alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012118EN.01000202.xml

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 March 2012 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-354/10) (1)

1

(Failure to fulfil obligations - State aid - Tax-exempt reserve fund - Incompatibility with the common market - Recovery - Failure to execute)

2012/C 118/03

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Mylonopoulos and K. Boskovits, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take, within the period prescribed, the measures necessary for recovery of the aid held unlawful and incompatible with the internal market by Article 1(1) (excepting the aid referred to in Article 1(2) and Articles 2 and 3) of the Commission decision of 18 July 2007 (C(2007) 3251) concerning the tax-exempt reserve fund (State aid C 37/2005)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the measures necessary for recovery, in accordance with Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2008/723/EC of 18 July 2007 on State aid C 37/05 (ex NN 11/04) implemented by Greece — tax-exempt reserve fund, of the aid held unlawful and incompatible with the internal market, excepting the aid referred to in Article 1(2) and Articles 2 and 3 of that decision, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 to 6 of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the measures necessary for recovery, in accordance with Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2008/723/EC of 18 July 2007 on State aid C 37/05 (ex NN 11/04) implemented by Greece — tax-exempt reserve fund, of the aid held unlawful and incompatible with the internal market, excepting the aid referred to in Article 1(2) and Articles 2 and 3 of that decision, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 to 6 of that decision;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.

1

---
II-00249

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Carey Hix <beachgir1732001 @yahoo.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 9:24 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Carey Hix

5037 Fairfax Street

Fort Worth, TX 76116
**Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 December 2010 – LG Electronics v OHIM (KOMPRESSOR PLUS)**

**(Case T-497/09)**

Community trade mark – Application for Community word mark KOMPRESSOR PLUS – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods (Council Regulation
No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 14, 18-21)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2009 (Case R 397/2009-1), relating to an application for registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign KOMPRESSOR PLUS. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | LG Electronics, Inc. |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark KOMPRESSOR PLUS for goods in Class 7 – Application No 7282924 |
| Decision of the examiner: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal partially dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders LG Electronics, Inc. to pay the costs. |
# C_2011186EN.01002301.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2011 — Commission v New Acoustic Music and Hildibrandsdottir

(Case T-464/09) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Contract for financial assistance concluded under the ‘Culture 2000’ Framework Programme - Implementation of the action entitled ‘European Music Roadwork’ - Non-performance of the contract - Repayment of part of the amounts advanced - Partial inadmissibility of the action - Procedure by default - Legal aid)

2011/C 186/42

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët and N. Bambara, Agents, assisted by C. Erkelens, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: New Acoustic Music Association (Orpington, United Kingdom); and Anna Hildur Hildibrandsdottir (Orpington, United Kingdom)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application by the Commission under an arbitration clause within the meaning of Article 238 EC, seeking an order that New Acoustic Music Association and Ms Hildibrandsdottir repay to it part of the amount of the advances paid, together with default interest, in performance of Contract No 2003-1895/001-001, to carry out the action entitled ‘CLT2003/A1/GB-317 — European Music Roadwork’, as part of the ‘Culture 2000’ Framework Programme established by Decision 508/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 February 2000 (OJ 2000 L 63, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that the action is inadmissible in so far as it is brought against New Acoustic Music Association; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the action is inadmissible in so far as it is brought against New Acoustic Music Association;

| 2. | Orders Ms Anna Hildur Hildibrandsdottir, as a member of the New Acoustic Music Association partnership, to repay to the European Commission the amount of EUR 31 136,23, together with interest at the rate of 7,70% per annum as of 14 January 2008 until the debt is fully discharged; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Anna Hildur Hildibrandsdottir, as a member of the New Acoustic Music Association partnership, to repay to the European Commission the amount of EUR 31 136,23, together with interest at the rate of 7,70% per annum as of 14 January 2008 until the debt is fully discharged;

| 3. | Orders Ms Hildibrandsdottir to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ms Hildibrandsdottir to pay the costs.

| 4. | Ms Hildibrandsdottir’s application for legal aid is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Ms Hildibrandsdottir’s application for legal aid is rejected.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT AND CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.:

Under date of January 24, 2002 we reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 29, 2001 and
December 30, 2000 and the related Consolidated Statements of Operations, Cash
Flows and Changes in Shareholders' Equity for each of the fiscal years in the
three-year period ended December 29, 2001, which are incorporated by reference
in this Form 10-K. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned
Consolidated Financial Statements, we also audited the related consolidated
financial statement schedule included in this Form 10-K. This consolidated
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this consolidated financial
statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic Consolidated Financial Statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to the use of reports included herein or incorporated herein by
reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-79357, 333-79369, 333-79375,
333-79365, 333-80647, 333-60428, 333-69622, 333-73302) on Form S-8 of The Pepsi
Bottling Group, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2002
**Exhibit 15(a).3**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-12958, No. 333-11288, No. 333-118619 and No. 333-123666 on Form S-8 and No. 333-145834 on Form F-3 of CDC Corporation and subsidiaries, of our report dated February 15, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Equity PacificLimited for the year ended December 31, 2005 which appear in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A Amendment No. 1 of CDC Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd. 

Beijing, the People’s Republicof China 

June 27, 2008
James H. DICKEY, petitioner, v. Christine SAMUEL.

No. 17-7570.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
TEN STIX, INC.
                             A Colorado Corporation

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Ten Stix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Sawyer,
President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated: June 21, 2004                         /s/ Thomas E. Sawyer
                                             _________________________________
                                             By:  Thomas E. Sawyer
                                             Its:   President and C.E.O.
SINO LEGEND (ZHANGJIAGANG) CHEMICAL CO. LTD. et al., petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al.

No. 16-428.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
---

Exhibit
  32(a)

In connection with the CNB Florida Bancshares, Inc.
  (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
  March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
  hereof, (the Report), I, K.C. Trowell, Chairman of the Board and
  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                                           
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ K.C. Trowell                                                          
| |                                                                           
| | K.C. Trowell
      Chairman of the Board and
      Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34240-34241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group (AMWG), and Glen 
Canyon Technical Work Group (TWG); Cancellation of Meetings

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings; cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation is canceling the Adaptive Management 
Work Group Meeting Scheduled for July 17-18, 2001, in Phoenix, Arizona, 
in order to complete work on the Strategic Plan and other assignments. 
The meeting will be rescheduled for early October 2001 and will be 
noticed in the Federal Register when arrangements have been made.
    Dates and Location: The Glen Canyon Technical Work Group will 
conduct the following public meeting.

[[Page 34241]]

Flagstaff, Arizona--August 7, 2001

    The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and conclude at 5:00 p.m. The 
meeting will be held at the Residence Inn, 3440 N. Country Club Drive, 
Flagstaff, Arizona.
    Agenda: The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss the Strategic 
Plan, and other administrative and resource issues pertaining to the 
AMP.
    Agenda items may be revised prior to any of the meetings. Final 
agendas will be posted 15 days in advance of each meeting and can be 
found on the Bureau of Reclamation website under Environmental Programs 
at: http://www.uc.usbr.gov. Time will be allowed on each agenda for any 
individual or organization wishing to make formal oral comments 
(limited to 10 minutes) at the meetings.

ADDRESSES: To allow full consideration of information by the AMWG and 
TWG members, written notice must be provided to Randall Peterson, 
Bureau of Reclamation, Upper Colorado Regional Office, 125 South State 
Street, Room 6107, Salt Lake City, Utah 84138-1147; telephone (801) 
524-3758; faxogram (801) 524-3858; E-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4969481908196978b8aa49187ca91978696ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8dad8cddccddadbc7c6e8ddcb86dddbcada86cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a> at 
least FIVE (5) days prior to the meeting. Any written comments received 
will be provided to the AMWG and TWG members at the meetings.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Peterson, telephone (801) 524-
3758; faxogram (801) 524-3858; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dba9abbeafbea9a8b4b59baeb8f5aea8b9a9f5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b494b5e4f5e494854557b4e58154e485949155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 14, 2001.
Rick L. Gold,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 01-16007 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2012058EN.01000703.xml

| 25.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/7

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Tilda Riceland Private v OHIM — Siam Grains (BASMALI)

(Case T-304/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark BASmALI - Earlier non-registered trade mark and earlier sign BASMATI - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2012/C 58/12

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tilda Riceland Private Ltd (Gurgaon, India) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, N. Urwin and D. Sills, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Siam Grains Co. Ltd (Bangkok, Thailand) (represented by: C. Thomas-Raquin, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 March 2009 (Case R 513/2008-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Tilda Riceland Private Ltd and Siam Grains Co. Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 March 2009 (Case R 513/2008-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 March 2009 (Case R 513/2008-1);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of the costs incurred by Tilda Riceland Private Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of the costs incurred by Tilda Riceland Private Ltd;

| 3. | Orders Siam Grains Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by Tilda Riceland Private Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Siam Grains Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs incurred by Tilda Riceland Private Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

1

---
Sandra FINCH, petitioner, v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 17-858.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
11-OLOOO

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Vic Anderson <sixt2ndpatriot@hushmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:17 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

And get the SS (Secret Service) to JAIL the racketeering Bernanksters, Wall Street-walkers and BP (Big Petroleum) Greasegun molls!

Vic Anderson

1999 Bradbury Road

Eagle Lake, FL 33880
# C_2012165EN.01000302.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 April 2012 — Artegodan GmbH v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-221/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Second paragraph of Article 288 EC - Non-contractual liability of the Union - Conditions - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Decision withdrawing marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing amfepramone)

2012/C 165/05

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Artegodan GmbH (represented by: U. Reese, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and M. Heller, acting as Agents), Federal Republic of Germany

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2010 in Case T-429/05 Artegodan v Commission, in which the General Court dismissed an action for compensation under Article 235 EC and the second paragraph of Article 288 EC, seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant on account of the adoption of Commission Decision C(2000) 453 of 9 March 2000, concerning the withdrawal of marketing authorisations for medicinal products for human use containing amfepramone — Infringement of the second paragraph of Article 288 EC — Erroneous assessment of the criteria as to the existence of a sufficiently serious breach of EU law

Artegodan v Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Artegodan GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Artegodan GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---