alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1205.

#### French *v.*The State.

Accusation of cheating and swindling, from city court of Fitzgerald — Judge Jay. April 24, 1908.

Submitted June 9,

Decided June 18, 1908.

*J. B. Wall,*for plaintiff in error.

*O. H. Elkins, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

Under the Penal Code, § 669, “Any person who shall, in the sale or disposing of any property, either real or personal, defraud another by falsely representing that such property is not subject to any lien,' knowing the same to be subject thereto, . . shall be punished as for misdemeanor.” Where the State shows that the defendant knowingly sold the prosecutor a parcel of real estate upon which a binding common-law execution had been levied, and expressly informed him that there was no lien thereon, a conviction may be sustained, although the prosecutor has not paid off the execution. The incumbrance upon the property, caused by the existence of the lien, effects such damage upon the prosecutor as to make the act criminal. In the ease at bar the evidence justified the verdict of guilty rendered against the accused.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Gregston MARSHALL, petitioner, v. Larry T. EDMONDS, Warden.

No. 15-9731.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1759 

Expressing support for designation of January 23rd as ‘‘Ed Roberts Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2010 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California (for himself, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. 

FARR, Mr. HOLT, and Mr. LANGEVIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of January 23rd as ‘‘Ed 

Roberts Day’’. 

Whereas Edward Verne Roberts was born January 23, 1939; 

Whereas Roberts acquired polio as an adolescent in 1953 and 

had to spend vast expanses of time in an iron lung; 

Whereas Roberts’ career as an advocate began when a high 

school administrator threatened to deny him a diploma 

because he had not completed driver’s education and 

physical education; 

Whereas in 1962 Roberts was admitted to the University of 

California at Berkeley (UC Berkeley), where he became 

the first student with a severe disability to attend UC 

Berkeley; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1759 IH 

Whereas when his search for housing at the university met 

resistance, the director of the campus hospital offered 

Roberts a room in an empty wing, which Roberts accepted on the condition that it was considered a dormitory 

space; 

Whereas other students with significant disabilities joined 

Roberts in the empty wing over the next few years and 

called themselves the ‘‘Rolling Quads’’; 

Whereas at UC Berkeley the Rolling Quads began advocating 

for curb cuts, opening access to the wider community and 

creating the first student-led disability services program 

at a university in the Nation; 

Whereas the student program led to the creation of the Nation’s first center for independent living; 

Whereas Roberts assumed leadership of the Center for Independent Living, Berkeley, and guided its development as 

a model for disability advocacy and self-help services 

across the Nation and around the world; 

Whereas in 1975 Roberts was appointed the Director of the 

California Department of Rehabilitation; 

Whereas in 1983 Roberts co-founded the World Institute on 

Disability, an organization committed to eliminating barriers to full social integration for persons with disabilities; 

Whereas Ed Roberts died from natural causes on March 14, 

1995; and 

Whereas Ed Roberts was a leader and champion in the disability rights movement: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1759 IH 

1 (1) supports the designation of an ‘‘Ed Roberts 

2 Day’’; and 

3 (2) acknowledges the accomplishments of Ed 

4 Roberts in helping reduce barriers, increase access, 

5 and improve lives for persons with disabilities. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,194
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (96)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,048
<PP&E>                                           3,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,892)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,854
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,254
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,885
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   144
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,147)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,205)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
Dora L. ADKINS, petitioner, v. PUBLIC STORAGE.

No. 17-5417.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2011030EN.01003102.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/31

---

Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 25 October 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-528/09) (1)

1

()

2011/C 30/50

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 13.03.2010.

1

---
Leroy JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Stewart ECKERT, Superintendent, Wende Correctional Facility.

No. 16-5534.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
II-00975

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Richard Doyle <doyler2d2@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:32 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Richard Doyle

PO Box 1151

Santa Teresa, NM 88008
# C_2011080EN.01000801.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/8

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Inmogolf SA v Dirección General de Tributos de la Consejería de Economia y Hacienda de la Comunidad Autónoma de Murcia

(Case C-487/09) (1)

1

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 69/335/EEC - Indirect taxes - Raising of capital - Transfer of securities - Capital of a company mostly made up of immovable property)

2011/C 80/13

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Inmogolf SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Dirección General de Tributos de la Consejería de Economía y Hacienda de la Comunidad Autónoma de Murcia

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Supremo — Interpretation of Articles 11(a) and 12(1)(a) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ English Special Edition 1969 (II), p. 412) — Prohibition on the taxation of the creation, issue, admission to quotation on a stock exchange, making available on the market or dealing in securities — Derogation — Tax on the transfer of securities — National tax on the transfer of shares in a company in which at least 50 % of the assets comprise immovable property and, where as a result of the transfer, the person acquiring the securities obtains control of the company

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital, and, more particularly, Articles 11(a) and 12(1)(a) thereof, does not preclude legislation of a Member State, such as provided in Article 108(2) of Law 24/1988 of 28 July 1988 on stock markets, as amended by Law 18/91 of 6 June 1991, which, in order to prevent tax avoidance in the context of the transfer of immovable assets by companies, subjects transfers of securities to tax on capital transfers where those transfers of shares represent shares in the share capital of companies the assets of which are at least 50 % comprised of immovable property and where the purchaser has following such a transfer a position which allows it to exercise control over the entity at issue, even in cases where, firstly, there was no intention to evade tax and where, secondly, those companies are fully operational and the immovable properties cannot be dissociated from the economic activity carried out by those companies.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost-U-Less, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin P. Moore, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      May
      14, 2007








/s/
                Martin P. MooreMartin
                P. MooreChief
                Financial Officer
Leah Joy WARD, petitioner, v. Carolyn JORDAN, Warden.

No. 16-5792.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, J. Jeffrey Meder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Cost-U-Less, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 11, 2003


/s/ J. Jeffrey Meder
------------------------------------------------------
J. Jeffrey Meder
President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.13



OFFER LETTER, ERIC WILLGOHS

July 20, 1999

Eric Willgohs

Dear Eric,

I am pleased to offer you the position of General Counsel, Vice President Legal
for Broadbase Software, Inc., reporting directly to me.

This letter outlines the proposed terms of employment with Broadbase.

-       Your annual salary will be $120,000 paid semi-monthly

-       Your "at target" pay including base salary and bonus is $50,000.

-       You will start immediately.


I will recommend that you will be granted an option to purchase 60,000 shares of
stock. This grant is subject to approval by the Board of Directors at its first
meeting after your employment begins. The option would vest over four years and
would be governed by the terms set forth in the Company's standard form of stock
options agreement. The purchase price of each of the shares covered by the
option will be the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of
the approval of the grant by the Board. In the event of a change in control of
50% or more of the stock of Broadbase coupled with the termination of your
employment as General Counsel, then 50% of your unvested shares shall
immediately vest.

The Company will provide to you the health, holiday, vacation and other benefits
available to all its employees. Enclosed, for your review, is information
related to some of the benefits.

To indicate your acceptance of this offer of employment, please sign below and
return on or before, Monday, July 26, 1999. Employment at Broadbase is subject
to your signing the attached nondisclosure and inventions agreement, as well.
Please also understand that your employment is not governed by any written or
oral contract and is considered an "at-will" agreement. This means that you are
free, as is the Company, to terminate the employment relationship at any time
for any reason, so long as there is not violation of applicable state or federal
law.

Eric, all of us welcome you in joining Broadbase and we look forward to having
you on our team. Meanwhile, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call me at (650) 614-8304.

Sincerely,

Chuck Bay
Chief Financial Officer
EVP Business Development

Accepted


Signature: /s/ Eric Willgohs
           ------------------------------

Name:  Eric Willgohs

Start Date:
           ------------------------------
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-1196

___________________________ Autumn Roberson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. CrawlSpace Solutions of Arkansas; John Cossey; Bridgett Cossey

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central

____________ Submitted: October 13, 2021 Filed: October 18, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. In this employment action, Autumn Roberson challenges the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment. After careful review of the record and the

1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Schaffhauserv. UPS,

Inc., 794 F.3d 899, 902 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
II-00376

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mary Ann Black <maryablack@msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:26 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mary Ann Black

101 NLong St

Caseyville, IL 62232
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1556 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 225
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1556

                          [Report No. 111-566]

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 
   301) directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War 
   Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from 
                               Pakistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2010

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 
   301) directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War 
   Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from 
                               Pakistan.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 301) directing the 
President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to 
remove the United States Armed Forces from Pakistan, if called up by 
Representative Kucinich of Ohio or his designee. The concurrent 
resolution shall be considered as read. The concurrent resolution shall 
be debatable for one hour, with 30 minutes controlled by Representative 
Kucinich of Ohio or his designee and 30 minutes equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Foreign Affairs. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 
on the concurrent resolution to final adoption without intervening 
motion.
                                                 House Calendar No. 225

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1556

                          [Report No. 111-566]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 
   301) directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War 
   Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from 
                               Pakistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 26, 2010

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Donald Arthur HERRINGTON, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 16-6144.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.