alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Office of the 

Secretariat 

Eugene Scalia 

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-5000 

Facsimile: (202) 418-5521 

www.cftc.gov 

May 17,2013 

Mario M. Cuomo 

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 

1050 Connecticut Ave. N.W. 

Washington, DC 20036 

escalia@gibsondunn.com 

mtseytlin@gibsondunn.com 

Wilkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 

787 Seventh A venue 

New York, NY 10019-6099 

mcuomo@wilkie.com 

Re: Motion for Stay of Final Rule by Bloomberg L.P. 

Dear Sirs: 

Enclosed herewith please find the Commission's order of this date. 

Enclosure 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Motion for Stay of Final Rule 

by Bloomberg L.P. 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the April25, 2013 Motion for Stay of Final Rule by Bloomberg 

L.P. ("Motion"), requesting that the Commission stay Rule 39.13(g)(2)(ii), 17 C.F.R. 

§ 39.13(g)(2)(ii), pending judicial review, the Commission having considered Movant's request 

under 5 U.S.C. § 705 and the standard set forth in Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 

555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008), the Commission denies the motion.* 

Issued in Washington, DC, this 17th day of May, 2013. 

Melissa D. Jurgens 

Secretary of the Commission 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

*Commissioners Sommers and O'Malia dissent from the denial of the motion.
!"##       !    ! $#"%!&!

'''

(  $)*+,    

#!-!!  # 	
    !" +# .  !  /#  !##%01  0 ## !     !   % !   $#" (	(+22'$*$#" +22'$* !" 




7KH +RQRUDEOH .DUO 6 )RUHVWHU 8Q

(DVWHUQ 'LVWULFW RI .HQWXFN\ VLWWLQJ E\ G



5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//

3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUF

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )

)LOH 1DPH D

	


23$14)5'614

999999999999

81,7(' 57$7(6 2) +0(5,&$

	



	



:2+1 + $$3$126

 		

!""#$!





+##8 5

),*

.	

	.=>?@A

+! -3%

,   2 -,

<-*+$1'7:! 

23$)51)$,
	 	

		
 	
	






99999999999999999




	  1 B ( <  4*  +##  : : ?  8'1),51+1)5 +113$)C , *  +## 
  1 B ( <  4*  +##  : : ?  8'1),51+1)5+113$)C,*+##







<3C7)2*+$1':$7:! :+$#

## !"       ..857D.EF18 5##$#"0"#% G

 2+22'$* $#"+22'$*     $)*+,  #!

'

1 %07!

	

		
2. .HEH7F

  % 3##$#      &!0 !#! ! !0 $### !" (    !  

	
	






  %*$! )#   # ##I!     !##

2! +## 

D .) E
F   ##   I#%0 $#5#0%!$#%! ### !!0    !J1I!0 !%! %0##      #  # K%	&


2	 

/### !<!J0 L M #  !"     !! 

7

3 ##  

!  &!! D.7! !"##	
'( 	H( ##0   !"     !  	F%!/ I  !" !%!&!&!! 
.
(    <!
H 	

		
 	
	






 #!! JL,M%#    !N  %0  !    ### %    !   ##%!  K  (        #!! +##
  !"    #!%! 

<

1  !    $#  

##%0 #!!/#

D.)! +##	70-J'  !  00 #  #%0     ! !/!10!/#   #! !!K1  ! &!      -J+!, #!O%!   #      %!    !! %!  I! ##%0! !K+ !"        # #%0!  !%!0!	
%	&




2	 HEH7F

($#  #0##%0

! !+##	J'  !        # #%0%% #0!##  !K$#"   ! %  0    J0 LM# #%0K2/#$# !!! 00      ##0    

	
	






''

1  ## $#

! -F !   #!##0   $#  #  #%0   $#"&!(!  $#    ##        %!&!

+

1 ! $#

 #! !  D 	P.E%FEFE+O!  *! E
F !!# #!   K    # J!#K1 !%   #!        #!! #

L1M!  

!#!!   #!  I!  #     '0/ # !  !  &!  0###0

 	

		
 	
	






' 7! 

A'"A0!"#(    !"  # 

5O! %! *

	
85EHF+ 857D..E%FE	


F!! ##% %0! J!! /!A   I!0A %057!! ! !  % K+  ! %!     A ! 0  %07! *85 '  !  !!  J!A!! " K)H17 J!%0I!K855O! *!#+#HE
F

'# !#%0 

!   #! I!0  %07! 1! #  0##!%0 !  5	P	 N !/!% #  # %    D 	P.    J #!K   !   $#  < !"   #!  !#! A    1  !       #! !  +##  
 #     #!   JL M# !#!  I!0   !   !%  #!  !       A    K1 !"   

	
	






 #!+## #! ! I!0 !%    K  1 %!0##! !      !          

1 !#   

!  0   ! # '  % #0!   !  # !  $#! 

' "A"&!

' &!   #   !   *# #4#4+N4#

5#

5     A#!+ +#00  /0#!0N0' "A 

+ !   #####%     #!  #    %70  D Q
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,376
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,431
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,033
<PP&E>                                          84,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,148
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         40
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,252
<SALES>                                        134,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,064
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,833
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,273
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,273
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
1295.

#### Daniel *v.*The State.

Powell, J.

In a criminal prosecution, when the State’s witnesses have testified that in a difficulty which occurred the defendant drew a pistol from his pocket and had it out in his hand during the difficulty, and the defendant’s witnesses, in whose presence and sight also the transaction occurred, have testified that they did not see him draw or have any pistol, it is error for the court to give the following charge to the jury: “I charge you, if you find some witnesses were present and had opportunity to know the facts and bring them to your consideration, and there was another class of witnesses, who say they didn’t know, the law requires you to believe the positive testimony. Positive testimony is., that of witnesses who know the facts; negative testimony is that where the witness doesn’t know the facts, or didn’t see it.” *Hunter*v. *State,*ante, 761 (62 S. E. 466). *Judgment reversed.*

*844Accusation of carrying concealed weapon; from city court of Sparta — Judge Little. June 15, 1908.

Submitted October 6,

Decided October 12, 1908.

*R. H. Lewis,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. W.*Moore, *solicitor,*contra.
William SALLIE, petitioner, v. Eric SELLERS, Warden.

No. 16-7096 (16A559).

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 6, 2016.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          93,949                 113,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,881,728               2,054,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                   1,170
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,881,728               2,053,631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,881,728               2,054,801
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,108                     882
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,715                  10,142
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,393                  (9,260)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,393                  (9,260)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,393                  (9,260)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Christopher Turryle BRYANT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6254.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
INITIATIVE LEGAL GROUP APC, et al., petitioners, v. Terri MAXON.

No. 15-1283.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
H. Res. 1752 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 8, 2010. 

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported through the 

legislative day of December 18, 2010. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the legislative day of December 18, 2010, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker 

or her designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or his 

designee on the designation of any matter for consideration 

pursuant to this section. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1502 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1502

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives respecting the 
 treatment of earmarks in conferences between the House and the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2010

Mr. Akin submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives respecting the 
 treatment of earmarks in conferences between the House and the Senate.

    Resolved, That clause 9 of rule XXII is amended by inserting 
``(a)'' after ``9.'' and by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(b) A conference report may not include a modification of any 
congressional earmark, limited tax benefit, or limited tariff benefit 
(as such terms are defined in clause 9 of rule XXI) committed to the 
conference committee by either or both Houses if that modification is 
beyond the scope of that specific matter as committed to the conference 
committee. Whenever a point of order is made that a conference report 
contains a violation of this paragraph, the Chair may submit the 
question of whether such violation has occurred to the House and shall 
be debatable up to 10 minutes by the Member initiating the point of 
order and for up to 10 minutes by an opponent and shall be decided with 
a roll call vote as to whether to strip the congressional earmark 
without intervening motion except one that the House adjourn.''.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 

Division of Clearing and 

Risk 

ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Daniel Maguire 

Head of SwapClear US 

Managing Director 

LCH.Cleamet Limited 

17 State Street 

New York, NY 10004 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-5000 

Facsimile: (202) 418-5521 

November 21, 2012 

Re: Extension for Compliance with Commission Regulation 39.12(b)(7) 

Dear Mr. Maguire: 

By correspondence dated September 26, 2012, LCH.Clearnet Limited ("LCH"), a 

registered derivatives clearing organization ("DCO"), requested that the Division of Clearing and 

Risk ("Division") grant an extension to March 31, 2013 for compliance with Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission ("Commission") Regulation 39.12(b)(7) and the Division's guidance 

thereon, with respect to the requirement that DCOs establish systems that allow for the 

acceptance or rejection oftrades as quickly as would be technologically practicable if fully 

automated systems were used and in no event later than 60 seconds after submission. 

LCH's request specifically relates to the requirement in Commission Regulation 

3 9 .12(b )(7) that a DCO accept or reject each trade submitted to the DCO for clearing by or for a 

clearing member or a customer of a clearing member "as quickly as would be technologically 

practicable if fully automated systems were used." 1 The Division has provided further guidance 

that under the standard set forth in Commission Regulation 39.12(b)(7), it expects each DCO to 

accept or reject trades not later than 60 seconds after submission.2 

LCH has represented that it will use the extension period to install, and to perform full 

regression and performance testing of, the technology systems necessary to enable LCH and its 

clearing members to accept or reject trades within 60 seconds after submission. 

I See 17 C.F.R. § 39.12(b)(7). 

2 See Email from Ananda Radhakrishnan, Director, Division of Clearing and Risk, to all registered DCOs (August 

31,2012). 
Daniel Maguire 

November 21, 2012 

Page 2 

The Division herein grants the requested extension to LCH, thereby requiring full 

compliance with Commission Regulation 39.12(b)(7) and the Division's guidance thereon, no 

later than March 31 , 2013, unless LCH is notified otherwise. This extension is granted by the 

Division in reliance on the representations contained in LCH's request, and any different, 

changed, or omitted material facts or circumstances may require termination of the extension and 

immediate action by LCH to facilitate compliance. The Division retains the authority to 

condition further, modify, suspend, or otherwise restrict the extension granted herein. 

Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact John C. Lawton, Deputy 

Director, Glawton@cftc.gov, 202-418-5480) or Christopher Hower, Attorney-Advisor 

(chower@cftc.gov, 212-418-6703). 

cc: John C. Lawton 

Christopher Hower 

Director
Calvin LATIMER, et ux., petitioners, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et al.

No. 16-6366.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Joshua Shane MARSING, petitioner, v. Brandon KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

No. 16-6294.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated May 24, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-210384) of Smart Trust 245, comprising
Smart Trust, Strategic Growth & Income Trust, Series 9.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


May 24, 2016
Eliseo RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 15-9298.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Spirit Enterprises Ltd.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),



I,Robert Klein, Director  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this amended certification as of the 30th day of March 2007.



/s/Robert Klien



Robert Klein

President/Director
II-01186

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Pessatore <mpessatore@cfl.rr.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 6:10 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Pessatore

1887 Wentwood Cove

Lake Mary, FL 32746
Craig SAUNDERS, petitioner, v. Mark GARMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

No. 16-7086.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Jeremy L. BURRELL, petitioner, v. Shane PLACE, Warden.

No. 16-6004.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS LLC, petitioner, v. SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

No. 16-551.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
II-01209

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Mahoney <dmahoney@bates.edu>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 3:08 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Mahoney

PO Box 133

Hebron, ME 04238