alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APR 06, 2001 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 99-14419

________________________ D. C. Docket No.95-00114-CV-WLS-1-2 YORK INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus WILLIAMS SEAFOOD OF ALBANY, INC., WEBB PROPERTIES, INC., and OXFORD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Defendants-Appellants.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

_________________________ (April 6, 2001) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and FLETCHER*, Circuit Judges.

___________________________ *Honorable Betty B. Fletcher, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.2 WILSON, Circuit Judge: We now revisit this case upon its return to us from the Georgia Supreme Court, to which we certified a question of Georgia state law. See York Ins. Co. v. Williams Seafood of Albany, Inc. , 223 F.3d 1253 (11th Cir. 2000). The facts, briefly, are that York Insurance Company (“York”) issued a policy of insurance to Williams Seafood of Albany, Inc., Webb Properties, Inc., and Oxford Construction Company, Inc. (“Williams”) covering Williams’s restaurant. Following a flood, the restaura nt collapsed into a sinkhole, suffering a total loss. Williams then filed a claim w ith York, asking York to cover the loss. York denied Williams’s claim because its investigation revealed that the loss was caused directly or indirectly by the fl ood, which was an excluded precipitating event. York next sought from the district court a declaratory judgment that the loss was not covered. After a bench trial, the district court granted York a declaratory judgment absolving York of all liability for Williams’s collapsed building loss. Williams appealed to this Court. After hearing oral argument in the case, we determined that the pivotal issue turned on an unresolved question of Geor gia law. We therefore certified to the Georgia Supreme Court the following question: “Where the ‘exclusions’ section of an insurance policy excludes covera ge for damage resulting directly or3 indirectly from floods, but the ‘additional coverage - collapse’ section specifically includes sinkhole collapse damage, does th e policy cover damage produced by a sinkhole collapse that was precipitated by a flood?” York, 223 F.3d at 1256. The Georgia Supreme Court has answer ed our certified question; the Court responded, “we answer the question in th e affirmative and hold that the policy covers damage produced by a sinkhole collapse that was precipitated by a flood.” York Ins. Co. v. Williams Seafood of Albany, Inc. , Ga., 2001, __ S.E.2d __ (No. S00Q23003, March 19, 2001). Thus, under Ge orgia law, York’s insurance policy covered Williams’s loss. It follows that th e district court’s grant of a declaratory judgment to York absolving York of liability for Williams’s loss was in error. Accordingly, we REVERSE the district court’s grant of a declaratory judgment, and REMAND for further proceedings. REVERSED and REMANDED.
Michael G. WYMER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6886.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        51


        <NAME>      Fidelity International Growth & Income Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

6-MOS


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

OCT-31-1998


<PERIOD-END>

APR-30-1998


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

816,680


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

1,017,051


<RECEIVABLES>

15,607


<ASSETS-OTHER>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

1,032,658


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

0


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

6,702


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

6,702


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

790,995


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

45,318


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

51,120


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

4,992


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

0


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

29,726


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

200,243


<NET-ASSETS>

1,025,956


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

7,622


<INTEREST-INCOME>

8,967


<OTHER-INCOME>

(750)


<EXPENSES-NET>

5,850


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

9,989


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

30,022


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

104,798


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

144,809


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

18,064


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

42,969


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

29,225


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

38,025


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

2,998


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

(41,213)


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

22,267


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

72,251


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

0


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

3,771


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

0


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

5,974


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

1,016,153


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

20.880


<PER-SHARE-NII>

 .200


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

2.810


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .370


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

 .880


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

22.640


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

120


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 223 

Honoring the life, achievements, and contributions of Paul Harvey, affectionately known for his signature line, ‘‘This is Paul Harvey . . . Good 

Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2009 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself and Mr. BOREN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life, achievements, and contributions of Paul 

Harvey, affectionately known for his signature line, 

‘‘This is Paul Harvey . . . Good Day’’. 

Whereas Paul Harvey, a son, brother, husband, father, 

friend, pioneering American, and a cherished voice, 

passed away on February 28, 2009; 

Whereas Paul Harvey Aurandt was born on September 14, 

1918, in Tulsa, Oklahoma; 

Whereas prefacing a storied career in radio by making radio 

receivers as a young boy and a fill-in announcer while a 

student at the University of Tulsa, he epitomized American values and American ideals proving that one can 

lead a decent life with hard work and solid values; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 223 IH 

Whereas Paul Harvey, through open expression, pioneered 

the format of radio broadcasts that so many now find 

commonplace; 

Whereas Paul Harvey was a blogger before it was a known 

medium, he just did his blogging on the radio; 

Whereas Paul Harvey was elected to the National Association 

of Broadcasters Radio Hall of Fame and Oklahoma Hall 

of Fame and appeared on the Gallup poll list of America’s most admired men; 

Whereas Paul Harvey received 11 Freedom Foundation 

Awards as well as the Horatio Alder Award; 

Whereas Paul Harvey was named to the Dimboola Hall of 

Fame, a Masonic institution, on June 25, 1993; 

Whereas in 2005, Paul Harvey was awarded the Presidential 

Medal of Freedom, the United States most prestigious civilian award, by President George W. Bush; 

Whereas Paul Harvey’s career in radio spanned over 70 years 

and he is considered one of the United States most accomplished radio personalities and a trail blazer; 

Whereas Paul Harvey was beloved by his family, friends, 

neighbors, and vast listening audience for his great generosity, good humor, and spirited charm; 

Whereas Paul Harvey, the ‘‘largest one-man network in the 

world’’, was heard on 1,200 radio stations, 400 Armed 

Forces Network stations around the world, and in 300 

newspapers; and 

Whereas Paul Harvey’s broadcasts and newspaper columns 

have been reprinted in the Congressional Record more 

than those of any other commentator: Now, therefore, be 

it 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 223 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the life and accomplishments of Paul Harvey. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]


Regulations Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public 
Notice

June 15, 2001.
    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(h), of 
the receipt of exempt and prohibited off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission 
decisional employees, who make or receive an exempt or a prohibited 
off-the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested on-
the-record proceeding, to deliver a copy of the communication, if 
written, or a summary of the substance of any oral communication, to 
the Secretary.
    Prohibited communications will be included in a public, non-
decisional file associated with, but not part of, the decisional record 
of the proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited 
communication and any responses thereto should become part of the 
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not 
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a 
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or 
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may 
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and 
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant 
such requests only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any 
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record 
communication should serve the document on all parties listed on the 
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with 
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications will be included in the 
decisional record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with 
a cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 12501.6, made under 18 CFR 
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of exempt and prohibited off-the-record 
communications received in the Office of the Secretary within the 
preceding 14 days. The documents may be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).
Exempt
1. CP01-361-000, 06-13-01, John W. Wisniewski
2. CP00-412-000, 06-11-01, Patricia A. Kurkul
3. CP01-260-000, 06-11-01, John J. Wisniewski
4. Project No. 2042, 06-08-01, Timothy B. Bachelder
5. Project No. 1962-000, 06-07-01, Felix Smith
6. CP01-45-000, 06-01-01, David Swearingen and Laurence Sauter
7. Project No. 2042, 06-07-01, Timothy B. Bachelder
Prohibited
1. RP00-241-000, 06-01-01, Robert A. Felburg
2. EL00-95-020, et al., 05-16-01, Jan Smutny-Jones

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15583 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary publishes a list of information collections it has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) and 5 CFR 1320.5. The following are those information collections recently submitted to OMB.

1. Title X Grantees Family Planning Annual Report—0990-0221—Revision—The Office of Population Affairs collects annual data from Title X Grantees to assure compliance with legislative and regulatory requirements and identify areas where grantees may require assistance. Respondents: Title X Family Planning Program Grantees; Annual Number of Respondents: 85; Average Burden per Response: 22 hours; Annual Burden: 1,870 hours; Average Annual Cost per Respondent: $550; Annual Cost: $46,750.

*OMB Desk Officer:*                     Allison Eydt.                

                    Copies of the information collection packages listed above can be obtained by calling the OS Reports Clearance                           ( print page 34200)                        Officer on (202) 690-6207. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the OMB desk officer designated above at the following address: Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.                

Comments may also be sent to Cynthia Agens Bauer, OS Reports Clearance Officer, Room 503H, Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.

Dated: June 19, 2001.

Kerry Weems,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Budget.

[FR Doc. 01-16027  Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-34-M
Agustin LOPEZ-COLLAZO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6251.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Ronnie CARRASQUILLO, petitioner, v. John VARGA, Warden.

No. 16-6239.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 1154 V

UNPUBLISHED

KATHLEEN C. THOMAS

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: September 3, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA , for petitioner.

R onalda Elnetta Kosh , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On August 9, 2019

, Kathleen C. Thomas filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from Guillain

- Barre Syndrome ( “ GBS ” )

as a result of an influenza vaccin e received on Augu st 22, 2016 . Petit ion at 1 . The case

was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 2, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent agrees that “ petitioner suffered from GBS and that she has

sa tisfied the criteria se t forth in the revised Vaccine Injury Table ( “ Table ” ) and the

Quali fic ations and Aids to Interpretation ( “ QAI ” ), which afford her a presumption of

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012 ).2

vaccine causation if the on set of GBS o ccurs between three and forty

- two days after a

seas onal flu vaccination, and there is no m ore likely alternative diagnosis and no apparent

alter native cau se

. ” Id. at 6

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Freddie L. SOLOMON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 15-9551.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.18
 
 Length of Severance PeriodEmployee
    
    Title

    
    Termination

    
    Change of ControlBahram Akradi
    
    CEO
    
    NA
    
    NAMike Gerend
    
    President/COO
    
    18 mos.
    
    21 mosMike Robinson
    
    EVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    21 mosMike Brown
    
    SVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    12 mos.Eric Buss
    
    EVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    12 mos.Mark Zaebst
    
    EVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    12 mos.Jeff Zwiefel
    
    SVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    12 mos.
Frank Eli HEARD, petitioner, v. Scott KERNAN, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 16-6873.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
II-01149

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Cason <mcwoodlands@centurylink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:11 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Cason

949 Golden Meadows Drive

Defiance, MO 63341-1752
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1748 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States 

should initiate negotiations to enter into a bilateral free trade agreement 

with Turkey. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2010 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. DELAHUNT, and Mr. MORAN of Virginia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the United States should initiate negotiations to enter 

into a bilateral free trade agreement with Turkey. 

Whereas Turkey is the 17th largest economy in the world and 

is a founding member of the Organisation for Economic 

Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Group 

of Twenty (G–20); 

Whereas Turkey has signed 16 free trade agreements with 

several countries and the European Free Trade Association, and 14 of those agreements are in effect; 

Whereas Turkey is in negotiations to enter into free trade 

agreements with several other countries, including Canada, Lebanon, South Africa, and Mexico; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1748 IH 

Whereas United States exports account for 6.09 percent of 

goods that enter Turkey; 

Whereas closer relations with Turkey through free trade 

agreements would encourage further privatization in Turkey’s economy; 

Whereas from 2000 to 2009 Turkey’s imports posted a 158 

percent increase and imports from free trade agreement 

countries increased by 118 percent; and 

Whereas Turkey is a democratic, secular, unitary, constitutional republic, with an ancient cultural heritage and 

westward-looking future: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the United States should initiate negotia3 tions to enter into a bilateral free trade agreement with 

4 Turkey. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS