alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Peter Shapiro 

Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 9:07 AM 

Subject: RE: Title VII discussion with SEC/CFTC 

Importance: High 

Lourdes, Phyllis, et al.:

On the Dodd‐Frank issues we discussed a few weeks back, I think it would be great to pick back

up on some of the subjects we never fully discussed to due to lack of time:  (1) dealer disclosure

of conflicts and material interests; (2) when is a dealer serving as an “advisor” and when are

they not in an advisory relationship under the Dodd‐Frank Special Entity provisions; (3) what

should constitute appropriate standards for determining if an “independent representative”

meets the requirements of the Special Entity provisions in Title VII; (4) what would constitute

the dealer’s “reasonable basis to believe” that the independent rep meets the requirements of

the statute; etc.

There are some important subtleties about the ISDA documentation structure and existing

market practice that, I believe, fall significantly short of what Dodd‐Frank is aiming to achieve.  I

think there are several workable approaches that are worth considering.   

Please let me know if there would be a good time to review, either in person or by phone.

Best,

Peter
John F. JONES, petitioner, v. Michael FINESILVER.

No. 15-9401.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
PIONEER CENTRES HOLDING COMPANY STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND ITS TRUSTEES, et al., petitioners, v. ALERUS FINANCIAL, N.A.

No. 17-667.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in the case expressing the views of the United States.
Exhibit 32.1

EX-32.1 CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL J. PECORA

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unilens Vision Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Pecora, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|Date: February 14, 2011          
|                                 
|/s/ Michael J. Pecora            
|Michael J. Pecora                
|President/Chief Executive Officer
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2009153EN.01002501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/25 |

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Dendermonde (Belgium) lodged on 22 April 2009 — Criminal proceedings against V.W. Lahousse & Lavichy BVBA

(Case C-142/09)

2009/C 153/45

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Dendermonde

Parties to the main proceedings

| | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Defendants: | : | | | | | --- | --- | | 1. | V.W. Lahousse | | | | | --- | --- | | 2. | Lavichy BVBA | |

Question referred

Must Directive 2002/24/EC,[(1)](#ntr1-C_2009153EN.01002501-E0001) in particular Article 1(1)(d) thereof (according to which the directive does not apply to vehicles intended for use in competition, on roads or in off-road conditions), be interpreted as allowing the Member States to extend its scope so as to render it applicable to all traffic by land (that is to say, also to the use of two or three-wheel motor vehicles off-road and/or on private land), without granting the exception in respect of vehicles intended for use in competition on roads (racing) or for vehicles in off-road conditions?

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2009153EN.01002501-E0001)  Directive 2002/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 March 2002 relating to the type-approval of two or three-wheel motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 92/61/EEC ([OJ 2002 L 124, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2002_124_R_TOC)).

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    this periodic report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in this periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Life Time Fitness, Inc.
  /s/ Bahram AkradiBahram AkradiChairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive
Officer /s/ Michael R. RobinsonMichael R. RobinsonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Peter J. Schied, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)     The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/     Peter J. SchiedPeter J. Schied Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer March 18, 2003
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00281

- CR

K EVIN M. G IBSON

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 213th District

Court

of Tarrant County (1389802D)

February 28, 2019

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
Michael Lee LONG, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7456.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 16, 2010 |  | /s/ George M. Davis                  
|                        |  | George M. Davis                      
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Lawrence Rychlak                 
|                        |  | Lawrence Rychlak                     
|                        |  | President and Chief Financial Officer
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 February 2010 – Commission v Spain**

**(Case C‐18/09)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Freedom to provide services – Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 – Article 1 – Maritime transport – Ports of general interest – Harbour dues – Exemptions and subsidies

Member States – Obligations – Failure to fulfil obligations – Maintaining in force domestic legislation incompatible with Community law – Discriminatory system of rebates of and exemptions from harbour dues – Not permissible (Art. 226 EC; Council Regulation No 4055/86, Art. 1) (see para. 18)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 of 22 December 1986 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries (OJ 1986 L 378, p. 1) – Ports of general interest – Subsidies and exemptions from harbour dues. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by maintaining in force Article 24(5) and Article 27(1), (2) and (4) of Law 48/2003 of 26 November 2003 on the economic rules and supply of services for ports of general interest, which establishes a system of rebates and exemptions for harbour dues, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 of 22 December 1986 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
EXHIBIT 32
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
In connection with the Quarterly Report of DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS,
INC., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.


/s/ Richard H. Casper

-----------------------------

Richard H. Casper

Chief Executive Officer







/s/ Pamela Lindquist

-----------------------------

Pamela Lindquist

Chief Financial Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1237/2004

of 5 July 2004         

amending for the 36th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freezing of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan (1), and in particular the first indent of Article 7(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is hereby amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 July 2004.

For the Commission

Christopher PATTEN            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 984/2004 (OJ L 180, 15.5.2004, p. 24).

----

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

The following entry shall be added under the heading ‘Legal persons, groups and entities’.

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 23, 2001.
    Time: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Contact Person: Richard J. Bartlett, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal 
and Skin Diseases, Natcher Bldg./Bldg. 45, Room 5As37B, (301) 594-
4952.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-16357 Filed 6-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2009141EN.01004204.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/42

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 2 April 2009 — Cachuera v OHIM — Gelkaps (Ayanda)

(Case T-43/09) (1)

1

(Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2009/C 141/90

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: La Cachuera, SA (Misiones, Argentina) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Gelkaps GmbH (Pritzwalk, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2008 (Case RE 87/2008-2), relating to opposition proceedings between La Cachuera, SA and Gelkaps GmbH

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders La Cachuera, SA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders La Cachuera, SA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         5,868
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           634
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   37,854
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               0
<LOANS>                                      350,230
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               404,097
<DEPOSITS>                                   280,302
<SHORT-TERM>                                  39,378 <F1>
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            4,038
<LONG-TERM>                                   26,020
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          42
<OTHER-SE>                                    54,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               404,097
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               26,541
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              3,086
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 161
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              29,788
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            13,034
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            16,681
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         13,107
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    240
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               274
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                9,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,864
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     5,864
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,867
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  2.65
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,149
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3,182
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     79
<RECOVERIES>                                      10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3,355
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           3,355
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        


<FN>
     Total Advances                  $65,398
     Less Portion Due over 1 year    (26,020)
                                     -------
                                     $39,378
                                     =======
</FN>


</TABLE>
Steven BREWER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6703.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Surette, the Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 12, 2004                          By: /s/ David J. Surette
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         David J. Surette
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
Christopher Chubasco WILKINS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-723 (16A584).

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 11, 2017.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2010113EN.01004302.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2010 — Euro-Information v OHIM (EURO AUTOMATIC CASH)

(Case T-15/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark EURO AUTOMATIC CASH - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 113/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Européenne de traitement de l'information (Euro-Information) (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Grolée, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2008 (Case R 70/2006-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign EURO AUTOMATIC CASH as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 November 2008 (Case R 70/2006 4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 November 2008 (Case R 70/2006 4);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay four fifths of the costs incurred by the parties before the Court; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay four fifths of the costs incurred by the parties before the Court;

| 3. | Orders Européenne de traitement de l'information (Euro-Information) to pay one fifth of the costs incurred by the parties before the Court; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Européenne de traitement de l'information (Euro-Information) to pay one fifth of the costs incurred by the parties before the Court;

| 4. | Orders OHIM to pay the essential costs incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders OHIM to pay the essential costs incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
SEALED, petitioner, v. SEALED.

No. 16M58.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal granted.