alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 247 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1741 

[Report No. 111–664] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 101) making 

further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2011, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2010 

Mr. POLIS of Colorado, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

101) making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2011, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the joint reso3 lution (H.J. Res. 101) making further continuing appro4 priations for fiscal year 2011, and for other purposes. All 

5 points of order against consideration of the joint resolu6 tion are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 

7 of rule XXI. The joint resolution shall be considered as 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1741 RH 

1 read. All points of order against provisions in the joint 

2 resolution are waived. The previous question shall be con3 sidered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage 

4 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

5 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

6 minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; 

7 and (2) one motion to recommit. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 247 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1741 

[Report No. 111–664] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

purposes. propriations for fiscal year 2011, and for other (H.J. Res. 101) making further continuing apNOVEMBER 30, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1586 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1586

   Expressing support for designation of the first week of August as 
                   ``National Family Business Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2010

 Mr. Altmire submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing support for designation of the first week of August as 
                   ``National Family Business Week''.

Whereas many of the Founding Fathers, including Benjamin Franklin, Alexander 
        Hamilton, and John Hancock were family businessmen;
Whereas family enterprises create jobs and pass on the entrepreneurial spirit 
        from generation to generation;
Whereas the Family Business Chamber of Commerce is a newly launched national 
        professional association committed to the common good of family 
        businesses;
Whereas the goal of the Family Business Chamber of Commerce is to support and 
        promote family firms nationwide in providing information, education, 
        business services, and networking opportunities designed to meet the 
        unique needs of family businesses;
Whereas the mission of the Family Business Chamber of Commerce is to promote 
        entrepreneurial excellence, economic advancement, quality of life for 
        families in business, and the retention and development of new jobs in 
        the United States; and
Whereas the first week of August would be an appropriate week to designate as 
        ``National Family Business Week'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of ``National Family Business Week''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3645 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3645

 To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide that individuals in 
prison shall, for the purposes of a decennial census, be attributed to 
    the last place of residence before incarceration, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2019

 Mr. Clay (for himself, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Norton, Mr. Pocan, 
  Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. Rush, 
Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Pascrell, Ms. Pressley, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Carson of 
   Indiana, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Danny K. Davis of 
Illinois, Ms. Moore, Ms. Johnson of Texas, and Mr. Johnson of Georgia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide that individuals in 
prison shall, for the purposes of a decennial census, be attributed to 
    the last place of residence before incarceration, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Correct the Census Count Act''.

SEC. 2. RESIDENCE OF INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
    ``(g)(1) Effective beginning with the 2030 decennial census of 
population, in taking any tabulation of total population by States 
under subsection (a) or (c), the Secretary shall, with respect to an 
individual incarcerated in a State or Federal correctional center as of 
the date on which such census is taken, attribute such individual to 
such individual's last place of residence before incarceration.
    ``(2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall consult 
with each State department of corrections and the Bureau of Prisons to 
collect the information necessary to make the determination required 
under paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

129053 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver & (62) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, TERRA ENERGY, LTD., Justices Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,

v SC: 129053 COA: 254159 Antrim CC: 99-007582-CK WHITE PINE ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., and STAR ENERGY, INC., Defendants-Counter Plaintiffs-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
11-01122

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

henry goodliffe <henrygoodliffe@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:06 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

henry goodliffe

601 Eighth Avenue

Langdon, ND 58249
# C_2011139EN.01001701.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Visti Beheer v OHIM — Meister (GOLD MEISTER)

(Case T-372/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark GOLD MEISTER - Earlier national and Community trade marks MEISTER - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 139/32

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Visti Beheer BV (Helmond, The Netherlands) (represented by: A. Herbetz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Meister & Co. AG (Wollerau, Switzerland) (represented by: V. Knies, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 June 2009 (Case R 1465/2008-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Meister & Co. AG and Visti Beheer BV

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Visti Beheer BV to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Visti Beheer BV to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by OHIM;

| 3. | Orders Meister & Co. AG to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Meister & Co. AG to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.

1

---
Eric N. DRAPER, petitioner, v. Mike WHORTON.

No. 16-6515.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     See accompanying notes.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                                          365491
<SECURITIES>                                    498316
<RECEIVABLES>                                   767879
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (20191)
<INVENTORY>                                     292171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2024758
<PP&E>                                           88344
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (56108)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2069321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1046059
<BONDS>                                         200000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           809
<OTHER-SE>                                      822453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2069321
<SALES>                                        1570165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1570165
<CGS>                                          1089327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1089327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                539437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (73014)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (73014)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (73014)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (73014)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
II-00694

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Howard Miller <hbmiller@mindspring.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:22 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Howard Miller

8004 Bennington Drive

Knoxville, TN 37909
Alvin FULTON, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 16-6624.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department denied.
Quincy Martez TERRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7031.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-00581

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Betty Ford <bfordx2@verizon.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:06 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Betty Ford

12603 Dawnridge Ct.

Midlothian, VA 23114
csfl-ex47_8.htm



 

Exhibit 4.7

 

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

TO

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF

CENTERSTATE BANK CORPORATION

 

 

Pursuant to Sections 607.1003 and 1006, Florida Statues, the Articles of Incorporation of CenterState Bank Corporation are hereby amended as follows:

 

FIRST:  Section A(1) of Article IV of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended by deleting the text thereof in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:


	
 
	
(1)
	
Common Stock.  The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock (referred to in these    Articles of Incorporation as “Common Stock”) which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 200,000,000 with a par value of $0.01 per share.




 

The foregoing amendment was approved by the holders of Common Stock of the Corporation, being the sole voting group entitled to vote on the amendment, on April 26, 2018 and the number of votes cast for the amendment by such shareholders was sufficient for approval.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused these Articles of Amendment to Articles

of Incorporation to be executed and attested to by its duly authorized officer as of this 26th day of April 2018. 

 


	
 
	
CENTERSTATE BANK CORPORATION

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ John C. Corbett

	
 
	
 
	
John C. Corbett

	
 
	
 
	
President and Chief Executive Officer

	
 
	
 
	
 




                                     

 

 

 

 

 



 

STATE OF FLORIDA

COUNTY OF POLK

 

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 26th day of April, 2018 by John C. Corbett, President and Chief Executive Officer of CenterState Bank Corporation, a Florida corporation on behalf of the corporation.

 

 


		
	
/s/ Jill P. Osborne

	
Printed  Name:
	
Jill P. Osborne

	
Notary Public, State of Florida

	
 
	
 




 

 

 

Personally Known X or Produced Identification __

 

Type of Identification Produced ______________________________________________
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 26, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137064 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. _________________________________________ Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

In re SKYLER LEROY MCBRIDE, ALEXANDER 

GARAND MCBRIDE, and SAWYER DALE

MCBRIDE, Minors. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 137064 

 COA: 282243 

Bay CC Family Division:

06-009381-NA 

SUSAN MCBRIDE, 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

RONALD D. MCBRIDE, JR.,

Respondent. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 15, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0822 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 26, 2008 

 Clerk
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 24 53

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v. Ro be rt S ta nf

or d J oh ns on ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe llan t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof I owa- Des M oi ne s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Nov em

be r 27 , 20 13 Fi le d: Decem

be r 5, 2 01 3 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, BOW MAN, an d GRUENDER, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Ro be rt Jo hn so n ap pe al s th e se nt en ce im po se d by th e Dis tri ct Co ur t aft er he 1 pl ead ed gu il ty to a drug of fen se . On ap p e a l , J oh ns on ’s co un se l ha s m ov ed to

The Hon or ab le James E. Grit zn er, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co urt 1 fo r th e So ut he rnDis tri ctof I owa .wit hd raw an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r And ers v. Cal ifo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) ,

arg ui ng th atth e se nt en ce i s s ub st an ti ve ly unr eas on ab le

. Upo n care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at Jo hn so n’s w i t h in -Gu id el in es -ran ge se nt en ce is no t subs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le

. See Uni te d St at es v. Feem st er, 57 2 F.3 d 45 5, 46 1 ( 8t h Ci r. 20 09 ) (en ba nc ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w); Gall v. Uni te d St at es , 55 2 U.S. 38 , 51 (2 00 7) (n ot in g th at if a se nt en ce i s w it hi n th e pr op erl y cal cu la te d Gui de li ne s ran ge , a n ap pe ll at e co ur t m ay ap pl y a pr es um pt io n o f reas on ab le ne ss to th e se nt en ce). Fu rth er, ha vi ng in de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd in acco rd an ce wit h Pen so n v. Ohi o, 48 8 U.S. 75 , 80 (1 98 8) , we fin d no no nf riv ol ou s is su es . The refo re, we gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw, an d we a ffi rm .

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-