alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,259,212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,171,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (500,063)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,825,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,159,640
<PP&E>                                      66,707,395
<DEPRECIATION>                             (9,318,194)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             877,320,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,698,686
<BONDS>                                    586,875,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                  98,213,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               877,320,767
<SALES>                                      6,407,302
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           119,112,985
<CGS>                                       13,566,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              131,676,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (4,178,410)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          65,360,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (73,746,023)
<INCOME-TAX>                                28,023,488
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (45,722,535)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (45,722,535)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (457,225)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (457,225)


</TABLE>
# C_2010288EN.01003802.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2010 — Skareby v Commission

(Case T-91/09) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Reports - Career Development Report - 2005 Assessment procedure - Simplified report established for the period from January to September 2005 - Repetition of all the findings in the 2004 Career Development Report partially annulled subsequent to the judgment under appeal)

(2010/C 288/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Carina Skareby (Louvain, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Berschied and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 15 December 2008 in Case F-34/07 Skareby v Commission [2008] ECR II-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets side the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 15 December 2008 in Case F-34/07 Skareby v Commission [2008] ECR I-0000 in so far as the Civil Service Tribunal dismissed the complaint alleging the failure to assess the productivity of Ms Carina Skareby for the period from January to September 2005. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets side the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 15 December 2008 in Case F-34/07 Skareby v Commission [2008] ECR I-0000 in so far as the Civil Service Tribunal dismissed the complaint alleging the failure to assess the productivity of Ms Carina Skareby for the period from January to September 2005.

| 2. | Sets aside the decision of 18 July 2006 establishing Ms Skareby’s Career Evaluation Report for the period from January to September 2005 in so far as it concerns paragraph 6.1 entitled ‘Productivity’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sets aside the decision of 18 July 2006 establishing Ms Skareby’s Career Evaluation Report for the period from January to September 2005 in so far as it concerns paragraph 6.1 entitled ‘Productivity’.

| 3. | Dismisses with respect to the remainder the action brought before the Civil Service Tribunal under case number F-34/07. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses with respect to the remainder the action brought before the Civil Service Tribunal under case number F-34/07.

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to bear all the costs relating to the present proceedings and those before the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to bear all the costs relating to the present proceedings and those before the Civil Service Tribunal.

---

(1)  OJ C 102 of 1.5.2009.

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 22, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0104. BRIAN NIX v. CITY OF GRIFFIN FIRE DEPARTMENT et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

18V382
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of APO Health, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Jan Stahl, Chief
Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to APO Health, Inc. and will be retained by APO Health, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


December 28, 2004                   /S/ Dr. Jan Stahl
                                    -----------------
                                    Dr. Jan Stahl
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Acting Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012025EN.01001502.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Chancery Division (Patents Court) (United Kingdom)) — Georgetown University, University of Rochester, Loyola University of Chicago v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks

(Case C-422/10) (1)

(Medicinal products for human use - Supplementary protection certificate - Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 - Article 3 - Conditions for obtaining a certificate - Concept of a ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ - Criteria - Existence of further or different criteria for a medicinal product comprising more than one active ingredient or for a vaccine against multiple diseases (‘Multi-disease vaccine’ or ‘multivalent vaccine’))

(2012/C 25/24)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Chancery Division (Patents Court) (United Kingdom)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Georgetown University, University of Rochester, Loyola University of Chicago

Defendant: Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) — Interpretation of Article 3(b) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (OJ 2009 L 152, p. 1) — Conditions for obtaining certificate — Whether it is possible to issue a supplementary protection certificate for an active ingredient or combination of active ingredients if that active ingredient or combination of active ingredients is protected by a basic patent in force within the meaning of Article 3(a) of the regulation

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(b) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products must be interpreted as meaning that, provided the other requirements laid down in Article 3 are also met, that provision does not preclude the competent industrial property office of a Member State from granting a supplementary protection certificate for an active ingredient specified in the wording of the claims of the basic patent relied on, where the medicinal product for which the marketing authorisation is submitted in support of the supplementary protection certificate application contains not only that active ingredient but also other active ingredients.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

---
# C_2010234EN.01003702.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/37

---

Order of the General Court of 6 July 2010 — Marcuccio v Court of Justice

(Case T-401/09) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Rejection by the Court of Justice of a request for compensation - Action for damages - Service of an appeal to the applicant’s former representative - Absence of harm - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2010/C 234/67

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: A. Placco, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Firstly, an action for annulment of the alleged rejection by the Court of Justice of the applicant’s request for damages by way of compensation for the damage suffered by the applicant as a result of an alleged irregularity in service on him of an appeal in Case T-20/09 P and, secondly, an action for damages

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs.

| 3. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application of the European Commission for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application of the European Commission for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.

1

---
**Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 March 2012 — Volkswagen v OHIM — Suzuki Motor (SWIFT GTi)**

**(Case T-63/09)**

Community Trade Mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SWIFT GTi — Earlier international and national marks GTI — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Rejection of the opposition

Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
— Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 40-42, 117-118, 127,
131-135)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2008 (Case R 749/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Volkswagen AG and Suzuki Motor Corp. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Volkswagen AG to pay the costs. |
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF William Lee ANDREWS, III.

No. D-3025.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

William Lee Andrews, III, of Roanoke, Virginia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3806 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3806

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit the grounds of 
deportability for certain relatives of members of the Armed Forces and 
                   veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2019

   Mr. Gallego (for himself, Mr. Soto, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Gonzalez of 
   Texas, and Ms. Escobar) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit the grounds of 
deportability for certain relatives of members of the Armed Forces and 
                   veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Immigrant Gold Star and 
Military Families Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITING GROUNDS OF DEPORTABILITY FOR RELATIVES OF MEMBERS OF 
              THE ARMED FORCES AND VETERANS.

    Section 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Alien Relatives of Members of the Armed Forces and 
Veterans.--The provisions of this section shall not apply to an alien 
who--
            ``(1) is--
                    ``(A) the spouse, widow or widower, parent, son or 
                daughter, or sibling of--
                            ``(i) a member of the Armed Forces of the 
                        United States; or
                            ``(ii) a veteran (as that term is defined 
                        in section 101 of title 38, United States 
                        Code); or
                    ``(B) eligible for the Gold Star lapel button under 
                section 1126 of title 10, United States Code; and
            ``(2) has not been convicted of--
                    ``(A) a felony;
                    ``(B) a significant misdemeanor (as such term is 
                defined in section 2 of the Restoring Respect for 
                Immigrant Service in Uniform Act); or
                    ``(C) three or more misdemeanors that are not 
                significant misdemeanors, each of which occurred on a 
                different date, and arose out of separate conduct; and
            ``(3) is not otherwise a threat to national security or 
        public safety.''.
                                 <all>
```
II-00882

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

paul yoder <pmy@valornet.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:22 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

paul yoder

5541 east highway 126

cuba, NM 87013
Chandler P. SMITH, petitioner, v. BOROUGH OF MORRISVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 16-5836.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2014175EN.01004201.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/42

---

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — CNIPT v Commission

(Case T-302/09) (1)

1

((State aid - Framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented - Financing by voluntary levies made compulsory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the common market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 175/57

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Comité national interprofessionnel de la pomme de terre (CNIPT) (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Ledoux and B. Néouze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, subsequently by: B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, and finally by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final of 10 December 2008 concerning State aid No 561/2008, on the framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the recognised French agricultural interprofessional organisations in favour of members of the agricultural sectors represented

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

1

---
Jerome Deon NUNN, petitioner, v. Steve HAMMER, Warden.

No. 17-5960.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
II-00787

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Brad Schmidt <bradleyrschmidt@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:23 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Brad Schmidt

1

Faribault, MN 55021
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rand Worldwide, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 14, 2011 |  | /s/ Marc L. Dulude                   
|                        |  | Marc L. Dulude                       
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Lawrence Rychlak                 
|                        |  | Lawrence Rychlak                     
|                        |  | President and Chief Financial Officer