alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 38 02

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Don /M cC Co ok /S ol o
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Je ffre y Sti ev e, Med ic al Dire ct or , Cor rrec t Ca re So lu ti on s; Arka ns as Sta te Pri so n; Aric Simm on s, APN, Pra ct it io ne r, Co rrec t Ca re So lu ti on ; Br et t Bu tl er, Me di cal

Doc to r, Co rrec t Ca re So lu ti on , a Tenn es se e Co rp or at io n
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rnDis tri ctof Ark an sa s - P in e Bl uf f

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Nov em

be r 8, 2 01 7 Fi le d: Nov em

be r 14 , 20 17 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Ark an sa s pr is o n e r Don /M cC Co ok/S ol o (So lo ) ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s 1

ad ve r s e gr an t of su m

m ary jud gm en t in fav or of Dr. Je ffre y St ie ve in th is pr o se 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n. Upo n care fu l de no vo rev ie w, se e Uni te d St at es v. Dico , In c., 80 8 F.3 d 34 2, 34 6 (8 th Ci r. 20 15 ), we co nc lu de th at S ol o de m on st rat ed ne it he r de li be rat e in di ffer en ce no r un co ns ti tu t i o n a l ret al ia ti on by Dr. St ie ve

. See Meu ir v. Green e Ct y . Jai l Em

ps ., 48 7 F .3d11 15 , 11 18 (8 th Ci r. 20 07 ) (p ris on ph y si ci an s ar e free to ex erci se in de pe nd en t m ed ic al jud gm en t); Lon g v. Nix , 86 F.3 d 76 1, 76 5 (8 th Ci r. 19 96 ) (p ris on of

fic ia l s do no t vi ol at e Eig ht h Am en dm en t whe n, in ex erci si ng pr of es si on al jud gme n t, th ey refu se to im pl em en t in m at e’s reque st ed co ur se of tre at m en t). Acc or di ng ly, we affi rm th e jud gm en t. See 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Jo e J. Vol pe , Un it ed St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e Eas te rn 1 Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, to who m th e cas e was refe rred fo r fin al di sp os it io n by co ns en t of th e p art ie s p ur su an t t o 2 8 U.S.C. § 63 6( c).
-2

-
II-00272

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jon Schnaitman <j schnaitman@hotmail, com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:45 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jon Schnaitman

114 w. hanover

marshall, MI 49068
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Proposed Rulemaking Q & A – Designation of Chief Compliance Officer and 

Preparation of Annual Compliance Report 

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking? 

The goal of the proposed rulemaking is to implement the Dodd-Frank Act’s requirements on designation, 

qualifications, and duties of a chief compliance officer (CCO) as well the requirements relating to the annual 

compliance report, to be prepared by the chief compliance officer and furnished to the Commission. 

What is the purpose of the position of chief compliance officer? 

The purpose of a CCO is to establish and administer the compliance policies of the registrant, and resolve conflicts 

of interest within the organization. The CCO must be part of a registrant’s Risk Management Program, as provided 

for in other rulemakings. The CCO is not intended to act as a substitute for audit staff, back office staff, external 

auditors, or the chief financial officer. 

What is included in the proposed registration system? 

The purpose of the annual compliance report is to detail both the compliance policies of the registrant, and to 

describe any non-compliance events that occurred during the last reporting period along with the action taken to 

address the event. The annual report is intended to promote compliance behavior by requiring a registrant to 

conduct a periodic self-evaluation and to inform the Commission of possible compliance weaknesses that should be 

addressed. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
# C_2010024EN.01001902.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu (Romania) lodged on 16 October 2009 — Ioan Tatu v Romanian State represented by the Ministerul Finanțelor și Economiei, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu, Ministerul Mediului

(Case C-402/09)

2010/C 24/32

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ioan Tatu

Applicant:

Defendants: Romanian State, represented by the Ministerul Finanțelor și Economiei, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu, Ministerul Mediului

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Are the provisions of OUG No 50/2008 [introducing a pollution tax for motor vehicles] (1), as subsequently amended (by OUG No 208/2008 (2) and OUG No 218/2008 (3)), contrary to the provisions of Article 90 of the EC Treaty, and do they constitute a measure which is manifestly discriminatory?

1

2

3

---

(1)  OUG No 50/2008 introducing a pollution tax for motor vehicles, M.Of. No 237, 25.4.2008.

1

(2)  OUG No 208/2008 implementing certain measures concerning the pollution tax for motor vehicles, M. Of. No 825, 8.12.2008.

2

(3)  OUG No 836 amending the Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului No 50/2008 on the introduction of the pollution tax for motor vehicles, M Of. No 836, 11.12.2008.

3

---
# C_2009220EN.01001501.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/15

---

Request for an opinion submitted by the Council of the European Union pursuant to Article 300(6) EC

(Opinion 1/09)

2009/C 220/24

Language of the case: all the official languages

Applicant

Applicant

Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-C. Piris, F. Florindo Gijón and G. Kimberley, acting as Agents)

Questions submitted to the Court

Questions submitted to the Court

Is the proposed agreement creating a unified patent litigation system (currently called the ‘European and Community Patents Court’) (1) compatible with the provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Community?

1

---

(1)  Council Working Document on a revised Presidency text of the Draft Agreement on the European and Community Patents Court and Draft Statute (document 7928/09 of 23 March 2009).

1

---
Randall JENNETTE, petitioner, v. Brian THOMPSON, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mercer, et al.

No. 16-6171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 18 

Honoring the life, achievements, and contributions of Paul Newman. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. HIMES, Mr. 

HINCHEY, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. COURTNEY, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. FARR, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. BOSWELL, Ms. WOOLSEY, and Ms. SHEA-PORTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life, achievements, and contributions of Paul 

Newman. 

Whereas Paul Newman, a great American actor, film director, entrepreneur, humanitarian, and automobile racing 

enthusiast, passed away on September 26, 2008; 

Whereas Paul Newman was born on January 26, 1925, in 

Shaker Heights, Ohio; 

Whereas following his service in the Navy during World War 

II in the Pacific theater, Paul Newman completed his degree at Kenyon College and later at the Yale School of 

Drama; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 18 IH 

Whereas Paul Newman is considered one of America’s most 

accomplished actors and his career in film and on stage 

spanned over fifty years; 

Whereas Paul Newman was nominated for ten Oscars, winning Best Actor in 1986 for his role in The Color of 

Money and two honorary Oscars, the Humanitarian 

Award in 1993 and the Lifetime Achievement Award in 

1985; 

Whereas Paul Newman brought life to many memorable characters, including ‘‘Hud’’, ‘‘Cool Hand Luke’’, ‘‘Butch 

Cassidy’’, ‘‘Henry Gondorff’’, and ‘‘Fast Eddie’’; 

Whereas in 1982, Paul Newman co-founded Newman’s Own, 

a premium food and beverage company that began with 

salad dressings and has expanded to over 150 varieties 

of all-natural food and beverage products; 

Whereas Paul Newman was a dedicated philanthropist, donating all of the profits from Newman’s Own sales for 

educational and charitable purposes, totaling over 

$250,000,000 in donations; 

Whereas Paul Newman founded eleven Hole in the Wall 

camps around the world, named for the outlaw gang 

made famous by Newman’s portrayal of Butch Cassidy in 

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and dedicated to 

providing free recreation to children with cancer and 

other serious illnesses; 

Whereas Paul Newman founded the Scott Newman Foundation for the prevention of drug abuse in 1978 after the 

death of his son; 

Whereas Paul Newman was a successful racecar driver and 

well-rounded athlete, winning several Sports Car Club of 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 18 IH 

America national driving titles and competing in Daytona 

in 1995 on the occasion of his 70th birthday; 

Whereas Paul Newman was beloved by his family, friends, 

and neighbors for his great generosity, good humor, and 

spirited charm; and 

Whereas Paul Newman’s humanitarian works and incomparable talents have made him an American icon who will 

never be forgotten: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the life and accomplishments of Paul Newman for his 

3 many contributions to American film, theater, and philan4 thropy. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ELELAKE JAMES JEFFERSON, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 131 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Karen E. GREENE, petitioner, v. HARRIS CORPORATION, et al.

No. 16-650.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<R></R>

**Fund**/Ticker

<R>**Fidelity Advisor**®**Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund**/FMMLX</R>

Shares of the fund are available for purchase only by mutual funds for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment manager.

**Prospectus**

<R>**December 5, 2012**</R>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    Notice is hereby given that on June 4, 2001, a proposed Consent Decree (“Decree”) in                     *United States*                    v.                     *IBM Corporation*, Civil No. 01-B-1017, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The United States filed this action pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act for recovery of costs incurred by the United States in responding to releases of hazardous substances at the Rocky Flats Industrial Park Superfund Site in Jefferson County, Colorado.                

Pursuant to the proposed Consent Decree, IBM Corporation will pay $460,000, in reimbursement of past costs.

                    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to,                     *United States*                    v.                    *IBM Corporation*, D.J. Ref. #90-11-3-1719/2.                

The Decree may be examined at the office of the U.S. Attorney, 1225 17th Street, Denver, Colorado; at U.S. EPA Region 8, Office of Enforcement, 999 18th Street, Denver, CO. A copy of the Decree may be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $3.75 for the Decree (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Robert D. Brook,

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 01-15668 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
In re Ronald CHAVIS, petitioner.

No. 16-6331.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen W. Webster, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ STEPHEN W. WEBSTER                                    
|Stephen W. Webster                                        
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 26, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3651 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3651

 To facilitate the use of certain land in Nebraska for public outdoor 
          recreational opportunities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2019

 Mr. Fortenberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To facilitate the use of certain land in Nebraska for public outdoor 
          recreational opportunities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF CONVEYED LAND.

    Section 342(c) of the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``The conveyance'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) Primary use.--The conveyance''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Additional use.--The Missouri River Basin Lewis and 
        Clark Interpretive Trail and Visitor Center Foundation, Inc. 
        may use, or enter into a lease or agreement to use, not more 
        than 40 acres of the land conveyed under subsection (a) for 
        public outdoor recreation under the following conditions:
                    ``(A) The land shall continue to be maintained in a 
                manner that is compatible with the use authorized in 
                paragraph (1), conditions stated in the deed for the 
                land, and the memorandum of understanding with the 
                National Park Service dated June 2009.
                    ``(B) The nature trail around the perimeter of the 
                land shall remain in place and may be enhanced with 
                educational signage about the flora and fauna that are 
                native to the land and planting of native flora.
                    ``(C) Revenue from any use (including any lease or 
                agreement entered into) under this paragraph shall be 
                used to offset maintenance and operating costs of the 
                Lewis and Clark Interpretive Center.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010179EN.01001402.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/14

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arios Pagos — Greece) — Organismos Sillogikis Diakhirisis Dimiourgon Theatrikon kai Optikoakoustikon Ergon v Divani Acropolis Hotel and Tourism AE

(Case C-136/09) (1)

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Copyright and related rights in the information society - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 3 - Concept of ‘communication to the public’ - Works communicated by means of television sets installed in hotel rooms)

(2010/C 179/23)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Arios Pagos

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Organismos Sillogikis Diakhirisis Dimiourgon Theatrikon kai Optikoakoustikon Ergon

Defendant: Divani Acropolis Hotel and Tourism AE

Intervener in support of the defendant: Hellenic Chamber of Hotels

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Arios Pagos — Interpretation of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10) — Concept of ‘communication to the public’ — Works transmitted by means of television sets installed in hotel rooms and connected to the central antenna of the hotel with no other action by the hotel to ensure reception of a signal by hotel customers

Operative part of the order

The hotelier, by installing televisions in his hotel rooms and by connecting them to the central antenna of the hotel, thereby, and without more, carries out an act of communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.

---

(1)  OJ C 141, of 20.06.2009.

---
Alexander POU, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-870.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
II-00393

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jinx Mercer <jinxmercer@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:42 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jil~x Mercer

4925 N. Calle Bosque

Tucson, AZ 85718