alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009220EN.01002102.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 3 July 2009 — Albron Catering BV v FNV Bondgenoten and John Roest

(Case C-242/09)

2009/C 220/41

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Gerechtshof te Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Albron Catering BV

Applicant:

Defendants: FNV Bondgenoten, John Roest

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Should Directive 2001/23/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that there is a transfer of rights and obligations to the transferee referred to in the first sentence of Article 3(1) only if the transferor of the undertaking to be transferred is also the formal employer of the employees concerned, or does the protection of employees envisaged by the Directive imply that, upon transfer of an undertaking from an operating company belonging to a group, the rights and obligations pertaining to the employees working for that undertaking are transferred to the transferee if all the personnel working in the group are in the employ of a personnel company (which also belongs to that group) which functions as the central employer? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Should Directive 2001/23/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that there is a transfer of rights and obligations to the transferee referred to in the first sentence of Article 3(1) only if the transferor of the undertaking to be transferred is also the formal employer of the employees concerned, or does the protection of employees envisaged by the Directive imply that, upon transfer of an undertaking from an operating company belonging to a group, the rights and obligations pertaining to the employees working for that undertaking are transferred to the transferee if all the personnel working in the group are in the employ of a personnel company (which also belongs to that group) which functions as the central employer?

1

| 2. | What would be the answer to the second part of the first question if the employees referred to there who work for an undertaking belonging to a group are in the employ of another company which also belongs to that group, which is not a personnel company as described in the first question? |
| --- | --- |

2.

What would be the answer to the second part of the first question if the employees referred to there who work for an undertaking belonging to a group are in the employ of another company which also belongs to that group, which is not a personnel company as described in the first question?

which is not

---

(1)  Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16).

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1761 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1761

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 15, 2010.
Whereas Cameron Newton graduated from Westlake High School in College Park, 
        Georgia, in 2007;
Whereas Cameron Newton became Auburn University's starting quarterback in 2010;
Whereas Cameron Newton became the first player in Southeastern Conference 
        history and only the eighth player in National Collegiate Athletic 
        Association Football Bowl Subdivision history to achieve over 2,000 
        yards passing and over 1,000 yards rushing in a single season;
Whereas the Auburn University football team finished the regular season with a 
        12-0 record;
Whereas the Auburn University football team won the Southeastern Conference 
        Championship game by a score of 56 to 17 over the University of South 
        Carolina;
Whereas Cameron Newton accounted for 6 touchdowns, 4 passing and 2 rushing, in 
        the Southeastern Conference Championship game;
Whereas the Auburn University football team is ranked number one in both the 
        Bowl Championship Series and Associated Press rankings;
Whereas Cameron Newton was named the Southeastern Conference Offensive Player of 
        the Year for 2010;
Whereas Cameron Newton was named the Walter Camp Football Foundation Player of 
        the Year for 2010;
Whereas Cameron Newton received the Maxwell Award for the Collegiate Player of 
        the Year in 2010; and
Whereas Cameron Newton was named the 76th winner of the 2010 Heisman Memorial 
        Trophy for the most outstanding college football player in the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Auburn University 
quarterback and College Park, Georgia, native Cameron Newton on winning the 2010 
Heisman Trophy for being the most outstanding college football player in the 
United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated November 20, 2000, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on November 5, 2000, (65 FR 75959), Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, 30 North Jefferson Road, Whippany, New Jersey 07981, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleDihydromorphine (9145)
IHydromorphone (9150)
II
 The firm plans to produce bulk product and finished dosage units for distribution to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Knoll Pharmaceutical Company to manufacture the listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Knoll Pharmaceutical Company on a regular basis to ensure that the company's continued registration is consistent with the public interest. These investigations have included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, audits of the company's records, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed above is granted. Dated: June 4, 2001. Laura M. Nagel, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 01-15834 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
II-00928

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Brenda Turiello <bturiello@merwinpaolazzi.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:58 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Brenda Turiello

211 Mountain Way

Lyndhurst, NJ 7071
II-00723

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

jason haze <howardbigalow@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:02 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

jason haze

604 stm ave

covina, CA 91790
Michael BAKER, petitioner, v. Randy PFISTER, Warden.

No. 16-6967.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
II-01179

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

steve claus <sbc5@pacbell.net>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 7:11 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

steve claus

10 Clover Court

Woodland, CA 95695
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15886]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6997-4]


Divex Superfund Site Notice of Proposed Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) has proposed to settle claims for response costs at the 
Divex Site located in Columbia, South Carolina (Site), with three South 
Carolina schools districts, SCDHEC, and six other parties. EPA will 
consider public comments on the proposed settlement for thirty (30) 
days. EPA may withdraw or modify the proposed settlement should such 
comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed 
settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. Copies of the 
proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, CERCLA Program Services 
Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, GA 
30303, 404-562-8887.
    Written comments may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor at the above 
address on or before July 25, 2001.

    Dated: May 31, 2001.
Anita L. Davis,
Acting Chief, CERCLA Program Services Branch, Waste Management 
Division.
[FR Doc. 01-15886 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Agency for International Development

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Performance Review Board will initiate their labors on or about June 28, 2001. The following persons are members of the Performance Review Board for 2001.

#### Members

Corbett M. Flannery, Chair

Arnold J. Haiman, SES Member

Michael G. Kitay, SES Member

Adrienne R. Rish, SES Member

Franklin C. Moore, SES Member

John L. Wilkinson, SES Member

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Anne Conboy, 202-712-5438.

Dated: June 14, 2001.

Henry W. Reynolds,

Executive Secretary, Executive Resources Board.

[FR Doc. 01-16008  Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
Teresita A. CANUTO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-604.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost-U-Less, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Jeffrey Meder, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 8, 2003


                                          /s/ J. Jeffrey Meder
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          J. Jeffrey Meder
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Cost-U-Less, Inc. and will be
retained by Cost-U-Less, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2009082EN.01001502.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 26 January 2009 — Bolbol Nawras v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal

(Case C-31/09)

(2009/C 82/28)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bolbol Nawras

Applicant:

Defendant: Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal

Defendant:

Questions referred

For the purposes of Article 12(1)(a) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1)

1

| 1. | Must someone be regarded as a person receiving the protection and assistance of a United Nations agency merely by virtue of the fact he is entitled to assistance or protection or is it also necessary for him actually to avail himself of that protection or assistance? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must someone be regarded as a person receiving the protection and assistance of a United Nations agency merely by virtue of the fact he is entitled to assistance or protection or is it also necessary for him actually to avail himself of that protection or assistance?

| 2. | Does cessation of the agency's protection or assistance mean residence outside the agency's area of operations, cessation of the agency and cessation of the possibility of receiving the agency's protection or assistance or, possibly, an objective obstacle such that the person entitled thereto is unable to avail himself of that protection or assistance? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does cessation of the agency's protection or assistance mean residence outside the agency's area of operations, cessation of the agency and cessation of the possibility of receiving the agency's protection or assistance or, possibly, an objective obstacle such that the person entitled thereto is unable to avail himself of that protection or assistance?

| 3. | Do the benefits of this directive mean recognition as a refugee, or either of the two forms of protection covered by the directive (recognition as a refugee and the grant of subsidiary protection), according to the choice made by the Member State, or, possibly, neither automatically but merely inclusion in the scope ratione personae of the directive? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Do the benefits of this directive mean recognition as a refugee, or either of the two forms of protection covered by the directive (recognition as a refugee and the grant of subsidiary protection), according to the choice made by the Member State, or, possibly, neither automatically but merely inclusion in the scope ratione personae of the directive?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (OJ 2004 L 304, p. 12).

1

---
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2010 – Commission v Spain**

**(Case C‐295/09)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2006/43/EC – Company law – Statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 9)*

2.                     *Member States – Obligations – Implementation of directives – Failure to fulfil obligations – National system pleaded as justification
– Not permissible (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 10)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt or notify, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC (OJ 2006 L 157, p. 87). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
Charles R. KOKESH, petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 16-529.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.