alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-66,244-02

EX P ARTE LAFARRIS BORENS , Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. F -05-60566- R IN THE 265 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y o u ng , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag gravat ed robber y and sentenc ed to twenty-five year s’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Borens v. State , No. 05-07-01516

- CR ( T e x. A p p . — D a ll as Apr. 15, 2009) (unpublished). A p p licant contends that his appellate counsel rende red ineffe ctive ass is ta n c e b e c a u s e c o u n s e l failed to timely

notify Applicant that his conviction had been affir med and failed to advise him of his right to petition pro se for discretionar y revie w. The trial court found th at ap pellate counsel discharg ed his duties appropriately . We remande d this application to the trial court for f indings of2

fa ct and conclusions of law addre ssing Applicant’s claim that he never rec eived counsel’s
corr espondenc e. Ba sed on an aff

idavit from the Texas Depa rtment o f C ri m inal J ustice, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that Applicant never rec eived notice his conviction had bee n aff

irmed. The trial court re commends that re lief be grante d. We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the Fifth Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 05-07-01516- CR that aff irmed his conviction in Cause No. F- 05-60566-R from the 265 District Court of Dallas t h County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discr etionary revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: August 21, 2013 Do not publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1373-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the                               ( print page 33700)                            State of Nebraska, (FEMA-1373-DR), dated May 16, 2001, and related determinations.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 14, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Nebraska is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 16, 2001: 

Custer County for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-15808 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3679 

To direct the Director of National Intelligence to carry out a prize competition 

to stimulate research and development relevant to 5G technology. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2019 

Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the 

Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Director of National Intelligence to carry out 

a prize competition to stimulate research and development relevant to 5G technology. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Research, 

5 Innovation, and Zeal in Emerging 5G Technology Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘PRIZE 5G Tech Act’’. 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3679 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF 5G PRIZE COMPETITION. 

2 (a) PRIZE COMPETITION.—Pursuant to section 24 of 

3 the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 

4 (15 U.S.C. 3719), the Director of National Intelligence, 

5 acting through the Director of the Intelligence Advanced 

6 Research Projects Agency, shall carry out a program to 

7 award prizes competitively to stimulate research and de8 velopment relevant to 5G technology. 

9 (b) PRIZE AMOUNT.—In carrying out the program 

10 under subsection (a), the Director may award not more 

11 than a total of $5,000,000 to one or more winners of the 

12 prize competition. 

13 (c) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out the program 

14 under subsection (a), the Director may consult with the 

15 heads of relevant departments and agencies of the Federal 

16 Government. 

17 (d) 5G TECHNOLOGY DEFINED.—In this section, the 

18 term ‘‘5G technology’’ means hardware, software, or other 

19 technologies relating to fifth-generation wireless networks. 

Æ 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2011013EN.01002401.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-9/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Dismissal of the action at first instance as manifestly inadmissible - Request for the return of personal property - Notification of the decision rejecting the complaint in a language other than that of the complaint - Action out of time - No response to a head of claim submitted at first instance)

2011/C 13/45

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 4 November 2008 in Case F-133/06 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the annulment of that order

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | annuls the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 4 November 2008 in Case F-133/06 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, in so far as it did not rule on the application for a declaration that the decision contested at first instance did not exist; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 4 November 2008 in Case F-133/06 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, in so far as it did not rule on the application for a declaration that the decision contested at first instance did not exist;

| 2. | dismisses the appeal as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;

| 3. | dismisses the action inasmuch as it sought a declaration that the contested decision did not exist; |
| --- | --- |

3.

dismisses the action inasmuch as it sought a declaration that the contested decision did not exist;

| 4. | orders Mr Luigi Marcuccio to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present case. The costs of the proceedings at first instance which culminated in the above order in Marcuccio v Commission are to be borne in accordance with point 2 of the operative part of that order. |
| --- | --- |

4.

orders Mr Luigi Marcuccio to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present case. The costs of the proceedings at first instance which culminated in the above order in Marcuccio v Commission are to be borne in accordance with point 2 of the operative part of that order.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1371-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Maine, (FEMA-1371-DR), dated May 16, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 8, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Maine is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 16, 2001: 

Kennebec, Penobscot and Washington Counties for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Lacy E. Suiter 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-15257 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
##### 



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Net income before taxes, minority interest and
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    
    $
    772
    
    
    $
    745
    
    
    $
    710
    
    
    $
    700
    
    
    $
    482Undistributed (income) loss from equity
investments
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest
    
    $
    288
    
    
    $
    261
    
    
    $
    270
    
    
    
    221
    
    
    
    217Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    1,060
    
    
    $
    1,005
    
    
    $
    979
    
    
    $
    921
    
    
    $
    699Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    258
    
    
    $
    236
    
    
    $
    247
    
    
    $
    200
    
    
    $
    204Capitalized interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    30
    
    
    
    25
    
    
    
    23
    
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    13Total fixed charges
    
    $
    288
    
    
    $
    261
    
    
    $
    270
    
    
    $
    221
    
    
    $
    218Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.68
    
    
    
    3.85
    
    
    
    3.63
    
    
    
    4.17
    
    
    
    3.20
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         16,778
<SECURITIES>                                   10,410
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,629)
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               47,436
<PP&E>                                        125,744
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,619)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                186,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          34,038
<BONDS>                                       133,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    12,527
<COMMON>                                           32
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,239)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  186,021
<SALES>                                        26,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,095
<CGS>                                         (11,941)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (46,205)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,081)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (11,731)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,420)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (143)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,430)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,430)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.06)


</TABLE>
Regina Nachael HOWELL FOSTER, petitioner, v. Areya HOLDER.

No. 15-9853.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Community Financial Corporation (the "Company") that the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

| Dated: February 10, 2003 |  | /s/ P. Douglas RichardP. Douglas RichardChief Executive Officer/s/ R. Jerry GilesR. Jerry GilesChief Financial Officer |
|--------------------------|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN GILBERT,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00359-CR

Appeal from

372nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC # 1002470D)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Juan Gilbert appeals a judgment adjudicating him guilty of indecency with a child. For 

the reasons that follow, we affirm.

FACTUAL SUMMARY

Appellant entered a negotiated plea of guilty in 2006 and the trial court placed him on 

deferred adjudication community supervision for ten years. The State subsequently filed a 

petition to adjudicate, alleging multiple violations of the terms and conditions of community 

supervision. The State agreed to recommend a six year term of imprisonment in exchange for a 

plea of true, but Appellant rejected that offer and entered an open plea of true. The trial court

made an adjudication of guilt and sentenced Appellant to serve twelve years in TDCJ-ID. 
- 2 -

FRIVOLOUS APPEAL

Appellant=s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 

2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record 

demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re Schulman, 

252 S.W.3d 403, 407 n.9 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008)(“In Texas, an Anders brief need not specifically 

advance ‘arguable’ points of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to 

the facts and procedural history and set out pertinent legal authorities.”); High v. State, 573 

S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to Appellant, 

and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se

brief. Appellant has filed a pro se brief.

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and the pro se brief, as well as 

correspondence related to the pro se brief, and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and 

without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. A 

discussion of the contentions advanced in the pro se brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence 

of the state. The judgment is affirmed.

March 28, 2013

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                   ------------
                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the "Company") on Form
10K-A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Muir, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: January 13, 2011           /s/ Gordon J. Muir
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman,
                                  and Director



























                                Exhibit 32.1 - 1
**Exhibit 31**
 ****
 ****
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 **I, Ash Mascarenhas, certify the following:**
 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc.; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 
 4.
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc. and I have done the following: 
 a.
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc. is made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 
 b.
evaluated the effectiveness of Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc.s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and 
 c.
presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 
 5.
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc.s auditors and the audit committee of Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc.s board of directors: 
 a.
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc.s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc.s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 
 b.
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc.s internal controls; and 
 6.
I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 
 October 18, 2004

/s/ Ash Mascarenhas

Ash Mascarenhas,
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)