alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,127
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,557
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     23,832
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          26,730
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            26,236
<LOANS>                                        243,676
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 322,410
<DEPOSITS>                                     272,718
<SHORT-TERM>                                       503
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,572
<LONG-TERM>                                        503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,098
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 322,410
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,675
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,495
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   258
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,428
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,684
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,490
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,938
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      619
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,469
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,469
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,714
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.25
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       971
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    828
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,193
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      203
<RECOVERIES>                                        34
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,643
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,643
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Novogen Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) ) for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared:(b)
    
    Omitted(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect the companys internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions).
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date:
December 23, 2005
    
    /s/ Christopher NaughtonManaging Director
Emmanuel Adebayo AYODELE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6477.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 18**

 

[PricewaterhouseCoopers Letterhead]

 

March25, 2004

 

Boardof Directors

DeCraneHoldings Co.

c/oCredit Suisse First Boston / DLJ Merchant Banking Partners II, L.P.

ElevenMadison Avenue

NewYork, NY 10010

 

Dear Directors:

 

We are providing thisletter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-K filing pursuant toItem 601 of Regulation S-K.

 

We have audited theconsolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and issued our report thereondated March 25, 2004.  Note 1 to thefinancial statements describes a change in accounting principle from deferringcertain program costs in inventory and charging cost of sales over the expectedproduction cycle of the individual program to not including such costs ininventory.  It should be understood thatthe preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another forprogram costs has not been addressed in any authoritative accountingliterature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied onmanagement’s determination that this change in accounting principle ispreferable.  Based on our reading ofmanagement’s stated reasons and justification for this change in accountingprinciple in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to theirjudgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change,we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company’scircumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformitywith Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20.

 

Very truly yours,

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

 

----
Amendment
to Advisory Board Agreement


 


		1.	This
                                         Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made by and between Lans Holdings, Inc. a
                                         Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Dave Christensen of Enterprise Technology
                                         Consulting, Inc. (the “Advisor”) parties to the agreement ADVISORY BOARD
                                         AGREEMENT dated September 17, 2015 (the “Agreement”). The effective date
                                         of this Amendment is January 1, 2016.



 


		2.	The
                                         Agreement is amended as follows:



 


		a.	Whereas
                                         Exhibit A provides the detail to the compensation for the Advisor and the change of business
                                         requirements of the Company presents the need for increased commitment of services in
                                         the areas of strategic planning and implementation of operational policies of the Company
                                         beyond scope of the original Agreement.



 


		b.	The
                                         Advisor acknowledges that the Company has met the compensation obligations of the original
                                         Agreement.



 


		c.	The
                                         Company proposes the Amendment to the Exhibit A compensation to be defined as follows:



 


		d.	The
                                         Company will compensate Advisor Eight Thousand ($8,000.00) USD per month for advisory
                                         services for the remainder of the Term of the existing agreement, of which is September,
                                         17, 2016.



 


		3.	Except
                                         as set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement is unaffected and shall continue in full
                                         force and effect in accordance with its terms. If there is a conflict between this amendment
                                         and the Agreement or any earlier amendment, the terms of this amendment will prevail.



	 

         

        Signature:
        /s/ Trevor Allen

        Name:
        Trevor Allen

        Of
        Lans Holdings Inc.

        Address:
        800 BRICKELL AVE STE 900 MIAMI FL 33131
	 

         

        Signature:
        /s/ David Christensen

        Name:
        David Christensen

        Of
        Enterprise Technology Consulting, Inc.

        Address:
        6841 W. Dale Lane

        Peoria,
        AZ 85383
Raul Patricio MENDIETA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6775.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
COMMONWEALTH INDUSTRIES, INC.

                               Amendment No. 1 to
                            1997 Stock Incentive Plan


                  The first sentence of Section 7 is amended,  effective July 1,
1998, to read in its entirety as follows:

Nonqualified  Stock Options to purchase 2,500 shares of Common Stock, the number
of shares being in each case subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 13, shall
be granted  automatically to each  Non-Employee  Director (a) upon the date such
director  joins the Board or  becomes a  Non-Employee  Director  and (b) on each
succeeding  January 1 which is not less than 90 days after the date  referred to
in clause (a).

April 24, 1998


/jbex10.6.1.doc
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         510,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,731,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (184,807)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,760,127
<PP&E>                                       6,232,683
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,816,991)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,910,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,047,137
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,373,590
<COMMON>                                         7,719
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,698,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,910,833
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,809,191
<CGS>                                       12,551,658
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,517,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,141,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,848,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,848,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,848,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1 

SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS, INC. 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY 

Atlanta Motor Speedway, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company. 

Bristol Motor Speedway, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company. 

Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC a/k/a Lowe’s Motor Speedway at Charlotte (“LMS”), a North Carolina limited liability company.

600 Racing, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of LMS), a North Carolina corporation. 

INEX Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of LMS), a North Carolina corporation. 

Jim Russell Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation. 

Las Vegas Motor Speedway, LLC (“LVMS”), a Delaware limited liability company. 

Nevada Speedway, LLCd/b/a Las Vegas Motor Speedway (a wholly owned subsidiary of LVMS), a Delaware limited liability company. 

Speedway Funding, LLC (awholly owned subsidiary of LVMS), a Delaware limited liability company. 

Oil-Chem Research Corporation, an Illinois corporation.

SMI Systems, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company. 

SMISC Holdings, Inc., a North Carolina corporation.

SPR, LLC (“SPR”), a Delaware limited liability company. 

Speedway Properties Company, LLC(“SPC”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPR), a Delaware limited liability company. 

Speedway Media, LLC d/b/a RacingCountry USA (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPC), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

Speedway Sonoma, LLC a/k/a InfineonRaceway (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPR), a Delaware limited liability company. 

Speedway Systems, LLC d/b/a SMI Properties(“SMIP”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPR), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

Speedway TBA, LLC d/b/a NorthCarolina Speedway, a North Carolina limited liability company. 

Motorsports by Mail, LLC (a subsidiary of SMIP), a North Carolinalimited liability company. 

TSI Management Company, LLC (“TSI”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SMIP), a North Carolinalimited liability company. 

Trackside Holding Corporation (“THC”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SMIP), a North Carolinacorporation. 

SMI Trackside, LLC (a subsidiary of THC), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

Texas Motor Speedway, Inc., a Texas corporation.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

PHILIP A. IGNELZI, INDIVIDUALLY,

PHILIP A. IGNELZI AND MARIANNE IGNELZI, HUSBAND AND WIFE

v.

OGG, CORDES, MURPHY AND IGNELZI, LLP; GARY J. OGG; SAMUEL J. CORDES; MICHAEL A. MURPHY, INDIVIDUALLY; MICHAEL A. MURPHY AND REBECCA MURPHY, HUSBAND AND WIFE; OGG, MURPHY, AND PERKOSKY, LLP; JOHN D. PERKOSKY;
AND ESQUIRE REALTY ASSOCIATES

PETITION OF: GARY J. OGG, MICHAEL A. MURPHY AND REBECCA MURPHY, OGG, MURPHY AND PERKOSKY, LLP

AND JOHN D . PERKOSKY :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 192 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of November, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.

Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this

matter.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 92 9 . EDI TH GI TTENS v . REGI NALD GI TTENS.

On J u l y 2 4, 2 0 1 7

, t h e t ri al co u rt en t ered a fi n al ju dg m en t an d d ecree of d i v o rce

b et ween Reg i n al d Gi t t en s an d Ed i t h G i t t en s

. On Au g u s t 2 5

, 2 0 17

, Ed i t h Gi t t en s fi l ed

a n o t ice o f ap p eal o f th e d i v o rce d ecree i n t h e t ri al co u rt

. E d i t h Gi t t en s fi l ed an

am en d ed n o t i ce o f ap peal of t he s am e o rd er o n S e p t e m b er 1 8, 2 0 1 7 an d ag ai n o n

Decem b er 1 , 2 0 1 7. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n.

W h ere, as h ere, t h e u n d erl y i n g act io n i n v o l v es ri g h t s an d o b li g at i o n s ari s i n g

o u t o f a di v o rce decree, t h e cas e i s a d om es t i c rel at i o n s m at t er wi t h in t h e m ean i n g o f

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 ( a ) (2 ). See W a l ker v. Es t a t e o

f Ma ys , 2 79 Ga. 6 52

, 6 5 3 (1 ) (6 1 9

SE2 d 6 7 9 ) (2 0 05 ). Ap p eal s i n su ch m at ters m u s t b e i ni t i at ed b y fi l i n g an ap p l i cat i o n

f o r d i s c ret io n ary rev i ew. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (2 ), (b ); acco rd Vo yl es v. Vo y l e s , 3 0 1 Ga. 4 4

, 4 7 (7 9 9 S E 2 d 1 6 0 ) ( 2 0 1 7 ) (an ap p eal i n a d o m es t i c rel at i o n s cas e in

wh i ch ch i l d cu s t o d y i s n o t at i s s u e m u s t b e b ro u g h t b y d i s cret i on ary ap p l i cat i o n ).

“ [C] o m p l i an ce w i t h t h e d i scret i o n ary a p p e a l s p ro ced u re i s ju ri s di ct io n al .” Fa b e v.

Fl o yd , 1 9 9 Ga. Ap p . 3 22 , 3 3 2 (1 ) (4 0 5 SE2 d 2 6 5 ) (1 9 9 1 ).

Ev en if Ed it h Gi t t en s h ad a ri g h t o f d i rect ap p eal

, t h i s ap p eal i s u n ti m el y

. To

b e t i m el y , a n o t i c e o f ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry o f t h e o rd er o n

ap p eal

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro per an d t i m el y fi l i n g o f a no t i ce o f ap p eal i s

an ab s o l u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d i c t i o n o n t h i s Co u rt

. See Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e , 2 6 4 Ga. 8 7 2

, 8 72 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 95 ). Becau s e Ed i t h Gi t t en s d i d n o t fi l e h er

fi rs t n o t i ce o f ap p eal u nt il 32 d ay s aft er t h e en t ry o f t h e o rd er s he s eek s to ap p eal

, h er

ap p eal i s u nt i m el y

. Acco rd i ng l y , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

January 30, 2018C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/30/2018
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





CERTIFICATION OF CUSTODIAN





In connection with the Annual Report of GYK Ventures, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-KSB for the September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, J. Dan Sifford , Sole Officer Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 30, 2004  by











/s/ J. Dan Sifford


J. Dan Sifford


Officer/Director
CURRENT PRACTICES IN SETTING SPECULATIVE POSITION LIMITS AND POSITION ACCOUNTAB

SELECTED FUTURES CONTRACT MARKETS

AS OF JULY 24, 2009 

Category Sample Contracts Speculative Position Limits (9) or Position Acc

Spot Month Single Month 

CFTC Speculative Position Limits 

Federal limits 1/

Corn, oats, soybeans, soybean oil, soybean meal, wheat, and cotton 9 9 

Limits and Levels Set by Exchanges 

Other 

Agricultural 

CME Frozen Pork Bellies; ICE U.S. Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice 2/ 9 9 

CME Livestock and Milk* 3/ 9 9 ICE Cocoa, Coffee and World Sugar 4/ 9 PA 

Energy 5/

NYMEX Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Heating Oil, and Gasoline; ICE U.K. WTI 

9 PA 

Metals 5/ COMEX Gold and Silver 9 PA 
CURRENT PRACTICES IN SETTING SPECULATIVE POSITION LIMITS AND POSITION ACCOUNTAB

SELECTED FUTURES CONTRACT MARKETS

AS OF JULY 24, 2009 

Category Sample Contracts Speculative Position Limits (9) or Position Acc

Spot Month Single Month 

Limits and Levels Set by Exchanges 

Financial 

CME S&P 500 Stock Index* 6/

- - 

CME Eurodollars*, CME major foreign currencies 7/ - - CBOT Treasury Notes, Bonds 8/ 9 - 

Footnotes

* Cash settled contract - Not Applicable 1/ See, 17 CFR 150.2. Designated contract markets adopted exchange rules to mirror the Federal limits. 

2/ See, CME rule 15102.E. (Pork Bellies), ICE Futures U.S. rule 6.21 (Orange Juice). 3/ See, CME rule 10102.E. (Live Cattle), CME rule 10202.E. (Feeder Cattle), CME rule 15202.E. (Lean Hogs) (collectively, Livestock

(Milk) (individual month limit applies to all months, including spot). 4/ See, ICE Futures U.S. rule 6.17 (Cocoa), rule 6.18 (Coffee “C”), rule 6.22 (Sugar No. 11). 

5/ See, NYMEX rule 9A. and Appendix A. for table of all NYMEX and COMEX commodities, with spot-month limits on Natural Gas 

effective Oct. 2009 and currently subject to Position Accountability. ICE U.K. WTI imposes position limits and accountability levels irules, as a condition of the CFTC no-action letter. 6/ See, CME rule 35102.D. (S&P 500). 

7/ See, CME rule 45202.D. (Three Month Eurodollars) and, for example, CME rule 25101.D. (British Pound Sterling). 

8/ See, for example, CBOT rule 19102.E. (Long-term U.S. Treasury Note), rule 560 (Position Accountability) and Chapter 5, Table 5T
James SEXTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-609.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.