alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: January 21, 2011/s/ Eddie Cheung Wai HungCheung Wai Hung, Eddie, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,677
<INVENTORY>                                     97,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,839
<PP&E>                                          82,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 395,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,044
<BONDS>                                        447,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   395,904
<SALES>                                        252,926
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,926
<CGS>                                          152,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,502
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,513
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,238
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,751
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
        

</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1949/2004

of 11 November 2004         

fixing the export refunds on milk and milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 on products exported in the natural state shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 November 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2003 (OJ L 287, 5.11.2003, p. 13).

(3)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(4)OJ L 91, 1.4.1984, p. 71. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 222/88 (OJ L 28, 1.2.1988, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 11 November 2004 fixing the export refunds on milk and milk products

----
II-00726

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

George Epsilanty <epsilanty@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:59 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Please remember - you work on behalf of the American people. It’s natural that

the businesses you regulate would complain! Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms

like "commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Please remember - you work on behalf of the American people. It’s natural that the businesses you regulate would complain!

George Epsilanty

1029 Carolina St

San Francisco, CA 94107
Carlos L. WOODSON, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-5930.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JONATHAN DONNELL JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00136-GCM-3)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: August 1, 2016

Before KEENAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Donnell Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Donnell Johnson appeals the district court’s 

orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for 

reduction of sentence and denying his motion for an extension of 

time to appeal the denial of the § 3582(c)(2) motion.* Upon 

review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its 

discretion in denying Johnson’s motion for an extension, see

Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4), 26(b), and find no reversible error 

with respect to the denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Johnson, No. 3:00-cr-00136-GCM-3 

(W.D.N.C. July 24 & Oct. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Because we construe Johnson’s motion for an extension as 

his notice of appeal of the order denying his § 3582(c)(2) 

motion, both orders are before the court.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1706 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week, which begins 

on October 3, 2010, and the work of firefighters in educating and 

protecting the communities of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. PASCRELL (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. KING of New 

York, and Mr. ANDREWS) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Fire Prevention Week, 

which begins on October 3, 2010, and the work of firefighters in educating and protecting the communities 

of the United States. 

Whereas Fire Prevention Week is a time for the people of the 

United States to learn life saving fire safety information, 

practice emergency escape plans, and check and replace 

batteries in smoke alarms; 

Whereas the National Fire Protection Association reports 

that smoke alarms cut the risk of people in the United 

States dying in a fire in half; 

Whereas each year nearly 3,000 people die in the United 

States from house fires; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1706 IH 

Whereas the National Fire Protection Association reports 

that in the United States 82 firefighters lost their lives 

in the line of duty in 2009; 

Whereas the United States Fire Administration reports that 

more than 50 firefighters have already lost their lives in 

the line of duty in 2010; 

Whereas the Nation’s firefighters courageously respond to 

calls and risk their lives to protect families and communities from fire, natural disasters, and acts of terrorism; 

Whereas 343 firefighters sacrificed their lives responding heroically to the events of September 11, 2001; 

Whereas the Nation’s first responders selflessly and bravely 

provided search and rescue assistance to Haiti following 

the tragic earthquake that took the lives of more than 

100,000 Haitians on January 12, 2010; 

Whereas Fire Prevention Week is the longest running public 

health and safety observance on record, as firefighters 

have been honored for their role in educating the people 

of the United States during Fire Prevention Week since 

1922; 

Whereas the National Fire Protection Association has designated the week of October 3 through 9, 2010, as Fire 

Prevention Week; and 

Whereas the people of the United States can do their part 

to protect themselves, their families, and our Nation’s 

firefighters by checking their smoke alarms regularly: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1706 IH 

1 (1) supports the work of firefighters in edu2 cating and protecting the communities of the United 

3 States; and 

4 (2) supports the goals and the ideals of Fire 

5 Prevention Week, as designated by the National Fire 

6 Protection Association. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         503,840
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,529,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (461,097)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,100,138
<PP&E>                                       5,797,980
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,972,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,496,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,504,845
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,363,590
<COMMON>                                         7,170
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,621,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,496,679
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,687,508
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,616,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             350,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,279,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,279,439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,279,439)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                      AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                            104,004
<SECURITIES>                                      67,128
<RECEIVABLES>                                     103,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                      15,732
<INVENTORY>                                       12,248
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  288,906
<PP&E>                                            135,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                    48,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    629,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             75,232
<BONDS>                                           160,887
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          399
<OTHER-SE>                                        385,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      629,379
<SALES>                                           364,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  372,531
<CGS>                                             259,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     259,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  52,288
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   59,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                      22,658
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               36,826
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      36,826
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .93
        


</TABLE>
II-00179

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Susan tercek <susantercek@yahoo.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 11:38 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Susan tercek

5254 Eagle Harbor Drive NE

Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
# C_2010037EN.01003802.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/38

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 December 2009 — Vereniging Milieudefensie and Stichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht v Commission

(Case T-396/09 R)

(Interim measures - Obligation of the Member States to protect and improve ambient air quality - Exemption granted to a Member State - Commission’s refusal to review - Application for suspension of operation of a measure and interim measures - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 37/53

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Vereniging Milieudefensie (Amsterdam, Netherlands) and Stichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: A. van den Biesen, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver, W. Roels and A. Alcover San Pedro, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application (i) for suspension of operation of Decision C (2009) 6121 of 28 July 2009 declaring inadmissible the applicants’ request for review by the Commission of its Decision C (2009) 2560 final of 7 April 2009 granting the Kingdom of the Netherlands a temporary exemption from its obligations in combating ambient air pollution; and (ii) for interim measures requiring the Kingdom of the Netherlands to comply with those obligations at the earliest opportunity.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
II-00936

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Paul Governa <pgoverna@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:54 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Paul Governa

58 Cranberry Ct.

Marlton, NJ 8053
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Bradley E. Larson, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company and Clint Tryon, Principal
Accounting Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify to their
knowledge:

            (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 /s/ Bradley E. Larson                          /s/ Clint Tryon
-----------------------------                   -------------------------------
Bradley E. Larson                               Clint Tryon
Chief Executive Officer and President           Principal Accounting Officer
March 30, 2004                                  March 30, 2004