alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Theodore S. Li, certify that:

1.  I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  of  Pacific  Magtron
International Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of
the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and


      c.  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a. all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and


      b. any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: April 20, 2005

By: Theodore S. Li
    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-25701, 333-04676, 333-60611, 333-65978,
333-137959 and 333-162548) on Form S-8 and Registration Statements (Nos. 333-146728 and 333-162464) on Form S-3 of DG FastChannel, Inc. of our reports dated
March 10, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of DG FastChannel, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of DG FastChannel, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPDallas, Texas
March 10, 2010


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET & STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 30,1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,467,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,893,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,737,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,194,000
<PP&E>                                       7,826,065
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,297,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,438,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,250,000
<BONDS>                                      2,552,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,428,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,438,000
<SALES>                                     20,946,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,946,000
<CGS>                                       12,728,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,728,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,536,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             193,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,598,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   260,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,338,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,338,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
David M. KISSI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6362.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
II-00714

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

harry binder <hjb3749@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:12 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

harry binder

3749 w 85th place

chicago, IL 60652
II-O0113

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Sheri Randolph <pastorsheri@gmail.com>

Sunday, December 5, 2010 11:42 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Sheri Randolph

36703 Bel Air

Barstow, CA 92311
# C_2011055EN.01001502.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/15

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof, Germany) — Minerva Kulturreisen GmbH v Finanzamt Freital

(Case C-31/10) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 26 - Special scheme for travel agents and tour operators - Scope - Sale of opera tickets without the provision of supplementary services)

2011/C 55/27

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Minerva Kulturreisen GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Freital

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Article 26 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Special scheme for travel agents — Sale of opera tickets without the provision of supplementary services

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 26 of Sixth Council Directive 77/338/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment is to be interpreted as not applying to the sale by a travel agent of opera tickets in isolation, without the provision of a travel service.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
Motion Granted; Order filed July 26 , 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00772

- CR NO. 14

- 17

- 00773

- CR

____________ JEFFREY MICHAEL MCDO NOUGH, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 17

- 04

- 05120

- CR & 15

- 12

- 13012

- CR



### ORDER
Appellant is represented by retained counsel, Richard Martin P. Canlas

. Appellant ’ s brief was originally due March 7, 2018
. We have granted more than 90 days ’ extension to file appellant ’ s brief until July 23, 2018. No brief was filed. On July 23, 2018 , counsel filed a further request for extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief. We grant the request for extension and issue the following order.Accordingly, we order Richard Canlas to file a brief with the clerk of this

c ourt on or before August 15, 2018

. No further extensions will be entertained. If counsel does not timely f

ile appellant’s brief as ordered, the c ourt may issue an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the brief and the consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, o r other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1608 

Condemning the detainment of a South Korea fishing ship by North Korea 

and the continued provocation by the North Korean military. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 10, 2010 

Mr. DJOU submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the detainment of a South Korea fishing ship 

by North Korea and the continued provocation by the 

North Korean military. 

Whereas the Daesung 55 squidding boat that carried a 7- 

member crew of South Korean and Chinese citizens was 

detained by North Korea on the eastern sea boundary; 

Whereas the North Korean military fired more than 100 live 

rounds into waters close to the contested sea boundary 

with South Korea; 

Whereas the relations between North and South Korea are 

extremely strained following the sinking of Cheonan in 

March; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1608 IH 

Whereas North Korea recently warned of a strong physical 

retaliation in response to South Korea’s maritime drills; 

and 

Whereas United Nations Command officials are holding talks 

in the demilitarized zone as preparation for a generallevel meeting between the two sides to discuss the sinking 

of the Cheonan: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) it is the sense of the House of Representa3 tives that— 

4 (A) North Korea should release the 7- 

5 member crew of the Daesung 55; 

6 (B) North Korea should immediately stop 

7 any hostile rhetoric and activity towards the 

8 Republic of Korea and engage in mutual dia9 logue to enhance inter-Korean relations; 

10 (C) North Korea should return to the Six11 Party diplomatic process and Pyongyang must 

12 commit to the complete, verifiable, and irrevers13 ible dismantlement of all of North Korea’s nu14 clear programs, including those derived both 

15 from plutonium as well as highly enriched ura16 nium; 

17 (D) North Korea should comply with 

18 United Nations Security Council Resolutions 

19 1718 of 2006 and 1874 of 2009; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1608 IH 

1 (E) the United States remains committed 

2 to the promotion of inter-Korean dialogue and 

3 cooperation; and 

4 (F) the strategic importance of the strong 

5 alliance between the United States and the Re6 public of Korea, in promoting peace and pros7 perity on the Korean Peninsula and in North8 east Asia, should be recognized; and 

9 (2) the House of Representatives— 

10 (A) condemns North Korea for the detain11 ment of the Daesung 55 and hostile activity to12 wards the Republic of Korea; and 

13 (B) urges the international community to 

14 fully and faithfully implement all United Na15 tions Security Council Resolutions pertaining to 

16 security on the Korean Peninsula, including 

17 United Nations Security Council Resolution 

18 1695 (2006), United Nations Security Council 

19 Resolution 1718 (2006), and United Nations 

20 Security Council Resolution 1874 (2009). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Carlton GARY, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 17-8085 (17A995).

Supreme Court of the United States

March 15, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Muscogee County denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6190

KEVIN LAMONT NEAL , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv - 00278

- TSE

- MSN )

Submitted : June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kevin L. Neal , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Lamont Neal seeks to appeal the district court’s order di smissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a sub stantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’ s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstra te both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Neal has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Neal’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presente d in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.2





WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Annual Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Weidong Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      April 15, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Weidong HuangName:
      Weidong
      HuangTitle:
      Chief
      Financial Officer
Clifford S. DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7653.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Miguel Angel HERRERA, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-509.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.
Subject: Tennessee SWAP Guidelines

The Tennessee Swap Guidelines can be accessed through the following link:

http://tn.gov/comptroller/lf/lfsfundbd.htm

Should you have any questions, please give me a call.

Mary-Margaret Collier, Director

Office of State and Local Finance

Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury
# C_2010246EN.01001102.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Baranya Megyei Bíróság — Hungary) — Pannon Gép Centrum Kft v APEH Központi Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály Dél-dunántúli Kihelyezett Hatósági Osztály

(Case C-368/09) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Directive 2006/112/EC - Right to deduct input tax - National legislation penalising an error in the invoice by loss of the right to deduct)

2010/C 246/18

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Baranya Megyei Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pannon Gép Centrum Kft

Applicant:

Defendant: APEH Központi Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály Dél-dunántúli Kihelyezett Hatósági Osztály

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Baranya Megyei Biróság — Interpretation of Articles 17(1), 18(1) and 22(3)(a) and (b) of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1), and of Council Directive 2001/115/EC of 20 December 2001 amending Directive 77/388/EEC with a view to simplifying, modernising and harmonising the conditions laid down for invoicing in respect of value added tax (OJ 2002 L 15, p. 24) — Loss of the right to deduct for a recipient of services by reason of an error in the completion date of the works referred to in the invoice issued by the provider — National rules penalising any formal defect in the invoice by the loss of the right to deduct

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 167, 178(a), 220(1) and 226 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding national legislation or practice whereby the national authorities deny to a taxable person the right to deduct from the VAT which he is liable to pay the VAT due or paid in respect of services supplied to him on the grounds that the initial invoice, in the possession of the taxable person when the deduction is made, contained an incorrect completion date for the supply of services and the numbering of the subsequently corrected invoice and the credit note cancelling the initial invoice were not sequential, if the material conditions governing deduction are satisfied and, before the tax authority concerned has made a decision, the taxable person has submitted to the tax authority a corrected invoice stating the correct date on which that supply of services was completed, even though the numbering of that invoice and the credit note cancelling the initial invoice are not sequential.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---