alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT



I, James Clark, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mind2Market, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of December 31, 2002; and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 23, 2004


/s/James Clark
-----------------------
James Clark, CEO
11-01112

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Edwin McGrath <eddie1247@roadrunner.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:10 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Edwin McGrath

66 1st Avenue

Albion, PA 16401
- 0086_001
- 0086_039
David Andrew CHRISTENSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5869.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Stephen Floyd ULLRICH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR the DISTRICT OF IDAHO.

No. 16-6454.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Appendix A

CFTC FY 2010 to FY 2014 Expenses

Information Technology Expenses

Fiscal Year Appropriation % Change in 

Appropriation

IT Non-FTE 

Expenses2

IT FTE 

Expenses3

IT Total 

Expenses

% Change in 

IT Non-FTE 

Expenses

% Change 

in IT Total 

Expenses

FY 2010 Actual 168,800,000 -- 31,490,686 10,039,650 41,530,336 -- --

FY 2011 Actual 202,270,000 19.8 39,130,000 14,110,000 53,240,000 24.3 28.2

FY 2012 Actual 205,294,000 1.5 51,110,000 15,020,000 66,130,000 30.6 24.2

FY 2013 Actual 194,555,0001-5.2 42,140,000 14,800,000 56,940,000 -17.6 -13.9

FY 2014 Spend Plan 215,000,000 10.5 42,900,000 16,233,000 59,133,000 1.8 3.9

1) Post sequestration.

2) Direct IT costs for the Commission. Includes IT contracts.

3) Office of Data and Technology FTE salary and benefits.

Division Expenses

Division / Office FY 2010

Actual

605 FTE

FY 2011 

Actual 

666 FTE

FY 2012 

Actual 

684 FTE

FY 2013 

Actual 

682 FTE

FY 2014 

Spend Plan 

667 FTE

% Change 

FY14 vs 

FY 13

FY14 % of 

Approp.

% Change 

FY14 vs 

FY 11

Market Oversight 35,391,000 26,658,000 25,822,000 26,377,000 26,722,000 1.31 12.43 0.24

Clearing & Inter. Oversight427,294,000 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Clearing & Risk -- 11,296,000 13,237,000 13,993,000 15,011,000 7.28 6.98 32.89

Swap Dealer & Inter. Oversight -- 16,040,000 16,057,000 17,455,000 20,233,000 15.92 9.41 26.14

Chief Economist 3,895,000 2,937,000 3,689,000 2,480,000 2,632,000 6.13 1.22 -10.38

Enforcement 42,217,000 37,051,000 36,020,000 39,703,000 43,312,000 9.09 20.15 16.90

Proceedings53,060,000 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

General Counsel 11,966,000 10,844,000 11,501,000 13,051,000 13,141,000 0.69 6.11 21.18

International Affairs 2,505,000 2,033,000 2,170,000 2,661,000 3,190,000 19.88 1.48 56.91

Agency Direction 8,070,000 8,811,000 8,463,000 7,365,000 8,342,000 13.27 3.88 -5.32

Admin. / Support 33,946,000 16,718,000 17,142,000 18,874,000 18,277,000 -3.16 8.50 9.33

Data and Technology6-- 60,073,000 64,958,000 59,770,000 64,140,000 7.31 29.83 6.77

Total 168,344,000 192,461,000 199,059,000 201,729,000 215,000,000 6.58 100.0 11.71

4) The Division of Clearing & Inter. Oversight split into the Division of Clearing & Risk and the Division of Swap Dealer & Inter. Oversight in FY 2011.

5) Proceedings moved into Admin. / Support in FY 2011.

6) The Office of Data and Technology split from Admin. / Support in FY 2011. In FY 2010, technology costs were distributed equally among Divisions.
No. 522.

#### Foster *v.*Chickasha.

November 18, 1935.

*Mr. Frank M. Bailey*for petitioner.

*Mr. Alger Melton*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma denied.
II-01158

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Matt Reeder <mareede@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:48 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Matt Reeder

2825 SE Holgate Blvd.

Portland, OR 97202
Paul MADDEN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, petitioner, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of California, et al.

No. 16-6598.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Dralves Gene EDWARDS, petitioner, v. Sylvia BURWELL, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.

No. 16-541.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Angel MELENDEZ-ORSINI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7266.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
II-01177

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jeff Lovejoy <trees98@pwless.net>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 7:15 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jeff Lovej oy

558 Drew Mill Rd.

Linnaeus, ME 04730
II-00527

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Daniel Isaacson <disaacsonl @aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:34 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Daniel Isaacson

6055 Verde Trail South, Apt. H219

Boca Raton, FL 33433
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2014

s0319 

# Order

Clerk March 26, 2014

147903

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147903

COA: 313359

Washtenaw CC: 06

- 000987

- FH ;

06

- 000988

- FH

LARRY DESHAWN LEE

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 24 , 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 2

- 00 411

- CR

Pamela Hutchins , Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 3020524 , HONORABLE JON N. WISSER , JUDGE PRESIDING

Sentence was imposed in this cause on May 17, 2002. There was no motion for new trial. The deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore June 17. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Notice of appeal

was filed on June 18. No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. There is no indication that notice of appeal was properly mailed to the district clerk within the time prescribed by rule 26.2(a). Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See

Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522

- 23
(Tex. Crim. App. 1996).2 The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ Lee Yeakel, Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: July 26, 2002

Do Not Publish
II-01082

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Wayne Thompson <maxman0012@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:23 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Wayne Thompson

101 Woodland Ave

Coatesville, PA 19320
Mario EVANS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7242.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Martin RUGAMBA, petitioner, v. ROCKLEDGE BUS TOUR INC. et al.

No. 15-9274.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2012138EN.01001403.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Hipp v OHIM — Nestlé (Bebio)

(Case T-41/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Bebio - Earlier Community word mark and international word mark BEBA - Partial refusal of registration - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2012/C 138/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hipp & Co. KG (Sachseln, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented: initially by I. Valdelomar Serrano and subsequently by R. Mottola and D. Gabarre Armengol, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 November 2008 (Case R 1790/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Société des Produits Nestlé, S.A. and Hipp & Co KG

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hipp & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hipp & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3680 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3680

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 415 North Main Street in Henning, Tennessee, as the ``Paula Croom 
        Robinson and Judy Spray Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAULA CROOM ROBINSON AND JUDY SPRAY MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located 415 North Main Street in Henning, Tennessee, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Paula Croom Robinson and Judy Spray Memorial Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Paula 
Croom Robinson and Judy Spray Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3680

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 415 North Main Street in Henning, Tennessee, as the ``Paula Croom 
        Robinson and Judy Spray Memorial Post Office Building''.
```
Germaine Michael RIVERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7226.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Charlie BRITFORD, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 16-6363.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.