alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00856

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Brenda Reiss <habrenda@earthlink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:40 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Brenda Reiss

20 Dressler Road

Greenlawn, NY 11740
II-00588

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Bill Jaynes <bjaynes@montanaport.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:56 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Bill Jaynes

215 Williams Lane

Bigfork, MT 59911
Edward H. FLINT, petitioner, v. COACH HOUSE, INC.

No. 16-583.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
MS. M., Individually and as Parent and Legal Guardian of O.M., a Minor, petitioner, v. FALMOUTH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT.

No. 16-1440.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*129Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23.1

|ALBERTWONG & CO.CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 7th Floor, Nan Dao Commercial Building 359-361 Queen's Road Central 
Hong Kong 
Tel : 2851 7954 
Fax: 2545 4086ALBERTWONGB.Soc.,Sc.,
ACA., LL.B., 
C.P.A. (Practising)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors 
ACL Semiconductors Inc.

We
  hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into Form 10-K/A of ACL Semiconductors
    Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about May 4, 2010, filed pursuant to the Securities
    Act of 1933, of our report dated  April 14, 2010, with respect to the financial statements
    of ACL Semiconductors Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|Albert Wong & Co.
Hong Kong
Dated: May 4, 2010





---
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3675 

AN ACT 

To require a review of Department of Homeland Security 

trusted traveler programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3675 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trusted Traveler Re3 consideration and Restoration Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW. 

5 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

6 of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 

7 shall conduct a review of Department of Homeland Secu8 rity trusted traveler programs. Such review shall examine 

9 the following: 

10 (1) The extent to which the Department of 

11 Homeland Security tracks data and monitors trends 

12 related to trusted traveler programs, including root 

13 causes for identity-matching errors resulting in an 

14 individual’s enrollment in a trusted traveler program 

15 being reinstated. 

16 (2) Whether the Department coordinates with 

17 the heads of other relevant Federal, State, local, 

18 Tribal, or territorial entities regarding redress proce19 dures for disqualifying offenses not covered by the 

20 Department’s own redress processes but which of21 fenses impact an individual’s enrollment in a trusted 

22 traveler program. 

23 (3) How the Department may improve individ24 uals’ access to reconsideration procedures regarding 

25 a disqualifying offense for enrollment in a trusted 

26 traveler program that requires the involvement of 
3 

•HR 3675 EH

1 any other Federal, State, local, Tribal, or territorial 

2 entity. 

3 (4) The extent to which travelers are informed 

4 about reconsideration procedures regarding enroll5 ment in a trusted traveler program. 

6 SEC. 3. ENROLLMENT REDRESS. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec8 retary of Homeland Security shall, with respect to an indi9 vidual whose enrollment in a trusted traveler program was 

10 revoked in error extend by an amount of time equal to 

11 the period of revocation the period of active enrollment 

12 in such a program upon re-enrollment in such a program 

13 by such an individual. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3675 

AN ACT 

To require a review of Department of Homeland 

purposes. Security trusted traveler programs, and for other
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1491

PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JAMES TOWNSEND; RODNEY MOORE; DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR.; 

ROBERT B. NIPPER,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00140-RJC-DSC)

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Patrick O. Christian appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2006) complaint under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find 

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Christian v. Townsend, No. 3:11-cv-00140-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. 

Apr. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,078
<SECURITIES>                                    19,267
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,375)
<INVENTORY>                                        295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,099
<PP&E>                                          49,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                (39,117)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       105,491
<OTHER-SE>                                    (66,925)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,256
<SALES>                                        104,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,126
<CGS>                                           16,659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               121,476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,232
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (36,174)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,174)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
Jason SPRINGER, and Rick Makohoniuk, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7389.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
1022.

#### Hill *v.*The State.

Accusation of pointing gun at another, from city court of Hart-well — Judge Hodges. January 8, 1908.

Submitted March 11,

Decided March 30, 1908.

*A. G. & Julian McGurry,*for plaintiff in error.

*James H. Shelton, solicitor,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

No error of law is complained of, and the verdict is fully supported by the evidence. *Judgment affirmed.*
In re David Andrew CHRISTENSON, petitioner.

No. 16-6345.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Order entered Octob er 2 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01261 - CV EX PARTE MICHEAL GER OD MCGREGOR On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. X - 13 - 1459 - W



### O RDE R W e GRANT appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file pro

- se amended brief and ORDER the brief tendered to the Clerk of the Court October 26, 2015 filed as of the date of this order
. Appellee shall file its brief no later than December 2, 20 15.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Mauricio AGUILERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7701.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Open Meeting of the Commission – Thursday, July 23, 2020

AGENDA

1. Call to Order

2. Opening Statements

Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

Commissioner Brian D. Quintenz

Commissioner Rostin Behnam

Commissioner Dawn D. Stump

Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz

3. Final Rule: Cross-Border Application of the Registration Thresholds and 

Certain Requirements Applicable to Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants

Staff Presentation

Joshua B. Sterling, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO)

Frank Fisanich, DSIO Rajal Patel, DSIO

Lauren Bennett, DSIO Jacob Chachkin, DSIO Owen Kopon, DSIO 

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

4. Amendment Order: Exempting Certain Multilateral Trading Facilities and 

Organised Trading Facilities Authorized Within the European Union from 

the Requirement to Register with the CFTC as Swap Execution Facilities

Staff Presentation

Dorothy D. DeWitt, Division of Market Oversight (DMO)

Roger Smith, DMO 

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

5. Closing Remarks

6. Adjournment
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RAILROAD PASSENGERS, et al., petitioners, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al.

No. 17-714.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF C.E.O. PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of KIT
digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Barak Bar-Cohen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



April
30, 2012



| | /s/ Barak Bar-Cohen     | 
| | ----------------------- | 
| | Barak Bar-Cohen         | 
| | Chief Executive Officer |
Carl Frederick KIEFFER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9488.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# C_2011013EN.01002502.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2010 — Deutsche Bahn v OHIM (Vertical combination of the colours grey and red)

(Case T-405/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community trade mark consisting in a vertical combination of the colours grey and red - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 13/49

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Bahn AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, K. Schmidt-Hern and B. Weichhaus, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 July 2009 (Case R 372/2009-1) concerning an application for registration of a colour sign, consisting in the combination of the colours grey and red, as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Deutsche Bahn AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deutsche Bahn AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.

1

---
Alexandra JONES, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7668.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
John SHEK, petitioner, v. ACE-USA/ESIS, et al.

No. 16-44.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Randall PATRICK, petitioner, v. CITIBANK, N.A.

No. 17-7228.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
II-00175

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dana Allen <rebelfarms@peak.org>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 12:42 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dana Allen

1865 NE Seavy Ave.

Corvallis, OR 97330
Miguel WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 16-6618.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2009205EN.01004801.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/48

---

Action brought on 11 May 2009 — Schopphoven v Commission

(Case F-48/09)

2009/C 205/88

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nikolaus Schopphoven (Zemmer, Germany) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of EPSO’s decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list for open competition EPSO/AD/117/08.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for competition EPSO/AD/117/08 and, so far as necessary, EPSO’s decisions rejecting the requests for reexamination made by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for competition EPSO/AD/117/08 and, so far as necessary, EPSO’s decisions rejecting the requests for reexamination made by the applicant;

| — | annul the reserve list for competition EPSO/AD/117/08; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the reserve list for competition EPSO/AD/117/08;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
Kultar Singh GORAYA, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7364.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,623
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          17,190
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                18,589
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     69,496
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          11,450
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            11,410
<LOANS>                                      1,007,166
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,157,445
<DEPOSITS>                                     807,362
<SHORT-TERM>                                   157,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             24,647
<LONG-TERM>                                     70,930
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,157,445
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,957
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,672
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   245
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,874
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,757
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,176
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,698
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       70
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,828
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,348
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.72
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,334
<LOANS-PAST>                                       400
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  9,559
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,599
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       18
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,653
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,653
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,653
        

</TABLE>