alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-O0600

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

A Felix <afelix3232@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:40 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

A Felix

2446 Avenida Chapparal

Santa Fe, NM 87505
Raphael D. PERSON, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7847.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Kenneth T. EMBRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9553.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2009267EN.01006502.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/65

---

Action brought on 4 August 2009 — Sanyō Denki v OHIM — Telefónica O2 Germany (eneloop)

(Case T -309/09)

2009/C 267/118

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sanyō Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: M. De Zorti, M. Koch and T. Grimm, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Telefónica O2 Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 May 2009 (Case R 794/2008-2); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 May 2009 (Case R 794/2008-2);

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings;

| — | Order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘eneloop’ for goods in Class 9 (application No 4620225)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Telefónica O2 Germany GmbH & Co. OHG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Inter alia, the German word mark ‘LOOP’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 38 and 42 (No 30 416 654,5)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition allowed

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
II-00367

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Raymond Nash <nash984954@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:48 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Raymond Nash

238 E Main St

Westminster, MD 21157
Daryl COOK, petitioner, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 17-7394.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied.
Re: Conference call 

Date: November 30, 2010; 3:00-3:27 EST 

Participants: David Taylor (CFTC), Irina Leonova (CFTC), Joanne Medero (BlackRock), 

SupurnaVdebrat (BlackRock) 

Attachments: 

SEFs: Trade execution liquidity – Credit default swap (CDS) Products 

SEFs: Trade execution liquidity – Interest Rate Swap (IRS) Products 

Agenda: 

To discuss data reporting as contemplated in the proposed rule in relation to two swap asset 

classes--IRS and CDS. 

Notes: 

Three tiers of different swap trade sizes 

1. Normal trade size – electronic execution, smaller size, high volume, likely will be done 

by SEFs, will not impact pricing for risk and reporting purposes 

2. Block (or bunched order)size – a lot of business is in this category, some delay, need 

sufficient time to hedge the position, takes three hours to allocate trades so delay for SDR 

reporting is needed, buy-side has opportunity to RFQ that will again impact reporting 

time 

3. Big block size – vary by asset class, IR is bigger than CDS, for real time reporting need 

more time to transfer risk, need to mask trade from the market during risk transfer, 

allocation time is the same as for tier two, three hour allocation time window is sufficient. 

Question: 

-How much time is needed to allocate a trade? 

Answer: 

-General agreement is that three hours is sufficient time to allocate a block trade. 

For non-SEF executed trades between US and non-US counterparties, the US counterparty will 

have a reporting obligation. Concern: will this requirement be imposed on US affiliates? It will 

be costly to set-up a pipe-line for this type of reporting, especially for smaller buy-side 

counterparties. 

Swap identifier. In the IRs world where compression of trades is done, not sure how the swap 

identification will be done, however it seems to be a technical problem rather than a conceptual 

problem. Need some innovation to address this issue.
Danuta LOBECK, petitioner, v. Tina M. LICATINO, et al.

No. 16-1467.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16337]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Gene Transfer for Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Diseases.
    Date: July 18, 2001.
    Time: 1:30 pm to 2:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Anne P Clark, NIH, NHLBI, DEA, Review Branch, 
Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7202, Bethesda, MD 20892-
7924, 301/435-0310.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 22, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16337 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         519,422
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  379,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,789
<INVENTORY>                                    308,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,130,357
<PP&E>                                         538,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,788,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,721,226
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,105
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,904,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,788,895
<SALES>                                        175,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               474,759
<CGS>                                          544,472
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,810,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,719,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                28,659
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,127,947)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,127,947)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,131,147)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
# C_2011340EN.01001703.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — PAKI Logistics v OHIM (PAKI)

(Case T-526/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark PAKI - Absolute ground for refusal - Trade mark contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality - Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/209)

2011/C 340/34

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PAKI Logistics (Ennepetal, Germany) (represented by M. Bergermann, P. Mes, C. Graf von der Groeben, G. Rother, J. Bühling, A. Verhauwen, J. Künzel, D. Jestaedt and J. Vogtmeier, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by S. Behzadi-Spencer and subsequently by F. Penlington, Agents, assisted by S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2009 (Case R 1805/2007-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign PAKI as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders PAKI Logistics GmbH to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PAKI Logistics GmbH to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
Abdul Faird Naim MUHAMMAD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7857.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 2 July 2009 – Insula v Commission**

**(Case T-246/09 R)**

Application for interim measures – Debit notes – Application for suspension of operation – Failure to comply with formal requirements – Inadmissibility

1.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting (Arts
225 EC, 242 EC and 243 EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 5, 7)*

2.                     *Applications for interim measures – Conditions for admissibility – Application – Formal requirements (Arts 242 EC and 243
EC; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Arts 44 and 104(2) and (3)) (see paras 8-9, 12, 14)*

3.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Urgency – Serious and
irreparable damage – Financial loss – Situation which could jeopardise the existence of the applicant company (Art. 242 EC;
Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 18-30)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for suspension of the operation of two debit notes requiring the repayment of sums of money paid to the applicant under subsidy contracts. |

**Operative part**

1.      The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2.      Costs are reserved.
DISMISS; Opinion Filed September 16, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-01254-CV

No. 05-13-01255-CV

No. 05-13-01256-CV

No. 05-13-01257-CV

IN RE TROY LEE PERKINS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F07-00645-S, F07-71769-S, F07-71970-S, F07-71990-S

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lewis 

Opinion by Justice Moseley

Before the Court is relator=s petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to order the 

trial court to allow him to appeal his criminal conviction. The facts and issues are well known to 

the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court does not have jurisdiction over 

relator=s petition. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. Art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2010); In re Vasquez, 

No. 04-12-00314-CR, 2012 WL 2125956, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 13, 2012, orig. 

proceeding). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator=s petition for a writ of mandamus for want of 

jurisdiction. 

131254F.P05

/Jim Moseley/

JIM MOSELEY

JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.12



OFFER LETTER, GREG MARTIN

January 4, 2000

Greg Martin

Dear Greg,

I am pleased to offer you the position of Sr. Vice President of Consulting
Services for Broadbase Software, Inc.

This letter outlines the proposed terms of employment with Broadbase.

-       Your annual salary will be $200,000 paid semi-monthly

-       There is an incentive bonus associated with this position allowing you
        to make an additional $40,000 per annum to be paid semi-annually

-       You will start immediately.


I will recommend that you will be granted an option to purchase 125,000 shares
of stock. This grant is subject to approval by the Board of Directors after your
employment begins. The option would vest over four years subject to a
three-month cliff and would be governed by the terms set forth in the Company's
standard form of stock options agreement. The purchase price of each of the
shares covered by the option will be $40 under the closing price of the
Company's common stock on the date of the approval of the grant by the Board.

The company will extend you a loan in the amount if $200,000 which will be a non
recourse loan secured only by your stock options and any stock issued therefrom
provided you do not terminate your employment with the Company within the first
three months of your employment (in which case the loan would need to be repaid
in full within two weeks).

The Company will provide to you the health, holiday, vacation and other benefits
available to all its employees. Enclosed, for your review, is information
related to some of the benefits.

To indicate your acceptance of this offer of employment, please sign below and
return by Friday evening, December 17, 1999. Employment at Broadbase is subject
to your signing the attached nondisclosure and inventions agreement, as well.
Please also understand that your employment is not governed by any written or
oral contract and is considered an "at-will" agreement. This means that you are
free, as is the Company, to terminate the employment relationship at any time
for any reason, so long as there is not violation of applicable state or federal
law.

Greg, all of us welcome you in joining Broadbase and we look forward to having
you on our team. Meanwhile, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call me at (650) 614-8304.



Sincerely,

Chuck Bay
President

Accepted

Signature: /s/ Greg Martin
           -------------------------------------

Name:  Greg Martin

Start Date:
           -------------------------------------
William C. PLOUFFE, Jr., petitioner, v. F. Javier CECALLOS, et al.

No. 16-6558.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Viorel COTUNA, petitioner, v. WALMART STORES, INC.

No. 17-1057.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
II-00174

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jean Bails <swimbails@aol.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 1:24 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jean Bails

21221 Thiele Ct.

St. Clair Shores, MI 48081
DIRECT MARKETING ASSOCIATION, petitioner, v. Barbara BROHL, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Revenue.

No. 16-267.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.