alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JOHN T. LYONS, EDWARD A. ARNOLD, AND JOSEPH H. OWENS 

DOCKET NUMBER: 143 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 143 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

John T. Lyons and 

Edward A. Arnold 

(Palos Heights, Illinois) 

Joseph H. Owens 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that during the period from November 24, 1965, through 

March 9, 1966, John T. Lyons, Joseph H. Owens and Edward A. Arnold, acting for 

themselves, entered into transactions which were, or were of the character of, 

wash sales or fictitious sales. The complaint also charges that the respondents 

executed purchases and sales of commodities for future delivery in a manner 

which was not open and competitive. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, February 21, 1967, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
II-00449

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Maximillian F.O. Gutierrez <max.gutierrez@sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:20 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Maximillian F.O. Gutierrez

100 N. EDGEFIELD AVE. APT.#3

Dallas, TX 75208
Peter T. ROUKIS, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY.

No. 17-7321.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1779 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1779

          Honoring the 50th anniversary of the Freedom Rides.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2010

  Mr. Lewis of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          Honoring the 50th anniversary of the Freedom Rides.

Whereas, on May 4, 1961, a Greyhound bus left Washington, DC with black and 
        white passengers and traveled South to challenge discriminatory racial 
        segregation laws;
Whereas, while the travels of these passengers were initially called a Journey 
        of Reconciliation, their efforts would come to be known as the Freedom 
        Rides;
Whereas these Southern-bound passengers, known as the Freedom Riders, were 
        united by their commitment to end segregation and ongoing racial 
        discrimination;
Whereas the Freedom Riders traveled into states where Jim Crow laws were still 
        prevalent, thus challenging the Federal Government to enforce its 
        decision to overturn them by non-violently integrating the bus routes 
        and rest stops;
Whereas, on their journeys during the Summer of 1961, the Freedom Riders would 
        stop at locations in Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, South 
        Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, and 
        Louisiana;
Whereas, at many times during the Freedom Rides, the Riders encountered 
        antagonism, verbal abuse, acts of violence, and incarceration, yet never 
        gave up their commitment to equality and social justice;
Whereas, led by James Farmer and the Congress of Racial Equality, the Freedom 
        Riders were successful in part due to their role-playing preparation and 
        practice in non-violence and Gandhian principles;
Whereas the Freedom Riders' non-violent actions would help expose to the Nation 
        and the world the cruelty and injustice of Jim Crow laws; and
Whereas the Freedom Rides would spur the Kennedy Administration to enforce laws 
        and judicial rulings that guaranteed the rights and safety of all 
        passengers, regardless of race, gender, or religious background, to sit 
        wherever they desired on bus routes and at rest stops: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the 50th anniversary of the Freedom Rides; and
            (2) recognizes the extraordinary leadership and sacrifice 
        of the Freedom Riders in their commitment to ending racial 
        segregation in America.
                                 <all>
```
In re Otis BRASCOM, petitioner.

No. 15-9141.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
COMMIL USA, LLC, petitioner, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 15-1446.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 October 2010 – Commission v Portugal**

**(Case C‐154/09)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2002/22/EC – Electronic communications – Networks and services – Articles 3(2) and 8(2) – Designation of undertakings responsible for universal service obligations – Incorrect transposition

1.                     *Approximation of laws – Telecommunications sector – Universal service and users’ rights – Directive 2002/22 – Designation
of undertakings for the provision of the universal service – Obligation to use an efficient, objective, transparent and non-discriminatory
designation procedure (European Parliament and Council Directive 2002/22, Arts 3(2) and 8(2)) (see paras 34-39, 42-49)*

2.                     *Member States – Obligations – Implementation of directives – Failure to fulfil obligations – Justification – Not permissible
(Art. 226 EC) (see paras 37-38)*

3.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Right of the Commission to bring judicial proceedings – To be exercised at its
discretion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 51)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Articles 3(2) and 8(2) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51) – Designation of the undertakings responsible for universal service obligations. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to transpose correctly into national law the provisions of European Union law governing the designation of universal service provider(s) and, in any event, by failing to ensure that those provisions are applied in practice, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3(2) and 8(2) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive). |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 75/2004

of 8 June 2004         

amending Annex XI (Telecommunication services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 5ef (Commission Decision 2002/16/EC) of Annex XI to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2003/490/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 June 2004, provided that all the notifications pursuant to Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2004.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

S. GILLESPIE            

----

(1)OJ L 130, 29.4.2004, p. 3.

(2)OJ L 168, 5.7.2003, p. 19.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 18 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 18

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 24, 2009.
Whereas Paul Newman, a great American actor, film director, entrepreneur, 
        humanitarian, and automobile racing enthusiast, passed away on September 
        26, 2008;
Whereas Paul Newman was born on January 26, 1925, in Shaker Heights, Ohio;
Whereas following his service in the Navy during World War II in the Pacific 
        theater, Paul Newman completed his degree at Kenyon College and later at 
        the Yale School of Drama;
Whereas Paul Newman is considered one of America's most accomplished actors and 
        his career in film and on stage spanned over fifty years;
Whereas Paul Newman was nominated for ten Oscars, winning Best Actor in 1986 for 
        his role in The Color of Money and two honorary Oscars, the Humanitarian 
        Award in 1993 and the Lifetime Achievement Award in 1985;
Whereas Paul Newman brought life to many memorable characters, including 
        ``Hud'', ``Cool Hand Luke'', ``Butch Cassidy'', ``Henry Gondorff'', and 
        ``Fast Eddie'';
Whereas in 1982, Paul Newman co-founded Newman's Own, a premium food and 
        beverage company that began with salad dressings and has expanded to 
        over 150 varieties of all-natural food and beverage products;
Whereas Paul Newman was a dedicated philanthropist, donating all of the profits 
        from Newman's Own sales for educational and charitable purposes, 
        totaling over $250,000,000 in donations;
Whereas Paul Newman founded eleven Hole in the Wall camps around the world, 
        named for the outlaw gang made famous by Newman's portrayal of Butch 
        Cassidy in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and dedicated to 
        providing free recreation to children with cancer and other serious 
        illnesses;
Whereas Paul Newman founded the Scott Newman Foundation for the prevention of 
        drug abuse in 1978 after the death of his son;
Whereas Paul Newman was a successful racecar driver and well-rounded athlete, 
        winning several Sports Car Club of America national driving titles and 
        competing in Daytona in 1995 on the occasion of his 70th birthday;
Whereas Paul Newman was beloved by his family, friends, and neighbors for his 
        great generosity, good humor, and spirited charm; and
Whereas Paul Newman's humanitarian works and incomparable talents have made him 
        an American icon who will never be forgotten: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the life and 
accomplishments of Paul Newman for his many contributions to American film, 
theater, and philanthropy.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Stavros M. GANIAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-263.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.2** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Dirkson R. Charles, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of K&F Industries, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  DIRKSON    R. CHARLES    Dirkson R. Charles    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: May 11, 2006
Exhibit
4.2


 


	 	BARBARA
                                         K. CEGAVSKE
	Filed
    in the office of 	Document
    Number
	{“Seal
    of	Secretary
    of State	/s/Barbara
    K.	20150059687-53
	State
    of	204
    North Carson St, Suite 1	Cegavske	Filing
    Date and Time
	Nevada”}	Carson
    City, Nevada 89701-4299	Barbara
    K. Cegavske	02/09/2015
    7:22 AM
	 	(775)
    684 5708	Secretary
    of State	Entity
    Number 
	 	Website:
    www. nvsos.gov	State
    of Nevada	E0486232014-3


 


	 	 
	Certificate
    of Designation 	 
	(Pursuant
    to NRS 78.1955)	 
	 	 





	USE
    BLACK INK ONLY- DO NOT HIGHLIGHT	ABOVE
    SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY


 


Certificate
of Amendment to Certificate of Designation For


Nevada
Profit Corporation


(Pursuant
to NRS 78.1955)


 


	 	1.	Name
    of corporation:


 


	 	 
	 	  Duo
    World, Inc.
	 	 


 


	 	2.	By
    resolution of the board of directors the original class or series is amended as follows:


 


	 	To
                                         read in its entirety as follows:

        “
        Designation: Series A Preferred Stock

        Number
        of Shares of Series A Preferred Stock: 10,000,000

        Voting
        Rights: Each share of Series A Preferred Stock has one vote per share on all matters brought before shareholders. Series
        A Preferred Stock votes with Common Stock and not as a separate class.

        Conversion
        Rights: Each share of Series A Preferred Stock may be converted into ten shares of Common Stock commencing on the first
        anniversary of issuance.

        Other
        Rights: None.”



 


	 	4.	Effective
    date of filing: (optional)		
	 	 	 	(must
    not be later than 90 days after certificate is filed)


 


	 	5.	Signatures:
    (required)


 


X  /s/
Muhunthan Canagasooryam


     Muhunthan
Canagasooryam


 


Filing
Fee: $ 175.00


 


Stock
shall be insufficient to permit in full payment of the Liquidation Preference, then all such assets of the corporation shall be
distributed ratably among the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock. Neither the consolidation or merger of the corporation
nor the sale, lease or transfer by the corporation of all or part of its assets shall be deemed a liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of the corporation for purposes of this Section (c).


 






    	 	1
Terance Taylor PRIGGE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7021.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE 39>

                                                       EXHIBIT 11

AMERICAN GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, LTD.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE


                               Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended
                                    June 30,                  June 30,
                                1999        1998         1999         1998
                                ____        ____         ____         ____

Weighted average number
 of shares for computation   12,532,102  12,532,102   12,532,102   12,532,102
                             ==========  ==========   ==========   ==========

Net income (loss)            $1,413,000 $(1,943,000)   $(450,000) $(3,854,000)

Dividends and accretion
on preferred stock              467,000     467,000      933,000      933,000
                                _______     _______      _______      _______

Net income (loss) for
common
stockholders                   $946,000 $(2,410,000) $(1,383,000) $(4,787,000)
                               ======== ===========  ===========  ===========

Income (loss) for common
stockholders per common
share                             $0.08      $(0.19)      $(0.11)      $(0.38)
                                  =====      =======      =======      ======
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Inst | Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| **Supplement to the Fidelity Advisor® Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Institutional Class December 29, 2012 Prospectus**The following information replaces similar information found in the "Fund Summary" section under the heading "Fee Table" on page 4. 1 year$	1533 years$	8105 years$	1,52310 years$	3,416 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Supplement Text Block
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**fit_SupplementTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**fit_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |