alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33232-33233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 
897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether an 
instrument of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which 
the instrument shown below is intended to be used, is being 
manufactured in the United States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the 
regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import 
Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. 
Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 
4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 01-013. Applicant: Stanford University, Department 
of Biological Sciences, Herrin Labs 80, Off Serra Street, Stanford, CA 
94305-5020. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM-1230. 
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
    Intended Use: The instrument is intended to be used to carry out a 
variety of research projects which might include:
    1. Ultrastructural studies of cultured hippocampal neurons to 
identify morphological features of synapse formation,

[[Page 33233]]

    2. Immuno-labeling studies of various molecules involved in synapse 
formation between hippocampal neurons,
    3. Analysis of the spatial and temporal regulatory circuitry that 
controls the bacterial cell cycle,
    4. Comparative studies of mutant and wild type Drosophila (fruit 
fly) larvae to identify the role of genes in anatomical features,
    5. Immuno-electron microscopy to visualize cellular protein 
locations in submicron levels in various cell types,
    6. Morphological detection of bacterial surface pili, which are 
virulence factors in many bacterial pathogens,
    7. Studies of structural changes in wild type, mutant, and non-
virulent cells as they progress through the cell cycle,
    8. EM analysis of cellular changes in non-virulent and pathogenic 
organisms, and
    9. Immuno-localization and structural studies of the budding yeast 
Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify yeast structures and proteins.
    Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: June 8, 2001.

Gerald A. Zerdy,
Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 01-15651 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
HENRY SCHEIN, INC., et al., applicants, v. ARCHER AND WHITE SALES, INC.

No. 17A859.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 2, 2018.

Application for stay presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court granted, and the proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, case No. 2:12-cv-572, are stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Department of Agriculture, 
Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to INDOPCO, d/b/a 
National Starch & Chemical Company, of Bridgewater, New Jersey, an 
exclusive license for all uses in cosmetics and cosmetic ingredients to 
U.S. Patent No. 5,676,994, ``Non-Separable Starch-Oil Compositions,'' 
issued on October 4, 1997, and to U.S. Patent No. 5,882,713, ``Non-
Separable Compositions of Starch and Water-Immiscible Organic 
Materials,'' issued on March 16, 1999. U.S. Patent No. 5,676,994 is a 
continuation of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/233,173, ``Non-
Separable Starch-Oil Compositions,'' and U.S. Patent No. 5,882,713 is a 
continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/233,173. 
Notice of Availability for U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/
233,173 was published in the Federal Register on October 24, 1994.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 27, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1158, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5257.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as National Starch & Chemical 
Company has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a 
license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and 
will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 
404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within 
sixty (60) days from the date of this published Notice, Agricultural 
Research Service receives written evidence and argument which 
establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with 
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Michael D. Ruff,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 01-16134 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
Maria T. SERRA, petitioner, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON.

No. 15-1441.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, denied.
# C_2011186EN.01002201.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — CheapFlights International v OHIM — Cheapflights (Cheapflights)

(Case T-460/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark Cheapflights - Earlier national figurative mark CheapFlights - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 186/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CheapFlights International Ltd (Ballybofey, Ireland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Cheapflights Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 August 2009 (Case R 1356/2007-4), relating to opposition proceedings between CheapFlights International Ltd and Cheapflights Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 31 August 2009 (Case R 1356/2007-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 31 August 2009 (Case R 1356/2007-4);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders OHIM and Cheapflights Ltd to pay the costs including those incurred by CheapFlights International Ltd in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM and Cheapflights Ltd to pay the costs including those incurred by CheapFlights International Ltd in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
II-00776

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Gregory Severson <gmseverson@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:26 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Gregory Severson

15414 35th ave W

lynnwood, WA 98087
Glenda Ann SMITH, petitioner, v. CITY OF WYOMING, OHIO, et al.

No. 17-7318.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             439
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              40
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,790
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,312
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,050
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,511
<LOANS>                                         48,041
<ALLOWANCE>                                        379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,948
<DEPOSITS>                                      62,735
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                320
<LONG-TERM>                                        524
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,966
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  68,948
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,174
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  136
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    34
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,344
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 603
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 620
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              724
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      198
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (51)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (51)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (46)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.39
<LOANS-NON>                                        831
<LOANS-PAST>                                        61
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   354
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (173)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  379
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               379
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009069EN.01004802.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/48

---

Action brought on 16 January 2009 — Eurotel SpA v OHIM

(Case T-21/09)

(2009/C 69/106)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Eurotel SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: F. Paola, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DVB Project

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Board of Appeal and, consequently, declare invalid the figurative Community mark ‘DVB’, which is manifestly contrary to the spirit and wording of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of the Regulation on the Community trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Board of Appeal and, consequently, declare invalid the figurative Community mark ‘DVB’, which is manifestly contrary to the spirit and wording of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of the Regulation on the Community trade mark;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: figurative mark ‘DVB’ (registration application No 2.75.771), for goods and services in Classes 9 and 38.

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: DVB Project.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: the applicant.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration: the party seeking a declaration of invalidity is not claiming any trade mark right, but argues that the mark in question is descriptive and generic.

Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: application for declaration of invalidity dismissed.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2010024EN.01007903.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/79

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Labate v Commission

(Case F-64/09)

(Staff cases - Officials - Social security - Insurance against the risk of accident and occupational disease - Occupational disease - Action for failure to act - Lack of jurisdiction of the Tribunal - Referral to the Court of First Instance)

2010/C 24/151

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kay Labate (Tarquinia, Italy) (represented by: I. Forrester, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to act insofar as it failed to take a decision on the applicant’s request for recognition that the illness from which her husband died was an occupational disease.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action registered as Case F 64/09 Labate v Commission is referred to the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action registered as Case F 64/09 Labate v Commission is referred to the Court of First Instance.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
II-00483

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Valorie Calton <Valorie.Calton@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:20 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Valorie Calton

693 Three Springs Road

Russellville, TN 37860
# C_2010037EN.01004301.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/43

---

Action brought on 8 December 2009 — Leali v Commission

(Case T-489/09)

2010/C 37/60

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Leali SpA (Odolo, Italy) (represented by: G. Belotti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Commission Decision C(2009) 7492 final in Case COMP. 37 956 — Reinforcing bars, readoption — adopted by the Commission on 30 September 2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission Decision C(2009) 7492 final in Case COMP. 37 956 — Reinforcing bars, readoption — adopted by the Commission on 30 September 2009.

| — | |
| --- | --- |

—

—

| — | Reduce the amount of the fine imposed. |
| --- | --- |

Reduce the amount of the fine imposed.

| — | Order the defendant to pay all the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-472/09 SP v Commission.

SP

Commission

---
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1480 

Commending the University of Southern California Trojan men’s tennis team 

for its victory in the 2010 National Collegiate Athletic Association 

(NCAA) Men’s Tennis Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2010 

Ms. WATSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the University of Southern California Trojan 

men’s tennis team for its victory in the 2010 National 

Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Men’s Tennis 

Championship. 

Whereas the University of Southern California (USC) Trojan 

men’s tennis team has achieved many accomplishments 

during the 2010 season; 

Whereas USC finished the 2010 season with an overall record 

of 25–3; 

Whereas, the No. 5 seed in the tournament, USC won the 

2010 NCAA Championship with a 4–2 victory over the 

No. 2 seed Tennessee; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1480 IH 

Whereas the USC men’s tennis team has now won its 18th 

NCAA men’s tennis team championship, making the Trojans the all-time leader in such team victories; 

Whereas USC’s previous NCAA men’s tennis team championship came in 2009; 

Whereas USC won the 2009 NCAA Championship with a 4– 

1 victory over Ohio State; 

Whereas, as a whole, USC has won its 113th national championship as a university, and its 90th men’s national 

championship; 

Whereas the 2010 NCAA Championship is the second for 

USC head coach Peter Smith; 

Whereas USC Daniel Nguyen was named the NCAA Tournament’s Most Outstanding Player; 

Whereas other All-Team Tournament Team honors went to 

Robert Farah at No. 1 singles, Steve Johnson at No. 2 

singles, Daniel Nguyen at No. 4 singles, and Peter 

Lucassen at No. 6 singles, as well as Robert Farah and 

Steve Johnson at No. 1 doubles and Daniel Nguyen and 

JT Sundling at No. 2 doubles; and 

Whereas under the leadership of USC’s 10th president, Steven B. Sample, USC has established itself as a worldclass research university, known for its leadership in the 

fields of communication, media, public diplomacy, the 

sciences, and the arts: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the University of Southern Cali3 fornia (USC) Trojan men’s tennis team and USC 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1480 IH 

1 President Steven B. Sample for USC’s victory in the 

2 2010 NCAA Men’s Tennis Championship; 

3 (2) applauds Coach Peter Smith for his winning 

4 his second NCAA Championship as USC’s head 

5 coach; and 

6 (3) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

7 coaches, students, alumni, and staff who were in8 strumental in helping the University of Southern 

9 California win the 2010 NCAA Men’s Tennis Cham10 pionship. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS