Office of 

Public Affairs

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-5003 

Facsimile: (202) 418-5530

January 4, 2018

CFTC Backgrounder on Oversight of and Approach to Virtual Currency Futures Markets 

This backgrounder provides clarity regarding federal oversight of and jurisdiction over virtual currencies; the CFTC’s 

approach to regulation of virtual currencies; the self-certification process generally, as well as specifically regarding the 

recent self-certification of new contracts for bitcoin futures products by designated contract markets (DCMs); background 

on the CFTC’s “heightened review” for virtual currency contracts; and a discussion of the constituencies the CFTC 

believes could be impacted by virtual currency futures. 

Federal and State Oversight of Virtual Currencies

US law does not provide for direct, comprehensive Federal oversight of underlying Bitcoin or virtual currency spot 

markets. As a result, US regulation of virtual currencies has evolved into a multifaceted, multi-regulatory approach: 

 State Banking regulators oversee certain US and foreign virtual currency spot exchanges largely through state 

money transfer laws. 

 The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) treats virtual currencies as property subject to capital gains tax. 

 The Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) monitors Bitcoin and other virtual currency 

transfers for anti-money laundering purposes. 

 The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) takes increasingly strong action against unregistered initial 

coin offerings. 

The CFTC also has an important role to play. In 2014, the CFTC declared virtual currencies to be a “commodity” subject 

to oversight under its authority under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA).1

 

Since then, the CFTC has taken action against unregistered Bitcoin futures exchanges (BitFinex),2 enforced the laws 

prohibiting wash trading and prearranged trades on a derivatives platform,3

 issued proposed guidance on what is a 

derivative market and what is a spot market in the virtual currency context,4 issued warnings about valuations and volatility 

in spot virtual currency markets,5 and addressed a virtual currency Ponzi scheme.6 

CFTC Approach to Responsible Regulation of Virtual Currencies 

The CFTC seeks to promote responsible innovation and development that is consistent with its statutory mission to foster 

open, transparent, competitive and financially sound derivative trading markets and to prohibit fraud, manipulation and 

abusive practices in connection with derivatives and other products subject to the CEA. The CFTC believes that the 

responsible regulatory response to virtual currencies involves the following:

1) Consumer Education. Amidst the wild assertions, bold headlines, and shocking hyperbole, there is a need for 

greater public understanding. 

 

1

 Testimony of CFTC Chairman Timothy Massad before the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry (Dec. 10, 2014), 

http://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/opamassad-6. 

2

In re BXFNA Inc. d/b/a Bitfinex, Dkt. No. 16-19 (CFTC June 2, 2016), 

http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@lrenforcementactions/documents/legalpleading/enfbfxnaorder060216.pdf. 

3

In re TeraExchange LLC, Dkt. No. 15-33 (CFTC Sept. 24, 2015), 

http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@lrenforcementactions/documents/legalpleading/enfteraexchangeorder92415.pdf. 

4

 CFTC, Retail Commodity Transactions Involving Virtual Currency, 82 Fed. Reg. 60335 (Dec. 20, 2017), www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-12-

20/pdf/2017-27421.pdf. 

5

 CFTC, A CFTC Primer on Virtual Currencies (Oct. 17, 2017), http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/documents/file/labcftc_primercurrencies100417.pdf. 

6

 On September 21, 2017, the CFTC filed a complaint in federal court in the Southern District of New York against Nicholas Gelfman and Gelfman 

Blueprint, Inc., see http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@lrenforcementactions/documents/legalpleading/enfgelfmancomplaint09212017.pdf. 
2

2) Asserting Legal Authority. Asserting legal authority over virtual currency derivatives in support of the CFTC’s 

anti-fraud and manipulation efforts, including in underlying spot markets, is a key component in the CFTC’s ability 

to effectively regulate these markets. 

3) Market Intelligence. Gaining the ability to monitor markets for virtual currency derivatives and underlying 

settlement reference rates through the gathering of trade and counterparty data will provide regulatory and 

enforcement insights into those markets. 

4) Robust Enforcement. In addition to its general regulatory and enforcement jurisdiction over the virtual currency 

derivatives markets, the CFTC has jurisdiction to police fraud and manipulation in cash or spot markets. The 

CFTC intends to continue to exercise this jurisdiction to enforce the law and prosecute fraud, abuse, manipulation 

or false solicitation in markets for virtual currency derivatives and underlying spot trading. 

5) Government-wide Coordination. The CFTC actively coordinates its approach to Bitcoin and other virtual 

currencies with other Federal regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Federal 

Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Justice Department and Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC). The CFTC 

also coordinates with state entities, including state Attorneys General, in addition to working with the White 

House, Congress and other policy-makers. 

Virtual Currency Self-Certifications

On Friday, December 1, 2017, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME) and the CBOE Futures Exchange (CFE) selfcertified new contracts for bitcoin futures products and the Cantor Exchange self-certified a new contract for bitcoin binary 

options. 

 The product self-certification process was deliberately designed by Congress and prior Commissions to give the 

initiative to DCMs to certify new products. This is consistent with a DCM’s role as a self-regulatory organization 

(SRO) and the CFTC’s principles-based approach to regulation. 

 This self-certification process is one that Congress promulgated and prior Commissions have implemented. 

Unless it is changed, the staff of the CFTC must work responsibly within the self-certification structure.

 It is notable that the product self-certification process does NOT provide for public input, the creation of separate 

guaranty funds for clearing, or value judgments about the underlying spot market.7 

 There are limited grounds for the CFTC to “stay” self-certification such as filing a false statement in the 

certification.8

 

 In the case of the CME and CFE self-certifications, no such grounds were evident. 

 Had it even been possible, blocking self-certification would not have stemmed interest in Bitcoin or other virtual 

currencies nor their spectacular and volatile valuations. Instead, it would have ensured that the virtual currency 

spot markets continue to operate without federal regulatory surveillance for fraud and manipulation. 

The CFTC was well prepared to handle the recent self-certifications of Bitcoin futures products. CFTC staff knew that a 

virtual currencies market was evolving rapidly in 2017 and that the agency would likely see proposals for the launch of 

Bitcoin futures. 

 The CFTC has past experience with virtual currency derivatives, such as TeraExchange swaps,9 Nadex binary 

options,10 and LedgerX options.11 

 

7 CEA section 5c(c)(1); 7 U.S.C. 7a-2(c); and 17 C.F.R. 40.2. 

8 See 17 C.F.R. 40.2(c). There are a few other limited avenues to provide additional time for consideration, such as the statutory requirement for special 

steps when a Systematically Important Derivatives Clearing Organization (SIDCO) proposes rule changes that could materially affect the nature or level 

of risk undertaken. But, there was no such finding of materiality of new Bitcoin futures, given market size. Also, this would not have applied to CFE 

contracts, which are not cleared by a SIDCO. Another avenue would have required the CFTC to adopt a rule though regular order and require DCM 

adoption. For a variety of reasons, that was not feasible. 

9

 TeraExchange was registered as a swap execution facility (SEF) in October 2013 and its Bitcoin swaps were certified on September 11, 2014. 

10 Nadex’s Bitcoin options were certified on November 26, 2014.

11 LedgerX was registered as a SEF in July 2017 and its Bitcoin options were certified on September 19, 2017. 
3

 CME created the Bitcoin Reference Rate in December 2016. CFE approached the CFTC in July 2017. 

 The CFTC built into its 2018 Congressional budget request12 additional resources to strengthen its technological 

and econometric resources to support its ability to oversee virtual currency derivatives. 

Although CFTC staff did not dictate the firm date for CME and CFE listing Bitcoin futures, the exact timing of these issues 

in 2017 did not affect the self-certification process. 

Background on “Heightened Review” for Virtual Currency Self-Certifications

Within the limits and parameters of the current self-certification process, CFTC staff has engaged in a “heightened review” 

with the DCMs and worked collaboratively through several drafts of the terms and conditions of these Bitcoin futures 

products to address issues. At the heart of the CFTC’s heightened review is extensive visibility and monitoring of markets 

for virtual currency derivatives and underlying settlement reference rates. Virtual currency self-certification under 

heightened review means that the CFTC not only has clear legal authority, but now also will have the means to police 

certain underlying spot markets for fraud and manipulation. 

Heightened review includes: 

1) derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) setting substantially high initial13 and maintenance margin for cashsettled Bitcoin futures; 

2) DCMs setting large trader reporting thresholds at five bitcoins or less; 

3) DCMs entering direct or indirect information sharing agreements with spot market platforms to allow access to 

trade and trader data; 

4) DCM monitoring of data from cash markets with respect to price settlements and other Bitcoin prices more 

broadly, and identifying anomalies and disproportionate moves in the cash markets compare to the futures 

markets; 

5) DCMs agreeing to engage in inquiries, including at the trade settlement level when necessary; 

6) DCMs agreeing to regular coordination with CFTC surveillance staff on trade activities, including providing the 

CFTC surveillance team with trade settlement data upon request; and 

7) DCMs coordinating product launches so that the CFTC’s market surveillance branch can carefully monitor minuteby-minute developments. 

The CFTC expects that any registered entity seeking to list a virtual currency derivative product would follow the same 

process, terms and conditions. 

Constituencies Impacted By Self-Certification of Virtual Currency Futures

While engaged in this heightened review, the CFTC identified three constituencies impacted by virtual currency futures: 

 Market Participants and Consumers. The CFTC seeks to look out for virtual currency market participants and 

consumers through the CFTC’s educational efforts, such as the CFTC Virtual Currency Primer,14 CFTC Bitcoin 

consumer advisory,15 the CFTC market advisory,16 the CFTC Dedicated bitcoin webpage,17 the CFTC analysis of 

Bitcoin spot market data,18 and CFTC weekly publication of Bitcoin futures “Commitment of Traders” data.19 

 

12 The CFTC’s FY 2018 budget request was submitted on May 23, 2017.

13 In the case of CME and CFE Bitcoin futures, the initial margin was ultimately set at 47 percent and 44 percent, respectively. By way of comparison 

that is more than ten times the margin required for CME corn futures product. 

14 See supra note 9. 

15 CFTC Customer Advisory: Understand the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading (Dec. 15, 2017), 

http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@customerprotection/documents/file/customeradvisory_urvct121517.pdf. 

16 CFTC, Statement on Self-Certification of Bitcoin Products by CME, CFE and Cantor Exchange (Dec. 1, 2017), 

http://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/pr7654-17.

17 CFTC, Bitcoin, http://www.cftc.gov/Bitcoin/index.htm. 

18 See supra note 8. 
4

Market participants and consumers are also protected through DCOs greatly increasing initial margin levels and 

efforts by the National Futures Association (NFA), in conjunction with the CFTC, to direct NFA members to 

heighten customer protection.20 Finally, the CFTC will work to protect consumers through its ongoing

enforcement activities, including those against virtual currency Ponzi schemes21 and unregistered futures

exchanges.22

 Public Interest. The CFTC looks to protect the public interest in regard to virtual currencies through its formation

of a virtual currency task team, including recruitment of greater virtual currency expertise, its establishment of

“heightened review” of virtual currency futures, its assertive enforcement against fraud and manipulation in Bitcoin

and other virtual currency and its providing legal certainty to CFTC anti-fraud and manipulation jurisdiction over

spot markets. In fact, without the self-certification of Bitcoin futures products, the CFTC’s surveillance of virtual

currency spot trading markets would be practically impossible and legally challengeable.

 DCO Clearing Members. The CFTC recognizes that major global banks and brokerages that are DCO clearing

members are able to look after their own commercial interests by choosing not to trade virtual currency futures (as

some have done), requiring substantially higher initial margins (as many have done), and through their active

participation in DCO risk committees. One clearing member called for the CFTC to force DCOs to establish a

separate clearing system for virtual currencies.23

 However, as noted above, the CFTC’s “hands were tied” by

statute from requiring a separate clearing system or guaranty fund for Bitcoin futures. Where separate guaranty

funds have been used by DCOs in the past, they have come about through independent negotiations between

clearing members and DCOs, not by CFTC action.

It is important to note that there is no provision in statute or regulation for public input into new product self-certifications. 

Neither statute nor rule would have prevented CME and CFE from launching their new products before public hearings 

could have been called. Even if the CFTC could have held public hearings or requested public input, it is unlikely that the 

outcome would have changed, as the CFTC staff found no basis to determine their filings to be inconsistent with the CEA 

or CFTC regulations. 

Independent from the self-certification process, the CFTC and its advisory committees have the ability to call hearings. 

Both the Market Risk Advisory Committee (MRAC) and the Technology Advisory Committee (TAC) will hold hearings this 

month, to allow clearing members, alongside the virtual currency futures trading platforms and appropriate representatives 

of the public interest, to discuss the process of self-certification of new products, such as virtual currencies, and, more 

broadly, the challenges and opportunities of virtual currencies for CFTC regulated derivatives and underlying spot 

markets. 

19 CFTC, Commitments of Traders, http://www.cftc.gov/MarketReports/CommitmentsofTraders/index.htm. 

20 See NFA, Investor Advisory—Futures on Virtual Currencies Including Bitcoin (Dec. 1, 2017), https://www.nfa.futures.org/investors/investoradvisory.html; NFA, Additional Reporting Requirements Regarding Virtual Currency Futures Products for FCMs for Which NFA is the DSRO (Dec. 6, 

2017), https://www.nfa.futures.org/news/newsNotice.asp?ArticleID=4973; NFA, Additional Reporting Requirements For IBs That Solicit or Accept 

Orders in Virtual Currency Products (Dec. 14, 2017), https://www.nfa.futures.org/news/newsNotice.asp?ArticleID=4975; NFA, Additional Reporting 

Requirements for CPOs and CTAs That Trade Virtual Currency Products (Dec. 14, 2017),

https://www.nfa.futures.org/news/newsNotice.asp?ArticleID=4974. 

21 See supra note 10. 

22 In re Coinflip, Inc., Dkt. No. 15-29 (CFTC Sept. 17, 2015), 

http://www.cftc.gov/idc/groups/public/@lrenforcementactions/documents/legalpleading/enfcoinfliprorder09172015.pdf. 

23 Chloe Aiello, Keep Bitcoin Away From the Real Economy, Says Billionaire 'Father of High Speed Trading,' cnbc.com (Nov. 15, 2017), 

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/15/thomas-peterffy-keep-bitcoin-away-from-the-real-economy.html.