alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1573]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting


Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, January 22, 2001.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551

Status: Closed

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Dated: January 12, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-1573 Filed 1-12-01; 4:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# C_2010100EN.01001301.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/13

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy)) — Isabella Calestani (C-292/09), Paolo Lunardi (C-293/09) v Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Parma

(Joined Cases C-292/09 and C-293/09) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

2010/C 100/20

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Isabella Calestani (C-292/09), Paolo Lunardi (C-293/09)

Applicants:

Defendant: Agenzi delle Entrate Ufficio di Parma

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma — Interpretation of Article 13B(c) of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Exemption of supplies of goods used wholly for an exempted activity or excluded from the right to deduction — National legislation precluding the exemption

Operative part

Operative part

The references for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy), by decisions of 9 and 17 June 2009, are manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 26.09.2009.

1

---
STERLING JEWELERS INC., petitioner, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.

No. 15-1329.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2012209EN.01000702.xml

| 14.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/7

---

Order of the General Court of 16 May 2012 — La City v OHIM — Bücheler and Ewert (citydogs)

(Case T-444/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Appointment of a new representative - Applicant’s failure to act - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 209/11

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: La City (La Courneuve, France) (represented initially by: S. Bénoliel-Claux, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: S. Schäffner and R. Pethke, Agents)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Andreas Bücheler and Konstanze Ewert (Engelskirchen, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 August 2009 (Case R 233/2008-1) relating to opposition proceedings between (1) La City and (2) Mr Andreas Bücheler and Ms Konstanze Ewert.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | La City, the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Mr Andreas Bücheler and Ms Konstanze Ewert shall each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

La City, the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Mr Andreas Bücheler and Ms Konstanze Ewert shall each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---
Craya C. CARON, petitioner, v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-7216.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Robert Gregory MODRALL, petitioner, v. John Thomas FOWLKES, Jr.

No. 15-9503.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2010037EN.01002202.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/22

---

Action brought on 2 December 2009 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-500/09)

2010/C 37/27

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and D. Triantafillou, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that, by continuing to apply Ministerial Decision A1/44351/3608 of 12 October 2005, the Hellenic Republic is in breach of its obligations under Directive 97/67/EC (1) (as amended), as they result in particular from Article 9(1) and (2); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by continuing to apply Ministerial Decision A1/44351/3608 of 12 October 2005, the Hellenic Republic is in breach of its obligations under Directive 97/67/EC (1) (as amended), as they result in particular from Article 9(1) and (2);

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Hellenic Republic is hindering the liberalisation of postal services, the objective of Directive 97/67, which provides in that connection for the grant of general authorisations and individual licences in an open manner and without discrimination.

The Greek legislation requires of authorised carriers, when licences are issued for postal transport vehicles, that they should themselves be postal undertakings entered in the appropriate register as holders of a general authorisation. That necessitates radical restructuring of postal networks and makes it impossible for the principal undertakings to employ franchisees, unless they opt to convert themselves into undertakings leasing vehicles with the costs that that implies.

Moreover, the Greek legislation allows the transport of heavy loads only by certain commercial vehicles, reserved to a regulated profession, which prevents other undertakings from providing the same service.

The Hellenic Republic has not submitted sufficient justification for those restrictions.

---

(1)  OJ L 15 of 21.1.1998, p. 14.

1

---
II-00465

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mary Wilson <aldenponds@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:11 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mary Wilson

$4895 Getter Drive

Viroqua, WI 54665
# C_2010148EN.01005105.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/51

---

Order of the General Court of 22 March 2010 — Al Barakaat International Foundation v Commission

(Case T-45/09) (1)

1

2010/C 148/87

Language of the case: Swedish

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.

1

---
Andrew T. PLANCARTE, petitioner, v. James FALK, Warden, et al.

No. 15-9289.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      $2,171,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               $4,012,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                ($645,880)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $5,912,905
<PP&E>                                      $3,081,590
<DEPRECIATION>                              ($679,339)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $47,492,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      $10,622,167
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 $5,666,596
<COMMON>                                        $6,842
<OTHER-SE>                                ($3,139,788)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $47,492,706
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $6,300,352
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $6,689,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $882,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           ($1,272,099)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       ($1,272,099)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              ($1,272,099)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 of Meadow Valley Corporation (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by the Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 30, 2006
    
    
    
    /s/ Bradley E. LarsonBradley E. LarsonChief Executive Officer
Mychal Andra REED, petitioner, v. Scott KERNAN, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 15-9650.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Lorna CLAUSE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI, et al.

No. 16-641.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Motion of The Pension Rights Center for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2013325EN.01002102.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-486/09) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Rural development measures - Less favoured areas and agri-environment - Flat-rate financial correction - Expenditure incurred by Poland - Control reports - Effectiveness of controls - System of penalties - Obligation to state reasons)

2013/C 325/35

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented: initially by M. Szpunar, subsequently by M. Szpunar and B. Majczyna, and lastly by B. Majczyna and S. Balcerak, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and M. Owsiany-Hornung, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision 2009/721/EC of 24 September 2009 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2009 L 257, p. 28).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jerry A. Dukes,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 12, 2004



/s/ Jerry A. DukesJerry A. DukesPresident
# C_2009082EN.01002001.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/20

---

Appeal brought on 3 February 2009 by Barbara Becker against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) delivered on 2 December2008 in Case T-212/07 Harman International Industries, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-51/09 P)

(2009/C 82/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Barbara Becker (represented by: P. Baronikians, A. Hofstetter, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Harman International Industries, Inc., Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should order:

| — | annulment of § 1 of the Court of First Instance's decision of 2 December 2008 (Case T-212/07), by which the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 7 March 2007 (Case R-502/2006-1) was annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of § 1 of the Court of First Instance's decision of 2 December 2008 (Case T-212/07), by which the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 7 March 2007 (Case R-502/2006-1) was annulled;

| — | annulment of § 3 of the Court of First Instance's decision of 2 December 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of § 3 of the Court of First Instance's decision of 2 December 2008;

| — | order that the defendant pays the appellant's costs incurred in the entire proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the defendant pays the appellant's costs incurred in the entire proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the Court of First Instance erred in finding that there was similarity between the trademark ‘Barbara Becker’ applied for by the appellant and the defendant's mark ‘BECKER’, and therefore misapplied article 8(1)(b) CTMR in concluding that there was likelihood of confusion.

---
Elder Nehemias Lopez HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7342.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

*1026Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Infinex Ventures, Inc.
  (the "Company") on 10K SB for fiscal year ending October 31, 2003, 2003, as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  I, Mario Aiello, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        result of operations of the Company.

|Date: January 28, 2004 | By: | /s/ Mario Aiello       
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                       |     |                        
|                       |     | (Signature)            
|                       |     |                        
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer
|                       |     |                        
|                       |     | (Title)                

---