

burden is 439 hours a year.

2. Title: Welding and Hot-Work

Permits; Posting of Warning Signs.

OMB Control Number: 2115–0054.

Summary: The information collected

here helps ensure that waterfront

facilities and vessels are in compliance

with safety standards. A permit must

issue before welding or hot work on

certain waterfront facilities; and the

posting of warning signs is required on

certain such facilities.

Need: The information is needed to

ensure safe operations on certain

waterfront facilities and vessels.

Respondents: Owners and operators

of certain waterfront facilities and

vessels.

Frequency: On occasion.

Burden Estimate: The estimated

burden is 226 hours a year.

3. Title: Approval of Alterations to

Marine Portable Tanks; Approval of

Non-Specification Portable Tanks.

OMB Control Number: 2115–0585.

Summary: The information helps us

evaluate the safety of proposed

alterations to marine portable tanks and

of non-specification portable tank

designs used to transfer hazardous

materials during offshore operations,

such as those on drilling rigs.

Respondents will be those who wish to

alter existing marine portable tanks or

use non-specification portable tanks.

Need: Approval by the Coast Guard of

alterations to marine portable tanks

ensures that the altered tanks retain the

level of safety to which they were

originally designed. Further, rules’

allowing for the approval of nonspecification portable tanks ensures that

the rules do not frustrate innovation and

new designs.

Respondents: Owners of marine

portable tanks and owners and

designers of non-specification portable

tanks.

Frequency: On occasion.

Burden Estimate: The estimated

burden is 18 hours a year.

Dated: June 15 2001.

V.S. Crea,

Director of Information and Technology.

[FR Doc. 01–16185 Filed 6–26–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

To Impose and Use the Revenue From

a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at

San Antonio International Airport, San

Antonio, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on

application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to impose and use the

revenue from a PFC at San Antonio

International Airport under the

provisions of the Aviation Safety and

Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title

IX of the Omnibus Budget reconciliation

Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and part

158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(14 CFR part 158).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before July 27, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

in triplicate copies tot he FAA at the

following address: Mr. G. Thomas

Wade, Federal Aviation Administration,

Southwest Region, Airports Division,

Planning and Programming Branch,

ASW–611, Fort Worth, Texas 76193–

0610.

In addition, one copy of any

comments submitted to the FAA must

be mailed or delivered to Mr. Kevin

Dolliole, Manager of San Antonio

International Airport at the following

address: Mr. Kevin Dolliole, Director of

Aviation, San Antonio International

Airport, 9800 Airport Boulevard, San

Antonio, TX 78216–9990.

Air carriers and foreign air carries

may submit copies of the written

comments previously provided to the

Airport under § 158.23 of part 158.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

G. Thomas Wade, Federal Aviation

Administration, Southwest Region,

Airports Division, Planning and

Programming Branch, ASW–611, Fort

Worth, Texas 76193–0610, (817) 222–

5613.

The application may be reviewed in

person a this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

proposes to rule and invites public

comment on the application to impose

and use the revenue from a PFC at San

Antonio International Airport under the

provisions of the Aviation Safety and

Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title

IX of the Omnibus Budget

Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L.

101–508) and part 158 of the Federal

aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158).

On June 19, 2001 the FAA determined

that the application to impose and use

the revenue from a PFC submitted by

the Airport was substantially complete

within the requirements of § 158.25 of

part 158. The FAA will approve or

disapprove the application, in whole or

in part, no later than October 16, 2001.

The following is a brief overview of

the application.

Level of the proposed PFC: $3.00.

Proposed charge effective date:

November 1, 2001.

Proposed charge expiration date:

November 1, 2009.

Total estimated PFC revenue:

$102,524,363.

PFC application number: 01–01–C–

00–SAT.

Brief description of proposed

project(s):

Projects To Impose PFC’s

1.1 Residential Noise Attenuation

Program

1.4 Construct ARFF Training Facility

1.5 Construct Three High-Speed

Taxiways (Runway 12R/30L)

1.6 Extend Runway 21

1.10 Construct Concourse B

1.12 Construct Concourse B Elevated

Roadway

Projects To Impose and Use PFC’s

1.3 Construct RW 30L Holding Apron

1.7 Modify Wash Rack

1.8 Relocate Remain Over Night Apron

1.9 Terminal 1 and 2 Modifications

1.11 Reconstruct Perimeter Road

Proposed class or classes of air

carriers to be exempted from collecting

PFC’s: Air Carriers holding a part 135

certificate and Filing FAA Form 1800–

31.

Any person may inspect the

application in person at the FAA office

listed above under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA

regional Airports office located at:

Federal Aviation Administration,

Southwest Region, Airports Division,

Planning and Programming Branch,

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices 34313

ASW–610, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort

Worth, Texas 76137–4298.

In addition, any person may, upon

request, inspect the application, notice

and other documents germane to the

application in person at San Antonio

International Airport.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on June

19,2001.

Joseph G. Washington,

Acting Manager, Airports Division.

[FR Doc. 01–16182 Filed 6–26–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Application

To Impose and Use the Revenue From

a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at

Texarkana Regional Airport, Texarkana

AR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on

application.

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and

invites public comment on the

application to impose and use the

revenue from a PFC at Texarkana

Regional Airport under the provisions of

the Aviation Safety and Capacity

Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of

1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and part 158 of

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14

CFR part 158).

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before July 27, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this

application may be mailed or delivered

in triplicate copies to the FAA at the

following address: Mr. G. Thomas

Wade, Federal Aviation Administration,

Southwest Region, Airports Division,

Planning and Programming Branch,

ASW–611, Fort Worth, Texas 76193–

0610.

In addition, one copy of any

comments submitted to the FAA must

be mailed or delivered to Mr. Stephen

Luebbert, Manager of Texarkana

Regional Airport at the following

address: Mr. Stephen Luebbert, Airport

Director, Texarkana Regional Airport,

201 Airport Way, Texarkana, AR 71854.

Air carriers and foreign air carriers

may submit copies of the written

comments previously provided to the

Airport under § 158.23 of part 158.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

G. Thomas Wade, Federal Aviation

Administration, Southwest Region,

Airports Division, Planning and

Programming Branch, ASW–611, Fort

Worth, Texas 76193–0610, (817) 222–

5613.

The application may be reviewed in

person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

proposes to rule and invites public

comment on the application to impose

and use the revenue from a PFC at

Texarkana Regional Airport under the

provisions of the Aviation Safety and

Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title

IX of the Omnibus Budget reconciliation

Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and part

158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(14 CFR part 158).

On June 19, 2001 the FAA determined

that the application to impose and use

the revenue from a PFC submitted by

the Airport was substantially complete

within the requirements of § 158.25 of

part 158. The FAA will approve or

disapprove the application, in whole or

in part, no later than October 11, 2001.

The following is a brief overview of

the application.

Level of the proposed PFC: $4.50.

Proposed charge effective date:

August 1, 2004.

Proposed charge expiration date: June

1, 2005.

Total estimated PFC revenue:

$125,891.

PFC application number: 01–03–C–

00–TXK.

Brief description of proposed

project(s):

Projects To Impose and Use PFC’s

1. Enclose Drainage Ditch

2. Rehabilitate Apron

3. Rehabilitate Runway 4/22 Lighting

4. Acquire Airfield Sweeper

5. PFC Administrative Fees

Proposed class or classes of air

carriers to be exempted from collecting

PFC’s: None.

Any person may inspect the

application in person at the FAA office

listed above under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA

regional Airports office located at:

Federal Aviation Administration,

Southwest Region, Airports Division,

Planning and Programming Branch,

ASW–610, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort

Worth, Texas 76137–4298.

In addition, any person may, upon

request, inspect the application, notice

and other documents germane to the

application in person at Texarkana

Regional Airport.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on June 19,

2001.

Joseph G. Washington,

Acting Manager, Airports Division.

[FR Doc. 01–16183 Filed 6–26–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

Environmental Impact Statement:

Williamson County, Tennessee

AGENCY: Federal Highway

Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this

notice to advise the public that an

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

will be prepared for a proposed highway

project in the City of Franklin in

Williamson County Tennessee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

Mark A. Doctor, Field Operations Team

Leader, Federal Highway

Administration, 640 Grassmere Park,

Suite 112, Nashville, Tennessee 37211,

Telephone: (615) 781–5788.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

FHWA, in cooperation with the

Tennessee Department of

Transportation, will prepare an

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

on a proposal to extend State Route 397

(Mack Hatcher Parkway) in the City of

Franklin in Williamson County,

Tennessee. The proposed project will

extend the existing Mack Hatcher

Parkway circumferentially around the

westside of the City of Franklin and will

be constructed on new alignment for a

distance of approximately 12.8

kilometers (8.0 miles). The extension

will be constructed as a four lane

divided, partial control of access

highway.

The proposed extension of Mack

Hatcher Parkway to the west is being

developed as a transportation facility

that will be capable of safely handling

anticipated levels of future traffic

growth within the study area. The

proposed project is located within one

of the fastest growing counties in

Tennessee. This growth has placed a

heavy burden on the existing

transportation system and will continue

to do so as projected development

occurs within the study area. The

completed circumferential route will

help improve the overall local flow of

traffic for the City of Franklin. The

proposed extension will be developed to

continue the geometry and operational

characteristics of the existing parkway.

Alternatives under consideration

include (1) taking no action (no-build)

(2) constructing a four-lane divided

highway on new locations to complete

the circumferential route and (3) other

reasonable alternatives that may arise

from public and agency input.

Initial coordination letters describing

the proposed action and soliciting