alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011120EN.01001102.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/11

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2011 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Performing Science (5 HTP)

(Case T-190/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark 5 HTP - Absolute ground of refusal - Signs or indications which have become customary - Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Distinctive character acquired by use - Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2011/C 120/28

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Longevity Health Products Inc. (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: J.E. Korab, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Performing Science LLC (Las Vegas, Nevada, United States) (represented by: D. Plasser, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2009 (Case R 595/2008-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Performing Science LLC and Longevity Health Products Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | The action is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed;

| 2. | Longevity Health Products Inc. is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Longevity Health Products Inc. is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greenland Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
Beener, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

/s/ Thomas Beener.
------------------

Thomas Beener
Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 16, 2004
DISMISS and Opinion Filed March 20, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-01284-CV 

FULLCLIP CRAFT DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, Appellant 

V. 

THE FOOD HALL COMPANY, LLC AND 

LEGACY HALL BEVERAGE HOLDING, LLC D/B/A 

UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY BREWING COMPANY, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-11639 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Reichek, Carlyle, and Miskel 

Opinion by Justice Reichek 

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal because the trial 

court has granted a new trial. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

231284F.P05 

/Amanda L. Reichek/

AMANDA L. REICHEK 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

FULLCLIP CRAFT 

DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, Appellant 

No. 05-23-01284-CV V. 

THE FOOD HALL COMPANY, LLC 

AND LEGACY HALL BEVERAGE 

HOLDING, LLC D/B/A 

UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY 

BREWING COMPANY, Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-11639. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek. 

Justices Carlyle and Miskel 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellees THE FOOD HALL COMPANY LLC AND 

LEGACY HALL BEVERAGE HOLDING, LLC D/B/A UNLAWFUL 

ASSEMBLY BREWING COMPANY recover their costs of this appeal from 

appellant FULLCLIP CRAFT DISTRIBUTORS, LLC. 

Judgment entered March 20, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	9
<MULTIPLIER>	1,000
       
<S>	<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>	6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>	JUN-30-1996
<CASH>	3,024
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>	0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>	0
<TRADING-ASSETS>	0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>	0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>	28,915
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>	28,915
<LOANS>	62,988
<ALLOWANCE>	372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	101,080
<DEPOSITS>	88,398
<SHORT-TERM>	2,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>	473
<LONG-TERM>	0
<COMMON>	309
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	0
<PREFERRED>	0
<OTHER-SE>	9,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>	101,080
<INTEREST-LOAN>	2,795
<INTEREST-INVEST>	873
<INTEREST-OTHER>	41
<INTEREST-TOTAL>	3,709
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>	1,858
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	1,872
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>	1,837
<LOAN-LOSSES>	0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>	0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>	1,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>	824
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>	607
<EXTRAORDINARY>	0
<CHANGES>	0
<NET-INCOME>	607
<EPS-PRIMARY>	1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>	1.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>	4.08
<LOANS-NON>	310
<LOANS-PAST>	439
<LOANS-TROUBLED>	0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>	0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>	345
<CHARGE-OFFS>	4
<RECOVERIES>	34
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>	375
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>	375
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>	0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>	0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                       507
<INVENTORY>                                     36,644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,847
<PP&E>                                         102,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,621
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,807
<SALES>                                         63,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,524
<CGS>                                           54,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,671
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,258
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,258
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011038EN.01001402.xml

| 5.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2010 — Novartis AG v OHIM — Sanochemia Pharmazeutika (TOLPOSAN)

(Case T-331/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark TOLPOSAN - Earlier international word mark TONOPAN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 38/24

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basle, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Hebeis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sanochemia Pharmazeutika AG (Vienna, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 June 2009 (Case R 1601/2007-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Novartis AG and Sanochemia Pharmazeutika AG

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Novartis AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Novartis AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6567
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALVIN THEODORE HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-93-13, CA-97-323-R) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 10, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alvin Theodore Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Elizabeth Plagenhoef, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harris , Nos. CR-93-13; CA-97-323-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2013026EN.01003902.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 December 2012 — A. Loacker SpA v OHIM — Editrice Quadratum (QUADRATUM)

(Case T-42/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark QUADRATUM - Earlier Community word mark LOACKER QUADRATINI - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) - Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009)

2013/C 26/74

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: A. Loacker SpA (Auna di Sotto, Italy) (represented by: V. Bilardo, C. Bacchini and M. Mazzitelli, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Sempio, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Editrice Quadratum SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: P. Pezzoi, P. Perani and G. Ghisletti, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2008 (Case R 34/2008-1), concerning opposition proceedings between A. Loacker SpA and Editrice Quadratum SpA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders A. Loacker SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders A. Loacker SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     See accompanying notes.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                                          304833
<SECURITIES>                                    504965
<RECEIVABLES>                                   898604
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (18703)
<INVENTORY>                                     276794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2049005
<PP&E>                                           90798
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (60488)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2091404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1094467
<BONDS>                                         200000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           809
<OTHER-SE>                                      796128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2091404
<SALES>                                        3263200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3263200
<CGS>                                          2271613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2271613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1166888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (99339)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               41655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (99339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (99339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (99339)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
Pierce Carson, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.



|Date: February 16, 2009 | By: /s/ W. Pierce
      Carson                        
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                        | W. Pierce Carson,                                     
|                        | Chief Executive Officer, President, Director
      and
|                        | Principal Accounting Officer                          

---
II-O0108

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

steve roth <sroth92@aol.com>

Sunday, December 5, 2010 3:57 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

steve roth

945 huntington chase

fenton, MO 63026
OKLEVUEHA NATIVE CHURCH OF HAWAII, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, et al.

No. 16-418.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
National Council of 

Farmer Cooperatives Co-op Fertilizer Hedging

Large inventories of fertilizer are necessary to provide farmers with timely service as fertilizer 

is produced year round and there are only seasonal applications. Though there are no 

centrally cleared tools, there is a growing OTC market that helps cooperatives hedge away 

inventory/price risk during volatile times.
Jermaine E. REDDICK, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT.

No. 17-7359.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 33550)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         July 10, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Suites Bethesda, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Peter J. Sheridan, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6142, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-1513, psherida@mail.nih.gov

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 18, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-15769 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
##### 



[LETTERHEAD OF KPMG LLP] Exhibit 23.2 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Central Bancorp, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-87005 and
333-49264) on Form S-8 of Central Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated April 25, 2003, except as to
the fourth paragraph of Note 8, which is as of June 23, 2003, with respect to the consolidated
statement of income, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows of Central Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiary for the year ended March 31, 2003, which report appears in the March 31, 2005 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Central Bancorp, Inc. Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. KPMG LLP Boston, MassachusettsJune 27, 2005