alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than January 19, 2001. 

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                    (Phillip Jackson, Applications Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

*1.  Lyle P. Campbell,*                     Downers Grove, Illinois, Craig L. Campbell, Danville, Illinois, and Thomas E. Malone and Verna C. Malone, Scottsdale, Arizona; to acquire voting shares of Terrapin Bancorp, Inc., Elizabeth, Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Elizabeth State Bank, Elizabeth, Illinois.                

**B.  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                    (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                

*1.  Kevin J. Kavanaugh,*                    Lawrenceville, Illinois; to acquire voting shares of HBancorporation, Inc., Lawrenceville, Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Heritage National Bank, Lawrenceville, Illinois.                
      ( print page 798)    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 28, 2000.

Jennifer J. Johnson

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-158 Filed 1-3-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# C_2009297EN.01002901.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/29

---

Action brought on 6 October 2009 — Ernst August Prinz von Hannover Herzog zu Braunschweig und Lüneburg v OHIM (Figurative mark representing a coat of arms)

(Case T-397/09)

2009/C 297/42

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ernst August Prinz von Hannover Herzog zu Braunschweig und Lüneburg (Hanover, Germany) (represented by R. Stötzel and J. Hilger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | Annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 July 2009 in Case R 1361/2008-1 concerning the application for Community trade mark No 5 627 245 and admission of the application for Community trade mark No 5 627 245 for publication in the Community Trade Marks Bulletin; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 July 2009 in Case R 1361/2008-1 concerning the application for Community trade mark No 5 627 245 and admission of the application for Community trade mark No 5 627 245 for publication in the Community Trade Marks Bulletin;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The colour figurative mark representing a coat of arms for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 2, 33, 35, 39, 41 and 43 (Application No 5 627 245)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Inter alia, infringement of Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation No 207/2009 (1), since the mark applied for is neither identical with the opposing royal emblem nor a heraldic immitation thereof.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 26 August 2004         

amending Decision 2002/994/EC concerning certain protective measures with regard to the products of animal origin imported from China

(notified under document number C(2004) 3256)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2004/621/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (1), and in particular Article 22(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2002/994/EC is amended as follows:

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 31 August 2004.

Article3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 August 2004.

For the Commission

David BYRNE            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 30, 31.1.2002, p. 50. Decision as last amended by Decision 2002/933/EC (OJ L 324, 29.11.2002, p. 71).

(3)OJ L 348, 21.12.2002, p. 154. Decision as amended by Decision 2003/72/EC (OJ L 26, 31.1.2003, p. 84).

----

ANNEX

                     ‘ANNEX

PART I

List of products of animal origin intended for human consumption or animal feed use authorised to be imported into the Community without the attestation provided for in Article 3

PART II

List of products of animal origin intended for human consumption or animal feed use authorised to be imported into the Community, subject to the attestation provided by Article 3:

----
# C_2013123EN.01000201.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 March 2013 — Swiss Confederation v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany, Landkreis Waldshut

(Case C-547/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - External relations - Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on air transport - Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 - Access of Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes - Articles 8 and 9 - Scope - Exercise of traffic rights - Decision 2004/12/EC - German measures relating to the approaches to Zurich Airport - Duty to state reasons - Non-discrimination - Proportionality - Burden of proof)

2013/C 123/02

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Swiss Confederation (represented by: S. Hirsbrunner, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. van Rijn, K. Simonsson and K. P. Wojcik, Agents); Federal Republic of Germany (represented by T. Henze, Agent, assisted by T. Masing, Rechtsanwalt); Landkreis Waldshut, (represented by M. Núñez Müller, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Fifth Chamber) on 9 September 2010 in Case T-319/05 Switzerland v Commission by which that court dismissed the action brought by the Swiss Confederation for the annulment of Commission Decision 2004/12/EC of 5 December 2003 on a procedure relating to the application of Article 18(2), first sentence, of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on air transport and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes (OJ 1993 L 15, p. 33) — Measures adopted by Germany relating to the approaches to Zurich airport — Wrongful assessment of the applicability of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 to the contested measures — Misinterpretation of the scope of the Commission’s obligation to state reasons — Failure to take account of the rights of the airport operator and the people living around the airport — Infringement of the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality

Switzerland

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders the Swiss Confederation to bear, in addition to its own costs, all of the costs incurred by the European Commission both at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Swiss Confederation to bear, in addition to its own costs, all of the costs incurred by the European Commission both at first instance and on appeal.

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and Landkreis Waldshut to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and Landkreis Waldshut to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
# C_2009220EN.01003901.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/39

---

Action brought on 17 July 2009 — Verband Deutscher Prädikats- und Qualitätsweingüter v OHIM (GG)

(Case T-278/09)

2009/C 220/82

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Verband Deutscher Prädikats- und Qualitätsweingüter eV (Gau-Algesheim, Germany) (represented by N. Schindler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 April 2009 (Case R 1568/2008-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 April 2009 (Case R 1568/2008-1);

| — | order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘GG’ for goods in Class 33 (registration application No 6 388 284)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal to register

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 75 due to a lack of reasons on which the decision was based and of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), since the trade mark applied for has the requisite distinctive character and there is no need for it to be allowed to remain available.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3696 

To extend funding for section 510 of the Social Security Act (regarding 

a youth empowerment program). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2019 

Mr. FLORES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend funding for section 510 of the Social Security 

Act (regarding a youth empowerment program). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Youth Empowerment 

5 Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM. 

7 Subsections (a)(1), (a)(2), (f)(1), and (f)(2) of sec8 tion 510 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 710) are 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3696 IH

1 amended by striking ‘‘2018 and 2019’’ each place it ap2 pears and inserting ‘‘2020 and 2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3341] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated June 21, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to include Crow Wing, Kandiyohi, Lake of the Woods and Meeker Counties in the State of Minnesota as disaster areas caused by severe winter storms, flooding and tornadoes occurring between March 23, 2001 and continuing. 

Any counties contiguous to the above named primary counties and not listed here have been previously declared. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.,*                     the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is July 15, 2001 and for economic injury the deadline is February 15, 2002.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: June 22, 2001.

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-16433 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### UNITED STATES ex rel. KIMLER v. RAGEN, Warden.

No. 8700.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Feb. 2, 1945.

David R. Landau, of Chicago, and Walker Kinder, pro se, for appellant.

George F. Barrett and William C. Wines, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before SPARKS, MAJOR, and KERNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a prisoner in the Illinois State Penitentiary, appeals from an order of the District Court dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The record shows that the court appointed counsel to represent petitioner in the presentation of his petition for the writ, and that hearing was had on the petition and respondent’s motion to dismiss.

According to appellant’s petition, he was convicted of forgery and sentenced to a term of one to fourteen years in the penitentiary, in 1926. In 1928 he was released on a so-called “banishment parole” under the terms of which he left the state of Illinois, going first to Iowa and later to California. In 1936, he was convicted of a felony in California and given a sentence of one year to life. In 1937, a detainer was filed against him by the Illinois authorities, and upon his release on parole from the California prison in 1943, he was apprehended by Illinois officers and returned to Illinois where he is now serving the balance of his 1926 sentence.

Under these facts we find no merit in appellant’s contention that his full sentence expired in 1940, and that the state of Illinois had no power thereafter to incarcerate him for further service of the 1926 sentence. See People ex rel. Ross v. Becker, 382 Ill. 404, 47 N.E.2d 475; Purdue v. Ragen, 375 Ill. 98, 30 N.E.2d 637.

Order affirmed.
# C_2011232EN.01000901.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach (Poland)) — Logstor ROR Polska sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Katowicach

(Case C-212/10) (1)

(Taxation - Capital duty - Directive 69/335/EEC - Indirect taxes on the raising of capital - Taxation of a loan taken up by a capital company from a person entitled to a percentage of the profits of the same company - Right of a Member State to reintroduce a tax which was no longer in force at the date of its accession to the European Union)

(2011/C 232/14)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Logstor ROR Polska sp. z o.o.

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Katowicach

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach — Interpretation of Article 4(2) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ, English Special Edition 1969 (II), p. 412), as amended by Council Directive 85/303/EEC of 10 June 1985 (OJ 1985 L 156, p. 23) — Right of a Member State to reintroduce a tax abolished on the date on which it acceded to the European Union — Capital duty — Charging of capital duty on a loan taken out by a capital company with a person entitled to a percentage of the profits of that company

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(2) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital, as amended by Council Directive 85/303/EEC of 10 June 1985, must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from reintroducing a capital duty on a loan taken up by a capital company, if the creditor is entitled to a share in the profits of the company, where that Member State has previously waived the levying of that tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.

---
II-00850

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Robert Hatch <bobh@pivot.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:45 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Robert Hatch

99 Rowell Road

Walden, VT 05873
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
              This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted
              from Greenland Corporation September 30, 1998 financial statements
              and is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
              statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                  0000852127
<NAME>                                 Greenland Corporation

       

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                  37,256
<SECURITIES>                                            1,639,143
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        184,841
<PP&E>                                                  43,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (16,688)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          6,562,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   357,494
<BONDS>                                                 5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                11,346
<OTHER-SE>                                              6,188,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            6,562,073
<SALES>                                                 15,539
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        15,539
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           2,311,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        437,881
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      17,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (2,733,461)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (2,733,461)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (2,733,461)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.43)
        


</TABLE>
Mohammad Haider Agha HASAN, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COUNTY, et al.

No. 16-9421.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.