alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00666

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Camille Gilbert <camillegilbert@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:47 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Camille Gilbert

1923 San Andres St Apt F

Santa Barbara, CA 93101
# C_2009220EN.01003303.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/33

---

Action brought on 2 July 2009 — AECOPS v Commission

(Case T-256/09)

2009/C 220/71

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Associação de Empresas de Construção, Obras Públicas e Serviços (Aecops) (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J.L. da Cruz Vilaça and L. Pinto Monteiro, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 21 June 2005 in respect of File 89 0771 P1, reducing the aid granted by Decision C(89) 0570 of 22 March 1989 to PTE 48 504 201 and requiring reimbursement of the amount of PTE 53 310 198; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 21 June 2005 in respect of File 89 0771 P1, reducing the aid granted by Decision C(89) 0570 of 22 March 1989 to PTE 48 504 201 and requiring reimbursement of the amount of PTE 53 310 198;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Infringement of the right to a prior hearing: the applicant was not given the opportunity to comment before a definitive decision to reduce the financial assistance was adopted, which constitutes a breach of an essential procedural requirement the disregard of which renders such a decision void.

Infringement of the principal of legal certainty through limitation and excessive delay in adopting a decision.

Breach of the duty to state reasons: the contested decision fails to set out, even summarily, the reasons for reducing the assistance.

---
Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Laserscope on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended March 31, 2006, I, Derek Bertocci, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officerof Laserscope, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended March 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Laserscope.      Date: May 10, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1764 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1764

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 15, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 2965) to amend the Small Business Act 
with respect to the Small Business Innovation Research Program and the Small 
Business Technology Transfer Program, and for other purposes, with the Senate 
amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of any 
point of order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a motion 
offered by the Majority Leader or his designee that the House concur in the 
Senate amendment with the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 
Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be 
considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided 
and controlled by the Majority Leader and Minority Leader or their respective 
designees. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to 
final adoption without intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 6, 2009.
    Resolved, That Lorraine C. Miller of the State of Texas, be, and is hereby, 
chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives; That Wilson S. Livingood of the 
Commonwealth of Virginia be, and is hereby, chosen Sergeant at Arms of the House 
of Representatives; That Daniel P. Beard of the State of Maryland be, and is 
hereby, chosen Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives; and 
That Father Daniel P. Coughlin of the State of Illinois, be, and is hereby, 
chosen Chaplain of the House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2010113EN.01007804.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/78

---

Order of the General Court of 1 March 2010 — TerreStar Europe v Commission

(Case T-196/09) (1)

1

2010/C 113/115

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
----

| 1. | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date: | March      30, 2008 |
|--------|-------|---------------------|

|   | Signed: | /s/ Kelvin Claney                          |   |
|--------|---------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |    | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |    |                                       |   |
|   | Signed: | /s/ Karl Redekopp                          |   |
|   |    | Chief      Financial Officer               |   |

----
**Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2010 – Özdemir v OHIM – Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 (James
Jones)**

**(Case T-11/09)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community word mark James Jones – Earlier Community word mark JACK & JONES – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 21, 38)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 November 2008 (Case R 858/2007-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 and Mr Rahmi Özdemir. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Rahmi Özdemir |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark James Jones for goods in Class 25 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Community trade mark registration No 1107747 of the word mark JACK & JONES for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25; United Kingdom trade mark registration No 2063437 of the word mark JACK & JONES for goods in Class 25; Benelux trade mark registration No 474622 of the word mark JACK & JONES for goods in Class 25; Denmark trade mark registration No VR 1990 06569 of the word mark JACK & JONES for goods in Class 25 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Mr Rahmi Özdemir to pay the costs. |
In Re William FREDERICK, petitioner.

No. 17-7102.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
George FOXX, petitioner, v. MY VINTAGE BABY, INCORPORATED, et al.

No. 15-1434.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-00213

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ronald Harden <hardenrr@msn.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 4:54 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: It is important to not let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine

important terms like "commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with

transparency and business conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk.

Accepting the ABA argument would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ronald Harden

3125 Elevado Court

Loveland, CO 80538
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Diversified Industries,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending February 29, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

1/13/04                /s/ Amy Gallo
Date                   -----------------------------------------
                       Amy Gallo, Chief Financial Officer
II-00780

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jason Schmidt <tycomputerguy@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:23 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jason Schmidt

10309 N. Baltimore

Kansas City, MO 64155-3533
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6879

EZRA CHARLES CALLOWAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND; BARRY

STANTON, Warden; MAJOR CRUMBECKER; SHIFT

SERGEANT CRUMP,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER;

RICARDO WILLIAMS, II,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-02-324-AW)

Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 22, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Ezra Charles Calloway, Appellant Pro Se. Rhonda Lee Weaver, Upper

Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ezra Charles Calloway appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Calloway v. Prince George’s

County, No. CA-02-324-AW (D. Md. May 16, 2002). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
To: The Comment File

From: Sarah Josephson

Re: Meeting with Barclays Capital 

Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2011

On Tuesday, January 18, 2011, CFTC staff met with representatives of Barclays Capital during 

which Barclays commented on the CFTC’s proposed rules on conflicts of interest policies and 

procedures of futures commission merchants, introducing brokers and swap dealers. 

CFTC staff invited Barclays to submit a formal comment in response to the proposed rule 

makings.

At the meeting, among other matters, Barclays representatives provided an overview of bi-lateral 

OTC swap transaction processes in the prime brokerage context. They also commented that 

current operational structures may not support full separation of trading, risk management and 

clearing operations; especially in terms of making pricing information available and conducting 

default management. A need for freer information flow among such personnel was also

expressed, particularly among senior management (versus, for example, traders and day-to-day 

operations personnel) in the relevant groups and specifically among legal, compliance, credit and 

operations personnel. Barclays also requested clarification in the proposed rules of which roles 

fit under the various operating divisions. Finally, Barclays representatives expressed concerns 

regarding requirements for disclosing criteria for selecting clients and the need to have flexibility 

for client selection given operations and risk management issues.

Representing Barclays Capital at the meeting were Raymond Kahn, Alex Guest, Kathleen 

Peacock and Allison Parent. Participating for the CFTC were Ananda Radhakrishnan, John 

Lawton, Sarah Josephson, Jocelyn Partridge, Peter Kals, Ward Griffin and Erik Remmler.
# C_2010288EN.01001601.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/16

---

Order of the Court of 1 July 2010 — DSV Road NV v European Commission

(Case C-358/09 P) (1)

(Appeal - Customs Code - Import of diskettes originating in Thailand - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Application for remission of import duties)

(2010/C 288/25)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Appellant: DSV Road NV (represented by: A. Poelmans and G. Preckler, advocaten)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Bouyon, Agent)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of 8 July 2009 of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) in Case T-219/07 DSV Road v Commission dismissing an application for annulment of the Commission’s Decision of 24 April 2007 informing the Belgian authorities that they might proceed with post-clearance recovery of import duties on diskettes originating in Thailand and that there were no grounds for granting remission of those duties (File reference: REC 05/02)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | DSV Road NV shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

DSV Road NV shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, of 05.12.2009.

---
II-00746

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

michael mclaughlin <mmclaughlin554@email.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:44 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

michael mclaughlin

1010 currie ave n

minneapolis, MN 55403
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          38,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,291,771)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,289
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,122
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,646
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,646
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>