alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



AMENDMENT NO. 2 
TO THE 
BLUCORA, INC. 2016 EQUITY INDUCEMENT PLAN


(Effective as of May 24, 2018)


This Amendment No. 2 to the Blucora, Inc. 2016 Equity Inducement Plan (this “Amendment”), is adopted by action of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Blucora, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) to be effective as of the date set forth above.  Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Blucora, Inc. 2016 Equity Inducement Plan (the “Inducement Plan”).


WHEREAS, Section 16.1 of the Inducement Plan permits the Board to amend the Inducement Plan at any time; 


WHEREAS, in order to have a consistent share usage application under the Inducement Plan with the Blucora, Inc. 2015 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “2015 Incentive Plan”), and the Blucora, Inc. 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which has been approved by the Board and submitted to stockholders for approval at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and will replace the 2015 Incentive Plan if approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Board desires to amend the Inducement Plan to incorporate a substantially similar fungible share provision; and


WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, the Board resolved that this Amendment be adopted and that the Inducement Plan be amended as set forth herein.


NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 16.1 of the Inducement Plan, the Company hereby amends the Inducement Plan as follows:


1.Section 4 of the Inducement Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 4.3 to the end of Section 4:


4.3    Fungible Share Provision


The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be reduced by 2.0 shares for each share delivered in settlement of Awards other than Options or SARs and one share for each share delivered in settlement of Options or SARs.  Any shares of Common Stock that again become available for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Section 4.2 shall be added back to the Plan as 2.0 shares if such shares were subject to Awards other than Options or SARs and one share if such shares were subject to Options or SARs.















2.Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Inducement Plan shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the provisions thereof.


* * * * * * * *
















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first written above, pursuant to prior action taken by the Board.




	
			
	BLUCORA, INC.


	 

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ John S. Clendening
	 

	Name:
	John S. Clendening
	 

	Title:
	President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2012133EN.01002202.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2012 — Volkswagen v OHIM — Suzuki Motor (SWIFT GTi)

(Case T-63/09) (1)

1

(Community Trade Mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SWIFT GTi - Earlier international and national marks GTI - Relative grounds for refusal - Similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Assessment of the likelihood of confusion - Rejection of the opposition)

2012/C 133/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: H.-P. Schrammek, C. Drzymalla and S. Risthaus, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Suzuki Motor Corp. (Shizuoka-ken, Japan)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2008 (Case R 749/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Volkswagen AG and Suzuki Motor Corp.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Volkswagen AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Volkswagen AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.

1

---
II-00273

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

ARIADNE DECARVALHO <ninidecarv@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:40 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

ARIADNE DECARVALHO

3518 ASTER CT

WILMINGTON, NC 28409
II-00609

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Martha Eberle <wildwoodsoftexas@texas-skies.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:34 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Martha Eberle

2525 mcgregor lane

Dripping Springs, TX 78620
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Semitool, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Raymon F. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Semitool, Inc. and will be retained by Semitool, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: December 10, 2004 |  | By: /s/Raymon F. ThompsonRaymon F. ThompsonChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC Exhibit








Exhibit 10.95


Election to Defer Delivery of Shares - 
2016 Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) Award 


Under Section 23(i) of the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“Plan”) and as permitted by the Compensation Committee, I hereby elect to defer from the Scheduled Delivery Date1 the delivery of ___%2 of the shares underlying my 2016 RSU Award to the following Elected Delivery Date (check one)3:
___ Separation from Service 
___ On ____/____/____ (must be after the Scheduled Delivery Date) 


Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Plan. 


In witness whereof, I have executed this Election to Defer Delivery of Shares.4 


_____    ______________   ______________
Date        Director’s Signature             Director’s Printed Name


/1/ The Scheduled Delivery Date is expected to be the Vesting Date, which is expected to be the earliest of (1) the annual meeting of Sprint shareholders in 2017, (2) one year from the Date of Grant, and (3) your Separation from Service with the Board because of your death, Disability or involuntary Separation from Service following a Change in Control of the Corporation. 


/2/ The number of shares is not determined until the Date of Grant; accordingly only a percentage of total shares may be indicated.


/3/ Note that if you die before your Elected Delivery Date, your Delivery Date will instead be your date of death. Your shares will be delivered no later than 60 days after the Elected Delivery Date or your death, as applicable. The remaining terms of the Award Agreement, including dividend equivalent accrual, shall apply during the period of deferral.


/4/ An election to defer delivery of shares must be made before the calendar year of an RSU Award Date of Grant. Therefore, this Election to Defer Delivery of Shares must be made by and becomes irrevocable as of December 31, 2015, except that you may change your Elected Delivery Date with respect to the shares deferred under this election by filing a new Election to Defer Delivery of Shares form at least 12 months before, and only to defer to a date that is at least five years after, the Elected Delivery Date above.


This signed Election to Defer Delivery of Shares form must be received on or before 5:00 p.m. CT on December 31, 2015 via 
		
	•
	fax at (913) 523-9797 or


		
	•
	email at timothy.ogrady@sprint.com.
Exhibit 1082d


		
			Exhibit No. 10.82d
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			November 30, 2015
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Via Facsimile and Certified Mail – Return Receipt Request
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Mr. Frederic A. Tomarchio
		

		
			The Three Marquees
		

		
			﻿P.O. Box 55
		

		
			﻿Glenelg,  MD    21737
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						RE:

					
					
						Lease Agreement dated January 1, 1997 by and between The Three Marquees (“Landlord”) and Monro Muffler Brake, Inc., successor-in-interest to Mr. Tire, Inc. (“Tenant”) for premises situate at 1105 North Point Road, Dundalk, MD  [MMB #756]

				



		
			﻿
		

		
			Dear Fred:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Please accept this letter as Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.’s official notification of our intent to renew said lease agreement for the ten-year renewal period commencing on January 1, 2017 and expiring December 31, 2026.  The rent for said renewal shall be increased annually by the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumer.  The adjustment shall be no less than 3.5% per year and no more than 7% per year.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Tenant shall have no renewal option remaining.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Please do not hesitate to contact Mindi Collom at 800-876-6676 ext. 3320 if you have any questions relative to the renewal.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Very truly yours,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			John W. Van Heel
		

		
			CEO and President
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			JVH:mc
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
LEI KE, petitioner, v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 16-5793.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Donald Wayne SHIPE, petitioner, v. Tracy S. RAY, Warden.

No. 16-6823.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Greenland Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Thomas  Beener, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.   1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.

/s/  Thomas  Beener.
--------------------

Thomas  Beener
Chief  Executive  Officer

Date:  November  18,  2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4644-N-25]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 22, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                    v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determine suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: June 15, 2001.

John D. Garrity,

Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 01-15568 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
# C_2010024EN.01007603.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/76

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 November 2009 — Putterie-de-Beukelaer v Commission

(Case F-1/09) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Attestation procedure - Assessment of potential)

2010/C 24/142

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Françoise Putterie-de-Beukelaer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision not to admit the applicant to the 2007 attestation procedure.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Putterie-de-Beukelaer to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Putterie-de-Beukelaer to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009, p. 53.

1

---
Michael DORSEY, petitioner, v. Sherman LANKFORD.

No. 17-7168.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
# C_2009267EN.01002405.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/24

---

Appeal brought on 9 December 2008 by Hasbro, Inc. against the decision of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) contained in a letter of 22 September 2008 in Case T-472/07: Enercon v OHIM

(Case C-59/09 P)

2009/C 267/45

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Hasbro, Inc. (represented by: M. Edenborough, Barrister)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 10 July 2009 the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
TROY W. SIMMONS, D.D.S., P.C., et al., petitioners, v. Charles SMITH, Executive Commissioner, Texas Health and Human Services Commission.

No. 16-1387.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15682]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Comment Period Extension for Supplement to the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the 
Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at 
Yucca Mountain, Nye County, NV

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of comment period extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 4, 2001, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published 
a Notice of Availability (66 FR 22540) of its Supplement to the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the 
Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at 
Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada (Draft EIS) (DOE/EIS-0250D-S) and 
announced a 45-day public comment period ending June 25, 2001. In 
response to requests from the public, DOE is extending the comment 
period to July 6, 2001.

DATES: Comments on the Supplement to the Draft EIS are now due by July 
6, 2001. DOE will consider all comments received during the comment 
period in preparation of the Final EIS. Comments received after July 6, 
2001 will be considered to the extent practicable.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and requests for further information on the 
Supplement to the Draft EIS, and requests for copies of the document 
(hard copy or CD-ROM) should be directed to: Dr. Jane Summerson, EIS 
Document Manager, M/S 010, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of 
Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain Site 
Characterization Office, P.O. Box 30307, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89036-
0307, Telephone 1-800-967-3477, Facsimile 1-800-967-0739.
    Written comments via facsimiles should include the following 
identifier: ``Yucca Mountain Supplement to the Draft EIS.''
    Written comments on or requests for copies of the document may also 
be submitted over the internet via the Yucca Mountain Project website 
at http://www.ymp.gov, under the listing ``Environmental Impact 
Statement.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Jane Summerson, EIS Document 
Manager, M/S 010, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian 
Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization 
Office, P.O. Box 30307, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89036-0307, Telephone 
1-800-967-3477, Facsimile 1-800-967-0739.
    For general information on the DOE NEPA process, contact: Ms. Carol 
M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (EH-42), 
U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, 
DC 20585, Telephone 1-202-586-4600, or leave a message at 1-800-472-
2756.

    Issued in Washington, DC, June 18, 2001.
Ronald Milner,
Chief Operating Officer, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste 
Management.
[FR Doc. 01-15682 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-U