alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[ARTICLE] 9
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               JUN-30-1999
[CASH]                                           2,745
[INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS]                               0
[FED-FUNDS-SOLD]                                     0
[TRADING-ASSETS]                                     0
[INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE]                          0
[INVESTMENTS-CARRYING]                          24,598
[INVESTMENTS-MARKET]                            24,598
[LOANS]                                         89,185
[ALLOWANCE]                                        671
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 124,139
[DEPOSITS]                                      96,559
[SHORT-TERM]                                    13,975
[LIABILITIES-OTHER]                                811
[LONG-TERM]                                          0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           309
[OTHER-SE]                                      12,485
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY]                 124,139
[INTEREST-LOAN]                                  3,556
[INTEREST-INVEST]                                  580
[INTEREST-OTHER]                                   172
[INTEREST-TOTAL]                                 4,308
[INTEREST-DEPOSIT]                               1,843
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               2,106
[INTEREST-INCOME-NET]                            2,202
[LOAN-LOSSES]                                      100
[SECURITIES-GAINS]                                   2
[EXPENSE-OTHER]                                  1,463
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                    946
[INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY]                         740
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                       740
[EPS-BASIC]                                       1.49
[EPS-DILUTED]                                     1.49
[YIELD-ACTUAL]                                    4.02
[LOANS-NON]                                          0
[LOANS-PAST]                                       654
[LOANS-TROUBLED]                                     0
[LOANS-PROBLEM]                                      0
[ALLOWANCE-OPEN]                                   580
[CHARGE-OFFS]                                       28
[RECOVERIES]                                        19
[ALLOWANCE-CLOSE]                                  671
[ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC]                               671
[ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN]                                  0
[ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED]                              0
</TABLE>
Anderson Lee FERNANDERS, petitioner, v. Jeff WRIGHT, et al.

No. 16-5828.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2009167EN.01000302.xml

| 18.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social Único de Algeciras (Spain) lodged on 28 April 2009 — Federación de Servicios Públicos de la UGT (UGT-FSP) v Ayuntamiento de la Línea de la Concepción, María del Rosario Vecino Uribe and Others, and the Ministerio Fiscal

(Case C-151/09)

2009/C 167/05

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social Único de Algeciras

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Federación de Servicios Públicos de la UGT (UGT-FSP)

Applicant:

Defendants: Ayuntamiento de la Línea de la Concepción, María del Rosario Vecino Uribe and Others,

Defendants:

the Ministerio Fiscal

Question referred

Question referred

Is the requirement that autonomy be preserved — referred to in Article 6(1) of Directive 2001/23/EC (1) of 12 March 2001 — met in a factual situation (such as that in the main proceedings) in which, following the recovery of various outsourced public services by a municipal authority, the employees who were part of the staff of the actual undertakings which until then had provided the outsourced municipal services are taken on by that municipal administration and integrated into its staff, but it is those same employees (without exception) who continue to hold the same posts and carry out the same duties as before, in the same places of work and under the instruction of the same immediate superiors (hierarchical superiors), without significant changes in the working conditions, the sole difference being that now their overall managers (above the previous superiors) are the relevant publicly elected officials (councillors or mayor)?

1

---

(1)  On the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16).

1

---
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

** **

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OFREGISTRANT**

** **

**Subsidiaries of DeCraneHoldings Co.**

 

DECRANEAIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation.

** **

**Subsidiaries of DeCraneAircraft Holdings, Inc.**

 

AUDIOINTERNATIONAL, INC., an Arkansas corporation.

 

CARLF. BOOTH & CO., LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

 

CUSTOMWOODWORK & PLASTICS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

 

DAH-IPHOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation.

 

DAH-IPINFINITY, INC., a Delaware corporation.

 

DECRANEAIRCRAFT SEATING COMPANY, INC., a Wisconsin corporation.

 

DECRANECABIN INTERIORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

 

DECRANECABIN INTERIORS - CANADA, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

 

HOLLINGSEADINTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation.

 

PATSAIRCRAFT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

 

PCINEWCO, INC., a Delaware corporation.

 

PPIHOLDINGS, INC., a Kansas corporation.

 

PRECISIONPATTERN, INC., a Kansas corporation.

 

THEINFINITY PARTNERS, LTD., a Texas limited partnership.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                               13,159,820
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     18,545,861
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       18,545,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   462,347
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         18,545,861
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      3,652,953
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      2,203,629
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,449,324
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   1,449,324
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          1,449,324
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               100.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                               100.38
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009267EN.01004201.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/42

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Meiningen (Germany) lodged on 24 August 2009 — Frank Scheffler v Landkreis Wartburgkreis

(Case C-334/09)

2009/C 267/73

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Meiningen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Frank Scheffler

Applicant:

Defendant: Landkreis Wartburgkreis

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

May a Member State, in accordance with Article 1(2) and Article 8(2) and (4) of Directive 91/439/EEC, (1) exercise its authority under Article 8(2) of Directive 91/439/EEC — to apply its national provisions on the restriction, suspension, withdrawal or cancellation of the right to drive to the holder of a driving licence issued by another Member State — in relation to a certificate of aptitude to drive submitted by the holder of a driving licence issued by another Member State if the certificate was issued after the date of issue of the driving licence and is also based on an examination of the party concerned carried out after the issue of the driving licence, but relates to circumstances that took place prior to the issue of the driving licence.

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences (OJ L 237, 24.8.1991, p. 1).

1

---
**EXHIBIT 99.6**

|   | **KPMG LLP**                       | Telephone | (604) 691-3000   |
|--------|------------------------------------|-----------|------------------|
|   | **Chartered   Accountants**        | Fax       | (604)   691-3031 |
|   | PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir   Street | Internet  | www.kpmg.ca      |
|   | Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3   Canada      |      |             |

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

The Board of Directors  Ballard Power Systems Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated February 7, 2006 included in this annual report on Form 40-F.

We also consent to the use of our report dated February 7, 2006 related to “Comments by Auditor for U.S. Readers on Canada - U.S. Reporting Difference” included on Form 40-F.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such report in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-104193, 333-102364, 333-99077, 333-98009, 333-97561, 333-97559, 333-89414, 333-89088, 333-89064, 333-108775, 333-11771) on Form S-8 of Ballard Power Systems Inc.

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada  February 7, 2006

 

 

 

 

KPMG LLP a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadian member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
# C_2012133EN.01000201.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 March 2012 — Melli Bank plc v Council of the European Union, French Republic, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, European Commission

(Case C-380/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation - Freezing the funds of a bank’s subsidiary - Principle of proportionality - Ownership or control of the entity)

2012/C 133/02

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Melli Bank plc (represented by: D. Anderson and D. Wyatt QC, R. Blakeley, Barrister, instructed by S. Gadhia and T. Din, Solicitors)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, (represented by: M. Bishop and R. Szostak, Agents), French Republic, (represented by: E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, L. Butel and E. Ranaivoson, Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, (represented by: S. Hathaway, Agent, and S. Lee, Barrister), European Commission (represented by: S. Boelaert and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2009 in Joined Cases T-246/08 and T-332/08 Melli Bank plc v Council of the European Union by which that court dismissed an application for the annulment in part of Council Decision 2008/475/EC of 23 June 2008 implementing Article 7(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2008 L 163, p. 29), in so far as the appellant’s name appears in the list of persons, bodies and entities to which those provisions apply.

Melli Bank plc

Council of the European Union

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Melli Bank plc to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Melli Bank plc to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.

1

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40926 

Summary Calendar

__________________

ROGER M. LANCE,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI

AUTHORITY,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-229

- - - - - - - - - -

September 20, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roger M. Lance argues that the district court erred in

granting the defendant's summary judgment motion and dismissing

his claims for defamation, retaliatory discharge, and a violation

of the Family Medical Leave Act.

We have reviewed the record, the opinion of the district

court, and the briefs, and find, substantially for the reasons

relied upon by the district court, that the district court did 
No. 95-40926

-2-

not err in granting summary judgment and dismissing Lance's claim

for retaliatory discharge and his claim that the defendant

violated the FMLA. See Lance v. Port of Corpus Christ, No. C-95-

CV-229 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 1995).

Our review of the record reveals that Lance's defamation

claim is barred by governmental immunity, and, thus, the district

court did not err in granting summary judgment and dismissing the

defamation claim. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.

§§ 101.021 (West 1986).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2011130EN.01000302.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 March 2011 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece)) — Kakavetsos-Fragkopoulos AE Epexergasias kai Emporias Stafidas, formerly K. Fragkopoulos kai SIA OE v Normarchiaki Aftodioikisi Korinthias

(Case C-161/09) (1)

1

(Free movement of goods - Measures having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions - Currants - National legislation aimed at protecting the quality of the product - Restrictions imposed on marketing according to different areas of production - Justification - Proportionality)

2011/C 130/05

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Symvoulio tis Epikratias

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kakavetsos-Fragkopoulos AE Epexergasias kai Emporias Stafidas, formerly K. Fragkopoulos kai SIA OE

Applicant:

Defendant: Normarchiaki Aftodioikisi Korinthias

Defendant:

intervening parties: Ypourgos Georgias, Enosis Agrotikon Synaiterismon Aigialeias tou Nomou Achaïas

intervening parties:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Simvoulio tis Epikratias — Free movement of goods — Quantitative restrictions on exports– Measures having equivalent effect — National legislation distinguishing between regions producing dried grapes according to their quality — Prohibition on bringing drying grapes from Region B, where the drying grapes are of inferior quality, into Region A, where they are of superior quality, to be processed and marketed — Prohibition on bringing into Region A best drying grapes from a particular area of that region to be processed and marketed — Compatibility with Articles 29 EC and 30 EC

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 29 EC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which lays down an absolute prohibition on bringing in, storing, processing and packing for export dried grapes both as between the two sub-areas of area A and as between the second sub-area of area A and area B, since it does not enable the legitimate objectives pursued to be met consistently and goes beyond what is necessary to ensure the attainment of those objectives.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.

1

---
II-00327

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

richard boyle <woodmanat709@gmail. com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 2:06 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

richard boyle

709 garland pl.

des plaines, IL 60016
Filed 12/22/98 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

1998 ND 211

David L. Reiswig,                      Plaintiff and Appellant

       v.                                                        

Karen K. Reiswig,                   Defendant and Appellee

Civil No. 980210 

Appeal from the District Court for Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Deborah J. Carpenter of Carpenter Law Offices, P.O. Box 2761, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2761, for plaintiff and appellant.

Thomas M. Tuntland of Tuntland & Hoffman, P.O. Box 1315, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for defendant and appellee. 

Reiswig v. Reiswig

Civil No. 980210

Per Curiam.

[¶1]David Reiswig appeals from a district court judgment granting him and Karen Reiswig a divorce, awarding joint legal custody to the parties with primary physical custody of the minor child to Karen Reiswig, setting the child support obligation, dividing the marital property, and denying rehabilitative support to either party.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greenland Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas Beener, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Thomas Beener.
---------------------
Thomas Beener
Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 9, 2005
# C_2009220EN.01003001.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/30

---

Action brought on 27 July 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-294/09)

2009/C 220/57

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Braun, A.-A. Gilly, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/43/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/43/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

| — | order Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 29 June 2008.

---

(1)  OJ L 157, p. 87

1

---