alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        31


        <NAME>      Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

6-MOS


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

OCT-31-1998


<PERIOD-END>

APR-30-1998


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

214,178


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

215,899


<RECEIVABLES>

1,085


<ASSETS-OTHER>

1


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

216,985


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

1,543


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

990


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

2,533


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

296,854


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

17,196


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

17,867


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

0


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

4,851


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

(79,257)


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

1,706


<NET-ASSETS>

214,452


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

1,469


<INTEREST-INCOME>

377


<OTHER-INCOME>

(130)


<EXPENSES-NET>

1,881


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

(165)


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

(16,520)


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

4,100


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

(12,585)


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

4,351


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

3,087


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

4,110


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

352


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

(25,065)


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

0


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

(62,737)


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

336


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

1,181


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

0


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

1,884


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

221,533


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

13.410


<PER-SHARE-NII>

(.010)


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

(.690)


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .250


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

0


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

12.470


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

174


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 8.1
 Company Subsidiaries
  Name of Entity
    
    Country of Incorporation
    
    Ownership %Novogen Laboratories Pty Ltd
    
    Australia
    
    
    100Novogen Research Pty Ltd
    
    Australia
    
    
    100Central Coast Properties Pty Ltd
    
    Australia
    
    
    100Phytosearch Pty Ltd
    
    Australia
    
    
    100Phytogen Pty Ltd
    
    Australia
    
    
    100Glycotex Pty Ltd
    
    Australia
    
    
    100Norvogen Pty Ltd
    
    Australia
    
    
    100Novogen Inc
    
    U.S.A.
    
    
    100Glycotex, Inc.
    
    U.S.A.
    
    
    81.0Novogen Limited(U.K.)
    
    U.K.
    
    
    100Promensil Limited
    
    U.K.
    
    
    100Novogen BV
    
    Netherlands
    
    
    100Novogen New Zealand Limited
    
    New Zealand
    
    
    100Novogen Canada Limited
    
    Canada
    
    
    100Marshall Edwards, Inc.
    
    U.S.A.
    
    
    71.9Marshall Edwards Pty Limited*
    
    Australia
    
    
    71.9
 
 *
    
    Owned indirectly through Marshall Edwards, Inc.
# C_2010346EN.01003804.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/38

---

Order of the President of the Court of 1 September 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-531/09) (1)

1

()

2010/C 346/70

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---
# C_2010246EN.01001401.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 July 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-513/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/66/EC - Batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2010/C 246/22

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V. Peere and A. Marghelis, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: T. Materne, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt or communicate, within the prescribed period, all the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC (OJ 2006 L 266, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.02.2010.

1

---
Abraham MORRIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9183.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

OCTOBER 1999 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

)C.C.A. NO. W1999-01914-CCA-R3-CD

Appellee, )

) HARDIN COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. C. CREED McGINLEY,

PERCY FARRIS, ) JUDGE

)

Appellant. ) (Sentencing)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

ED NEAL McDANIEL PAUL G. SUMMERS

618 Main St. Attorney General & Reporter

Savannah, TN 38372

J. ROSS DYER

Asst. Attorney General

 425 Fifth Ave.., North

Nashville, TN 37243

ROBERT “GUS” RADFORD

District Attorney General

JOHN W. OVERTON, JR.

Asst. District Attorney General

P. O. Box 484

Savannah, TN 38372

ORDER FILED:____________________

AFFIRMED - RULE 20

JOHN H. PEAY,

Judge

FILED

December 20, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk
2

O R D E R

The defendant was convicted, on his guilty plea, of delivery of under five

grams of cocaine. He received an agreed sentence of three years as a Range I standard

offender. The manner of service was reserved for determination by the trial judge who

refused to grant alternative sentencing.

In this appeal, the defendant contends that he was entitled to alternative

sentencing and that he should have been given credit for the time he served in the state

of Kentucky after a detainer was placed against him by Tennessee authorities. We find

the issues to be without merit.

The proof submitted at the sentencing hearing supports the trial judge’s

findings that the defendant had been arrested and convicted of another felony drug

offense after his arrest on the instant charge, and that this indicated a continuing pattern

for violating the drug laws. The trial court also found that the defendant was “not candid

and truthful”, that he had continued to use drugs, and was unemployed, all of which

indicated to the trial court that the defendant lacked amenability to correction.

Further, the defendant cites no authority for his proposition that he is

entitled to credit for the time spent in the Kentucky penal system. The case law in this

state holds otherwise. See Majeed v. State, 621 S.W.2d 153, 155 (Tenn. Crim. App.

1981).

Finding the defendant’s issues to be without merit, we affirm the trial court’s

denial of alternative sentencing and denial of credit for service in another state pursuant

to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee.

________________________________

JOHN H. PEAY, Judge
3

CONCUR:

________________________________

NORMA M. OGLE, Judge

________________________________

ALAN E. GLENN, Judge
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: GEORGE REX ANDREWS 

DOCKET NUMBER: 195 

DATE: MARCH 23, 1973 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

CEA Docket No. 195 

Name: George Rex Andrews 

Effective on March 23, 1973 

Order 

Effective on the date of service of this order upon the respondent, George 

Rex Andrews shall cease and desist from: (1) placing or causing to be placed, in 

any customer's account, any commodity futures transaction without the prior 

knowledge and consent of such customer; (2) transferring funds from any 

customer's regulated commodity account to any other account without the 

knowledge or authorization of said customer; and (3) deceiving or attempting to 

deceive by any means, or wilfully making or causing to be made any false report 

or statement, or wilfully entering or causing to be entered any false record in 

connection with any order to make, or the making of any contract of sale of any 

commodity for future delivery in interstate commerce, made or to be made, on or 

subject to the rules of any contract market, for or on behalf of any other 

person. 

Done at Washington, D. C. 

March 8, 1973 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Donald A. Campbell 

Judicial Officer 

Office of the Secretary 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        211


        <NAME>      Fidelity Japan Small Companies Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

6-MOS


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

OCT-31-1998


<PERIOD-END>

APR-30-1998


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

116,411


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

105,515


<RECEIVABLES>

654


<ASSETS-OTHER>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

106,169


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

293


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

216


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

509


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

161,787


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

17,528


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

13,015


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

0


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

602


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

(44,622)


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

(10,903)


<NET-ASSETS>

105,660


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

413


<INTEREST-INCOME>

247


<OTHER-INCOME>

(61)


<EXPENSES-NET>

567


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

32


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

(6,299)


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

258


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

(6,009)


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

142


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

8,724


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

4,236


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

25


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

21,386


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

0


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

(38,323)


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

492


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

335


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

0


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

567


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

90,372


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

6.470


<PER-SHARE-NII>

0


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

(.440)


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .010


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

0


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

6.030


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

128


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

        In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Laserscope on
Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2002, I, Eric M. Reuter, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Laserscope, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1)    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June
               30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
               for the six months ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Laserscope.



Date:  August 13, 2002                       By:      /s/  Eric M. Reuter
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Eric M. Reuter
                                                 President and Chief Executive
                                                 Officer
Charles Gadsden KINNEY, petitioner, v. SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 16-606.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Exhibit 4.13



|                                                                         |  |  |  |                                                                                 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|BMS Audit (NSW-VIC) Pty Ltd (Formerly named BDO Audit (NSW-VIC) Pty Ltd) |  |  |  | Level 19, 2 Market Street
Sydney NSW 2000 GFO Box 2551
Sydney NSW 2001 Australia

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Office of the Chief Accountant

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

26 October 2012

Re: Novogen Limited

File No.
0-29962

Dear Sir or Madam:

We BMS
Audit (NSW-VIC) Pty Limited formerly BDO Audit (NSW-VIC) Pty Limited have read Item 16F of Form 20-F of Novogen Limited dated October 26, 2012 and agree with the statements concerning our Firm contained therein.

Very truly yours,



| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 

BMS Audit (NSW-VIC) Pty Limited

BMS Audit (NSW-VIC) Pty Ltd ABN 17 114 673 540
#### In the Matter of Kenneth Page, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[883 NYS2d 626]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was observed fighting with other inmates in a prison recreation yard and charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance, violent conduct, fighting and disobeying a direct order. He was found guilty of the former three charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and a penalty was imposed. After exhausting his administrative remedies, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, unusual incident report and testimony from officers present at the scene constitute substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt *(see Matter of Price v Goord,*29 AD3d 1203, 1204 [2006]). Petitioner’s contention that he was not involved in the fighting created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Lashley v Goord,*39 AD3d 1105, 1106 [2007]) and, to that extent, the Hearing Officer relied on videotape evidence which substantiated testimony from the author of the misbehavior report.

Petitioner’s assertion that the misbehavior report failed to fulfill the particularity requirements of 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 is unavailing. *“A*misbehavior report is sufficient if it contains the date, time and place of the offense, identifies the disciplinary rule[s] alleged to have been violated and specifies the factual basis for the charge with enough particularity to enable the inmate to prepare a defense” *(Matter of Torres v Goord,*261 AD2d 759, 759 [1999] [citation omitted]). Here, the misbehavior report complies with those requirements. Similarly unavailing *1068is petitioner’s claim that the misbehavior report is defective because it was not endorsed by a correction officer who witnessed the fighting. Although that officer testified to petitioner’s general location during the incident, he specifically stated that he did not observe petitioner throw a punch or fight. Consequently, petitioner suffered no prejudice from his failure to sign the misbehavior report *(see Matter of Spulka v Selsky,*277 AD2d 552, 553 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 703 [2001]).

To the extent that they are properly before us, petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and are determined to be without merit.

Peters, J.P, Spain, Kane, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
II-00388

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Adams <ctrarcht@nccn.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:49 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Adams

14487 Burlington Pkwy.

Penn Valley, CA 95946
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY



WHEREAS, BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the Company), will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003; and



WHEREAS, the undersigned serve the Company in the capacity indicated;



NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints THOMAS N. HUND or JEFFREY R. MORELAND, his or her attorney with full power to act for him or her in his or her name, place and stead, to sign his or her
name in the capacity set forth below, to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and to any and all amendments to such Annual Report on Form 10-K, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said
attorney may or shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been executed by the undersigned this 12th day of February, 2004.



|                                                 |  |                                                                                                 
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alan L. BoeckmannAlan L. Boeckmann, Director |  | /s/ John J. Burns, Jr.John J. Burns, Jr., Director                                              
|                                                 | 
|/s/ Vilma S. MartinezVilma S. Martinez, Director |  | /s/ Marc F. RacicotMarc F. Racicot, Director                                                    
|                                                 | 
|/s/ Roy S. RobertsRoy S. Roberts, Director       |  | /s/ Matthew K. RoseMatthew K. Rose, Director and Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                 | 
|/s/ Marc J. ShapiroMarc J. Shapiro, Director     |  | /s/ J.C. Watts, Jr.J.C. Watts, Jr., Director                                                    
|                                                 | 
|/s/ Robert H. WestRobert H. West, Director       |  | /s/ Edward E. Whitacre, Jr.Edward E. Whitacre, Jr., Director                                    
|                                                 | 
|/s/ J. Steven WhislerJ. Steven Whisler, Director |  | /s/ Michael B. YanneyMichael B. Yanney, Director
# C_2010051EN.01002802.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/28

---

Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 26 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic

(Case C-15/09) (1)

1

2010/C 51/47

Language of the case: Czech

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the amended quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Henry
P. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
-------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
September 30, 2005


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.