alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3726 

To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 to extend the availability 

of identity protection coverage to individuals whose personally identifiable 

information was compromised during recent data breaches at Federal 

agencies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2019 

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mr. RUPPERSBERGER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 to 

extend the availability of identity protection coverage to 

individuals whose personally identifiable information was 

compromised during recent data breaches at Federal 

agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing the Effects 

5 of the Cyberattack on OPM Victims Emergency Response 

6 Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘RECOVER Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3726 IH

1 SEC. 2. IDENTITY PROTECTION COVERAGE FOR INDIVID2 UALS AFFECTED BY FEDERAL AGENCY DATA 

3 BREACHES. 

4 Section 633(a) of title VI of division E of the Consoli5 dated Appropriations Act, 2017 (Public Law 115–31), as 

6 amended by section 630 of title VI of division D of the 

7 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (Public Law 115– 

8 141), is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) For fiscal years 2016 

10 through 2026,’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.— 

11 For fiscal year 2016 and each fiscal year there12 after,’’; 

13 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

14 (1); and 

15 (3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 

16 following: 

17 ‘‘(2) is effective for the remainder of the life of 

18 the affected individual; and 

19 ‘‘(3) includes not less than $5,000,000 in iden20 tity theft insurance.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
                                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<CAPTION>
                                                    Three Months Ended                   Six Months Ended
                                                       September 30,                       September 30,
                                               ----------------------------        ----------------------------
                                                  1999              1998              1999              1998
                                               ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------
                                                       (In thousands, except share and per share data)
<S>                                            <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Average common shares outstanding               6,396,462         6,269,394         6,509,916         6,199,775

Average common stock equivalents of
  warrants and options outstanding -
  based on the treasury stock method
  using market price                               37,014           320,507            69,992           446,001
                                               ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------
Average diluted common shares
  outstanding                                   6,433,476         6,589,901         6,579,908         6,645,776
                                               ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========

Net income                                     $    1,429        $    1,207        $    3,776        $    2,911

Basic earnings per common share                      0.22              0.19              0.58              0.47

Diluted earnings per common share                    0.22              0.18              0.57              0.44
</TABLE>
Armando Eugene HICKS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-6715.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURTOF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711
OFFICIAL BUSINESS STATE ©F TEXAS PENALTY FOR V 

# 1/14/2015 PRQVATE USE .: :" j2g §S£3ii&^ 0002003152 janisIois 

# BARRON, JACOB Tr. CV: nb^^^df^^dt^^^^^^Piiloi This is to advise tha^the Courthas'denied without written order motion for leave to file the Oridina ?anrilifiatimn fnr-x.vwnPKf rnanW«r^..» 

# filethe ° W£a|^^

Abel Acosta, Clerk

.«*•j^t-S^a^SSSFSSBSri&&* JACOB BARRON 

### •BANJO. UNIT-- TDC #1448990 •038 OOUTII l~M 1073 •SNYDER, TX 79549- ANK
EXHIBIT 31.1

                         MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

I, Pamela Lindquist, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of DOLPHIN
PRODUCTIONS, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statement were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the"Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and the registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.



                         DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS, INC.


Date: December 27, 2005                /s/ Pamela Lindquist

                                       ----------------------

                                      Pamela Lindquist,Vice President
                                      and Principal Financial Officer
Jose RODRIGUES, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.

No. 16-1417.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 5) (2001-3)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the third quarter 2001 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The third quarter 2001 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.079. 
The third quarter 2001 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.585. The third quarter 2001 
RCAF-5 is 0.562.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. Jeff Warren, (202) 565-1533. 
Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-
800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DA<t-bullet> TO<t-bullet> DA OFFICE 
SOLUTIONS, Suite 405, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001, 
telephone (202) 293-7776. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is 
available through FIRS: 1-800-877-8339.]
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: June 19, 2001.
    By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Clyburn, and 
Commissioner Burkes.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15890 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Kenneth W. Powell, Chief Executive Officer and Acting
Chief Financial Officer of Titan Trading Analytics Inc. (the Company) , hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | a. | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | b. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                  

By: /s/**Dr. Kenneth W. Powell**Name: Dr. Kenneth W. PowellTitle: Chief Executive
Officer and 
          Acting Chief Financial OfficerDate: April 30, 2010

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Carlos Israel DONJUAN-LAREDO, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-983.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3739 

To withhold Federal highway funds from States that provide driver’s licenses 

or identification cards to aliens who are unlawfully present in the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2019 

Mr. COLLINS of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To withhold Federal highway funds from States that provide 

driver’s licenses or identification cards to aliens who are 

unlawfully present in the United States, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Red Light Act’’. 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3739 IH

1 SEC. 2. WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS FOR PROVIDING IDENTI2 FICATION CARDS TO CERTAIN ALIENS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 23, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing new section: 

6 ‘‘§ 171. Withholding of funds for providing identifica7 tion cards to certain aliens 

8 ‘‘(a) WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS FOR NONCOMPLI9 ANCE.—For fiscal year 2020 and each fiscal year there10 after, the Secretary shall withhold 100 percent of the 

11 amount required to be apportioned under each of sections 

12 104(b)(1), 104(b)(3), and 104(b)(4) of this title to any 

13 State that is described in subsection (b). 

14 ‘‘(b) STATE DESCRIBED.—A State described in this 

15 subsection is a State that has enacted a law that allows 

16 the State to provide a driver’s license or other identifica17 tion card to an alien who is unlawfully present in the 

18 United States. 

19 ‘‘(c) EFFECT OF WITHHOLDING FUNDS.— 

20 ‘‘(1) Any funds withheld under subsection (a) 

21 from apportionment to any State shall remain avail22 able until the end of the fiscal year for which the 

23 funds are authorized to be appropriated. 

24 ‘‘(2) If, before the last day of the period for 

25 which funds withheld under subsection (a) from ap26 portionment are to remain available for apportionVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:04 Jul 23, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3739.IH H3739

jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3739 IH

1 ment to a State under paragraph (1), the State 

2 meets the requirement of subsection (b), the Sec3 retary shall, on the first day on which the State 

4 meets the requirement, apportion to the State the 

5 funds withheld under subsection (a) that remain 

6 available for apportionment to the State. 

7 ‘‘(d) IDENTIFICATION CARD DEFINED.—The term 

8 ‘identification card’ means a personal identification card, 

9 as defined in section 1028(d) of title 18, United States 

10 Code, issued by a State.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—Chapter 1 of title 23, 

12 United States Code, in the table of contents is amended 

13 by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘171. Withholding of funds for providing identification cards to certain aliens.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOHN DERAFFELE,

Petitioner

v.

HONORABLE HUGH JONES,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 126 MM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2022, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is 

DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the filing of the Annual  Report of  Virilitec  Industries,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission
(the "Report"), the undersigned, Robin Smyth, the Chief
 Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,  hereby  certifies  to  the  best  of his
knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods represented in the Report.

Dated: February 17, 2004


/s/ Robin Smyth
--------------------------------
Robin Smyth
Chief Financial Officer
II-00258

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Pamela Wills <pamwills@Gmail. corn>

Friday, December 3, 2010 7:53 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Pamela Wills

5800 Manchester Place NW

Washington, DC 20011
996.

#### Brown *v.*The State.

Indictment for selling liquor, from Macon superior court— Judge Littlejohn. January 10, 1908.

Submitted March 10,

Decided March 16, 1908.

*Tlixon & Greer, James M. duPree,*for plaintiff in error.

*Frank A. Hooper, solicitor-general,*contra.

Powell, J.

This ease is controlled by *Plummer’s case,*1 *Ga. App.*507 (57 S. E. 969), and *Tompkins’*case, 2 *Ga. App.*639 (58 S. E. 1011).

*Judgment affirmed.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1232

TYRONE E. MURRAY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE STATE OF MARYLAND; LYNDA FOX, MarylandDepartment of Human Resources; GLADYS MITCHELL, Baltimore City Office of Child Support Enforcement; YVONNE GILCHIRST, Director, Baltimore City Department of Social Services;KENNETH HENDRICKS, Baltimore City Child Protective Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-3474-L) Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 20, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone E. Murray, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Elise Hee Sook Song, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Tyrone E. Murray appeals the district court’s order denyingrelief on his 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Murray v. Maryland , No.CA-99-3474-L (D. Md. Jan. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered June 12, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00573 - CV NORDSTROM INC., THOM AS ZAROBAN, JR., AND LAUREN GALE, Appellant s V. GOLPAR SIAMAK, INDIV ID UALLY AND AS INDEPEN DENT ADMINISTRATOR O F

THE ESTATE OF PARNAZ M. CHEKINI, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 19 - 00690 - D



### O RDER This is an accelerated appeal. The record has been filed and appellants’ opening brief is due no later than June 18, 2019. Before the Court is appellants’ June 11, 2019 unopposed motion for a sixty

- day extension of time to file their brief

. Appellants seek the extension, in part, because the parties have agreed t o participate in mediation on June 27, 2019. We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER appellants to file either a status report or motion to dismiss the appeal no later than July 8, 2019.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
John PEROTTI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6349.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Angel LOPEZ-VALENZUELA, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Correction, et al.

No. 15-9459.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.