alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                     INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REVIEW REPORT         EXHIBIT 99.1

To the Board of Directors and Audit Committee
Security Associates International, Inc.
  And Subsidiaries
Arlington Heights, Illinois

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Security
Associates International Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002, the related
consolidated statements of income for the three month and six month periods
ended June 30, 2002 and the related consolidated statement of cash flows for the
six month period ended June 30, 2002. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. We did not make a similar
review of the consolidated financial statements for the corresponding periods of
the prior year (2001).

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2002,
and for the three and six month periods then ended for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to
their consolidated interim financial statements and Note 2 to the consolidated
annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001 (not presented
herein), the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net
working capital deficiency. This raises substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these
matters are also described in Note 1 and Note 2 to the respective consolidated
financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The consolidated balance sheet of Security Associates International, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented herein); were audited by other auditors whose report dated April 15,
2002 on those consolidated financial statements included an explanatory
paragraph concerning matters that raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.

                          /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Schaumburg, Illinois
September 6, 2002
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-31371 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SHEILA WALLEN HEARD, also known as Sheila Clemons, also known as Joan A. Hynes, also known as Charlene Ourso, also know as Jill Marie Heavey, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CR-370-ALL-D

- - - - - - - - - - August 25, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Sheila Wallen Heard appeals her sentence for conspiracy and possession of stolen mail, arguing that the district court committed plain error in upwardly departing from the guideline range pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3. She argues that the district court did not adequately discuss or consider lesser, incremental sentences. This argument lacks merit. See United States v. Lambert , 984 F.2d 658, 662-63 (5th Cir. 1993)(en banc). The record reveals that the district court provided acceptableNo. 98-31371 -2- reasons for the departure and that the departure was reasonable. Id .; United States v. Ashburn , 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). There is no plain error in Heard’s sentence. AFFIRMED.
II-00615

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Karen Gray <kcgii2@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:31 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Karen Gray

5749 Arlington Drive

Plainfield, IN 46168-9029
II-00772

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Paul Mendelsohn <paulm@cherryvalley.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:28 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Paul Mendelsohn

238 Mill Rd

Cherry Valley, NY 13320
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1375-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of South Dakota, (FEMA-1375-DR), dated May 17, 2001, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 15, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of South Dakota is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 17, 2001:

Buffalo, Deuel, Edmunds, Gregory, Jerauld, Todd, and Tripp Counties for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.

[FR Doc. 01-15809 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718-02-M
# C_2012089EN.01002003.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2012 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-59/09) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to an infringement procedure which has been closed - Documents originating from a Member State - Grant of access - Prior agreement of the Member State)

2012/C 89/32

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: M. Lumma, B. Klein and A. Wiedmann, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, P. Costa de Oliveira and F. Hoffmeister, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented: initially by M. Muñoz Pérez, and subsequently by S. Centeno Huerta, Agents); and Republic of Poland (represented: initially by M. Dowgielewicz, and subsequently by M. Szpunar and B. Majczyna, Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented: initially by J. Bering Liisberg and B. Weis Fogh, and subsequently by S. Juul Jørgensen and C. Vang, Agents); Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, Agent); and Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: K. Petkovska, A. Falk and S. Johannesson, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision SG.E.3/RG/mbp D(2008) 10067 of 5 December 2008 granting some citizens access to certain documents submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany in infringement procedure No 2005/4569.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs and those of the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs and those of the European Commission.

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Finland, the Republic of Poland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Finland, the Republic of Poland and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.

1

---
II-00873

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Elaine & Joe Mayer <eljomayer@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:27 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Elaine & Joe Mayer

1432 20th St NW

Rochester, MN 55901
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Johnathan Lee Wood, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00194

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 1323123 ). Opinion delivered by C hief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Johnathan Lee Wood, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 12, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Antun LEWIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6983.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23.2 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We have issued our report dated January 27, 2010, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of **Motorsports Authentics, LLC** for the years ended November 30, 2009 and 2008, and for each of the two years in the period ended November 30, 2009, which are included in the AnnualReport of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.333-17687, effective December 12, 1996; File No. 333-69616, effective October 9, 2001; File No. 333-49027, effective April 24, 2008; File No. 333-69618, effective October 9, 2001; File No. 333-89496, effectiveApril 24, 2008; File No. 333-114965, effective April 24, 2008; File No. 333-114969, effective April 24, 2008; File No. 333-150418, effective April 24, 2008). 

/s/    Grant Thornton LLP 

 

Charlotte, North Carolina 

March 9, 2011
IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON OCTOBER 1999 SESSION STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) )C.C.A. NO. W1999-01914-CCA-R3-CD Appellee, ) ) HARDIN COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. C. CREED McGINLE Y, PERCY FARR IS, ) JUDGE ) Appellant. ) (Sentencing) FOR THE APPE LLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: ED NEAL McDA

NIEL PAUL G. SUMMERS 618 Main St. Attorney General & Repor ter Savannah, TN 38372 J. ROSS DYER Asst. Attorney General 425 Fifth Ave.., North Nashville, TN 37243 ROBERT “GUS” RADFORD District Attorney General JOHN W. OVERTON, JR. Asst. District Attor

ney General P. O. Box 484 Savannah, TN 38372

ORDER FILED:____________________ AFFIRMED -

RULE 20 JOHN H. PEAY, Judge 

# FILED December 20, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Cou rt Clerk2 

### O R D E R The defendant was convicted, on his gu ilty plea, of delive ry of unde r five grams of cocaine. He received an agreed sent ence of three years as

a Range I standard offender. The manner ofservice was res erved for determination by the trial judge who refused to gran t alternative sen tencing.

In t his appe al, the de fendan t conten ds that h e was entit led to alt ernative sentencing and that he should have been given cred it for the time he served i n the state of Kentucky after a detainer w as placed against him by Tennessee authorities. We find the issues to be without mer it. The proof submitted a t the sentencing hearing supports the trial judge’s findings that the defendant had been arrested and convicted of another f elony dru g offense after his arrest on the instant char ge, and that this indicated a continuing pattern forviolating the drug laws. The trial courtalso found that thedefendant was “not candid and truthful”, that he had continued to use drugs, and was unemp loyed, all of which indicated to the trial cour t that the defendant lacked amenability to correction. Further, the defendant cites no authority for his proposition tha t he is entitled to credit for the time spent i n the Kentucky penal sys tem. The case law in this state holds otherwise. See Maje ed v. Stat e , 621 S.W.2d 153, 155 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1981). Finding the def endant’ s issues to be without merit, we affirm the trial court’s denial of alternative sentencing and denial of credit for serv ice in another state pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee.

________________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, Judge3

CONCUR:

________________________________ NORMA M. OGLE, Jud ge

________________________________ ALAN E. GLENN, Ju dge
David Israel SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. John F. KERRY, Secretary of State, et al.

No. 15-1395.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
1094.

#### Johnson *v.*Gleaton, Jones & Company.

Powell, J.

“Where no motion for new trial is made, tlie evidence should be embodied in the bill of exceptions, or attached as an exhibit thereto, and properly identified [or since the act of 1889 (Civil Code, §5529), contained in a brief approved by the trial judge and made a part of the record]. A rule to distribute money having been tried on an agreed statement of facts, and exceptions: been taken to the ruling thereon, the embodiment in the record of what purports to be a copy of the agreement, signed by counsel, is not sufficient.” *Mann*v. *Archer,*69 *Ga.*767. See also *Partridge*v. *Hollingshead,*105 *Ga.*282 (30 S. E. 787).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*384Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

Submitted May 6,

Decided May 18, 1908.

*L. W. Nelson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Woolen & Hofmayer,*contra.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 18 to the Treasury Department Circular 570; 2000 Revision, published June 30, 2000 at 65 FR 40868.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6765.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Certificate of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above named Company, under the United States Code, title 31, sections 9304-9308, to quality as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is terminated effective today.

The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds at 65 FR 40901, June 30, 2000.

With respect to any bonds, including continuous bonds, currently in force with above listed Company, bond-approving officers should secure new bonds with acceptable sureties in those instances where a significant amount of liability remains outstanding. In addition, in no event, should bonds that are continuous in nature be renewed.

The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570/​index.html. A hard copy may be purchased from the Government Printing Office (GPO), Subscription Service, Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 048-000-00536-5.

Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6A04, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: June 18, 2001.

Wanda J. Rogers,

Acting Assistant Commissioner, Financial Operations, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 01-15918  Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M