Filed 12/16/20 P. v. Nevarez CA2/8

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions 

not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion 

has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CAMILO ILARIO NEVAREZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

B304837

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. VA150215)

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los 

Angeles County, Michael A. Cowell, Judge. Affirmed.

Susan L. Ferguson, under appointment by the Court of 

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

——————————
2

We review this appeal pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 

25 Cal.3d 436.

On April 10, 2019, Camilo Ilario Nevarez was charged with 

one count of multiple identifying information theft in violation of 

Penal Code section 530.5, subdivision (c)(3), and one count of 

possession of a smoking device in violation of Health and Safety 

Code section 11364. It was further alleged Nevarez had suffered 

several prior convictions for which a prison term was served as 

described in Penal Code section 667.5.1

On August 13, 2019, Nevarez completed a felony 

advisement of rights, waiver, and plea form in which he indicated 

he intended to plead no contest to information theft. In exchange 

for his plea, the People agreed to dismiss the remaining count 

and allegations. Nevarez agreed to be placed on probation for 

three years and to enter a one-year residential drug treatment 

program at the Salvation Army as a condition of probation.

On August 13, 2019, Nevarez entered a no contest plea and 

was so sentenced. On September 20, 2019, the court was advised 

defendant had not entered the drug treatment program or any 

other program and had failed to report thereafter to probation. 

The court preliminarily revoked defendant’s probation and issued 

a warrant for his arrest.

On February 11, 2020, Nevarez appeared with counsel in 

court. At Nevarez’s request, the court gave an indicated sentence 

of two years. Nevarez accepted the court’s indicated sentence, 

orally waived his rights, and admitted violating probation. The 

court found Nevarez in violation of probation and sentenced him 

1 All further undesignated statutory references are to the 

Penal Code.
3

to the midterm of two years in the county jail with total custody 

credits of 251 days. 

On February 11, 2020, the court granted Nevarez a 

certificate of probable cause.

On May 18, 2020, we appointed counsel to represent 

Nevarez on appeal. After examining the record, counsel filed an 

opening brief raising no issues and asking this court to review 

the record independently as required by People v. Wende. On 

October 19, 2020, counsel sent a letter to Nevarez at an address 

on Levelside Avenue in Lakewood, California informing him of 

his right to file a supplemental brief. On October 19, 2020, we 

advised Nevarez he had 30 days within which to personally 

submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. To 

date, we have received no response.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that 

Nevarez’s counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and 

that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 

106, 109–110; People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)

DISPOSITION

The order is affirmed. 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

STRATTON, J.

We concur:

BIGELOW, P. J. WILEY, J.