T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AH AB J OSEP H N AFAL, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. S H A W N C A R T E R ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees, E M I M U S I C P U B L I S H I N G L T D ., D ef

endant- A pp el l ee , a nd E M I M U S I C I N C ., D e f

e n d a n t. N o. 07- 56488 D. C . No . C V- 0 5 - 0 2 4 8 0 - S VW ME MOR AN DU M *

A H A B J O S E P H N A F A L , a n in d iv id u a l, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. S H A W N C A R T E R , p /k/aJ A Y - Z ; e t a l., N o. 08- 55540 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 5 - c v - 0 2 4 8 0 - S V WP JW 

# FI LED JU L 21 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSD efen d an t s,

a nd R O B B O U R D O N ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l an t s. A H A B J O S E P H N A F A L , a n in d iv id u a l, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. S H A W N C A R T E R , p /k/aJ A Y - Z ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l an t s, a nd E M I B L A C K W O O D M U S I C , I N C .; e t a l., D efen d an t s. N o. 08- 55543 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 5 - c v - 0 2 4 8 0 - S V WP JW

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S t e phe n V . W i l s on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d Jul y15, 2010 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia- 3-

T he H onor abl e J a c k J . C a m p, S e ni orU ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge f or ** the N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof G e or gi a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. B ef ore: F A R R IS and S IL V E R M A N , C i rc ui tJudg es , and C A M P , S eni or D i stri ct Judg e. ** T hi s c as e i nv ol ves P l ai nt i ff A hab Joseph N af

al ’ s app ea l fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e ntrul i ng i n f a vorof D e f e nda nt s di s m i s s i ng hi s c opy r i ght i nf r i nge m e ntc l a i m f

orl a c k of

s t a ndi ng, a s w e l l a s ac r os s appe a l bys om e of the D e f e nda nt s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de ni a l of the i rm ot i on f

ors t a tut oryf

e e s a nd c o s ts u n d e r1 7 U .S .C . § 5 0 5 . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u a n t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e a f f i rm. F i r s t , a s s um i ng w i thoutde c i di ng tha tthe C opy r i ghtA c tof 1976 gove rns stan d in g in th is ca se , an dfo r th e a m p le re as o n s a rticu latedin th e d istrict co u rt’s o p in io n , se e N

af alv. Carter , 540 F . S upp. 2d 1128, 1139–44 ( C . D . C a l . 2007) , the a s s ig n m e n t d o c u m e n ts a t is s u e h e r e d idn o t a c tu a llyg r a n t P la in tif f a n o w n e r s h ip i nt er es ti n an excl usi ve copyri gh tl i ce nse. R ather, the do cum ent s w er e adi sgui se d as si gn m entof a c ause of ac t i on proh i bi t ed un der Si lve rs v. So ny P i ctures E nter tai nm ent

, Inc. , 40 2 F . 3d 88 1, 88 4– 89 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( en banc). P l ai nt i ff appr opr i a t e l yc onc e de s tha the w oul d l a c k s t andi ng t o s ue i f he w e r e notthe c oo w n e ro f th e e x c lu s iv e lic e n s e . Se e i d. at88 6. C on se qu ent l y, the di stri ctcourt p ro p erl y g ran t edsu m m ary j u d g m en tt o D efen d an t s.- 4-

T he D e f e nda nt s ' unoppos e d m ot i ons f orj udi c i a l not i c e a r e gr a nt e d. *** S e c ond, the di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng the § 505 m o tio n f o ra tto rn e y s ’ f

e e s a n dc o s ts . See Fa n ta s y, I n c . v . Fo g e r ty , 94 F . 3d 553, 556 ( 9th C i r . 1996) ( quot i ng Sch w a rz v. Sec’y o f H ea l th & H

u m a n Servs. , 73 F . 3d 8 9 5 , 9 0 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 5 ) ) ; see a l so T h e T r a d itio n a l Ca t A s s ’ n , I

n c . v . G ilb r e a th , 3 4 0 F .3 d8 2 9 , 8 3 3 n .4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( “I n e x e r c is in g th is d is c r e tio n , d is tr ic t c o u rts a r e g iv e n ‘w id e la titu d e .’” ( c ita tio n o m itte d ) ) . A lth o u g h D e f e n d a n ts s u c c e e d e din d i sm i ssi n g th e case, th e d i stri ctco u rtd i dn o tcl earl y err i n fi n d i n g th atth e case pr e s e nt e d c om pl e x l e ga la nd f a c tua l i s s ue s ; tha tP l a i nt i f f ha d s uf f i c i e ntf a c tua l a nd le g a l b a s e s f

o rh is s ta n d in g c la im ; th a t P la in tif f d idn o t b r in g th e in s ta n t la w s u it in bad fai th; or thatthe ca se di d n otul t i m at el y f urther the go al s of the C op yr i gh tA ct o rs i g n i f i c a n t l yc l a r i f

yth e l a w. A FFI R M ED . ***