alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
llU\1 .L~ UO .Ll:.lil:.'"T~ p. 1 

COMMENT o~-~ 

@) 

Subject: Proposed Rules for Trading Off the Centraliz~:~ 

Market <''•l ··:-) 

Dear sir/madam, co 

:~~~ ~ .... _) 

I am happy to hear the CFTC is taking comment o~;J "';7 

this subject. I believe "block trading" is a non transparen:~ t~ 

method of trading that is disrupting the liquidity of our --. 

markets by removing trades from the centralized market. I 

have been told that it is possible the trades are part of a 

multi-leg trade that could not take place otherwise; I 

propose making that a requirement instead of a possibility. 

In addition I believe the current minimum requirements are 

so low, if it was the only position a trader put on in one 

market, it would barely be a "reportable" or a "large trader" 

position. 

The CFTC should regulate these trades and implement 

stringent rules for trading off the centralized market. 

Thank you, 

Terrence E. Fit 

j~f-~---~ ., 

~~--

-· 

:> 

:·! 

\..;1 

Vl 

~-··-, 

-~· •,' 

·~?y~; 

. :-n 

') 

i 

' ' .. ~ 

·- -I ', 

·~ 

/ 

'/
II-00731

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Glenn Knoblock <glenndandyl @yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:54 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Glenn Knoblock

1407 Middletree Road

Joliet, IL 60433
II-00876

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Glen Benjamin <soulroll@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:26 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Glen Benjamin

140 Court Street apt 209

Portsmouth, NH 3801
# C_2011130EN.01002701.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/27

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 8 March 2011 — Carlo De Nicola v European Investment Bank

(Case F-59/09) (1)

1

(Civil service - Staff of the European Investment Bank - Appraisal - Promotion - Jurisdiction of the Tribunal - Admissibility - Implied decision of rejection - Internal Directive - Staff representative - Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

2011/C 130/54

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: C. Gómez de la Cruz, T. Gilliams and F. Martin, agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, annulment of the promotions of 29 April 2008 which do not include the applicant’s name and the assessment of the applicant for 2007. Second, annulment of the decision of the Appeal Committee to remain seized of the matter notwithstanding an objection. Finally, a declaration that the applicant has been the victim of psychological harassment and an order that the defendant desist from such conduct and compensate the non-material and material damage suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the staff report for 2007 and the decision refusing M. De Nicola promotion. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the staff report for 2007 and the decision refusing M. De Nicola promotion.

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the heads of claim. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the heads of claim.

| 3. | Orders Mr De Nicola and the European Investment Bank to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr De Nicola and the European Investment Bank to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 205 of 29.8.09 p. 49.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1647 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1647

Urging the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to acquire and utilize the Our 
 Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center in Lafayette, Louisiana, as a 
 full-service Department of Veterans Affairs hospital to better serve 
         veterans throughout the Acadiana region of Louisiana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2010

Mr. Melancon submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Urging the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to acquire and utilize the Our 
 Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center in Lafayette, Louisiana, as a 
 full-service Department of Veterans Affairs hospital to better serve 
         veterans throughout the Acadiana region of Louisiana.

Whereas Louisiana veterans, having served the United States with honor and at 
        great personal sacrifice, deserve the best possible medical treatment 
        available;
Whereas the residents of Louisiana and the American people owe the security of 
        the Nation to those who have heroically defended it;
Whereas over 60,000 veterans currently reside in Louisiana's Acadiana region;
Whereas veterans living in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the surrounding areas must 
        travel more than 180 miles round trip to receive comprehensive medical 
        treatment from a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital;
Whereas traveling long distances to receive medical treatment is inconvenient 
        and difficult for many veterans;
Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs has stated its desire to expand 
        medical services in Lafayette to better serve Acadiana veterans and 
        their families;
Whereas the Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center in Lafayette, Louisiana, 
        is being vacated in 2011, and this presents an opportunity for the 
        Secretary of Veterans Affairs to acquire a prime medical facility; and
Whereas a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital in Acadiana would be a boon to 
        the region's economy, providing more than 1,300 jobs to residents and 
        veterans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives strongly urges the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to acquire and utilize the Our Lady of 
Lourdes Regional Medical Center in Lafayette, Louisiana, as a full-
service Department of Veterans Affairs hospital to better serve 
veterans throughout the Acadiana region of Louisiana.
                                 <all>
```
Reginald REYFORD, petitioner, v. Scott KERNAN, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 16-6265.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
H. Res. 1585 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 30, 2010. 

Whereas the base originally named Fairfield-Suisun Army Air 

Base, the ‘‘Gateway to the Pacific’’, was renamed Travis 

Air Force Base in 1951; 

Whereas Team Travis includes the 13,900 active duty, reservists, and civilians of the 60th Air Mobility Wing, the 

349th Air Mobility Wing, the 15th Expeditionary Mobility Task Force, the 615th Contingency Response Wing, 

and their families; 

Whereas the 60th Air Mobility Wing, one of the Air Force’s 

largest air mobility organizations, significantly contributed to the defense of our Nation during World War II, 

the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Persian Gulf 

War, and operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom; 

Whereas, after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, 

Team Travis played major roles in providing airlift, air 

refueling, and aero medical evacuation in support of Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom, flying 102,581 

hours for Operation Iraqi Freedom and 70,940 hours for 

Operation Enduring Freedom; 

Whereas in January 2009, Travis aircrews from the 60th Air 

Mobility Wing and 349th Air Mobility Wing supported 
2 

•HRES 1585 EH 

humanitarian aid operations in the Darfur region of 

Sudan; 

Whereas the 615th Contingency Response Wing, one of two 

Air Force Contingency Response Wings, facilitated airlift 

efforts from Rwanda in support of the Rwandan peacekeeping mission; 

Whereas, after a 7.0 magnitude earthquake struck Haiti on 

January 12, 2010, Team Travis conducted the first humanitarian airlift mission, providing search and rescue 

personnel, medical experts and supplies, and facilitated 

the delivery of more than 1,000,000 pounds of cargo during the duration of the Haitian Relief Effort; and 

Whereas the 60th Air Mobility Wing and Team Travis valiantly fulfill its motto of being ‘‘America’s First Choice’’, 

for true global reach: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors and recognizes the exemplary service and 

sacrifice of the 60th Air Mobility Wing, the 349th Air 

Mobility Wing, the 15th Expeditionary Mobility Task 

Force, and the 615th Contingency Response Wing civilians and families serving at Travis Air Force Base, California; 

(2) offers condolences to the families of the brave 

servicemembers of Team Travis who have lost their lives 

in defense of the United States; and 

(3) commends the actions of private citizens and organizations in the Travis Air Force Base community for 
3 

•HRES 1585 EH 

their steadfast support of members of the United States 

Armed Forces and their families. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
A.C.S., petitioner, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF EXAMINERS.

No. 16-6676.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until January 30, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
1296.

#### DANIEL *v.*THE STATE.

No reversible error appears.

Accusation of disturbing divine worship, from city court of Sparta — Judge Little. June 15, 1908.

Submitted October 6,

Decided October 12, 1908.

*R. H. Lewis,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. W. Moore, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

The only exception is to an instruction of the court to the jury in the following language: “It is not necessary for a defendant charged with an offense like this to go into the church to disturb it, or even to go on the church grounds to disturb the congregation. If, either in the- church or outside of it, he is guilty of any of the conduct defined in the section I have just read to you, section 418 [óf the Penal Code], which actually does disturb a congregation from the very beginning of their assembling until they ape finally dispersed, any member of the congregation, whether one, or two, or ten, or five hundred, or a thousand, if he is guilty óf such conduct as disturbs people who are assembled to worship, then this offense is made out.” While we can not approve the instruction as altogether suitable for a model, jet, when it is carefully analyzed, it shows no reversible error as applied to the facts of the present case. *Judgment affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 16 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 16

 Supporting the goals and ideals of National Life Insurance Awareness 
                                 Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

 Mrs. Biggert (for herself and Mr. Kanjorski) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of National Life Insurance Awareness 
                                 Month.

Whereas life insurance is an essential part of a sound financial plan;
Whereas life insurance provides financial security for families by helping 
        surviving members meet immediate and long-term financial obligations and 
        objectives in the event of a premature death in their family;
Whereas approximately 68,000,000 United States citizens lack the adequate level 
        of life insurance coverage needed to ensure a secure financial future 
        for their loved ones;
Whereas life insurance products protect against the uncertainties of life by 
        enabling individuals and families to manage the financial risks of 
        premature death, disability, and long-term care;
Whereas individuals, families, and businesses can benefit from professional 
        insurance and financial planning advice, including an assessment of 
        their life insurance needs; and
Whereas numerous groups supporting life insurance have designated September 2009 
        as ``National Life Insurance Awareness Month'' as a means to encourage 
        consumers to--

    (1) become more aware of their life insurance needs;

    (2) seek professional advice regarding life insurance; and

    (3) take the actions necessary to achieve financial security for their 
loved ones: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of ``National Life 
        Insurance Awareness Month''; and
            (2) calls on the Federal Government, States, localities, 
        schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and the citizens 
        of the United States to observe the month with appropriate 
        programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          65,959
<SECURITIES>                                    58,675
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                        90
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,922
<PP&E>                                          16,780
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,750)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,934
<BONDS>                                        131,791
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,443
<SALES>                                          3,327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,327
<CGS>                                            2,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,219)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,219)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        







</TABLE>
Robert Dewayne BOSLEY, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-6711.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15945]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-44453; File No. SR-ISE-01-03]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, 
LLC; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change Relating to Market 
Maker Block Transactions

June 20, 2001.
    On January 12, 2001, the International Securities Exchange 
(``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to permit market makers to enter block-size orders 
into the ISE's Block Order mechanism.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal 
Register on February 8, 2001.\3\ The Commission received no comments on 
the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43290 (February 2, 
2001), 66 FR 9613.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange \4\ and, in 
particular, the requirements of Section 6 of the Act \5\ and the rules 
and regulations thereunder. The Commission finds specifically that the 
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \6\ 
because it allows ISE market makers to participate in the Block Order 
Mechanism to the same extent as Electronic Access Members and thus to 
more easily hedge or liquidate positions resulting from their market 
making activities on the ISE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission notes 
that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, 
competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\7\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-ISE-01-03) be, and 
it hereby is, approved.

    \7\ 16 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15945 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Matthew BENDEL, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 16-6809.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District denied.
II-00592

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Daniel Spencer <lmpncof@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:48 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Daniel Spencer

214 LUCAS

San Antonio, TX 78209