alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Fulton Bancshares Corporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George W. Millward,Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCorporation.
| Date: May 11, 2006 | By:    | /s/ GEORGE W.  MILLWARD                         |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | George W. Millward,                             |
|                    |   | *Interim President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

1

----
II-00858

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Robert Shebesta <joeyshebesta@att.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:39 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Robert Shebesta

3313 Werner Ave.

Austin, TX 78722
II-00515

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Tamara Ford <tford06@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:56 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Tamara Ford

1410 Hillcrest Drive

Austin, TX 78723
Joshua Lee TEVIS, petitioner, v. KENTUCKY.

No. 16-6784.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the Quarterly Report of K & F Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Bernard L. Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ BERNARD L. SCHWARTZ
-----------------------
Bernard L. Schwartz
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2002
NEVADA RESTAURANT SERVICES, INC., dba Dotty's, petitioner, v. CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, et al.

No. 15-1364.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2009113EN.01002501.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/25

---

Action brought on 6 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-94/09)

2009/C 113/47

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Alfonso, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by not applying a single rate of VAT to all services provided by funeral directors, or to related supplies of goods, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 96 to 99(1) of the VAT Directive (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by not applying a single rate of VAT to all services provided by funeral directors, or to related supplies of goods, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 96 to 99(1) of the VAT Directive (1);

1

| — | Order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its action, the Commission claims that French tax legislation distorts the functioning of the VAT system to the extent that it applies two VAT rates to services and goods supplied by funeral directors to the families of deceased persons whereas they constitute, in practice, a single complex transaction which should be subject to a single rate of tax.

The applicant complains in particular about the unjustified splitting off by the defendant of the service involving the transportation of the body by a vehicle designed especially for that purpose, for which a reduced VAT rate is applicable, from the other services carried out by funeral directors, such as the use of persons to move the body or the supply of a coffin, which, for their part, are subject to the normal rate of VAT. According to settled case-law, a transaction which comprises a single supply from an economic point of view should not be artificially split, so as not to distort the functioning of the VAT system. In the circumstances, the vast majority of families requesting the undertaking to organise funerals would moreover consider the activities in question as forming the same single supply.

The Commission also contests the defendant’s choice to apply variable reduced rates to the services provided by funeral directors. Article 98(1) of the VAT Directive does not allow a reduced rate to be applied to certain transportation services and a normal rate to other services carried out by the undertakings in question, since that is bound to make the actual rate of tax lower than the normal rate applicable in France. In addition, the level of that reduced tax varies from transaction to transaction according to the relative extent, in each case, of the services provided at a reduced rate, which is also prohibited by the directive.

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION CARE, INC., petitioner, v. REMBRANDT VISION TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.

No. 16-489.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
----

            COUNCIL DECISION 2004/837/CFSP

of 6 December 2004         

concerning the implementation of Joint Action 2002/210/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2002/210/CFSP of 11 March 2002 on the European Union Police Mission (1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof, in conjunction with the second indent of Article 23(2) of the Treaty on European Union,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1.   An amount of EUR 17 410 000 covering operational running costs of EUPM in 2005 shall be financed in common from the general budget of the European Union.

2.   The management of the expenditure financed by the general budget of the European Union specified in paragraph 1 shall be subject to the procedures and rules of the Community applying to budget matters with the exception that any pre-financing shall not remain the property of the Community.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 2004.

For the Council

The President

H. HOOGERVORST            

----

(1)OJ L 70, 13.3.2002, p. 1. Joint Action as last amended by Joint Action 2003/188/CFSP (OJ L 73, 19.3.2003, p. 9).

----
David Mark ISAACSON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-7328.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.4








CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Annual Report of Acacia Research Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2018 (the “Report”), I, Clayton J. Haynes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:


1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


























By:/s/ Clayton J. HaynesClayton J. HaynesChief Financial OfficerApril 2, 2018








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Stephen Michael MICHUDA, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 16-9315.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
# C_2009055EN.01002101.xml

| 7.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/21

---

Action brought on 9 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-12/09)

(2009/C 55/35)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga and S. Mortoni, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

| — | Declare that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first subparagraph of Article 7(1) of Commission Directive 2006/17/EC (1) of 8 February 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for the donation, procurement and testing of human tissues and cells, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/17/EC or, in any event, by not communicating those measures to the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first subparagraph of Article 7(1) of Commission Directive 2006/17/EC (1) of 8 February 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for the donation, procurement and testing of human tissues and cells, by not adopting all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/17/EC or, in any event, by not communicating those measures to the Commission.

1

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2006/17/EC expired on 1 November 2006.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 38, p. 40.

1

---
EXHIBIT 21


             SUBSIDIARIES OF NS GROUP, INC.  
               (all are wholly-owned)

Name                               State of Incorporation
Erlanger Tubular Corporation       Oklahoma
Imperial Adhesives, Inc.           Ohio
Koppel Steel Corporation           Pennsylvania
Newport Steel Corporation          Kentucky
Northern Kentucky Management       Kentucky
ANTHONY N., petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 16-6237.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,314
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,460
<PP&E>                                             857
<DEPRECIATION>                                     367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,191
<SALES>                                         34,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           30,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,159
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    782
<INCOME-TAX>                                       299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       483
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009297EN.01001602.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 19 May 2009 — Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria OOD

(Case C-181/09)

2009/C 297/20

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Canon Kabushiki Kaisha

Applicant:

Defendant: IPN Bulgaria OOD

Defendant:

By decision of 17 September 2009, the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) declared the reference for a preliminary ruling to be manifestly inadmissible.

---
W.L. WILLIAMS, Jr., petitioner, v. Diane ANDREWS, Warden.

No. 15-9518.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II-00039

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Karolina Urban <karolina.urban@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 9, 2010 9:55 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Karolina Urban

1107 Sycamore Mills rd.

Media, PA 19063
# C_2010209EN.01005301.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/53

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 12 May 2010 — Peláez Jimeno v Parliament

(Case F-13/09) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Previous complaint - Time-limit for the complaint - Lateness - Proof - Former member of the temporary staff - Appointment as an official - Article 5(4) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Equal treatment)

2010/C 209/81

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Peláez Jimeno (Relegem-Asse, Belgium) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and K. Zejdová initially, then by K. Zejdová and S. Seyr, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the appointing authority’s decision to classify the applicant, as a probationary official, in a grade and step lower than that which she occupied as a member of the temporary staff

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Peláez Jimeno to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Peláez Jimeno to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.04.2009, p, 40.

1

---
Dave N. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 16-9384.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
Duane T. THACKREY, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-7287.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
H. Res. 1784 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 22, 2010. 

Resolved, That a committee of two Members of the 

House be appointed to wait upon the President of the United 

States and inform him that the House of Representatives has 

completed its business of the session and is ready to adjourn, 

unless the President has some other communication to make 

to them. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D19-650

________________ _____________
W ILLIAM L ESLIE R HOW , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

________________ _____________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Du val County. Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

July 8, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , W ETHERELL , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur.

________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________2 William Leslie Rhow, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Genera l, Tallahassee, for Appellee.