alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Industry Sector Advisory Committee on Services (ISAC-13) will hold a meeting on June 28, 2001, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon. The meeting will be open to the public from 9 a.m. to 9:45 a.m. and closed to the public from 9:45 a.m. to 12 noon.

# DATES:

The meeting is scheduled for June 28, 2001, unless otherwise notified.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held in Conference Room 6057, of the Department of Commerce, located at 14th Street between Pennsylvania and Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ingrid Mitchem, Acting Designated Officer for ISAC-13, (202) 482-3268, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (principal contacts), or myself on (202) 395-6120.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

During the meeting the following topics will be addressed:
    - Trade Promotion Authority; and
    - International Trade Agreements

Heather K. Wingate,

Assistant United States Trade Representative for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.

[FR Doc. 01-15772 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
II-01056

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lee C.R. Baker <lbaker2@triad.rr.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:40 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Lee C.R. Baker

2506 Sylvan Road

Greensboro, NC 27403
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1



                               RIVIANA FOODS INC.


                                 P. O. Box 2636
                              Houston, Texas 77252

                                                       Telephone: (713) 529-3251
                                                             Fax: (713) 529-1866

                                February 1, 2001


Mr. Frank A. Godchaux III
600 Fifth Street
Abbeville, Louisiana 70510

         Re:  AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

Dear Frank:

         The purpose of this letter is to amend the Consulting Agreement between
you and the Company dated January 1, 1996.

         Effective as of February 1, 2001, the rate paid by the Company to you
as set forth in paragraph 2. of the Agreement shall be $65,000 per year.

         All other terms of the Consulting Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

         Please indicate your agreement by signing and returning a copy to me.

                                                Yours very truly,

                                                RIVIANA FOODS INC.


                                                By: /s/ Joseph A. Hafner, Jr.
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Joseph A. Hafner, Jr.
                                                    President


The foregoing agreement is
hereby accepted and agreed.

/s/ Frank A. Godchaux III
---------------------------------
Frank A. Godchaux III, Consultant
Kristofor J. LANGE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6877.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-2890

___________________________ Michael Lindsey, as husband and wife; Marquesa Lindsey, as husband and wife

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants

v. Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc.; John Doe lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas

____________ Submitted: March 26, 2024 Filed: April 4, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Michael and Marquesa Lindsey appeal the district court’s 1 denial of their motion to voluntarily dismiss their action without prejudice. After careful review of

1 The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court did not

abuse its discretion in denying the Lindseys’ motion. See Hamm v. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharms., Inc. , 187 F.3d 941, 950 (8th Cir. 1999) (reviewing denial of motion to voluntarily dismiss for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
II-00734

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Barbara Rowe <browe@ci.garland.tx.us>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:54 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Barbara Rowe

625 Austin St

Gasrland, UT 75040
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3675 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 15, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To require a review of Department of Homeland Security 

trusted traveler programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 3675 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trusted Traveler Re3 consideration and Restoration Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW. 

5 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

6 of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 

7 shall conduct a review of Department of Homeland Secu8 rity trusted traveler programs. Such review shall examine 

9 the following: 

10 (1) The extent to which the Department of 

11 Homeland Security tracks data and monitors trends 

12 related to trusted traveler programs, including root 

13 causes for identity-matching errors resulting in an 

14 individual’s enrollment in a trusted traveler program 

15 being reinstated. 

16 (2) Whether the Department coordinates with 

17 the heads of other relevant Federal, State, local, 

18 Tribal, or territorial entities regarding redress proce19 dures for disqualifying offenses not covered by the 

20 Department’s own redress processes but which of21 fenses impact an individual’s enrollment in a trusted 

22 traveler program. 

23 (3) How the Department may improve individ24 uals’ access to reconsideration procedures regarding 

25 a disqualifying offense for enrollment in a trusted 

26 traveler program that requires the involvement of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

HR 3675 RFS

1 any other Federal, State, local, Tribal, or territorial 

2 entity. 

3 (4) The extent to which travelers are informed 

4 about reconsideration procedures regarding enroll5 ment in a trusted traveler program. 

6 SEC. 3. ENROLLMENT REDRESS. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec8 retary of Homeland Security shall, with respect to an indi9 vidual whose enrollment in a trusted traveler program was 

10 revoked in error extend by an amount of time equal to 

11 the period of revocation the period of active enrollment 

12 in such a program upon re-enrollment in such a program 

13 by such an individual. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2010024EN.01007902.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/79

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 November 2009 — Lebedef v Commission

(Case F-54/09) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Officials - Annual leave - Half-time secondment for the purposes of union representation - Unauthorised absence - Deduction from annual leave entitlement - Article 60 of the Staff Regulations - Action manifestly unfounded)

2010/C 24/150

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of several decisions concerning the deduction of 39 days of the applicant’s leave entitlement for 2008.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law;. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law;.

| 2. | Mr Lebedef is ordered to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Lebedef is ordered to pay the costs in their entirety.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.07.2009, p. 28

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1756 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1756

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 8, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 5281) to amend title 28, United States 
Code, to clarify and improve certain provisions relating to the removal of 
litigation against Federal officers or agencies to Federal courts, and for other 
purposes, with the Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in the House, 
without intervention of any point of order except those arising under clause 10 
of rule XXI, a single motion offered by the chair of the Committee on the 
Judiciary or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendments 
numbered 1 and 2, and that the House concur in the Senate amendment numbered 3 
with the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as 
read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption 
without intervening motion or demand for division of the question.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Walter CAMPBELL, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 15-9907.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laserscope on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Derek Bertocci, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officerof Laserscope, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2005fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Laserscope.     Date:November 9, 2005 By: /s/ Derek Bertocci         Derek Bertocci    Vice President, Finance and    Chief Financial Officer
H. Res. 1617 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2010. 

Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers have suffered the 

supreme sacrifice of motherhood by losing a son or 

daughter who served in the Armed Forces, and thus perpetuate the memory of all whose lives are sacrificed in 

war; 

Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers assist veterans of 

the Armed Forces and their dependents in the presentation of claims to the Department of Veterans Affairs 

and aid members of the Armed Forces who served and 

died or were wounded or incapacitated during hostilities; 

Whereas the services rendered to the United States by the 

mothers of America have strengthened and inspired 

Americans throughout the history of the United States; 

Whereas Americans honor themselves and the mothers of 

America when they revere and emphasize the role of the 

home and the family as the true foundations of the 

United States; 

Whereas by doing so much for the home, the American mother is a source of moral and spiritual guidance for the 

people of the United States and thus acts as a positive 

force to promote good government and peace among all 

mankind; and 
2 

•HRES 1617 EH 

Whereas the last Sunday in September of each year is observed as Gold Star Mothers Day: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and purpose of Gold Star 

Mothers Day, which is observed in remembrance of the 

supreme sacrifice made by mothers who lose a son or 

daughter serving in the Armed Forces; and 

(2) urges the President to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe Gold 

Star Mothers Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
II-00760

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

George Davis <g_davis39@live.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:37 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

George Davis

20946 E. Parkview Ln.

Mayer, AZ 86333
Carolyn W. FORD, petitioner, v. James F. ROHR, et al.

No. 16-5468.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 17, 2022 No. 04-21-00553-CV IN THE INTEREST OF L.M.C., A CHILD From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-16354 Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On May 12, 2022, the court received appellee’s brief. Appellee’s brief fails to comply with Rule 9.5(d),(e) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Under Rule 9.5(d),(e), a document presented for filing in this court must contain a certificate of service, stating the date and manner of service, and the name and address of each person served. T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.5(d),(e). Appellee’s brief does not contain a proper certificate of service. We therefore order appellee to promptly file a certificate of service that complies with Rule 9.5(d),(e), but not later than May 24, 2022.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of May, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1099 

KA 12-00107 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID COLON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (PATRICK J. MARTHAGE OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M.

Donalty, J.), rendered September 13, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the first

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law §

215.51 [b] [iii]), defendant challenges the validity of his waiver of

the right to appeal. We conclude that “County Court did not

improperly conflate the waiver of the right to appeal with those

rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea” (People v Bentley, 63

AD3d 1624, 1625, lv denied 13 NY3d 742; see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d

257, 264; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that the record

establishes that the court engaged defendant “in an adequate colloquy

to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and

voluntary choice” (People v Burt, 101 AD3d 1729, 1730, lv denied 20

NY3d 1060 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Defendant’s valid

waiver encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see

generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827).

Although defendant’s contentions that his plea was coerced and

that he is innocent survive the valid waiver of the right to appeal

(see People v Merritt, 115 AD3d 1250, 1251; People v Lewandowski, 82

AD3d 1602, 1602), we conclude that those contentions are without

merit. “The court was presented with a credibility determination when

defendant moved to withdraw his plea and advanced his belated claims

of innocence and coercion, and it did not abuse its discretion in

discrediting those claims” (People v Sparcino, 78 AD3d 1508, 1509, lv

denied 16 NY3d 746). Indeed, we conclude that “defendant’s assertions
-2- 1099 

KA 12-00107 

of innocence and coercion were conclusory and belied by defendant’s

statements during the plea colloquy” (People v Wright, 66 AD3d 1334,

1334, lv denied 13 NY3d 912; see People v Allen, 99 AD3d 1252, 1252). 

Entered: November 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT I, Robert Klein, President and
Chief Executive Officer of 2Uonline.com, Inc, a Delaware Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. Dated: April 11, 2003

/s/ Robert Klein
-----------------------
Robert Klein
President and Chief Executive Officer