alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# AGENCY:

Department of Education. 

# ACTION:

Correction notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        On June 8, 2001, a 60-day notice inviting comment from the public was inadvertently published for the Applications for Grants under the Smaller Learning Communities Program in the                         **Federal Register**                         (66 FR 111) dated June 8, 2001. The Department will provide a public comment period once the Notice of Proposed Priority (NPP) is published. This will allow for sufficient time for the public to comment not only on the NPP but also on the information collection activity.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Axt at her internet address Kathy.Axt@ed.gov. 

Dated: June 19, 2001. 

John Tressler, 

Leader, Regulatory Information Management, Office of the Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-15803 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000-01-U
# FCM Data November 2013

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF November 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002013FROM REPORTS FILED BY January 2,&KFF0000 &K0000002014	&P of &N
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 July 2010 – Commission v Austria**

**(Case C‐189/09)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2006/24/EC – Respect for private life – Retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of electronic communications services – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Disregard of the obligations imposed by a directive – Defences – Challenge to
the lawfulness of the directive – Inadmissibility – Limits – Non-existent measure (Art. 226 EC, 227 EC, 230 EC and 232 EC)
(see paras 15-16)*

2.                     *Member States – Obligations – Implementation of directives – Failure to fulfil obligations – National system pleaded as justification
– Not permissible (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 18)*

3.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration
– Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC; European Parliament and Council Directive
2006/24) (see paras 19-22)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt or communicate, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC (OJ 2006 L 105, p. 54). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
Order filed, September 13, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00535-CV

____________

CASPIAN OIL SERVICES, INC. AND JAMES W. REYNOLDS, Appellant

V.

SE MANAGEMENT, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-16599

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 9, 2012, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. On August 23, 2012, this court granted the court reporters request for extension of 

time to file the record until September 10, 2012. To date, the record has not been filed 

with the court. Because the reporter’s record was not filed within the time prescribed in 

the first request, the court GRANTS your second request and issues the following order.

We order Carmen Miller, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal on or before September 26, 2012. No further extension will be entertained 
absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible 

for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If 

Carmen Miller does not timely file the record as ordered, the Court may issue an order 

directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file 

the record.

PER CURIAM
# C_2011055EN.01001301.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/13

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien — Austria) — Humanplasma GmbH v Republik Österreich

(Case C-421/09) (1)

1

(Articles 28 EC and 30 EC - National rules prohibiting the importation of blood products provided from donations which were not entirely unpaid)

2011/C 55/22

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Humanplasma GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Republik Österreich

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien — Interpretation of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — Compatibility with those provisions of national legislation prohibiting the importation of human blood where payment was made for the blood donation

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 28 EC, read in conjunction with Article 30 EC, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides that the importation of blood or blood components from another Member State is permitted only on the condition, which is also applicable to national products, that the donations of blood on which those products are based were made not only without any payment being made to the donors but also without any reimbursement of the costs incurred by them in connection with those donations.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
II-00554

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Henry Holt <henryh@lvha.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:59 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Henry Holt

1301 Idylberry Rd.

San Rafael, CA 94903
# C_2009180EN.01003301.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/33

---

Action brought on 26 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-186/09)

2009/C 180/55

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. van Beek, P. Van den Wyngaert, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claim that the Court should:

The applicant claim that the Court should:

| — | Declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/113/EC (1) of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, or in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/113/EC (1) of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, or in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive;

1

| — | order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the Directive had to be transposed expired on 21 December 2007.

---

(1)  OJ L 373, p. 37.

1

---
Richard G. FRIES, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16M67.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Exhibit 32.1
 
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 27,
2008 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-K.
 /s/ Eric J. FossEric J. FossChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 20, 2009
Order entered October 12, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-22-01051-CV

IN RE TOMMY RAY KING, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F12-55339-R

ORDER Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus.

/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS
JUSTICE
Anthony JOHNSON, petitioner, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 16-6341.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Carbiz Inc. - Exhibit 4.4






AMENDMENT TO THE DEBENTURE AGREEMENT

This amendment to the Debenture Agreement is made as of the _____day
  of October, 2005.

BETWEEN:


  
    
      
        CARBIZ INC., a corporation existing under the
          laws of the Province of Ontario (the “Corporation”)

      

    

  



AND:


  
    
      
        ______________________________, an individual residing
          in the State of Florida, United States of America (the “Holder”)

      

    

  



                    WHEREAS,
the Holder and Carbiz have entered into a Debenture Agreement (the “Original
Debenture”) dated October 6, 2004;

                    AND
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Original Debenture, the Maturity Date
upon which the Principal Amount of the Debenture is to be repaid, if the common
shares of Carbiz have not been listed and posted for trading on the United
States Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, is October 6, 2005; 

                    AND
WHEREAS, as it is unlikely that the common shares of Carbiz will be listed
and posted for trading on the United States Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board
prior to the Maturity Date, Carbiz and the Holder have agreed to extend the
Maturity Date for a further six month period;

                    NOW
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto, the parties
hereto agree as follows:

1.                
All capitalized terms herein shall have the meanings assigned in the Original
Debenture unless otherwise stated;

2.                
  Section 3.2 of the Original Debenture shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced
  with the following:

“Maturity. In the
  event that the Indebtedness has not been converted into Units as set out in
  Section 2.1 on or prior to the date that is one year and six months from the
  date hereof (the “Maturity Date”), then the Indebtedness and all accrued
  and unpaid interest shall be paid in cash on the Maturity Date and the Corporation’s
  obligations hereunder shall expire."

3.                
Except as set out herein, the Original Debenture shall otherwise remain
unamended and in full force and effect.




- 2 -

4.                
Each party shall do all such further acts and execute and deliver all such
further deeds and documents as may be reasonably required in order to give full
effect to the intent expressed in this Agreement.

5.                
This Agreement and any document required to be signed by any or all of the
parties to this Agreement may be so executed in counterpart and a complete set
of counterpart execution pages shall be provided to each party and delivery of
such counterparts may be effected by means of telecopier.

	CARBIZ INC. 	 	Name: 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Per: 	  	 	Per:
# C_2010288EN.01003801.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — Micro Shaping v OHIM (packaging)

(Case T-64/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark packaging - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2010/C 288/72)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Micro Shaping Ltd (Goring-by-Sea, Worthing, West Sussex, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 December 2008 (Case R 1063/2008-1), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign packaging as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Micro Shaping Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Micro Shaping Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.

---
Frank Monaco BAZZO, petitioner, v. Debbie ASUNCION, Acting Warden.

No. 15-9322.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO NOCELOTL,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 15-73784

Agency No. A073-869-637

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2016** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. 

Armando Nocelotl, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion for a

FILED

DEC 20 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
continuance and review de novo constitutional claims. Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey,

526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008). We review for abuse of discretion the

decision to deem an application abandoned. Taggar v. Holder, 736 F.3d 886, 889

(9th Cir. 2013). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion or violate due process in denying a

continuance to seek post-conviction relief for failure to show good cause, where

Nocelotl provided no evidence that he had begun to seek post-conviction relief. 

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (no abuse of discretion

in denying a motion for a continuance where the relief sought was not immediately

available to petitioner); Singh v. Holder, 638 F.3d 1264, 1274 (9th Cir. 2011)

(“[T]he IJ [is] not required to grant a continuance based on . . . speculations.”);

Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (to prevail on a due process

challenge, an alien must show error and prejudice).

The agency did not abuse its discretion in determining that Nocelotl

abandoned his application for relief, where he did not file the application with the

immigration court by the deadline the IJ imposed. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.31

(applications in removal proceedings must be filed with the immigration court, and

if an application “is not filed within the time set by the [IJ], the opportunity to file

2 15-73784
that application . . . shall be deemed waived”); Taggar, 736 F.3d at 889 (petitioner

abandoned application where she did not file it by the IJ’s deadline).

The record does not support Nocelotl’s contention that there was ambiguity

concerning the filing deadline or that the agency misstated evidence. 

Contrary to Nocelotl’s contention, the agency provided sufficient reasoning

for its determinations. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir.

2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 15-73784
GLOBALTRANZ ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Alla Josephine ROSENFIELD.

No. 15-1431.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
BNSF RAILWAY CO., petitioner, v. Kelli TYRRELL, Special Administrator for the Estate of Brent T. TYRRELL, Deceased, et al.

No. 16-405.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 13, 2017.

Motion of National Association of Manufacturers for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of The Association of American Railroads for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of Washington Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana granted.
Ricky Earl WHITE, petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 16-6870.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000851105
<NAME> BANKNORTH GROUP, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          84,726
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             101
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    542,861
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          31,977
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            31,985
<LOANS>                                      1,899,495
<ALLOWANCE>                                     23,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,648,660
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,078,316
<SHORT-TERM>                                   316,912
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,979
<LONG-TERM>                                     23,679
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,827
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,648,660
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 41,832
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,036
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   114
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                50,982
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,384
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,434
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           28,548
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  18
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 22,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,443
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,443
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.90
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                     16,439
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,310
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   427
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                23,520
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,757
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,125
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               23,638
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            23,638
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>