alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-38022 and 333-50500)
of Amedia Networks, Inc and Subsidiaries ("Amedia") of our report dated March 4,
2005 (except for Note 13C and Note 13D, which is dated March 30, 2005) relating
to the financial statements which appear in Amedia's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004


/s/ Marcum & Kliegman, LLP

New York, New York
March 30, 2005


                                                                              58
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

           I, Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc., as amended;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. and I have done the following:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. is made known
     to us by others within Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc., particularly
     during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc.'s
     disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
     filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc.'s auditors and the audit committee of Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc.'s board of directors (or persons performing similar functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect Fortune Diversified Industries,
     Inc.'s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
     have identified for Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc.'s auditors any
     material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in Fortune Diversified Industries,
     Inc.'s internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


11/29/04                    /s/ Carter M. Fortune
Date                       ------------------------------------------
                           Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer
# C_2012295EN.01000201.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 July 2012 — Council of the European Union v Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd, European Commission, Association des utilisateurs et distributeurs de l’agrochimie européenne (Audace)

(Case C-337/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Commercial policy - Dumping - Imports of glyphosate originating in China - Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Article 2(7)(b) and (c) - Status of an undertaking operating under market economy conditions - Concept of ‘significant State interference’ within the meaning of the first indent of Article 2(7)(c) - State shareholder controlling de facto the general meeting of the producer’s shareholders - Equating such control to ‘significant interference’ - Assessment of an export contract stamping mechanism - Limits of judicial review - Assessment of the evidence submitted)

2012/C 295/02

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, and by G. Berrisch, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd (represented initially by D. Horovitz, avocat, and subsequently by F. Graafsma, J. Cornelis and A. Woolich, advocaten, K. Adamantopoulos, dikigoros, and D. Moulis, Barrister), European Commission (represented by: T. Scharf, N. Khan and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents), Association des utilisateurs et distributeurs de l’agrochimie européenne (Audace) (represented by: J. Flynn QC)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of 17 June 2009 of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) in Case T-498/04 Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group v Council [2009] ECR II-1969, annulling, in so far as it concerns Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd., Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1683/2004 of 24 September 2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of glyphosate originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2004 L 303, p. 1) — Interpretation of Article 2(7)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 1996 L 56, p. 1) — Market economy treatment

Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group

Council

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G.
Day, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Dated: August 22, 2005

                                                     /s/ John G. Day
                                                     ---------------
                                                     John G. Day
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
# C_2010288EN.01001701.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/17

---

Order of the Court of 30 June 2010 — Royal Appliance International GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH

(Case C-448/09 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Earlier mark ‘sensixx’ - Word mark ‘Centrixx’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Application for revocation of an earlier mark - Proceedings pending before the national courts - Request for a stay of the proceedings before the General Court)

(2010/C 288/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Royal Appliance International GmbH (represented by: K.-J. Michaeli and M. Schork, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, acting as Agent), BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgerate GmbH (represented by: S. Biagosch, Rechtsanwalt)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 15 September 2009 in Case T-446/09 Royal Appliance International v OHIM — BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 October 2007, rejecting the registration of the word mark ‘Centrixx’ as a Community trade mark for certain goods in Class 7, by granting the opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ‘sensixx’ — Failure to stay the proceedings while awaiting the resolution of the dispute pending before the national courts concerning the application for revocation of the earlier mark — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Likelihood of confusion between two marks

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Royal Appliance International GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Royal Appliance International GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

---
# C_2009267EN.01005101.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/51

---

Action brought on 22 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Malta

(Case C-376/09)

2009/C 267/85

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro, E. Depasquale, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Malta

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by not decommissioning non-critical uses of halons in fire protection systems and fire extinguishers on ships and by not recovering these halons, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(4)(v) and 16 of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not decommissioning non-critical uses of halons in fire protection systems and fire extinguishers on ships and by not recovering these halons, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(4)(v) and 16 of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer;

1

| — | order Republic of Malta to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Republic of Malta to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

It follows from the provisions of Articles 4(4)(v) and 16 of the Regulation, read in conjunction with the provisions of Article 2 of the Act of Accession, that the Republic of Malta was required to decommission fire protection systems and fire extinguishers containing halons before 1 May 2004, with the exception of the critical uses listed in Annex VII to the regulation, and to recover these halons by appropriate technologies.

In the absence of any information to the effect that that the Republic of Malta has decommissioned non-critical uses of halons in fire protection systems and file extinguishers on all the ships listed in the form attached to its reply to the letter of formal notice and has recovered these halons, the Commission concludes that the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(4)(v) and 16 of the regulation.

---

(1)  OJ L 244, p. 1

1

---
II-00444

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Duke Briscoe <db88@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:44 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Duke Briscoe

16 Orvis Rd

Arlington, MA 2474
II-00533

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

JAMES RATHBUN <ADJMRA18@COX.NET>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:25 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

JAMES RATHBUN

5228 DOE AVE

LAS VEGAS, NV 89146
II-01159

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

adam milgram <JAMILGRAM@AOL.COM>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:45 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

adam milgram

49 EDWARDS AVE

SAUALITO, CA 94965
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,525-01

EX P ARTE JES SICA RENEA RIOS, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1143421-A IN THE 185 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of the offense of possession of methampheta mine and sente nced to 90 da y s. On May 15, 2014, an order desig nating issues was signe d by the trial court. On Oct. 9. 2019 observing that no further order s had been rec eived within the time allotted by Tex. R. App. P. Rule 73.4, the district cler

k corr ectly forwa

rded the application to this Court. Howeve r, the rec ord befor e this Court indicates that the desig nated issue has still not been resolved. Fur ther, Applicant uses the phrase , “collate ral conseque nces,” but she has not identified any collater al conseque nces resultingfrom this conviction. We rema nd this application to the 185 District Court of Ha rr i s C o unty to t h allow the trial judge to complete an evident i ar y i n v es tiga tion and enter finding s of fac t and conclusions of law

. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 9 0 d ay s o f this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. A ny extensions of ti me must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court. Filed: November

20, 2019 Do not publish
Sriram RAJASEKARAN, et al., petitioners, v. Mark HAZUDA, Director, Nebraska Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.

No. 16-146.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Cyrus F. SARVESTANEY, petitioner, v. Lisa Arlene SARVESTANEY

No. 16-5742.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
II-00562

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

ronnie mitchell <ronniemitchelll @comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:45 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

ronnie mitchell

401 w. champion st.

Bellingham, WA 98225