alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-Olll9

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Maria Wyatt <mmwyatt@verizon.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:07 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Maria Wyatt

6329 East Eliot Street

Long Beach, CA 90803
II-00495

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rich Yurman <ryurman@newsguy.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:47 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Rich Yurman

5925 Ross St

Oakland, CA 94618
Lewis WHOOLERY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7333.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# C_2009102EN.01002101.xml

| 1.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/21

---

Action brought on 16 February 2009 — Meica v OHIM — Bösinger Fleischwaren (Schinken King)

(Case T-61/09)

2009/C 102/33

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co KG (Edewecht, Germany) (represented by: S. Russlies, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Bösinger Fleischwaren GmbH (Bösingen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 December 2008 (Case R 1049/2007-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 December 2008 (Case R 1049/2007-1);

| — | Order OHIM to pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Bösinger Fleischwaren GmbH

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Schinken King’ for goods in Classes 29 and 30 (Application No. 3 720 968)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the Community word mark ‘Curry King’ (Community trade mark No 2 885 077) for goods in Class 30 and the German word marks ‘Curry King’ (No 399 02 969,9) and ‘King’ (No 304 04 434,2) for goods in Classes 29 and 30

Mark or sign cited in opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94, (1) because there is a likelihood or confusion or at least a likelihood of association between the marks at issue and of Article 74(1) on the ground of inadequate reasoning of the decision.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2012227EN.01001702.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2012 — Kavaklidere-Europe v OHIM — Yakult Honsha (Yakut)

(Case T-276/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Yakut - Earlier Community figurative mark Yakult - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 227/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kavaklidere-Europe (Schoten, Belgium) (represented: initially by J. Vercraeye and I. Tytgat, and subsequently by J. Vercraeye and B. De Vuyst, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Yakult Honsha Kabushiki Kaisha (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by M. Edenborough QC, P. Harris, Solicitor, and T. Elias, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 May 2009 (Case R 1396/2008-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Yakult Honsha Kabushiki Kaisha and Kavaklidere-Europe

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Kavaklidere-Europe to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kavaklidere-Europe to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

1

---
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MARKETS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

MAY 7, 2020

AGENDA

10:00 a.m. Opening Remarks 

• Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz

• Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

• Commissioner Brian D. Quintenz 

• Commissioner Rostin Behnam 

• Commissioner Dawn D. Stump

10:30 a.m. Panel I: Proposed Position Limits for Spot Months, Single Month, and All-MonthsCombined

A discussion of speculative position limits for energy derivatives products as proposed in 

the Commission’s January 30, 2020 Position Limits for Derivatives proposed rule.

 Lead Participants:

• Thomas LaSala, CME Group

• Demetri Karousos, Nodal Exchange, LLC

• William F. McCoy, Morgan Stanley

• Sean Cota, NEFI

• Susan Bergles, Exelon Corporation

• Daniel Dunleavy, Ingevity Corporation

• Kaiser Malik, Calpine Corporation 

• Dr. Richard Sandor, Environmental Financial Products, LLC

12:00 p.m. Break

12:30 p.m. Panel II: Proposed Bona Fide Hedge Exemptions from Position Limits and Related 

Procedures

 

A discussion of the exemptions from speculative position limits and the process for 

recognizing non-enumerated bona fide hedging transactions or positions with respect to 

federal position limits.

 Lead Participants:

• Vito Naimoli, ICE Futures U.S.

• Thomas LaSala, CME Group

• Demetri Karousos, Nodal Exchange, LLC

• Tyson T. Slocum, Public Citizen 

• Matthew Picardi, Commercial Energy Working Group

• Dr. John Parsons, Special Government Employee

• Jennifer Fordham, Natural Gas Supply Association

• Matthew Agen, American Gas Association 
• Daniel Dunleavy, Ingevity Corporation 

• Kaiser Malik, Calpine Corporation

• Lopa Parikh, Edison Electric Institute

• Jeffrey Walker, ACES 

• William F. McCoy, Morgan Stanley 

2:00 p.m. Closing Remarks

• Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

• Commissioner Brian D. Quintenz 

• Commissioner Rostin Behnam 

• Commissioner Dawn D. Stump 

• Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz 

2:30 p.m. Adjourn Meeting
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Jeffrey Adam WERTKIN.

No. D-3014.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Jeffrey Adam Wertkin, of Washington, District of Columbia, is suspended from *1458the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2472

CATHLENA JENKINS BRIGHT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (6:17-cv-01431-CMC)

Submitted: May 9, 2019 Decided: May 16, 2019

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DUNCAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cathlena Jenkins Bright, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cathlena Jenkins Bright appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation and upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of 

Bright’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. 

“In social security proceedings, a court of appeals applies the same standard of review as 

does the district court. That is, a reviewing court must uphold the determination when an 

ALJ has applied correct legal standards and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by 

substantial evidence.” Brown v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 

2017) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “Substantial evidence is that 

which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. It consists of 

more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be less than a preponderance.” Pearson v. 

Colvin, 810 F.3d 204, 207 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 

“In reviewing for substantial evidence, we do not undertake to reweigh conflicting 

evidence, make credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ. 

Where conflicting evidence allows reasonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is 

disabled, the responsibility for that decision falls on the ALJ.” Hancock v. Astrue, 667 

F.3d 470, 472 (4th Cir. 2012) (brackets, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted).

We have reviewed the record and perceive no reversible error. The ALJ applied 

the correct legal standards in evaluating Bright’s claims for benefits, and the ALJ’s 

factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment upholding the denial of benefits. We dispense with oral 
3

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II-O0070

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Harvey Eisen <heisen9929@aol.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 10:42 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Harvey Eisen

8503 Rosewood Dr.

Bethesda, MD 20814-1433
Hayes BACALL, petitioner, v. Shane JACKSON, Acting Warden.

No. 17-1178.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT
        23.2**
 **HERBORIUM
        GROUP, INC.**


**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




To
      the
      Board of Directors and Stockholders


Herborium
      Group, Inc.




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
      Herborium Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form S-8 filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2007 of our report dated January 30,
      2007 on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as
      of
      November 30, 2006 and for the year then ended which report appears in the 2007
      Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB.






/s/  Berenson
      LLP




New
      York,
      NY


February
      28, 2008
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 50286 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE GABINO AGUILAR

- RIVERA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 2416

- 1

Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Gabino Aguilar

- Rivera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Agui lar

- Rivera h a s not f iled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 12, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-50286 Document: 00512966391 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2015No. 14

- 50286
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-50286 Document: 00512966391 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/12/2015
Jose CARRASCO, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 15-9555.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department denied.
II-01058

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

LISA NOWAK <itzlisa7@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:40 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

LISA NOWAK

11415 METTER AVE

WARREN, MI 48089
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification

Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act Of 2002

(Subsections (A) And (B) Of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of PolarityTE, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
year ended October 31, 2017 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Denver Lough                            
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Denver Lough, Chief Executive Officer       
| | (Principal Executive Officer)               
| |                                             
| | Dated: February 28, 2018                    
| |                                             
| | /s/ John Stetson                            
| | John Stetson, Chief Financial Officer       
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| |                                             
| | Dated: February 28, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3655 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3655

To allow the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of 
   the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, to issue depredation 
   permits for the taking of black vultures to livestock farmers to 
           prevent harm to livestock, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2019

    Mr. Hollingsworth (for himself, Mr. Baird, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. 
     Crawford, Mr. Comer, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Guest, Mr. Kelly of 
  Mississippi, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Abraham, Mr. 
Massie, and Mr. Bost) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of 
   the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, to issue depredation 
   permits for the taking of black vultures to livestock farmers to 
           prevent harm to livestock, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Livestock Protection Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. DEPREDATION PERMITS FOR BLACK VULTURES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, may issue a 
depredation permit to a livestock farmer, authorizing the taking of a 
black vulture otherwise prohibited by Federal law during the calving or 
lambing season--
            (1) if--
                    (A) such vulture is found committing depredations 
                on livestock; or
                    (B) the livestock is located in an area where 
                depredation by vultures have been known to occur; and
            (2) provided that such taking may only occur if it is 
        necessary to protect livestock from depredation.
    (b) Reporting.--The Secretary shall require, as a condition of such 
a permit, that the holder of such permit shall report annually to the 
appropriate State enforcement agency, as determined by the Secretary, 
any taking of a black vulture under the permit.
                                 <all>
```