alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Victor Manuel BLANCAS-ROSAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9558.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2011186EN.01002102.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Álava and Others v OHIM (TXAKOLI)

(Case T-341/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community collective verbal mark TXAKOLI - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 66(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2011/C 186/39

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Álava (Amurrio, Spain); Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Bizkaia (Leioa, Spain); and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Getaria (Getaria, Spain) (represented by: J. Grimau Muñoz and J. Villamor Muguerza, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 June 2009 (Case R 197/2009-2), concerning an application for the registration of the word sign TXAKOLI as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Álava, Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Bizkaia and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Getaria are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Álava, Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Bizkaia and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Getaria are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

1

---
# C_2009205EN.01004401.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/44

---

Action brought on 26 June 2009 — Wilo SE v OHIM (shape of a motor casing)

(Case T-253/09)

2009/C 205/80

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wilo SE (Dortmund, Germany) (represented by G. Braun)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 March 2009 in Case R 1184/2008-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 March 2009 in Case R 1184/2008-1;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: a three-dimensional mark representing the casing of a motor of a heating pump, for goods in Classes 7 and 11 (Application No 5 805 692)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (CE) No 207/2009 (1))as the mark applied for has the requisite distinctive character

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
II-00625

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Peter Roche <sunmtnsft@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:19 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Peter Roche

2916-C Avenida Alamosa

Santa Fe, NM 87507
September 11 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DEER PARK CONSTRUCTI ON ASSOCIATION, INC. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00578

- CV V.

CRANE EQUIPMENT & SE RVICE, INC., DBA GAF FEY, A DIVISION OF

COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORPORATION , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard the parties joint motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on April 27, 2012. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
CHICAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, et al., petitioners, v. SCHAL BOVIS, INC.

No. 16-690.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,758,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,937,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   395,000
<INVENTORY>                                 68,698,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           119,683,000
<PP&E>                                     146,321,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              77,913,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             423,315,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       69,620,000
<BONDS>                                    508,875,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (237,205,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               423,315,000
<SALES>                                    173,392,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           173,392,000
<CGS>                                      101,774,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              101,774,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,823,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               105,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          23,039,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             21,720,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,388,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         19,332,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                19,332,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                5
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           2,058,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,055,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,828,000
<INVENTORY>                                     59,577,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,851,000
<PP&E>                                          91,464,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,495,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,329,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,388,000
<BONDS>                                         30,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            80,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,539,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,329,000
<SALES>                                        284,965,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284,965,000
<CGS>                                          197,816,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  197,816,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,428,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (110,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,633,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,635,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,711,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,924,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,924,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                         3.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.54



</TABLE>
Glendal RHOTON, petitioner, v. Richard BROWN, Superintendent, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility.

No. 17-6070.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of China Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Holdings, Inc.  By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:June 30, 2008By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:June 30, 2008
Michael Wayne EGGERS, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 17-8105 (17A970).

Supreme Court of the United States

March 15, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
James A. BRENSON, Jr., petitioner, v. Dave MARQUIS, Warden.

No. 16-9342.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Albert ESTRADA, petitioner, v. Neil McDOWELL, Warden.

No. 16-6892.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2014194EN.01001902.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2014 — Dunamenti Erőmű v Commission

(Case T-179/09) (1)

1

((State aid - Aid awarded by the Hungarian authorities to certain electricity generators - Power purchase agreements concluded between a public undertaking and certain electricity generators - Decision declaring the State aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Concept of State aid - Advantage - New aid - Operating aid - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty))

2014/C 194/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dunamenti Erőmű Zrt. (Százhalombatta, Hungary) (represented by: initially J. Lever QC, A. Nourry, R. Griffith and S. Spence, Solicitors, and subsequently J. Philippe and F.-H. Boret, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and K. Talabér-Ritz, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for, in essence, the annulment of Commission Decision 2009/609/EC of 4 June 2008 on the State aid C 41/05 awarded by Hungary through Power Purchase Agreements (OJ 2009 L 225, p. 53) and, in the alternative, the annulment of Articles 2 and 5 of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dunamenti Erőmű Zrt. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dunamenti Erőmű Zrt. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
Jesus HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-7354.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
##### 



Exhibit 99.01

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Niku Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joshua Pickus, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                        
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                                |  |                         |  |               
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------
|Signature                       |  | Title                   |  | Date          
|                                |  |                         |  |               
|                                |  |                         |  |               
|/s/ Joshua Pickus
Joshua Pickus |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | August 6, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Niku Corporation and will be retained by Niku Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Kenneth M. Schwartz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of K&F Industries, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  KENNETH    M. SCHWARTZ    Kenneth M. Schwartz    President and Chief Executive Officer     Date: August 14, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

16875 

Vol. 72, No. 65 

Thursday, April 5, 2007 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency 

12 CFR Part 40 

[Docket ID OCC–2007–0003] 

RIN 1557–AC80 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

12 CFR Part 216 

[Docket No. R–1280] 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

12 CFR Part 332 

RIN 3064–AD16 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Thrift Supervision 

12 CFR Part 573 

[Docket ID OTS–2007–0005] 

RIN 1550–AC12 

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION 

ADMINISTRATION 

12 CFR Part 716 

RIN 3133–AC84 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

16 CFR Part 313 

[Project No. 034815] 

RIN 3084–AA94 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

17 CFR Part 160 

RIN 3038–AC04 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

17 CFR Part 248 

[Release Nos. 34–55497, IA–2598, IC–27755; 

File No. S7–09–07] 

RIN 3235–AJ06 

Interagency Proposal for Model 

Privacy Form Under the Gramm– 

Leach–Bliley Act 

Correction 

In proposed rule document 07–1476 

beginning on page 14939 in the issue of 

Thursday, March 29, 2007, make the 

following corrections: 

On pages 14948, 14963, 14968, 14973, 

14978, 14983, 14988, 14993 and 14998, 

the corrected ‘‘Model Privacy Form, p. 

3 of 3’’ appears as follows: 

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with CORRECTIONS

16876 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 65 / Thursday, April 5, 2007 / Corrections 

[FR Doc. C7–1476 Filed 4–5–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with CORRECTIONS


EP29MR07.031</GPH>
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR the ADVANCEMENT OF MULTIJURISDICTION PRACTICE, et al., petitioners, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, et al.

No. 16-404.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.