alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1

Company Subsidiaries

Novogen Limited is a company limited by shares and is
incorporated and domiciled in Australia. Novogen Limited has prepared a consolidated financial report incorporating the entities that it controlled during the financial year ended June 30, 2013, which included the following:



|                                 |  |                          |                          |  |                |  |        |        |  |  |        | 
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ------------------------ |  | -------------- |  | ------ | ------ |  |  | ------ | 
|                                 |  |                          |                          |  | Equity holding | 
|Name of entity                   |  | Country of incorporation |                          |  | 2013+%         |  |        | 2012+% | 
|                                 |  |                          |                         
|Novogen Laboratories Pty Ltd     |  |                          | Australia                |  |                |  | 100.00 |        |  |  | 100.00 | 
|Novogen Research Pty Ltd         |  |                          | Australia                |  |                |  | 100.00 |        |  |  | 100.00 | 
|Novogen North America Inc.       |  |                          | United States of America |  |                |  | 100.00 |        |  |  |       | 
|Triaxial Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd |  |                          | Australia                |  |                |  | 100.00 |        |  |  |       | 
|Novogen Inc.                     |  |                          | United States of America |  |                |  | 100.00 |        |  |  | 100.00 | 
|Glycotex, Inc.                   |  |                          | United States of America |  |                |  |       |        |  |  | 99.70  | 
|MEI Pharma, Inc.*                |  |                          | United States of America |  |                |  |       |        |  |  | 63.50  | 



|* | Formerly known as Marshall Edwards Inc.
|- | ---------------------------------------

|+ | Ownership % at June 30, 2013 and 2012 respectively
|- | --------------------------------------------------
II-00044

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Anne Wolf <wolfmdst@sonic.net>

Thursday, December 9, 2010 12:36 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Anne Wolf

1452 Townview Ave.

Santa Rosa, CA 95405
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000851726
<NAME> AZCO MINING INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      17,901,298
<SECURITIES>                                   701,092
<RECEIVABLES>                                  348,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,951,094
<PP&E>                                       4,370,746
<DEPRECIATION>                               (153,688)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,168,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    25,675,574
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,566,814)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,168,152
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,048,413
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,286,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,237,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (334,580)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,903,141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,903,141)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
Leon HEARD, petitioner, v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

No. 16-9273.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      44,151,502
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  182,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,251,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,178,706
<PP&E>                                       2,986,443
<DEPRECIATION>                               (792,924)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,373,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,419,695
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       151,182
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,544,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,373,826
<SALES>                                      5,768,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,768,524
<CGS>                                        5,291,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,291,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            55,380,297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             207,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             59,107,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         59,107,774
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                59,107,774
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (31.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (31.48)


</TABLE>
Order filed, January 09, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-01115-CV

____________

HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant

V.

PERX, AS NEXT FRIEND OF WRRX, A MINOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-34695

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 13, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cynthia Martinez Montalvo, the official court reporter, to file 

the record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Craig Michael KELLERMAN.

No. D-3002.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Disbarment order entered.
PARTICIPANT LIST (TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE) 

10:00 am. Welcome and Opening Remarks

• Vincent McGonagle, Director, Division of Market Oversight, U.S.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

10:00 am to 11:00 am Panel 1—Mandatory Exchange Trading Requirements in Various 

Jurisdictions

Moderator:

• Roger Smith, Special Counsel, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Panelists:

• Kazunari Mochizuki, Director for International Financial Markets

(Settlements), Japan Financial Services Agency 

• Nhan Nguyen, Special Counsel, Division of Market Oversight, U.S.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

• Edwin Schooling Latter, Head of Markets Infrastructure and Policy

U.K. Financial Conduct Authority

, 

• Heather Seidel, Chief Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, U.S.

Securities and Exchange Commission

11:00 am to 11:15 am Break

11:15 am to 12:00 pm Panel 2—Assessing MAT: Academic Perspectives on, and DataBased Assessment of, MAT

Moderator: 

• Sayee Srinivasan, Chief Economist, U.S. Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission

Panelists: 

• Dr. Darrell Duffie, Dean Witter Distinguished Professor of 

Finance, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University

• Dr. John Hull, Maple Financial Professor of Derivatives and Risk 

Management, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, 

University of Toronto

• Amir Khwaja, Chief Executive Officer, Clarus Financial 

Technology

• Kevin McPartland, Principal, Greenwich Associates

12:00 pm to 12:15 pm Break

12:15 pm to 1:50 pm Panel 3—Industry Assessment of the MAT Process

Moderator: 

• Roger Smith, Special Counsel, Division of Market Oversight, U.S. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Panelists: 

• Tom Benison, Managing Director, Global Credit Trading and 

Syndication, J.P. Morgan 

• Stephen Berger, Director, Government and Regulatory Policy, 

Citadel LLC

• Lisa Cavallari, Director, Fixed Income Derivatives, Russell 

Investments

• Douglas Friedman, General Counsel, Tradeweb Markets

• George Harrington, Global Head, Fixed Income, Commodity and 

Currency Trading, Bloomberg, L.P.

• Sunil Hirani, Chief Executive Officer, trueEX LLC

• Vincent Johnson, Head of Regulatory & Policy Affairs, BP

Integrated Supply and Trading – Representing the International 

Swaps and Derivatives Association 

• Arthur J. Leiz, Managing Director, Goldman Sachs Asset 

Management

• Angela M. Patel, Trading Operations Manager, Fixed Income & 

Derivatives Investment Management, Putnam Investments 

• Dexter Senft, Managing Director, Fixed Income Electronic 

Trading, Morgan Stanley

• William Shields, Chief Compliance Officer, GFI Swaps Exchange 

LLC – Representing the Wholesale Market Brokers Association

• Ron Steinfeld, Chief Compliance Officer, MarketAxess

• Wally Sullivan, Chief Executive Officer, Javelin Capital Markets

• Edward Tsai, Director and Counsel, Credit Suisse

1:50 pm Concluding Remarks
Order entered June 29 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05 - 14 - 01396 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 01397 - CR JONATHON VILLANUEVA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F14 - 00304 - T , F13 - 41450 - T 

### O RDER The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendati ons and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presenc e at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier. /s/ ADA BROWN JUST ICE
Phillip KEEN, Jr., petitioner, v. JUDICIAL ALTERNATIVES OF GEORGIA, INC.

No. 15-1357.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2009153EN.01002102.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 April 2009 — Dr. József Uzonyi. v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve

(Case C-133/09)

2009/C 153/40

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Dr. József Uzonyi

Applicant:

Defendant: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does it follow from the provision contained in Article 143ba(1) of Regulation (EC) 1782/2003 (1) in the version in force until 31 December 2006, under which ‘[payment] shall be granted on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory criteria’, that, as regards eligibility for the separate sugar payment in connection with the single area payment, it was not possible to draw a distinction between farmers on the basis of whether they supplied the sugar beet for processing directly (themselves) or indirectly (via intermediaries)?

1

---

(1)  Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001; OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, Special Edition in Hungarian, Chapter 3, Volume 40, p. 269-377.

1

---
David E. McMASTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7502.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MOORE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC.,

CHARLES “CHIP” STRADER, AND

XMEX TRANSPORTS, L.L.C.,

Appellant s

,

v.

LORENA MUNOZ, IND. AND ON

BEHALF OF THE EST. OF

LORENZO MUNOZ, AND AS N/F OF

C.M., A MINOR CHILD,

LESLIE MUNOZ, VIRGINIA MUNOZ,

JESSICA LOPEZ, AS N/F OF A.F.

AND J.L., MINOR CHILDREN AND

HEIRS TO THE EST. OF

ROGER FRANCEWARE, DEC., AND

ROSA FRANCEWARE, IND.,

Appe llee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00254

- CV

Appeal from

168th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2010

- 4169 )

J U D G M E N T

This Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes that there was error in

the judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and render that Appellees take

nothing against Appellants. We further order that the Appellants recover from Appellees all costs,

for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 6 TH DAY OF JU LY

, 2017.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Lar sen, J., (Senior Judge)

(Larsen, J., Senior Judge, sitting by assignment)
II-00743

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

James Roberts <jimrobj@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:45 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK6! SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

James Roberts

215 S Ellis St

Palouse, WA 99161
# C_2012343EN.01001201.xml

| 10.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2012 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-84/09) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from financing - Provision of information and promotion of agricultural products - Production of olive oil and table olives - Late payment)

2012/C 343/15

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: L. Ventrella and G. Palmieri, avvocati dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández and P. Rossi, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/960/EC of 8 December 2008 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) (OJ 2008 L 340, p. 99), as far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 18.4.2009.

1

---
Marvin Lee ELLIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7524.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Starsky Darnell REDD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6946.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of PLXTechnology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Michael J. Salameh,****Chief Executive Officer****of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of myknowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,"filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: August 5, 2005
                          /s/ Michael J.Salameh	 
Michael J. Salameh, Chief Executive Officer
# C_2010051EN.01003301.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/33

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 8 January 2010 — Escola Superior Agrária de Coimbra v Commission

(Case T-446/09 R)

(Interim measures - Programme Life - Reimbursement of a part of the amounts paid - Recovery order - Debit note - Application for suspension of enforcement - Financial loss - Exceptional circumstances - Lack of urgency)

2010/C 51/64

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Escola Superior Agrária de Coimbra (Coimbra, Portugal) (represented by: L. Pais do Amaral, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braga da Cruz and J-B. Laignelot, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decisions contained, respectively, in Commission letter D (2009) 224268 of 9 September 2009, concerning a recovery order, and Commission debit note No 3230909105 of 11 September 2009 for an amount of EUR 327 500,35.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2010100EN.01003403.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/34

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-328/09) (1)

1

2010/C 100/51

Language of the case: Estonian

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.

1

---