alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00912

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kathryn Darrow <kdarrow21 @msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:06 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kathryn Darrow

912 S Rees Ln

Spokane Valley, WA 99037
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


$38,000.00 Date: February 1, 2016


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Skinvisible, Inc., of 6320
South Sandhill Road, Suite 10, Las Vegas, NV 89120 promises to pay to the order of Victor Voebel Jr. (“Lender”), whose
address is 12 Massey Row, Sugar Land, Texas 77479, or such other place as the Lender may designate in writing to the undersigned,
the principal sum of Thirty Eight Thousand Dollars ($38,000.00), together with interest thereon from date hereof until paid, at
the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum as follows: The entire principal and interest amount shall be repaid on or before February
15, 2017. As payment for the loan the company agrees to gift 400,000 shares of Skinvisible, Inc at a deemed value of $0.02 per
share.


 


All or any part of the aforesaid principal sum may be prepaid at
any time and from time to time without penalty.


 


Upon written request by Lender, the principal of this loan may be
converted to common shares of Skinvisible, Inc. at the price of $0.02 per share plus 1⁄2 warrant at any time up until February
1, 2017. Warrants shall be issued at $0.02 per share and may be converted equal to 1 share for every 2 warrants issued and shall
expire 1 year from conversion of the loan conversion date.


 


This note is made and executed under, and is in all respects governed
by, the laws of the State of Nevada.


 


/s/ Terry Howlett


President & CEO


Skinvisible, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability and intent.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the invention disclosed in Patent Cooperation Treaty Application PCT/GB00/04562, “Resistance Gene,” filed November 29, 2000, is available for licensing and that the Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Plant BioScience Limited, of Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom, an exclusive license to the Federal Government's patent rights in this invention. This invention is jointly owned by Plant BioScience Limited, Iowa State University and the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before September 25, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4-1158, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

June Blalock of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 301-504-5257.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Government's patent rights to this invention are assigned to the United                           ( print page 34142)                        States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within ninety (90) days from the date of this published Notice, Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.                

Michael D. Ruff,

Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 01-16128 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy E. Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:  July 14, 2009


By:  /s/ Randy E. Butler


Randy E. Butler


Chief Financial Officer
**Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 September 2011 – Germany v Commission**

**(Case C-544/09 P)**

Appeal – State aid – Introduction of digital terrestrial television in the Berlin-Brandenburg region – Article 87(3)(c) EC – Market failure – Proportionality – Technological neutrality – Incentive effect

1.                     *State aid – Compatibility of aid with the common market – Aid bringing about improvement in the financial situation of the
recipient undertaking without being necessary in order for the aims laid down in Article 87(3) EC to be attained – None –
Public funding of the move to terrestrial digital television – Assessment of the criterion of necessity (Art. 87(3) EC) (see
paras 44, 46-48)*

2.                     *Appeals – Grounds – Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal – Inadmissibility (see para. 63)*

3.                     *State aid – Prohibited – Derogations – Aid eligible for the derogation laid down in Article 87(3)(c) EC – Conditions – Transition
from analogue to digital broadcasting – Condition of technological neutrality – Assessment (Art. 87(3)(c) EC; Commission notice
COM(2003) 541 final) (see paras 77, 79-81)*

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 6 October 2009 in Case T-21/06 | Germany | v | Commission | by which that court dismissed the action for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/513/EC of 9 November 2005 on the state aid which the Federal Republic of Germany has implemented for the introduction of digital terrestrial television in Berlin-Brandenburg (OJ 2006 L 200, p. 14) – Infringement of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the appeal; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
Robin LIPETZKY, petitioner, v. John FARROW, et al.

No. 15-1426.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
William MUNNS, petitioner, v. Shahrooz ABOOTALEBI.

No. 16-6863.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Luis A. SORO, petitioner, v. Pedro J. LOPEZ.

No. 15-9611.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         852426
<NAME>                        PW EAGLE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                          1,387,000
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                  40,880,000
<ALLOWANCES>                    3,091,000
<INVENTORY>                    64,212,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              104,393,000
<PP&E>                         86,321,000
<DEPRECIATION>                 13,468,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                189,998,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          75,612,000
<BONDS>                        32,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           80,000
<OTHER-SE>                     45,901,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  189,998,000
<SALES>                       199,347,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              199,347,000
<CGS>                         133,374,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 133,374,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               22,383,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                (110,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              7,291,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                36,245,000
<INCOME-TAX>                   13,880,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            22,365,000
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   22,365,000
<EPS-BASIC>                        2.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                        2.12


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jeffrey S. Kulka, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the accompanying Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2012, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







By:/s/  Jeffrey S. KulkaJeffrey S. KulkaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date: August 14, 2012
# C_2012165EN.01000201.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 April 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Cosenza (Italy)) — CCIAA di Cosenza v Grillo Star Srl, in liquidation

(Case C-443/09) (1)

1

(Directive 2008/7/EC - Indirect taxes on the raising of capital - Articles 5(1)(c) and 6(1)(e) - Scope - Annual duty paid to local chambers of commerce, industry, crafts and agriculture)

2012/C 165/02

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Ordinario di Cosenza

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CCIAA di Cosenza

Applicant:

Defendant: Grillo Star Srl, in liquidation

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale Ordinario di Cosenza — Interpretation of Articles 5(1)(c) and 6(1)(e) of Council Directive 2008/7/EC of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital — Annual duty payable on account of registration in the register of companies maintained by the local chambers of commerce — Annual duty determined on a flat-rate basis — Concept of ‘duties in the form of fees or dues’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(1)(c) of Council Directive 2008/7/EC of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital must be interpreted as not precluding a duty, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, payable annually by all undertakings on account of their registration in the register of undertakings, even if that registration has constituent effect for capital companies and even if the duty is also payable by those companies for the period during which they only carry on activities preparatory to operating a business.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---
# C_2010037EN.01002101.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 30 November 2009 — Vandoorne NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-489/09)

2010/C 37/23

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Vandoorne NV

Appellant:

Respondent: Belgische Staat

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Belgian law, in particular Article 58(1), in conjunction with Article 77(1)(7), of the Value Added Tax Code (Wetboek van de belasting over de toegevoegde waarde), compatible or incompatible with Article 27 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC, (1) which allows the Member States to adopt simplification measures, and/or with Article 11.C(1) of that directive, which grants a right to a refund of value added tax (VAT) in the case of total or partial non-payment, by reason of the fact that such national law (1) lays down a simplified procedure for charging VAT on supplies of manufactured tobacco products by imposing a single charge at source; and (2) does not give persons liable to tax at the various intermediary stages of the chain of supply who have borne VAT on those products a right to a refund of VAT on account of the total or partial loss of the purchase price?

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1)

1

---
Allan L. ROTHER, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 16-5919.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Allen GRIFFIN, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 17-7112.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

*1005Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
Thomas Wayne CRUMP, petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 16-6394.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	6

<CIK>	0000744822

<NAME>	Fidelity Investment Trust

<SERIES>

	<NUMBER>	21

	<NAME>	Fidelity Europe Fund

<MULTIPLIER>	1,000



<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>
year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>
oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>
oct-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>
1,130,124
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>
1,359,758
<RECEIVABLES>
16,241
<ASSETS-OTHER>
1,637
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>
0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>
1,377,636
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>
31,290
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>
0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>
28,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>
60,234
<SENIOR-EQUITY>
0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>
981,316
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>
38,641
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>
48,334
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>
9,182
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>
0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>
97,293
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>
0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>
229,611
<NET-ASSETS>
1,317,402
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>
22,216
<INTEREST-INCOME>
2,055
<OTHER-INCOME>
29
<EXPENSES-NET>
13,126
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>
11,174
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>
103,624
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>
59,285
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>
174,083
<EQUALIZATION>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>
13,416
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>
107,821
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>
0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>
10,551
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>
23,999
<SHARES-REINVESTED>
3,755
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>
(268,956)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>
15,518
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>
128,566
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>
0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>
0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>
8,733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>
109
<GROSS-EXPENSE>
14,037
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>
1,467,077
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>
32.820
<PER-SHARE-NII>
 .250
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>
3.540
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>
 .280
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>
2.250
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>
0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>
34.090
<EXPENSE-RATIO>
96





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy E. Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
            Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:  November 13, 2009


By:  /s/ Randy E. Butler


Randy E. Butler


Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009312EN.01001502.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/15

---

Action brought on 23 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-378/09)

2009/C 312/24

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Šimerdová and J.-B, Laignelot, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to implement correctly in its national legislation the provisions of the first, second and third paragraphs of Article 10a of the Council Directive of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (85/337/EEC), (1) as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC (2) and Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, (3) the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first, second and third paragraphs of Article 10a of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to implement correctly in its national legislation the provisions of the first, second and third paragraphs of Article 10a of the Council Directive of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (85/337/EEC), (1) as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC (2) and Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, (3) the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the first, second and third paragraphs of Article 10a of that directive;

1

2

3

| — | order Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period of implementing the directive into the domestic legal order expired on 25 June 2005.

---

(1)  OJ 1985 L 175, p. 40.

1

(2)  Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment; OJ 1997 L 73, p. 5.

2

(3)  Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC; OJ 2003 L 156, p. 17.

3

---
Jian WANG, aka James Wang, petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION.

No. 16-561.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost-U-Less, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Martin P. Moore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 11, 2003


                                        /s/   Martin P. Moore
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Martin P. Moore
                                        Chief Financial Officer