alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00219

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Gerald Thursby <Jerry.Thursby@yahoo.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 3:37 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Gerald Thursby

109 Clark Dr

Ferris, TX 75125
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33532-33533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15735]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Program Subcommittee

AGENCY: U.S. Army Cadet Command, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In Accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (U.S.C., App. 2) announcement is made of the following 
Committee meeting:
    Name of Committee: Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Program 
Subcommittee.
    Place: Pentagon, Washington, DC.

[[Page 33533]]

    Date(s): July 15-17, 2001.
    Time: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., July 16, 2001; 8 A.M.-Noon, July 17, 2001.
    Proposed Agenda: Review and discuss status of Army ROTC since the 
February 2001 meeting held in Hampton, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commander, HQ U.S. Army Cadet Command, 
ATTN: ATCC-TT (MAJ Hewitt), Fort Monroe, VA 23651. Telephone number is 
(757) 788-5456.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public. Any 
interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with 
the committee.

Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-15735 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Rogerio Chaves SCOTTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7501.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY, petitioner, v. Lee PELE.

No. 15-1044.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Albert Miklos KUN, petitioner, v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-6693.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greenland Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the year ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
Beener, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

/s/ Thomas Beener.
------------------

Thomas Beener
Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 17, 2004
II-00087

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Charles Clarke <chclkq@hotmail.com>

Monday, December 6, 2010 7:03 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Charles Clarke

PO Box 2117 653 N Brooklyn St

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2117
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 18 , 2024.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 24

- 00673

- CV

IN RE MESA IRREVOCABLE TRUST, JUSTIN COX, SPECIAL TRUSTEE AND JOSHUA COTTLE , Relator s

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 202262317



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Thursday, September 12, 2024 , relator s Mesa Irrevocable Trust, Justin Cox, Special Trustee , and Joshua Cottle filed a petition for writ of mandamus in
this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator s ask this c ourt to compel the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland ,2 presiding judge of the 133rd District Court of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s January 29, 2024 “Order on Defendant Bryan Cooper’s Verified Partially Agreed Emergency Motion for Temporary Seal and Motion for Sanctions

. ”
Relators have not demonstrated they are entitled to mandamus relief. We deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1370-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1370-DR), dated May 16, 2001, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 19, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given of the reopening of the incident period for this disaster. The incident period for this declared disaster is now March 23, 2001 and continuing.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Joe M. Allbaugh,

Director.

[FR Doc. 01-15929 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Edrix ROMILUS, petitioner, v. IOWA.

No. 15-9548.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Iowa denied.
# C_2010051EN.01001601.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/16

---

Order of the Court of 17 September 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíroság (Republic of Hungary)) — Pannon GSM Távközlési Rt. v Nemzeti Hírközlési Hatóság Tanácsa

(Case C-143/09) (1)

1

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Accession to the European Union - Directive 2002/22/EC - Application ratione temporis - Jurisdiction of the Court)

2010/C 51/25

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Bíroság (Republic of Hungary)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant(s): Pannon GSM Távközlési Rt.

Applicant(s):

Defendant(s): Nemzeti Hírközlési Hatóság Tanácsa

Defendant(s):

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Fővárosi Bíroság — Interpretation of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (OJ 2003 L 236, p. 33), of Articles 10, 87(1) and 249 EC and of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (‘Universal Service Directive’) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51) — Sharing of the net cost of the universal service obligation between providers of networks and electronic communications services — National legislation on the mechanisms for cost sharing providing for the application of rules incompatible with the directive as regards the financing of universal services provided during the year preceding the accession of the Member State in question to the European Union

Operative part

Operative part

Article 13(2) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (‘Universal Service Directive’) and Annex IV to that directive do not apply to the facts of a dispute such as that in the main proceedings, which concerns a contribution in the field of electronic communications charged by the authorities of the Republic of Hungary for 2003.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 04.07.2009

1

---
Exhibit (d)(73)

**FORM OF**
SEC Exhibit






Exhibit 10.4


AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment to the Executive Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") effective as of January 1, 2016, is hereby made by and between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Elaine B. Bittner (the "Executive").




Background Information


     The parties to this Amendment (the "Parties") entered into the Agreement dated as of January 9, 2013, regarding the Executive's employment relationship with the Company.  The Parties desire to amend the Agreement to provide for the extension of the Current Term, as defined therein, for a period of two years, subject to further extension each year thereafter, as provided in the Agreement.  




Agreement


In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the Company and Executive hereby agree as follows:


1.    The first sentence of Section 2.b of the Agreement shall be revised to read as follows:  “Subject to Paragraph 2(c), the Current Term of this Agreement shall extend through December 31, 2017, subject to further extension as provided below.”


2.    All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.




	
				
	 
	 
	CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION

	 
	 
	 
	 

	[CORPORATE SEAL]
	 
	By:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	ATTEST:
	 
	Title:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Date:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	EXECUTIVE:

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Date:
Nathaniel L. HART, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 15-9442.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
Kurt Lee GOODSON, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-6690.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 2, 2021

Order 

Clerk

April 2, 2021

162681(40)

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff/CounterdefendantAppellee,

SC: 162681

v COA: 350981

Allegan CC: 18-060665-CH

LESA WERME, also known as LESA J. 

WERME, 

Defendant/CounterplaintiffAppellant.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of appellant to file a corrected application 

for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The corrected application submitted on March 18, 2021, 

is accepted for filing.
# C_2010037EN.01004904.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/49

---

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2009 — Mars v OHIM — Marc (MARC Marlon Abela Restaurant Corporation)

(Case T-208/09) (1)

1

2010/C 37/77

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: STERLING SECURITIES, INC., PAUL J. MILLER, AND R. PETER DENKER 

DOCKET NUMBER: 158 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 158 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Acting Secretary of 

Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Sterling Securities, Inc., 

Paul J. Miller, and 

R. Peter Denker 

(Sterling, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that the respondents were undersegregated on eight 

business days during the period February 28, 1967, through April 27, 1967, in 

amounts ranging up to approximately $ 6,000. It also charges that during 1968 

funds belonging to customers had been temporarily diverted to the firm's own 

use. It further charges that on June 26, 1968, certain information was reported 

by the respondents which they knew, or had reason to know, was false. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, January 22, 1969, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Brian P. KALEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-1539.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II-00127

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Kevin Havener <khave01 @yahoo.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 11:17 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Kevin Havener

2970 N Sheridan #1517

Chicago, IL 60657-5834
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA.)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,378
<SECURITIES>                                     6,889
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,611
<INVENTORY>                                      2,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,723
<PP&E>                                         222,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 321,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,867
<BONDS>                                        175,451
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           241
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   321,235
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,215
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  261,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,275
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 31,379
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of K & F Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bernard L. Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ BERNARD L. SCHWARTZ
---------------------------
Bernard L. Schwartz
Chief Executive Officer
November 4, 2004
Edward ELLIOTT, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-7231.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.