alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 195 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 195

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         March 4, 2009.
Whereas the Department of Homeland Security was created as a result of the 
        terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, to consolidate our Nation's 
        efforts to prevent, prepare for, protect against, respond to, and 
        mitigate against threats to the homeland, including acts of terrorism, 
        natural disasters, and other emergencies;
Whereas the Department of Homeland Security marks its sixth year of full-scale 
        operations on March 1, 2009;
Whereas more than 223,000 employees of the Department of Homeland Security work 
        diligently to deter, detect, and prevent acts of terrorism and stand 
        ready to respond to a terrorist attack, natural disaster, or other 
        emergency;
Whereas the employees of the Department of Homeland Security are dedicated 
        individuals who rarely receive the recognition they deserve;
Whereas the employees of the Department of Homeland Security work tirelessly to 
        protect our Nation, frequently working long hours and sacrificing time 
        with their loved ones;
Whereas the employees of the Department of Homeland Security support the 
        Department's mission to secure the borders, protect critical 
        infrastructure, share information, facilitate safe and lawful travel and 
        trade, and work with States and localities to enhance preparedness;
Whereas the employees of the Department of Homeland Security deserve the best in 
        training and resources to accomplish their vital mission;
Whereas the United States has not been attacked since September 11, 2001, and 
        this is due in large part to the dedicated service of the employees of 
        the Department of Homeland Security; and
Whereas the Nation owes a debt of gratitude to the employees of the Department 
        of Homeland Security for their continued and steadfast efforts to secure 
        the homeland: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes and honors the 
employees of the Department of Homeland Security on its sixth anniversary for 
their continuous efforts to keep the Nation safe.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Pierce Carson, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.



|Date: November 16, 2007 | By: /s/ Pierce
      Carson                 
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                        | Pierce Carson                               
|                        | Chief Executive Officer, President, Director
|                        | and Principal Accounting Officer            

---
# C_2013063EN.01001801.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2013 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-46/09) (1)

1

(EAGGF - ‘Guarantee’ Section - Expenditure excluded from financing - Processing of citrus fruits, cotton, beef and olive oil - Financial audit - Key checks - Proportionality - Recurrence - Obligation to state reasons)

2013/C 63/34

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: V. Kontolaimos, I. Chalkias, S. Charitaki and S. Papaïoannou, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Markoulli and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, acting as Agents, assisted by N. Korogiannakis)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/960/EC of 8 December 2008 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) (OJ 2008 L 340, p. 99), in so far as it excludes from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of Management and Budget a request for review of an existing information collection. The regulations describe how former spouses give us written notice of a court order requiring us to pay benefits to the former spouse. Specific information is needed before OPM can make court-ordered benefit payments.

Approximately 19,000 former spouses apply for benefits based on court orders annually. We estimate it takes approximately 30 minutes to collect the information. The annual burden is 9,500 hours.

Comments are particularly invited on:

—Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of OPM, and whether it will have practical utility;

—Whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and

—Ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through use of the appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, or E-mail to mbtoomey@opm.gov.

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 60 calendar days from the date of this publication.

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to—Ronald W. Melton, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3349A, Washington, DC 20415-3450.

# FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION—CONTACT:

Donna G. Lease, Team Leader, Forms Analysis and Design, Budget and Administrative Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Steven R. Cohen,

Acting Director.

[FR Doc. 01-15828 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-50-P
Sergio ROBLES, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-7167.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
# C_2009312EN.01004001.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/40

---

Action brought on 29 October 2009 — TTNB v OHIM — March (Tila March)

(Case T-443/09)

2009/C 312/66

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TTNB SARL (represented by: J.-M.Moiroux, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Juan Carmen March (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 August 2009 in Case R 1538/2008-2 and authorise the registration of the mark applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 August 2009 in Case R 1538/2008-2 and authorise the registration of the mark applied for;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Tamara Taichman, the applicant’s predecessor

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Tila March’ for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25 — application No 5 402 722

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Carmen March Juan

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the Spanish word mark ‘CARMEN MARCH’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 18, 24, 25, 35 and 38. The opposition was brought against registration of the goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: annulment of the decision of the opposition division

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting marks.

Pleas in law:

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2001-46]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption 
part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice 
contains a summary of certain petitions seeking relief from specified 
requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to improve the 
public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA's 
regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the 
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before July 19, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any petition to the Docket Management 
System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket 
number FAA-2000-XXXX at the beginning of your comments. If you wish to 
receive confirmation that FAA received your comments, include a self-
addressed, stamped postcard.
    You may also submit comments through the Internet to http://dms.dot.gov. You may review the public docket containing the petition, 
any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the 
Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on 
the plaza level of the NASSIF Building at the Department of 
Transportation at the above address. Also, you may review public 
dockets on the Internet at 
http://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Forest Rawls (202) 267-8033, Sandy 
Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267-7271, or Vanessa Wilkins (202) 267-8029, 
Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 25, 2001.
Michael Chase,
Acting Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2001-8723.
    Petitioner: Astral Aviation, Inc. dba Skyway Airlines, The Midwest 
Express Connection.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 119.21(a)(3).
    Description of Relief Sought: To permit Skyway to conduct 
supplemental operations under domestic operating rules, within the 
territory of the United States and within certain limits outside the 
United States.

[FR Doc. 01-16314 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Alvin THOMAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6330.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2014175EN.01004301.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/43

---

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — Val’hor v Commission

(Case T-306/09) (1)

1

((State aid - Framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented - Financing by voluntary levies made compulsory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the common market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 175/58

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Val’hor (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Ledoux and B. Néouze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, subsequently by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, and finally by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final of 10 December 2008 concerning State aid No 561/2008, on the framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

1

---
Ted H. GRAUER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-1451.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2012379EN.01002102.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2012 — Astrim and Elyo Italia v Commission

(Case T-216/09) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Maintenances services for air conditioning, heating and ventilation systems - Ispra Joint Research Centre - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Interpretation of a condition laid down in the contract specifications - Duty to state reasons)

2012/C 379/36

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Astrim SpA (Rome, Italy) and Elyo Italia Srl (Sesto San Giovanni, Italy) (represented by: M. Brugnoletti and M. Civello, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by N. Bambara and E. Manhaeve, then E. Manhaeve and F. Moro, Agents, and D. Gullo, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the Commission Decision of 27 March 2009 rejecting the bid submitted by the applicants in connection with the call for tenders published on 25 October 2008 by the Commission for the award of routine and non-routine maintenance services for air conditioning, heating and ventilation systems at the Ispra Joint Research Centre (OJ 2008/S 208-274999), and, in the alternative, an application for partial annulment of point 17 of the invitation to tender.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Astrim SpA and Elyo Italia Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Astrim SpA and Elyo Italia Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
# C_2012355EN.01002102.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Producteurs de légumes de France v Commission

(Case T-328/09) (1)

1

(State aid - Fruit and vegetable sector - ‘Contingency plans’ aimed at supporting the fruit and vegetable market in France - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market - Legitimate expectation - Material error in the calculation of the amounts to be recovered)

2012/C 355/43

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Producteurs de légumes de France (Paris, France) (represented: by initially O. Fachin, and subsequently O. Redon, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 203 final of 28 January 2009 on the ‘contingency plans’ in the fruit and vegetable sector implemented by the French Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Producteurs de légumes de France to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Producteurs de légumes de France to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Conforming Amendments to Part 4 Regulations 

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking? 

The proposal would ensure that Part 4 of the Commission’s regulations, which governs the operations and activities 

of commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs), conforms to changes made to the 

Commodity Exchange Act (CEAct) made by the Dodd-Frank Act. 

Just what are these changes that the Dodd-Frank Act made to the CEAct regarding CPOs and 

CTAs? 

The Dodd-Frank Act amended the CEAct by: 

• Including within the definition of the term “commodity pool operator” persons operating collective 

investment vehicles that trade swaps; 

• Including within the definition of the term “commodity trading advisor” persons who provide advice on 

swap transactions; and 

• Adding a definition of the term “commodity pool” to the CEAct, and that new definition includes swap 

transactions. 

Can you give some examples of what sorts of conforming amendments are being proposed? 

The conforming amendments are intended to bring the Part 4 regulations in line with the new definition of the term 

“commodity pool” in the CEAct and the revised definitions of the terms “commodity pool operator” and 

“commodity trading advisor” – each of which refers to involvement with swaps activities and transactions. 

Accordingly, the Commission has proposed: (1) defining the term “commodity interest” in Part 4 to refer to, among 

other instruments, “swaps;” and (2) including within existing disclosure, reporting, recordkeeping and operational 

requirements references to swaps and swap dealers. 

The Commission has proposed other rulemakings in response to the Dodd-Frank Act that could 

affect the Part 4 regulations – such as the “Proposed Amendments to CPO and CTA Compliance 

Obligations.” How does this proposed rulemaking relate to these other Dodd-Frank rulemakings? 

This proposed rulemaking is more in the nature of technical, non-substantive amendments to Part 4. Nonetheless, 

to the extent there are discrepancies among the various proposed rulemakings affecting Part 4, the Commission 

intends to resolve any such discrepancy in the course of finalizing its rulemaking under the Dodd-Frank Act. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080