alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00765

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Peter Hollings <phollings@ipt.org>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:32 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Peter Hollings

2950 Mt Wilkinson Pkwy SE

Atlanta, GA 30339
Gordon Lynn STOCKENAUER, petitioner, v. Tim BALL, Warden, et al.

No. 15-9495.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15973]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1389; MM Docket No. 00-12; RM-9706]


Radio Broadcasting Services; West Rutland, VT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: At the request of Great Casco Bay Wireless Talking Machine 
Limited Liability Company, this document substitutes Channel 298A for 
Channel 298C3 at West Rutland, Vermont, in order to permit Station 
WTHT, Lewiston, Maine, to improve its facilities. See 65 FR 7518, 
published February 16, 2000. The reference coordinates for Channel 298A 
at West Rutland, Vermont, are 43-34-04 and 73-00-30.

DATES: Effective July 23, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order in MM Docket No. 00-12, adopted June 6, 2001, and 
released June 8, 2001. The full text of this decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's 
Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, 
SW, Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio Broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Vermont, is 
amended by removing Channel 298C3 at West Rutland and adding Channel 
298A at West Rutland.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-15973 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Franco CARACCIOLI, petitioner, v. FACEBOOK, INC.

No. 17-7378.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    Pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 
897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether an 
instrument of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which 
the instrument shown below is intended to be used, is being 
manufactured in the United States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the 
regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import 
Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. 
Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 
4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 01-001R. Applicant: St. Louis Science Center, 5050 
Oakland Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110. Instrument: Universal Planetarium, 
Universarium Model IX. Manufacturer: Carl Zeiss, Germany. Intended Use: 
Original notice of this resubmitted application was published in the 
Federal Register of February 8, 2001.

Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 01-16170 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000851726
<NAME>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,493,659
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  507,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,001,245
<PP&E>                                       8,476,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                (65,127)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,412,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,694
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,213,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,412,133
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               538,871
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,242,167
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (703,296)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (703,296)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (703,296)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
# C_2012133EN.01000502.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 March 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt

(Case C-338/10) (1)

1

(Dumping - Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in China - Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 - Validity - Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Article 2(7)(a) - Determination of normal value - Non-market economy country - Commission’s obligation to take due care to determine normal value on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country)

2012/C 133/08

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Hamburg — Validity, in the light of Article 2(7)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 1996 L 56, p. 1), of Commission Regulation (EC) No 642/2008 of 4 July 2008 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2008 L 178, p. 19) and of Council Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 of 18 December 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2008 L 350, p. 35) — Determination of normal value for a country which does not have a market economy — Determination of normal value on the basis of the price actually paid or payable for like products in the European Union — Obligation imposed on the Commission by Article 2(7)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 to take the measures necessary to determine normal value on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market-economy third country.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 of 18 December 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China is invalid.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.

1

---
# C_2009256EN.01003202.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/32

---

Action brought on 25 August 2009 — Häfele v OHIM — Topcom Europe (Topcom)

(Case T-336/09)

2009/C 256/57

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Häfele GmbH & Co. KG (Nagold, Germany) (represented by: J. Dönch, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Topcom Europe NV (Heverlee, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Repeal the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 June 2009 in case R 1500/2008-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Repeal the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 June 2009 in case R 1500/2008-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “Topcom”, for goods in classes 7, 9 and 11

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration of the word mark “TOPCOM” for goods in class 9; Benelux trade mark registration of the word mark “TOPCOM” for goods in class 9.

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal, allowed the opposition and annulled the decision of the Opposition Division

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Council Regulation 40/94 (which became Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 207/2009) as the Board of Appeal wrongly held that there was a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned, due to the fact that the goods in question are not similar nor complementary.

Pleas in law:

---
Harrison WILLIS, petitioner, v. DENTISTS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 17-7152.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
<PAGE>
II-00075

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Susan Shellar <sblue@peoplepc.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 5:50 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Susan Shellar

1950 Osage Lane

Santa Fe, NM 87505
II-00860

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Martin Melkonian <ecomzm@hofstra.edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:38 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Martin Melkonian

763 Goodrich St.

Uniondale, NY 11553
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6325

TITUS MIL-QUIGLESS COTTEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MARVIN POLK, Warden of Central Prison,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:06-hc-02119-H)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Titus Mil-Quigless Cotten, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe

DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Titus Mil-Quigless Cotten seeks to appeal the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice

of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

August 23, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed on February 25,

2008.*

 Because Cotten failed to file a timely notice of appeal or

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2012287EN.01000501.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Chartres — France) — Michel Bourgès-Maunoury, Marie-Louise Heintz, wife of Mr Bourgès-Maunoury v Direction des services fiscaux d’Eure-et-Loir

(Case C-558/10) (1)

1

(Privileges and immunities of the European Communities - Exemption from national taxes on salaries paid by the European Union - Inclusion of income paid by the European Union in the calculation of the cap for wealth tax)

2012/C 287/07

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de grande instance de Chartres

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Michel Bourgès-Maunoury, Marie-Louise Heintz, wife of Mr Bourgès-Maunoury

Applicant:

Defendant: Direction des services fiscaux d’Eure-et-Loir

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de grande instance de Chartres –Interpretation of the second paragraph of Article 13 of Chapter V of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities (OJ 1967, 152, p. 13) — Validity of national legislation providing that the entirety of a taxpayer’s income, including Community income, is to be taken into account in calculating the cap on wealth tax — Exemption from national taxes on remuneration paid by the Communities — Former officials of the European Communities

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The second paragraph of Article 13 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, initially annexed to the Treaty establishing a single Council and a single Commission of the European Communities, and subsequently, under the Amsterdam Treaty, to the EC Treaty must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings which takes account of the income, including the pensions and allowances on termination of service, paid by the European Union to its officials and other staff, or to its former officials and former staff, in calculating the cap on a tax such as the wealth tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 12.2.2011.

1

---
II-00986

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dianne Knowles <dknowles001 @woh.rr.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:24 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dianne Knowles

540 W Dow St

Tipp City, OH 45371