alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting – Emergency Meeting Notice.

This notice that an emergency meeting was held is published pursuant to the provisions of the 

Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 

The Commission held an emergency closed meeting on October 31, 2011 at 12:00 p.m. The 

Commission, by a recorded unanimous vote, determined that the agency business required that 

business of the agency required that the meeting be held at that time. 

PLACE: 

Three Lafayette Center, 

1155 21st St., NW., 

Washington, DC

9

th Floor Commission Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Registrant Financial Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, Assistant Secretary of the Commission, 

202–418–5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2011– Filed ]

BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
II-00691

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Douglas Benedict <douggieb@verizon.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:25 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Douglas Benedict

2211 21st Street

Santa Monica, CA 90405
# C_2012235EN.01001301.xml

| 4.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2012 — Hearst Communications, Inc., v OHIM — Vida Estética (COSMOBELLEZA)

(Case T-344/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark COSMOBELLEZA - Earlier national and international word and figurative marks COSMO, COSMOPOLITAN, COSMOTEST, COSMOPOLITAN TELEVISION and THE COSMOPOLITAN SHOW - Non registered marks and trade names COSMO and COSMOPOLITAN - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the marks - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 235/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hearst Communications, Inc., (New York, United States) (represented by: A. Nordemann, C. Czychowski and A. Nordemann-Schiffel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by C. Bartos, and subsequently by V. Melgar, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Vida Estética, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A.I. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 June 2009 (Case R 770/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Hearst Communications, Inc. and Vida Estética, SL

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hearst Communications, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hearst Communications, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

1

---
# C_2010063EN.01004407.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/44

---

Order of the President of the Court of 17 December 2009 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-149/09) (1)

1

2010/C 63/77

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.

1

---
II-01203

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Katy Parrish <katyparrish23 @gmail.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 4:07 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Katy Parrish

2163 W 29th Avenue #11

Anchorage, AK 99517
EXHIBIT
4.4








AMENDMENT
TO WARRANTS





THIS
AMENDMENT TO WARRANTS ("Warrant Amendment") is effective as of July 7, 2003, and
amends Warrant No. I-1 to purchase 243,750 shares of common stock of Voxware,
Inc. ("Voxware"), Warrant No. I-2 to purchase 81,250 shares of Voxware's common
stock, and Warrant Purchase and Release Agreement dated April 24, 2000 by and
among Voxware, Inc. and InRoad, Inc. and Stratos Product Development, LLC to
purchase 50,000 shares of Voxware's common stock (together referred to as the
"Warrants").





Pursuant
to an Amendment dated January 25, 2003 by and among Voxware, Inc., Verbex
Acquisition Corporation and InRoad, Inc., the Warrants are hereby amended to
reflect an exercise price of $0.032 per share as of the effective date hereof
(original exercise price was $3.08 per share). This Warrant Amendment also
amends the term of the Warrants by extending the expiration to April 4,
2008.







VOXWARE, INC./s/ Bathsheba J.
    MalsheenBathsheba J. MalsheenPresident and Chief
      Executive Officer/s/ Nicholas NarlisNicholas NarlisSenior Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer




/s/ Allan H. StephanStratos Product Development, LLCAllan H. Stephan
      CEO





/s/ Allan H. StephanInRoad, Inc.Allan H. Stephan
      CEO
II-00303

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ralph Hitchcock, Jr. <rhitchcock@erols.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:05 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ralph Hitchcock, Jr.

1135 Ocean Parkway, Unit 113

Ocean Pines, MD 21811
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Henry P. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
-------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2006


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Charles QUATRINE, Jr., petitioner, v. Mary BERGHUIS, Warden.

No. 16-6723.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### Robert C. Best, Respondent, v 2170 5th Avenue Corporation, Appellant.

[873 NYS2d 631]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann BriganttiHughes, J.), entered on or about January 4, 2008, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied defendant’s motion to unseal plaintiffs criminal court file, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion granted.

Where an individual, who has records that would otherwise be kept sealed under Criminal Procedure Law § 160.50, affirmatively places the underlying conduct at issue by bringing a civil suit, the statutory protection afforded by section 160.50 is waived, as the privilege, which is intended to protect the accused, may not be used as “a sword to gain an advantage in a civil action” *(Green v Montgomery,*95 NY2d 693, 701 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; *see Rodriguez*
      *406
      *v Ford Motor Co.,*301 AD2d 372 [2003]). Here, plaintiff waived the protection afforded by the statute by placing into issue the prosecution against him when he commenced this action alleging, inter alia, malicious prosecution based on that criminal proceeding *(see Kalogris v Roberts,*185 AD2d 335, 336 [1992]; *Wright v Snow,*175 AD2d 451, 452 [1991], *lv dismissed*79 NY2d 822 [1991]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Gonzalez, Sweeny, McGuire and DeGrasse, JJ.
NISENAN TRIBE OF THE NEVADA CITY RANCHERIA, et al., petitioners, v. Sally JEWELL, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

No. 16-616.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Joseph Leonard BELL, petitioner, v. Bernard W. BOOKER, Warden.

No. 16-6365.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 372 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

provide for the eligibility of Transportation Security Administration employees to receive public safety officers’ death benefits, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California (for herself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. VELA, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SOTO, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. 

MOORE, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. BEYER, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. GONZALEZ of 

Texas, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. 

RUSH, Mr. HASTINGS, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. AGUILAR, Mr. MOULTON, and 

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to provide for the eligibility of Transportation Security Administration employees to receive public safety officers’ death benefits, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Our Fallen 

5 TSA Officers Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 372 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION EM2 PLOYEES ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE PUBLIC 

3 SAFETY OFFICERS’ DEATH BENEFITS. 

4 Section 1204(9) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

5 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10284(9)) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

10 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

11 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(E) an employee of the Transportation 

14 Security Administration who is performing offi15 cial duties of the Administration, if those offi16 cial duties are related to protecting the Nation’s 

17 transportation systems to ensure freedom of 

18 movement for people and commerce.’’. 

19 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

20 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

21 take effect as if they had been enacted on October 31, 

22 2013. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, George W. Millward, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FultonBancshares Corporation.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report.

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: August 10, 2005 | By:                                            | /s/George W. Millward |   |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                  | George W. Millward,                            |
|                  | Interim President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2009082EN.01001101.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 8 January 2009 — Erotic Center BVBA v Belgian State

(Case C-3/09)

(2009/C 82/20)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Erotic Center BVBA

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgian State

Defendant:

Question referred

Should a cubicle consisting of a lockable space where there is room for only one person and where this person can watch films on a television screen for payment, where this person personally starts the film projection by inserting a coin and has a choice of different films, and during the time paid for can continually modify his/her choice of projected films, be regarded as a ‘cinema’ as referred to in the Sixth Council Directive No 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977, Annex H, Category 7 (subsequently: Annex III, No 7, of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (2) of 28 November 2006)?

1

2

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

2

---
II-01022

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Theodore Ritz <Ritzwoodwork@msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:03 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Theodore Ritz

230 Douglas St. N.W.

Warren, OH 44483-3216
Ismael TAMAYO-BAEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9718.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
II-00881

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jude Rodriguez <jrodriguez@cci-exchange.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:23 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jude Rodriguez

3739 N. Sacramento Av.

Chicago, IL 60618