alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.02

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Annual Report of AvStar Aviation Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes  Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

April  15,  2011                                 By:  /s/  Robert  Wilson
                                                      -------------------
                                                 Robert  Wilson,
                                                 Chief  Financial  Officer
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of iTrackr Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, I, John Rizzo, Chief Executive Officer of iTrackr Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.  Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of iTrackr Systems, Inc.




Dated: May 5, 2011
By:
/s/John RizzoJohn RizzoChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Peter Yip, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of chinadotcomcorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRuler 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 7, 2004     /s/ Peter Yip   Peter Yip Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

February 1, 2008

135650 & (3)(4)

In re:
Anonymous Judge.

________________ _______________ __________/ Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices SC: 135650

On order of the Court, the motions to s eal the file and mainta in confidentiality and for immediate consideration are GRANTED. The petition for interim suspen sion without pay is considered, and it is DENIED.

p0130 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 1, 2008

Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 17, 2009 

p0610 

Order 

 

June 17, 2009 

137871 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137871 

 COA: 274171 

Wayne CC: 06-004417-01 

LEANDER PHILLIP TAYLOR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 23, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00906

- CV

AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

Noela DE LOS SANTOS , Individually and as n ext friend of Kimberly A. Ruiz,

Appellee s

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 06

- 11

- 45222

- CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the m otion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of December, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Frank LOCASCIO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7780.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1658/2004

of 22 September 2004         

determining the extent to which applications lodged in September 2004 for import licences for certain pigmeat products under the regime provided for by the Agreements concluded by the Community with the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1898/97 of 29 September 1997 laying down detailed rules for the application in the pigmeat sector of the arrangements provided for by the Agreements concluded by the Community with the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Hungary (1), and in particular Article 4(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 October to 31 December 2004 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1898/97 shall be met as referred to in Annex I.

2.   For the period 1 January to 31 March 2005, applications may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1898/97 for import licences for a total quantity as referred to in Annex II.

3.   Licences may only be used for products which comply with all veterinary rules currently in force in the Community.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 267, 30.9.1997, p. 58. Regualtion as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 333/2004 (OJ L 60, 27.2.2004, p. 12).

----

ANNEX I

----

ANNEX II

----
II-00717

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David McFarland <mcfarlandloans@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:06 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David McFarland

1063 Grant Ct.

Sonoma, CA 95476
II-00698

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Bennett <michael.bennett@einstein.yu.edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:22 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Bennett

629 Pinebrook

New Rochelle, NY 10804
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

# Meeting Date and Time:

Friday, July 13, 2001; Time 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Luckenbach Mill, Historic Bethlehem Industrial Quarters, 459 Old York Road, Bethlehem, PA 18018.

The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting and promoting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 100-692, November 18, 1988 and extended through Public Law 105-355, November 13, 1998.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 10 E. Church Street, Room A-208, Bethlehem, PA 18018, (610) 861-9345.

Dated: June 25, 2001.

C. Allen Sachse,

Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-16395  Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20861-20862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07612]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question 
whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the 
BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than April 
25, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Brent B. Hassell, Assistant 
Vice President) P.O. Box 27622, Richmond, Virginia 23261. Comments can 
also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2e1cdcfcfc7ccd6d18cc3d2d2cecbc1c3d6cbcdccd1e2d0cbc1ca8cc4d0c08ccdd0c5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1f2dedcdcd4dfc5c29fd0c1c1ddd8d2d0c5d8dedfc2f1c3d8d2d99fd7c3d39fdec3d6">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Harbor Bankshares Corporation, Baltimore Maryland; through its 
subsidiaries Harbor Bankshares Capital Corporation and Harbor 
Bankshares Asset Management, LLC, both of Baltimore, Maryland, to 
engage in

[[Page 20862]]

extending credit and servicing loans and community development 
activities pursuant to sections 225.28(b)(1) and (b)(12) of the Board's 
Regulation Y, respectively.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 5, 2022.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-07612 Filed 4-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Stacia CROMARTIE, petitioner, v. The LAW OFFICE OF E. PEYTON FAULK, et al.

No. 17-7547.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama denied.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 2, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-2191

Lower Tribunal No. 13-13632

________________

Jose Andres Raffo,

Appellant,

vs.

Monica M. Menendez,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby 

Cynamon, Judge.

Law Offices of Alfaro & Fernandez, P.A., and Elbert Alfaro, for 

appellant.

Law Offices of Gonzalez & Associates, LLC, and Alexis Gonzalez, for 

appellee.

Before EMAS, SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See § 61.13(3), Fla. Stat. (2022) (providing that a trial court 

may modify a parenting plan upon a showing of a substantial, material and 

unanticipated change in circumstances, and modification is in the best 

interests of the child); George v. Lull, 181 So. 3d 538, 540 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2015) (“[T]he petitioning party has the extraordinary burden to prove the 

substantial change in circumstances.”); Ezra v. Ezra, 299 So. 3d at 466, 468-

69 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020 (recognizing that the standard of review for modifying 

a parenting plan is abuse of discretion and concluding that “the decision [of 

the trial court] to afford the mother the sole parental responsibility for 

educational and medical needs of the children is well-supported by 

competent, substantial evidence.”).
Organization: 

Rabobank Nederland 

Rulemakings: 

Entity Definitions; Entity Registration; Internal Business Conduct Standards; Swap Reporting; 

Real-time Public Reporting 

Summary: 

On April 11, 2011, CFTC staff met with representatives from Rabobank Nederland 

(“Rabobank”) and their attorneys at Davis Polk & Wardell LLP (“Davis Polk”) to discuss issues 

relating to the implementation of Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and the extra-territorial 

application of the CFTC’s regulations to foreign banks. Rabobank and Davis Polk requested the 

meeting as a follow up to a letter dated February 17, 2011, which Rabobank co-signed and 

submitted to the CFTC, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Board of Governors 

of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) along with 11 other foreign banks in 

response to several rulemaking proposals under Title VII. 

During the meeting, Rabobank and its attorneys asked the CFTC to allow foreign banks 

(particularly European-based banks) to continue to book their global swap transactions using a 

centralized booking model (i.e., booking swaps through a non-U.S. branch of a foreign bank) in a 

manner that does not subject them to various regulatory requirements under Title VII. In that 

way, Rabobank asked the CFTC to recognize a comparability framework for certain regulatory 

requirements that apply to swap dealers at the entity level (such as capital, margin, and internal 

business conduct standards) and transaction-level requirements that regulate the activities of 

particular swap transactions. Under their proposed framework, Title VII would apply to a foreign 

bank in a way that relies on home country prudential regulation in the case of entity-level rules. 

In the case of transaction-level rules, Rabobank proposed that Title VII would apply to a foreign 

bank based on the identity of the counterparty to the swap transaction. Finally, this framework 

would give foreign banks the ability to delegate specific activity-based compliance obligations 

under Title VII to U.S.-based branches of the foreign bank; although, the foreign bank would 

maintain ultimate responsibility for compliance. 

Rabobank acknowledged that European lawmakers would not likely pass final legislation 

regulating swaps and swap activities for at least 15 months. As a result, Rabobank asked the 

CFTC in the short-term to deem a foreign bank’s home country prudential regulation as being 

comparable to the CFTC’s entity-level rules. Thus, if the Federal Reserve has granted a 

favorable comparability determination to a home country’s prudential regulatory regime, the 

CFTC similarly should recognize such regime in implementing Title VII. 

CFTC Staff: 
Dan Berkowitz 

Ananda Radhakrishnan 

Terry Arbit 

Warren Gorlick 

Mark Fajfar 

Carl Kennedy 

Carlene Kim 

Aaron Miller 

Visitors: 

David Dietz (Rabobank) 

Wenchi Hu (Rabobank) 

Arthur Long (Davis Polk) 

Bill Mansfield (Rabobank) 

Courtenay Myers (Davis Polk) 

Lenny Schwartz (Davis Polk) 

Angelique Slag (Rabobank) 

Justin Sliney (Rabobank)