alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3679 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3679

 To direct the Director of National Intelligence to carry out a prize 
   competition to stimulate research and development relevant to 5G 
                              technology.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2019

Mr. Krishnamoorthi introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the 
    Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Director of National Intelligence to carry out a prize 
   competition to stimulate research and development relevant to 5G 
                              technology.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Research, Innovation, and 
Zeal in Emerging 5G Technology Act'' or the ``PRIZE 5G Tech Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF 5G PRIZE COMPETITION.

    (a) Prize Competition.--Pursuant to section 24 of the Stevenson-
Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3719), the Director 
of National Intelligence, acting through the Director of the 
Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Agency, shall carry out a 
program to award prizes competitively to stimulate research and 
development relevant to 5G technology.
    (b) Prize Amount.--In carrying out the program under subsection 
(a), the Director may award not more than a total of $5,000,000 to one 
or more winners of the prize competition.
    (c) Consultation.--In carrying out the program under subsection 
(a), the Director may consult with the heads of relevant departments 
and agencies of the Federal Government.
    (d) 5G Technology Defined.--In this section, the term ``5G 
technology'' means hardware, software, or other technologies relating 
to fifth-generation wireless networks.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010161EN.01001401.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/14

---

Appeal brought on 23 September 2009 by Constantin Hârsulescu against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 22 July 2009 in Case T-234/09 Hârsulescu v Romania

(Case C-374/09 P)

(2010/C 161/20)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Appellant: Constantin Hârsulescu (represented by: C. Stanciu)

Other party to the proceedings: Romania

The Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) dismissed the appeal by order of 4 March 2010.

---
Lucille R. KELLEY, petitioner, v. ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.

No. 17-6363.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Tomas Rodriguez INFANTE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 15-8613.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
II-00895

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Miller, Jr. <michamille@earthlink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:16 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Miller, Jr.

2200 Ben Franklin Pkwy

Phila, PA 19130
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**ChiefExecutive Officer Certification**

 

I, R. JackDeCrane, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K of DeCrane Holdings Co.;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 
| Date:  October 9, 2003 |                      |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                   |                      |
|                   |                      |
|                   | /s/  R. JACK DECRANE |
|                   | R. Jack  DeCrane          |
|                   | Chief  Executive Officer  |

 

----
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JOHN S. MORRIS, EVERETT E. KLIPP, AND JOHN S. MORRIS AND CO., INC. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 205 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 205 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

John S. Morris, 

Everett E. Klipp, and 

John S. Morris and Co., Inc. 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that during 1971, the respondents accepted a stock 

certificate from Mr. Charles E. Evans, Jr., with the understanding that such 

stock would constitute the margin for Mr. Evans' futures trading. Thereafter, 

without notice, they closed out his position in the futures market on the basis 

that such stock was not acceptable as margin. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before a referee in Chicago, 

Illinois, at a date and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
II-00391

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Matthew Ahart <Alanandsuzy@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:43 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Matthew Ahart

P.o.bx.141

Point clear, AL 36564
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3640 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3640

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to assist blind veterans who have not lost use of a 
  leg in acquiring specially adapted housing, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2019

 Mrs. Luria (for herself and Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to assist blind veterans who have not lost use of a 
  leg in acquiring specially adapted housing, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Housing Access for Blind Veterans 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO ASSIST BLIND 
              VETERANS WHO HAVE NOT LOST USE OF A LEG IN ACQUIRING 
              SPECIALLY ADAPTED HOUSING.

    Section 2101(a)(2)(B)(ii) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subclause (I), by striking 
        ``due to--'' and inserting ``due to blindness in both eyes, 
        having central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better 
        eye with the use of a standard correcting lens. For the 
        purposes of this clause, an eye with a limitation in the fields 
        of vision such that the widest diameter of the visual field 
        subtends an angle no greater than 20 degrees shall be 
        considered as having a central visual acuity of 20/200 or 
        less.''; and
            (2) by striking subclauses (I) and (II).
                                 <all>
```
Gregory Shawn MERCER, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-964.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
II-00476

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Marian Cruz <marian.cruz2903@sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:49 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Marian Cruz

661 4th St

Hollister, CA 95023
II-O0511

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rhodie Jorgenson <rhodieajorgenson@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:00 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Rhodie Jorgenson

6116 Temple Street

Bethesda, MD 20817
Hugo VILLARREAL-SOLIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16M62.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 130020 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, ANNA MARIE TAYLOR and DARL TAYLOR, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 130020 COA: 256058 Lapeer CC: 99-027598-NH RATAN RAJANI, M.D. and SURGICAL SPECIALISTS, P.C., Defendants-Appellants,

and

LAPEER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2006

Clerk
*The HONORABLE LEONARD I. GARTH, United States

Circuit Judge for the United States Court of

Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by

designation.

_____________

No. 95-2345EM

_____________

Marlowe T. Price, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Board of Police Commissioners, *

of the City of St. Louis; *

Anne-Marie Clarke; Charles E. *

Mischeaux; Matthew J. Padberg; * Appeal from the United States

Robert T. Haar; * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Defendants, *

* 

Vincent Edwards; *

*

Defendant-Appellant, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Larry Davis; T. Moore; *

Freeman Bosley, Jr.; *

State of Missouri, *

*

Defendants. *

_____________

Submitted: December 15, 1995

 Filed: March 27, 1996 

_____________

Before FAGG, GARTH, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges. *

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Marlowe T. Price injured his head during a fight with several

security guards at a grocery store in Saint Louis, Missouri. Officer

Vincent Edwards responded to the disturbance at the grocery
-2-

store and placed Price under arrest. Price had a visible abrasion on his

forehead and was suffering from a headache at the time of his arrest. On

the way to jail, Price asked to be taken to the hospital, but Edwards

refused. About four hours later, jail officials took Price to the

hospital. At the hospital, a doctor diagnosed Price with a mild head

injury and prescribed Tylenol. Price brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

contending Edwards was deliberately indifferent to Price's serious medical

needs. See Davis v. Hall, 992 F.2d 151, 153 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam).

The jury found in Price's favor and awarded damages. The district court

then denied Edwards's motion for judgment as a matter of law. The district

court also awarded attorney's fees to Price as a prevailing party. Edwards

appeals, and we reverse.

Although Price's injury could be viewed as serious, Price's claim

must fail because he did not produce any verifying medical evidence to

establish the detrimental effect of the delay in medical treatment.

Beyerbach v. Sears, 49 F.3d 1324, 1326-27 (8th Cir. 1995). Viewing the

record in the light most favorable to Price, there is simply no evidence

that the delay in taking Price to the hospital aggravated his fight-related

injury. Price did not offer any medical testimony, and his medical records

do not show he suffered any detrimental effects from the four-hour delay

in treatment. Id. Price cannot recover attorney's fees because he is no

longer a prevailing party. See 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) (Supp. V 1993).

We thus reverse the judgment entered on the jury's verdict and the

order awarding attorney's fees.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2009244EN.01000201.xml

| 10.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/2

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2009 — Susanne Bulicke v Deutsche Büro Service GmbH

(Case C-246/09)

2009/C 244/02

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesarbeitsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Susanne Bulicke

Applicant:

Defendant: Deutsche Büro Service GmbH

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does national legislation under which a time-limit of two months from receipt of a rejection of a job application — or by way of interpretation: from knowledge of the discrimination — applies (in the absence of provisions in a collective agreement) to the bringing in writing of a claim for damages and/or compensation based on discrimination in recruitment infringe primary law of the European Community (safeguarding effective legal protection) and/or the Community law prohibition of age discrimination, Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000, (1) if three-year limitation periods apply to equivalent claims under national law, and/or the ‘prohibition of regression’ (reduction of protection) under Article 8 of Directive 2000/78/EC, if a previous national provision provided for a longer limitation period for discrimination on grounds of sex?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation; OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.

1

---
Jose A. RIVERA-RIVERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7003.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to the requirementset forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Paul V. Maier, Principal Financial andAccounting Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 

1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, and 

2. Theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission(“SEC”) or its staff upon request. 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the AnnualReport), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** theundersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 8th day of March, 2011.