alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 18 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 24, 2009. 

Whereas Paul Newman, a great American actor, film director, entrepreneur, humanitarian, and automobile racing 

enthusiast, passed away on September 26, 2008; 

Whereas Paul Newman was born on January 26, 1925, in 

Shaker Heights, Ohio; 

Whereas following his service in the Navy during World War 

II in the Pacific theater, Paul Newman completed his degree at Kenyon College and later at the Yale School of 

Drama; 

Whereas Paul Newman is considered one of America’s most 

accomplished actors and his career in film and on stage 

spanned over fifty years; 

Whereas Paul Newman was nominated for ten Oscars, winning Best Actor in 1986 for his role in The Color of 

Money and two honorary Oscars, the Humanitarian 

Award in 1993 and the Lifetime Achievement Award in 

1985; 

Whereas Paul Newman brought life to many memorable characters, including ‘‘Hud’’, ‘‘Cool Hand Luke’’, ‘‘Butch 

Cassidy’’, ‘‘Henry Gondorff’’, and ‘‘Fast Eddie’’; 

Whereas in 1982, Paul Newman co-founded Newman’s Own, 

a premium food and beverage company that began with 
2 

•HRES 18 EH 

salad dressings and has expanded to over 150 varieties 

of all-natural food and beverage products; 

Whereas Paul Newman was a dedicated philanthropist, donating all of the profits from Newman’s Own sales for 

educational and charitable purposes, totaling over 

$250,000,000 in donations; 

Whereas Paul Newman founded eleven Hole in the Wall 

camps around the world, named for the outlaw gang 

made famous by Newman’s portrayal of Butch Cassidy in 

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and dedicated to 

providing free recreation to children with cancer and 

other serious illnesses; 

Whereas Paul Newman founded the Scott Newman Foundation for the prevention of drug abuse in 1978 after the 

death of his son; 

Whereas Paul Newman was a successful racecar driver and 

well-rounded athlete, winning several Sports Car Club of 

America national driving titles and competing in Daytona 

in 1995 on the occasion of his 70th birthday; 

Whereas Paul Newman was beloved by his family, friends, 

and neighbors for his great generosity, good humor, and 

spirited charm; and 

Whereas Paul Newman’s humanitarian works and incomparable talents have made him an American icon who will 

never be forgotten: Now, therefore, be it 
3 

•HRES 18 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 

life and accomplishments of Paul Newman for his many contributions to American film, theater, and philanthropy. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# C_2010024EN.01008203.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/82

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 November 2009 — Moschonaki v European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

(Case F-10/09) (1)

1

2010/C 24/159

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009, p. 37.

1

---
II-00304

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kevin Wixted <morguefiles@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:04 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kevin Wixted

4548 N. Lawndale Avenue

Chicago, IL 60625
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESSIE M c DANIEL,

Plaintiff

- Appella nt,

v.

ROBERT WILKIE * , Secretary,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 18

- 15256

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 00003

- JAD

- PAL

MEMORANDUM * *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 12, 2018 ** *

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Essie McDaniel appeals pro se from the district court’ s summary judgment

in her employment action alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII

. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Trunk v. City of San

* Robert Wilkie has been substituted for his predecessor, David J.

Shulkin

, as Secretary of Veterans Affairs under Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

* * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 15256

Diego , 629 F.3d 1099, 1105 (9th Cir. 2011) . We may affirm o n any basis

supported by the record, Thompson v. Paul , 547 F.3d 1055, 1058

- 59 (9th Cir.

2008)

, and we affirm.

Summary judgment on McDaniel ’s retaliation claim was proper be cause

McDaniel failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether

def endant’s leg itimate, non

- retaliatory reason for not hiring McDaniel was

pretextual. See Winarto v. Toshiba Am. Elecs. Components, Inc. , 274 F.3d 1276,

1284 (9th Cir. 2001) (explaining burden

- shifting framework for Title VII

retaliation claims and requirements for establishing pretext); see also Little v.

Windermere Relocation, Inc ., 30 1 F.3d 958, 969 (9th Cir. 2002) (a p la intiff must

offer “specific, substantial evidence of pretext ” (citation and internal quotation

marks omitted)).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
II-00333

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

May Ellam <aw767@lafn.org>

Friday, December 3, 2010 1:17 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

May Ellam

1007 N. Avenue 51

Los Angeles, CA 90042
Talakkottur R. DAVID, petitioner, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, etc., et al.

No. 15-9100.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2138** 

RICHARD MARTIN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. HOWARD J. WALSH, III, Esq. , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. George J
. Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:15

- cv - 2302

- GJH )

Submitted : February 4, 2016 Decided: March 29, 2016

Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Remanded by un published per curiam opinion
.
Richard Martin , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) . Parties to a civil action have 30 days following the entry of the district court’s final order or judgment in which to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, the district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if a party moves for an extension of the appeal period within 30 days after the expiration of the original appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect or good cause to warrant an extension. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) ; see Washington v. Bumgarner , 882 F.2d 8 99, 900

- 01 (4th Cir. 1989). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
T he district court’s final judgment was entered on August 21, 2015. Martin filed a p leading construed as a notice of appeal on September 22, 2015, after the expiration of the 30

- day appeal period but within the excusable neglect period. Martin’s notice of appeal contained language that we liberally construe as a request for an extension of time to appeal. Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether Martin has demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the3 30

- day appeal period. The record, as supplemen ted, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. We deny Martin’s motions to seal and to compel.
REMANDED
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 

Mr. Robert Swagger 

Chief Executive Officer 

Media Derivatives, Inc. 

6720 North Scottsdale Road 

Suite 250 

Scottsdale, Arizona 85253 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-51 00 

Facsimile: (202) 418-5521 

www.cftc.gov 

June 14,2010 

Re: Request by Media Derivatives, Inc. for review and approval of the Takers 

collared futures contract and binary option contract. 

Dear Mr. Swagger: 

In correspondence to the Commission dated March 4, and March 9, 2010, counsel for 

Media Derivatives, Inc., (MDEX or Exchange) requested product review and approval of a 

collared futures contract and a binary option contract based on the Opening Weekend Box Office 

Revenues for the motion picture Takers, pursuant to Section 5c(c)(2) of the Commodity 

Exchange Act (Act) and Commission Regulation 40.3. On April2, 2010, MDEX requested an 

extension of the review period by 45 days to June 7, 2010. On June 7, 2010, MDEX request by 

letter that same elate that the review period be extended to June 14, 2010 and the Commission 

granted that extension. On June 2, 2010, MDEX amended its filing at the request of 

Commission staff. The Commission posted all of the filings on its website with a request for 

public comment and received responsive comments from several persons and entities, both in 

favor of and opposed to approval. The Commission posted all of those comments on its website. 

On May 19, 2010, the Commission conducted a public hearing (Hearing) to consider the trading 

of contracts based on motion picture revenues and gather views of interested parties. 

Section 5c(c)(3) of the Act provides that the Commission shall approve any new contract 

or rule unless the Commission finds that the contract or rule would violate the Act. After having 

reviewed in detail the entire record in this matter, including the comments received, testimony at 

the Hearing, and the June 3, 20 I 0 Memorandum of the Division of Market Oversight, the 

Commission finds that the proposed Opening Weekend Box Office Revenue Collared Futures 

contract, the proposed Opening Weekend Box Office Revenue Collared Binary Option contract, 

or the rules associated with those contracts are not inconsistent with the Act. Accordingly, 

please be advised that the proposed Opening Weekend Box Office Collared Futures contract, the 

proposed Opening Weekend Box Office Binary Option 
contract and the rules associated with those contracts were approved by the Conunission as of 

the elate of this letter. 

For the Commission, 

(l ( )J ( G)f:;f.~. ~~~ ' ;/tw u{ ~ Assistant Secretary of the ommission 

2
# C_2012184EN.01000901.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2012 — In ’t Veld v Council

(Case T-529/09) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Opinion of the Council’s Legal Service on a recommendation from the Commission to authorise the opening of negotiations for an international agreement - Partial refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of international relations - Exception relating to the protection of legal advice - Specific and foreseeable threat to the interest in question - Overriding public interest)

2012/C 184/14

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sophie in ’t Veld (Brussels (Belgium)) (represented by: O. Brouwer and J. Blockx, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially by M. Bauer, C. Fekete and O. Petersen, and subsequently by M. Bauer and C. Fekete, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission, (represented by: C. O’Reilly and P. Costa de Oliveira, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Council’s decision of 29 October 2009 refusing full access to document 11897/09 of 9 July 2009 containing an opinion of the Council’s Legal Service entitled ‘Recommendation from the Commission to the Council to authorise the opening of negotiations between the European Union and the United States of America for an international agreement to make available to the United States Treasury Department financial messaging data to prevent and combat terrorism and terrorist financing — Legal basis’.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Council’s decision of 29 October 2009 insofar as it refuses access to the undisclosed parts of document 11897/09 other than those which concern the specific content of the envisaged agreement or the negotiating directives; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Council’s decision of 29 October 2009 insofar as it refuses access to the undisclosed parts of document 11897/09 other than those which concern the specific content of the envisaged agreement or the negotiating directives;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of the Principal Executive and Financial Officers of

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Lorenzo H. Zambrano, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Fernando A. González, as Executive Vice President of
Planning and Finance of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and periods set forth therein.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|      
|       | 
|       |  | /s/ Lorenzo H. Zambrano
|Name:  |  | Lorenzo H. Zambrano    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | June 30, 2010          

|       |  |                                                 
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------------
|      
|       | 
|       |  | /s/ Fernando A. González                        
|Name:  |  | Fernando A. González                            
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President of Planning and Finance
|Date:  |  | June 30, 2010                                   

This certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Jeffrey Venable JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Brad HOOKS, Warden.

No. 16-5527.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
H. Res. 1704 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 8, 2010. 

Whereas in 490 BC, Athenian warriors defeated foreign invaders and won against overwhelming odds in one of the 

most significant battles in human history; 

Whereas the Athenian victory helped continue the development of a new form of government called ‘‘democracy’’; 

Whereas according to legend, a messenger named Phidippides 

ran from the battlefield of Marathon, Greece, to Athens 

26 miles away to carry news of the victory and it is said, 

that upon delivering the news to the citizens of Athens, 

Phidippides died from exhaustion; 

Whereas Phidippides’ run inspired the spiritual origin of 

what has become the sport of marathoning; 

Whereas the first official marathon race was introduced in 

the first modern Olympics in 1896 held in Athens, 

Greece; 

Whereas officials from the Boston Athletic Association 

brought the long distance Olympic running event to Boston, Massachusetts, where it has been run annually since 

1897; 

Whereas a ceremony took place in Marathon, Greece, in 2007 

at the Tomb of the Athenians, the burial cite of the 
2 

•HRES 1704 EH 

Greek warriors who gave their lives defending their country; 

Whereas this ceremony created the symbolic Flame of Marathon that embodies the strength of the human spirit, fair 

competition, and peace; 

Whereas Hopkinton, Massachusetts, and Marathon, Greece, 

have a twin-city relationship, the Flame of Marathon 

traveled from Marathon, Greece, and was presented to 

the Town of Hopkinton in 2008; 

Whereas the Flame of Marathon has burned continuously in 

Hopkinton, Massachusetts, since its arrival in the United 

States; 

Whereas the Flame of Marathon reminds us of the sacrifice 

of the United States Armed Forces and their families, 

the defenders of democracy; 

Whereas the 35th Marine Corps Marathon received the 

Flame of Marathon as part of its celebration of the 

2500th anniversary of the Battle of Marathon; and 

Whereas the Flame of Marathon was displayed at events 

leading to and including the Marine Corps Marathon in 

view of 30,000 runners who embodied the marathon spirit as they ran through Washington, DC: Now, therefore, 

be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives joins with 

the Greek Embassy in Washington, DC, the people of 

Hopkinton, Massachusetts, the people of Marathon, Greece, 

and the hundreds of thousands of runners participating in 

marathons throughout the United States, in celebrating the 
3 

•HRES 1704 EH 

2500th anniversary of the Battle of Marathon, Greece, one 

of the most significant battles in human history. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
II-00574

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Charles S Wilson <chasmn@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:31 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Charles S Wilson

8421 22nd Ave S

Bloomington, MI 55425