alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011311EN.01003902.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Chalk v OHIM — Reformed Spirits Company Holdings (CRAIC)

(Case T-83/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Community word mark CRAIC - Assignments - Registration of the transfer of the mark - Revocation - Articles 16, 17, 23 and 77a of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 16, 17, 23 and 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) and Rule 31 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

2011/C 311/70

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: David Chalk (Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom) (represented by: W. James, M. Gilbert, C. Balme, Solicitors, and S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Reformed Spirits Company Holdings Ltd (Saint Helier, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Morcom QC)

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 November 2008 (Case R 1888/2007-2) relating to an application for registration of the transfer of a Community trade mark following an assignment

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr David Chalk to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Reformed Spirits Company Holdings Ltd for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr David Chalk to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Reformed Spirits Company Holdings Ltd for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.

1

---
Edmund W. CLARKE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE.

No. 16-1490.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
# C_2010080EN.01001403.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 12 January 2010 — Agrargenossenschaft Münchehofe e.G. v BVVG Bodenverwertungs- und -verwaltungs GmbH

(Case C-18/10)

2010/C 80/26

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agrargenossenschaft Münchehofe e.G.

Applicant:

Defendant: BVVG Bodenverwertungs- und -verwaltungs GmbH

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the provisions of Paragraph 5(1)(ii) and (iii) of the Flächenerwerbsverordnung (Land Purchase Regulations), implementing Paragraph 4(3)(i) of the Ausgleichsleistungsgesetz (Compensation Act), in the version in force until 11 July 2009, infringe Article 87 EC?

---
Edwin Jassiel PERALTA-CASTRO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7612.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2011186EN.01001702.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 9 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias — Spain) — María Luisa Gómez Cueto v Administración del Estado

(Case C-517/10) (1)

1

2011/C 186/30

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
II-00987

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

C J Wilson <wilson_cindyj@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:23 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

C J Wilson

970 54th ST.

Pullman, MI 49450
Bitnomial Clearinghouse, LLC

Form DCO

Derivatives Clearing Organization

Application for Registration

Cover Sheet

Exact name of Applicant as specified in charter:

Bitnomial Clearinghouse, LLC

Address of principal executive offices:

318 W Adams St

Chicago, IL 60606

[X] This is an application for registration.

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. Name under which business is or will be conducted, if different than name specified 

above (include acronyms, if any):

BTNL

2. If name of derivatives clearing organization is being amended, state previous 

derivatives clearing organization name: 

N/A

3. Additional contact information:

Website: https://bitnomial.com

Phone: 312-883-5851

4. List of principal office(s) and address(es) where derivatives clearing organization 

activities are/will be conducted: 

Bitnomial

318 W. Adams St.

Chicago, IL 60606
SIGNATURE/REPRESENTATION

14. Applicant has duly caused this application to be signed on its behalf by its duly 

authorized representative as of the eight day of March, 2023. Applicant and the 

undersigned each represent hereby that, to the best of their knowledge, all information

contained herein is true, current and complete in all material respects. It is understood 

that all required items and Exhibits are considered integral parts of this Form DCO and 

that the submission of any amendment represents that all unamended items and Exhibits 

remain true, current, and complete as previously filed.

Name of Applicant: Bitnomial Clearinghouse, LLC

__________________________________________

Signature of Duly Authorized Person

Name of Signatory: James Walsh

Title of Signatory: Chief Compliance Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 6639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1632]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Determining the Carcinogenic Significance of Heterocyclic 
Amines.
    Date: February 9, 2001.
    Time: 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Cancer Institute, Grants Review Branch, Division 
of Extramural Activities, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8127, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Michael B. Small, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8040, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301/402-0996.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-1632 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
D.T., petitioner, v. W.G.

No. 17-913.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama denied.
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO SECTION 302 

 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 

 

I, Robert L. Lee, certify that: 

 

     1. I have reviewed thisamended annualreport on Form 10-KSB of Empyrean Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31,2004; 

 

     2. Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this amended annual report; 

 

     3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annualreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this amended annual report. 

 

     4. The registrant's othercertifying offering officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisamended annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this amended annual report (the "Evaluation Date");and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date; 

 

     5. The registrant's othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant's internal controls; and 

 

     6. The registrant's othercertifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or notthere were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date:   May 18, 2005

  

***/s/ Robert L. Lee           ***Robert L. LeePresident and Chief Financial Officer

----
Jorge CASANOVA, petitioner, v. Robert ULIBARRI, Warden.

No. 17-7715.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

ELI BETH A. B OWN 

BY: 

I - 3 2 IS 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 83588 

FILED 

NOV 0 8 2021 

CLERK g SeEMEOCTURT 

BY • 

DEPUTY CLERK 

FELTON L. MATTHEWS, JR., 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE 

RONALD J. ISRAEL, DISTRICT 

JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

THE STATE OF NEVADA 

DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 

AND PUBLIC SAFETY, PAROLE AND 

PROBATION DIVISON; AND THE 

STATE OF NEVADA, 

Real Parties in Interest. 

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION 

This petition was docketed on October 7, 2021, without 

paynient of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 21(g). That same day, this 

court issued a notice directing petitioner to pay the required filing fee or 

demonstrate compliance with NRAP 21 within 10 days. The notice advised 

that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this petition. To date, 

petitioner has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's 

notice. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. 

It is so ORDERED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 
cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge 

Felton L. Matthews, Jr. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

2 

(0) 1947 eigE41.
Emma WIGGINS, petitioner, v. ROCKFORD HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 16-6917.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.
Mario MUNOZ-GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9431.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Dennis MARTIN, petitioner, v. Carl BEAR, Warden.

No. 16-9489.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Ronald Bert SMITH, Jr., petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 16-7070.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama dismissed as moot.
# C_2009220EN.01003801.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/38

---

Action brought on 14 July 2009 — Deutsche Bahn v OHIM — DSB (IC4)

(Case T-274/09)

2009/C 220/80

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Bahn AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: E. Haag, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DSB (Copenhagen, Denmark)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 30 April 2009 and the decision of the Opposition Division of 26 July 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 30 April 2009 and the decision of the Opposition Division of 26 July 2007;

| — | order OHIM to pay all the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred during the appeal and opposition proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay all the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred during the appeal and opposition proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: DSB

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘IC4’ for goods in Class 39 (application No 4 255 411)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘ICE’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 19, 37, 38, 39, 41 and 42 (Community trade mark No 170 605) and the German figurative mark ‘IC’ for services in Classes 39 and 42 (No 1 009 258)

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) since there is a likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

1

---
Troy DAVIS, petitioner, v. Jonathan A. ROUNDTREE, et al.

No. 17-7642.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129620 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129620 COA: 264144 Jackson CC: 04-001406-FH MICHAEL JABARIE BOYD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 7, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2006

Clerk
Louis LAVARIS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7341.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2009233EN.01001002.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy) lodged on 27 July 2009 — Isabella Calestani v Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Parma

(Case C-292/09)

2009/C 233/17

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Isabella Calestani

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Parma

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 19(5) of Presidential Decree No 633/72 at variance with Community law and with the principle of the neutrality of VAT, and in particular has Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 been incorrectly transposed in so far as domestic legislation does not provide that VAT is deductible on purchases made by taxable persons whose transactions are exempt?

---
# C_2010024EN.01008002.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/80

---

Action brought on 21 October 2009 — Dekker v Europol

(Case F-87/09)

2010/C 24/153

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Abraham Dekker (Dordrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: D. Dane and P. de Casparis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Europol

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of Europol of 15 April 2009 refusing to guarantee the amount of the invalidity pension awarded to the applicant (taking into account his other sources of income) at a net income of 90 % of his last gross basic salary and refusing to respond to the negative changes to the applicant’s total net income due to a tax adjustment.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of 15 April 2009 by which the defendant informed the applicant that it is not required to guarantee a net income of 90 % of the last gross basic salary of the member of staff and that it does not have an obligation to make good the financial loss in so far as the taxation by the Netherlands tax authorities is maintained; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 15 April 2009 by which the defendant informed the applicant that it is not required to guarantee a net income of 90 % of the last gross basic salary of the member of staff and that it does not have an obligation to make good the financial loss in so far as the taxation by the Netherlands tax authorities is maintained;

| — | annul the decision of 23 July 2009 on the complaint which declared the pleas raised by the applicant against the decision of 15 April 2009 unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 23 July 2009 on the complaint which declared the pleas raised by the applicant against the decision of 15 April 2009 unfounded;

| — | order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to pay the costs.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF
            IKON RECEIVABLES, LLC PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1850
            --------------------------------------------------------

We certify that,  to the best of our knowledge and belief,  the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of IKON Receivables, LLC for the period ended September 30, 2002:

(1)    complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13  (a)  or 15 (d) of the
       Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of IKON
       Receivables, LLC.



/s/ Russell S. Slack                            /s/ Harry G. Kozee
----------------------                          -------------------------
Russell S. Slack                                Harry G. Kozee
President (Principal Executive Officer)         Vice President - Finance
December 26, 2002                               (Chief Accounting Officer)
                                                December 26, 2002