alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 25, 1997

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Meridian Fund, Inc.

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements of Meridian 
Fund and Meridian Value Fund (the portfolios constituting Meridian Fund, Inc.,
hereafter referred to as the "Funds") for the year ended June 30, 1997, we 
considered their internal control structure, including control activities 
for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures 
for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to 
comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the 
internal control structure.

The management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and maintaining 
an internal control structure.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates 
and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and 
related costs of control. Generally, control activities that are relevant to 
an audit pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial statements 
for external purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with generally 
accepted accounting principles.  Those control activities include the 
safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or irregularities 
may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal
control to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and 
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily disclose all 
matters in an internal control that might be material weaknesses under 
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public 
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or 
operation of the specific internal control components does not reduce to a 
relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that 
would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may 
occur and not be detected within a timely period by the employees in the 
normal course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted no 
matters involving internal control, including control activities for 
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined
above as of June 30, 1997.  This report is intended solely for the information
and use of management and the Board of Directors of Meridian Fund, Inc. and
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Price Waterhouse LLP
----

            COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 2051/2004

of 25 October 2004         

amending Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 establishing a European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 308 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 25 October 2004.

For the Council

The President

R. VERDONK            

----

(1)  Opinion of 31 March 2004 (not yet published In the Official Journal).

(2)OJ C 112, 30.4.2004, p. 53.

(3)OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1655/2003 (OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p. 41).

----
James Charles SCOTT, petitioner, v. Cheryl GROVES, et al.

No. 16-6902.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy E. Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
            Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:  March 17, 2010


By:  /s/ Randy E. Butler


Randy E. Butler


Chief Financial Officer
Christopher TEASLEY, petitioner, v. Gregory McLAUGHLIN, Warden.

No. 16-9409.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
II-00524

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kenneth Fulton <bones4rn59@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:37 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kenneth Fulton

6 Georges Rock Rd

Sandwich, MA 02563
# C_2010134EN.01005201.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/52

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 9 March 2010 — Tzvetanova v Commission

(Case F-33/09) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Temporary staff - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Conditions laid down in Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Habitual residence before entering the service - Stay as a student in the place of employment - Training periods outside the place of employment during the reference period - Account taken of actual residence)

2010/C 134/86

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aglika Tzvetanova (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É.. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents, later by J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the Commission to refuse the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance provided for in Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 10 July 2008 refusing Ms Tzvetanova the benefit of the expatriation allowance provided for in Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 10 July 2008 refusing Ms Tzvetanova the benefit of the expatriation allowance provided for in Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129 of 06. 06. 2009, p. 22.

1

---
II-00428

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

werner maile <Maile99@verizon.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:56 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

werner maile

801 west richmondville rd

cobleskill, NY 12043
II-01052

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Doug MacMillan <doug.macmillan@mac.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:43 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Doug MacMillan

338 Pelham Road

Amherst, MA 01002
# C_2010234EN.01005702.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/57

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2010 — Menghi v ENISA

(Case F-2/09) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Temporary staff - Dismissal following end of the probationary period - Psychological harassment)

2010/C 234/104

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Riccardo Achille Menghi (Cagliari, Italy) (represented by: L. Defalque, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Network and Information Security Agency (represented by: E. Maurage, Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision not to confirm the applicant’s contract after the probationary period and an application for compensation for the material and non-material harm suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55 of 07.03.2009, p. 53.

1

---
1215.

#### Young *v.*The State.

Accusation of cheating and swindling, from city court of Moultrie — Judge McKenzie. May 18, 1908.

Hill, C. J.

1. All the objections made by tlie plaintiff in error to tlie act. of tlie General Assembly approved August 15, 1903 (Acts 1903, p. 90), making criminal the fraudulent obtaining of money or other thing of value under a labor contract, on the ground that the act is repugnant, to certain provisions of the Eederal and State constitutions, having been fully settled by the decisions of the Supreme Court, this court refuses to certify any of the questions to the Supreme Court, especially where-there is no request made to have any of these decisions reviewed. *Lamar*v. *State,*120 *Ga.*312 (47 S. E. 958) ; *Banks*v. *State,*124 *Ga.*15 (52 S. E. 74, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1007) ; *Vance*v. *State,*128 *Ga.*661 (57 S. E. 889) ; *Mulkey*v. *State,*1 *Ga. App.*521 (57 S. E. 1022).

2. “Peonage is a status or condition of compulsory service based upon the-indebtedness of the peon to the master. The basal fact is indebtedness.” Clyatt *v.*U. S., 197 U. S. 207 (25 Sup. Ct. 429, 49 L. ed. 726). A. State statute which makes criminal the procurement of money upon a. fraudulent contract to perform service, and the fraudulent abandonment of the contract after having so procured the money, is not a violation, of the Federal Statutes (Rev. Stat. §§1990, 5526 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 1266, 3715)), prohibiting involuntary service or labor.

3. The fraudulent act of the promisor in procuring the money on his contract does more'than make a debt; it also constitutes a crime; and the-purpose of the act of 1903, supra, is not to create a remedy for the collection of the debt, but to provide punishment for the fraudulent and successful intent to cheat and defraud. *Mulkey*v. *State,*supra.

4. It is permissible, in an accusation or indictment for a violation of the-act of 1903, supra, to embrace in a single count various sums of money, as having been fraudulently procured by the promisor from the promisee . at different times, the various amounts so procured making up the aggregate sum charged to have been fraudulently obtained by the accused. Such a count does not charge separate offenses, but includes only one offense. *Jackson*v. *State,*76 *Ga. 551 (7).*

*6.*The accusation sets out in apt and sufficient language the offense as. defined by the statute, and the evidence proves the offense as charged.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*828Submitted June 30,

Decided October 12, 1908.

*James Humphreys, Alfred R. Kline,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. F. Way, solicitor,*contra.
# C_2010317EN.01002902.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/29

---

Order of the General Court of 5 October 2010 — Strategi Group v OHIM — RBI (STRATEGI)

(Case T-92/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark STRATEGI - Earlier national word mark Stratégies - Relative ground for refusal - Proof of use of the earlier trade mark - Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) and Rule 22 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))

2010/C 317/53

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Strategi Group Ltd (Manchester, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Saunders, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Reed Business Information (RBI) (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) (represented by: A. Messas, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 December 2008 (Case R 1581/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Reed Business Information (RBI) and Strategi Group Ltd.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Strategi Group Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Strategi Group Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration


Working Group on Challenges to the Employment-Based Healthcare 
System Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting will be held Wednesday, July 18, 2001, of the Advisory 
Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans Working Group 
assigned to study challenges to the employment-based healthcare system.
    The session will take place in Room N-5437 A-C, U.S. Department of 
Labor Building, Second and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20210. The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. 
to approximately 2 p.m., is for working group members to examine 
weaknesses, strengths and alternatives to employer-based health 
benefits from both employer and employee perspectives.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before July 10, 
2001, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, 
U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or representatives of organizations 
wishing to address the Working Group should forward their request to 
the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations 
will be limited to 20 minutes, but an extended statement may be 
submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who need 
special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by July 10, at 
the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before July 10.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 21st day of June 2001.
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-16165 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
651.

#### Hart *v.*The State.

Indictment for selling liquor, from Walker superior court — ' Judge Wright. June 10, 1907.

Submitted October 7,

Decided May 18, 1908.

*Payne & Payne, Lumpkin &*Wright, *J. E. Posser,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. U. Ennis, solicitor-general, Walter B. Shaw,*contra.

Russell, J.

No error of law is assigned; the evidence authorized the conviction of the defendant, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, based solely upon the general grounds; for the reason that these grounds are insufficient to raise any question as to the admissibility of the evidence adduced upon the trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Amany Fahim BESADA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al.

No. 15-9373.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Infinex Ventures, Inc.(the
  "Company") on 10K SB for fiscal year ending October 31, 2003, as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
  Earl Hope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        result of operations of the Company.

|Date: January 28, 2004 | By: | /s/ Earl Hope          
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                       |     |                        
|                       |     | (Signature)            
|                       |     |                        
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer
|                       |     |                        
|                       |     | (Title)                

---
James Lynn STYERS, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

No. 16-6576.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Toni FOUDY, et vir, petitioners, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.

No. 16-573.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.

No. 15-1111.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 28, 2016.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.