alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
ELECTRONIC DESIGNS, INC.

<TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11                    Statement re: computation of per share earnings

<CAPTION>
NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED              SIX MONTHS ENDED 
                                      -------------------------      --------------------------
                                        MARCH 30,     MARCH 31,        MARCH 30,     MARCH 31,
                                          1997          1996             1997          1996
<S>                                   <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>
Net income                            $1,067,000     $1,157,000      $2,338,000      $  236,000
Adjustments thereto (1)                  163,000        277,000         327,000         277,000
                                      ----------     ----------      ----------      ----------

Adjusted net income                   $1,230,000     $1,434,000      $2,665,000      $  513,000
                                      ==========     ==========      ==========      ==========

Weighted average shares
  outstanding                          7,090,000      5,447,000       6,852,000       5,133,000
Adjustments thereto (2)                2,693,000      4,544,000       2,971,000       2,272,000
                                      ----------     ----------      ----------      ----------
 
Shares used in computation             9,783,000      9,991,000       9,823,000       7,405,000
                                       =========      =========       =========       =========

Net income per share (3)              $     0.13     $     0.14      $     0.27      $     0.07
                                      ==========     ==========      ==========      ==========

<FN>
(1)  In accordance with the modified treasury stock method, the proceeds from the exercise of 
     stock options and warrants are first used to buy back up to 20% of the Company's common 
     stock at the average price for the period. Any remaining proceeds are used to retire 
     outstanding debt, which adjusts income for interest assumed to be saved (net of income 
     tax effect), and, to the extent there are proceeds remaining after the assumed debt 
     retirement, used to invest in commercial paper, which further adjusts income for
     interest assumed to be earned (net of income tax effect).

(2)  Adjusts the weighted average number of shares outstanding for (i) all stock options and 
     warrants using the modified treasury stock method, and (ii) the conversion of preferred 
     stock using the if-converted method.

(3)  Primary and fully-diluted earnings per share are the same.
</TABLE>



                                       13
# C_2012073EN.01000401.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 January 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Suiker Unie GmbH — Zuckerfabrik Anklam v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-392/10) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 - Article 15(1) and (3) - Agricultural products - System of export refunds - Differentiated export refund - Conditions for granting - Import of the product into the third country of destination - Payment of import duties)

2012/C 73/05

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Suiker Unie GmbH — Zuckerfabrik Anklam

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Hamburg — Interpretation of Article 15(1) and (3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products (OJ 1999 L 102, p. 11) and of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) — Product exported from a Member State to a third State for the purpose of substantial processing under the inward processing procedure without payment of import duty — Export of the product resulting from that processing to another third State — Conditions for the grant of a differentiated export refund — Need to place the product in free circulation in the third State of destination with payment of import duty?

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(1) and (3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 444/2003 of 11 March 2003, must be interpreted as meaning that the condition for receipt of a differentiated refund laid down by that article, namely completion of the customs import formalities, is not satisfied when in the third country of destination, following release for inward processing without collection of import duties, the product undergoes a ‘substantial processing or working’ within the meaning of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code and the product resulting from that processing or working is exported to a third country.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 6640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1634]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Human Factors in Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis.
    Date: February 8-10, 2001.
    Time: 7:30 PM to 12 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Wyndham Garden Brookfield, 18155 W. Bluemound Rd., 
Brookfield, WI 53045.
    Contact Person: William D. Merritt, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, National Cancer Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8034, 
MSC 8328, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-496-9767.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting the due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-1634 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 13(A)(1)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CDC Corporation (the Company) on Form 20-F for
the period ended December 31, 2005, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F/A), I, Peter Yip, chief executive officer of the
Company, certify that:

(1) The Form 20-F/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: July 2, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Peter Yip          
|Peter Yip              
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CDC Corporation and will be retained by CDC Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Lareesa BERMAN, petitioner, v. Thomas A. KAFKA.

No. 17-963.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31

                    MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
I, Pamela Lindquist, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of DOLPHIN
PRODUCTIONS, INC.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statement were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report (the"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and the registrant's other
certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report
whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.



                    DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS, INC.


Date: December 23, 2004              /s/ Pamela Lindquist

                                     -------------------------------

                                     Pamela Lindquist, Vice President
                                     and Principal Financial Officer
# C_2010024EN.01006202.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/62

---

Action brought on 30 November 2009 — medi v OHIM (medi)

(Case T-470/09)

2010/C 24/110

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: medi GmbH & Co. KG (Bayreuth, Germany) (represented by H. Lindner und D. Terheggen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 1 October 2009 in Case R 692/2008-4, insofar as the complaint was dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 1 October 2009 in Case R 692/2008-4, insofar as the complaint was dismissed;

| — | annul OHIM’s Decision of 26 February 2008 to refuse Community trade mark application No 5 378 021; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul OHIM’s Decision of 26 February 2008 to refuse Community trade mark application No 5 378 021;

| — | allow publication in full of Community trade mark application No 5 378 021; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow publication in full of Community trade mark application No 5 378 021;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘medi’ for goods and services in Classes 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, 17, 35, 38, 39, 41, 42 and 44 (Application No 5 378 021)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the Examiner’s Decision

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Wrong application of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, (1) because the mark concerned does have the distinctive character required

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
<PAGE>

32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
         Officer of Ravenwood Bourne, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
         Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ravenwood Bourne, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael
Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ravenwood
Bourne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 15, 2009

                                      /s/Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CUSTODIAN
  In connection with the Annual Report of Gaofeng Gold Corporation , a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kevin A. Polis, Interim sole officer director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated: May 13, 2004
  /s/Kevin A. Polis
 Kevin A. Polis
 Interim sole officer director
# C_2017038EN.01002201.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2016 — DEI v Commission

(Case T-421/09 RENV) (1)

1

((Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Greek market for the supply of lignite and Greek wholesale electricity market - Decision establishing specific measures to correct the anti-competitive effects of an infringement of Article 86(1) EC, in conjunction with Article 82 EC - Article 86(3) EC - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Freedom of contract))

(2017/C 038/29)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) (Athens, Greece) (represented by: P. Anestis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Mylonopoulos and K. Boskovits, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou, Agent, and A. Oikonomou, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission decision C(2009) 6244 final of 4 August 2009 establishing specific measures to correct the anti-competitive effects of the infringement identified in the Commission Decision of 5 March 2008 on the granting or maintaining in force by the Hellenic Republic of rights in favour of DEI for the extraction of lignite.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI), in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI), in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Declares that the Hellenic Republic is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the Hellenic Republic is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,766
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             685
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,996
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     11,530
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,815
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            16,860
<LOANS>                                        154,048
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 197,120
<DEPOSITS>                                     171,663
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,618
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,238
<LONG-TERM>                                        216
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,917
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 197,120
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,382
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,539
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   278
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,199
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,421
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,900
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,299
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      399
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,155
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,155
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.53
<LOANS-NON>                                         14
<LOANS-PAST>                                        37
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     22
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,415
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       72
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,752
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,752
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-20572 GARDEN RIDGE,L.P., Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS USCO DISTRIBUTION SERVICES INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-97-CV-1272)

March 9, 1999 Before DAVIS, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Our review of the record in this case pers uades us that the judgment entered on the jury verdict is amply supported by record evidence. The jury was entitled to conclude that appellant
suffered no loss as a result of any breach of the agreement between appellant and appellee. Also, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.
AFFIRMED.