alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from NS Group, Inc.'s condensed consolidated financial statements
as of and for the six month period ended March 27,1999, included
in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such condensed consolidated
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000745026
<NAME> NS GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,318
<SECURITIES>                                    19,340
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                       828
<INVENTORY>                                     61,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,559
<PP&E>                                         328,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                 181,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,062
<BONDS>                                         72,674
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       257,139
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,940)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   372,849
<SALES>                                        110,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,729
<CGS>                                          112,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,726)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,076)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,837)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,913)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.30)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          532243
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   986992
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1578981
<PP&E>                                           59746
<DEPRECIATION>                                   19971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2215270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1088101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       3852825
<OTHER-SE>                                      231207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2215270
<SALES>                                         269346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                269346
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   299099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 89051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (116484)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (116484)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (116484)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
# C_2010209EN.01005703.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/57

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 May 2010 — Nikolchov v Commission

(Case F-94/09) (1)

1

()

2010/C 209/94

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register, following amicable settlement.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010, p. 42.

1

---
Jonathon Adam LAMB, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5152.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ Consolidated Cases Nos. 02-60404, 02-60411, 02-60419, 02-60457, 02-60458, 02-60481,

02-60517, 02-60536 Summary Calendar

_______________________ Case No. 02-60404 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. JESSE WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60411 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. SUSIE GEORGE, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60419 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. LINDA HAWKINS, Defendant-Appellant.2 _________________________ Case No. 02-60457 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. CURRY JOE ATTERBURY, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60458 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. RUBIN ASHFORD, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60481 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MARY BURT, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60517 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. L.D. TAYLOR, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Case No. 02-60536 BANK ONE NA,* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, t he Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

1 288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002).

2 No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished). 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARY McMORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

(3:01-CV-24-D)

_____________________________________________

January 29, 2003 Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Appellants challenge the district court’s rulings granting Bank One’s motions to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellants’ pending state law claims. This case is indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in the relate d cases of B ank One, N.A. v. Boyd 1 and Bank One, N.A. v. Lake
. 2 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our opinion in Boyd and in the district court’s opinion in B ank One,3 125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001).

4 No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 200 2 ) (order granting petition to compel arbitration). 4 N.A. v. Coates , 3 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor , 4 the judgment of the district court in this case is, in all respects, AFFIRMED .
II-01067

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Charles Walker <cawalker43@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:34 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Charles Walker

6387 New Market Way

Raleigh, NC 27615-6821
# C_2009220EN.01002501.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Germany), lodged on 14 July 2009 — Extradition proceedings concerning Gaetano Mantello

(Case C-261/09)

2009/C 220/50

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Gaetano Mantello

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the existence of ‘the same acts’ within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (1) to be determined:






  a) | according to the law of the issuing Member State, |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Is the existence of ‘the same acts’ within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (1) to be determined:

1

a)

according to the law of the issuing Member State,

| b) | according to the law of the executing Member State, or |
| --- | --- |

b)

according to the law of the executing Member State, or

| c) | according to an autonomous interpretation, based on the law of the European Union, of the phrase ‘the same acts’? |
| --- | --- |

c)

according to an autonomous interpretation, based on the law of the European Union, of the phrase ‘the same acts’?

| 2. | Are acts consisting of the illicit importation of drugs ‘the same acts’, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the Framework Decision, as membership of an organisation the purpose of which is illicit drugs trafficking, in so far as the investigating authorities had information and evidence, at the time at which sentence was passed in respect of such importation, which supported a strong suspicion of membership of such an organisation, but omitted for tactical reasons relating to their investigation to provide the relevant information and evidence to the court and to initiate criminal proceedings on that basis? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are acts consisting of the illicit importation of drugs ‘the same acts’, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the Framework Decision, as membership of an organisation the purpose of which is illicit drugs trafficking, in so far as the investigating authorities had information and evidence, at the time at which sentence was passed in respect of such importation, which supported a strong suspicion of membership of such an organisation, but omitted for tactical reasons relating to their investigation to provide the relevant information and evidence to the court and to initiate criminal proceedings on that basis?

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1

1

---
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0002936

29-SEP-2016

08:13 AM
II-00684

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Scott Lazenby <pelinacal @sol.corn>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:34 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Scott Lazenby

99 Southaven Ave.

Mastic, NY 11950
Boytina LOCKE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6347.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 10.8

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$2,000,000.00                                                 New York, New York

Dated: December 14, 2004

     WHEREAS,  Everlast Worldwide Inc.  ("Everlast") having a principal place of
business at 1350  Broadway,  Suite 2300,  New York, New York 10018 has agreed to
pay to Ben Nadorf (the "Holder"), the sum of TWO MILLION ($2,000,000.00) DOLLARS
pursuant to the terms of this Promissory Note; it is

     NOW, THEREFORE, agreed as follows:

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  Everlast promises to pay to the order of Holder at his
office,  or such other  place as may be  designated  in  writing by Holder,  the
principal  sum of TWO  MILLION  ($2,000,000.00)  DOLLARS  which sum  shall  bear
interest on the unpaid principal  balance at the fixed rate of nine and one-half
percent  (9.5%) per annum from  December 15, 2004 through  December 14, 2007 and
ten percent  (10%) per annum from  December 15, 2007 through  December 14, 2008,
computed on the basis of a three  hundred  sixty-five  (365) day year.  Interest
payments shall be made to Holder by Everlast on the 14th day of December of each
year  through  December  14,  2008.  The full  amount of this  Promissory  Note,
including the unpaid principal and any accrued and unpaid interest, shall be due
and payable four (4) years from the date  hereof.  This  Promissory  Note may be
prepaid,  in whole or in part,  at  anytime  without  penalty  at the  option of
Everlast.

     This is the Promissory  Note referred to in that certain  Agreement of even
date made by and between  Everlast and Holder and, as such, is subject to all of
the terms and conditions contained in the Agreement. To the extent that there is

a conflict  between the terms hereof and those  contained in the Agreement,  the
terms of the Agreement shall prevail.

     Presentment for payment, notice of dishonor or default,  protest and notice
of protest on payments of principal  and interest are hereby waived by Everlast.
The provisions of this Note shall be interpreted  and all rights and obligations
shall be determined, in accordance with the Laws of the State of New York.

     Everlast  and  Holder  hereby  agree that any  action  arising  out of this
Promissory  Note  shall be held in the New York  State  Courts in the  County of
Manhattan,  State of New York, or the Federal Court in the Southern  District of
New York.

     This Promissory  Note may not be changed or terminated  except by a written
instrument duly executed by Holder.

                                             EVERLAST WORLDWIDE, INC.

                                             By:
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 George Q Horowitz
                                                 President and CEO
```
II-00541

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

ELAINE GOULD <egould5@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:27 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

ELAINE GOULD

300 CENTRAL PARK WEST, #6B

NEW YORK, NY 10024-1579
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Life Time Fitness, Inc.
  /s/ Bahram Akradi  

Bahram AkradiChairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Michael R. Robinson  

Michael R. RobinsonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Robert ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 16-6807.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 

### 2024 KW 0035 VERSUS WESLEY RICKS 

### MARCH 13, 2024 In Re: 

### Wesley Ricks, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 20th



### Judicial District Court, Parish of West Feliciana, No. 16259. BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., CHUTZ AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT APPLICATION DISMISSED. The writ application 

### is 

### dismissed at relator' s request.
MATTHEW PHILLIP ALEXANDER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5186

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 2, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Don H. Lester, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
I N THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
A T HOME AUTO GLASS, LLC A/A/O ANTHONY ANTORINO , A ppellant ,
v. Cas e No

. 5D 21 -2 21 5 LT Cas e No. 2021- SC- 000 9 71

M ENDOTA INSURANCE COMPANY , A ppellee

. ________________________________/ O pinion filed August 26, 2022 Non f inal Appeal from the County Court for Seminole County , James J. DeKleva , Judge. Chad A. Barr, of Chad Barr Law, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. Matthew C. Scarborough and Amy Lee, of Scarborough Attorneys at Law, Tampa, for Appellee.

PE R CURIAM.
A t Home Auto Glass, LLC a/a/o Anthony Antorino appeals the trial court’s nonfinal order granting Appellee, Mendota Insurance Company’s,2 motion to transfer venue pursuant to section 47.122, Florida Statutes (2020). Based on our recent decision in At Home Auto Glass, LLC v. Mendota Insurance , 47 Fla. L. Weekly D1706 (Fla. 5th DCA Aug. 12, 2022), which involved the same parties a nd is indistinguishable in all material respects from the instant case, we reverse the order transferring venue and remand this case for further proceedings. REVERSED and REMANDED.
L AMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EDWARDS , JJ., concur.
II-00404

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

EVA ADAMYAN <sos473943874@juno.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:50 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

EVA ADAMYAN

4618 1/2 PROSPECT AVENUE

Los Angeles, CA 90027