alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ETHICON, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Jo HUSKEY, et vir.

No. 16-1399.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Dawn NGUYEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1054.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of the Principal Executive and Financial Officers of

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Lorenzo H. Zambrano, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Héctor Medina, as Executive Vice President of Finance and Legal of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and periods set
forth therein.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                                              
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ Lorenzo H. Zambrano                      
|Name:  |  | Lorenzo H. Zambrano                          
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer                      
|Date:  |  | June 30, 2009                                
|       | 
|       |  | /s/ Héctor Medina                            
|Name:  |  | Héctor Medina                                
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President of Finance and Legal
|Date:  |  | June 30, 2009                                

This certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and accompanies the Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2010024EN.01008101.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/81

---

Action brought on 13 November 2009 — Skareby v Commission

(Case F-95/09)

2010/C 24/155

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carina Skareby (Leuven, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

An appeal lodged against the decision of the Commission rejecting the applicant’s request that an administrative inquiry be opened in order to establish the psychological harassment she alleges to have been a victim of.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare her appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare her appeal admissible;

| — | annul the decision of the Commission of 4 March 2009 and, so far as necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Commission of 4 March 2009 and, so far as necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
CFTC Staff Roundtable 

Proposed Changes to Registration and

Compliance Regime for Commodity Pool

Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

July 6, 2011, 9:30 a.m. 

Robert Amedeo, National Futures Association, Altegris Investments 

Daniel Driscoll, National Futures Association 

John Grady, National Futures Association, Steben & Co. 

Carol Wooding, National Futures Association 

Alice Joe, U.S. Chamber of Commerce 

Karrie McMillan, Investment Company Institute 

Nevis Bregasi, Association of Institutional Investors, MFS Investment Management 

Peter Bonanno, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Goldman Sachs Asset 

Management 

Stephen King, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, PIMCO 

Matthew Nevins, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Fidelity Investments 

William Thum, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Vanguard 

Andrew Baker, Alternative Investment Management Association 

W. Todd Groome, Alternative Investment Management Association 

Jiri Krol, Alternative Investment Management Association 

Marc Baum, Managed Funds Association, Serengeti Asset Management 

Tom Lloyd, Managed Funds Association, Campbell & Co. 

Alison Baur, Investment Adviser Association, Franklin Templeton Investments 

Jennifer Setzenfand, Security Traders Association, Federated Investors 

Martin Lybecker, Private Investor Coalition 

Douglas J. Scheidt, Chief Counsel, Division of Investment Management, U.S. Securities and 

Exchange Commission 

Sarah G. ten Siethoff, Senior Special Counsel, Division of Investment Management, U.S. Securities 

and Exchange Commission 

Ananda Radhakrishnan, Director, Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, U.S. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Kevin Walek, Assistant Director, Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, U.S. Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission 

Amanda Lesher Olear, Special Counsel, Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, U.S. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Eileen Chotiner, Senior Compliance Analyst, Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, U.S. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Barry McCarty, Attorney-Advisor, Division of Enforcement, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission 

Carl Kennedy, Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission
869.

#### Howell *v.*Simpson Grocery Company.

Claim, from city court of Floyd county — Judge Hamilton. November 7, 1907.

Argued February 4,

Decided April 22, 1908.

*George A. II. Harris & Son,*.for plaintiff in error.

, *Lipscomb & 'Willingham,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

No error of law appears, and the verdict of the jury settles the conflict in the evidence. *Judgment affirmed.*
Charlie FLENTROY, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-7382.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
# C_2011232EN.01002801.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2011 — ATB Norte v OHIM — Bricocenter Italia (BRICO CENTER Città)

(Case T-482/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark BRICO CENTER Città - Earlier Community figurative marks ATB CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE Brico Centro and CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE BricoCentro - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

(2011/C 232/49)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: ATB Norte, SL (Burgos, Spain) (represented initially by P. López Ronda, G. Macias Bonilla, H. Curtis-Oliver and G. Marín Raigal, and subsequently by F. Brandolini Kujman, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Montalto and G. Mannucci, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bricocenter Italia Srl (Rozzano, Italy) (represented by: G. Ghidini, M. Mergati and C. Signorini, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 September 2009 (Case R 1047/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between ATB Norte, SL and Bricocenter Italia Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 September 2009 (Case R 1047/2008-4) inasmuch as it upheld the appeal of Bricocenter Italia Srl before the Board of Appeal regarding the services of ‘advertising’, ‘business management’ and ‘business administration’ covered by the Community trade mark application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 September 2009 (Case R 1047/2008-4) inasmuch as it upheld the appeal of Bricocenter Italia Srl before the Board of Appeal regarding the services of ‘advertising’, ‘business management’ and ‘business administration’ covered by the Community trade mark application;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders ATB Norte, SL, Bricocenter Italia and OHIM each to bear their own costs incurred during the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders ATB Norte, SL, Bricocenter Italia and OHIM each to bear their own costs incurred during the proceedings before the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

---
II-00841

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lisa Gosnell <eotas@mchsi.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:55 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Lisa Gosnell

24536 Marsh Hawk Lane

Georgetown, DE 19947
Marvase J. SPELL, petitioner, v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 15-9257.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
II-00744

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kallie Wilbourn <kalliewilbourn@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:45 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kallie Wilbourn

801 Lincoln Street

Las Vegas, NM 87701
Exhibit 32.1

SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS, INC.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, O. Bruton Smith, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                     
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | March 13, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    O. BRUTON SMITH              
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | O. Bruton Smith                     
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to, and will be
retained by, Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Vadim Stanley MIESEGAES, petitioner, v. Kamala D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California, et al.

No. 16-6751.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2005 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-K.
 /s/ John T. CahillJohn T. CahillChief Executive Officer
February 23, 2006
Ernest CADET, petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 17-6146.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Michael Dodak, the Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 10, 2005

                              /s/ Michael Dodak
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Name: Michael Dodak
                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3746 

To provide that service of the members of the organization known as the 

United States Cadet Nurse Corps during World War II constituted 

active military service for purposes of laws administered by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2019 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that service of the members of the organization 

known as the United States Cadet Nurse Corps during 

World War II constituted active military service for purposes of laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Cadet 

5 Nurse Corps Equity Act’’. 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3746 IH

1 SEC. 2. SERVICE DEEMED TO BE ACTIVE MILITARY SERV2 ICE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of section 

4 401(a)(1)(A) of the GI Bill Improvement Act of 1977 (38 

5 U.S.C. 106 note), the Secretary of Defense is deemed to 

6 have determined that qualified service of a person con7 stituted active military service. 

8 (b) DETERMINATION OF DISCHARGE STATUS.—The 

9 Secretary of Defense shall issue an honorable discharge 

10 under section 401(a)(1)(B) of the GI Bill Improvement 

11 Act of 1977 to each person whose qualified service war12 rants an honorable discharge. Such discharge shall be 

13 issued before the end of the one-year period beginning on 

14 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

15 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF RETROACTIVE BENEFITS. 

16 No benefits may be paid to any person as a result 

17 of the enactment of this Act for any period before the date 

18 of the enactment of this Act. 

19 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

20 In this Act, the term ‘‘qualified service’’ means serv21 ice of a person as a member of the organization known 

22 as the United States Cadet Nurse Corps during the period 

23 beginning on July 1, 1943, and ending on December 31, 

24 1948. 

Æ 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# Front Page

# Interest Rate

# Credit

# FX

# Commodity

# Equity

# Unit Type Appendix

# Effective Date - Tenor Appendix

# Product Pairings

# Interest Rate Examples

# CDS Examples

# FX Examples

# Commodities Examples

# Taxonomy Change Log
# C_2011113EN.01001301.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/13

---

Order of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — RapidEye v Commission

(Case T-330/09) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid granted by the German authorities pursuant to the multi-sectoral framework on regional aid - Satellite-based geo-information services system project - Request for confirmation of the scope of a decision declaring aid to be compatible with the common market - Commission's response - Measure not open to appeal - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 113/25

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: RapidEye AG (Brandenbourg-sur-la-Havel, Germany) (represented by: T. Jestaedt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Gross and B. Martenczuk, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the letter from the Commission of 9 June 2009, relating to the aid granted to RapidEye AG by the German authorities for the creation of a satellite-based geo-information services system (State Aid CP 183/2009 — Germany, RapidEye AG (ex-post monitoring MSR 1998 — N 416/2002)).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | RapidEye AG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

RapidEye AG shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---