alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 6641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1637]



[[Page 6641]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Biobehavioral Bases of CHD Risk and 
Management.
    Date: February 22, 2001.
    Time: 9 AM to 12:30 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Washington National Airport Hilton, 2399 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Louise P. Corman, Review Branch, NIH, NHLBI, 
Rockledge Building II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Suite 7180, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-0270.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Disease Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-1637 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jerry A. Dukes, Chief
Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 15, 2005



/s/ Jerry A. DukesJerry A. Dukes Chief Executive Officer
II-O0191

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Emil Berkanovic <eb@bgerber.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 9:26 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Emil Berkanovic

1742 S. Coming St.

Los Angeles, CA 90035
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3844 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3844

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require all persons 
 exercising substantial operational control over a concentrated animal 
 feeding operation to jointly obtain a permit for certain discharges, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2019

 Mr. Khanna (for himself and Mr. Pocan) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require all persons 
 exercising substantial operational control over a concentrated animal 
 feeding operation to jointly obtain a permit for certain discharges, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmer Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATION DISCHARGES.

    Section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1342) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(t) Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Discharges.--
            ``(1) In general.--For the purposes of applying the 
        requirements of this section to a discharge from a concentrated 
        animal feeding operation, the Administrator shall require all 
        persons exercising substantial operational control over the 
        concentrated animal feeding operation to jointly obtain a 
        permit under this section for the discharge.
            ``(2) Substantial operational control.--For purposes of 
        this subsection, a person exercises substantial operational 
        control over a concentrated animal feeding operation if the 
        person--
                    ``(A) has an ownership interest in the livestock, 
                land, or other capital of the concentrated animal 
                feeding operation;
                    ``(B) exercises any control over the activities, 
                operation (including specifying how the livestock of 
                the concentrated animal feeding operation is fed, 
                grown, or medicated), or management (including waste 
                management practices) of a concentrated animal feeding 
                operation; or
                    ``(C) meets any other criteria that the 
                Administrator determines appropriate.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010221EN.01004201.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Commission v Antiche Terre

(Case T-51/09) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Programme concerning the promotion of energy technologies for Europe (Thermie) - Contract concerning the project for the building in Umbertide (Italy) of an electricity generating plant using an innovative agro-forestry biomass combustion technology - Substantial amendment to the conditions for performance of the contract - Termination - Reimbursement of sums paid - Interest)

2010/C 221/68

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V Joris, acting as Agent, and A. dal Ferro, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Antiche Terre Soc. Coop. rl Società Agricola Cooperativa (Arezzo, Italy) (represented by: L. Defalque and P. Van Leynseele, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought by the Commission under Article 238 EC seeking an order that Antiche Terre reimburse the sums paid by the Community in performance of contract no BM/188/96 of 23 December 1996, concluded with three companies, including Antiche Terre, under the Thermie programme

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders Antiche Terre Soc. Coop. rl Società Agricola Cooperativa to pay the European Commission the sum of EUR 479 332,40, together with late-payment interest at the Italian statutory rate, calculated in accordance with the rates applicable from 4 January 2004 until payment in full of the debt, after deduction of the sum of EUR 461 979 recovered by the Commission following the implementation on 25 January 2005 of the bank guarantee of which it was beneficiary; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders Antiche Terre Soc. Coop. rl Società Agricola Cooperativa to pay the European Commission the sum of EUR 479 332,40, together with late-payment interest at the Italian statutory rate, calculated in accordance with the rates applicable from 4 January 2004 until payment in full of the debt, after deduction of the sum of EUR 461 979 recovered by the Commission following the implementation on 25 January 2005 of the bank guarantee of which it was beneficiary;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders Antiche Terre to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Antiche Terre to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.

1

---
# C_2011080EN.01001701.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 September 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-455/09) (1)

1

2011/C 80/32

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,207
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,348
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     38,372
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,785
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,279
<LOANS>                                        228,371
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330,106
<DEPOSITS>                                     274,456
<SHORT-TERM>                                     9,922
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,653
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 330,106
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,956
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,454
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   938
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,348
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,426
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,640
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,708
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      785
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,563
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,322
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,322
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.93
<LOANS-NON>                                        438
<LOANS-PAST>                                        93
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,875
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      499
<RECOVERIES>                                       145
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,306
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Samuel Rodriguez REYNA, petitioner, v. Lorrie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 15-9780.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
II-00693

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Richard Ellison <richard_ellison@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:23 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Richard Ellison

8003 28th ne

seattle, WA 98115
UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 3047, et al., petitioners, v. HARDIN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, et al.

No. 16-1451.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2010051EN.01003602.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/36

---

Action brought on 16 December 2009 — Carlyle v OHIM — Mascha & Regner Consulting (CAFE CARLYLE)

(Case T-505/09)

2010/C 51/70

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Carlyle, LLC (St. Louis, United States) (represented by: E. Cornu, E. De Gryse and D. Moreau, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mascha & Regner Consulting KEG (Vienna, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 October 2009 in case R 239/2009-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 October 2009 in case R 239/2009-4; and

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the request for revocation: The word mark “CAFE CARLYLE”, for services in class 42

Registered Community trade mark subject of the request for revocation:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the revocation of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Party requesting the revocation of the Community trade mark:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the request for revocation

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Revoked the Community trade mark concerned

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Council Regulation 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erroneously employed a too restrictive interpretation of the concept of genuine use. Moreover, the Board of Appeal failed: (i) to take into consideration properly the evidence of use submitted by the applicant before the Cancellation Division; (ii) to assess correctly the scope of the said evidence of use; and (iii) to make an overall assessment thereof.

Pleas in law:

---
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 22-0001 

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: 

BENJAMIN MARTIN, 

Co-Petitioner, 

and 

BRANDI WILLIAMS, 

Co-Petitioner. 

SEP 2 2 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

Benjamin Martin, representing himself, has filed an affidavit in support of his 

request to disqualify the Honorable John C. Brown from presiding in Cause No. 

DR-12-60C in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, pursuant to 

§ 3-1-805, MCA. 

Section 3-1-805, MCA, provides that an affidavit for disqualification for cause must 

allege facts showing personal bias or prejudice of the presiding judge. Section 3-1-

805(1)(c), MCA, provides in part that an affidavit that does not allege facts showing 

personal bias or prejudice may be set aside as void. Martin's affidavit makes no allegations 

of bias or prejudice on the part of Judge Brown, only asserting that Martin did not attend a 

hearing because of illness, Judge Brown later attempted to reschedule the hearing, and 

Martin sent Judge Brown a "notice of intent to sue" but has not actually filed suit against 

Judge Brown. Since Martin's affidavit offers nothing that demonstrates personal bias or 

prejudice on the part of Judge Brown, Martin has not satisfied the requirements of 

§ 3-1-805, MCA, and it is therefore unnecessary to appoint a judge to hear this matter. 

In addition to Martin's filing, this Court has further received a Notice to Montana 

Supreme Court of Motion to Disqualify for Cause from Judge Brown and a Response to 

Motion for Disqualification of Judge Biown filed by counsel for Brandi Williams, Co09/22/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0001
Petitioner in the District Court matter. Williams's filing, in addition to arguing against 

disqualification, requests attorney fees for the preparation of the response. Under 

§ 3-1-805(1), MCA, when a party files an affidavit in support of a disqualification for cause 

of a presiding judge, "such judge shall proceed no further in the cause," but shall refer the 

matter to this Court. Thus, responsive filings are neither contemplated by the statute nor 

are they relied upon by this Court in determining whether the filing is in compliance with 

§ 3-1-805(1)(a)-(c), MCA, and whether a judge shall be assigned to hear the matter. Since 

Williams's filing was unnecessary, she is not entitled to her attomey fees. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to disqualify District Judge John 

C. Brown from Gallatin County Cause No. DR-12-60C is DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Co-Petitioner Brandi Williarns's request for 

attorney fees is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to the Clerk of the District 

Court of Gallatin County for notification to parties in Cause No. 

DR-12-60C, and to the Honorable John C. Brown. 

DATED thik72a6A day of September, 2022. 

( Chief Justice 

2
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23
                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Central Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (333-71165) of Central Bancorp, Inc. of our report, dated April 26,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Central Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiary as of March 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2000, which report is
incorporated by reference in the March 31, 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Central Bancorp, Inc.

                                                       /s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
June 27, 2000
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1698 

Recognizing the myriad contributions of female ambassadors and members 

of the Foreign Service to help build a more free, prosperous, and secure 

world. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Ms. WATSON, Mr. 

HOLT, Mr. CARNAHAN, and Ms. BALDWIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the myriad contributions of female ambassadors 

and members of the Foreign Service to help build a 

more free, prosperous, and secure world. 

Whereas women have risen to the highest levels of leadership 

in the Department of State since they were allowed into 

the United States diplomatic corps in 1922; 

Whereas gender diversity among international leaders contributes to a more comprehensive and versatile approach 

to conflict resolution; 

Whereas the responsibilities of peacemaking and peacekeeping cannot be left to one gender, institution, or political party; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1698 IH 

Whereas women in these positions frequently choose to bring 

attention to important issues including poverty, discrimination, education, and health; and 

Whereas women diplomats furthermore have a unique opportunity to highlight the potential for women to be the 

agents of the socioeconomic change that is necessary for 

lasting peace: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the myriad contributions of female ambassadors and 

3 members of the Foreign Service to help build a more free, 

4 prosperous, and secure world. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS