alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00669

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Laura Taffany <laurataffany4@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:43 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Laura Taffany

475 Camino Don Emilio

Santa Fe, NM 87507
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 01-4247



# 

S HAUN A UTALEON P OSTON , a/k/a Shawn Autaleon Poston,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville.

Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge.

(CR-99-12)
Submitted: January 14, 2002
Decided: February 1, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL
Mark P. Foster, Jr., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. RobertJ. Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION

PER CURIAM: Shaun Autaleon Poston was charged in a one-count superseding indictment with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a)(1),841(b)(1)(A)(ii), 841(b)(1)(A)(iii), 846 (West 1999). Poston was convicted following a jury trial and sentenced to 360 months in prison and five years of supervised release. Because we find no reversible error, we affirm. On appeal, Poston argues: (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction; (2) the district court improperly concluded he was responsible for in excess of 1.5 kilograms of cocaine base; and (3) a two-level enhancement was not warranted because there was insufficient evidence that he possessed a dangerousweapon. We review the verdict to determine "whether ‘there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the government,’ to support the conviction." United States v. Ismail , 97 F.3d 50, 55 (4th Cir. 1996) (quoting Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942)).We do not review a witness’s credibility in assessing whether the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction. United States v. Hobbs
,136 F.3d 384, 391 n.11 (4th Cir. 1998). We have reviewed the evidence presented at trial and, when taken in the light most favorable to the Government, we conclude the evidence is sufficient to support Poston’s conviction. We review the district court’s factual findings regarding Poston’ssentencing for clear error and its application of the sentencing guidelines de novo. United States v. Daughtrey , 874 F.2d 213, 217 (4th Cir. 1989). We have reviewed the district court’s findings and have found no error. Accordingly, we affirm Poston’s conviction and sentence.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. P OSTON
II-00918

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

James Kinsman <k90205@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:03 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

James Kinsman

70 Fox Chase Ln.

Southgate, KY 41071
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15911]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 01D-0232]


Medical Devices Premarket Guidance: Reprocessing and Reuse of 
Single-Use Devices; Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff; 
Availability; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
that appeared in the Federal Register of June 1, 2001 (66 FR 29822). 
The document announced the availability of the draft guidance entitled 
``Premarket Guidance: Reprocessing and Reuse of Single-Use Devices; 
Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff.'' The document published 
inadvertently omitting the address for the Dockets Management Branch. 
This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Strong, Office of Policy, 
Planning, and Legislation (HF-27), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-7010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Friday, June 1, 
2001, in FR Doc. 01-13731, on page 29822, in the third column, correct 
the ADDRESSES caption to read:

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies on a 3.5'' 
diskette of the draft guidance document entitled ``Premarket 
Guidance: Reprocessing and Reuse of Single-Use Devices; Draft 
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff'' to the Division of Small 
Manufacturers Assistance (HFZ-220), Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., 
Rockville, MD 20850. Send two self-addressed adhesive labels to 
assist that office in processing your request, or fax your request 
to 301-443-8818. Submit written comments concerning this draft 
guidance to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. 
See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for information on 
electronic access to the draft guidance document.

    Dated: June 19, 2001.
Margaret M. Dotzel,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-15911 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
William Dale HOLLEY, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 16-6828.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
AMGEN INC., et al., petitioners, v. SANDOZ INC.

No. 15-1195.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 13, 2017.

Motion of Apotex, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BRANDON HETRICK, EXECUTOR OF

THE ESTATE OF: WILLIAM WASHINGTON, DECEASED,

Respondent

v.

MANORCARE OF CARLISLE PA, LLC

D/B/A MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES, CARLISLE, AND HCR MANORCARE, INC., AND MANORCARE, INC., AND HCR HEALTHCARE, LLC, AND HCR II HEALTHCARE, LLC, AND HCR III HEALTHCARE, LLC, AND HCR IV HEALTHCARE, LLC,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 506 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Unpublished Memorandum and

Order of the Superior Court at No. 266
MDA 2014 entered on June 3, 2015, affirming the Order Entered of the Cumberland County Court of Common

Pleas at No. 11

- 7979 entered on January 10, 2014

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is GRANTED , the order of the Superior Court is VACATED , and this matter is

REMANDED to the Superior Court for further proceedings in light of Taylor v.

Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc., et. al., __ A.3d __, 2016 WL 5630669 (Pa. filed Sept.

28, 2016).
Taylor Christian PROFITA, petitioner, v. The REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, et al.

No. 17-966.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
II-00857

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Zeanah <mhzeanah@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:40 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Zeanah

2205 Willow Ave NE

Atlanta, GA 30305
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 7, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20

- 0866 Lower Tribunal No. 11

- 23514

________________ 

### Jesus G. Joubert Rodriguez, etc., et al. , Appellant s ,
vs. 

### Central Florida Equipment Rentals, Inc. , Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Alan Fine , Judge.
D eehl PLLC and David L. Deehl; Kula & Associates, P.A., and Elliot B. Kula and William D. Mueller , for appellant s

. Boyd Richards Parker & Colonnelli, PL and Elaine D. Walter and Yvette R. Lavelle and Maria E. Dalmanieras , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and LOBREE , JJ. PER CURIAM. In this wrongful

- death action, Jesus G. Joubert Rodriguez, the2 personal representative of the estate of his deceased wife, Ivon Arbesun Nunez, challenges a final summary ju dgment entered in favor of Central Florida Equipment Rentals, Inc. (the “contractor”). He contends that, in moving for summary judgment on the issues of legal duty and legal causation, the contractor failed to meet its preliminary burden to show that there were no genuine issues of material fact entitling it to judgment as a matter of law. We review the trial court’s entry of summary judgment de novo, viewing
the evidence in t he light most favorable to the nonmoving party. See
Luckman v. Wills , 306 So. 3d 990, 993 n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) ; Sierra v. Shevin , 767 So. 2d 524, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)

. Upon our thorough examination of the record, we agree that the trial court erred i n granting summary judgment, because genuine issues of material fact remain in dispute regarding the existence of legal duty and legal causation

. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
# C_2011269EN.01004703.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2011 — Ergo Versicherungsgruppe v OHIM — Société de développement et de recherche industrielle (ERGO Group)

(Case T-221/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ERGO Group - Earlier Community word mark URGO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 269/104

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ergo Versicherungsgruppe AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A.W. Renck, T. Dolde and J. Pause, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: B. Schmidt, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Société de développement et de recherche industrielle (Chenôve, France) (represented by: K. Dröge, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2009 (Case R 520/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Société de développement et de recherche industrielle and Ergo Versicherungsgruppe AG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Versicherungsgruppe AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Versicherungsgruppe AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 1.8.2009.

1

---
# C_2010024EN.01003301.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/33

---

Action brought on 19 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-454/09)

2010/C 24/60

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Righini and B. Stromsky, agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to take, within the prescribed time-limits, all the measures necessary to withdraw the aid considered unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision No 2008/697/EC (1) of 16 April 2008 on State Aid C 13/07 (ex NN 15/06 and N 734/06) implemented by Italy for New Interline (notified under document number C(2008) 1321 on 17 June 2008), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 3 and 4 of that decision and the EC Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to take, within the prescribed time-limits, all the measures necessary to withdraw the aid considered unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision No 2008/697/EC (1) of 16 April 2008 on State Aid C 13/07 (ex NN 15/06 and N 734/06) implemented by Italy for New Interline (notified under document number C(2008) 1321 on 17 June 2008), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 3 and 4 of that decision and the EC Treaty.

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time limit within which Italy was required to withdraw and recover the unlawfully paid aid expired four months after the date of notification of the decision in question. More than a year later, the Italian authorities have yet to adopt the measures necessary to implement the decision and recover the aid.

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 235, p. 12.

1

---
II-00278

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

janet steck <j steck@twcny.rr.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:51 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

janet steck

113 clinton street

homer, NY 13077
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Michael Dodak, the Chief Executive Officer of Global Axcess Corp. (the
      "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
      June
      30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
      (a)
      or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
      May 24, 2006


/s/
                  Michael Dodak
                ---------------------------
                Name:
                  Michael Dodak
                Title:
                  Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
 Life Time Fitness, Inc.
List of Subsidiaries
 Name
    
    State of FormationBloomingdale LIFE TIME Fitness, L.L.C.
    
    IllinoisLTF Club Operations Company, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaFCA Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Operations Holdings, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaFCA Construction Company, LLC
    
    DelawareFCA Restaurant Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLife Time Fitness Financial, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Triathlon Series, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Club Management Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF TIAA Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Michigan Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Minnesota Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF USA Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Company, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaLTF CMBS Managing Member, Inc.
    
    DelawareLTF CMBS I, LLC
    
    DelawareNon-profit corporation:Life Time Fitness Foundation
    
    Minnesota
 NOTES:
Corazon McDONALD, petitioner, v. John McHUGH, Secretary of the Army.

No. 15-9725.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jackie H. RICHARDSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6644.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.