alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000             APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000             APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                     299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         3,000                   3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,000)                 (2,701)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                     299
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                     101
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                   (101)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                   (101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                   (101)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
Ricky HENSON, et al., petitioners, v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., et al.

No. 16-349.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that
this  Annual  Report on Form  10-K/A  for the year  ended  March  31,  2004 (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                             By: /s/ John D. Doherty
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 John D. Doherty
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



                             By: /s/ Michael K. Devlin
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Michael K. Devlin
                                 Senior Vice President, Treasurer
                                 and Chief Financial Officer



Date:  July 23, 2004
II-00572

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Claire Perricelli <ceperr@sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:32 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Claire Perricelli

2259 16th

Eureka, CA 95501
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33675-33676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15859]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-394-001]


Texas Eastern Transmission LP; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 19, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 14, 2001, Texas Eastern Transmission, LP 
(Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Seventh Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to be 
effective on June 1, 2001:

Sub First Revised Sheet No. 543

    Texas Eastern states that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the directives of the Commission's Letter Order dated May 30, 
2001, in Docket No. RP01-394 (May 30 Order).
    Texas Eastern states that, on May 1, 2001, revised tariff sheets 
were filed in this docket in order to add a new Section 3.16 to its 
General Terms and Conditions that provides for transportation and 
storage services using off-system capacity acquired by Texas Eastern on 
other pipelines and requested a waiver of the Commission's ``shipper 
must have title'' policy with respect to off-system capacity.
    Texas Eastern states that the May 30 Order accepted Texas Eastern's 
May 1 tariff filing, effective June 1, 2001, subject to the condition 
that Texas Eastern file, within fifteen days of the May 30 Order, a 
revised tariff sheet to reflect the changes required by the May 30 
Order.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
all affected customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the

[[Page 33676]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15859 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Rachel A. WINDHAM, petitioner, v. HARMON LAW OFFICES, P.C., et al.

No. 17-7144.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3765 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3765

      To amend title 13, United States Code, to require that any 
  questionnaire used for a decennial census of population contains a 
        question regarding citizenship, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2019

 Mr. Comer (for himself and Mr. Jordan) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title 13, United States Code, to require that any 
  questionnaire used for a decennial census of population contains a 
        question regarding citizenship, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Citizens Count Census Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. CITIZENSHIP STATUS ON CENSUS QUESTIONNAIRES.

    Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
    ``(g) In conducting the 2020 decennial census and each decennial 
census thereafter, the Secretary shall include in any questionnaire 
distributed or otherwise used for the purpose of determining the total 
population by States a checkbox or other similar option for respondents 
to indicate whether the respondent is a citizen or national of the 
United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011319EN.01001701.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-500/09) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Aid for the processing of citrus fruit - Effectiveness of the checks - Proportionality)

2011/C 319/33

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: L. Ventrella and G. Palmieri, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2009/721/EC of 24 September 2009 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2009 L 257, p. 28), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic in the sector of citrus-fruit processing.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.

1

---
# C_2009297EN.01002103.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/21

---

Action brought on 27 March 2009 — Phoenix-Reisen and DRV v Commission

(Case T-120/09)

2009/C 297/31

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Phoenix-Reisen GmbH (Bonn, Germany) and Deutscher Reiseverband eV (DRV) (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: R. Gerharz and A. Funke, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the defendant’s decision of 13 February 2009 by which it refused to take action against State aid granted by the Federal Republic of Germany in the form of insolvency payments; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the defendant’s decision of 13 February 2009 by which it refused to take action against State aid granted by the Federal Republic of Germany in the form of insolvency payments;

| — | In the alternative, reinterpret the action for annulment as an action for failure to act, in the event that the Court should take the view that the present proceedings must take the form of an action for failure to act. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, reinterpret the action for annulment as an action for failure to act, in the event that the Court should take the view that the present proceedings must take the form of an action for failure to act.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants’ action is directed against the Commission’s letter (reference D/50594) of 13 February 2009 concerning its complaint in connection with insolvency benefit payments to undertakings and with the financing of the payment of insolvency benefit in the Federal Republic of Germany (CP 79/2007 — Alleged State Aid in the form of insolvency benefit payments). In that letter the Commission states repeatedly that there is in its view no infringement of the provisions on State aid.

In support of their claim, the applicants maintain that the contested measures cannot be justified under Directive 80/987/EEC. (1) Furthermore, the Commission’s refusal to take action against the alleged wrongdoing infringes Community law. That rejection also cannot be justified by the decisions of the Bundessozialgericht (Federal Social Court).

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 80/987/EEC of 20 October 1980 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer (OJ 1980 L 283, p. 23)

1

---
James REMINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7250.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# C_2010221EN.01004402.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/44

---

Order of the General Court of 16 June 2010 — Biocaps v Commission

(Case T-24/09) (1)

1

(Competition - Administrative procedure - Decision ordering an inspection - Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Existence of the addressee of the decision - Action manifestly unfounded in law)

2010/C 221/73

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Biocaps (Orsay, France) (represented by: Y.-R. Guillou, H. Speyart van Woerden and T. Verstraeten, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and É. Gippini Fournier, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6524 of 29 October 2008, in Case COMP/39510, ordering Laboratoire Champagnat Desmounlins Philippakis, and all of the entities controlled directly or indirectly by it, to submit to an inspection pursuant to Article 20(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 [EC] and 82 [EC] (OJ 2002 L 1, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law;

| 2. | Biocaps is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Biocaps is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1715 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1715

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 17, 2010.
Whereas Joe Paterno reached the milestone of 400 wins as head coach on November 
        6th, 2010;
Whereas Joe Paterno has served the Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) 
        with honor and distinction for 60 years since starting as an assistant 
        coach in 1950;
Whereas in 2009, the graduation rate of Joe Paterno's players was 89 percent, 
        and the graduation success rate was 85 percent--both of which were the 
        greatest among all football teams in the final 2009 Associated Press Top 
        25 poll;
Whereas the legacy Joe Paterno has left at Penn State reaches far beyond 
        football, as he has personally given millions of dollars to the 
        university and raised hundreds of millions more for the library and 
        need-based scholarships;
Whereas Joe Paterno has been very active in the community as a strong supporter 
        of the Pennsylvania Special Olympics and a national spokesperson for the 
        Charcot-Marie-Tooth Association;
Whereas Joe Paterno has more wins as head coach than any other in NCAA Division 
        1A FBS history, surpassing legendary coaches Bear Bryant in 2001 and 
        Bobby Bowden in 2008;
Whereas Penn State is one of just seven teams with more than 800 wins in its 
        history, and Joe Paterno has been active with the program for 692 of 
        those games over 60 seasons with an amazing record of 504-181-7 (72.8 
        percent);
Whereas among Joe Paterno's accolades in 45 years as head coach are two National 
        Championships, seven undefeated seasons, 23 finishes in the top 10 
        rankings, and three Big Ten Conference Championships since joining the 
        conference in 1993;
Whereas Joe Paterno has 24 bowl game wins and 36 bowl game appearances, both of 
        which are the most of any coach in history; and
Whereas Joe Paterno's continued dedication to his players and emphasis on 
        academic integrity and education has resulted in Penn State fostering 15 
        Hall of Fame Scholar-Athletes, 34 first-team and 44 overall Academic 
        All-Americans, and 18 NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship winners: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Joe Paterno for his unparalleled success with both 
        the Penn State football program and the University, resulting in 400 
        wins as head coach; and
            (2) commends Joe Paterno for setting an on- and off-the-field 
        example of honor, success, integrity, and respect for thousands of 
        players, coaches, students, and fans throughout the Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Daron THOMAS, petitioner, v. Sam OLENS, Attorney General of Georgia, et al.

No. 16-5166.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Erksine James McKINLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7267.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Stuart DIZAK, petitioner, v. John COLVIN, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility.

No. 16-9354.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
MASIMO CORPORATION, petitioner, v. Michael RUHE, et al.

No. 15-1408.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
II-00543

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rick Redfield <redfieldrh@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:22 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Rick Redfield

2032 Lake Ave

Wilmette, IL 60091
Joseph A. JONES, petitioner, v. SOUTH DAKOTA.

No. 17-7166.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Dakota denied.