alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly
  Report of Azco Mining, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal
  quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pierce Carson, President & Chief Executive
  Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                   
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented
        in the Report.

|Date: June 18, 2007 | By: | /s/ Pierce Carson                                 
|------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------
|                    |     | Pierce Carson                                     
|                    |     | Chief Executive Officer, President,
      Director
|                    |     | and Principal Accounting Officer                  

---
In re Gregory C. KAPORDELIS, petitioner.

No. 16-6434.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
Gregory WANTON, petitioner, v. David BAUGHMAN, Warden.

No. 15-9434.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Scott PATRICK, petitioner, v. Suzan L. HUBBARD, Warden.

No. 16M57.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
# C_2009267EN.01003101.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/31

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany), lodged on 22 July 2009 — DEB Deutsche Energiehandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-279/09)

2009/C 267/54

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Kammergericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: DEB Deutsche Energiehandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH

Appellant:

Respondent: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

The following question is referred, pursuant to Article 234 EC, to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for a preliminary ruling:

In view of the fact that Member States may not, through the structuring of conditions under national law governing the award of damages and of the procedure for pursuing a claim seeking to establish State liability under Community law, make the award of compensation in accordance with the principles of State liability under Community law virtually impossible or excessively difficult, must there be reservations with regard to a national rule under which the pursuit of a claim before the courts is subject to the making of an advance payment in respect of costs, and a legal person, which is unable to make that advance payment, does not qualify for legal aid?

---
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

           I, Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc., as amended;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. and I have done the following:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc. is made known
     to us by others within Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc., particularly
     during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc.'s
     disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
     filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc.'s auditors and the audit committee of Fortune Diversified
Industries, Inc.'s board of directors (or persons performing similar functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect Fortune Diversified Industries,
     Inc.'s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
     have identified for Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc.'s auditors any
     material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in Fortune Diversified Industries,
     Inc.'s internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


1/14/05                    /s/ Carter M. Fortune
Date                       ------------------------------------------
                           Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer
Walter V. HARRIS, petitioner, v. Bobby L. MEEKS, Warden.

No. 16-6990.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Edward H. FLINT, petitioner, v. Steven L. BESHEAR, Governor of Kentucky.

No. 16-425.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Montie SULLIVAN, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 16-5986.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County denied.
Warnell REID, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5942.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Laserscope on Form10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2004, I, Dennis LaLumandiere, VicePresident, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Laserscope, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months endedJune 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the six months ended June 30, 2004 fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof Laserscope.     Date: August 9, 2004 By: /s/ Dennis LaLumandiere   Dennis LaLumandiere   Vice President, Finance and   Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by section 906, has been provided to Laserscope and will beretained by Laserscope and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.185

                              [LETTERHEAD OF CIT]

[LOGO]

          March 26, 2002

          Mr. Brad Larson
          Meadow Valley Corporation
          4411 South 40th Street Suite D-11
          Phoenix AZ 85040

          Re: Amendment No. 2 to Restated and Amended Revolving Loan Agreement
          (the "Agreement") dated July 27, 2001 between Meadow Valley
          Contractors, Inc. and The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. ("CIT")

          Dear Mr. Larson:

          The above Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

          Section 5. Interest. The rate is changed to "governing rate plus
          1.50%".

          All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
          and effect.

          Sincerely,

           /s/  Mark Saylor
          Mark Saylor
          The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.

          Agreed to:

          Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc.

          By: /s/ Bradley E. Larson         Title:  President
             --------------------------            --------------------

          Guarantor Acknowledgement:

          Meadow Valley Corporation

          By: /s/ Kenneth D. Nelson         Title:  Vice President
             --------------------------            --------------------

<PAGE>

                              [LETTERHEAD OF CIT]

[LOGO]

          March 26, 2002

          Mr. Brad Larson
          Meadow Valley Corporation
          4411 South 40th Street Suite D-11
          Phoenix AZ 85040

          Re: Amendment No. 2 to Revolving Loan Agreement (the "Agreement")
          dated July 27, 2001 between Ready Mix, Inc. and The CIT
          Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. ("CIT")

          Dear Mr. Larson:

          The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

          Section 5. Interest. The rate is changed to "governing rate plus 1.50"

          All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
          and effect.

          Sincerely,

          /s/ Mark Saylor
          Mark Saylor
          The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.

          Agreed to:

          Ready Mix, INc.

          By: /s/ Kenneth D. Nelson          Title: Vice President
              ---------------------                 --------------

          Guarantor Acknowledgement:

          Meadow Valley Corporation

          By: /s/ Bradley E. Larson          Title: President
              ---------------------                 --------------
EXHIBIT 99

                               CERTIFICATION UNDER
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     To my knowledge, this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March
31, 2003 (the "Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained
in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  consolidated
financial condition and results of operations of Central Bancorp, Inc.



                                     By:/s/ John D. Doherty
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        John D. Doherty
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer



                                     By:/s/ Michael K. Devlin
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Michael K. Devlin
                                        Senior Vice President, Treasurer
                                        and Chief Financial Officer


Date:  July 29, 2003



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Central  Bancorp,  Inc. and will be
retained by Central  Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 11, 2011
By: /s/ Randy ButlerRandy ButlerChief Financial Officer
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Proposed Rule Regarding Removing References to 

Credit Ratings from Commission Regulations 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced the publication in the Federal Register of 

proposals to remove certain references to or reliance on credit ratings in current CFTC regulations. The 

proposals implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. 

On July 21, 2010, the Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act requires Federal agencies to: 

 Review their regulations that require the use of a credit-worthiness assessment of a security or money market 

instrument; 

 Remove any reference to or reliance on credit ratings in those regulations and substitute an appropriate standard of 

credit-worthiness; 

 Work to develop uniform standards of credit-worthiness; and 

 Report to Congress after the completion of the rulemaking process. 

The Commission has completed the required review of its regulations, and the Proposal removes 

the following references and substitutes them with these standards: 

CFTC Regulation 1.49 - Denomination of Customer Funds and Location of Depositories, Qualifications for 

Depositories: We are proposing to remove the clause in this regulation that previously allowed the placement of customer 

funds in foreign depositories that issued highly rated commercial paper or long term debt instruments. We propose to rely on 

the standard that customer funds be placed only in foreign depositories that have in excess of $1 billion of regulatory capital. 

CFTC Regulation 4.24 - Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors – General Disclosures 

Required; Investment Program and Use of Proceeds: We are proposing to remove the reference to “investment rating” 

in this regulation and substitute it with phrase “credit-worthiness.” 

The Proposal notes other references to credit ratings that are removed or amended in other 

concurrent Commission Proposals: 

 CFTC Regulation 1.25 – Investment of Customer Funds

 CFTC Regulation 30.7 - Treatment of Foreign Futures or Foreign Options Secured Amount 

 Appendix A to Part 40- Application for Designation of Physical Delivery Futures Contracts and Application for Cash Settled Futures 

Contracts 

The Commission is working to develop uniform standards of credit-worthiness by engaging in 

consultation with the: 

 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Office of the 

Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (FRB) and other regulators. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
#### In the Matter of Benjamin Perez, Respondent, v Grissel Sepulveda, Appellant.

[877 NYS2d 344]—

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from (1) an order of protection of the Family Court, Queens County (Richroath, J.), dated April 15, 2008, and (2) an order of the same court, also dated April 15, 2008, which, without a hearing, granted that branch of the father’s motion which was to suspend visitation between her and the child.

Ordered that the appeal from the order of protection is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*1073The order of protection expired by its own terms on June 27, 2008. Since the rights of the parties will not be directly affected by a determination as to the propriety of the order of protection, the appeal from that order has been rendered academic *(see Matter of Cooper-Winfield v Gary,*9 AD3d 366 [2004]; *Matter of Levande v Levande,*308 AD2d 450, 451 [2003]; *Matter of Greene v Greene,*216 AD2d 393 [1995]). Moreover, the issuance of the order of protection in this case did not constitute a permanent and significant stigma which might indirectly affect the mother’s status in potential future proceedings *(see Matter of Cooper-Winfield v Gary,*9 AD3d at 366-367; *Matter of Levande v Levande,*308 AD2d at 451; *Matter of McClure v McClure,*176 AD2d 325, 326 [1991]; *cf. Matter of Malfetano v Parker,*7 AD3d 715 [2004]; *Matter of Cutrone v Cutrone,*225 AD2d 767, 768 [1996]).

Even if the Family Court erred in considering the transcript of the tape made by the father of the mother’s conversation with the child, which the father submitted in support of his application, inter alia, to suspend the mother’s visitation *(see Matter of Cameron C.,*283 AD2d 946, 947 [2001]; *Matter of Jaeger v Jaeger,*207 AD2d 448, 449 [1994]; *Matter of Berk v Berk,*70 AD2d 943 [1979]), the Family Court possessed sufficient information to render, without a hearing, an informed visitation determination consistent with the best interests of the child *(see Matter of Perez v Sepulveda,*51 AD3d 673, 673-674 [2008]; *Matter of Horn v Zullo,*6 AD3d 536 [2004]) without considering the recorded conversation *(see Matter of Jaeger v Jaeger,*207 AD2d at 449; *Janecka v Franklin,*131 AD2d 436, 437 [1987]; *Matter of Berk v Berk,*70 AD2d at 943). Spolzino, J.P., Florio, Covello and Eng, JJ, concur.
II-00639

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Marshall Shield <corp@myshield.us>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:01 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

This was sent by fax/email and the presidents new online domain

To contact the President

Email: president@whitehouse.gov

Fax: 202-456-2461

Online: The Obama-Biden Presidential Transition Team http://change.gov

Click on the right side to send a message

The document can be any size and you can add an image

Marshall

From: MyShieldCorp [mailto:corp@mvshield.us]

Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:37 AM

To: ’president@whitehouse.gov’

Subject: NO Price controls: The United States is being destroyed!!!!

Importance: High

Sensitivity: Confidential

To: President Obama

Cc: Executive Staff

Ccc: Anyone that give a damn!

The world is watching, they are laughing so hard, they are getting sick

They are praying the USA fails and falls to the ground

Am I alone, I think I am?

What has happened since the 70’s?

At that time, any cost raising was suppose to be the same as an employee pay increases

A vehicle today, cost twice as much as a home in the 70’s

A home worth $35K-55K in the 70’s is being sold for $200K-450K today

I guess, when no one was looking the homes were blasted apart and rebuilt using Gold!

There is NO COST controls, everything across the board continues to climb higher and higher with no stopping is site!

I can’t believe nothing is being done about this!

The social security coffer is being destroyed for several reasons ..... I know why

The owners/executives of the companies/corporations that sold out and sent their company overseas is one of the worst

possible causes of destroying the USA
II-00639

How many persons are unemployed because of this?

Where are the jobs? They are overseas!

How many Americans are going to lose out, when there unemployment ends at Christmas?

Why are sporting athletes being paid millions a year to play a handful of GAMES?

Why should any American have a child?

What will they be able to purchase in the future?

The only food they will be able to purchase is the grass in their back yard!

The United States is being destroyed

You couldn’t pay me enough to be in your position

Why do we even have any US Senators or Congress, if NO ONE is doing anything to stop what is destroying the United

States of America?

Is everyone in Washington DC wearing ’Blinders’ or worse ’Their heads stuck in a mud hole!’

I don’t watch the news anymore, unless to check on the Weather

Why should I watch TV News?

I did last night, only found what I knew I would.

Thanksgiving Dinners - Turkeys costing $2.00 more this year

Everything involved with Thanksgiving costing more

Everything costs more and more and more and more .... this started in the late 70’s and NO ONE has ever accomplished

anything to STOP PRICE INCREASES!

Credit Cards interest’s rates started at 3%, what are they today?

What is this doing to America?

The United States is being destroying because of several wrongful reasons: # 1 GREED

Marshall Shield

1202 So. 3rd St. Ste. 5

Mount Vernon, WA 98273
Barrington O. BENNETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6505.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.