alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 25, 2012

The Honorable Scott O’Malia

Commissioner

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Dear Commissioner O’Malia:

In the wake of the failures of MF Global and Peregrine Financial Group (PFG), this letter 

expresses the support of the National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA) for the 

commission's exploration of technological solutions that could provide additional 

protections for segregated customer funds.

We understand that the agency’s Technology Advisory Committee (TAC) will meet on 

July 26, 2012 to begin identifying and exploring technological issues and possible 

solutions related to the ability of the CFTC, self-regulatory organizations and futures 

commission merchant (FCM) customers to verify the location and status of funds held in 

customer-segregated accounts. The NGFA commends the TAC for promptly turning its 

attention to this matter in recognition that regulators should not wait until problems like 

MF Global and PFG occur. Rather, we believe the CFTC should take a proactive stance 

to move toward real-time monitoring to ensure that segregated customer funds are held 

safely and in proper amounts.

The NGFA will be pleased to provide information or support that may assist in the 

process of expeditiously developing and implementing technological solutions to help 

protect customer funds.

Sincerely,

Randall C. Gordon

Acting President
# C_2013225EN.01006103.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/61

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 May 2013 — Morte Navarro v Parliament

(Case T-280/09) (1)

1

(Petition addressed to the European Parliament - Decision to take no further action on the petition - Action for annulment - Act adversely affecting an official - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Petition not falling within an area of activity of the European Union)

2013/C 225/137

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: José Carlos Morte Navarro (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: J. González Buitrón, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, N. Gorlitz and P. López-Carceller, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions of 5 May 2009 to take no further action on the petition submitted by the applicant on 17 December 2008 (petition No 1818/2008).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr José Carlos Morte Navarro to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr José Carlos Morte Navarro to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
cosm_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
 SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
  
 THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 24th day of May, 2018.
  
 AMONG
  
 THE PERSONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A TO THIS AGREEMENT AS THE SELLERS,
  
 (together, the “Sellers”)
  
 AND
  
 MARATHON GLOBAL INC., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario
  
 (“Marathon”)
  
 AND
  
 KANEH BOSM BIOTECHNOLOGY INC., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia
  
 (“KBB”)
  
 WHEREAS the parties entered into a Share Exchange Agreement dated May 17, 2018 (the “Agreement”);
  
 AND WHEREAS the parties have agreed to amend the Agreement as set out in this amending agreement;
  
 NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual provisions and covenants herein and in the Agreement, the parties hereby agree as follows:
  
  	 1.
	 The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

	  
	  
	  

	  
	 (a)
	 Schedule A of the Agreement is hereby deleted and Schedule A hereto is hereby inserted in its place.

	  
	  
	  

	2.	 In all other respects the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall remain unamended, and time shall remain of the essence.

	  
	  
	  

	3.	 Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in this Agreement.



  
  	 
	1
	 
 
	 


  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed these presents the day and year first above written.
  
  	 MARATHON GLOBAL INC.
	  
	 KANEH BOSM BIOTECHNOLOGY INC.
	  

	  
	 	 	  
	 	 
	 By: 
	/s/ Gavin Treanor	 	 By:
	/s/ Eugene Beukman	 
	  
	(Authorized Signatory)	 	  
	(Authorized Signatory)	 
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	 SELLERS:
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	 COSMOS HOLDINGS INC.
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	 By:
	 /s/ Grigorios Siokas
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	 (Authorized Signatory)
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	 SIGNED, SEALED & DELIVERED
 In the presence of:
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	 /s/ Gavin Treanor
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	 Gavin Treanor
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	 SIGNED, SEALED & DELIVERED
 In the presence of:
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	 /s/ Lianne Treanor
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	 Lianne Treanor
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	 SIGNED, SEALED & DELIVERED
 In the presence of:
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	 /s/ Brian Treanor
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	 Brian Treanor
	  



  
  	 
	2
	 
 
	 


  
 SCHEDULE A
  
 THE SELLERS, PURCHASED SHARES AND PAYMENT SHARES 
  
 	 Sellers
	  
	 Shareholder Address
	  
	 Number of Purchased Shares Held
	  
	  
	 Number of Payment Shares to be Received
	  

	 Cosmos Holdings Inc.
	  
	  
	  
	  
	2,500,000	  
	  
	  
	5,000,000	  

	 Gavin Treanor
	  
	  
	  
	  
	2,250,000	  
	  
	  
	4,500,000	  

	 Lianne Treanor
	  
	  
	  
	  
	2,250,000	  
	  
	  
	4,500,000	  

	 Brian Treanor
	  
	  
	  
	  
	500,000	  
	  
	  
	1,000,000	  

	  
	  
	 Total
	  
	  
	7,500,000	  
	  
	  
	15,000,000	  


  
  
  	 3
# C_2009244EN.01001601.xml

| 10.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/16

---

Action brought on 9 July 2009 — Apostolov/Commission

(Case F-8/09)

2009/C 244/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Svetoslav Apostolov (Saarwellingen, Germany) (represented by: D. Schneider-Addaeh-Mensah, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Community

Defendant:

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 23 October 2008 which rejects the complaint of the applicant contesting the decision to exclude him from the open competition EPSO/CAST27/4/07.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission dated 23 October 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission dated 23 October 2008;

| — | oblige the European Commission and their specialized services, mainly the European community Personnel selection Office (EPSO), to count the answers given by the applicant to questions 9, 30 and 32 of the competency test of 14.12.2007 as correct; |
| --- | --- |

—

oblige the European Commission and their specialized services, mainly the European community Personnel selection Office (EPSO), to count the answers given by the applicant to questions 9, 30 and 32 of the competency test of 14.12.2007 as correct;

| — | in the alternative, allow the applicant to pass again the competency test; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, allow the applicant to pass again the competency test;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
II-00516

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Tamara Ford <tford06@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:56 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Tamara Ford

1410 Hillcrest Drive

Austin, TX 78723
II-00076

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Thomas Wilson <balthomore@gmail.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 5:29 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Thomas Wilson

1161 Quantril Way

Baltimore City, MD 21205
Brent JUSTICE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7860.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Arnold Eugene FOX, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6955.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In re Elijah W. RATCLIFF, petitioner.

No. 15-1130.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 31  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of China Holdings, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  June 30, 2008  /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012258EN.01000402.xml

| 25.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 June 2012 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-485/10) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - Aid granted to Ellinika Nafpigeia AE - Incompatibility with the common market - Recovery - Non-execution)

2012/C 258/06

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Milonopoulos and K. Boskovits, acting as Agents, V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have taken, within the period prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with Commission Decision 2009/610/EC of 2 July 2008 on aid C 16/04 (ex NN 29/04, CP 71/02 and CP 133/05) granted by Greece to Hellenic Shipyards SA (notified under number C(2008) 3118) (OJ 2008 L 225, p. 104)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take, within the period prescribed, all the measures necessary in order to implement Commission Decision 2009/610/EC of 2 July 2008 on aid C 16/04 (ex NN 29/04, CP 71/02 and CP 133/05) granted by Greece to Hellenic Shipyards SA, and by failing to provide the information listed in Article 19 of that decision to the European Commission, the Hellenic Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11 to 19 of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take, within the period prescribed, all the measures necessary in order to implement Commission Decision 2009/610/EC of 2 July 2008 on aid C 16/04 (ex NN 29/04, CP 71/02 and CP 133/05) granted by Greece to Hellenic Shipyards SA, and by failing to provide the information listed in Article 19 of that decision to the European Commission, the Hellenic Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11 to 19 of that decision;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
Xavier Mitchell BABERS, petitioner, v. Christian PFEIFFER, Acting Warden.

No. 15-9351.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-00406

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Gordon Osse <wgo@inbox.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:48 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Gordon Osse

460 E Date St Apt 3

Cottonwood, AZ 86326
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 29,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB
QUARTERLY REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 29, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                       4,073,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,817,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,916,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,563,000
<PP&E>                                       2,066,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,161,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,069,000
<BONDS>                                      2,539,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,455,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,526,000
<SALES>                                     31,011,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,011,000
<CGS>                                       18,968,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,968,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,498,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             236,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,472,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   449,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,023,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,664,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,359,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
Antonio CAUICH-GAMBOA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7940.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2009153EN.01002603.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Prof. Dr. Claus Scholl v Stadtwerke Aachen AG

(Case C-146/09)

2009/C 153/49

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Prof. Dr. Claus Scholl

Applicant:

Defendant: Stadtwerke Aachen AG

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the third example in the third indent of Article 6(3) of Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts (1) to be interpreted as meaning that there is no right of withdrawal in respect of distance contracts for the mains supply of electricity and gas?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1997 L 144, p. 19.

1

---