alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, P. Douglas Richard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Financial Corporation (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: February 11, 2005

/s/ P. Douglas Richard                           P. Douglas RichardPresident and Chief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2127

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JASON EDWARD RHEINSTEIN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv - 02550

- MJG )

Submitted : J an uary 28, 2019 Decided: February 5, 2019

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

. Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by un published per curiam opinion

.

Jason E

. Rheinstein , Appellant Pro Se

. Brian E. Frosh , Attorney General of Maryland, Michele J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jason Edward Rheinstein appeals the district court ’ s orders granting the Attorney Grievance Comm ission of Maryland ’ s motion to remand for lack of federal jurisdiction and denying Rheinstein’s emergency motion to stay remand pending appeal or for reconsideration or for appropriate relief. We dismiss in part and affirm in part the district
court ’ s ord ers denying the notice of removal and remanding the case to state court and denying Rheinstein’s emergency motion.

“ An order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, except that an order remand ing a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to [28 U.S.C. §§ 1 4 42 or 1443 (2012)] shall be reviewable by appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012). Rheinstein removed the action pursuant to the federal officer removal statute, 28 U

. S.C. § 1442, and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 14 4 1(a (2012 ), on the ground that it presented a federal question.
A defendant seeking to remove a case under Section 1442 must establish (1) [he] is a federal officer or a person acting under that officer; (2) a colorable federal defense; and (3) the suit is for an act under color of office, which requires a causal nexus between the charged conduct and asserted official authority. Northrup Grumman Tech. Servs., Inc. v. DynCorp Int’l LLC , 865 F.3d 181, 186 (4th Cir. 2017) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). Because Rheinstein failed to meet his burden of es tablishing that he met these criteria, we affirm the portion of the district court’s orders remanding for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the federal officer removal statute and denying the emergency motion. The remainder of the appeal3 must be d ismissed because this court lacks jurisdiction to review the district court ’ s order.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). We therefore dismiss the appeal in part and affirm in part. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED IN PART , AFFIRMED IN PART
Filed 2/5/01 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2001 ND 22

Bernice Fredericks, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

American Federal Bank, a corporation, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20000150

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lawrence A. Leclerc, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Mark G. Schneider, Schneider, Schneider & Phillips, 815 3rd Avenue South, Fargo, N.D. 58103-1815, for plaintiff and appellee.

Wayne W. Carlson (argued), Vogel, Weir, Hunke & McCormick, Ltd., P.O. Box 1389, Fargo, N.D. 58107-1389, and Michael T. Andrews (on brief), Vogel Law Firm, P.O. Box 2097, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2097, for defendant and appellant.

Fredericks v. American Federal Bank

No. 20000150

Per Curiam.

[¶1]American Federal Bank appeals from a judgment awarding Bernice Fredericks $23,864 for severance benefits under the terms of a merger agreement between American Federal Bank and Fredericks’s employer, Northwestern State Bank.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom

Mary Muehlen Maring

James H. O'Keefe, S.J.

[¶3]The Honorable James H. O’Keefe, S.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.
Jon Christopher STOUNE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9582.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Joshua D. KNAUP, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7957.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Surette, the Chief Finacial Officer of Global Axcess, Corp.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best
of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 12, 2003

                                         /s/ David J. Surette
                                       Name: David J. Surette
                                      Title: Chief Financial
                                             Officer
II-00144

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Katherine Threatt <eclecticlife2@msn.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 4:01 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Katherine Threatt

17 Harrison Branch

Isom, KY 41824
cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge Julie Raye Law, LLC Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk Robert Burke

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2
Pamela M. TIMBES, applicant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, et al.

No. 17A838.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Application for stay addressed to Justice SOTOMAYOR and referred to the Court denied.
John MOORE, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9513.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Florida Citizen Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Florida Citizen Advocacy Panel will be 
held in Sunrise CAP Office, Florida.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, July 27, 2001 and Saturday, 
July 28, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Ferree at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7973.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held Friday, 
July 27, 2001 from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. and Saturday, July 28, 2001 from 9 
a.m. to 12 p.m., at Sunrise CAP Office, 7771 W Oakland Park Boulevard, 
Suite 225, Sunrise, Florida 33351. The public is invited to make oral 
comments. Individual comments will be limited to 10 minutes. If you 
would like to have the CAP consider a written statement, please call 1-
888-912-1227 or 954-423-7973, or write Nancy Ferree, CAP Office, 7771 
W. Oakland Park Blvd., Rm. 225, Sunrise, FL 33351, or e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#51373823222532302122373d113c383f35222123383f367f323e3c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="caaca3b8b9bea9abbab9aca68aa7a3a4aeb9bab8a3a4ade4a9a5a7">[email protected]</span></a>. Due to limited conference space, 
notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Nancy 
Ferree. Ms. Ferree can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7973, or 
e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4a2adb6b7b0a7a5b4b7a2a884a9adaaa0b7b4b6adaaa3eaa7aba9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c6a657e7f786f6d7c7f6a604c616562687f7c7e65626b226f6361">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The agenda will include the following: various IRS issue updates 
and reports by the CAP sub-groups.

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: June 22, 2001.
John J. Mannion,
Director, Program Planning Quality.
[FR Doc. 01-16415 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CFTC TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)

December 14, 2020

AGENDA

9:30am Opening Remarks

9:45am Panel: Virtual Currencies Subcommittee Presentation: The Growth and 

Regulatory Challenges of Decentralized Finance

Discussion on the growth of decentralized finance, a broad category of emerging 

smart contract-based financial services being built on top of blockchains, that will

highlight areas of development, detail potential regulatory challenges, and 

propose possible solutions.

Presenters:

▪ Aaron Wright, Clinical Professor of Law, Cardozo Law School

▪ Gary DeWaal, Special Counsel, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

11:15am TAC Vote

A recommendation from the TAC Cybersecurity Subcommittee for the TAC to 

recommend to the CFTC that it provide clear, concise and up-to-date guidance on 

how the CFTC reviews highly-sensitive cybersecurity artifacts and sensitive 

intellectual property.

Presenters:

▪ Jerry Perullo, Chief Information Security Officer, ICE

▪ Hunter Landrum, Government Affairs Counsel, Two Sigma

11:30am Closing Remarks
Jose H. CADET, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 16-9329.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 384 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to increase the penalties 

applicable to aliens who unlawfully reenter the United States after being 

removed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. JONES, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. 

DUNCAN, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, 

Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. BACON, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, and Mr. KELLY of Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to increase 

the penalties applicable to aliens who unlawfully reenter 

the United States after being removed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Kate’s Law’’ or as the 

5 ‘‘Establishing Mandatory Minimums for Illegal Reentry 

6 Act of 2019’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 384 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR REENTRY OF RE2 MOVED ALIENS. 

3 Section 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

4 (8 U.S.C. 1326) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter following 

6 paragraph (2) by striking ‘‘fined under title 18, 

7 United States Code, or imprisoned not more than 2 

8 years, or both’’ and inserting ‘‘imprisoned not less 

9 than 5 years and not more than 6 years’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (b)— 

11 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘fined 

12 under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned 

13 not more than 10 years, or both’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘imprisoned not less than 5 and not more than 

15 10 years, and may, in addition, be fined under 

16 title 18, United States Code’’; 

17 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fined 

18 under such title, imprisoned not more than 20 

19 years, or both’’ and inserting ‘‘imprisoned not 

20 less than 5 and not more than 20 years and 

21 may, in addition, be fined under such title’’; 

22 and 

23 (C) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘fined 

24 under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned 

25 for not more than 10 years, or both’’ and in26 serting ‘‘imprisoned for not less than 5 and not 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 384 IH

1 more than 10 years and may, in addition, be 

2 fined under such title’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Created with Sketch.Menu Transparency
	Contact Us Search
Search
 Main navigation

      
      About the CFTC
                          The Commission
                        Chairman & Commissioners
                        CFTC Organization
                        Advisory Committees
                        Budget & Performance
                        Privacy at the CFTC
                        Careers
                        Diversity and Inclusion at the CFTC
                        Industry Oversight
                          Industry Filings
                        Trading Organizations
                        Clearing Organizations
                        Data Repositories
                        Intermediaries
                        Market Surveillance
                        Contracts & Products
                        Rules & Rule Amendments
                        Anti-Money Laundering
                        Law & Regulation
                          Commodity Exchange Act & Regulations
                        How Rules Are Made
                        Holding Wrongdoers Accountable
                        Federal Register
                        Public Comments
                        CFTC Staff Letters
                        Office of Technology Innovation
                        Market Data & Economic Analysis
                          Data at CFTC
                        Commitments of Traders
                        Bank Participation Reports
                        Cotton On-Call
                        Financial Data for FCMS
                        Net Position Changes Data
                        Staff Reports
                        Weekly Swaps Report
                        Cleared Margin Reports
                        Office of the Chief Economist
                        Forms & Submissions
                        Learn & Protect
                          Check Registration & Disciplinary History
                        Submit a Tip
                        Reparations Program
                        RED List
                        Advisories & Articles
                        Videos
                        Publications
                        News & Events
                          Press Releases
                        Public Statements & Remarks
                        Events Carousel Rotation On
              On


External Meetings: Meeting with GE Energy Financial Services
  
    



  Participants discussed 80FR26200--Trade Options.
      
  When
              07/27/2015

  Rulemaking(s)
              Commodity OptionsII. Definitions

  CFTC Staff
              Clark Ogilvie

  Visitor(s)
              Amy Fisher (GE)

  Organization(s)
              GE Energy Financial Services (GE)


Resources

CFTC Regulations
	Commodity Exchange Act
	Privacy Policy
	Web Policy
	FOIA
	EEO Statement
	No Fear Act
	Accessibility Statement
	Procurement
	USA.gov
	Glossary

Actions

Search Public Comments
	Submit Tips & Complaints
	Search Industry FilingsWhistleblower.gov
	Office of Technology InnovationInspector GeneralSitemap

HomeCFTC Headquarters
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
202.418.5000
II-O0040

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kristina Tatta <kristinat 1 @yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 9, 2010 9:00 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kristina Tatm

2110 Banner Street

Dearborn, MI 48124