alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010100EN.01003901.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2010 — Özdemir v OHIM — Aktieselskabet af 21 november 2001 (James Jones)

(Case T-11/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark James Jones - Earlier Community word mark JACK & JONES - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 100/60

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rahmi Özdemir (Dreieich, Germany) (represented by: I. Hoes, M. Heinrich, C. Schröder, K. von Werder and J. Wittenberg, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 (Brande, Denmark) (represented by: C. Barrett Christiansen, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 November 2008 (Case R 858/2007-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 and Rahmi Özdemir.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rahmi Özdemir to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rahmi Özdemir to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 10.1

 

SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Senior Housing Properties Trust (the “Company”) for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee of the Board, as applicable:

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $50,000 for services as a Trustee, plus a fee of $1,250 for each meeting attended. Up to two $1,250 fees are paid if a Board meeting and one or more Board committee meetings, or two or more Board committee meetings, are held on the same date. The annual fee for any new Independent Trustee is prorated for the initial year.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee who serves as a committee chair of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional annual fee of $15,000, $10,000 and $10,000, respectively. The committee chair fee for any new Independent Trustee is prorated for the initial year.

 

·                  The Lead Independent Trustee receives an additional annual cash retainer fee of $12,500 for serving in this role.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 3,000 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first Board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first Board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2066/2004

of 1 December 2004         

fixing the definitive rate of refund and the percentage of system B export licences to be issued in the fruit and vegetables sector (tomatoes, oranges, table grapes and apples)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1961/2001 of 8 October 2001 on detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards export refunds on fruit and vegetables (2), and in particular Article 6(7) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For applications for system B export licences submitted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1425/2004 between 17 September and 15 November 2004, the percentages of licences to be issued and the rates of refund applicable are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 December 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1176/2002 (OJ L 170, 29.6.2002, p. 69).

(3)OJ L 262, 7.8.2004, p. 5.

----

ANNEX

Percentages for the issuing of licences and rates of refund applicable to system B licences applied for between 17 September and 15 November 2004 (tomatoes, oranges, table grapes and apples)

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
          This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
          Greenland  Corporation  September 30, 1997 financial statements and is
          qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                          0000852127
<NAME>                        Greenland Corporation

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         22,056
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  148,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,404
<PP&E>                                         5,364,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                 451,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,238,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          672,246
<BONDS>                                        4,065,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       22,315
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,477,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,238,026
<SALES>                                        15,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               382,024
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,507,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             273,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,543,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,543,659)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,253,659)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.06)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.48


 


Supplement Agreement



 


In respect of the
related agreement arrangement of Beijing AirMedia Shengshi Advertising Co., Ltd.


 


This Agreement is entered by the following
parties on January 21, 2016 in Beijing.


 


Party A: AirMedia
Technology (Beijing), Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Guo Man


Xu Qing


 


Party C: Beijing
AirMedia Shengshi Advertising Co., Ltd. (formally known as “Beijing Shengshi Lianhe Advertising Co., Ltd.”)


 


Whereas:


 


		(1)	Party A, Party B, Party C has respectively
entered into the Amended and Restated Equity Pledge Agreement on June 14th, 2007; and has respectively entered into
the Supplement Agreement of Equity Pledge Agreement in 2008 (collectively, the “Original Equity Pledge Agreement”);



 


		(2)	Party A, Party B and Party C have entered
into the Amended and Restated Call Option Agreement on June 14th, 2007; and has respectively entered into the Supplement Agreement
of Call Option Agreement in 2008 (collectively, the “Original Call Option Agreement”);



 


		(3)	The equity holding structure of Party
C changed in 2015 and 2016, and the shareholding percentage of Party B in Party C after the change is as follows: 77.1% equity
is held by Guo Man, 19.4% equity is held by Xu Qing.



 


NOW, THEREFORE, all Parties, through
friendly negotiations, hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	All parties agree that, for so long as party B continues to hold equity interest in party C, the
relevant provisions in the Original Equity Pledge Agreement and the Original Call Option Agreement applicable to the parties hereto
shall be deemed to be continuously effective, provided that the equity interest pledged and granted with exclusive call option
by party B to party A under the Original Equity Pledge Agreement and the Original Call Option Agreement shall be varied respectively
to provide: Guo Man holds 77.1% equity in party C, Xu Qing holds 19.4% equity in party C.



 


 



    	 	- 1 -	 



     


    




 


		2.	Party B and party C shall, upon request by party A, enter into new equity pledge agreement and
call option agreement with party A in order to reflect the actual shareholding percentage of party B, and Party B and party C shall
cooperate with party A to handle the industry and commence procedures required for the registration of the equity pledge.



 


(No
text below)


 






    	 	- 2 -	 



     


    

 











[Signature Page]


 


Party A: AirMedia Technology (Beijing),
Co., Ltd.


/s/ AirMedia Technology (Beijing), Co.,
Ltd.


 


Party B:


 





	Guo Man	/s/ Guo Man	 
	 	 
	Xu Qing	/s/ Xu Qing	 







 


Party C: Beijing AirMedia Shengshi Advertising
Co., Ltd.


 


/s/ Beijing AirMedia Shengshi Advertising
Co., Ltd.


 




    	 	- 3 -
II-00596

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

richard krzeminski <rkical@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:46 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

richard krzeminski

west main

milford, NY 13807
# C_2009267EN.01003104.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/31

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België lodged on 29 July 2009 — Vlaamse Gemeenschap v M. Baesen

(Case C-296/09)

2009/C 267/57

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie van België

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vlaamse Gemeenschap

Applicant:

Defendant: M. Baesen

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | For the purpose of Article 13(2)(d) of Regulation No 1408/71, (1) should the expression ‘civil servants and persons treated as such’ be interpreted on the basis of the national social security scheme to which the person concerned is affiliated? |
| --- | --- |

1.

For the purpose of Article 13(2)(d) of Regulation No 1408/71, (1) should the expression ‘civil servants and persons treated as such’ be interpreted on the basis of the national social security scheme to which the person concerned is affiliated?

1

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the affirmative, should a person who is employed under a contract of employment by an employer in the public sector and who is subject, under the national scheme, to the social security scheme for employed persons in respect of some of the branches of social security referred to in Article 4(1) of the Regulation and to a special scheme for civil servants in respect of the branches of social security referred to in Article 4(1)(e) of the Regulation be regarded as a person treated as a civil servant within the meaning of Article 13(2)(d) of Regulation No 1408/71? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the affirmative, should a person who is employed under a contract of employment by an employer in the public sector and who is subject, under the national scheme, to the social security scheme for employed persons in respect of some of the branches of social security referred to in Article 4(1) of the Regulation and to a special scheme for civil servants in respect of the branches of social security referred to in Article 4(1)(e) of the Regulation be regarded as a person treated as a civil servant within the meaning of Article 13(2)(d) of Regulation No 1408/71?

---

(1)  Council Regulation of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2).

1

---
# C_2010051EN.01002904.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 19 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-252/09) (1)

1

2010/C 51/56

Language of the case: Portuguese

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 29.8.2009.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1833

FRANCIS AKINRO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FIREMAN ABINA GBENGA; MS. WILLIAMS, (Iya

Alake),

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.

(1:01-cv-04188-CCB)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 17, 2006

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order denying

Akinro’s motion to reopen his case based on newly discovered

evidence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Akinro v. Gbenga, No. 1:01-cv-04188-CCB (D. Md.

July 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
980.

#### CLEMENTS *v.*THE STATE.

The verdict is without evidence to support it.

Indictment for burglary, from Sumter superior court — Judge Littlejohn. December 23, 1907.

Argued March 10,

Decided April 22, 1908.

*Blalock & Cobb,*for plaintiff in error.

*F. A. Hooper, solicitor-general, Zach Childers,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

Will Clements was convicted of the crime of burglary, on an indictment charging that he “did unlawfully and with force and arms the dwelling-house of Mrs. Fannie Furlow break and enter, with intent to commit a larceny.” His motion for a new trial being overruled, he brings the ease to this court. The evidence may be substantially stated as follows: Mr. and Mrs. Porter boarded with Mrs. Furlow, and on the day named in the indictment Mrs. Furlow had gone out of her house to take a drive, leaving Mrs. Porter inside. Before she left she closed the doors and windows, but did not lock the front door. Subsequently, and before the return of Mrs. Furlow, Mr. Porter came to the house, and he and his wife were in their room up-stairs. Between four and five o’clock in the afternoon, the defendant opened the door of the room occupied by Mr. and Mrs. Porter, and, seeing them inside, immediately shut the door and ran, and was pursued by Mr. Porter, but was not then caught. A day or two after the defendant had been seen in the house, he was arrested, and was identified by Mr. ánd Mrs. Porter as the negro who opened the door of their room and,ran from the house. His identity was also clearly established by two other witnesses, of his own race, who knew him and saw him mn from the house. The defendant acknowledged having been in the house, stating that he went there “to hunt a job.”

We think that the verdict in this case is without evidence to sup*272port it, and should be set aside. The corpus delicti is not satisfactorily shown, either by the evidence considered alone, or by the evidence in connection with the statement of the defendant as to the fact of his presence in the house and the purpose for which he entered. It should be clearly established by the evidence alone. The circumstances indicating a breaking are quite weak, and there is no evidence whatever as to the specific intent in breaking and entering the house, charged in the indictment. The conduct of the defendant when discovered in the hpuse arouses suspicion that his intent in so entering was unlawful, but a bare suspicion is not sufficient to establish a fact. And even if it be conceded that his conduct was suspicious and indicated some unlawful purpose in entering the house, it certainly was not sufficient to show that this unlawful purpose was that charged in the indictment, to wit,- to commit the offense of larceny. The statement of the defendant as to his purpose in entering the house was probably false, and evidently was not believed by the jury; but a falsehood, while the subterfuge of a criminal, is not alone satisfactory proof of crime.

*Judgment reversed.*
Marco M. TORRES, petitioner, v. UNKNOWN PARTY.

No. 15-9136.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1675 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require live dissemination on the Internet of all markups of bills and resolutions that are 

open to the public. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mrs. BONO MACK submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require live dissemination on the Internet of all markups 

of bills and resolutions that are open to the public. 

1 Resolved, That (a) it is the purpose of this resolution 

2 to— 

3 (1) modernize the operations of the House of Rep4 resentatives using information technology that has trans5 formed and increased the efficiency of many aspects of 

6 American society such as financial services and markets, 

7 transportation, manufacturing, agriculture, and commerce 

8 with consumers and businesses; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1675 IH 

1 (2) enhance public participation in American democ2 racy and improve the quality of proposed legislation by 

3 allowing the opportunity for its review by interested citi4 zens; and 

5 (3) help restore public trust in Government and en6 hance respect for the House of Representatives and the 

7 Congress by ensuring that their operations are conducted 

8 with openness, order, and dignity. 

9 (b) Clause 2(g) of rule XI of the Rules of the House 

10 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

11 following new subparagraph: 

12 ‘‘(7) In the case of each meeting of a standing com13 mittee for the markup of bills and resolutions, including 

14 the Committee on Appropriations and any subcommittee 

15 thereof for consideration of a chairman’s mark, that is 

16 open to the public, the committee shall broadcast the 

17 markup in real time on the official public Web site of the 

18 committee.’’. 

19 (c) Clause 2 of rule XI of the Rules of the House 

20 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

21 following new paragraph: 

22 ‘‘(q)(1) In the case of any committee or subcommittee 

23 markup that is open to the public, the text of any bill or 

24 resolution under consideration, and any amendments of25 fered thereto, shall be available to the public on the official 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1675 IH 

1 public Web site of the committee in a timely manner that 

2 is accessible using existing technology, at no cost, and in 

3 a format that is searchable by text. 

4 ‘‘(2) As used in paragraph (1), a chairman’s mark 

5 shall be deemed to be a bill for purposes of the Committee 

6 on Appropriations and any subcommittee thereof.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Stephen Floyd ULLRICH, petitioner, v. IDAHO, et al.

No. 15-9314.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Christopher John HORTON, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 16-6688.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
Steve AUSTIN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-5369.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2010209EN.01005702.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/57

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 May 2010 — Nikolchov v Commission

(Case F-70/09) (1)

1

()

2010/C 209/93

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register, following amicable settlement.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009, p. 16.

1

---