alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00930

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Juliette Watts <juliette.watts5@gmail. com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:57 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Juliette Watts

216 Harvard Ave

Collingswood, NJ 08108
Mumtaz Ali HUSSAINI, et ux., petitioners, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General.

No. 15-1435.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2009267EN.01004801.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/48

---

Action brought on 11 September 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-363/09)

2009/C 267/80

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Parpala and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that by maintaining in force Article 38 of Law 43/2002 of 20 November 2002 on plant health, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of Directive 91/414/EEC (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that by maintaining in force Article 38 of Law 43/2002 of 20 November 2002 on plant health, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of Directive 91/414/EEC (1)

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Directive 91/414/EEC responds to the need to harmonise the provisions of national law relating to the marketing of plant protection products. For that purpose it lays down uniform rules on the conditions and procedures for the authorization of such products.

Article 13 of that Directive sets out the rules relating to (i) the data which must be submitted by applicants for the authorisation of a particular plant protection product and (ii) the use and protection of that data, safeguarding, apart from specified exceptions, the confidentiality of that data.

The Directive is a complete harmonisation and, consequently, a Member State cannot adopt legislation at national level which requires economic operators to share data submitted by the first applicant for authorisation, except on the conditions laid down in Article 13(7).

Nevertheless, Article 38 of Law 43/2002 permits access to data obtained from studies and experiments in circumstances other than those expressly provided in the Directive.

The Commission considers that since the Kingdom of Spain has no discretion in relation to the transposition into national law of Article 13 of Directive 91/414/EEC and since it has not brought an action for the annulment of that provision, the introduction of an exception to the rules relating to access to data accompanying an application for authorisation of plant protection products, when that exception is not provided for in the Directive concerned, is an infringement of Community law.

---

(1)  Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ L 230, p. 1)

1

---
In Re Daniel L. JUNK, et ux., petitioners.

No. 17-929.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Henry Louis DOBBS, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 17-6176.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2010113EN.01004401.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2010 — Baid v OHIM (LE GOMMAGE DES FACADES)

(Case T-31/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark LE GOMMAGE DES FACADES - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009) - Duty to state reasons - First sentence of Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now the first sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

2010/C 113/70

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Baid SARL (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Grasset, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 October 2008 (Case R 963/2008-1), concerning an application to register the word sign LE GOMMAGE DES FACADES as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Baid SARL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Baid SARL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
J-S38042-21

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

JAJUAN DEMAR DAVIS 

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 574 WDA 2021

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered May 4, 2021

In the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County Criminal Division at 

No(s): CP-26-CR-0002484-2018

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., DUBOW, J., and COLINS, J.*

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY DUBOW, J.: FILED: MAY 20, 2022

While I agree with the Majority that the trial court properly denied 

Appellant’s Rule 600 Motion, I disagree with its treatment of the time-period 

in which the trial court was shut down as a result of COVID. The Majority 

concludes that the time-period during the COVID shutdown is not attributable 

to the Commonwealth because “the record does not show any lack of diligence 

by the Commonwealth or that it was not prepared to go to trial during the 

period of judicial delay.” I agree that this time is not attributable to the 

Commonwealth. I would find, however, that it is not attributable to the 

Commonwealth because the court shutdown during COVID was an event out 

of the control of Commonwealth. Commonwealth v. Goldman, 70 A.3d 874 

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S38042-21

- 2 -

(Pa. Super. 2013); Commonwealth v. Pipkin, 2022 WL 1555399 at * 5 (Pa. 

Super. filed May 17, 2022) (non-precedential decision).

Moreover, even if consideration of the Commonwealth’s due diligence 

were appropriate in this circumstance, I disagree with the Majority’s 

conclusion that unless the record shows that the Commonwealth failed to act 

with due diligence, the delay is not attributable to the Commonwealth. In

Commonwealth v. Harth, 252 A.3d 600 (Pa. 2021), the defendant filed a 

Rule 600 motion to dismiss after the trial court’s schedule required the court 

to continue the defendant’s trial. In considering whether the trial court 

properly denied the motion, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that the 

delay of the trial in such instances is excludable from the Rule 600 calculation 

only when the trial court finds that the Commonwealth was ready for trial on 

the trial date. Thus, when the trial court schedules a case for trial and then 

continues the trial because of the court’s schedule, the proper analysis does 

not focus on whether there is no evidence that the Commonwealth failed to 

act with due diligence; rather, the record must show that Commonwealth was 

ready to proceed to trial on the date that the trial court continued the case. 

Id.

I, therefore, concur in the result of the Majority.
II-00514

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Tasker <psykopsykik@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:58 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Tasker

21036 Shearer ave

Carson, CA 90745
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Laserscope on
Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, I, Dennis LaLumandiere,
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Laserscope, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended
               September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
               section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               and
        (2)    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
               for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Laserscope.



Date:  November 13, 2002               By:   /s/  Dennis LaLumandiere
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Dennis LaLumandiere
                                           Vice President, Finance and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
II-00690

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

ronald benton <ron@econetmobile.co.zw>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:24 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

ronald benton

119 South 16th

Lewisburg, PA 17837
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, Francis E. Wilde, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Tarantella, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tarantella, Inc.



By:

/s/ Francis E. WildeName:

Francis E. WildeTitle:

Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)February 11,
2005
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel ``Web-based Visualization and Analysis of DNA Micro-
array Data.''
    Date: June 20, 2001.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Neuroscience Center, National Institutes of Health, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Richard C. Harrison, Chief, Contract Review 
Branch, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 
3158, MSC 9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, 301-435-1437.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279. Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)


    Dated: June 12, 2001.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-15469 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2010288EN.01006901.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/69

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Armitage-Wilson v European Police Office (Europol)

(Case F-36/09) (1)

(Staff case - Europol employees - Non-renewal of a contract - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees - Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

(2010/C 288/128)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Kate Armitage-Wilson (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by W. J. Dammingh, lawyer)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by- D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer her a permanent post, and the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to offer to Ms Armitage-Wilson a contract of indefinite duration; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to offer to Ms Armitage-Wilson a contract of indefinite duration;

| 2. | orders Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Europol to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, of 18.07.09., p 26

---
# C_2010317EN.01001102.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — European Commission v Czech Republic

(Case C-481/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Environment - Directive 2006/7/EC - Bathing water quality - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2010/C 317/21

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and M. Thomannová-Körnerová, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek and J. Jirkalová, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt or communicate within the prescribed period the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2006/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC, (OJ 2006 L 64, p. 37)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Czech Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.01.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                        $317,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,857,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,240,400
<PP&E>                                          20,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                     700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,069,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,615,400
<BONDS>                                        171,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,400
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,267,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,069,600
<SALES>                                      8,257,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,257,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,619,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,486,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (315,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,200,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,355,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,844,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,844,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($5.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($5.17)
        

</TABLE>