alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Semitool, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Larry A. Viano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Semitool, Inc. and will be retained by Semitool, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: December 10, 2004 |  | By: /s/Larry A. VianoLarry A. VianoVice President and Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 225 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that general 

appropriations for military construction and veterans’ affairs be considered as stand-alone measures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2009 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require that general appropriations for military construction and veterans’ affairs be considered as stand-alone 

measures. 

1 Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

3 following new clause: 

4 ‘‘Stand-alone requirement for military construction 

5 and veterans’ affairs appropriations 

6 ‘‘11. It shall not be in order to consider any bill or 

7 joint resolution, or conference report thereon, containing 

8 appropriations within the jurisdiction of the Subcommittee 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 225 IH 

1 on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related 

2 Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations if such 

3 measure also contains appropriations within the jurisdic4 tion of any other subcommittee of that committee. The 

5 preceding sentence shall not apply to any measure making 

6 supplemental appropriations or to any measure continuing 

7 appropriations for a period of not to exceed 60 days.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0069. WILLIAM J. HENDERSON v. THE STATE.

In 2000, William J. Henderson pled guilty to murder and other charges. The

Supreme Court later affirmed the trial court’s denial of his motion for out-of-time

appeal. Henderson v. State, 293 Ga. 6 (743 SE2d 19) (2013). Henderson has now

filed an application for discretionary appeal in this Court, seeking review of the trial

court’s denial of his motion in arrest of judgment. We lack jurisdiction.

Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over

“[a]ll cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be imposed.” Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty of death can be

imposed for the crime of murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court. See

OCGA § 17-10-30 (b); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012)

(Hunstein, C. J., concurring); see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524 (1) (322 SE2d

711) (1984) (directing this Court to transfer “all cases in which either a sentence of

death or of life imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of murder”).

Accordingly, Henderson’s application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme

Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/22/2016

September 22, 2016
In re David Andrew CHRISTENSON, petitioner.

No. 16-6278.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-4037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. CHUCK WILLIE BELLAMY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:05-cr-01036-TLW-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chuck Willie Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chuck Willie Bellamy appeals from the district court’s order granting the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion and reducing Bellamy’s term of imprisonment from 216 to 120 months. On appeal, Bellamy challenges the extent of the district court’s departure, which this court has no jurisdiction to consider on appeal, absent circumstances not here alleged.

See United States v. Hill , 70 F.3d 321, 324 (4th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we deny Bellamy’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), John Sharp, Principal Financial and Accounting Officerof Sequenom, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge: 

 

1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, to which this Certification is attached asExhibit 32 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report, and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual report. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in suchfiling. 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the undersigned has set hishand hereto as of the 30th day of March, 2007.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of International Commercial Television Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Kelvin  Claney,  President  and  Chief  Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.



                              /s/ Kelvin Claney
                              -------------------------------------
                              Kelvin Claney
                              President and Chief Executive Officer
                              March 27, 2003


<PAGE>
Saitta IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

EDWIN VON SEVRENCE, Appellant, No. 70033



# FILED
MAY 2 3 2016 vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. 

### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL CLETRRKAgFES-RIEUEMEO‘IURT BY 

### 5 , V

DEPUTY CLERK r This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a motion to be relieved as counsel, vacating an order granting a motion for appointment of counsel, and denying a motion for appointment of counsel. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Elliott A. Sattler, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, we lack jurisdiction. 

### Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'



# / 4A; Hardesty 

## PiadAdhp

Pickering

"In light of this order, we take no action on the pro se motion filed on May 6, 2016.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
( 0 ) 19(17A 1‘,-lia083cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge Edwin Von Sevrence Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
II-00423

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Lorimer <garcilon@gmx.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:12 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Lorimer

1411 Santa Rosa Avenue

Santa Barbara, CA 93109
Joseph Anthony DANIEL, petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General.

No. 15-9319.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - 10 CFR Part 72 
          - RIN 3150-AF94 

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document is necessary to correct three erroneous                         **Federal Register**                         citations appearing in a document published on February 26, 2001 (66 FR 11527).                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jayne McCausland, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, telephone 301-415-6219, e-mail: jmm@nrc.gov. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On page 11527, in the first column, in the                     **SUMMARY**                     paragraph, in the third line, “65” is corrected to read “64.”                 

On page 11527, in the first column, in the Background paragraph, in both the first and last lines of the paragraph, “64” is corrected to read “63”. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of June 2001. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Alzonia W. Shepard,

Acting Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration. 

[FR Doc. 01-15472 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 5.4

                                   RESOLUTION

                    AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL SHARES

Upon motion made and seconded, the Board of Directors of PowerSource Corporation
unanimously adopted the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the Corporation hereby authorizes, the issuance of two hundred
eighty-nine thousand seven hundred twenty-two shares (289,722) Rule 144 shares
with all restrictions removed to the following bond holders of the Company in
exchange of their bond into shares of common stock at a negotiated $0.18 per
share value.

Herbert Dornbush                        124,217 shares
Daniel S. Allen                         123,055 shares
Gordon Livingston                        12,181 shares
Malossian Family                         30,270 shares

The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and qualified
Secretary and the custodian of the books and records and seal of PowerSource, a
corporation duly formed pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada, and that
the foregoing is a true record of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of the
Board of Directors, and that said meeting was held in accordance with state law
and the Bylaws of PowerSource corporation on, and that said resolution is now in
full force and effect without modification or rescission.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have an executed my name as Secretary and have hereunto
affixed the corporate seal of the above-named Corporation this day of April 24,
2001.

A True Record.                               /s/ Roman Gordon
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Roman Gordon

                                             /s/ Illya Bond
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Illya Bond

/s/ signature                                /s/ E. Douglas Mitchell
-------------------------------              -----------------------------------
Secretary                                    E. Douglas Mitchell
Exhibit 23.1 - Consent Of Independent Auditors


                                              1205 - 1095 West Pender Street
                                              Vancouver, BC  Canada
                                              V6E 2M6
                                              Telephone       (604) 682-2778
                                              Facsimile       (604) 689-2778
                                              Email:       rjl@labonteco.com


June 20, 2002


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporate Finance
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


Re: 2U Online.com, Inc. - Form 10-KSB


Dear Sir or Madam:


        We hereby consent to the inclusion or incorporation by reference therein
of our Auditor's Report dated March 31, 2002 to the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of the Company with respect to the financial statements of the
Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 included in its
annual report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-
KSB.


Yours truly,

/s/ LaBonte & Co.
    ---------------------
    LABONTE & CO.
    Chartered Accountants
# C_2009282EN.01006203.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/62

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 2009 — Johnson & Johnson v OHIM — Simca (YourCare)

(Case T-25/09) (1)

1

2009/C 282/117

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
Robert BOLUS, et al., petitioners, v. FLEETWOOD RV, INC., et al.

No. 16-553.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

*641Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
II-00056

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

jeff asch <jeff]aml @lycos.com>

Wednesday, December 8, 2010 12:13 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

jeff asch

p.o. box 2332

portland, OR 97208
Exhibit 12.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Daniel Widdicombe, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of chinadotcomcorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRuler 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
     Date:July 7, 2004     /s/Daniel Widdicombe   Daniel Widdicombe Chief Financial Officer