alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-01073

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Thomas Windberg <tjwindberg@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:28 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Thomas Windberg

2416 Pace Bend Rd S

Spicewood, TX 78669
**Exhibit 8.1**- Subsidiaries
***Organizational Structure.***
*Corporate Structure*
Novogen Limited is a company limited by shares and is incorporated and domiciled in Australia.Novogen Limited has prepared a consolidated financial report incorporating the entities that itcontrolled during the financial year, which included the following:       **Name of Entity** **Country of Incorporation** **Ownership %**Novogen Laboratories Pty Ltd Australia  100 Novogen Research Pty Ltd Australia  100 Central Coast Properties Pty Ltd Australia  100 Phytosearch Pty Ltd Australia  100 Phytogen Pty Ltd Australia  100 Glycotex Pty Ltd Australia  100 Norvogen Pty Ltd Australia  100 Novogen Inc USA  100 Glycotex Inc USA  97.6 Novogen Limited(UK) UK  100 Promensil Limited UK  100 Novogen BV Netherlands  100 Novogen New Zealand Limited New Zealand  100 Novogen Canada Limited Canada  100 Marshall Edwards, Inc. USA  86.9 Marshall Edwards Pty Limited* Australia  86.9 
* Owned indirectly through Marshall Edwards, Inc.
Eulandas J. FLOWERS, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 15-9134.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
 Life Time Fitness, Inc.
List of Subsidiaries
 Name
    
    State of FormationBloomingdale LIFE TIME Fitness, L.L.C.
    
    IllinoisLTF Club Operations Company, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaFCA Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Operations Holdings, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaFCA Construction Company, LLC
    
    DelawareFCA Restaurant Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLife Time Fitness Financial, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Triathlon Series, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Club Management Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF TIAA Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Michigan Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Minnesota Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF USA Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Company, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaLTF CMBS I, LLC (99%)
    
    DelawareLTF CMBS II, LLC (1%)
    
    DelawareLTF CMBS Managing Member, Inc.
    
    DelawareLTF CMBS I, LLC (1%)
    
    DelawareLTF CMBS II Managing Member, Inc.
    
    DelawareLTF CMBS II, LLC (1%)
    
    DelawareNon-profit corporation: Life Time Fitness Foundation
    
    Minnesota
 NOTES:
NEW MEXICO, plaintiff, v. COLORADO.

No. 147, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33674-33675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15861]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-320-046]


Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

June 19, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 15, 2001, Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP 
(Gulf South) filed with the Commission a contract between Gulf South 
and the following company for disclosure of a recently negotiated rate 
transaction. As shown on the contract, Gulf South requests an effective 
date of June 12, 2001.

Special Negotiated Rate Between Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP and 
Trunkline Gas Company Contract No. 29007

    Gulf South states that copies of the filing has served copies of 
this filing upon all parties on the official service list created by 
the Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance

[[Page 33675]]

with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and 
interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of 
paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the 
Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell/htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15861 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Eduard Musheyev, Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial
Accounting Officer) of CaseyCorp Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies,
under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 19, 2010By:
                /s/
      Eduard MusheyevName:
                Eduard
      MusheyevTitle:
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                  and
      Principal Financial Accounting
Officer
II-00802

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Paul Voytas <pvoytas@uwalumni.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:14 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Paul Voytas

1223 N Lowry Ave

Springfield, OH 45504
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-38,706]

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on February 20, 2001 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Sample Service, Long Island, New York.

The Department of Labor was unable to contact the owner of the subject firm to obtain information to make a determination. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 8th day of June, 2001

Edward A. Tomchick,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-16076  Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
II-00602

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Elizabeth Kauffman <bflobeth@hotmail. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:38 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Elizabeth Kauffman

50rton Place

Buffalo, NY 14201
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE

VOLT MANAGEMENT

CORPORATION

RELATOR

 §

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-09-00055-CV

An Original Proceeding 

in Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator, Volt Management Corporation, seeks a writ of mandamus against the Honorable

William Moody, Judge of the 34th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will lie only to

correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992)(orig.

proceeding). Moreover, there must be no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the

petition and record before us, we are unable to conclude that Relator is entitled to the relief

requested. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See TEX.R.APP.P. 52.8(a).

March 5, 2009

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
EXHIBIT 11

                               VIVRA INCORPORATED
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                       February 28/29,
                                                      1997        1996
                                                   ---------------------
Primary:
   Average shares outstanding                        40,447     39,132
   Stock options granted to employees, based
     on the treasury-stock method using
     average market price                               500*       655*
                                                   ----------- ---------
   Total                                             40,947     39,787
                                                   =========== =========

Net Earnings                                        $13,685    $11,287
                                                   =========== =========

Net Earnings per Share                              $  0.34    $  0.29
                                                   =========== =========

Fully diluted:
   Average shares outstanding                        40,447     39,132
     Assumed conversion of 5% convertible
     subordinated notes due 2001                      4,262          0
                                                   ----------- ---------
   Total                                             44,709     39,132
                                                   =========== =========

   Average shares outstanding                        44,709     39,132
     Stock options granted to employees, based on
     the treasury-stock method using quarter end
     market price, if higher than average
     market price                                       510*       747*
                                                   ----------- ---------
   Total                                             45,219     39,879
                                                   =========== =========

Net Earnings                                        $13,685    $11,287
Add 5% convertible subordinated notes due 2001
     interest, net of income taxes                    1,369**        0
                                                   ----------- ---------
   Total                                            $15,054    $11,287
                                                   =========== =========

Net Earnings per Share                              $  0.34    $  0.29
                                                   =========== =========


*   As the dilutive  Common Stock  equivalents  are less than 3% of the weighted
    average  outstanding  shares, they have not been included in the computation
    of earnings per share.

**  Fully  diluted  EPS  calculation  determined  as net  earnings  plus the tax
    effected   interest   expense   related  to  the  Company's  5%  Convertible
    Subordinated Notes divided by the fully diluted weighted shares outstanding.

                                       12
**Exhibit 3.20.1.1**

 

Filed: Secretary of State of Kansas on February 2, 2001 at 11:23AM

 

**Form AP**

**State of Kansas Domestic For Profit**

**Certificate of Amendment**

 

Name of corporation:           PCI Acquisition Co., Inc.

 

We, John Didier,President or Vice President, and Stephen A. Silverman, Secretary or AssistantSecretary, of the above named corporation, a corporation organized and existingunder the laws of the State Kansas, do hereby certify that at a meeting of theBoard of Directors of the corporation, the board adopted a resolution settingforth the following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation and declaringits advisability:

 

Article First ofthe Articles of Incorporation of this Corporation is hereby amended to read asfollows:

 

FIRST: The name ofthe Corporation is PCI Newco, Inc.

 

We further certifythat thereafter, pursuant to the resolution and in accordance with the bylawsof the corporation and the laws of the State of Kansas, the Board of Directorscalled a meeting of stockholders for consideration of the proposed amendment,and thereafter, pursuant to notice and in accordance with the statutes of theState of Kansas, the stockholders convened and considered the proposedamendment.

 

We further certifythat at the meeting a majority of the stockholders entitled to vote voted infavor of the proposed amendment.

 

We further certifythat the amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of K.S.A.17-6602, as amended.

 

In TestimonyWhereof, we have hereunto set our hands this 22nd day of January,2000.

 
|   |                              | /s/    | John Didier           |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | John Didier                       |
|   | President or  Vice President      |
|   |                              |   |
|   |                              | /s/    | Stephen A.  Silverman |
|   | Stephen A.  Silverman             |
|   | Secretary or  Assistant Secretary |

 

----
Donald Ray DAVES, petitioner, v. Eddie J. WILSON, Warden.

No. 15-9509.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# C_2009153EN.01002601.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller

(Case C-144/09)

2009/C 153/47

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH

Applicant:

Claimant: Oliver Heller

Claimant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the fact that a website of the party with whom a consumer has concluded a contract can be consulted on the internet sufficient to justify a finding that an activity is being ‘directed’, within the terms of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (‘the Brussels I Regulation’)? (1)

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.

1

---
DaRen Kereem GADSDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6538.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
II-00227

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lynn Camhi <camhi@stare.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 2:33 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Lynn Camhi

95 Marshall Ave.

Petaluma, CA 94952
Milton Lee GARDNER, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-6656.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District denied.
Brent Douglas COLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5966.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Erik ALTAMIRANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7326.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.