alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00247

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

SANDRA SHORTRIDGE <SHORTR41 @CHARTER.NET>

Friday, December 3, 2010 9:43 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

SANDRA SHORTRIDGE

10 KINLOCH CT

COVINGTON, GA 30014
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company
for the periods reflected therein.



|                        |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 14, 2008 |  | /s/ George M. Davis                                 
|                        |  | George M. Davis                                     
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Lawrence Rychlak                                
|                        |  | Lawrence Rychlak                                    
|                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Aric Shayne WOODARD, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 15-9545.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

*93Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
Arthur Ray DEERE, Sr., petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-9292.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
**Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2011 – Rintisch v OHIM – Valfleuri Pâtes alimentaires (PROTIACTIVE)**

**(Case T-152/09)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark PROTIACTIVE – Earlier national word and figurative marks PROTIPLUS, PROTI and PROTIPOWER – Late submission of documents – Discretion granted by Article 74(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) – Concept of a provision to the contrary – Rule 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 – Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95

Community trade mark – Appeals procedure – Appeal brought against a decision of the Opposition Division of the Office – Examination by Board of Appeal – Scope – Evidence not submitted in support of the opposition within the prescribed time-limit – Account taken – Discretion of the Board of Appeal (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 74(2); Commission Regulation No 2868/95, Arts 20(1)
and 50(1)) (see paras 31-33, 37-42)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2009 (Case R 1661/2007-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Bernhard Rintisch and Valfleuri Pâtes alimentaires SA. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Mr Bernhard Rintisch to pay the costs. |
----

----

|                             |   |   |   |                                                                                   |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/      Alan L. Boeckmann       |   |   |   | /s/      Donald G. Cook                                                                |
| Alan      L. Boeckmann, Director |   |   |   | Donald      G. Cook, Director                                                          |
|                             |   |   |
| /s/      Vilma S. Martinez       |   |   |   | /s/      Marc F. Racicot                                                               |
| Vilma      S. Martinez, Director |   |   |   | Marc      F. Racicot, Director                                                         |
|                             |   |   |
| /s/      Roy S. Roberts          |   |   |   |                                                                                   |
| Roy      S. Roberts, Director    |   |   |   | Matthew      K. Rose, Director and Chairman,President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                             |   |   |
| /s/      Marc J. Shapiro         |   |   |   | /s/      J.C. Watts, Jr.                                                               |
| Marc      J. Shapiro, Director   |   |   |   | J.C.      Watts, Jr., Director                                                         |
|                             |   |   |
|                             |   |   |   | /s/      Edward E. Whitacre, Jr.                                                       |
| Robert      H. West, Director    |   |   |   | Edward      E. Whitacre, Jr., Director                                                 |
|                             |   |   |
| /s/      J. Steven Whisler       |   |   |   |                                                                                   |
| J.      Steven Whisler, Director |   |   |   |                                                                                   |
Ernesto MADRIGAL-SOLORIO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9527.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Michael J. Loiacono, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of
Global Axcess Corp (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the second quarter ended June
30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
August 4, 2009





/s/ Michael J. LoiaconoName: Michael J. LoiaconoTitle: Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
# C_2010148EN.01005301.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/53

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2010 — Britto Patricio Dias v Commission

(Case F-4/09) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Posting - Reassignment - Interests of the service - Correspondence between grade and post - Rights of the defence - Reasons stated)

2010/C 148/93

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jorge de Britto Patricio Dias (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Massaux, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to reassign the applicant

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr de Britto Patricio Dias to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr de Britto Patricio Dias to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.03.2009, p. 54.

1

---
Bruce Carlton WRIGHT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9348.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision for this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                   <ARTICLE>        5

                                         <S>                           <C>
                               <PERIOD-TYPE>        6-MOS
                           <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
                                <PERIOD-END>                   Jun-30-2000
                                      <CASH>                     1,075,623
                                <SECURITIES>                       380,000
                               <RECEIVABLES>                     4,929,160
                                <ALLOWANCES>                       438,263
                                 <INVENTORY>                             0
                            <CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0
                                      <PP&E>                       289,618
                              <DEPRECIATION>                       173,327
                              <TOTAL-ASSETS>                     6,105,986
                       <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       740,471
                                     <BONDS>                     4,954,000
                       <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
                                 <PREFERRED>                             0
                                    <COMMON>                       411,515
                                  <OTHER-SE>                             0
                <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,105,986
                                     <SALES>                             0
                            <TOTAL-REVENUES>                       407,474
                                       <CGS>                             0
                               <TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
                            <OTHER-EXPENSES>                       828,073
                            <LOSS-PROVISION>                     (365,489)
                          <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       346,714
                             <INCOME-PRETAX>                     (401,824)
                                <INCOME-TAX>                             0
                         <INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
                              <DISCONTINUED>                             0
                             <EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
                                   <CHANGES>                             0
                                <NET-INCOME>                     (401,824)
                                 <EPS-BASIC>                         (.17)
                               <EPS-DILUTED>                         (.17)


</TABLE>
James Harrell BROWN, petitioner, v. Nora HUNT, Superintendent, Columbus Correctional Facility, et al.

No. 17-7699.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 12

                   RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                           ----------------------------------------------------
                                                             1999       1998       1997       1996       1995
                                                           --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                                        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:
Income (loss) before taxes and extraordinary items.......   $(9.7)     $(4.8)     $ 6.9      $ 6.2      $ 2.6
Plus: Fixed charges......................................    23.3       17.5        9.2        7.8        8.5
                                                            -----      -----      -----      -----      -----

Income before taxes and extraordinary items plus fixed
  charges................................................   $13.6      $12.7      $16.1      $14.0      $11.1
                                                            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====

Fixed charges:
Interest expense.........................................   $21.1      $16.0      $ 8.8      $ 7.5      $ 8.3
One third of rental expense, representing interest
  portion................................................     2.2        1.5        0.4        0.3        0.2
                                                            -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
                                                            $23.3      $17.5      $ 9.2      $ 7.8      $ 8.5
                                                            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.......................      --*        --*       1.8        1.8        1.3
</TABLE>

------------------------

*   Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $9.7 in 1999 and $4.8
    in 1998.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                                                                                
                       HEADLANDS MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.
                Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1998-3


                             Officer's Certificate
                                        
In connection with the above-referenced trust and pursuant to Section 3.13 of
the related Pooling and Servicing Agreement ("Agreement"), Headlands Mortgage
Company (as "Master Servicer") hereby confirms the following:


(i)   a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during 1998 and of
      performance under the Agreement has been made under the undersigned's
      supervision; and

(ii)  to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the
      Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
      for the calendar year 1998.



                                    HEADLANDS MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.



                                    By:
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Kristen Decker
                                       Vice President

                                       7
Joseph John PLANY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7898.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Alexis GONZALEZ-BADILLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-696.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

*1283Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2011038EN.01001302.xml

| 5.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Commission v Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari and Gessa

(Case T-259/09) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Agreement entered into as part of support for European discussion projects organised by non-governmental organisations for 2003 - Action brought against the head of an association - No jurisdiction - Failure to implement the agreement - Repayment of sums advanced)

2011/C 38/22

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. M. Rouchaud-Joët and N. Bambara, agents, and by M. Moretto, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari (Cagliari, Italy) (represented initially by S. Diana, then by P. Aureli, lawyers); and Alberto Gessa (Cagliari, Italy)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought under Article 238 EC on the basis of an arbitration clause seeking an order that Arci Nuova Associazione Comitato di Cagliari and Alberto Gessa, in a personal capacity and jointly and severally, should repay an advance paid by the Commission under the agreement 2003-1550/001-001, together with late payment interest.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action so far as brought against Mr Alberto Gessa; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action so far as brought against Mr Alberto Gessa;

| 2. | orders Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari to repay to the European Commission the principal sum of EUR 15 675, together with late payment interest at the rate of 7,32 % from 20 May 2007 until full payment of the debt; |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari to repay to the European Commission the principal sum of EUR 15 675, together with late payment interest at the rate of 7,32 % from 20 May 2007 until full payment of the debt;

| 3. | orders Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 220 of 12.9.2009.

1

---
II-00204

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Patricia Snow <patriciasnowl @charter.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 6:14 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Patricia Snow

6160 Dell Drive

Madison, WI 53718
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 

(Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) 

 

I, Donald R. Walsh, Chief ExecutiveOfficer (principal executive officer) of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the“Report”): 

 

(1)    The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

 

**/s/  Donald R. Walsh**

**Name: Donald R. Walsh**

**Date: May 15,2003**
Brian Keith HUETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7946.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 15.(a).1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-11288, No. 333-118619 and No. 333-123666) and in the related
Prospectus of CDC Corporation (formerly chinadotcom corporation) of our report
dated March 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
chinadotcom corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year
ended December 31, 2004.

Ernst & Young
Hong Kong
June 24, 2005