alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00586

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Acocks <KrazyK55@charter.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:58 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Acocks

808Missouri, Ave.

South Roxana, IN 62087
II-00548

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Colleen Spining <cspining@san.rr.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:04 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Colleen Spining

8694 Villa La Jolla Dr., #6

La Jolla, CA 92037
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1207

Propane Fixed Swap - Mt. Belvieu Propane (non-LDH) - OPIS

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by OPIS for the location 

specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the OPIS Mt. 

Belvieu Propane (non-LDH) price for each business day that it is determined during the contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in gallons. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity in 

gallons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per gallon. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per gallon. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
John Earl EASLEY, petitioner, v. Rosemarie E. AQUILINA, Judge, Circuit Court of Michigan, Ingham County.

No. 16-5741.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Tony L. FORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7548.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
II-00319

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jack David Marcus <jackdavidm@nyc.rr.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 2:51 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jack David Marcus

215 West 92nd Street Apt. 15E

New York, NY 10025-7480
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 6585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC)

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date: February 8, 2001.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Place: Room 3407, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee will 
hold a plenary meeting on February 8, 2001, in Room 3407 of the U.S. 
Department of Commerce.
    During the morning, the ETTAC will hear reports on cross-cutting 
trade and environment issues including those at issue in the U.S.-
Jordan, and U.S. Singapore free trade agreements negotiations and the 
Free Trade Agreement of the Americas. The ETTAC will also hear a report 
from its Government Resources Subcommittee and review past initiatives. 
In the afternoon, the ETTAC will conduct a strategic planning session.
    The ETTAC is mandated by Public Law 103-392). It was created to 
advise on the environmental trade policies and programs of the U.S. 
Government and to help it to focus its resources on increasing the 
exports of the U.S. environmental industry. The ETTAC operates as an 
advisory committee to the Secretary of Commerce and the interagency 
Environmental Trade Working Group (ETWG) of the Trade Promotion 
Coordinating Committee (TPCC). The ETTAC was originally chartered in 
May of 1994. It was most recently rechartered until May 30, 2002. The 
ETTAC was created on May 31, 1994, to advise the U.S. government on 
policies and programs to expand U.S. exports of environmental products 
and services.
    For further information phone Jane Siegel, Office of Technologies 
Industries, (ETI), U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-5225. This 
meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests 
for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be 
directed to ETI.

    Dated: January 12, 2001.
Carlos F. Montoulieu,
Deputy Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-1602 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-U
Jaime GONZALEZ, petitioner, v. Clark E. DUCART, Warden.

No. 16-9739.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7549

LAWRENCE GENE LANZY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RICKIE HARRISON, Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution; GARY D. MAYNARD, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-01-3652-24BH-4) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 9, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Gene Lanzy, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lawrence Gene Lanzy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Lanzy has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Lanzy v. Harrison , No. CA-01-3652-24BH-4 (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We also deny Lanzy’s “Motion to Accept Exhibit Evidence.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 October 2011 – Alfastar Benelux v Council**

**(Case T-57/09)**

Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of technical maintenance and help desk and on-site intervention services for the PCs, printers and peripherals
of the General Secretariat of the Council – Rejection of a tender – Duty to state reasons

1.                     *Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope – Decision, in the procedure for awarding a public services
contract, to reject a tender – Assessment having regard to the information at the applicant’s disposal at the time the action
was brought – Advantages of the successful tender not communicated – Inadequate statement of reasons (Art. 253 EC; Council
Regulation No 1605/2002, Art. 100(2); Commission Regulation No 2342/2002, Art. 149(3)) (see paras 24-29, 36-43)*

2.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Unlawfulness – Injury/damage – Causal link – Annulment, for lack of reasoning, of
a Council decision rejecting a tender in a public service contract procedure – Reality of the unlawfulness and the causal
link depending on examination of pleas having to be directed against the decision replacing the annulled decision – Claim
for compensation premature (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 45-53)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION, first, for annulment of the Council’s decision of 1 December 2008 to reject the tender submitted by the Alfastar-Siemens consortium, composed of Alfastar Benelux SA and Siemens IT Solutions and Services SA, in response to Call for Tenders UCA/218/07 for the provision of technical maintenance – help desk and on-site intervention services for the PCs, printers and peripherals of the General Secretariat of the Council (OJ 2008/S 91‐122796) and to award the contract to another tenderer and, secondly, for damages. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the Council’s decision of 1 December 2008 to reject the tender submitted by the consortium composed of Alfastar Benelux SA and Siemens IT Solutions and Services SA, in response to Call for Tenders UCA/218/07 for the provision of technical maintenance – help desk and on-site intervention services for the PCs, printers and peripherals of the General Secretariat of the Council and to award the contract to another tenderer; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Dismisses the claim for damages; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
II-00753

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Eloise Bates <eloise.bates@gmail. corn>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:39 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Eloise Bates

1952 SE Mulberry Ave

Portland, OR 97214
Dean William CRIDER, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 15-9148.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and the Statements of Revenue and Expenses and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Report on Form 10-Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,770,054
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,577,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,263,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,577,666
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,070
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (347,528)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,371)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II-00749

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Steven Smith <scanman1948@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:43 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Steven Smith

PO Box 66928

Scotts Valley, CA 95067
II-00439

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Gail Owens <geowens@tds.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:06 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Gail Owens

2030 east mifflin st

madison, WI 53704
II-00828

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Patricia Fiedler <pimar361 @msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:04 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Patricia Fiedler

27 Stream Lane

Levittown, PA 19055
Michael A. LILLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7621.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.