alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit No. 32.1



                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the filing of American Asset Management Corporation
(the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I,  Richard G. Gagliardi, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Company.



                                 _/s/ Richard G. Gagliardi____________
                                 Richard G. Gagliardi
                                 Chief Executive and Financial Officer


Date:  August 23, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.01
                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------

I, Gary D. Halbert, the President of ProFutures, Inc., as General Partner of
Alternative Asset Growth Fund, L.P., certify that (i) the Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Alternative Asset Growth Fund, L.P. fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Alternative Asset Growth
Fund, L.P.

                                ALTERNATIVE ASSET GROWTH FUND, L.P.
                                By: ProFutures, Inc., General Partner

                                By:      /s/ GARY D. HALBERT
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Gary D. Halbert
                                         President
                                         May 13, 2005
Jesus C. HERNANDEZ, et al., petitioners, v. Jesus MESA, Jr., et al.

No. 15-118.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Motion of Federal Respondents for divided argument granted.
Stanley HOWARD, petitioner, v. Michael CLARK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion, et al.

No. 16-6634.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
John E. RODARTE, Sr., petitioner, v. BENEFICIAL TEXAS, INC.

No. 16-5539.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15929]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1370-DR]


Minnesota; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Minnesota (FEMA-1370-DR), dated May 16, 2001, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 19, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given of the reopening of 
the incident period for this disaster. The incident period for this 
declared disaster is now March 23, 2001 and continuing.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Joe M. Allbaugh,
Director.
[FR Doc. 01-15929 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Adekunle Olufemi ADETILOYE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5290.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 6 
<CIK> 0000744822
<NAME> Fidelity Investment Trust
<SERIES>
 <NUMBER> 131
 <NAME> Fidelity Latin America Fund
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                year         
 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            oct-31-1998  
 
<PERIOD-END>                 oct-31-1998  
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>        388,007      
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>       328,350      
 
<RECEIVABLES>                5,198        
 
<ASSETS-OTHER>               0            
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>         0            
 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               333,548      
 
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>     0            
 
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>      0            
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>    1,308        
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>          1,308        
 
<SENIOR-EQUITY>              0            
 
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>     460,744      
 
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>        30,967       
 
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>        52,116       
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>    6,697        
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>       0            
 
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>      (75,451)     
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>     0            
 
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>     (59,750)     
 
<NET-ASSETS>                 332,240      
 
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>            16,764       
 
<INTEREST-INCOME>            1,275        
 
<OTHER-INCOME>               (1,274)      
 
<EXPENSES-NET>               7,908        
 
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>      8,857        
 
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>     45,291       
 
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>    (200,091)    
 
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>        (145,943)    
 
<EQUALIZATION>               0            
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>    10,041       
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>     0            
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>        0            
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>      8,080        
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>  29,807       
 
<SHARES-REINVESTED>          578          
 
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>       (476,303)    
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>      8,496        
 
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>    (121,521)    
 
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>      0            
 
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>   0            
 
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>        4,433        
 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           0            
 
<GROSS-EXPENSE>              7,982        
 
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>         594,180      
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>        15.510       
 
<PER-SHARE-NII>              .220         
 
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>      (4.810)      
 
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>         .200         
 
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>    0            
 
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>         0            
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>          10.730       
 
<EXPENSE-RATIO>              134          
 
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>       0            
 
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>         0
Exhibit 10.1

 

HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Hospitality Properties Trust, or the Company, for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $40,000, plus a fee of $1,250 for each meeting attended. Up to two $1,250 fees are payable if more than one board and board committee meetings are held on the same date.

 

·                  The chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an Independent Trustee, receive an additional annual fee of  $15,000, $10,000 and $10,000, respectively.

 

·                  The lead Independent Trustee receives an additional annual cash retainer fee of $12,500 for serving in this role.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 2,500 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
II-00498

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rick Lambert <prankstr@q.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:32 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Rick Lambert

439 Log Cabin

Independence, OR 97351
Eladio SANTOS, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 15-9550.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00785-CV

E. L. and S. L. F., Jr., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 

NO. D-1-FM-13-005219

THE HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellants E.L. and S.L.F., Jr. filed their notices of appeal on December 10, 2014 

and December 17, 2014 respectively. The appellate record was complete December 22, 2014, 

making appellants’ briefs due January 12, 2015. On January 12, 2015, counsel for S.L.F., Jr.

filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. Counsel for E.L. has not yet filed a 

motion or otherwise communicated with the Court.

Amendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition 

of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) 

(providing 180 days for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this 

Court’s leeway in granting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order John 

M. Sigman and Lisa Marie Mims to file appellants= briefs no later than February 2, 2015. If the 
briefs are not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why they should not be 

held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on January 13, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Field
ROMANOFF EQUITIES, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-514.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Willie Ray HARPER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-6168.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0566 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JASON DEAN KELLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 25, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 21 2022

10/21/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0566
In re Ken CALDWELL, et ux., petitioners.

No. 16-6890.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
A.C., petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 16-6438.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

*523Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Helen Y. ROBINSON, petitioner, v. TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, et al.

No. 15-9549.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

*94Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                      HOSIERY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     The  following  table  lists  each   significant   subsidiary  of  Hosiery
Corporation  of  America,   Inc.  and  its  jurisdiction  of  organization.
Jurisdiction of Subsidiary Organization

                                                                Jurisdiction
                                                                      of
Subsidiary                                                      Organization
----------                                                      ------------

U.S. Textile Corporation (100% owned).......................... North Carolina
The Stonebury Group, Inc. (100% owned)......................... Nevada
Hosiery Corporation International, Inc. (100% owned)........... Delaware
Enchantress Hosiery of Canada (100% owned)..................... Ontario, Canada
H&R BLOCK, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Manuel LOPEZ.

No. 16-392.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District denied.
H. Res. 1490 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 30, 2010. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 4173) to provide for financial regulatory reform, to protect consumers and investors, to enhance Federal 

understanding of insurance issues, to regulate the over-thecounter derivatives markets, and for other purposes. All 

points of order against the conference report and against its 

consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the conference report to its adoption without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate; and (2) one 

motion to recommit if applicable. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 January 2010 – Commission v Germany**

**(Case C‐17/09)**

Public service contracts – Bio-waste and green waste disposal service – Award without an open public tender procedure

1.                     *Approximation of laws – Procedures for the award of public service contracts – Directive 92/50 – Failure to fulfil obligations
(Council Directive 92/50) (see paras 15-18)*

2.                     *Approximation of laws – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive
89/665 (Art. 226 EC; Council Directive 89/665) (see paras 22-23)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Article 8 in conjunction with Titles III to VI of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1) – Failure to organise a formal European award procedure before the conclusion of a contract for bio-waste and green waste disposal services between the city of Bonn and a private company. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 8 and Titles III to VI of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts, on the grounds that the municipality of Bonn and the Müllverwertungsanlage Bonn GmbH awarded a public service contract on the disposal of bio-waste and green waste without carrying out a procedure for the award of public works including Europe-wide tendering; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Laserscope on Form
10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, I, Dennis LaLumandiere, Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Laserscope, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended
            September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
            the nine months ended September 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Laserscope.



Date:  November 13, 2003            By:    /s/  Dennis LaLumandiere
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Dennis LaLumandiere
                                       Vice President, Finance and
                                       Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by section 906, has been provided to Laserscope and will be retained by
Laserscope and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Mario CASTILLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9521.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Dennis RUNNER, petitioner, v. Bonita J. HOFFNER, Warden.

No. 16-6815.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT FAICCO and ROGANNE D. FAICCO
, Appellant s ,

v.

GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1019

[ March 15, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Edward L. Artau , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2012

- CA

- 023476

.

Michael Vater and Kyle M. Costello of The Ticktin Law Group, PLLC, Deerfield Beach, for appellants.

Stephen Janes, Michael T. Ruff and Preston C. Davis of Timothy D. Padget t, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C.J., M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Gregory Leon YOUNG, petitioner, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 16-6627.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Thomas Lee BROWN, Jr., petitioner, v. Michael OVERMYER, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Forest, et al.

No. 16-5515.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
II-00604

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Joseph Buhowsky <jbuhowsky@sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:38 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Joseph Buhowsky

83 Tahoe Court

San Ramon, CA 94582