alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 218 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 15
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 218

                          [Report No. 111-24]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2009

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of March 6, 2009, providing 
for consideration or disposition of any measure making appropriations 
for the fiscal year 2009, and for other purposes.
                                                  House Calendar No. 15

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 218

                          [Report No. 111-24]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 5, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

In connection with the Amended and Restated Annual Report of Form 10-K/A for the
period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") filed by Everlast  Worldwide Inc.,
a  Delaware  corporation  (the  "Company")  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission, the undersigned, George Q Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer of, does
hereby  certify,  to his  knowledge,  that  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ George Q Horowitz
                                      -------------------------------------
                                      George Q Horowitz
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      November 28, 2005

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Everlast  Worldwide Inc. and will be retained by Everlast  Worldwide
Inc and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
```
Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Final Rule on Derivatives Clearing 

Organization General Provisions and Core Principles

What does the rulemaking do?

This rulemaking implements Section 725 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 

(Dodd-Frank Act), which revised the core principles applicable to derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) 

registered with the Commission.

The rulemaking finalizes regulations that were proposed in five separate notices of proposed rulemaking: 

Requirements for Processing, Clearing, and Transfer of Customer Positions (March 10, 2011); Risk Management 

Requirements for DCOs (Jan. 20, 2011); Information Management Requirements for DCOs (Dec. 15, 2010); 

General Regulations for DCOs (Dec. 13, 2010); and Financial Resources Requirements for DCOs (Oct. 14, 2010).

Many regulations will be adopted largely as proposed, although a number of provisions have been revised or 

eliminated upon further consideration in light of the comments received. The regulations are designed to strike an 

appropriate balance between establishing general prudential standards and specific requirements, and reflect a 

careful consideration of the associated costs and benefits.

Who must comply with the final regulations?

The regulations apply to all DCOs registered with the Commission and any entity that wishes to apply for 

registration as a DCO.

What matters are addressed in this rulemaking?

The matters addressed include Core Principles A (Compliance), B (Financial Resources), C (Participant and Product 

Eligibility), D (Risk Management), E (Settlement Procedures), F (Treatment of Funds), G (Default Rules and 

Procedures), H (Rule Enforcement), I (System Safeguards), J (Reporting), K (Recordkeeping), L (Public 

Information), M (Information Sharing), N (Antitrust Considerations), and R (Legal Risk). The remaining core 

principles will be addressed in a separate rulemaking. 

The regulations also establish requirements for DCO chief compliance officers and revise the application 

procedures for DCO registration.
# C_2011186EN.01002601.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/26

---

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-402/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Rules on insurance against the risk of accident and occupational disease for officials of the European Communities - Procedure for the recognition of the occupational origin of a disease - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2011/C 186/48

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis Kayser, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 July 2009 in Case F-86/07 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking the annulment of that order.

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered, in addition to bearing his own costs, to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered, in addition to bearing his own costs, to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.

1

---
(LOGO)

Marine Midland Mortgage Corporation
2929 Walden Avenue, Depew, New York 14043

                             Management's Assertion

As of and  for the  year  ended  December  31,  1998,  Marine  Midland  Mortgage
Corporation  has complied in all material  respects  with the minimum  servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage  Banker's  Association of America's  Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
Marine Midland  Mortgage  Corporation had in effect fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policies in the amounts of $550,000,000 and $50,000,000, respectively.

David J. Hunter
President

Daniel B. Duggan
SVP, Secondary Marketing

Susan Wojnar
SVP  Mortgage Servicing
# C_2011139EN.01001002.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Telefónica Móviles España, SA v Administración del Estado, Secretaría de Estado de Telecomunicaciones

(Case C-85/10) (1)

1

(Telecommunication services - Directive 97/13/EC - General authorisations and individual licences - Fees and charges applicable to undertakings holding individual licences - Article 11(2) - Interpretation - National legislation which does not allocate any special use to a fee - Increase in the fee for digital systems, but no change in the fee for first generation analogue systems - Compatibility)

2011/C 139/16

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Telefónica Móviles España, SA

Applicant:

Defendants: Administración del Estado, Secretaría de Estado de Telecomunicaciones

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Supremo — Interpretation of Article 11(2) of Directive 97/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 April 1997 on a common framework for general authorisations and individual licences in the field of telecommunications services (OJ 1997 L 117, p. 15) — Fees and charges applicable to undertakings holding individual licences — Imposition of pecuniary charges above and beyond those authorised by the directive and for a purpose not provided for therein — More advanced technologies penalised as compared with obsolete technologies

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The requirements laid down in Article 11(2) of Directive 97/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 April 1997 on a common framework for general authorisations and individual licences in the field of telecommunications — under which a charge imposed on operators of telecommunications services for the use of scarce resources must seek to ensure optimal use of those resources and must take into account the need to foster the development of innovative services and competition — must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which provides for a fee to be levied on operators of telecommunications services holding individual licences for the use of radio frequencies, but does not allocate a specific use to the income derived from that fee, and which significantly increases the fee for a particular technology but leaves it unchanged for another.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.

1

---
# C_2011030EN.01006003.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/60

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 14 December 2010 — Gowitzke v Europol

(Case F-74/09) (1)

1

(Civil service - Europol staff - Article 27 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees - Article 4 of the policy for determining grades and steps of Europol staff - Reassessment of a post to the next grade - Classification by step)

2011/C 30/115

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Werner Siegrfried Gowitzke (The Hague, the Netherlands) (represented by: D.C. Coppens, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Europol’s decision of 5 June 2009 rejecting the applicant’s claim to have his classification changed to grade 5, step 1.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009, p. 85.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,817
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             144
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                16,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     72,261
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        217,972
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,535
<DEPOSITS>                                     238,490
<SHORT-TERM>                                    16,310
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,474
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,911
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 318,535
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,968
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,241
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    54
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,263
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,623
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,911
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,352
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (34)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,342
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       832
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.66
<LOANS-NON>                                        768
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    455
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,062
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      (59)
<RECOVERIES>                                        47
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,260
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,258
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,002


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34257-34258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16161]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,739, TA-W-38,739A]


Allison Manufacturing Company, Albermarle, NC and Allison 
Manufacturing Company, New York, NY; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 30, 2001, applicable to 
workers of Allison Manufacturing Company, Albermarle, North Carolina. 
The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 2, 2001 (66 FR 
22006).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in providing corporate administrative functions to support the 
production of children's apparel. The company reports that worker 
separations have occurred at a second administrative office located in 
New York, New York. The New York, New York location provides 
administrative functions, including executive, art design and sales 
services, to the subject firm's production facilities.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
included workers of Allison Manufacturing Company, New York, New York.

[[Page 34258]]

    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Allison Manufacturing Company adversely affect by increased 
imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-38,729 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Allison Manufacturing Company, Albermarle, North 
Carolina (TA-W-739) and New York, New York (TA-W-38,739A) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 
14, 2000 through March 30, 2003, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of June, 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-16161 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Makeshia Lashon GLOVER, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7961.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
II-00999

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rev. Norma Fleischer <mnshangrila@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:17 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Rev. Norma Fleischer

263 Henley Drive

Naples, FL 34104-6530
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Salameh, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods indicated.
  This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
  Date: May
7, 2008
  By: /s/ Michael J.
Salameh
 Michael J.
Salameh
 Chief
Executive Officer
  33
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation (BKFC) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin J.
Gerrety, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of BKFC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations
of BKFC.

/s/ Martin J. GerretyMartin J. GerretyTreasurer and Assistant SecretaryMarch 11, 2011