<PAGE>

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                          -----------------------------
                                   FORM 10-KSB
                          -----------------------------
(MARK ONE)

( X )    ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

(   )    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                        COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-15071

                             POWERSOURCE CORPORATION
                (Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         NEVADA                                        61-1180504
(State or other jurisdiction of             (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

3660 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 1104
LOS ANGELES, CA                                          90010
(Address of principal executive office)                (Zip Code)

REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE:  (213) 383-4443

      SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 (b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT:

                                      NONE

      SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 (g) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT:

                                 TITLE OF CLASS

                          COMMON STOCK, $.001 PAR VALUE
                         PREFERRED STOCK, $100 PAR VALUE

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or of such shorter period as the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (   ) No ( x )

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to
this Form 10-KSB. ( )

The registrant's revenues for the year ended December 31, 2000 were $1,807,689.

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity (the only
such common equity being Common Stock, $.001 par value) held by non-affiliates
of the registrant (computed by reference to the closing sale price of the Common
Stock on July 31, 2001) is $1,090,721.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock, $.001 par
value (being the only class of common stock) is 6,817,008 (as of July 31, 2001).

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

                                      None.

================================================================================

<PAGE>

                             POWERSOURCE CORPORATION
                      INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

                   FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

                              ITEMS IN FORM 10-KSB

                                                                            PAGE
                                                                            ----
                                    PART I.

Item 1.   Description of Business.........................................     3

Item 2.   Description of Property.........................................    10

Item 3.   Legal Proceedings...............................................    10

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.............    10

                                    PART II.

Item 5.   Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters........    10

Item 6.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
          and Results of Operations.......................................    11

Item 7.   Consolidated Financial Statements...............................    13

Item 8.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
          and Financial Disclosure........................................    25

                                    PART III.

Item 9.   Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;
          Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act...............    26

Item 10.  Executive Compensation..........................................    27

Item 11.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management..    28

Item 12.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions..................    29

Item 13.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K................................    29

Signatures................................................................    30

================================================================================

                                       2

<PAGE>

                 DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE
SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 Statements in this filing which are not
historical facts may be considered "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, including
projected sales based on orders, estimated cost savings and savings that may be
generated from restructuring. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate",
"estimate", and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Any
forward-looking statement involves risk and uncertainties that could cause
actual events or results to differ, perhaps materially, from the events
described in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The risks associated
with the Company's forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
risks associated with the Company's history of losses and uncertain
profitability, reliance on a large customer, risks associated with competition,
general economic conditions, reliance on key management and production people,
future capital needs, dilution, effects of outstanding notes and convertible
debentures, limited public market, low stock price, and lack of liquidity.

================================================================================

                                     PART I.

Item 1. Description of Business
-------------------------------

PowerSource Corporation (the "Company" or "PowerSource") is a Nevada corporation
formed in 1990 under the name American Gas Corporation. In 1992, Kensington
International Holding Corporation ("Kensington"), a fully reporting Company,
acquired American Gas Corporation. Subsequently in May 1998, American Gas
Corporation reorganized and changed its name to PowerSource Corporation. From
its inception until February 1998, the Company operated as an energy provider in
the Midwest. In 1998, the Company relocated to California to take advantage of
California Assembly Bill 1890 which permits California residents and businesses
to choose their utility suppliers. The Bill opened the market through
deregulation. This is potentially a $20 billion dollar market per annum.

PowerSource is a registered electric service provider (registration # 1237) with
the California Public Utilities Commission ("PUC"). The Company has also
satisfied the necessary criteria to be a Registered Renewable Provider
(registration #CEC-91237). As a result, the Company is eligible to receive
funding from the Renewable Technology Program. On July 13, 1998, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission licensed the Company as a Wholesale Electric Power
& Energy Transactions Marketer/Public Utility Company (docket #ER98-3052-000),
which automatically became effective on August 14, 1998. When filing documents
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Company requested a waiver of
various Commission regulations. In particular, the Company requested that the
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances
of securities by the Company. On July 10, 1998, pursuant to delegated authority,
the Director, Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation,
granted the Company's request for blanket approval of issuances of securities
effective August 10, 1998.

Power marketers whose rates are registered with the Commission are considered to
be "Public Utilities" under the Federal Power Act. As such, the Company, at all
times, must fully comply with a number of regulations governing all Public
Utilities.

Currently, the State of California licenses and permits sales of power by
independent providers other than utilities. By being licensed at the federal
level, as well as with the California PUC, PowerSource is positioned eventually
to sell power in states other than California if those states adopt deregulation
legislation. Furthermore, PowerSource can purchase power from sources in any
jurisdiction. With the defeat of Proposition 9 in California in November 1998,
energy deregulation and the related opportunities remain intact.

                                       3

<PAGE>

PowerSource acts as an energy aggregator. Energy aggregators provide individuals
and businesses the opportunity to pool together into a common buying group
creating larger, more economical purchases of energy. The Company markets its
energy aggregation service to various types of organizations, including business
associations, membership retailers, homeowners associations, chambers of
commerce, churches, municipalities, cause-related groups, and other non-profit
organizations. PowerSource also promotes environmentally friendly, renewable
energy sources such as wind and solar power. Assuming energy deregulation
evolves nationwide, with this group buying approach, PowerSource anticipates
that it will have an opportunity to earn profits initially from operations in
California, and eventually throughout the United States.

PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

PowerSource has two primary products: PowerGreen 100 (a 100% renewable energy
service) and PowerGreen 25 (a low-priced product for commercial customers).
PowerGreen 100 is the primary product and maintains a higher gross margin.

The other product, PowerGreen 25, will be offered selectively to major
organizations. This product is used for publicity reasons and to maintain a
low-cost option that will likely produce greater profit margins in the future.
(Beyond the year 2003) No sales of the PowerGreen 25 product have been attempted
to date.

PowerSource's wholly-owned subsidiary, GreenView Energy, Inc. (GreenView) is a
Delaware Corporation, formed on November 2, 2000 to expand PowerSource's
positioning in the energy market place. GreenView focuses on energy efficiency
products for industrial, commercial and governmental applications.

GreenView's flagship product is Stabilux(TM), a voltage regulator that
stabilizes voltage and manages lighting for various applications. Stabilux(TM)
is a proven technology, developed by the Italian manufacturer IREM S.p.A., and
is in use throughout Europe.

GreenView has obtained, through EconoWatt Corporation, the exclusive rights to
market, sell, service and promote Stabilux(TM) in the United States. GreenView
is developing a network of dealerships and distributorships to market, sell,
install and service the Stabilux(TM) units.

Principal markets for Stabilux(TM) include medium to large lighting applications
where voltage stabilization and/or energy management is important. Stabilux(TM)
can be used with all lamp types and ballasts found in commercial, industrial,
and government facilities.

GreenView's authorized dealers and distributors are companies and individuals
that currently provide energy management and electrical retrofitting services to
GreenView's target market.

Stabilux(TM) has only one competitor in the United States, Electric City (OTC:
ELC) from Illinois. Electric City has a similar unit, however it differs in
numerous operational features that are important in stabilizing voltages for
proper lighting applications. Stabilux(TM) is ETL Listed for the U.S. market and
is ISO 9001 compliant. Stabilux(TM) is certified under ISO 14001, which
identifies products that are produced using environmentally safe and sound
standards.

GreenView had no activity in 2000.

CURRENT ACTIVITIES AND MATERIAL EVENTS

At year-end 2000 PowerSource had approximately 7,250 active customers.
PowerSource's ability to realize revenue is dependent upon successful
implementation of the following steps:

1.   PowerSource obtained a $1.5 million surety bond from Cascade Surety and
     Bonding, Inc. to satisfy Automated Power Exchange for energy purchases and
     an additional bond for $100,000 to satisfy the CPUC. These bonds must
     remain in effect.

                                       4

<PAGE>

2.   Billing and collection mechanisms must be kept current to use the UDCs for
     collection services. While these software services are provided by an
     experienced vendor, until actual payments start to accumulate in a
     PowerSource bank account some uncertainty remains that this system will
     work properly and may create delays in payments to PowerSource.

3.   Electronic data interface (EDI) protocols with the three UDCs must be
     maintained with a high degree of precision or the potential for disrupted
     operations is possible and may cause a delay of payments due to
     PowerSource.

4.   Maintain continued expansion of marketing activities. These independent
     sales groups need to meet the current sales projections anticipated by
     PowerSource, until sales are actually achieved there is a risk of not
     obtaining these goals.

5.   A continued influx of investor funds is needed to fuel expansion. New
     customer growth is dependent on obtaining investor funds to pay the
     up-front commissions demanded by marketers. The availability of these funds
     is uncertain and dependent on general economic conditions of the financial
     markets and on the specific continued economic interest of investors in
     PowerSource.

As of the date of this filing, (August, 2001), the State of California has been
in the midst of an energy crisis; with the result being that wholesale prices
skyrocketed. Due to the "regulations" surrounding the deregulation of the energy
market, a situation was created whereby the retail (consumer) prices were fixed,
but wholesale prices fluctuated with the market. With the prospects of
"guaranteed" losses, the Company exercised its right to move the customer base
back to the respective utilities until such time that the market stabilizes at a
level where the providers of energy can make a profit. We expect this to occur
during the second half of 2001, but the Company will hold off until there is
assurance that this regulatory situation has been rectified.

INDUSTRY

The restructuring of the electric utility industry in California allows electric
service providers like PowerSource to provide its customers with power derived
only from resources that are less harmful to the environment and renewable in
nature. The use of these resources helps clean up California's air, reduces
greenhouse emissions and supports in-state energy industries. The California
Energy Commission selects the specific resources that comply with these
environmental standards. This agency has determined that the following resources
should be included in the renewable category: biomass, digester gas, geothermal,
small hydro, landfill gas, municipal solid waste, photovoltaic, solar thermal,
waste tire, and wind. By purchasing from this group of energy resources,
PowerSource is able to participate, along with 14 other companies, in a $75
million plus pool set aside for discounts to customers using green energy.

MARKETING MATERIALS

In its search for business opportunities, PowerSource intends to use the
Company's standard promotional material, including full-color marketing
brochures, an internet website, information contained in a sales training
manual, and a future public/investor relations packet. The Company currently
uses two (2) websites, mypower.com and energyguide.com, as a method of
advertising its products and services. At this time the Company has no plans to
use the newspaper or other types of print mediums as a method of advertising.

DISTRIBUTION METHODS OF THE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

Experience has shown that potential customers need some education about "green"
energy before committing to the service. This education process can occur either
face-to-face or over a telephone. PowerSource employs two organizational
approaches to obtain a sales force to offer this personal service, (1)
independent agents, and (2) existing telemarketing firms.

PowerSource now has two independent agents. Both firms contact potential
customers using crews of sales personnel that canvass neighborhoods
door-to-door.

                                       5

<PAGE>

Two existing telemarketing firms are now marketing the PowerSource services.
They have eight telemarketers and approximately one hundred telemarketers,
respectively.

MARKET INFORMATION SOURCES

PowerSource is selling a premium product for which customers have demonstrated a
willingness to pay extra. Findings from recent retail competition and green
power pilot programs confirm numerous market studies that consistently show that
more than 30% of residential customers are "very willing" to pay a premium for
green power. Market studies also consistently show an additional 30% to 40% are
"somewhat willing" to pay a premium for green power. This means a striking 60%
to 70% of the residential market looks favorably on paying a premium for green
power.

For example, on January 1, 1997, the Massachusetts Electric Company began
delivering power for a retail competition pilot program involving the
municipalities of Worcester, Lynne, Lawrence, and Northhampton. This was the
first pilot program in the U.S. with a sufficiently large sample size and clear
tabulation of results to provide meaningful data. Over 4,700 residential and
small business customers chose to participate. Of those, 31% of residential
customers chose to purchase an environmentally differentiated, "green" commodity
option. Over 53% of customers who chose a green option chose the most aggressive
and environmentally beneficial product, and paid a 12.1% premium, the highest of
all of the options. This pilot offers clear proof of the willingness of a large
percentage of the residential segment to pay a premium for perceived
environmental benefit.

In addition, over thirteen U.S. utilities have recently launched green power
pilot programs, 20 more are planning such programs. These programs are typically
small and not aggressively marketed by the host utility. However, they clearly
indicate that customers will pay a premium for green power.

At Traverse City Light & Power in Michigan, customers of their wind power
program pay a 23% premium over current rates. The program is sold out, and has a
long waiting list. The utility is planning to build more green supply to serve
this strong demand.

At the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, subscription in their "Greenergy"
program has been growing steadily since its introduction in August of 1997.
Customers in this program pay an approximate 20% premium over normal utility
rates.

Other existing utility programs vary greatly in their offerings, marketing
effort, and methodologies, but universally show that customers are willing to
pay a premium for green power.

For the California market specifically, PowerSource relies on the results from
The League of Conservation Voters. This League commissioned a statewide
California residential survey in September 1996. Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin &
Associates conducted the survey according to stringent polling standards. It
asked, "If you were sure that the money you spend for electrical energy was
paying for clean alternative sources of power and not for electricity from
nuclear or coal plants, how willing would you be to pay approximately 10% more
on your monthly bill?" Approximately 32% of respondents said they were "very
willing" to pay more. Another approximately 38% said they were "somewhat
willing" to pay more. Only 30% said they were either "not very willing" (12%) or
"not at all willing" (18%) to pay a 10% premium.

PROTECTED TERRITORIES - DISTRICTS

The Company entered into marketing agreements with five limited liability
partnerships (the "Partnerships") for eight geographic territories throughout
the State of California ("Districts"). Pursuant to these marketing agreements,
the Partnerships have agreed to make payments to the Company in consideration
for the exclusive right to sell the Company's power in certain geographic
territories or Districts. As of July 31, 2001, two of the five marketing
agreements with the limited liability partnerships have been canceled. The three
remaining marketing agreements are with Energy District 111 LLC, Premier Energy
Group LLP, and Paramount Energy Group LLP. Independent sales agents perform the
sales of all Districts. These sales agents are acting on an independent
contractor basis for the Company and none of the sales agents are partners,
joint venture partners, employees, or franchisers of the Company.

                                       6

<PAGE>

Under the terms of the marketing agreements, each Partnership has agreed to pay
a one-time fee to the Company of $210,000 for its exclusive right to sell the
Company's power in a particular District. The Partnerships have also agreed to
utilize its best efforts to obtain customers for the Company's power in those
geographic Districts, and to purchase all power for its customers from the
Company at the Company's prevailing rates. Several of the Partnerships are in
the process of raising capital to finance their individual marketing programs to
sell the Company's power. There is no assurance that any of the Partnerships
will be able to raise adequate capital, to implement their planned marketing
programs, to make payments to the Company or otherwise perform their other
obligations to the Company under the marketing agreements. In the future, the
Company may repurchase these marketing territories from the Partnerships through
an exchange offer. (i.e. exchanging shares of the Company's Common Stock for the
outstanding limited liability partnership units). If the Company decides to
repurchase the marketing territories, the repurchase price for the units may
equal 125% or more of the fair market value of the units or the then stock value
of the Company at the time of exchange.

The Company intends to replicate its operating model across the nation as other
states and utilities ready themselves for deregulation. After California, the
marketing focus will be directed towards states where electrical usage costs are
between $0.08 and $0.14 per kWh. Potential states include Nevada, New Mexico,
Arizona, Texas, the New England states, the Northeast and mid-Atlantic states
and Florida. This group represents over $100 billion in electricity charges per
year. As of August 2001, there are more than 40 states at various stages of
examining ways to enhance competition in the marketing of electricity. The
Company's management believes that these developments and financial
considerations indicate that there is a vast market potential for the Company's
electricity re-selling services.

STATUS OF PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED NEW PRODUCTS OR SERVICES

On December 15, 1998 the Company entered the "premium green energy market" in
California. The premium green energy market refers to the suppliers of
environmentally friendly energy forms such as wind, geothermal and solar power.
Accordingly, the Company introduced two products, PowerGreen 100 and PowerGreen
25, which qualify as premium green energy. The price, terms and conditions of
the PowerGreen 100 and PowerGreen 25 products were fully described in Item
21(4L) to the Form 10-SB filing for September 1999.

PowerSource's wholly-owned subsidiary, GreenView Energy, Inc. (GreenView) is a
Delaware Corporation, formed on November 2, 2000 to expand PowerSource's
positioning in the energy market place. GreenView focuses on energy efficiency
products for industrial, commercial and governmental applications.

GreenView's flagship product is Stabilux(TM), a voltage regulator that
stabilizes voltage and manages lighting for various applications. Stabilux(TM)
is a proven technology, developed by the Italian manufacturer IREM S.p.A., and
is in use throughout Europe.

GreenView has obtained, through EconoWatt Corporation, the exclusive rights to
market, sell, service and promote Stabilux(TM) in the United States. GreenView
is developing a network of dealerships and distributorships to market, sell,
install and service the Stabilux(TM) units.

Principal markets for Stabilux(TM) include medium to large lighting applications
where voltage stabilization and/or energy management is important. Stabilux(TM)
can be used with all lamp types and ballasts found in commercial, industrial,
and government facilities.

GreenView's authorized dealers and distributors are companies and individuals
that currently provide energy management and electrical retrofitting services to
GreenView's target market.

Stabilux(TM) has only one competitor in the United States, Electric City (OTC:
ELC) from Illinois. Electric City has a similar unit, however it differs in
numerous operational features that are important in stabilizing voltages for
proper lighting applications. Stabilux(TM) is ETL Listed for the U.S. market and
is ISO 9001 compliant. Stabilux(TM) is certified under ISO 14001, which
identifies products that are produced using environmentally safe and sound
standards.

GreenView had no activity in 2000.

                                       7

<PAGE>

COMPETITION

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has licensed almost 300
Electric Service Providers (ESP's) in the State of California including
PowerSource. The Company estimates that since the market opened in 1998, only 25
ESPs in addition to PowerSource remain in full compliance with CPUC mandates. In
addition, only 12 companies, including PowerSource, are believed to be licensed
as Renewable Electric Service Providers in California. The Company's competitors
include approximately 15 other established utilities and power providers in the
State of California.

The Company's target market can be divided into three major segments:

(1) large industrial customers,
(2) small to medium-sized commercial customers, and
(3) residential customers.

The most competitive market is the large industrial segment. Most of the very
large ESPs have targeted industrials as their sole marketing focus. While
PowerSource intends to target this market, its emphasis is on the small to
medium-sized commercial customers. In the small-to-medium market approximately
five firms offer direct competition to PowerSource. In the residential market,
the Company estimates that only 19 ESPs are active. Most of the Company's
competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger
installed customer bases, and substantially greater financial, technical, and
marketing resources than the Company. The Company is competing for highly
qualified technical and managerial personnel since it must install a
sophisticated power purchasing and billing system for its business. There is no
assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully in the power
provision business or in recruiting qualified personnel.

PRINCIPAL SUPPLIERS

The Company's principal suppliers are lower-cost electrical power suppliers in
the Western United States. As of August 2001, this region has a surplus of
low-cost power, which the Company believes will continue for approximately the
next four years. As of August 2001, PowerSource is positioned to secure low-cost
bulk supplies through power marketing firms specializing in this area. Power
supply contracts are obtained from these low-cost sources as customer loads grow
to the levels that permit economic purchases.

When customer electrical load requirements grow to a sufficient level,
PowerSource expects to issue a Request for Proposal ("RFP") to a small number of
well-known highly regarded companies who perform bulk purchasing functions and
supply industry services. These companies have strong reputations and market
presence in their respective fields. In its RFP, the Company will adhere to its
strategy of partnering with industry leaders. PowerSource expects to negotiate a
highly favorable bulk and service purchasing contract if PowerSource's customer
base expands sufficiently.

One of PowerSource's principal energy suppliers is the Automated Power Exchange
(APX). Through the deregulation of the power industry, all power generators must
purchase and sell power from the APX in an effort to level the playing field in
the energy industry.

DEPENDENCE ON ONE OR A FEW CUSTOMERS

As of August 2001, the Company does not depend on one or a few customers. The
Company's products and services require a large customer base.

                                       8

<PAGE>

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND LICENSES

On July 13, 1998, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission licensed the Company
as a Wholesale Electric Power & Energy Transaction Marketer/Public Utility
Company (docket # ER98-3052-000), which automatically became effective on August
14, 1998. When filling documents with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the
Company requested a waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, the
Company requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part
34 of all future issuances of securities by the Company. On July 10, 1998, the
Office of Electric Power Regulation granted the Company's request for blanket
approval of issuances of securities effective August 10, 1998.

On December 19, 1997 PowerSource was licensed as an Energy Service Provider
(license #1237). The Company has also met the necessary criteria to be a
Registered Renewable Provider and received its registration from the California
Energy Commission on March 23, 1998 (license # CEC-91237). On December 17, 1998,
the California Energy Commission approved PowerSource as a renewable provider
for the product named "PowerGreen - 100" (license # CEC-91237-B). On January 4,
1999, the California Energy Commission approved PowerSource as a renewable
provider for the product named "PowerGreen - 25" (license # CEC-91237-A).
PowerSource has not applied for any patents and does not intend to do so in the
foreseeable future.

TRADEMARK APPLICATION STATUS

A service mark application filed with the United States Department of Commerce,
Patent and Trademark Office on August 2, 1998 was declined on August 24, 1999
due to prior existence of similar names in unrelated industries. The Company is
contemplating a new filing under a different name in the near future. The
Company has not been issued any registered trademarks for its "PowerSource"
trade name.

GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL.

PowerSource has received all necessary governmental approvals at the federal and
state levels necessary to transact business as a Power Marketer and Energy
Service Provider.

GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS

As a licensed purchaser and reseller of energy, the Company is subject to
extensive government regulation from federal and state government agencies. The
California Public Utilities Commission ("CUPC") regulates utilities and other
purchasers and sellers of power at the state level. At the federal level, the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") regulates the purchase and sale of
energy and power. The Company has received licenses from the CPUC and FERC.
However, many of the regulations that customarily apply to traditional Public
Utilities have been waived or relaxed for power marketers. As a result, rates
are determined by supply and demand.

The Company is also subject to extensive federal, state, and local Government
regulation applicable to businesses in general. The trend in governmental
regulations on the electric utility industry has consistently moved toward
increased levels of competition over the last several years.

COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS

The Company is a marketer of electric power and does not assume any of the
responsibilities associated with environmental compliance laws or regulations.
PowerSource may, indirectly, be impacted by the cost of environmental compliance
by some of the power plants from which it purchases power, but the Company will
retain the ability to seek other power sources such as solar power and renewable
energy, if a power source is found to have substantial environmental problems.

EMPLOYEES

PowerSource currently has six full time employees. In addition, the Company
retains, on an as needed basis, various expert consultants and specialized
professional support in the areas of legal, financial, and computer operations.

                                       9

<PAGE>

Item 2. Description of Property
-------------------------------

Our principal executive offices occupy approximately 2,100 square feet of space
in Los Angeles, California under a lease expiring on July 31, 2002. We believe
that our space is adequate for our reasonably foreseeable future needs.

Item 3. Legal Proceeding
------------------------

On February 24, 2000, Keystone Energy Services, Inc., filed a complaint against
the Company and its President, E. Douglas Mitchell, individually, in Los Angeles
Superior Court alleging: (1) fraud; (2) conversion; (3) negligence; (4)
misappropriation of trade secrets; and (5) unfair business practices. Keystone
based its fraud claim primarily on alleged misrepresentations made by Mr.
Mitchell about his qualifications and expertise in the energy field --
misrepresentations, which Keystone alleges, caused it to employ Mitchell as an
energy consultant. Keystone based its conversion claim on its allegation that
Mr. Mitchell refused to return Keystone's computer trade secrets, and other
proprietary information. Keystone based its negligence claim on its allegation
that Mr. Mitchell did not perform the duties that he agreed to undertake on
Keystone's behalf with the care required of an expert in the energy field.
Keystone brought its claim of misappropriation of trade secrets against both
Mitchell and the Company, and Keystone based the claim on its allegation that
Mr. Mitchell obtained Keystone trade secrets while working for it and used the
information for his personal benefit as well as for the benefit of the Company.
Keystone based this claim on its allegation that Mr. Mitchell's use of
Keystone's confidential and proprietary information while working for the
Company allowed both defendants to compete unfairly with Keystone in the
nationwide power markets. On March 27, 2001, the case was settled without any
monetary effect.

There is no litigation pending as of July 31, 2001.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
-----------------------------------------------------------

No matter was submitted during the fourth quarter of 2000 to a vote of our
security holders.

                                     PART II

Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

A)  MARKET INFORMATION

Our Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"PSRE." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of
high and low sales prices for our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market.
Trading commenced on June 17, 1999.

                                           Price Range of Common Stock
                                           ---------------------------
                                               High              Low
                                               ----              ---
         1998
              First Quarter                     N/A              N/A
              Second Quarter                    N/A              N/A
              Third Quarter                     N/A              N/A
              Fourth Quarter                    N/A              N/A
         1999
              First Quarter                     N/A              N/A
              Second Quarter                    5.38             5.38
              Third Quarter                     5.38             4.50
              Fourth Quarter                    5.38              .51
         2000
              First Quarter                     3.00              .25
              Second Quarter                    1.20              .13
              Third Quarter                      .45              .16
              Fourth Quarter                     .70              .14

On June 29, 2001, the last sale price of our common stock reported on the Nasdaq
National Market was $.16 per share.

                                       10

<PAGE>

The Company's transfer agent is:
              Manhattan Transfer
              58 Dorchester Rd.
              Lake Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
              631-585-7341

B)  SECURITY HOLDERS

As of July 31, 2001, there were approximately 300 holders of record of our
common stock.

C)  DIVIDENDS PAID

No dividends were paid by the Company in 2000.

Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of Operations.
--------------

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
Company's financial statements, related notes, and other information included in
this annual report on Form 10-KSB.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the year ended December 31, 2000, revenues totaled approximately $1.8
million. This compares to revenue of approximately $18,000 for 1999. Expenses
totaled approximately $1.5 million for both 2000 and 1999. The revenue was
primarily attributable to sales of energy, with $210,000 coming from the sale of
a marketing territory. Selling expenses increased from approximately $49,000 to
approximately $264,000. See Risk Factors below for further information regarding
status of electricity sales activities.

General and administrative expenses during 1999 were attributable almost
exclusively to professional fees incurred in the start-up of the business
whereas general and administrative expense for 2000 was attributable to
continuing operations of the business.

The net loss in 2000 was approximately $626,000 compared with a net loss in 1999
of approximately $1.5 million. This is due to the fact that the Company went
from being a start-up in 1999 to being an operating company in 2000.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

On March 8, 2000, PowerSource obtained a surety bond with Cascade Surety and
Bonding, Inc. in the amount of $1.5 million to satisfy Automated Power Exchange
requirements for purchasing power in California.

On June 10, 2000 a bond for $100,000 was obtained from Cascade Surety and
Bonding, Inc. to satisfy the CPUC.

As of December 31, 2000, the Company had negative working capital of
approximately $649,000. The Company is currently seeking sources of outside
financing in order to continue its operations. No assurance can be given that
such financing will become available.

Cash balance as of 12/31/00 was approximately $144,000.

INFLATION

The rate of inflation does not have a material impact on the Company's results
of operations and is not expected to have much of an impact in the future. The
primary cost component in energy sold to customers subject to inflationary
pressures, is electrical power. The Company has a contract with its customers
whereby it automatically passes along these costs to the end-use customers, as
the Company incurs them.

                                       11

<PAGE>

RISK FACTORS

California is one of the first states to deregulate the electric industry to
create competition in that industry. Management believes that the Company has a
window of opportunity to develop a network dedicated to providing electricity at
competitive rates. There is no assurance, however, that the Company will be
successful in developing a network of electricity suppliers and purchasers.

The Company recently commenced its business operations with respect to the
marketing of electricity. There can be no assurance at this time that the
Company will operate profitably or that it will have adequate working capital to
meet its obligations as they become due. The Company believes that its success
will depend in large part on its ability to pool individuals and businesses
together into a common buying group to make larger, more economical purchases of
energy. The Company must implement sophisticated purchasing and billing hardware
systems to conduct its business. There is no assurance that a malfunction of or
failure to properly develop or operate one or more of its computer systems will
not have a material adverse affect on the Company.

Because of the Company's limited resources, it is unlikely that the Company will
conduct an exhaustive investigation and analysis of a power marketing
opportunity before the Company commits its capital or other resources.
Management decisions may be made without detailed feasibility studies,
independent analysis, and market surveys which the Company would likely conduct
if the Company had sufficient resources. Management decisions will be
particularly dependent on information provided by the promoter, owner, sponsor
or others associated with a particular power marketing opportunity seeking the
Company's participation.

The Company's business is speculative and dependent upon the acceptance of the
Company's products and the effectiveness of its marketing program. There can be
no assurance that the Company will be successful or that its business will earn
any revenues or profit.

The Company reflects deferred revenue from affiliated distributors from the sale
of geographic territories in California to independent affiliated and
unaffiliated marketing companies in consideration for a single one-time payment.
The Company also expects to earn revenues by selling power to the distributors'
customers at a profit. The deferred revenue on the financial statements
represents the one time initial payment of the distributors to the Company. The
Company also intends to earn revenues from the sale of its Stabilux(TM) product.
There is no assurance that the Company will earn significant revenues or that
investors will not lose their entire investment.

Since the passage of recent utility deregulation laws by the California
legislature, the market for electrical power in the State of California is
intensely competitive. The market is also intensely competitive throughout the
United States. The Company's principal competitors include large utility
companies and a myriad of other independent licensed purchasers and sellers of
electrical power. These competitors have longer operating histories, greater
name recognition, larger installed customer bases, and substantially greater
financial, technical, and marketing resources than the Company. The Company
believes that the principal factors affecting competition in its market include
name recognition, the ability to aggregate customers and purchase and sell power
at a profit, the ability to attract and service customers, and the ability to
find low cost, reliable suppliers. Other than licensing requirements and the
time necessary to enter the market, there are no significant proprietary or
other barriers of entry that could keep potential competitors from providing
competing services in the Company's market. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to compete successfully in the future, or that future
competition will not have a material adverse effect on the business, operating
results, and financial condition of the Company.

To manage growth effectively, the Company will need to continue to improve its
operational, financial and management information systems and to hire, train,
motivate and manage a growing number of employees. Competition is intense for
qualified technical, marketing and management personnel. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to effectively achieve or management any
future growth, and its failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

As of the date of this filing, (August, 2001), the State of California has been
in the midst of an energy crisis; with the result being that wholesale prices
skyrocketed. Due to the "regulations" surrounding the deregulation of the energy
market, a situation was created whereby the retail (consumer) prices were fixed,
but wholesale prices fluctuated with the market. With the prospects of
"guaranteed" losses, the Company exercised its right to move the customer base
back to the respective utilities until such time that the market stabilizes at a
level where the providers of energy can make a profit. We expect this to occur
during the second half of 2001, but the Company will hold off until there is
assurance that this regulatory situation has been rectified.

                                       12

<PAGE>

Item 7. Consolidated Financial Statements.
------------------------------------------


                          Independent Auditors' Report



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
PowerSource Corporation
Los Angeles, California


We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of PowerSource Corporation as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of PowerSource Corporation as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. The Company incurred a net loss of
$626,025 for the year ended December 31, 2000 and as of December 31, 2000 had a
working capital deficiency of $648,978 and has had limited revenues to date. As
a result of these and other factors, there is substantial doubt as to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty. Management's plans with regard to these matters are discussed in
note 2 to the financial statements.




                                                    Pannell Kerr Forster
Los Angeles, California                             Certified Public Accountants
June 14, 2001                                       A Professional Corporation


                                       13
<PAGE>
<TABLE>

                                       POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

                                     Consolidated Balance Sheets

                                               Assets
<CAPTION>
                                                                           December 31,
                                                                       ------------------
                                                                      2000              1999
                                                                  ------------      ------------
<S>                                                               <C>               <C>
Current assets
     Cash                                                         $   143,651       $     1,408
     Accounts receivable (net allowance for doubtful
      accounts of $192,569 for 2000 and $0 for 1999)                  348,028            17,345
     Prepaid expenses                                                  12,411                --
                                                                  ------------      ------------
                  Total current assets                                504,090            18,753
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Property and equipment, net                                            41,792            55,937
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Other assets
     Notes receivable - related parties                                30,000                 -
     Investments                                                       38,375            13,375
     Deposits                                                           1,774             1,774
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Total assets                                                      $   616,031       $    89,839
                                                                  ============      ============

                      Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit

Current liabilities
     Accounts payable and accrued expenses                        $   804,616       $   129,938
     Accrued wages                                                     97,453           802,133
     Interest payable                                                  24,411            10,000
     Income taxes payable                                                 800               800
     Notes payable (in default at December 31, 2000)                  210,000            65,700
     Current portion of capitalized lease obligation                   15,788            14,959
                                                                  ------------      ------------
                  Total current liabilities                         1,153,068         1,023,530
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Capitalized lease obligation, net of current portion                   22,292            39,959
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Accrued wages, net of current portion                                 704,055                --
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Deferred revenue                                                      510,860           335,775
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' deficit
     Preferred stock, par value $100, 10,000,000 authorized,
      5,350 shares issued and outstanding                              13,375            13,375
     Common stock, par value $.001, 40,000,000 shares
      authorized, 6,147,008  and 5,661,069 shares issued
      and outstanding                                                   6,147             5,661
     Paid-in capital in excess of par value                           925,240           764,520
     Accumulated deficit                                           (2,719,006)       (2,092,981)
                                                                  ------------      ------------
                  Total stockholders' deficit                      (1,774,244)       (1,309,425)
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit                       $   616,031       $    89,839
                                                                  ============      ============
</TABLE>

See notes to consolidated financial statements

                                                 14

<PAGE>
<TABLE>

                                  POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

                           Consolidated Statements of Operations
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Years Ended
                                                                  December 31,
                                                               -----------------
                                                             2000              1999
                                                         ------------      ------------
<S>                                                      <C>               <C>
Revenues
     Electricity sales                                   $ 1,597,689       $    18,408
     Cost of electricity sales                               946,089            14,676
                                                         ------------      ------------
                  Gross margin on electricity sales          651,600             3,732

     Sale of marketing territory                             210,000                --
                                                         ------------      ------------
                                                             861,600             3,732
                                                         ------------      ------------

Expenses
     Selling expenses                                        263,862            49,391
     General and administrative expenses                   1,192,755         1,492,040
                                                         ------------      ------------
                  Total expenses                           1,456,617         1,541,431
                                                         ------------      ------------

Loss from operations                                        (595,017)       (1,537,699)

Other expense
     Interest expense                                        (31,008)          (11,083)
                                                         ------------      ------------

Loss before provision for income taxes                      (626,025)       (1,548,782)

Provision for income taxes                                         -               800
                                                         ------------      ------------

Net loss                                                 $  (626,025)      $(1,549,582)
                                                         ------------      ------------

Loss per common share                                    $      (.10)      $      (.28)
                                                         ------------      ------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                        6,076,167         5,508,481
                                                         ------------      ------------
</TABLE>

See notes to consolidated financial statements

                                            15

<PAGE>
<TABLE>

                                                 POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

                               Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit
                                     For the Years Ended December 31, 2000 and 1999
<CAPTION>

                                                                           Paid-in
                                                Common Stock              Capital in
                           Preferred        --------------------          Excess of       Accumulated
                             Stock           Shares       Amount          Par Value          Deficit             Total
                         -------------      ---------     ------          ---------       ------------           ------
<S>                           <C>           <C>           <C>              <C>            <C>                  <C>
Balance on
 December 31, 1998            $13,375       5,408,161     $5,408           $403,781       $  (543,399)         $  (120,835)

Sale of shares
 for cash                          -          103,608        104            258,916                -               259,020

Issuance of shares
 for consulting
 services                          -          149,300        149            101,823                -               101,972

Net loss                           -               -          -                  -         (1,549,582)          (1,549,582)
                              --------      ----------    -------          ---------      ------------         ------------

Balance on
 December 31, 1999             13,375       5,661,069      5,661            764,520        (2,092,981)          (1,309,425)

Sale of shares
 for cash                          -          219,511        220             53,286                -                53,506

Debt and district
 Conversions                       -          266,428        266            107,434                -               107,700

Net loss                           -               -          -                  -           (626,025)            (626,025)
                              --------      ----------    -------          ---------      ------------         ------------

Balance on
 December 31, 2000            $13,375       6,147,008     $6,147           $925,240       $(2,719,006)         $(1,774,244)
                              ========      ==========    =======          =========      ============         ============
</TABLE>

See notes to consolidated financial statements

                                                           16

<PAGE>
<TABLE>

                                       POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

                                Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
<CAPTION>

                                                                           Years Ended
                                                                           December 31,
                                                                       -------------------
                                                                      2000             1999
                                                                  ------------      ------------
<S>                                                               <C>               <C>
Cash flows from operating activities
     Net loss                                                     $  (626,025)      $(1,549,582)
     Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
      used by operating activities
         Depreciation                                                  14,145            15,268
         Shares issued for payment of consulting services                   -           101,972
         Provision for Doubtful Accounts                              192,569                 -
         Changes in operating assets and liabilities
              Accounts receivable, net                               (523,252)          (17,345)
              Notes receivable                                        (30,000)                -
              Prepaid expenses                                        (12,411)                -
              Deposits                                                      -            (1,774)
              Accounts payable and accrued expenses                   674,678            93,911
              Accrued wages                                              (625)          801,591
              Interest payable                                         24,411             4,400
              Deferred revenue                                        207,085           325,275
                                                                  ------------      ------------
                  Net cash used by operating activities               (79,425)         (226,284)
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Cash flows from investing activities
     Investments in related party                                     (25,000)                -
                                                                  ------------      ------------
                  Cash used by investing activities                   (25,000)                -
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Cash flows from financing activities
     Payments on notes payable and capital lease obligations          (16,838)          (31,948)
     Proceeds from notes payable                                      210,000                 -
     Issuance of common stock                                          53,506           259,020
                                                                  ------------      ------------
                  Net cash provided by financing activities           246,668           227,072
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Net increase in cash                                                  142,243               788

Cash - beginning of the year                                            1,408               620
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Cash - end of year                                                $   143,651       $     1,408
                                                                  ------------      ------------

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
     Cash paid for income tax payments                            $         -       $       800
                                                                  ------------      ------------

     Cash paid for interest payments                              $     6,597       $     6,683
                                                                  ------------      ------------
</TABLE>

Supplementary disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activity:

     During the year ended December 31, 2000, $75,700 of a note payable and
     related accrued interest were converted into 221,428 shares of common stock
     (see note 8). In addition, deferred revenues of $32,000 resulting from the
     sale of marketing territories were converted into 45,000 shares of common
     stock (see note 3).

     In 1999, the Company capitalized leased assets and recorded an offsetting
     capital lease obligation for $62,565.

See notes to consolidated financial statements

                                       17

<PAGE>

                             POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

                   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
                           December 31, 2000 and 1999

Note 1 - The Company
--------------------

Reporting entity
----------------

PowerSource Corporation (a Nevada Corporation) was originally formed in March of
1990. PowerSource Corporation is a registered electric service provider and
through the assistance of certain other companies, has procured permits to
provide electric service to residential, commercial and industrial customers
located in the state of California. GreenView Energy, Inc. is a wholly-owned
subsidiary formed by PowerSource on November 2, 2000. Through December 31, 2000,
GreenView Energy, Inc. had no activity.

         Business
         --------

         PowerSource has two primary products: PowerGreen 100 (a 100% renewable
         energy service) and PowerGreen 25 (a low-priced product for commercial
         customers). PowerGreen 100 is the primary product and maintains a
         higher gross margin.

         The other product, PowerGreen 25, will be offered selectively to major
         organizations. This product is used for publicity reasons and to
         maintain a low-cost option that will likely produce greater profit
         margins in the future. (Beyond the year 2003) No sales of the
         PowerGreen 25 product have been attempted to date.

         California is one of the first states to deregulate the electric
         industry to create competition in that industry. Management believes
         that the Company has a window of opportunity to develop a network
         dedicated to providing electricity at competitive rates. There is no
         assurance, however, that the Company will be successful in developing a
         network of electricity suppliers and purchasers.

         The Company recently commenced its business operations with respect to
         the marketing of electricity. There can be no assurance at this time
         that the Company will operate profitably or that it will have adequate
         working capital to meet its obligations as they become due. The Company
         believes that its success will depend in large part on its ability to
         pool individuals and businesses together into a common buying group to
         make larger, more economical purchases of energy. The Company must
         implement sophisticated purchasing and billing hardware systems to
         conduct its business. There is no assurance that a malfunction of or
         failure to properly develop or operate one or more of its computer
         systems will not have a material adverse affect on the Company.

         Because of the Company's limited resources, it is unlikely that the
         Company will conduct an exhaustive investigation and analysis of a
         power marketing opportunity before the Company commits its capital or
         other resources. Management decisions may be made without detailed
         feasibility studies, independent analysis, and market surveys which the
         Company would likely conduct if the Company had sufficient resources.
         Management decisions will be particularly dependent on information
         provided by the promoter, owner, sponsor or others associated with a
         particular power marketing opportunity seeking the Company's
         participation.

         The Company's business is speculative and dependent upon the acceptance
         of the Company's products and the effectiveness of its marketing
         program. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful
         or that its business will earn any revenues or profit.

         The Company reflects deferred revenue from affiliated distributors from
         the sale of geographic territories in California to independent
         affiliated and unaffiliated marketing companies in consideration for a
         single one time payment. The Company also expects to earn revenues by
         selling power to the distributors' customers at a profit. The deferred
         revenue on the Company's financial statements represent the one time
         initial payment of the distributors to the Company. There is no
         assurance that the Company will earn significant revenues or that
         investors will not lose their entire investment.

                                       18

<PAGE>

                             POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

             Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
                           December 31, 2000 and 1999

Note 1 - The Company (continued)
-------------------------------

         Business (continued)
         -------------------

         Since the passage of recent utility deregulation laws by the California
         legislature, the market for electrical power in the State of California
         is intensely competitive. The market is also intensely competitive
         throughout the United States. The Company's principal competitors
         include large utility companies and a myriad of other independent
         licensed purchasers and sellers of electrical power. These competitors
         have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger
         installed customer bases, and substantially greater financial,
         technical, and marketing resources than the Company. The Company
         believes that the principal factors affecting competition in its market
         include name recognition, the ability to aggregate customers and
         purchase and sell power at a profit, the ability to attract and service
         customers, and the ability to find low cost, reliable suppliers. Other
         than licensing requirements and the time necessary to enter the market,
         there are no significant proprietary or other barriers of entry that
         could keep potential competitors from providing competing services in
         the Company's market. There can be no assurance that the Company will
         be able to compete successfully in the future, or that future
         competition will not have a material adverse effect on the business,
         operating results, and financial condition of the Company.

         To manage growth effectively, the Company will need to continue to
         improve its operational, financial and management information systems
         and to hire, train, motivate and manage a growing number of employees.
         Competition is intense for qualified technical, marketing and
         management personnel. There can be no assurance that the Company will
         be able to effectively achieve or management any future growth, and its
         failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
         financial condition and results of operations.

         The State of California has been in the midst of an energy crisis, with
         the result being that wholesale prices skyrocketed. Due to the
         "regulations" surrounding the deregulation of the energy market, a
         situation was created whereby the retail (consumer) prices were fixed,
         but wholesale prices fluctuated with the market. With the prospects of
         "guaranteed" losses, the Company exercised its right to move the
         customer base back to the respective utilities until such time that the
         market stabilizes at a level where the providers of energy can make a
         profit. The Company expects this to occur during the second half of
         2001, but will hold off until there is assurance that this regulatory
         situation has been rectified.

         GreenView Energy, Inc. (GreenView) was formed to expand the Company's
         positioning in the energy market place. GreenView focuses on energy
         efficiency products for industrial, commercial and governmental
         applications.

         GreenView's flagship product is Stabilux(TM), a voltage regulator that
         stabilizes voltage and manages lighting for various applications.
         Stabilux(TM) is a proven technology, developed by the Italian
         manufacturer IREM S.p.A., and is in use throughout Europe.

         GreenView has obtained, through EconoWatt Corporation, the exclusive
         rights to market, sell, service and promote Stabilux(TM) in the United
         States. GreenView is developing a network of dealerships and
         distributorships to market, sell, install and service the Stabilux(TM)
         units.

         Principal markets for Stabilux(TM) include medium to large lighting
         applications where voltage stabilization and/or energy management is
         important. Stabilux(TM) can be used with all lamp types and ballasts
         found in commercial, industrial, and government facilities.

                                       19

<PAGE>

                             POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

             Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
                           December 31, 2000 and 1999

Note 1 - The Company (continued)
-------------------------------

         Business (continued)
         -------------------

         GreenView's authorized dealers and distributors are companies and
         individuals that currently provide energy management and electrical
         retrofitting services to GreenView's target market.

         Stabilux(TM) has only one competitor in the United States, Electric
         City (OTC: ELC) from Illinois. Electric City has a similar unit,
         however it differs in numerous operational features that are important
         in stabilizing voltages for proper lighting applications. Stabilux(TM)
         is ETL Listed for the U.S. market and is ISO 9001 compliant.
         Stabilux(TM) is certified under ISO 14001, which identifies products
         that are produced using environmentally safe and sound standards.

Note 2 - Basis of presentation and going concern
------------------------------------------------

The accompanying financial statements of the Company have been prepared on the
basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets
and satisfaction of liabilities, except as otherwise disclosed, in the normal
course of business. However, as a result of the Company's losses from operations
and working capital deficiency to service its debt obligations, such realization
of assets and liquidation of liabilities is subject to significant
uncertainties. Further, the Company's ability to continue as a going concern is
dependent upon obtaining other sources of financing, achievement of profitable
operations and the ability to generate sufficient cash from operations. The
Company intends to focus its efforts on the marketing of electricity. The
financial statements do not include any adjustment to reflect the possible
future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amount
and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of
the Company to continue as a going concern.

                                       20
<PAGE>

                             POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

             Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
                           December 31, 2000 and 1999

Note 3 - Summary of significant accounting policies
---------------------------------------------------

Cash flows
----------

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all cash
investments and related deposits purchased with a maturity of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.

Use of estimates
----------------

Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements.
Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and reported
revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Property and equipment
----------------------

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided principally
on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets of
five years.

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred,
while renewals and betterment are capitalized.

Revenue recognition
-------------------

Revenue from sales of marketing territories is deferred until such time as the
specified purchase price is received and any options to exchange interests in
the related limited liability partnerships for equity interests in the Company
have expired or have been waived by the option holder. Revenue is also earned as
electric services are provided to customers.

Income taxes
------------

The Company recognizes the tax effect of transactions in the year in which such
transactions enter into determination of net income regardless of when they are
reported for tax purposes. The Company has adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109 (Accounting for Income Taxes) in computing
deferred income taxes. Deferred income taxes, when shown, result primarily from
different depreciation methods for book and tax purposes.

Earnings (loss) per share
-------------------------

Earnings (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted outstanding common
shares and equivalents during the period. Common share equivalents are not
included in the calculation for periods when loss from operations are incurred
as the effect would be antidilutive, see note 11.

Other comprehensive income
--------------------------

The Company has no material components of other comprehensive income (loss) and,
accordingly, net loss is equal to comprehensive loss for all periods presented.

                                       21
<PAGE>

                             POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

             Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
                           December 31, 2000 and 1999

Note 3 - Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
--------------------------------------------------------------

Fair value of financial instruments
-----------------------------------

The Company's cash, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable and
accrued expenses and notes payable represent financial instruments. The carrying
value of these financial instruments is a reasonable approximation of their fair
value.

Business segments
-----------------

Through December 31, 2000, the Company operates in one reportable segment:
delivering electricity services to residential and commercial customers in
Southern California.

Note 4 - Surety Bonds
---------------------

On March 8, 2000, PowerSource obtained a surety bond with Cascade Surety and
Bonding, Inc. in the amount of $1.5 million to satisfy Automated Power Exchange
requirements for purchasing power in California.

On June 10, 2000 a bond for $100,000 was obtained from Cascade Surety and
Bonding, Inc. to satisfy the CPUC.

Note 5 - Notes receivable
-------------------------

As of December 31, 2000, there were three notes receivable from officers
totaling $30,000 issued at interest rates of 5% each. Principal and interest are
due and payable, at maturity, on May 2003.

Note 6 - Property and equipment
-------------------------------

Property and equipment consist of the following:

                                                          December 31
                                                          -----------
                                                      2000           1999
                                                   ---------        ---------

         Furniture and fixtures                    $  1,906         $  1,906
         Office equipment                            71,323           71,323
                                                   ---------        ---------
                                                     73,229           73,229
         Less: Accumulated depreciation             (31,437)         (17,292)
                                                   ---------        ---------

                                                   $ 41,792         $ 55,937
                                                   =========        =========

Note 7 - Investments
--------------------

Investments consists of an investment in oil and gas properties and an
investment in EHG Technology, LLC, a related party.

In February 1998, PowerSource Ltd. (a Nevada Corporation) entered into a plan of
reorganization with American Gas Corporation (a Nevada Corporation), then a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Kensington International Holding Corporation AKA The
Kensington Company, Inc. (a Minnesota Corporation and referred to hereinafter as
"Kensington"), a fully reporting public company. Kensington retained fifteen
(15%) percent (200,000 shares of the then issued common stock) and was granted
5,350 shares of American Gas Corporation's series A, $100 par value, preferred
stock. The series A preferred stock is convertible into common stock, in five
years, at $10 per share.

                                       22

<PAGE>

                             POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

             Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
                           December 31, 2000 and 1999

Note 7 - Investments (continued)
-------------------------------

On May 12, 1998, American Gas Corporation's name was changed to PowerSource
Corporation and became the Company. The acquisition was accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting. As of the date of acquisition, the Company has
recorded an investment in oil and gas properties of $13,375 based upon the fair
value of the 5,350 preferred shares issued to Kensington.

Realization of the Company's investment in the oil and gas properties is
contingent upon the Company's investment of about $100,000 as stated below in
note 9, commitments. The Company has not invested any funds and has not entered
into any contract for the proposed improvement.

During 2000, the company purchased 250,000 shares of Class A membership interest
in EHG Technology, LLC for $25,000.

Note 8 - Notes payable and capital lease obligation
---------------------------------------------------

During 1999, notes payable consisted of an unsecured note payable to Senator
Associates, Ltd. with interest at 7% per annum. At December 31, 1999, the
principal balance and accrued interest outstanding was $65,700 and $10,000,
respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company issued
221,428 shares of its common stock as settlement of the note payable and accrued
interest.

During 2000, the Company entered into a note payable agreement to borrow
$210,000 with interest at 15%. The outstanding principal balance and unpaid
accrued interest was due in August 2000. The holder of the note may elect to
receive payment of all principal and interest due by converting the note into
300,000 shares of the Company's common stock. As of December 31, 2000, the
Company has not repaid the note, and the note holder has not called for
repayment or elected to convert the note into shares of the Company's common
stock. At December 31, 2000, accrued interest totaled $24,411. In accordance
with the terms of the note agreement, the Company is in default. Accordingly,
the principal and accrued interest are reflected as current liabilities in the
accompanying balance sheet.

During 2000 and 1999, capital lease obligation consisted of a capital lease due
in 48 monthly installments of $1,774, including principal and interest, with
interest at 13.7%.

Future minimum lease payments at December 31, 2000 are as follows:

                  Year                                     Amount
                  ----                                     ------

                  2001                                   $ 21,289
                  2002                                     21,289
                  2003                                      3,548
                                                         --------
                  Total future minimum
                   lease payments                          46,126
                  Less amount representing
                   interest                                 8,046
                                                         --------

                  Present value of future
                   minimum lease payments                $ 38,080
                                                         --------

                                       23
<PAGE>

                             POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

             Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
                           December 31, 2000 and 1999

Note 9 - Commitments
--------------------

During the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, the Company had a line of
credit from a financial institution with a $3,000,000 limit. Funds are to be
made available at a rate of 70% of the Company's trade receivables. The line of
credit expired in October 2000. As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, there were no
amounts due on the line of credit.

During 1999, the Company's office lease agreement extended through March 31,
2000, with monthly payments of $2,104. Effective August 2000, the Company signed
a one year extension agreement, with monthly payments of $2,348. The lease has
been further extended through July 2002. Rent expense for the years ended
December 31, 2000 and 1999 was $33,548 and $25,739, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2000 are $28,176 in 2001 and
$16,436 in 2002 for an aggregate of $44,612.

In the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, as part of the reorganization plan
with American Gas Corporation (see note 7), the Company committed to pay a
minimum fee or dividend to Kensington in the amount of $3,000 a month. In
addition, the Company committed to pay the president of Kensington $3,000 a
month for consulting fees. As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, no payments have
been made and the expiration dates of the commitments to pay the monthly fees
have not been determined. The accrued liabilities are reflected in the current
liability portion of the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Note 10 - Provision for income taxes
------------------------------------

At December 31, 2000, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for
Federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $3,000,000 and
$1,500,000, respectively, which expire through 2015 and 2005, respectively.

Under SFAS 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes", the Company utilizes the liability
method of accounting for income taxes. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a
deferred tax benefit of approximately $800,000. The Company recorded a valuation
account to fully offset the deferred tax benefit due to uncertainty of the
realization of this benefit.

                                       24
<PAGE>

                             POWERSOURCE CORPORATION

             Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
                           December 31, 2000 and 1999

Note 11 - Common stock options and warrants
-------------------------------------------

The Company has not adopted a stock option plan under which employees (including
officers), nonemployees directors, and independent consultants may be granted
options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock.

During 1999, the Company recorded $1,993,192 in compensation expense to four of
the Company's officers by issuing 2,546,828 shares of the Company's common
stock. On July 3, 2000, all of these shares were rescinded and the officers were
issued a total of 2,546,850 common stock options to be exercised at $.001 per
share and expire on July 3, 2010. The fair market value of the Company stock at
July 3, 2000 was deemed to be $.30 a share. As a consequence, the Company's
December 31, 2000 and 1999 financial statements includes $761,508 as wages
payable and salaries expense for the stock options issued the four officers on
July 3, 2000. During the year, certain officers elected to waive their right to
exercise their options before January 2, 2002. Additionally, during the year,
the Company granted a total of 242,772 common stock options exercisable at $.001
per share which expire in July 2010. As of December 31, 2000, no options were
exercised or cancelled.

Stock warrant activity is summarized as follows:

                                                    Weighted
                                                    Average
                                                    Number          Exercise
                                                    of Shares       Price
                                                    ---------       -----

         Outstanding, December 31, 1998             150,000           $ .10
              Granted                                51,650            3.50
              Exercised                                   -              -
              Expired                               (51,650)           3.50
                                                   ---------          -----

         Outstanding, December 31, 1999             150,000             .10

              Granted                                     -              -
              Exercised                                   -              -
              Expired                              (150,000)            .10
                                                   ---------          -----

         Outstanding, December 31, 2000                   _              -

Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial Disclosure.
---------------------

None.

                                       25
<PAGE>

                                    PART III.

Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
--------------------------------------

     Our directors and executive officers are as follows:

     Name                        Age                   Position
     ----                        ---                   --------

     Illya Bond                  50         Chief Executive Officer and Director

     Roman Gordon                49         Chairman of the Board of Directors

     E. Douglas Mitchell         53         President and Director

     Mark Haggerty               50         Director

Illya Bond, age 50, has been the Chief Executive Officer, and a director of the
Company since its name change in May 1998. Mr. Bond has over 25 years experience
in the investment-banking industry. He has participated in the underwriting of
over $1 billion in real estate, alternative energy, and synfuel projects;
working through the nation's largest broker/dealer firms, including Merrill
Lynch and Dean Witter. Additionally, Mr. Bond assisted in the formation and
capitalization of several domestic banks, savings and loans, and insurance
companies, taking several of these firms public in the process, through initial
public offerings and mergers. Mr. Bond participated in the following energy
projects either as corporate developer, sponsor, or general partner: 7MW
Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant located in Carissa Plains, California; two of the
world's largest ethanol generating plants located in the States of Iowa
(5,000,000 gallons per month) and Nebraska (10,000,000 gallons per month); and
Offshore Insurance Company (domiciled in New Zealand) specializing in property
and casualty insurance risks. Mr. Bond received his Bachelors Degree from the
University of California, Los Angeles.

Roman Gordon, age 49, has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Company since its name change in May 1998. Mr. Gordon is also the President of
Advanced Legal Management, a principal stockholder in the Company. Mr. Gordon
has over 15 years combined experience in energy risk management and business
management. Mr. Gordon was the Vice-President of Operations for Express Oil
Company where he participated in oil market evaluation and environmental
compliance. Previously, Mr. Gordon was the Chief Executive Officer of BioSystem,
Inc. where he developed and implemented marketing plans and a comprehensive and
customized Ayurvedic health program for national and international markets. From
1992 until 1994, Mr. Gordon was an officer of America Pacific Insurance Company
where he was responsible for managing an advertising budget, building
relationships with surplus line brokers, product development, generation of
marketing plans, and growth initiatives. Mr. Gordon has experience in the fields
of planning, development, and operations of the bulk power systems, as well as
planning and analytical studies. He has performed many duties, including but not
limited to management, marketing, training, operations and administration. Mr.
Gordon received his bachelor degree in 1974 from Politechnical University in
Civil Engineering.

Mark Haggerty, age 50, has been a director of the Company since its name Change
in May 1998. Mr. Haggerty has been in the private practice of law since 1973 in
the areas of municipal bonds, utilities, securities, and business law. From 1973
through 1985, Mr. Haggerty was a vice president and director of a twelve-person
law firm. From 1987 through 1993, Mr. Haggerty owned his own firm consulting for
Johnson Controls, Bull HN, & Peoples Gas of Chicago on energy and co-generation
projects. The energy projects included electrical and gas energy savings
programs for customers such as the Chicago Housing Authority and Sara Lee foods.
In 1993, Mr. Haggerty became the President of the Kensington, a public energy
Company. Since 1995, Mr. Haggerty has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of American Gas Corporation, a former subsidiary of Kensington. Mr. Haggerty
received his Juris Doctorate from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1973
and his Bachelors of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota in 1970. Mr.
Haggerty is licensed as an attorney and has Series 7 and 63 NASD securities
license.

                                       26
<PAGE>

E. Douglas Mitchell, age 53, has been the President of the Company since March
1999. He has over twenty years of experience working for electric utility
Providers such as Keystone Energy. His experience includes supervising a group
of professionals that purchased power supplies for San Diego Gas & Electric and
was also a Manager of New Business Development at Enova Energy. He has written
and presented several publications on energy and regulatory issues both
nationally and internationally. Mr. Mitchell, as a Manager of Regulatory Policy,
actively promoted the electric industry to electric utility regulators and
legislators in eight western states.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Executive Utility Committee
The Executive Utility Committee is comprised of high-level professionals
experienced in the power industry, computer industry, legal industry,
international business, and engineering, who will render advice to the Company
from time to time upon the request of the Company's Board of Directors.

         Illya Goldin                       Technical Support Supervisor

         Ahmad Moradi                       Computer Service Engineer

         Michael Y. Vaiman                  Load Forecasting

Illya Goldin, heads the Company's technical support department. He has over 15
years of experience in the electrical industry and is a licensed electrical
contractor in the State of California. Mr. Goldin's responsibilities include the
evaluation and provision of metering technology, communication of real time
metering information, site diagnostics to identify and prevent service problems,
innovative cost-of-service analysis, and power quality monitoring.

Ahmad Moradi, received his Bachelors Degree at Florida Atlantic University (FAU)
in engineering and international business. In 1989, he received his Ph.D. in
Management Information Systems from LaSalla University in Louisiana. During the
past seven years, Dr. Moradi has been a director, officer, and consultant of a
several companies. Currently, Dr. Moradi is the President of G4, Inc., a
consulting firm, and a director of Dunhil-Medinet-Worldwide, Inc. and several
other public companies. He is also the owner and shareholder of several private
and public companies.

Michael Y. Vaiman, is the President and principal engineer of V&R Company, an
energy systems research Company. Dr. Vaiman has published more than 65 articles
devoted to issues of power system stability and control. He has also developed
several software applications. Dr. Vaiman received his Masters in Electrical
Engineering from Kaunas Polytechnic University in 1961, his Ph.D. in electrical
engineering from Moscow University of Transportation Engineering in 1969, and
his Doctor of Technical Sciences from St. Petersburg Polytechnic University in
1986.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The following officers, directors, or beneficial owners of more than 10% of
the Company's common stock failed to file on a timely basis reports required
by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the most recent fiscal year.

Roman Gordon, the Company's Chairman did not file Form 3 to report his initial
security holdings and has not filed Form 4 or Form 5 to report changes to such
holdings.

Illya Bond, the Company's CEO did not file Form 3 to report his initial security
holdings and has not filed Form 4 or Form 5 to report changes to such holdings.

E. Douglas Mitchell, the Company's President did not file Form 3 to report his
initial security holdings and has not filed Form 4 or Form 5 to report changes
to such holdings.

Mark Haggerty, a Director of the Company did not file Form 3 to report his
initial security holdings and has not filed Form 4 or Form 5 to report changes
to such holdings.

Advanced Legal Management, Inc., a beneficial owner of more than 10% of the
Company's common stock did not file Form 3 to report its initial security
holdings and has not filed Form 4 or Form 5 to report changes to such holdings.

Magnum Real Estate, Inc, a beneficial owner of more than 10% of the
Company's common stock did not file Form 3 to report its initial security
holdings and has not filed Form 4 or Form 5 to report changes to such holdings.

Kensington International Holding Corp., a beneficial owner of more than 10%
of the Company's common stock and 100% of the Company's preferred stock,
did not file Form 3 to report its initial security holdings and has not filed
Form 4 or Form 5 to report changes to such holdings.

Item 10. Executive Compensation
-------------------------------

                             Executive Compensation

         Name                   Position                            Salary
         -----------------------------------------------------------------------

         Illya Bond             Chief Executive Officer             $120,000

         E. Douglas Mitchell    President                           $100,000

         Roman Gordon           Chairman of the Board               $120,000

                                       27
<PAGE>

Directors receive no cash compensation for their services to the Company as
directors, but are reimbursed for expenses actually incurred in connection with
attending meetings of the Board of Directors, and may receive a cash fee for
attending meetings. The Company plans to establish a stock incentive program for
the directors, executive officers, employees and key consultants of the Company.
The Company anticipates that it will set aside approximately 30% of the issued
and outstanding Common Stock of the Company for the stock incentive program.

Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table sets forth the certain information as of June 30, 2001 with
respect to the beneficial ownership of our common and preferred stock by (1)
each person known to us to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of the
outstanding shares of our common stock, (2) each of our directors, (3) each
named officer, and (4) all our directors and executive officers as a group.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  Name                                            Amount and
                  of                                              Nature of
                  Beneficial                                      Beneficial
Title of Class    Owner                                           Owner              % of Class
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>               <C>                                             <C>                <C>
Common Stock      German Teiltelbaum (2) ........................ 1,446,452            15.0%

Common Stock      Advanced Legal Management Inc.(3) .............   927,001             9.7%

Common Stock      Magnum Real Estate, Inc.(4) ...................   822,001             8.6%

Common Stock      Blue Grass Management and Operating Co (5) ....   385,486             4.0%

Common Stock      Illya Bond (6) ................................   649,472             6.8%

Common Stock      Roman Gordon (7) ..............................   666,902             7.0%

Common Stock      E. Douglas Mitchell (8) .......................   581,026             6.1%

Common Stock      Mark Haggerty (1)(5) ..........................     1,312              *

Common Stock      Kensington International Holding Corp (1) .....   265,328             2.8%
                                                                 -----------         -------

Common Stock      Directors and officers as a group ............. 4,033,200            42.1%

Preferred Stock   Kensington International Holding Corp .........     5,350           100.0%

*  Less than 1%.

</TABLE>

(1) Mark Haggerty, 8325 Northwood Parkway, New Hope, Minneapolis, MN 55426, a
director of the Company, is the President of Kensington. The Company issued
150,000 Class A Warrants to Kensington to purchase 150,000 shares of the
Company's Common Stock for a purchase price of $.10 per share, exercisable at
any time until February 12, 2001. The shares indicated on the table include the
shares issuable upon the exercise of the Class A Warrants.

(2) German Teiltelbaum, 4139 Via Marina, #805, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292, is a
former director, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company. This
amount includes 649,450 shares which Mr. Teiltelbaum may purchase upon the
exercise of certain stock options.

(3) Roman Gordon, 3660 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1104, Los Angeles, CA 90010, is
Chairman of the Board of the Company, and is the President of Advanced Legal
Management Company, Inc.

(4) Illya Bond, 3660 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1104, Los Angeles, CA 90010, the Chief
Executive Officer and a director of the Company, is the President of Magnum Real
Estate, Inc.

(5) Mark Haggerty is President of Blue Grass Management and Operating Co. This
amount includes 242,772 shares which Mr. Haggerty may purchase upon the exercise
of certain stock options. He is also the president of Kensington International
Holding Company.

(6) Illya Bond is the Company's Chief Executive Officer. This amount consists of
options for 649,472 shares which Mr. Bond may purchase at his discretion after
July 3, 2001.

(7) Roman Gordon is the Company's Chairman. This amount consists of options for
666,902 shares which Mr. Gordon may purchase at his discretion after July 3,
2001.

(8) E. Douglas Mitchell is the Company's President. This amount consists of
options for 581,026 shares which Mr. Mitchell may purchase at his discretion
after July 3, 2001.

SOLE INVESTOR POWER

As of the date of this filing, each of the Company's principal stockholders has
sole investment power and sole voting power.

                                       28
<PAGE>

Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
-------------------------------------------------------

Advanced Legal Management Company, Inc., a principal stockholder of PowerSource,
is a consulting and management services firm for small business clients.
Advanced Legal Management does not employ any attorneys or provide any legal
services for its clients. Advanced Legal Management is wholly-owned by Roman
Gordon.

Magnum Real Estate, Inc., a principal stockholder of PowerSource, is a real
estate consulting and management services firm. Magnum Real Estate, Inc. is
wholly-owned by Illya Bond.

During 2000, the Company had a note receivable from Roman Gordon, the Company's
Chairman, in the amount of $10,000. Additionally, 666,902 shares of common stock
held by Roman Gordon were converted to options to purchase 666,902 common stock
shares with an exercise price of $.001.

During 2000, the Company had a note receivable from Illya Bond, the Company's
Chief Executive Officer, in the amount of $10,000. Additionally, 649,472 shares
of common stock held by Illya Bond were converted to options to purchase 649,472
common stock shares with an exercise price of $.001.

During 2000, the Company had a note receivable from E. Douglas Mitchell, the
Company's President, in the amount of $10,000. Additionally, 581,026 shares of
common stock held by E. Douglas Mitchell were converted to options to purchase
581,026 common stock shares with an exercise price of $.001.

During 2000, 242,772 shares of common stock held by Blue Grass Management, a
beneficial owner of the Company, were converted to options to purchase 242,772
common stock shares with an exercise price of $.001.

During 2000, 649,450 shares of common stock held by German Teitelbaum, a
beneficial owner of the Company, were converted to options to purchase 649,450
common stock shares with an exercise price of $.001.

Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
------------------------------------------

         (a)      The following documents are filed as part of this Annual
                  Report on Form 10-KSB:

(1) Financial Statements (included in Item 8):

                  -        Independent Auditors' Report

                  -        Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000
                           and 1999

                  -        Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years
                           ended December 31, 2000 and 1999

                  -        Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders'
                           Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2000 and
                           1999

                  -        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years
                           ended December 31, 2000 and 1999

                  -        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(2) Exhibits

EXHIBIT
NUMBER                           DESCRIPTION
------                           -----------

3.1      Rescission and General Release of Common Shares.- German Teitelbaum
3.2      Option Agreement - German Teitelbaum
3.3      Rescission and General Release of Common Shares.- Roman Gordon
3.4      Option Agreement - Roman Gordon
3.5      Rescission and General Release of Common Shares.- Illya Bond
3.6      Option Agreement - Illya Bond
3.7      Rescission and General Release of Common Shares.- Mark Haggerty
3.8      Option Agreement - Mark Haggerty
3.9      Rescission and General Release of Common Shares.- Blue Grass Management
3.10     Option Agreement - Blue Grass Management
3.11     Rescission and General Release of Common Shares.- E. Douglas Mitchell
3.12     Option Agreement - E. Douglas Mitchell                           (2000)
3.1.1    Authorization of Appointment of Additional Directors             (2000)
3.1.2    Authorization of Appointment of Additional Officer
3.1.3    Authorization of Appointment of Additional Officer
3.1.4    Authorization of Appointment of Additional Officer
3.1.5    Authorization of Issuance of Stock
3.2.1    Hobart Building Office Lease                                     (1998)
3.3.1    Prestige Capital - Financing Agreement                           (1999)
3.4.1    Selling Agreement - Power Capital Funding Group                  (1998)
3.4.2    Telemarketing Agent Agreement - Consumer Sales Solutions         (2000)
3.4.3    Agent Agreement - Energy Wize                                    (1999)
3.4.4    Master Agent Agreement - Luis Rodriguez                          (2000)
3.4.5    Master Agent Agreement - Latino Business Solutions               (2000)
3.5.1    Employment Agreement - Roman Gordon                              (2000)
3.5.2    Employment Agreement - Illya Bond                                (2000)

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

None

                                       29
<PAGE>

Signatures
----------

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

PowerSource Corporation

By /S/ Illya Bond
   -------------------------------

Pursuant to the Requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual
Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and the capacities and on the dates indicated.


/s/ Illya Bond
---------------------------     -----------------------         ----------------
Illya Bond                      Chief Executive Officer         August 15, 2001


/s/ E. Douglas Mitchell
---------------------------     ---------------------------     ----------------
E. Douglas Mitchell             President                       August 15, 2001

================================================================================

                                       30