alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012138EN.01001501.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2012 — Ryanair v European Commission

(Case T-123/09) (1)

(State aid - Loan granted to an airline company and capable of being counted as own capital - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Sale of assets of an airline company - Decision finding no aid at the conclusion of the preliminary examination phase - Actions for annulment - Locus standi - Interested party - Admissibility - Serious difficulties - Jurisdiction - Duty to state reasons)

(2012/C 138/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida and I.-G. Metaxas-Maragkidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Grespan and E. Righini, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Italian Republic, (represented by: G. Palmieri and P. Gentili, lawyers); and Alitalia — Compagnia Aerea Italiana SpA (Fiumicino, Italy) (represented by: G.M. Roberti, G. Bellitti and I. Perego, lawyers)

Re:

Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2009/155/EC of 12 November 2008, concerning the loan of EUR 300 million granted by Italy to the airline company Alitalia (C 26/08 (ex NN 31/08)) (OJ 2009 L 52, p. 3), and the annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6745 final of 12 November 2008, concerning State Aid (N 510/2008, OJ 2009 C 46, p. 6) — Italy — Sale of the assets of Alitalia.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ryanair Ltd to pay its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission and Alitalia — Compagnia Aerea Italiana SpA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ryanair Ltd to pay its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission and Alitalia — Compagnia Aerea Italiana SpA;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.

---
EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Annual Report of DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS, INC., (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.



    /s/ Richard H. Casper

    Richard H. Casper
    Chief Executive Officer







    /s/Pamela Lindquist

    Pamela Lindquist
    Chief Financial Officer
WI-LAN USA, INC., et al., petitioners, v. APPLE INC.

No. 16M74.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted.
Mitchell WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA, et al.

No. 16-6581.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


|                     |                                                
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: April 15, 2011 | /s/ Cheung Wai Hung Eddie                      
|                     | Cheung Wai Hung, Eddie, Chief Financial Officer
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                    Washington, DC    20549


                       _________________

                            FORM 8-K



                         CURRENT REPORT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
                         June 21, 1999



                           NS GROUP, INC.
     (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



        Kentucky                 1-9838            61-0985936
     (State or other          (Commission        (IRS Employer
     jurisdiction of           File No.)          I.D. Number)
     incorporation)



     Ninth & Lowell Streets, Newport, Kentucky         41072
     (Address of principal executive offices)        (Zip Code)



                         (606) 292-6809
      Registrant's telephone number, including area code:



     Item 5.   Other Events

               On June 25, 1999, the Registrant issued a press
               release announcing certain management changes.  A
               copy of such press release is filed as Exhibit 99
               hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

     Item 7.   Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial
               Information and Exhibits

               (c) Exhibits

               99. Press released dated June 25, 1999




                           SIGNATURE



     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
     signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly
     authorized.

                                   NS Group, Inc.
                                   (Registrant)


     Date: June 25, 1999           By: /s/John R. Parker
                                   Vice President and Treasurer,
                                   Principal Financial Officer
Brenda RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2012399EN.01001702.xml

| 22.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2012 — Verband Deutscher Prädikatsweingüter v OHIM (GG)

(Case T-278/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community collective word mark GG - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

2012/C 399/29

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Verband Deutscher Prädikatsweingüter eV, formerly Verband Deutscher Prädikats- und Qualitätsweingüter eV (Mainz, Germany) (represented by: N. Schindler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially B. Schmidt, subsequently G. Schneider and lastly D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 April 2009 (Case R 1568/2008-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign GG as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Verband Deutscher Prädikatsweingüter eV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Verband Deutscher Prädikatsweingüter eV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.

1

---
Ryan WITTEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7004.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2012032EN.01000302.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 December 2011 — Commission v Republic of Hungary

(Case C-253/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Freedom of movement for persons - Freedom of establishment - Purchase of property for use as a new principal residence - Establishing the basis of assessment for the tax levied on the purchase of real property - Deduction of the value of the residence sold from the value of the residence purchased - Exclusion of that deduction if the property sold is not situated within the national territory)

2012/C 32/05

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and K. Talabér-Ritz, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Hungary (represented by: R. Somssich and M.Z. Fehér, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 18 EC, 39 EC and 43 EC and Articles 28 and 31 of the EEA Agreement — National legislation on the tax levied on the purchase of real property which, when the basis of assessment for that tax is established, makes the deduction of the value of the residence sold from the value of the residence purchased conditional upon the residence sold being located within the national territory

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 26.9.2009.

1

---
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Paul D. Melnuk,as Chief Executive Officer of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation (the “Company”)certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) theaccompanying Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                         |   | By:    |   | /s/ Paul D. Melnuk            |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                    |   |   |   |                          |
|                    |   |   |   | Paul D. Melnuk                |
|                    |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                    |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                    |   |   |   |                          |
|                    |   |   |   |                          |
| Date: November 8,  2006 |   |   |   |                          |

 

----
II-01133

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Charles Cook <cmcook41 @yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:03 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Charles Cook

800 Rock

Kingsland, TX 78639
**Exhibit 32**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

 

Theundersigned, M. Dendy Young, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GTSI Corp.(“the Company”) and Thomas A. Mutryn, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act 0f 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that

 

1.               The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A ofthe Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (“the Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:                                                    | November 17,  2005 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                                     |                    |
|                                                     |                    |
| /s/  M. DENDY YOUNG                                      |                    |   |
|  M. Dendy Young                                     |                    |
|  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer               |                    |
|                                                     |                    |
|                                                     |                    |
| /s/  THOMAS A. MUTRYN                                    |                    |   |
|  Thomas A. Mutryn                                   |                    |
|  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |                    |
|                                                          |                         |        |  |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Huey P. WILLIAMS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7340.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-OlO03

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

DEAN LINDER LINDER <lindersissyl @aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:16 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK6! SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

DEAN LINDER LINDER

920S CHICKASAW ST

PAULS VALLEY, OK 73075
Karly C. BAILEY, petitioner, v. Benjamin S. CARSON, et al.

No. 16-9071.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
ex_1052.htm


Exhibit 10.5.2


 


 


Paragon Commercial Corporation


Paragon Commercial Bank


Amendment of the


Change-In-Control Agreement







This Amendment of the Change-In-Control Agreement is entered into and shall be effective as of May 20, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Paragon Commercial Corporation, a North Carolina corporation, Paragon Commercial Bank, a North Carolina state-chartered commercial bank and wholly-owned subsidiary of Paragon Commercial Corporation (hereby referred to collectively as “Paragon”), and Matthew C. Davis, an executive of the Bank (the “Executive”).


 


Whereas, the Executive and Paragon entered into a Change-In-Control Agreement dated March 28, 2013 (the “Agreement”) that includes a Section 16 Noncompete that conditions severance payments due under the Agreement if the Executive terminates employment involuntarily or for Good Reason following a change in control upon the Executive not competing with Paragon for a specified period of time following termination of employment (the “Noncompete Obligation”), and


 


Whereas, Section 11 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement may be amended by written amendment signed by Paragon and the Executive, and


 


Whereas, the Executive and Paragon wish to amend the Agreement so that, as of the Effective Date, the Agreement shall not include a Noncompete Obligation for the Executive.


 


Now Therefore, in consideration of these premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Executive and Paragon hereby agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as of the Effective Date to delete in its entirety Section 16 Noncompete of the Agreement.


 


In Witness Whereof, Paragon Commercial Corporation, Paragon Commercial Bank, and the Executive have executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of the Effective Date.


 


 


	 	
Paragon Commercial Corporation

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Robert C. Hatley	 
	 	 	
Robert C. Hatley

	 
	 	 	Its:    President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 







 



	 	
Paragon Commercial  Bank

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
  

	
By: 

	/s/ Robert C. Hatley	 
	 	 	
Robert C. Hatley

	 
	 	 	Its:    President and Chief Executive Officer










	 	
Executive

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Matthew C. Davis	 
	 	 	
Matthew C. Davis
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**JERMAL BIZZEL,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 639 EAL 2014** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of December, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
Agenda

A. MSP/MSSP Definition -- scope of the pension plan exclusion from the substantial position test for 

systemic risk, and related issues. 

B. Independent Representative -- the special entity business conduct standard for SDs and MSPs.

C. Financial Integrity for Uncleared and Cleared Swaps -- separate, segregated collateral held by thirdparties which is protected from rehypothecation.

D. Data Repositories and MiddleWare -- Swap terms negotiated by plan fiduciaries should not be 

changed after the trade as a result of executing user agreements for data repositories or middleware.

E. ISDA Protocols -- Clearing contract terms, repositories and user agreements should not incorporate 

ISDA (private group) protocols, plan fiduciaries should be able to determine the terms in the best interest 

of the plans.