6578 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2001 / Notices

during the estimating process. These

estimates are used in Federal funding

allocations, monitoring recent

demographic trends, and benchmarking

may federally funded survey totals.

Public Law 94–171—The Federal law

amending Section 141 of Title 13

directing the Secretary of Commerce

(who delegates that responsibility to the

Director of the Census Bureau) to

provide selected decennial census data

tabulations to the states by April 1 of the

year following the census. These

tabulations are used by the states to

redefine the areas included in each

Congressional District and the areas

used for state and local elections, a

process called redistricting.

Special Place—A place containing

one or more group quarters, including

hotels and campgrounds. A special

place also may include housing units

occupied by staff or guests.

Summary File 1—A data file that

presents counts and basic crosstabulations of information collected

from all people and housing units. This

information includes age, sex, race,

Hispanic or Latino origin, household

relationship, and whether the residence

is owned or rented. Data will be

available down to the block level for

many tabulations, but limited to the

census tract level in cases where there

are concerns with disclosure.

Summaries also will be included for

other geographic areas, such as ZIP

Code Tabulation Areas and

Congressional Districts.

Exhibit—Additional Information

This section provides additional

information on how the Census 2000

CQR program will operate.

1. Where Should a Governmental Unit

Submit a Challenge for the Census 2000

CQR program?

Governmental units challenging the

completeness or accuracy of the Census

2000 counts should submit their

challenge in writing to: Count Question

Resolution Program, Room 2002, SFC—

2, Decennial Management Division, U.S.

Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233–

0001.

2. Will the Census Bureau Make

Corrections to the Census Counts Based

on Information Submitted by

Governmental Units?

The Census Bureau will make

corrections if research indicates they are

warranted. Our experience has shown

that many of the questions received

from the local or tribal officials do not

reflect errors in census counts.

Questions may result from an incorrect

or incomplete understanding of the

procedures used to take the census. In

other instances, questions about census

counts reflect a local or tribal official’s

reliance on different enumeration

concepts, definitions, geographic

assignments, and/or the currency of the

information in comparison to the

census. The Census Bureau’s

determination of whether a correction is

necessary will be based on the quality

and completeness of the information

provided by local and tribal

governmental unit representatives and

the results of the Census Bureau’s

review of the census records.

3. Will the Census Bureau Incorporate

Corrections From the CQR Process Into

the Apportionment or Redistricting Data

or Subsequent Data Products?

The Census Bureau will not change

the apportionment counts to reflect

corrections resulting from the CQR

process. The apportionment counts

were delivered to the President on

December 28, 2000.

The Census Bureau will begin

delivery of the counts required for

redistricting purposes in March 2001

and will complete this delivery by the

statutory deadline of April 1, 2001. The

Census Bureau will not incorporate CQR

corrections into the redistricting data

and subsequent data products for

Census 2000. This process will allow

the Census Bureau to maintain

consistency between data products

while maintaining the schedule for

timely release of the data. However, the

Census Bureau will issue a revised

official Census 2000 population and

housing unit counts for the affected

governmental entity(es), maintain a list

of CQR corrected areas on the American

Factfinder, and will incorporate any

corrections into its Postcensal Estimates

program beginning in December 2002.

III. Data

OMB Number: Not available.

Form Number: None.

Type of Review: Regular collection.

Affected Public: Local governmental

jurisdictions in the United States and

Puerto Rico.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

Approximately 3,000 annually.

Estimated Time Per Response: 5.2

hours ( based on an average challenge of

40 housing units).

Estimated Total Annual Burden

Hours: 15,600 hours.

Estimated Total Annual Cost:

$244,440.00.

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.

Legal Authority: Title 13, USC,

Section 141.

IV. Request for Comments

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether

the proposed collection of information

is necessary for the proper performance

of the functions of the agency, including

whether the information shall have

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden

(including hours and cost) of the

proposed collection of information; (c)

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the

burden of the collection of information

on respondents, including through the

use of automated collection techniques

or other forms of information

technology.

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for OMB

approval of this information collection;

they also will become a matter of public

record.

Dated: January 12, 2001.

Madeleine Clayton,

Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office

of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 01–1564 Filed 1–19–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration

Action Affecting Export Privileges;

Randy Reyes

In the Matter of: Randy Reyes,

currently incarcerated at: Wachenhut

FCI, USM #05425–089, P.O. Box 17001,

1500 Cadet Road, Taft, California 93268;

and with an address at: 5250 Colodny

Drive, #3, Agoura Hills, California

91301–2656.

Order Denying Export Privileges

On January 14, 2000, Randy Reyes

(Reyes) was convicted in the United

States District Court for the Eastern

District of Wisconsin of violating

Section 38 of the Arms Export Control

Act (22 U.S.A. 2778 (1990 & Supp.

2000)) (the AECA) and the International

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50

U.S.C.A. 1701–1706 (1991 & Supp.

2000)) (IEEPA). Specifically, Reyes was

convicted of knowingly and willfully

exporting and attempting to export from

the United States aircraft component

parts which were designated as defense

articles on the United States Munitions

List without having first obtained from

the Department of State a license or

written authorization, and of knowingly

and willfully exporting and attempting

to export from the United States to Iran

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2001 / Notices 6579

1 During the time of the Act’s lapse, (August 20,

1994 through November 12, 2000) the President,

through Executive Order 12924 (3 CFR, 1994 Comp.

917 (1995)), which had been extended by

successive Presidential Notices, the most recent

being that of August 3, 2000 (65 FR 48347, August

8, 2000), continued the Regulations in effect under

the IEEPA.

2Pursuant to appropriate delegations of authority

that are reflected in the Regulations, the Director,

Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the

Director, Office of Export Enforcement, exercises

the authority granted to the Secretary by section

11(h) of the Act.

through Geneva, Switzerland, aircraft

component parts.

Section 11(h) of the Export

Administration Act of 1979, as amended

(currently codified at 50 U.S.C.A. app

2401–2420 (1991 & Supp. 2000 and Pub.

L. No. 106–508, November 13, 2000))

(the Act) 1 provides that, at the

discretion of the Secretary of

Commerce,2 no person convicted of

violating the AECA or the IEEPA, or

certain other provisions of the United

States Code, shall be eligible to apply

for or use any export license issued

pursuant to, or provided by, the Act or

the Export Administration Regulations

(currently codified at 15 CFR Parts 730–

774 (2000), as amended (65 FR 14862,

March 20, 2000)) (the Regulations), for

a period of up to 10 years from the date

of the conviction. In addition, any

license issued pursuant to the Act in

which such a person had any interest at

the time of conviction may be revoked.

Pursuant to sections 766.25 and

750.8(a) of the Regulations, upon

notification that a person has been

convicted of violating the AECA or the

IEEPA, the Director, Office of Exporter

Services, in consultation with the

Director, Office of Export Enforcement,

shall determine whether to deny that

person’s export privileges for a period of

up to 10 years from the date of

conviction and shall determine whether

to revoke any license previously issued

to such a person.

Having received notice of Reyes’s

conviction for violating the AECA and

the IEEPA, and after providing notice

and an opportunity for Reyes to make a

written submission to the Bureau of

Export Administration before issuing an

Order denying his export privileges, as

provided in section 766.25 of the

Regulations, I, following consultations

with the Director, Office of Export

Enforcement, have decided to deny

Reyes’s export privileges for a period of

10 years from the date of his conviction.

The 10-year period ends on January 14,

2010. I have also decided to revoke all

licenses issued pursuant to the Act in

which Reyes had an interest at the time

of his conviction.

Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered:

I. Until January 14, 2010, Randy

Reyes, currently incarcerated at:

Wachenhut FCI USM # 05425–089, P.O.

Box 17001, 1500 Cadet Road, Taft,

California 93268, and with an address

at: 5250 Colodny Drive, #3, Agoura

Hills, California 91301–2656, may not,

directly or indirectly, participate in any

way in any transaction involving any

commodity, software or technology

(hereinafter collectively referred to as

‘‘item’’ ) exported or to be exported from

the United States, that is subject to the

Regulations, or in any other activity

subject to the Regulations, including,

but not limited to:

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using

any license, License Exception, or

export control document;

B. Carrying on negotiations

concerning, or ordering, buying,

receiving, using, selling, delivering,

storing, disposing of, forwarding,

transporting, financing, or otherwise

servicing in any way, any transaction

involving any item exported or to be

exported from the United States that is

subject to the Regulations, or in any

other activity subject to the Regulations;

or

C. Benefiting in any way from any

transaction involving any item exported

or to be exported from the United States

that is subject to the Regulations, or in

any other activity subject to the

Regulations.

II. No person may, directly or

indirectly, do any of the following:

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf

of the denied person any item subject to

the Regulations;

B. Take any action that facilitates the

acquisition or attempted acquisition by

the denied person of the ownership,

possession, or control of any item

subject to the Regulations that has been

or will be exported from the United

States, including financing or other

support activities related to a

transaction whereby the denied person

acquires or attempts to acquire such

ownership, possession or control;

C. Take any action to acquire from or

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted

acquisition from the denied person of

any item subject to the Regulations that

has been exported from the United

States;

D. Obtain from the denied person in

the United States any item subject to the

Regulations with knowledge or reason

to know that the item will be, or is

intended to be, exported from the

United States; or

E. Engage in any transaction to service

any item subject to the Regulations that

has been or will be exported from the

United States and which is owned,

possessed or controlled by the denied

person, or service any item, of whatever

origin, that is owned, possessed or

controlled by the denied person if such

service involves the use of any item

subject to the Regulations that has been

or will be exported from the United

States. For purposes of this paragraph,

servicing means installation,

maintenance, repair, modification or

testing.

III. After notice and opportunity for

comment as provided in Section 766.23

of the Regulations, any person, firm,

corporation, or business organization

related to Reyes by affiliation,

ownership, control, or position of

responsibility in the conduct of trade or

related services may also be subject to

the provisions of this Order.

IV. This Order does not prohibit any

export, reexport, or other transaction

subject to the Regulations where the

only items involved that are subject to

the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin

technology.

V. This Order is effective immediately

and shall remain in effect until January

14, 2010.

VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the

Regulations, Reyes may file an appeal

from this Order with the Under

Secretary for Export Administration.

The appeal must be filed within 45 days

from the date of this Order and must

comply with the provisions of Part 756

of the Regulations.

VII. A copy of this Order shall be

delivered to Reyes. This Order shall be

published in the Federal Register

Dated: January 5, 2001.

Eileen M. Albanese,

Director, Office of Exporter Services.

[FR Doc. 01–1620 Filed 1–19–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration

Action Affecting Export Privileges;

Peter Rigolli, Also Known as Pietro

Rigolli, Ian Falcon, G. Tedaldi, Rafael

Heredia, and Farid H. Talab

In the Matter of: Peter Rigolli, also

known as Pietro Rigolli, Ian Falcon, G.

Tedaldi, Rafael Heredia, and Farid H.

Talab, currently incarcerated at: Inmate

#044–22082, FCI Otisville, P.O. Box

600, Otisville, New York 10963; and

with an address at: 118 Northview,

Dollar Des, Ormeaux, Quebec, Canada

H9B3J6.

Order Denying Export Privileges

On March 27, 2000, Peter Rigolli, also

known as Pietro Rigolli, Ian Falcon, G.