alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Julia Ngoc NGUYEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6929.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1782 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1782

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 21, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution, it shall be in order to 
take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 3082) making appropriations for 
military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes, with the 
Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment thereto, and to 
consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order except those 
arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a motion offered by the chair of the 
Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House concur in the Senate 
amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment 
and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the motion to final adoption without intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Regina Nachael HOWELL FOSTER, petitioner, v. Areya HOLDER.

No. 16-5370.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Carlton Parfitt, Chief Financial Officer of Golden Spirit Mining Ltd., a
Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.      I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year
ended December 31, 2004 of GOLDEN SPIRIT MINING LTD.

2.      Based on my knowledge, this amended annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this amended report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14 and 15d - 14) for the registrant and we have:

        a.      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
	material information relating to the registrant, including its
	consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
	entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
	being prepared;

        b.      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
	controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
	date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c.      presented in this amended report our conclusions about the
	effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
	evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

        a.      All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
	internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
	to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
	identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
	internal controls; and

        b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
	other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
	controls; and

6.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 09, 2005

  /s/ Carlton Parfitt
      --------------
     Carlton Parfitt
     Director and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-39,209]

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on May 7, 2001 in response to a worker petition which was filed on May 7, 2001 on behalf of workers at Mayfair Mills, Arcadia, South Carolina.

An existing investigation is underway for this worker group (TA-W-38940). Eligibility will be determined by the results of that investigation. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and this investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 25th day of May, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-15040  Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., aka Royal Philips, et al., petitioners, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 16-559.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                                             |  |                              
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                                           |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|StarGuide Digital Networks, Inc.                             |  | Nevada                       
|Digital Generation Systems of New York, Inc.                 |  | New York                     
|Starcom Mediatech, Inc.                                      |  | Delaware                     
|Musicam Express, L.L.C.                                      |  | Delaware                     
|Corporate Computer Systems, Inc.                             |  | Delaware                     
|Corporate Computer Systems Consultants, Inc.                 |  | Delaware                     
|DG Systems Acquisition Corporation d/b/a AGT Broadcast, Inc. |  | Delaware                     
|DG Systems Acquisition II Corporation d/b/a SourceTV, Inc.   |  | Delaware
Francisco VALENCIA-VILLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9371.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
ACCEPTED

04-15-00238-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

11/25/2015 6:02:06 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 11/25/2015 6:02:06 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
# C_2009256EN.01001001.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/10

---

Action brought on 28 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-295/09)

2009/C 256/18

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Braun and E. Adsera Ribera, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not having adopted the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2006/43/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC or, in any event, by not having communicated them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not having adopted the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2006/43/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC or, in any event, by not having communicated them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive.

1

| — | order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed to transpose Directive 2006/43/EC into national law ended on 28 June 2008.

---

(1)  OJ L 157, p. 87

1

---
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our
report dated January 27, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Motorsports Authentics, LLCas of November 30, 2009 and 2008, and for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2009, which
are included in the Annual Report of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Speedway Motorsports, Inc.
on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-69616, effective October 9, 2001; File No. 333-49027, effective April 24, 2008; File No. 333-69618, effective October 9, 2001; File No. 333-89496, effective April 24, 2008; File
No. 333-114965, effective April 24, 2008; File No. 333-114969, effective April 24, 2008; File No. 333-150418, effective April 24, 2008).



|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|/s/    Grant Thornton LLP
|Charlotte, North Carolina
|March 11, 2010
II-Oll03

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Thierry Deshayes <uncleterr@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:13 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Thierry Deshayes

Scottsdale Unified #48

Scottsdale, AZ 85251
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-41225

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR,

Petitioner-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CV-64

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Christopher Taylor, federal prisoner # 04971-078, appeals

the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside,

or correct his sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Taylor

argues that his counsel was ineffective for failing to file a

direct appeal and that the district court erred in calculating

the amount of drugs attributable to him for sentencing purposes.

Taylor raises his ineffective-assistance claim for the first

time on appeal. At most, his claim is subject to plain-error
No. 96-41225

-2-

review. See United States v McPhail, 112 F.3d 197, 199 (5th Cir.

1997). His claim gives rise to a factual question which this

court will not resolve on appeal and which, by its nature, does

not rise to the level of obvious error. See Robertson v. Plano

City of Texas, 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). Taylor’s argument

regarding the district court’s calculation of the quantity of

drugs attributable to him is not cognizable under § 2255. See

United States v. Vaughn, 955 F.2d 367, 368 (5th Cir. 1992).

Taylor’s claims are without merit. Accordingly, the

district court’s judgment denying his § 2255 motion is 

AFFIRMED.
Domenico A. LOCKHART, petitioner, v. Nora HUNT, Superintendent, Columbus Correctional Facility.

No. 15-9339.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2010246EN.01001301.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Françoise-Eléonor Hanssens-Ensch (insolvency administrator of Agenor SA) v European Community

(Case C-377/09) (1)

1

(Article 235 EC and Article 288 EC, second paragraph - Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice to hear and determine actions for damages brought against the European Community on the basis of non-contractual liability - Action to make good a shortfall in the assets, within the meaning of Article 530(1) of the Belgian Code des sociétés - Action brought against the European Community by the insolvency administrator of a limited company - Jurisdiction of the national courts to hear and determine such an action)

2010/C 246/20

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de commerce de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Françoise-Eléonor Hanssens-Ensch (insolvency administrator of Agenor SA)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Community

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de commerce de Bruxelles — Interpretation of the second paragraph of Article 288 EC — Action for damages brought by an insolvency administrator against the European Community on grounds of serious misconduct on the part of the Community in the de facto management of a commercial company, thus contributing to its insolvency — Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice to hear and determine an action for damages brought under national insolvency provisions on the basis of non-contractual liability

de facto

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

An action for damages brought against the European Community on the basis of non-contractual liability, even if it is brought under national legislation establishing special statutory rules which differ from the ordinary rules of law governing civil liability in the Member State concerned, does not — pursuant to Article 235 EC, read in conjunction with the second paragraph of Article 288 EC — fall within the jurisdiction of the national courts.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---
Brian E. PORTER, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 16-6639.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
II-00815

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Christopher Trice <cptrice@swbell.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:08 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Christopher Trice

4632 N Keumore Ave #3

Chicago, IL 60640
# C_2010288EN.01002703.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 25 May 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — DAR Duale Abfallwirtschaft und Verwertung Ruhrgebiet GmbH v Ministerstvo životního prostředí

(Case C-299/09) (1)

()

(2010/C 288/48)

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

---
**Fidelity**®**Emerging Markets Discovery Fund**

**Class**/Ticker

**Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund**/FEDDX

In this summary prospectus, the term "shares" (as it relates to the fund) means the class of shares offered through this summaryprospectus.

**Summary Prospectus**

**December 29, 2012**
# C_2009267EN.01003403.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/34

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands), lodged on 3 August 2009 — Olbek Industrial Services sp. z.o.o.; other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid

(Case C-309/09)

2009/C 267/64

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Olbek Industrial Services sp. z o.o.

Appellant:

Other party: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid

Other party:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Articles 49 EC and 50 EC be interpreted as precluding a national arrangement, as set out in Article 2 of the Netherlands Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), read in conjunction with Article 1e(1)(c) of the Decree implementing the Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Besluit uitvoering Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), under which a work permit is required for the hiring-out of workers as referred to in Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Articles 49 EC and 50 EC be interpreted as precluding a national arrangement, as set out in Article 2 of the Netherlands Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), read in conjunction with Article 1e(1)(c) of the Decree implementing the Law on the Employment of Foreign Nationals (Besluit uitvoering Wet arbeid vreemdelingen), under which a work permit is required for the hiring-out of workers as referred to in Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC? (1)

1

| 2. | On the basis of what criteria should it be determined whether workers have been hired out within the meaning of Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC? |
| --- | --- |

2.

On the basis of what criteria should it be determined whether workers have been hired out within the meaning of Article 1(3)(c) of Directive 96/71/EC?

---

(1)  Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ 1997 L 18, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2010063EN.01004402.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/44

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 4 December 2009 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-46/09) (1)

1

2010/C 63/72

Language of the case: Estonian

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.

1

---