alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 March 2011 – Longevity Health Products v OHIM – Performing Science (5 HTP)**

**(Case T-190/09)**

Community trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Community word mark 5 HTP – Absolute ground for refusal – Signs or indications which have become customary – Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Distinctive character acquired by use – Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009

1.                     *Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed
exclusively of signs or indications which have become customary in everyday language or commerce – Commonplace character –
Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(d)) (see paras 26-27)*

2.                     *Community trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds of invalidity – Registration contrary to Article
7(1)(d) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Exception – Acquisition of distinctive character through use (Council Regulation No 207/2009,
Arts 7(1)(d) and 52(2)) (see paras 31, 37-40, 52)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2009 (Case R 595/2008-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Performing Science LLC and Longevity Health Products Inc. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Registered Community trade mark of which cancellation sought: | Word mark 5 HTP for goods and services in Classes 5, 16 and 35 – Community trade mark No 2846483 |
| Proprietor of the Community trade mark: | Longevity Health Products, Inc. |
| Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: | Performing Science LLC |
| Decision of the Cancellation Division: | Application for declaration of invalidity of the trade mark concerned partially granted |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Longevity Health Products Inc. to pay the costs. |
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, B. Amrey Harden, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Oconee FinancialCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted by sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

| (1) |   the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period endedDecember 31, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                       |

 

Dated: March 27, 2003 

|  |  /s/ B. Amrey Harden                            B. Amrey HardenPresident andChief Executive Officer |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
John R. GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE.

No. 16-6646.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# C_2011319EN.01001602.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/16

---

Judgment of the General Court (SecondChamber) of 20 September 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-298/09) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Community tendering procedure - Supply of external services for educational programmes - Award of the contract to several tenderers - Tenderer’s ranking - Action for annulment - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Grounds for exclusion from the contract award procedure - Article 93(1)(f) of the Financial Regulation - Tender validity period - Non-contractual liability)

2011/C 319/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Bambara and E. Manhaeve, Agents, assisted by P. Wytinck, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION, first, for annulment of two Commission decisions, communicated in two separate letters of 12 May 2009 ranking the applicant, for its tenders in response to the open call for tenders EAC/01/2008 for external service provision for educational programmes (ESP-ISEP) (OJ 2008/S 158-212752), for Lot No 1 (IS (information system) Development and Maintenance) and for Lot No 2 (IS (information system) Studies, Testing, Training and Support), as second contractor for each of those lots and, secondly, for damages

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 26.9.2009.

1

---
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3798 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for limitations on copayments for contraception furnished by the 

Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3798 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Access to Con3 traception for Veterans Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON COPAYMENTS FOR CONTRACEP5 TION. 

6 Section 1722A(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘to pay’’ and all that follows 

9 through the period and inserting ‘‘to pay—’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraphs: 

12 ‘‘(A) an amount in excess of the cost to the 

13 Secretary for medication described in paragraph (1); 

14 or 

15 ‘‘(B) an amount for any contraceptive item for 

16 which coverage under health insurance coverage is 

17 required without the imposition of any cost-sharing 

18 requirement pursuant to section 2713(a)(4) of the 

19 Public Health Service Act (42 USC 300gg– 

20 13(a)(4)).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3798 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide 

and for other purposes. furnished by the Department of Veterans Affairs, for limitations on copayments for contraception
R+L CARRIERS, INC., petitioner, v. INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION.

No. 17-980.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
II-00046

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jill Bachelis <marlenajb@aol.com>

Thursday, December 9, 2010 2:50 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK6! SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jill Bachelis

2220 Avenue of the Stars, 1102W

Los Angeles, CA 90067
# C_2012126EN.01001002.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/10

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 February 2012 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Sezione Terza (Italy)) — Enipower SpA (C-328/10), ENI SpA (C-329/10), Edison Trading SpA (C-330/10), E.On Produzione SpA (C-331/10), Edipower SpA (C-332/10), E.On Energy Trading SpA (C-333/10) v Autorità per l’energia elettrica e il gás (C-328/10 to C-333/10), Cassa Conguaglio per il Settore Elettrico (C-329/10) intervening parties: Terna Rete Elettrica Nazionale SpA (C-328/10, C-329/10, C-331/10 and C-332/10), Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (C-328/10 and C-329/10), Gestore dei Servizi Elettrici SpA (C-331/10)

(Joined Cases C-328/10 to C-333/10) (1)

1

2012/C 126/20

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the cases be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.

1

---
# C_2009167EN.01002002.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/20

---

Action brought on 25 May 2009 — Olymp Bezner v OHIM — Bellido (Olymp)

(Case T-203/09)

2009/C 167/40

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG (Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) (represented by: J. Dönch and M. Eck, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miguel Bellido, S.A. (Manzanares, Ciudad Real, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Repeal the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2009 in case R 531/2008-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Repeal the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2009 in case R 531/2008-2; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘Olymp’ for goods in class 25

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: Spanish trade mark registration of the figurative mark ‘OLIMPO’ for goods in class 25

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the Community trade mark concerned invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94 (which became Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 207/2009) and of Article 52(1)(a) of Council Regulation 40/94 (which became Article 53(1)(a) of Council Regulation 207/2009) as the Board of Appeal erred in its finding that there was a likelihood of confusion, due to the fact that the concerned trade marks are not visually, aurally or conceptually similar.

Pleas in law:

---
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2024 ND 182 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v. Heather Renee Faith Hoffman, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20240095 Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Rozanna C. Larson, State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.1 State v. Hoffman No. 20240095 Per Curiam. [¶1] Heather Hoffman appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted her of murder, a class AA felony. Hoffman argues the district court abused its discretion by denying her Rule 29, N.D.R.Crim.P., motion for judgment of acquittal because there is insufficient evidence to support her conviction. After reviewing the record, we conclude the court did not abuse its discretion by denying Hoffman’s motion for judgment of acquittal, and substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Must Haves, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stella Gostfrand, as Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Must Haves, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Must Haves, Inc.



|                    |  |                                                            
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 31, 2008 |  | /s/ Stella Gostfrand                                       
|                    |  | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer



19
# C_2009205EN.01004802.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/48

---

Action brought on 19 May 2009 — Petrilli v Commission

(Case F-51/09)

2009/C 205/89

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alessandro Petrilli (Grottammare, Italy) (represented by: J.-L. Lodomez, J. Lodomez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the appointing authority’s decision concerning the fixing of the applicant’s main place of residence.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 19 February 2009 by which the appointing authority refused to fix the applicant’s main residence in Italy; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 19 February 2009 by which the appointing authority refused to fix the applicant’s main residence in Italy;

| — | order the Commission to pay, on the sums due by virtue of the retroactive application of the correction coefficient for Italy on his pension, the resettlement allowance and the doubling of the family allowance, from 1 July 2007, interest on the basis of the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its principal refinancing operations applicable for the period in question, increased by two points; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay, on the sums due by virtue of the retroactive application of the correction coefficient for Italy on his pension, the resettlement allowance and the doubling of the family allowance, from 1 July 2007, interest on the basis of the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its principal refinancing operations applicable for the period in question, increased by two points;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
Richard J. RIOS, petitioner, v. PNC MORTGAGE, aka PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., et al.

No. 15-1425.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Thomas Eugene WALTEMYER, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 16-6678.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office denied.
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO, et al.

No. 16-1450.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Jean Emmanuel DUVAL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7740.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Justin Curtis WERLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8119.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Charles W. McCORMICK, petitioner, v. Joseph McFADDEN, Warden.

No. 16-6585.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Barry COGGINS, et ux., petitioners, Peggy HILL, et al.

No. 17-865.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Robert SIMON, Jr., petitioner, v. Marshall L. FISHER, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections.

No. 16-6085.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Commissioner Kristin N. Johnson

Public Calendar

December 1 to December 31, 2022

Thursday, December1, 2022

12:00 pm Speaking Event: Investment Company Institute Derivatives Markets Advisory 

Committee

1:30 pm Internal meeting

2:00 pm Internal meeting

Friday, December 2, 2022

1:30 pm Internal meeting

Monday, December 5, 2022

10:00 am Internal meeting

Tuesday, December 6, 2022

12:00 pm Internal meeting

2:30 pm Meeting with CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam

Wednesday, December 7, 2022

9:00 am CFTC Agricultural Advisory Committee

1:00 pm Internal meeting

Thursday, December 8, 2022

12:30 pm Internal meeting

3:30 pm Internal meeting

Friday, December 9, 2022

9:00 pm Meeting with Dr. Leila Fourie, CEO, Johannesburg Stock Exchange

1:30 pm Meeting with Jesse Hamilton, CoinDesk

2:00 pm Speaking Event: ABA Futures & Derivatives Winter Meeting

Monday, December 12, 2022

1:00 pm Internal meeting

3:00 pm Internal meeting

5:00 pm Closed Commission Meeting

5:30 pm Event: 2022 EXIM Annual Conference VIP Reception

Tuesday, December 13, 2022

10:00 am Bloomberg Interview with Natalia Kniazhevich

1:00 pm Internal meeting

2:00 pm Internal meeting

3:00 pm Internal meeting
Wednesday, December 14, 2022

10:30 am Internal meeting

12:30 pm Interview with Neil Cavuto, Fox News

1:00 pm Meeting with Paul Kangas, Eric Banta, Theresa Bunsman, Joseph Demetrick, 

Todd Lurie, Chris McAlister, Debra Svoboda Epp, and Kathleen O’Neill, 

American Council of Life Insurers

1:30 pm Internal meeting

Thursday, December 15, 2022

6:30 pm Speaking Event: NYC Bar Association Committee of Futures & Derivatives 

December Meeting

Monday, December 19, 2022

11:00 am Closed Commission Meeting

Wednesday, December 21, 2022

11:00 am Meeting with Mansingh Patil, Richard Metcalfe, Nandini Sukumar, and Pedro 

Gurrola, World Federation of Exchanges

12:00 pm Meeting with Anna Bakhmetyeva and Kristi Battles, University of Washington 

School of Law

2:30 pm Internal meeting

3:00 pm Internal meeting

Thursday, December 22, 2022

7:30 am Meeting with Janice Kirkel and Bernard Goyder, Risk.net

11:30 am Meeting with Allison Lurton and Michael Sorrell, Futures Industry 

Association 

Tuesday, December 27, 2022

2:30 pm Meeting with CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam

Wednesday, December 28, 2022

11:00 am Internal meeting

Friday, December 30, 2022

10:30 am Internal meeting
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 01-14]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is  published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated July 21, 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 01-14 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: June 21, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 34166)          ( print page 34167)          ( print page 34168)          ( print page 34169)          ( print page 34170)    

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M

[FR Doc. 01-16036  Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-C