alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION, petitioner, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.

No. 17-921.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
# C_2011063EN.01001702.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/17

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău — Romania) — SC DRA SPEED SRL v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Bacău, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Bacău

(Case C-439/10) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Failure to provide a factual description - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 63/32

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bacău

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC DRA SPEED SRL

Applicant:

Defendant: Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Bacău, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Bacău

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Curtea de Apel Secția Bacău Secția Comercială, Contencios Administrativ și Fiscal — Registration of second-hand vehicles previously registered in another Member State — Environmental tax on vehicles on their first registration in a Member State — Compatibility of the national rules with Article 110 TFEU — Discrimination in relation to second-hand vehicles already registered in the territory of that Member State and not subject to that tax on a subsequent sale or new registration

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Curtea de Apel Bacău by decision of 1 September 2010 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
Leroy WILLIS, petitioner, v. Daniel PARAMO, Warden.

No. 16-9503.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's unaudited financial reports and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         137,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,125,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,684,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,361,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,000,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,500,000
<COMMON>                                       391,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               138,000,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,361,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,740,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,339,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,379,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,379,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,379,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)

        

</TABLE>
Victor PIANKA, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 16-6461.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
LaToya Nivea MOREHEAD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9400.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Christian Philip PARKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7824.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Blackbird TM Interactive Trading Overview Interactive Trading Overview

Price Discovery & Trading ...

Live Order

View

Order Staging Area

Mark

Live Order

View

Trader Work

Managing and Monitoring
Central – when you want to post hit lift a price

Live Order View

when you want to post, hit, lift a price

3⁄4Allows for anonymous price discovery3⁄4Credit pre-screening3⁄4Live prices and full depth of the market with color coding for easy credit recognition

Live Order View

Trading takes place on the Live Order View (LOV).

•You can easily execute a trade by double-clicking a tradable live price or by using mapped keyboard shortcut keys. (See Shortcut Keys Section)•Double-clicking your own price allows you to change the order price, quantity, and order time.
Market Details Screen

The Market Details Screen displays the full depth of the market...

Market Details Screen
Symbol Explode Screen Symbol Explode Screen

The Symbol Explode Screen displays the transaction details of each deal before you trade
Order Staging Area Order Staging Area

The Order Staging Area is for quickly inputting and Managing Orders
Trade Confirmation Trade Confirmation

The Trade Confirmation records each completed transaction 
Trader Work Station

The Trader Workstation is for Managing and Monitoring Orders...

Trader Work Station

These are the five default Trader Workstation tools you will see at login

Active Markets , My Orders , Blotter , Messages , Trader Talk
Blackbird Direct Blackbird Direct – when you want to deal direct when you want to deal direct

3⁄4 Point-to-point instant messaging platform3⁄4 Free-form negotiation3⁄4 Integrated ticket generation3⁄4 Audit trail and electronic record of a direct trade

•Blackbird Direct allows you straight access to other Direct users on the system. You can with selected counter parties using freeform negotiation.•After negotiating the ticket and terms, you can send a Confirm directly to the counter Blackbird Direct Ticket generation process Blackbird Direct Ticket generation process.

•Blackbird Direct ticket process will be followed by Term Negotiation (setting underlying b

volume) and Blotter entries.
Blackbird Direct Ticket Builder Blackbird Direct Ticket Builder

The Ticket Builder helps traders build trade tickets
RFP – when you want to request a price when you want to request a price

Hold a live auction by sending inquiries electronically to multiple dealers simultaneouslyReceive live, executable quotes from each dealerIntegrated ticket generationTrade audit trail and FpML electronic record

•Blackbird RFP allows you straight access to other RFP users on the system. You can request a price on a specific strucmultiple dealers directly with selected counter parties.•After receiving prices from dealers, you can execute a live quote and send a Confirm directly to the counter party usRFP Ticket generation process.•Blackbird RFP ticket process will be followed by Term Negotiation (setting underlying bond price and volume) and Blott
Trade Confirmation Trade Confirmation

The Trade Confirmation records each completed transaction
Noah Bradley LESTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8197.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of International Commercial Television Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Patrick  Lavin,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.



                               /s/ Patrick Lavin
                              ------------------
                              Patrick Lavin
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              March 27, 2003


<PAGE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: LOUIS ROMOFF 

CITATION: 31 Agric. Dec. 382 

DOCKET NUMBER: 166 

DATE: MARCH 21, 1972 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STAY ORDER 

(No. 14,456) 

In re LOUIS ROMOFF. CEA Docket No. 166. Decided March 21, 1972. 

Stay order -- Pending outcome of court appeal 

Decision by Donald A. Campbell, Judicial Officer

STAY ORDER

By petition dated March 17, 1972, the respondent herein appealed to the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to set aside the Decision 

and Order entered in this proceeding on February 11, 1972. 

In view of this petition, the cease and desist provisions of the order of 

February 11, 1972, shall remain in effect. However, the denial of trading 

privileges to the respondent is hereby stayed pending the outcome of the appeal. 

LOAD-DATE: June 9, 2008 
Page 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16363]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-6(02)S.
    Date: July 19, 2001.
    Time: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Courtyard by Marriott, 2899 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, VA 22203.
    Contact Person: Dan E. Matsumoto, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 749, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, 
(301) 594-8894.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-B(02)S.
    Date: August 1, 2001.
    Time: 5:00 pm to 11:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Michele L. Barnard, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of 
Health, Room 753, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/
594-8898.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB-B(01)S.
    Date: August 2, 2001.
    Time: 7:30 am to 6:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Blvd. Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Michele L. Barnard, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of 
Health, Room 753, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/
594-8898.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 22, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16363 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Skystar Bio-Pharmaceutical Company, (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Weibing
Lu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.
  /s/
      Weibing LuWeibing
      Lu
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                April
      15, 2009
   A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II-00917

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

A Keller <AKeller@KeltekTool.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:03 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

A Keller

1430 Red Butte Drive

Aspen, CO 81611
Calvin GREEN, petitioner, v. Bruce LEE, Warden.

No. 15-9395.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2010288EN.01001702.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/17

---

Order of the Court of 10 June 2010 — Thomson Sales Europe v European Commission

(Case C-498/09 P) (1)

(Appeal - Customs Code - Remission of import duties - Waiver of post-clearance recovery - Anti-dumping duties - No obvious negligence - Complexity of the legislation - Professional experience - Operator’s diligence - Colour televisions made in Thailand - Challengeable acts)

(2010/C 288/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Thomson Sales Europe (represented by: F. Foucault and F Goguel, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Bouyon and H. van Vliet, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of 29 September 2009 of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) in Joined Cases T-225/07 and T-364/07 Thomson Sales Europe v Commission by which the Court dismissed the appellant’s action for annulment of Commission Decision REM No 03/05 of 7 May 2007 informing the French authorities that remission of import duties on the colour television receivers manufactured in Thailand covered by their application of 14 September 2005 was not justified, and for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 20 July 2007 not confirming entitlement to a waiver of post-clearance recovery of import duties on those items — Procedure relating to the application for remission of duties claimed on the basis of Article 239 of the Customs Code and for waiver of post-clearance recovery of those duties on the basis of Article 220(2)(b) of the Code — Failure to respect the rights of the defence — Error in the legal characterisation of the facts

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | Thomson Sales Europe shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Thomson Sales Europe shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, of 27.03.2010.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

				       NOS.	2-03-066-CR

						2-03-067-CR

EX PARTE MICHELLE ROSE NURNBERG	

	------------

	FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	After the trial court revoked her appeal bond, Appellant Michelle Nurnberg filed two applications for writs of habeas corpus requesting the setting of or reinstatement of a reasonable appeal bond.  The trial court denied the applications without a hearing and without issuing a writ.  The State argues that we have no jurisdiction to hear Appellant’s complaints because the trial court has issued neither a writ nor a ruling on the merits in either case.  We agree.2

	In her reply brief, Appellant urges us to treat each of her appeals as an  original application for writ of habeas corpus in this court.  As an intermediate appellate court, we have no original jurisdiction over postconviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases.3  Even if we had jurisdiction to entertain Appellant’s complaints, they are now moot because mandate has issued on Appellant’s underlying conviction.4

	Accordingly, we dismiss these cases for want of jurisdiction.5

									PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	DAUPHINOT, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and DAY, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  June 12, 2003
Wayne C. BENTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES; and Joshua L McDaniel, petitioner, v. United States.

No. 17-8094.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

www.cftc.gov

Final Rulemaking Regarding Core Principles and Other Requirements for 

Designated Contract Markets

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) is adopting new and revised rules, guidance and 

acceptable practices governing the designation and operation of designated contract markets (DCMs). The final 

rulemaking implements provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 

(Dodd-Frank Act).

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 amended the 

obligations of DCMs under the CEA

On July 21, 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act, which amended the Commodity Exchange Act. 

Section 735 of the Dodd-Frank Act amended Section 5 of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) by: 

 Eliminating the eight criteria for designation as a contract market under Section 5(b) of the CEA; 

 Amending most of the core principles, including incorporating into the core principles most of the former 

designation criteria; and 

 Adding five new core principles: Core Principle 13 (Disciplinary Procedures), Core Principle 20 (System 

Safeguards), Core Principle 21 (Financial Resources), Core Principle 22 (Diversity of Boards of Directors), 

and Core Principle 23 (Securities and Exchange Commission). 

Section 723 of the Dodd-Frank Act added Section 2(h)(8) of the CEA to require that the execution of certain 

swaps, those that are subject to the mandatory clearing requirement of CEA Section 2(h), occur on DCMs or Swap 

Execution Facilities (SEFs), except where no DCM or SEF makes the swap available for trading.

The Commission’s new and amended rules, guidance and acceptable practices govern the 

obligations of DCMs under the CEA

The new and amended rules, guidance and acceptable practices implement the new and amended 23 core principles, 

and incorporate the trading and execution of swaps on DCMs. 

The rulemaking codifies rules and provides guidance and acceptable practices governing the obligations of DCMs to 

comply with the applicable provisions of the CEA, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, including the 23 core 

principles under Section 5(d) of the CEA. 

Specifically, the rules, guidance and acceptable practices govern the general obligations of DCMs under the 

amended core principles, including but not limited to: 

 Financial information and resource requirements; 

 Compliance obligations; 

 Operational capabilities; 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080

 Surveillance obligations; and 

 Trading and products requirements. 

In addition, the rules, guidance and acceptable practices govern the obligations of DCMs with respect to the trading 

and execution of swaps, in addition to futures and options contracts.