# C_2009090EN.01001102.xml

| 18.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester (United Kingdom) made on 29 January 2009 — Astra Zeneca UK Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

(Case C-40/09)

2009/C 90/17

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Astra Zeneca UK Limited

Applicant:

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1) | In the circumstances of this case, where an employee is entitled under the terms of his or her contract of employment to opt to take part of his or her remuneration as a face value voucher, is Article 2(1) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) [now Article 2(1)(c) of the Principal VAT Directive] to be interpreted such that the provision of that voucher by the employer to the employee constitutes a supply of services for consideration? |
| --- | --- |

1)

In the circumstances of this case, where an employee is entitled under the terms of his or her contract of employment to opt to take part of his or her remuneration as a face value voucher, is Article 2(1) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) [now Article 2(1)(c) of the Principal VAT Directive] to be interpreted such that the provision of that voucher by the employer to the employee constitutes a supply of services for consideration?

1

| 2) | If the answer to question 1 is no, is Article 6(2)(b) [now Article 26(1)(b)] to be interpreted as requiring the provision of the voucher by the employer to the employee in accordance with the contract of employment to be treated as a supply of services, in circumstances where the voucher is to be used by the employee for his or her private purposes? |
| --- | --- |

2)

If the answer to question 1 is no, is Article 6(2)(b) [now Article 26(1)(b)] to be interpreted as requiring the provision of the voucher by the employer to the employee in accordance with the contract of employment to be treated as a supply of services, in circumstances where the voucher is to be used by the employee for his or her private purposes?

| 3) | If the provision of the voucher is neither a supply of services for consideration within the meaning of Article 2(1) nor is to be treated as a supply of services under Article 6(2)(b), is Article 17(2) [now Article 168] to be interpreted so as to permit the employer to recover the value added tax it has incurred in purchasing and providing the voucher to the employee in accordance with the contract of employment in circumstances where the voucher is to be used by the employee for his or her private purposes? |
| --- | --- |

3)

If the provision of the voucher is neither a supply of services for consideration within the meaning of Article 2(1) nor is to be treated as a supply of services under Article 6(2)(b), is Article 17(2) [now Article 168] to be interpreted so as to permit the employer to recover the value added tax it has incurred in purchasing and providing the voucher to the employee in accordance with the contract of employment in circumstances where the voucher is to be used by the employee for his or her private purposes?

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment OJ L 145, p. 1

1

---