alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33956-33957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-255-025]


TransColorado Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

June 19, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 31, 2001, TransColorado Gas Transmission 
Company (TransColorado) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, Twenty-Fifth Revised Sheet No. 21 and 
Twenty-First Revised Sheet No. 22, with an effective date of June 1, 
2001.
    TransColorado states that the filing is being made in compliance 
with the Commission's letter order issued March 20, 1997, in Docket No. 
RP97-255-000.
    TransColorado states that the tendered tariff sheets revise its 
tariff to reflect one amended negotiated-rate contract with National 
Fuel Marketing Company, and two new negotiated-rate contracts with Red 
Cedar Gathering Company and El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. In addition, 
the tendered tariff sheets reflect the deletion of one expired 
contract.
    TransColorado stated that a copy of this filing has been served 
upon all parties to this proceeding, TransColorado's customers, the 
Colorado Public Utilities Commission and the New Mexico Public 
Utilities Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before June 26, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web

[[Page 33957]]

site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15952 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FOUNTAIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             171
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      180
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (11)
<INVENTORY>                                        412
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   808
<PP&E>                                             441
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (318)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,759
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,703)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,084
<SALES>                                            567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   567
<CGS>                                               82
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (830)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.35)


</TABLE>
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 19 November 2004         

amending the declaration by the European Community on the exercise of competence and voting rights submitted to the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean

(2004/815/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 37 thereof, in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of paragraph 3 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, (1)

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, (2)

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

1.   The European Community shall amend its single declaration of competence and voting rights submitted to the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean when acceding to this organisation, which shall be replaced by the declaration by the European Community on the exercise of competence and voting rights according to Article II(6) of the GFCM Agreement contained in the Annex hereto.

2.   The President of the Council is hereby authorised to notify the amended declaration by the European Community to the Director-General of the Food and Agriculture Organisation.

Done at Brussels, 19 November 2004.

For the Council

The President

J. P. H. DONNER            

----

(1)OJ C 15, 20.1.1999, p. 13.

(2)OJ C 150, 28.5.1999, p. 153.

(3)  Council Decision 98/416/EC of 16 June 1998 on the accession of the European Community to the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (OJ L 190, 4.7.1998, p. 34).

(4)OJ L 197, 3.8.2000, p. 35.

----

ANNEX

Single declaration by the European Community on the exercise of competence and voting rights according to Article II(6) of the GFCM Agreement

This declaration specifies the competence of the European Community and of its Member States in matters covered by the Agreement establishing the GFCM.

1.   European Community's exclusive competence

For agenda items dealing with conservation and management of living marine resources, the European Community has exclusive competence and voting rights.

2.   Member States' competence

For agenda items dealing with organisational matters (legal and procedural issues), the Member States of the European Community have competence and voting rights.

3.   Shared competence

This declaration replaces the preceding declaration as of 1 December 2004 and applies to all GFCM meetings unless a specific statement is made by the European Community in respect of any meeting or agenda item.

Should the scope of the competence shared between the European Community and its Member States change, this declaration will be supplemented or modified.

----
# C_2010051EN.01002806.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 20 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-184/09) (1)

1

2010/C 51/51

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
II-00457

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Marc Beschler <hfarmer@juno.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:10 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Marc Beschler

5 East 51st Street, #4A

New York, NY 10022
Sontay T. SMOTHERMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6290.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)**

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Summer Street Trust  (the "Trust") on Form N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of such officer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Dated:	 June 26, 2015

Dated:	June 26, 2015

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order filed, September 13, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00535

- CV

____________ CASPIAN OIL SERVICES , INC. AND JAMES W. REYNOLDS , Appellant

V.
SE MANAGEMENT, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th Distric t Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 16599



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 9, 2012 , 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On August 23, 2012, this court granted the court reporters request for extension of
time to f ile the record until September 10, 2012. To date, the record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record was not filed within the time prescribed in the first request, the court GRANTS your second request and issue s the following ord er.
We order Carmen Miller , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal on or before September 26, 2012

. No further extension will be entertainedabsent exceptional circumstances . The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible

for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If
Carmen Miller does not timely file the record as ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file
the record.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**INFINEX VENTURES, INC.**

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the **Infinex Ventures, Inc**. (the “Company”) on **Form 10-KSB** for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2005 and 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, **Michael De Rosa**Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Dated: February 27, 2006. |
|---------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Michael De Rosa

Michael De Rosa, Chief Executive Officer

Michael De Rosa, Chief Financial Officer
Charles LEWIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5156.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2011160EN.01000801.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 April 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu — Romania) — Ioan Tatu v Statul român prin Ministerul Finanțelor și Economiei, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu, Ministerul Mediului

(Case C-402/09) (1)

1

(Internal taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Pollution tax charged on first registration of motor vehicles - Neutrality of tax between imported second-hand motor vehicles and similar vehicles already on the domestic market)

2011/C 160/05

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ioan Tatu

Applicant:

Defendants: Statul român prin Ministerul Finanțelor și Economiei, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu, Ministerul Mediului

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunalul Sibiu — Registration of second-hand vehicles previously registered in other Member States — National legislation subjecting first registration of those vehicles to payment of an environment tax, whereas second-hand vehicles already on the national market are exempted from payment of that tax on a subsequent registration — Compatibility of the national legislation with Article 90 EC — Obstacle to the free movement of goods

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from introducing a pollution tax levied on motor vehicles on their first registration in that Member State if that tax is arranged in such a way that it discourages the placing in circulation in that Member State of second-hand vehicles purchased in other Member States without discouraging the purchase of second-hand vehicles of the same age and condition on the domestic market.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
II-00459

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Hessie Rubin <Mr.Popper@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:08 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Hessie Rubin

86 Maple Street

Plympton, MA 02367
Felix J. BRUETTE, Jr., petitioner, v. Sally JEWELL, Secretary of the Interior.

No. 16-5918.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Bryant MOORE, petitioner, v. LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al.

No. 15-1520.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 10.1

 

Per Section 6.1(a) of the Business Combination Agreement, dated as of 14 August 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among Marathon Group SA, a Luxembourg société anonyme, Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A., a Luxembourg société anonyme, Uniloc Corporation Pty. Limited, an Australian company limited by shares ACN 058 043 744 (“Uniloc Australia”), and Marathon Patent Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Marathon”), the undersigned agree to terminate the Agreement.

 

 

	
MARATHON GROUP SA
    	
UNILOC   LUXEMBOURG S.A.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Richard S.   Chernicoff
    	
Name:
    	
Craig   Etchegoyen
    
	
Title:
    	
Director
    	
Title:
    	
CEO
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
MARATHON PATENT GROUP, INC.
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Douglas B.   Croxall
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Chief   Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
UNILOC CORPORATION PTY LIMITED
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Craig   Etchegoyen
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Chairman
Rory A. McKELLIPS, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 16-396.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.
OXY USA INC., petitioner, v. David SCHELL, et al.

No. 16-107.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Domenic TRICOME, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 15-9546.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    This  schedule   contains  summary   financial   information
                    extracted   from  Greenland   Corporation   March  31,  1997
                    financial  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by
                    reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000852127
<NAME>                        Greenland Corporation

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         23,778
<SECURITIES>                                   152,893
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,636
<PP&E>                                         5,361,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                 354,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,042,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          650,343
<BONDS>                                        3,686,657
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       18,195
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,781,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,042,686
<SALES>                                        15,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,127
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  602,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             71,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (538,456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (538,456)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (538,456)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)
        


</TABLE>