alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010221EN.01006001.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/60

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 June 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-56/09) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Action for damages - Access of the administration to an official’s lodgings - Respect for the home and private life)

2010/C 221/95

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, then by G. Cipressa and L. Mansullo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision to reject the applicant’s application seeking, first, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered because agents of the Commission entered his lodgings in Luanda on 8 April 2002 and, secondly, the provision of copies of the photos taken at that time and the destruction of all documentation connected with that event.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Orders the European Commission to pay Mr Marcuccio EUR 5 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Commission to pay Mr Marcuccio EUR 5 000;

| 2. | Annuls the European Commission’s decision of 11 September 2008, in so far as it rejected Mr Marcuccio’s application of 24 April 2008 that he be sent photographs, that photographs be destroyed and that he be provided with information relating to the destruction of the photographs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the European Commission’s decision of 11 September 2008, in so far as it rejected Mr Marcuccio’s application of 24 April 2008 that he be sent photographs, that photographs be destroyed and that he be provided with information relating to the destruction of the photographs;

| 3. | Dismisses the rest of the claims in the application; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the rest of the claims in the application;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay one quarter of Mr Marcuccio’s costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay one quarter of Mr Marcuccio’s costs;

| 5. | Orders Mr Marcuccio to pay three quarters of his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Mr Marcuccio to pay three quarters of his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 29.8.2009, p. 48.

1

---
In re Douglas J. MacNEILL, petitioner.

No. 16-720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          33,593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,529
<PP&E>                                          11,157
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,452)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,160
<BONDS>                                          5,060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       550,470
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,550)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,707
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,894
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    33
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,388)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,388)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7268

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT LEE GWYN, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:13-cr-00048-GEC-1)

Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 16, 2020

Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Gwyn, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Gwyn, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2018) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

United States v. Gwyn, No. 7:13-cr-00048-GEC-1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 9, 2019). We deny 

Gwyn’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 5.7

                                   RESOLUTION

                    AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL SHARES

Upon motion made and seconded, the Board of Directors of PowerSource Corporation
unanimously adopted the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the Corporation hereby authorizes, the issuance of forty thousand
(40,000) Series B Preferred Stock to the investors of the following district
partnerships of the Company in exchange of their investment into shares of
Series B Preferred Stock stock at $100 par value per share, at a conversion rate
of 125% of the investor's initial investment.

     Paramount Energy Group LLP
     Pinnacle Energy Group LLP
     Premiere Energy Group LLP
     Paragon Energy Group LLP

The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected and qualified
Secretary and the custodian of the books and records and seal of PowerSource, a
corporation duly formed pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada, and that
the foregoing is a true record of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of the
Board of Directors, and that said meeting was held in accordance with state law
and the Bylaws of PowerSource corporation on, and that said resolution is now in
full force and effect without modification or rescission.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have an executed my name as Secretary and have hereunto
affixed the corporate seal of the above-named Corporation this day of December
14, 2001.

A True Record.                               /s/ Roman Gordon
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Roman Gordon, Secretary
                                             PowerSource Corporation

                                             /s/ Illya Bond
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Illya Bond, CEO
                                             PowerSource Corporation

/s/ Roman Gordon                             /s/ E. Douglas Mitchell
-------------------------------              -----------------------------------
Roman Gordon, Secretary                      E. Douglas Mitchell, President
PowerSource Corporation                      PowerSource Corporation
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

          - A-427-801, A-428-801, A-475-801, A-588-804, A-401-801, A-412-801] 

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of extension of time limits for final results of antidumping duty administrative reviews.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 12, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard Rimlinger, AD/CVD Enforcement 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4477. 

## Extension of Time Limits for Final Results 

The Department of Commerce (the Department) has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on antifriction bearings (other than tapered roller bearings) and parts thereof (AFBs) from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. On July 7, 2000, the Department initiated these administrative reviews covering the period May 1, 1999, through December 31, 1999, for certain orders and May 1, 1999, through April 30, 2000, for other orders. 

Because of the complexity of certain issues which have arisen and the large number of respondents under review, it is not practicable to complete these reviews within the time limits mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Therefore, in accordance with that section, the Department is extending the time limit for the final results of these administrative reviews until July 5, 2001. This extension of the time limit is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Dated: June 5, 2001.

Richard W. Moreland, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. 01-14793 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Miguel E. NEIL, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 16-9401.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County denied.
<PAGE>

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES. We have calculated PBG's ratio of earnings
to fixed charges in the following table by dividing earnings by fixed charges.
For this purpose, earnings are before taxes, minority interest and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle, plus fixed charges (excluding
capitalized interest) and losses recognized from equity investments, reduced by
undistributed income from equity investments. Fixed charges include interest
expense, capitalized interest and one-third of net rent which is the portion of
the rent deemed representative of the interest factor.

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 ($ in millions)
                                                                      Exhibit 12

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            FISCAL YEAR
                                                           2004       2003       2002      2001      2000
                                                           ----       ----       ----      ----      ----
<S>                                                       <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>
NET INCOME BEFORE TAXES, MINORITY INTEREST AND
    CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE   $   745    $   710    $   700   $   482   $   397

Undistributed (income) loss from equity
    investments                                                (1)        (1)         -         -         -
Fixed charges excluding capitalized  interest             $   261    $   270        221       217       222
                                                          -------    -------    -------   -------   -------
EARNINGS AS ADJUSTED                                      $ 1,005    $   979    $   921   $   699   $   619
                                                          =======    =======    =======   =======   =======
FIXED CHARGES:
    Interest expense                                      $   236    $   247    $   200   $   204   $   208
    Capitalized interest                                        -          -          -         1         1
    Interest portion of rental expense                         25         23         21        13        14
                                                          -------    -------    -------   -------   -------
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                       $   261    $   270    $   221   $   218   $   223
                                                          =======    =======    =======   =======   =======

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                           3.85       3.63       4.17      3.20      2.78
</TABLE>
II-00580

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dulcey Simpkins <dulceysimpkins@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:07 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dulcey Simpkins

2780A W. 106th Loop

Westminster, CO 80234
Kyle COSTELLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7531.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration, North Florida District Office, Jacksonville, Florida, Advisory Council will hold a public meeting from 12:00 p.m. to 2 p.m., eastern standard time July 11, 2001, at the North Florida District Office, 7825 Baymeadows Way, Suite 100-B, in the Conference Room, to discuss such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present. 

Anyone wishing to make an oral presentation to the Board must contact Claudia Taylor, in writing by letter or fax no later than June 25, 2001, in order to be put on the agenda. For further information, write or call Claudia D. Taylor, U.S. Small Business Administration, 7825 Baymeadows Way, Suite 100-B, Jacksonville, Florida 32256-7504, telephone (904) 443-1933, fax (904) 443-1980. 

Nancyellen Gentile,

Committee Management Office. 

[FR Doc. 01-15737 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
II-00078

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Constance Kain <constancinople@yahoo.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 3:59 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Constance Kain

2753 NW Overlook Dr

Hillsboro, OR 97124
# C_2010063EN.01004403.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/44

---

Order of the President of the Court of 24 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-121/09) (1)

1

2010/C 63/73

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 10.2



|          |  |              
|--------- |  | -------------
|No. W-106 |  | 38,878 shares



Avatech Solutions, Inc.

A Delaware Corporation

Common
Stock, Par Value $.01 per share



Stock Purchase Warrant



W. James Hindman, or bearer of this warrant, is entitled,
upon presentation of this Warrant and upon surrender of this warrant at the offices of the Company, to subscribe for, purchase and receive thirty-eight thousand eight hundred seventy-eight (38,878) shares of the Companys common stock, for
a purchase price of sixty cents ($.60) per share, provided, however, that no fractional shares will be issued. Upon such payment, the Company agrees to cause to be issued in the name of the registered holder, or his or her nominee, a certificate or
certificates duly representing the shares so purchased.



In the
event of the declaration and payment of share dividends by the Company on its Common Stock, or any split-up of the Common Stock, or recapitalization of the Company which changes the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock, additional shares of
the Company may be deliverable to the holder of this warrant upon the exercise of it without additional consideration, or the exercise price per share may be adjusted in the appropriate manner.



The purchase privilege herein contained shall expire on June 1, 2010.



Dated as of July 1, 2005.



Avatech Solutions, Inc.By :

/s/ Donald R. WalshDonald R. WalshChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (122)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,560
<PP&E>                                           2,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,719)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,614
<BONDS>                                             98
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           14,155
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,195)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,683
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,644
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   175
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (48)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    439
<INCOME-TAX>                                        91
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Joyce CONYERS-CARSON, petitioner, v. GERMANTOWN HOMES, et al.

No. 16-6891.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.