alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the amended Quarterly Report of Greenland Corporation
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB/A for the year ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Thomas  Beener, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.   1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.

/s/  Thomas  Beener.
--------------------

Thomas  Beener
Chief  Executive  Officer

Date:  June  9,  2003
Lori IRISH, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.

No. 16-6540.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pierce Carson, President &
Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.

|Date: May 19, 2008 | By: | /s/
      Pierce Carson                     
|------------------ | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                   |     | Pierce Carson                               
|                   |     | Chief Executive Officer, President, Director
|                   |     | and Principal Accounting Officer            

---
# C_2010317EN.01001301.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Mora Kommun (Sweden) lodged on 21 August 2009 — Dan Bengtsson v Tele2 Sverige AB, Telenor Sverige AB, TeliaSonera Mobile Networks AB, Teracom

(Case C-344/09)

()

2010/C 317/24

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Mora Kommun

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Dan Bengtsson

Applicant:

Defendants: Tele2 Sverige AB, Telenor Sverige AB, TeliaSonera Mobile Networks AB, Teracom

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

The environment and health committee of the Municipality of Mora seeks a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC (1) in relation to Article 174(2) EC. The question is whether the reference levels for electromagnetic fields set out in the Recommendation are to be interpreted as guidelines for the application of the precautionary principle, or whether that principle constitutes a complement to the Recommendation?

1

---

(1)  Council Recommendation of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz) (OJ 1999 L 199, p. 59).

1

---
In Re Joe Daniel CONTRERAS, petitioner.

No. 17-7630.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# C_2009167EN.01002603.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/26

---

Action brought on 2 April 2009 — Doyle v Europol

(Case F-37/09)

2009/C 167/51

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Margaret Doyle (Noordwijkerhout, the Netherlands) (represented by: P. de Casparis)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer her a permanent post, and the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the defendant informed the applicant that it could not offer her a permanent post and the decision of 7 January 2009 in response to a complaint, stating that the objections which the applicant had raised to the decision of 12 June 2008 were unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the defendant informed the applicant that it could not offer her a permanent post and the decision of 7 January 2009 in response to a complaint, stating that the objections which the applicant had raised to the decision of 12 June 2008 were unfounded;

| — | order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to pay the costs.

---
II-00218

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

mary ortner <mary.ortner@gmail.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 3:46 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

mary ortner

500 west 6th

Odebolt, IA 51458
II-00248

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Britton Saunders <brittik@aol.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 9:42 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Britton Saunders

2975 South Wentworth Avenue

Milwaukee, WI 53207
Troy Ahkeem WILSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7854.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2014112EN.01003102.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/31

---

Order of the General Court of 31 January 2014 — France v Commission

(Case T-79/09) (1)

1

((State aid - Framework system of activities carried out by agricultural inter-trade organisations recognised in France in favour of the members of the represented agricultural industries - Financing by compulsory voluntary contributions - Decision classifying the aid scheme as compatible with the common market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 112/41

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented initially by: E. Belliard, G. de Bergues and A.-L. Vendrolini, subsequently by E. Belliard, G. de Bergues and J. Gstalter, and lastly by E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, D. Colas and J. Bousin, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, and subsequently by B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final of 10 December 2008 in respect of State aid No 561/2008 relating to the framework system of activities carried out by agricultural inter-trade organisations recognised in France in favour of the members of the represented agricultural industries.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.

1

---
Timothy WEST, petitioner, v. Margaret BRADSHAW, Warden.

No. 17-7438.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Beth CARNICELLA, petitioner, v. MERCY HOSPITAL.

No. 17-987.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.
# C_2012032EN.01002103.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2011 — Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials v Council

(Case T-423/09) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China - Regulation terminating an interim review - Comparison between the normal value and the export price - Taking into account the value added tax of the country of origin - Application of a different methodology to that used in the initial investigation - Change in circumstances - Articles 2(10)(b) and 11(9) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Articles 2(10)(b) and 11(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)

2012/C 32/41

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co. Ltd (Dashiqiao, China) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis and R. Luff, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially J.-P. Hix and subsequently by J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, Agents, assisted initially by G. Berrisch and G. Wolf, and subsequently by G. Berrisch, lawyers)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and H. van Vliet, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 826/2009 of 7 September 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2009 L 240, p. 7), in so far as the anti-dumping duty it sets in relation to the applicant exceeds that which would be applicable if that duty had been determined on the basis of the method of calculation applied in the original investigation in order to take account of the fact that Chinese export VAT was not refunded.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---
# C_2012133EN.01000401.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 March 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Génesis Seguros Generales Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (GENESIS) v Boys Toys SA, Administración del Estado

(Case C-190/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Definition and acquisition - Earlier trade mark - Procedure for filing - Filing by electronic means - Method enabling precise identification of the day, hour and minute when the application was filed)

2012/C 133/06

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Génesis Seguros Generales Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (GENESIS)

Applicant:

Defendants: Boys Toys SA, Administración del Estado

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Supremo — Interpretation of Article 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Priority — Procedure for filing — Method (e-mail) enabling precise identification of the day, hour and minute when the application was filed

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1992/2003 of 27 October 2003 must be interpreted as precluding account being taken not only of the day but also of the hour and minute of filing of an application for a Community trade mark with the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (OHIM) for the purposes of establishing that trade mark’s priority over a national trade mark filed on the same day, where, according to the national legislation governing the registration of national trade marks, the hour and minute of filing are relevant in that regard.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
# C_2011226EN.01000401.xml

| 30.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Central Bank

(Case C-401/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Admissibility - Power of attorney - Consortium - Public contracts - Negotiated procedure - IT consultancy and IT development services - Rejection of the tender - Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Interest in bringing proceedings - Ground for exclusion - Permit required by national law - Obligation to state reasons)

2011/C 226/05

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (represented by: F. von Lindeiner and G. Gruber, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 2 July 2009 in Case T-279/06 Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Central Bank (ECB) dismissing an action for annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 31 July 2006 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the negotiated procedure for the provision of IT consultancy and IT development services to the ECB (OJ 2005 S 137-135345) and of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer

Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE

European Central Bank (ECB)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---
II-00397

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

V. Alexander <La_Arcolris de Verdad@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:36 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

V. Alexander

4232 Eubank Blvd. NE

Albuquerque, NM 87111
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1999
<CASH>                                         382,765
<SECURITIES>                                 2,056,199
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,413,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               626,862
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,915,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          797,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,223
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,915,590
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,109,346
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                951,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   971,879
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81


</TABLE>