alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of AlphaTrade.com (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Muir, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
           respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
           Company.

         /s/ Gordon Muir
         -------------------------
         Gordon Muir
         Chief Executive Officer

         Date:  March 26, 2003


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
         U.S.C. ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
         separate disclosure document.





















                                       1
797.

#### KING & COMPANY *v.*CANTRELL.

1. A certiorari bond need not be under seal.

*%.*The evidence demanded the judgment rendered.

Certiorari, from Fulton superior court — Judge Ellis. September 13, 1907.

Submitted December 18, 1907.

Decided April *22,*1908.

*Maddox &*Sims, for plaintiffs in error. *J. E. & L. F. McClelland,*contra.

Powell, J.

In June, 1905, Cantrell obtained .from King & Co. $45; and in September, 1905, obtained a like sum. In each case he executed his note, due 90 days after date, for $60; also an order on Lester Book & Stationery Company, directing it to pay King & Co. $5 on each Saturday night, out of his wages to be earned, until twelve such payments were made. The notes were paid in full, and Cantrell brought this suit to recover back, as usury, the difference between the lawful interest on the $90 and the amount received by King & Co. King & Co. practically admitted these facts,' but set up that they did not make a loan, — that they *264bought the wages to be due Cantrell by Lester Book & Stationery Company. They swore that there was an agreement that there was to be no loan of the money, and only a purchase of his earnings. The jury in the justice’s court found for the defendant. The plaintiff brought certiorari. The certiorari bond was not under seal, and the defendants moved to dismiss the proceeding; the judge overruled the motion, and to this the first exception in the record is taken. Upon considering the petition and the answer, the judge decided that- no issue of fact was presented, and rendered final judgment in favor of the plaintiff, for the full amount sued for. To this judgment also exception is taken.

1. A certiorari bond need not be under seal. Political Code, §4, par. 7. The court therefore did not err in overruling the motion to dismiss.

2. The contention of the plaintiffs in error, that they were entitled to go to the jury on the question whether the transaction between them and Cantrell was a loan of money or a purchase of wages, is not well founded. The papers speak for themselves; and they are not to be Contradicted by parol testimony, in the absence of fraud, accident, or mistake. Indeed, under the 17th section of the act of August 15, 1904 (Georgia Laws 1904, p. 84), an assignment of unearned wages is void. Cantrell’s giving of his promissory notes for the money is wholly contradictory of the contention that he merely sold wages and borrowed nothing. But one lawful result was possible, and that was effectuated by the judgment rendered. *Judgment affirmed.*
II-00478

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Kreiss-Tomkins <d_kreiss-tomkins@riseup.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:44 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Kreiss-Tomkins

805 Charles St.

Sitka, AK 99835
II-00614

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Steven B. Wiese <sbwiesel @qwestoffice.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:31 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Steven B. Wiese

2543 Nicollet Avenue

Minneapolis, MN 55404
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 302

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





James Garner, Chief Executive Officer and Cristyn
Humphreys, Chief Financial Officer of Novogen Limited, a New South Wales corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | The Companys periodic report on Form 20-F for the period ended June 30, 2016 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*        *        *



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  | 
|/s/ James Garner        |  |  |  | /s/ Cristyn Humphreys  
|James Garner            |  |  |  | Cristyn Humphreys      
|                        |  | 
|Date: October 27, 2016  |  |  |  | Date: October 27, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-301-016]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

June 12, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 4, 2001, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
tendered for filing and approval twenty-seven (27) Service Agreement 
between ANR and Wisconsin Public Service Corporation pursuant to ANR's 
Rate Schedules ETS, FTS-1, FSS and NNS, a Buyout Agreement and A Letter 
Agreement (the Agreements).
    ANR states that the Agreements contain a negotiated rate 
arrangement to be effective June 1, 2001. ANR is also filing redlined 
tariff sheets and Eighth Revised Sheet No. 14 which is being provided 
for future use. ANR requests that the Commission accept and approve the 
Agreements and tariff sheet, effective June 1, 2001.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15231 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II-01127

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ray Di Zefalo <raylila 120359@yahoo. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:04 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ray Di Zefalo

109 La Costa St. Unit 508

Melbourne Beach, FL 32951
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           20379
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1210
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 21589
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   21589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (4425768)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     21589
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1687
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10678
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               32794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (41785)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (41785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (41785)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.015)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  DERIVED FROM THE
     ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,133
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         4,838
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    2,726
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         3,198
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           3,201
<LOANS>                                      184,736
<ALLOWANCE>                                      763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               201,436
<DEPOSITS>                                   145,378
<SHORT-TERM>                                  24,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,917
<LONG-TERM>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         219
<OTHER-SE>                                    29,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               201,436
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               14,570
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                755
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              15,325
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             6,980
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,542
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          6,803
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,745
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3,745
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,220
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.18<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.43
<LOANS-NON>                                      237
<LOANS-PAST>                                     205
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  481
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 615
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     66
<RECOVERIES>                                      34
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                763
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             763
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0


<FN>
     <F1> BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
</FN>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-69616, 333-49027, 333-69618, 333-89496, 333-114965, and 333-114969 on Forms S-8 of our report dated March 14, 2007, March 13, 2008 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 2 (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP
|                            
|DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP       
|Charlotte, North Carolina   

March 13, 2008
# C_2009069EN.01002502.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/25

---

Action brought on 9 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-9/09)

(2009/C 69/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga and J. Sénéchal, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells (1) or, in any case, by not communicating them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells (1) or, in any case, by not communicating them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The deadline for transposition of Directive 2004/23/EC expired on 7 April 2006. When this action was brought, the defendant had not yet adopted all the measures necessary to transpose the directive or, in any case, had not communicated them to the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 102, p. 48.

1

---
# C_2011152EN.01000501.xml

| 21.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 March 2011 — ISD Polska sp. z o.o., Industrial Union of Donbass Corp., ISD Polska sp. z o.o. (formerly Majątek Hutniczy sp. z o.o.) v European Commission

(Case C-369/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - State aid - Commission decision - Finding that aid is incompatible with the common market - Order for recovery of aid - Principles of legal certainty and non-retroactivity - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Determination of the ‘appropriateness’ of the interest rate applicable to the recovery of aid)

2011/C 152/07

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellants: ISD Polska sp. z o.o., Industrial Union of Donbass Corp., ISD Polska sp. z o.o. (formerly Majątek Hutniczy sp. z o.o.) (represented by: C. Rapin and E. Van den Haute, lawyers)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 1 July 2009 in Joined Cases T-273/06 and T-297/06 ISD Polska and Others v Commission dismissing the appellants’ actions seeking the partial annulment of Commission Decision 2006/937/EC of 5 July 2005 on State aid C-20/04 in favour of Huta Częstochowa SA (OJ 2006 L 366, p. 1) in so far as it declared certain aid incompatible with the common market and ordered the Republic of Poland to recover the aid — Principles of legal certainty and the non-retroactivity of Community acts — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Determination of the ‘appropriate’ nature of the interest rate applicable to the recovery of aid found to be incompatible with the common market

ISD Polska and Others

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders ISD Polska sp. z o.o. and Industrial Union of Donbass Corp. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ISD Polska sp. z o.o. and Industrial Union of Donbass Corp. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---