alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013114EN.01000601.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 February 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-483/10) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Development of the Community’s railways - Directive 2001/14/EC - Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity - Levying of charges - Charges - Management independence)

2013/C 114/05

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta and B. Plaza Cruz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Očková and T. Müller, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and M. Perrot, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 10(7) of Council Directive 91/440/EEC of 29 July 1991 on the development of the Community’s railways (OJ 1991 L 237, p. 25) and of Articles 4(1), 11, 13(2), 14(1) and 30(1) of Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (OJ 2001 L 75, p. 29) — Charges — Management independence

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 4(1), 11, 13(2) and 14(1) of Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure, as amended by Directive 2007/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Articles 4(1), 11, 13(2) and 14(1) of Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure, as amended by Directive 2007/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic and the French Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic and the French Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
Lillian ADAMS, petitioner, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES.

No. 17-7908.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

*1563Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District denied.
Phillip BROWN, petitioner, v. S.L. BURT, Warden, et al.

No. 16-1462.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Joseph MODESTE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 15-9567.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
Edgar GONZALEZ-PINA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9441.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Dirk van den Boom, Chief Executive Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:


1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended December 31, 2015, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, and


2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request.


This certification accompanies the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.


I N W ITNESS W HEREOF , the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 9th day of March, 2016.











/s/ Dirk van den BoomDirk van den BoomPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
II-O0180

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

edward reardon <judd65002@yahoo.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 11:27 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

edward reardon

4 winslow st.

arlington, MA 2474
3200 Southwest Freeway
Houston, Texas 77027-7528
P.O. Box 1370
Houston, Texas 77251-t 370
Telephone 713/543-6500

(LOGO)
BANK UNITED

October 21, 1998

Deloitte & Touche LLP
333 Clay Street, Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002

As of  and  for  the  year  ended  September  30,  1998,  Bank  United  and  its
subsidiaries (the "Bank) have complied in all material respects with the minimum
servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same
period,  the Bank had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount of $40,000,000 and
an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $25,000,000.

Anthony J. Nocella
Vice Chairman and
Chief Financial Officer

Jonathan  K. Heffron
Chief Operating Officer and
General Counsel
# C_2013225EN.01006201.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/62

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2013 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-509/09) (1)

1

(Fisheries - Financial contribution for the implementation of control and surveillance systems - Decision not to reimburse expenditure incurred for the purchase of two Ocean Patrol Vessels (OPV) - Article 296 EC - Directive 93/36/EEC - Legitimate expectations - Obligation to state reasons)

2013/C 225/138

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented: initially by L. Inez Fernandes, A. Trindade Mimoso and A. Miranda Boavida, and subsequently by I. Inez Fernandes, H. Leitão and V. Coelho, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and M. Afonso, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision of 14 October 2009 declaring ineligible for European Union financial support under Commission Decision 2002/978/EC of 10 December 2002 on the eligibility of expenditure on a number of operations to be incurred by certain Member States in 2002 in implementing the control, inspection and surveillance systems applicable to the common fisheries policy (OJ 2002 L 338, p. 33) expenditure associated with the purchase of two Ocean Patrol Vessels (OPV), to be used partly for the control and surveillance of fishing activities.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
Bernard McFADDEN, petitioner, v. David DUNLAP, Warden.

No. 16-9566.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Kevin EPPERSON, petitioner, v. DELAWARE.

No. 17-7751.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
SCPR-15-0000962
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
IN RE LIZANNE T. PASQUARETTE, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )

Upon consideration of Petitioner Lizanne T. Pasquarette’s petition to resign and surrender her license to practice law in the State of Hawai # i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai # i (RSCH), and of the affidavits and exhibits in support thereof,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted, nunc pro tunc to December 31, 2015.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the name of Petitioner Lizanne T. Pasquarette, attorney number 10291, Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-15-0000962 15-JAN-2016 03:36 PMfrom the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai # i, effective

with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, January 15, 2016. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,517,090
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         124,112
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,755,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,498,119
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         200,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           185,767
<LOANS>                                     58,616,545
<ALLOWANCE>                                    445,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,768,750
<DEPOSITS>                                  57,427,913
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            366,781
<LONG-TERM>                                 12,465,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       717,759
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,791,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              75,768,750
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,415,626
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              183,242
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               134,784
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,733,652
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,055,269
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,398,179
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,335,473
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   37,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,169,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                364,368
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     242,233
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   242,233
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.82
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   241,312
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               404,385
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,409
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              445,794
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           445,794
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
James W. MASSARO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9527.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38, 101 and TA-W-38, 101A]


Bonney Forge Corporation, Allentown, PA and Bonney Forge 
Corporation, Mt. Union, PA; Notice of Revised Determination on 
Reopening

    On February 5, 2001, the Department, on its own motion, reopened 
its investigation for the former workers of the subject firm.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
issued on December 18, 2000, because the ``contributed importantly'' 
test of the Group Eligibility Requirements of the Trade Act was not met 
for workers at the subject firm. The workers produce steel fittings and 
o'let valves. The denial notice was published in the Federal Register 
on January 11, 2001 (66 FR 2450).
    Criteria (1) and (2) of the worker group eligibility requirements 
of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 were met. Employment and sales 
decreased from FY 1999 to FY 2000.
    New information was provided by one of the customers of the subject 
firm, which warranted further investigation. Review of all survey 
respondents and clarification of the information received by the 
Department revealed that a major declining customer of the subject firm 
increased import purchases of steel pipe fittings while reducing 
purchases from Bonney Forge.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on reopening, 
it is concluded that increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with steel pipe fittings produced by the subject firm 
contributed importantly to the decline in sales and to the total or 
partial separation of workers of the subject firm. In accordance with 
the provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I make the following revised 
determination:

    ``All workers at Bonney Forge Corporation, Allentown, 
Pennsylvania (TA-W-38, 101), and Mt. Union, Pennsylvania, (TA-W-38, 
101A), who became totally or partially separated from employment on 
or after August 29, 1999, through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''


    Signed in Washington, DC this 7th day of June 2001.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-16155 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6639-6640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1633]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer 
Liaison Group.
    Date: January 29, 2001.
    Time: 12:30 pm to 2:30 pm.

[[Page 6640]]

    Agenda: To get updates from the working groups and to discuss 
the advocates section of the April 2001 DCLG meeting.
    Place: National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Suite 300 C, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Elaine Lee, Acting Executive Secretary, Office 
of Liaison Activities, National Institute of Health, National Cancer 
Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Suite 300 C, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301/594-3194.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to scheduling conflicts.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-1633 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
# C_2013032EN.01001503.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/15

---

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 — Novácke chemické závody v Commission

(Case T-352/09) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Fines - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Equal treatment - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Ability to pay)

2013/C 32/22

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novácke chemické závody a.s. (Nováky, Slovakia) (represented initially by: A. Černejová, and subsequently by M. Bol’oš and L. Bányaiová, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, N. von Lingen and A. Tokár, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Slovak Republic (represented by: B. Ricziová, acting as Agent)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 5791 final of 22 July 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.396 — Calcium carbide and magnesium based reagents for the steel and gas industries), in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, cancellation or a reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Novácke chemické závody a.s. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Novácke chemické závody a.s. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Slovak Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Slovak Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00112-CV

DAVID A. SKEELS, Appellant

V.

JONATHAN T. SUDER; MICHAEL T.

COOKE; AND FRIEDMAN, SUDER &

COOKE, P.C., Appellees

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 236th District Court

of Tarrant County (236-284262-16)

October 14, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

Dissenting Memorandum Opinion by 

Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT ON FURTHER REHEARING

After reviewing the parties’ further motions for rehearing, we deny the 

motions. We deny appellant David A. Skeels’s further motion for en banc 

reconsideration as moot. However, we withdraw our June 17, 2021 judgment on 

rehearing and substitute the following.

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. We modify the trial court’s January 7, 

2018 amended final judgment (1) to delete appellee Friedman, Suder & Cooke, P.C.’s 
award of attorney’s fees and costs under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act and 

(2) to delete the award of sanctions in favor of appellees Jonathan T. Suder and 

Michael T. Cooke. As modified, we affirm the trial court’s amended final judgment. 

We affirm the trial court’s September 11, 2017 declaratory-judgment order.

It is further ordered that all parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal, for 

which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack