alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-01145

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Stephanie Hosking <shosking 123 @gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:30 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Stephanie Hosking

2250 se 185th Ave.

Portland, OR 97233
II-00358

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Lock <lock809@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:15 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Lock

8353 Four Mile Rd.

Ada, MI 49301
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-89-000]


Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., Complainant, v. California 
Independent System Operator Corporation, Respondent; Notice of 
Complaint

June 15, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 14, 2001, Morgan Stanley Capital Group 
Inc. (MSCG), tendered for filing a complaint pursuant to section 206 of 
the Federal Power Act against the California Independent System 
Operator (CAISO) concerning the ongoing problem of phantom congestion. 
Given the ongoing harm that MSCG faces and the immediacy of the peak 
summer months, MSCG requests interim relief.
    Copies of the filing were served upon CAISO and other interested 
parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before July 5, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for 
assistance. Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before 
July 5, 2001. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15693 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
----

----

I Aktai, kuriuos skelbti privaloma

Taryba

----

TARYBOS REGLAMENTAS (EB) Nr. 1241/2004

2004 m. liepos 5 d.

iš dalies keičiantis Reglamentą (EB) Nr. 1255/96, laikinai sustabdantį autonominių Bendrojo muitų tarifo muitų taikymą tam tikriems pramonės, žemės ūkio ir žuvininkystės produktams

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS TARYBA,

atsižvelgdama į Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 26 straipsnį,

atsižvelgdama į Komisijos pasiūlymą,

kadangi:

PRIĖMĖ ŠĮ REGLAMENTĄ:

1 straipsnis

Reglamento (EB) Nr. 1255/96 priedas iš dalies keičiamas taip:

2 straipsnis

Šis reglamentas įsigalioja trečią dieną po jo paskelbimo Europos Sąjungos oficialiajame leidinyje.

Jis taikomas nuo 2004 m. liepos 1 d.

Šis reglamentas yra privalomas visas ir tiesiogiai taikomas visose valstybėse narėse.

Priimta Briuselyje, 2004 m. liepos 5 d.

Tarybos vardu

G. ZALM

Pirmininkas

----

(1)OL L 158, 1996 6 29, p. 1. Reglamentas su paskutiniais pakeitimais, padarytais Reglamentu (EB) Nr. 2285/2003 (OL L 341, 2003 12 30, p. 1).

----

I PRIEDAS

----

(1)  Naudojant šiam specialiam tikslui kontrolė vykdoma laikantis atitinkamų Bendrijos nuostatų

----

II PRIEDAS

----
### NUMBER 13
- 1 3
- 00 1 37
- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ERIC SANCHEZ , INDIVIDUALLY D/B/A ROLI'S AUTO SALES AND ROLI'S AUTO SALES, INC. , APPELLANT,

v.
RUBEN MARQUEZ AND ALICIA MARQUEZ , APPELLEES.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

of Cameron County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________ __ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Eric Sanchez , Individually d/b/a Roli’s Auto Sales and Roli’s Auto Sales,
Inc., filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 3 of2

Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2013

- CCL

- 33

- C . The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appea l on grounds that the parties have resolved the underlying lawsuit and the issues have become moot. The parties request that this
Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to
dismiss, is of the opini on that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED , and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will
issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM

Delivered an d filed the 9th day of May , 201 3

.
Bruce WALKER, petitioner, v. ESTATE OF Ryan L. CLARK.

No. 17-872.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
II-00334

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Art Hanson <ahanson47@comcast.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 12:57 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Art Hanson

1815 Briarwood Dr.

Lansing, MI 48917-1773
II-00551

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kristin Klass <kristin klass@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:04 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kristin Klass

POBox 549

Bridgman, MI 49106
##### 



Exhibit 10.37
 EXECUTION
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
 This Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement Borrower Bank Banks Agent
 RECITALS :
    NOW, THEREFORE,
 1. Defined Terms .
 2. Amendments .
 Permitted Permanent Loan




---



##### 



provided however provided
 Senior Secured Operating Company Leverage Ratio
 Senior Secured Operating Company Leverage Ratio
 plus plus plus
 2




---



##### 



minus minus minus
  Allocated Clubs Cash Flow
 Allocated Clubs Excess Ren
 Average Life
 Parity Secured Debt
   provided
 3




---



##### 



provided pari passu
  Senior Secured Operating Company Leverage Ratio.
 3. Conditions to Effectiveness .
   4




---



##### 



4. Representations and Warranties .
   5




---



##### 



5. Reference to and Effect on the Loan Documents .
   6. Costs, Expenses and Taxes
 6




---



##### 



7. Governing Law .
 8. Headings .
 9. Counterparts .
 10. Recitals .
  7




---



##### 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,


LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.By:Name:
    
    Eric J. BussTitle:
    
    SecretaryU.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as Agent and as a BankBy:Name:
    
    Karen E. WeathersTitle:
    
    Vice President







---



##### 



JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A.By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



Royal Bank of CanadaBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



Bank of MontrealBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



Bank of the West, a California banking corporationBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



M&I Marshall & Ilsley BankBy:Name:Title:andBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



National City BankBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



Associated Bank, National AssociationBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



RBS Citizens, N.A.By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



MB Financial Bank, N.A.By:Name:Title:
Marcus B. FIFER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6552.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
1031.

#### Singleton *v.*Merchants *&*Miners Transportation Company.

Action for damages, from city court of Savannah — Judge Freeman. January 9, 1908.

Argued April 21,

Decided June 18, 1908.

Rehearing denied July 8, 1908.

Powell, J.

The action is by a ship-hand against the owners, for injuries received while loading freight. The evidence tends to indicate either that the injury was occasioned by the negligence of fellow servants— as to this defendant a non-actionable transaction, or through haste in the manner in which the loading was being done under the orders of a foreman, — a thing for which the defendant primarily would be liable. Nevertheless the situation was manifestly patent, and the servant, by voluntarily continuing to work under the circumstances, in legal contemplation evinced a willingness to assume risk of injury. The grant of a nonsuit was, therefore, not erroneous. *Judgment affirmed.*

*463*Shelby Myrick,*for plaintiff.

*O’Connor, O’Byrne & Hartridge,*for defendant.
# C_2011046EN.01001102.xml

| 12.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/11

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Ilink Kommunikationssysteme v OHIM (ilink)

(Case T-161/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark ilink - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 46/20

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ilink Kommunikationssysteme GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: B Schütze, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 February 2009 (Case R 1849/2007-4), relating to registration of the word sign ‘ilink’ as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ilink Kommunikationssysteme GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ilink Kommunikationssysteme GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 153 of 4.7.2009.

1

---
Gabriel POPA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6980.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
MED RX/SYSTEMS, P.L.L.C., dba Alimentos, dba Med Care Pharmacy, dba Good Start, petitioner, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES, et al.

No. 15-1454.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
      George A.
      McQuain, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp (the
      "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) the
      Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the third quarter ended September
      30,
      2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13 (a)
      or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 14, 2006




/s/
            George
              A. McQuainName: George A. McQuainTitle: President and Chief Executive
              Officer
Charles HEAD and Jeremy Michael Head, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7549.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      19,457,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  785,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,243,320
<PP&E>                                         559,198
<DEPRECIATION>                               (117,362)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,685,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          181,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,361
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,451,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,685,156
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               795,374
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,297,745
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,502,371)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,893,237)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,609,134)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,609,134)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41371 Summary Calendar

JAMES EARL MINIX, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:96-CV-60

- - - - - - - - - - January 28, 1999 Before KING, Circuit Judge, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James Earl Minix, TDCJ #551618, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Minix argues that he was denied Due Process and Equal Protection, that trial counsel was ineffective, and that the wrong parole statute was applied to his sentence. Since he filed his § 2254 petition prior to the enactment ofNo. 97-41371 -2-

the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, Minix must obtain a certificate of probable cause (CPC). Green v. Johnson , 116 F.3d 1115, 1119-20 (5th Cir. 1997). To obtain a CPC, Minix must make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right.
See Barefoot v. Estelle , 463 U.S. 880, 893 (1983). Minix has met this standard, and his CPC motion is GRANTED. In his second ground for relief, Minix alleges that counsel failed to advise him regarding parole eligibility, that counsel gave inadequate advice about the sentence being non-aggravated, and that counsel failed to object to an inaccurate presentence investigation report. He made these same claims in his first and second state habeas petitions. These claims are exhausted. Minix’s other two claims were not exhausted, and the district court did not err in finding that they would be procedurally barred. Since Minix filed a mixed petition with both exhausted and unexhausted claims, Minix should be allowed the opportunity to amend his petition by deleting the unexhausted claims. See Rose v. Lundy , 455 U.S. 509, 510 (1982). The judgment of the district court is affirmed in part and vacated in part, and the matter is remanded to allow the district court to give Minix the opportunity to amend his petition by deleting his unexhausted claims and to proceed with his exhausted claims. CPC GRANTED. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND
REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Adolor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael R. Dougherty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  | 
|------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ MICHAEL R. DOUGHERTY
|Michael R. Dougherty    
|Chief Financial Officer 
|March 4, 2004