alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1 

SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS, INC. 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY 

Atlanta Motor Speedway, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company. 

Bristol Motor Speedway, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company. 

Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC a/k/a Lowe’s Motor Speedway at Charlotte (“LMS”), a North Carolina limited liability company.

600 Racing, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of LMS), a North Carolina corporation. 

INEX Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of LMS), a North Carolina corporation. 

Jim Russell Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation. 

Las Vegas Motor Speedway, LLC (“LVMS”), a Delaware limitedliability company. 

Nevada Speedway, LLC d/b/a Las Vegas Motor Speedway (a wholly owned subsidiary of LVMS), a Delaware limitedliability company. 

Speedway Funding, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of LVMS), a Delaware limited liability company. 

Oil-Chem Research Corporation (“OCRC”), an Illinois corporation. 

SMI Systems, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company. 

SMISC Holdings, Inc., a North Carolina corporation. 

SPR, LLC (“SPR”), a Delaware limited liability company. 

Speedway Motorsports International Limited (“SMIL”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of OCRC), a British Virgin Islands limited liability company. 

Speedway Properties Company, LLC (“SPC”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPR), a Delaware limited liability company. 

Speedway Media, LLC d/b/a Racing Country USA (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPC), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

Speedway Sonoma, LLC a/k/a Infineon Raceway (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPR), a Delaware limited liability company. 

Speedway Systems, LLC d/b/a SMI Properties (“SMIP”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPR), a North Carolina limited liability company.

Speedway TBA, LLC d/b/a North Carolina Speedway, a North Carolina limited liability company. 

Motorsports by Mail, LLC (a subsidiary of SMIP), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

TSI Management Company, LLC (“TSI”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SMIP), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

Trackside Holding Corporation (“THC”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SMIP), a North Carolina corporation. 

SMI Trackside, LLC (a subsidiary of THC), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

Visheraneft, Ltd. (a wholly owned subsidiary of SMIL), a Russian limited liability company. 

Vorga, Ltd. (a majority owned subsidiary of SMIL), a Russian limited liability company. 

Texas Motor Speedway, Inc., a Texas corporation.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7851
EARL THOMAS, III, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-01484) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 1, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Thomas, III, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Earl Thomas, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II-00674

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jane Engelsiepen <jane@viewstudio.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:40 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jane Engelsiepen

385 Toro Canyon Road

Carpinteria, CA 93013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,970
<SECURITIES>                                    31,429
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,678
<INVENTORY>                                      2,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,542
<PP&E>                                          28,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,293
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,414
<SALES>                                         18,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,614
<CGS>                                            5,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    85
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,124
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,918
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00131-CR

Bobby Soriano, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-04-205638, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Bobby Soriano seeks to appeal a judgment of conviction for possession of less than

one gram of cocaine. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115 (West 2003). The pro se

notice of appeal was filed ninety-three days after sentence was imposed. See Tex. R. App. P.

26.2(a)(1); see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918

S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). In addition, the trial court has certified that this is a

plea bargain case and Soriano has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
2

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: March 22, 2006

Do Not Publish
In Re Joseph WITCHARD, petitioner.

No. 17-8234.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 23, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Royrick MILLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7238.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2005 |  | /s/ Donald R. Walsh            
|                   |  | Donald R. Walsh                
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer        
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Catherine Dodson           
|                   |  | Catherine Dodson               
|                   |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer



31
II-00208

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Laura Simpson <laura. simpson24@yahoo.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 5:34 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Laura Simpson

Box 2926

McKinleyville, CA 95519
Exhibit 10.4


 


OFFICE SPACE AGREEMENT







This office space agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into and effective as of May 1, 2018 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Axelerex Corp, a Nevada corporation (“Axelerex”) and Mr. Vladimir Orekhovsky (“Mr. Orekhovsky).







In consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained in this Agreement the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:








	
1.

	
TERM












This Agreement shall be effective from the Effective Date to    (“Term”).  This Agreement shall automatically renew thereafter for one-year term, unless either party provides notice to the other of its intention not to renew at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the initial or then-effective renewal term.








	
2.

	
STATEMENT OF SPACE












During the Term, Mr. Orekhovsky shall provide Axelerex office space at the address 84 Couture Gardens, Thornhill, ON L4J 9H6 Canada







 


	
/s/ Vladimir Orekhovsky

	 



 


	
By:

	
Vladimir Orekhovsky


	
Title:

	
Treasurer


	
Date:

	
April 28, 2018
II-00923

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

kimberly johnson <kj ohnson3 @ltu. edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:02 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

kimberly johnson

2282 pheasant rtm

howell, MI 48843
Exhibit 21.1

GSI GROUP INC. SUBSIDIARIES



|                                                        |  |                       
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Subsidiary                                              |  | Place of Incorporation
|GSI Group Corporation                                   |  | Michigan              
|GSI Group Japan Corporation                             |  | Japan                 
|GSI Group Singapore Pte. Ltd.                           |  | Singapore             
|GSI Limited Holdings Corporation                        |  | New Brunswick, Canada 
|GSI Group GmbH                                          |  | Germany               
|GSI Limited Holdings II Corporation                     |  | New Brunswick, Canada 
|GSI Group Limited UK                                    |  | United Kingdom        
|GSI Lumonics SARL                                       |  | France                
|Westwind Air Bearings Limited UK                        |  | United Kingdom        
|GSI Group Precision Technologies (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.     |  | China                 
|General Scanning Securities Corporation                 |  | Massachusetts         
|MicroE Systems Corp.                                    |  | Delaware              
|MES International Inc.                                  |  | Delaware              
|GSI Lumonics Asia Pacific Ltd.                          |  | Hong Kong             
|Excel Technology, Inc.                                  |  | Delaware              
|Cambridge Technology, Inc.                              |  | Massachusetts         
|The Optical Corporation                                 |  | California            
|Control Laser Corporation (d/b/a Baublys Control Laser) |  | Florida               
|Synrad, Inc.                                            |  | Washington            
|Continuum Electro-Optics, Inc.                          |  | Delaware              
|Photo Research, Inc.                                    |  | Delaware              
|Quantronix Corporation                                  |  | Delaware              
|Excel Laser Technology                                  |  | India                 
|Excel Technology Asia Sdn. Bhd                          |  | Malaysia              
|Excel Technology Europe GmbH                            |  | Germany               
|Excel Technology Lanka (Pvt.) Ltd.                      |  | Sri Lanka             
|Excel Technology Japan Holding Co., Ltd.                |  | Japan                 
|D. (Green Electronics), Ltd.                            |  | United Kingdom        
|Excel Technology Italy Srl                              |  | Italy                 
|Baublys Control Laser GmbH                              |  | Germany               
|Excel Technology France S.A.S.                          |  | France                
|Excel Technology Japan K.K.                             |  | Japan
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-3802

___________________________

Don/McC Cook/Solo

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Jeffrey Stieve, Medical Director, Corrrect Care Solutions; Arkansas State Prison;

Aric Simmons, APN, Practitioner, Correct Care Solution; Brett Butler, Medical

Doctor, Correct Care Solution, a Tennessee Corporation

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff

____________

 Submitted: November 8, 2017 

Filed: November 14, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Arkansas prisoner Don/McC Cook/Solo (Solo) appeals the district court’s1

adverse grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. Jeffrey Stieve in this pro se 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful de novo review, see United States v. Dico, Inc.,

808 F.3d 342, 346 (8th Cir. 2015), we conclude that Solo demonstrated neither

deliberate indifference nor unconstitutional retaliation by Dr. Stieve. See Meuir v.

Greene Cty. Jail Emps., 487 F.3d 1115, 1118 (8th Cir. 2007) (prison physicians are

free to exercise independent medical judgment); Long v. Nix, 86 F.3d 761, 765 (8th

Cir. 1996) (prison officials do not violate Eighth Amendment when, in exercising

professional judgment, they refuse to implement inmate’s requested course of

treatment). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-
##### 



Exhibit 23.01

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Niku Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by
reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-31318, 333-44988, 333-50184, 333-54404, 333-56402, 333-69196,
333-85918, 333-90224, 333-90554, 333-102891 and 333-104860) on
Forms S-8 and S-3
of Niku Corporation of our report dated February 21, 2003,
except as to Note 12, which is as of June 2, 2003, Note 18,
which is as of May 13, 2003,
Note 3, which is as of May 23, 2003 and Note 10, which
is as of July 23, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Niku Corporation and
subsidiaries as of January 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
January 31, 2003, and the related schedule, which report appears
in the January 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10K of Niku Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
August 6, 2003
1120.

#### Thornton *v.*The State.

Conviction of manslaughter, from Bibb superior court — Judge Felton. March 28, 1908.

Submitted May 5,

Decided June 18, 1908.

*John R. Cooper,*for plaintiff in error, *William Brunson, solicitor-general,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

No error of law appears, and the verdict is fully warranted by the evidence. *Judgment affirmed.*