alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


Security Associates International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
2101 South Arlington Heights Road
Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005

We have reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements of Security Associates International, Inc. and Subsidiaries
as of June 30, 2002 and for the three- and six-month periods then ended, as
indicated in our report dated September 6, 2002, which includes an emphasis
paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on
that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Amendment No. 2 to 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, is incorporated
by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-73908 on Form S-3.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

                           /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP


Schaumburg, Illinois
September 19, 2002
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3640 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to assist blind veterans who have not lost use of a leg in acquiring 

specially adapted housing, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2019 

Mrs. LURIA (for herself and Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to assist blind veterans 

who have not lost use of a leg in acquiring specially 

adapted housing, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing Access for 

5 Blind Veterans Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3640 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 TO ASSIST BLIND VETERANS WHO HAVE NOT 

3 LOST USE OF A LEG IN ACQUIRING SPE4 CIALLY ADAPTED HOUSING. 

5 Section 2101(a)(2)(B)(ii) of title 38, United States 

6 Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in the matter preceding subclause (I), by 

8 striking ‘‘due to—’’ and inserting ‘‘due to blindness 

9 in both eyes, having central visual acuity of 20/200 

10 or less in the better eye with the use of a standard 

11 correcting lens. For the purposes of this clause, an 

12 eye with a limitation in the fields of vision such that 

13 the widest diameter of the visual field subtends an 

14 angle no greater than 20 degrees shall be considered 

15 as having a central visual acuity of 20/200 or less.’’; 

16 and 

17 (2) by striking subclauses (I) and (II). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Subsidiaries of the Registrant
--------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>      <C>                                                         <C>

1.       Campania de Juguetes Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V. (99%)          (Mexico)
2.       MEI Holding Company F Corp.                                 (Delaware)
3.       MEI Holding Company S Corp.                                 (Delaware)
4.       MRV, Inc.                                                   (Delaware)
5.       Marvel Characters, Inc.                                     (Delaware)
6.       Marvel Entertainment group                                  (Delaware)
7.       Marvel Restaurant Ventuer Corp.                             (Delaware)
8.       Spider-man Merchandising L.P. (50%)                         (Partnership)
9.       Toy Biz International Limited (99%)                         (Hong Kong)
10.      UMRV Co. (30%)                                              (Partnership
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.7**

 
| ** ** | **KPMG LLP**                    | Telephone | (604)  691-3000 |
|------------|---------------------------------|-----------|-----------------|
| ** ** | **Chartered Accountants**       | Fax       | (604)  691-3031 |
|       | Box  10426, 777 Dunsmuir Street | Internet  | www.kpmg.ca     |
|       | Vancouver  BC V7Y 1K3           |      |            |

 

 

**COMMENTS BYAUDITOR FOR U.S. READERS ON CANADA - U.S. REPORTING DIFFERENCE**

 

 

Inthe United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of anexplanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there is a changein accounting principles that has a material effect on the comparability of thecompany’s financial statements, such as the change described in Note 1(s) tothe financial statements.  Our report tothe shareholders dated February 4, 2005, included herein, is expressed inaccordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a referenceto such a change in accounting principles in the auditors’ report when thechange is properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financialstatements.

 

 

CharteredAccountants

 

 

Vancouver,Canada

February4, 2005

 

 

KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnershipis the Canadianmember firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.

 

----
EXHIBIT 12.1
 Oncothyreon Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries
 Computation of Deficiency in the Coverage of Fixed Charges by Earnings Before Fixed Charges
 For the NineMonthsEndedSeptember 30, 2008Earnings before fixed charges:Loss from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest and income/(loss) from equity investees
    
    $
    (13,599
    )Add fixed charges
    
    
    19Add amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    Add distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    Subtract capitalized interest
    
    
    Loss before fixed charges
    
    $
    (13,580
    )Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    2Amortization of debt expense
    
    
    Estimate of interest expense within rental expense
    
    
    17Preference security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries
    
    
    Total fixed charges
    
    $
    19Deficiency of earnings available to cover fixed charges
    
    $
    (13,599
    )
Order entered May 20, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-19-00520-CV No. 05-19-00521-CV

IN RE GENTRY S. LEONARD, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Cr iminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. M18-62976-I & M18-62478-I



### ORDER Before Justices Brown, S chenck, and Reichek

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s May 2, 2019 petition for

writ of mandamus.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1759 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1759

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 15, 2010.
Whereas Edward Verne Roberts was born January 23, 1939;
Whereas Roberts acquired polio as an adolescent in 1953 and had to spend vast 
        expanses of time in an iron lung;
Whereas Roberts' career as an advocate began when a high school administrator 
        threatened to deny him a diploma because he had not completed driver's 
        education and physical education;
Whereas in 1962 Roberts was admitted to the University of California at Berkeley 
        (UC Berkeley) where he became the first student with a severe disability 
        to attend UC Berkeley;
Whereas when his search for housing at the university met resistance, the 
        director of the campus hospital offered Roberts a room in an empty wing, 
        which Roberts accepted on the condition that it was considered a 
        dormitory space;
Whereas other students with significant disabilities joined Roberts in the empty 
        wing over the next few years and called themselves the ``Rolling 
        Quads'';
Whereas at UC Berkeley the Rolling Quads began advocating for curb cuts, opening 
        access to the wider community and creating the first student-led 
        disability services program at a university in the Nation;
Whereas the student program led to the creation of the Nation's first center for 
        independent living;
Whereas Roberts assumed leadership of the Center for Independent Living, 
        Berkeley and guided its development as a model for disability advocacy 
        and self-help services across the Nation and around the world;
Whereas in 1975 Roberts was appointed the Director of the California Department 
        of Rehabilitation;
Whereas in 1983 Roberts co-founded the World Institute on Disability, an 
        organization committed to eliminating barriers to full social 
        integration for persons with disabilities;
Whereas Ed Roberts died from natural causes on March 14, 1995; and
Whereas Ed Roberts was a leader and champion in the disability rights movement: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of an ``Ed Roberts Day''; and
            (2) acknowledges the accomplishments of Ed Roberts in helping reduce 
        barriers, increase access, and improve lives for persons with 
        disabilities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2009312EN.01002502.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden lodged on 21 October 2009 — Realchemie Nederland BV v Bayer CropScience AG

(Case C-406/09)

2009/C 312/41

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Realchemie Nederland BV

Appellant:

Respondent: Bayer CropScience AG

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the phrase ‘civil and commercial matters’ in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (1) on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to be interpreted in such a way that this regulation applies also to the recognition and enforcement of an order for payment of ‘Ordnungsgeld’ (an administrative fine) pursuant to Paragraph 890 of the German Code of Civil Procedure (Zivilprozessordnung)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the phrase ‘civil and commercial matters’ in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (1) on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to be interpreted in such a way that this regulation applies also to the recognition and enforcement of an order for payment of ‘Ordnungsgeld’ (an administrative fine) pursuant to Paragraph 890 of the German Code of Civil Procedure (Zivilprozessordnung)?

1

| 2. | Is Article 14 of Directive 2004/48 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights to be interpreted as applying also to enforcement proceedings relating to






  (i) | an order made in another Member State concerning an infringement of intellectual property rights; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 14 of Directive 2004/48 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights to be interpreted as applying also to enforcement proceedings relating to

(i)

an order made in another Member State concerning an infringement of intellectual property rights;

| (ii) | an order made in another Member State imposing a penalty or fine for breach of an injunction against infringement of intellectual property rights; |
| --- | --- |

(ii)

an order made in another Member State imposing a penalty or fine for breach of an injunction against infringement of intellectual property rights;

| (iii) | costs determination orders made in another Member State on the basis of the orders referred to at (i) and (ii) above? |
| --- | --- |

(iii)

costs determination orders made in another Member State on the basis of the orders referred to at (i) and (ii) above?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

1

---
Michael Lamont SMITH, petitioner, v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA, et al.

No. 16-7102.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Marshall SPIEGEL, petitioner, v. Rita NOVACK, Judge, Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County.

No. 16-592.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
II-O0400

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Parsons <moonflower@hughes.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:29 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Parsons

18205 County Rd. 54.2

Aguilar, CO 81020
II-00499

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Walter Reece <wreeceyog@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:23 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Walter Reece

37 Deer Ridge Road

Wimberley, TX 78676
#### Fidel MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-72264.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 4, 2012.

Fidel Martinez-Rodriguez, Eloy, AZ, pro se.

OIL, Genevieve Holm, Anthony W. Nor-wood, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Fidel Martinez-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Vargas-Hernandez v. Gonzales,*497 F.3d 919, *607921 (9th Cir.2007), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the order of removal entered against Martinez-Rodriguez because his 1996 conviction for possession of cocaine renders him removable by reason of having committed a criminal offense relating to a controlled substance. *See*8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), 1252(a)(2)(C); *Perez-Mejia v. Holder,*668 F.3d 403, 409-10 (9th Cir.2011) (the immigration judge may rely on an alien’s factual admissions at the pleading stage of removal proceedings in determining whether a conviction qualifies as a removable controlled substance offense).

Martinez-Rodriguez’s contention that the agency erred and violated his right to due process by failing to reopen his proceedings sua sponte is not a colorable legal or constitutional claim. *See Vargas-Hernandez,*497 F.3d at 921; *Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder,*633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir.2011). Martinez-Rodriguez’s contention that the agency violated his right to due process by refusing to allow him to apply for suspension of deportation fails because he has not demonstrated that the alleged error may have affected the outcome of his proceedings. *See Vargas-Hernandez,*497 F.3d at 926.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 10.30 

 

BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE CORPORATION 

 

**AMENDMENT OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE**

**SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN FOR CHARLES L. SCHULTZ**

 

Recommend adoption of the following resolution by the Board of Directors: 

 

**AMENDMENT OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE**

**SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN FOR CHARLES L. SCHULTZ**

 

WHEREAS, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Retirement Plan(the “Plan”) and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”) to provide pension benefits to the salaried employees of the Company and certain of its affiliated companies; 

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Supplemental Plan, theCompany provides certain supplemental pension benefits as set forth on Schedule A to the Supplemental Plan; 

 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to provide Mr. Charles L. Schultz, Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, with certain pensionbenefits as described in the attached Exhibit D to the Minutes of the Compensation and Development Committee dated December 11, 2002, by amending the Supplemental Plan to provide for such benefits; 

 

NOW THEREFORE IT IS RESOLVED, that Mr. Charles L. Schultz beprovided with supplemental pension benefits calculated in the manner described in Exhibit D to the Minutes of the Compensation and Development Committee dated December 11, 2002; 

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Vice President-Human Resources is authorized and directed to prepare a RetirementBenefit Agreement for Mr. Schultz on substantially the terms and conditions indicated in Exhibit D to the Minutes of the Compensation and Development Committee dated December 11, 2002; 

 

FURTHER RESOLVED that the Supplemental Plan be amended by adding “Retirement Benefit Agreement betweenBurlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and Mr. Charles L. Schultz” at the end of Schedule A; 

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that each of the Secretary and other officers of the Company are authorized and empowered by and on behalf and in thename of the Company to do and perform, or cause to be done and performed, all such acts, deeds and things and to make, execute and deliver, or cause to be made, executed and delivered, all such agreements, undertakings, documents, instruments orcertificates, as each such officer may deem necessary or appropriate to effectuate or carry out fully the purpose and intent of the foregoing resolutions. 

 

 

Fort Worth, Texas 

December 12, 2002
Carl Dion LOVINGS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-6528.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District denied.
No. 486.

#### Peyser *v.*McLean.

November 11, 1935.

*Messrs. William C. Sullivan*and *Simon E. Sobeloff*for petitioner.

*Mr. Edgar Allen Poe*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
Robert STRECKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6643.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-38683, 333-38695, 333-38703) of NetVantage,
Inc. of our report dated March 31, 1997 appearing on page 18 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the application of such report to the
Financial Statement Schedule for the two years ended December 31, 1996 listed
under Item 14 (a)(2) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K when such schedule is
read in conjunction with the financial statements referred to in our report.
The audits referred to in such report also included this schedule.
 
Price Waterhouse LLP
 
Costa Mesa, California
April 14, 1998