alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00661

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Sally Church <swmlc 1 @aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:51 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Sally Church

1429 Homeland Avenue

Norman, OK 73-72
Glenn PERNELL, petitioner, v. Scott LEWIS, Warden.

No. 16-6247.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.7
EXHIBIT A
MARIO A. HARIK




	
		
	Start Date: 
	February 9, 2016

	Employee:
	Mario A. Harik

	Position: 
	Chief Information Officer of the Company

	Reporting Person: 
	Chief Executive Officer of the Company (initially the designee shall be the Chief Strategy Officer)

	Base Salary: 
	$425,000

	2015 Bonus: 
	$400,000

	2015 Additional Bonus:
	$900,000

	Target Bonus: 
	100% of Base Salary

	Prior Agreement:
	Employment Agreement effective as of March 14, 2014, by and between the Company and Employee

	Sections of Prior Agreement that survive with respect to Equity Compensation granted under the Prior Agreement: 
	Section 3(c) and Section 3(d)
EXHIBIT 21
 Subsidiaries of Central Bancorp, Inc.
 Central Co-operative Bank
    
    100% owned by the Company, incorporated
under the laws of the Commonwealth of
MassachusettsCentral Securities Corporation
    
    100% owned by the Bank, incorporated
under the laws of the Commonwealth of
MassachusettsCentral Securities Corporation II
    
    100% owned by the Bank, incorporated
under the laws of the Commonwealth of
MassachusettsMetro Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    100% owned by the Bank, organized under
the laws of the Commonwealth of
MassachusettsCentral Bancorp Capital Trust I
    
    100% owned by the Company, incorporated
under the laws of the State of DelawareCentral Bancorp Statutory Trust II
    
    100% owned by the Company, incorporated
under the laws of the State of
Connecticut
II-00448

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Marjorie Conrad <mdbirdmom@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:20 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Marjorie Conrad

8891 Hickory Dr

Kewaskum, WI 53040
# C_2009082EN.01002201.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/22

---

Appeal brought on 14 February 2009 by Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Makhteshim-Agan Italia Srl, Magan Italia Srl against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2008 in Case T-393/06 Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV and Others v Commission

(Case C-69/09 P)

(2009/C 82/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Makhteshim-Agan Italia Srl, Magan Italia Srl (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, C. Mereu, advocaten)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should, following an oral hearing:

| — | set aside the Order of the Court of First Instance in Case T-393/06 and declare the Appellants' application for annulment admissible; and |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the Order of the Court of First Instance in Case T-393/06 and declare the Appellants' application for annulment admissible; and

| — | annul the Contested Decision; or |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Contested Decision; or

| — | alternatively, refer the case back to the Court of First Instance to rule on the Appellants' application for annulment; and |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, refer the case back to the Court of First Instance to rule on the Appellants' application for annulment; and

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs of these proceedings (including the costs before the Court of First Instance). |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs of these proceedings (including the costs before the Court of First Instance).

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellants submit that the CFI erred in law in rejecting their application for annulment of the decision of the European Commission, expressed in a letter dated 12 October 2006, not to include the active substance azinphos-methyl in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC (1) of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (the ‘Contested Decision’).

1

In particular, the Appellants contend that the Court of First Instance erred in law in rejecting their application on grounds of admissibility. It wrongly held that the Contested Decision was not a challengeable act pursuant to Article 230 of the EC Treaty.

---

(1)  OJ L 230, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2010134EN.01001302.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/13

---

Order of the Court of 29 January 2010 — Georgios Karatzoglou v European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR), European Commission, successor in law to the EAR

(Case C-68/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Civil service - Temporary staff contract for an indefinite period - Termination)

2010/C 134/20

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Georgios Karatzoglou (represented by: S.A. Pappas, dikigoros)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR), European Commission, successor in law to the EAR (represented by: D. Martin and J. Currall, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 2 December 2008 in Case T-471/04 Karatzoglou v European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) — Referral back to the Court of First Instance after setting aside — Dismissal of an application for annulment of the decision of the EAR terminating the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff — Obligation to state reasons — Misuse of powers — Principle of sound administration.

Karatzoglou

European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Karatzoglou shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Karatzoglou shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.

1

---
Burton KAHN, petitioner, v. HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.

No. 16-437.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly
  Report of Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
  quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W. Pierce Carson, President
  & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.

|Date: November 19, 2008 | By: | /s/ W.
      Pierce Carson                            
|----------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | W. Pierce Carson                                      
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer, President, Director
      and
|                        |     | Principal Accounting Officer                          



---
II-00756

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kim Pursell <bubuco61 @yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:38 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kim Pursell

181 4th st

Hotchkiss, CO 81419
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 155 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 155

   Recognizing Filipino American Heritage Month and celebrating the 
     heritage and culture of Filipino Americans and their immense 
                      contributions to the Nation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2009

  Mr. Filner (for himself, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Honda, Mr. Issa, and Mr. 
   Scott of Virginia) submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing Filipino American Heritage Month and celebrating the 
     heritage and culture of Filipino Americans and their immense 
                      contributions to the Nation.

Whereas the first Filipinos to set foot in North America arrived in the Morro 
        Bay area, of what is now known as San Luis Obispo, California, on board 
        the Manila-built galleon ship Nuestra Senora de Esperanza under the 
        command of Spanish Captain Pedro de Unamuno;
Whereas the first permanent Filipino settlement in North America was established 
        in 1763 in Saint Malo, Louisiana;
Whereas Filipino Americans have been a part of the American experience and have 
        remained resolute and steadfast in the face of many difficult times and 
        challenges;
Whereas 2,900,000 Americans of Philippine ancestry currently live in the United 
        States and more than 250,000 American citizens live in the Philippines;
Whereas Filipino Americans have made substantial contributions to American 
        society in the arts, sciences, music, and literature;
Whereas brave and courageous Filipinos and Filipino Americans such as the 
        250,000 Filipinos fought under the United States flag during World War 
        II to protect and defend this country;
Whereas the values and traditions of Filipino Americans have had a positive 
        impact upon American society; and
Whereas it is essential to promote the understanding, education, and 
        appreciation of the history and culture of Filipino Americans in the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the celebration of Filipino American 
        Heritage Month;
            (2) honors the heritage and culture of Filipino Americans 
        and their immense contributions to the life of this Nation; and
            (3) urges the people of the United States to observe 
        Filipino American Heritage Month with appropriate programs and 
        activities.
                                 <all>
```
Scottie PROPST, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 16-6557.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Central Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  June 17, 2011
    /s/ John D. DohertyJohn D. DohertyChairman and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Donatus U. UNARA, petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, et al.

No. 16-587.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF THE REGISTRANT AT NOVEMBER 30, 1999 AND FEBRUARY
28, 1999 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF
THE REGISTRANT FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1999 AND
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS IN THE
FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,831,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,904,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,501,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,545,000
<PP&E>                                       5,772,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,146,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,012,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,146,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            50,705,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,332,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,575,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   630,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            945,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   945,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          88,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,262
<PP&E>                                         290,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,302,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,601,804
<BONDS>                                        656,349
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,917
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,887,477)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,302,276
<SALES>                                      2,437,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,496,029
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,648,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,952,992
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,105,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,105,067)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,105,067)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.59)


</TABLE>