alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 19 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 19

    Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to encourage 
                         bipartisan amendments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

 Mr. Gerlach submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to encourage 
                         bipartisan amendments.

    Resolved, That rule XVI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
``Bipartisan amendments
    ``9. It shall be in order to consider any amendment offered by at 
least one Member from the majority party and one Member from the 
minority party to any bill or resolution that does not violate any rule 
and that is timely submitted to the Committee on Rules.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15986]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34056]


Fore River Transportation Corp.--Change in Operators Exemption--
Fore River Railroad Corporation and Massachusetts Water Resources 
Authority

    Fore River Transportation Corp. (FRT), a noncarrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to operate the rail 
line of Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) and Fore River 
Railroad Corporation (FRRC) \1\ extending approximately 3.76 miles 
between a point in the City of Quincy, MA, and an interchange with CSX 
Transportation, Inc., in the Town of Braintree, MA (line).\2\ FRT 
states that it will soon enter into an agreement with FRRC to provide 
rail freight service over the line.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ MWRA, a governmental body, owns the line. FRRC, MWRA's 
wholly owned subsidiary, has the residual common carrier obligation 
with respect to the line.
    \2\ The line consists of approximately 1.83 miles of branch line 
and approximately 1.93 miles of spur and/or side track.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction is expected to be consummated on July 1, 2000.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ FRT further states that, upon consummation, Quincy Bay 
Terminal Co., the current operator of the line, will cease all 
operations on the line. This change in operators is exempt under 49 
CFR 1150.31(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34056, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Richard H. Streeter, Esq., Barnes & Thornburg, 1401 I Street, 
NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: June 19, 2001.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15986 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

          <ARTICLE> 5
          <LEGEND>
          This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
          from the unaudited condensed financial statements of T. Rowe
          Price Renaissance Fund Ltd., A Sales-Commission-Free Real Estate
          Investment included in the accompanying Form 10-Q for the period
          ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
          reference to such financial statements.
          </LEGEND>
          <CIK> 0000852160
          <NAME> T. ROWE PRICE RENAISSANCE FUND, LTD., A
          SALES-COMMISSION-FRE
                 
          <S>                             <C>
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
          <PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
          <PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
          <CASH>                                         553,000
          <SECURITIES>                                         0
          <RECEIVABLES>                                  131,000
          <ALLOWANCES>                                    13,000
          <INVENTORY>                                          0
          <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
          <PP&E>                                      20,488,000
          <DEPRECIATION>                                       0
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,189,000
          <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
          <BONDS>                                      2,562,000
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
          <PREFERRED>                                          0
          <COMMON>                                             0
          <OTHER-SE>                                  18,061,000
          <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,189,000
          <SALES>                                              0
          <TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,201,000
          <CGS>                                                0
          <TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,605,000
          <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
          <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
          <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
          <INCOME-PRETAX>                                596,000
          <INCOME-TAX>                                         0
          <INCOME-CONTINUING>                            596,000
          <DISCONTINUED>                                       0
          <EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
          <CHANGES>                                            0
          <NET-INCOME>                                   596,000
          <EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37

          












          <EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
          <FN>
          <F1>Not contained in registrant's unclassified balance sheet.
          </FN>
Exhibit 23.2


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors
Central Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(333-87005  and  333-49264) on Form S-8 of Central  Bancorp,  Inc. of our report
dated April 25, 2003,  except as to the fourth  paragraph of Note 8, which is as
of June 23, 2003,  with  respect to the  consolidated  balance  sheet of Central
Bancorp,  Inc. and subsidiary as of March 31, 2003, and the related consolidated
statements  of income,  changes in  stockholders'  equity and cash flows for the
years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002,  which report appears in the March 31, 2004
Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Central  Bancorp,  Inc. Our report  refers to the
adoption of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets."


/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
June 25, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2015

d0518 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2015

149433(51)

PHIL FORNER,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v SC: 149433

COA: 307626

Public Service Commission:

00

- 016273

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY,

Respondent

- Appellee,

and

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November

25, 2014 o rder is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order

was entered erroneously.
# C_2010011EN.01004002.xml

| 16.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/40

---

Action brought on 21 October 2009 — W v Commission

(Case F-86/09)

2010/C 11/77

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: W (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to grant the household allowance to the applicant.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Office for the administration and payment of individual entitlements of 5 March 2009 not to grant the household allowance to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Office for the administration and payment of individual entitlements of 5 March 2009 not to grant the household allowance to the applicant;

| — | annul the rejection of the complaint brought by the applicant on 2 April 2009, recorded as No R/149/09 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations, issued by the Director General of DG Admin as appointing authority and dated 17 July 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the rejection of the complaint brought by the applicant on 2 April 2009, recorded as No R/149/09 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations, issued by the Director General of DG Admin as appointing authority and dated 17 July 2009;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
II-00486

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dennis Stevens <theshadow795@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:18 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dennis Stevens

214 East Kelso Road

Columbus, OH 43202
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7300
ZACHARY E. ROLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN L. POLK; ROBERT LEWIS; LEON EDMONDS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-905-5-BO) Submitted: November 21, 1995 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Zachary E. Roland, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Woodard, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal a magistrate judge's recommendation to grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment and a protectiveorder, and denying Plaintiff's motion to compel production. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greenland Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the year ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
Beener, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Thomas Beener.
---------------------------
Thomas Beener
Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 9, 2005
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Paul V. Maier, Principal Financial andAccounting Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge: 

 

1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, to which this Certification isattached as Exhibit 32 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report, and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual report. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. 

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Annual Report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing. 

 

**IN WITNESSWHEREOF,** the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 15th day of March, 2010.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                [GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                                March 31, 2000

The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street, 12E
New York, NY  10286
Attn: Mortgage-Backed Securities Group
(Headlands 1998-3)

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services
25 Broadway
New York, NY 10004
Attn: Structured Finance

FITCH IBCA
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Attn: Residential Mortgage Surveillance Group

GreenPoint Mortgage Securities Inc.
700 Larkspur Landing Circle, Suite 240
Larkspur, CA  94939

          RE:  Headlands Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (Series 1998-3);
               Officer's Certificate of the Master Servicer
               --------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Pursuant to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with
respect to the above-referenced offering, the undersigned officer of GreenPoint
Mortgage Funding, Inc. (as "Master Servicer") hereby certifies as to the
following:

     1.   a review of the activities of the Servicer and its performance under
          the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the preceding fiscal year
          since the inception of the trust has been made under the direct
          supervision of the undersigned officer; and

     2.   to the best knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such
          review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material
          obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the
          applicable period, and there has been no known default in the
          fulfillment of the Master Servicer's material obligations throughout
          such period.

                          [Signature Page to Follow]
<PAGE>

The Bank of New York
Standard & Poor's Rating Services
FITCH IBCA
GreenPoint Mortgage Securities Inc.
March 31, 2000
Page 2


                                         Very truly yours

                                         GREENPOINT MORTGAGE
                                         FUNDING, INC.,
                                         as Master Servicer



                                         /s/ Kristen Decker
                                         ------------------------
                                         Kristen Decker
                                         Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 375 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 375

  To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 
 Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian Tribes, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

Mr. Cole (for himself and Ms. McCollum) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 
 Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian Tribes, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY REAFFIRMED.

    (a) Reaffirmation.--Section 19 of the Act of June 18, 1934 
(commonly known as the ``Indian Reorganization Act''; 25 U.S.C. 5129), 
is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``The term'' and inserting 
                ``Effective beginning on June 18, 1934, the term''; and
                    (B) by striking ``any recognized Indian tribe now 
                under Federal jurisdiction'' and inserting ``any 
                federally recognized Indian Tribe''; and
            (2) by striking the third sentence and inserting the 
        following: ``In said sections, the term `Indian tribe' means 
        any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, 
        village, or community that the Secretary of the Interior 
        acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly known as 
the ``Indian Reorganization Act''; 25 U.S.C. 5129), on the date of the 
enactment of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
Saitta 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

EDWIN VON SEVRENCE, 

Appellant, 

No. 70033 

FILED 

MAY 2 3 2016 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL CLETRRKAgFES-RIEUEMEO‘IURT 

BY 5, V 

DEPUTY CLERK r 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a 

motion to be relieved as counsel, vacating an order granting a motion for 

appointment of counsel, and denying a motion for appointment of counsel. 

Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Elliott A. Sattler, Judge. 

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the 

aforementioned order, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 

352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.' 

/ 4A; 

Hardesty 

PiadAdhp 

Pickering 

"In light of this order, we take no action on the pro se motion filed on 

May 6, 2016. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 19(17A 1‘,-lia083 
cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge 

Edwin Von Sevrence 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2
Simon John JUDGE, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7539.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000750 18-JAN-2017 08:07 AM