alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130020 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ANNA MARIE TAYLOR and DARL TAYLOR, Justices 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 130020 

 COA: 256058 
 Lapeer CC: 99-027598-NH

RATAN RAJANI, M.D. and SURGICAL 

SPECIALISTS, P.C., 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

LAPEER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, 

Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
# C_2010037EN.01004903.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/49

---

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2009 — Complejo Agrícola v Commission

(Case T-174/09) (1)

1

2010/C 37/76

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        71


        <NAME>      Fidelity Canada Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

6-MOS


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

OCT-31-1998


<PERIOD-END>

APR-30-1998


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

61,969


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

76,378


<RECEIVABLES>

3,784


<ASSETS-OTHER>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

80,162


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

1,129


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

329


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

1,458


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

65,125


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

4,310


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

5,110


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

169


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

0


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

(1,002)


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

14,412


<NET-ASSETS>

78,704


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

542


<INTEREST-INCOME>

55


<OTHER-INCOME>

(59)


<EXPENSES-NET>

348


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

190


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

(99)


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

6,634


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

6,725


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

247


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

10,106


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

250


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

1,677


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

627


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

(17,754)


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

323


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

12,764


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

0


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

127


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

0


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

370


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

83,926


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

18.880


<PER-SHARE-NII>

 .040


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

1.470


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .050


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

2.080


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

18.260


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

90


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
# C_2010080EN.01000701.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 February 2010 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-259/09) (1)

1

(Management of waste from extractive industries - Failure to transpose or to communicate national transposition measures)

2010/C 80/12

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Marghelis and P. Van den Wyngaert, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Ossowski, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC (OJ 2006 L 102, p. 15)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009

1

---
# C_2010100EN.01000902.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-295/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/43/EC - Company law - Statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2010/C 100/13

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and E. Adsera Ribera, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt or notify, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC (OJ L 157, p. 87)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

1

---
Gary WATKINS, petitioner, v. Jodi DeANGELO-KIPP, Warden.

No. 16-1385.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Patrick TOWNS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7261.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2011319EN.01001902.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/19

---

Order of the General Court of 1 September 2011 — Maftah v Commission

(Case T-101/09) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Out of time - No force majeure - No excusable error - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 319/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Elmabruk Maftah (South Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom) (represented by: E. Grieves, Barrister, and A. McMurdie, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Paasivirta and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervening party on behalf of the defendant: Council of the European Union, represented by R. Szostak, G. Étienne, M.-M. Josephides and E. Finnegan, Agents

Intervening party on behalf of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1330/2008 of 22 December 2008 amending for the 103rd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban (OJ 2008 L 345, p. 60), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible;

| 2. | Mr Elmabruk Maftah shall bear his own costs and pay the costs of the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Elmabruk Maftah shall bear his own costs and pay the costs of the European Commission;

| 3. | The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 01-1437; MM Docket No. 01-79; RM-10088] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; dismissal. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document dismisses a petition filed on behalf of Runnels Broadcasting System, LLC, licensee of Station KQTN, Lordsburg, New Mexico, proposing the reallotment of Channel 250C to Deming, New Mexico, and modification of its authorization accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1.420(i) of the Commission's Rules. Petitioner withdrew its interest in pursuing the proposal.                         *See*66 FR 17843, April 4, 2001.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's                     *Report and Order*, MM Docket No. 01-79, adopted June 6, 2001 , and released June 15, 2001. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800.                 

Federal Communications Commission

John A. Karousos,

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 01-15974 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1721-000]


Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 14, 2001.
    Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC (Entergy Nuclear) submitted for 
filing a rate schedule under which Entergy Nuclear will engage in 
wholesale electric power and energy transactions at market-based rates. 
Entergy Nuclear also required waiver of various Commission regulations. 
In particular, Entergy Nuclear requested that the Commission grant 
blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all futures issuances of 
securities and assumptions of liability by Entergy Nuclear.
    On May 24, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Entergy Nuclear should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules and Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Entergy Nuclear is authorized to issue securities and assume 
obligations or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or 
otherwise in respect of any security of another person; provided that 
such issuance or assumption is for some lawful object within the 
corporate purposes of the applicant and compatible with the public 
interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Entergy Nuclear's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 25, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15516 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II-00446

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lisa Hoppin <leehoppster@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:29 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Lisa Hoppin

4401 E Smokehouse trail

Cave Creek, AZ 85331
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JAMES HENRY MCDONALD,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00122-CR

Appeal from

34th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20170D03030)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Pro Se’s fourth motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until October 17, 2020. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE PRO SE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that James Henry McDonald, pro se, prepare the Pro Se brief and 

forward the same to this Court on or before October 17, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 362 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 362

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with respect to 
  functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Emergency Leadership Act''.

SEC. 2. FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO ASSISTANT SECRETARIES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 203 of the Department of 
Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
            ``(12) Energy emergency and energy security functions, 
        including--
                    ``(A) responsibilities with respect to 
                infrastructure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, 
                supply, and emergency planning, coordination, response, 
                and restoration; and
                    ``(B) upon request of a State, local, or tribal 
                government or energy sector entity, and in consultation 
                with other Federal agencies as appropriate, provision 
                of technical assistance, support, and response 
                capabilities with respect to energy security threats, 
                risks, and incidents.''.
    (b) Coordination.--The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the 
functions of the Secretary described in section 203(a)(12) of the 
Department of Energy Organization Act (as added by this Act) are 
performed in coordination with relevant Federal agencies.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 362

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with respect to 
  functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, and for other purposes.
```
II-01142

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Christine Arsenault <christine.arsenaultm@gmail. corn>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:46 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Christine Arsenault

2362 Jean-Durand app.4

Qudbec (Ste-Foy), QC G1V 4J7
# C_2010037EN.01000301.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 November 2009 — Ulrich Schröder v Finanzamt Hameln

(Case C-450/09)

2010/C 37/04

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Niedersächsisches Finanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ulrich Schröder

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Hameln

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

The following question is referred, pursuant to Article 234(3) EC, for a preliminary ruling:

Is a situation where a relative with domestically limited tax liability, unlike a person with unlimited tax liability, may not deduct from his total income, as special expenditure, annuities paid in connection with income from letting or leasing, contrary to Articles 56 and 12 EC?

---