alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010063EN.01004502.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/45

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 November 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands)) — Criminal proceedings against X

(Case C-297/09) (1)

1

2010/C 63/79

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---
Antonio Don MILTON, petitioner, v. David MILLER, Warden.

No. 15-9344.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# C_2010100EN.01003402.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/34

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-313/09) (1)

1

2010/C 100/50

Language of the case: German

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

1

---
William Martin FREDERICK, petitioner, v. Michael CLARK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion.

No. 16-6630.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-93-000]


Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, L.P., Mirant New England, LLC, 
Mirant Kendall, LLC, Mirant Canal, LLC, Complainant, v. ISO New England 
Inc., Respondent; Notice of Complaint

June 21, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 20, 2001, Mirant Americas Energy 
Marketing, L.P., Mirant New England, LLC, Mirant Kendall, LLC and 
Mirant Canal, LLC (the Mirant Parties) tendered for filing a complaint 
pursuant to Sections 206 and 306 of the Federal Power Act against the 
ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) in connection with ISO-NE's proposed 
revisions to procedures for mitigation of generation resources run or 
used out of economic merit order during transmission constraints.
    The Mirant Parties have served copies of the complaint upon the 
ISO-NE and the New England Power Pool.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before June 29, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the 
complaint shall also be due on or before June 29, 2001. Comments, 
protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet 
in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 
on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-16062 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2010051EN.01002103.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/21

---

Action brought on 18 December 2009 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-529/09)

2010/C 51/34

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under the fourth paragraph of Article 288 TFEU, and Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 1999/509/EC of 14 October 1998 concerning aid granted by Spain to companies in the Magefesa group and their successors (OJ 1999 L 198, p. 15), by not adopting the measures necessary to comply with that decision in respect of Industrias Domésticas, S.A. (Indosa) |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under the fourth paragraph of Article 288 TFEU, and Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 1999/509/EC of 14 October 1998 concerning aid granted by Spain to companies in the Magefesa group and their successors (OJ 1999 L 198, p. 15), by not adopting the measures necessary to comply with that decision in respect of Industrias Domésticas, S.A. (Indosa)

| — | Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Kingdom of Spain has failed to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Decision 1999/509/EC in respect of Industrias Domésticas, S.A. (Indosa).

---
II-O0130

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rik Masterson <rikmasterson@hotmail.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 11:11 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Rik Masterson

4542 NE 27th Ave

Portland, OR 97211
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-1196

___________________________

Autumn Roberson

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

CrawlSpace Solutions of Arkansas; John Cossey; Bridgett Cossey

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central

 ____________

 Submitted: October 13, 2021

Filed: October 18, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this employment action, Autumn Roberson challenges the district court’s1

adverse grant of summary judgment. After careful review of the record and the

1The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.
parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Schaffhauserv. UPS,

Inc., 794 F.3d 899, 902 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. 

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
# C_2011186EN.01002202.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — CheapFlights International v OHIM — Cheapflights (Cheapflights with a black aeroplane)

(Case T-461/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark Cheapflights with a black aeroplane - Earlier international figurative mark CheapFlights - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 186/41

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CheapFlights International Ltd (Ballybofey, Ireland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Cheapflights Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 August 2009 (Case R 1607/2007-4), relating to opposition proceedings between CheapFlights International Ltd and Cheapflights Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 31 August 2009 (Case R 1607/2007-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 31 August 2009 (Case R 1607/2007-4);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders OHIM and Cheapflights Ltd to pay the costs including those incurred by CheapFlights International Ltd in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM and Cheapflights Ltd to pay the costs including those incurred by CheapFlights International Ltd in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
Ernie SANDOVAL, petitioner, v. D.B. LONG, Warden.

No. 16-9284.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-00188

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Robert Pancner <rpancn@yahoo.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 10:42 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Robert Pancner

7936 Redondo Court

Darien, IL 60561
Rebecca Irene BRENES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5980.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GIDDINGS &
LEWIS' CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 29, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                          20,761
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  325,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,752
<INVENTORY>                                    113,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               466,689
<PP&E>                                         230,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                 114,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 800,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,774
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,462
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     493,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   800,794
<SALES>                                        577,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               577,860
<CGS>                                          457,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  457,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,701
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,292
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Feasibility Study, Enhanced Ferry Service, Golden Gate National 
Recreation Area, San Francisco Bay Area, California; Notice of 
Interviews of Current Passenger Ferry Operators

    The National Park Service (NPS), Golden Gate National Recreation 
Area (GGNRA), is currently studying increased commercial marine vessel 
service (including new ferry routes) to various sites within and 
contiguous to GGNRA. A team of transportation consultants has been 
retained to advise GGNRA on the feasibility of enhanced ferry service. 
The consultants expect to interview park users, tourism industry 
leaders, and residents of northern California to help determine the 
feasibility of these new services. As a part of this study, the 
consultants and NPS also expect to interview and obtain comment from 
commercial vessel operators to understand the opportunities and the 
constraints associated with these new services. Personal interviews 
will be conducted in the San Francisco Metropolitan area or by 
telephone at vessel operator option. Should any firm with applicable 
maritime experience (defined as follows: currently operating vessels 
with U.S. Coast Guard approval to transport more than 100 passengers, 
and currently providing, or provided within the last 30 days, regularly 
scheduled commuter and/or scheduled recreational water transportation 
services) desire to participate in the commercial vessel operator 
interview phase of the study, the appropriate company official must 
contact the National Park Service, Maria Banuelos Connell, at 415 561-
4944, no later than July 14,2001.

    Dated: June 1, 2001.
Brian O'Neill,
General Superintendent, Golden Gate National Recreation Area.
[FR Doc. 01-15560 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
# C_2009233EN.01001801.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/18

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 10 July 2009 — TerreStar Europe v Commission

(Case T-196/09 R)

(Application for interim measures - Decision on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services - Application for suspension of operation of the measure and interim relief - No urgency)

2009/C 233/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TerreStar Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Olofsson, lawyer and J. Killick, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Braun, A. Nijenhuis, K. Platteau and D. Van Liedekerke, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

In essence, application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (OJ 2009 L 149, p. 65).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
KfW is 100% owned by the Federal Republic of Germany and the Federal States of

Germany. KfW also said its obligations are fully guaranteed by the Federal Republic of 

Germany pursuant to statute. Because of this guarantee, KfW does not post collateral (in the 

normal sense) with respect to its swaps. KfW is concerned that for this reason, it’s current 

uncollateralized exposure under the major swap participant (“MSP”) tests would be high and 

it could be designated as an MSP. KfW said, however, that it does not raise systemic risk 

because of its public mandate as promotional or development bank, its corresponding 

business model and the guarantee and it therefore should not be designated as an MSP.

KfW said designation as an MSP would raise the cost of fulfilling its public mandate. On the 

point that a person should be designated as an MSP if it has very large swap positions, even 

if the person itself does not pose systemic risk, because such person may unwind its large 

positions in times of market disruption, KfW said that they believe that even in a financial 

crisis its book of interest rate and foreign exchange swaps would not fuel the adverse effects 

of a crisis, because as a user of derivatives for hedging purposes KfW seeks to maintain its 

market risk exposure at a minimum and would not be liquidating large positions. The only 

time KfW needed to trade on a large portfolio was when one of its counterparties became 

insolvent, in which case KfW had to re-hedge its open positions resulting from the insolvency

of the counterparty. Also, KfW said the requirements applicable to MSPs are generally not 

attuned to resolving any issues that might arise from large swap positions in times of market 

disruption, so such positions should not be a basis for MSP status but might be a separate 

subject for regulation.

Gelöscht: f

Gelöscht: s

Gelöscht: governments in

Gelöscht: German f

Gelöscht: ederal government

Gelöscht: be difficult to liquidate 

(if necessary) or that its holding 

large swap positions would 

otherwise
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RODNEY DERRICKSON,

Petitioner

v.

CO STRAZISER, ET AL.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 150 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of November, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Public Roundtable to Discuss the “Available to Trade” Provision for 

Swap Execution Facilities and Designated Contract Markets

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

January 30, 2012

9:30 a.m. Introduction

9:40 a.m. Panel One: Procedure to Make a Swap Available to Trade

Panelists: Kevin Gould – Markit; Philip Weisberg – FXall; 

Thomas LaSala – Chicago Mercantile Exchange; Patrick 

McCarty – ICAP; Trabue Bland – IntercontinentalExchange; 

Stephen Humenik – Eris Exchange; Rich McVey – MarketAxess

10:55 a.m. Intermission

11:00 a.m. Panel Two: Factors to Consider to Make a Swap Available to 

Trade

Panelists: Karl Cooper – NYSE Liffe; William Thum on behalf of 

Asset Management Group of the Securities Industry and 

Financial Markets Association; George Harrington – Bloomberg; 

Hugo Barth on behalf of Association of Institutional Investors; 

Michael Cosgrove on behalf of Wholesale Markets Brokers 

Association, Americas; Lee Olesky – Tradeweb; Evan Ard –

Evolution Markets; Professor Charles Jones – Columbia 

Business School

12:15 p.m. Intermission

12:20 p.m. Panel Three: Economically Equivalent Swaps

Panelists: Mark Szycher on behalf of The Committee on 

Investment of Employee Benefit Assets; Dexter Senft on behalf 

of International Swaps and Derivatives Association; Keith Bailey 

– Barclays; James Cawley, Javelin Capital Markets; Professor 

Matthew Spiegel – Yale School of Management; Christian 

Martin – TeraExchange

1:05 p.m. Concluding Remarks 

1:15 p.m. Roundtable concludes
Lauren MacARTHUR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9496.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.