alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 16 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 16

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 29, 2009.
Whereas life insurance is an essential part of a sound financial plan;
Whereas life insurance provides financial security for families by helping 
        surviving members meet immediate and long-term financial obligations and 
        objectives in the event of a premature death in their family;
Whereas approximately 68,000,000 United States citizens lack the adequate level 
        of life insurance coverage needed to ensure a secure financial future 
        for their loved ones;
Whereas life insurance products protect against the uncertainties of life by 
        enabling individuals and families to manage the financial risks of 
        premature death, disability, and long-term care;
Whereas individuals, families, and businesses can benefit from professional 
        insurance and financial planning advice, including an assessment of 
        their life insurance needs; and
Whereas numerous groups supporting life insurance have designated September 2009 
        as ``National Life Insurance Awareness Month'' as a means to encourage 
        consumers to--

    (1) become more aware of their life insurance needs;

    (2) seek professional advice regarding life insurance; and

    (3) take the actions necessary to achieve financial security for their 
loved ones: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of ``National Life Insurance 
        Awareness Month''; and
            (2) calls on the Federal Government, States, localities, schools, 
        nonprofit organizations, businesses, and the citizens of the United 
        States to observe the month with appropriate programs and activities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 6 
<CIK> 0000744822
<NAME> Fidelity Investment Trust
<SERIES>
 <NUMBER> 181
 <NAME> Fidelity France Fund
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 year          
 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             oct-31-1997   
 
<PERIOD-END>                  oct-31-1997   
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>         4,959         
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>        5,412         
 
<RECEIVABLES>                 222           
 
<ASSETS-OTHER>                0             
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>          0             
 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                5,634         
 
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>      6             
 
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>       0             
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>     50            
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>           56            
 
<SENIOR-EQUITY>               0             
 
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>      4,368         
 
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>         420           
 
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>         453           
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>     23            
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>        0             
 
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>       744           
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>      0             
 
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>      443           
 
<NET-ASSETS>                  5,578         
 
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>             158           
 
<INTEREST-INCOME>             39            
 
<OTHER-INCOME>                (23)          
 
<EXPENSES-NET>                125           
 
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>       49            
 
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>      753           
 
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     21            
 
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         823           
 
<EQUALIZATION>                0             
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>     70            
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>      266           
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>         0             
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>       411           
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>   473           
 
<SHARES-REINVESTED>           29            
 
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        37            
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>       88            
 
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>     415           
 
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>       0             
 
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>    0             
 
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>         47            
 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0             
 
<GROSS-EXPENSE>               226           
 
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>          6,251         
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>         12.240        
 
<PER-SHARE-NII>               .100          
 
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>       1.660         
 
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>          .160          
 
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>     .610          
 
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>          0             
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>           13.270        
 
<EXPENSE-RATIO>               200           
 
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>        0             
 
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>          0
Raymond CLAUDIO, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-6523.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Johnathan Lee Wood, Appellant

No. 06-18-00194-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1323123). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Johnathan Lee Wood, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 12, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
II-O0171

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Maureen O’Connor <mauj skt@hotmail.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 2:51 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Maureen O’Connor

305 Dutton Street

Lowell, MA 01854
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors

Fulton Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries

McConnellsburg, Pennsylvania

 

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of FultonBancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005 and the relatedcondensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for thethree and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and condensedconsolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005and 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the corporation’smanagement.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interimfinancial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures tofinancial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial andaccounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conductedin accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding theconsolidated financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do notexpress such an opinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modificationsthat should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements forthem to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in theUnited States of America.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards ofthe Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidatedbalance sheet of Fulton Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes instockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presentedherein); and in our report dated March 2, 2005 (except for notes 14 and 15, asto which the date is March 29, 2005), we expressed an unqualified opinion on thosefinancial statements.  In our opinion,the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balancesheet as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, inrelation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

 
|                       |                                    | /s/ Smith  Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                       | SMITH ELLIOTT KEARNS & COMPANY, LLC |
|                       |                                    |
|                       |                                    |
| Chambersburg, Pennsylvania |                                    |
| August 2, 2005             |                                    |

 

----
Miguel RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6018.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# C_2009256EN.01000702.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/7

---

Action brought on 22 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-280/09)

2009/C 256/13

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by P. Oliver and G. Braga da Cruz, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | a declaration that, by failing to adopt the national measures required for the application of Articles 10 and 12 of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors, by failing to communicate them in accordance with Article 16 of that act and by failing to adopt the national measures required for the application of Articles 26(3) and 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 (2) of 22 December 2004 laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Community and third countries in drug precursors, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Regulations (EC) No 273/2004 and (EC) No 111/2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

a declaration that, by failing to adopt the national measures required for the application of Articles 10 and 12 of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors, by failing to communicate them in accordance with Article 16 of that act and by failing to adopt the national measures required for the application of Articles 26(3) and 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 (2) of 22 December 2004 laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Community and third countries in drug precursors, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Regulations (EC) No 273/2004 and (EC) No 111/2005;

1

2

| — | an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Regulation No 273/2004 entered into force on 18 August 2005 and Regulation No 111/2005 entered into force on 15 February 2005, being applicable from 18 August 2005.

Not having received any communication at all of any measures taken by the Portuguese Republic to give effect to the abovementioned provisions of those two regulations, and not being in possession of any other information that might allow it to conclude that the necessary measures have been adopted, the Commission supposes that the Portuguese Republic has not yet adopted those measures and so has not fulfilled its obligations under those regulations.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 47, p. 1

1

(2)  OJ 2005 L 22, p. 1

2

---
# C_2011038EN.01001203.xml

| 5.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Council v Stols

(Case T-175/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Public service - Promotion - Comparative examination of the merits - Manifest error of assessment - Distortion of the evidence)

2011/C 38/20

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and G. Kimberley, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Willem Stols (Halsteren, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 February 2009 F-51/08 Stols v Council [2009] ECR II-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Stols

Council

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 February 2009 in Case F-51/08 Stols v Council [2009] ECR II-0000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 February 2009 in Case F-51/08 Stols v Council [2009] ECR II-0000;

| 2. | Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 167,18.7.2009.

1

---
Herschel BYRD, petitioner, v. Gregory McLAUGHLIN, Warden.

No. 15-9478.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
II-00820

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ira Ballen <iballen@sprynet.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:05 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ira Ballen

166 east 96 st

new york, NY 10128
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **4 -**  **7589**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. NORMAN L. TALLEY, a/k/a Storm , Defendant

- Appell ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington
. Robert C. Chambers , Chief District Judge. ( 3 : 10

- cr - 000 38

- 1 ; 3 :1 3

- cv - 0 1754 )

Submitted : March 17 , 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Norman L. Talley , Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Steven Loew , Assistant United States Attorney s , Charleston, West Virginia; Joseph Franklin Ada ms , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Huntington, West Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Norman L. Talley seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and its subsequent order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion . The order s ar e not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that t he motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Talley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealab ility and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit



Exhibit (10)NN





AMENDMENT
to the
Target Corporation SPP III (2014 Plan Statement)
Pursuant to the retained power of amendment contained in Section 7.2 of the Target Corporation SPP III (2014 Plan Statement) (the “Plan”) and the authority delegated to the undersigned by the November 10, 2010 resolution of the Board of Directors of Target Corporation, the undersigned hereby amends the Plan in the manner described below.
The Plan, which was frozen to new participants as of November 8, 2000 and currently has no participants eligible to receive benefits from the Plan, is formally terminated effective January 1, 2016.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has adopted this Amendment effective as of April 3, 2016.    
        
	
		
	



Dated:    3/24/2016            
	TARGET CORPORATION


By:  /s/ Stephanie Lundquist         
        Stephanie Lundquist
        EVP & Chief HR Officer
II-00029

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jan Foust <jwf267@yahoo.com>

Sunday, December 12, 2010 4:37 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: For the continued existence of the decent earning part of the USA public, we

plead with you to not let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like "commercial risk" to keep

banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business conduct requirements.

Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument would open the door for

exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies. That is the opposite of what is needed. Please save us.

Thank you.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose, and plenty of damage. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address

not only manipulation, but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

Thank you.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Please, please say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency

derivatives from the clearing and transparency requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. Keep the Dodd-Frank Act as strong as it

is, and save our economy from more destruction. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this

number may increase to over $10 trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Please decrease the risk. Thank you.

Jan Foust

2002 Cromwell Br Rd

Parkville, MD 21234