alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00521

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Sally Church <swmlc 1 @aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:42 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Sally Church

1429 Homeland Avenue

Norman, OK 73-72
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 362 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 362

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2020

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with respect to 
  functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Emergency Leadership Act''.

SEC. 2. FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO ASSISTANT SECRETARIES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 203 of the Department of 
Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
            ``(12) Energy emergency and energy security functions, 
        including--
                    ``(A) responsibilities with respect to 
                infrastructure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, 
                supply, and emergency planning, coordination, response, 
                and restoration; and
                    ``(B) upon request of a State, local, or tribal 
                government or energy sector entity, and in consultation 
                with other Federal agencies as appropriate, provision 
                of technical assistance, support, and response 
                capabilities with respect to energy security threats, 
                risks, and incidents.''.
    (b) Coordination.--The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the 
functions of the Secretary described in section 203(a)(12) of the 
Department of Energy Organization Act (as added by this Act) are 
performed in coordination with relevant Federal agencies.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Eugene Howard RAINEY, petitioner, v. Tom McGINLEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

No. 16-9371.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33700-33701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15870]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 20, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Cynthia C. Goodwin, Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309-4470:
    1. Florida Coastline Community Group, Inc., Miami, Florida; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting 
shares of Florida Coastline National Bank, Miami, Florida (in 
organization).
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Allegiant Bancorp, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri; to merge with 
Southside Bancshares Corp., St. Louis, Missouri, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Southside National Bank in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Bank 
of Ste. Genevieve, Sainte Genevieve, Missouri; Bank of St. Charles 
County, St. Charles,

[[Page 33701]]

Missouri; and State Bank of Jefferson County, De Soto, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 20, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-15870 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Daniel CONTRERAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7489.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Lisa BELYEW, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, BUTTE COUNTY, et al.

No. 16-9082.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2009267EN.01003301.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/33

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands), lodged on 30 July 2009 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie; other party: F. Toprak

(Case C-300/09)

2009/C 267/60

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie

Appellant:

Other party: F. Toprak

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 13 of Decision No 1/80 [of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association, taken by the Association Council set up under the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey] be interpreted as meaning that a new restriction, within the terms of that provision, includes a tightening in respect of a provision which entered into force after 1 December 1980, and which constituted a relaxation of the provision which had been in force on 1 December 1980, if that tightening does not amount to a deterioration vis-à-vis the provision which was in force on 1 December 1980?

---
Timothy JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7520.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2010148EN.01005401.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/54

---

Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Cuallado Martorell v Commission

(Case F-96/09)

2010/C 148/95

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eva Cuallado Martorell (Augsburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Díez Lorenzo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions not to admit the applicant to the oral test of Open Competition EPSO/AD/130/08 and to deny access to the corrected written tests and annulment with retroactive effect of the reserve list published for the appointment of Lawyer linguists having Spanish as their main language.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of 14 September 2009 by which EPSO refused to send the applicant a copy of her written tests and an individual assessment sheet, in which were indicated the grounds which caused the selection board to award her the eliminatory mark of 18/40 in the final written test (c), and disregarded her application for admission to the oral test of Open Competition AD/130/08; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 14 September 2009 by which EPSO refused to send the applicant a copy of her written tests and an individual assessment sheet, in which were indicated the grounds which caused the selection board to award her the eliminatory mark of 18/40 in the final written test (c), and disregarded her application for admission to the oral test of Open Competition AD/130/08;

| — | annul the decision of 23 July 2009 by which EPSO stated that it was maintaining the eliminatory mark of 18/40 in the last written test (c) and refused the applicant admission to the oral test of Open Competition EPSO/AD/130/08 for the purpose of drawing up a reserve list for the appointment of Lawyer linguists having Spanish as their main language; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 23 July 2009 by which EPSO stated that it was maintaining the eliminatory mark of 18/40 in the last written test (c) and refused the applicant admission to the oral test of Open Competition EPSO/AD/130/08 for the purpose of drawing up a reserve list for the appointment of Lawyer linguists having Spanish as their main language;

| — | annul the reserve list published following the competition with retroactive effect from the date of publication thereof; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the reserve list published following the competition with retroactive effect from the date of publication thereof;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
# C_2012165EN.01001603.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-49/09) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Community tendering procedure - Provision of services relating to the maintenance and development of the information systems of the Directorate-General for Regional Policy - Rejection of a tender - Action for annulment - Equal treatment - Obligation to state reasons - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Manifest error of assessment - Non-contractual liability)

2012/C 165/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and P. Katsimani, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by N. Bambara and E. Manhaeve, and subsequently by E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents, assisted by P. Wytinck and B. Hoorelbeke, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 21 November 2008 to reject the tender submitted by the applicant in the context of call for tenders REGIO-A4-2008-01 for the maintenance and development of the Directorate-General for Regional Policy’s information systems (OJ 2008/S 117-155067) and the decision to award the contract to another tenderer and, secondly, for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.

1

---
Stanley F. ALLEN, petitioner, v. Dorothy WILLIAMS, et al.

No. 16-5714.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
II-00819

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

richard boyle <woodmanat709@gmail. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:03 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

richard boyle

709 garland pl.

des plaines, IL 60016
Felicia ROSS, petitioner, v. ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC., et al.

No. 17M83.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
II-O0090

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael McEachern <mpjamc@gmail.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 6:44 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael McEachern

2007 Simms Street

Beaufort, SC 29902
Adrian Michael REQUENA, petitioner, v. Joe NORWOOD, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-5575.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2010037EN.01005202.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/52

---

Action brought on 30 December 2009 — Pascual García v Commission

(Case F-106/09)

2010/C 37/83

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: César Pascual García (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: B. Cortese and C. Cortese, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Claim for compensation for the damage arising as a result of the failure to pay the applicant remuneration and related emoluments for the period 1 April 2006 — 1 March 2009 and for interest on the sum due.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Order the Commission to pay compensation for the damage arising as a result of the failure to pay the applicant remuneration and related emoluments for the period 1 April 2006 — 1 March 2009 and interest on the sum due. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay compensation for the damage arising as a result of the failure to pay the applicant remuneration and related emoluments for the period 1 April 2006 — 1 March 2009 and interest on the sum due.

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           8,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  302,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               373,736
<PP&E>                                          62,818
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,916,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,715,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,434,325
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,916,022
<SALES>                                        166,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,083
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (94,212)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (94,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (94,212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
II-O0601

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Glenn Ewen <glennewen@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:40 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Glenn Ewen

465 Greenwood Ave.

Trenton, NJ 7305