alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1997
<CASH>                                           7,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,771
<INVENTORY>                                     92,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               205,402
<PP&E>                                          82,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 386,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,040
<BONDS>                                        444,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                   (184,646)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   386,647
<SALES>                                        117,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,751
<CGS>                                           70,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,904
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,981
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,932
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,036
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
CENTER FOR REGULATORY REASONABLENESS, petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.

No. 17-334.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34171-34176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16037]



[[Page 34171]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 01-18]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 
July 21, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 01-18 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: June 21, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternative OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of 
Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M

[[Page 34172]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN01.004


[[Page 34173]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN01.005


[[Page 34174]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN01.006


[[Page 34175]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN01.007


[[Page 34176]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN27JN01.008

[FR Doc. 01-16037 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-C
Artush MARGARYAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-787.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-00475

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

William Erlenbach <bornfree33 @cox.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:49 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

William Erlenbach

13402 W Copperstone Dr.

Sun City West, AZ 85375
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,616
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                29,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     58,627
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        180,850
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,514
<DEPOSITS>                                     215,293
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,902
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,281
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 280,514
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,957
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,099
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   139
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,195
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,247
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,769
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,426
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       48
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (5)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,610
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,610
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,615
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.86
<LOANS-NON>                                        412
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    513
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,646
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      508
<RECOVERIES>                                       581
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,859
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,736
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,028


</TABLE>
Edgar Julian DIETRICH, petitioner, v. CITY OF GROSSE POINTE PARK, MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 17-7098.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# C_2011139EN.01000801.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsrätten (Sweden)) — Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB Momsgrupp v Skatteverket

(Case C-540/09) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Sixth VAT Directive - Article 13B(d)(5) - Exemptions - Underwriting guarantee provided against payment of a commission by credit institutions to the issuing companies in respect of a share issue on the capital markets - Transactions in securities)

2011/C 139/12

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Regeringsrätten

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB Momsgrupp

Applicant:

Defendant: Skatteverket

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (formerly Regeringsrätten) — Interpretation of Article 13 B of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Exemptions — Underwriting guarantee issued by a bank to a company issuing new shares in return for payment of a commission — Transaction consisting in an undertaking by the bank to acquire part of the shares in the issuing company in the event that an insufficient number of shares is subscribed, in order to guarantee to the issuing company the financing sought by the issue (underwriting)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13B(d)(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption from VAT laid down therein covers services supplied by a credit institution, for consideration, in the form of an underwriting guarantee to a company wishing to issue shares, where under that guarantee the credit institution undertakes to acquire any shares which are not subscribed within the period for share subscription.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16214]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to an approved Tribal-State Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 
1988, Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on 
Indian lands. The Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs 
(Management), Department of the Interior, through his delegated 
authority, has approved Amendment IX to the Confederated Tribes of the 
Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon and the State of Oregon Gaming 
Compact, which was executed on May 4, 2001.

DATES: This action is effective June 28, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 
20240, (202) 219-4066.

    Dated: June 20, 2001.
James H. McDivitt,
Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs (Management).
[FR Doc. 01-16214 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
Vijay Kumar CHHABRA, petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General.

No. 16-630.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                          SCHEDULE 27.3

This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the May 31,
1998 Financial  Statements  included in the Company's Form 10-K and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K. </LEGEND>

<CIK>     0000934798
<NAME>    ICON Health & Fitness Inc

<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                            3892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   131188
<ALLOWANCES>                                      6887
<INVENTORY>                                     121466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                267819
<PP&E>                                           89398
<DEPRECIATION>                                   40579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  363129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           114951
<BONDS>                                         268495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        166186
<OTHER-SE>                                    (186503)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    363129
<SALES>                                         749313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                749313
<CGS>                                           535976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   189441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               35058
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5897)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
II-00644

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Peggy Fry <real_folkie@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:58 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Peggy Fry

507 Center Drive West

Beaufort, SC 29902
1080.

#### DAVIS *v.*THE STATE.

Prom a defendant caught in an apparently guilty situation, an unreasonable explanation is worse than no explanation at all.

Accusation of selling liquor, from city court of Vienna — Judge Hendersón. February 10, 1908. • •

Submitted March 31,

Decided April 22, 1908.

*275
      *Busbee £ Busbee,*for plaintiff in error.

Waifs *Powell, solicitor,*contra.

Powell, J.

One night last August two gentlemen, while standing in the concealment' of a warehouse door in the city of Vienna, saw two negroes, one of them the defendant, the other Perry Street, go behind the warehouse and sit down on a platform. The defendant had a quart bottle and a grip. He handed the bottle to Street, who proceeded first to take a drink and then to reach his hand into his pocket and to give the defendant therefrom something, which the gentlemen in watching could not' swear was money, but which one of them testified “rattled like money.” The defendant was immediately arrested for violating the prohibition law. On his person were found a small drinking glass and a corkscrew, in the grip another bottle of whisky and a shoe-buttoner. The defendant, while on his way to jail, admitted that what Street had given him was a dime. In his statement before the jury the defendant said, that he had started to the railroad station with a view of going to Montezuma on a visit to his father and mother, and was carrying the whisky to them; that he met his nephew by marriage, Perry Street, who asked him if he had any whisky, and, the reply being in the affirmative, a drink was requested. The defendant expressed a willingness to comply with the request, on condition that Street would leave the sidewalk and go behind the warehouse. There the drink was tendered and taken. The defendant then recalled that Street owed him a dime for a shirt, and asked for payment. Street did not have a dime, but paid him a nickel. Street was not called as a witness. Why the defendant should have started off from a “dry” town, on a visit to his parents, carrying only two bottles of whisky, a drinking glass, a corkscrew, and a shoe-buttoner, why he sought such seclusion in the nighttime, to give his kinsman a harmless drink, why he should have remembered to dun him for the price of a shirt while he was still smacking his lips over the exhilarating draught, why shirts should be so cheap in Vienna, why Street was not called to corroborate his unfortunate benefactor’s statement, were questions which must have weighed heavily on the minds of the twelve intelligent men who tried the case. All these things may have been the result of coincidence; the jury did not think so; nor do we.

*Judgment affirmed.*
# C_2011311EN.01003802.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — Dredging International and Ondernemingen Jan de Nul v EMSA

(Case T-8/09) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - EMSA’s procurement procedures - Operation of stand-by oil spill recovery vessels - Rejection of a tender - Action for annulment - Tender inconsistent with the subject of the contract - Consequences - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Definition of the subject of the contract - Failure to disclose the characteristics and relative advantages of the successful tender - Statement of reasons - Award of the contract - No right of action - Application for a declaration that the contract concluded with the successful tenderer is null and void - Claim for damages)

2011/C 311/68

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Dredging International NV (Zwijndrecht, Belgium) and Ondernemingen Jan de Nul NV (Hofstade-Aalst, Belgium) (represented by: R. Martens and A. Van Vaerenbergh, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (represented by: J. Menze, Agent, assisted by J. Stuyck and A.-M. Vandromme, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, annulment of the decision of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) of 28 October 2008 to reject the applicants’ bid submitted in response to a call for tenders EMSA/NEG/3/2008 regarding the service contracts for stand-by oil spill recovery vessels (Lot 2: North Sea) (OJ 2008/S 48-065631) and of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer, and, second, a request for damages

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dredging International NV and Ondernemingen Jan de Nul NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dredging International NV and Ondernemingen Jan de Nul NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.

1

---