alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1570 

Supporting the preservation of internet entrepreneurs and small businesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Mr. HODES (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. PITTS, Mr. SCHRADER, and Mr. 

DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the preservation of internet entrepreneurs and 

small businesses. 

Whereas the United States enjoys a strong online retail market, which for the past decade has provided consumers in 

the United States the opportunity to purchase quality 

products and services at competitive prices; 

Whereas the open online marketplace has enabled a large 

number of small retailers and entrepreneurs across the 

United States to establish their businesses on various ecommerce platforms and therefore create jobs, increase 

consumer choice, create competition in the retail industry, and provide quality goods and services at reasonable 

and often discounted prices; 

Whereas any Federal legislation that would upset this open 

and fair environment and impose new onerous and burVerDate Mar 15 2010 20:55 Jul 30, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1570.IH HR1570

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1570 IH 

densome tax collecting schemes on hundreds of thousands 

of small online retailers would not only adversely impact 

thousands of jobs and reduce consumer choice, but would 

also effectively put an end to the robust e-commerce marketplace that consumers in the United States currently 

enjoy; and 

Whereas at a time when national unemployment numbers are 

high and small businesses across the country are shutting 

their doors, Federal policy should promote and encourage 

the growth of small online entrepreneurs and recognize 

the benefits they provide to consumers across the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Congress should not impose any new bur3 densome or unfair tax collecting requirements on small on4 line businesses, which would ultimately hurt the economy 

5 and consumers in the United States. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2014071EN.01003403.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/34

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5.12.2013 Birkhoff v Commission

(Case F-60/09 DEP)

(Civil service - Procedure - Taxation of costs - No need to adjudicate)

(2014/C 71/67)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Gerhard Birkhoff (Isny, Germany) (represented by: C. Inzillo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for taxation of costs in Case F 60/09 DEP, Birkhoff v Commission. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for taxation of costs in Case F 60/09 DEP, Birkhoff v Commission.

| 2. | The parties are to bear their own costs incurred in respect of the present taxation of costs proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties are to bear their own costs incurred in respect of the present taxation of costs proceedings.

---
II-00716

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dan Rynberg <drynberg@msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:07 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geitlmer: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dan Rynberg

64 Newell Rd.

Yarmouth, ME 4096
Kewanda LOVE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7212.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II-00540

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

ELAINE GOULD <egould5@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:27 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

ELAINE GOULD

300 CENTRAL PARK WEST, #6B

NEW YORK, NY 10024-1579
James W. GRIFFIN, petitioner, v. Dan SCNURR, et al.

No. 15-9560.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                            KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA , LLC








                                                                  March 12, 2007


To Whom It May Concern:



The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, Certified Public Accountant,  LLC hereby consents to
the  inclusion  of this report of January  26,  2007,  accompanying  the audited
financial  statements of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. , as of December 31, 2006
in the Form 10KSB.


Very truly yours,


/s/ KYLE L. TINGLE
________________________
Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC




        P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452,
             Fax: (702) 436-4218, e-mail: ktingle@kyletinglecpa.com
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Ant onio, Texas**  January 7, 2015 Nos. 04
- 13
- 00099
- CV, 04
- 13
- 00100
- CV, and 04
- 13
- 00101
- CV EX PARTE Sean C. MCNAMARA From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 121073B, 121074B, and 121075B Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presidi ng 

### ORDER This court issued its mandate in these appeals on June 4, 2014. On December 30, 2014, Sean C. McNamara asked this court to issue an order pertaining to his appeal. This court’s plenary power in appeals 04
- 13
- 00099
- CV, 04
- 13
- 00100
- CV, and 04
- 13
- 00101
- CV has expired; this court no longer has jurisdiction in these appeals. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 19.1 (plenary power period); id. 19.3 (“After its plenary power expires, the court cannot vacate or modify its judgment.”).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of January, 2015 .

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Capital Return Futures
                    Fund 2, L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000851786
<NAME>              P-B Capital Return Futures Fund 2, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1998

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1998

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos

<CASH>                          6,007,687

<SECURITIES>                    20,952,880

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                26,960,567

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  26,960,567

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,596,983

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      25,363,584

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    26,960,567

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                820,367

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,619,712

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (1,799,345)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (15.57)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 6639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Spore Review Genitourinary and Prostate Cancer.
    Date: February 15-16, 2001.
    Time: 8:00 am to 6:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Brian E. Wojcik, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 8019, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/402-2785.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institute of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-1631 Filed 1-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
SEC Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2



	
													
	Annex 1 (2nd Amendment) to the Corporate Guarantee dated August 11th, 2014 in the amount of EUR 30 mn.

	in connection with the Umbrella Facility Agreement with an amount of EUR 30 mn dated 21.07.2014 including the 2nd Amendment dated 18.04.2016

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	The following branches and subsidiaries of Deutsche Bank AG ("Lending Offices") have entered into business relationship

	with the subsidiaries of IPG Laser GmbH (named hereinafter "IPG Laser Group")

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	In this context the following facilities of the Umbrella Credit Agreement dated 21.07.2014 have been allocated

	inter alia for the use of the companies listed hereafter:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Summary of credit agreements for the IPG Laser Group of companies in Germany and abroad:

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Debtor
	Lending Office
	local currency
	amount (in currency)
	Facility 1
Cash
	Facility 2
Guarantee 
	Facility 3
Margin Line 
	total
	 

	if not in EURO convert to EURO
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	IPG Photonics (Italy) s.r.l., Via Kennedy 21, 20023 Cerro Maggiore (Milano), Italy
	Deutsche Bank Spa, Milano, Italy
	 
	 
	3,000,000
	

	—
	 
	3,000,000
	

	 

	IRE-Polus NTO, 141190, Fryazino pl. Vvedenskogo, Russia
	Deutsche Bank Ltd., Moscow, Russia
	 
	 
	3,000,000
	

	5,000,000
	

	 
	8,000,000
	

	 

	IPG Photonics (Beijing) Fiber Laser Technology Company Limited
	Deutsche Bank Ltd., Beijing, China
	 
	 
	3,000,000
	

	 
	3,000,000
	

	6,000,000
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Total credit lines based on the guarantee
	 
	 
	 
	9,000,000
	5,000,000
	

	3,000,000
	

	17,000,000
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Oxford, MA, May 19, 2016
	 
	Cologne, 18th April, 2016
	 
	 

	Place and date
	 
	Place and date
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Eugene Scherbakov
	 
	/s/ Frank Gehrmann /s/ Joachim Gartz


	 
	 

	(corporate seal and  binding signatures of the Guarantor)
	 
	(Deutsche Bank AG Filiale Deutschlandgeschäft)
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Timothy P.V. Mammen
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	(legally binding signature of IPG Photonics Corporation)
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Central Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  June 17, 2011
    /s/ Paul S. FeeleyPaul S. FeeleySenior Vice President,
 Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

     We have calculated PBG's ratio of earnings to fixed charges in the
following table by dividing earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose,
earnings include pre-tax income plus fixed charges and losses recognized from
equity investments reduced by undistributed income from equity investments.
Fixed charges include interest expense, capitalized interest and one-third of
net rent expense, which is the portion of rent deemed representative of the
interest factor.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                             FISCAL YEAR
                                                                           ($ IN MILLIONS)
                                                         1999(B)     1998(B)        1997        1996       1995
                                                         -------     -------        ----        ----       ----
<S>                                                      <C>         <C>            <C>         <C>        <C>
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
AND MINORITY INTEREST ..................................      $ 209      $(192)      $ 115      $ 138      $ 110

Undistributed (income) loss from equity
   investments .........................................         --          5          12          1         (3)
Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest ...........        227        245         238        238        256
                                                              -----      -----       -----      -----      -----
EARNINGS AS ADJUSTED ...................................      $ 436      $  58       $ 365      $ 377      $ 363
                                                              =====      =====       =====      =====      =====
FIXED CHARGES:
   Interest expense ....................................      $ 209      $ 230       $ 226      $ 224      $ 243
   Capitalized interest ................................          1          1           1          1          1
   Interest portion of rental expense ..................         18         15          12         14         13
                                                              -----      -----       -----      -----      -----
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES ....................................      $ 228      $ 246       $ 239      $ 239      $ 257
                                                              =====      =====       =====      =====      =====
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES .....................       1.91        (A)        1.53       1.58       1.41
</TABLE>

(A)  As a result of the losses incurred in the fiscal year ended December 26,
     1998, PBG was unable to fully cover the indicated fixed charges. Earnings
     did not cover fixed charges by $188 million in 1998.

(B)  Excluding the impact of unusual impairment and other charges and credits
     of $16 million of income in 1999 and $222 million of expense in 1998, the
     ratio of earnings to fixed charges would have been 1.85 and 1.14 in 1999
     and 1998, respectively.
**Exhibit 14.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

CEMEX,S.A.B. de C.V.: 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement on FormS-8 (File No. 333-13970) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., (ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-83962) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-86090) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., (iv) theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.333-128657) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and (v) the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-161787) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. of our reports dated June 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and changes in stockholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,and the related statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statement of changes in financial position for the year ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 20-F of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. 

KPMGCárdenas Dosal, S.C. 

/s/ Celin Zorrilla Rizo 

Monterrey, N.L., Mexico 

June 29, 2010
Brian GILL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7584.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
DENNIS K., petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 16-6355.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARRYL JONES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 205 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARRYL JONES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 206 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of January, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.