alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-11-00348- CV Aletha Jane Jaso, Appellant

v. Anthony Jame s Ke ith, App ellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 395 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 04- 913- F 395, H ONO RAB LE TAMARA ARRINGTO N, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant has f

iled a motion to dism iss her appe al, explaining that the par ties have settled their dispute. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose and Goodwin Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: August 26, 2011
Richard OLAWALE-AYINDE, aka Richard Williams, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5351.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jose William QUINTANILLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7323.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Meeting with Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association

February 9, 2012

Attendees:

Bonnie Litt, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, Goldman Sachs

Maria Chiodi, Director and General Counsel, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC

Alessandro Cocco, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, J.P. Morgan Securities

Barbara Wierzynski, General Counsel, Futures Industry Association

Bradley Edgell, Managing Director, Government Affairs, Securities Industry and Financial 

Markets Association

James McHale, Managing Director and Chief Compliance Officer, Pershing

Belinda Blaine, Executive Director, Legal and Compliance, Morgan Stanley & Co.

Paul Architzel, Partner, Wilmer Hale

Yoon-Young Lee, Partner, Wilmer Hale

John Nicholas, Global Head of New Regulation Monitoring, NewEdge

Craig Griffith, Analyst, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association

Kyle Brandon, Managing Director, Director of Research, Securities Industry and Financial 

Markets Association

John Polanin, Regional Head of Compliance, Americas, Macquarie Group

Greg Johnson, Managing Director and Head of Regulatory Compliance, J.P. Morgan Chase
Arquives Deon McNEAL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7478.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel ``Research Dissemination Project''.
    Date: June 26, 2001.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National 
Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3158, MSC 
9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, (301) 435-1439.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel ``Pharmacokinetic Analysis Resource Center''.
    Date: June 27, 2001.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Eric Zatman, Contract Review Specialist, Office 
of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National 
Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3158, MSC 
9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, (301) 435-1439.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training: 
93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: June 18, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-15767 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
AFMS LLC, petitioner, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., et al.

No. 17-1092.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2010024EN.01006002.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/60

---

Action brought on 19 November 2009 — Stelzer v Commission

(Case T-467/09)

2010/C 24/107

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dierk Stelzer (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: F. Weiland, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decisions in the form of refusals by the Directorate-General Environment of the Commission of 6 August 2009 and the Secretariat-General of the Commission of 29 October 2009 (correct date must be 29 September 2009); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions in the form of refusals by the Directorate-General Environment of the Commission of 6 August 2009 and the Secretariat-General of the Commission of 29 October 2009 (correct date must be 29 September 2009);

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs incurred out of court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs incurred out of court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contests in particular the Commission decision dated 29 October 2009, by which his second application for inspection of the compliance study on the transposition of Directive 2003/35/EC (1) was partially rejected.

1

In support of its action the applicant claims that the reasons invoked by the defendant for the rejection of access to the document applied for, based on protection of the purpose of investigations (Article 4(2), third indent, of Regulation [EC] No 1049/2001 (2)) and on protection of the decision-making process (Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001) were erroneous. The applicant also claims that the request for partial access to the document applied for under Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001 was wrongly rejected. Furthermore there is an overwhelming public interest in the dissemination of the study in question. Finally the applicant complains that the defendant failed to comply with the obligation to state reasons.

2

---

(1)  Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 156, p. 17).

1

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

2

---
Wendell BROWN, nka Menes Ankh El, petitioner, v. RAY SKILLMAN WESTSIDE IMPORTS, INC., et al.

No. 16-6519.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Larry JONES, petitioner, v. Mark McCULLICK, Acting Warden.

No. 16-7025.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Jesus A. TINAJERO-PORRAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7433.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3624 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require 

the disclosure of the total number of domestic and foreign employees of certain public companies, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3624 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Outsourcing Account3 ability Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REQUIRED DISCLOSURE OF NUMBER OF DOMESTIC 

5 AND FOREIGN EMPLOYEES. 

6 Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

7 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(s) DISCLOSURE OF NUMBER OF DOMESTIC AND

10 FOREIGN EMPLOYEES.— 

11 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term 

12 ‘covered subsidiary’ means, with respect to an issuer, 

13 any subsidiary of such issuer that is— 

14 ‘‘(A) a consolidated subsidiary; or 

15 ‘‘(B) a subsidiary with respect to which the 

16 issuer accounts for the investment of the issuer 

17 in the subsidiary using the equity method of ac18 counting. 

19 ‘‘(2) DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT.—Except with 

20 respect to an emerging growth company, beginning 

21 in the first full fiscal year that begins after the date 

22 of the enactment of this subsection, each issuer that 

23 is required to file a report with the Commission pur24 suant to subsection (a) shall disclose in such re25 port— 
3 

•HR 3624 EH

1 ‘‘(A) the total number of employees of the 

2 issuer and any covered subsidiary of the issuer 

3 who are domiciled in the United States— 

4 ‘‘(i) disaggregated by State, District 

5 of Columbia, commonwealth, territory, or 

6 possession of the United States; and 

7 ‘‘(ii) compared using a percentage 

8 change calculation to any such total re9 ported by the issuer in the most recent an10 nual report of the issuer; 

11 ‘‘(B) the total number of employees of the 

12 issuer who physically work in and are domiciled 

13 in any country other than the United States— 

14 ‘‘(i) disaggregated by country; and 

15 ‘‘(ii) compared using a percentage 

16 change calculation to any such total re17 ported by the issuer in the most recent an18 nual report of the issuer; and 

19 ‘‘(C) the total number of employees of any 

20 covered subsidiary of the issuer who physically 

21 work in and are domiciled in any country other 

22 than the United States— 

23 ‘‘(i) disaggregated by country; and 

24 ‘‘(ii) compared using a percentage 

25 change calculation to any such total re-
4 

•HR 3624 EH

1 ported by the issuer in the most recent an2 nual report of the issuer. 

3 ‘‘(3) RULEMAKING.—The Commission may 

4 issue such rules as the Commission considers nec5 essary to implement this subsection.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 18, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3624 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to 

companies, and for other purposes. mestic and foreign employees of certain public require the disclosure of the total number of do-
II-00216

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Anthony Shaw <shaw24@mindspring.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 4:30 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Anthony Shaw

1078 Van Buren St S

Shakopee, MN 55379
James H. FITZPATRICK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6090.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Rose Mary KNICK, petitioner, v. TOWNSHIP OF SCOTT, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 17-647.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
IV 

House Calendar No. 221 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1537 

[Report No. 111–552] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules and 

providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2010 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported through the legislative day of July 23, 2010, promstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 1537 RH 

1 viding for consideration or disposition of a measure ad2 dressing unemployment compensation. 

3 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the 

4 legislative day of July 23, 2010, for the Speaker to enter5 tain motions that the House suspend the rules. The 

6 Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority 

7 Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter 

8 for consideration pursuant to this section. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

House Calendar No. 221 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1537 

[Report No. 111–552] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

the rules. providing for consideration of motions to suspend tions reported from the Committee on Rules and with respect to consideration of certain resoluJULY 20, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1798867
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3254175
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                128828 
<PP&E>                                         9132072
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1756275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12557667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           316087
<BONDS>                                        7604511
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5269286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12557667
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2620490
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1394919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              572302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 653269
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             653269
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    653269
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-4814]


Maurice Silvera, Inc., Lumberton, NC; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (P.L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on 
April 26, 2001 in response to a petition filed by a company official on 
behalf of workers at Maurice Silvera, Inc., Lumberton, North Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Dated: Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of June 2001.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-16159 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00384-CR

ALICIA ELIZABETH FORD APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1405276

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

On November 9, 2015, we notified Appellant Alicia Elizabeth Ford of our 

concern that we lack jurisdiction over her attempt to appeal the trial court’s 

October 6, 2015 order supplementing or amending her conditions of community 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

supervision.2 See Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) 

(“There is no legislative authority for entertaining a direct appeal from an order 

modifying the conditions of community supervision.”); Helms v. State, Nos. 02-

14-00170-CR, 02-14-00171-CR, 2014 WL 3778283, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 

July 31, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). We informed 

Ford that the appeal may be dismissed unless she or any party desiring to 

continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. We have not received a response. Therefore, we 

dismiss this appeal.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 25, 2016

 

2

The trial court’s certification of Ford’s right to appeal states that it involves 

“another” order—an “Amendment to Conditions of Community Supervision dated 

10-6-15. No Right of Appeal.”
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16033]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Membership of the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) 
Performance Review Boards

AGENCY: Defense Contract Audit Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of membership of the Defense Contract Audit Agency 
Performance Review Boards.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Performance Review Boards (PRBs) of the Defense Contract Audit Agency 
(DCAA). The publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 
4314(c)(4). The Performance Review Boards provide fair and impartial 
review of Senior Executive Service (SES) performance appraisals and 
make recommendations to the Director, DCAA, regarding final performance 
ratings and performance awards for DCAA SES members.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 27, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale R. Collins, Chief, Human 
Resources Management Division, Defense Contract Audit Agency, 
Department of Defense, Ft. Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6219, 703-767-1236.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following are the names and titles of the executives who have been 
appointed to serve as members of the DCAA Performance Review Boards. 
They will serve one-year terms, effective upon publication of this 
notice.

Headquarters Performance Review Board

    Mr. Larry Uhlfelder, Assistant Director, Policy and Plans, Defense 
Contract Audit Agency, Chairperson.
    Mr. Earl Newman, Assistant Director, Operations, Defense Contract 
Audit Agency, member.
    Mr. Kirk Moberley, General Counsel, Defense Contract Audit Agency, 
member.

Regional Performance Review Board

    Mr. Frank Summers, Regional Director, Eastern, Defense Contract 
Audit Agency, Chairperson.
    Mr. James Lovelace, Director, Field Detachment, Defense Contract 
Audit Agency, member.
    Mr. Steve Hernandez, Deputy Regional Director, Northeastern, 
Defense Contract Audit Agency, member.

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-16033 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M