alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Signature                          |   | Title          |   | Date                      |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                               |   |           |   |                      |
| /s/      Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D. |   | Director       |   | March      12, 2009       |
| Wayne      T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D.     |   |           |   |                      |
|                               |   |           |   |                      |
| /s/Zola      Horovitz, Ph.D.       |   | Director       |   | March      11, 2009       |
| Zola      Horovitz, Ph.D.          |   |           |   |                      |
|                               |   |           |   |                      |
| /s/William      N. Kelley, M.D.    |   | Director       |   | March      10, 2009       |
| William      N. Kelley, M.D.       |   |           |   |                      |
|                               |   |           |   |                      |
|  /s/      Kevin M. Rooney     |   |  Director |   |  March      11, 2009 |
|  Kevin      M. Rooney         |   |           |   |                      |
|                               |   |           |   |                      |
|  /s/      Joshua Ruch         |   |  Director |   |  March      11, 2009 |
|  Joshua      Ruch             |   |           |   |                      |
|                               |   |           |   |                      |
|  /s/      Marc R. Schneebaum  |   |  Director |   |  March      11, 2009 |
|  Marc      R. Schneebaum      |   |           |   |                      |

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-449-000]


Sea Robin Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

June 14, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 8, 2001, Sea Robin Pipeline Company (Sea 
Robin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, Third Revised Sheet No. 49, to be effective July 
8, 2001.
    Sea Robin states that the purpose of this filing is to add a 
general statement in section 14.1 of the General Terms and Conditions 
to address the ``shipper must have title'' rule and state that Sea 
Robin will only provide service for others utilizing capacity acquired 
on another piepline (off-system capacity) pursuant to its existing 
rates and tariff. Sea Robin requests that the Commission grant a 
generic waiver of the ``shipper must hold title'' policy for any future 
service that Sea Robin may provide utilizing off-system capacity.
    Sea Robin states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rule 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15502 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Proposed Rule Regarding the Protection of Consumer Information 

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced the publication in the Federal Register of 

proposed regulations that provide protections to consumer information held by entities that are subject to 

Commission jurisdiction. These regulations implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

Consumer Protection Act.

On July 21, 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 

Act. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act further amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act and 

the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 to: 

• Create a regime for consumers to prohibit entities that are subject to CFTC jurisdiction from using certain 

consumer information obtained from an affiliate to make solicitations to consumers for marketing purposes. 

• Require entities subject to CFTC jurisdiction that possess or maintain consumer information in 

connection with their business activities to develop and implement a written program and procedures for 

the proper disposal of such information. 

Who would be affected by the rules? 

The proposed regulations will apply to futures commission merchants, retail foreign exchange dealers, commodity 

trading advisors, commodity pool operators, introducing brokers, swap dealers and major swap participants, 

regardless of whether they are required to register with the CFTC.

When would the rules become effective? 

The CFTC proposes to make the proposed regulations become effective on July 21, 2011, which is the designated 

transfer date of authority from various federal agencies to the Bureau. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
bdco_ex102.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 



FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE







This FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE (the "Amendment") by and between Lazarus Energy, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Maker") and John H. Kissick ("Payee") is made effective as of April 1, 2016 (the "Effective Date"). The Maker and the Payee shall be referenced individually as a "Party" and collectively and "Parties".







WHEREAS, the Maker and the Payee are Parties to that certain Promissory Note dated June 1, 2006, (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with its provisions, the "Note") to which reference is hereby made for all purposes; and







WHEREAS, the Parties hereto desire to amend the Note on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:







1. Definitions.  Capitalized terms used and not defined in this Amendment shall have the respective meanings given them in the Note.







2. Amendments to the Note.  The Note is hereby amended as follows:








(a)  Interest Rate -- The annual Interest Rate on Unpaid Balance shall be sixteen percent (16.00%); and










(b)  Final Maturity -- The Final Maturity shall be January 2, 2018.









3. Limited Effect.  Except as expressly provided hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Note and the Deed of Trust are and shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed by the Maker. The amendments contained herein shall not be construed as a waiver or amendment of any other provision of the Note or Deed of Trust or for any purpose except as expressly set forth herein or a consent to any further or future action on the part of the Maker that would require the waiver or consent of the Payee.







4. Successors and Assigns.  This Amendment shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Payee and Maker and each of their respective successors and assigns.







5. Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement, and any Party hereto may execute this Amendment by signing and delivering one or more counterparts.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of this Amendment electronically or by facsimile shall he effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Amendment.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page to follow]


 




  





1











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


 


 





	 	Lazarus Energy LLC, as Maker	 
	 	 	 	 
	
  

	
By: 

	/s/ JONATHAN P. CARROLL	 
	 	 	

Jonathan P. Carroll

	 
	 	 	

President

	 
	 	 	 	 







  




	 	John H. Kissick, as Payee	 
	 	 	 	 
	
  

	
By: 

	/s/ JOHN H. KISSICK	 
	 	 	

John H. Kissick

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 







  




 




2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     The undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed by GTSI Corp. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of GTSI Corp.



Dated: August 14. 2003                   /s/ Dendy Young
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Dendy Young
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 14, 2003                   /s/ THOMAS A. MUTRYN
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Thomas A. Mutryn
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice
                                         President






                                       1
II-01196

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jose Davila <extemporaneously@hotmail.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 4:58 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jose Davila

2508 N Edwin Cir

Memphis, TN 38104
Harold WERKHEISER, petitioner, v. POCONO TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al.

No. 17-848.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for
the periods reflected therein.



|                        |  |  |  |                                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 13, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald R. Walsh                     
|                        |  |  |  |                                         
|                        |  |  |  | Donald R. Walsh Chief Executive Officer 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ Beth MacLaughlin                    
|                        |  |  |  |                                         
|                        |  |  |  | Beth MacLaughlin Chief Financial Officer
Glenn HENDERSON, petitioner, v. Jim AMMONS, et al.; and Glenn Henderson, petitioner, Eaton, et al.

No. 15-1348.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Elwood JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Vincent MOONEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Retreat, et al.

No. 16-6904.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of PLXTechnology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Michael J. Salameh,****President****of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of myknowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to PLXTechnology, Inc. and will be retained by PLX Technology, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,"filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: August 5, 2003
                          /s/ Michael J.Salameh	 
Michael J. Salameh, President
# C_2011089EN.01001603.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Gühring v OHIM (Combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey and combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey)

(Case T-299/09 and T-300/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey - Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Examination of the facts of the Court’s own motion - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

2011/C 89/38

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gühring OHG (Albstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by G. Schneider and subsequently by G. Schneider and B. Schmidt, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Two actions brought against the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 April 2009 (Cases R 1330/2008-1 and R 1329/2008-1) concerning applications for registration of the combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey and the combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey as Community trade marks.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that Cases T-299/09 to T-300/09 be joined for the purposes of the judgment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that Cases T-299/09 to T-300/09 be joined for the purposes of the judgment.

| 2. | Dismisses the actions. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions.

| 3. | Orders Gühring OHG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Gühring OHG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

1

---
Mark A. CHRISTESON, petitioner, v. Cindy GRIFFITH, Warden.

No. 16-7730 (16A769).

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 31, 2017.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Justice GINSBURG would grant the application for stay of execution.
Seon Deon JONAS, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-6607.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Clarence Dannel DUNNINGTON, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 15-9494.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3290

_____________________________

BRIAN J. NEWMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

June 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Brian J. Newman, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Durrell BESTER, petitioner, v. Cynthia STEWART, Warden, et al.

No. 16-6988.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Rebecca BOONE, petitioner, v. Kathleen KENNEDY, Warden.

No. 16-5917.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          27,621
<SECURITIES>                                    24,818
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,910)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,449
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,476
<PP&E>                                          56,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                (43,686)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,482
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,956
<OTHER-SE>                                    (45,742)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,237
<SALES>                                         52,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,738
<CGS>                                            7,956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 944
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                       735
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,844
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,844
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
II-OlOl5

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Joseph Cropper <thegreatjc@mac.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:09 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Joseph Cropper

7103 Craighill Dr

st.louis, MO 63123
Fidelity®Latin America Fund