alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15868]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (01-081)]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC, Sun-Earth Connection Advisory Subcommittee

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space 
Science Advisory Committee, Sun-Earth Connection Advisory Subcommittee.

DATES: Monday, July 23, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.; Tuesday, July 24, 
2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Conference 
Room 6H46, 300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC, 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. George L. Withbroe, Code S, 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 
202/358-2150.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:

--State of the Sun-Earth Connection Theme
--Geospace Management Operations Working Group
--Living With a Star Science Architecture Committee
--Solar/Heliospheric Management Operation Working Group
--Report of Discipline Scientists

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: June 19, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-15868 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
Antonio Damarcus WOODSON, petitioner, v. John PALMER, Warden, et al.

No. 16-9299.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
II-00635

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Robert Linzmeier <musicman690@hotmail. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:04 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Robert Linzmeier

950 E. Wilmette Rd.

Palatine, IL 60074
Travis Kyndall LONGORIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6771.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families

# AGENCY:

Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, ACF, DHHS.

# ACTION:

Award announcement. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that a noncompetitive grant award is being made to National Center for Appropriate Technology to develop a series of brief, research-based papers on the impact of energy restructuring programs. As a Congressional setaside, this one-year project is being funded noncompetitively. National Center for Appropriate Technology has considerable experience in studying problems and issues relating to the provision of energy to low-income households. The cost of this one-year project is $175,000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

K.A. Jagannathan, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW, Washington, DC 20447, Phone: 202-205-4829.

Dated: June 20, 2001.

Howard Rolston,

Director, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

[FR Doc. 01-16028  Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

were based on an erroneous interpretation of the controlling law and did 

not reach the other issues colorably asserted.Accordingly, we 

VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief, 

REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss, AND REMAND this 

matter for proceedings consistent with this order. 

'PA 

Pickering 

, J. 

Saitta 

PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring: 

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. 

U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree 

that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners 

association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR 

Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the 

disposition of this appeal. 

).0.„.31,recant=9,J. 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge 

Howard Kim & Associates 

Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2 

(0) 1947A
Harry KELLER, et al., petitioners, v. HERDER SPRING HUNTING CLUB; and Hoyt Royalty, LLC, petitioner, v. David C. Bailey, et al.

No. 16-556.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District denied.
# C_2011055EN.01000702.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany)) — Seydaland Vereinigte Agrarbetriebe GmbH & Co. KG v BVVG Bodenverwertungs- und -verwaltungs GmbH

(Case C-239/09) (1)

1

(State aid - Aid granted by the Federal Republic of Germany for the acquisition of land - Programme for land privatisation and restructuring of agriculture in the new Länder in Germany)

2011/C 55/11

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Seydaland Vereinigte Agrarbetriebe GmbH & Co. KG

Applicant:

Defendant: BVVG Bodenverwertungs- und -verwaltungs GmbH

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Landgericht Berlin — Interpretation of Article 87 EC — State aids — Privatisation of land in the new German Länder — Purchase of that land at a price, established according to national provisions providing for the determination of the market value of the land based on regional criteria, which is lower than their market value — Compatibility of those national provisions with Article 87 EC

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 87 EC must be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law laying down calculation methods for determining the value of agricultural and forestry land, offered for sale by public authorities in the context of a privatisation plan, such as those laid down in Paragraph 5(1) of the Land Purchase Order (Flächenerwerbsverordnung) of 20 December 1995, to the extent that those methods provide for the updating of the prices, where prices for such land are rising sharply, so that the price actually paid by the purchaser reflects, in so far as is possible, the market value of that land.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.09.2009

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 24
 LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.
 
  st
 /s/ Bahram AkradiBahram Akradi




---



##### 



LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.
 
  st
 /s/ Joseph S. VassalluzzoJoseph S. Vassalluzzo




---



##### 



LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.
 
  st
 /s/ James F. HalpinJames F. Halpin




---



##### 



LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.
 
  st
 /s/ Guy C. JacksonGuy C. Jackson




---



##### 



LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.
 
  st
 /s/ Giles H. BatemanGiles H. Bateman




---



##### 



LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.
 
  st
 /s/ Stephen R. SeftonStephen R. Sefton




---



##### 



LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.
 
  st
 /s/ John B. RichardsJohn B. Richards
Manila VICHITVONGSA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9433.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32330-32333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14981]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 01-10]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 01-10 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: June 5, 2001.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[[Page 32331]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN14JN01.012


[[Page 32332]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN14JN01.013


[[Page 32333]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN14JN01.014

[FR Doc. 01-14981 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
Wayne PRATER, petitioner, v. John E. WETZEL, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 15-9207.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant for the dates and periods covered by the  Report. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  March      16, 2009 |   |                                                                                                             |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                                                                             |   |
|                      |   | /s/      Douglas J. Swirsky                                                                                      |   |
|                      |   | Douglas      J. SwirskySr.      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer      & Corporate Secretary |   |
|                      |   |                                                                                                             |   |
|                      |   |                                                                                                             |   |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ACL Semiconductors
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Chung-Lun Yang, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations
of the Company for the periods presented.
|
|

|Date: |  | April 16, 2008 |  | /s/ Chung -Lun Yang           
|----- |  | -------------- |  | ------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | Chung-Lun
    Yang            
|      |  |                |  | Chief Executive
    Officer of
|      |  |                |  | ACL Semiconductors
    Inc.   



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACL Semiconductors,Inc. and will be retained by
ACL Semiconductors Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# C_2009267EN.01003401.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/34

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands), lodged on 3 August 2009 — Vicoplus SC PUH; other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid

(Case C-307/09)

2009/C 267/62

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Vicoplus SC PUH

Appellant:

Other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid

Other party:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Articles 49 EC and 50 EC be interpreted as precluding a national arrangement, as set out in Article 2 of the Netherlands Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), read in conjunction with Article 1e(1)(c) of the Decree implementing the Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Besluit uitvoering Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), under which a work permit is required for the hiring-out of workers as referred to in Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Articles 49 EC and 50 EC be interpreted as precluding a national arrangement, as set out in Article 2 of the Netherlands Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), read in conjunction with Article 1e(1)(c) of the Decree implementing the Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Besluit uitvoering Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), under which a work permit is required for the hiring-out of workers as referred to in Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC? (1)

1

| 2. | On the basis of what criteria should it be determined whether workers have been hired out within the meaning of Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC? |
| --- | --- |

2.

On the basis of what criteria should it be determined whether workers have been hired out within the meaning of Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC?

---

(1)  Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ 1997 L 18, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 32.1
------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of AlphaTrade.com (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Penny Perfect, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

         /s/ Penny Perfect
         -------------------------
         Penny Perfect
         Chief Executive Officer

         Date:  March 31, 2006


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
         this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
         accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.















                                Exhibit 32.1 - 1
# C_2011089EN.01000201.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/2

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria OOD

(Case C-449/09) (1)

1

(The first subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Right of the proprietor of a mark to oppose the first placing into circulation within the EEA, without his consent, of goods bearing that mark)

2011/C 89/02

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Canon Kabushiki Kaisha

Applicant:

Defendant: IPN Bulgaria OOD

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Sofiyski gradski sad — Interpretation of Article 5, in conjunction with Article 7 of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1) — Parallel imports of original goods without the consent of the proprietor of the right conferred by the mark — Possibility for that proprietor to prevent the use in the course of trade, without his consent, of a sign identical to the mark — Proprietor’s right not exhausted

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 5 of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that the trade mark proprietor may oppose the first placing into circulation in the course of trade in the European Economic Area, without his consent, of original goods bearing that mark.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
# C_2011226EN.01002601.xml

| 30.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2011 — Mundipharma v OHIM — Asociación Farmaceuticos Mundi (FARMA MUNDI FARMACEUTICOS MUNDI)

(Case T-76/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark ‘FARMA MUNDI FARMACEUTICOS MUNDI’ - Earlier Community figurative ‘markmundipharma’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 226/52

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mundipharma GmbH (Limburg an der Lahn (Germany)) (represented by: F. Nielsen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: W. Verburg, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Asociación Farmaceuticos Mundi (Alfafar, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 December 2008 (Case R 825/2008-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Mundipharma GmbH and Asociación Farmaceuticos Mundi.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mundipharma GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mundipharma GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.

1

---