alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00212

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rose Lernberg <lernberg@pacbell.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 5:01 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission

Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN 3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler:

Please don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like "commercial risk"; banks that

engage in risky derivatives trading must be mandated to comply with transparency and business conduct requirements.

Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument would open the door for

exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission

Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler:

The CFTC must set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity speculation that serves no

productive purpose. Please define limits that will address not only manipulation, but also excessive speculation, which will

require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury

Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner:

Please do not exempt foreign currency derivatives from the clearing and transparency requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act.

$4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10 trillion in a

decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board, you should decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Rose Lernberg

831 Balra Drive

E1 Cerrito, CA 94530
**CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**
 
 I,J.
      Dan Sifford,
      certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of *GYK
Ventures, Inc.* ;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c)
      presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
      Evaluation Date;
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a)
      all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and
 
 b)
      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and
 
 6. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Dated:
March 30, 2005  by
 
 
 
 
 /s/ J.
Dan Sifford
 J. Dan
Sifford
 Officer/Director
Vanessa RIVERA, petitioner, v. NEW YORK, et al.

No. 15-9421.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 22

- 00077

- CR

__________________

IN RE FABBIAN DONTA SCOTT

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No s . 21

- 36748 & 21

- 36749

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Fabbian Donta Scott asks this Court to compel the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing and rule on a motion to quash
the indictments as a matter of law. Scott complains that the trial court fa iled to “give
an attentive ear [] ” before denying the motion to quash on January 31, 2022. Also,
h e complains of alleged misconduct of the prosecutor. The record before this Court fails to establish that Scott seeks to compel a ministerial act, not involvin g a discretionary or judicial decision, for which he lacks an adequate remedy at law. See State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of2 Appeals at Texarkana , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). We deny the petition for a w rit of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM
Submitted on March 22, 2022 Opinion Delivered March 23, 20 22 Do Not Publish
Before Golemon , C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32851-32852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15318]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION


Printing Plant Tour

AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.

ACTION: Notice of commission visit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Postal Rate Commission members and staff will tour the 
Martinsburg, WV, printing facility of Quebecor World Inc. on Monday, 
June 18, 2001.

DATES: The tour is scheduled for Monday, June 18, 2001, beginning at 11 
a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 
Postal Rate Commission, Suite 300, 1333 H Street NW., Washington, DC 
20268-0001, 202-789-6820.


[[Page 32852]]


    Dated: June 13, 2001.
Steven W. Williams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15318 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
II-00331

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Carol Johnson <montessori_carol@yahoo.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 1:23 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Carol Johnson

s305 section st

Stephenson, MI 64113
CFTC ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MARKETS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

NOVEMBER 7, 2019 

AGENDA

10:00 a.m. Opening Remarks

• Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz 

• Chairman Heath P. Tarbert 

• Commissioner Rostin Behnam 

• Commissioner Dawn D. Stump 

10:30 a.m. Panel I: The Global Energy Transition: Evolving Standards Impacting 

Physical Markets

A primer on the recent evolution of environmental regulation and the increased 

use of biofuels and renewable energy sources. 

 Lead Participants: 

• Tyson T. Slocum, Public Citizen

• Jenny Fordham, Natural Gas Supply Association 

• Sue Kelly, American Public Power Association 

• Vincent Johnson, BP Integrated Supply and Trading 

11:30 a.m. Panel II: Exchange-Traded Environmental Derivatives Contracts

An overview of exchange-traded environmental derivatives. 

 Lead Participants: 

• Daniel Scarbrough, IncubEx 

• Michael Kierstead, Intercontinental Exchange 

• Richard Sandor, Environmental Financial Products, LLC 

12:30 p.m. Lunch

1:30 p.m. Panel III: The Impact of the Global Energy Transition on Market 

Participants’ Use of the Energy and Environmental Derivatives Markets

A panel discussion of the global energy transition’s effect on how market 

participants manage risk using exchange-traded and over-the-counter derivatives. 

 Lead Participants: 

• Matthew Picardi, Commercial Energy Working Group 

• Lopa Parikh, Edison Electric Institute 

• Paul Hughes, Southern Company 

• William F. McCoy, Morgan Stanley 

• Jackie Roberts, Consumer Advocate Division of West Virginia 
2:45 p.m. Closing Remarks

• Commissioner Rostin Behnam 

• Commissioner Dawn D. Stump 

• Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz 

3:00 p.m. Adjourn Meeting
# C_2010317EN.01003102.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2010 — Rosenruist v OHIM (Representation of two curves on a pocket)

(Case T-388/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark representing two curves on a pocket - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2010/C 317/57

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rosenruist — Gestão e serviços, Lda (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Rizzo and S. González Malabia, lawyers)

Applicant:

da

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 June 2009 (Case R 237/2009-2) concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a figurative sign representing two curves on a pocket.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rosenruist — Gestão e serviços, Lda to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rosenruist — Gestão e serviços, Lda to pay the costs.

da

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.

1

---
Trent Scentail SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7523.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Mark Wayne BALLARD, petitioner, v. Marcellus BUCHANAN, et al.

No. 16-6849.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                       525
<INVENTORY>                                     12,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,938
<PP&E>                                          17,936
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,878
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           51,268
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (33,127)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,610
<SALES>                                         11,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,866
<CGS>                                            6,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        96
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (639)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (639)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
Kenneth G. FRANTZ, petitioner, v. PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC.

No. 16-1447.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,683,106
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         100,979
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,865,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,856,050
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         949,813
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           931,675
<LOANS>                                     50,983,637
<ALLOWANCE>                                    359,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,308,755
<DEPOSITS>                                  47,096,059
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            531,922
<LONG-TERM>                                 12,440,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       713,015
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,527,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              65,308,755
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,145,983
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               67,979
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                73,736
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,287,698
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             509,317
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             702,364
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          585,334
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   12,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                567,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,268
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      71,903
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,903
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.1
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.1
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     3.9
<LOANS-NON>                                    127,142
<LOANS-PAST>                                   201,256
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               346,896
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                       540
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              359,436
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
----

----

I Πράξεις για την ισχύ των οποίων απαιτείται δημοσίευση

----

ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΌΣ (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1936/2004 ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΉΣ

της 9ης Νοεμβρίου 2004

για καθορισμό των κατ' αποκοπή τιμών κατά την εισαγωγή για τον καθορισμό της τιμής εισόδου ορισμένων οπωροκηπευτικών

Η ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ ΤΩΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΩΝ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΩΝ,

Έχοντας υπόψη:

τη συνθήκη για την ίδρυση της Ευρωπαϊκής Κοινότητας,

τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 3223/94 της Επιτροπής, της 21ης Δεκεμβρίου 1994, σχετικά με τις λεπτομέρειες εφαρμογής του καθεστώτος κατά την εισαγωγή οπωροκηπευτικών (1), και ιδίως το άρθρο 4 παράγραφος 1,

Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:

ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΑ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟ:

Άρθρο 1

Οι κατ' αποκοπή τιμές κατά την εισαγωγή που αναφέρονται στο άρθρο 4 του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 3223/94 καθορίζονται όπως αναγράφονται στον πίνακα που εμφαίνεται στο παράρτημα.

Άρθρο 2

Ο παρών κανονισμός αρχίζει να ισχύει στις 10 Νoεμβρίου 2004.

Ο παρών κανονισμός είναι δεσμευτικός ως προς όλα τα μέρη του και ισχύει άμεσα σε κάθε κράτος μέλος.

Βρυξέλλες, 9 Νoεμβρίου 2004.

Για την Επιτροπή

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Γενικός Διευθυντής Γεωργίας

----

(1)ΕΕ L 337 της 24.12.1994, σ. 66· κανονισμός όπως τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία από τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1947/2002 (ΕΕ L 299 της 1.11.2002, σ. 17).

----

ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ

του κανονισμού της Επιτροπής, της 9ης Νοεμβρίου 2004, για τον καθορισμό των κατ' αποκοπή τιμών κατά την εισαγωγή για τον καθορισμό τιμών εισόδου ορισμένων οπωροκηπευτικών

----

(1)  Ονοματολογία των χωρών που καθορίζεται από τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2081/2003 της Επιτροπής (ΕΕ L 313 της 28.11.2003, σ. 11). Ο κωδικός «999» αντιπροσωπεύει «άλλες καταγωγές».

----

----

ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΌΣ (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1937/2004 ΤΗΣ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΉΣ

της 9ης Νοεμβρίου 2004

για την τροποποίηση των παραρτημάτων I, II, III και IV του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 44/2001 του Συμβουλίου για τη διεθνή δικαιοδοσία, την αναγνώριση και την εκτέλεση αποφάσεων σε αστικές και εμπορικές υποθέσεις

Η ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ ΤΩΝ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΩΝ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΩΝ,

Έχοντας υπόψη:

τη συνθήκη για την ίδρυση της Ευρωπαϊκής Κοινότητας,

τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 44/2001 του Συμβουλίου, της 22ας Δεκεμβρίου 2000, για τη διεθνή δικαιοδοσία, την αναγνώριση και την εκτέλεση αποφάσεων σε αστικές και εμπορικές υποθέσεις (1), και ιδίως το άρθρο 74,

Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:

ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΑ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟ:

Άρθρο 1

Ο κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 44/2001 τροποποιείται ως εξής:

Άρθρο 2

Ο παρών κανονισμός αρχίζει να ισχύει την έβδομη ημέρα από τη δημοσίευσή του στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.

Ο παρών κανονισμός είναι δεσμευτικός ως προς όλα τα μέρη του και ισχύει άμεσα σε κάθε κράτος μέλος.

Βρυξέλλες, 9 Νοεμβρίου 2004.

Για την Επιτροπή

António VITORINO

Μέλος της Επιτροπής

----

(1)ΕΕ L 12 της 16.1.2001, σ. 1· κανονισμός όπως τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία από την πράξη προσχώρησης του 2003.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10QSB
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         262,786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  754,293
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,144,353
<PP&E>                                         127,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,161,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,380,370
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,449,325
<OTHER-SE>                                   (231,207)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,161,691
<SALES>                                        563,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               563,215
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  527,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.049
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.049
        

</TABLE>
# FCM Data February 2016

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF February 29,&KFF0000 &K0000002016FROM REPORTS FILED BY April 1,&KFF0000 &K0000002016	&P of &N
Marquita BUCHANAN, petitioner, v. TALLAHATCHIE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY.

No. 17-6083.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Mona R. CONWAY.

No. D-2996.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Disbarment order entered.