alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000852220
<NAME> ALLSTATE FINANCIAL CORP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          599131
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 28294900
<ALLOWANCES>                                  10959981
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              17971550
<PP&E>                                          804243
<DEPRECIATION>                                  504163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                18271630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9321051
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         40000
<OTHER-SE>                                     3956579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  18271630
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2537179
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3018346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               8376057
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              710964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (9568188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4021849
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (13590037)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (13590037
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (5.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.85)


</TABLE>
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03- 08 -00 605 -CR NO. 03-08-00606- CR He at he rLe disk

y , A ppe lla nt v. The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOS. D-1-D C-08 -2024 65 & D-1 -DC -08-90 7240 , HONOR ABLE WILFORD FLOWER S , JUDGE PRESI DING M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant He ather

L edisky has filed a

pro s e m o t i o n to withdraw he r notices of a pp e a l, e xpla ini ng that sh e do e s n ot w ish to p ur su e he r a

pp e a ls. We gra

nt t he mot ion

and dis mis s bo th a pp e a ls.

________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Pember

ton Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: De cembe r 19, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
II-00288

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ron Schmidt <ronstreehouse@earthlink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:42 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ron Schmidt

515 John Muir Dr., A501

San Francisco, CA 94132
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-54938, No. 333-43090, No.333-90725, No. 333-54936) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan, 1999 Stock Option Plan, 1999 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, PaylinX Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan, and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CyberSource Corporation of ourreport dated January 16, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of CyberSource Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

Palo Alto, California 

March 10, 2004
II-01129

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Isabeau Premont-Schwarz <isabeau.premont. schwarz@gmail, com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:04 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Isabeau Premont-Schwarz

281 iver st

cambridge, MA 2139
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1380-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana, (FEMA-1380-DR), dated June 11, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 14, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of June 11, 2001:

Beauregard, Iberia, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. James, St. John the Baptist, St. Mary, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa, and Washington Parishes for Individual and Public Assistance. 

East Feliciana for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-15810 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 10.7


 


		TO:	The Purchasers of xG Technology, Inc., 6% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures and Warrants



 


To Whom It May Concern:


 


This letter will confirm
my agreement to vote all shares of xG Technology, Inc. (“XGTI”) voting stock over which I have voting control
in favor of any resolution presented to the shareholders of XGTI to approve the issuance, in the aggregate, of more than 19.999%
of the number of shares of common stock of XGTI outstanding on the date of closing pursuant to that certain Securities Purchase
Agreement, dated May 29, 2018, by and between XGTI and each purchaser signatory thereto (the “Purchase Agreement”)
and the other agreements entered into in connection therewith or as otherwise may be required by the applicable rules and regulations
of the Nasdaq Stock Market (or any successor entity). This agreement is given in consideration of, and as a condition to enter
into such Securities Purchase Agreement and is not revocable by me.


 


	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name of Shareholder:
	 	 	Percentage Beneficial Ownership:
Saul Garcia CUEVAS, petitioner, v. James D. HARTLEY, Warden.

No. 17-6107.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0566

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JASON DEAN KELLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 25, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 21 2022

10/21/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0566
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

____________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 22, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 125250(66) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 125250 

v COA: 242050 

Oakland CC: 2001-177534-FC 

NICHOLAS JAMES JACKSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for leave to 

file a post-argument reply brief is considered and it is GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 22, 2005 

Clerk
Clinton BURNS, III, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6161.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2011305EN.01000601.xml

| 15.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/6

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2011 — Meredith v OHIM (BETTER HOMES AND GARDENS)

(Case T-524/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark BETTER HOMES AND GARDENS - Absolute ground for refusal - Partial refusal by the examiner to register the mark - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 305/06

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Meredith Corp. (Des Moines, United States of America) (represented by: R. Furneaux and E. Hardcastle, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2009 (Case R 517/2009-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign BETTER HOMES AND GARDENS as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Meredith Corp. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Meredith Corp. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---
UNITED STATES, ex rel. James BROOKS, petitioner, v. Jeffrey ORMSBY, et al.

No. 17-893.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2011347EN.01000301.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-302/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State Aid - Aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia - Reductions in social security contributions - Withdrawal)

2011/C 347/03

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent and G. Aiello, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take, within the period prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with Articles 2, 5 and 6 of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (notified under document number C(1999) 4268) (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that by failing to take, within the prescribed time-limits, all the measures necessary to recover from the beneficiaries the aid granted under the aid scheme considered unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 and, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 5 and 6 of that decision and under the EC Treaty the Italian Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of the decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that by failing to take, within the prescribed time-limits, all the measures necessary to recover from the beneficiaries the aid granted under the aid scheme considered unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 and, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 5 and 6 of that decision and under the EC Treaty the Italian Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of the decision;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

1

---
Michael M. CHOY, petitioner, v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC.

No. 15-9493.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Jill M. ALBAN, et al., petitioners, v. NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA, et al.

No. 16-1415.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 14.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.:

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13970) of CEMEX, S.A.B. deC.V., (ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333 83962) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., (iii) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-86090) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., and (iv) the Registration Statementon Form S-8 (File No.333-128657) of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. of our reports dated April 24, 2015, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof December 31, 2014, which reports appear in the December 31, 2014 Annual Report on Form 20-F of CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. 

KPMG CardenasDosal, S.C. 

/s/ Luis Gabriel Ortiz Esqueda 

Monterrey,N.L., México 

April 24, 2015
II-O0210

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

David Van Grinsven <griz86@sbcglobal.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 5:17 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

David Van Grinsven

1906 E. Lourdes Dr.

Appleton, WI 54915-3622
Minyard Cass DAVIS, petitioner, v. Bob McCABE, Interim Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, et al.

No. 16-6351.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Michael Wayne BOHANNAN, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-6005.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
II-Ol200

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Ed Plnson <edpinson@mac.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 4:31 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Ed PInson

442 W. Palm Av.

Monrovia, CA 91016
Sonny ALLEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6819.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

*678Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.