alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,739, TA-W-38,739A]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 30, 2001, applicable to workers of Allison Manufacturing Company, Albermarle, North Carolina. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 2, 2001 (66 FR 22006).                

At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in providing corporate administrative functions to support the production of children's apparel. The company reports that worker separations have occurred at a second administrative office located in New York, New York. The New York, New York location provides administrative functions, including executive, art design and sales services, to the subject firm's production facilities.

                    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to included workers of Allison Manufacturing Company, New York, New York.                          ( print page 34258)    

The intent of the Department's certification is to include all workers of Allison Manufacturing Company adversely affect by increased imports.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-38,729 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Allison Manufacturing Company, Albermarle, North Carolina (TA-W-739) and New York, New York (TA-W-38,739A) who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 14, 2000 through March 30, 2003, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of June, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-16161  Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
II-O0112

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Cathy Pittman <avpittman@yahoo.com>

Sunday, December 5, 2010 11:47 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Cathy Pittman

177 Newman Rd.

Kalama, WA 98525
John T. CHISHOLM, et al., petitioners, v. TWO UNNAMED PETITIONERS, et al.

No. 15-1416.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Motion of Center for Media and Democracy, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.
Joe Anthony GUERRA, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Jose Alberto Guerra, Deceased, et al., petitioners, v. Frank BELLINO.

No. 17-722.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Juliette FAIRLEY, petitioner, v. Mauricette FAIRLEY, et al.

No. 17-7005.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 3.1.2

                                   RESOLUTION:

                 AUTHORIZE APPOINTMENT OF ADDITIONAL OFFICER (S)

Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board of Directors of PowerSource
Corporation unanimously adopted the following resolution:

RESOLVE, that Roman Gordon be appointed Secretary of PowerSource Corporation,
and shall held two office position, Chairman and Secretary.

Roman Gordon shall have the authority to perform such duties in the management
of the corporation as may be required by Articles of Incorporation, the bylaws
or by resolution of the Board of Directors of the corporation.

The undersigned hereby certifies that he/she is the duly elected and qualified
Secretary and the custodian of the books and records and seal of PowerSource, a
corporation duly formed pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada, and that
the foregoing is a true record of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of
Board of Directors, and that said meeting was held in accordance with state law
and the bylaws of the above-named Corporation on, and that said resolution is
now in full force and effect without modification or rescission.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed my name as Secretary and have hereunto
affixed the corporate seal of the above-named Corporation this 1st day of July
2000.

A True Record


/s/ Roman Gordon
--------------------------------
BY: Roman Gordon, Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Scott Long, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 12, 2004



/s/ Scott LongScott LongChief Financial Officer
1. WSPP Electronic Writing 

WSPP Agreement Definitions 

Documentary Writing: A document which is physically delivered by courier or U.S. 

mail, or a copy of which is transmitted by telefacsimile or other electronic means. 

Electronic Writing: 

(1) Recorded oral conversation; or 

(2) electronic communications, including but not limited to e-mail, if the 

Parties to the transaction use such method to create an electronic writing 

for the Confirmation for such transaction and, except with respect to email, specifically agree to the method of electronic communication. 

Electronic Writings shall not include the transmittal of a copy of a document by 

electronic means, which is considered a Documentary Writing. 

32.5 The Parties agree not to contest, or assert any defense with respect to, the 

validity or enforceability of any agreement to the terms concerning a specific 

transaction, on the basis that documentation of such terms fails to comply with the 

requirements of any statute that agreements be written or signed. Each Party 

consents to the recording by the other Party, without any further notice, of telephone 

conversations between representatives of the Parties, which contain agreements to or 

discussion concerning the tenns of a specific transaction. All such recordings may be 

introduced and admitted into evidence for the purpose of proving agreements to terms, 

and any objection to such introduction or admission for such purpose is hereby expressly 

waived. 

2. Volume bookouts 

3. Existing "bookout" language 

Bookout: A transaction where: 

(a) (i) prior to the time performance is to commence under a Confirmation, 

the Parties enter into a second (substitute) transaction for the purpose of 

fulfilling their respective obligations under that Confirmation by offset 

rather than physical delivery, or 

(ii) after non-performance under a Confirmation, the Patties enter into a 

second (substitute) transaction for the purpose of finally settling losses 

incurred by the Performing Party due to non-performance of such 

Confirmation; and 

(b) the second transaction, under either (i) or (ii), was performed. 

Section 21.3(e) 

In the event a Bookout occurs to resolve anticipated or actual non-performance of 

a transaction, then no damages shall be calculated or due under § 21.3(a) with 

respect to the non-performed transaction. Neither Patty shall be required to enter 

into a Bookout.
MOUNT LEMMON FIRE DISTRICT, petitioner, v. John GUIDO, et al.

No. 17-587.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
H. Res. 1783 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 22, 2010. 

Resolved, That section 3(b) of House Resolution 1757, 

agreed to December 15, 2010, is amended by striking paragraph (1) and redesignating paragraphs (2) through (5) as 

paragraphs (1) through (4). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Larry GRANT, petitioner, v. Tom BENNETT, et al.

No. 17-940.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.
Wanda E. SMITH-JETER, petitioner, v. ARTSPACE EVERETT LOFTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION.

No. 17-7794.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 22-0001
IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: BENJAMIN MARTIN,

Co-Petitioner, and BRANDI WILLIAMS,

Co-Petitioner. 

## SEP 2 2 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Benjamin Martin, representing himself, has filed an affidavit in support of his request to disqualify the Honorable John C. Brown from presiding in Cause No. DR-12-60C in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, pursuant to § 3-1-805, MCA. Section 3-1-805,MCA, providesthat an affidavit for disqualification for causemust allege facts showing personal bias or prejudice of the presiding judge. Section 3-1- 805(1)(c), MCA, provides in part that an affidavit that does not allege facts showing personalbias orprejudicemaybe setaside asvoid. Martin'saffidavitmakesnoallegations ofbias or prejudice on the part ofJudge Brown, only asserting that Martin did not attend a hearing because of illness, Judge Brown later attempted to reschedule the hearing, and Martin sent Judge Brown a "notice ofintent to sue" but has not actually filed suit against Judge Brown. Since Martin's affidavit offers nothing that demonstrates personal bias or prejudice on the part of Judge Brown, Martin has not satisfied the requirements of § 3-1-805, MCA, and it is therefore unnecessary to appoint ajudge to hear this matter. In addition to Martin's filing, this Court has further received a Notice to Montana Supreme Court ofMotion to Disqualify for Cause from Judge Brown and a Response to Motion for Disqualification of Judge Biown filed by counsel for Brandi Williams, Co09/22/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0001Petitioner in the District Court matter. Williams's filing, in addition to arguing against

disqualification, requests attorney fees for the preparation of the response. Under § 3-1-805(1),MCA,when aparty filesan affidavitin supportofadisqualification forcause ofa presidingjudge, "suchjudge shall proceed no further in the cause,"but shall refer the matter to this Court. Thus, responsive filings are neither contemplated by the statute nor are they relied upon by this Court in determining whether the filing is in compliance with § 3-1-805(1)(a)-(c),MCA, andwhether ajudge shall be assigned to hearthe matter. Since Williams's filing was unnecessary, she is not entitled to her attomey fees. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to disqualify District Judge John C.Brown from Gallatin County CauseNo. DR-12-60C is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Co-Petitioner Brandi Williarns's request for attorney fees is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to the Clerk of the District Court of Gallatin County for notification to parties in Cause No. DR-12-60C, and to the Honorable John C. Brown. DATED thik

7 2a6 Aday ofSeptember, 2022.

( ChiefJustice

2
# C_2009312EN.01001901.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht lodged on 2 October 2009 — Joao Filipe da Silva Martins v Bank Betriebskrankenkasse — Pflegekasse

(Case C-388/09)

2009/C 312/31

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundessozialgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Joao Filipe da Silva Martins

Applicant:

Defendant: Bank Betriebskrankenkasse — Pflegekasse

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is it compatible with the primary and/or secondary law of the European Community on freedom of movement and social security for migrant workers (in particular Articles 39 and 42 EC and Articles 27 and 28 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1)) for a former worker who receives pensions from both his former State of employment and his home State and acquired an entitlement to care allowance in his former State of employment because he is reliant on care to forfeit the entitlement to care allowance after returning to his home State?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2

1

---
<Page>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of dELiA*s Corp.: (a) Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-90435), (b)
Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-53670), (c) Form S-3 (Registration No.
333-36300) (d) Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-91837), (e) Form S-3
(Registration No. 333-54430), and (f) Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-83508)
of our report dated March 11, 2002 (except for the last paragraph of Note 10,
as to which the date is April 26, 2002), with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of dELiA*s Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year
ended February 2, 2002.

                                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
May 2, 2002
Adam TITUS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-7439.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Kacey LEWIS, petitioner, v. Thomas CAVANUGH, et al.

No. 17-7311.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
1

CFTC Energy & Environmental 

Markets

Advisory Committee Meeting

Timothy J. Burke

President and CEO 

Omaha Public Power District
3

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I)

Community Company 

Clarity

Connection Capacity
4

DE&I Community Activity

• CODE: Community Opportunity for Diversity and Equity

̶ CEOs for CODE (quarterly conversation on DE&I)

̶ 280+ We Will Campaign (CEOs and managing partners)

̶ Annual CODE Conference in October 2020

̶ Lead Diversity (Chamber Leadership Academy)

̶ Omaha 2040 Priority

• Empowerment network 

̶ Community Scorecard

̶ Redefine the Game Leadership Development
5

Company Clarity on DE&I

• OPPD Board of Directors Resolution on Racism and DE&I

• Strategic Directive – 8 Employee Relations

• June 2020 Leader Huddles on Racism

̶ Leadership discussion

̶ Community leaders of color participation and discussion

̶ Corporate Town Hall on Racism sponsored by the OPPD African American Network

• Employee Resource Groups

African American Network

Society of Engineers Pride

Young Professionals Group Latino Society

People of the World *Upcoming Parent Group

Veterans’ Network Women’s Network
6

Connection to DE&I Initiatives

Gatherings & Roundtables

• For professionals of color and 

women

• 82 employees have 

participated to date

White Men as Full Diversity 

Partners

• Labs & roundtables

• 47 white, male leaders have 

attended

• Key to creating inclusive work 

environments

Courageous Conversations

• All employee town hall

• Diversity allies

• Employee development 

opportunities
7

Capacity Building for the Future

Building capacity & capability for the future

Inroads Interns

• Targets college-level students

Legacy I3 Initiative

• Started in 2017

• Targets juniors and seniors in high school

• 20-25 students per year

• Personal development boot camp 

• Assigned an ambassador

• Career exploration

• 3 full-time employees to date (two call center employees and a line technician)
8

Thank You for the Opportunity
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40137 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROSARIO FELIX-TERRAZAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-776-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rosario Felix-Terrazas (Felix) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. He raises a constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) and also argues that the district court plainly erred in requiring him to submit to DNA testing as a condition of his supervised release. Felix’s appeal waiver is unenforceable because the magistrate judge advised him at his rearraignment hearing that he could appeal an illegal sentence. See, e.g., United States v. Robinson , 187 F.3dNo. 05-40137 -2- 516, 517-18 (5th Cir. 1999). We need not decide the applicability of the sentencing waiver in the plea agreement because the appellate issues are foreclosed. Felix’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Felix contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Felix properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Felix’s supervised release claim is not ripe for review and is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu , 428 F.3d 1100, 1101 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662)

. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
# C_2011311EN.01004102.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Omnicare v OHIM — Astellas Pharma (OMNICARE CLINICAL RESEARCH)

(Case T-289/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark OMNICARE CLINICAL RESEARCH - Earlier national figurative mark OMNICARE - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the services - Genuine use of the earlier mark)

2011/C 311/74

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Omnicare, Inc. (Covington, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Astellas Pharma GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Gutiérrez Martínez, H. Granado Carpenter and M. Polo Carreño, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 May 2009 (Case R 401/2008-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Yamanouchi Pharma GmbH and Omnicare, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Omnicare, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Omnicare, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

1

---