alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24

THE BANK OF KENTUCKY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation, a Kentucky corporation, hereby constitute and appoint Robert W. Zapp, President
and CEO and Martin J. Gerrety, Executive Vice President and CFO, and each of them, individually, without the need to act jointly, as attorneys-in-fact for the undersigned, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in the name,
place, and stead of the undersigned, to sign and file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006, and all exhibits thereto, and any and all amendments thereto, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done, hereby ratifying and approving the acts of such
attorneys-in-fact or any such substitute or substitutes. This Power of Attorney may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereto set his or her hand as of March 15, 2007.



|                           |  |  |  |                      
|-------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|/s/ Charles M. Berger      |  |  |  | /s/ Rodney S. Cain   
|Charles M. Berger          |  |  |  | Rodney S. Cain       
|                           |  | 
|                           |  |  |  | /s/ R.C. Durr        
|Ruth Seligman-Doering      |  |  |  | R.C. Durr            
|                           |  | 
|/s/ Harry J. Humpert       |  |  |  | /s/ Barry G. Kienzle 
|Harry J. Humpert           |  |  |  | Barry G. Kienzle     
|                           |  | 
|/s/ John F. Miracle, M. D. |  |  |  | /s/ Mary Sue Rudicill
|John F. Miracle, M. D.     |  |  |  | Mary Sue Rudicill    
|                           |  | 
|/s/ John P. Williams, Jr.  |  |  |  | /s/ Herbert H. Works 
|John P. Williams, Jr.      |  |  |  | Herbert H. Works     
|                           |  | 
|/s/ Robert W. Zapp         |  |  |  |                      
|Robert W. Zapp             |  |  |  |
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-10-00117-CV

______________________________

GEORGE WESLEY FISHER, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE 

OF WILMER GIDDENS, DECEASED AND INDIVIDUALLY, Appellant

V.

ESTATE OF JOHNNIE HUE GIDDENS, BENNIE J. NELSON, AS 

ADMINISTRATOR AND INDIVIDUALLY, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 102nd Judicial District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10C0638-102

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

George Wesley Fisher, independent executor of the estate of Wilmer Giddens, deceased, 

and individually, filed his notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment quieting title on 

November 1, 2010. 

Fisher has not paid a filing fee and is not indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P. app. C(B)(1).

Further, the clerk’s record was filed January 4, 2011, and the reporter’s record was due to 

be filed on or before February 22, 2011. Appellant is not indigent, and is thus responsible for 

paying or making adequate arrangements to pay the reporter’s fees for preparing the record. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3. On March 30, 2011, we contacted appellant by letter, reminding him that 

the record was over thirty days past due, and warning that if a reporter’s record was desired, 

appellant must make a substantial and tangible effort to obtain such a record within ten days of the 

date of our letter. 

We also informed appellant that if he did not desire to file a reporter’s record, the 

appellant’s brief was due based solely on the clerk’s record, and his brief was due within thirty 

days of our letter. We further warned appellant that if no response was received, the appeal would 

be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
3

We have received no communication from appellant. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), 

we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: May 18, 2011

Date Decided: May 19, 2011
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 185 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Black History Month and honoring the 

outstanding contributions of African-American Medal of Honor recipients. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2009 

Mr. CASTLE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Black History Month 

and honoring the outstanding contributions of AfricanAmerican Medal of Honor recipients. 

Whereas the Medal of Honor is the highest award for valor 

in action against an enemy force which can be bestowed 

upon an individual serving in the United States Armed 

Forces; 

Whereas since its first presentation in 1863, 3,467 Medals of 

Honor have been awarded to a total of 3,448 individuals 

(there have been 19 double recipients); 

Whereas African-American service members have played vital 

roles in military operations throughout the history of our 

Nation; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 185 IH 

Whereas 87 African-Americans have been awarded the Medal 

of Honor for military valor; 

Whereas William Harvey Carney was an American Civil War 

soldier and the first African-American to earn the Medal 

of Honor after he risked his own life to save the American flag and return it from the front lines of battle, despite being wounded several times as Confederate troops 

charged; 

Whereas William Harvey Carney was not presented with the 

Medal of Honor until nearly 37 years after his act of 

bravery; 

Whereas in 1993, a study commissioned by the United States 

Army described systematic racial discrimination in the 

criteria for awarding medals during World War II; 

Whereas after an exhaustive review, the study recommended 

seven African-American World War II veterans be awarded the Medal of Honor; 

Whereas, on January 13, 1997, President Bill Clinton awarded the medal to these seven distinguished World War II 

veterans, at which time Vernon Joseph Baker was the 

only living recipient; 

Whereas Lieutenant Vernon Joseph Baker displayed great 

courage and valor through his actions in 1945 near 

Viareggio, Italy, when he voluntarily led a battalion advance through enemy mine fields and heavy fire toward 

the division objective, risking his own life above and beyond the call of duty; and 

Whereas African-American men and women who today serve 

in the United States Armed Forces play a critical role in 

the defense and security of our Nation: Now, therefore, 

be it 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 185 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the significance of Black History 

3 Month as an important time to recognize the con4 tributions of African-Americans in our Nation’s his5 tory; and 

6 (2) honors the outstanding contributions of Af7 rican-American service members, including the 87 

8 African-Americans who have been awarded the 

9 Medal of Honor for military valor. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33297-33298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


Notice of Public Meeting and Request for Comments To Address the 
Development of a Booster Seat Education Plan; Correction

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of 
Transportation.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration published a 
document in the Federal Register of June 6, 2001, concerning notice of 
public meeting and request for comments to address the development of a 
booster seat education plan. The document was incorrectly published as 
a Proposed Rule. It should have been published as a Notice because it 
will not lead to Rulemaking. The document also contained incorrect 
dates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tami Levitas, NHTSA, 202-366-0652.

Correction

    1. In the Federal Register of June 6, 2001, in (66 FR 30366) 
(Docket NHTSA-01-9785), on page 30367, in the first column, second 
paragraph, correct the ``Dates'' caption to read:

DATES: * * * Written Comments: Written requests to speak at the public 
meeting and/or suggestions for items to be included in the meeting 
agenda, should be received at Docket Management at the below address no 
later than July 3, 2001. Comments to be submitted for the public record 
should be received at Docket Management at the below address no later 
than July 13, 2001.
    2. In the Federal Register of June 6, 2001, in (66 FR 30366) 
(Docket NHTSA-01-9785), on page 30367, correct the third column, 
paragraph after question 12, first sentence, of the ``Supplementary 
Information'' caption to read:
    If you wish to make a presentation at the meeting, please contact 
Tami Levitas at the above mailing address or telephone number by July 
3, 2001.


[[Page 33298]]


    Dated: June 15, 2001.
Rose A. McMurray,
Associate Administrator for Traffic Safety Programs.
[FR Doc. 01-15603 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT TO THE


AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


This Amendment (“Amendment”)
is entered into as of the 23rd day of May 2016, by and between Home Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and
John W. Bordelon (the “Executive”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS, the
Corporation and the Executive previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2011
(the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the
parties desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend its term, as provided in Section 2(b) thereof.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


1.The
last sentence in Section 2(a) of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows: “The terms and conditions of
this Agreement shall be and remain in effect during the period beginning on the Effective Date of this Agreement and ending on
June 22, 2019, plus such extensions, if any, as are provided pursuant to Section 2(b) hereof (the “Employment Period”).”


 


2.Except
to the extent expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue unmodified and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first written above.


 


 


 





	 	HOME BANCORP, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Michael P. Maraist
	 	    	Michael P. Maraist
	 	      	Chairman of the Board
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ John W. Bordelon
	 	John W. Bordelon
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, David W. Cathell, certify,that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q/Aof Fulton Bancshares Corporation.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thequarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report.

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in this quarterlyreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

(a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: June 2, 2005 | By:                                           | /s/David W.  Cathell |   |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|               | David W.  Cathell ,                           |
|               | Acting  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Digital Generation Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities
and dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ MATTHEW E. DEVINEMatthew E. Devine Chief Executive Officer
|                                                              



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ OMAR A. CHOUCAIROmar A. Choucair Chief Financial Officer
|                                                            



April 30, 2003
# C_2010024EN.01001801.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/18

---

Order of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 24 September 2009 — Compagnie des bateaux mouches SA v Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs), Jean-Noël Castanet

(Case C-78/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Word mark BATEAUX MOUCHES - Refusal of registration - Absence of any distinctive character)

2010/C 24/29

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Compagnie des bateaux mouches SA (represented by: G. Barbaut, avocat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs), (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Jean-Noël Castanet (represented by: J.-P. Sulzer, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2008 in Case T-365/06 Bateaux mouches v OHMI by which the Court dismissed the action brought by the applicant against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 September 2006, concerning proceedings for invalidity of the Community word mark ‘BATEAUX MOUCHES’ — Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) — Misinterpretation of the criteria laid down by the case-law of the Court of Justice — Absence of any distinctive character

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders the Compagnie des bateaux mouches SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Compagnie des bateaux mouches SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102 of 01.05.2009

1

---
Exhibit 32.2
------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of AlphaTrade.com (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brooke Styba,
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.



         /s/  Brooke Styba
         -------------------------------
         Principal Accounting Officer

         Date:  March 25, 2004



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
         this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
         accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.













                                       34
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-400-001]

Take notice that on June 7, 2001, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1-A, substitute tariff sheets intended to address certain issues raised by the Commission in its June 1, 2001 Order in this docket.

GTN's filing provides further clarification and explanation as requested by the Commission. GTN requests that the original, revised and substitute tariff sheets filed in this docket become effective July 1, 2001.

GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served on GTN's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory agencies.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15508 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M