alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 12.2
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Novogen Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) ) for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared:(b)
    
    Omitted(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect the companys internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit
committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions).
 (e)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(f)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date:
December 23, 2005
    
    /s/ David SeatonChief Financial Officer
David SCAGGS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6665.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Stanley T. ADAMS, petitioner, v. Charlotte JENKINS, Warden.

No. 16-6642.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2012032EN.01002002.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2011 — Rintisch v OHIM — Valfleuri Pâtes alimentaires (PROTIVITAL)

(Case T-109/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PROTIVITAL - Earlier national word and figurative marks PROTIPLUS, PROTI and PROTIPOWER - Late submission of documents - Discretion granted by Article 74(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Concept of a provision to the contrary - Rule 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95)

2012/C 32/38

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bernhard Rintisch (Bottrop, Germany) (represented by: A Dreyer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Valfleuri Pâtes alimentaires SA (Wittenheim, France) (represented by: F. Baujoin, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 January 2009 (Case R 1660/2007-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Bernhard Rintisch and Valfleuri Pâtes alimentaires SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Bernhard Rintisch to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Bernhard Rintisch to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the  incorporation by reference in  Post-Effective  Amendment
No.  2 to  the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-68019)  of  Marvel
Enterprises,  Inc. (formerly Toy Biz, Inc.) and in the related Prospectus of our
report  dated  February 21, 2003,  with  respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements  and schedules of Marvel  Enterprises,  Inc.  included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 18, 2003
# C_2009244EN.01000202.xml

| 10.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/2

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Śródmieścia (Poland) lodged on 23 July 2009 — Artur Weryński v Mediatel 4B

(Case C-283/09)

2009/C 244/03

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Śródmieścia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimant: Artur Weryński

Claimant:

Defendant: Mediatel 4B

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Under Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters, does the requested court have the right to demand from the requesting court an advance for witness expenses or reimbursement of the expenses paid to the witness heard, (1) or must it cover them out of its own financial resources?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 174, p. 1.

1

---
Raymond SERIO, petitioner, v. Neal ROHLFLING.

No. 16-6667.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District denied.
Exhibit 32.2

SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS, INC.

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, William R. Brooks, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | March 12, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    WILLIAM R. BROOKS                            
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | William R. Brooks                                   
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to, and will be retained by, Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# Time and Date: 

10:00 a.m., Monday, July 2, 2001. 

# Place: 

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551. 

# Status: 

Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered: 

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees. 

2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting. 

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Michelle A. Smith, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204. 

# Supplementary Information: 

                    You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at                           ( print page 33965)                        approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                     *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                    for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                 

Dated: June 22, 2001. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 01-16089 Filed 6-22-01; 11:08 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Robert R. BENNIE, Jr., petitioner, v. John MUNN, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Nebraska Department of Banking and Finance, et al.

No. 16-452.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Motion of Nine Law Professors for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of Cato Institute, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of Center for Competitive Politics for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Yochai KAPLA, petitioner, v. Sheila FREED.

No. 16M60.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Christopher MOSBY, petitioner, v. Eric SYKES, et al.

No. 17-7115.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
II-Oll30

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Timothy Mosier <tmosier562001 @yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:03 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Timothy Mosier

429 Comfort Lane

Wa.Ct.HS., OH 43160
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14980]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a 
closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Tuesday, June 26, 2001.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Eliot Cohen, AGED Secretariat, 
1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and 
managing an effective and economical research and development program 
in the area of electron devices.
    The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and 
development programs which the Military Departments propose to initiate 
with industry, universities or in their laboratories. The agenda for 
this meeting will include programs on Radiation Hardened Devices, 
Microwave Tubes, Displays and Lasers. The review will include details 
of classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App 10(d)(1994)), it has been determined that this Advisory 
Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)(1994), and 
that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: June 5, 2001.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-14980 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
Carlyle Lee COLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5779.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Denny OBERMILLER, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 16-7044.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
                              A Nevada Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of International Building Technologies
Group,  Inc.  ("Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Kenneth Yeung, Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: April 15, 2009                         /s/ Kenneth Yeung
                                              ---------------------------------
                                         By:  Kenneth Yeung
                                         Its: Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1956

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Ezekiel D. Barry

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

 ____________

Submitted: October 12, 2023

Filed: October 17, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Ezekiel Barry appeals the below-Guidelines-range sentence the district court1

imposed after he pled guilty to a drug offense pursuant to a plea agreement containing

1The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.
an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging Barry’s career-offender

classification.

Upon careful review, we conclude the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and

applicable to the issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702,

704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing de novo the validity and applicability of an appeal

waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc)

(enforcing appeal waiver if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the

defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver,

and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice).

Further, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope

of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and

dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

-2-
Thomas Perry WELLS, petitioner, v. Karen MILLER, Judge, Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Palm Beach County, et al.

No. 16-6696.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

January 22, 2016

Mr. Robert J. Laorno
General Counsel

ICE Swap Trade, LLC

55 East 52TM Street, 39" Floor
New York, New York 10055

Re: Application of ICE Swap Trade, LLC for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Mr. Laorno:

By submissions dated August 2, 2013 through January 19, 2016, ICE Swap Trade, LLC
(“ICE Swap Trade”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(“Commission”), pursuant to Section Sh of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. §
7b-3, and Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap
execution facility (“SEF”).

The Commission has reviewed ICE Swap Trade’s application and has determined to
grant ICE Swap Trade registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the
accompanying Order of Registration.

Sincerely,

WAL ) AE

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
II-01072

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Charles Wirth <pcw577@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:31 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Charles Wirth

605 Judson Ave

Hurley, SD 57036
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices 34161

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 01–12]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of

section 36(b)(1) arms sale notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Public

Law 104–164 dated July 21, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 01–12 with

attached transmittal and policy

justification.

Dated: June 21, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–08–M

34162 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices 34163

34164 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices

[FR Doc. 01–16035 Filed 6–26–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–08–C