alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011226EN.01000502.xml

| 30.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece)) — Eleftheri tileorasi AE ‘ALTER CHANNEL’, Konstantinos Giannikos v Ipourgos Tipou kai Meson Mazikis Enimerosis, Ethniko Simvoulio Radiotileorasis

(Case C-52/10) (1)

1

(Directive 89/552/EEC - Television broadcasting activities - Article 1(d) - ‘Surreptitious advertising’ - Intentional nature - Presentation of cosmetic dental treatment during a television broadcast)

2011/C 226/08

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Simvoulio tis Epikratias

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Eleftheri tileorasi AE ‘ALTER CHANNEL’, Konstantinos Giannikos

Applicants:

Defendants: Ipourgos Tipou kai Meson Mazikis Enimerosis, Ethniko Simvoulio Radiotileorasis

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Simvoulio tis Epikratias — Interpretation of Article 1(c) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 1989 L 298, p. 23), as amended by Article 1(c) of Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 (OJ 1997 L 202, p. 60) — Television programme consisting in the presentation of cosmetic dental treatment — Concept of ‘surreptitious advertising’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(d) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997, is to be interpreted as meaning that the provision of payment or of consideration of another kind is not a necessary condition for establishing the element of intent in surreptitious advertising.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
ENNS FOR LEGACY IBOR SWAPS 

Open Interest for Uncleared IBOR Swaps for SD/SD (top line) and SD/Non-SD (remaining) as of 9/13/19 ($mns) 

Long 

Notional 

Short 

Notional 

Long Adj. 

Not. 

Short Adj. 

Not. 

Long 

ENNs 

Short 

ENNs Participant Type 

SD/SD 10,363,983 10,363,983 7,534,588 7,534,588 2,219,419 2,219,419 

ASSET MANAGER 565,968 492,737 401,059 410,806 178,346 188,092 

BANK 523,511 662,270 470,055 748,345 207,051 485,342 

GOVT/QUASI-GOVT 512,495 364,546 315,911 404,935 162,541 251,565 

HEDGE FUND 2,978,990 2,128,228 935,176 697,999 521,257 284,080 

INSURANCE 290,694 221,008 517,970 314,984 321,285 118,299 

NONFINANCIAL 205,000 702,654 190,246 688,189 162,478 660,421 

OTHER FINANCIAL 493,594 479,804 591,302 385,564 371,607 165,869 

PENSION 586,662 448,546 1,043,231 742,800 493,762 193,331 

UNCLASSIFIED 94,216 207,728 68,721 170,824 43,008 145,111 

TOTAL (non-SD) 6,251,130 5,707,521 4,533,671 4,564,446 2,461,335 2,492,110 

Office of the Chief Economist, CFTC 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16474]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY

Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: National Council on Disability (NCD).

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule of the forthcoming 
conference call for NCD's Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee. Notice 
of this conference call is required under section 10(a)(1)(2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).
    Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee: The purpose of NCD's 
Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee is to provide advice and 
recommendations to NCD on issues affecting people with disabilities 
from culturally diverse backgrounds. Specifically, the committee will 
help identify issues, expand outreach, infuse participation, and 
elevate the voices of underserved and unserved segments of this 
nation's population that will help NCD develop federal policy that will 
address the needs and advance the civil and human rights of people from 
diverse cultures.

DATES: July 31, 2001, 2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. EDT

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerrie Drake Hawkins, Ph.D., Program 
Specialist, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street NW, Suite 
1050, Washington, D.C. 20004; 202-272-2004 (voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 
202-272-2022 (fax), [email protected] (e-mail).
    Agency Mission: The National Council on Disability is an 
independent federal composed of 15 members appointed by the President 
of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Its overall 
purpose is to promote policies, programs, practices, and procedures 
that guarantee equal opportunity for all people with disabilities, 
regardless of the nature of severity of independent living, and 
inclusion and integration into all aspects of society.
    This committee is necessary to provide advice and recommendations 
to NCD on disability issues.
    We currently have a membership reflecting our nation's diversity 
and representing a variety of disabling conditions from across the 
United States.
    Open Meeting: This advisory committee meeting/conference call of 
the National Council on Disability will be open to the public. However, 
due to fiscal constraints and staff limitations, a limited number of 
additional lines will be available. Individuals can also participate in 
the conference call at the NCD office. Those interested in joining this 
conference call should contact the appropriate staff member listed 
above.
    Records will be kept of all Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee 
meetings/calls and will be available after the meeting for public 
inspection at the National Council on Disability.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on June 26, 2001.
Ethel D. Briggs,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 01-16474 Filed 6-29-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-M
```
Lawrence Donal HOWERTON, Jr., petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-7775.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF C.F.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, in the capacity and date
indicated below, hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual
report on Form 10-K/A of KIT digital, Inc.;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|               | /s/ Robin Smyth         | 
|-------------- | ----------------------- | 
|April 30, 2012 | Robin Smyth             | 
|               | Chief Financial Officer |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Geological Survey

# AGENCY:

U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) negotiation.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating entering into a cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with the National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association to develop a CD-ROM database of U.S. aggregates operations, based on the information included in the USGS National Atlas. The interative CD-ROM will allow users to search and correlate aggregates operations with a broad array of geographical, geologic, environmental, infrastructure, and political features.

*Inquiries:*                         If any other parties are interested in similar activities with the USGS, please contact: Valentin V. Tepordei, USGS National Center, MS 983, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr., Reston, VA 20192, Tel. 703-648-7728.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is submitted to meet the USGS requirements stipulated in the Survey Manual Chapter 500.20.

P. Patrick Leahy,

Associate Director for Geology, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

[FR Doc. 01-16273  Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
1132.

#### Jordan *v.*The State.

Accusation of gaming, from city court of Sparta — Judge Little. April 16, 1908.

Submitted June 9,

Decided June 18, 1908.

*R. H. Lewis,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. W. Moore, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

The evidence against the defendant is meagre, but not so wholly deficient as to warrant this court in interfering with the verdict, on that ground. *Judgment affirmed.*
Armando PADILLA-DIAZ, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7682.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 381 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture and the Administrator of General 

Services to modernize terms in certain regulations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. JEFFRIES (for himself and Mr. CHABOT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture and the Administrator 

of General Services to modernize terms in certain regulations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century Respect 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS REQUIRED. 

7 (a) SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.—The Secretary 

8 of Agriculture shall amend section 1901.202(g) of title 7, 

9 Code of Federal Regulations, to— 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 381 IH

1 (1) strike ‘‘Negro or Black’’ and insert ‘‘Black 

2 or African American’’; 

3 (2) strike ‘‘Spanish Surname’’ and insert ‘‘His4 panic’’; and 

5 (3) strike ‘‘Oriental’’ and insert ‘‘Asian Amer6 ican or Pacific Islander’’. 

7 (b) ADMINISTRATOR OF GENERAL SERVICES.—The 

8 Administrator of General Services shall amend section 

9 906.2(k) of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, to— 

10 (1) strike ‘‘Negro’’, each place it appears, and 

11 insert ‘‘Black or African American’’; 

12 (2) strike paragraph (1) (the definition of 

13 ‘‘Negro’’) and insert the following: ‘‘(1) Black or Af14 rican American—is an individual having origins in 

15 any of the Black racial groups of Africa’’; 

16 (3) strike ‘‘Oriental’’, each place it appears, and 

17 insert ‘‘Asian American or Pacific Islander’’; 

18 (4) strike ‘‘Eskimo’’, each place it appears, and 

19 insert ‘‘Alaska Native’’; and 

20 (5) strike ‘‘Aleut’’, each place it appears, and 

21 insert ‘‘Alaska Native’’. 

22 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

23 Nothing in this Act, or the amendments required by 

24 this Act, shall be construed to affect Federal law, except 

25 with respect to the use of terms by the Secretary of AgriVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:04 Jan 24, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H381.IH H381

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 381 IH

1 culture and the Administrator of General Services, respec2 tively, to the regulations affected by this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANDREW MITCHELL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 805

[ June 14, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Edward H. Merrigan

Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 07

- 16443CF10A

.

Andrew Mitchell, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS, INC.

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, William R. Brooks, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | March 13, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    WILLIAM R.
BROOKS                            
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | William R. Brooks                                   
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to, and will be
retained by, Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
James A. HERB, petitioner, v. Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States.

No. 17-1242.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

*1566Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
KENOSHA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., v. Ashton WHITAKER, By His Mother and Next Friend, Melissa WHITAKER.

No. 17-301 (R46-021).

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Exhibit 10.49



SEQUENOM, INC.



NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR

COMPENSATION
POLICY



The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
of the Board of Directors (the Board) of Sequenom, Inc. (the Company) adopted the following compensation program for non-employee directors of the Board. Pursuant to this program, each member of
the Board who is not an employee or an officer of the Company will receive the following cash compensation for Board services, as applicable:



| |  |  | a $25,000 annual retainer for service as a Board member;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a $20,000 supplemental annual retainer for service as Chairman of the Board;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a $12,000 supplemental annual retainer for service as Chairman of the Audit Committee;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a $8,000 supplemental annual retainer for service as Chairman of the Compensation Committee;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a $5,000 supplemental annual retainer for service as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Members of our Board will also be paid $1,500 and $1,000 for attending
special meetings in person or telephonically, respectively. For attending special meetings of committees of the Board, members of each committee will receive $1,000.



Additionally, members of the Board who are not employees or officers of the Company receive a nonqualified stock option to
purchase 40,000 shares of the Companys common stock on the date of their election to the Board and also receive an annual nonqualified stock option to purchase 20,000 additional shares of the Companys common stock at the annual
stockholders meeting.
Lawrence Curtis BAKER, Jr., petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-7707.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Ajay KAJLA, petitioner, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston MBS ARMT 2005-8.

No. 16-1425.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
James PATTERSON, petitioner, v. James M. HOLLOWAY, Warden.

No. 16-6589.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2010080EN.01002503.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/25

---

Order of the Judge hearing the application for interim measures of 5 February 2010 — De Post v Commission

(Case T-514/09 R)

(Interim measures - Public procurement - Community tendering procedure - Application for suspension of operation and for interim measures - No urgency)

2010/C 80/45

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: De Post NV van publiek recht (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Martens and B. Schutyser, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Manhaeve and N. Bambara, Agents, and assisted by P. Wytinck, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, in essence, first, an order suspending the operation of the decision by which the Publications Office of the European Union awarded the contract referred to in Invitation to Tender No 10234 ‘Daily transport and delivery of the Official Journal, books, other periodicals and publications’ to Entreprise des postes et télécommunications Luxembourg, second, an order prohibiting the signature of the contract referred to in the Invitation to Tender and, third, if the contract has already been signed, that its performance be suspended until the Court has ruled on the substance of the action.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
1115.

#### KITCHENS *v.*THE STATE.

Where it appears that a plaintiff in error who has been convicted in a criminal case (and upon whom an alternative sentence, permitting the-payment of a fine, has been imposed) has voluntarily complied with the sentence of the court, by payment of the fine, this court will not review the judgment of conviction. The court will not consider the record in any ease where it is shown that the parties have settled their controversy or that the judgment has been satisfied. In such a ease the writ of error will be dismissed.

Practice. Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

Submitted May 5,

Decided June 18, 1908.

*R. L. Tipton,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. A. Comer, solicitor, Crum & Jones,*contra.

Russell, J.

The plaintiff in error filed a .hill of exceptions assigning error on the dismissal of his motion for new trial. Counsel for the defendant in error moved to dismiss the exceptions, upon the ground that the plaintiff in error had voluntarily and without protest paid the fine imposed by the court as an alternative to the term which he had been sentenced to serve in the-chain-gang upon the public works, and had also paid costs in the court below. The ground of the motion to dismiss the writ is properly verified, and the fact that the sentence of the lower court has been complied with is undisputed. As “courts do not settle moot questions^ or deal with fictitious litigation, nor proceed to judgment where.it is shown that the parties have settled their controversy or that the *441judgment has been satisfied,” the writ of error will be dismissed. Upon this subject see *White*v. *Tifton,*1 *Ga. App.*569 (57 S. E. 1038), in which we held that “a defendant who has paid a fine imposed by a police court, with the alternative of imprisonment, can not, after paying such fine, prosecute a writ of error to review the judgment, unless the fine was paid under protest and under duress.” See also *Brown*v. Atlanta, 123 *Ga.*497 (51 S. E. 507). The rule is the same in criminal as in civil cases. It has uniformly been held in this State that the appellate court will not investigate and decide the abstract questions involved in-a case where the substance of the controversy has been withdrawn. *Sutcliffe*v. *McSweeney,*102 *Ga.*897 (30 S. E. 268); *Henderson*v. *Hoppe,*103 *Ga.*684 (30 S. E. 653); *Atlanta & Fla. Ry. Co.*v. *Blanton,*80 *Ga.*563 (6 S. E. 584); *Thornton*v. *Manchester Investment Co.,*97 *Ga.*342 (22 S. E. 987); *Cranston*v. *Bank of the State of Ga.,*97 *Ga.*406 (23 S. E. 822); *Gallaher*v. *Schneider,*110 *Ga.*322 (35 S. E. 321); *Tuells*v. *Torras,*113 *Ga.*691 (39 S. E. 455) ; *Owens*v. *Read Phosphate Co.,*115 *Ga.*768 (42 S. E. 762); *Randolph*v. *Brunswick Ry. Co.,*120 *Ga.*969 (48 S. E. 396).

*Let the writ of error be dismissed.*