alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00708

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

thomas nickerson <nicktom21 @msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:16 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

thomas nickerson

4100 madrona dr se # 403

Port Orchard, WA 98366
Elgene PORTER, petitioner, v. Kevin GENOVESE.

No. 17-7595.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's unaudited financial reports and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,111,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,829,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,994,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,157,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             122,962,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       391,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               122,962,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,168,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,716,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,792,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,548,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,548,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,548,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)

        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3, numbers 333-154157 and 333-32966, and Form S-8,numbers 333-118320, 333-43080, 333-76849 and 333-73666), of our reports dated April 13, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of GSI Group Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of GSI GroupInc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP 

April 13, 2010 

Boston, Massachusetts
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed June 15, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________
No. 3D21

- 2 162 Lower Tribunal No. 1 3

- 2263 SP

________________



### United Automobile Insurance Company

, Appellant,

vs.


### Millennium Radiology, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI, a/a/o Al exander Fiallo

- Batista

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the C ounty Court for Miami

- Dade County, Myriam Lehr , Judge.

Michael J. Neimand , for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks & F leischer , P.A., and Gary Marks (Ft

. Lauderdale) , for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ , C.J., and LOGUE, and LINDSEY , JJ.

PER CURIAM.2 W e reverse and remand c onsistent with our decision in United

Automobile Insurance Company v. Millennium Radiology, LLC

, 47 Fla. L.

Weekly D175 , D177 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) ( “Millennium's ‘ identity ’ is

not the same in each of these cases again st United Auto; Millennium draws

its identity from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of

collateral estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.”).
James Ernest LESPIER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7721.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Wade F. LILES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-667.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
II-01034

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

ken lusk <bogananda666@windstream.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:55 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

ken lusk

1203 old 441 s.

clayton, GA 30525
II-00357

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Benjamin Allen <ballen777@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:18 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Benjamin Allen

10 Sandstone Ct. Apt. K

Annapolis, MD 21403
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Office of External Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 202.418.5080 

Statement 

Statement by CFTC Acting Chairman Walter L. Lukken 

January 15, 2009 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Acting Chairman Walter L. Lukken 

today issued the following statement: 

“As I announced late last year, I intend to step aside as Acting Chairman of the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission on January 20, 2009 when Presidentelect Obama is sworn into office. Although my term as Commissioner does not 

end until 2010, I will immediately begin to explore opportunities outside of 

government. The Commission has elected Commissioner Mike Dunn to replace 

me as Acting Chairman until a permanent Chairman is confirmed by the Senate. 

“It has been an honor to serve as Acting Chairman of the CFTC, particularly 

during a very tumultuous and challenging period for our nation, our economy, 

and our commodity futures and options markets. Over the last 18 months, the 

agency has evolved significantly to bring greater transparency and smarter 

oversight to our markets. During this time, the Commission worked with 

Congress to enact the CFTC’s reauthorization after years of delay, improved the 

transparency of electronic energy derivatives markets and OTC swap dealers, 

enhanced CFTC fraud powers over foreign currency scams, facilitated the 

clearing of credit default swaps and other OTC derivatives, signed 

unprecedented cooperation agreements with the SEC and Federal Reserve, and 

generated the greatest funding jump in our agency’s history. 

“I thank President Bush, my fellow Commissioners, and the extraordinary CFTC 

staff for the privilege of serving the public by safeguarding the integrity of our 

commodity futures and options markets.” 

The text of Chairman Lukken’s letter to President Bush follows. 

Dear Mr. President: 

It has been an honor and a privilege to serve your Administration and the public as 

Acting Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). I am writing 
CFTC PAGE 2 OF 2 

to inform you of my intention to step down as Acting Chairman of the CFTC and return 

to Commissioner status, effective January 20, 2009. 

As Acting Chairman, I have had the pleasure to work alongside the dedicated and 

professional staff of the CFTC. I have tremendous respect for the work they do every 

day to protect the integrity of the commodity futures and options markets. During a very 

challenging period in the nation’s financial history, the tireless efforts of this agency and 

its staff have helped to ensure the stability of the financial system, the protection of 

market participants, and the integrity and competitiveness of our financial markets. I 

step aside as Acting Chairman with great confidence that the CFTC will continue to fulfill 

its many significant responsibilities. 

Mr. President, I am deeply grateful for the honor of being nominated and the 

opportunities you have provided me to serve our nation at the CFTC.
David W. TUYTJENS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6413.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Norman BROWN, petitioner, v. Michael BOWERSOX, Warden.

No. 16-6474.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33987-33988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15915]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3347; Amendment #1]


State of Texas

    In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated June 18, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration 
is hereby amended to include Grimes and Harrison Counties in the State 
of Texas as disaster areas caused by Tropical Storm Allison occurring 
on June 5, 2001 and continuing.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in Marion and Washington Counties in the State of 
Texas; and Caddo Parish in the State of Louisiana may be filed until 
the specified date at the previously designated location. Any counties 
contiguous to the above named primary counties and not listed here have 
been previously declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing

[[Page 33988]]

applications for physical damage is August 8, 2001, and for loans for 
economic injury is March 8, 2002.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: June 19, 2001.
James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-15915 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
II-00312

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Suzanne Levels <szlevels@aol.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 3:56 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Suzanne Levels

3457 Raflin Drive

Columbus, OH 43231-7331
Abdelhafid RAHMANI, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 15-9668.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60004 Summary Calendar

HERMAN J. MAYFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN J. CALLAHAN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:95-CV-27LS

- - - - - - - - - - July 29, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Herman J. Mayfield argues that the district court erred in affirming the decision of the Commissioner denying supplemental social security income. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and AFFIRM for essentially the reasons adopted by the district court. Mayfield v. Callahan , No. 4:95- CV-27LS (S.D. Miss. Sept. 30, 1996).No. - 2 -
AFFIRMED.
Keith C. KISACK, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 17-7540.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3712

___________________________

Carlos Perez Garcia

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

 ____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

 ____________

 Submitted: June 26, 2020

Filed: July 1, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Perez Garcia, a citizen of Cuba, seeks review of an order issued by the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (IJ’s) order, which denied him asylum, withholding of removal, and relief

under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). He argues that the BIA erred in

affirming the IJ’s determination that he was not credible and that the IJ failed to
develop the record. Perez Garcia’s challenges to the denial of withholding of

removal, the denial of CAT relief, and the IJ’s failure to develop the record are not

properly before this court for review because he did not challenge those issues on

appeal to the BIA. See Chak Yiu Lui v. Holder, 600 F.3d 980, 984 (8th Cir. 2010). 

Having reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. We conclude that

the IJ’s adverse credibility determination, which was upheld by the BIA, was

supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record as a whole. See Yu An

Li v. Holder, 745 F.3d 336, 340 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review). The IJ provided

specific, cogent reasons for the credibility determination, and Perez Garcia failed to

adequately explain the inconsistencies or provide sufficient corroborating testimony. 

See Kegeh v. Sessions, 865 F.3d 990, 995-96 (8th Cir. 2017); Ezeagwu v. Mukasey,

537 F.3d 836, 838-40 (8th Cir. 2008). 

The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

-2-
II-OlOl7

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Karen Nelson <karensfire@att.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:07 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Karen Nelson

241 E 73 ST

NEW YORK, NY 10021
Raymond Antonio McMILLON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6979.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-00463

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Carol Verga <caverga@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:04 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Carol Verga

6711 W. Mercer Way

Mercer Island, WA 98040