alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00484

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Sammy Low <cougarcreek7@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:17 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Sammy Low

709 W Wiser Lake Rd

Ferndale, WA 98248
John CORRION, petitioner, v. David BERGH, Warden.

No. 16-6179.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for *594writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# C_2014194EN.01002401.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/24

---

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — CIVR and Others v Commission

(Case T-303/09) (1)

1

((State aid - Framework system of activities carried out by agricultural inter-trade organisations recognised in France in favour of the members of the represented agricultural industries - Financing by compulsory voluntary contributions - Decision classifying the aid scheme as compatible with the common market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 194/31

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Conseil interprofessionnel des vins du Roussillon (CIVR) (Perpignan, France); Comité national des interprofessions des vins à appellation d’origine et à indication géographique (CNIV) (Paris, France); and Interprofession nationale porcine (Inaporc) (Paris) (represented by: H. Calvet, O. Billard and Y. Trifounovitch, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, then by B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, and finally by B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final of 10 December 2008 in respect of State aid No 561/2008 relating to the framework system of activities carried out by agricultural inter-trade organisations recognised in France in favour of the members of the represented agricultural industries.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10. 10. 2009.

1

---
**Exhibit 14.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors andStockholders 

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement on Form 5-8 (File No. 333-13970) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.,(ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-83962) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-86090) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., (iv) the Registration Statement on FormS-8 (File No. 333-128657) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and (v) the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-161787) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. of our reports dated April 23, 2013, with respect to the consolidated balance sheetsof CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended December 31, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, which reports appear in the December 31, 2012 Annual Report on Form 20-F of CEMEX, S.A.B. deC.V. 

KPMG Cardenas Dosal, S.C. 

 

/s/ Celin Zorrilla Rizo 

Monterrey, N.L.,México 

April 23, 2013
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 375 

AN ACT 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to take land into 

trust for Indian Tribes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 375 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY REAFFIRMED. 

2 (a) REAFFIRMATION.—Section 19 of the Act of June 

3 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorganization 

4 Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 5129), is amended— 

5 (1) in the first sentence— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘Effective beginning on June 18, 1934, the 

8 term’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘any recognized Indian 

10 tribe now under Federal jurisdiction’’ and in11 serting ‘‘any federally recognized Indian Tribe’’; 

12 and 

13 (2) by striking the third sentence and inserting 

14 the following: ‘‘In said sections, the term ‘Indian 

15 tribe’ means any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, 

16 band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the 

17 Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an 

18 Indian tribe.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall take effect as if included in the Act of 

21 June 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorga-
3 

•HR 375 EH

1 nization Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 5129), on the date of the enact2 ment of that Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 375 

AN ACT 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm 

other purposes. take land into trust for Indian Tribes, and for the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to
Alphonza Leonard Philip THOMAS, III, petitioner, v. Frank L. PERRY, Warden.

No. 17-7136.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-161]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can 
review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of 
the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Room 940. Interested 
parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date 
this notice appears in the Federal Register.
    Agreement No.: 011742
    Title: P&O Nedlloyd-Farrell/Hapag-Lloyd/Zim Mediterranean Space 
Charter Agreement.
    Parties: P&O Nedlloyd Limited, P&O Nedlloyd B.V., Farrell Lines, 
Inc., Hapag-Lloyd Linie GmbH, Zim Israel Navigation Co. Ltd.
    Synopsis: The proposed agreement authorizes the parties to 
establish a cooperative arrangement to discuss and agree on the number, 
size, and characteristics of vessels deployed, and to exchange and 
charter vessel space between the parties in the trade between the U.S. 
East and Gulf coast ports, and major ports in the Mediterranean, 
including Atlantic ports of Portugal.
    Agreement No.: 011743
    Title: Global Transportation Network Agreement.
    Parties: APL Co. PTE Ltd., CP Ships Holding Inc., Crowley Maritime 
Corporation, Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd., Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., 
Ltd., Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd., Mitsu O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Senator 
Line GmbH, Yangming Marine Transport Corp., Zim Israel Navigation 
Company.
    Synopsis: The proposed agreement authorizes members to establish 
and operate an Internet Portal so they and other user carriers may 
provide information and offer services to their respective customers 
worldwide.

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
    Dated: December 28, 2000.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-161 Filed 1-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00630

- CR

Dwayne Chance Chadwick , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTIC E BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having r eviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
Nathaniel JACKSON, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 16-9344.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Trumbull County denied.
Jimmy D. WOODS, petitioner, v. ARIZONA, et al.

No. 16-6871.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2102/2004

of 9 December 2004         

on certain exceptional market support measures for eggs in Italy

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs (1), and in particular Article 14 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   The use for processing of hatching eggs falling within CN code 0407 00 19 and the destruction of hatching eggs falling within CN codes 0407 00 19 and 0407 00 11, between 17 December 1999 and 14 April 2000, between 14 August and 16 October 2000 and between 11 October 2002 and 30 September 2003, decided on by the Italian authorities following the application of the national veterinary measures under, in particular, Directive 92/40/EEC, are hereby deemed to be an exceptional market support measure within the meaning of Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75.

2.   Under the measure referred to in paragraph 1, compensation of:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 49. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 167, 22.6.1992, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003.

----
EXHIBIT 10(f)

                    KENAN TRANSPORT COMPANY

                    AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                  1998 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


     AMENDMENT NO. 1, effective as of January 1, 1999, to the Kenan
Transport Company 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan").

                                RECITAL
                                -------

     The following amendment is adopted to make a technical correction
to Section 14.7 of the Plan by substituting the correct defined term
"Stock Options" for an undefined term, "the Option" therein.

                               AGREEMENT
                               ---------
 
     NOW, THEREFORE, the proviso at the end of the first paragraph of
Section 14.7 of the Plan be and is hereby amended by substituting the
phrase "all Stock Options" for the Phrase "the Option" therein.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1, having been approved by
the Board of Directors of Kenan Transport Company at a meeting duly held
on January 25, 1999, is executed on behalf of the Company on the 25th day
of January 1999, to be made effective as of January 1, 1999.



                              KENAN TRANSPORT COMPANY


                              By:  /s/ Lee P. Shaffer, President


Attest:


By:  /s/ William L. Boone, Secretary


[Corporate Seal]
Jorge ROCHA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES;

Kenny Arloth Ignacio-Francisco, petitioner, v. United States.

No. 17-7480.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-01092

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Charles Infantino <cril 114@wowway.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:18 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Charles Infantino

13084 Concord

Sterling Heights, MI 48313
ex_115636.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Consulting Agreement


 


Beginning June 1, 2018, Amber Murra will no longer be an employee of Art’s Way Manufacturing Co, Inc. due to her resignation. Ms. Murra will be moving into a consulting position. Ms. Murra will be expected to work three days a week, three weeks per month, on days pre-approved by Carrie Gunnerson. In addition, one week per month Ms. Murra will be expected to work four days a week, on site in Armstrong, IA on dates agreed-upon with Carrie Gunnerson. We anticipate this schedule to be concluded on September 30, 2018. Ms. Murra will be paid at a rate of $1,617 per week, billed no more than once weekly. Any travel expenses related to on-site working days will be reimbursed upon submission of an expense report. Ms. Murra will have use of an Art’s-Way issued laptop for working on-site and remotely. Once the agreement ends the laptop must be returned or purchased at an agreed upon price. After the termination of this agreement any consulting work performed by Ms. Murra will be paid at a rate of $150.00 per hour, billed no more than once weekly in one hour increments.


 


Agent – Amber Murra is not the agent or legal representative of Art’s Way Manufacturing Co. for any purpose whatsoever and this agreement shall not be construed to vest in Ms. Murra such rights. Ms. Murra is not granted any right or authority to assume or create any obligation or responsibility, express or implied, on behalf of or in the name of Art’s Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. or to bind Art’s Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. in any way.


 


Confidentiality - I agree to retain all confidential information in the strictest confidence. I will not disclose any confidential information to any person other than for purposes of Art’s Way, I will not use for my own purposes of for purposes other than those of Art’s Way, any confidential information which I have acquired in relation to the business of Art’s Way, its affiliates or the clients of either. I acknowledge that the obligation to disclose to others or use the confidential information continues in effect following the termination of my consulting agreement with Art’s Way, for whatever reason, unless I obtain the prior written consent of the Chief Executive Officer or Board of Directors.


 


Termination – This agreement will be in force at least until September 30, 2018. However, this agreement may be terminated by either party at any time for any reason or no reason giving four weeks written notice of termination to the other party. The failure of either party to perform any obligation under this Agreement shall be deemed a breach, and the other party shall thereon be entitled to terminate this Agreement immediately without such written notice.


 


	/s/ Amber Murra	 	/s/ Carrie Gunnerson
	 	 	Art’s Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.
	 	 	 
	5-18-18 	 	5-18-18
	Date	 	Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                    0
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                    14,439,116
<ALLOWANCES>                        366,000
<INVENTORY>                      13,129,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 28,581,781
<PP&E>                           29,134,072
<DEPRECIATION>                    6,585,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   58,599,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            30,099,963
<BONDS>                          10,282,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            10,037,500
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             70,152
<OTHER-SE>                        8,109,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     58,599,901
<SALES>                          19,585,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 19,585,939
<CGS>                            14,145,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    14,145,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  4,511,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      5,453
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  561,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     361,735
<INCOME-TAX>                         32,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 329,735
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        329,735
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .02
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7300

ZACHARY E. ROLAND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN L. POLK; ROBERT LEWIS; LEON EDMONDS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-94-905-5-BO)

Submitted: November 21, 1995 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zachary E. Roland, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Woodard, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal a magistrate judge's recommendation

to grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment and a protective

order, and denying Plaintiff's motion to compel production. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not

appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The

order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Joseph A. FERRIERO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-994.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Brandon J. COLLINS, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 16-1401.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Guadalupe HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, et al.

No. 16-6398.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.