alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34457-34458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Availability of Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and 
Environmental Assessment for Rydell National Wildlife Refuge, Erskine, 
Minnesota

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Refuge Improvement Act of 1997, the Fish and 
Wildlife Service has published the Rydell National Wildlife Refuge 
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment. The 
Plan describes how the Service intends to manage the Refuge for the 
next 15 years.

DATES: Submit written comments by August 15, 2001. All comments should 
be addressed to Rick Julian, Rydell National Wildlife Refuge, Route 3, 
Box 105, Erskine, MN 56535. Comments may also be submitted through the 
Service's regional website at: http://midwest.fws.gov/planning/rydtop.htm

ADDRESSES: A copy of the Plan or a summary may be obtained by writing 
to Rick Julian at the address above or by planing a request through the 
website. The plan is also posted on the Service's planning website at 
http://midwest.fws.gov/planning/rydelldccp.htm

[[Page 34458]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information contact 
Rick Julian at Rydell National Wildlife Refuge, Route 3, Box 105, 
Erskine, MN 56535; or call Mr. Julian at 218/687-2229; or direct e-mail 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c6e757f774343766970757d725c7a6b6f327b736a">[email protected]</a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Rydell National Wildlife Refuge includes 
wetlands, hardwood stands, conifer plantations, grass meadows and 
cropland. The Refuge was established in 1992 and today includes 2,120 
acres. The diverse habitat is used by diving and dabbling ducks, geese, 
swans, white-tailed deer, moose, ruffed grouse, cormorants, herons, 
black bear, hawks and owls, among other species. The Refuge was 
established to protect wildlife habitat diversity, to encourage 
waterfowl and other migratory bird production, and to promote 
environmental education and recreation. In addition, the Refuge was 
established to demonstrate sound fish and wildlife management and wise 
land and water stewardship.
    The Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan emphasizes the habitat 
needs of fish and wildlife and expanded opportunities for wildlife-
dependent recreation.

    Dated: June 15, 2001.
Barbara A. Milne,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 01-16249 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Von Skyler COX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6690.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Joan Marie WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7594.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-00427

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ellen Atkinson <Ellenatkinson24@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:01 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ellen Atkinson

207 Arnett Blvd

Danville, VA 24540
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Carolyn D. Beaver, Chief Financial Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:





1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of the 9th day of July, 2015.








/s/ Carolyn D. BeaverCarolyn D. BeaverChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
II-00261

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jill Cross <culpritwoman@adelphia.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 7:04 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jill Cross

47 Bayview Drive

Sandy Point, ME 04972
Maritza ORTIZ, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY, et al.

No. 17-7479.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico denied.
1021.

#### Walker *v.*State.

Accusation of larceny, from city .court of Griffin — Judge Hammond. January 13, 1908.

Argued March 11,

Decided March 16, 1908.

Andrew Walker was convicted on an accusation charging him with the larceny of two hens, the property of B. N. Barrow. Barrow testified, that the hens were taken from his yard, and he found in his garden, near where they were taken, one person’s tracks, which went in the direction of the road; and, where these tracks led out of the garden, he found tracks of two persons, which led towards town. He went to town and got a-policeman, who went with him to the house of Andrew Walker’s mother, about a mile and a half from where the hens were taken, and there got the hens.' Andrew Walker did not live there. He lived in town, and worked at a place about 400 or 500 yards from the house of the witness, between the house of the witness and town. Alex Harris was convicted of - stealing the samé hens. The mother of the accused testified, that the two hens, were brought to her house at night, in a sack, by Alex Harris, who wanted to sell them to her. Andrew Walker came with him. She told Alex she did not want to buy them, and he asked her to let them stay there until he came-back for them. She told him they could stay; and he did not come back. Andrew Walker did not' say anything about the hens. He and Alex remained a short time and left together. The accused made the following statement to the jury: I started home from my work place the night the chickens were stolen, and met Alex Harris. He offered to sell me some chickens. I told him I did not want to buy, that I had no money. ^ He asked me if my mother wanted some. I told him I did not know, but that he could see. I went with him to my mother’s, stopped in with him a short time, left, and went home. I had nothing to do with the chickens in any way.

The accused excepted to the overruling of his motion for a new trial, which was on the ground, among others, that the verdict was without evidence to support it.

*Thomas W. Thurman,*for plaintiff in error.

*William H. Beck, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

The evidence is not sufficient to connect the defendant with the larceny. *Judgment reversed.*
MyrRoi LaMONT, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-6516.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
George PIECZENIK, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, et al.

No. 17-1046.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
II-00159

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Patti Yeager <pattiplays@comcast.net>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 1:34 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Patti Yeager

606 N. Tomahawk Island Dr.

Portland, OR 97217
<PAGE> 1

Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
                                           COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<CAPTION>
                                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                                     March 31,
                                                                               ----------------------
                                                                               1999              1998
                                                                               ----              ----
                                                                  (In thousands, except share and per share data)
<S>                                                                        <C>               <C>
Average common shares outstanding                                           6,551,835         6,128,196

Average common stock equivalents of
      warrants and options outstanding-
      based on the treasury stock method
      using market price                                                      128,650           504,230
                                                                           ----------        ----------
                                                                            6,680,485         6,632,426
                                                                           ==========        ==========

Net income                                                                 $    1,002        $      627

Basic earnings per common share                                            $     0.15        $     0.10

Diluted earnings per common share                                          $     0.15        $     0.09
</TABLE>


                                    21
Open Meeting of the Commission – Tuesday, April 14, 2020

AGENDA

1. Call to Order

2. Opening Statements

Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

Commissioner Brian D. Quintenz

Commissioner Rostin Behnam

Commissioner Dawn D. Stump

Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz

3. Proposed Rule: Amendments to Part 190 Bankruptcy Regulations

Staff Presentation

Robert Wasserman, Division of Clearing and Risk

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

4. Proposed Rule: Amendments to Compliance Requirements for Commodity

Pool Operators on Form CPO-PQR

Staff Presentation

Joshua B. Sterling, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO) 

Amanda Olear, DSIO

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

[continued on next page]
5. Final Rule: Amendments to Part 23 Margin Requirements for the

European Stability Mechanism

Proposed Rule: Amendments to Part 50 Clearing Requirements for Central

Banks, Sovereigns, IFIs, Bank Holding Companies, and CDFIs

Staff Presentation (combined for both rules)

Clark Hutchison, Division of Clearing and Risk 

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion (combined for both rules)

Votes 

6. Final Rule: Amendment to Part 160 Consumer Financial Information

Privacy Regulation

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

7. Closing Remarks

8. Adjournment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                          SCHEDULE 27.1

This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the May 31,
1998 Financial  Statements  included in the Company's Form 10-K and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K. </LEGEND>

<CIK>      0001029294
<NAME>     ICON Fitness Corporation

<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                            3892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   131188
<ALLOWANCES>                                      6887
<INVENTORY>                                     121466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                267819
<PP&E>                                           89398
<DEPRECIATION>                                   40579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  387873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           114951
<BONDS>                                         460707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         49701
<OTHER-SE>                                    (237486)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    387873
<SALES>                                         749313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                749313
<CGS>                                           535976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   189441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               59496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (41897)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (14308)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (27589)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (27589)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1778

RONNIE WILLIAMS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WAL MART STORES, c/o Mendelson, GSO 2301 McGee St, 8th Floor, Kansas City, MO 64108 , Defendant

- Appellee , and DAVID ZILENSKI, Store Manager; WILLIAM JOEY, Shift Lead Manager; DELINDA BUTLER, Shift Lead Manager; MICHAEL ADAMS, Asst Manager No. 4487 , Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Donald C. Coggins, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv
- 00734

- DCC )

Submitted : November 29, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Ronnie Williams , Appellant Pro Se. Molly Mitchell Shah , LITTLER MENDELSON PC , Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding prec edent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Williams appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Williams’ employment discrimination suit for failure to participate in discovery. On appeal, we confine o ur review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Williams’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Williams has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispens e with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
# C_2009267EN.01006901.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/69

---

Action brought on 19 August 2009 — Producteurs de Légumes de France v Commission

(Case T-328/09)

2009/C 267/125

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Les Producteurs de Légumes de France (Paris, France) (represented by: O. Fachin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the contested decision on the basis of the fourth paragraph of Article 230 of the EC Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision on the basis of the fourth paragraph of Article 230 of the EC Treaty;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 203 final of 28 January 2009, (1) by which the Commission declared incompatible with the common market the State aid granted by the French Republic to fruit and vegetable producers under the ‘contingency plans’ intended to facilitate marketing of agricultural products harvested in France and instructed the French Republic to recover the aid in question.

1

In support of its action, the applicant raises two pleas in law, alleging:

| — | breach of the principle of legitimate expectations, since the fact that the Commission was, in the period 1992 to 2002, aware of the existence of the contingency plans but did not, even so, institute a procedure gave rise to expectations on the part of the producers as to the validity of those plans; |
| --- | --- |

—

breach of the principle of legitimate expectations, since the fact that the Commission was, in the period 1992 to 2002, aware of the existence of the contingency plans but did not, even so, institute a procedure gave rise to expectations on the part of the producers as to the validity of those plans;

| — | an error in the amount of reimbursement sought in respect of 2001, which affects the overall amount of the reimbursement and the interest claimed. |
| --- | --- |

—

an error in the amount of reimbursement sought in respect of 2001, which affects the overall amount of the reimbursement and the interest claimed.

---

(1)  OJ L 127, p.11 — published as Decision 2009/402/EC.

1

---
Keith M. KUTSKA, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 16-1411.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*114Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District III denied.