alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Vicki Dillard CROWE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7763.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Benjamin Ernest JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7909.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Robert MOORE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7454.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)


Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at Walterboro Municipal Airport, Walterboro, South Carolina

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. section 47153(c), 
notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from the 
City of Walterboro and Collection County to waive the requirement that 
a 2.0-acre parcel of surplus property, located at the Walterboro 
Municipal Airport, be used for aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 26, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Atlanta Airports 
District Office, 1701 Columbia Ave., Suite 2-260, Atlanta, GA 30337-
2747.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to L. Chriswell Bickley, Jr., of the Walterboro-
Colleton County Airport Commission at the following address: P.O. Box 
8, Walterboro, SC 29488.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rusty Nealis, Program Manager, Atlanta 
Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia Ave., Suite 2-260, Atlanta, GA 
30337-2747, (404) 305-7142. The application may be reviewed in person 
at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by City of 
Walterboro and Colleton County to release 2.0 acres of surplus property 
at the Walterboro Municipal Airport. The property will be purchased by 
Marion R. Simmons, III and used to maintain adequate drainage control 
for Simmons Irrigation Company. The net proceeds from the sale of this 
property will be used for airport purposes. The proposed use of this 
property is compatible with airport operations.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, any 
person may, upon request, inspect the request, notice and other 
documents germane to the request in person at the Walterboro-Colleton 
County Airport Commission.

    Issued in Atlanta, Georgia on June 12, 2001.
Scott L. Seritt,
Manager, Atlanta Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 01-15989 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# C_2011055EN.01000801.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium)) — Fluxys SA v Commission de régulation de l’électricité et du gaz (CREG)

(Case C-241/09) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Jurisdiction of the Court - Partial withdrawal by the applicant in the main proceedings - Changed legal framework - Court’s reply no longer necessary for the decision in the main proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 55/12

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fluxys SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission de régulation de l’électricité et du gaz (CREG)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Interpretation of Articles 1, 2 and 18 of Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC (OJ 2003 L 176, p. 57) and Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 September 2005 on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks (OJ 2005 L 289, p. 1) — Automatic revision of the rules for determining the total revenue of system operators in the event of the occurrence of exceptional circumstances during a regulatory period — Compatibility with Community law of a separate tariff regime for transit activities distinct from that applicable to ‘conveyance’ and storage

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

There is no need to answer the question referred for a preliminary ruling in Case C-241/09.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 29.08.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 13.(a).2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of CDC Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 20-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Form 20-F/A”), I, Keith Oliver, chief financial officer of theCompany, certify that:(1) The Form 20-F/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: October 11, 2005     /s/ Keith Oliver     Chief Financial OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto CDC Corporation and will be retained by CDC Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 50-373 AND 50-374] 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted the request of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (the licensee), to withdraw its April 26, 2000, application for proposed amendment to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-11 and NPF-18 for the LaSalle County Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, located in LaSalle County, Illinois. 

The proposed amendment would have revised the habitability system requirements associated with the auxiliary electric equipment room. 

                    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 28, 2000 (65 FR 39958). However, by letter dated June 8, 2001, the licensee withdrew the proposed change.                 

                    For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendment dated April 26, 2000, and the licensee's letter dated June 8, 2001, which withdrew the application for license amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the internet at the NRC Web site,                     *http://www.nrc.gov/​NRC/​ADAMS/​index/​html*. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737 or by email to                     *pdr@nrc.gov*.                 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of June 2001. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Jon B. Hopkins, 

Senior Project Manager, Section 2, Project Directorate III, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 01-16389 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
II-00084

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Daithi Wolfe <dawolfel @gmail. com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 10:50 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Daithi Wolfe

1225 Spaight St.

Madi, WI 53703
# C_2010051EN.01004803.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/48

---

Order of the General Court of 5 January 2010 — Société des Pétroles Shell v European Commission

(Case T-251/09) (1)

1

2010/C 51/88

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.

1

---
II-00177

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Janice Clark <janicerclark@gmail.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 12:29 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Janice Clark

12232 NW Barnes Rd. Apt. 78

Portland, OR 97229
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.



|                   |  |  |  |                                         
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald R. Walsh                     
|                   |  |  |  |                                         
|                   |  |  |  | Donald R. Walsh Chief Executive Officer 
|                   |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ Beth MacLaughlin                    
|                   |  |  |  |                                         
|                   |  |  |  | Beth MacLaughlin Chief Financial Officer
Marcus BLACKMON, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-9429.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GUSTAVO MENDOZA-BUSTOS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10463

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00411-LDG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Gustavo Mendoza-Bustos appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of a controlled substance and

possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21

FILED

MAY 21 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-10463

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

Mendoza-Bustos contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing

to explain adequately the sentence imposed. The record belies this contention. 

Mendoza-Bustos next contends that the district court erred by failing to

make any findings of fact, or to conduct an evidentiary hearing, regarding his

assertion that the government’s refusal to move for a sentence reduction under

U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 was based on a desire to punish him for not entering into a plea

agreement. The court was not required to conduct an evidentiary hearing, or to

make findings of fact, because Mendoza-Bustos did not make a “substantial

threshold showing” that the government had unconstitutional motives or acted

arbitrarily. See Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181, 185-86 (1992); see also

United States v. Murphy, 65 F.3d 758, 764 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Maintaining the

effectiveness of the plea negotiation process is a legitimate governmental

interest.”). 

Finally, Mendoza-Bustos contends that his sentence is substantively

unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C.
3 11-10463

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors, Mendoza-Bustos’s within-Guidelines sentence is

substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). 

AFFIRMED.
# C_2009153EN.01004402.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/44

---

Action brought on 21 April 2009 — Ilink Kommunikationssysteme v OHIM (ilink)

(Case T-161/09)

2009/C 153/87

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ilink Kommunikationssysteme GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by B. Schütze, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 5 February 2009 in Case R 1849/2007-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 5 February 2009 in Case R 1849/2007-4; and

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ilink’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 38 and 42

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused in part

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1)), since the trade mark applied for has the requisite distinctive character and there is no need for it to be allowed to remain available.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
Kevin Michael SHEA, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-6095.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF C.F.O. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of KIT digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robin Smyth, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





August 3, 2011/s/ Robin SmythRobin SmythChief Financial Officer
Yan DONOVAN, petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.

No. 15-9426.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2011030EN.01005701.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/57

---

Order of the General Court of 29 November 2010 — Eurotel v OHIM — DVB Project (DVB)

(Case T-21/09) (1)

1

()

2011/C 30/101

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
II-00137

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Karen Thomas <katdog9@aol.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 7:54 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Karen Thomas

3900 Edenvale P1.

Oakland, CA 94605
**Exhibit 15.(a).5**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-11288, No. 333-118619 and No. 333-123666) of CDC Corporation (formerly chinadotcom corporation) of our report dated June 20, 2006 (except for note 2, as to which the date is July 2, 2007) with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of CDC Corporation included in the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report (Form 20-F/A) of CDC Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ Ernst & Young 

Hong Kong 

July 2, 2007