alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#EmpowerInnovation2020

The Power of Innovation: Where Tech & Crisis Collide

Thursday, September 24, 2020

10:00 a.m. Welcome & Opening Remarks

Melissa Netram, Chief Innovation Officer and Director, LabCFTC

10:15 a.m. Fireside Chat featuring CFTC Chairman Heath P. Tarbert

with JoAnn Barefoot, CEO and Co-Founder, Alliance for Innovative Regulation

11:15 a.m. Tech Talk: “A Pandemic Response” 

Avi Sinha from Deloitte Consulting discusses technology and innovation in light of the 

pandemic.

• Moderator: LaSharn Dozier, Strategic Communications Specialist, LabCFTC.

11:45 a.m. The Role of Technology and Innovation in a time of Crisis

Industry leaders will discuss how technology and innovation help during a crisis 

and in rebuilding after a crisis. Confirmed speakers currently include:

• Caroline Pham, Deputy Head of Global Regulatory Affairs, Citi

• Gary DeWaal, Special Counsel and Chair, Financial Markets and Regulatory

Practice, Katten Muchin and Rosenman, LLP

• Dan Dooney, CEO and Co-Founder, Securrency

• Moderator: Chris Goodman, Economist and Policy Advisor, LabCFTC

12:30 p.m. Closing Remarks and Important Updates 

Shivon Kershaw, Senior Innovation and Education Advisor, LabCFTC 

and #EmpowerInnovation Chair

Agenda-at-a-glance
EXHIBIT 12.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Michael Latimore, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by this Form 20-F/A, of CDC Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003), Release
No. 33-8392 (February 24, 2004) and Release No. 33-8545 (March 2, 2005)];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: July 2, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael Latimore   
|Michael Latimore       
|Chief Financial Officer
Dony A. CISNEROS, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-7812.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Sideware Systems Inc. has nine wholly owned subsidiaries:

Sideware Corp.
3032650 Nova Scotia Company
Sideware International SRL
9050 Investments Ltd.
Evergreen International Technology Inc.
9123 Investments Ltd.
484117 B.C. Ltd.
JOT-IT! Software Corp.
and Doorchester 52613 Investments Ltd.

9050 Investments Ltd., Evergreen International Technology Inc.,
9123 Investments Ltd., 484117 B.C. Ltd., JOT-IT! Software Corp.,
and Doorchester 52613 Investments Ltd. were all incorporated
under the laws of the Province of British Columbia.  None of
those companies carries on active business or has any material
assets.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3844 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require all persons 

exercising substantial operational control over a concentrated animal 

feeding operation to jointly obtain a permit for certain discharges, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Mr. KHANNA (for himself and Mr. POCAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require 

all persons exercising substantial operational control over 

a concentrated animal feeding operation to jointly obtain 

a permit for certain discharges, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmer Fairness Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3844 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATION DIS2 CHARGES. 

3 Section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

4 Act (33 U.S.C. 1342) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘(t) CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATION

7 DISCHARGES.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For the purposes of apply9 ing the requirements of this section to a discharge 

10 from a concentrated animal feeding operation, the 

11 Administrator shall require all persons exercising 

12 substantial operational control over the concentrated 

13 animal feeding operation to jointly obtain a permit 

14 under this section for the discharge. 

15 ‘‘(2) SUBSTANTIAL OPERATIONAL CONTROL.— 

16 For purposes of this subsection, a person exercises 

17 substantial operational control over a concentrated 

18 animal feeding operation if the person— 

19 ‘‘(A) has an ownership interest in the live20 stock, land, or other capital of the concentrated 

21 animal feeding operation; 

22 ‘‘(B) exercises any control over the activi23 ties, operation (including specifying how the 

24 livestock of the concentrated animal feeding op25 eration is fed, grown, or medicated), or man26 agement (including waste management pracVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:36 Jul 27, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3844.IH H3844

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 3844 IH

1 tices) of a concentrated animal feeding oper2 ation; or 

3 ‘‘(C) meets any other criteria that the Ad4 ministrator determines appropriate.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
James R. LOWE, petitioner, v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCE.

No. 16-9534.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

*152Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1082 CA 14-00428**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

SHARELLE REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
RICHARD KELLY, BETTE KELLY AND MARK KELLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

ATHARI & ASSOCIATES, LLC, NEW HARTFORD (MO ATHARI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BOEGGEMAN, GEORGE & CORDE, P.C., ALBANY (PAUL A. HURLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (David A. Murad, J.), entered December 9, 2013. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for, inter alia, a protective order striking a certain report.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed with costs ( see Pagan v Rafter , 107 AD3d 1505, 1507).

Entered: November 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

MICHAEL REIVES, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 76 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Rafael Torres, Chief Financial Officer of PLX Technology, Inc.,certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form
10-Q of PLX Technology, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 4, 2004



/s/ Rafael Torres	  Rafael Torres
   Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

---
In Re DaRen Kareem GADSDEN, petitioner.

No. 17-6314.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2010346EN.01004003.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2010 — Farmeco v OHIM — Allergan (BOTUMAX)

(Case T-131/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark BOTUMAX - Earlier Community word and figurative marks BOTOX - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Damage to reputation - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 346/80

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Farmeco AE Dermokallyntika (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Lymperis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Allergan Inc. (Irvine, California, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 February 2009 (Case R 60/2008-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Allergan Inc. and Farmeco AE Dermokallyntika.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Farmeco AE Dermokallyntika to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Farmeco AE Dermokallyntika to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 6.6.2009.

1

---
OPENRISK, LLC, petitioner, v. MICROSTRATEGY SERVICES CORPORATION.

No. 17-1280.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied
Carol Johnene MORRIS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-7503.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
June 29, 1999



Mr. Dan Berkable
President
American Toxicology Institute, Inc.
3330 Sunrise Avenue, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

Re:  Memorandum of Understanding

Dear Mr. Berkable:

This memo confirms the agreement between Anonymous Data Corporation (ADC) and
American Toxicology Institute, Inc. (ATI).

1.   ATI is the sole contact and interface to the Las Vegas Family Courts for
  the "Beta Test" of ADCnet.
2.   Where ADC personnel are required on site at the Las Vegas Family Courts,
  they will be accompanied by an ATI representative.
3.   ADC will be responsible for all expenses for the Beta Test. This
  includes all required hardware at both the Las Vegas Family Court and the ATI
  Facility.
4.   At the end of the Beta Test, all data (database and manual hard copy
  files) derived from the Beta Test will belong to the Las Vegas Family Court.
5.   No material associated with this Beta Test will be distributed outside
  of the Las Vegas Family Court premises without the express permission of the
  Las Vegas Family Court.
6.   Software maintenance will be performed by ATI personnel.

Sincerely,

ANONYMOUS DATA CORPORATION              July ______, 1999
                                        Acknowledged, Agreed, Accepted
                                        & Approved
                                        ____________________________
James Beecha                            Authorized Signature
President                               American Toxicology Institute, Inc.
II-00392

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

richard riger <rsriger@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:43 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

richard riger

1029 nashville ave sw

Albuquerque, NM 87105
# C_2011269EN.01004602.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2011 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-81/09) (1)

1

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Operational programme falling within Objective No 1 (1994-1999), ‘Accessibility and Trunk roads’ in Greece - Delegation of auxiliary tasks by the Commission to third parties - Rate of financial correction - Commission discretion - Review by the courts)

2011/C 269/101

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: initially M. Tassopoulou, agent, assisted by C. Meïdanis and E. Lampadarios, lawyers, then P. Mylonopoulos and K. Boskovits, agents, assisted by G. Michailopoulos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and D. Triantafyllou, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 8573 of 15 December 2008 reducing the financial assistance of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) granted to Greece, amounting to EUR 30 104 470,47 in respect of the operational programme ‘Accessibility and Trunk Roads’ by Commission Decision C(94) 3579 of 16 December 1994, authorising financial assistance from the ERDF.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2008) 8573 of 15 December 2008 reducing the financial assistance of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) granted to Greece in so far as it provides, first, a correction amounting to EUR 506 303 in respect of the project ‘Isthmos — Galota’ and, second, a correction amounting to EUR 684 343 in respect of the project ‘Polymylos crossroads’ (contract 928)’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2008) 8573 of 15 December 2008 reducing the financial assistance of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) granted to Greece in so far as it provides, first, a correction amounting to EUR 506 303 in respect of the project ‘Isthmos — Galota’ and, second, a correction amounting to EUR 684 343 in respect of the project ‘Polymylos crossroads’ (contract 928)’;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs and 80 % of the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs and 80 % of the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to bear 20 % of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to bear 20 % of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 6.6.2009.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT AND CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.:


The audits referred to in our report dated January 28, 2003, included the
related financial statement schedule as of December 28, 2002, and for each of
the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 28, 2002, incorporated
in this Form 10-K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

We consent to the use of reports included herein or incorporated herein by
reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-79357, 333-79369, 333-79375,
333-79365, 333-80647, 333-69622, 333-60428, 333-73302, 333-100786) on Form S-8
of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. Our report on the consolidated financial
statements referred to the adoption of FASB No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets," as of December 30, 2001.

/s/ KPMG LLP


New York, New York
March 28, 2003
Suran WIJE, petitioner, v. David A. BURNS, et al.

No. 17-7586.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer andActing Chief Financial Officer of Bancorp International Group, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSBof the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Annual Report”)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| Date: June 20, 2006 |   |   |   | /S/THOMAS MEGAS                                          |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |   |   | Chief Executive  Officer  Acting Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Antonio M. RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. Cindy GRIFFITH, Warden.

No. 17-7577.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Kim Wade DILLON, petitioner, v. Dennis DAUGAARD, Governor of South Dakota, et al.

No. 17-7527.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 15(a).6**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-12958, 333-11288, No. 333-118619 and No. 333-123666; and Form F-3 No. 333-145834) of CDC Corporation (formerly chinadotcom corporation) of our report dated June 20, 2006 with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of CDC Corporation included in the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report (Form 20-F/A) of CDC Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young 

Hong Kong 

June 30, 2008