alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
[LEGEND]
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE PEPSI
BOTTLING GROUP, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 25, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
[/LEGEND]
[RESTATED]
<CIK> 0001076405
<NAME> THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                             190
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      880
<ALLOWANCES>                                        48
<INVENTORY>                                        293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,498
<PP&E>                                           4,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              952
<BONDS>                                          3,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,624
<SALES>                                          7,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,505
<CGS>                                            4,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,296
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    188
<INCOME-TAX>                                        70
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                118
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       118
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.92


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33735-33736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16001]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice #3679]


Notice of Meetings; United States International Telecommunication 
Advisory Committee (ITAC); Telecommunication Sector Committee (ITAC-T); 
ITAC-T U.S. Study Group A; ITAC-T U.S. Study Group D

    The Department of State announces meetings of the U.S. 
International Telecommunication Advisory Committee. The purpose of the 
Committee is to advise the Department on policy and technical issues 
with respect to the International Telecommunication Union.
    The ITAC will meet on July 2, 2001 from 1:30 to 3:30 at the 
Telecommunication Industry Association (TIA) offices at 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 350 (North Tower), Washington, DC to 
debrief the recent ITU Council meeting.
    The ITAC-T will meet July 11, 2001 at the offices of the Alliance 
for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS), 1200 G Street, NW., 
Suite 500, Washington, DC from 9:30-12:30 to continue working on the 
ITAC-T Guidelines.
    U.S. Study Group A will meet from 9:30 to noon on July 31, 2001 and 
August 15, 2001 to prepare for the next meeting of ITU-T Study Group 2. 
The location of the July 31 meeting will be announced. The August 15 
meeting will be at the Federal Communications Commission, 6 North 
Conference room, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. Attendees 
should enter through the 12th St. entrance, use the North elevators to 
go to the sixth floor and call the receptionist (202 418-1460) from the 
North Elevator lobby for admittance.
    The U.S. Study Group A meeting previously scheduled for August 22, 
2001 is cancelled.
    U.S. Study Group D will meet at the offices of the Alliance for 
Telecommunications Industry Solutions, 1200 G Street, NW., Suite 500, 
Washington, DC from 1:30 to 3:30 on July 11, 2001 to begin preparations 
for the next ITU-T Study Group 9 meeting.

[[Page 33736]]

    Members of the general public may attend these meetings. Directions 
to meeting locations and actual room assignments may be determined by 
calling the Secretariat at 202 647-0965/2592.
    Attendees may join in the discussions, subject to the instructions 
of the Chair. Admission of members will be limited to seating 
available.

    Dated: June 19, 2001.
Doreen McGirr,
Multilateral Affairs, Communication & Information Policy, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 01-16001 Filed 6-21-01; 3:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-P
Dimitry ARONSHTEIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-1527.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
II-00223

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

PI Norton <nomad9x@yahoo.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 3:15 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

PI Norton

39 Sussex

Lewes, DE 19958
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,519
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,512,716)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,519
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,423
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,803
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,380)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,380)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.013)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Order entered June 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01467-CV

No. 05-12-01469-CV

CRESENCIO BASTIDA, Appellant

V.

ABEL'S MOBILE HOME SERVICE, INC., ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-02287-06

Trial Court Cause No. 296-02287-06

ORDER

By order dated June 19, 2013 we issued a second order in cause number 05-12-10467-CV 

regarding an overdue clerk’s record. By letter dated June 20, 2013, the Collin County District 

Clerk responded that the clerk’s record had been filed in cause number 05-12-01469-CV and that 

the case had been docketed twice in this Court. Our records show that two separate notices of 

appeal were filed, one with trial court cause number 296-02287-06, assigned cause number 05-

12-01467-CV, and the other trial court cause number 199-02287-06, assigned cause number 05-

12-01469-CV. Other than the trial court cause numbers, the notices of appeal are identical.
Accordingly, we VACATE our June 19, 2013 order in cause number 05-12-01467-CV. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer all documents from cause number 05-12-01467-

CV into cause number 05-12-01469-CV.

We ADMINSTRATIVELY CLOSE cause number 05-12-01467-CV.

We further DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order by electronic 

transmission to Collin County District Clerk Andrea Stroh Thompson. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6750

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.
AVAUN CORNELL JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00554-CCB-2)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Avaun Cornell Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan Michael Giblin, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Avaun Cornell Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson , No. 1:06-cr-00554-CCB-2 (D. Md. filed Mar. 30, 2009; entered Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2010148EN.01002902.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 April 2010 — Schunk v OHIM (Presentation of part of a chuck)

(Case T-7/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark in the form of a presentation of part of a chuck with three grooves - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Lack of distinctive character acquired by use - Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2010/C 148/52

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Schunk GmbH & Co KG Spann- und Greiftechnik (Lauffen am Neckar, Germany) (represented by: C. Koppe-Zagouras, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 October 2008 (Case R 1109/2007-1) concerning the registration of the sign in the form of a presentation of part of a chuck with three grooves as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Schunk GmbH & Co KG Spann- und Greiftechnik to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Schunk GmbH & Co KG Spann- und Greiftechnik to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
# C_2009297EN.01003602.xml

| 5.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/36

---

Action brought on 14 September 2009 — Cusack-Gard'ner v Commission

(Case F-76/09)

2009/C 297/56

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carolyn Cusack-Gard'ner (Wavre, Belgium) (represented by: J. Temple Lang, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Action for annulment of the decision of 22 June 2009 rejecting the applicant’s request to be able to benefit from a full reimbursement of the costs resulting from the treatment of her illness.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of 22 June 2009 rejecting the applicant’s request; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 22 June 2009 rejecting the applicant’s request;

| — | declare that Chapter 3 of Title II of the Commission Decision of 2 July 2007 laying down General Implementing Provisions for the reimbursement of medical expenses is inapplicable in accordance with Article 241 of the EC Treaty:






  — | insofar as it provides that the cost of providing ‘board and lodging’ for an essential living-in carer is not refundable, and, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

declare that Chapter 3 of Title II of the Commission Decision of 2 July 2007 laying down General Implementing Provisions for the reimbursement of medical expenses is inapplicable in accordance with Article 241 of the EC Treaty:

—

insofar as it provides that the cost of providing ‘board and lodging’ for an essential living-in carer is not refundable, and,

| — | in so far as it imposes a limit on the amount of the repayment that may be made for the cost of an essential living-in care; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as it imposes a limit on the amount of the repayment that may be made for the cost of an essential living-in care;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                               11,812,403
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     20,231,741
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       20,231,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   768,170
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         20,231,741
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      2,703,812
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,925,804
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         778,007
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     778,007
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            778,007
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                44.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                44.70
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Donald R. Walsh, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Avatech Solutions, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |  |  |                                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: May 17, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald R. Walsh                    
|                   |  |  |  |                                        
|                   |  |  |  | Donald R. Walsh Chief Executive Officer
Helen Y. ROBINSON, petitioner, v. TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK, et al.

No. 15-9549.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
1359.

#### Bryant *v.*The State.

Accusation of larceny from house, from city court of Fort Haines — Judge Bambo. August 10, 1908.

Submitted October 8,

Decided October 12, 1908.

*Ben. M. Turnipseed,*for plaintiff in error.

*P. C. King, solicitor,*contra.

Russell, J.

Evidence of the- possession of a • stolen pistol will not, without more, authorize a conviction of larceny, in the absence of any evidence that the defendant was in possession of the pistol shortly after the larceny, and where it appears that the property had passed from hand to hand before it was recovered. Especially is this true where others, who are shown to have been in possession of the stolen property prior to its discovery by the owner, had made false and contradictory statements in regard to the manner in which they procured possession. While the possession of stolen goods is a circumstance from which guilt may be inferred, the presumption is not conclusive, when that possession is not shown to have been recent. *Cuthbert*v. *State,*3 *Ga. App.*600 (60 S. E. 322). *Judgment reversed.*
NUMBERS 13-21-00415-CV; 13-21-00433-CV; 

13-21-00434-CV; 13-21-00435-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

VHS HARLINGEN HOSPITAL 

COMPANY, LLC D/B/A VALLEY 

BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER-HARLINGEN;

KRISHNA MOHAN TURLAPATI, M.D.,

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A VALLEY PEDIATRIC

CRITICAL CARE AND HOSPITAL SERVICES; 

WILMER LOJA, M.D., WILMER E. LOJA, M.D., P.A.,

WILMER E. LOJA, AND ASSOCIATES, P.A.;

RAFAEL VILLALOBOS-NIETO, M.D. AND

RAFAEL VILLALOBOS-NIETO, M.D., P.A., Appellants,

v.

MALLORY COTTON AND JERAMY BRIDGES,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS, 

NATURAL PARENTS, AND AS WRONGFUL DEATH

BENEFICIARIES OF BABY BOY BRIDGES, Appellees.

 
2

On appeal from the 103rd District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

 

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Before the Court is an amended agreed motion to consolidate appellate cause 

numbers 13-21-00415-CV, 13-21-00433-CV, 13-21-00434-CV, and 13-21-00435-CV, an 

agreed motion to increase the word limit on appellees’ brief, and an agreed motion for a 

joint briefing schedule. Having reviewed the motions, the Court grants the motions and 

orders the appeals consolidated for briefing purposes only. Each appeal will maintain its 

separate cause number, and each appellant shall file their brief under their respective 

cause number. The appellees may elect to file a single brief with an increased word limit 

of 30,000 words; however, this brief should be filed in each cause number. Finally, the 

clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed in each case; therefore, according to the 

last filed record, the Court orders the following joint briefing schedule: appellants’ briefs 

are due February 22, 2022, appellees’ brief is due March 23, 2022, and any reply briefs 

are due April 12, 2022. All other requested relief is denied.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

10th day of February, 2022.