alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011095EN.01001303.xml

| 26.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/13

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2011 — Skareby v Commission

(Case F-95/09) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Psychological harassment by a hierarchical superior - Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Reasonable period - Point from which time starts to run - Length of time)

2011/C 95/21

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carina Skareby (Louvain, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the defendant’s decision not to open an enquiry into the psychological harassment of which the applicant alleges to have been a victim

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 4 March 2009 refusing to open an administrative enquiry into allegations of psychological harassment by one of Ms Skareby’s former hierarchical superiors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 4 March 2009 refusing to open an administrative enquiry into allegations of psychological harassment by one of Ms Skareby’s former hierarchical superiors;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010, p. 81.

1

---
**Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 April 2011 – United States Polo Association v OHIM – Textiles CMG (U.S.
POLO ASSN.)**

**(Case T-228/09)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark U.S. POLO ASSN. – Earlier Community and national word marks POLO-POLO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 56) (see paras 27, 52,
60)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2009 (Case R 886/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Textiles CMG, SA and United States Polo Association. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | United States Polo Association |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark U.S. POLO ASSN. for goods in Classes 9, 20, 21, 24 and 27 – Application No 4567483 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Textiles CMG, SA |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Spanish trade mark registration of the word mark POLO‐POLO for goods in Class 24; Community trade mark registration of the word mark POLO‐POLO for goods in Classes 24, 25 and 39 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition upheld in respect of all the products in dispute |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders United States Polo Association to pay the costs. |
II-00909

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

PATTI CONSTANT1NO-MART1N <ppattiplcsam@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:08 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

PATTI CONSTANTINO-MARTIN

17249 HELEN K DR

SPRING HILL, FL 34610
Paul SPRENG, petitioner, v. Brian THOMPSON, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mercer, et al.

No. 17-1133.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF C.E.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, in the capacity and date
indicated below, hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual
report on Form 10-K/A of KIT digital, Inc.;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|               | /s/ Barak Bar-Cohen     | 
|-------------- | ----------------------- | 
|April 30, 2012 | Barak Bar-Cohen         | 
|               | Chief Executive Officer |
# C_2010011EN.01003902.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/39

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 November 2009 — Mannatech v OHIM (BOUNCEBACK)

(Case T-263/09) (1)

1

2010/C 11/75

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 29.8.2009.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,136
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          42,671
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                17,288
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     71,928
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          23,438
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            23,451
<LOANS>                                        991,101
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,184,294
<DEPOSITS>                                     823,915
<SHORT-TERM>                                   121,750
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             15,865
<LONG-TERM>                                    120,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,184,294
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 57,217
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,624
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   758
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                63,599
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              29,947
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,268
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,331
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      160
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 165
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,920
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,303
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.72
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,479
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,153
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 11,729
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,599
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       68
<RECOVERIES>                                        13
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,704
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,704
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,704
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Jerry K. Wages, the Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Oconee FinancialCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted by sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

| (1) |   the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period endedDecember 31, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                       |

 

Dated: March 27, 2003 

|  |  /s/ Jerry K. Wages                        Jerry K. WagesExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Mukhabbat NURITDINOVA, petitioner, v. CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER.

No. 16-6456.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Open Meeting of the Commission – Thursday, January 30, 2020

AGENDA

Morning Session – 9:00 a.m.

1. Call to Order

2. Opening Statements

Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

Commissioner Brian D. Quintenz

Commissioner Rostin Behnam

Commissioner Dawn DeBerry Stump

Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz

3. Proposed Rule: Position Limits for Derivatives

Staff Presentation

Dorothy D. DeWitt, Division of Market Oversight (DMO) 

Aaron Brodsky, DMO Steven Benton, DMO

Lillian Cardona, DMO Jeanette Curtis, DMO 

Steven A. Haidar, DMO Harold Hild, DMO

Vincent A. McGonagle, CFTC

Scott Mixon, Office of the Chief Economist (OCE) Stephen Kane, OCE

Daniel J. Davis, Office of the General Counsel (OGC) Rob Schwartz, OGC

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

4. Closing Statements

5. Session Recesses

[continued on reverse]
Afternoon Session – 1:30 p.m.

1. Call to Order and Reconvene

2. Opening Statements

Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

Commissioner Brian D. Quintenz

Commissioner Rostin Behnam

Commissioner Dawn DeBerry Stump

Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz

3. Proposed Rule: Amendments to Codify No-Action Relief for Swap Execution Facility and 

Real-Time Reporting Requirements

Staff Presentation

Dorothy D. DeWitt, DMO

Roger Smith, DMO 

Vincent A. McGonagle, CFTC

Motion 

Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion

Vote

4. Closing Statements

5. Meeting Adjourns
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MENITES, INC., D/B/A THEO'S BAR AND 

GRILLE, THEODORE KALATHAS, AND 

MOSCA KALATHAS,

Petitioners

v.

WHTM ABC27 NEWS, MEDIA GENERAL, 

INC., JAMES CRUMMEL, AMANDA 

ST.HILAIRE,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 760 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
II-00281

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Julie Sanford <jksanford@sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:51 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Julie Sanford

15416 Gault Street

Van Nuys, CA 91406
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# mtntteb**~tate~** 

# <!Courtof**~peaI~** 

# fortbejf

# eberaIQCtrcutt

WILLIE STEPHENS, JR., Claimant-Appellant,


### v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.

2012-7157 Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 12-1173, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel.


### ON MOTION
ORDER The Secretary moves for a 7-day extension of time, until September 17, 2012, to file his response briefelectronically with his brief attached. The court notes that the Secretary's paper brief received on September 10, 2012 was rejected on September 13, 2012, and the SecreCase: 12-7157 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 09/27/2012WILLIE STEPHENS V. SHINSEKI 2 tary was given a due date ofSeptember 27, 2012 to file a corrected brief. Upon consideration thereof, 

### ITIs ORDERED

### THAT: The motion is granted to the extent that the Secretary's corrected informal response brief is due no later than September 27, 2012.
FOR THE COURT 

## SEP 21 2012 Date

cc: Willie Stephens, Jr. Lauren S. Moore, Esq. s21 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

# ~m=JOR SEP 

## 27 ZOlZ JANHORBALY 

### ClERK Case: 12-7157 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 09/27/2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

*Date:*                     February 8, 2001.                 

*Time:*                     9:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.                 

*Place:*                     Room 3407, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.                 

# SUMMARY:

The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee will hold a plenary meeting on February 8, 2001, in Room 3407 of the U.S. Department of Commerce. 

During the morning, the ETTAC will hear reports on cross-cutting trade and environment issues including those at issue in the U.S.-Jordan, and U.S. Singapore free trade agreements negotiations and the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas. The ETTAC will also hear a report from its Government Resources Subcommittee and review past initiatives. In the afternoon, the ETTAC will conduct a strategic planning session. 

The ETTAC is mandated by Public Law 103-392). It was created to advise on the environmental trade policies and programs of the U.S. Government and to help it to focus its resources on increasing the exports of the U.S. environmental industry. The ETTAC operates as an advisory committee to the Secretary of Commerce and the interagency Environmental Trade Working Group (ETWG) of the Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee (TPCC). The ETTAC was originally chartered in May of 1994. It was most recently rechartered until May 30, 2002. The ETTAC was created on May 31, 1994, to advise the U.S. government on policies and programs to expand U.S. exports of environmental products and services. 

For further information phone Jane Siegel, Office of Technologies Industries, (ETI), U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-5225. This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to ETI. 

Dated: January 12, 2001. 

Carlos F. Montoulieu, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-1602 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DR-U
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.4






625 WESTPORT PKWY., GRAPEVINE, TX. 76051  P: 817 424 2000  F: 817 424 2002




May 31, 2018




Mr. Troy W. Crawford
625 Westport Parkway
Grapevine, Texas 76051
RE:    Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement
Dear Troy:
This letter agreement (this “Amendment”) amends the Executive Employment Agreement dated May 13, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”) between you (“Executive”) and GameStop Corp. (the “Company”) as follows:
Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following:   “Base Salary. Effective May 31, 2018, the Company shall provide Executive with an annual base salary of no less than $500,000, paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll policies (as adjusted from time to time, the “Base Salary”).”
For the avoidance of doubt, your bonus opportunity for fiscal year 2018 will be determined as a weighted average of: (i) for the portion of fiscal year 2018 preceding the date of this Amendment, your target annual bonus opportunity as in effect prior to the Amendment, and (ii) for the remaining portion of fiscal year 2018 commencing on the date of this Amendment, your target annual bonus opportunity as determined based upon the salary increase described herein. 
Except as otherwise set forth in this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged.
To confirm your agreement with the foregoing, please countersign this Amendment in the space below provided.
GAMESTOP CORP.
	
			
	By:
	 
	/s/ Daniel A. DeMatteo

	Name:
	 
	Daniel A. DeMatteo

	Title:
	 
	Executive Chairman













Agreed on May 31, 2018:


	
	
	/s/ Troy W. Crawford

	Troy W. Crawford
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

EARL KENNEDY, ELIZABETH 

KENNEDY, CHARLES G. ELY, II, JAMES 

SISLEY, JOANNA STORER, JOHN O. 

HARKER, AND THE EARL KENNEDY 

TRUST, 

 Petitioners 

 v. 

CONSOL ENERGY, INC., A DELAWARE 

CORPORATION AND CNX GAS 

COMPANY, LLC, A VIRGINIA LIMITED 

LIABILITY COMPANY, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 197 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED. 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.
Ketron TAYLOR, petitioner, v. Jerry GOODWIN, Warden.

No. 15-9251.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.