alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00374

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Thomas Keenan <grssrts09@imaxmail.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:34 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Thomas Keenan

1415 E. McFarland Ave.

Coeur d’ Alene, ID 83814-4876
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1741 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 247
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1741

                          [Report No. 111-664]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 101) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2011, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 30, 2010

    Mr. Polis, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 101) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2011, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 101) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2011, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the joint 
resolution are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 
XXI. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of 
order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion 
to recommit.
                                                 House Calendar No. 247

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1741

                          [Report No. 111-664]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 101) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2011, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 30, 2010

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
No. 686, Misc.

#### In re Felsch.

Treating the application in this case as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ -of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction.

U, S. Constitution, Article HI, § 2, Clause 2; see *Ex parte Betz*and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); *Milch*v. *954
      *United States,*332 U. S. 789 (1947); *Brandt*v. *United States,*333 U. S. 836 (1948); *In re Eichel;*333 U. S. 865 (1948); *Everett*v. *Truman,*334 U. S. 824 (1948).

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy,- and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that argument should be heard on the motion for léave to file the petition in order to settle what remedy, if any, the petitioner has.

Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Exhibit j(2)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the
Prospectuses and Statements of Additional Information in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 79 to the Registration Statement on Form
N-1A of Fidelity Investment Trust: Fidelity Canada Fund, Fidelity
Emerging Markets Fund, Fidelity Europe Fund, Fidelity France Fund,
Fidelity Germany Fund, Fidelity Global Balanced Fund, Fidelity Hong
Kong & China Fund, Fidelity International Growth & Income Fund,
Fidelity International Value Fund, Fidelity Japan Fund, Fidelity Japan
Smaller Companies Fund (formerly Fidelity Japan Small Companies Fund),
Fidelity Latin America Fund, Fidelity Nordic Fund, Fidelity Overseas
Fund, Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund, Fidelity Southeast Asia Fund, and
Fidelity United Kingdom Fund of our reports dated December 15, 1999 on
the financial statements and financial highlights included in the
October 31, 1999 Annual Reports to Shareholders of the aforementioned
funds.

We further consent to the references to our Firm under the headings
"Financial Highlights" in the Prospectuses and "Auditor" in the
Statements of Additional Information.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
December 21, 1999
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Adolor Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce A. Peacock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|/s/ BRUCE A. PEACOCK   
|Bruce A. Peacock       
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 4, 2004
Exhibit 10.4
 2010 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
THERMADYNE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
 AMENDED AND RESTATED  2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 (
 :
    Terms of Plan to Control
  Grant of Option
 7.71
  Page 1 of 9




---



##### 



Exercisability
    Method of Exercise
  Termination of Employment
 Termination for Cause; Voluntary Resignation Without Consent
 Termination Without Cause
 Page 2 of 9




---



##### 



Termination by Death; Death following Termination Without Cause
   a.
    
    an act or omission by the Optionee that causes material harm to
the Company or a Subsidiary Corporation of which the Optionee is notified in
writing by the Company and the Optionee has not corrected within ten (10) days
of such notification;b.
    
    any continued neglect of, or failure to perform, duties by the
Optionee of which the Optionee is notified in writing by the Company and the
Optionee has not corrected within ten (10) days of such notification;
 Page 3 of 9




---



##### 



c.
    
    the Optionees performing services for any other corporation or
person which competes with the Company or a Subsidiary Corporation while he or
she is employed by the Company or a Subsidiary Corporation and without the
written approval of the chief executive officer of the Company; ord.
    
    any conviction of the Optionee or plea of guilty (or nolo
contendere) by the Optionee to a felonious crime;
  Section 6.
    
    Securities Law Restrictions and Other Restrictions on Transfer of Shares of Company
Common Stock Purchased Pursuant to this Agreement
  Restrictive Legend
   Page 4 of 9




---



##### 



Non-Assignability
  Withholding Taxes
  Requirement of Notification on Section 83(b) Election
  Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization
  Reorganization
  Page 5 of 9




---



##### 



Right of Discharge Reserved
  No Rights as a Stockholder
  Nature of Payments
   Committee Determinations
  Page 6 of 9




---



##### 



Section Headings
  Notices
  Successors and Assigns
  Other Payments or Awards
  Governing Law and Venue
  Severability
  Page 7 of 9




---



##### 



Entire Agreement; Modification
  Authority to Receive Payments
  Counterparts
   THERMADYNE HOLDINGS
CORPORATION
    
    GRANTEEBy:
    
    
    
    By:Nick H. Varsam
    
    Grantees Name:General Counsel & Secretary
    
    Date of Signature:Grantees Address:
 Page 8 of 9




---



##### 



2010 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
THERMADYNE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION
         Date of this Designation
    
    Signature of Participant
  Page 9 of 9
ped_ex108.htm


Exhibit 10.8


 



FIRST AMENDMENT TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made as of this 12th day of May, 2016 by PEDEVCO Corp. (“Grantor”) in favor of BAM Administrative Services LLC, in its capacity as agent for the Investors under the Purchase Agreement (as defined below) (in such capacities, and together with its successors, transferees and assigns, the “Secured Party”). 


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, Grantor entered into that certain Patent Security Agreement dated March 7, 2014 (the “Original Security Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the undersigned desire to amend the Original Security Agreement as set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in the Original Security Agreement, the undersigned, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:


 


1. Amendment to Recitals.  The first “Whereas” clause of the Original Security Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“WHEREAS, Grantor is party to that certain Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement dated May 12, 2016 (as amended, amended and restated, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Purchase Agreement”) by and between Grantor, the investors party thereto (collectively, the “Investors” and each, individually, an “Investor”) and Secured Party, as agent for the Investors, pursuant to which the Investors agreed to extend loans to Grantor in the original principal amount of up to $85,000,000 (the ”Loans”), repayment of which is evidenced by certain Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Notes or Senior Secured Promissory Notes, each dated May 12, 2016, issued to each Investor (the “Notes”), and”


 


2. Integration of Amendment and Original Security Agreement.  From and after the effective date of this Amendment, the Original Security Agreement and this Amendment shall be read as one Security Agreement.  Except as set forth in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Original Security Agreement are not being modified or amended, and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3. Duplicate Originals; Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in any number of duplicate originals and each duplicate original shall be deemed to be an original.  This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which counterparts shall be deemed an original instrument and all of which together shall constitute a single Amendment.


 


[remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]


 


 


 


 


 


 




  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this First Amendment to Patent Security Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 



	  	
PEDEVCO Corp.


 


 


By:      /s/ Michael L. Peterson


Title:   President


 


	
Acknowledged and agreed to:


 


BAM Administrative Services LLC, as Agent


 


By:        /s/ Dhruv Narain


Name:   Dhruv Narain                                                           


Title:    Authorized Signatory
Donald Ray STEVENS, petitioner, v. Martin BITER, Warden.

No. 16-6472.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2011063EN.01000902.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Collège d'autorisation et de contrôle du Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (Belgium)) — in proceedings concerning RTL Belgium SA, formerly TViSA

(Case C-517/09) (1)

1

(Directive 89/552/EEC - Television broadcasting services - Licensing and Control Authority of the Broadcasting Authority - Court or tribunal of a Member State for the purposes of Article 267 TFEU - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2011/C 63/17

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Collège d'autorisation et de contrôle du Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (Belgium)

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

RTL Belgium SA, formerly TViSA

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Collège d’autorisation et de contrôle du Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel (Belgium) — Interpretation of Article 1(c) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 1989 L 298, p. 23) — Freedom to provide services — Television broadcasting services — Concept of ‘supplier’ of audiovisual services and of ‘effective control both over the selection of the programmes and over their organisation’ — Concept of national court or tribunal for the purposes of Article 267 TFEU

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Collège d’autorisation et de contrôle du Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel in its decision of 3 December 2009.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15537]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 960531152-6152-01; I.D. 042996B]
RIN 0648-A118


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule 
consolidating regulations for fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone 
off Alaska that was published in the Federal Register on June 19, 1996.

DATES: Effective June 20, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patsy A. Bearden, 907-586-7008.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A final rule was published in the Federal 
Register on 61 FR 31227 (June 19, 1996), to consolidate six parts (671, 
672, 673, 675, 676, and 677) in title 50 of the CFR into one new part 
(50 CFR part 679). A new prohibition to Sec. 679.7 was created by 
combining the prohibitions from the formerly separate six parts. 
Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) fisheries prohibitions were placed into 
Sec. 679.7 (f).
    An error was made in citing the cross reference within one 
paragraph placed in the new part. The former prohibition Sec. 676.16 
(d) referred the reader to an exception at Sec.  676.17. Section 676.17 
(a), entitled ``vessel clearance,'' described vessel landing procedures 
and became Sec.  679.5(l)(3) entitled ``vessel clearance.'' Section 
676.17(b), entitled ``Ten Percent Adjustment Policy,'' described a 
requirement to harvest within the allocated IFQ permit amount. This 
second paragraph became Sec. 679.40 (d). The former prohibition 
Sec. 676.16 (d) became Sec. 679.7 (f)(4).
    The error occurs because the cross reference at Sec. 679.7 (f)(4) 
incorrectly refers the reader to an exception at Sec. 679.5 (l)(3); the 
correct cite is Sec. 679.40 (d).

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679

    Alaska, Fisheries, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.

    Accordingly, 50 CFR part 679 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendments:

PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA

    1. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., 1801 et seq., and 1631 et seq.


Sec. 679.7  [Corrected]

    2. In Sec. 679.7 (f)(4), remove ``Except as provided in Sec.  679.5 
(l)(3)'' and add in its place, ``Except as provided in Sec. 679.40 
(d)''.

    Dated: June 14, 2001.
William T. Hogarth,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 01-15537 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Christopher Stephen MARTIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6916.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
H. Res. 183 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 26, 2009. 

Whereas the people of New York have experienced a terrible 

tragedy with the loss of 50 lives in the crash of Continental Connection Flight 3407 in Clarence Center, New 

York, on February 12, 2009; 

Whereas many of the victims of the crash were residents of 

New York, particularly of the close-knit Western New 

York community; and 

Whereas Federal, State, and local officials have cooperated to 

respond to the emergency, investigate the accident, and 

provide assistance to families devastated by the loss of 

loved ones: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) expresses condolences to the families, friends, 

and loved ones of the victims of the crash of Continental 

Connection Flight 3407; 

(2) honors those who lost their lives, including 

David Borner, Linda Davidson, Ronald Davidson, Alison 

Des Forges, Beverly Eckert, John J. Fiore, Ronald Gonzalez, Brad S. Green, Sr., Zhaofang Guo, Kevin Johnston, Ellyce Kausner, Goerges Karm, Nicole 
2 

•HRES 183 EH 

Korczykowski, Jerome Krasuski, Brian Kuklewicz, Beth 

Kushner, Madeline Loftus, Lorin Maurer, Donald 

McDonald, Coleman Mellett, Dawn Monachino, Jennifer 

Neill, Gerry Niewood, Johnathan Perry, Mary E. Pettys, 

Donna Prisco, Matilda Quintero, Marvin Renslow, Julie 

M. Ries, John G. Roberts III, Kristin Safran, Rebecca 

Shaw, Ms. Jean Marie Srnecz, Darren Tolsma, Susan 

Wehle, Ernest W. West, Douglas Wielinski, Shibin Yao, 

Clay Yarber, and Joseph Zuffoletto, as well as 10 others; 

(3) expresses sympathies to the people of Clarence 

Center, the entire State of New York, and the Nation 

who grieve for the victims; 

(4) commends the heroic actions of the first responders, emergency services personnel, and air traffic 

controllers; and 

(5) commends the hundreds of volunteers who 

worked together to respond to the tragedy with tremendous courage. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-60428, 333-79357,333-79369, 333-79375, 333-79365, 333-80647, 333-69622, 333-73302, 333-100786, 333-117894,333-128992, 333-128993) on Form S-8 of our reports datedFebruary 27, 2007, relating to (1) the 2006 and 2005 financialstatements and the retrospective adjustments to the 2004 financialstatement disclosures of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. andsubsidiaries, (2) the financial statement schedule for 2006 and 2005of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. and subsidiaries, and (3)management’s report on the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of December 30, 2006, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. andsubsidiaries for the year ended December 30, 2006 (which reportsexpress unqualified opinions and whichreport on the 2006 and 2005 financial statements includes explanatory paragraphsreferring to the Company’s adoptionof Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),“Share-Based Payment,” and No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other PostretirementPlans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106,and 132(R),”  related to the requirement to recognize thefunded status of a benefit plan)./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPNew York, New York
II-00648

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mha Atma S Khalsa <earthactionnetwork@earthlink.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:55 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler:

As a concerned American citizen I strongly urge you to NOT let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine

important terms like "commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with

transparency and business conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk.

Accepting the ABA argument would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mha Atma S Khalsa

1536 S. Crest Dr.

Los Angeles, CA 90035-3314