alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013032EN.01001502.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 — Electrabel v Commission

(Case T-332/09) (1)

1

(Competition - Concentrations - Decision imposing a fine for having put a concentration into effect - Obligation not to put the concentration into effect - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Error of assessment - Limitation period - Amount of the fine)

2013/C 32/21

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Electrabel (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Pittie and P. Honoré, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and V. Di Bucci, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 4416 final of 10 June 2009, imposing a fine for having implemented a concentration contrary to Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (COMP/M.4994 Electrabel — Compagnie Nationale du Rhône) and, in the alternative, the annulment of or the reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Electrabel to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Electrabel to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
Nicholas KUSALICH, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-9321.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
# C_2012355EN.01002202.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012 — Applied Microengineering v Commission

(Case T-387/09) (1)

1

(Fifth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration - Contracts concerning the projects ‘Formation of a New Design House for MST’ and ‘Assessment of a New Anodic Bonder’ - Recovery of part of the financial contribution paid - Enforceable decision - Decision amending the contested decision during the proceedings - Legal basis of the action - Nature of the pleas put forward - Legitimate expectations - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Principle of sound administration)

2012/C 355/46

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Applied Microengineering Ltd (Didcot, United Kingdom) (represented: initially by P. Walravens and J. De Wachter, and subsequently by P. Walravens and J. Blockx, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Petrova, acting as Agent, assisted by R. Van der Hout, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 5797 of 16 July 2009 relating to the recovery of the sum of EUR 258 560.61 plus interest payable by the applicant in the framework of the projects IST-199-11823 FOND MST (‘Formation of a New Design House for MST’) and IST-2000-28229 ANAB (‘Assessment of a New Anodic Bonder’).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Applied Microengineering Ltd, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Applied Microengineering Ltd, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---
Sean A. CLARK, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al.

No. 16-6495.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Wilson SERRANO-MERCADO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-237.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         244,924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,158,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,538,584
<PP&E>                                         135,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,636,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,895,013
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    687,500
<COMMON>                                     2,449,325
<OTHER-SE>                                   (231,207)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,636,114
<SALES>                                        389,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               389,618
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  384,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,649)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,649)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.004)
        

</TABLE>
II-O0800

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

RS Stoner <hillhaven@boreal.org>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 11:15 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

RS Stoner

PO Box 179

Grand Marais, MN 55604
Kenneth RIVERA, petitioner, v. Bryan STIRLING, et al.

No. 16-9360.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
II-00235

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

JAMES SULLIVAN <MIDKNIGHT6@LYCOS.COM>

Friday, December 3, 2010 12:45 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

JAMES SULLIVAN

5509 W HIGGINS AVE

Chicago, IL 60630
# C_2012080EN.01001602.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — skytron energy v OHIM (arraybox)

(Case T-321/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark arraybox - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 80/24

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: skytron energy GmbH & Co. KG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H.J. Omsels and C. Danziger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 June 2009 (Case R 1680/2008-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign arraybox as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders skytron energy GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders skytron energy GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
Leon R. KOZIOL, Individually and as Natural Parent of Child A and Child B, petitioner, v. Daniel KING, et al.

No. 16-512.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

*635Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2012151EN.01002703.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/27

---

Order of the General Court of 27 March 2012 — Connefroy and Others v Commission

(Case T-327/09) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 151/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Philippe Connefroy (Le Rozel, France); Jean-Guy Gueguen (Carantac, France); and EARL de Cavagnan (Grézet-Cavagnan, France) (represented by: C. Galvez, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2009/402/EC of 28 January 2009 on the ‘contingency plans’ in the fruit and vegetable sector implemented by France (OJ 2009 L 127, p. 11).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Philippe Connefroy and Jean-Guy Gueguen and EARL de Cavagnan are ordered to pay, in addition to their own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Philippe Connefroy and Jean-Guy Gueguen and EARL de Cavagnan are ordered to pay, in addition to their own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
II-00891

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

virginia Smith <ivmsmith@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:17 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

virginia Smith

9580 NW 25th Ct

Sunrise, FL 33322
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

-__ 

Hcmorsblo c. J. #Llde 

county .~udit~,r, luooer County 

Corpue Christi, Texas 

/ 

853 

Dear Sir; 

Tho ooeontlal 

thlr 

al80 llko your o 

83266, whioh rea 

Cea~ua, aad whioh 

re judiolal districts, 

tlon of tra3sorlpt 

by law, shall be Three ThouQo3hre per annuts to be paid 

or other court reporWW8.iere 

"The Crlnlnal District Court in thla County also covers 

Kloberg, Kenedy, nlllaoy a4 Cassron Counties, and any 

four of the oountfsa co;aprialng suoh Judiolal dlstrlot 

sect tho sggregte popul~tlon requlremmt and other roqulreuents enmerrted in auoh artlole. We should like 

to know wbotber this County rhauld not pay the reporter 

for this Court on the barle of +3,000.00 a8 provided in 

eufd .atlcle Z3Ebd. * * l " 
?horablo C. J. Wilde, page 2 856 

By Ac?tE o? 1925, 39th hgialature, page 244, chapter 79, paragraph 1, (Article 199, Sea. 28, Subdivisions 1 to 

8, lnoluelve, Vernon’6 Annotated Civil Statutes) the Legislature “continued as. established for the counties of Nuecee, 

Kleberg, Kenedy, Willaoy and Camron a orlminal district court,” 

whioh le the aam as referred to in your communication. It will 

be noted that five (5) oountiee compose the judioial district 

in whioh said oourt has jurisdiction. 

alone oompoae eald judloial district. 

Thus, said rive counties 

Article 23286, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, 

hereinabove quoted rrom your letter and therein rersrred to as 

Artlolo 23266, applied only to the salary of the orflcial shorthand roporter ln eaoh judiolal dirtriet eoaposed of four oapnties, with an aggregate oxoeae population aa therein eet forth, 

and which four oountiee *alone oonstitute one or more judioiel 

dlstricte~e (Kmphaeia ours) 

It 16 obvious, therefore, that tho provisions or said 

Artiolo 23266, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, have no applloation to the salary of the offlOlaI shorthand reporter ror 

the Criminal Distrlot Court for the countiee of Dueoes, KIeberg, 

Kenedy, Willaoy and Cameron. 

Art1010 2327a, Vernon’r Annotated Clvll Statutes, rlres 

the salary of the ortloial oourt reporter la eaOh judlolel district 

eompoeed of two or more oountlse at $2,700 per annum, “in addition 

to the oompensatlon for transcript fees end allowances for expenses 

as now provided by lag.” 

You are, thererore, advised that the salary of the 

orrlolal shorthand reporter for the Criminal District Court of 

ibsoee, Kleberg, Kenedy, Wlllaoy and Caneron Counties 1s rlxed 

and governed by the provlaione of’ Article 2327a, supra. 

Your8 very truly 

ATT{ IRNH Gii’ WAL OF TEXAS 

/A-- 

L. E. Blewellen 

Assi etant
Ishmael Avive SANTIAGO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-1417.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# C_2010100EN.01001001.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-330/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/43/EC - Company law - Statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2010/C 100/14

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and M. Adam, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt or notify, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC (OJ L 157, p. 87)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 26.9.2009.

1

---
II-01163

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Schmid <d_schmid@sbcglobal.net>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 10:41 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Schmid

7800 W. Vienna Ave.

Milwaukee, WI 53222
# C_2009256EN.01003703.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/37

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 1 September 2009 — United Kingdom v Commission

(Case T-107/09) (1)

1

2009/C 256/67

Language of the case: English

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation (BKFC) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Zapp, Chief Executive Officer and President of BKFC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of BKFC.



/s/    ROBERT W. ZAPPRobert W. Zapp Chief Executive Officer and President March 12, 2004