alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices 34157

an order, as well as any relevant

information regarding past production.

CITA will protect any business

confidential information that is marked

business confidential from disclosure to

the full extent permitted by law. CITA

will make available to the public nonconfidential versions of the request and

non-confidential versions of any public

comments received with respect to a

request in room 3100 in the Herbert

Hoover Building, 14th and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.

Persons submitting comments on a

request are encouraged to include a nonconfidential version and a nonconfidential summary.

J. Hayden Boyd,

Acting Chairman, Committee for the

Implementation of Textile Agreements.

[FR Doc.01–16147 Filed 6–26–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 01–03]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Public

Law 104–164 dated July 21, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 01–03 with

attached transmittal and policy

justification.

Dated: June 21, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001–08–M

34158 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices 34159

34160 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2001 / Notices

[FR Doc. 01–16034 Filed 6–26–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–08–C
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Beth O. MacLaughlin, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Avatech Solutions, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                 
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Beth MacLaughlin                            
|                   |  |  |  |                                                 
|                   |  |  |  | Beth MacLaughlin Interim Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 

          - [OJP(OJJDP)-1323] 

# AGENCY:

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), Office of Justice Programs, Justice. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Announcement of the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention meeting. 

# DATES:

A meeting of this advisory committee, chartered as the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, will take place in the District of Columbia on Tuesday, July 24, 2001, beginning at 10 a.m. and ending at noon, ET. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will take place at the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Main Conference Room, 3rd Floor, 810 Seventh Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bob Altman, Program Manager, Juvenile Justice Resource Center, at 301-519-5721. [This is not a toll-free number.] 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Coordinating Council, established pursuant to section 3(2)A of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), will meet to carry out its advisory functions under section 206 of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5601*et seq.*). The topic of this meeting is Today's Youth Gangs. This meeting will be open to the public. Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting should notify the Juvenile Justice Resource Center at the number listed above by 5 p.m., et, on Tuesday, July 17, 2001. For security purposes, picture identification will be required.                 

Dated: June 20, 2001. 

John J. Wilson, 

Acting Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 01-15957 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
Order entered November 8, 2021 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00741-CV 

IN RE JOHN CREUZOT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 305th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. JC-21-00754 

ORDER 

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein 

In accordance with the Court’s opinion of this date, we 

CONDITIONALLY GRANT relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We 

ORDER the juvenile court to vacate its August 20, 2021 injunctive order and 

dismiss the proceeding for want of jurisdiction. We further ORDER the juvenile 

court to file with this Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, a 

certified copy of the order issued in compliance with this order. Should the 

juvenile court fail to comply with this order, the writ will issue. 

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN 

 JUSTICE
BROOKLINE HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al., petitioners, v. Kimberly P. DeCAMBRE.

No. 16-495.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Jesse VENTURA, aka James G. Janos, petitioner, v. Taya KYLE, Executor of the Estate of Chris Kyle.

No. 16-600.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2

I, R. Jerry Giles, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Community Financial Corporation (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidatedfinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report;

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

Date: November 12, 2003

/s/ R. Jerry Giles            R. Jerry GilesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Robert Lamont GREEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6728.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Antonio FORTSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6613.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
II-00633

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Sally Simpson <sally. simpson@sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:08 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Sally Simpson

326 Crooked Creek

Garland, TX 75043
# C_2011160EN.01001802.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — Alder Capital v OHIM — Gimv Nederland (ALDER CAPITAL)

(Case T-209/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark ALDER CAPITAL - Earlier Benelux word marks Halder and Halder Investments - Earlier international word mark Halder - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Genuine use of the trade mark - Article 15 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 15 of Regulation No 207/2009))

2011/C 160/25

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alder Capital Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and R. Manea, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Gimv Nederland BV (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: M. van de Braak and S. Beelaard, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 February 2009 (Case R 486/2008-2) in relation to invalidity proceedings between Halder Holdings BV and Alder Capital Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Alder Capital Ltd to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Gimv Nederland BV for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Alder Capital Ltd to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Gimv Nederland BV for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 1.8.2009.

1

---
January 9, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOHNATHAN WAYNE HUNT , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00051

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2011046EN.01001201.xml

| 12.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer v OHIM (CHROMA)

(Case T-281/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark CHROMA - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 46/22

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer AG (Frechen, Germany) (represented by: J. Albrecht, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 May 2009 (Case R 1429/2008-4), relating to an application for registration as a Community trade mark of the word sign CHROMA

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

1

---
# C_2010317EN.01005102.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/51

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 September 2010 — Ernotte v Commission

(Case F-90/09) (1)

1

()

2010/C 317/95

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register, following an amicable settlement.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010, p. 41.

1

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00757

- CV

Michael TATSCH

, Appellant

v.

CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC and Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company

, Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12977 Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgments are AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED and REMANDED in pa rt. Specifically, the trial court’s no evidence summary judgment in favor of appellee Chrysler Group, LLC with regard to appellant Michael Tatsch’s implied warranty claim is AFFIRMED. The trial court’s no evidence summary judgment in favor of appellee Ch rysler Group, LLC as to appellant Michael Tatsch’s express warranty claim is REVERSED and the claim is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion.

The trial court’s traditional summary judgment in favor of appellee Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company is REVERSED because it did not address appellant Michael Tatsch’s claims against appellee Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company. The trial cour t’s no evidence summary judgment in favor of appellee Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company with regard to appellant Michael Tatsch’s claims based on sections 541.060(a)(2), (3), and (8) of the Texas

Insurance Code is AFFIRMED. The trial court’s no evi dence summary judgment in favor of appellee Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company with regard to appellant Michael Tatsch’s claim based on section 541.060(a)(7) of the Texas Insurance Code is REVERSED and that claim

is REMANDED to the trial court for fu rther proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion.04

- 13

- 00757

- CV

We order that each party bear its own costs of appeal.

SIGNED December 3, 2014.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

- 2

-
Andrew Taylor HUTCHINSON, petitioner, v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, INC., et al.

No. 15-9359.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michael S. GORBEY, petitioner, v. John T. RATHMAN, Warden.

No. 16-6960.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

The CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Richard APONTE, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 15-9465.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.6

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, James H. Tate, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Thermadyne Capital Corp. (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Thermadyne Capital Corp. and will be retained by Thermadyne
Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Dated:  May 15, 2003

                                         /s/      James H. Tate
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         James H. Tate
                                         Senior Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer of the
                                         Company
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00433

- CR

Daniel Ledesma

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 396th District Court

o f Tarrant Coun ty (1273111D )

July 3, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that t he judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
Henry N. HARPER, petitioner, v. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

No. 16-6722.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.