alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00969

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Skadeland <ing_art4u@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:36 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Skadeland

1536 W Farwell

Chicago, IL 60626
II-00870

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

li mo <storymo@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:30 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

li mo

148 richdale ave.

cambridge, MA 2140
Joseph Alan JAMES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8063.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6327
RUFUS W. GOODMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. D. MATHEWS, SR., Sheriff; COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA; MICHEL MARQUEZ, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-97-296-2) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rufus W. Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Goodman v. Mathews , No. CA-97-296-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 1998). We deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16063]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors, Committee on 
Provision for the Delivery of Legal Services

TIME AND DATE: The Committee on Provision for the Delivery of Legal 
Services of the Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors will meet 
on June 29, 2001. The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. and continue until 
the Committee concludes its agenda.

LOCATION: Sheraton Harborside Hotel, 250 Market Street, Portsmouth, NH.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
1. Approval of agenda.
2. Approval of the minutes of the Committee's meeting of January 26, 
2001.
3. Presentation by Equal Justice Stakeholders in New Hampshire on 
Delivering Services to Low-Income Clients.
4. Presentation by Don Saunders, of NLADA, on State Planning.
5. Presentation by Michigan State Bar concerning State Planning in 
Michigan.
6. Presentation by other Michigan Stakeholders concerning State 
Planning in Michigan.
7. Update by Randi Youells on State Planning and Other Business.
8. Consider and act on other business.
9. Public comment.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for 
Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 
336-8800.
    Special Needs: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available 
in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Elizabeth S. Cushing, at (202) 336-8800.

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate 
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-16063 Filed 6-22-01; 9:29 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
# C_2010051EN.01004802.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/48

---

Order of the General Court of 5 January 2010 — Shell Hellas v European Commission

(Case T-245/09) (1)

1

2010/C 51/87

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FOUNTAIN PHARMACEUTICALS,  INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      156
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   298
<PP&E>                                             264  
<DEPRECIATION>                                     247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              377
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                         (36) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       454
<SALES>                                            322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   322
<CGS>                                              149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (275) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (275)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.003) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.003)
        

</TABLE>
William BRECK, petitioner, v. Raul HERNANDEZ, et al.

No. 17-926.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
Vincent THOMAS, petitioner, CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA.

No. 16-9266.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
H. Res. 1759 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 15, 2010. 

Whereas Edward Verne Roberts was born January 23, 1939; 

Whereas Roberts acquired polio as an adolescent in 1953 and 

had to spend vast expanses of time in an iron lung; 

Whereas Roberts’ career as an advocate began when a high 

school administrator threatened to deny him a diploma 

because he had not completed driver’s education and 

physical education; 

Whereas in 1962 Roberts was admitted to the University of 

California at Berkeley (UC Berkeley) where he became 

the first student with a severe disability to attend UC 

Berkeley; 

Whereas when his search for housing at the university met 

resistance, the director of the campus hospital offered 

Roberts a room in an empty wing, which Roberts accepted on the condition that it was considered a dormitory 

space; 

Whereas other students with significant disabilities joined 

Roberts in the empty wing over the next few years and 

called themselves the ‘‘Rolling Quads’’; 

Whereas at UC Berkeley the Rolling Quads began advocating 

for curb cuts, opening access to the wider community and 
2 

•HRES 1759 EH 

creating the first student-led disability services program 

at a university in the Nation; 

Whereas the student program led to the creation of the Nation’s first center for independent living; 

Whereas Roberts assumed leadership of the Center for Independent Living, Berkeley and guided its development as 

a model for disability advocacy and self-help services 

across the Nation and around the world; 

Whereas in 1975 Roberts was appointed the Director of the 

California Department of Rehabilitation; 

Whereas in 1983 Roberts co-founded the World Institute on 

Disability, an organization committed to eliminating barriers to full social integration for persons with disabilities; 

Whereas Ed Roberts died from natural causes on March 14, 

1995; and 

Whereas Ed Roberts was a leader and champion in the disability rights movement: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the designation of an ‘‘Ed Roberts 

Day’’; and 

(2) acknowledges the accomplishments of Ed Roberts in helping reduce barriers, increase access, and improve lives for persons with disabilities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Marvin BELSER, petitioner, v. Vonda R. EVANS, et al.

No. 16-9508.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
### NUMBER 13

- 1 4

- 00 675

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

— EDINBURG

EDGAR GARCES DIAZ

, A ppellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, A ppellee

.

On appeal from the 357 th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.



### ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant’s brief. Appellant ’ s

brief w as filed on July 24, 2015 , and appellant has requested oral argument

. To date

,

t he State has not filed a brief. Th is case involves a capital murder conviction and

contemplates legal sufficiency, suppression , sentencing, and jury charge issues which2

warrant a response from the State. The Court, having fully examined the record and

appellant’s brief hereby ORDERS the State to file its brief with this Court on or before

November 9 , 2015.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

7th day of September , 20 1 5

.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

          I, Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. and I have done the following:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. is made known
     to us by others within Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc., particularly
     during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc.'s
     disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
     filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc.'s auditors and the audit committee of Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc.'s board of directors (or persons performing similar functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect Fortune Diversified Industries,
     Inc.'s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
     have identified for Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc.'s auditors any
     material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in Fortune Diversified Industries,
     Inc.'s internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


4/13/05                    /s/ Carter M. Fortune
Date                       ------------------------------------------
                           Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 373 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 373

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for certain 
  administrative or judicial review respecting the identification of 
    primary care practitioners under part B of the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

  Ms. Brownley of California introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for certain 
  administrative or judicial review respecting the identification of 
    primary care practitioners under part B of the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for Medical Providers Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE OR JUDICIAL REVIEW 
              RESPECTING THE IDENTIFICATION OF PRIMARY CARE 
              PRACTITIONERS UNDER PART B OF THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1833(x)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395l(x)(4)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) Limitation on review.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), 
                there shall be no administrative or judicial review 
                under section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, respecting the 
                identification of primary care practitioners under this 
                subsection.
                    ``(B) Exception.--Subparagraph (A) shall not apply 
                in the case of administrative or judicial review under 
                section 1869, 1878, or otherwise, of the issue of 
                whether the Secretary (or an entity contracting with 
                the Secretary) failed to identify an individual 
                described in clause (i) of paragraph (2)(A) as a 
                primary care practitioner by reason of coding error 
                with respect to items and services furnished by such 
                individual during an applicable prior period (as 
                described in clause (ii) of such paragraph).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply as if included in the enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148).
                                 <all>
```
(LOGO) BankAmerica

March 30, 1999

Real Estate Loan Service Center

Structured Asset Securities Corporation
C/O Norwest Bank of Minnesota N.A.
MSD SASCO98-1
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044

Dear D. Woodus,

RE: Servicing Agreement Compliance and Annual Officer Certification
Investor Numbers: S61

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT PURSUANT TO OUR  SERVICING  DEPARTMENT  CONCURRENCE,  THE
FOLLOWING AREAS HAVE BEEN CERTIFIED FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1998:

*    All taxes,  ground rents,  and special  assessments  that may become a lien
     upon the property and which became due in the last  calendar  year has been
     paid. This also includes  verifications of payment with taxing  authorities
     for non-impound accounts.

*    All  insurance  premiums  for flood or other  casualty  insurance;  and FHA
     premiums or Private Mortgage  Insurance premiums on conventional loans have
     been paid, and all policies as required are in full force.

*    Inspections  have  been  made  monthly  on all  delinquent,  foreclosed  or
     otherwise  vacant  properties,  and any other  property  we have  reason to
     believe requires an inspection.

* Analysis  has been made to ensure  sufficient  monies are being  collected  in
escrow for the current year.

*    All information  returns have been provided to the Internal Revenue Service
     as required on activity  relating to  Mortgage's  serviced  during the last
     calendar year.

*    A "Year 2000" plan has been adopted to meet the  business-wide  risks posed
     by the millennium date change.

* All interest  and/or monthly  payment  adjustments for ARMS and GPM loans have
been made in  accordance  with the mortgage  terms.  Timely and proper notice of
such changes was provided to the mortgagors.

*    Blanket Bond and Errors & Omission  policies  are in full force,  a copy is
     attached for your  records.  Please note the policies have been combine and
     have one renewal date of September 2001.

Enclosed  please find the uniform  single audit letter  prepared by our external
auditors Ernst & Young along with our corporate annual financial report.

ANNUAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

To the best of my knowledge and upon reasonable investigation,  the servicing of
the Mortgage  Loans during the preceding  year has been  conducted in compliance
with all other provisions of the Servicing Agreement(s).  Any exceptions to this
certification will be on an attachment along with explanations  concerning their
completion.  If no attachment is sent, it should be considered that there are no
exceptions.

BY:
Sheryl Franke, Vice President

BankAmerica  Mortgage,  A Division  of Bank of  America,  FSB 10600  Valley View
Street Box 6012 Cypress, CA 90630-0012