alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| /s/ Warren E. Buffett                              |   | /s/ Marc D. Hamburg                                                        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Warren E. Buffett, Manager                    |   | Marc D. Hamburg, Manager                                                        |
|                                                                   |   |                                                                            |
| /s/ Matthew K. Rose                           |   | /s/ Carl R. Ice                                                       |
| Matthew K. Rose, Manager and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   | Carl R. Ice, Manager                                                            |
|                                                                   |   |                                                                            |
| /s/ Gregory C. Fox                                                |   | /s/ Thomas N. Hund                                                         |
| Gregory C. Fox, Manager                                                |   | Thomas N. Hund, Manager and Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer |
|                                                                   |   |                                                                            |
| /s/ John P. Lanigan, Jr.                                     |   | /s/ Roger Nober                                                                 |
| John P. Lanigan, Jr., Manager                      |   | Roger Nober, Manager                                                            |

----

----
Gernard CHESNUT, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7181.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          20,575
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,079,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                   363,564
<INVENTORY>                                    232,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,161,681
<PP&E>                                       9,524,810
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,980,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,049,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,214,808
<BONDS>                                      3,910,547
<COMMON>                                           799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,263,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,049,256
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,638,503
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,447,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,295,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               169,607
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             593,285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,937,716)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,813,149
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,124,567)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
        

</TABLE>
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Q & A – End-User Exception to Mandatory Clearing of Swaps 

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking? 

The goal of this rulemaking is to provide an easy-to-use process for end users who want to use the exception to 

mandatory clearing of swaps under the Dodd-Frank Act. 

Who is an end user? 

An end user is a non-financial entity that is using swaps to hedge or mitigate its commercial risks. 

What does an end user do to comply with the law? 

The end user must provide notice that it is using the exception to mandatory clearing. This notice is a user-friendly, 

check-the-box procedure spelled out in the rule. 

How does an end user know if it is hedging or mitigating commercial risk? 

The rule provides examples of uses of swaps that constitute hedging or mitigating commercial risk. The rule further 

spells out activity that does not qualify as hedging. 

Is the proposed definition of hedging or mitigating commercial risk limited to positions that 

qualify for hedge accounting treatment or bona fide hedging treatment? 

No. Although the proposed definition includes swaps that are recognized as hedges for accounting purposes or as 

bona fide hedging under Commission rules, the swaps included within the proposed exclusion for hedging or 

mitigating commercial risk are not limited to those categories. Rather, the proposal covers swaps hedging or 

mitigating any of a person’s business risks, regardless of their status under accounting guidelines or the bona fide 

hedging rule. 

What is the potential small bank clearing exception, and what is the CFTC doing about it? 

Banks and other financial institutions are financial entities that, as a general rule, are barred by the Dodd-Frank Act 

from relying on the end-user clearing exception. However, the law also permits the CFTC to consider whether to 

exempt small financial institutions from the general rule that applies to all financial institutions. 

As directed by the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFTC is seeking public comment on its options and what approach it 

should take on this issue. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
Troy K. SCHEFFLER, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

No. 15-9466.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           2,325
<SECURITIES>                                     1,019
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                       740
<INVENTORY>                                     10,731
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,103
<PP&E>                                          12,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        37,074
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,091)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,153
<SALES>                                         23,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,142
<CGS>                                           11,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (250)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,843)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., petitioners, v. Theodore WESBY, et al.

No. 15-1485.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 19, 2017.

Motion of International Municipal Lawyers Association, Inc. for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIE FRANK JOHNSON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2203 ) STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 20, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Donald H. Mason, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew J. Salvia, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachel Kamoutsas, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 99(b)



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - October 12, 2000

CONTACT:       Linda A. Pleiman
               Director - Investor Relations & Corporate
Communications
               lpleiman@nsgrouponline.com


        NS GROUP COMPLETES SALE OF IMPERIAL ADHESIVES


(Newport, Kentucky - October 12, 2000) Newport, Kentucky
based NS Group  announced today that it has completed the
sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Imperial Adhesives,
Inc. to Sovereign Specialty Chemicals, Inc.  The transaction
price was for cash of $26.75 million.

Mr. Rene J. Robichaud, President and CEO of NS Group, Inc.,
stated, "This is a real win-win situation for NS Group and
Imperial.  It is a good deal for NS Group shareholders and
we're very happy to place Imperial in a sound growth
environment with Sovereign.  We intend to begin the process
of paying down approximately $25 million of our outstanding
$74.7 million 13 1/2% senior secured notes, which will result
in over $3.3 million in annual interest expense savings."

Imperial Adhesives was purchased by NS Group in 1985 and
represented approximately 10 percent of its net sales.

NS Group is a leading producer of tubular products serving
the energy industry and certain industrial markets.  The
company manufactures seamless and welded tubular steel
products which are used in the drilling and transmission of
oil and natural gas.  NS Group's industrial products include
special bar quality (SBQ) products used in critical weight
bearing applications.  Log on to www.nsgrouponline.com to
learn more about NS Group.

Sovereign Specialty Chemicals, Inc. is a leading developer,
marketer and distributor of high-performance specialty
adhesives, sealants and coatings utilized in a variety of
industrial and commercial applications.  Headquartered in
Chicago, Sovereign was founded by Robert Covalt and a group
of private investors in 1996.  Sovereign has grown
organically and through acquisitions, becoming one of the
premier companies in its field.
Exhibit 31.2

I, R. Jerry Giles, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Financial Corporation (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report;

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2006

/s/ R. Jerry GilesR. Jerry GilesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Randy Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November
      15, 2010
                        By:
                        /s/ Randy
      ButlerRandy
      ButlerChief
      Financial Officer
IV 

House Calendar No. 12 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 184 

[Report No. 111–20] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1105) making omnibus appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2009 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1105) making 

omnibus appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 1105) making omnibus appropriations for the fiscal year 

4 ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes. All 

5 points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 

6 except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 

7 The amendment printed in the report of the Committee 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 184 RH 

1 on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered 

2 as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 

3 read. All points of order against the bill, as amended, are 

4 waived. The previous question shall be considered as or5 dered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 

6 intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 

7 divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

8 member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one 

9 motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

10 SEC. 2. House Resolution 158 is laid on the table. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

House Calendar No. 12 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 184 

[Report No. 111–20] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1105) 

purposes. year ending September 30, 2009, and for other making omnibus appropriations for the fiscal 

FEBRUARY 24, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.2


 


Motivating the Masses


Compensation Structure


 


Position: President, COO 


Employee: Susie Carder


 


As of May 1st, 2016 compensation will be broken into
a few different categories. As described below, each aspect will assist in growing the business and compensating for efforts in
each area. A 10% attrition rate will be deducted from sales for all calculations to allow for natural attrition. Coaching will
be the exception as coaching commission is paid upon payment from client.


 


Salary: As of May 1st 2016 an Annual
Salary of $200,000.00 will be paid semi-monthly on the 15th and the last day of the month.


 


Executive Bonus: An executive bonus stipulated
by the Board of Directors will be provided based on the firm’s profitability.


 


Other:


Car Allowance


Phone Allowance


50% of Health Insurance


Section 79 Plan or equivalent $30,000 annually


 


Previous Coaching Clients: As of 1-21-16, previous
clients being coached will be paid out at old rates.


 


All commissions, with the exception of Coaching Commission,
will be paid out on the 15th of the month following 30 days from the end of each event.


 


		5/1/16	 		5/1/16
	Employee	Date	 	MTM	Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                       726
<INVENTORY>                                     24,743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,693
<PP&E>                                          54,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,790
<SALES>                                         70,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           55,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   127
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
        

</TABLE>
II-00477

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Erika DeCarlo <erikaed@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:53 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Erika DeCarlo

3134 Timber Hill Ln

Aurora, IL 60504
Ruben Cardenas RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-5961.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.7 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Bradley E. Larson, Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company and Clint Tryon, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of
the Company, certify to their knowledge: (1) The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. /s/ Bradley E. Larson
    
    /s/ Clint TryonBradley E. Larson
    
    Clint TryonChief Executive Officer and President
    
    Principal Accounting OfficerMarch 30, 2005
    
    March 30, 2005