alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Steven Chan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A of CDC Corporation (the “report”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003),Release No. 33-8392 (February 24, 2004) and Release No. 33-8545 (March 2, 2005)];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 11, 2005     /s/ Steven Chan     Steven Chan  Acting Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                   ------------
                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the "Company") on Form
10K-A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Katharine Johnston,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 25, 2010           /s/ Katharine Johnston
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Principal Financial Officer,
                                  Vice-President, Business Operations, Director























                                Exhibit 32.2 - 1
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34003]


The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company--
Construction and Operation Exemption--Seadrift and Kamey, TX

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board conditionally exempts from 
the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10901 the construction and 
operation by The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company of a 
7\1/2\-mile line of railroad between Seadrift and Kamey, TX.

DATES: The exemption will not become effective until the environmental 
review process is completed. Once that process is completed, the Board 
will issue a further decision addressing the environmental matters and 
establishing an exemption effective date at that time, if appropriate. 
Petitions to reopen must be filed by July 9, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 34003, 
to: (1) Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case 
Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001; and (2) 
Erika Z. Jones, Mayer, Brown & Platt, 1909 K Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 565-1600. [TDD for 
the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: Da-To-Da Office Solutions, Room 405, 
1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 293-7776. E-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3276536d665d6d7653727a5d465f535b5e1c515d5f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f9bd98a6ad96a6bd98b9b1968d94989095d79a9694">[email protected]</span></a>. [TDD for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-
8339.]
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: June 12, 2001.
    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Clyburn, and 
Commissioner Burkes.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15432 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Cheryl KIRK, v. INVESCO, LIMITED.

No. 17-762 (R46-020/OT 2017)

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 22, 2018.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Order filed December 9, 2021 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00663-CR

____________

EX PARTE DERIN KEITH MULLER

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 73524-B

ORDER

Appellant is appealing the denial of his application for a writ of habeas 

corpus. On November 17, 2021, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record, which 

did not contain a certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(a)(2), 34.5(a)(12); see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the 

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. Tex. R. 

App. P. 25.2(d); Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613. Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure instructs the trial court to enter a certificate of the defendant’s 

right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order.

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (emphasis added). This includes the entry of an order on 

a defendant’s application for writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Vazquez, No. 3-
19-00885-CR, 2019 WL 6972681 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 20, 2019, no pet.)

(order).

We order the trial court to execute a certification of appellant’s right to 

appeal and direct the trial court clerk to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing the certification with this court within 30 days of the date of this 

order. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2), 37.1, 44.4; Vazquez, 2019 WL 6972681 at 

*1.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
Melissa DAVENPORT, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS, GEORGIA.

No. 17-869.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II-O0150

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Linda Longobardi <lr1928@snet.net>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 3:04 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Linda Longobardi

16 Holmes

Glastonbury, CT 6033
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                COMMUNITY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
             STATEMENT REGARDING: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                                                             March 31,
                                                                                     2000               1999

                                                                                   ----------        ----------
<S>                                                                                <C>               <C>
Basic Income Per Common Share (1)

Net income (in thousands)                                                          $      832        $      805
                                                                                   ==========        ==========

Net income per share                                                               $      .21        $      .19
                                                                                   ==========        ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding                                          3,875,053         4,217,795
                                                                                   ==========        ==========

Diluted Income Per Common Share (2)

Net income (in thousands)                                                          $      832        $      805
                                                                                   ==========        ==========

Net income per share                                                               $      .21        $      .19
                                                                                   ==========        ==========

Weighted average common shares outstanding                                          3,920,275         4,296,416
                                                                                   ==========        ==========
</TABLE>

(1)      Basic net income per share has been computed using the weighted average
         number of common shares outstanding during each period presented.

(2)      Diluted net income per share has been computed using the weighted
         average number of common shares outstanding and the dilutive effect of
         stock options outstanding during the periods presented.



                                      -19-
II-00664

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Stefan Kozinski <kozopreds@t-online.de>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:48 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geitlmer: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Stefan Kozinski

807 E. Matson Run Pkwy.

Wilmington, DE 19802
EXHIBIT 99.2
 
       (a)
    
    SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary
and excessive risks that could threaten the value of Central Bancorp, Inc.;(b)
    
    Employee compensation plans that unnecessarily expose Central
Bancorp, Inc. to risks; and(c)
    
    Employee compensation plans that could encourage the
manipulation of reported earnings of Central Bancorp, Inc. to enhance the
compensation of an employee;




---



##### 



Date:  June 17, 2011
    /s/ Paul S. FeeleyPaul S. FeeleySenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
II-00033

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

steven haselden <stevenaselden@yahoo.com>

Friday, December 10, 2010 10:43 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

steven haselden

32 brown lee st

hemingway, SC 29554
Ricardo Enriquez SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. George ALLEN, et al.

No. 17-7357.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, James H. Tate, as Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the periodending March 31, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

Dated:  May 10, 2004

 
|   | By:    |   | /s/ James H. Tate                            |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |                                         |   |
|   |   |   | James H. Tate                                |   |
|   |   |   | Senior Vice President and                    |   |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                      |   |
|   |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
# C_2011347EN.01000601.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Limoges — France) — Philippe Bonnarde v Agence de Services et de Paiement

(Case C-443/10) (1)

1

(Free movement of goods - Quantitative restrictions - Measures having equivalent effect - Importation, by a person resident in a Member State, of a vehicle already registered in another Member State - Ecological subsidy - Conditions - Registration certificate attesting to the nature of the demonstration vehicle)

2011/C 347/08

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal administratif de Limoges

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Philippe Bonnarde

Applicant:

Defendant: Agence de Services et de Paiement

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal administrative de Limoges — Interpretation of Council Directive 1999/37/EC of 29 April 1999 on the registration documents for vehicles (OJ 1999 L 138, p. 57), amended by Commission Directive 2003/127/EC of 23 December 2003 (OJ 2004 L 10, p. 29) — Importation, by a person resident in France, of a vehicle already registered in another Member State — National legislation making the grant of an environmental subsidy subject to presentation of a registration certificate bearing the statement ‘demonstration vehicle’ — Quantitative restrictions — Measures having equivalent effect

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 34 and 36 TFEU preclude legislation of a Member State from requiring, for the award of the subsidy known as the ‘bonus écologique — Grenelle de l’environnement’ to imported demonstration motor vehicles at the time of registration in that Member State, that the first registration document of those vehicles bear the words ‘demonstration vehicle’.

---

(1)  OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of China Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Holdings, Inc.  By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:June 30, 2008By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:June 30, 2008