alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 15 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 13, 2009. 

Resolved, That in continuance of the authority conferred 

in House Resolution 1448 of the One Hundred Tenth Congress adopted by the House of Representatives on September 

17, 2008, the Committee on the Judiciary shall inquire 

whether the House should impeach G. Thomas Porteous, a 

judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Louisiana. 

SEC. 2. The Committee on the Judiciary or any subcommittee or task force designated by the Committee may, in 

connection with the inquiry under this resolution, take affidavits and depositions by a member, counsel, or consultant of 

the Committee, pursuant to notice or subpoena. 

SEC. 3. There shall be paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives such sums as may be 

necessary to assist the Committee in conducting the inquiry 

under this resolution until a primary expense resolution providing for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary for 

the first session of the One Hundred Eleventh Congress is 
2 

•HRES 15 EH 

adopted. Any of the amounts paid under the authority of this 

section may be used for the procurement of staff or consultant services. 

SEC. 4. (a) For the purpose of the inquiry under this 

resolution, the Committee on the Judiciary is authorized to 

require by subpoena or otherwise— 

(1) the attendance and testimony of any person (including at a taking of a deposition by counsel or consultant of the Committee); and 

(2) the production of such things; 

as it deems necessary to such inquiry. 

(b) The Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, 

after consultation with the ranking minority member, may exercise the authority of the Committee under subsection (a). 

(c) The Committee on the Judiciary may adopt a rule 

regulating the taking of depositions by a member, counsel, or 

consultant of the Committee, including pursuant to subpoena. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
II-Oll50

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jerry Best <iamjmbsf@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:06 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK6! SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jerry Best

528 N Sherman Ave

Sioux Falls, SD 57103
# C_2009153EN.01002902.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/29

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom) made on 8 May 2009 — Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Taous Lassal

(Case C-162/09)

2009/C 153/55

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Applicant:

Defendant: Taous Lassal

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1) | In circumstances where (i) an EU citizen came to the United Kingdom in September 1999 as a worker and remained as a worker until February 2005 (H) the EU citizen then left the United Kingdom and returned to the Member State of which she is a national for a period of 10 months (iii) the EU citizen returned to the United Kingdom in December 2005 and resided there continuously until November 2006, when she made a claim for social security assistance: |
| --- | --- |

1)

In circumstances where (i) an EU citizen came to the United Kingdom in September 1999 as a worker and remained as a worker until February 2005 (H) the EU citizen then left the United Kingdom and returned to the Member State of which she is a national for a period of 10 months (iii) the EU citizen returned to the United Kingdom in December 2005 and resided there continuously until November 2006, when she made a claim for social security assistance:

Is Article 16(1) of Directive 2004/38 of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 to be interpreted as entitling that EU citizen to a right of permanent residence by virtue of the fact that she had been legally resident, in accordance with earlier Community law instruments conferring rights of residence on workers, for a continuous period of five years which ended prior to 30 April 2006 (the date by which Member States had to transpose the Directive)?

---
Jeff SPRUILL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-401.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial statement information from the Form 10-Q
of Howell Corporation for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000745113
<NAME>                        TARRANT FENDLEY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         52
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4018
<ALLOWANCES>                                   141
<INVENTORY>                                    50
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4674
<PP&E>                                         306073
<DEPRECIATION>                                 204871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10955
<BONDS>                                        3500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    690
<COMMON>                                       5112
<OTHER-SE>                                     86654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129213
<SALES>                                        24493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               24493
<CGS>                                          17359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (128)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1064
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3353
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2291
<DISCONTINUED>                                 757
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .24
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015034EN.01002101.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2014 — Leali and Acciaierie e Ferrieere Leali Luigi v Commission

(Cases T-489/09, T-490/09 and T-56/10) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils - Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Fixing of prices and payment terms - Limiting or controlling output or sales - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Legal basis - Misuse of powers and abuse of procedure - Fines - Duration of the infringement - Proportionality - Limitation period - Action for annulment - Amending decision - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 034/22)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Leali SpA (Odolo, Italy) (Cases T-489/09 and T-56/10); and Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA (Brescia, Italy) (Cases T-490/09 and T-56/10) (represented by: G. Belotti, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented, in Cases T-489/09 and T-490/09, initially by R. Sauer and V. Di Bucci, subsequently by R. Sauer and B. Gencarelli, and finally by R. Sauer and R. Striani, and, in Case T-56/10, initially by R. Sauer and B. Gencarelli, and subsequently by R. Sauer and R. Striani, acting as Agents, assisted by M. Moretto, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

In Cases T-489/09 and T-490/09, applications for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 7492 final of 30 September 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 65 CS (Case COMP/37.956 — Reinforcing bars, readoption), and in the alternative, applications for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants, and in Case T-56/10, application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9912 final of 8 December 2009, amending Decision C(2009) 7492 final.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that Cases T-489/09, T-490/09 et T-56/10 be joined for the purposes of the present judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that Cases T-489/09, T-490/09 et T-56/10 be joined for the purposes of the present judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | In Case T-489/09, orders Leali SpA to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

In Case T-489/09, orders Leali SpA to pay the costs;

| 4. | In Case T-490/09, orders Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

In Case T-490/09, orders Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA to pay the costs;

| 5. | In Case T-56/10, orders Leali and Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

In Case T-56/10, orders Leali and Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15942]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In compliance with section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995, the United States Air Force Academy, Office of Admissions, 
announces the proposed reinstatement of a public information collection 
and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are 
invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the 
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed 
information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize 
the burden of the information collection on respondents, including the 
use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by August 
27, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations on the proposed 
information collection should be sent to United States Air Force 
Academy, Office of Admissions, 2304 Cadet Drive, Suite 236, USAFA, CO 
80840.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this 
proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposed and 
associated collection instruments, please write to the above address, 
or call United States Air Force Academy, Office of Admissions, (719) 
333-7291.
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Air Force Academy 
Applications, United States Air Force Academy Form 149, OMB Number 
0701-0087.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain data on candidate's background and aptitude in determining 
eligibility and selection to the Air Force Academy.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Annual Burden Hours: 4,925.
    Number of Respondents: 9,850.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Average Burden per Response: 30 Minutes.
    Frequency: 1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Summary of Information Collection

    The information collected on this form is required by 10 U.S.C. 
9346. The respondents are students who are applying for admission to 
the United States Air Force Academy. Each student's background and 
aptitude is reviewed to determine eligibility. If the information on 
this form is not collected the individual cannot be considered for 
admittance to the Air Force Academy.

Janet A. Long,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-15942 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
# C_2011030EN.01006202.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/62

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 November 2010 — Taillard v Parliament

(Case F-97/09) (1)

1

(Civil service - Official - Successive sick leave - Arbitration - Finding that the applicant was able to work - Refusal of new duly issued medical certificate - No medical examination - Sick leave deducted from annual leave - Inadmissibility - Action for annulment and damages)

2011/C 30/120

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Christine Taillard (Thionville, France) (represented by: N. Cambonie and C. Lelièvre, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: K. Zejdová and S. Seyr, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, an action for annulment of the decision by which the European Parliament declares a medical certificate attesting to the applicant’s incapacity to work inadmissible and the resultant decision to withdraw annual leave. Second, a claim for compensation for the damage suffered by the applicant

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the Decision of the European Parliament of 15 January 2009, by which the Parliament refused to accept the medical certificate of 5 January 2009 and the resultant decision to deduct Ms Taillard’s absence of 6 to 9 January2009 from her annual leave; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Decision of the European Parliament of 15 January 2009, by which the Parliament refused to accept the medical certificate of 5 January 2009 and the resultant decision to deduct Ms Taillard’s absence of 6 to 9 January2009 from her annual leave;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Parliament to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Ms Taillard. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Parliament to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Ms Taillard.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010, p. 81.

1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00213-CV

Sylvia MORAN and Leo J. Moran,

Appellants

v.

WELLS FARGO USA HOLDINGS, INC.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CV-02303

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appellants’ motion to dismiss is 

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the party who 

incurred them.

SIGNED September 25, 2019.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
II-00971

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Randolph Murray <jwrmurray@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:35 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Randolph Murray

3 Cloverhill Cres

Cookstown, ON L0L 1L0
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT FAICCO and ROGANNE D. FAICCO,

Appellants,

v.

GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1019

[March 15, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Edward L. Artau, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2012-CA-023476.

Michael Vater and Kyle M. Costello of The Ticktin Law Group, PLLC, 

Deerfield Beach, for appellants.

Stephen Janes, Michael T. Ruff and Preston C. Davis of Timothy D. 

Padgett, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Miguel Angel VIVES-MACIAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6854.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
1126.

#### Rogers *v.*The State.

Accusation of vagrancy, from city court of Ashbum — Judge Hawkins. April 4, 1908.

Submitted May 5,

Decided May 18, 1908.

*R. L. Tipton,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. A. Comer, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

In order to convict a minor between the ages of sixteen and twenty-one years, of- the offense of vagrancy, under the act of August 7, 1903 (Georgia Laws 1903, p. 46), the State must allege and prove, in* addition to the usual allegations, that the minor’s parents were un-. able to support him, and that he was not in attendance upon an educational institution. *Jacobs*v. *State,*1 *Ga. App.*519 (57 S. E. 1063); *Turner*v. *State,*2 *Ga. App.*386 (58 S. E. 492) ; *Collins*v. *State,*125 *Ga.*15 (53 S. E. 809); *Braswell*v. *State,*119 *Ga.*72 (45 S. E. 963).

*Judgment reversed.*
Jonathan CARVALHO, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 16-9309.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 214 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 214

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 21, 2009.
Whereas the Commonwealth of Kentucky suffered a devastating ice storm on January 
        26, 2009, that left more than 700,000 homes and businesses without 
        electricity;
Whereas the ice storm is considered the worst natural disaster in Kentucky 
        history;
Whereas State and local officials acted quickly to coordinate relief efforts and 
        enlisted volunteer agencies, faith-based groups, and community 
        organizations;
Whereas volunteers from 25 organizations in 15 States came to the Commonwealth 
        of Kentucky to provide help and support to those affected by the ice 
        storm;
Whereas volunteers operated 192 shelters for victims of the ice storm, providing 
        7,884 Kentuckians with shelter, food, and water;
Whereas more than 378,160 meals and snacks were provided to victims of the ice 
        storm by volunteers;
Whereas these volunteers played a key role in Kentucky's recovery efforts and 
        gave their valuable time and resources to offer support;
Whereas 4,600 members of the Kentucky National Guard were activated to assist 
        the citizens of the Commonwealth; and
Whereas the resolve, courage, and determination shown by the citizens of the 
        Commonwealth was commendable: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the efforts of the 
countless volunteers who helped the Commonwealth of Kentucky recover from the 
ice storm of January 2009.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Joseph A. DANIELS, petitioner, v. Paul E. CALDWELL.

No. 16-6271.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Dawn V. MARTIN, et al., petitioners, v. LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INC., et al.

No. 16-654.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.