alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

****

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of American Church Mortgage Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

	1.	TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

	2.	Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationof the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II-Oll05

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

timothy raymond <raymont@cityofrochester.gov>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:12 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

timothy raymond

45-1/2 marshall st

rochester, NY 14607
No. 623, Misc.

#### Adams *v.*Hiatt, Warden.

C. A. 3d Cir.

*Wm. H. Ramsey*for petitioner.

Certiorari denied.
Karen MARKOSIAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7231.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Bruce MURRAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7045.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2011013EN.01001002.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht (Germany)) — Hogan Lovells International LLP v Bayer CropScience AG

(Case C-229/09) (1)

1

(Patent law - Plant-protection products - Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 - Directive 91/414/EEC - Supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products - Grant of a certificate for a product which had obtained a provisional marketing authorisation)

2011/C 13/16

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundespatentgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hogan Lovells International LLP

Applicant:

Defendant: Bayer CropScience AG

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundespatentgericht — Interpretation of Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products (OJ 1996 L 198, p. 30) — Conditions governing the acquisition of a supplementary protection certificate — Possibility of having such a certificate issued on the basis of a previous marketing authorisation issued pursuant to Article 8(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC — Active substance iodosulfuron

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products must be interpreted as not precluding a supplementary protection certificate from being issued for a plant protection product in respect of which a valid marketing authorisation has been granted pursuant to Article 8(1) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.09.2009.

1

---
II-00950

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Marnie Schwartz-Hanley <marnieschwartz@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:44 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Marnie Schwartz-Hanley

10 Welborn St

West Pelzer, SC 29669-1134
Joe JOHNSON, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 16-6766.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.
# C_2010024EN.01003302.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/33

---

Action brought on 20 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

(Case C-455/09)

2010/C 24/61

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and Ł. Habiak, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not bringing into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to give effect to Directive 2006/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC, (1) and in any event by not informing the Commission of those measures, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 18 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not bringing into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to give effect to Directive 2006/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC, (1) and in any event by not informing the Commission of those measures, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 18 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which Directive 2006/7/EC had to be transposed expired on 24 March 2008.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 64, p. 37.

1

---
10.2  AMENDMENT  TO  LEASE  AGREEMENT FOR 3020 NORTH EL PASO, STE. 103, COLORADO
      SPRINGS,  CO  80907,  DATED  MAY  20,  1999.

                              AMENDMENT #1 TO LEASE

LANDLORD:   Lapham Enterprises
            P.O. Box 7208
            Colorado Springs, CO  80933

TENANT:     Anything,  Inc.
            3020 N. El Paso Street
            Colorado Springs, CO  80907

PREMISES:   3020 N. El Paso Street
            Colorado Springs, CO  80907

LEASE  DATE:     June 2, 1998

This  amendment  made  and  entered  into  by  and  between  Lapham  Enterprises
(hereinafter  referred  to  as  the  Landlord),  and Anything, Inc. (hereinafter
referred  to  as  the  Tenant)

WITNESSETH:  Anything,  Inc.  previously entered into a Lease dated June 2, 1998
("Lease") for the premises commonly referred to as 3020 N. El Paso Street, Suite
#103,  Colorado Springs, Colorado.  The term of the Lease commenced June 3, 1998
and  ends  on  May  31,  1999.

                     NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1.   Term:  The term of the Lease  agreement  shall be extended  for Twelve (12)
     additional months hence revising the Lease expiration date to May 31, 2000.

2.   Rent Amount:  In consideration of said Lease extension Tenant agrees to pay
     Landlord as base rent for the premises an amount of Twelve Thousand,  Three
     Hundred Sixty Dollars ($12,360.00) payable in equal monthly installments of
     $1,030.00.

     Such monthly rental  payments shall be payable in advance by the 1st day of
     each and every calendar month at the office of the Landlord,  or such other
     place as the Landlord from time to time may designate in writing.

3.   DISCLOSURE:  Tenant understands that Robert J. Lapham is acting as agent of
     the Landlord in this  transaction  with duty to respect the Landlord's best
     interest.  Furthermore,  Tenant is  advised to seek  appropriate  Legal and
     Financial counsel prior to accepting this Amendment.

4.   RATIFICATION:  All terms and  conditions  of the  original  Lease except as
     expressly  modified  herein,  shall be unchanged,  remain in full force and
     effect,  and are  hereby  ratified,  confirmed,  and  approved  by both the
     Landlord and Tenant.

<PAGE>
IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Landlord  and  Tenant  have  entered into this Lease
Amendment  consisting  of  Four  (4)  provisions  this  20th  day  of May, 1999.

TENANT:
ANYTHING,  INC.

BY:  /s/  J.  Scott  Sitra
TITLE  President/CEO

LANDLORD:
LAPHAM  ENTERPRISES

BY:  /s/  Robert  J.  Lapham
TITLE:  Manager




<PAGE>
Andrea FORSYTHE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7417.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 207 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that all employers 

give veterans a holiday on Veteran’s Day in honor of their service 

to our country. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2009 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida (for herself, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Ms. 

HERSETH SANDLIN, and Mr. MITCHELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

all employers give veterans a holiday on Veteran’s Day 

in honor of their service to our country. 

Whereas veterans of the United States Armed Forces have 

served our country with honor and at great personal sacrifice; 

Whereas according to the latest Census figures there are 

26,400,000 veterans living in the United States; 

Whereas we are all grateful to the men and women who have 

served and are serving in our Armed Forces; 

Whereas Veterans Day is observed on November 11 each 

year, which was originally called Armistice Day to celebrate the conclusion of hostilities in World War I; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 207 IH 

Whereas President Dwight Eisenhower stated in his Proclamation to establish Veterans Day, ‘‘In order to insure 

proper and widespread observance of this anniversary, all 

veterans, all veterans’ organizations, and the entire citizenry will wish to join hands in the common purpose’’; 

and 

Whereas Veterans Day is a Federal holiday and all 50 States 

have declared it a State holiday: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that all employers should give veterans a holi3 day in honor of their service to our country and so that 

4 they may participate in appropriate ceremonies on Vet5 erans Day. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
II-OlO06

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Thomas Peer <trpeer@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:14 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Thomas Peer

7508 Lamar Ave., #55

Prairie Village, KS 66208
II-00795

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

katharina hunter <klhl 16@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:16 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

katharina htmter

356 se maple st

hillsboro, OR 97123
II-01147

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

edward reardon <judd65002@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:21 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

edward reardon

4 winslow st.

arlington, MA 2474
### Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER In re Newman Minors Docket No. 329063 /329076 LC No. 15 -000074 NA Michael F. Gadola Presiding Judge Deborah A. Servitto Douglas B. Shapiro

Jud ges The Court orders that the September 22, 2016 op1mon is hereby VACA TED, and a new opinion is attached.

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zi mmer Jr., Chief C lerk, on 

# SEP 2 9 2016 Date
# C_2010011EN.01002002.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

(Case C-174/09) (1)

1

2010/C 11/37

Language of the case: Polish

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Room 940. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*Agreement No.:*                     001792-005                

*Title*: New Orleans/New Orleans Cold Storage Terminal Agreement                

*Parties*:                

 The Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans

New Orleans Cold Storage and Warehousing Company, Ltd.

*Synopsis*: The proposed amendment amends the demise of the property covered by the lease. The term of the lease still runs until April 30, 2005.                 

*Agreement No.:*                     011502-003                

*Title:*                     NYK/HUAL Space Charter and Cooperative Working Agreement                

*Parties*:                

 HUAL A/S

Nippon Yusen Kaisha

*Synopsis*: The proposed modification changes HUAL's address, adds the trade from Japan and Korea to U.S. Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific ports, and limits the outbound scope to the trade from U.S. Atlantic and Gulf ports to Red Sea and Arabian Gulf ports.                 

By order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: June 22, 2001.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-16166 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P