alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3706]

# AGENCY:

United States Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 (64 FR 56014), and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 (64 FR 57920), as amended by Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (65 FR 53795), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibit, “Russian Avant-Garde Drawings of the 20th Century,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign lender. I also determine that the temporary exhibition or display of the objects at the Northeast Document Conservation Center, Andover, Massachusetts, from on or about October 15, 2001, to on or about November 9, 2001, and possible additional venues yet to be determined is in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, 202/619-5997, and the address is United States Department of State, SA-44, Room 700, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: June 14, 2001.

Helena Kane Finn,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State.

[FR Doc. 01-15628 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
II-00849

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Julie Parcells <jparcells@verizon.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:45 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Julie Parcells

4706 Woodland Rd

Ellicott City, MD 21042
EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Micahel Dodak, the Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess, Corp.
   (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
   Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 12, 2003

                                        /s/ Michael Dodak
                                      Name: Michael Dodak
                                     Title: Chief Executive
                                            Officer
Pedro BUSTILLO-FORMOSO, petitioner, v. MILLION AIR SAN JUAN CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-895.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
II-00968

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

JEMM..MOHAMED BEN HEDI <jemai2007@yahoo.fr>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:35 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

JEMAI..MOHAMED BEN HEDI

RUE.5162..N.426.RIADH.SOUSSE

SOUSSE.4023.TUNISIA, FL 4023
Juan Concepcion HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7076.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, John M. Greeley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Tarantella, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tarantella, Inc.



By:

/s/ John M. GreeleyName:

John M. GreeleyTitle:

Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)May 16, 2005
Orlando DEWITT, aka Orlando Williamson, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7258.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Eitan LEASCHAUER, petitioner, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, et al.

No. 16-6469.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until January 30, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
II-O0118

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Deborah Barbieri <onearthl 1 @optonline.net>

Sunday, December 5, 2010 9:10 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Deborah Barbieri

11 Beers Rd.

Easton, CT 06612
Brent D. SHARP, petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 15-9438.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

*80Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District denied.
# C_2011186EN.01002302.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2011 — Jager & Polacek v OHIM (REDTUBE)

(Case T-488/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark REDTUBE - Earlier unregistered national mark Redtube - Failure to pay the opposition fee within the prescribed period - Decision deeming the opposition non-existent - Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 - Protection of legitimate expectations - Rule 17 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Ex parte proceedings - Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 - Rule 18 of Regulation No 2868/95 - Legal nature of a communication from OHIM informing a party that an opposition has been found to be admissible - Rule of parallelism of procedural requirements and of the actus contrarius - Article 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 186/43

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jager & Polacek GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: A. Renck, V. von Bomhard and T. Dolde, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2009 (Case R 442/2009-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Jager & Polacek GmbH and RT Mediasolutions s.r.o.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Jager & Polacek GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Jager & Polacek GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.

1

---
II-00167

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Sondra Katz <sondrakatz@yahoo.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 5:30 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Sondra Katz

10905 Lombardy Road

Silver Spring, MD 20901
# C_2011013EN.01001302.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 2010 — Architecture, microclimat, énergies douces — Europe et Sud SARL (ArchiMEDES) v Commission

(Case C-317/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Set-off of claims governed by separate legal orders - Application for repayment of sums advanced - Principle of litis denuntiatio - Rights of the defence and right to a fair hearing)

2011/C 13/21

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Architecture, microclimat, énergies douces — Europe et Sud SARL (ArchiMEDES) (represented by: P.-P. Van Gehuchten, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Manhaeve and S. Delaude, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 10 June 2009 in Joined Cases T-396/05 and T-397/05 ArchiMEDES v Commission, by which the Court dismissed the action brought by the applicant at first instance seeking, first, annulment of the Commission's decisions to recover certain sums paid under a contract with the applicant and set-off of their reciprocal claims and, second, an order for the Commission to pay the remainder of the balance due under that contract — Non-applicability of the principle of litis denuntiatio — Rejection of the claim that the co-contractors are jointly and severally liable — Infringement of the rights of the defence and of the right to a fair hearing

ArchiMEDES

Commission

litis denuntiatio

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Architecture, microclimat, énergies douces — Europe et Sud SARL (ArchiMEDES) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Architecture, microclimat, énergies douces — Europe et Sud SARL (ArchiMEDES) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 07.11.09.

1

---
II-00468

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Perry Chapdelaine <docanthonyl @yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:07 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Perry Chapdelaine

5284 Village Way

Nashville, TN 37211
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.



|                        |  |  |  |                                
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald R. Walsh            
|                        |  |  |  | Donald R. Walsh                
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer        
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ Catherine Dodson           
|                        |  |  |  | Catherine Dodson               
|                        |  |  |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer



26
# C_2009312EN.01002101.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Republic of Poland), lodged on 13 October 2009 — Oasis East sp. z o.o. v Minister Finansów

(Case C-395/09)

2009/C 312/34

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Oasis East sp. z o.o.

Appellant:

Respondent: Minister Finansów

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Community law (in particular, Article 17(6) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, now Article 176 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (2) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax) entitle a Member State to apply national provisions which exclude the right of a taxable person to reduce the amount of tax due, or to receive a refund of the difference, in the case of the purchase of imported services in connection with which payment of the amount due is made directly or indirectly to a person having its place of residence, registered office or central management in one of the territories or countries referred to in national law as so-called ‘tax havens’, regard being had to the fact that such exclusion was applied in the Member State prior to its accession to the Community?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

2

---
James W. HICKLIN, aka Jessica James Hicklin, petitioner, v. Troy STEELE, Warden.

No. 16-6660.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
# C_2014212EN.01002301.xml

| 7.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Toshiba v Commission

(Case T-519/09) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Power transformers market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Market-sharing agreement - Proof of distancing from the cartel - Restriction of competition - Effect on trade - Barriers to entry - Fines - Basic amount - Reference year - Section 18 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Use of a notional market share in the EEA market))

2014/C 212/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Toshiba Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: J. MacLennan, Solicitor, A. Schulz, J. Jourdan and P. Berghe, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Bourke and K. Mojzesowicz, and subsequently by K. Mojzesowicz and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision of 7 October 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.129 — Power Transformers), and, in the alternative, for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Toshiba Corp. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Toshiba Corp. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---