alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-01153

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Col. & Mrs. B. Jones <dontsend@mail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:01 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Do not let the American Bankers Association redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. As you must be aware, $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number

may increase to over $10 trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial Stability Oversight Board, your job is to decrease

risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Col. & Mrs. B. Jones

Quartz Hill

Sunriver, OR 97707
Jose Luis Saldana ZAVALA, petitioner, v. Steve FREITAS, Sheriff, Sonoma County, California.

No. 15-1370.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 207 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 207

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that all employers 
 give veterans a holiday on Veteran's Day in honor of their service to 
                              our country.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2009

 Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida (for herself, Mr. Miller of Florida, 
    Ms. Herseth Sandlin, and Mr. Mitchell) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that all employers 
 give veterans a holiday on Veteran's Day in honor of their service to 
                              our country.

Whereas veterans of the United States Armed Forces have served our country with 
        honor and at great personal sacrifice;
Whereas according to the latest Census figures there are 26,400,000 veterans 
        living in the United States;
Whereas we are all grateful to the men and women who have served and are serving 
        in our Armed Forces;
Whereas Veterans Day is observed on November 11 each year, which was originally 
        called Armistice Day to celebrate the conclusion of hostilities in World 
        War I;
Whereas President Dwight Eisenhower stated in his Proclamation to establish 
        Veterans Day, ``In order to insure proper and widespread observance of 
        this anniversary, all veterans, all veterans' organizations, and the 
        entire citizenry will wish to join hands in the common purpose''; and
Whereas Veterans Day is a Federal holiday and all 50 States have declared it a 
        State holiday: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
all employers should give veterans a holiday in honor of their service 
to our country and so that they may participate in appropriate 
ceremonies on Veterans Day.
                                 <all>
```
II-00705

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Manuel Revuelta <perfecto36@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:16 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Manuel Revuelta

257 West 21st Street #1W

NEW YORK, NY 10011
Trevor J. SCHLEICHER, petitioner, v. PREFERRED SOLUTIONS INC.

No. 16-571.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. HAWAII, et al.

No. 17A275.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 11, 2017.

**ORDER**

UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicants,

IT IS ORDERED that the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, case No. 17-16426, is hereby stayed with respect to refugees covered by a formal assurance, pending receipt of a response, due on or before Tuesday, September 12, 2017, by 12 p.m., and further order of the undersigned or of the Court.
Anthony MAYES, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6488.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
JAE LEE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-327.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
# C_2010051EN.01002903.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 12 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Malta

(Case C-220/09) (1)

1

2010/C 51/55

Language of the case: Maltese

Language of the case: Maltese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Legal Services Corporation

# Contact Person for Information:

Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, at (202) 336-8800. 

*Special Needs:*                         Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. Individuals who have a disability and need an                               ( print page 33979)                            accommodation to attend the meeting may notify Elizabeth S. Cushing, at (202) 336-8800.                     

Dated: June 21, 2001. 

Victor M. Fortuno,

Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary. 

# Footnotes

1.                             Any portion of the closed session consisting solely of staff briefings does not fall within the Sunshine Act's definition of the term “meeting” and, therefore, the requirements of the Sunshine Act do not apply to any such portion of the closed session. 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(a)(2) and (b). See also 45 CFR 1622.2 & 1622.3                     
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 01-16066 Filed 6-22-01; 9:31 am] 

BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 11-1447 September Term, 2012

DHS-AT-0752-11-0765-I-1

Filed On: July 30, 2013

Jose Lacson,

Petitioner

v.

United States Department of Homeland

Security and Transportation Security

Administration,

Respondents

BEFORE: Garland, Chief Judge; Brown, Circuit Judge; and Williams, Senior 

 Circuit Judge

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the order to show cause filed July 23, 2013, and the

response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the sealed opinion filed July 23, 2013, be unsealed. 

The Clerk is directed to unseal the opinion and issue it publicly. 

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Jennifer M. Clark 

Deputy Clerk
Wilson BELL, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 15-9578.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit denied.
Blake Joseph SANDLAIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6373.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NASSIR NAZAROVICH KOURBANOV, 

AKA Milan F. Fargo, AKA Milan Frank 

Fargo, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 19-15560 

D.C. No. 1:16-cv-00024 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of the Northern Mariana Islands

Ramona V. Manglona, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 6, 2020**

Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Nassir Nazarovich Kourbanov, AKA Milan F. Fargo, AKA Milan Frank 

Fargo, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action 

seeking mandamus relief and disclosure of records under the Freedom of 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 12 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-15560 

Information Act (“FOIA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

review de novo. Kwan v. SanMedica Int’l, 854 F.3d 1088, 1093 (9th Cir. 2017)

(dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)); Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 

(9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); In re Gallagher, 

548 F.3d 713, 716 (9th Cir. 2008) (denial of mandamus). We affirm.

The district court properly denied Fargo’s mandamus claims because Fargo 

failed to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. See 

Patel v. Reno, 134 F.3d 929, 931 (9th Cir. 1997) (stating that mandamus is an 

“extraordinary remedy” and setting forth the requirements for mandamus relief).

The district court properly dismissed Fargo’s claims related to his FOIA 

request because Fargo failed to exhaust administrative remedies. See In re Steele, 

799 F.2d 461, 465 (9th Cir. 1986) (“Exhaustion of . . . administrative remedies is 

required under the FOIA before that party can seek judicial review.”).

We reject as meritless Fargo’s contentions that the district court erred by 

consolidating his cases and by refusing to adjudicate the history of his immigration 

status dating back to 2002.

We do not consider documents not filed with the district court. See United 

States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-60428,333-79357, 333-79369, 333-79375, 333-79365, 333-80647, 333-69622, 333-73302, 333-100786,333-117894, 333-128992, 333-128993, 333-142554) on Form S-8 of ourreports dated February 27, 2008relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of The PepsiBottling Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to the Company’s adoption ofFinancial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in IncomeTaxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement 109,” and Statements of Financial Accounting StandardsNo. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” and No. 158,“Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and OtherPostretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,88, 106, and 132(R),” related to the requirement to recognize thefunded status of a benefit plan) and theeffectiveness of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financialreporting, appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of The PepsiBottling Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 29, 2007./s/ Deloitte& Touche LLP
# C_2009282EN.01006601.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/66

---

Action brought on 22 September 2009 — Schlienger v Commission

(Case F-79/09)

2009/C 282/126

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marc Schlienger (Muchamiel, Spain) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for (i) annulment of the decision of the appointing authority of 15 December 2008, received on 16 January 2009, rejecting the applicants’ request for recognition of the ailment suffered by him as an occupational disease within the meaning of Article 73 of the Staff Regulations and (ii) so far as necessary annulment of the decision of 11 June 2009 rejecting the applicant’s complaint.

Application for EUR 12 000 in damages as compensation for the non-material damage suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 15 December 2008, received on 16 January 2009, rejecting the applicants’ request for recognition of the ailment suffered by him as an occupational disease within the meaning of Article 73 of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 15 December 2008, received on 16 January 2009, rejecting the applicants’ request for recognition of the ailment suffered by him as an occupational disease within the meaning of Article 73 of the Staff Regulations;

| — | So far as necessary, annul the decision of 11 June 2009 rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

So far as necessary, annul the decision of 11 June 2009 rejecting the complaint;

| — | order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 12 000 in compensation for non-material damage; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 12 000 in compensation for non-material damage;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

---
Timothy SEDLAK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-919.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Robert Curtis FINCH, petitioner, v. Henry MOORE, et al.

No. 16-6650.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Greenstar International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas Diemer Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting
officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 14, 2008

By: /s/ Thomas Diemer
    -----------------
    Thomas Diemer, Chief Financal Officer
    principal financial and accounting officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Armando CAZAREZ-SANTOS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7193.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3643 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3643

  To amend the Revised Statutes to grant State attorneys general the 
ability to issue subpoenas to investigate suspected violations of State 
  laws that are applicable to national banks, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2019

  Ms. Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Revised Statutes to grant State attorneys general the 
ability to issue subpoenas to investigate suspected violations of State 
  laws that are applicable to national banks, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accountability for Wall Street 
Executives Act''.

SEC. 2. VISITORIAL POWERS.

    The fifth undesignated paragraph of section 5240 of the Revised 
Statutes of the United States (12 U.S.C. 484) is amended by striking 
subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
            ``(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A)--
                    ``(i) lawfully authorized State auditors and 
                examiners may, at reasonable times and upon reasonable 
                notice to a bank, review the bank's records solely to 
                ensure compliance with applicable State unclaimed 
                property or escheat laws upon reasonable cause to 
                believe that the bank has failed to comply with such 
                laws;
                    ``(ii) an attorney general (or other chief law 
                enforcement officer) of a State may issue subpoenas to 
                national banks or officers of national banks based upon 
                reasonable cause to believe that the national bank or 
                an officer of a national bank has failed to comply with 
                applicable State laws; and
                    ``(iii) an attorney general (or other chief law 
                enforcement officer) of a State may require a national 
                bank to provide aggregate data on loans and other 
                financial products and services provided by the 
                national bank in such State.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010100EN.01000901.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2010 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Lahti Energia Oy

(Case C-209/09) (1)

1

(Directive 2000/76/EC - Incineration of waste - Incineration plant - Co-incineration plant - Complex comprising a gas plant and a power plant - Incineration in the power plant of non-purified gas produced from the thermal treatment of waste in the gas plant)

2010/C 100/12

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Lahti Energia Oy

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Interpretation of Article 3 of Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste (OJ 2000 L 332, p. 91) — Complex consisting of a plant producing gas from waste and a power plant whose steam boiler burns the gas produced from the thermal treatment of waste in the gas plant — Combustion in the steam boiler of the power plant of non-purified instead of purified gas

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

A power plant which uses as an additional fuel, in substitution for fossil fuels used for the most part in its production activities, gas obtained in a gas plant following thermal treatment of waste is to be regarded, jointly with that gas plant, as a ‘co-incineration plant’ within the meaning of Article 3(5) of Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste when the gas in question has not been purified within the gas plant.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.

1

---