alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

                    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Federal Advisory Committee on International Exhibitions will be held from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. on Monday, July 16, 2001 in Room 714 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20506.                          ( print page 34274)    

This meeting is for the purpose of review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of May 22, 2001, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.

Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

Dated: June 21, 2001.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 01-16087 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Scott Long, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 6, 2005



/s/ Scott LongScott LongChief Financial Officer
ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS, et al., petitioners, v. Daniel WORTMAN, et al.

No. 17-659.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# C_2013071EN.01002702.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/27

---

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2013 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission

(Joined Cases T-445/09 and T-448/09) (1)

1

2013/C 71/42

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000852220
<NAME> ALLSTATE FINANCIAL CORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3100630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 41216650
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3024591
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              45234545
<PP&E>                                         1321664
<DEPRECIATION>                                  844355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                49188173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         20451890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         40000
<OTHER-SE>                                    23663384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  49188173
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2963482
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1797058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                547000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              410331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 209093
<INCOME-TAX>                                     77364
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             131729
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    131729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        


</TABLE>
II-00055

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Candice Rowe <sweetecandie@gmail. com>

Wednesday, December 8, 2010 2:35 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Candice Rowe

8624 South 250 West

Trafalgar, IN 46181
# C_2009282EN.01005001.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/50

---

Action brought on 14 September 2009 — Reber Holding v OHIM — Wedl & Hofmann (Walzer Traum)

(Case T-355/09)

2009/C 282/96

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Reber Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Bad Reichenhall, Germany) (represented by: O. Spuhler and M. Geitz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Wedl & Hofmann (Mils/Hall in Tirol, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 9 July 2009 in Case R 623/2008-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 9 July 2009 in Case R 623/2008-4;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Wedl & Hofmann GmbH

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘Walzer Taum’ in respect of goods in Classes 21 and 30 (Application No 4 593 752)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Reber Holding GmbH and Co. KG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German word mark ‘Walzertraum’ in respect of goods in Class 30 (No 1 092 615) and the opposition was directed against only the registration in respect of the goods in Class 30

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Contested decision was annulled and the opposition was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of the first sentence of Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) and the general principle of equal treatment in relation to the interpretation of the requirements for genuine use of the mark cited in oppostion

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 20

- 683

_____________________________ M AURICE C AMPBELL , Petitioner ,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 22, 2020

P ER C URIAM

. D ISMISSED

. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).
B.L. T HOMAS , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Maurice Campbell, pro se , Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
Ray GIBSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7614.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2011282EN.01001703.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/17

---

Order of the General Court of 7 July 2011 — Acetificio Marcello de Nigris v Commission

(Case T-351/09) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Registration of a protected geographical indication - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 282/32

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Acetificio Marcello de Nigris Srl (Afragola, Italy) (represented by: P. Perani and P. Pozzi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and B. Rasmussen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri and S. Fiorentino, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 583/2009 of 3 July 2009 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Aceto Balsamico di Modena (PGI)] (OJ 2009 L 175, p. 7)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Consorzio Filiera Aceto Balsamico di Modena. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Consorzio Filiera Aceto Balsamico di Modena.

| 3. | Acetificio Marcello de Nigris Srl shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Acetificio Marcello de Nigris Srl shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The Italian Republic and Consorzio Filiera Aceto Balsamico di Modena shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Italian Republic and Consorzio Filiera Aceto Balsamico di Modena shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

1

---
EXHIBIT 10.2







 AMENDMENT NUMBER 1


TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This AMENDMENT is in clarification and amendment of that certain EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated March 28, 2013, (“Effective Date”) by and between T Bancshares, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary T Bank, N.A. ("Company"), and Ken Bramlage ("Executive"), to which this AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 is attached and of which it is hereby made a part.







The Agreement is hereby supplemented and amended as follows:


 


1.   Definitions. All terms defined in the Agreement and not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings where used herein.


 


2.   Paragraph 3.a. is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following to be and read: “So long as Executive is employed by the Company in good standing, commencing on May 15, 2015, the Company agrees to compensate the Executive on a salary basis of 5,500.00 semi-monthly.”


 


3.   General.


 


(a) Except as expressly amended and supplemented hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.


 


(b) In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall prevail.







Executed this 11th day of May, 2015












EXECUTIVE


 


	
            /s/ Shari Jensen                       

	
           /s/ Ken Bramlage                      


	
WITNESS

	
Ken Bramlage 


	 	 
	
T BANK N.A. 

	 
	 	 
	 	 
	
            /s/ Shari Jensen                       

	
           /s/ Patrick Howard                    


	
WITNESS

	
President& CEO 


	 	 
	
T BANCSHARES, INC. 

	 
	 	 
	 	 
	
            /s/ Shari Jensen                      

	
           /s/ Patrick Howard                     


	
Witness

	
President & CEO
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10762 Summary Calendar

MARCELINO MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus FNU LUEVA; FNU GONZALEZ; JOHN DOE, Parole Officer; FNU GARRISON; FNU ORTIZ; FNU GARCIA; FNU ANDERSON; BILL CHEATHAM, SCC; JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JOHN DOE, SCC; JANE DOE, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CV-126-BG

-------------------- Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Marcelino Martinez, Texas prisoner #526628, appeals the district court’s denial of his motions for a preliminary injunction and for appointment of counsel. Martinez wishes to be placed in "super-seg[regation] protective custody" pending a disposition of his civil rights claims by the district court.No. 03-10762 -2- Martinez’s civil rights claims against the TDCJ-ID Connally Unit personnel have been dismissed by the Western District of Texas for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, see Martinez v. Ambriz , No. SA-03-CA-319-EP (W.D. Tex. May 21, 2003), and, although his claims against the TDCJ-ID Smith Unit personnel are still pending before the Northern District, Martinez is no longer housed at the Smith Unit and, thus, he is in no danger from the personnel or inmates at the Smith Unit. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Martinez’s motion for a preliminary injunction. See White v. Carlucci , 862 F.2d 1209, 1211 (5th Cir. 1989); Women’s Med. Ctr. v. Bell , 248 F.3d 411, 419 n.15 (5th Cir. 2001). The district court also did not abuse its discretion in denying Martinez’s motion for appointment of counsel, and his motion to this court for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212, 213 (5th Cir. 1982).
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF THE REGISTRANT AT NOVEMBER 30, 1998 AND FEBRUARY
28, 1998 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE
THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1998 AND 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,682,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,790,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,583,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,662,000
<PP&E>                                       5,963,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,641,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,913,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,641,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,980,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,841,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,424,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   970,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,454,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,454,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
In Re Sharon CLOUD, petitioner.

No. 17-7211.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3704 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3704

     To amend the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to clarify the use of 
           subminimum wage with respect to certain contracts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2019

   Mrs. Hartzler (for herself, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Clay, Mr. Graves of 
    Missouri, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Mr. Long, and Mr. Luetkemeyer) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to clarify the use of 
           subminimum wage with respect to certain contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Choices for Disabled 
Workers Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF USE OF SUBMINIMUM WAGE WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN 
              CONTRACTS.

    (a) Exception to Prohibition.--Section 511(b)(2) of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794g(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``A local'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraph (B), a local''; and
            (2) by adding at the end following:
                    ``(B) State of missouri.--Notwithstanding 
                subparagraph (A), a local educational agency or State 
                educational agency described in subparagraph (A) that 
                is in the State of Missouri may enter into a contract 
                or other arrangement with an entity described in 
                subsection (a) for the purpose of operating a program 
                for an individual who is age 24 or younger under which 
                work is compensated at a subminimum wage if the 
                individual has received, and produces appropriate 
                documentation indicating completion of, the services 
                described in subsection (a)(2)(A) before beginning 
                work.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 511(a) of such Act (29 U.S.C. 
794g(a)) is amended by striking ``No entity'' and inserting ``Except as 
provided in subsection (b)(2), no entity''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to work beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011252EN.01002604.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/26

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 11 February 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy)) — Reti Televisive Italiane SpA (RTI) v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Communicazioni, Sky Italia Srl

(Case C-390/09) (1)

1

2011/C 252/51

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---