alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<CIK>                            0000850428   
<NAME>                           GEODYNE INST/PENSION ENERGY INCOME P-2 LTD PSHP
                                  
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                               104,934
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         72,603
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     177,537
<PP&E>                             5,605,467
<DEPRECIATION>                     4,637,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1,145,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      0
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                         1,145,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1,145,550
<SALES>                              410,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     671,453
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        207,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      464,128
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  464,128
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         464,128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           4.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0
        
 

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 6 
<CIK> 0000744822
<NAME> Fidelity Investment Trust
<SERIES>
 <NUMBER> 231
 <NAME> Fidelity United Kingdom Fund
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                year         
 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            oct-31-1998  
 
<PERIOD-END>                 oct-31-1998  
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>        6,878        
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>       6,918        
 
<RECEIVABLES>                277          
 
<ASSETS-OTHER>               0            
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>         0            
 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               7,195        
 
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>     227          
 
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>      0            
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>    53           
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>          280          
 
<SENIOR-EQUITY>              0            
 
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>     6,231        
 
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>        495          
 
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>        402          
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>    99           
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>       0            
 
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>      545          
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>     0            
 
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>     40           
 
<NET-ASSETS>                 6,915        
 
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>            249          
 
<INTEREST-INCOME>            24           
 
<OTHER-INCOME>               (28)         
 
<EXPENSES-NET>               151          
 
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>      94           
 
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>     575          
 
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>    (520)        
 
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>        149          
 
<EQUALIZATION>               0            
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>    115          
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>     484          
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>        0            
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>      455          
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>  405          
 
<SHARES-REINVESTED>          43           
 
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>       1,207        
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>      115          
 
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>    567          
 
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>      0            
 
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>   0            
 
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>        55           
 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           1            
 
<GROSS-EXPENSE>              254          
 
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>         7,486        
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>        14.210       
 
<PER-SHARE-NII>              .190         
 
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>      .460         
 
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>         .190         
 
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>    .800         
 
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>         0            
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>          13.960       
 
<EXPENSE-RATIO>              202          
 
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>       0            
 
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>         0
Marlon SCARBER, petitioner, v. Carmen Denise PALMER, Warden.

No. 15-1174.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
David Michael TSCHEU, petitioner, v. Michelle SMITH, Warden.

No. 16-6940.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 3, 2021

N o. 04

- 20

- 00403

- CV

IN RE EUGENIO VILLARREAL

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On August 12, 2020, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary stay. After considering the petition, response, reply, and sur

- reply, this court concludes relator did not show he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied and the stay granted by this court on August 13, 2020 is lifted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on February 3, 2021

.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of February, 2021.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016

- CVT

- 000921

- D3, styled Tina Botello v. Eugenio Villarreal , in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca Palom o presiding.
II-01136

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Francine Dolins <fdolins@umd.umich.edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:02 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Francine Dolins

350 North Territorial Rd W

Ann Arbor, MI 48105
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	6

<CIK>	0000744822

<NAME>	Fidelity Investment Trust

<SERIES>

	<NUMBER>	31

	<NAME>	Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund

<MULTIPLIER>	1,000



<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>
year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>
oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>
oct-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>
486,144
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>
670,121
<RECEIVABLES>
10,761
<ASSETS-OTHER>
4,632
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>
0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>
685,514
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>
10,827
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>
0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>
14,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>
25,633
<SENIOR-EQUITY>
0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>
521,918
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>
29,359
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>
16,436
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>
0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>
44
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>
(45,996)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>
0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>
184,003
<NET-ASSETS>
659,881
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>
3,187
<INTEREST-INCOME>
723
<OTHER-INCOME>
29
<EXPENSES-NET>
4,772
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>
(833)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>
54,810
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>
177,169
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>
231,146
<EQUALIZATION>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>
345
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>
0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>
21,838
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>
8,941
<SHARES-REINVESTED>
26
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>
464,417
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>
0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>
(95,810)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>
3,862
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>
0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>
3,235
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>
0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>
4,828
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>
352,183
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>
11.890
<PER-SHARE-NII>
(.040)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>
10.620
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>
 .020
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>
0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>
0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>
22.480
<EXPENSE-RATIO>
137





</TABLE>
# C_2011340EN.01003601.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/36

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 September 2011 — Sarah Whitehead v European Central Bank

(Case F-98/09) (1)

1

(Civil service - Staff of the ECB - Annual salary and bonus review - 2008 review - Annual assessment - Criteria for assessment - Staff Committee consultation - Taking account of periods of sick leave - Setting of objectives)

2011/C 340/71

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sarah Whitehead (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented: initially by F. Feyerbacher and G. Nuvoli, Agents and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, and subsequently by E. Carlini and G. Nuvoli, Agents and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, annulment of the decision of the ECB awarding the applicant a salary increase of two points for the purpose of the Annual Salary and Bonus Review for the year 2008, and payment of the difference between the salary increase received and that to which the applicant claims she was entitled. Second, compensation for non-material loss suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Whitehead to bear her own costs and to pay those of the European Central Bank. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Whitehead to bear her own costs and to pay those of the European Central Bank.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.10, p. 82.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Eric M. Reuter, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Laserscope; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: May 7, 2004 /s/ Eric M. Reuter   Eric M. Reuter   Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10684 Conference Calendar

__________________ DALE ALAN CURTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus DALE S. HANNA ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-945-X
- - - - - - - - - - December 20, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Dale Alan Curtis appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). We have reviewed the record and Curtis's brief on appeal. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Curtis's claims of unlawful arrest, illegal search and seizure, and wrongful deprivation of property. AFFIRMED.
# C_2010288EN.01006701.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/67

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — Hanschmann v European Police Office (Europol)

(Case F-27/09) (1)

(Staff case - Europol employees - Non-renewal of a contract - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 6 of the Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees - Principle of respect for the rights of the defence)

(2010/C 288/124)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Ingo Hanschmann (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented initially by P. de Casparis, lawyer, then by W. J. Dammingh and N. D. Dane, lawyers)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by- D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 12 June 2008 informing the applicant that it was impossible to offer him a permanent post, and the decision of 7 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to offer to Mr Hanschmann a contract of indefinite duration; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of 12 June 2008 by which the European Police Office (Europol) refused to offer to Mr Hanschmann a contract of indefinite duration;

| 2. | orders Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Europol to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, of 18.07.09., p 25

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

ERROL J. TORRES and AQUA CAPITAL 

ADVISORS LLC 

v. 

NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION 

CFTC Docket No. CRAA 11-02 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Upon review of the record and the parties' appellate submissions, we have determined 

that the appeal was not timely perfected, 1 and that there was no demonstration of excusable 

neglect? Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal without opinion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

By the Commission (Chairman GENSLER and Commissioners SOMMERS, CHILTON, 

O'MALIA and WETJEN). 

Melissa D. Jurgens 

Secretary of the Commiss on 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Dated: April 11, 2013 

1 Pursuant to Commission Regulation 171.25{a), the Commission may dismiss any appeal from an NF A decision for 

which an appeal brief is not timely filed. 

2 The Commission may excuse untimeliness ifthe petitioner demonstrates excusable neglect, considering: (I) the 

risk of prejudice to the non-moving party; (2) the length ofthe delay and its potential impact on judicial 

proceedings; {3) the reasons for the delay, including whether it was in the reasonable control of the tardy party; and 

{4) whether the tardy party acted in good faith. In re Ligammari, [2005-2007 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. 

{CCH) ~ 30,103 at 57,407 (CFTC June 28, 2005) (order pursuant to delegated authority).
II-00370

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Linda Greenberg <lmg20980@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:40 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Linda Greenberg

20980 Olivo Way

Boca Raton, FL 33433
# C_2010234EN.01001902.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/19

---

Order of the Court of 12 May 2010 — Pigasos Alieftiki Naftiki Etairia v Council of the European Union and European Commission

(Case C-451/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Non-contractual liability - Proof of Community origin of products fished by a vessel owned by a company registered under Greek law - Failure to adopt provisions permitting the customs authorities of the Member States to accept documents issued by a non-Member State, other than form T2M)

2010/C 234/29

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Pigasos Alieftiki Naftiki Etairia (represented by: N. Skandamis and E. Perakis, dikigoroi)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Florindo Gijón and M. Balta, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: M. Patakia and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 16 September 2009 in Case T-162/07 Pigasos Alieftiki Naftiki Etairia v Council and Commission, in which that Court dismissed an action for damages to compensate for the damage alleged to have been suffered by the applicant as a result of the fact that the Council and the Commission did not adopt provisions enabling the customs authorities of a Member State, in this case the Greek customs authorities, to accept as proof of the Community nature of products fished by a Greek vessel belonging to the applicant documents issued by a third State other than the T2M form provided for in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 (JO 1993 L 253, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Pigasos Alieftiki Naftiki Etairia is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Pigasos Alieftiki Naftiki Etairia is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

AMENDED CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Carlton Parfitt, Director and the Chief Financial Officer of Golden Spirit
Mining Ltd., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 09, 2005


/s/ Carlton Parfitt
------------------
Carlton Parfitt

Director and Chief Financial Officer