alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7526

TEON JAMELL WILLIAMS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. BRAD PERRITT , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 5:18

- cv - 00074

- FDW )

Submitted : April 4, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Teon Jamell Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Teon Jamell Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his
28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as an unauthorized, successive petition over which it lacked subject matter jurisdiction . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appe alability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional righ t. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Specifically, Williams’ failure to challenge the district court’s jurisdictional ruling in his informal brief forecloses our consideration of that dispositive holding on appeal. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014 ) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument3 because th e facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, P. Douglas Richard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Community Financial Corporation (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidatedfinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

Date: February 12, 2004

/s/ P. Douglas Richard            P. Douglas RichardPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Michael SAMMONS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-795.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-01188

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Greg Cooksey <cooksey@cs.wisc.edu>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 6:08 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Greg Cooksey

5100 Ave. G

Austin, TX 78751
Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of CEO and CF0 Section 906




CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT I, Robert Klein, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Golden Spirit Minerals Ltd., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: April 14, 2003

/s/ Robert Klein
-----------------
Robert Klein
President and Chief Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT I, Robert Waters, Director and the Chief
Financial Officer of Golden Spirit Minerals Ltd., a Delaware Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the
Company for the year ended December 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Dated: April 14, 2003


/s/ Robert Waters
Robert Waters

Director and Chief Financial Officer
#### T. Phants *v.*The State.

1. Informations.—Affidavit alleged that the defendant, on a day designated, “did commit the offense of disturbing religious worship, contrary,” etc. The information. founded thereon charged, with full and appropriate averments, that the defendant, on the day named in the affidavit, unlawfully and willfully disturbed a congregation. assembled for religious worship, etc. The defendant excepted to the affidavit because it alleged no known offense, and to the information because not supported by a sufficient affidavit. *Held,*that the information, taken in connection with the affidavit, is sufficient to support the conviction.

2. Practice in this Court.—When errors are not assigned in a misdemeanor case, this court will consider such only as go to the foundation of the action.

Appeal from the County Court of Milam. Tried below before the Hon. T. H. Brenan, County Judge.

The head-notes state the case.

*M. Rogers,*for the appellant.

*George McCormick,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Winkler, J.

The information, taken in connection with the affidavit upon which it was based, is sufficient to support the conviction.

The application for a continuance was properly overruled.

There being no statement of facts in the record, we cannot inquire into most of the errors complained of; and, in the absence of an assignment of errors in a misdemeanor case, we will only inquire into such errors as go to the foundation of the action.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3831 

To repeal the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to confer jurisdiction on the State 

of North Dakota over offenses committed by or against Indians on 

the Devils Lake Indian Reservation’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Mr. ARMSTRONG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To repeal the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to confer jurisdiction 

on the State of North Dakota over offenses committed 

by or against Indians on the Devils Lake Indian Reservation’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

4 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to confer jurisdiction on 

5 the State of North Dakota over offenses committed by or 

6 against Indians on the Devils Lake Indian Reservation’’, 

7 approved May 31, 1946 (60 Stat. 229), is repealed. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2009129EN.01002202.xml

| 6.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/22

---

Action brought on 1 April 2009 — Andrikopoulou v Council

(Case F-32/09)

2009/C 129/39

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Anna Andrikopoulou (Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 under the 2008 promotion procedure and, to the extent that it is necessary, the decision to promote to that grade less meritorious officials.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 under the 2008 promotion procedure and, to the extent that it is necessary, the decision to promote to that grade less meritorious officials; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 under the 2008 promotion procedure and, to the extent that it is necessary, the decision to promote to that grade less meritorious officials;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---
Armando BARAJAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7827.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michael J. RINIS, petitioner, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, et al.

No. 17-889.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*1009Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Roger R. Robb, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 14, 2003





/s/ Roger R. Robb

Roger R. Robb

Chief Financial Officer
Kory ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-1177.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-60766

Summary Calendar

NELL PHILLIPS,

Petitioner,

VERSUS

UNION TEXAS PETROLEUM; NATIONAL UNION FIRE

INSURANCE COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER’S

COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

Petition for Review of an Order 

of the Benefits Review Board

(94-773)

February 11, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

On December 11, 1987, J. T. Phillips (decedent) was an

employee of Union Texas Petroleum (Union Texas) and was on duty on

the offshore drilling rig Eugene Island 384 which was owned and

operated by Union Texas. Sometime between 9:45 and 10:00 a.m. on
2

that date, a co-worker found the decedent collapsed and unconscious

in the well bay of the rig. An Air Med helicopter was summoned and

it subsequently evacuated decedent from the rig to the Iberia

Parish General Hospital emergency room where he was pronounced dead

at 11:40 a.m. An autopsy later determined that the cause of death

was arteriosclerotic heart disease and the mode of death was

natural. Nell Phillips, the widow of decedent, filed a claim for

benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act

against Union Texas Petroleum (the employer) and National Union

Fire Insurance (the compensation carrier). The claim was presented

to an administrative law judge for determination who found "that

employer presented substantial evidence sufficient to overcome the

Section 20(a) presumption" and concluded that "decedent’s death on

December 11, 1987, was due to his underlying arteriosclerotic

coronary disease to which he was predisposed and that no causal

connection to his work activities exists." Accordingly, the

administrative law judge denied the claim for benefits and that

determination was appealed to the Benefits Review Board. This

appeal was pending before the Benefits Review Board for more than

one year and had not been acted upon before September 12, 1996.

Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of Public Law 104-134

(Omnibus Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1996), the decision of the

administrative law judge "shall be considered affirmed and shall

become the Final Order of the Board for purposes of obtaining a

review in the United States Courts of Appeal." Claimant appeals to
3

this Court.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and

relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by

the administrative law judge in his Order filed January 13, 1994,

we are satisfied that the administrative law judge properly found

the facts and properly applied the law thereto in this case.

Accordingly, the Order of the administrative law judge is AFFIRMED.
Rubin YOUNG, petitioner, v. Christina WHITE, et al.

No. 17-6620.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Robert Waters, Director and the Chief Financial Officer of Golden Spirit
Mining Ltd., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 20, 2005


/s/ Carlton Parfitt
------------------
Carlton Parfitt

Director and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011139EN.01001702.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/17

---

Order of the General Court of 14 March 2011 — Campailla v Commission

(Case T-429/09) (1)

1

(Action for damages - Limitation period - Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 139/33

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Massimo Campailla (Boulogne-sur-Mer, France (represented initially by P. Georgen, subsequently by G. Reuter and C. Verbruggen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by A. Bordes and T. Scharf, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for damages to compensate for the harm allegedly suffered following the Commission’s refusal to intervene in a dispute between the applicant and the Cameroonian State.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Massimo Campailla shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Massimo Campailla shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
II-00066

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Emily Millhollen <emilymillhollen@juno.com>

Tuesday, December 7, 2010 3:46 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Emily Millhollen

2407 SW 21st St. Apt. 4

Topeka, KS 66604
Chidiebere NWAUBANI, petitioner, v. Divina GROSSMAN, et al.

No. 17M89.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.