alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00196

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

dianne demonte <millenium4@comcast.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 8:45 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

dianne demonte

72 warren st.

plainville, MA 02762-1806
II-00898

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Bob Clark <bclark@iserv.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:15 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Bob Clark

1153 W Glenlord Lot 68

St Joseph, MI 49085
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6999-2]

      ( print page 33683)    
                    On May 30, 2001, at (66 FR 29308) of the                     **Federal Register**                    , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program issued a request for proposals (RFP) that would further the goals of the Chesapeake 2000 Agreement. The RFP was available May 30, 2001. The website that was listed was incorrect. The correst website is:                     *http://www.epa.gov/​r3chespk/​*                    You may receive a paper copy by calling Kim Scalia at 215-814-5421 or by a e-mail at                     *scalia.kim@epa.gov*                    or by calling Lori Mackey at 410-267-5715 or by e-mail at                     *mackey.lori@epa.gov*. All proposals must be postmarked by Monday, July 16, 2001.                

Peter J. Marx, 

Associate Director, Communications and Support Staff.

[FR Doc. 01-15877 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
II-01219

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jill M. Reese <azjill@cox.net>

Monday, December 13, 2010 11:19 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Jill M. Reese

538 S. Third Ave

Tucson, AZ 85701
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33546-33547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant

[[Page 33547]]

applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 27, 2001.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6100 Executive Blvd 5th Floor, Rockville, MD 20852, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, Scientist Review Administrator, 
Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E03, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 18, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-15754 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
II-00974

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Linda Jerling <shelbywoo 1 @sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:33 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Linda Jerling

1005 Edgewood Court

Lemont, IL 60439
H. Res. 224 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 12, 2009. 

Whereas the Greek letter (Pi) is the symbol for the ratio of 

the circumference of a circle to its diameter; 

Whereas the ratio Pi is an irrational number, which will continue infinitely without repeating, and has been calculated to over one trillion digits; 

Whereas Pi is a recurring constant that has been studied 

throughout history and is central in mathematics as well 

as science and engineering; 

Whereas mathematics and science are a critical part of our 

children’s education, and children who perform better in 

math and science have higher graduation and college attendance rates; 

Whereas aptitude in mathematics, science, and engineering is 

essential for a knowledge-based society; 

Whereas, according to the 2007 Trends in International 

Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) survey done by 

the National Center for Education Statistics, American 

children in the 4th and 8th grade were outperformed by 

students in other countries including Taiwan, Singapore, 

Russia, England, South Korea, Latvia, and Japan; 

Whereas since 1995 the United States has shown only minimal improvement in math and science test scores; 
2 

•HRES 224 EH 

Whereas by the 8th grade, American males outperform females on the science portion of the TIMSS survey, especially in Biology, Physics, and Earth Science, and the 

lowest American scores in math and science are found in 

minority and impoverished school districts; 

Whereas America needs to reinforce mathematics and science 

education for all students in order to better prepare our 

children for the future and in order to compete in a 21st 

Century economy; 

Whereas the National Science Foundation has been driving 

innovation in math and science education at all levels 

from elementary through graduate education since its 

creation 59 years ago; 

Whereas mathematics and science can be a fun and interesting part of a child’s education, and learning about Pi 

can be an engaging way to teach children about geometry 

and attract them to study science and mathematics; and 

Whereas Pi can be approximated as 3.14, and thus March 

14, 2009, is an appropriate day for ‘‘National Pi Day’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the designation of a ‘‘Pi Day’’ and its 

celebration around the world; 

(2) recognizes the continuing importance of National Science Foundation’s math and science education 

programs; and 
3 

•HRES 224 EH 

(3) encourages schools and educators to observe the 

day with appropriate activities that teach students about 

Pi and engage them about the study of mathematics. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# C_2009129EN.01002203.xml

| 6.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/22

---

Action brought on 1 April 2009 — Tzvetanova v Commission

(Case F-33/09)

2009/C 129/40

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aglika Tzvetanova (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Commission to refuse the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance provided for in Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority not to grant the applicant the expatriation allowance; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority not to grant the applicant the expatriation allowance;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
**Exhibit 31.1** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Kenneth M. Schwartz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of K&F Industries, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  KENNETH    M. SCHWARTZ    Kenneth M. Schwartz    President and Chief Executive Officer     Date: November 6, 2006
# C_2012080EN.01002601.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/26

---

Order of the General Court of 6 February 2012 — Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Valencia v Commission

(Case T-337/09) (1)

1

2012/C 80/44

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

1

---
# C_2013071EN.01001501.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 January 2013 — Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços v OHIM — Jacson of Scandinavia (JACKSON SHOES)

(Case T-474/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark JACKSON SHOES - Earlier national business name JACSON OF SCANDINAVIA AB - Relative ground for refusal - Relative ground for invalidity - Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 71/21

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: A. Rodrigues, lawyer)

Applicant:

da

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Novais Gonçalves, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Jacson of Scandinavia AB (Vollsjö, Sweden)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 August 2009 (Case R 1253/2008-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Jacson of Scandinavia AB and Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.

1

---
# C_2011252EN.01000702.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/7

---

Order of the Court of 23 March 2011 — Republic of Estonia v European Commission, Republic of Latvia

(Case C-535/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Sugar - Determination of surplus quantities of sugar, isoglucose and fructose for the new Member States)

2011/C 252/11

Language of the case: Estonian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: L. Uibo, acting as Agent)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and E. Randvere, acting as Agents), Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Drevina and K. Krasovska, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of 2 October 2009 in Case T-324/05 Estonia v Commission dismissing the appellant’s action for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 832/2005 of 31 May 2005 on the determination of surplus quantities of sugar, isoglucose and fructose for the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (OJ 2005 L 138, p. 3)

Estonia

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | The Republic of Estonia shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Republic of Estonia shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | The Republic of Latvia shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Republic of Latvia shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.

1

---