alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009167EN.01002701.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/27

---

Action brought on 2 April 2009 — Goddijn v Europol

(Case F-39/09)

2009/C 167/53

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jaqueline Goddijn (Breda, the Netherlands) (represented by: P. de Casparis)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer her a permanent post, and the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the defendant informed the applicant that it could not offer her a permanent post and the decision of 7 January 2009 in response to a complaint, stating that the applicant’s objections to the decision of 12 June 2008 were unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the defendant informed the applicant that it could not offer her a permanent post and the decision of 7 January 2009 in response to a complaint, stating that the applicant’s objections to the decision of 12 June 2008 were unfounded;

| — | order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to pay the costs.

---
II-00042

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Laura Simpson <laura. simpson24@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 9, 2010 4:04 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Laura Simpson

Box 2926

McKinleyville, CA 95519
John Anthony GENTRY, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE, et al.

No. 17M88.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
Luis Enrique BELTRAN-CERVANTES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7493.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2012025EN.01000802.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 November 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm — Germany) — KHS AG v Winfried Schulte

(Case C-214/10) (1)

(Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Right to paid annual leave - Lapse of right to paid annual leave not taken because of illness on the expiry of a period laid down by national rules)

(2012/C 25/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: KHS AG

Defendant: Winfried Schulte

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm — Interpretation of Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9) — Right to payment in lieu of untaken paid annual leave of a worker who could not exercise his right to paid annual leave, on account of sick leave, during the reference period and whose unfitness for work persisted for several years until the end of his employment relationship — Collective agreement allowing payment in lieu of paid annual leave which has not been taken to be made only at the end of the employment relationship and providing that entitlement to paid annual leave which has not been taken because of illness lapses 15 months after the end of the reference period.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as not precluding national provisions or practices, such as collective agreements, which limit, by a carry-over period of 15 months on the expiry of which the right to paid annual leave lapses, the accumulation of entitlement to such leave of a worker who is unfit for work for several consecutive reference periods.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

---
Eddie MENDIOLA, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 16-1439.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*128Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
II-00518

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jessica Bader <jessica.ashlee.bader@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:53 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jessica Bader

121 East 31st Street

New York, NY 10016
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Michael J. Loiacono, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of
Global Axcess Corp (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the third quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
November  4, 2009





/s/ Michael J. LoiaconoName:
      Michael J. LoiaconoTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
  Officer
II-00829

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dorrine Marshall <quitetherebel@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:03 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dorrine Marshall

3202 Aspen Grove

Irvine, CA 92618
Darnell DUKES, petitioner, v. Charlotte JENKINS, Warden.

No. 16-6912.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         February 2, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8 AM to 5:30 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joyce A. Hunter, Review Branch, Room 7194, Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20872.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: January 11, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-1642  Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-3732

___________ Gabriel W. Mills, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the David Laser, Circuit Court Judge, * Eastern District of Arkansas. Second Judicial Circuit; Brent Davis, * Prosecuting Attorney, Second Judicial * [UNPUBLISHED] Circuit; Carla Powell, Deputy * Prosecuting Attorney, Second Judicial * Circuit; Mike Everett, Attorney at Law; * Poinsett County; Arkansas State * Hospital; L. D. Gibson, Poinsett * County Public Defender; Thomas E. * Fowler, Attorney at Law, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 1, 2004 Filed: September 7, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
2 SeeYounger v. Harris , 401 U.S. 37, 46 (1971). -2- Gabriel W. Mills appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal, under the Younger 2 abstention doctrine, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise jurisdiction in light of ongoing state proceedings. See Night Clubs, Inc. v. City of Fort Smith, Ark. , 163 F.3d 475, 479 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, but we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice, see Anderson v. Schultz , 871 F.2d 762, 766 (8th Cir. 1989) (dismissal without prejudice is appropriate when court abstains under Younger ).

______________________________
II-O0401

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Sarah Apfel <mfprtoo@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:28 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Sarah Apfel

201 E. 17th St.

New York, NY 10003
# Table of Contents

# 1

# 2

# 3

# 4

# 5

# 6

# 7a

# 7b

# 7c

# 7d

# 7e

# 8a

# 8b

# 8c

# 8d

# 8e

# 9a

# 9b

# 9c

# 9d

# 9e

# 13a

# 13b

# 13c

# 13d

# 13e

# 14a

# 14b

# 14c

# 14d

# 14e

# 15a

# 15b

# 15c

# 15d

# 15e
Gabriel James BROWN, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9430.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
TEXAS, Petitioner, v. Gene Allen BURKS.

No. 15-1323.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

*48Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District denied.
Alejandro GARCIA-LAGUNAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7009.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Frank Salmeron WALKER, petitioner, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 16-6846.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until January 30, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,757,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                   290,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,688,397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,987,322
<PP&E>                                      16,955,428
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,564,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,100,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,948,284
<BONDS>                                     10,321,543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        9,455,129
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,182
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,131,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,233,842
<SALES>                                     36,947,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,947,458
<CGS>                                       28,687,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,687,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,517,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (551)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,458,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,284,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (192,932)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,477,745
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,477,745
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        


</TABLE>
# C_2011030EN.01005702.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/57

---

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2010 — Easycamp v OHIM — Oase Outdoors (EASYCAMP)

(Case T-29/09) (1)

1

()

2011/C 30/102

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
In Re Ricardo WATKINS, petitioner.

No. 17-7925.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ERIC MUMAW,

Petitioner

v.

SCHUYLKILL COUNTY COURT OF 

COMMON PLEAS,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 87 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2022, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or 

Extraordinary Relief and the Application for Leave to File Response are DENIED.
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Inst | Fidelity Total Emerging Markets Fund                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| **Supplement to the Fidelity Advisor® Total Emerging Markets Fund Institutional Class December 29, 2012 Prospectus**The following information replaces similar information found in the "Fund Summary" section under the heading "Fee Table" beginning on page 3. 1 year$	1433 years$	4865 years$	85710 years$	1,900 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Supplement Text Block
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**fit_SupplementTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**fit_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |