alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
James Harvey TIPLER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 15-9492.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
Exhibit 32.1
------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of AlphaTrade.com (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Penny Perfect, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.

         /s/ Penny Perfect
         -------------------------
         Penny Perfect
         Chief Executive Officer

         Date:  March 25, 2004


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
         this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
         accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.















                                       33
II-00660

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Darlene Davis <darlene.jaya@cox.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:51 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Darlene Davis

2573 shellsburg ave

henderson, NV 89052
Ronald Jerome LEE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-9268.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-2453

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Robert Stanford Johnson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: November 27, 2013

Filed: December 5, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Robert Johnson appeals the sentence imposed by the District Court after he 1

pleaded guilty to a drug offense. On appeal, Johnson’s counsel has moved to

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, Chief Judge, United States District Court

1

for the Southern District of Iowa.
withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.

Upon careful review, we conclude that Johnson’s within-Guidelines-range

sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d

455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (standard of review); Gall v. United States, 552

U.S. 38, 51 (2007) (noting that if a sentence is within the properly calculated

Guidelines range, an appellate court may apply a presumption of reasonableness to

the sentence). Further, having independently reviewed the record in accordance with

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Therefore,

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
Arthur PAYTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7372.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
    (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0000852447
<NAME>                                      EUROMED INC
<MULTIPLIER>                                1
<CURRENCY>                                  $US
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1
<CASH>                                      275,000
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,367,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 3,609,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            9,465,000
<PP&E>                                      910,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (478,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,534,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,888,000
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,623,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,534,000
<SALES>                                     7,012,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            7,012,000
<CGS>                                       6,404,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               7,420,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          135,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (543,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (11,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (554,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (554,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.15
        

</TABLE>
No. 99-10535

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10535

Conference Calendar

 

ANTHONY T. THOMAS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

J. SAWYER ET Al.,

Defendants,

J. BALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CV-2475

--------------------

February 17, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Justin Ball appeals the district court's denial of his

motion for summary judgment in Thomas’s civil rights suit. Ball

argues that the district court erred by denying his summaryjudgment motion and that this court has jurisdiction over the

interlocutory appeal. Because there is a significant factrelated dispute with regard to Thomas’s brutality claim, this 

court does not have jurisdiction to review the district court’s

denial of the motion for summary judgment on this claim. See
No. 99-10535

-2-

Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 313 (1995). Thus, Ball’s appeal

is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group Population Research Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         June 28-29, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         7:30 p.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Hyatt Regency Hotel, 100 Bethesda Metro Center, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jon M. Ranhand, Ph.D, Scientist Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Blvd., Rm. 5E01, MSC 7510, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 18, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-15753  Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Julie SUNDIN, petitioner, v. UNITED AIRLINES, Inc., et al.

No. 16-274.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33963-33964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1378-DR]


West Virginia; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia, (FEMA-1378-DR), dated June 3, 2001, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 18, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia is hereby amended to include the 
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of June 3, 2001:

[[Page 33964]]

Preston County for Individual Assistance

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Lacy E. Suiter,
Assistant Director, Readiness, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-15930 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
##### 



Exhibit 10.8
 EXECUTION COPY
 ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
ENCORE WIRE LIMITED
 WAIVER
TO MASTER NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT




---



##### 



1. WAIVER
  2. ISSUANCE OF NEW NOTES
  3. REAFFIRMATION; REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
 Reaffirmation of Note Agreement
 Note Agreement
 No Default or Event of Default
 Authorization
 Parent
 2




---



##### 



Subsidiary Guarantor
 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
  Consent of Holders to Waiver
 Reaffirmation of Subsidiary Guaranty
 Amendment to Credit Agreement
 Legal Opinion
 Fees of Special Counsel
 5. MISCELLANEOUS
 Ratification
 Binding Effect
 Governing Law
 3




---



##### 



Counterparts
 4




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 ENCORE WIRE CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Daniel L. JonesName:
    Daniel L. JonesTitle:
    President and Chief Executive OfficerENCORE WIRE LIMITED
By its General Partner, EWC GP CORP.By:
    /s/ Frank J. BilbanName:
    Frank J. BilbanTitle:
    Vice President Finance, Treasurer and
Secretary S-1




---



##### 



HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    
    Hartford Investment Management
Company (successor by merger of
Hartford Investment Services, Inc.)Its Agent and Attorney-in-Fact
 By:
    /s/ Daniel C. LeinlbachName:
    Daniel C. LeinlbachTitle:
    Senior Vice President S-2




---



##### 



GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    /s/ Tad AndersonName:
    Tad AndersonTitle:
    Asst. Vice President, InvestmentsBy:
    /s/ Eve HamptonName:
    Eve HamptonTitle:
    Vice President, InvestmentsLONDON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    /s/ B.R. AllisonName:
    B.R. AllisonTitle:
    Authorized SignatoryBy:
    /s/ D.B.E. AyersName:
    D.B.E. AyersTitle:
    Authorized Signatory LONDON LIFE AND
GENERAL REINSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDBy:
    
    Orchard Capital Management, LLC as
Investment Advisor
 By:
    /s/ Eve HamptonName:
    Eve HamptonTitle:
    Authorized SignatoryBy:
    /s/ Cathe TocherName:
    Cathe TocherTitle:
    Authorized Signatory S-3




---



##### 



SCHEDULE I
 Principal AmountHolder
    
    of Senior NotesHartford Life Insurance Company
    
    $
    25,000,000Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
    
    
    10,000,000London Life Insurance Company
    
    
    7,000,000London Life and General Reinsurance Company Limited
    
    
    3,000,000
 Schedule I




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 REAFFIRMATION OF SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY
    EWC AVIATION Corp.By:
    /s/ Frank J. BilbanName:
    Frank J. BilbanTitle:
    Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Exhibit A
John HOWELL, petitioner, v. Sandra HOWELL.

No. 15-1031.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

SERGEI S. LAUBE and GALINA LAUBE CFTC Docket No. 13-R006 

v. 

GAIN CAPITAL GROUP, LLC d/b/a 

FOREX.COM 

ORDER PURSUANT TO 

DELEGATED AUTHORITY 

Appellant Gain Capital Group LLC, requests a three-week extension of time, to and 

including December 5, 2014, within which to file its appeal brief. Appellant requests the 

extension due to recently retaining counsel to represent it, and counsel requiring time to become 

familiar with the facts of the case. 

Accordingly, appellant's request for an extension of time is granted for good cause 

shown. Appellant's brief shall be filed and served on or before December 5, 2014. 

IT IS so ORDERED. 1 

Dated: I 

Robert A. Schwartz 

Deputy General Counsel 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

1 By the Commission pursuant to delegated authority. 17 C.F.R. § 12.408(a)(iii).
# C_2009102EN.01001302.xml

| 1.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio (Italy) lodged on 20 February 2009 — Gowan Comercio Internacional e Servicos Limitada v Ministero della Salute

(Case C-77/09)

2009/C 102/21

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gowan Comercio Internacional e Servicos Limitada

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministero della Salute

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

In view of the fact that the conclusion of the technical and scientific assessment carried out by the Rapporteur State appears to be that the risk arising from the use of fenarimol is acceptable, is Directive 2006/134/EC, which significantly limited such use, valid?

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting date change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Thursday, February 22, 2001 (66 FR 11158), the Department 
of Defense announced a closed meeting of the Defense Science Board 
(DSB) Task Force on Precision Targeting. This meeting has been 
rescheduled from July 26-27, 2001 to July 25-26, 2001. The meeting will 
be held at SAIC, 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA.

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-16031 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
Richard Scott BATTERSON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-754.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
II-00585

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Robert Burr <BobBurr@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:59 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Robert Burr

1130 40th St

Bellingham, WA 98229
# C_2012133EN.01002301.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2012 — Feng Shen Technology v OHIM — Majtczak (FS)

(Case T-227/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark FS - Applicant acting in bad faith - Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2012/C 133/43

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Feng Shen Technology Co. Ltd (Guieshan Township, Taïwan) (represented by: P. Rath and W. Festl-Wietek, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: (Jarosław Majtczak (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: initially by J. Wyrwas, and subsequently by J. Radłowski, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 April 2009 (Case R 529/2008-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Feng Shen Technology Co. Ltd and Jarosław Majtczak

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 1 April 2009 (Case R 529/2008-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 1 April 2009 (Case R 529/2008-4);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and pay the costs of Feng Shen Technology Co. Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and pay the costs of Feng Shen Technology Co. Ltd;

| 3. | Orders Mr Jarosław Majtczak to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Jarosław Majtczak to bear his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.

1

---