alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
International Dial-In Numbers

Fintech Forward 2019

Thursday, October 24, 2019

Participant passcode: 9800558

Country Toll Numbers Freephone/

Toll Free Numbers

ARGENTINA 0800-444-0891 

AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-5054 1-800-027-350 

AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-2043 1-800-027-350 

AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-0105 1-800-027-350 

AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-0854 1-800-027-350 

AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5282 1-800-027-350 

AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8209-1531 1-800-027-350 

AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-450 0800-005-805 

BELGIUM 32-2-400-9833 0800-3-8929 

BRAZIL RIO DE JANEIRO: 55-21-40421433 0800-7610654 

BRAZIL SAO PAULO: 55-11-3958-0778 0800-7610654 

CANADA 866-845-8493 

CHILE 1230-020-5986 

CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4796 10800-712-2423 

CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4796 10800-120-2423 

COLOMBIA 01800-9-157005 

CROATIA 080-08-06-410 

CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-26 800-700-241 

DENMARK 45-7014-0294 8088-2739 

EGYPT 0800000-9037 

ESTONIA 800-011-1126 

FINLAND 358-9-5424-7157 0-800-9-14619 

FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-03-51-62 080-510-2764 

FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-48-62 080-510-2764 

FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-72-25-40-65 080-510-2764 

GERMANY 49-69-2222-4866 0800-800-1420 

GREECE 30-80-1-100-0647 00800-12-8034 

HONG KONG 852-3001-3890 800-963-172 

HUNGARY 36-1-700-8827 06-800-11152 

INDONESIA 007-803-011-0169 

IRELAND 353-1-506-0475 1800-936-202 

ISRAEL 1-80-9212604 

ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3604-6279 800-977-454 

ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6068 800-977-454 

ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0168 800-977-454 

JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2610 0066-33-812353 

JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2610 0066-33-812353 

LATVIA 8000-3206 

LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1392 8002-9169 

MALAYSIA 1-800-81-4674 

MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7366 001-866-944-7658 

MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9166 001-866-944-7658 

MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0666 001-866-944-7658 
NETHERLANDS 31-20-716-8075 0800-020-0350 

NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4640 0800-456-285 

NORWAY 47-21-590-067 800-10580 

PANAMA 011-001-800-5072373 

PERU 0800-53785 

PHILIPPINES 63-2-8858-3759 1800-111-42417 

POLAND 00-800-1213477 

PORTUGAL 351-2-10054708 8008-14925 

ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-34 

RUSSIA 8-10-8002-5624011 

SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110059 

SINGAPORE 65-6883-9196 800-120-5221 

SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-78 0800-002074 

SLOVENIA 0-800-81359 

SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-82147 

SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1051 00798-14800-7786 

SPAIN 34-91-414-21-71 800-300-906 

SWEDEN 46-8-503-34-824 0200-899-945 

SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-4320 0800-001-428 

TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7345 00801-136-036 

THAILAND 001-800-1206-66632 

TURKEY 00-800-151-0810 

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702387

UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9182 0808-238-9816 

UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-0812 0808-238-9816 

UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-0012 0808-238-9816 

UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7950-1256 0808-238-9816 

UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-0112 0808-238-9816 

URUGUAY 000-413-598-3837 

USA 1-203-369-5026 866-844-9416 

VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-2884 

VIETNAM 120-11746
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34165-34170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16036]



[[Page 34165]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 01-14]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 
July 21, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 01-14 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M

[[Page 34166]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN01.012


[[Page 34167]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN01.013


[[Page 34168]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN01.014


[[Page 34169]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN01.015


[[Page 34170]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN01.016

[FR Doc. 01-16036 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-C
Vijaya Prakash BOGGALA, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-996.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.30

SUMMARY OF 2006 EXECUTIVE OFFICER BASE SALARIES

The following is a summary of the 2006 base salaries established
for the executive officers of Adolor Corporation. For additional information regarding the compensation of the Companys executive officers, please refer to the Companys Proxy Statement relating to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.



|                                                                        |  |                  |        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | -------
|Name and Principal Position                                             |  | 2006 Base Salary
|James E. Barrett, Ph.D.                                                 |  | $                | 351,500
|Senior Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer and President, Research |  |                  |        
|                                                                        | 
|Michael R. Dougherty                                                    |  | $                | 333,900
|Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer                       |  |                  |        
|                                                                        | 
|*Roger D. Graham, Jr.                                                   |  | $                | 338,800
|Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing                              |  |                  |        
|                                                                        | 
|Thomas P. Hess                                                          |  | $                | 196,300
|Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer                     |  |                  |        
|                                                                        | 
|David Jackson, M.D.                                                     |  | $                | 358,600
|Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer                         |  |                  |        
|                                                                        | 
|Martha E. Manning, Esq.                                                 |  | $                | 274,750
|Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary                    |  |                  |        

---

|* | Roger Graham was granted options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock of the Company on January 6, 2006, which vested immediately upon grant in lieu of $49,000 guaranteed
annual bonus.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 19, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. BancStar, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri; to acquire 100 percent of 
the voting shares of Pacific BancStar, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Bank Star, Pacific, Missouri.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (JoAnne F. Lewellen, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. First Western Bancorp, Inc., Huron, South Dakota; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 74.8 percent of the voting shares of 
American Bank Shares, Inc., Rapid City, South Dakota, and thereby 
indirectly acquire American State Bank of Rapid City, Rapid City, South 
Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 19, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-15731 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
II-00491

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Elizabeth Hanson <hansonlizzy@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:57 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Elizabeth Hanson

1715 Dorchester Rd

Brooklyn, NY 11226
In Re Stephen SACCOCCIA, petitioner.

No. 17-7379.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF FLORIDA, INC., petitioner, v. Jean CHARLES, Jr., as Next Friend and Guardian of His Sister, Marie Charles, et al.

No. 16-1446.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*130Motion for leave to file a brief in opposition under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Motion for leave to file a motion for just damages and costs pursuant to Rule 42.2 under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. Motion for leave to file a response to motion for leave to file a motion for just damages and costs pursuant to Rule 42.2 under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted. The motion for just damages and costs pursuant to Rule 42.2 denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# C_2009297EN.01002602.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/26

---

Action brought on 5 October 2009 — General Bearing v OHIM (GENERAL BEARING CORPORATION)

(Case T-394/09)

2009/C 297/39

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant(s): General Bearing Corp. (West Nyack, United States) (represented by: A. Dellmeier-Beschorner, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 July 2009 in case R 73/2009-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 July 2009 in case R 73/2009-1;

| — | Order the defendant to register the Community trade mark concerned; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to register the Community trade mark concerned;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the court; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the court; and

| — | Set a date for an oral hearing if such is deemed necessary. |
| --- | --- |

—

Set a date for an oral hearing if such is deemed necessary.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “GENERAL BEARING CORPORATION” for goods in classes 7 and 12

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Council Regulation 207/2009, as well as of general principles of trademark law, as the Board of Appeal wrongly found that the Community trade mark concerned is not eligible for registration due to the fact that it is a purely descriptive term.

Pleas in law:

---
**Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2011 – Omnicare v OHIM – Astellas Pharma (OMNICARE CLINICAL RESEARCH)**

**(Case T-289/09)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark OMNICARE CLINICAL RESEARCH – Earlier national figurative mark OMNICARE – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the services – Genuine use of the earlier mark

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 95)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 May 2009 (Case R 401/2008-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Yamanouchi Pharma GmbH and Omnicare, Inc. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Omnicare, Inc. to pay the costs. |
Janet Lenell EASTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7108.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2011319EN.01001601.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — Cesea Group v OHIM — Mangini & C. (Mangiami)

(Case T-250/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity Proceedings - Community figurative mark Mangiami - Earlier international word mark MANGINI - Admissibility of new evidence - Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 319/30

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cesea Group Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: D. De Simone, D. Demarinis and J. Wrede, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Mangini & C. Srl (Sestri Levante, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 April 2009 (Case R 982/2008-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Mangini & C. Srl and Cesea Group Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 April 2009 (Case R 982/2008-2). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 April 2009 (Case R 982/2008-2).

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.

1

---
Eileen HERNANDEZ, et al., petitioners, v. Lualhati CRESPO, et al.; Women's Care Florida, LLC, aka Delaney Obstetrics and Gynecology, petitioner, v. A.K., et al.; and Women's Care Florida, LLC et al., petitioners, v. A.G., et al.

No. 16-1458.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# C_2011204EN.01002101.xml

| 9.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 May 2011 — Prinz von Hannover v OHIM (Representation of a coat of arms)

(Case T-397/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark representing a coat of arms - Absolute ground for refusal - Imitation from a heraldic point of view of the symbol of a State - Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 6 ter of the Paris Convention)

2011/C 204/36

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ernst August Prinz von Hannover Herzog zu Braunschweig und Lüneburg (Hanover, Germany) (represented by: R. Stötzel and J. Hilger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 July 2009 (Case R 1361/2008-1) concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a figurative sign representing the coat of arms of the house of Hanover.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ernst August Prinz von Hannover Herzog zu Braunschweig und Lüneburg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ernst August Prinz von Hannover Herzog zu Braunschweig und Lüneburg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.

1

---
Sascha LYNCH, petitioner, v. PFIZER, INC.

No. 17-7870.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,883,697
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          84,470
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,375,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,906,522
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         200,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           185,405
<LOANS>                                     60,923,678
<ALLOWANCE>                                    463,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,428,955
<DEPOSITS>                                  57,814,118
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            350,684
<LONG-TERM>                                 12,715,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       753,463
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,795,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              76,428,955
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,670,241
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              296,400
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               205,334
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,171,975
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,597,676
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,119,906
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,052,069
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   55,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,793,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                561,988
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     370,005
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   370,005
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.86
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   143,131
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               404,385
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,409
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              463,794
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           463,794
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>