alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011232EN.01003901.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/39

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — Missir Mamachi di Lusignano v European Commission

(Case F-50/09) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Action for damages - Rule of correspondence between request, complaint and action regarding compensation - Inter partes nature of proceedings - Use in judicial proceedings of a confidential document classified as ‘EU restricted’ - Non-contractual liability of the institutions - Liability for fault - Causal link - Plurality of causes of damage - Third party fault - Strict liability - Duty to provide assistance - Obligation on an institution to ensure the protection of its staff - Murder of an official and his spouse by a third party - Loss of a chance of survival)

(2011/C 232/66)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Livio Missir Mamachi di Lusignano (Kerkhove-Avelgem, Belgium) (represented by: F. Di Gianni, R. Antonini and N. Sibona, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro, B. Eggers and D. Martin, Agents)

Re:

Application for an order that the defendant pay a sum by way of reparation for material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant by reason of the murder of his son, a former official.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the extracts from the 2006 document on security standards and criteria, sent by the European Commission to the Tribunal in the course of proceedings, to be returned immediately to the European Commission in an envelope marked “confidential” and ‘classified restricted EU’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the extracts from the 2006 document on security standards and criteria, sent by the European Commission to the Tribunal in the course of proceedings, to be returned immediately to the European Commission in an envelope marked “confidential” and ‘classified restricted EU’.

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009, p. 27.

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
Pierce Carson, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.

|Date: November 20, 2009 | By: /s/ W. Pierce
      Carson                        
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                        | W. Pierce Carson,                                     
|                        | Chief Executive Officer, President, Director
      and
|                        | Principal Accounting Officer                          

---
JaTimothy WALKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7513.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
II-00871

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Molly Hauck <mollyhauck@verizon.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:30 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Molly Hauck

4004 Dresden St.

Kensington, MD 20895
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20792 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARL MAE SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR H 94-282-9

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carl Mae Smith appeals her guilty-plea conviction for unlawful use of a telephone to facilitate the distribution of cocaine base. She contends that the district court erred in finding her competent to plead guilty and to formulate the criminal intent at the time of committing the charged offense. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and hold that Smith’s unconditional guilty plea waived allNo. 96-20792 - 2 - nonjurisdictional defects in the lower court proceedings, including her challenge to the district court’s competency determination. United States v. Bell , 966 F.2d 914, 915 (5th Cir. 1992); Speed v. United States , 441 F.2d 1106, 1107 (5th Cir. 1971). AFFIRMED.
II-00184

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

jill nord <jillanord@aol.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 10:59 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

jill nord

7715 62 st

glendale, NY 11385
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 371 

Making appropriations for certain Federal employees working during the 

Government shutdown beginning on or about December 22, 2018, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Appropriations 

A BILL 

Making appropriations for certain Federal employees working 

during the Government shutdown beginning on or about 

December 22, 2018, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay Our Protectors 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF SALARIES OF CERTAIN EXCEPTED 

7 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. 

8 There are appropriated, out of any money in the 

9 Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as are 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 371 IH

1 necessary to pay, during the period of a lapse in discre2 tionary appropriations beginning on or about December 

3 22, 2018, the salaries and expenses of any officer or em4 ployee of the Coast Guard, Customs and Border Protec5 tion, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Transpor6 tation and Security Administration, or the E-Verify pro7 gram who is excepted from the furlough resulting from 

8 such lapse. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Sierra Resource Group,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended  December 31, 2007, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Paul W.  Andre,  Treasurer  and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Company,  hereby  certifies for the purpose of complying  with Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange  Act") and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: April 30, 2008                     By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Paul W. Andre
                                          Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
                                          and Director


A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SIERRA RESOURCE  GROUP,  INC., AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY SIERRA RESOURCE GROUP, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6190

KEVIN LAMONT NEAL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00278-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin L. Neal, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Lamont Neal seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as 

untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) 

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court 

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Neal has not made

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Neal’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
#### BOWLES, Price Administrator, v. WINGFIELD.

No. 9849.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1945.

*683Fritz Krueger and Homer B. Parrent, both of Louisville, Ky., and David London and Fleming James, Jr., both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Joe S. Garman, of Bowling Green, Ky., for appellee.

Before HICKS, ALLEN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case was tried to the court without a jury. Neither the transcript of evidence nor the record contain any findings of fact specially made by the court, nor does it appear that any proposed findings or conclusions were requested by appellant. He made no motion for judgment and the record fails to disclose exceptions to the rulings of the court in the progress of the trial. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 46 and 52, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The appeal is dismissed because of failure to present a reviewable question for determination here.
(LOGO) BANK OF AMERICA

Bank of America Corporation
100 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28255

Tel 704.386.5000

Report of Management

We,  as  members  of  management  of Bank of  America,  FSB (the  Company),  are
responsible for complying with the minimum  servicing  standards as set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP).  We are also  responsible  for  establishing  and
maintaining effective internal control over compliance with these standards.  We
have  performed  an  evaluation  of the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum
servicing standards as set forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1998 and for the
year then ended. Based on this evaluation,  we assert that during the year ended
December 31, 1998,  the Company  complied,  in all material  respects,  with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of December  31, 1998,  the Company had in effect a fidelity  bond and errors
and  omissions  policy  in the  mount of  $249.9  million  and  $250.0  million,
respectively.

Andrew D. Woodward, Jr.
President
BankAmerica Mortgage, a Division
of Bank of America NT&SA

Gary K. Bettin
Senior Vice President and
Director of Operations
BankAmerica Mortgage, a Division of Bank of America NT&SA

Brian D. Shea
Senior Vice President and
Servicing Manager BankAmerica Mortgage, a Division of Bank of America, FSB

Denise C. Sawyer
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Bank America Mortgage, a Division
of Bank of America NT&SA

Donald J. Atkins
Executive Vice President and
Servicing Director
BankAmerica Mortgage, a Division
of Bank of America, FSB
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-2111-001]

Take notice that on June 22, 2001, Allegheny Energy Service Corporation on behalf of Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC (AE Supply), filed an amendment to First Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 4 (First Revised Schedule) filed at Docket No. ER01-2111-000. The amendment is filed at the request of Commission Staff.

Copies of the filing have been provided to all parties on the service list in this proceeding.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before July 2, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-16252 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Delegation of Authority No. 530]

                    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the laws of the United States, including the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), the Taiwan Relations Act (22 U.S.C. 3301*et seq.*), E.O. 13014, and the Foreign Service Act of 1980, as amended (22 U.S.C. 3983(d)), I hereby delegate to the Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, to the extent authorized by law, oversight authority over the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), including but not limited to approving staffing changes that require national interest determinations for assignments or details of U.S. government employees as the case may be.                

Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time. Authorities delegated herein may be re-delegated, to the extent authorized by law.

                    The Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, and the Under                           ( print page 21247)                        Secretary for Management may also exercise the authorities delegated herein. Nothing in this delegation shall be deemed to supersede or otherwise affect any other delegation of authority.                

Any actions related to the functions described herein that may have been taken prior to the date of this delegation are hereby confirmed and ratified. Such actions shall remain in force as if taken under this delegation of authority, unless or until such actions are rescinded, amended, or superseded.

                    This document shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: March 17, 2022.

Antony J. Blinken,

Secretary of State. 

[FR Doc. 2022-07638 Filed 4-8-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
Charles Kenneth WALLACE, Sr., petitioner, v. LOUISIANA, et al.

No. 16-9350.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.