alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

The Board of Directors
GenVec, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-55590, No. 333-55586, and No. 333-55584) on Form S-8 of GenVec, Inc.
of our report dated March 1, 2001, relating to the balance sheets of GenVec,
Inc., and the related statements of operations and comprehensive loss,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000
annual report on Form 10-K of GenVec, Inc.



McLean, Virginia
March 29, 2001
David Anthony FERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. DAIMLER AG, fka DaimlerChrysler, A.G., et al.

No. 16-1482

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
II-00992

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

William O’Hearn <williamohearn@optonline.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:22 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

William O’Hearn

4 Wanaque Terrace

Ringwood, NJ 07456
David FIERRO, petitioner, v. William MUNIZ, Warden.

No. 17-7725.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Abraham WALKER-COUVERTIER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7852.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
Pierce Carson, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.



|Date: February 8, 2011 | By:
      /s/ W. Pierce Carson                        
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                       | W. Pierce Carson,                                     
|                       | Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Director and
|                       | Principal
      Accounting Officer                    

---
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 362 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with 

respect to functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 362 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Emergency 

3 Leadership Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO ASSISTANT SECRE5 TARIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 203 of 

7 the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 7133(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

9 new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(12) Energy emergency and energy security 

11 functions, including— 

12 ‘‘(A) responsibilities with respect to infra13 structure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, sup14 ply, and emergency planning, coordination, re15 sponse, and restoration; and 

16 ‘‘(B) upon request of a State, local, or 

17 tribal government or energy sector entity, and 

18 in consultation with other Federal agencies as 

19 appropriate, provision of technical assistance, 

20 support, and response capabilities with respect 

21 to energy security threats, risks, and inci22 dents.’’. 

23 (b) COORDINATION.—The Secretary of Energy shall 

24 ensure that the functions of the Secretary described in sec25 tion 203(a)(12) of the Department of Energy OrganizaVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:10 Oct 01, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H362.RFS H362

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 362 RFS

1 tion Act (as added by this Act) are performed in coordina2 tion with relevant Federal agencies. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
OLIVER, Supt., Cambridge, et al., v. Audrey McDANIELS.

No. 17-682 (R46-023) / OT 2017.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
# C_2009082EN.01002102.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/21

---

Appeal brought on 16 February 2009 by Georgios Karatzoglou against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) delivered on 2 December 2008 in Case T-471/04 Georgios Karatzoglou v European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR)

(Case C-68/09 P)

(2009/C 82/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Georgios Karatzoglou (represented by: S. A. Pappas, dikigoros)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR)

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the appealed decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the appealed decision;

| — | Cancel the contested decision of the appointing authority; |
| --- | --- |

—

Cancel the contested decision of the appointing authority;

| — | Order the Defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that in holding that dismissals of temporary staff do not require reasoning the Court of First Instance disregarded recent case law of the Court of Justice, infringed international law and infringed art. 253 of the EC Treaty, which imposes a general obligation to give reasons.

The appellant also submits that the CFI was wrong in declaring that he had not presented evidence capable of establishing the existence of a misuse of powers. He also contests the finding of the CFI that there was no breach of the principle of sound administration.

---
II-00869

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Erin Clermont <erinclermont@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:30 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK6! SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Erin Clermont

227 Waverly Place, 5-D

New York, NY 10014
II-00790

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

M C Kubiak <m.c.kubiak@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:21 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

M C Kubiak

43 Whites P1

Bloomington, IL 61701
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34702-34703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16353]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby give of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-4(02)S.
    Date: July 13, 2001.
    Time: 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, 1300 Concourse Drive, Linthicum, MD 
21090.
    Contact Person: William E. Elzinga, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 747, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-8895.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-3(01).
    Date: July 17-18, 2001.
    Time: 7:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency, One Metro Center, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Ned Feder, MD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 645, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-4(01).
    Date: August 16-17, 2001.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, 1300 Concourse Drive, Linthicum, MD 
21090.
    Contact Person: William E. Elzinga, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 747, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-8895.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes,

[[Page 34703]]

Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16353 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
Maurice HOPKINS, petitioner, v. Edward SHELDON, Warden.

No. 15-9525.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Isai PEDRAZA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7783.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
II-00656

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Patty Osborne <patty_osborne@sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:53 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Patty Osborne

1198 Dresden Way

San Jose, CA 95129
II-00803

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Bob Thomas <rockthomas@mcsi.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:13 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Bob Thomas

2001 Weaver Rd.

Myrtle Creek, OR 97457
Alvaro VASQUEZ-RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-873.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
1

From: Patent, Lawrence B. [mailto:lawrence.patent@klgates.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 2:19 PM 

To: Josephson, Sarah E; Karpoff, Timothy; Cela, Phyllis J. 

Cc: Barnett, Gary; Burns, Jeffrey P.; Donovan, Eileen A.; Fajfar, Mark; Remmler, Erik F; Jain, Vivek; Kneller, Theodore; 

McCarty, Barry; Sanchez, Peter; Stawick, David; Lourdes Gonzalez; Cindy Oh; Page, Karishma S. 

Subject: The Church Alliance Follow Up to Meeting on September 9 at CFTC 

 

Dear Sarah, Tim, and Phyllis: 

On behalf of the Church Alliance, I would like to thank you and your colleagues for meeting with me, Andy Hendren, and 

Karishma Page on September 9, 2011. We appreciated the opportunity to discuss with you the unique issues impacting 

church plans. 

In follow up to our discussion, please find attached two items. First, attached is a document that discusses a possible rule 

that would allow for church plans to opt-in to Special Entity status. Second, attached is a document that provides draft 

language to clarify the status of church plans and that discusses the legal and historical background of church plans. 

Feel free to share with the appropriate individuals. We are also submitting these items in hard copy. 

Please do not hesitate to be in touch with questions or for additional information. Thank you for your consideration and for 

your help in assuring that individuals who dedicate their lives to working for religious institutions are not disadvantaged in 

terms of the treatment of their employee benefits. 

 

Regards, 

 

Larry 

 

Lawrence B. Patent 

K&L Gates LLP 

1601 K Street NW 

Washington, DC 20006-1600 

Phone: 202-778-9219 

Fax: 202-778-9100 

lawrence.patent@klgates.com

www.klgates.com

 

Consider the environment. Think before you print!

 

This electronic message contains information from the law firm of K&L Gates LLP. The contents may be privileged and 

confidential and are intended for the use of the intended addressee(s) only. If you are not an intended addressee, note 

that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact me at lawrence.patent@klgates.com.
Jomo THOMAS, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 17-7334.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Larry Richard BROWN, petitioner, v. Darrell VANNOY, Warden.

No. 15-9464.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Cost-U-Less, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Jeffrey Meder, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:  November 13, 2007


| | /s/ J. Jeffrey Meder
        J. Jeffrey Meder
        President and Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



.


---
Rosa RODRIGUEZ, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Omar Wilfredo Ventura, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF HOUSTON TEXAS.

No. 16-625.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.