alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00385

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

lance gimenez <lanceflys@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:03 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

lance gimenez

11223 SW 88th Street, Cl17

Kendall, FL 33176
John STAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7289.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                     EXHIBIT 23.1

                  CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-68777) pertaining to the 1998 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-19883) pertaining to the 1996 Stock
Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-11841) pertaining to
the 1996 Nonstatutory Employee and Consultant Option Plan and the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 033-95886) pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the 1995 Employee and Consultant Stock Plan and the 1995 Director
Stock Option Plan of DSP Communications, Inc., of our report dated January 11,
1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of DSP
Communications, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1998.


                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 23, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - [Dockets No. FAA-2001-9852; No. FAA-2001-9854]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Request for comments on alternative policy options for managing capacity and mitigating congestion and delay at LaGuardia Airport (LGA) and the proposed extension of the lottery allocation; Correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This is a correction to an FAA notice that was published on June 12, 2001 (66 FR 31731). That notice requested comments on the feasibility and effectiveness of a limited number of demand management options that could replace the current temporary administrative limits on the number of aircraft operations at LGA which are scheduled to expire on September 15, 2001. The reasons for this correction is that the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is making a correction in section 3 of the document that it submitted to the FAA, which was attached as an appendix to the June 12, 2001,                         **Federal Register**                         notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rich Yarges, telephone (425) 227-2143.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         notice FR Doc. 01-14739, published on June 12, 2001 (66 FR 31731), make the following corrections:                    

1. On page 31737, column 2, in lines 44-45 under section (2), A Potential Auction Based Approach, remove the phrase “and AIR-21 slot exemptions”. 

2. On page 31737, column 3, in lines 2-3, remove the phrase “and AIR-21 slot exemptions”.

3. On page 31745, column 3, in lines 18-19 under section 3. Allocation and Auction of Reservations, remove the phrase “and AIR-21 slot exemptions”.

Issued in Washington, DC on June 14, 2001.

Louise Maillett,

Acting Assitant Administrator for Policy, Planning, and International Aviation.

[FR Doc. 01-15487  Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
II-00317

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Maryellen Redish <MREDISH@AOL.COM>

Friday, December 3, 2010 2:52 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Maryellen Redish

671 S. Riverside Dr, #6

Palm Springs, CA 92264
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,634,156
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         115,044
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,665,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,504,585
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         200,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           190,297
<LOANS>                                     55,497,399
<ALLOWANCE>                                    388,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,936,226
<DEPOSITS>                                  53,167,165
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            259,963
<LONG-TERM>                                 12,190,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       715,257
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,603,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              70,936,226
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,442,953
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              209,883
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               276,010
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,928,846
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,578,219
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,122,502
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,806,344
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   49,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,771,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                304,358
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     192,607
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   192,607
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     3.7
<LOANS-NON>                                    250,575
<LOANS-PAST>                                   127,174
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               346,896
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    8,154
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,008
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              388,750
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           388,750
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Business and Operations Advisory Committee (9556).                    

*Date/Time:*                         July 18, 2001; 1:30-4:00 p.m. (EDT).                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 110, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Louise McIntire, National Science Foundation. 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-8200.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         Interim meeting as follow-up to the April 26-27, 2001 meeting.                    

## Agenda

### July 18, 2001—1:30-4:00 p.m.

    - Follow-up discussion on administrative and management planning at NSF
    - Plans for Fall 2001 meeting
    - Other business

Dated: July 19, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-15723  Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
II-00809

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Star Star <grammystar@gmail. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:10 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Star Star

21 Linden St. Apt. A

Somersworth, NH 03878
# C_2010179EN.01001202.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 May 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-158/09) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/88/EC - Organisation of working time - Non-civilian personnel in public authorities - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2010/C 179/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Martinez del Peral Cagigal and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: B. Plaza Cruz, acting as Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 1(3) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9) and Article 18(a) of Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 1993 L 307, p. 18) maintained by Article 27(1) of Directive 2003/88, read in conjunction with Annex I, Part B, of the same directive — Non-civilian personnel in public authorities

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, in respect of non-civilian personnel in public authorities, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 1(3) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, in respect of non-civilian personnel in public authorities, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 1(3) of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 180 of 1.8.2009.

---
Ruben Orlando BENITEZ, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 15-9477.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE

GTG SOLUTIONS, INC.

,

Relator

. §

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00182

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable John L. Pool of the 109th District Court of Winkler County, and concludes that

Relator ’ s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the petition for writ

of mandamus, in accordan ce with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 5 TH DAY OF AUGUST , 20 21

.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
II-00906

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Edward Spevak <zoospevak@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:09 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Edward Spevak

6556 Nashville Avenue

Saint Louis, MO 63139
James Patrick YOUNG, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-6679.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Maurice R. GREENBERG, et al., petitioners, v. NEW YORK, et al.

No. 16-284.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
Unassociated Document


     

    Exhibit
10.11

     

    
      Agreement
for Repayment of Money

       

       

      Party A:
Xu Jianping

      Party B:
Guangzhou Dongfang Hospital

       

      


      Party B
has owed Party A RMB27,659,977.26 yuan (twenty seven million six hundred fifty
nine thousand nine hundred seventy seven yuan twenty six cents) as of December
31, 2008. Party A and Party B agree as follows after common
discussions:

       

      
        	
                1.

              	
                Of
      the money owed by Party B to Party A, The amount RMB3,659,977.26
      yuan(three million six hundred fifty nine thousand nine hundred seventy
      seven yuan twenty six cents) shall be paid off by Party B before December
      31,2010, The specific
      repayment date and time for payment is
      determined
      by the Party
      B.
      The rest amount RMB24,000,000 yuan (twenty four million yuan only) shall
      be paid off by Party B in a period of five years from January 1, 2011 to
      December 31, 2015.

              
	 	 


      

      
        	
                2.

              	
                Party
      B shall pay RMB4,800,000 yuan (four million eight hundred thousand yuan)
      in equal amount to Party A every year, The specific
      repayment date and time for payment is
      determined
      by the Party
      B.

              
	 	 


      

      
        	
                3.

              	
                Party
      B shall pay the interests to Party A according to the simple 5% interest
      rate per annum. The specific payment
      interest
      date
      and time is
      determined
      by the Party
      B.

              
	 	 


      

      
        	
                4.

              	
                If
      there is any newly added loan from Party A to Party B during 2009 and
      2010, the loan shall also be repaid in a period of five years from
      January, 2011 according to this agreement.

              
	 	 


      

      
        	
                5.

              	
                If
      there is any newly added loan from Party A to Party B from January 1,
      2011, the loan shall not be subject to this agreement.

              
	 	 
	6.	The
      effective date of this agreement is December 31,
2008.


      

       

       

      
        	Party A: Xu
      Jianping	Party B: Guangzhou
      Dongfang Hospital (seal)
	/s/ Xu
      Jianping	/s/ Wu
  Pifa