alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

In the matter of CME Europe Limited 

revocation of registration pursuant to 

§ 48.9(b)(4) of the regulations of the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

ORDER OF REVOCATION OF REGISTRATION 

By Order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) dated October 

31, 2016, CME Europe Limited (CMEEL or Exchange), a foreign board of trade (FBOT) 

formerly recognized by and subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in 

the United Kingdom, was granted registration pursuant to Section 4(b)(l) of the Commodity 

Exchange Act (the Act), 7 U.S.C. § 6(b)(l), and Part 48 of the Commission's regulations, 17 

C.F.R. Part 48, to permit direct access, as that term is defined in Section 4(b)(l)(A) of the Act 

(FBOT registration). 

At the request of CMEEL and following the voluntary closure of the Exchange, the FCA 

issued an Order on October 12, 2017, revoking CMEEL's status as a recognized investment 

exchange under the Financial Services and Markets Act of the United Kingdom. 

On October 24, 2017, CMEEL submitted notice to the Commission confirming (1) the 

derecognition of CMEEL by the FCA, and (2) a request by CMEEL for the Commission to 

revoke CMEEL' s FBOT registration. 

Commission regulation 48.8(a)(2)(i) specifies that, as a condition for maintaining FBOT 

registration, "[t]he foreign board of trade will continue to satisfy the criteria for a regulated 

1 
market or licensed exchange pursuant to the regulatory regime described in its application and 

will continue to be subject to oversight by the regulatory authorities described in its application." 

Commission regulation 48.9(b)(4) provides that "[t]he Commission may revoke a foreign 

board of trade's registration in the event the foreign board of trade ... is no longer authorized, 

licensed or registered, as applicable, as a regulated market and/or exchange ... or ceases to 

operate as a foreign board of trade ... " 

In light of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 17 C.F.R. § 48.9(b)(4), that the 

registration of CMEEL pursuant to Section 4(b)(l) of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 

§ 6(b)(l), is hereby revoked, effective October 12, 2017. 

Issued in Washington, D.C. this 15th day of December, 2017. 

By the Commission 

Christopher . Kirkpatrick 

Secretary of the Commission 

2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of K & F Industries, Inc. (the
  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
  Dirkson R. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
  Company.





      /s/ Dirkson R. Charles

      Dirkson R. Charles
      Chief Financial Officer
      August 14, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of K & F Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard
L. Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ BERNARD L. SCHWARTZ
-----------------------
Bernard L. Schwartz
Chief Executive Officer
July 31, 2003
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 11-1447 September Term, 2012 DHS-A T-0752 -11-07 65-I-1 Filed O n: July 30, 2 013 Jose Lacso n, Pet itione r
v . United Sta tes De partm entof Hom elan d Secu rity an d T ransp ortat ion S ecurity Adm inistration ,

Respo nde nts
BEFORE: Garlan d, Ch ief Jud ge; Brown, Circuit Jud ge; an d W illiams, S enio r Circuit Jud ge
O R D E R Upon con siderat ion o f

the orde r to sh ow cause f iled Ju ly 23 , 20 13, an d th e respo nse the reto, it is ORDERED tha t th e o rder to sho w cau se b e d ischarged. It is FURTHER ORDERED tha t th e se aled op inion f iled Ju ly 23 , 20 13, be un seale d. T he Clerk is directed to unse al th e o pinion an d issue it pu blicly

. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Jenn ifer M. Clark Depu ty Cl erk
II-00952

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Leo E Stack <lstack3 @tampabay.rr. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:43 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

STOP THIS FARCE,YOU CROOKS.

Leo E Stack

290 N Robin Hood Rd

Inverness, FL 34450
Lonnie EVANS-BEY, petitioner, v. Jay CASSADY, Warden.

No. 16-6441.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court Missouri denied.
Jeffrey BOLDEN, petitioner, v. Ronda J. PASH, Warden.

No. 15-9291.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Octavia SMITH, petitioner, v. DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, dba Parkland Health and Hospital System.

No. 16-6011.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
H. Res. 211 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 17, 2009. 

Whereas the purpose of National Women’s History Month is 

to increase awareness and knowledge of women’s involvement in history; 

Whereas as recently as the 1970s, women’s history was rarely 

included in the kindergarten through grade 12 curriculum and was not part of public awareness; 

Whereas the Education Task Force of the Sonoma County 

(California) Commission on the Status of Women initiated a ‘‘Women’s History Week’’ celebration in 1978 centered around International Women’s History Day, which 

is celebrated on March 8th; 

Whereas in 1981, responding to the growing popularity of 

women’s history celebrations, Congress passed a resolution making Women’s History Week a national observance; 

Whereas during this time, using information provided by the 

National Women’s History Project, founded in Sonoma 

County, California, thousands of schools and communities 

joined in the commemoration of National Women’s History Week, with support and encouragement from governors, city councils, school boards, and Congress; 
2 

•HRES 211 EH 

Whereas in 1987, the National Women’s History Project petitioned Congress to expand the national celebration to 

include the entire month of March; 

Whereas educators, workplace program planners, parents, 

and community organizations in thousands of American 

communities, under the guidance of the National Women’s History Project, have turned National Women’s History Month into a major local learning experience and 

celebration; 

Whereas the popularity of women’s history celebrations has 

sparked a new interest in uncovering women’s forgotten 

heritage; 

Whereas the President’s Commission on the Celebration of 

Women in American History was established to consider 

how best to acknowledge and celebrate the roles and accomplishments of women in American history; 

Whereas the National Women’s History Museum was founded in 1996 as an institution dedicated to preserving, interpreting, and celebrating the diverse historic contributions of women, and integrating this rich heritage fully 

into the Nation’s teachings and history books; 

Whereas the House of Representatives recognizes March 

2009 as National Women’s History Month; and 

Whereas the theme of National Women’s History Month for 

2009 is women taking the lead to save our planet: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of National Women’s History Month; and 
3 

•HRES 211 EH 

(2) recognizes and honors the women and organizations in the United States that have fought for and continue to promote the teaching of women’s history. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Darnel CHAFFIN, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-954.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Steven MUEHLGAY, et al., petitioners, v. CITIGROUP INC., et al.

No. 16-251.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Day, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Dated: May 17, 2004

                                                     /s/ John G. Day
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     John G. Day
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The financial data schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from Riviana Foods Inc.'s Year End Form 10K for Fiscal 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           7,609
<SECURITIES>                                     4,328
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,265
<INVENTORY>                                     49,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,613
<PP&E>                                         116,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,883
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,328
<SALES>                                        454,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               454,012
<CGS>                                          324,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (619)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,933
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,956
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42
        

</TABLE>
i. 01Jno.· J~N'J5 r. / / TUE · 04·05 . . P!J tl 

Received CFTC 

Records SectJon 

NEMAHA CO. COOP 

\ \,•,. 

,\'" 

! 

COMMENT •. ·· ·l 

FAX No. 785 336 13256 P. 002 

zms JAN t 6 AHtl= 39 

IJIIo I u'b · OFC. Of THE SECHETAHIAT 

Com1nodity Futures Trading Commission 

lv.rr. David Sta:wick) Secretary 

Our company- The Nemaha County Cooperative Association located in Seneca Kansas 

represents nearly 1600 grain patrons. It has come to our attention that the CBOT is 

considering doubling the speculative position ·limits for several raw grain commodities. 

·we are currently opposed to the increase of SP-eculative positions. The current market 

environment of convergence of cash price and futures has already been disrupted and the 

functionality ofwhat is supposed to be controlling price risk. The reality of the cash 

market carrying charges is the sole reason why futures viere created and to assist in 

situations of oversupply or undersupply of grain connnodities. We disagree with the 

proposal of expansion limits for speculators and believe the current situation of 

convergence be addressed prior to any such proposal by the CFTC. 

Charles Gabehart 

President/General Manager 

Nemaha County Cooperative 

Seneca, Kansas
11-01211

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Brian Hayden <bhayden90@hotmail. com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 2:57 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Brian Hayden

2202 Gough St.

Baltimore, MD 21231
No. 85-1590.

#### Kirk, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Human Resources *v.*Thomas S., by his Appointed Guardian ad Litem, Brooks.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
Arturo CRUZ, Alberto Hernandez, Jose Gonzalez, Noe Gonzalez, Manuel Hernandez, Francisco Flores, and Luis Aguilar, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7240.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                               11,212,042
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     16,840,431
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       16,840,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   397,482
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         16,840,431
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        511,742
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        551,167
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (39,425)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (39,425)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (39,425)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (3.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (3.19)
        

</TABLE>
Nancy MORROW, petitioner, v. Megan J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General.

No. 16-6764.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
976.

#### Anderson *v.*The State.

Accusation of abandoning child, from city court of Ashburn— Judge Hawkins. December 33, 1907.

Submitted February 25,

Decided March 16, 1908.

*B. A. Rogers, John B. Hutcheson,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. A. Corner, solicitor,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

The special assignments of error are entirely without merit, and the verdict is-amply supported by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Danny R. ALEJANDRO, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-6449.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-00557

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Hazel Rozema <rozema.hazel@uis.edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:50 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Hazel Rozema

751 Carman Woods Dr.

Manchester, MO 63021
Montez GADDY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6808.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Drew T. GREEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-540.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.