alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             191,441
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      239,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                        45,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   400,605
<PP&E>                                             416,602
<DEPRECIATION>                                     341,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     522,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              851,097
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               418
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,312,004)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       522,322
<SALES>                                            559,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   662,401
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      620,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   125,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (83,331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (83,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (83,331)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.02)


</TABLE>
James Scott ALTMAN, petitioner, v. Shawn BREWER, Warden.

No. 15-9417.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33109-33110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Public Announcement of meeting pursuant to the Government In 
the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409; 5 U.S.C. Section 552b).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agency Holding Meeting: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

Date and Time:  12:00 p.m., Friday, June 22, 2001.

Place:  5550 Friendship Boulevard, Suite 400, Chevy Chase, Maryland 
20815.

Status:  Closed--Meeting.

Matters Considered:  The following matter will be considered during the 
closed portion of the Commission's Business Meeting:
    Appeals to the Commission involving approximately two cases decided 
by the National Commissioners pursuant to a reference under 28 C.F.R. 
2.27. These cases were originally heard by an examiner panel wherein 
inmates of Federal prisons have applied for parole or are contesting 
revocation of parole or mandatory release.

[[Page 33110]]


Agency Contact:  Sam Robertson, Case Operations, United States Parole 
Commission, (301) 492-5962.

    Dated: June 15, 2001.
Michael A. Stover,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-15597 Filed 6-18-01; 1:06 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
Herman Avery GUNDY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6086.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

*1261Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to Question 4 presented by the petition.
II-00897

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

William Gardner <drogonfly_01 @yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:15 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

William Gardner

1501 N. E. Torch Lake Dr.

Central Lake, MI 49622
From: "Matta, Rick (rmatta@groom.com)" <RMatta@groom.com>

Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:04:26 -0400

Subject: Follow-up materials from yesterday's meeting

Thanks again to you and your colleagues for meeting with us yesterday. If we can be of further 

assistance, let us know.

Here are the two items I promised you:

1. 1996 letter from DOL to the OCC re fiduciary standards for investing in derivatives

2. A (not complete) list of DOL individual exemptions showing what percentages of 

ownership/revenues they've used as a test of fiduciary independence. These may be different 

from what DOL has put into some of its class exemptions, such as QPAM (PTE 84-14).

Richard K. Matta / 1701 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. / Washington, DC 20006 / Phone: 202-861-5431 / Fax: 

202-659-4503 / www.Groom.com <http://www.groom.com/> / RMatta@groom.com

Notice: This message is intended only for use by the person or entity to which it is addressed. 

Because it may contain confidential information intended solely for the addressee, you are 

notified that any disclosing, copying, downloading, distributing, or retaining of this message, and 

any attached files, is prohibited and may be a violation of state or federal law. If you received 

this message in error, please notify the sender by reply mail, and delete the message and all 

attached files.

To comply with U.S. Treasury Regulations, we also inform you that, unless expressly stated 

otherwise, any tax advice contained in this communication is not intended to be used and 

cannot be used by any taxpayer to avoid penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, and such 

advice cannot be quoted or referenced to promote or market to another party any transaction or 

matter addressed in this communication.
In Re Larry SHANE, et al., petitioners.

No. 17-857.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the Quarterly Report of K & F Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dirkson R. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ DIRKSON R. CHARLES
----------------------
Dirkson R. Charles
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002
# C_2010100EN.01001302.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 18 November 2009 — Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria

(Case C-449/09)

2010/C 100/21

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Canon Kabushiki Kaisha

Applicant:

Defendant: IPN Bulgaria OOD

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 5 of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC (1), in so far is it confers on the trade mark proprietor the exclusive right to prevent all third parties not having his consent from using in the course of trade any sign which is identical with the trade mark, for example importing or exporting goods under the sign, to be interpreted as meaning that the trade mark proprietor’s rights include the right to prohibit use of the trade mark without his consent through the importation of original goods, provided that the trade mark proprietor’s rights under Article 7 of the directive are not exhausted?

1

---

(1)  First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1).

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 18, 2001.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 30, 2001 
to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0122.
    Form Number: IRS Form 1118, Schedule I and Schedule J.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Foreign Tax Credit-Corporations.
    Description: Form 1118 and separate Schedules I and J are used by 
domestic and foreign corporations to claim a credit for taxes paid to 
foreign countries. The IRS uses Form 1118 and related schedules to 
determine if the corporation has computed the foreign tax credit 
correctly.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 30,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Learning about the law   Preparing and sending
           Form of schedule                 Recordkeeping             or the form          the form to the IRS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form 1118............................  97 hr., 19 min.........  17 hr., 51 min.........  21 hr., 9 min.
Schedule I (Form 1118)...............  9hr., 19 min...........  1 hr., 0 min...........  1 hr., 11 min.
Schedule J (Form 1118)...............  106 hr., 25 min........  1 hr., 12 min..........  2 hr., 58 min.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 4,113,889 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service,Room 
5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-16209 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
II-00445

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Janeth Mallory <j anandgary 18 @yahoo. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:40 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Janeth Mallory

1422 1/2 Cedar Ave

Lewiston, ID 83501
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

This document replaces and supercedes “Line of Succession Designation No. 1-A, Revision 22.” 

## Line of Succession Designation No. 1-A, Revision 23 

Effective immediately, the Administrator's Line of Succession Designation is as follows: 

(a) If I am absent from the office the Deputy Administrator will assume all functions and duties of the Administrator. In the event both I and the Deputy Administrator are absent from the office, I designate the officials in listed order below to serve as Acting Administrator with full authority to perform all acts which the Administrator is authorized to perform: 

(1) Chief of Staff; 

(2) General Counsel; 

(3) Associate Deputy Administrator for Management and Administration; 

(4) Associate Deputy Administrator for Capital Access; 

(5) Associate Deputy Administrator for Government Contracting and Business Development; 

(6) Associate Deputy Administrator for Entrepreneurial Development; 

(7) Counselor to the Administrator; 

(8) Chief Operating Officer; 

(9) Deputy General Counsel; 

(10) Chief Financial Officer. 

(a) An individual serving in an acting capacity in any of the positions listed in paragraph (a)(1) through (10) is not also included in this Line of Succession. Instead, the next non-acting incumbent on the list shall serve as Acting Administrator. 

(b) This designation shall remain in full force and effect until revoked or superceded in writing by the Administrator, or by the Deputy Administrator when serving as Acting Administrator. 

(c) Serving as Acting Administrator has no effect on the officials listed in paragraph (a)(1) through (10), above, with respect to their full-time position's authorities, duties and responsibilities (except that such official cannot both recommend and approve an action). 

Dated: January 5, 2001. 

Aida Alvarez, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 01-1584 Filed 1-18-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-U
II-00542

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Amy Perrin <akaroa614@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:17 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Amy Perrin

206 Gulf Aire Drive

Port Saint Joe, FL 32456
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 11, 2020

No. 04-19-00860-CV

IN RE VILORE FOODS COMPANY, Inc.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On December 12, 2019, Relator Vilore Foods Company, Inc. filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus. The Real Party in Interest responded, and the Relator replied. Having reviewed the 

petition, response, and reply, we conclude Relator is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of mandamus is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. See TEX.R. APP. P. 52.8(c). 

We order the Honorable Joe Lopez to (1) vacate his October 2, 2019 order denying Vilore 

Foods Company, Inc.’s plea to the jurisdiction and (2) render an order granting Vilore Foods 

Company, Inc.’s plea to the jurisdiction which dismisses Catalina Castillo’s cause for want of 

jurisdiction. 

The writ will issue only if the trial court fails to comply with this order within fifteen days 

from the date of this opinion and order. 

It is so ORDERED on March 11, 2020.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of March, 2020.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CVF00316 D1, styled Catalina Castillo v. Vilore Foods Co., Inc. and 

Raymundo Bretano, pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Joe Lopez 

presiding.
Michael C. DESUE, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 16-9387.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *123*Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Nazir FRENCH, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-6720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.1












Fiscal Year 2017 Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards


(Restricted Stock Performance-Based Vesting)


 


 


	
Named


Executive Officer

	
Restricted Stock* 


(Performance-Based


 Vesting) (#)

	
Restricted Stock*


 (Performance-Based Vesting 


ROIC) (#)


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Jeffrey N. Boyer

	 	 
	 	
Executive Vice President,


Chief Financial Officer

	
49,999

	
50,001


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Michael R. Benkel

	 	 
	 	
Executive Vice President,


Global Supply Chain

	
35,998

	
36,000


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Laura A. Coffey

	 	 
	 	
Executive Vice President,


Planning and Allocations

	
22,748

	
22,752





 


 


	
Catherine David

	 	 
	 	
Executive Vice President, 


Merchandising

	
44,998

	
45,001


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Eric W. Hunter

	 	 
	 	
Executive Vice President,


Marketing

	
43,498

	
43,502





 


*These equity awards were granted under the Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan.  The respective forms of award agreements are attached as Exhibits 10.2 and 10.3.  The grants were effective May 24, 2016.
Adaucto CHAVEZ-MEZA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5639.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted, and Todd A. Coberly, Esquire, of Santa Fe, New Mexico, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.