alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010234EN.01005703.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/57

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 May 2010 — Maxwell v Commission

(Case F-55/09) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Secondment in the interests of the service - Leave on personal grounds - Accommodation and education expenses - Action for damages - Liability for a wrongful act - Unjust enrichment)

2010/C 234/105

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Allan Maxwell (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for compensation for the loss suffered by the applicant during his leave on personal grounds taken to perform the duties of ‘EU Senior Adviser’ at the Korean Peninsular Energy Development Organization, loss resulting from the failure to reimburse accommodation and education expenses.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses Mr Maxwell’s application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses Mr Maxwell’s application.

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 1.8.2009, p. 64.

1

---
Edward Shane SMALLWOOD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9179.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Marcus ROBINSON, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA; and Quintel Augustine, Tilmon Golphin, and Christina Walters, petitioners, v. North Carolina.

No. 15-1397.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.
Cortez MOULTRIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7241.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2009205EN.01005101.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/51

---

Action brought on 9 July 2009 — Saracco v ECB

(Case F-66/09)

2009/C 205/94

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Roberta Saracco (Arona, Italy) (represented by: F. Parrat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the ECB’s decision refusing to extend the applicant’s leave on personal grounds.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision to refuse to allow the applicant to take leave on personal grounds from 1 November 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision to refuse to allow the applicant to take leave on personal grounds from 1 November 2008;

| — | so far as necessary, annul the decisions refusing revision and rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

so far as necessary, annul the decisions refusing revision and rejecting the complaint;

| — | order the European Central Bank to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Central Bank to pay the costs.

---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Conversion
Services International, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2008, I, William
Hendry, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.




Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. Such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Conversion Services International,
Inc.




Dated:
March 30, 2009




/s/
      William HendryWilliam
      HendryChief
      Financial Officer
Dale Wayne BASHAW, petitioner, v. Daniel PARAMO, Warden.

No. 15-9581.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-01088

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Wendy Rosner <wendymae@runbox.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:21 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Wendy Rosner

46 E. Stewart Ave.

Lansdowne, PA 19050
Robert SNYDER, petitioner, v. Randy GROUNDS, Warden.

No. 16-665.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Vsevolod GARANIN, petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, et al.

No. 17-7105.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, et al., petitioners, v. Stephen MORRIS, et al.

No. 16-300.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
II-00036

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

james drury <birdnutt22@gmail.com>

Friday, December 10, 2010 1:02 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

james drury

9901 s. rte.n

columbia, MO 65203
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-1389; MM Docket No. 00-12; RM-9706] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        At the request of Great Casco Bay Wireless Talking Machine Limited Liability Company, this document substitutes Channel 298A for Channel 298C3 at West Rutland, Vermont, in order to permit Station WTHT, Lewiston, Maine, to improve its facilities.                         *See*65 FR 7518, published February 16, 2000. The reference coordinates for Channel 298A at West Rutland, Vermont, are 43-34-04 and 73-00-30.                     

# DATES:

Effective July 23, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2177. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's                     *Report and Order*                     in MM Docket No. 00-12, adopted June 6, 2001, and released June 8, 2001. The full text of this decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.                 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

      - Radio Broadcasting

Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: 

# PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 

1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, and 336. 

§ 73.202 

2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Vermont, is amended by removing Channel 298C3 at West Rutland and adding Channel 298A at West Rutland. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos,

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 01-15973 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# C_2010246EN.01001402.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-515/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/21/EC - Management of waste from extractive industries - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2010/C 246/23

Language of the case: Estonian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Marghelis and K. Saaremäel-Stoilov, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: L. Uibo, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 15)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC, the Republic of Estonia has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC, the Republic of Estonia has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 13.03.2010.

1

---
# C_2009282EN.01002502.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof’s-Gravenhage (Netherlands) lodged on 28 August 2009 — State of the Netherlands v Denkavit Nederland b.v. and Others

(Case C-346/09)

2009/C 282/44

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Gerechtshof’s-Gravenhage

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

| Applicant | : | State of the Netherlands |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Defendants | : | | Denkavit Nederland b.v., |

Applicant

:

State of the Netherlands

Defendants

:

Denkavit Nederland b.v.,

| | Arie Blok b.v., |
| --- | --- |

Arie Blok b.v.,

| | Cehave b.v., |
| --- | --- |

Cehave b.v.,

| | Demeter b.v. |
| --- | --- |

Demeter b.v.

Question referred

Question referred

Must Community law, and specifically Directive 90/425/EEC, (1) Decision 94/381/EC (2) and Decision 2000/766/EC, (3) be interpreted as meaning that any national prohibition, such as that laid down in Article 2 of the Tijdelijke regeling, which, with a view to affording protection against BSE, prohibits the production of and trading in processed animal proteins intended for feeding to farmed animals, is incompatible with those provisions if such a national prohibition

1

2

3

| — | entered into force on 15 December 2000 (and so before Decision 2000/766/EC) and |
| --- | --- |

—

entered into force on 15 December 2000 (and so before Decision 2000/766/EC) and

| — | also applied temporarily (until Decision 2001/9/EC (4) of 29 December 2000 entered into force) to fishmeal and dicalcium phosphate? |
| --- | --- |

—

also applied temporarily (until Decision 2001/9/EC (4) of 29 December 2000 entered into force) to fishmeal and dicalcium phosphate?

4

---

(1)  Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra- Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (OJ L 224, p. 29).

1

(2)  Commission Decision 94/381/EC of 27 June 1994 concerning certain protection measures with regard to bovine spongiform encephalopathy and the feeding of mammalian derived protein (OJ L 172, p. 23).

2

(3)  Council Decision 2000/766/EC of 4 December 2000 concerning certain protection measures with regard to transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and the feeding of animal protein (OJ L 306, p. 32).

3

(4)  Commission Decision 2001/9/EC of 29 December 2000 concerning control measures required for the implementation of Council Decision 2000/766/EC concerning certain protection measures with regard to transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and the feeding of animal protein (OJ 2001 L 2, p. 32).

4

---
EXHIBIT 4(iii)

ROSS MILLER
Secretary of State
204 North Carson Street, Ste 1
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299
(775) 684-5708
Website: secretaryofstate.biz

         AMENDMENT TO
  CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION
AFTER ISSUANCE OF CLASS OR SERIES
  (Pursuant to NRS 78.1955)

USE BLACK INK ONLY-DO NOT HIGHLIGHT         ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

             CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION
                         FOR NEVADA PROFIT CORPORATIONS
          (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.1955- AFTER ISSUANCE OF CLASS OR SERIES)

1.   NAME OF CORPORATION:

International Building Technologies Group, Inc.

2.   STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL PURSUANT TO STATUTE HAS BEEN OBTAINED.

3.   THE CLASS OR SERIES OF STOCK BEING AMENDED:

Preferred Series B Stock

4.   BY A  RESOLUTION  ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF  DIRECTORS,  THE  CERTIFICATE  OF
     DESIGNATION IS BEING AMENDED AS FOLLOWS OR THE NEW CLASS OR SERIES IS:

The total  authorized  Preferred  Series B stock is being amended from 3,000,000
shares to 490,000 shares. The new total authorized  Preferred B stock is 490,000
shares.

5.   EFFECTIVE DATE OF FILING (OPTIONAL):

6.   OFFICER SIGNATURE (REQUIRED): X /s/ Kenneth Yeung

FILING FEE: $175.00
IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper
fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Proposed Rule on Customer Clearing 

Documentation and Timing of Acceptance for Clearing 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) is proposing rules concerning the documentation 

between a customer and a futures commission merchant (FCM) that clears on behalf of the customer, and the 

timing of acceptance or rejection of trades for clearing by DCOs and clearing members. 

Proposed Customer Clearing Documentation Rules 

The proposed regulations would prevent certain Commission registrants (FCMs, swap dealers, and major swap 

participants) from entering into an arrangement with their customers that would disclose the identity of a 

customer’s original executing counterparty. The proposed rule also would prevent these Commission registrants 

from (1) limiting the number of counterparties with whom a customer may enter into a trade; (2) restricting the size 

of the position a customer may take with any individual counterparty, apart from an overall credit limit for all 

positions held by the customer; (3) impairing a customer’s access to execution of a trade on terms that have a 

reasonable relationship to the best terms available; and (4) preventing compliance with specified time frames for 

acceptance of trades into clearing. 

Proposed Time Frames for Acceptance into Clearing Rules 

The proposed regulations would require a clearing member, or the derivatives clearing organization acting on its 

behalf, to accept or reject each trade submitted for clearing as quickly as would be technologically practicable if fully 

automated systems were used. The proposed standard would require action in a matter of milliseconds or seconds 

or, at most, a few minutes, not hours or days. However, the proposed rules would accommodate trade processing 

with manual steps provided that the process could operate within the same time frame as automated systems. 

The proposal would also permit DCOs to screen trades against applicable product and credit criteria before 

accepting or rejecting them, provided that such criteria do not discriminate with respect to trading venues and 

clearing participants.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
Bruce MINGO, petitioner, v. Rick RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-6494.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
DISMISS; Opinion Filed September 16, 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 13 - 01254 - CV No. 05 - 13 - 01255 - CV No. 05 - 13 - 01256 - CV No. 05 - 13 - 01257 - CV IN RE TROY LEE PERKINS , Relator Original Proceeding from the 282nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F07 - 00645 - S, F07 - 71769 - S, F07 - 71970 - S, F07 - 71990 - S 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lewis Opinion by J ustice Moseley Before the Court is relator = s petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to order the trial court to allow him to appeal his criminal conviction. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court does not have jurisdiction over relator = s petition. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . Art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2010); In re Vasquez , No. 04

- 12

- 00314

- CR, 2012 WL 2125956, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio June 13, 2012, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator = s petition for a writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

131254F.P05 /Jim Moseley/ JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE