alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3847 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3847

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2020

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 117 West Poythress Street in Hopewell, Virginia, as the ``Reverend 
               Curtis West Harris Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVEREND CURTIS WEST HARRIS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located 117 West Poythress Street in Hopewell, Virginia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Reverend Curtis West Harris Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Reverend 
Curtis West Harris Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Daviel SALINAS-ACEVEDO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7915.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# C_2011194EN.01000601.xml

| 2.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany)) — Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG), Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Frankfurt Branch

(Case C-144/10) (1)

1

(Jurisdiction in civil matters - Articles 22(2) and 27 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State in which a company has its seat to adjudicate upon disputes relating to the validity of decisions of the company’s organs - Scope - Action brought by a legal person governed by public law for a declaration that a contract is void on account of alleged invalidity of the decisions of its organs relating to the conclusion of the contract - Lis pendens - Obligation on any court other than the court first seised to stay proceedings - Scope)

2011/C 194/07

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Kammergericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG), Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts

Applicant:

Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Frankfurt Branch

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Kammergericht Berlin — Interpretation of Articles 22(2) and 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State in which a company has its seat over disputes concerning the validity of the decisions of its organs — Applicability of that exclusive jurisdiction rule to an action brought by a legal person governed by public law for a declaration that an agreement is void on account of the alleged invalidity of the decisions of its organs relating to the conclusion of the agreement

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 22(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as not applying to proceedings in which a company pleads that a contract cannot be relied upon against it because a decision of its organs which led to the conclusion of the contract is supposedly invalid on account of infringement of its statutes.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,024,955
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  311,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,465,222
<PP&E>                                         128,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,575,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,096,442
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,158,325
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,575,549
<SALES>                                      1,005,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,005,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  963,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               357,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,484
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.022
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.022
        

</TABLE>
Bobby Ray GRADY, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 16-6970.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
# C_2010024EN.01006801.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/68

---

Action brought on 30 November 2009 — ATB Norte v OHIM — Bricocenter Italia (maxi BRICOCENTRO)

(Case T-481/09)

2010/C 24/120

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ATB Norte, SL (Burgos, Spain) (represented by: P. López Ronda, G. Macías Bonilla, H.L. Curtis-Oliver and G. Marín Raigal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Bricocenter Italia Srl (Rozzano Milanofiori (Milan), Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 September 2009 – R 1046/2008-4. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 September 2009 – R 1046/2008-4.

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Bricocenter S.r.l.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘maxi BRICOCENTER’ (Application No 4 939 005) in respect of services in Class 35.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: ATB Norte, SL.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative Community trade marks containing the word elements ‘CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE BRICOCENTRO’ (No 3 262 623) and ‘ATB CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE BRICOCENTRO’ (No 989 046) in respect of services in Classes 35, 37 and 39.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Opposition Division’s decision annulled and the opposition rejected in its entirety.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
Gabriel I. PITTMAN, petitioner, v. William J. CLINTON, former President of the United States, et al.

No. 16-9251.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1687 

Recognizing and supporting the goals and ideals of National Runaway 

Prevention Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mrs. BIGGERT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and supporting the goals and ideals of National 

Runaway Prevention Month. 

Whereas the number of runaway and homeless youth in the 

United States is staggering, with studies suggesting that 

between 1,600,000 and 2,800,000 youth live on the 

streets each year; 

Whereas the problem of children who run away from home 

is widespread, as youth between 12 and 17 years of age 

are at a higher risk of homelessness than adults; 

Whereas runaway youth are often expelled from their homes 

by their families, discharged by State custodial systems 

without adequate transition plans, separated from their 

parents by death and divorce, or physically, sexually, and 

emotionally abused at home; 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1687 IH 

Whereas runaway youth are often too poor to secure their 

own basic needs and are ineligible or unable to access 

adequate medical or mental health resources; 

Whereas effective programs that provide support to runaway 

youth and assist them in remaining at home with their 

families can succeed through partnerships created among 

families, community-based human service agencies, law 

enforcement agencies, schools, faith-based organizations, 

and businesses; 

Whereas preventing youth from running away from home and 

supporting youth in high-risk situations is a family, community, and national priority; 

Whereas the future of the Nation is dependent on providing 

opportunities for youth to acquire the knowledge, skills, 

and abilities necessary to develop into safe, healthy, and 

productive adults; 

Whereas the National Network for Youth and its members 

advocate on behalf of runaway and homeless youth and 

provide an array of community-based support to address 

their critical needs; 

Whereas the National Runaway Switchboard provides crisis 

intervention and referrals to reconnect runaway youth 

with their families and link youth to local resources that 

provide positive alternatives to running away from home; 

and 

Whereas during the month of November, the National Network for Youth and the National Runaway Switchboard 

are cosponsoring National Runaway Prevention Month, 

in order to increase public awareness of the circumstances faced by youth in high-risk situations and to 

address the need to provide resources and support for 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1687 IH 

safe, healthy, and productive alternatives for at-risk 

youth, their families, and their communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and supports the goals and ideals of National Run3 away Prevention Month. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
Luke T. WEST, petitioner, v. Carrie L. RIETH, et al.

No. 17-7121.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

*1547Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Andrew Mark LAMAR, petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 16-7283.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To The Board of Directors
International Commercial Television Inc. and Subsidiaries


We consent to the incorporation in the Annual Report of International Commercial
Television  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries on Form 10-KSB of our report dated March 25,
2003  on  our  audits  of the consolidated financial statements of International
Commercial Television Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and
for the years then ended, which our reports are incorporated in the Form 10-KSB.




/s/ Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP

Walnut, California
March 25, 2003


<PAGE>
Robert Lee FOSTER, petitioner, v. Cecilia REYNOLDS, Warden.

No. 16-6545.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 364 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 364

 To provide for additional security requirements for Syrian and Iraqi 
                   refugees, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

 Mr. Calvert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for additional security requirements for Syrian and Iraqi 
                   refugees, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure Accountability for Emigres 
and Refugees Act of 2019'' or the ``SAFER Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SYRIAN AND IRAQI REFUGEES.

    (a) In General.--Prior to admitting to the United States as a 
refugee under section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1157) a covered alien, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in 
coordination with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation 
and the Director of National Intelligence, shall ensure that the 
covered alien--
            (1) has taken and passed a lie detector test, as determined 
        by the Secretary;
            (2) has submitted to the Secretary biometric identification 
        information, including DNA, which the Secretary has compared 
        against all relevant databases and determined that the covered 
        alien has no known history of engaging in terrorist activity 
        (as such term is defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iv) of the 
        Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(iv))); 
        and
            (3) does not pose a threat to the national security of the 
        United States based on a background check that the Secretary 
        conducts, which includes a review of the covered alien's 
        interactions on and posting of material to the Internet 
        (including social media services), and for purposes of which, 
        the alien has submitted to the Secretary such information as 
        the Secretary determines necessary.
    (b) Covered Alien.--The term ``covered alien'' means an alien 
applying for admission to the United States as a refugee who--
            (1) is a national of Iraq or Syria;
            (2) has no nationality and whose last habitual residence 
        was in Iraq or Syria; or
            (3) has been present in Iraq or Syria at any time on or 
        after March 1, 2011.
    (c) Sunset.--This Act shall cease to have effect on the date that 
is 10 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1772 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require House officers 

and employees to take annual factual training on the Constitution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2010 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. 

CONAWAY, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 

MCHENRY, Ms. FOXX, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado, Mr. 

BRADY of Texas, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. OLSON, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. 

LATTA, Mr. PITTS, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. REED, Mr. 

ROONEY, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. BURTON of 

Indiana, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, 

and Mr. HERGER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require House officers and employees to take annual 

factual training on the Constitution. 

1 Resolved, That (a) rule XI of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

3 following new clause: 

4 ‘‘Constitutional training for officers and employees 

5 ‘‘7.(a)(1) The Subcommittee on the Constitution, 

6 Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties of the Committee on the 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1772 IH 

1 Judiciary shall offer annual factual training on the Con2 stitution to each officer and employee of the House. Such 

3 training shall— 

4 ‘‘(A) involve the same class of employees for 

5 whom the Committee on Standards of Official Con6 duct has determined ethics training to be appro7 priate under clause 3(a)(6); and 

8 ‘‘(B) include such knowledge of the Constitu9 tion as may be determined appropriate by the Sub10 committee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and 

11 Civil Liberties of the Committee on the Judiciary. 

12 ‘‘(b)(1) A new officer or employee of the House shall 

13 receive training under this clause not later than 60 days 

14 after beginning service to the House. 

15 ‘‘(2) Not later than January 31 of each year, each 

16 officer and employee of the House shall file a certification 

17 with the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, 

18 and Civil Liberties of the Committee on the Judiciary that 

19 the officer or employee attended training on the Constitu20 tion in the last year as established by this clause.’’. 

21 (b) The amendment made by this resolution shall 

22 take effect immediately before noon, January 5, 2011. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Alaa E. ELKHARWILY, petitioner, v. MAYO HOLDING COMPANY, et al.

No. 16-403.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
DENY and Opinion Filed February 9, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00219-CV

IN RE TEKIN & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-01986-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein

Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial court’s August 31, 

2020 order denying relator’s Rule 91a motion to dismiss. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 91a. 

A writ of mandamus issues to correct a clear abuse of discretion when no adequate 

remedy by appeal exists. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) 

(orig. proceeding). Although mandamus is not an equitable remedy, its issuance is 

largely controlled by equitable principles. Rivercenter Assocs. v. Rivera, 858 S.W.2d 

366, 367 (Tex. 1993) (orig. proceeding). One such principle is that “equity aids the 

diligent and not those who slumber on their rights.” Id. (internal brackets and 

quotation marks omitted). Thus, delaying the filing of a petition for mandamus relief 
–2–

may waive the right to mandamus unless the relator can justify the delay. In re Int’l 

Profit Assocs., Inc., 274 S.W.3d 672, 676 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding).

Under prior holdings of this court and others, an unexplained delay of four 

months or more can constitute laches and result in denial of mandamus relief. See 

Rivera, 858 S.W.2d at 366 (unexplained delay of more than four months); In re

Wages & White Lion Investments, No. 05-21-00650-CV, 2021 WL 3276875 (Tex. 

App.—Dallas, July 30, 2021, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (unexplained delay of 

over four months from oral ruling and three months from date order was signed); 

Int’l Awards, Inc. v. Medina, 900 S.W.2d 934, 936 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1995, orig. 

proceeding) (unexplained delay of more than four months and waited until eve of 

trial); Furr’s Supermarkets, Inc. v. Mulanax, 897 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Tex. App.—El 

Paso 1995, no writ) (unexplained four-month delay in challenging discovery orders). 

Here, relator’s April 6, 2021 petition for mandamus was filed seven months 

and six days after the trial court’s August 31, 2020 order denying the motion to 

dismiss. We conclude that relator’s unexplained delay bars his right to mandamus 

relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

210219f.p05 /Bill Pedersen, III//

BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
Open Meeting of the Commission – Tuesday, October 6, 2020

AGENDA

1. Call to Order

2. Opening Statements

Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

Commissioner Brian D. Quintenz

Commissioner Rostin Behnam

Commissioner Dawn D. Stump

Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz

3. Final Rule: Amendments to Compliance Requirements for Commodity 

Pool Operators on Form CPO-PQR

Staff Presentation

Joshua B. Sterling, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO)

Pamela Geraghty, DSIO Elizabeth Groover, DSIO 

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

4. Memorandum of Understanding: MOU Between the CFTC and the Office 

of Financial Research Regarding the Sharing of Data and Information 

Collected on Form CPO-PQR

Staff Presentation

Amanda Olear, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO) 

Andrée Goldsmith, DSIO 

Natasha C. Robinson Coates, Office of General Counsel (OGC) 

Matthew Rowland, OGC

CFTC Chairman’s Statement on the MOU

OFR Director Dino Falaschetti’s Statement on the MOU

5. Closing Remarks

6. Adjournment