alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         26,996
<SECURITIES>                                   20,713
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,892)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               62,935
<PP&E>                                         113,313
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (14,170)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,855
<BONDS>                                        133,438
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    12,123
<COMMON>                                       30
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,495
<SALES>                                        11,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,750
<CGS>                                          (5,309)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (24,495)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (17,938)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,854)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (17)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,954)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,954)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.61)



</TABLE>
In re Nigel WHITTAKER, petitioner.

No. 15-9276.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Kenneth M. Schwartz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of K&F Industries, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.            Date: November 11, 2005 /s/ KENNETH M. SCHWARTZ   Kenneth M. Schwartz   President and Chief Executive Officer
Rafael Antonio JOSEPH, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, et al.

No. 16M63.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Tavares James WATSON, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-9408.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2467
VISALAKSHI YOGARAJ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WASHINGTON ADVENTIST HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-3217-AW) Submitted: February 4, 1997 Decided: February 21, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Visalakshi Yogaraj, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley James Reed, Susan Berry Bloomfield, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's complaint filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended , 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended , 29 U.S.C. § 621 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yogaraj v. Washington Adventist Hosp. , No. CA-95- 3217-AM (D. Md. Sept. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II-00255

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Glenn Daigon <gdaigon@hotmail.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 8:10 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Glenn Daigon

10428 Rockville Pike, #101

Rockville, MD 20852
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1535/2004

of 27 August 2004         

fixing the maximum aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for the 147th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The maximum aid and processing securities applying for the 147th individual invitation to tender, under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97, shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 August 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 921/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 94).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 27 August 2004 fixing the maximum aid for cream, butter and concentrated butter for the 147th individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2571/97

----
#### KERRCH et al. v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

January 26, 1909.)

No. 772.

Appeal and Eebob (§ 659*) — Record—Amendment.

A plaintiff in error is not entitled to a writ of certiorari with reference to perfecting a bill of exceptions which occurred through his own fault or neglect, where application for the writ was not made until the trial court had lost jurisdiction to amend the bill under rule 17 of the Circuit Court. N. Y. & N. E. R. R. Co. v. Hyde, 56 Fed. 188, 5 C. C. A. 461, applied.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. § 2834; Dec. Dig. § 659.*]

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

On suggestion of diminution of the record and writ of certiorari.

See, also, 171 Fed. 366.

Harvey H. Pratt (James E. Cotter, Charles E. Smith, and John J. Coady, on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.

Guy A. Flam, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., and Asa P. French, U. S. Atty.

Before COLT and PUTNAM. Circuit Judges, and ALDRICH, District Judge.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

This comes up on a return to a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court, based on a suggestion of diminution of the record made by the plaintiffs in error, but in substance amounting to an application for the amendment of the bill of exceptions. The return shows that a tentative bill of exceptions was filed in the Circuit Court, which contained the exception to the admission of evidence to which the present proceeding relates. Subsequently a new draft was prepared and filed, from which the matter to which this application relates was omitted. Later, at a term to which the bill of exceptions had been adjourned, in accordance with rule 17 of the Circuit Court, it was allowed. This was at the October term, 1907. In October, 1908, after the expiration of the October term, 1907, of the Circuit Court, and after the expiration of its February term, 1908, application for a writ of certiorari was made in this court, and allowed, withouFany question involved being prejudiced by the allowance so far as we are concerned. On the filing of the return by the Circuit Judge to a writ of *366certiorari, it appeared that the omission complained of came through the plaintiffs in error, and was in no part through any laches or fault of the Circuit Court, or of any judge thereof. It also appeared that the application to this court for the writ of certiorari was not within any period of time to which an extension had been granted, either expressly or impliedly, in accordance with rule 17 of the Circuit Court.

Under the circumstances, the question is settled against the plaintiffs in error by rule 17 of the Circuit Court and by the decision of this court in New York & New England Railroad Company v. Hyde, 56 Fed. 188, 5 C. C. A. 461, decided June 14, 1893, and by Hume v. Bowie, 148 U. S. 245, 253, 13 Sup. Ct. 582, 37 L. Ed. 438.

The suggestion of diminution of the record, made by the plaintiffs-in error, filed October 22, 1908, is dismissed as of no effect.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS REQUIRED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Software Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge.

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.



May 20, 2003    /S/ ERNEST WAGNER        President (Principal Executive Officer)
                -------------------
                Ernest Wagner


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 373 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for certain 

administrative or judicial review respecting the identification of primary 

care practitioners under part B of the Medicare program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for certain administrative or judicial review respecting 

the identification of primary care practitioners under 

part B of the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness for Medical 

5 Providers Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 373 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE OR JU2 DICIAL REVIEW RESPECTING THE IDENTI3 FICATION OF PRIMARY CARE PRACTI4 TIONERS UNDER PART B OF THE MEDICARE 

5 PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1833(x)(4) of the Social 

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(x)(4)) is amended to read 

8 as follows: 

9 ‘‘(4) LIMITATION ON REVIEW.— 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subpara11 graph (B), there shall be no administrative or 

12 judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or 

13 otherwise, respecting the identification of pri14 mary care practitioners under this subsection. 

15 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—Subparagraph (A) 

16 shall not apply in the case of administrative or 

17 judicial review under section 1869, 1878, or 

18 otherwise, of the issue of whether the Secretary 

19 (or an entity contracting with the Secretary) 

20 failed to identify an individual described in 

21 clause (i) of paragraph (2)(A) as a primary 

22 care practitioner by reason of coding error with 

23 respect to items and services furnished by such 

24 individual during an applicable prior period (as 

25 described in clause (ii) of such paragraph).’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 373 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply as if included in the enactment 

3 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public 

4 Law 111–148). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
II-00769

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Susan Terwilliger <suzegitar@mac.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:31 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Susan Terwilliger

136-19 58th Ave

Flushing, NY 11355
II-00503

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Elliot Schloss <ess.007@rcn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:18 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Elliot Schloss

155 E. 93rd St, #4A

New York, NY 10128
II-00889

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

B J, B.J, Burt J; J & Jr Bittner <waterflaws@q.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:18 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

BJ, B.J, Burt J; J & Jr Bittner

7055 West 48th Ave.

Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Brian Joseph BREWNER, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 17-7196.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.