alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ONE UP
CORPORATION INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         169,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,532,023
<PP&E>                                       1,370,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                 381,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,551,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,251,995
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       789,970
<OTHER-SE>                                     481,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,551,499
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,081,615
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,268,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,148,021)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (747,551)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,400,470)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,400,470)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
Kenneth PARNELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5945.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Reynaldo LANDRON-CLASS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6851.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
II-00417

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Smith <daoteterado@gmail. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:30 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Smith

5108 NE Killingsworth

Portland, OR 97218
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from
Meadowbrook  Rehabilitation  Group,  Inc.'s 10-K to stockholder  for the quarter
ended March 31, 1998 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000852164
<NAME>                          Meadowbrook Rehabilitation Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  Jul-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                          3,830
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,435
<ALLOWANCES>                     (757)
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                6,522
<PP&E>                          1,055
<DEPRECIATION>                    563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  7,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,690
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                           19
<OTHER-SE>                      5,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    7,358
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                6,286
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                6,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   81
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (354)
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (354)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                     (358)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (.18)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Harry Stylli, President and Chief Executive Officer ofSequenom, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge: 

 

1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, to which this Certification is attached asExhibit 32 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report, and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual report. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in suchfiling. 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the undersigned has set hishand hereto as of the 12th day of March, 2009.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1469 

Providing that the House of Representatives should pass a budget resolution 

for a fiscal year before the House considers any appropriation bill for 

that year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2010 

Mr. CAMPBELL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing that the House of Representatives should pass 

a budget resolution for a fiscal year before the House 

considers any appropriation bill for that year. 

Whereas the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 provides for 

the annual adoption of a concurrent resolution on the 

budget; 

Whereas the congressional budget timetable sets April 15 as 

a target date for completing action on annual budget resolutions; 

Whereas the budget resolution provides Congress a framework for subsequent legislative action on budgetary matters during each session of Congress; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1469 IH 

Whereas the House of Representatives has passed at least 

one budget resolution every year since 1976: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House that before 

2 Congress considers any appropriation bill for a particular 

3 a fiscal year, the House of Representatives should first 

4 pass a budget resolution for that year. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Cindy ORELLANA, petitioner, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 16-527.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-00474

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

George Connelly <geo 1952@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:57 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

George Connelly

13758 Vernon Circle

Savage, MN 55378
FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST
(the "Trust")
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
July 14, 1999

 Pursuant to notice duly given, a Special Meeting of Shareholders of

FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST

Fidelity Diversified International Fund
(the "Fund")

was held on July 14, 1999 at 10:00 a.m. at the principal office of the
Trust, 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts.

 Mr. Rich Silver acted as Chairman in the absence of Mr. Edward C.
Johnson 3d and Ms. Meg DiDonna, Senior Legal Counsel, acting as
Secretary Pro Tempore, recorded the minutes.  Mr. Ralph Cox, an
Independent Trustee of the Trust, and Mr. Eric Roiter, General Counsel
of FMR, were appointed to act as proxy agents for all shareholders who
had properly returned their proxy cards.

 Mr. Silver noted that the Trust has shareholder voting rights based
on the proportionate value of a shareholder's investment.
Accordingly, each shareholder is entitled to one vote for each dollar
of net asset value held on the record date for the meeting.

 Ms. DiDonna reported that proxies representing 50.001% of the
outstanding voting securities of the Fund have been received.  Mr.
Silver announced that a quorum was present and called the meeting of
the shareholders of the Fund to order.

 Mr. Silver stated that the Secretary had presented him with the
following documents relating to the meeting:

 Notice of Meeting dated May 24, 1999

 Proxy Statement dated May 24, 1999

 Form of Proxy

Affidavit attesting to the mailing of these documents to the record
shareholders entitled to vote at this meeting

 He indicated that a list of shareholders entitled to vote at this
meeting would be made available for viewing upon request.

 Mr. Silver recommended that the reading of the Notice of Meeting be
waived.  There was no objection to the recommendation.

 Mr. Silver stated that the first item of business as stated in the
Notice of Meeting and described in the accompanying Proxy Statement
was to approve an amended Management Contract for the Fund that would
(i) prospectively change the index used to calculate the fund's
performance adjustment from the Morgan Stanley Capital International
Europe, Australasia, and Far east index (GDP-weighted) to the Morgan
Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, and Far East Index
(Capitalization-weighted) and (ii) allow FMR and the Trust, on behalf
of the Fund, to modify the Management Contract subject to the
requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

 Ms. DiDonna reported that the proposal to approve an amended
Management Contract for the Fund, as set forth in the Proxy Statement,
received 983,747,960.03 affirmative votes of Fidelity Diversified
International Fund, or 77.767% of the votes cast at the meeting.
Whereupon, it was

VOTED: That an amended Management Contract for Fidelity Diversified
International Fund be, and it hereby is, approved, as set forth in the
Proxy Statement dated May 24, 1999.

 There being no further business to come before the meeting, upon
motion duly made and seconded, it was

VOTED: To Adjourn.

ADJOURNED.

A TRUE RECORD.

 ATTEST:
   Meg DiDonna
   Secretary Pro Tempore
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1721 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1721

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 18, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 1722) to require the head of each 
executive agency to establish and implement a policy under which employees shall 
be authorized to telework, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment 
thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of any point of 
order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a motion offered by the 
chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform or his designee that 
the House concur in the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment shall be 
considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided 
and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Oversight and Government Reform. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2.  It shall be in order at any time through the legislative day of 
November 19, 2010, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend 
the rules. The Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or 
his designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this 
section.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of K & F Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard
L. Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ BERNARD L. SCHWARTZ
-----------------------------------
Bernard L. Schwartz
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003
Steven JANAKIEVSKI, petitioner, v. Philip GRIFFIN, Executive Director, Rochester Psychiatric Center.

No. 16-6293.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries of Commonwealth Industries, Inc.

             Name                              Jurisdiction of Incorporation
             ----                              -----------------------------

 Commonwealth Financing Corp. (1)                                      Delaware

 CA Lewisport, Inc. (1)                                                Delaware

 Commonwealth Aluminum Sales Corporation (2)                           Delaware

 Commonwealth Aluminum Lewisport, LLC (8)                              Delaware

 Commonwealth Aluminum Metals, LLC (6)                                 Delaware

 Commonal Corporation (7)                                              Barbados

 CI Holdings, Inc. (1)                                                 Delaware

 Alflex Corporation (3)                                                Delaware

 Alflex E1 LLC (5)                                                     Delaware

 Commonwealth Aluminum Concast, Inc. (3)                                 Ohio

 Commonwealth Aluminum Tube Enterprises, LLC (4)                       Delaware

 Commonwealth Aluminum Corporation (9)                                 Delaware
       -------------------------------------------------------------------
         (1)  Subsidiary of Commonwealth Industries, Inc.

         (2)  Subsidiary of CA Lewisport, Inc.

         (3)  Subsidiary of CI Holdings, Inc.

         (4)  Limited Liability Company 100% owned by Commonwealth Aluminum
              Concast, Inc.

         (5)  Limited Liability Company 100% owned by Alflex Corporation.

         (6)  Limited Liability Company 100% owned by Commonwealth Aluminum
              Lewisport, LLC.

         (7)  Subsidiary of Commonwealth Aluminum Metals, LLC.

         (8)  Limited Liability Company 73% owned by CA Lewisport, Inc.
              and 27% owned by Commonwealth Aluminum Corporation.

         (9)  Subsidiary of Commonwealth Aluminum Concast, Inc.
In re Antonio AKEL, petitioner.

No. 16-5137.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Peggy J. BARNUM, petitioner, v. The OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, et al.

No. 16-19.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2009180EN.01003302.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/33

---

Action brought on 28 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-189/09)

2009/C 180/56

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Balta and B. Schöfer, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failure to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC, (1) or by failing to notify the commission thereof, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failure to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC, (1) or by failing to notify the commission thereof, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementation of the directive expired on the 15 September 2007. At the time the present action was lodged, the defendant had not yet adopted the necessary measures for the implementation of this directive, or had in any case not notified the Commission thereof.

---

(1)  OJ L 105 of 13.4.2006, p. 54.

1

---