CFTC Letter 04-26

CFTC letter No. 04-26 

October 1, 2004 

No-Action 

Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight 

Mr. James J. McCormack 

Controller 

Iowa Grain Company 

141 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1520 A 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Re: “No-Action” Relief for Bank Service Charges on Specified Customer-Segregated Accounts 

Dear Mr. McCormack: 

This is in response to your letter dated June 24, 2004, submitted on behalf of Iowa Grain Company 

(“Iowa Grain”), a registered futures commission merchant, to the Division of Clearing and Intermediary 

Oversight (the “Division” or “DCIO”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”). 

By your letter, you have asked whether Iowa Grain may use customer funds, which have been deposited 

in segregated accounts under Section 4d(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act[1] (the “Act”), to pay 

account service charges to banks for the maintenance of such accounts in which the customer funds are 

held. Such bank account service charges are expenses of Iowa Grain and not of its customers, and 

Section 4d(b) of the Act and Commission Rule 1.20 prohibit the use of customer-segregated funds for 

any person other than an FCM’s customers. The Division hereby confirms by this letter that, so long as 

Iowa Grain holds excess funds in segregation and has a residual interest in such funds[2], it will not 

recommend that the Commission commence an enforcement action against Iowa Grain with respect to 

the payment of account services charges directly out of a Section 4d(a) customer-segregated account as a 

reduction of such residual interest, subject to all the additional conditions set forth in this letter.[3]

As represented in your letter, almost all customer-segregated funds held by Iowa Grain are maintained in 

accounts near its main office. In order to facilitate customer business, however, Iowa Grain often will 

open accounts to hold customer funds in bank locations near its branch offices and/or guaranteed 

introducing brokers. As of May 31, 2004, Iowa Grain maintained ninety (90) such accounts, which taken 

together represented only three percent (3%) of total funds required to be held by Iowa Grain in 

segregation. The monthly bank service charges for these 90 accounts totaled $419 as of that same date. 

By your letter, Iowa Grain seeks confirmation that these bank service charges may be deducted directly 

by the bank from the funds maintained in the customer-segregated accounts in these 90 locations. 

If such deductions are not permissible, Iowa Grain advises that it will be required either to (1) open in 

each of these 90 locations a corresponding house account that would have no purpose other than to 

file:///H|/Desktop/04letters/tm04-26.htm (1 of 3) [5/6/2010 5:31:21 PM]
CFTC Letter 04-26

maintain minimal deposits in order to pay the bank service charges, or (2) issue from existing house 

accounts a monthly check or wire in the minimal amounts required to pay the bank service charges for 

these accounts. Iowa Grain accordingly seeks relief from the paperwork and administrative burden that 

Iowa Grain must undertake for accounts that represent a minor percentage of all customer-segregated 

funds held by Iowa Grain, but which are spread out among numerous bank locations. As additional 

support for the requested relief, you have noted that the deduction of such fees will have a de minimus

effect on the total amount of customer funds held in customer-segregated accounts. As noted earlier, for 

May 2004, the total amount of bank service charges for the 90 accounts was $419. As of that same date, 

the amount of customer funds held in the 90 customer-segregated accounts totaled $5,370,791. Also, as 

of the same date, Iowa Grain held $5,373,293 in customer-segregated accounts in excess of the total 

amount of funds owed to Iowa Grain’s customers. 

In consideration of the foregoing representations, and subject to Iowa Grain’s compliance with each and 

all of the following conditions, the Division has determined that it will not recommend that the 

Commission commence an enforcement action against Iowa Grain for using customer-segregated funds 

to pay bank account service charges for accounts in certain locations, as set forth below: 

1. Only customer-segregated bank accounts established to facilitate Iowa Grain’s branch office or 

guaranteed introducing broker (hereinafter, “remote customer-segregated accounts”) may qualify for this 

no-action relief. This relief is not applicable for general customer-segregated accounts used by Iowa 

Grain’s main office location. 

2. If a bank that maintains remote customer-segregated accounts also maintains any non-segregated 

account for Iowa Grain, the bank’s account service charges for the customer-segregated accounts may 

not be deducted from Iowa Grain’s customer-segregated accounts. 

3. Only bank account service charges required for the account’s maintenance may be paid from such 

remote customer-segregated accounts, and the amount of the charges must be de minimus. Any other 

fees to the bank, or to any other person, for any other services for such remote customer-segregated 

accounts may not be deducted or offset against the customer-segregated accounts. 

4. The use of customer funds to pay bank service charges may not benefit the bank to the potential 

detriment of Iowa Grain customers. Any payment of bank service charges from a remote customersegregated account is prohibited if the amount of the payment is greater than the total amount of excess 

segregated funds in all customer-segregated accounts of Iowa Grain. 

5. Iowa Grain is at all times responsible for ensuring compliance with all these conditions and may not 

delegate that responsibility to the bank or any other entity or individual. 

The position taken herein is based upon the representations that have been made to DCIO. Any different, 

changed, or omitted facts or conditions might require DCIO to reach a different conclusion. You must 

notify DCIO immediately in the event that there is any change from the facts as presented to us. Further, 

file:///H|/Desktop/04letters/tm04-26.htm (2 of 3) [5/6/2010 5:31:21 PM]
CFTC Letter 04-26

this letter represents the position of DCIO only and does not necessarily represent the views of the 

Commission or any other division or office of the Commission. 

If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Jennifer C.P. Bauer or Thelma 

Diaz, attorneys on my staff, at (202) 418-5430. 

Very truly yours, 

James L. Carley 

Director 

cc: Joseph Sanguedolce, Chairman, Joint Audit Committee, and Director Financial Surveillance, New 

York Mercantile Exchange 

Barbara Lorenzen, Vice President, Chicago Board of Trade 

[1] 7 U.S.C. §1 et seq. (2000). Commission rules referred to herein are found at 17 C.F.R. Ch. 1 (2004). 

[2] Customer-segregated accounts may include deposits from FCMs that are in “excess” of the customer 

funds in such accounts, because Commission Rule 1.23 provides that the prohibition in Section 4d of the 

Act against commingling customer funds and FCM funds shall not be construed to prevent an FCM 

from adding its own funds to insure against customer accounts becoming undermargined. The rule also 

allows FCMs to withdraw funds from customer-segregated accounts to the extent of their interest in such 

accounts, provided that: (1) the FCM's books and records accurately reflect its interest in customersegregated accounts; and (2) the withdrawals of funds by the FCM does not result in the funds of one 

customer being used to margin or carry the trades of another person. See 17 C.F.R. §1.23. 

[3] Although you requested that the Division respond to your letter by issuing an “interpretive” letter, the 

appropriate form of response in this instance is a “no-action” letter, as described in Commission Rule 

140.99. 

file:///H|/Desktop/04letters/tm04-26.htm (3 of 3) [5/6/2010 5:31:21 PM]