alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00570

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mark Precious <presh7@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:34 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mark Precious

3549 Iowa Avenue

Riverside, CA 92507-7215
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 223 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 223

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 30, 2009.
Whereas Paul Harvey, a son, brother, husband, father, friend, pioneering 
        American, and a cherished voice, passed away on February 28, 2009;
Whereas Paul Harvey Aurandt was born on September 4, 1918, in Tulsa, Oklahoma;
Whereas prefacing a storied career in radio by making radio receivers as a young 
        boy and a fill-in announcer while a student at the University of Tulsa, 
        he epitomized American values and American ideals proving that one can 
        lead a decent life with hard work and solid values;
Whereas Paul Harvey, through open expression, pioneered the format of radio 
        broadcasts that so many now find commonplace;
Whereas Paul Harvey was a blogger before it was a known medium, he just did his 
        blogging on the radio;
Whereas Paul Harvey was elected to the National Association of Broadcasters 
        Radio Hall of Fame and Oklahoma Hall of Fame and appeared on the Gallup 
        poll list of America's most admired men;
Whereas in 2005, Paul Harvey was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the 
        United States' most prestigious civilian award, by President George W. 
        Bush;
Whereas Paul Harvey's career in radio spanned over 70 years and he is considered 
        one of the United States' most accomplished radio personalities and a 
        trail blazer;
Whereas Paul Harvey was beloved by his family, friends, neighbors, and vast 
        listening audience for his great generosity, good humor, and spirited 
        charm;
Whereas Paul Harvey, the ``largest one-man network in the world'', was heard on 
        1,200 radio stations, 400 Armed Forces Network stations around the 
        world, and in 300 newspapers; and
Whereas Paul Harvey's broadcasts and newspaper columns have been reprinted in 
        the Congressional Record more than those of any other commentator: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the life and 
accomplishments of Paul Harvey.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
LIFESCAN SCOTLAND, LTD., petitioner, v. PHARMATECH SOLUTIONS, INC.

No. 16-377.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
II-01197

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jim Bateman <jrbateman@live.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 4:49 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jim Bateman

N7269 County Road BB

Spring Valley, WI 54767
EXHIBIT 99.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 31 C.F.R. § 30.15
       (A)
    
    SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive
risks that could threaten the value of Central Bancorp, Inc.;(B)
    
    Employee compensation plans that unnecessarily expose Central Bancorp, Inc. to
risks; and(C)
    
    Employee compensation plans that could encourage the manipulation of reported
earnings of Central Bancorp, Inc. to enhance the compensation of an employee;




---



##### 








---



##### 



Date: June 18, 2010
    /s/ John D. DohertyJohn D. DohertyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(c)


                    (SPROULE ASSOCIATES LIMITED LETTERHEAD)



February 26, 1999



CEC Resources, Ltd.
1700 Broadway, Suite 1150
Denver, CO 80290



    Sproule Associates Limited consents to the use of its name and its reports
dated February 10, 1999 entitled "Evaluation of the P&NG Reserves of CEC
Resources Ltd. (As of November 30, 1998) Constant (SEC) Price Case" in whole or
in part, by CEC Resources Ltd. in Resources' Form 10-K Report to the Securities
and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended November 30, 1998.



                           For and on behalf of
                           Sproule Associates Limited


                           s/Paul B. Jung
                           Paul B. Jung
Exhibit
10.1


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


First
Amendment dated as of May 16, 2016 (this “Amendment”) to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of December
31, 2015 by and between Steven Madden, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Edward R. Rosenfeld
(the “Executive”), as amended.


W
I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2015 (the “Original
Agreement”); and


WHEREAS,
the Executive and the Company desire to amend the Original Agreement in certain respects;


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


		1.	Effective
                                         as of the date of this Amendment, the Original Agreement is amended by the deletion of
                                         the first sentence of Section 9.6(a) in its entirety and the insertion of the following
                                         sentence in lieu thereof:





“In
the event that during the period commencing 90 days prior to a Change of Control (as hereinafter defined) and ending 180 days
after a Change of Control, the Executive’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company (other than for death,
Total Disability or Cause) or by the resignation of the Executive for Good Reason, the Executive shall receive in cash, within
ten days of the date of termination or resignation of employment, an amount equal to two and one-half (2.5) times the sum of (i)
the annual Base Salary to which the Executive was entitled under Section 4.1 as of the date of termination or resignation of employment
plus (ii) the average cash bonus received by the Executive for the preceding three-year period ending on the last previous December
31st.”




		2.	As
                                         hereinabove modified, all of the terms and provisions of the Original Agreement shall
                                         remain in full force and effect.





    	1



    	 



    

 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement on the date first set
forth above.




	 	Steven Madden, Ltd.	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Arvind
    Dharia	 
	 	Name:  	Arvind Dharia	 
	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Edward R. Rosenfeld	 
	 	Edward R. Rosenfeld	 







    	2
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-25701, 333-04676, 333-60611, 333-65978 and 333-137959) on
Form S-8 and Registration Statements (Nos. 333-70045, 333-65980, 333-112122 and 333-137958) on Form S-3 of DG FastChannel, Inc. of our reports dated March 13, 2008,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of DG FastChannel, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
DG FastChannel, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.



Dallas,
Texas
March 13, 2008

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Karl R. Wyss, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Thermadyne Holdings Corporation and will be retained by
Thermadyne Holdings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  May 15, 2003

                                  /s/      Karl R. Wyss
                                  --------------------------------
                                  Karl R. Wyss
                                  Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                  Executive Officer of the Company
# C_2009233EN.01001101.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy) lodged on 27 July 2009 — Paolo Lunardi v Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Parma

(Case C-293/09)

2009/C 233/18

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Paolo Lunardi

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Parma

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 19(5) of Presidential Decree No 633/72 at variance with Community law and with the principle of the neutrality of VAT, and in particular has Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 been incorrectly transposed in so far as the practical consequence of national law is that, as a result of the method prescribed for calculating the deductible proportion, a taxable person whose transactions are exempt under statute has no right to deduct VAT paid on purchases of equipment?

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 24.1 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned directors (each,
a Signatory) of GenVec, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Delaware (the Company), hereby constitutes and appoints Paul H.
Fischer, Jeffrey W. Church and Steven Kaplan (each, an Agent, and
collectively, Agents) or any of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent for and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to
sign the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each
Signatory further grants to the Agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary, in the judgment of such Agent, to be done in connection with any
such signing and filing, as full to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said Agents, or
any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This Power of Attorney may be executed simultaneously in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which
constitute but one and the same instrument. Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/Paul H. Fischer
Paul H. Fischer, Ph.D.
    
    President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
    
    March 5, 2004/s/Jeffrey W. Church
Jeffrey W. Church
    
    Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
    
    March 5, 2004/s/Barbara Hackman Franklin
Barbara Hackman Franklin
    
    Director
    
    March 5, 2004/s/Thomas Fraser, Ph.D.
Thomas Fraser, Ph.D.
    
    Director
    
    March 5, 2004/s/Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D.
Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D.
    
    Director
    
    March 5, 2004/s/Zola Horovitz, Ph.D.
Zola Horovitz, Ph.D.
    
    Director
    
    March 5, 2004/s/William N. Kelley, M.D.
William N. Kelley, M.D.
    
    Director
    
    March 5, 2004/s/Stelios Papadopoulos, Ph.D.
Stelios Papadopoulos, Ph.D.
    
    Director
    
    March 5, 2004/s/Joshua Ruch
Joshua Ruch
    
    Director
    
    March 5, 2004/s/ Harold R. Werner
Harold R. Werner
    
    Director
    
    March 5, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         859,885
<SECURITIES>                                   615,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  319,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                   169,389
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          97,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,422
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,965,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        116
<COMMON>                                        12,158
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,529,273)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,965,600
<SALES>                                         47,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,305
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  385,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (102,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             182,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (444,035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (444,035)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
R.P., et ux., petitioners, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SEVICES, et al.

No. 16-500.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of respondent The Minor, Alexandria P. for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Motion of respondent Father J.E. for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-388-001]

Take notice that on June 15, 2001 Northern Border Pipeline Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective June 1, 2001:

First Revised Sheet Number 183

First Revised Sheet Number 185

First Revised Sheet Number 189

First Revised Sheet Number 190

First Revised Sheet Number 191

Northern Border states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Commission's order dated May 31, 2001, 95 FERC 61,320 (May 31 Order), wherein the Commission directed Northern Border to file compliance tariff sheets for Rate Schedule PAL.

Northern Border states that copies of this filing have been sent to all parties of record in this proceeding.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15953  Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2010080EN.01000801.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Wuppertal (Germany) lodged on 14 December 2009 — Dieter May v AOK Rheinland/Hamburg — Die Gesundheitskasse

(Case C-519/09)

2010/C 80/14

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeitsgericht Wuppertal

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimant: Dieter May

Claimant:

Defendant: AOK Rheinland/Hamburg — Die Gesundheitskasse

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the concept of worker within the meaning of Article 7(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/88/EC (corresponding to Article 7 of Directive 93/104/EC) ... (1) also cover an employee subject to staff regulations (Dienstordnungsangestellter) in a public-law body whose autonomous regulations issued on the basis of authorisation under federal legislation (Paragraph 351 of the Reichsversicherungsordnung (National Social Insurance Code)) refer, in respect of the holiday entitlement of such an employee, to the provisions applicable to public servants (here Paragraph 101 of the Landesbeamtengesetz NW (Law on public servants of the Land North Rhine-Westphalia) in conjunction with the Verordnung über den Erholungsurlaub der Beamtinnen und Beamten und Richterinnen und Richter im Lande Nordrhein-Westfalen (Regulations on the holiday leave of public servants and judges in the Land North Rhine-Westphalia))?

1

Land

Land

---

(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003, L 299, p. 9).

1

---