alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,905
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,007
<INVENTORY>                                     21,616
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,099
<PP&E>                                          18,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,681
<BONDS>                                          1,701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,855
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,529)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,440
<SALES>                                         46,674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,674
<CGS>                                           24,969
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                       637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,726
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
**Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2011 – Dover v Parliament**

**(Case T-149/09)**

Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Review of the use of allowances – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Justification of expenditure – Recovery of undue payments

1.                     *Procedure – Measures of organisation of procedure – Request that internal documents of an institution be removed from the
file – Documents irregularly obtained – Retention on file – Criteria (see paras 61-63)*

2.                     *Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament
concerning the recovery of sums paid to an MEP by way of parliamentary assistance allowance – Duty to state specific, adequate
reasons for each amount regarded as unjustified (Art. 253 EC) (see paras 98-99, 109, 111)*

3.                     *European Parliament – Regulation governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament –
Parliamentary assistance allowance – Lack of documents to evidence use in accordance with rules – Obligation to repay – Conditions
for granting the allowance met at the time of the application – No effect (see paras 122-124)*

4.                     *European Parliament – Regulation governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament –
Parliamentary assistance allowance – Provider of parliamentary assistance services not having honoured his tax obligations
arising from the fees relating thereto – Liability of the MEP making the application vis-à-vis the Parliament – None (see
paras 150-155)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Decision D (2009) 4639 of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 29 January 2009 concerning the recovery of sums paid to the applicant by way of parliamentary allowances. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls Decision D (2009) 4639 of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 29 January 2009 as regards the recovery of the sum of GBP 193 001; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders the Parliament and Mr Densmore Ronald Dover each to bear their own costs. |
# C_2009102EN.01002301.xml

| 1.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/23

---

Action brought on 16 February 2009 — Micro Shaping Ltd v OHIM (>packaging)

(Case T-64/09)

2009/C 102/36

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Micro Shaping Ltd (Worthing, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 December 2008 — Appeal R 1063/2008-1 — in relation to Community trade mark application No 006354311 ‘>packaging’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 December 2008 — Appeal R 1063/2008-1 — in relation to Community trade mark application No 006354311 ‘>packaging’;

| — | Order the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the applicant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘>packaging’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 17 and 42 (Application No 6 354 311)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application in part

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94, (1) because the mark applied for has the necessary distinctive character and there is no need to retain availability, and of the right to be heard under Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
II-00086

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Paul Merkel <paulmerkel@yahoo.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 7:04 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Paul Merkel

537 Stoddards Mill Dr

Ballwin, MO 63011
II-O0080

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

virginia Smith <ivmsmith@comast.net>

Monday, December 6, 2010 2:14 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

virginia Smith

9580 nw 25th Ct

Sunrise, FL 33322-2713
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of PAIVIS, Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
      for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory L. Bauer, Principal
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)    
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.


Dated:
              February 21, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Gregory
              L. BauerGregory
              L. BauerPrincipal
                Executive Officer
              Acting
                Chief Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      PAIVIS, Corp and will be retained by PAIVIS, Corp. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Abdullahi Hamu JARA, petitioner, v. STANDARD PARKING, et al.

No. 17-6413.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
II-00165

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

hawkins boyle <silver.hawk.one@gmail.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 9:04 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

hawkins boyle

3506 34th st apt b44

astoria, NY 11106
II-00224

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Steve Hedges <gargoyle055@comcast.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 3:00 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Steve Hedges

6620 170th pl. s.w.

Edmonds, WA 98026
Carlos BARBOSA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7529.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3761 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of 

higher education from denying students access to transcripts because 

of loan default. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2019 

Mrs. LEE of Nevada (for herself, Ms. FINKENAUER, Ms. SHERRILL, Ms. WILSON of Florida, and Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit 

institutions of higher education from denying students 

access to transcripts because of loan default. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Access to 

5 Student Transcripts Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3761 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LOSS OF ACCESS TO TRAN2 SCRIPTS FOR LOAN DEFAULT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 487(a) of the Higher 

4 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended 

5 by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(30)(A) The institution will not prohibit a stu7 dent from accessing the student’s transcripts, degree 

8 scrolls, or other certifications of coursework or edu9 cational attainments at the institution because the 

10 student is in default on a loan made, insured, or 

11 guaranteed under this title. 

12 ‘‘(B) For purposes of this paragraph, the term 

13 ‘student’ includes former students.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall take effect with respect to academic 

16 year 2019–2020 and each succeeding academic year. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2010209EN.01003801.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — Muñoz Arraiza v OHIM — Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Calificada Rioja (RIOJAVINA)

(Case T-138/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark RIOJAVINA - Earlier Community collective figurative mark RIOJA - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 209/57

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Félix Muñoz Arraiza (Logroño, Spain) (represented by: J. Grimau Muñoz and J. Villamor Muguerza, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J.F. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Calificada Rioja (Logroño) (represented by: J.I. Martínez De Torre, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 January 2009 (Case R 721/2008-2) concerning opposition proceedings between the Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Calificada Rioja and Félix Muñoz Arraiza.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Félix Muñoz Arraiza to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Félix Muñoz Arraiza to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.

1

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3651 

To facilitate the use of certain land in Nebraska for public outdoor 

recreational opportunities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2019 

Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To facilitate the use of certain land in Nebraska for public 

outdoor recreational opportunities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CONVEYED LAND. 

4 Section 342(c) of the Consolidated Natural Resources 

5 Act of 2008 is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘The conveyance’’ and inserting 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(1) PRIMARY USE.—The conveyance’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3651 IH

1 ‘‘(2) ADDITIONAL USE.—The Missouri River 

2 Basin Lewis and Clark Interpretive Trail and Visitor 

3 Center Foundation, Inc. may use, or enter into a 

4 lease or agreement to use, not more than 40 acres 

5 of the land conveyed under subsection (a) for public 

6 outdoor recreation under the following conditions: 

7 ‘‘(A) The land shall continue to be main8 tained in a manner that is compatible with the 

9 use authorized in paragraph (1), conditions 

10 stated in the deed for the land, and the memo11 randum of understanding with the National 

12 Park Service dated June 2009. 

13 ‘‘(B) The nature trail around the perim14 eter of the land shall remain in place and may 

15 be enhanced with educational signage about the 

16 flora and fauna that are native to the land and 

17 planting of native flora. 

18 ‘‘(C) Revenue from any use (including any 

19 lease or agreement entered into) under this 

20 paragraph shall be used to offset maintenance 

21 and operating costs of the Lewis and Clark In22 terpretive Center.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         275
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    3,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,465
<PP&E>                                         910
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (478)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,888
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       23
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,534
<SALES>                                        7,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,012
<CGS>                                          6,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (11)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (554)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (554)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.24)
        

</TABLE>