alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00099

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Barbara Krings <bkr1052757@aol.com>

Sunday, December 5, 2010 8:12 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Barbara Krings

3939 Walnut Ave., #206

Carmichael, CA 95609
II-01074

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dennis Feichtinger <djfeich@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:27 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dennis Feichtinger

2711 Riverside

Trenton, MI 48183
In Re Allen F. CALTON, petitioner.

No. 17-7886.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# C_2009167EN.01001901.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/19

---

Action brought on 25 May 2009 — TerreStar Europe v Commission

(Case T-196/09)

2009/C 167/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TerreStar Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Olofsson, lawyer, J. Killick, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs;

| — | take such other of further steps as justice may require. |
| --- | --- |

—

take such other of further steps as justice may require.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the present case, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 3746 final/2 of 13 May 2009, regarding selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) adopted in application of the Decision No 626/2008/EC (1) in so far as it rejects the application of the applicant.

1

In support of its claims, the applicant puts forward three pleas in law.

First, it submits that the Commission committed a manifest error of assessment in finding that TerreStar did not meet the required milestones. The applicant claims that the inconsistencies between the information and a lack of evidence in completion of one of the milestone as found by the Commission were due to a misunderstanding of the information submitted and could have been cleared up on a simple request by the Commission.

Second, the applicant contends that the Commission acted in breach of the principle of good administration and the principle of proportionality by failing to request clarification and to review the clarifications voluntarily submitted by TerreStar.

Third, in the alternative, the applicant claims that the contested decision lacks adequate reasoning.

---

(1)  Decision No 626/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2008 on the selection and authorisation of systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (OJ 2008 L 172, p. 15)

1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50281 

c/w No. 10-50282

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE RAMOS-OCHOA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-139-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Ramos-Ochoa (Ramos) appeals the 12-month sentence he received

following the revocation of his supervised release. Ramos argues that the

revocation sentence was unreasonable because the district court ordered it to

run consecutively to sentences imposed for convictions of attempted illegal

reentry and making a false claim of citizenship.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 10-50281 

c/w No. 10-50282

2

We have yet to determine whether sentences imposed upon revocation of

supervised release are to be reviewed under the “unreasonableness” standard of

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Prior to Booker, we applied a

“plainly unreasonable” standard. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114,

119-20 (5th Cir. 2005). However, we need not decide the correct standard today

because Ramos’s revocation sentence is appropriate under either standard. See

id. at 120.

“The district court has the discretion to order that a sentence imposed

upon the revocation of supervised release run concurrently with or consecutively

to other sentences.” United States v. Whitelaw, 580 F.3d 256, 260 (5th Cir.

2009). The district court’s decision to run the revocation sentence consecutive

to the sentences on the underlying charges was authorized by statute and is

preferred under the sentencing guidelines policy statements. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3584; U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.3(f) & comment. (n.4).

Additionally, the sentencing transcript reflects that the district court at least

implicitly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when imposing Ramos’s

revocation sentence. See United States v. Gonzales, 250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir.

2001). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2013225EN.01008204.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/82

---

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2013 — Trasys v Commission

(Case T-277/09) (1)

1

2013/C 225/185

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33902-33903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15977]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 01-1390; MM Docket No. 01-6; RM-10009]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Steubenville, OH and Burgettstown, 
PA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document reallots Channel 278B from Steubenville, Ohio, 
to Burgettstown, Pennsylvania, and modifies the license for Station 
WOGH(FM) to specify operation on Channel 278B at Burgettstown, 
Pennsylvania, in response to a petition filed by Keymarket Licenses, 
LLC. See 66 FR 7872, January 26, 2001. The coordinates for Channel 278B 
at Burgettstown are 40-20-32 and 80-37-14.

DATES: Effective July 23, 2001.

[[Page 33903]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 01-6, adopted May 30, 2001, and released June 
8, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's 
Reference Center, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete 
text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 
857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.


    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Ohio, is 
amended by removing Steubenville, Channel 278B.

    3. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under 
Pennsylvania, is amended by adding Burgettstown, Channel 278B.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-15977 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09

- 12

- 00 467

- CV



### _________________

TERRY SOZANSKI

, TRUSTEE

, Appellant

V.

ERNEST ROGER CLEMMENSEN, HIGHLAND CAPITAL LENDING, INC.

AND ALL OTHER PARTIES SHARING IN THE INTEREST OF HIGHLAND

CAPITAL LENDING, INC. , Appellee s

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 9th District Court Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10

- 01

- 00205

- CV

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court signed the judgment on June 1, 2012 , and the appellate timetables

were not extended by the filing of a post

- judgment motion within thirty days of

judgment

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1; Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a). Notice of appeal was due to

be filed on J uly 2, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant filed notice of appeal on

September 28, 2012 , more than thirty days from the dat e of judgment and outside the

time for which we may grant an extension of time to perfect a regular appeal. See Tex. R.2

App. P. 26.1; Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. On October 11, 2012 , we notified the parties that the

appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant amended his notice of appeal to show that

he was pursuing a restricted appeal

. See Tex. R. App. P. 30. No response has been filed.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ DAVID GAULTNEY

Justice

Opinion Delivered November 15, 2012

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
# C_2009167EN.01001702.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/17

---

Action brought on 13 May 2009 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Performing Science (5 HTP)

(Case T-190/09)

2009/C 167/34

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Longevity Health Products, Inc (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Performing Science LLC

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | Declare the appeal of Longevity Health Products, Inc admissible, |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the appeal of Longevity Health Products, Inc admissible,

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 21 April 2009 and dismiss the application by Performing Science LLC that Community trade mark No 002846483 — ‘5 HTP’ be declared invalid, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 21 April 2009 and dismiss the application by Performing Science LLC that Community trade mark No 002846483 — ‘5 HTP’ be declared invalid, and

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the word mark ‘5 HTP’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 16 and 35 (Community trade mark No 2 846 483).

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Longevity Health Products, Inc.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Performing Science LLC.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application for declaration of invalidity of the trade mark concerned partially granted.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the applicant’s appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1).

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
Juan Aurelio SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-9323.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-00848

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Bill Holt <bill.holt@netzero.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:47 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Bill Holt

7407 Scenic Brook Dr.

Austin, TX 78736
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, Publication Grants.                    

*Date:*                         August 2-3, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         August 2, 2001, 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites, Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Rd., Wisconsin at Western Ave., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Time:*                         August 3, 2001, 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites, Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Rd., Wisconsin at Western Ave., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Merlyn M Rodrigues, MD, Medical Officer/SRA, National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, 6705 rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20894.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 20, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-16341  Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
II-00479

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Roger Yandell <RogerYandell@msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:42 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Roger Yandell

1407 N. Center Ave.

Shawnee, OK 74801
Christian F. MUMME, et ux., petitioners, v. SOUTHPORT SPRINGS PARK, LLC, dba Southport Springs.

No. 16-266.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries

The following is a list of the significant subsidiaries of CEMEX, S.A.B. de
C.V. as of December 31, 2008, including the name of each subsidiary and its country of incorporation:



|                                          |  |              
|----------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|Cemex México, S.A de C.V.                 |  | Mexico       
|                                          | 
|Cemex Construction Materials Florida LLC. |  | United States
|                                          | 
|Cemex Materials LLC.                      |  | United States
|                                          | 
|Cemex Inc.                                |  | United States
|                                          | 
|Cemex España, S.A.                        |  | Spain        
|                                          | 
|Cemex Concretos, S.A. de C.V.             |  | Mexico       
|                                          | 
|Cemex Colombia, S.A.                      |  | Colombia     
|                                          | 
|Assiut Cement Company                     |  | Egypt        
|                                          | 
|Cemex Australia Pty Ltd.                  |  | Australia    



1