alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012287EN.01000401.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Legfelsőbb Bíróság — Hungary) — ERSTE Bank Hungary Nyrt v Magyar Állam, BCL Trading GmbH, ERSTE Befektetési Zrt

(Case C-527/10) (1)

1

(Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Insolvency proceedings - Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 - Article 5(1) - Temporal application - Action in rem brought in a State not a member of the European Union - Insolvency proceedings opened against the debtor in another Member State - First State became a member of the European Union - Applicability)

2012/C 287/06

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Legfelsőbb Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ERSTE Bank Hungary Nyrt

Applicant:

Defendant: Magyar Állam, BCL Trading GmbH, ERSTE Befektetési Zrt

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Legfelsőbb Bíróság — Interpretation of Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings (OJ 2000 L 160, p. 1) — Action in rem brought in the Member State where the subject of the right in rem is situated against a defendant with its registered office in another Member State and against which insolvency proceedings were commenced in that latter State before the accession of the former State to the European Union — Temporal applicability of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that that provision is applicable, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, even to insolvency proceedings opened before the accession of the Republic of Hungary to the European Union where, on 1 May 2004, the debtor’s assets on which the right in rem concerned was based were situated in that State, which is for the referring court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
William A. LINDSEY, petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 17-6595.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Boardof Directors 

Adolor Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-51222, No. 333-62428, No. 333-100585, No. 333-105912, No. 333-134647 and No. 333-151628), registration statementon Form S-3 (No. 333-131765) and registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-64298) of Adolor Corporation of our report dated February 26, 2010, with respect to the balance sheets of Adolor Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and2008, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the related financial statement schedule, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Adolor Corporation. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

February 26, 2010
Juan LEON-CORDOVA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-9404.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dr. Kenneth W. Powell, President and Chief Executive Officer of Titan Trading Analytics Inc., certify that;

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Titan Trading Analytics Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: April 26, 2006

By:

/s/ Dr. Kenneth W. Powell





Name:

Dr. Kenneth W. Powell

Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:

April 26, 2006
Filed 5/11/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2010 ND 74

Rockwell Dean Skarsgard, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

Nos. 20090333 - 20090336

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gerald H. Rustad, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Rebecca J. McGurran, Grand Forks Public Defender Office, 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 101, Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for petitioner and appellant.

Mark A. Flagstad, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 315 Third Street SE, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58701-5005, for respondent and appellee.

Skarsgard v. State

Nos. 20090333 - 20090336

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Rockwell Skarsgard appeals a district court order denying his four applications for post-conviction relief, arguing he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

[¶2]The district court’s order denying Skarsgard’s applications for post-conviction relief is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner
ERNST & YOUNG, et al., petitioners, v. Stephen MORRIS, et al.

No. 16-300.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 25, 2017.

The following briefing schedule is adopted:

Petitioner in Nos. 16-285 and 16-300 and respondent in No. 16-307 will file opening and reply briefs under the schedule set forth in Rules 25.1 and 25.3. Respondent in Nos. 16-285 and 16-300 and petitioner in No. 16-307 will file response briefs under the schedule set forth in Rule 25.2.
Robert GRUNTZ, petitioner, v. OREGON.

No. 16-9244.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
II-00630

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jacqueline Strater <strater4111 @comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:11 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jacqueline Strater

2532 Natrional St

Richmond, VA 23231
Clyde W. PRESLEY, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-7555.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2010148EN.01003101.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/31

---

Order of the General Court of 23 March 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-16/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Officials - Reasonable time for the submission of a claim for compensation - Lateness - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2010/C 148/55

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 4 November 2008 in Case F-87/07 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the annulment of that order.

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present case. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present case.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
II-00886

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Steve Roddy <sidingwen@Yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:20 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Steve Roddy

619 7th Ave

San Francisco, CA 94118
Garrett Lee JONES, petitioner, v. John EGELHOF, et al.

No. 16-6147.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Nos. 1D18-3917

 1D18-3919

_____________________________

DAVID K. MARTIN II,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela M. Cox, Judge.

August 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Steven Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee; Mitchell Egber, Assistant Attorney 

General, West Palm Beach, for Appellee.
Alan Boyd Donta BARNETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6775.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Russell BUCKLEW, petitioner, v. Anne L. PRECYTHE, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-8151 (17A911).

Supreme Court of the United States

March 20, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice GORSUCH and by him referred to the Court is granted pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice THOMAS, Justice ALITO, and Justice GORSUCH would deny the application for stay of execution.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 20a0097n.06

Case No. 19

- 2372

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

IN RE JOHN DOE ,
Petitioner

. ) ) ) ) ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

BEFORE: GILMAN, GIBBONS , and THAPAR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

. John Doe petitions for a writ of mandamus. He claims that the district court misapplied our circuit’s mandate in Doe v. Baum , 903 F.3d 575 (6th Cir. 2018) , and committed legal error by denying him partial summary judgment and granting defendants qualified immunity. Because Doe’s claims do not satisfy the requirements for mandamus, w e deny the petition.

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for D.C. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004)

. To satisfy the test , John Doe must (1) have no other adequate means of obtaining relief, (2) demonstrate a right to issuance that is clear and indisputable, and (3) s how that issuance of the writ is appropriate under the circumstances. Id. at 380

– 81. Mandamus is appropriate to remedy a clear abuse of discretion or judicial usurpation of power

. Id . at 380

. The extraordinary remedy is not appropriate here. Doe challe nges a partial denial of summary judgment and a grant of qualified immunity. Even assuming that he is right about his claimed legal error (and that it rises to a clear abuse of discretion) , Doe can raise those issues on direct appeal. Thus, he is not without remedy, as required for mandamus.
We DENY the petition.
II-00089

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Barbara Stamp <bestamp7@yahoo.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 6:51 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Barbara Stamp

6901 W 84th St.

Bloomington, MN 55438
II-00835

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Susan Noble <suz 1705 @earthlink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:01 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Susan Noble

3501 Friendly Grove Rd

Olympia, WA 98506
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,765
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          35,127
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,331
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,359
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     62
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 62
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        62
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.29
        

</TABLE>