alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of K & F Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dirkson
R. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ DIRKSON R. CHARLES
----------------------
Dirkson R. Charles
Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2004
II-00153

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

M.P. Montgomery <padul@mac.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 2:39 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

M.P. Montgomery

P.O. Box 899

Fort Bragg, CA 95437
**Exhibit 8.1**— Subsidiaries***Organizational Structure.****Corporate Structure*Novogen Limited is a company limited by shares and is incorporated and domiciled in Australia.Novogen Limited has prepared a consolidated financial report incorporating the entities that itcontrolled during the financial year, which included the following:     *Name of Entity* *Country of Incorporation* *Ownership %*Novogen Laboratories Pty Ltd Australia 100Novogen Research Pty Ltd Australia 100Central Coast Properties Pty Ltd Australia 100Phytosearch Pty Ltd Australia 100Phytogen Pty Ltd Australia 100Glycotex Pty Ltd Australia 100Norvogen Pty Ltd Australia 100Novogen Inc USA 100Glycotex Inc USA 84.3Novogen Limited(UK) UK 100Promensil Limited UK 100Novogen BV Netherlands 100Novogen New Zealand Limited New Zealand 100Novogen Canada Limited Canada 100Marshall Edwards, Inc. USA 86.9Marshall Edwards Pty Limited* Australia 86.9 * Owned indirectly through Marshall Edwards, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification


Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002


(Subsections (A) And (B) Of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Majesco Entertainment Company and Subsidiary, (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


s/ Barry Honig

Barry Honig, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



Dated: February 26, 2016





/s/ John Stetson

John Stetson, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



Dated: February 26, 2016
II-00154

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jerry Hathaway <gradyhathaway@gmail.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 2:26 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jerry Hathaway

818 Chehalis Rd.

Blaine, WA 98230
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16154]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-39,063]


Grove U.S., LLC, Shady Grove, PA; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on April 30, 2001, applicable to 
workers producing scissor aerial work platforms at Grove U.S., LLC, 
Shady Grove, Pennsylvania. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on May 18, 2001 (66 FR 27690).
    At the request of State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
aerial work platforms. New information provided by the company show 
that workers of the subject firm are not separately identifiable by 
product line.
    The intent of the certification is to provide coverage to all 
workers of the subject firm impacted by increased imports of articles 
like or directly competitive with those produced by the workers' firm. 
Therefore, the Department is amending the certification to provide 
coverage to all workers separated from employment at the subject firm, 
and not limit the coverage to those workers producing scissor aerial 
work platforms.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-39,063 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Grove U.S., LLC, Shady Grove, Pennsylvania, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
March 28, 2000, through April 30, 2003, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 233 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed in Washington, DC this 6th day of June 2001.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-16154 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Henry WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Mark GARMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

No. 16-9296.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 12.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Keith Oliver, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A of CDC Corporation (the “report”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003),Release No. 33-8392 (February 24, 2004) and Release No. 33-8545 (March 2, 2005)];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 11, 2005     /s/ Keith Oliver     Keith Oliver  Chief Financial Officer
William J. McBRIDE, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6475.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, June 
27, 2001, 1 p.m. to June 29, 2001, 5 p.m. Nat. Institute of 
Environmental Health Sciences, South Campus, Building 101, Conference 
Room B, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709 which was published in the 
Federal Register on June 7, 2001, FR 66: 30742.
    The meeting will be held on July 15, 2001 from 7 p.m. to July 18, 
2001 at 5 p.m. at the Hawthorne Suites, Meredith Drive, Durham, NC. The 
meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: June 20, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16345 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2011211EN.01002401.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/24

---

Order of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Government of Gibraltar v Commission

(Case T-176/09) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Decision 2009/95/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region - Inclusion in the site of Community importance called ‘Estrecho oriental’ of an area of the territorial waters of Gibraltar and of an area of the high seas - Partial annulment - Non-severability - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 211/52

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Government of Gibraltar (represented by: D. Vaughan and M. Llamas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Boelaert and D. Recchia, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by E. Jenkinson and S. Ossowski, Agents, and by D. Wyatt QC and M. Wood, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by N. Díaz Abad and M. Muñoz Pérez, Agents

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2009/95/EC of 12 December 2008 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a second updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2009 L 43, p. 393), to the extent that it extends the site called ‘Estrecho oriental’ (ES6120032) to the territorial waters of Gibraltar (both within and outside Site UKGIB0002) and to an area of the high seas

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The Government of Gibraltar shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Government of Gibraltar shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | The Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.

1

---
# C_2011232EN.01002702.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2011 — ATB Norte v OHIM — Bricocenter Italia (maxi BRICO CENTER)

(Case T-481/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark maxi BRICO CENTER - Earlier Community figurative marks ATB CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE Brico Centro and CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE BricoCentro - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

(2011/C 232/48)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: ATB Norte, SL (Burgos, Spain) (represented initially by P. López Ronda, G. Macias Bonilla, H. Curtis-Oliver and G. Marín Raigal, and subsequently by F. Brandolini Kujman, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Montalto and G. Mannucci, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bricocenter Italia Srl (Rozzano, Italy) (represented by: G. Ghidini, M. Mergati and C. Signorini, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 September 2009 (Case R 1046/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between ATB Norte, SL and Bricocenter Italia Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 September 2009 (Case R 1046/2008-4) inasmuch as it upheld the appeal of Bricocenter Italia Srl before the Board of Appeal regarding the services of ‘advertising’, ‘business management’ and ‘business administration’ covered by the Community trade mark application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 September 2009 (Case R 1046/2008-4) inasmuch as it upheld the appeal of Bricocenter Italia Srl before the Board of Appeal regarding the services of ‘advertising’, ‘business management’ and ‘business administration’ covered by the Community trade mark application;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders ATB Norte, SL, Bricocenter Italia and OHIM each to bear their own costs incurred during the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders ATB Norte, SL, Bricocenter Italia and OHIM each to bear their own costs incurred during the proceedings before the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

---
MICHIGAN, petitioner, v. Treshaun TERRANCE.

No. 17-1097.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
# C_2009282EN.01005802.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/58

---

Action brought on 30 September 2009 — SPAR v OHIM — SPA Group Europe (SPA GROUP)

(Case T-378/09)

2009/C 282/109

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SPAR Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Schenefeld) (represented by: R. Kaase and J.-C. Plate, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: SPA Group Europe Ltd & Co. KG (Nürnberg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 July 2009 in case R 123/2008-1 for being incompatible with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 July 2009 in case R 123/2008-1 for being incompatible with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1);

1

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs incurred both in these proceedings and in the opposition and appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs incurred both in these proceedings and in the opposition and appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: SPA Group Europe Ltd & Co. KG

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SPA GROUP’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 41 and 44 (Application No 4 038 171)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German figurative mark ‘SPAR’ for goods and services in Classes 1 to 36 and 38 to 41 (No 30 108 039.9) and the figurative German mark ‘SPAR’ for services in Classes 35, 36 and 39 (No 30 404 087.8)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Council Regulation 40/94, since there is a likelihood of confusion between the two marks at issue

Pleas in law:

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
II-00065

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Toby Rane <ella0311 @gmail.com>

Tuesday, December 7, 2010 10:52 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Toby Rane

21731 Saticoy

Canoga Park, CA 91304
VISA INC., et al., petitioners, v. Mary STOUMBOS, et al.

No. 15-962.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.