alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1583 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1583

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 15, 2010.
Whereas on September 24, 2005, Hurricane Rita made landfall as a Category 3 
        hurricane just east of the Texas-Louisiana border, between Sabine Pass 
        and Johnson's Bayou, with wind speeds of 120 miles per hour, and further 
        devastated the Gulf Coast;
Whereas Hurricane Rita caused 7 deaths, forced 3,000,000 residents to evacuate 
        their homes, left 1,000,000 people without electricity (according to the 
        National Climatic Data Center), and caused flooding and tornadoes in the 
        States of Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama;
Whereas damages from Hurricane Rita are estimated at $11,300,000,000;
Whereas in 2005, Hurricane Rita was the second hurricane to reach Category 5 
        status in the Gulf of Mexico, making it only the third time that more 
        than one Category 5 storm had formed in the Atlantic in the same year 
        (according to the National Climatic Data Center);
Whereas the storm surge from Hurricane Rita was as high as 15 feet near the 
        landfall site and according to the United States Geological Survey 
        traveled as far as 50 miles inland, causing disastrous flooding and 
        massive loss of property;
Whereas tens of thousands of homes and businesses in Louisiana and Texas were 
        destroyed by the flooding; and
Whereas the United States Geological Survey's National Wetlands Center indicates 
        that 217 square miles of Louisiana's coastal lands were transformed to 
        water after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) observes the fifth anniversary of the date on which Hurricane 
        Rita devastated the coasts of Louisiana and Texas;
            (2) expresses its support to the survivors of Hurricane Rita and 
        condolences to the families of its victims;
            (3) commends the courageous efforts of those who assisted in the 
        response to the storm and the recovery process;
            (4) recognizes the contributions of the communities in Louisiana and 
        Texas to the United States; and
            (5) reaffirms its commitment to rebuild, renew, and restore the Gulf 
        Coast region.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Rick Lee EVANS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6945.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 

(Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) 

 

I, Gary Rever, Chief FinancialOfficer (principal financial officer) of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the“Report”): 

 

(1)    The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

**/s/  Gary Rever**

**Name: Gary Rever**

**Date: May 15, 2003**
# C_2011013EN.01001001.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 November 2010 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-226/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2004/18/EC - Public procurement procedures - Award of a contract for interpretation and translation services - Services falling within the ambit of Annex II B of the Directive - Services not subject to all the requirements of the Directive - Weighting of the award criteria determined after tenders have been submitted - Weighting altered following an initial review of the tenders submitted - Compliance with the principle of equal treatment and the obligation of transparency)

2011/C 13/15

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and A.-A. Gilly, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland (represented by: D. O’Hagan, Agent, and A.M. Collins, SC)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Public procurement procedures — Award of a contract for interpretation and translation services — Services not subject to all the requirements of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114) — Weighting of the award criteria after the submission of tenders — Principles of equal treatment as between tenderers and transparency

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by altering the weighting of the award criteria for a contract for the provision of interpretation and translation services following an initial review of the tenders submitted, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the principle of equal treatment and the consequent obligation of transparency, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by altering the weighting of the award criteria for a contract for the provision of interpretation and translation services following an initial review of the tenders submitted, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the principle of equal treatment and the consequent obligation of transparency, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission and Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission and Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.09.2009.

1

---
II-00956

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Thomas Adamski <tomadamski@sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:42 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Thomas Adamski

17 Council Dr

Oxford, CT 6478
# C_2009069EN.01002802.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/28

---

Action brought on 30 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-42/09)

(2009/C 69/52)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and E. Vesco, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/45/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the mutual recognition of seafarers' certificates issued by the Member States and amending Directive 2001/25/EC and, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2005/45/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the mutual recognition of seafarers' certificates issued by the Member States and amending Directive 2001/25/EC and, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of that directive.

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of Directive 2005/45/EC expired on 20 October 2007.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 255, p. 160.

1

---
Clark ELMORE, petitioner, v. Donald R. HOLBROOK, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.

No. 15-7848.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Stephen Robert YOUNG, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 17-7332.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
1101.

#### Atterberry *v.*The State.

Accusation of misdemeanor, from city court of Millen — Judge Anderson. February 17, 1908.

Submitted April 21,

Decided May 7, 1908.

*Joseph Law, B. P. Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*James A. Dixon, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

Though a single act of gaming, without more, will not constitute the house in which it occurs a gaming-house, yet where the owner, for a consideration paid him, invites or permits other persons to use his house, though on only a single occasion, for the purpose of gambling, he is guilty of a violation of that portion of § 398 of the Penal Code which makes it a misdemeanor if any person “shall in any house, place or room, occupied by him, permit persons, with his knowledge, to come together and play for money or any other valuable thing' at any game or device for the hazarding of money or other thing of value.” *Bell*v. *State,*92 *Ga.*49 (18 S. E. 186). *Judgment affirmed.*
Christopher ANDREWS, petitioner, v. INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS.

No. 16-7328.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification
 I, Paul S. Feeley, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Central Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: June 22, 2009
    /s/ Paul S. FeeleyPaul S. FeeleySenior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer
 and Treasurer
International Dial-In Numbers

Open Commission Meeting

Thursday, July 11, 2019 -10:00 am

Participant passcode: 2665194

Country Toll Numbers Freephone/

Toll Free Numbers

ARGENTINA 0800-444-1896 

AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-5055 1-800-010717 

AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-2044 1-800-010717 

AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-0106 1-800-010717 

AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-0855 1-800-010717 

AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5283 1-800-010717 

AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8209-1532 1-800-010717 

AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-451 0800-005-806 

BELGIUM 32-2-400-9848 0800-3-8930 

BRAZIL RIO DE JANEIRO: 55-21-40421496 0800-7610645 

BRAZIL SAO PAULO: 55-11-3958-0781 0800-7610645 

CANADA 866-845-8494 

CHILE 1230-020-5992 

CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4797 10800-712-2420 

CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4797 10800-120-2420 

COLOMBIA 01800-9-157003 

CROATIA 080-08-06-427 

CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-30 800-700-242 

DENMARK 45-7014-0293 8088-2749 

EGYPT 0800000-9038 

ESTONIA 800-011-1105 

FINLAND 358-9-5424-7160 0-800-9-19768 

FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-03-51-63 080-510-2765 

FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-48-63 080-510-2765 

FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-72-25-40-66 080-510-2765 

GERMANY 49-69-2222-4865 0800-800-1421 

GREECE 30-80-1-100-0646 00800-12-8037 

HONG KONG 852-3001-3891 800-963-695 

HUNGARY 36-1-700-8830 06-800-11161 

INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1135 

INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6247 

INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00495 

INDONESIA 007-803-011-0174 

IRELAND 353-1-506-0476 1800-936-203 

ISRAEL 1-80-9212610 

ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3604-6280 800-977-455 

ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6069 800-977-455 

ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0169 800-977-455 

JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2602 0066-33-812361 

JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2602 0066-33-812361 

LATVIA 8000-3204 

LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1393 8002-9280 

MALAYSIA 1-800-81-4685 
MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7389 001-866-944-7679 

MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9189 001-866-944-7679 

MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0689 001-866-944-7679 

NETHERLANDS 31-20-716-8076 0800-020-0351 

NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4606 0800-456-270 

NORWAY 47-21-590-025 800-18093 

PANAMA 011-001-800-5072372 

PERU 0800-53731 

PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3760 1800-111-42436 

POLAND 00-800-1213476 

PORTUGAL 351-2-10054734 8008-14928 

ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-38 

RUSSIA 8-10-8002-5594011 

SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110062 

SINGAPORE 65-6517-0502 800-120-5213 

SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-79 0800-002025 

SLOVENIA 0-800-81350 

SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-82158 

SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1091 00798-14800-7797 

SPAIN 34-91-414-21-70 800-300-907 

SWEDEN 46-8-503-34-825 0200-899-946 

SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-4321 0800-001-427 

TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7391 00801-136-033 

THAILAND 001-800-1206-66639 

TURKEY 00-800-151-0818 

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702389 

UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9183 0808-238-9817 

UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-0813 0808-238-9817 

UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-0013 0808-238-9817 

UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7950-1322 0808-238-9817 

UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-0113 0808-238-9817 

URUGUAY 000-413-598-3832 

USA 1-203-607-0666 877-951-7311 

VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3644 

VIETNAM 120-11747
Marcus Dante REED v. LOUISIANA.

No. 16-656.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 27, 2017.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice BREYER, dissenting from the denial of certiorari.

Marcus Dante Reed was sentenced to death in Caddo Parish, Louisiana, a county that in recent history has apparently sentenced more people to death per capita than any other county in the United States. See Aviv, Revenge Killing: Race and the Death Penalty in a Louisiana Parish, The New Yorker, July 6 & 13, 2015, p. 34. The arbitrary role that geography plays in the imposition of the death penalty, along with the other serious problems I have previously described, has led me to conclude that the Court should consider the basic question of the death penalty's constitutionality. See *Glossip v. Gross,* 576 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2726, 192 L.Ed.2d 761 (2015) (BREYER, J., dissenting). For this reason, I would grant Reed's petition for a writ of certiorari.
TO: The Comment File 

FROM: Ted Kneller 

RE: Comment on proposed rules for Business Conduct Standards for Swap Dealers 

and Major Swap Participants with Counterparties 

DATE: February 9, 2011 

On February 09, 2011, Mark Young of Skadden called and spoke to Phyllis Cela and Ted 

Kneller of the CFTC. 

Mr. Young identified two issues that he planned to address in meetings scheduled with 

CFTC staff on February 10: 1) CFTC’s proposed rules and possible intersections with the 

Department of Labor’s proposed rules on the term “fiduciary”; and 2) the application of the 

Special Entity provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and CFTC’s proposed rules to ERISA pension 

plans.
COOK, DARYL V. PHILADELPHIA, PA, ET AL.

No. 17-7394.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Michael J. Loiacono, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of
Global Axcess Corp (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the first quarter ended March
31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May 5, 2010





/s/ Michael J. LoiaconoName:
      Michael J. LoiaconoTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
  Officer
In re Douglas SINCLAIR, petitioner.

No. 16-6433.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
II-00579

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mark Precious <presh7@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:14 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mark Precious

3549 Iowa Avenue #72

Riverside, CA 92507
IV 

House Calendar No. 256 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1776 

[Report No. 111–689] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 105) making 

further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2011, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2010 

Mr. POLIS of Colorado, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

105) making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2011, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the joint reso3 lution (H.J. Res. 105) making further continuing appro4 priations for fiscal year 2011, and for other purposes. All 

5 points of order against consideration of the joint resolu6 tion are waived except those arising under clause 10 of 

7 rule XXI. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1776 RH 

1 All points of order against provisions in the joint resolu2 tion are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

3 as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without 

4 intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 

5 divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

6 member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one 

7 motion to recommit. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 256 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1776 

[Report No. 111–689] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

purposes. propriations for fiscal year 2011, and for other (H.J. Res. 105) making further continuing apDECEMBER 17, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS