alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011030EN.01006103.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/61

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 1 December 2010 — Nolin v European Commission

(Case F-82/09) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Withdrawal of merit and priority points)

2011/C 30/118

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Michel Nolin (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M.J. Baquero Cruz, Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the appointing authority of 19 December 2008 concerning the withdrawal of the applicant’s merit and priority points.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Nolin to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Nolin to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 5.12.2009, p. 37.

1

---
# C_2011211EN.01000602.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/6

---

Order of the Court of 24 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from Mora Kommun — Sweden) — in the course of consideration of a complaint made by Dan Bengtsson

(Case C-344/09) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Need for a dispute and proceedings intended to lead to a decision of a judicial nature - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2011/C 211/09

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Mora Kommun

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Dan Bengtsson

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Interpretation of Council Recommendation of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz) (OJ 1999 L 199, p. 59) and the precautionary principle — Effects on health of electromagnetic radiation from base stations for wireless telecommunication — Reference levels laid down by the recommendation

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to reply to the question referred by Mora Kommun, Miljö- och hälsoskyddsnämnden (Sweden) by decision of 2 June 2009.

---

(1)  OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1742 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1742

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 1, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (S. 3307) to reauthorize child nutrition 
programs, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 of rule XXI. The bill 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against the bill are waived. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Education and Labor; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Greenland Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas  Beener,  Chief  Executive Officer, President, and Acting Chief Financial
Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C.   1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.

/s/  Thomas  Beener.
--------------------

Thomas  Beener
Chief  Executive  Officer,  President,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer

Date:  December  5,  2003
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Douglas
L. Michels, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tarantella, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Tarantella, Inc.





By:Name:  Douglas L. Michels Title:  Chief Executive Officer





I, Randall Bresee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Tarantella, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tarantella, Inc.





By:Name:  Randall Bresee Title:  Chief Financial Officer
John TRANE, petitioner, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION.

No. 16-5339.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTHONY LATERZA,

Appellant,

v.

MARK RUBENSTEIN,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1140

[November 1, 2018]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Peter D. Blanc, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502016CA001722.

Anthony Laterza, Mayo, pro se.

Reed W. Kellner of Adams Coogler, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________________

No. 01-30486

 

STAR INSURANCE CO. 

Plaintiff - Appellee

VERSUS

LIVESTOCK PRODUCERS, INC.; GEORGE RONALD STRATTON

Defendants, Appellants

 

RONNIE STRATTON, doing business as Livestock Producers, Inc.;

LIVESTOCK PRODUCERS, INC.

Plaintiff - Appellants

VERSUS

MEADOWBROOK, INC.; ET AL

Defendants

STAR INSURANCE CO.

Defendant - Appellee

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

(99-CV-2) 

___________________________________________________

November 6, 2001

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
2

PER CURIAM:

Livestock Producers, Inc. (“LPI”) and Ronnie Stratton

(“Stratton”) (collectively referred to as the “Plaintiffs”) appeal

the district court’s decision to deny their motion for leave to

file a second amended complaint. Although the parties have not

contested this court’s jurisdiction, we are under a continuing

obligation to ensure that we have jurisdiction to hear this appeal.

MCG, Inc. v. Great Western Energy Corp., 870 F.2d 170, 173 (5th

Cir. 1990). Therefore, we can raise the issue sua sponte. Id. 

 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we have jurisdiction over all “final

decisions” of the district court. However, in this case, it is not

clear whether the district court has entered a “final decision”

because it has not entered a final judgment. We therefore REMAND

this case back to the district court for further clarification. If

all claims have been ruled upon, the district court shall enter

final judgment.
II-01001

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Joseph Rykiel <joerykiel@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:17 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Joseph Rykiel

36203 King St.

Rehoboth Beach, DE 19971
IV 

House Calendar No. 15 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 218 

[Report No. 111–24] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2009 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of March 6, 2009, providing 

6 for consideration or disposition of any measure making apVerDate Nov 24 2008 01:34 Mar 06, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR218.RH HR218

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 218 RH 

1 propriations for the fiscal year 2009, and for other pur2 poses. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 15 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 218 

[Report No. 111–24] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluMARCH 5, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Steve J. LONGARIELLO, petitioner, v. AURA AT MIDTOWN/ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL, LLC.

No. 16-6529.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 21 October 2004         

authorising the United Kingdom to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 11 of the Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes

(2004/736/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (1) and in particular Article 27 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

By way of derogation from Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the United Kingdom is hereby authorised, until 31 December 2009, in the case of a supply of services consisting in the use of a motor car, where the supplier and the recipient are connected persons in the motor trade, to treat the open market value of that supply as the taxable amount.

Article 2

Article 1 shall apply only if the following conditions are met:

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Luxembourg, 21 October 2004.

For the Council

The President

G. ZALM            

----

(1)OJ L 145, 13.6.1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/66/EC (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 35).

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15303]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Correction--Notice of Inventory Completion for Native American 
Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects in the Possession of the 
Putnam Museum of History and Natural Science, Davenport, IA

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with provisions of the Native 
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 43 CFR 10.9, 
of the completion of an inventory of human remains and associated 
funerary objects in the possession of the Putnam Museum of History and 
Natural Science, Davenport, IA.
    This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's 
administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 43 CFR 10.2 (c). The 
determinations within this notice are the sole responsibility of the 
museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of these Native 
American human remains and associated funerary objects. The National 
Park Service is not responsible for the determinations within this 
notice.
    This notice corrects the list of tribes to which the human remains 
and associated funerary objects may be repatriated in the Notice of 
Inventory Completion published March 26, 1997 (Federal Register 
Document 97-7602, pages 14441-14442).
    In the sixth paragraph, the final sentence which reads 
``Repatriation of the human remains and associated funerary objects to 
the Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma may begin after that date if no additional 
claimants come forward,'' is corrected to read ``Repatriation of the 
human remains and associated funerary objects to the Iowa Tribe of 
Oklahoma; the Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; the Sac and 
Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska; and the Sac and Fox 
Nation, Oklahoma may begin after that date if no additional claimants 
come forward.''

    Dated: April 20, 2001.
John Robbins,
Assistant Director, Cultural Resources Stewardship and Partnerships.
[FR Doc. 01-15303 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-F
NUMBERS 13-16-00086-CR AND 13-16-00087-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellant,

v.

COURTNEY HAYDEN Appellee.

On appeal from 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

 

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

On February 10, 2016, this Court ordered the trial court’s proceedings in each of 

these causes stayed, pending disposition of the State’s appeals. On May 12, 2016, 

appellee Courtney Hayden filed an amended motion to partially lift the stays so that she 

may request a modification of the conditions of her pretrial bond ordered by the trial court. 

The reason offered for this request relates to Hayden’s recently secured employment.
2

The Court, having examined and fully considered Hayden’s motion, is of the 

opinion that said motion should be GRANTED. Accordingly, the stay is hereby 

PARTIALLY LIFTED for the LIMITED AND EXCLUSIVE PURPOSE of Hayden seeking 

modification of her pretrial bond conditions with the trial court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b).

Delivered and filed the

13th day of May, 2016.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>

      (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000852447
<NAME>      EUROMED INC
<MULTIPLIER>         1
<CURRENCY>           $US

<S>                  <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>       JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>         MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>      1
<CASH>               349,609
<SECURITIES>          775,437
<RECEIVABLES>        1,015,725
<ALLOWANCES>                 0
<INVENTORY>                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>      2,410,930
<PP&E>                  806,360
<DEPRECIATION>         (352,864)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>        3,381,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 1,673,510
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>          10,975
<COMMON>             23,820
<OTHER-SE>           159,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3,781,753
<SALES>              3,530,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>     3,530,795
<CGS>                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>        3,627,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>   73,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>      (225,315)
<INCOME-TAX>         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>  (225,315)
<DISCONTINUED>       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>      0
<CHANGES>            0
<NET-INCOME>         (225,315)
<EPS-BASIC>          (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>        (0.10)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
               FROM THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
               ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                   43,009
<SECURITIES>                             24,311
<RECEIVABLES>                            77,463
<ALLOWANCES>                              1,286
<INVENTORY>                              97,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        277,867
<PP&E>                                   49,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          335,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    83,070
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                    213
<OTHER-SE>                              245,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            335,813
<SALES>                                 111,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        131,934
<CGS>                                    49,846
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            67,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         30,844  <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          16,851
<INCOME-TAX>                              5,729
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      11,122
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             11,122
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             $0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                             $0.51
<FN>
<F1>  EXCLUDES SG&A AS SG&A IS PART OF 5-03(b)(4).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2191** 

DAYYAN ATTA BEY EX REL DERICK SEALEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. REX A. DAVIS , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 4:15

- cv - 00087

- MSD

- LRL )

Submitted : February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Dayyan Atta Bey ex rel Derick Sealey , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dayyan Atta Bey ex r el Derick Sealey appeals the district
court ’ s order dismis sing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) ( 2)(B) (20 12 ). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Davis , No. 4:15

- cv - 00087

- MSD

- LRL (E. D. Va. Sept. 8, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SAI, petitioner, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

No. 16-287.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
II-00380

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Byron masterson <bjmast@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:11 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Byron masterson

5121 Hidden Harbor Rd

Sarasota, FL 34242