alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00782

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Meldrum <cleanerairnow@twmi.rr.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:23 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Meldrum

15316 Wilbur Ct. Apt. 42

Redford, MI 48239
# C_2011282EN.01001802.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/18

---

Order of the General Court of 30 June 2011 — Tecnoprocess v Commission

(Case T-403/09) (1)

1

(Action for damages - Unjust enrichment - Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 282/34

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tecnoprocess Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Majoli, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes and L. Prete, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, for a declaration that the European Commission and the delegations of the European Union to Morocco and Nigeria have been unjustly enriched and, second, for an order that the Commission pay the sum of EUR 114 069,94 and the interest due on that sum.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Tecnoprocess Srl is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Tecnoprocess Srl is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-506-007]

Take notice that on June 11, 2001, Northwest Pipeline Corporation (Northwest) submitted revised schedules to correct certain supplemental information filed by Northwest on May 25, 2001 relating to Northwest's proposed policy on partial capacity turnbacks.

Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC                           ( print page 33536)                        20426, in accordance with § 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before June 28, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make  protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​doorbell.htm.                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15694  Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FRED MINOR,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 106 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of August, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Katherine B. ROBINSON, petitioner, v. CHESAPEAKE BANK OF MARYLAND, et al.

No. 15-9346.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jerry A. Dukes, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 10, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report of Semitool, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Raymon F. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Semitool, Inc. and will be retained by Semitool, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

| Dated: December 12, 2008 |   | By:  | /s/ Raymon F. Thompson                              |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |      | Raymon F. Thompson                                  |
|                     |   |      | *Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer* |
II-00268

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

edgar gehlert <ewag41 @hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:09 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

edgar gehlert

150 rosh rd

rogersville, TN 37857
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of The Bank of Kentucky Financial
Corporation ("BKFC") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert W. Zapp, Chief Executive Officer and President of BKFC,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations
          of BKFC.


                                        /s/ Robert W. Zapp
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert W. Zapp
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
                                           March 27, 2003
Gregory PRESLEY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7139.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Form 10-K of Community Bank Shares of Indiana,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, I, James D. Rickard,
Chief Executive Officer of Community Bank Shares of Indiana, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  Such
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)  The
information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.








By:         /s/ James D.
Rickard


James D. Rickard


President and


Chief Executive Officer





Date:  March
31, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Miguel Moran DIAZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6869.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Kentorre D. HALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6956.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
mbcc-ex106_29.htm



Exhibit 10.6

 

AMENDMENT TO SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment dated as of January 1, 2016 (“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (“Mission”) is made to that certain Shared Services Agreement dated as of May 9, 2003 by and between Mission Broadcasting, Inc. and Nexstar Broadcasting of the Midwest, Inc., as amended by those certain amendments dated January 13, 2004 and November 16, 2004 (collectively, the “Agreement”).

 

WHEREAS, Mission is the licensee of television broadcast station WAWV-TV, Terre Haute, Indiana;

 

WHEREAS, Nexstar is the licensee of television broadcasting station WTWO, Terre Haute, Indiana; 

 

WHEREAS, Mission and Nexstar have entered into the Agreement for their mutual benefit;

 

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1. Paragraph 4(g) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in its place: “4(g) Services Fee. In consideration for the services to be provided to the Stations by Nexstar personnel as described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f), Mission will pay Nexstar the fee (“Services Fee”) described in Section 4(g).

 

(i)Base Amount. Subject to the remaining provisions of this Section 4(g), the base amount of the Services Fee will be $11,666.67 per month.

 

(ii) Payment Terms. The Services Fee will be payable monthly, in arrears, from and after the month during which this Agreement is executed, and will be prorated on a daily basis for the first and last months during which the sharing arrangements described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f) are in effect.” 

 

2.These revised payment terms are effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.

 

3. As so amended, all sections and provisions of the Agreement are hereby ratified in full. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date above.

 


			
	
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

 
	
 
	
MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

	
By: /s/ Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
By: /s/ Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Name: Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
 

Name: Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Title: EVP & Chief Financial Officer
	
 
	
 

Title: President
TOWN OF CHESTER, NEW YORK, petitioner, v. LAROE ESTATES, INC.

No. 16-605.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 13, 2017.

*811Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.
Ryan Daniel JONES-ADAMS, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 17-7100.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Michael R. BURNS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5498.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Proposed Rule on Swap Data Recordkeeping & Recording 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) is proposing rules on swap data recordkeeping & 

recording, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) 

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 

Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”). Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act amended the Commodity Exchange Act to establish a 

comprehensive new regulatory framework for swaps and security-based swaps. The legislation was enacted to 

reduce systemic risk, increase transparency, and promote market integrity within the financial system by, among 

other things: providing for the registration and comprehensive regulation of swap dealers (“SDs”) and major swap 

participants (“MSPs”); imposing clearing and trade execution requirements on standardized derivative products; 

creating rigorous recordkeeping and data reporting regimes with respect to swaps, including real time reporting; and 

enhancing the Commission’s rulemaking and enforcement authorities with respect to, among others, all registered 

entities, intermediaries, and swap counterparties subject to the Commission’s oversight. 

Swap Data Repositories 

Section 728 of the Dodd-Frank Act establishes a newly-created registered entity—the swap data repository (SDR)—

to collect and maintain data related to swap transactions as prescribed by the Commission, and to make such data 

electronically available to regulators.

Recordkeeping & Recording 

Section 728 directs the Commission to prescribe standards for swap data recordkeeping and reporting. These 

standards are to apply to both registered entities and counterparties involved with swaps and are to be comparable 

to those for clearing organizations. 

Section 729 requires that at least one counterparty to a swap must report data concerning that swap to an SDR. The 

determination of this reporting counterparty depends on the status of the counterparties involved. If only one 

counterparty is an SD, the SD is required to report. If one counterparty is an MSP, and the other counterparty is 

neither an SD nor an MSP (non-SD/MSP counterparty), the MSP must report. Where the counterparties have the 

same status—two SDs, two MSPs, or two non-SD/MSP counterparties—the counterparties must select a 

counterparty to report. In addition, Section 729 provides for reporting swap data to the Commission for swaps 

neither cleared by a DCO nor accepted by a SDR. 

Enactment Timeline 

After a 60-day comment period, the Commission plans to issue final regulations no later than July 15, 2011. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
James PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-7498.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

*1172Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
II-01217

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mary Bottari <mary.bottari@gmail. com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 10:01 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mary Bottari

1035 Sherman Ave

Madison, WI 53703
II-00916

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

John Neill <bigjohn@texas.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:04 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

John Neill

11202 Alhambra Drive

Austin, TX 78759
Jerome PRINGLE, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-7396.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.