alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00271

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Milbrey Leighton <leighton@isr.umich.edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:48 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Milbrey Leighton

7821 Chamberlin Rd

Dexter, MI 48130
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2007 (the  "Report") of Teche Holding  Company (the  "Company") as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  we,
Patrick O. Little,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and J. L. Chauvin,
Senior Vice President and Treasurer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  `1350, as
adopted pursuant to `906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                  <C>

/s/Patrick O. Little                          /s/J.L. Chauvin
-------------------------------------         -------------------------------------------
Patrick O. Little                             J.L. Chauvin
President and Chief Executive Officer         Senior Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer)                 Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

December 31, 2007



</TABLE>
In re Kevin SCHAAP, petitioner.

No. 16-637.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
# C_2009267EN.01006802.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/68

---

Action brought on 18 August 2009 — Connefroy and Others v Commission

(Case T-327/09)

2009/C 267/124

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Philippe Connefroy (Le Rozel, France), Jean-Guy Gueguen (Carantec, France) and EARL de Cavagnan (Bouglon, France) (represented by: C. Galvez, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision on the basis of the fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision on the basis of the fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC;

| — | Order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 203 final of 28 January 2009 (1), by which the Commission had declared incompatible with the common market the State aid granted by the French Republic to fruit and vegetable producers in the context of ‘contingency plans’ aimed at facilitating the marketing of agricultural products harvested in France and had instructed the French Republic to recover the aid in question.

1

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicants are identical or similar to those relied on in the context of Case T-243/09 Fedecom v Commission
   (2).

Fedecom

Commission

2

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 127, p. 11 — published under No 2009/402/EC.

1

(2)  OJ 2009 C 205, p. 43.

2

---
GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE, petitioner, v. BELIZE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED.

No. 15-830.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
II-00965

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Barbara and Jim Dale <nonrev909@neitel.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:38 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. We urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only

manipulation, but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Barbara and Jim Dale

909 Vernon St.

Decorah, IA 52101
Roberto VILLARRUEL-QUINTANILLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7510.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
34140 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Proposed Rules

ADDRESSES: All comments should be

addressed to: Randy Terry at the EPA,

Region 4 Air Planning Branch, 61

Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia

30303.

Copies of the State submittal(s) are

available at the following addresses for

inspection during normal business

hours:

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4, Air Planning Branch, 61

Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia

30303–8960. Randy Terry, 404/562–

9032.

North Carolina Department of

Environment, Health, and Natural

Resources, 512 North Salisbury Street,

Raleigh, North Carolina 27604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy B. Terry at 404/562–9032.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information see the direct

final rule which is published in the

Rules section of this Federal Register.

Dated: January 5, 2001.

A. Stanley Meiburg,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

[FR Doc. 01–15876 Filed 6–26–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 25

[IB Docket 01–96; FCC 01–134]

Policies and Service Rules for the NonGeostationary Satellite Orbit,Fixed

Satellite Service in the Ku-Band;

Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This documents corrects one

sentence in the preamble to a proposed

rule published in the Federal Register

of June 6, 2001, regarding Policies and

Service Rules for the Non-Geostationary

Satellite Orbit, Fixed Satellite Service in

the Ku-Band. This correction includes

the proper radio frequency bands cited

in the sentence.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J.

Mark Young, 202–418–0762.

Correction

In proposed rule FR Doc. 01–14141,

beginning on page 30361 in the issue of

June 6, 2001, make the following

correction, in the ‘‘Summary’’ section.

On page 30361 in the 3rd column, the

first sentence is corrected to read as

follows: ‘‘The Federal Communications

Commission (FCC) proposes to decide

the means for sharing among multiple

satellite network licensees in spectrum

recently designated for the nongeostationary satellite orbit, fixedsatellite service (NGSO FSS) in the

10.7–12.7 GHz, 12.75–13.25 GHz and

13.75–14.5 GHz frequency bands (the

Ku-band).’’

Dated: June 21, 2001.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–16189 Filed 6–26–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1491** 

PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. JAMES TOWNSEND; RODNEY MOORE; DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR.; ROBERT B. NIPPER , Defe ndants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00140

- RJC

- DSC )

Submitted : September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Patrick O. Christian appeals th e district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (200 6 ) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e) (200 6 ). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district cour t. Christian v. Townsend , No. 3:11

- cv - 00140

- RJC

- DSC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
proce ss.

DISMISSED
Delano HALE, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-7411.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
Edwin ARVELO, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-7237.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**AMERICAN RESTAURANTGROUP, INC.**

 

**CertificationFurnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned herebycertify as follows:

 

1.             RalphS. Roberts is the Chief Executive Officer of American Restaurant Group, Inc.(the “Company”).

 

2.             WilliamG. Taves is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

 

3.             Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

(a)           The Company’s Form 10-Q accompanying thisCertification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)           The information in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certifications are subject to the limitations andqualifications set forth in the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

 
| Date: August 12, 2004 |                    |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|                  |                    |
|                  | */s/ Ralph S.  Roberts* |   |
|                  | Ralph S. Roberts        |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer |
|                  |                    |
|                  |                    |
|                  | */s/ William G.  Taves* |   |
|                  | William G. Taves        |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
In connection with the Quarterly Report of DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS, INC., (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date: December 30, 2003    /s/ Richard H. Casper

                               -------------------

                               Richard H. Casper
                               Chief Executive Officer







Date: December 30, 2003         /s/ Pamela Lindquist

                               ---------------------

                               Pamela Lindquist
                               Chief Financial Officer
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Nodal Clear, LLC 

FORM DCO 

DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATION 

APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION 

COVER SHEET 

Exact name of Applicant as specified in charter 

1921 Gallows Road, 3rd Floor, Tysons Corner, Virginia 22182 

Address of principal executive offices 

D If this is an APPLICATION for registration, complete in full and check here. 

D If this is an AMENDMENT to an application, list below all items that are being amended and check here. 

181 If this is an APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT to an existing registration, list below all items to be 

amended and check here. 

At the time of its 2014 DCO application, Nodal Clear, LLC C'Nodal Clea(') sought to clear financially settled electric power and natural gas futures 

executed on or through its affiliated designated contract market, Nodal Exchange, LLC ("Nodal Exchange"). Therefore, the existing order states 

"Nodal Clear is permitted to clear, in its capacity as a DCO, financially settled futures and options on futures." Nodal Clear now wishes to also clear 

physically settled options on futures and seeks to amend its existing order accordingly. 

GENERAL INFORMATION 

I. Name under which business is or wit I be conducted, if different than name specified above (include acronyms, 

if any): 

Same as specified above 

2. If name of derivatives clearing organization is being amended, state previous derivatives clearing organization 

name: 

N/A 

3. Additional contact infonnation: 

www.NodalClear.com 703-962-9800 

Website URL Main Phone Number 

4. List of principal office(s) and address( es) where derivatives clearing organization activities are/will be 

conducted: 

Address 

Principal Office 1921 Gallows Road, 3rd Floor, Tysons Comer, Virginia 22182
# C_2010024EN.01007901.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/79

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 November 2009 — Meister v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case F-17/09) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Action for annulment - Carry-over of promotion points acquired earlier - Absence of act having adverse effect - Action for damages - Damages not quantified - Manifest inadmissibility)

2010/C 24/149

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Herbert Meister (Muchamiel, Spain) (represented by: H.-J. Zimmermann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the dismissal of the applicant’s complaint regarding the defective and incorrect periodical report for the year 2008 and application for damages for the material loss allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Mr Meister’s action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Mr Meister’s action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | Mr Meister is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Meister is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.05.2009, p. 46

1

---
Mohammad SAIDIN, petitioner, v. Sam NEGRON, et al.

No. 16-9293.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
Joseph MIGLIORI, petitioner, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-7444.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Tomas VISCARRA, petitioner, v. Kenneth REAGANS, Warden.

No. 16-9347.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### G. W. Nelson *et al. v.*The State.

Assault.—Indictment charged that the accused “ did unlawfully, willfully, and maliciously make an aggravated assault,” etc., upon one R, but failed to allege any statutory circumstance of aggravation. *Held,*that the indictment is good for a simple assault, and, therefore, it was not error to overrule a motion to quash it. So much of the opinion in *The State*v. *Pierce,*26 Texas, 114, as seems to rule otherwise, is *obiter dicta,*and has not been followed.

Appeal from the District Court of Milam. Tried below before the Hon. A. S. Broaddus.

The clause in the indictment quoted in the head-note was followed with allegations of a battery, but with none of the circumstances of aggravation enumerated in Article 2150, Paschal’s Digest.

The motion to quash was on the ground that no offense was charged in plain and intelligible words, and because no circumstance of aggravation was alleged.

The trial below was in January, 1876, and the appeal taken to the supreme court.

*Martin &*Atkinson, for the appellants.

*A. J. Peeler,*Assistant Attorney General.

Ector, P. J.

The indictment is good for a simple assault. It charges all that is necessary to prove to secure a conviction for this offense. The opinion of the learned judge in the case of *The State*v. *Pierce,*26 Texas, 114, as to the sufficiency of such an indictment on a motion to quash, is *obiter dicta,*and is not in accord with other and later decisions of the supreme court which the court of appeals has followed. *Jackson*v. *The State,*25 Texas (Supp.), 229; *The State*v. *Archer,*34 Texas, 647; *Smith*v. *The*State, 35 Texas, 502; *Bettick*v. *The State,*40 Texas, 117; 22 Texas, 211; Pasc. Dig., Art. 3096.

*228The evidence is abundantly sufficient to warrant the verdict of the jury. We find no error committed on the trial of the cause. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3704 

To amend the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to clarify the use of subminimum 

wage with respect to certain contracts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2019 

Mrs. HARTZLER (for herself, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. CLAY, Mr. GRAVES of Missouri, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. LONG, and Mr. LUETKEMEYER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to clarify the 

use of subminimum wage with respect to certain contracts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Choices for 

5 Disabled Workers Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3704 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF USE OF SUBMINIMUM WAGE 

2 WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN CONTRACTS. 

3 (a) EXCEPTION TO PROHIBITION.—Section 

4 511(b)(2) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 

5 794g(b)(2)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘A local’’ and inserting the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

9 subparagraph (B), a local’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end following: 

11 ‘‘(B) STATE OF MISSOURI.—Notwith12 standing subparagraph (A), a local educational 

13 agency or State educational agency described in 

14 subparagraph (A) that is in the State of Mis15 souri may enter into a contract or other ar16 rangement with an entity described in sub17 section (a) for the purpose of operating a pro18 gram for an individual who is age 24 or young19 er under which work is compensated at a sub20 minimum wage if the individual has received, 

21 and produces appropriate documentation indi22 cating completion of, the services described in 

23 subsection (a)(2)(A) before beginning work.’’. 

24 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 511(a) of 

25 such Act (29 U.S.C. 794g(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘No 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3704 IH

1 entity’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in subsection 

2 (b)(2), no entity’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to work beginning after the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Ravenwood
Bourne, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending October 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Fotis Georgiadis, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.



|Date: January 27, 2012 | /s/ Fotis Georgiadis                        
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                       | Fotis Georgiadis                            
|                       | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                       | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)