alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
cbim_ex1010.htm

EXHIBIT 10.10
  
  
 Contract for Sale of Goods
  
 This Contract for Sale of Goods is made this 18 day of October, 2017 by and between Zhengzhou Hento Machinery Co., Ltd. Address: NO.3 Dongfeng Road, Jinshui District, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China (“Seller”) and CASTLE BRIDGE IMPACT MEDIA INC, 3 Banyatelep, Visegrad 2025 Hungary (“Buyer”), for the purchase of the goods made by Seller. 
  
 1. Term. This Contract shall begin on October 18th, 2017, and end by October 30th, 2018, unless the parties agree otherwise. 
  
 2. Delivery. Seller will arrange for delivery through a carrier chosen by buyer, the costs of which shall be FOB
  
 3. Appointment. Buyer hereby appoints Supplier, and Supplier accepts such appointment, to act as a non-exclusive supplier of the Products to buyer.
  
 4. Prices. The prices paid by buyer to seller for Products shall initially be as set forth in agreement between seller and buyer. Buyer shall have the right to purchase products at item prices. Prices are exclusive of all taxes, insurance, and shipping and handling charges, which are buyer’s sole responsibility.
  
 5. Acceptance. Buyer will have the right to inspect the goods upon receipt, Buyer must give notice to Seller of any claim for damages on account of condition, quality, or grade of the goods, and Buyer must specify the basis of the claim in detail. Failure of Buyer to comply with these conditions will constitute irrevocable acceptance of the goods by Buyer. All notices between the parties must be in writing and delivered by courier or by certified mail, return receipt requested. 
  
 6. Confidentiality. Each of the parties hereto agrees to hold confidential and proprietary information and trade secrets obtained from the other, and designated as such in writing by the disclosing party, in confidence and not to use or disclose such confidential and proprietary information and trade secrets to third parties without the consent of the other party, except that each of parties may disclose such information to their respective employees and agents who need to know such information for the purposes of operating their respective businesses. The parties agree that the provisions contained in this paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
  
 7. Warranty. Seller warrants that the goods sold hereunder are new and free from substantive defects in workmanship and materials. Seller's liability under the foregoing warranty is limited to replacement of goods or repair of defects or refund of the purchase price at Seller's sole option. No other warranty, express or implied, is made by Seller, and none shall be imputed or presumed, warranty time :2 years
  
 8. Governing Law. This contract shall be governed by the laws of Zhengzhou city, China. Any disputes hereunder will be heard in the appropriate federal and state courts located in China. 
  
 9. TRADE TERM:FOB SHENZHEN PAYMENT TERM:30% TT for deposit,70% TT before shipment DELIVERY TIME:60 days after deposit
  
 Buyer 
 /s/ Mester Frigyes 
  
 Seller
 /s/ ZB – Zhengzhou Hento Machinery Co LTD
David Israel SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. John F. KERRY, Secretary of State, et al.

No. 15-1395.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	6

<CIK>	0000744822

<NAME>	Fidelity Investment Trust

<SERIES>

	<NUMBER>	111

	<NAME>	Fidelity Diversified International Fund

<MULTIPLIER>	1,000



<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>
year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>
oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>
oct-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>
3,002,667
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>
3,639,079
<RECEIVABLES>
62,708
<ASSETS-OTHER>
327
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>
0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>
3,702,114
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>
72,605
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>
0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>
49,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>
122,528
<SENIOR-EQUITY>
0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>
2,774,333
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>
167,756
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>
113,026
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>
28,735
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>
0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>
140,088
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>
0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>
636,430
<NET-ASSETS>
3,579,586
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>
47,094
<INTEREST-INCOME>
8,050
<OTHER-INCOME>
174
<EXPENSES-NET>
30,789
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>
24,529
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>
167,836
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>
481,619
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>
673,984
<EQUALIZATION>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>
26,415
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>
53,971
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>
0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>
142,412
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>
92,139
<SHARES-REINVESTED>
4,457
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>
1,634,771
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>
23,593
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>
68,559
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>
0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>
0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>
21,594
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>
0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>
31,509
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>
2,607,286
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>
17.210
<PER-SHARE-NII>
 .180
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>
4.650
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>
 .230
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>
 .470
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>
0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>
21.340
<EXPENSE-RATIO>
121





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Steven A. Schumm, as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:

   /s/ Steven A. SchummSteven A. Schumm Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date: August 15, 2011


---
# C_2009153EN.01003002.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/30

---

Action brought on 13 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-171/09)

2009/C 153/58

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Peere and P. Dejmek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/70/EC of 1 August 2006 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the definition of ‘politically exposed person’ and the technical criteria for simplified customer due diligence procedures and for exemption on grounds of a financial activity conducted on an occasional or very limited basis (1), or in any event by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/70/EC of 1 August 2006 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the definition of ‘politically exposed person’ and the technical criteria for simplified customer due diligence procedures and for exemption on grounds of a financial activity conducted on an occasional or very limited basis (1), or in any event by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of Directive 2006/70/EC expired on 15 December 2007. However, at the time the present action was brought, the defendant had not yet adopted all the necessary implementing measures or, in any event, had not informed the Commission thereof.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 214, p. 29.

1

---
Darron J. JONES, petitioner, v. FNU CRANFORD.

No. 17-5286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Ferrill VOLPICELLI, petitioner, v. Quentin BYRNE, Warden.

No. 15-9215.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SecureD Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Day, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 19, 2003

                         /s/ John Day
                         ---------------------------------
                         John Day
                         Acting Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Laserscope on
Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2002, I, Dennis LaLumandiere, Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Laserscope, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (3)    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June
               30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (4)    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
               for the six months ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Laserscope.



Date:  August 13, 2002                       By:    /s/  Dennis LaLumandiere
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Dennis LaLumandiere
                                                 Vice President, Finance and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ELIZABETH J. WILLIAMS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D20-95 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 23, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Sabella, Judge. Elizabeth J. Williams, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth J. Williams appeals the order denying her motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) to correct her sentence. We affirm without comment the denial of her motion but remand for correction of a scrivener's error in the amended judgment.

A jury found Williams guilty of one count each of second-degree murder with a weapon (count one) and conspiracy to commit second-degree murder with a- 2 -

weapon (count two). The court sentenced her to concurrent terms of life imprisonment on the substantive count and fifteen years' imprisonment on the conspiracy count.

In her rule 3.800(a) motion, Williams argued that her life sentence for second-degree murder with a weapon is illegal because the offense was improperly reclassified from a first-degree felony punishable by life imprisonment to a life felony pursuant to section 775.087(1), Florida Statutes (2003). In its response to the motion, the State conceded that Williams's conviction was "reclassified improperly" but maintained that her life sentence is nonetheless legal. The postconviction court agreed with the State but directed the clerk of court to amend the judgment and sentence toreflect that Williams's conviction for second-degree murder with a weapon is a firstdegree felony punishable by life imprisonment.

The amended judgment and sentence now correctly indicate thatWilliams's conviction on count one for second-degree murder with a weapon is a firstdegree felony punishable by life imprisonment. Inexplicably, however, the amended judgment now incorrectly indicates that Williams's conviction on count two is also for substantive second-degree murder with a weapon and is a life felony. (The amended sentence reflects no change.) The original judgment correctly indicated that Williams's conviction on count two is for conspiracy to commit second-degree murder with a weapon and is a second-degree felony. As the amended judgment contains a clear scrivener's error, we affirm but remand for correction of the amended judgment with respect to count two. See Herrera v. State, 276 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019).

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error.
NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JARVIS LEWIS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3124

[ August 13, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 432019CF000259A, 432019CF000263 , and 432019CF000265

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

A

ffirmed

.

G ROSS

, G ERBER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
H. Res. 1434 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 23, 2010. 

Whereas the month of June is recognized as National Homeownership Month; 

Whereas the people of the United States are one of the besthoused populations in the world; 

Whereas owning a home is a fundamental part of the American dream and is the largest personal investment many 

families will ever make; 

Whereas homeownership provides economic security for homeowners by aiding them in building wealth over time and 

strengthens communities through a greater stake among 

homeowners in local schools, civic organizations, and 

churches; 

Whereas creating affordable homeownership opportunities requires the commitment and cooperation of the private, 

public, and nonprofit sectors, including the Federal Government and State and local governments; 

Whereas homeownership can be sustained through appropriate homeownership education and informed borrowers; 

and 

Whereas affordable homeownership will play a vital role in resolving the crisis in the United States housing market: 

Now, therefore, be it 
2 

•HRES 1434 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) fully supports the goals and ideals of National 

Homeownership Month; 

(2) recognizes the importance of homeownership in 

building strong communities and families; and 

(3) reaffirms the importance of homeownership in 

the Nation’s economy and its central role in our national 

economic recovery. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
II-00894

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Eleanor Fox <efox@rscj.org>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:17 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geitlmer: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Eleanor Fox

4O6 E. 8O St.

New York, NY 10075
Charles N. TAYLOR Jr., petitioner, v. Dee MARGO, et al.

No. 16-339.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2009244EN.01000301.xml

| 10.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Anotato Dikastirio (Cyprus) lodged on 5 August 2009 — Giorgos Michalias v Christina A. Ioannou-Michalia

(Case C-312/09)

2009/C 244/04

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Anotato Dikastirio

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Giorgos Michalias

Appellant:

Respondent: Christina A. Ioannou-Michalia

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

When Articles 2(1), 42 and 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 are interpreted correctly and applied, do the courts of a Member State of the European Union (Cyprus) have jurisdiction in respect of:

| (a) | divorce proceedings begun by the husband in the courts of State X (Cyprus) in April 2003 after the regulation entered into force on 1 March 2001 but before State X (Cyprus) became a Member State on 1 May 2004 and |
| --- | --- |

(a)

divorce proceedings begun by the husband in the courts of State X (Cyprus) in April 2003 after the regulation entered into force on 1 March 2001 but before State X (Cyprus) became a Member State on 1 May 2004 and

| (b) | divorce proceedings begun by the wife after 1 May 2004 in the courts of another Member State (the United Kingdom) which was a Member State throughout the relevant period, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

divorce proceedings begun by the wife after 1 May 2004 in the courts of another Member State (the United Kingdom) which was a Member State throughout the relevant period,

if both spouses were permanently resident in State Y (the United Kingdom) throughout the relevant period

and both spouses were nationals of State X (Cyprus) throughout the relevant period?

---
LaBaron Alexander DAVIS, petitioner, v. Willis CHAPMAN, Acting Warden.

No. 17-7302.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2011238EN.01001503.xml

| 13.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2011 — Audi and Volkswagen v OHIM (TDI)

(Case T-318/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark TDI - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(c) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Articles 75 and 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2011/C 238/23

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Audi AG (Ingolstadt, Germany) and Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: P. Kather, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 May 2009 (Case R 226/2007-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign TDI as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Audi AG and Volkswagen AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Audi AG and Volkswagen AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
II-O0500

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Howard Ennes <nsdusoir@mcn.org>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:21 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Howard Ennes

160 Woodland Dr.

Ft. Bragg, CA 95437