alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.49


 


Supplement Agreement



 


In respect of the
related agreement arrangement of Beijing AirMedia Jiaming Advertising Co., Ltd.


 


This Agreement is entered by the following
parties on January 20, 2016 in Beijing.


 


Party A: AirMedia
Technology (Beijing), Co., Ltd.


 


Party B: Guo Man


Xu Qing


 


Party C: Beijing
AirMedia Jiaming Advertising Co., Ltd. (formally known as “Beijing AirMedia UC Advertising Co., Ltd.”)


 


Whereas:


 


(1) Party A, Party B, Party C has respectively
entered into the <Amended and Restated Equity Pledge Agreement> on June 14th, 2007; and has respectively entered
into the <Supplement Agreement of Equity Pledge Agreement> and < Supplement Agreement of Equity Pledge Agreement-2>
in November 2008 and 2010 (collectively, the “Original Equity Pledge Agreement”);


 


(2) Party A, Party B, Party C have entered
into the Amended and Restated Call Option Agreement on June 14th, 2007; and has respectively entered into the Supplement
Agreement of Call Option Agreement and Supplement Agreement of Call Option Agreement-2 in 2008 and 2010 (collectively, the “Original
Call Option Agreement”);


 


(3) The equity holding structure of Party
C changed in 2015 and 2016, and the shareholding percentage of Party B in Party C after the change is as follows: 1% equity is
held by Guo Man, 0.2% equity is held by Xu Qing.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, all Parties, through
friendly negotiations, hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	All parties agree that, for so long as party B continues to hold equity interest in party C, the
relevant provisions in the Original Equity Pledge Agreement and the Original Call Option Agreement applicable to the parties hereto
shall be deemed to be continuously effective, provided that the equity interest pledged and granted with exclusive call option
by party B to party A under the Original Equity Pledge Agreement and the Original Call Option Agreement shall be varied respectively
to provide: Guo Man holds 1% equity in party C, Xu Qing holds 0.2% equity in party C.



 






    	 	- 1 -	 



     


    




 


		2.	Party B and party C shall, upon request by party A, enter into new equity pledge agreement and
call option agreement with party A in order to reflect the actual shareholding percentage of party B, and Party B and party C shall
cooperate with party A to handle the industry and commence procedures required for the registration of the equity pledge.



 


(No
text below)


 




    	 	- 2 -	 



     


    

 


[Signature Page]


 


Party A: AirMedia Technology (Beijing),
Co., Ltd.


 


/s/ AirMedia Technology (Beijing), Co.,
Ltd.


 


Party B:


 





	Guo Man	/s/ Guo Man	 
	 	 
	Xu Qing	/s/ Xu Qing	 







 


Party C: Beijing AirMedia Jiaming Advertising
Co., Ltd


 


/s/ Beijing AirMedia Jiaming Advertising
Co., Ltd.


 








    	 	- 3 -
James FREEMAN, III, petitioner, v. Sean MEDEIROS, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Norfolk.

No. 16-7106.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4885-4886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1515]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3549]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determinations: ``Gauguin's Nirvana: Portrait of Meyer de Haan''

AGENCY: United States Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Gauguin's Nirvana: Portrait 
of Meyer de Haan'' imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition 
without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. 
These objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit 
objects at the Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art, Hartford, CT from on 
or about January 26, 2001, through on or about April 29, 2001, is in 
the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered 
to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-

[[Page 4886]]

44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: January 10, 2001.
William B. Bader,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 01-1515 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Exhibit 24.1





POWER OF ATTORNEY


WHEREAS , BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), will file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 ; and


WHEREAS , the undersigned serve the Company in the capacity indicated;


NOW, THEREFORE , the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints JULIE A. PIGGOTT or JUDY K. CARTER, her attorney with full power to act for her in her name, place and stead, to sign her name in the capacity set forth below, to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 , and to any and all amendments to such Annual Report on Form 10-K, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorney may or shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been executed by the undersigned this 27 th day of February, 2015.


/s/ Warren E. Buffett/s/ Marc D. HamburgWarren E. Buffett, ManagerMarc D. Hamburg, Manager/s/ Matthew K. Rose/s/ Carl R. IceMatthew K. Rose, Manager andChairman and Chief Executive OfficerCarl R. Ice, Manager andPresident and Chief Operating Officer/s/ Gregory C. Fox/s/ Julie A. PiggottGregory C. Fox, ManagerJulie A. Piggott, Manager and Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer/s/ Stevan B. Bobb/s/ Roger NoberStevan B. Bobb, ManagerRoger Nober, Manager
II-00509

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Bettie Ann Hough <wbahough@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:56 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Bettie Ann Hough

POB 881

PALERMO, CA 95968
**Exhibit21**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 

The direct and indirect subsidiaries of Aftermarket Technology Corp.are:

 
| **Name**                                      |   | **Jurisdiction of  Incorporation** |   | **Name Under Which  Business is Conducted**                                  |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Aaron’s Automotive Products, Inc.        |   | Delaware                           |   | Aaron’s Automotive Products                                             |   |
| ACI Electronics Holding Corp.                 |   | Delaware                           |   | Not Applicable                                                               |   |
| ACI Electronics Investment Corp.              |   | Delaware                           |   | Not Applicable                                                               |   |
| ATC Logistics & Electronics, L.P.         |   | Delaware                           |   | ATC Logistics  Autocraft Electronics  Logistics Services  Materials Recovery |   |
| ATC Information Services, Inc.                |   | Delaware                           |   | ATCIS  ATC Information Services                                              |   |
| ATS Remanufacturing Corp.                     |   | Delaware                           |   | ATS  CRS Gastonia                                                            |   |
| Autocraft Industries, Inc.                    |   | Delaware                           |   | Autocraft Industries                                                         |   |
| Autocraft Remanufacturing Corp.               |   | Delaware                           |   | Not Applicable                                                               |   |
| Automotive Development Limited                |   | England                            |   | Not Applicable                                                               |   |
| Aftermarket Technology (U.K.) Holding Limited |   | England                            |   | Not Applicable                                                               |   |
| Component Remanufacturing Specialists, Inc.   |   | New Jersey                         |   | CRS                                                                          |   |
| Elbar Industrial Limited                      |   | England                            |   | Autocraft UK  Autocraft Industries  South East Lincs Engineering             |   |
| PROFormance Powertrain Products, Inc.         |   | Delaware                           |   | PROFormance                                                                  |   |

 

----
Mitchell Glenn WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 16-6683.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Final Regulations to Expand the Scope of Consumer Privacy 

Protections Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced the publication in the Federal Register of final 

regulations that broaden the scope of Part 160 of the Commission’s Regulations, which set forth certain protections 

for the privacy of nonpublic, consumer information. These regulations implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank 

Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 made the CFTC a “federal functional 

regulator” within the meaning of Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. 

As a federal functional regulator, the CFTC was granted the authority to adopt rules that establish appropriate 

standards for financial institutions subject to its jurisdiction to safeguard customer records and information. 

In 2001, the CFTC promulgated Part 160 of the CFTC’s regulations. 

Part 160 of the CFTC’s regulations: 

• Requires certain entities subject to the CFTC’s jurisdiction to provide notice to consumers about their 

privacy policies and practices; 

• Describes the conditions under which an entity subject to the CFTC’s jurisdiction may disclose nonpublic, 

consumer information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties; and 

• Provides a method for consumers to prevent an entity subject to the CFTC’s jurisdiction from disclosing 

nonpublic, consumer information to most nonaffiliated third parties by opting out of that disclosure, subject 

to certain exceptions. 

On July 21, 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 

Act. 

Among other things, Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act amends Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to affirm the 

CFTC’s authority to promulgate regulations to require entities that are subject to the CFTC’s jurisdiction to provide 

certain privacy protections for consumer financial information. 

Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act created two new entities that are subject to the jurisdiction of the CFTC: swap 

dealers and major swap participants. 

The final regulations primarily expand the scope of Part 160 to apply to swap dealers and major swap participants, 

regardless of whether they are required to register with the CFTC. 

When do the final regulations become effective? 

The final regulations become effective 120 days after the date such regulations are published in the Federal Register. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080 

What changes were made to the final regulations from the proposed regulations? 

The final regulations are substantially similar to the proposed regulations. In response to six comment letters, the 

CFTC has made minor changes to the final regulations to ensure consistency with the other federal agencies’ final 

regulations.
# C_2009205EN.01002702.xml

| 29.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/27

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 29 June 2009 — DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA

(Case C-235/09)

2009/C 205/46

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DHL Express France SAS

Applicant:

Defendant: Chronopost SA

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 98 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 (1) on the Community trade mark be interpreted as meaning that the prohibition issued by a Community trade mark court has effect as a matter of law throughout the entire area of the Community? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 98 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 (1) on the Community trade mark be interpreted as meaning that the prohibition issued by a Community trade mark court has effect as a matter of law throughout the entire area of the Community?

1

| 2. | If not, is that court entitled to apply specifically that prohibition to the territories of other States in which the acts of infringement are committed or threatened? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If not, is that court entitled to apply specifically that prohibition to the territories of other States in which the acts of infringement are committed or threatened?

| 3. | In either case, are the coercive measures which the court, by application of its national law, has attached to the prohibition issued by it applicable within the territories of the Member States in which that prohibition would have effect? |
| --- | --- |

3.

In either case, are the coercive measures which the court, by application of its national law, has attached to the prohibition issued by it applicable within the territories of the Member States in which that prohibition would have effect?

| 4. | In the contrary case, may that court order such a coercive measure, similar to or different from that which it adopts pursuant to its national law, by application of the national laws of the States in which that prohibition would have effect? |
| --- | --- |

4.

In the contrary case, may that court order such a coercive measure, similar to or different from that which it adopts pursuant to its national law, by application of the national laws of the States in which that prohibition would have effect?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
II-00612

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ron Schutte <ras356@cox.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:32 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ron Schutte

3706 Georgia St. #1

San Diego, CA 92103
Jessica Lauren WICKY, petitioner, v. Crisanto C. OXONIAN, et al.

No. 16-546.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Florida, Pinellas County denied.
Cameron MUHLENBERG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6135.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive 
Licensing of U.S. Patent Concerning Methods for Production of Antigens 
Under Control of Temperature-Regulated Promoters in Enteric Bacteria

AGENCY: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, announcement is made of the 
availability for licensing of U.S. Patent Serial No. 5,698,416 entitled 
``Methods for Production of Antigens Under Control of Temperature-
Regulated Promoters in Enteric Bacteria'' issued December 16, 1997. 
This patent application has been assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Army.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, 
Maryland 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth 
Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul 
Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664. Both 
at telefax (301) 619-5034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Production of proteins in bacteria 
containing DNA sequences encoding proteins under the control of a 
temperature-regulated promoter is improved by growing the organisms at 
temperatures of less than 35  deg.C until the late logarithmic phase. 
Thereafter the temperature may be raised to 36  deg.C to 39  deg.C. 
Antigens produced by the method of invention may be used as vaccines, 
as means for measuring efficacy of vaccines, as probes to detect 
antigens from clinical samples and for biochemical characterizations of 
antigens.

Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-15734 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
II-00771

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mary Roam <MROAM@SAISD.NET>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:29 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

FOR 8 YEARS I WATCHED THE BUSH BOYS PLAY WIDE AND LOOSE WITH OUR NATION’S ECONOMY. I

EXPECT BETTER FROM THE OBAMA PEOPLE.

Mary Roam

9010 Tintagel

San Antonio, TX 78254