alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National City Mortgage
National City Mortgage Co..
3232 Newmark Drive
Miamisburg Ohio 45342
Telephone (937) 910-1200

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing



RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:.

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1998 fiscal year:


(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
preceding  fiscal  year  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of these  Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has  fulfilled all of its
duties,  responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements  throughout such
year,  or if there has been a default or failure of the  servicer to perform any
of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a description of each default
or failure and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported to Norwest Bank
Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement,
Trust Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer  Guide
are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),  with respect
to each Mortgaged Property,  have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on any
Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property,
required  per  section  6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the  Internal  Revenue  Code,
respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:

Officer

Vice President
Title
5/11/99
Date

No one Cares More !
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3675 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3675

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 15, 2019

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require a review of Department of Homeland Security trusted traveler 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trusted Traveler Reconsideration and 
Restoration Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of 
Department of Homeland Security trusted traveler programs. Such review 
shall examine the following:
            (1) The extent to which the Department of Homeland Security 
        tracks data and monitors trends related to trusted traveler 
        programs, including root causes for identity-matching errors 
        resulting in an individual's enrollment in a trusted traveler 
        program being reinstated.
            (2) Whether the Department coordinates with the heads of 
        other relevant Federal, State, local, Tribal, or territorial 
        entities regarding redress procedures for disqualifying 
        offenses not covered by the Department's own redress processes 
        but which offenses impact an individual's enrollment in a 
        trusted traveler program.
            (3) How the Department may improve individuals' access to 
        reconsideration procedures regarding a disqualifying offense 
        for enrollment in a trusted traveler program that requires the 
        involvement of any other Federal, State, local, Tribal, or 
        territorial entity.
            (4) The extent to which travelers are informed about 
        reconsideration procedures regarding enrollment in a trusted 
        traveler program.

SEC. 3. ENROLLMENT REDRESS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Homeland Security shall, with respect to an individual whose enrollment 
in a trusted traveler program was revoked in error extend by an amount 
of time equal to the period of revocation the period of active 
enrollment in such a program upon re-enrollment in such a program by 
such an individual.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2011063EN.01002502.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of 23 November 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-208/10) (1)

1

2011/C 63/48

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
# C_2012217EN.01000201.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — European Commission v Électricité de France (EDF), French Republic, Iberdrola SA

(Case C-124/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Waiver of a tax claim - Exemption from corporation tax - Increase in share capital - Conduct of a State acting as a prudent private investor in a market economy - Criteria to distinguish between the State as shareholder and the State exercising public power - Definition of ‘reference private investor’ - Principle of equal treatment - Burden of proof)

2012/C 217/02

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier, B. Stromsky and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Électricité de France (EDF) (represented by: M. Debroux, avocat), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and J. Gstalter, acting as Agents), Iberdrola SA (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado and É. Barbier de La Serre, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Supported by: EFTA Surveillance Authority (represented by: X. Lewis and B. Alterskjær, acting as Agents)

Supported by

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of 15 December 2009, by which the General Court (Third Chamber) annulled Articles 3 and 4 of the decision of the Commission of 16 December 2003 on the State aid granted to EDF and the electricity and gas industries (C 68/2002, N 504/2003 and C 25/2003) — Aid granted in the form of a selective tax exemption linked to an increase in share capital during a recapitalisation of the undertaking — Conduct of a State acting as a prudent private investor in a market economy — Criteria to distinguish between the State as shareholder and the State exercising public power — Principle of equal tax treatment

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority, the French Republic and Iberdrola SA to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority, the French Republic and Iberdrola SA to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT 21
 Subsidiaries of Central Bancorp, Inc.
 Central Co-operative Bank
    
    100% owned by the Company, incorporated under the laws of the
Commonwealth of MassachusettsCentral Securities Corporation
    
    100% owned by the Bank, incorporated under the laws of the
Commonwealth of MassachusettsCentral Securities Corporation II
    
    100% owned by the Bank, incorporated under the laws of the
Commonwealth of MassachusettsMetro Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    100% owned by the Bank, organized under the laws of the
Commonwealth of MassachusettsCentral Bancorp Capital Trust I
    
    100% owned by the Company, formed under the laws of the State of
DelawareCentral Bancorp Statutory Trust II
    
    100% owned by the Company, formed under the laws of the State of
Connecticut
##### 



Exhibit 8 PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES Jurisdiction of
    
    Name under whichName
    
    Percentage owned
    
    incorporation
    
    business is donehongkong.com Corporation
    
    81.4%
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    hongkong.comIon Global (BVI) Limited
    
    100%
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    Ion Globalchina.com Corporation Limited
    
    100%
    
    Hong Kong
    
    china.com Studios, Inc.
    
    100%
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    MEZZO Marketing Limited
    
    98.3%
    
    Hong Kong
    
    24/7 Asia; MEZZO MarketingTaiwan.com Corporation
    
    100%
    
    Cayman Islands
    
    Taiwan.comchinadotcom Ventures Limited
    
    100%
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    e2e Business SolutionsCDC Mobile Media Corporation
    
    100%
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    NewPalmCDC Australia Limited
    
    100%
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    PraxaCDC Software Holdings Limited
    
    100%
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    CDC Softwarechinadotcom
    
    
    
    
    
    Chinadotcom e-marketing,e-marketing Holdings Limited
    
    100%
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    MEZZO, RNR, IncNetCDC Outsourcing Holdings Limited
    
    100%
    
    British Virgin Islands
    
    CDC Outsourcing
Subsection (1) 

(legacy text) 

(1) IN GENERAL. 

Excessive speculation in any commodity under [futures contracts] or swaps that perform or affect a 

significant price discovery function...causing sudden or unreasonable fluctuations or unwarranted 

changes in the price of such commodity, is an undue and unnecessary burden on interstate commerce in 

such commodity. The Commission shall from time to time...proclaim and fix such limits on the amount 

of...positions which may be held...under [futures contracts] ...or swaps ...as the Commission finds are 

necessary to diminish, eliminate, or prevent such burden... [Provision goes on to address 

implementation issues such as aggregation and flexibility.] 

Subsection (2) 

Subparagraph (A) 

(DFA addition) 

(2) ESTABLISHMENT OF LIMITATIONS.--

 (A) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the standards set forth in [subsection (1)]...the Commission 

shall...establish limits on the amount of positions, as appropriate...that may be held by any 

 person with respect to [futures contacts] or with respect to options on the contracts or 

 commodities traded on or subject to the rules of a designated contract market. 

Subsection (2) 

Subparagraph (B) 

(DFA addition) 

 (B) Timing.—(i) Exempt Commodities [e.g., energy and metals].—For exempt commodities, the 

 limits required under subparagraph (A) shall be established within 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this paragraph...(ii) Agricultural Commodities.– For agricultural commodities, 

 the limits required under subparagraph (A) shall be established within 270 days after the date 

 of the enactment of this paragraph. 

Commodity Exchange Act § 4a(a): 

Finding Position Limits Necessary is a Prerequisite to the 

Mandate for Establishing Such 

Legacy Subsection (1) of 

CEA § 4a(a) has long 

provided CFTC a 

mandate to impose 

position limits it finds 

are necessary to 

diminish, eliminate, or 

prevent the burden on 

interstate commerce 

resulting from excessive 

speculation in derivatives 

Dodd-Frank added 

Subsection (2) re. 

“Establishment of 

Limits.” Subparagraph 

(A) mandates that CFTC 

establish position limits, 

but in accordance with 

the standards in 

subsection (1), including 

the standard of necessity 

Subparagraph (B) then 

informs the timing of any 

limits that must be 

established in 

Subparagraph (A) in 

accordance with the 

standards in subsection 

(1), including the 

standard of necessity 

Red Denotes Link to 

Standard of Necessity 

Blue Denotes Link to 

Mandate
Neville McGARITY, aka Wraith, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6138.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge 

Matthew J. Silva 

Attorney General/Carson City 

• Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Skystar Bio-Pharmaceutical Company, (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bennet
P. Tchaikovsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.
  /s/
      Bennet P. TchaikovskyBennet
      P. Tchaikovsky
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                April
      15, 2009
   A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II-Ol091

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jennifer Scherer <rizscherer@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:19 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jennifer Scherer

4110 Creek Way

Indianapolis, IN 46227
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

d0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

146903

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146903

COA: 304509

Oakland CC: 2010

- 234803

- FH

MICHAEL DEAN WORDEN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of June 25, 2013, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending th e decision in People v

Earl (Docket No. 145677). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on

March 26, 2014, 495 Mich 33 (2014), the application is again considered, and it is

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented sh ould be reviewed

by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF C.E.O. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of KIT digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kaleil Isaza Tuzman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





August 3, 2011/s/ Kaleil Isaza TuzmanKaleil Isaza TuzmanChairman and Chief Executive Officer
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                            |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | /s/ Kaleil      Isaza Tuzman               |   |
|   |   | Kaleil      Isaza Tuzman                        |   |
|   |   | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer  |   |

----
II-00836

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Martha Miller-Hampton <millermarthaa@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:59 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged

swaps and this number may increase to over $10 trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial Stability Oversight Board

surely you will decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Martha Miller-Hampton

17607 E 380 Road

Chelsea, OK 74016, OK 74016