alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 196 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 4, 2009. 

Whereas, on February 5, 2009, Head Coach Pat Summitt recorded her 1,000th win with a victory over Georgia 73– 

43; 

Whereas Coach Summitt has a lifetime record of 1,000–188 

in her more than 35 years of coaching, all with the Lady 

Vols; 

Whereas Coach Summitt’s first win as Coach of the Lady 

Vols was on January 10, 1975, against Middle Tennessee 

State 69–32; 

Whereas, on March 22, 2005, Coach Summitt passed Dean 

Smith for most NCAA collegiate basketball wins of alltime with a 75–54 victory over Purdue on March 22, 

2005; 

Whereas Coach Summitt and the Lady Vols own a 404–62 

all-time record verses 12 teams from the Southeastern 

Conference (SEC); 

Whereas Coach Summitt and the Lady Vols have won 27 

SEC titles; 

Whereas Coach Summitt has never had a losing season; 

Whereas Coach Summitt and the Lady Vols have had 32 consecutive seasons with at least 20 wins; 
2 

•HRES 196 EH 

Whereas Coach Summitt and the Lady Vols teams have gone 

undefeated in SEC play 8 times; 

Whereas since Tennessee began contesting games with SEC 

opponents, the Lady Vols have produced a 168–12 record 

in home games; 

Whereas Coach Summitt has been named SEC Coach of the 

Year 7 times; 

Whereas Coach Summitt has been named NCAA Coach of 

the Year 7 times; 

Whereas Coach Summitt and the Lady Vols have an NCAA 

Tournament Best record (men or women) of 104–19, including 18 NCAA Tournament number 1 seeds; 

Whereas Coach Summitt and the Lady Vols have won 8 

NCAA Championships; 

Whereas Coach Summitt is recognized as a leader and role 

model for her work not only on the basketball court but 

also for her work off the court; and 

Whereas Coach Pat Summitt’s Lady Vols continue their remarkable 100 percent graduation rate, with every student 

athlete who has completed her eligibility at the University 

of Tennessee either graduating or working toward all of 

the requirements for graduation: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the University of Tennessee women’s basketball team and Head Coach Pat Summitt on 

her 1,000th victory; 

(2) recognizes the significant achievements of the 

players, coaches, students, alumni, and support staff 

whose dedication and hard work have contributed greatly 
3 

•HRES 196 EH 

to the success of the Lady Vols program and Coach 

Summitt; and 

(3) respectfully requests the Clerk of the House of 

Representatives to transmit copies of this resolution to 

the following for appropriate display— 

(A) Dr. John D. Petersen, President of the 

University of Tennessee; 

(B) Dr. Loren Crabtree, Chancellor of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville; 

(C) Joan Cronan, Women’s Athletics Director; 

and 

(D) Pat Summitt, Women’s Basketball Head 

Coach. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<CIK>                            0000869801    
<NAME>                           GEODYNE INST/PENSION ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-6
                                  
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                253,745
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         128,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      381,995
<PP&E>                             11,957,968
<DEPRECIATION>                      9,782,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      2,557,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                          2,557,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        2,557,224
<SALES>                               873,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    1,017,308
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         439,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       577,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   577,861
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          577,861
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            3.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        
 

</TABLE>
Robert Carey EVANS, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9843.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
IV 

House Calendar No. 252 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1756 

[Report No. 111–677] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 

5281) to amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify and improve 

certain provisions relating to the removal of litigation against Federal 

officers or agencies to Federal courts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2010 

Mr. POLIS of Colorado, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to 

the bill (H.R. 5281) to amend title 28, United States 

Code, to clarify and improve certain provisions relating 

to the removal of litigation against Federal officers or 

agencies to Federal courts, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 5281) to amend title 28, United States Code, to 

4 clarify and improve certain provisions relating to the remstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 1756 RH 

1 moval of litigation against Federal officers or agencies to 

2 Federal courts, and for other purposes, with the Senate 

3 amendments thereto, and to consider in the House, with4 out intervention of any point of order except those arising 

5 under clause 10 of rule XXI, a single motion offered by 

6 the chair of the Committee on the Judiciary or his des7 ignee that the House concur in the Senate amendments 

8 numbered 1 and 2, and that the House concur in the Sen9 ate amendment numbered 3 with the amendment printed 

10 in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 

11 this resolution. The Senate amendments and the motion 

12 shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable 

13 for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair 

14 and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 

15 Judiciary. The previous question shall be considered as or16 dered on the motion to final adoption without intervening 

17 motion or demand for division of the question. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

House Calendar No. 252 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1756 

[Report No. 111–677] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amenderal courts, and for other purposes. tion against Federal officers or agencies to Fed- tain provisions relating to the removal of litiga- United States Code, to clarify and improve cer- ments to the bill (H.R. 5281) to amend title 28, 

DECEMBER 8, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Commodity Futures Trading Commission

(not to scale)

SDR Data

Margin

& Collat

Data Feeds 

(approximate # of million records per day

CFTC is currently loading)

Market Data

0.2M / Day

Margin & 

Collateral

3M / Day

Valuation / Stress Test

0.1M / Day

Fin Statement / Capitalization

0.1M / Day

Org / Product Data

0.1M / Day

FERC Data

0.33M / Day

Time & Sales Futures Data 

(top of the order book)

240M / Day 

(not to scale, at full scale 

this bubble would be 8 feet across)

Enforcement

.2 – 1TB / Week

(not to scale, scale = 10 feet) 2.5M records / inch

 Commodity Futures Trading Commission Futures & Swaps

Position Data

16M / Day

Futures Intraday Trades / 

Swaps Events

10M / Day (Note: adding order 

messages would be orders of 

magnitude greater, adding 200 –

300M records per day. 

At scale, adds another 

7 - 10 feet to 

the diameter)
HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER, et al., applicants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.

No. 16A683 (16-880).

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 27, 2017.

Application to recall and stay the mandate pending disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari presented to Justice KENNEDY and by him referred to the Court denied.
FTS USA, LLC, et al., petitioners, v. Edward MONROE, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated.

No. 16-204.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo,* 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1036, 194 L.Ed.2d 124 (2016).
# C_2010113EN.01001502.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso Administrativo Número 3 de Almería (Spain) lodged on 2 October 2009 — Águeda María Sáenz Morales v Consejería para la Igualdad y Bienestar Social

(Case C-389/09)

2010/C 113/22

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso Administrativo Número 3 de Almería

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Águeda María Sáenz Morales

Applicant:

Defendant: Consejería para la Igualdad y Bienestar Social

Defendant:

By Order of 20 January 2010 the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) declared the reference for a preliminary ruling manifestly inadmissible.

---
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, et al., petitioners, v. Marley CASTRO, et al.

No. 15-1427.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
David Jermaine GRIFFITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9364.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
16.1  LETTER  ON  CHANGE  IN  CERTIFYING  ACCOUNTANTS

September  17,  1999

Securities  and  Exchange  Commission
450  Fifth  St.,  N.W.
Washington,  D.C.  20549

Gentlemen:

This  letter  is to confirm that the reason I am no longer the auditor of record
for  Anything Internet Corporation is due to the fact that I have redirected the
focus  of  my  professional  practice  and as such I no longer perform audits of
publicly  traded  companies.

At  no time have I ever had a disagreement with Anything Internet Corporation or
its  management  concerning financial statement auditing or presentation issues.

Sincerely,


J.  PAUL  KENOTE,  CPA,  P.C.


/s/  J.  Paul  Kenote,  CPA
J.  Paul  Kenote,  CPA







<PAGE>
Douglas A. COPE, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 16-6537.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Butler County denied.
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Richard Wells MOORE, Jr.

No. D-2916.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
Jose CASTILLO-NUNEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9379.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Johnny R. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Robert A. McDONALD, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 15-9661.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Babashola ABE, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES.

No. 16-5100.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A1702. ROBERT L. TILLMAN v. THE STATE.

This case was docketed by this Court on May 15, 2014, and appellant’s brief

and enumerations of error were due June 4, 2014. On June 4, 2014, appellant filed

a motion for extension of time to file his brief, and an extension was granted to allow

appellant through and until June 19, 2014 to file its brief and enumerations of error.

As of the date of this order, appellant still has not filed a brief and enumeration of

error and has not requested an additional extension of time in which to do so.

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED as abandoned pursuant to Court of

Appeals Rules 13 and 23. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/15/2014

July 15, 2014
Exhibit 18


February 2, 1999



NS Group, Inc.
Ninth & Lowell Streets
Post Office Box 1670
Newport, Kentucky 41072

RE: Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended December 26, 1998

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of
Regulation S-K calling for a letter from a registrant's
independent accountants whenever there has been a change in
accounting principle or practice.

We have been informed that, as of September 27, 1998, the
Company changed from the LIFO method of accounting for
inventory at its Newport Steel Corporation subsidiary to the
FIFO method.  According to the management of the Company,
this change was made to more appropriately cost inventory in
light of continuing decreases in prices for scrap steel, a
significant raw material component of inventory, as well as
technological innovations in recent years that have
significantly altered, or will significantly alter,
production costs on a permanent basis, including the
expected impact of the new electric arc furnace installed at
Newport in February 1999.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting
standards for determining the preferability of accounting
principles among acceptable alternative principles has not
been established by the accounting profession.  Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change
in accounting described in the preceding paragraph is to a
preferable method.  However, we have reviewed the pertinent
factors, including those related to financial reporting, in
this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion
stated below is based on our determination made in this
manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of
accounting is to an acceptable alternative method of
accounting, which, based upon the reasons stated for the
change and our discussions with you, is also preferable
under the circumstances in this particular case.  In
arriving at this opinion, we have relied on the business
judgment and business planning of your management.

We have not audited the application of this change to the
financial statements of any period.  Further, we have not 
examined and do not express any opinion with respect to 
your financial statements as of  and for the three months
ended December 26, 1998.

Very truly yours,


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to
the incorporation of our reports included or incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements, File Nos. 33-24182, 33-24183,
33-51899, 33-28995, 33-37454, 33-39695, 33-56637 and 333-03657.




                                   /s/Arthur Andersen LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio                   Arthur Andersen LLP
December 15, 1998
Julian Kenneth ARMEL, Jr., petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 15-1326.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement of Everlast  Worldwide,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February
18, 2005, on our audits of the financial  statements of Everlast  Worldwide Inc.
as of  December  31,  2004 and 2003 and for each of the years in the  three-year
period ended  December 31, 2004,  which report  appears in the Annual  Report on
Form 10-K.

/s/ Berenson LLP
---------------------------------
Berenson  LLP

New York, NY
March 24, 2005
```
Luis Carlos LOZOYA-VASQUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6938.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2010246EN.01000801.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-189/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/24/EC - Respect for private life - Retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of electronic communications services - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2010/C 246/12

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Balta and B. Schöfer, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: E. Riedl, Agent)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Council of the European Union

Intervener in support of the applicant

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt or communicate, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC (OJ 2006 L 105, p. 54)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 01.08.2009.

1

---
Carl D. WELLS, petitioner, v. Jill KONVISER, Acting Justice, Supreme Court of New York, New York County, et al.

No. 16-6920.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department denied.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE ©F TEXAS

PENALTY FOR

V

1/14/2015 PRQVATE USE .: :" j2g §S£3ii&^ 0002003152 janisIois BARRON, JACOB Tr. CV: nb^^^df^^dt^^^^^^Piiloi

This is to advise tha^the Courthas'denied without written order motion for leave to file file the the °

Oridina W£a|^^ ?anrilifiatimn fnr-x.vwnPKf rnanW«r^..»

Abel Acosta, Clerk

.«*•j^t-S^a^SSSFSSBSri&&*

JACOB BARRON

•BANJO. UNIT-- TDC #1448990

•038 OOUTII l~M 1073

•SNYDER, TX 79549- ANK
Jerry Neil ALFRED, petitioner, v. Pam BONDI, Attorney General of Florida.

No. 16-6479.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# C_2011362EN.01002201.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/22

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — A v Commission

(Case F-12/09) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Occupational disease - Relationship between the procedures under Articles 73 and 78 of the Staff Regulations - Provisional allowance - Reimbursement of medical costs - Access to the individual file)

2011/C 362/34

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: A (P., France) (represented by: B. Cambier and A. Paternostre, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application that the Commission be declared liable for certain faults allegedly committed against the applicant in the context of the procedure under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations, and for the annulment of various decisions refusing to apply to the applicant the provisions of Article 73(2)(b) of the Staff Regulations, to communicate to him a series of documents forming part of his medical file and to reimburse him for certain medical costs — Application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009, p. 45.

1

---
Rafael Gonzalez SANTANA, petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY.

No. 16-5186.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.