U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-5495 

 Facsimile: (202) 418-5547 

Division of Clearing and 

Intermediary Oversight

 

CFTC letter No. 07-24 

December 11, 2007 

Interpretation 

Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight 

 

[Name and address redacted] 

Re: Customer Funds Segregation Requirements under Section 4d of the Commodity Exchange 

Act 

Dear “X”: 

 This letter responds to your recent question concerning Commission Regulation 1.12(h),1

which requires a future commission merchant (“FCM”) to provide notice to the Commission and 

to its designated self-regulatory organization (“DSRO”) whenever the FCM knows, or should 

know, that “the total amount of its funds on deposit in segregated accounts on behalf of 

[customers] is less than the total amount of such funds required by the Act and the Commission's 

rules...”. Your question has been prompted by the DSRO’s recent examination of a member 

FCM, in which it was determined that the FCM had invested customer funds in certificates of 

deposit (“CDs”) that do not meet all of the requirements of Commission Regulation 1.25. In 

particular, the issuing bank’s commercial paper and long term debt is unrated, and therefore 

cannot satisfy the rating requirements in Commission Regulation 1.25(b)(2)(i)(E). The amounts 

invested in the CDs also exceeded the concentration limits set forth in Commission Regulation 

1.25(b)(4)(i)(C). 

 The FCM subsequently has closed the CDs and invested the proceeds in other instruments 

meeting the requirements of Commission Regulation 1.25. For the period during which the CDs 

were still open, the DSRO is questioning whether the FCM’s segregation records correctly 

reflected the CDs as assets held in segregation for its customers. If the CDs are excluded from 

the FCM’s total assets in segregation, the FCM would be required to file an undersegregation 

notice under Commission Regulation 1.12(h). Pending further instruction, the FCM already has 

filed such a notice with the Commission and the DSRO. 

 As required by Section 4d(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act2

 and Commission 

Regulation 1.20, FCMs must segregate and separately account for the funds of their commodity 

1

 Commission regulations referred to in this letter may be found at 17 C.F.R. Ch. 1 (2007). 

2

 The Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”) is codified at 7 U.S.C. §1 et seq. (2005). 
and option customers. At all times, the FCM complied with its obligations under Section 4d(a) of 

the Act and Commission Regulation 1.20 to hold the CDs separately from the FCM’s own 

proprietary accounts. The CDs were titled in an account name that clearly identified the deposits 

as segregated customer funds, and the FCM obtained a letter from the bank acknowledging that 

the funds in the account were those of commodity or option customers. As such, the CDs were 

included, at market value, in the FCM’s required recordkeeping of total funds held in segregation 

for the benefit of its customers. 

FCMs may be subject to Commission enforcement action for investments made in 

violation of the requirements of Commission Regulation 1.25.3

 The DSRO also is expected to 

pursue appropriate disciplinary action for violations of Commission Regulation 1.25. However, if 

the funds have been segregated on behalf of customers in accordance with Section 4d(a) of the 

Act and Commission Regulation 1.20, an FCM is not required to exclude the market value of 

such Regulation 1.25 investments from the total amount of “funds on deposit in segregated 

accounts on behalf of customers.”4

 

 

The views expressed in this letter are based on the facts and conditions described above, 

and represent the views of the Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight (“Division”). 

They do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission or any other division or office of 

the Commission, and the Division’s opinion does not excuse the FCM from compliance with any 

other applicable requirements contained in the Act or the Commission’s regulations thereunder. 

Any different, changed or omitted facts or conditions might require us to reach a different 

conclusion. Please contact Thelma Diaz, Special Counsel, at 202-418-5137 if you have any 

questions concerning this correspondence. 

Very truly yours, 

Thomas Smith 

Deputy Director and Chief Accountant 

 

3 See, e.g., In the Matter of Incomco, Inc., et al., (Dec. 30, 1991) (fines assessed based on several counts, including

two counts for misuse of customer funds by purchasing investments not permitted under Regulation 1.25). 

4

 Commission Regulation 1.12(h) was adopted in the wake of a large FCM’s failure to advise the Commission of the

severe depletion of its customer-segregated funds by the trading losses of a customer that was likely to default on its 

obligations to the FCM, which resulted in the FCM becoming undersegregated and undercapitalized. See 63 Fed.

Reg. 45771 (August 27, 1998). 

2