[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33833-33836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15996]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 110

[CGD11-01-003]
RIN 2115-AA98


Anchorage Regulation; San Francisco Bay, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is revising the anchorage boundaries for 
Anchorages 8, 9, and 24, and specifying procedures for vessels 
intending to be in a ``dead ship'' status in the San Francisco Bay 
Anchorage Grounds. The regulations concerning use of the anchorage by 
vessels, and the activities permitted in the anchorage areas are not 
affected by the change in shape and size of these anchorages.

DATES: This rule is effective July 26, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
are part of docket [CGD11-01-003], and are available for inspection or 
copying at Coast Guard Marine Safety Office San Francisco Bay, Bldg. 
14, Coast Guard Island, Alameda, CA 94501, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Patricia Springer, Vessel 
Traffic Management Section, Coast Guard Eleventh District/Pacific Area, 
(510) 437-2943, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7c7c4c7c5ded9d0d2c5f7d3868699c2c4d4d099dadedb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="67171417150e09000215270356564912140400490a0e0b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On February 28, 2001, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking 
(NPRM) entitled Anchorage Regulation; San Francisco Bay, California in 
the Federal Register (66 FR 12742). We did not receive any letters 
commenting on

[[Page 33834]]

the proposed rule. No public hearing was requested, and none was held.

Background and Purpose

    Due to changing uses of the waterways in the San Francisco Bay 
region--including the closure of Naval Air Station Alameda, the trend 
of larger ships arriving in the Bay, and the anticipated growth of 
faster Marine Transportation Systems--mariners have requested changes 
to several anchorage grounds. Recent situations have demanded increased 
use and space for Anchorages 8 and 9. Vessels have had to take anchor 
while awaiting the departure of another at berth. Periodic labor 
strikes and disputes have caused delays in the turnaround time of 
cargo, which in turn have filled the anchorages to capacity. In 
general, this rule allows more room for the anchorages while enhancing 
safer and more efficient use of the waterways through San Francisco Bay 
and the Carquinez Strait.
    The Coast Guard conducted a Waterways Analysis and Management study 
of the San Pablo Bay and Carquinez Strait in late 1998. One of the 
recommendations of the study, which was based primarily on the comments 
of mariners using the waterway, was to make better use of the navigable 
waters of the Carquinez Strait just south-southeast of Southampton Bay. 
The Coast Guard has established a buoy marking the edge of the useable 
channel just west-southwest of Commodore Jones Point, effectively 
shrinking the area that is currently Anchorage 24.
    Currently, safety measures for anchoring in the San Francisco Bay 
in a dead-ship status are addressed by individual COTP orders. The term 
``dead ship'' refers to when a vessel's propulsion or control is 
unavailable for normal operations. This rule will enhance the safety of 
navigation in the area by designating a dead-ship anchorage, away from 
usual areas of navigation on the bay, and by uniformly requiring the 
assistance of a tugboat when anchoring in a dead ship status. Also, the 
owner/operator will now be able to make its own arrangements for a tug 
without having to gain the approval of the COTP before proceeding to 
the dead-ship anchorage.

Discussion of Comments and Changes

    We did not receive any letters commenting on the proposed rule. The 
final rule has not been changed from the proposed language, except to 
make a technical amendment. In paragraph 2.c. of the amendatory 
language of the NPRM, we incorrectly stated we were revising 
subparagraphs (e)(5), (e)(6) and (e)(17) of paragraph (d). We have 
corrected the incorrect reference to paragraph (d) here.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does 
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the 
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation 
(DOT) (44 FR 11040; February 26, 1979).
    The changes in the size and shape of anchorage areas are slight and 
the purpose is to conform to the changed use of the harbor and to make 
best use of available water. As for implementing the dead ship 
regulation, this rulemaking simply makes official in the regulation 
what has already been in practice.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.

Assistance for Small Entities

    If your small business or organization is affected by this rule and 
you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact Lieutenant Andrew B. Cheney, U.S. Coast Guard Marine 
Office San Francisco Bay at (510) 437-3073.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 Federalism, 
and have determined that this rule does not have implications for 
federalism under that Order.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
governs the issuance of Federal regulations that require unfunded 
mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that requires a State, 
local, or tribal government or the private sector to incur direct costs 
without the Federal Government's having first provided the funds to pay 
those unfunded mandate costs. This rule will not impose an unfunded 
mandate.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Environment

    We have considered the environmental impact of this rule and 
concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph 34(f) of Commandant 
Instruction M16475.1C, this rule is categorically excluded from further 
environmental documentation. In the above referenced Coast Guard policy 
instruction, the Coast Guard has determined that no further 
environmental documentation is required when changing the size of 
Special Anchorage Areas or anchorage grounds, or when disestablishing 
or reducing the size of the Area or grounds, as in Anchorage No. 24. 
Because the

[[Page 33835]]

Coast Guard is increasing the size of Anchorages No. 8 and 9, the Coast 
Guard has completed a Categorical Exclusion Document (CED), which is 
available in the docket for inspection or copying where indicated under 
ADDRESSES.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110

    Anchorage grounds.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 110 as follows:

PART 110--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035, and 
2071; 49 CFR 1.46 and 33 CFR 1.05-1(g).

    2. Section 110.224 is amended as follows:
    a. Add a new paragraph (a)(18);
    b. In paragraph (d), revise Table 110.224(D)(1) and add a new 
paragraph m to Notes at the end of the table; and
    c. Revise paragraphs (e)(5), (e)(6), and (e)(17) to read as 
follows:


Sec. 110.224  San Francisco Bay, San Pablo Bay, Carquinez Strait, 
Suisun Bay, Sacramento River, San Joaquin River, and connecting waters, 
CA.

    (a) * * *
    (18) No vessel may anchor in a ``dead ship'' status (propulsion or 
control unavailable for normal operations) at any anchorage other than 
in Anchorage 9 as specified in Table 110.224(D)(1) without prior 
approval of the Captain of the Port.
* * * * *
    (d) * * *

                                               Table 110.224(D)(1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Anchorage No.            General location           Purpose                  Specific regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4..........................  San Francisco Bay....  General..............  Notes a, b.
5..........................  ......do.............  ......do.............      Do.
6..........................  ......do.............  ......do.............  Note a.
7..........................  ......do.............  ......do.............  Notes a, b, c, d, e.
8..........................  ......do.............  ......do.............  Notes a, b, c.
9..........................  ......do.............  ......do.............  Notes a, b, m.
10.........................  ......do.............  Naval................  Note a.
12.........................  ......do.............  Explosives...........  Notes a, f.
13.........................  ......do.............  ......do.............  Notes a, e, g.
14.........................  ......do.............  ......do.............  Notes a, f, h.
18.........................  San Pablo Bay........  General..............
19.........................  ......do.............  ......do.............  Note b.
20.........................  ......do.............  ......do.............
21.........................  ......do.............  Naval................
22.........................  Carquinez Strait.....  General..............
23.........................  Benicia..............  General..............  Notes c, d, e, l.
24.........................  Carquinez Strait.....  General..............  Note j.
26.........................  Suisan Bay...........  ......do.............  Note k.
27.........................  ......do.............  ......do.............
28.........................  San Joaquin River....  ......do.............
30.........................  ......do.............  Explosives...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notes: a. When sustained winds are in excess of 25 knots each 
vessel greater than 300 gross tons using this anchorage shall 
maintain a continuous radio watch on VHF channel 13 (156.65 MHz) and 
VHF channel 14 (156.70 MHz). This radio watch must be maintained by 
a person who fluently speaks the English language.
    b. Each vessel using this anchorage may not project into 
adjacent channels or fairways.
    c. This anchorage is primarily for use by vessels requiring a 
temporary anchorage waiting to proceed to pier facilities or other 
anchorage grounds. This anchorage may not be used by vessels for the 
purpose of loading any dangerous cargoes or combustible liquids 
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port.
    d. Each vessel using this anchorage may not remain for more than 
12 hours unless authorized by the Captain of the Port.
    e. Each vessel using this anchorage shall be prepared to move 
within 1 hour upon notification by the Captain of the Port.
    f. The maximum total quantity of explosives that may be on board 
a vessel using this anchorage shall be limited to 3,000 tons unless 
otherwise authorized with the written permission of the Captain of 
the Port.
    g. The maximum total quantity of explosives that may be on board 
a vessel using this anchorage shall be limited to 50 tons except 
that, with the written permission of the Captain of the Port, each 
vessel in transit, loaded with explosives in excess of 50 tons, may 
anchor temporarily in this anchorage provided that the hatches to 
the holds containing explosives are not opened.
    h. Each vessel using this anchorage will be assigned a berth by 
the Captain of the Port on the basis of the maximum quantity of 
explosives that will be on board the vessel.
    i. [Reserved]
    j. Each vessel using this anchorage shall promptly notify the 
Captain of the Port, upon anchoring and upon departure.
    k. See Sec. 162.270 of this title establishing restricted areas 
in the vicinity of the Maritime Administration Reserve Fleet.
    l. Vessels using this anchorage must exceed 15 feet draft, have 
engines on standby, and have a pilot on board.
    m. Any vessel anchoring in a ``dead-ship'' status shall have one 
assist tug of adequate bollard pull on standby and immediately 
available (maximum of 15 minute response time) to provide emergency 
maneuvering. When the sustained winds are 20 knots or greater, or 
when the wind gusts are 25 knots or greater, the tug must be 
alongside.

    (e) * * *
    (5) Anchorage No. 8. In San Francisco Bay bounded by the west shore 
of Alameda Island and the following lines: Beginning at 37 deg.47'52" 
N, 122 deg.19'58" W; thence west-northwesterly to 37 deg.48'02.5" N 
122 deg.21'01.5" W; thence west-southwesterly to 37 deg.47'51.5" N, 
122 deg.21'40" W; thence south-southwesterly to 37 deg.47'35.5" N, 
122 deg.21'50" W; thence south-southeasterly to 37 deg.46'40" N, 
122 deg.21'23"

[[Page 33836]]

W; thence easterly to 37 deg.46'36.5" N, 122 deg.19'52" W; thence 
northerly to shore at 37 deg.46'53" N, 122 deg.19'53.5" W (NAD 83).
    (6) Anchorage No. 9. In San Francisco Bay bounded on the east by 
the eastern shore of San Francisco Bay and on the north by the southern 
shore of Alameda Island and a line beginning at 37 deg.46'21.5" N, 
122 deg.19'07" W; thence westerly to 37 deg.46'30" N, 122 deg.21'56" W; 
thence south-southeasterly to 37 deg.41'45" N, 122 deg.20'22" W (San 
Bruno Channel Light 1); thence south-southeasterly to 37 deg.38'38.5" 
N, 122 deg.18'48.5" W (San Bruno Channel Light 5); thence southeasterly 
to 37 deg.36'05" N, 122 deg.14'18" W; thence northeasterly to shore at 
37 deg.37'38.5" N, 122 deg.09'06.5" W (NAD 83).
* * * * *
    (17) Anchorage No. 24. Bounded by the north shore of Carquinez 
Strait and the following points: Beginning on the shore at Dillon Point 
at 38 deg.03'44" N, 122 deg.11'34" W; thence southeasterly to 
38 deg.03'21" N, 122 deg.10'43" W; thence southeasterly to 
38 deg.02'36" N, 122 deg.10'03" W (Carquinez Strait Light 23); thence 
to the shore at the Benicia City Wharf at 38 deg.02'40" N, 
122 deg.09'55" W (NAD 83).
* * * * *

    Dated: June 11, 2001.
E.R. Riutta,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 01-15996 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>