alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00599

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Alexander Leo Reilly <lereillyl @hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:42 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Alexander Leo Reilly

1000 Sainte Anne

Detroit, MI 48216
II-00814

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

steve holmes <stevor h@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:08 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

Supposedly, you were given your job because you wanted to help the PEOPLE and not just be a pawn of BIG industry. If so,

here’s problems:

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

steve holmes

1720 42nd st

sacramento, CA 95819
Adam E. SCHULMAN, petitioner, v. LEXISNEXIS RISK AND INFORMATION ANALYTICS GROUP, INC., et al.

No. 15-1420.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-152230, 333-134906,333-125456, 333-112322, 333-102769, 333-99629, 333-90778, 333-69706, 333-67332 and 333-95797 and Form S-3 Nos. 333-151837, 333-147146, 333-135015 and 333-112323) of Sequenom, Inc., and in the related prospectuses of our reports dated March 6, 2009,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sequenom, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sequenom, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2008. 

 

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

San Diego, California

March 6, 2009
William Roger WILKINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7512.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-01046

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Wilcox <dlw2010@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:49 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Wilcox

516 W. Parkway Blvd

Tempe, AZ 85281
#### PIEL BROS. v. DAY et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 15, 1922.)

No. 313.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Suit by Piel Bros, against Ralph A. Day, Federal Prohibition Director for the State of New York, and others. From an order denying a temporary injunction (278 Fed. 223), complainant appeals.

Order affirmed.

Olcott, Bonynge, McManus *&*Ernst, of New York City (William M. K. Olcott and Nathan Baffin, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Ralph C. Greene, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Henry J. Walsh, of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for appellees.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00065

- CV

IN RE T.H. RELATOR

------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TRIAL COURT NO. CIV

- 13

- 0225

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------ The court has considered relator’s petition f or writ of mandamus and
motion for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be den ied.
Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency

relief are denied.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, MEIER, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 3, 2016

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).
# C_2011331EN.01000201.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2011 — Kingdom of Belgium v Deutsche Post AG, DHL International, European Commission

(Case C-148/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Action for annulment - State aid - Article 88(3) EC - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Commission decision not to raise objections - Concept of ‘doubts’ - Services of general economic interest)

2011/C 331/02

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet and T. Materne, Agents, and J. Meyers, advocaat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Deutsche Post AG (represented by: T. Lübbig and J. Sedemund, Rechtsanwälte), DHL International (represented by: T. Lübbig and J. Sedemund, Rechtsanwälte), European Commission (B. Martenczuk and D. Grespan, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2009 in Case T-388/03 Deutsche Post and DHL International v Commission, by which the Court annulled Commission Decision C(2003) 2508 final of 23 July 2003 not to raise objections, following the preliminary examination procedure provided for in Article 88(3) EC, to several measures adopted by the Belgian authorities in favour of La Poste SA — Compensation of net costs of services of general economic interest — Certain circumstances wrongly classified as evidence of serious difficulties necessitating the initiation of the formal investigation procedure — Inadmissible pleas taken into consideration — Breach of the principle of legal certainty

Deutsche Post and DHL International

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
Exhibit
32.1



Certifications
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), Robert Silzer, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of DSG Global, Inc. (the “Company”),
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | Our Quarterly Report
    on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”),
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | 2. | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
    Company.                                                                                                     



|Date: May 21, 2018 | /s/
    Robert Silzer                                  
|------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------
|                   | Robert Silzer                                          
|                   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
    Officer
|                   | (Principal Executive Officer and                       
|                   | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Larry M. FIELDS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-9236.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Rick BOBERTZ, et al., petitioners, v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF CALIFORNIA, INC., et al.

No. 17-891.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Accountants**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-99643 and333-59894 ) and (ii) the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-62825, 33-62827, 33- 62829, 33-62831, 33-62833, 33-62835, 33-62837, 33-62839, 33-62841, 33-62943, 33-63247, 33-63249, 33-63253, 333-03275, 333-03277, 333-19241, 333-77615 and333-59854) of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation of our report dated February 6, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Fort Worth, Texas 

February 13, 2003
II-00412

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Seth Snapp <sethsnapp@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:37 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Seth Snapp

2214 H. Street

Bellingham, WA 98225
Charlotte TAYLOR, petitioner, v. RICHARD III, LLC, et al.

No. 15-9372.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Anthony B. HODGES, petitioner, v. Tamyra JARVIS, Warden.

No. 16-6719.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Order entered June 21 , 2013



### In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 12 - 01467 - CV No. 05 - 12 - 01469 - CV CRESENCIO BASTIDA, Appellant

V. ABEL'S MOBILE HOME S ERVICE, INC., ET AL, Appellee s On Appeal from the 401st Judicial Distr ict Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199 - 02287 - 06 Trial Court Cause No. 296 - 02287 - 06



### O RDER By order dated June 19, 2013 we issued a second order in cause number 05 - 12 - 1 0 467 - CV regarding an overdue clerk’s record. By letter dated June 20, 2013, the Collin County District Clerk responded that the clerk’s record had been filed in cause number 05 - 12 - 01469 - CV and that the case had been docketed twice in this Court. Our records show that two separate notices of appeal were filed, one with tria l court cause number 296 - 02287 - 06, assigned cause number 05 - 12 - 0146 7 - CV, and the other trial court cause number 199 - 02287 - 06, assigned cause number 05 - 12 - 0146 9 - CV. Other than the trial court cause numbers, the notices of appeal are identical.Accordingly, we VACATE our June 19, 2013 order in cause number 05 - 12 - 01467 - CV.

W e DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer all documents from cause number 05 - 12 - 01467 - CV into cause number 05 - 12 - 01469 - CV . We ADMINSTRATIVELY CLOSE cause number 05 - 12 - 01467 - CV . We furthe r DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order by electronic transmission to Collin County District Clerk Andrea Stroh Thompson. /s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Darlene F. EDWARDS, et al., petitioners, v. Cynthia S. BLACKMAN, et al.

No. 15-1343.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3788 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3788

 To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from making payments to 
   child care providers that employ individuals charged with certain 
                   offenses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2019

 Mr. Barr (for himself, Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Bilirakis, 
Mrs. Radewagen, Mr. Bost, Mr. Dunn, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Banks, Mr. Meuser, 
 Mr. Watkins, and Mr. Steube) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from making payments to 
   child care providers that employ individuals charged with certain 
                   offenses, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Child Care Protection Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR CHILD CARE PROVIDERS RECEIVING PAYMENT FROM 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs may not make a payment to any child care center, child 
care agency, or child care provider that employs an individual who has 
been charged with--
            (1) a sex offense;
            (2) an offense involving a child victim;
            (3) a violent crime;
            (4) a drug felony; or
            (5) other offense that the Secretary determines 
        appropriate.
    (b) Exception.--Payment may be made to a child care center, child 
care agency, or child care provider, if such child care center, child 
care agency, or child care provider has suspended the individual 
described in subsection (a) from having any contact with children while 
on the job until the case is resolved.
                                 <all>
```
Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Washington D.C.

9th September 2010
SURFACExchange overview

l

Institution

clients

SURFACE h t electronic k

Electronic

SURFACExchange operates an electronic mark

for Foreign Exchange derivatives where instit

clients can enjoy price discovery and transanonymity on the open‐to‐all multilateral guaranteed by a central counterparty

Price discovery and

transaction anonymity

Mu

Central

counterparty
SURFACExchange overview

• Fully Electronic Trade Lifecycle of Complex

FX Derivatives Derivatives Available Available with 2010 Technol

Technol

Æ Pre‐trade Price Discovery

Æ Order Management

Æ Order MatchingÆ Trade Enrichment and STPÆ Option Exercise and other post trade even

• Institutional clients

Æ Great demand from “other financial financial institu

institu

Æ Only ECPs are allowed on the platform

Æ No retail
SURFACExchange overview

• Price discovery and transaction anonymity

Æ TRANSPARENCY thro gh through ANONYMITY ANONYMITYÆ Transparency Through Post‐trade Reportin

Æ Level playing field

• Multilateral venue

Æ Multi‐to‐multi platform platform for OTC FX derivat

derivat

Æ Anyone can market make or market take

• Central Counterparty

Æ Central Prime Broker acts as central counteto every trade on the platform platformÆ Necessary condition for ANONYMITY
Regulatory Framework

• USA: Exempt Board of Trade (notified) (notified)

Æ under Section 5d of the Commodity Excha

(CEA), 7 USC 7a‐3

• EU: Multilateral Trading Facility (filed)

Æ under MiFID Directive 2004/ / 39 EC

• Hong Kong: Approved Money Broker (filed)

Æ under S ti ec on 118A of the B ki an ng O di r na

• Sing pa ore, Japan, Australia, .....
Discussion

•

Questions

• Recommendations• Open action points
IV 

House Calendar No. 255 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1771 

[Report No. 111–684] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and 

providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17 (legislative day, DECEMBER 16), 2010 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported through the legislative day of December 24, 2010. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1771 RH 

1 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the 

2 legislative day of December 24, 2010, for the Speaker to 

3 entertain motions that the House suspend the rules. The 

4 Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority 

5 Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter 

6 for consideration pursuant to this section. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 255 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1771 

[Report No. 111–684] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

D

the rules. providing for consideration of motions to suspend tions reported from the Committee on Rules, and with respect to consideration of certain resoluECEMBER 17 (legislative day, DECEMBER 16), 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS