alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael TISIUS, petitioner, v. MISSOURI.

No. 17-6938.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
# C_2010288EN.01007101.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/71

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Roumimper v European Police Office (Europol)

(Case F-41/09) (1)

(Public service - Europol staff - Non-renewal of a contract - Contract for an indefinite period - Article 6 Europol Staff Regulation - Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

(2010/C 288/132)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Jacques Pierre Roumimper (Zoetermeer, Netherlands) (represented initially by P. de Casparis, lawyer, and subsequently by W.J. Dammingh and N.D. Dane, lawyers)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D. Neumann and D. El Khoury Agents, and B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer him a permanent post and the decision of 7 January 2009 dismissing the complaint against the first decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to award a contract for an indefinite period to Mr Roumimper; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to award a contract for an indefinite period to Mr Roumimper;

| 2. | Orders Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Europol to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 1.8.09, p. 63.

---
II-00413

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ruth A. Fox, M.D. <YoMammaMD@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:36 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ruth A. Fox, M.D.

226 Monarch Bay

Dana Point, CA 92629
# C_2009113EN.01004701.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/47

---

Action brought on 9 March 2009 — De Benedetti-Dagnoni v Council

(Case F-21/09)

2009/C 113/99

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rosangela De Benedetti-Dagnoni (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, of the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the appointing authority’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the appointing authority’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2008 promotion procedure and, so far as necessary, the decisions to promote less deserving officials to that grade;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4034

_____________________________

LEONARD AYERS III,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Robert E. Long, Judge.

October 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee; and Leonard Ayers III, pro se, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30095 Conference Calendar

VIRGIL A. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus REBECCA DOHERTY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE; WILLIE LEDET; MR. RUSHEN, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-2221

- - - - - - - - - - August 18, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Virgil A. Harris, federal prisoner #08940-035, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). He argues that his due process rights were violated because he was forced to sign a legal document before his admission to a halfway house as a special condition of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find noNo. -2- reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Naresh C. ARORA, et ux., petitioners, v. Captain JAMES, et al.

No. 17-758.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
In Re Frederick WEBSTER, petitioner.

No. 17-7906.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34155-34156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 061501A]


Marine Mammals; File No. 1000-1617

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Whitlow W.L. Au, University of 
Hawaii, Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, Marine Mammal Research 
Program, PO Box 1106, Kailua, Hawaii 96734, has been issued a permit to 
take several species of small cetaceans for purposes of scientific 
research.

DATES: Written or telefaxed comments must be received on or before July 
27, 2001.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; 
phone (301) 713-2289; fax (301) 713-0376; and
    Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long 
Beach, CA 90802-4213; phone (562) 980-4001; fax (562) 980-4018;
    Protected Species Coordinator, Pacific Area Office, NMFS, 1601 
Kapiolani Blvd., Room 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814-

[[Page 34156]]

4700; phone (808)973-2935; fax (808) 973-2941.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynne Barre or Trevor Spradlin, (301) 
713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 12, 2001, notice was published in 
the Federal Register ( 66. FR 18904) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to take several species of small cetaceans around 
Hawaii, California and on the high seas had been submitted by the 
above-named individual. The requested permit has been issued under the 
authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the Regulations Governing the Taking and 
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216).

    Dated: June 22, 2001.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 01-16174 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
EXHIBIT 21
 Life Time Fitness, Inc.
List of Subsidiaries
 Name
    
    State or Province of FormationLTF Club Operations Company, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaBloomingdale LIFE TIME Fitness, L.L.C.
    
    IllinoisFCA Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Operations Holdings, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaFCA Construction Company, LLC
    
    DelawareFCA Restaurant Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Minnetonka Restaurant Company, LLC
    
    DelawareFCA Construction Company Canada Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaLife Time Fitness Financial, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Financial & Insurance, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Triathlon Series, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Club Management Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF TIAA Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Michigan Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Minnesota Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF USA Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Company, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaLTF CMBS I, LLC (99%)
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Company Canada Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaLTF CMBS Managing Member, Inc.
    
    DelawareLTF CMBS I, LLC (1%)
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate VRDN I, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Voyager I, LLC
    
    DelawareNon-profit corporation: Life Time Fitness Foundation
    
    Minnesota
 NOTES:
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of the Principal Executive and Financial Officers of

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (the Company) for the year ended December 31,
2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Lorenzo H. Zambrano, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Fernando A. González, as Executive Vice President of Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
periods set forth therein.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                                                                                   
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ Lorenzo H. Zambrano                                                           
|Name:  |  | Lorenzo H. Zambrano                                                               
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer                                                           
|Date:  |  | April 23, 2013                                                                    
|       | 
|       |  | /s/ Fernando A. González                                                          
|Name:  |  | Fernando A. González                                                              
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
|Date:  |  | April 23, 2013                                                                    

This certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and accompanies the Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Determination Under Section 405(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, Concerning the Socialist Republic of 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                    Pursuant to the authority vested in me under the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2431*et seq.*) (the “Trade Act”), I determine, pursuant to section 405(a) of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2435(a)), that the “Agreement Between the United States of America and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on Trade Relations” will promote the purposes of the Trade Act and is in the national interest.                

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 01-16445

Billing code 4710-10-M
# C_2010024EN.01008201.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/82

---

Action brought on 20 November 2009 — Whitehead v European Central Bank

(Case F-98/09)

2010/C 24/157

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sarah Whitehead (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi, M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

An appeal against the decision dated 8 January 2009 awarding the applicant a salary increase of 2 points for the purpose of the Annual Salary and Bonus Review (ASBR) for the year 2008, received on 15 January 2009, as well as against the salary statement of 15 January 2009 implementing this decision.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claim that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Central Bank dated 8 January 2009 on the Appellant's ASBR 2008, served upon her on 13 or 14 January 2009 (during her absence); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Central Bank dated 8 January 2009 on the Appellant's ASBR 2008, served upon her on 13 or 14 January 2009 (during her absence);

| — | annul the Appellant's salary statement of 15 January 2009, implementing this decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Appellant's salary statement of 15 January 2009, implementing this decision;

| — | as a consequence, order the payment of the amount of her salary representing the difference between the challenged 2008 ASBR and the ASBR which should have been granted to her, as of 15 January 2009 until complete payment, plus late interest at the rate equal to the margin lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points; |
| --- | --- |

—

as a consequence, order the payment of the amount of her salary representing the difference between the challenged 2008 ASBR and the ASBR which should have been granted to her, as of 15 January 2009 until complete payment, plus late interest at the rate equal to the margin lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

| — | in the case that the organisation of a new 2008 ASBR procedure would be found to entail excessive difficulties, order the award of the equivalent of 3 salary points to compensate the material prejudice; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the case that the organisation of a new 2008 ASBR procedure would be found to entail excessive difficulties, order the award of the equivalent of 3 salary points to compensate the material prejudice;

| — | in any case, order the compensation of the moral prejudice suffered evaluated ex aequo et bono at EUR 10 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

in any case, order the compensation of the moral prejudice suffered evaluated ex aequo et bono at EUR 10 000;

| — | order that the European Central Bank pays all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the European Central Bank pays all the costs.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3646 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3646

     To direct the Secretary of Transportation, acting through the 
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, to revise section 
  91.145 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, such that the term 
``sporting'' does not limit the types of major events described in such 
                                section.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2019

 Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Burchett, Mr. John W. Rose of 
Tennessee, and Mr. Kustoff of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To direct the Secretary of Transportation, acting through the 
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, to revise section 
  91.145 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, such that the term 
``sporting'' does not limit the types of major events described in such 
                                section.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stadiums Operating under New 
Guidance Act'' or the ``SONG Act''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF SECTION 91.145 OF TITLE 14, CODE OF FEDERAL 
              REGULATIONS.

    Not later than one year after the enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Transportation, acting through the Administrator of the 
Federal Aviation Administration, shall revise section 91.145 of title 
14, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation), such 
that the term ``sporting'' does not limit the types of major events 
described in such section.
                                 <all>
```
1144.

#### Murray *v.*The State.

Accusation of receiving stolen goods, from city court of Macon— Judge Hodges. March 14, 1908.

Submitted June 9,

Decided June 18, 1908.

*Nottingham & McClellan,*for plaintiff in error.

*William Brunson, solicitor-general,*contra.

Powell, J.

In a prosecution for receiving stolen goods, proof of guilty knowledge on the part of the defendant in receiving the goods is an essential to a lawful conviction. There is a fatal lack of proof of the scienter in the present case. See *Sanford*v. *State,*ante, 449.

*Judgment reversed.*
Domingo HERNANDEZ-VILLEDA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6042.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         356,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  189,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                    153,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               688,000
<PP&E>                                         773,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 476,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,543,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          271,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,241,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,543,000
<SALES>                                        579,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               579,000
<CGS>                                          382,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  382,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               514,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (317,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (317,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (317,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 7, 2015

Nos. 04-13-00099-CV, 04-13-00100-CV,

and 04-13-00101-CV

EX PARTE Sean C. MCNAMARA

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 121073B, 121074B, and 121075B

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 This court issued its mandate in these appeals on June 4, 2014. On December 30, 2014, 

Sean C. McNamara asked this court to issue an order pertaining to his appeal.

This court’s plenary power in appeals 04-13-00099-CV, 04-13-00100-CV, and 04-13-

00101-CV has expired; this court no longer has jurisdiction in these appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P.

19.1 (plenary power period); id. 19.3 (“After its plenary power expires, the court cannot vacate 

or modify its judgment.”).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court