alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00233

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Andrew Seidenfeld <noprob@mindspring.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 1:14 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Andrew Seidenfeld

260 Harrison Av #407

Jersey City, NJ 07304
II-00982

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Cunningham <mrsea2@eznet.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:28 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Cunningham

762 South Huckleberry Way

Webster, NY 14580
In Re Christopher PARKER, petitioner.

No. 16-9565.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
NO. 06-14-00062-CV

KRSTA LYNN GARDNER, 

INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF

THE ESTATE OF LARRY RAY 

TINER,

 Appellant,

V.

PENNY HEDDIN TINER

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

IN THE SIXTH COURT OF

APPEALS IN AND FOR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLEE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

COMES NOW PENNY HEDDIN TINER, by and through her attorney, Wm. Brandon 

Baade, and makes this MOTION TO EXTEND TIME APPELLEE BRIEF: 

1. The deadline for filing the Appellee’s Brief is January 28, 2015. 

2. Appellee seeks and extension of four days (4) days until February 1, 2015 to file 

Appellee’s Brief.

3. Facts relied on to reasonably explain the need for an extension: 

Counsel for Appellee was granted a seven day extension because I was sick with 

the flu. I anticipated getting better, I didn’t. Indeed I got worse and was placed 

on antibiotics the very day the brief was due four days ago. I am still sick, but I 

have got it done. I apologize to the court for being late by four days. It was not 

intentional, nor intended to be dilatory or seek any advantage. I have an 

immune system that is weakened for which I take injections three times a week, 

and when I get sick it is difficult to overcome it. The brief is filed with this 

motion. 

Appellee has been granted one (2) extensions of time. 

4. Appellee’s brief is being filed simultaneously with this Motion to Extend Time 

to File Appelllee Brief. 

WHEREFORE, Penny Heddin Tiner, by her attorney, Wm. Brandon Baade, requests 

the court extend time to file Appellee’s Brief in this case.

ACCEPTED

06-14-00062-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

2/1/2015 6:53:54 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 2/4/2015 4:15:00 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

Wm. Brandon Baade

522 N Broadway Ave

Tyler, TX 75702

Tel: (903) 526-5867

brandonbaadelaw@gmail.com

 _______________________________

Wm. Brandon Baade

State Bar No. 00793189

Attorney for Appellee

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

 I certify that I attempted to contact Lawrence Beason, Attorney for Appellant, in this case 

at the phone number listed on the Appellant’s brief and the number was not in service.

 _______________________________

Wm. Brandon Baade

State Bar No. 00793189

Attorney for Appellee

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing MOTION

TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELEE’S BRIEF was served on all counsel of record by U.S. 

Mail on February 1, 2015.

 _______________________________

Wm. Brandon Baade

State Bar No. 00793189

Attorney for Appellee
Lucky IROMUANYA, petitioner, v. Scott FRAKES, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services.

No. 17-7497.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Azco Mining, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pierce
Carson, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.



|Date: May 11, 2007 | By:   /s/ Pierce Carson                           
|------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|                   | Pierce Carson                                     
|                   | Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Director
|                   | and Principal
      Accounting Officer            

---
Denard STOKELING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5554.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit are granted.
II-00284

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michelle Sullivan <violetplanet@earthlink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:49 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michelle Sullivan

1516 Rosalia Rd

Los Angeles, CA 90027
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: J. F. FREEMAN & CO., INC., JAY A. NOVAK, AND IRVING A. OLSHEVER 

DOCKET NUMBER: 186 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 186 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

J. F. Freeman & Co., Inc., 

Jay A. Novak, and 

Irving A. Olshever 

(New York, New York) 

The complaint charges that during the period March 31, 1969, through January 

30, 1970, the respondent corporation, while registered as a futures commission 

merchant under the Act, failed to meet minimum financial requirements prescribed 

for futures commission merchants by varying amounts ranging up to $ 14,000. It 

further charges that as of March 31 and November 30, 1969, all of the 

respondents submitted to the Commodity Exchange Authority false financial 

reports on behalf of the respondent corporation. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, on November 22, 1971, in New York, New York. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3814 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3814

To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2019

 Mr. Richmond (for himself and Mr. Graves of Louisiana) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Domestic Offshore Energy 
Reinvestment Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE GULF OF MEXICO ENERGY SECURITY ACT OF 2006.

    (a) In General.--Section 105(a) of the Gulf of Mexico Energy 
Security Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``50'' and inserting 
        ``37.5''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 
                striking ``50'' and inserting ``62.5'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``75'' and 
                inserting ``80''; and
                    (C) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``25'' and 
                inserting ``20''.
    (b) In General.--Section 105(d) of the Gulf of Mexico Energy 
Security Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting after subparagraph (E):
                    ``(F) planning, engineering, design, construction, 
                operations, and maintenance of one or more projects 
                that are specifically authorized by any other Act for 
                ecosystem restoration, hurricane protection, or flood 
                damage prevention.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking paragraph (2) and 
        inserting:
            ``(2) Limitation.--Of the amounts received by a Gulf 
        producing State or coastal political subdivision under 
        subsection (b)--
                    ``(A) not more than 3 percent may be used for the 
                purposes described in paragraph (1)(E); and
                    ``(B) not less than 25 percent may be used for the 
                purposes described in paragraph (1)(F), and shall be 
                applied proportionally to the applicable Federal and 
                non-Federal share pursuant to such specific project 
                authorization.''.
    (c) In General.--Section 105(f) of the Gulf of Mexico Energy 
Security Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note) is amended by striking 
section 105(f).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010051EN.01001502.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/15

---

Order of the Court of 29 October 2009 — Portela — Comércio de artigos ortopédicos e hospitalares, Lda v European Commission

(Case C-85/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Non-contractual liability - Claim for compensation for damage sustained on account of the various omissions by the Commission in the application of Directive 93/42/EEC - No causal connection between the omission alleged and the damage suffered by the applicant in the marketing of defective digital thermometers - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2010/C 51/24

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Portela — Comércio de artigos ortopédicos e hospitalares, Lda (represented by: C. Mourato, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Schima and P. Guerra e Andrade, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 17 December 2008 in Case T-137/07 Portela v Commission, in which the Court rejected as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, for the remainder, manifestly unfounded an application claiming, primarily, that the Court of First Instance should impose on the Commission the obligation to act in accordance with Article 14b of Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices (OJ 1993 L 169, p. 1), as amended by Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (OJ 1998 L 331, p. 1), by ordering the certification company TÜV Rheinland Product Safety GmbH, through the Federal Republic of Germany, to activate, in favour of the appellant, the mandatory civil liability insurance provided for in point 6 of Annex XI to Directive 93/42, concluded by that company or, if the alleged damage could not be remedied by the main claim, a claim for compensation for the damage sustained by the applicant on account of the various omissions on the part of the Commission.

Portela

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Portela — Comércio de artigos ortopédicos e hospitalares, Lda is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Portela — Comércio de artigos ortopédicos e hospitalares, Lda is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 13, 2010 

Order 

 

May 13, 2010 

Rehearing No. 562 

138123 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 138123 

v COA: 284943 

Washtenaw CC: 07-001471-FC 

RONALD JAMES PLUNKETT, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing is considered, and it is 

DENIED. 

 KELLY, C.J., and CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant 

rehearing.
Julio Adrian MANZANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8156.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jesus BARRAGAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8050.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with the Annual Report of Empyrean Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert L. Lee, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Robert L. Lee_ Robert L. Lee, President and CEO   Dated:  April 28, 2008
II-00736

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

J Noble <gratefulbe@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:52 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

J Noble

Personal

Madison, WI 53716