alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00791

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jessica Stites <jessica. stites-mor@ubc.ca>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:20 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jessica Stites

16009 W. 149th Street

Olathe, KS 66062
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Avatech Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company for the periods reflected therein.



|                        |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  | /s/ George M. Davis                                 
|                        |  | George M. Davis                                     
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer                             
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Lawrence Rychlak                                
|                        |  | Lawrence Rychlak                                    
|                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
II-00308

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Charles Opitz <cjopitz@gmail.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 5:46 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Charles Opitz

2800 W Mt. Vernon

spfg, MO 65802
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The financial data schedule contains summary financial information
     extracted from the Form 10-Q of Howell Corporation for the three months
     ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
     such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                 1608
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                          9341
<ALLOWANCES>                            161
<INVENTORY>                              40
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      13607
<PP&E>                               408311
<DEPRECIATION>                       315000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       110036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 14951
<BONDS>                               70000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                             690
<COMMON>                               5522
<OTHER-SE>                            18200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         110036
<SALES>                               18276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      18276
<CGS>                                  8563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          8563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        6985
<INCOME-TAX>                           2445
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    4540
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                           4540
<EPS-BASIC>                          0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.59


</TABLE>
II-00961

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Donna Harlacher <sunnyone_az@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:39 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Donna Harlacher

28411 N 58th St

Cave Creek, AZ 85331
# C_2011179EN.01000501.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 April 2011 — European Commission v Romania

(Case C-522/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 79/409/EEC - Conservation of wild birds - Special protection areas - Areas designated insufficient in number and size - Irregularity of the pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility of the action)

2011/C 179/06

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and L. Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Romania (represented by: A. Popescu, L.-E. Batagoi, M.-L. Colonescu, A.-R. Arșinel and J.S. Smaranda)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 4(1) and (2) of Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 1979 L 103, p. 1) — Classification as special protection areas of areas insufficient in number and size, failing in part to have regard to the sites identified in the IBA Inventory — Alteration without scientific basis

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---
Titan TURNER, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 16-5870.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New York, New York County denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBERTO AGUIRRE-DIAZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-72529

Agency No. A087-451-062

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 21, 2014** 

Before: CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Alberto Aguirre-Diaz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

FILED

JAN 23 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1 12-72529
§ 1252. We review de novo legal determinations regarding eligibility for

cancellation of removal. Sinotes-Cruz v. Gonzales, 468 F.3d 1190, 1194 (9th Cir.

2006). We deny the petition for review.

Aguirre-Diaz conceded that he was confined to more than 180 days of pretrial detention credited against his six-month sentence, and that he is unable to

establish good moral character under Arreguin-Moreno v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 1229

(9th Cir. 2008). Thus the agency correctly determined that Aguirre-Diaz failed to

establish the requisite good moral character to qualify for cancellation of removal. 

See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(7) (a petitioner cannot meet the good moral character

requirement if confined 180 days or more in a penal institution); Arreguin-Moreno,

511 F.3d at 1233 (holding “that when pre-trial detention is credited against the

sentence imposed upon conviction, the period of pre-trial detention must be

considered as confinement as a result of a conviction within the meaning of 

§ 1101(f)(7)”).

Aguirre-Diaz’s attempts to distinguish his case from Arreguin-Moreno are

unavailing because he was sentenced to more than 180 days following his

conviction, regardless of whether he should have been given bail before his

conviction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(7).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 12-72529
II-O0104

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Corey E. Olsen <ceolsen@execpc.com>

Sunday, December 5, 2010 6:22 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Corey E. Olsen

CEO Pipe Organs/Golden Ponds Farm

Delafield, WI 53018
Yashua Ahem SHEKHEM EL BEY, petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 16-5054.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6742

RICCARDO DARNELL JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Buncombe County

Judicial System District 28,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00096)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: July 3, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Riccardo Darnell Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Riccardo Darnell Jones appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to

state a claim on which relief could be granted. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. State of

North Carolina, No. 1:06-cv-00096 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2006). We

deny Jones’ motions to appoint counsel, to subpoena Leann Melton

and Todd Lentz, and to authorize preparation of transcript at

government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Jessy ZUNO, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 15-9385.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.
In Re Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, petitioner.

No. 17-7130.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,119,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               53,091,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   243,000
<INVENTORY>                                 75,685,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           143,188,000
<PP&E>                                     159,803,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              84,278,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             442,616,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       74,338,000
<BONDS>                                    466,375,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (180,515,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               442,616,000
<SALES>                                    173,031,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           173,031,000
<CGS>                                       96,688,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               96,688,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,881,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          20,634,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             27,450,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,857,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         35,307,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                35,307,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2011030EN.01003801.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2010 — Earle Beauty v OHIM (NATURALLY ACTIVE)

(Case T-307/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark NATURALLY ACTIVE - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of inherent distinctive character - Lack of distinctive character acquired by use - Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 30/68

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Earle Beauty (Ryde, Isle of Wight, United Kingdom) (represented by: initially M. Cover, and subsequently K. O'Rourke, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 May 2009 (Case R 27/2009-2), concerning registration of the word sign NATURALLY ACTIVE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 May 2009 (Case R 27/2009-2) in so far as it refused registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign NATURALLY ACTIVE for wash bags, cosmetic bags and cases, beach bags, handbags, shoulder bags, draw string bags, purses, wallets, vanity cases, make-up bags, canvas bags, cases for mirrors in Class 18 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 May 2009 (Case R 27/2009-2) in so far as it refused registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign NATURALLY ACTIVE for wash bags, cosmetic bags and cases, beach bags, handbags, shoulder bags, draw string bags, purses, wallets, vanity cases, make-up bags, canvas bags, cases for mirrors in Class 18 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Liz Earle Beauty Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of OHIM’s costs. OHIM is ordered to bear one third of its costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Liz Earle Beauty Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of OHIM’s costs. OHIM is ordered to bear one third of its costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

1

---
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1779/2004

of 13 October 2004         

prohibiting fishing for ling by vessels flying the flag of Denmark

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Catches of ling in the waters of ICES sub-area III (EC waters and waters not subject to the sovereignty or jurisdiction of third countries) by vessels flying the flag of Denmark or registered in Denmark have exhausted the quota allocated to Denmark for 2004.

Fishing for ling in the waters of ICES sub-area III (EC waters and waters not subject to the sovereignty or jurisdiction of third countries) by vessels flying the flag of Denmark or registered in Denmark is hereby prohibited, as are the retention on board, transhipment and landing of this stock caught by the above vessels after the date of application of this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 October 2004.

For the Commission

Jörgen HOLMQUIST            

Director-General for Fisheries

----

(1)OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) 1954/2003 (OJ L 289, 7.11.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 356, 31.12.2002, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 762/2004 (OJ L 120, 24.4.2004, p. 8).

----