alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1542 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that Members 

official websites include congressional earmark requests and video presentations for requests submitted to committees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2010 

Ms. PINGREE of Maine submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require that Members official websites include congressional earmark requests and video presentations for requests submitted to committees. 

1 Resolved, That clause 17 of rule XXIII of the Rules 

2 of the House of Representatives is amended by adding at 

3 the end the following new paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(c) (1) Each Member, Delegate, or Resident Com5 missioner shall maintain an official website and include 

6 on it a comprehensive, sortable, and searchable database 

7 comprised of all congressional earmark request for the 

8 current fiscal year, and for the budget year including for 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1542 IH 

1 each such request the name and address of any recipient, 

2 the purpose of the earmark, the merits of the earmark, 

3 whether it meets applicable eligibility requirements (if 

4 any), the amount requested, and, in the case of the Com5 mittee on Appropriations, a video presentation by the in6 tended recipient with a link for public comment. 

7 ‘‘(2) Each Member, Delegate, or Resident Commis8 sioner may waive the requirement for a video presentation 

9 by the intended recipient of a congressional earmark if the 

10 Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner determines 

11 that the video presentation is unnecessary and places that 

12 determination on the official website of that Member, Del13 egate, or Resident Commissioner.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 362 

AN ACT 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with 

respect to functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 362 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Emergency 

3 Leadership Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO ASSISTANT SECRE5 TARIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 203 of 

7 the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 7133(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

9 new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(12) Energy emergency and energy security 

11 functions, including— 

12 ‘‘(A) responsibilities with respect to infra13 structure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, sup14 ply, and emergency planning, coordination, re15 sponse, and restoration; and 

16 ‘‘(B) upon request of a State, local, or 

17 tribal government or energy sector entity, and 

18 in consultation with other Federal agencies as 

19 appropriate, provision of technical assistance, 

20 support, and response capabilities with respect 

21 to energy security threats, risks, and inci22 dents.’’. 

23 (b) COORDINATION.—The Secretary of Energy shall 

24 ensure that the functions of the Secretary described in sec25 tion 203(a)(12) of the Department of Energy Organiza-
3 

•HR 362 EH

1 tion Act (as added by this Act) are performed in coordina2 tion with relevant Federal agencies. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 362 

AN ACT 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization 

ant Secretaries, and for other purposes. Act with respect to functions assigned to Assist-
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Karla W. SIMON.

No. D-2907.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
II-01037

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

susan carey <whitestripessuzy@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:53 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

susan carey

15033 20th road

whitestone, NY 11357
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRAD ING COMM ISS ION 

T hree Lafa yette Ce ntre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Tele phon e: (202) 418-543 0 

Facs imile: (202) 4 18-5547 

j bandman@cftc.gov 

Division of Clearing and Risk Jeffrey Sandman 

Acting Director 

September 24, 2015 

ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Paul Cusenza 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 

Nodal Clear, LLC 

1921 Gallows Road, 3 rct Floor 

Tysons Corner, VA 22182 

Re: Nodal Clear, LLC ' s Subpart C Election Form 

Dear Mr. Cusenza: 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the "Commission") is in receipt of the 

Subpart C Election Form (the "Election Form") filed by Nodal Clear, LLC ("Nodal Clear") 

pursuant to Commission Regulation 39.31(b) 1 and received by the Commission, along with 

Nodal Clear 's Form DCO, on December 9, 2014. 

Pursuant to Regulation 3 9.31, a derivatives clearing organization ("DCO") that is 

registered or applying for registration with the Commission may elect to become subject to the 

provisions of Subpart C ofPart 39 ofthe Commission' s regulations (the "S ubpart C Provisions") 

by following the procedures set forth in Regulation 39.31(b), which include filing a complete 

Election Form. 2 

Commission Regulation 39.31(c)(2) allows the Commission to permit a DCO applicant's 

Subpart C election to take effect at the time it approves the applicant' s application for 

registration by providing written notice thereof to the applicant. This letter constitutes such 

written notice. 

1 Commission regulations are found in 17 C.F.R. Chapter I. 2 See 17 C.F .R. § 39.3l(a)(l). 
Mr. Paul Cusenza 

September 24,2015 

Page 2 of2 

Thus, Nodal Clear' s election is permitted to take effect as ofthe date of this letter, and 

Nodal Clear will be subject to subparts A, Band C of Part 39 of the Commission' s regulations as 

of that date. Moreover, as noted in Regulation 39.40, the Subpart C Provisions are intended to 

establish standards which, together with Subparts A and B of Part 3 9, are consistent with the 

Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (the "PFMis"). As a result, Nodal Clear will be 

subj ect to standards that are consistent with the PFMis as of the date of this letter. 

In permitting Nodal Clear's election to take effect, the Commission is relying on the 

certification provided in Nodal Clear's submission that, as ofthe date of this letter, Nodal Clear 

will be in compliance with Subpart C of Part 39 ofthe Commission's regulations. The 

Commission is also relying on the other materials submitted by Nodal Clear in connection with 

its DCO application and Election Form, including all supplemental information submitted to the 

Commission' s Division of Clearing and Risk. 

Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Brian Baum, Special 

Counsel (bbaum@cftc.gov, (202) 4 18-5654) or Eileen Donovan, Deputy Director 

( edonovan@cftc.gov, (202) 4 18-5 096). 

Jeffrey Bandman 

Acting Director 

cc: 	 Eileen Donovan 

Julie Mohr 

BrianBaum 

2
Samim ANGHAIE, et ux., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-1456.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Judy KIRBY, petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 15-9534.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District denied.
Khadija DUMA, petitioner, v. U.S. BANK, N.A.

No. 16-9308.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	6

<CIK>	0000744822

<NAME>	Fidelity Investment Trust

<SERIES>

	<NUMBER>	211

	<NAME>	Fidelity Japan Small Companies Fund

<MULTIPLIER>	1,000



<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>
year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>
oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>
oct-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>
1,192,867
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>
1,890,340
<RECEIVABLES>
18,183
<ASSETS-OTHER>
1,183
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>
0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>
1,909,706
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>
17,957
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>
0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>
111,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>
129,693
<SENIOR-EQUITY>
0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>
1,109,862
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>
86,558
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>
16,637
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>
(1,879)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>
0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>
(25,534)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>
0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>
697,498
<NET-ASSETS>
1,779,947
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>
2,516
<INTEREST-INCOME>
3,197
<OTHER-INCOME>
79
<EXPENSES-NET>
7,132
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>
(1,440)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>
28,686
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>
699,994
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>
727,240
<EQUALIZATION>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>
0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>
112,923
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>
43,003
<SHARES-REINVESTED>
0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>
1,680,025
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>
0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>
(53,841)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>
753
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>
0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>
4,833
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>
0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>
7,169
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>
668,462
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>
6.010
<PER-SHARE-NII>
(.030)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>
14.450
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>
0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>
0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>
0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>
20.560
<EXPENSE-RATIO>
107





</TABLE>
Kenneth RIVERA, petitioner, v. Bryan STIRLING, et al.

No. 16-9335.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Robert Michael STORY, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 15-9386.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1715** 

In re: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR. , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Submitted : August 25, 2016 Decided: August 29, 2016

Before NIEMEYER , DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
James Lester Roudabush, Jr. , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Lester Roudabush, Jr. , p etitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order from this court directing the Secretary to the Fourth Circuit Judicial Council to rescind an order prohibiting Roudabush ’s filing of judicial complaints
under 28 U.S.C. § 351 (2012) without first obta ining leave of the Chief Judge and the Clerk of this court to file all papers
Roudabush submits to the court pursuant to that statute

. We conclude that Roudabush is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).
The relief sought by Roudabush is not available by way of
mandamus because Roudabush fails to establish any clear right to relief from this court in the form of an order directing the
rescission of a Judicial Council order and that the Clerk of this c ourt file all papers Roudabush submits pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 351 . Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ3 of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and ar gument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
# C_2010288EN.01004101.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/41

---

Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Schemaventotto v Commission

(Case T-58/09) (1)

(Action for annulment - Concentrations - Abandonment of an intended concentration - Decision to close the procedure opened under Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)

(2010/C 288/78)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Schemaventotto SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, G. Scassellati Sforzolini, G. Rizza and M. Piergiovanni, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and É. Gippini Fournier, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Abertis Infraestructuras, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: M. Roca Junyent and P. Callol García, lawyers)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision or decisions allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 13 August 2008 concerning the proceeding opened under Article 21(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1) in relation to the concentration between the intervener and Autostrade SpA (Case COMP/M.4388 Abertis v Autostrade)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Schemaventotto SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Schemaventotto SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | Abertis Infraestructuras, SA shall bear its own costs.. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Abertis Infraestructuras, SA shall bear its own costs..

---

(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
     SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          9,524
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            860
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    54,635
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          2,574
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                       390,142
<ALLOWANCE>                                     3,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                474,527
<DEPOSITS>                                    309,896
<SHORT-TERM>                                   69,388
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             4,157
<LONG-TERM>                                    42,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           42
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                474,527
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                28,419
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               4,365
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  192
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               32,976
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             13,196
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             19,098
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          13,878
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                13,780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 5,588
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      5,588
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,660
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.67
<LOANS-NON>                                     1,250
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                3,537
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      89
<RECOVERIES>                                       62
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               3,630
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            3,630
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
Sephora K. DAVIS, petitioner, v. Andrea W. EVANS, et al.

No. 16-727.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 199 

Providing that the Congress should stop passing massive Government bailouts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2009 

Mr. TIAHRT (for himself, Mr. CARTER, Mr. MACK, Mr. PAUL, Mr. SHIMKUS, 

Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. 

BARTLETT, and Mr. MORAN of Kansas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

RESOLUTION 

Providing that the Congress should stop passing massive 

Government bailouts. 

Whereas financial markets have been saturated with well over 

a trillion dollars from the Government ranging from the 

bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac at $200 billion, 

Bear Stearns at $29 billion, AIG at $85 billion; Wall 

Street at $700 billion, the automakers at $25 billion, and 

Citigroup at $247.5 billion; 

Whereas, in 2008, total Federal spending increased by 11 

percent to nearly $3 trillion; 

Whereas Congress should not rely on the same failed economic policies of the past; 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 199 IH 

Whereas, by looking in the past, we see the massive spending 

initiatives that occurred during the 1930s and 1970s 

failed to produce economic growth; 

Whereas the Government has a role in helping ensure American workers and industries are free to prosper, but these 

bailouts are nothing more than a mere band-aid that continues to follow a pattern of throwing more taxpayer 

money at a problem instead of addressing the root causes 

of the problem; and 

Whereas Congress should address fundamental reforms to 

help American workers and businesses achieve long-term 

prosperity through incentives for private-sector solutions 

instead of Government involvement: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Congress should stop passing massive 

3 Government bailouts. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Theresa A. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. BEACH PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT.

No. 16-5957.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, January 19, 2001, to consider the following matters:

*Summary Agenda:*                     No substantive discussion of the following items is anticipated. These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.                

Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.

Memorandum and resolution re: Final Amendments to Part 308—Rules of Practice and Procedure, to implement the requirements of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act.

Memorandum re: Information Sharing and Confidentiality Agreement Pursuant to Section 307 of Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

*Discussion Agenda:*                     Memorandum and Resolution Re: Proposed Amendments to Part 325—Capital Standards for Nonfinancial Equity Investments.                

The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550—17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

                    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (                    *e.g.*, sign language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees needing such assistance should call (202) 416-2089 (Voice); (202) 416-2007 (TTY), to make necessary arrangements.                

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-6757.

                        Dated: January 12, 2001.                              ( print page 4827)    

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-1604  Filed 1-16-01; 10:58 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-M