alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I,  Sandra J.  Andre,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of Sierra Resource  Group,  Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such
Annual  Report on Form 10-K/A fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of Sierra Resource Group, Inc.


December 24, 2008


                                            By: /s/ SANDRA J. ANDRE
                                                ___________________________
                                                    Sandra J. Andre
                                                    President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer




     I, Paul W. Andre, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of Sierra  Resource  Group,  Inc. for the fiscal year ended  December 31,
2007 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of Sierra Resource Group, Inc.


December 24, 2008


                                            By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                                ___________________________
                                                    Paul W. Andre
                                                    Treasurer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sierra Resource Group,  Inc. and will be retained by Sierra Resource
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
**Exhibit 8.1*****Company Subsidiaries***Novogen Limited is a company limited by shares and is incorporated and domiciled in Australia.Novogen Limited has prepared a consolidated financial report incorporating the entities that itcontrolled during the financial year ended June 30, 2007, which included the following:         *Name of Entity* C*ountry of Incorporation* *Ownership %*Novogen Laboratories Pty Ltd Australia  100 Novogen Research Pty Ltd Australia  100 Central Coast Properties Pty Ltd Australia  100 Phytosearch Pty Ltd Australia  100 Phytogen Pty Ltd Australia  100 Glycotex Pty Ltd Australia  100 Norvogen Pty Ltd Australia  100 Novogen Inc  U.S.A.   100 Glycotex, Inc.  U.S.A.   81.3 Novogen Limited(U.K.)  U.K.   100 Promensil Limited  U.K.   100 Novogen BV Netherlands  100 Novogen New Zealand Limited New Zealand  100 Novogen Canada Limited Canada  100 Marshall Edwards, Inc.  U.S.A.   78.1 Marshall Edwards Pty Limited* Australia  78.1  * Owned indirectly through Marshall Edwards, Inc.At the date of this report, Novogen owns 71.9% of Marshall Edwards, Inc. and Marshall Edwards PtyLimited.
154
Walter Lee ROBERTS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-1132.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, First District denied.
Karl COTTON, aka Karl Cornelius-Cotton, petitioner, v. SUPREME COURT OF the UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-7327.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,595,954
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          19,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,809,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,080
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,809,297
<SALES>                                         92,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,338
<CGS>                                           31,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  441,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (60,091)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (337,896)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (337,896)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (337,896)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
# C_2011186EN.01000402.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris — France) — Prunus SARL, Polonium SA v Directeur des services fiscaux

(Case C-384/09) (1)

1

(Direct taxation - Free movement of capital - Article 64 TFEU - Legal persons established in a non-Member State - Ownership of immovable property located in a Member State - Tax on the market value of that property - Refusal of exemption - Assessment with regard to overseas countries and territories - Combating tax evasion - Joint and several liability)

2011/C 186/07

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de grande instance de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Prunus SARL, Polonium SA

Applicants:

Defendant: Directeur des services fiscaux

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de grande instance (Paris) — Interpretation of Article 56 et seq. of the EC Treaty — Tax on the commercial value of immoveable property situated in France — Compatibility with the Treaty of national legislation exempting from that tax legal persons having their effective centre of management in France or another Member State of the European Union, but making that exemption conditional, as regards legal persons having their effective centre of management in the territory of a non-Member State, on the existence of a convention on administrative assistance to combat tax evasion and avoidance concluded between France and that State or of a treaty containing a clause prohibiting discrimination on grounds of nationality — Refusal to exempt in respect of two companies established in the British Virgin Islands — Obligation for the joint and several debtors, legal persons established in France, to pay the tax

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 64(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that Article 63 TFEU is without prejudice to the application of national legislation in force on 31 December 1993 which exempts from the tax on the market value of immovable property located in the territory of a Member State of the European Union companies having their registered office in the territory of that State and makes entitlement to that exemption, for a company whose registered office is in an overseas country or territory, conditional either on the existence of a convention on administrative assistance to combat tax evasion and avoidance concluded between that Member State and that territory or on there being a requirement, under a treaty containing a clause prohibiting discrimination on grounds of nationality, that those legal persons are not to be taxed more heavily than companies established in the territory of that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1736

ACCESS FOR THE DISABLED, INCORPORATED, a Florida not for 

profit corporation; DENISE PAYNE, Individually,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

PENN MAR ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability 

Company,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District

Judge. (8:09-cv-01365-PJM)

Submitted: October 20, 2011 Decided: November 10, 2011

Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas B. Bacon, Pete M. Monismith, THOMAS B. BACON, PA, Cooper 

City, Florida, for Appellants. Terrence M. McShane, Arthur 

T. K. Norris, LEE & MCSHANE, P.C., Washington, D.C., for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Denise Payne and Access for the Disabled, Inc., appeal

the district court’s orders dismissing their claims arising 

under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 

U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2006), and denying their motion for 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Access for the Disabled, Inc. v. Penn 

Mar Assoc., L.L.C., No. 8:09-cv-01365-PJM (D. Md. May 4, 2010; 

June 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2012025EN.01004502.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/45

---

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 17 October 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-551/09) (1)

(2012/C 25/84)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3341] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated June 19, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to reopen the incident period for this disaster as beginning on March 23, 2001 and continuing. 

All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is July 15, 2001 and for economic injury the deadline is February 15, 2002. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: June 21, 2001. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 01-16283 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Terrance Montreal JENKINS, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 17-7760.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.
# C_2012049EN.01000502.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Italy) — Enel Produzione SpA v Autorità per l’energia elettrica e il gas

(Case C-242/10) (1)

1

(Directive 2003/54/EC - Internal market in electricity - Electricity generating installations essential to the operation of the electricity system - Obligation to submit tenders on the national electricity exchange market in accordance with the limits and criteria laid down by the electricity transmission and distribution system operator - Dispatching and balancing service - Public service obligations)

2012/C 49/09

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Enel Produzione SpA

Applicant:

Defendant: Autorità per l’energia elettrica e il gas

Defendant:

Intervener: Terna rete elettrica nazionale SpA

Intervener:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Interpretation of Articles 23 EC, 43 EC, 49 EC and 56 EC and Article 11(2) and (6) and Article 24 of Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC (OJ 2003 L 176, p. 37) — National legislation requiring electricity producers, when submitting bids for the supply of electricity, to comply with rules laid down by the company responsible for the management of the electricity transmission and distribution grid

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC and, in particular, Article 3(2) and Article 11(2) and (6) of that directive must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, for the purposes of reducing the price of electricity in the interests of the end consumer and of ensuring the security of the electricity system, imposes on operators which own installations or groups of installations which are considered, on the basis of the criteria laid down by the national regulatory authority, to be essential in order to meet the requirements of the demand for electricity of dispatching services, the obligation to submit bids on the national electricity markets in accordance with conditions pre-determined by that authority, provided that that legislation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to attain the objective which it pursues. It is for the national court to ascertain whether that condition is met in the case before it.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.

1

---
Gregory HOVER, petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 15-9377.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
Exhibit 10.3


 


CB Pharma Acquisition Corp.


3 Columbus Circle, 15th Floor


New York, New York 10019


Attention: Lindsay A. Rosenwald


 


EJF Opportunities, LLC


Stephen B. Pudles


Jose M. Aldeanueva


Jeffrey J. Gutovich Profit Sharing Plan


Barry Rodgers 


 


Dear Sirs:


 


Pursuant to that certain Registration Rights Agreement (the
“RRA”), dated as of December 12, 2014, by and among CB Pharma Acquisition Corp., a Cayman Islands company (the
“Company”), and the respective undersigned parties (each, individually, a “Shareholder”,
and collectively, the “Shareholders”), the Company has granted the Shareholders certain registration rights
(the “Registration Rights”) with respect to the ordinary shares of the Company (the “Insider Shares”)
purchased by the Shareholders from the Company prior to the Company’s initial public offering.


 


The Shareholders have executed an agreement (the “Transfer
Agreement”) of even date herewith pursuant to which the Shareholders have transferred the Insider Shares, for aggregate
consideration of $1.00, to EJF Opportunities, LLC, Stephen B. Pudles, Jose M. Aldeanueva, Jeffrey J. Gutovich Profit Sharing Plan
and Barry Rodgers  (the “Investors”), in the amounts identified in Schedule A.  In connection
with the transfer of the Insider Shares, the Shareholders desire to assign their Registration Rights with respect to the Insider
Shares to the Investors in accordance with Section 6.2 of the RRA, and the Company has agreed to consent to such assignment. Accordingly,
the Shareholders’ Registration Rights with respect to such securities shall be assigned to the Investors as of the date hereof.  The
Shareholders shall maintain their Registration Rights with respect to any other securities of the Company not transferred to the
Investors pursuant to the Transfer Agreement.  


 


[Remainder
of page intentionally left blank; signature page to follow.]


 




     


     


    

 


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	SHAREHOLDERS:	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Lindsay A. Rosenwald	 
	 	Fortress Biotech, Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Adam J. Chill	 
	 	Adam J. Chill	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Arthur A. Kornlbuth	 
	 	Arthur A. Kornlbuth	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Neil Herskowitz	 
	 	Neil Herskowitz	 


 


The undersigned acknowledges and consents to the foregoing terms.


 


COMPANY:


 


CB PHARMA ACQUISITION CORP.


 


	By:	/s/ Lindsay A. Rosenwald	 
	 	Name: Lindsay A. Rosenwald	 
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer	 


 


[Signature Page - Registration Rights Assignment
Letter]


 




     


     


    

 


Schedule A


 


	Name of Shareholder     	 	Escrow Shares being

Transferred	 	Transferee
	 	 	 	 	 
	Fortress Biotech, Inc.	 	520,000	 	EJF Opportunities, LLC
	 	 	 	 	 
	Fortress Biotech, Inc.	 	260,000	 	Stephen B. Pudles
	 	 	 	 	 
	Fortress Biotech, Inc.	 	130,000	 	Jose M. Aldeanueva
	 	 	 	 	 
	Fortress Biotech, Inc.	 	110,000	 	Jeffrey J. Gutovich Profit Sharing Plan
	 	 	 	 	 
	Adam J. Chill	 	10,000	 	Jeffrey J. Gutovich Profit Sharing Plan
	 	 	 	 	 
	Arthur A. Kornbluth	 	10,000	 	Jeffrey J. Gutovich Profit Sharing Plan
	 	 	 	 	 
	Neil Herskowitz	 	10,000	 	Barry Rodgers
Exhibit 3.3
 ****
 ****
 **ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT** **TO THE** **ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION**
  
    Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Business Corporation Act, the undersigned corporation adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:
  FIRST; The name of the corporation is Anything Internet Corporation
  SECOND: The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was adopted on November 1 4, 2OOO , as prescribed by the Colorado Business Corporation Act, in the manner marked with an X below:
  No Shares have been Issued or Directors Elected - Action by Incorporators.
  No shares have been issued but Directors Elected - Action by Directors.
  Such amendment was adopted by the board of directors where shares have been issued and shareholder action was not required.
 xSuch amendment was adopted by a vote of the shareholders. The number of shares voted for the amendment was sufficient for approval.
  .
  THIRD: If changing corporate name, the new name of the corporation is I nform Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
 
 FOURTH; The manner, if not set forth in such amendment, in which any exchange, reclassification, or cancellation of issued shares provided for in the amendment shall be effected, is as follows:
  If these amendments are to have a delayed effective date, please list that date:
 (Not to exceed ninety (90) days from the date of filing)
 ****Date: November 14, 2000
By:
/s/ Larry G. ArnoldLarry G. ArnoldTitle: President
---

Exhibit 10.2

SECOND AMENDMENT to the 
Employment Agreement executed November 9, 1999 between Dobson West and Eagle Pacific Industries, Inc.

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into effective as of August 20, 2001, by and between Dobson West (the Employee) and PW
Eagle, Inc., f/n/a Eagle Pacific Industries, Inc. (Eagle).

WHEREAS, Employee and Eagle are parties to
that certain Employment Agreement executed November 9, 1999, as amended December 15, 1999 (the Agreement).

WHEREAS, the parties mutually desire to amend the Agreement effective August 20, 2001 to take into account the resolutions adopted by Eagles
Board of Directors at its meeting on such date.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual
agreements hereinafter contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:

| | 1. | The term of the Agreement as referenced in Section 1 shall be through December 31, 2004.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                         
| | 2. | Except as amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.          

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement effective as of the date first written above.

|PW EAGLE, INC.                |  |                 
|----------------------------- |  | ----------------
|(the Company)               |  |                 
|                              |  |                 
|                              |  |                 
|By:  /s/William H. Spell      |  | /s/Dobson West  
|Its:  Chief Executive Officer |  | (the Employee)
|                              |  |                 

|                             
|-----------------------------
|                             
|[RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS]
|
Exhibit 31.1
 Principal Executive Officers Certifications
 Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC; and
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.
 Date: May 3, 2010
    
    /s/ Matthew K. Rose

Matthew K. RoseChairman, President andChief Executive Officer