alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



FORM 10-Q  Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encore Wire Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Vincent A. Rego, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. Date: August 6, 2004 /s/ VINCENT A. REGOVincent A. RegoChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
1013.

#### Wheeler *v.*The State.

Accusation of selling liquor, from city court of Bainbridge — ■ Judge Harrell. January 20, 1908.

Submitted March 31,

Decided May 7, 1908.

*J. H.*Gilpin, *A. E.*Thornton, for plaintiff in error.

*M. E.*O’Neal, solicitor, contra.

Russell, J.

1. Under an indictment charging the commission of a criminal offense, evidence is admissible to show that the crime was committed upon any date prior to the finding of the indictment, within the statute of limitations. Where a defendant is charged with the unlawful sale of whisky generally, the sale not being alleged as made to any particular individual, proof may be submitted of any sales made by him, in the jurisdiction of the court, within two years prior to the date of the accusation.

2. Proof that a witness has been convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor affords no ground for impeachment of the witness, and can not be used to discredit his testimony. Only conviction of crime involving moral turpitude serves as a basis for impeaching, or 'can be held to be a ground for discrediting, the testimony of a witness who has been thus convicted; and the proper method of proving that a witness has been convicted of crime is by the record of his trial and conviction.

S. It is not error on the part of the court to confine the argument of counsel to such matters as are material to the issue, provided that, in rilling upon the question, neither the language nor the manner of the court is prejudicial to the rights of the client.

d. It was not error for the trial judge to instruct the jury, in response to a question from one of the jury as to the effect of their verdict upon a charge against witnesses in the case, that “it makes no difference to the jury whether witnesses were guilty of soliciting the sale of whisky or not; it is your duty to try this ease and see if the defendant is guilty or not guilty under the evidence and the law given in charge.”' Nor was it error for the court to charge the jury that they had nothing to do with what some one else did or did not; that it had nothing to do with the case on trial; that it was for them to say whether the defendant in the ease was guilty or not guilty.

5. The evidence authorized the conviction of the defendant, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

6. The overruling of a demurrer to an indictment can not be considered on a motion for new trial, and affords no ground for new trial. Error in ruling upon a demurrer in a criminal ease must be made the ground of a special exception preserved pendente lite, or must be presented in a bill of exceptions which has been certified within twenty days from the ruling of which complaint is made. *Judgment affirmed.*
II-00326

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mary Madden <purplecart@comcast.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 2:18 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mary Madden

1704 South Rd

Baltimore, MD 21209
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


May 24, 2016


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 245


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on May 23, 2016, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the
evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-210384) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO        


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
Craig SMALLWOOD, petitioner, v. HAWAII.

No. 15-9568.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
##### 



Exhibit 34.1 Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 Solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant at the dates and for the periods indicated. No purchaser or seller
of securities shall be entitled to rely on the foregoing statement for any
purpose, and the undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the
foregoing statement except as required by law. FIRST FEDERAL CAPITAL CORP  /s/ Jack C. Rusch
Jack C. Rusch
President and Chief Executive Officer
(duly authorized officer)
    
    August 9, 2004
 36
# C_2009220EN.01001902.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), lodged on 25 June 2009 — Hauptzollamt Koblenz v Kurt Etling und Thomas Etling, a civil law partnership; intervener: Bundesministerium der Finanzen

(Case C-230/09)

2009/C 220/35

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Hauptzollamt Koblenz

Appellant:

Respondents: Kurt Etling und Thomas Etling, a civil law partnership

Respondents:

Intervener: Bundesministerium der Finanzen

Intervener:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Community law, in particular Article 5(k) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector, (1) be interpreted to mean that the reference quantity of a producer, in the twelve-month period in which a reference quantity was transferred to that producer from another producer, does not include the quantity in respect of which, during the twelve-month period in question, milk was already delivered by that other producer?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 270, p. 123.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 11.1

                     Computation of Per Share Earnings

                For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           1996          1995
                                                       -----------  -----------
<S>                                                    <C>          <C>
PRIMARY NET INCOME PER SHARE

Average shares outstanding                              14,871,024   11,358,268

Net effect of dilutive stock options and
 warrants based on the treasury stock
 method using average market price                         726,240      144,728
                                                       -----------  -----------

Total                                                   15,597,264   11,502,996
                                                       -----------  -----------
                                                       -----------  -----------

Net income                                             $ 1,405,462  $   891,703
                                                       -----------  -----------
                                                       -----------  -----------

Primary net income per share                                 $0.09        $0.08
                                                       -----------  -----------
                                                       -----------  -----------

FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE

Average shares outstanding                              14,871,024   11,358,268

Net effect of dilutive stock options and
 warrants based on the treasury stock method
 using ending market price                                 726,240      270,262
                                                       -----------  -----------

Total                                                   15,597,264   11,628,530
                                                       -----------  -----------
                                                       -----------  -----------

Net income                                             $ 1,405,462  $   891,703
                                                       -----------  -----------
                                                       -----------  -----------

Fully diluted net income per share                           $0.09        $0.08
                                                       -----------  -----------
                                                       -----------  -----------
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1101 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1101

        Establishing an earmark moratorium for fiscal year 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2010

Mr. Flake submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        Establishing an earmark moratorium for fiscal year 2011.

    Resolved, That (a) it shall not be in order to consider--
            (1) a bill or joint resolution reported by any committee, 
        or any amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that 
        includes a congressional earmark, limited tax benefit, or 
        limited tariff benefit; or
            (2) a bill or joint resolution not reported by any 
        committee, or any amendment thereto or conference report 
        thereon, that includes a congressional earmark, limited tax 
        benefit, or limited tariff benefit.
    (b) For the purposes of this resolution, the terms ``congressional 
earmark'', ``limited tax benefit'', and ``limited tariff benefit'' have 
the meaning given those terms in clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives.
    (c) The point of order under subsection (a) shall only apply to 
legislation providing or authorizing discretionary budget authority, 
credit authority, or other spending authority, providing a Federal tax 
deduction, credit, or exclusion, or modifying the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule in fiscal year 2011.
    (d) This resolution shall not apply to any authorization of 
appropriations to a Federal entity if such authorization is not 
specifically targeted to a State, locality, or congressional district.
    Sec. 2.  The Committee on Rules may not report a rule or order that 
would waive the point of order set forth in the first section of this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF THE REGISTRANT AT NOVEMBER 30, 1996 AND FEBRUARY 
29, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE
THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1996 AND 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1996. 

</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,749,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,508,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,280,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,333,000
<PP&E>                                       5,306,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,648,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,040,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,648,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,887,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,976,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   109,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (86,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (86,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II-00567

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Chantelle Loper <ellylynn@gmail. corn>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:40 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Chantelle Loper

8442 Buckland Street

La Mesa, CA 91942
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 219 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 16
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 219

                          [Report No. 111-25]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2009, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2009

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2009, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2009, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the 
joint resolution are waived except those arising under clause 10 of 
rule XXI. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points 
of order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion 
to recommit.
                                                  House Calendar No. 16

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 219

                          [Report No. 111-25]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) 
making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2009, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 6, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 10.1

 

SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Senior Housing Properties Trust, or the Company, for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $40,000, plus a fee of $1,250 for each meeting attended. Up to two $1,250 fees are payable if more than one board and board committee meetings are held on the same date.

 

·                  The chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an Independent Trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $15,000, $10,000 and $10,000, respectively.

 

·                  The lead Independent Trustee receives an additional annual cash retainer fee of $12,500 for serving in this role.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 2,500 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas P.
Hess, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS P. HESS                                       
|Thomas P. Hess Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 29, 2008
# C_2010288EN.01002704.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 June 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-527/09) (1)

()

(2010/C 288/49)

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.

---