alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00784

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Patricia Huntington <celestinaspirit@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:23 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Patricia Huntington

9902 Crystal Ct. #107

Laredo, TX 78045
Exhibit 32

                           MOTORSPORTS EMPORIUM, INC.
                              A Nevada Corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of MotorSports Emporium, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David W. Keaveney, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: March 16, 2006                      /s/  David W. Keaveney
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  David W. Keaveney
                                      Its: President and Chief Executive Officer
William D. MITCHELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6307.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Marco M. TORRES, petitioner, v. UNKNOWN PARTY.

No. 15-9136.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIEDPUBLIC ACCOUNTANT**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on FormS-8 (No. 333-119630) pertaining to the First Community Corporation / DutchForkBancshares, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated March 11, 2005, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of First Community Corporationand Subsidiary which is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB AmendmentNo. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 
| /s/ Clifton D. Bodiford, CPA |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Clifton D. Bodiford, CPA     |   |

 

 

Columbia, SouthCarolinaMarch 28, 2005

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RODNEY DERRICKSON,

Petitioner

v.

CO STRAZISER, ET AL.,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 150 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4034

_____________________________
L EONARD A YERS I II
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Robert E. Long , Judge

. October 16, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , B ILBREY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee; and Leonard Ayers III, pro se
, for Appellant.

Ashle y Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          98,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  565,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (148,558)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      49,269,619
<DEPRECIATION>                            (25,705,025)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,272,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,231,886
<BONDS>                                     50,079,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (14,038,816)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,272,470
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,622,039
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,071,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,894,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,549,194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,549,194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,549,194)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.80)
        

</TABLE>
Chernard CARTER, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 16-6565.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 162 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 162

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means 
                 in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2009

     Mr. Rangel (for himself and Mr. Camp) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means 
                 in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $20,789,331.46 for the One Hundred 
Eleventh Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $10,141,137.30 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2009, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2010; and
            (2) not more than $10,648,194.16 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2010, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2011.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William Whittle, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of General Gold Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of General Gold Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:
5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2004

/s/ William WhittleWilliam Whittle
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
II-00395

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ruth Boice <rlboice2@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:38 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ruth Boice

162 Willow Grove Rd.

Shamong, NJ 08088
Maurice HUNT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2011080EN.01000501.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent — Belgium) — Vandoorne NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-489/09) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Articles 11.C(1) and 27(1) and (5) - Taxable amount - Simplification measures - Manufactured tobacco - Tax labels - Single charge of VAT at source - Intermediate supplier - Total or partial non-payment of the price - Refusal to refund VAT)

2011/C 80/07

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vandoorne NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hof van Beroep te Gent — Interpretation of Articles 11.C(1) and 27 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Simplification measures — National legislation providing for VAT to be charged at source in the case of manufactured tobacco imported, acquired or produced within the country, precluding a reduction in the basis of assessment for taxpayers who have paid tax on those products

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 11.C(1) and 27(1) and (5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 2004/7/EC of 20 January 2004, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, by providing, for the purposes of simplifying the procedure for charging value added tax and of combating tax evasion or avoidance in regard to manufactured tobacco, for the levying of that tax by means of tax labels, in a single charge and at source, from the manufacturer or importer of those products, excludes intermediate suppliers operating at a subsequent stage in the supply chain from the right to obtain reimbursement of value added tax in the event of non-payment by the purchaser of the price for those products.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.02.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 12
  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
($ in millions)
 Fiscal Year2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Net income before taxes and minority interest
    
    $
    334
    
    
    $
    803
    
    
    $
    740
    
    
    $
    772
    
    
    $
    745Undistributed (income) loss from equity
investments
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest
    
    
    356
    
    
    
    343
    
    
    
    331
    
    
    
    288
    
    
    
    261Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    689
    
    
    $
    1,146
    
    
    $
    1,073
    
    
    $
    1,060
    
    
    $
    1,005Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    316
    
    
    $
    305
    
    
    $
    298
    
    
    $
    258
    
    
    $
    236Capitalized interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    40
    
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    33
    
    
    
    30
    
    
    
    25Total fixed charges
    
    $
    356
    
    
    $
    343
    
    
    $
    331
    
    
    $
    288
    
    
    $
    261Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.94
    
    
    
    3.34
    
    
    
    3.24
    
    
    
    3.68
    
    
    
    3.85
# C_2009141EN.01002203.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia (Spain) lodged on 19 March 2009 — Pedro Manuel Roca Álvarez v Sesa Start España ETT SA

(Case C-104/09)

2009/C 141/40

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pedro Manuel Roca Álvarez

Applicant:

Defendant: Sesa Start España ETT SA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does a national law (specifically, Article 37.4 of the Workers’ Statute) which recognises only employed mothers, but not employed fathers, as holders of the right to paid leave in respect of the feeding of an unweaned child, — leave which consists of a half-hour reduction in the working day or an hour taken off from work that may be divided into two parts, which is voluntary, paid for by the employer and may be taken until the child is nine months old —, infringe the principle of equal treatment, which prohibits discrimination on grounds of sex, and is recognised in Article 13 of the Treaty, in Council Directive 76/207/EEC (1) of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions, and in Directive 2002/73 (2) amending that Directive?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1976 L 39, p. 40.

1

(2)  OJ 2002 L 269, p. 15.

2

---
No. 12, Original.

#### United States *v.*California.

The order of February 12, 1949, appointing William H. Davis, Esquire, of New York City, Special Master herein'is continued and he is directed to proceed with all convenient speed, with .respect to the seven coastal segments enumerated in Groups I and II of the Master’s Report, to consider: (1) a simplification of the issues; (2) statements of the issues and’amendments thereto in the nature of pleadings; (3) the nature and form of evidence proposed. to be submitted, including admission of facts and of documents which will avoid unnecessary proof; and report thereon to the Court.

*953Should the office of Master become vacant during the recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.

Mr. Justice Jackson took np part in the consideration or decision of this question.
II-00356

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dana Reay <danar 100@msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:26 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dana Reay

515 West 300 South

Orem, UT 84058
Garron T. BRIGGS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9685.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
FINAL CALL, INC., petitioner, v. Jesus MUHAMMAD-ALI.

No. 16-647.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Shawn Michael TOLBERT, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 16-6791.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.