alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-Oll70

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ruth Larsen <netminnow@gmail.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 8:58 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ruth Larsen

PO Box 444

Marion, WI 54950
# C_2009129EN.01000602.xml

| 6.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Republic of Poland) lodged on 11 March 2009 — Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o. o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej

(Case C-99/09)

2009/C 129/10

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o. o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 30(2) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) (1) ... to be interpreted as meaning that the competent regulatory authority of a Member State, when ensuring that direct charges to subscribers do not act as a disincentive for the use of the additional facility of porting numbers, has an obligation to take account of the costs incurred by mobile telephone network operators in providing that facility?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51.

1

---
Michael Ray HARRISON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7419.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, petitioner, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, et al.

No. 17-699.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Niku Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Joshua Pickus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Shahbazian as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge, respectively:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: April 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    JOSHUA PICKUS                 
|                      |  |  |  | Joshua Pickus Chief Executive Officer



| |  |  |  |                                                                         
| |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | /s/    MICHAEL
SHAHBAZIAN                                               
| |  |  |  | Michael Shahbazian Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)



This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
# C_2012217EN.01002202.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/22

---

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Azienda Agricola Bracesco v Commission

(Case T-440/09) (1)

1

(Extra-contractual liability - Agriculture - Bird flu - Exceptional market support measures in the eggs and poultry sector - Non-inclusion of quails among the poultry types for which compensation is available - Equal treatment and non-discrimination - No causal link - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2012/C 217/47

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Azienda Agricola Bracesco Srl — in liquidazione (Orgiano, Italy) (represented by: F. Tosello, S. Rizzioli and C. Pauly, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández and D. Nardi, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for damages seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following the adoption of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1010/2006 of 3 July 2006 on certain exceptional market support measures in the eggs and poultry sector in certain Member States (OJ 2006 L 180, p. 3), in so far as that regulation does not provide for such measures in favour of poultry farmers active in the farming and marketing of quails.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being manifestly devoid of any basis in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being manifestly devoid of any basis in law.

| 2. | Azienda Agricola Bracesco Srl — in liquidazione is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Azienda Agricola Bracesco Srl — in liquidazione is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November – Commission v Belgium**

**(Case C‐7/09)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2006/86/EC – Traceability requirements, notification of serious adverse reactions and events and certain technical requirements for the
coding, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells – Failure to transpose within the prescribed periods

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 9)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to adopt or communicate, within the prescribed time-limit, the measures necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/86/EC of 24 October 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards traceability requirements, notification of serious adverse reactions and events and certain technical requirements for the coding, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells (OJ 2006 L 294, p. 32). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by not adopting within the period prescribed in the first subparagraph of Article 11(1) of Commission Directive 2006/86/EC of 24 October 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards traceability requirements, notification of serious adverse reactions and events and certain technical requirements for the coding, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with that directive, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
II-O0061

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

susan weller <swella68@att.net>

Tuesday, December 7, 2010 1:44 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

susan weller

4539 scenic mountain dr

acworth, GA 30102
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,156
<INVENTORY>                                     17,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,905
<PP&E>                                          17,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,079
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,477
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,456)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,105
<SALES>                                         26,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,764
<CGS>                                           13,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,797
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (29)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        53
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,423)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-4707]

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Public Law 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called NAFTA-TAA and in accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2331), an investigation was initiated on March 30, 2001, in response to a worker petition which was filed on behalf of workers at General Automotive Manufacturing, LLC, Franklin, Wisconsin.

The petitioner has requested that he petition be withdrawn. Consequently further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 13th day of June, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-16160  Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 22 October 2004         

concerning a draft Regulation from the Federal Republic of Germany on the labelling of fruit, vegetables and potatoes treated after harvesting

(notified under document number C(2004) 4029)

(Only the German text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2004/765/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs (1), and in particular Articles 19 and 20 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Federal Republic of Germany is required to refrain from adopting its draft Regulation amending the Regulation on maximum residue limits with a view to adding to it specific provisions on the compulsory labelling of fruit, vegetables and potatoes treated with plant protection substances after harvesting for the purpose of preservation.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.

Done at Brussels, 22 October 2004.

For the Commission

David BYRNE            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 109, 6.5.2000, p. 29. Directive as last amended by Directive 2003/89/EC (OJ L 308, 25.11.2003, p. 15).

(2)OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/99/EC (OJ L 309, 6.10.2004, p. 6).

(3)OJ L 350, 14.12.1990, p. 71. Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/95/EC (OJ L 301, 28.9.2004, p. 42).

(4)OJ L 244, 14.9.2001, p. 12. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 907/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 50).

(5)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 58.

----
THINH HUNG LE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7142.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
II-Ol071

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mary Gail Decker <hricmgd@omh.state.ny.us>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:31 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mary Gail Decker

123 Pinebrook Drive

Hyde Park, NY 12538
John Robert MANNING, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-5993.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District denied.
Aaron GRANTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7559.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report
of Semitool, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Larry A. Viano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at           the dates
and for the periods indicated.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Semitool, Inc. and will be retained by Semitool, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated:  December 13, 2007 |  | By: /s/Larry A. Viano
Larry A. VianoVice President and Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rosa Maria MELENDEZ-JIMENEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6783.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
FIRST HORIZON ASSET SECURITIES, INC., et al., petitioners, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION.

No. 16-463.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2009180EN.01003201.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/32

---

Action brought on 26 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-185/09)

2009/C 180/54

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Jonsson and L. Balta, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15(1) of that directive, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15(1) of that directive, and

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementing the Directive expired on 15 September 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 105, p. 54.

1

---
Lee PERRY, petitioner, v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS, et al.

No. 16M72.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.