alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jill MEYER, petitioner, v. David J. SHULKIN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 17-898.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2010221EN.01001401.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 June 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-478/09) (1)

1

(Merger or division of public limited liability companies - Requirement of an independent expert’s report - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

2010/C 221/22

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. La Pergola and M. Karanasou Apostolopoulou, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: N. Dafniou and V. Karra, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take within the prescribed period the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2007/63/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 amending Council Directives 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC as regards the requirement of an independent expert’s report on the occasion of merger or division of public limited liability companies.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/63/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 amending Council Directives 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC as regards the requirement of an independent expert’s report on the occasion of merger or division of public limited liability companies or in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2007/63/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 amending Council Directives 78/855/EEC and 82/891/EEC as regards the requirement of an independent expert’s report on the occasion of merger or division of public limited liability companies or in any event by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM RIVIANA FOODS INC.'S FORM 10K FOR FISCAL 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                         5,605
<SECURITIES>                                   3,366
<RECEIVABLES>                                 42,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,386
<INVENTORY>                                   46,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             105,596
<PP&E>                                       121,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                44,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               200,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         52,674
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      15,883
<OTHER-SE>                                   114,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 200,204
<SALES>                                      462,761
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             462,761
<CGS>                                        328,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                101,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,813
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (1,039)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               35,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                  10,592
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           24,255
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  24,255
<EPS-BASIC>                                   1.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.60


</TABLE>
**Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 May 2010 – Commission v Spain**

**(Case C‐158/09)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Non-civilian personnel in public authorities – Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC; European Parliament and Council Directive
2003/88) (see paras 7-10)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Article 1(3) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9) and Article 18(a) of Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 1993 L 307, p. 18) maintained by Article 27(1) of Directive 2003/88, in conjunction with Annex I, Part B, of the same directive – Non-civilian personnel in public authorities. |

**Operative part:**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, in respect of non-civilian personnel in public authorities, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 1(3) of that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
Order filed, July 22, 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00231

- CR

____________ JORDAN MARQUI GRANT , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No 13

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2054134



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due May 10, 2016

. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.1. On May 10, 2016 , the court reporter filed a motion for extension of time to file the record which was granted until June 09, 2016

. On June 09, 2016 , the court reporter filed a second motion for extension of time to file the record which was granted until July 08, 2016 with the notation that no further extension will be granted absent exceptional circumstances. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court.Because t he reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following

order.

We order Deanne Bridwell , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
# C_2009180EN.01002503.xml

| 1.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/25

---

Action brought on 7 May 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-157/09)

2009/C 180/44

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and W. Roels, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by approving and maintaining in force Article 6(1) of the Law of 3 April 1999 on the statutory regulation of the notary profession, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty establishing the European Community, in particular Articles 43 EC and 45 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by approving and maintaining in force Article 6(1) of the Law of 3 April 1999 on the statutory regulation of the notary profession, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty establishing the European Community, in particular Articles 43 EC and 45 EC;

| — | order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission objects, first, to the fact that the nationality requirement for access to, and practice of, the profession of notary represents a disproportionate impediment to the freedom of establishment of notaries who are nationals of another Member State that is enshrined in Article 43 EC. Although Article 45 EC provides for an exemption from the rules concerning the freedom of establishment, it does so only in respect of activities which are directly and specifically connected with the exercise of official authority. The Commission takes the view that the duties carried out by notaries under Netherlands law represent the exercise of official authority to only a very limited extent, and therefore that factor cannot serve to justify the impediment in the light of settled case-law relating to Article 45 EC.

Second, the Commission submits that the nationality requirement is in any event inappropriate, in the light of Article 43 EC, for safeguarding a certain level of professional qualification that will ensure that consumers are protected. There is in fact another method — one that is far less of a hindrance to free movement — of guaranteeing the high level of qualification required for the work of a notary: the possibility of the host Member State demanding one of the compensatory measures provided for in Article 4 of Regulation 89/48/EEC. (1)

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration (OJ 1989 L 19, p. 16).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF THE REGISTRANT AT NOVEMBER 30, 1995 AND FEBRUARY
28, 1995 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1995 AND 1994 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1995.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                       2,880,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,552,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,605,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,613,000
<PP&E>                                       5,569,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,221,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,337,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           39,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,221,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            53,345,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,848,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             271,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,381,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   552,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            829,000
<DISCONTINUED>                               (165,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   664,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation; Grant to National 
Center for Appropriate Technology

AGENCY: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, ACF, DHHS.

ACTION: Award announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a noncompetitive grant award is 
being made to National Center for Appropriate Technology to develop a 
series of brief, research-based papers on the impact of energy 
restructuring programs. As a Congressional setaside, this one-year 
project is being funded noncompetitively. National Center for 
Appropriate Technology has considerable experience in studying problems 
and issues relating to the provision of energy to low-income 
households. The cost of this one-year project is $175,000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: K.A. Jagannathan, Administration for 
Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 
L'Enfant Promenade, SW, Washington, DC 20447, Phone: 202-205-4829.

    Dated: June 20, 2001.
Howard Rolston,
Director, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 01-16028 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
Clarence LEE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6914.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2009220EN.01002003.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 1 July 2009 — État Belge v Nathalie De Fruytier

(Case C-237/09)

2009/C 220/39

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: État Belge

Applicant:

Defendant: Nathalie De Fruytier

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the activity of transporting, in a self-employed capacity, human organs and samples for hospitals and laboratories constitute the supply of human organs, blood and milk, which is exempt from value added tax under Article 13(A)(1)(d) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment? (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ L 145, p. 1.

1

---
II-00678

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lucien Pan Morningstar <lpm_star@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:37 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Lucien Pan Morningstar

70 Waltham

Manitou Springs, CO 80829
##### 



Exhibit 13.1
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Companys periodic report on form 20-F for the period ended June 30,
2007 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Managing
Director
    
    
    
    
    
    Chief Financial Officer/s/ Christopher Naughton
    
    
    
    
    
    /s/ David SeatonChristopher Naughton
    
    
    
    
    
    David SeatonDate: December 14, 2007

    
    
    
    
    
    Date: December 14, 2007
 159
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

The Board of Directors

Adolor Corporation: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-51222, No. 333-62428 andNo. 333-100585) on Form S-8 and registration statement (No. 333-64298) on Form S-3 of Adolor Corporation of our report dated February 14, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Adolor Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31,2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and for the period from August 9,1993 (inception) to December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, Annual Report on Form 10-K of Adolor Corporation. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 17, 2003
Armin Calbo VELASCO, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-5937.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of K & F Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dirkson R. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 OF The Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ DIRKSON R. CHARLES
-----------------------
Dirkson R. Charles
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MOORE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC.,

CHARLES “CHIP” STRADER, AND

XMEX TRANSPORTS, L.L.C.,

 Appellants,

v.

LORENA MUNOZ, IND. AND ON

BEHALF OF THE EST. OF

LORENZO MUNOZ, AND AS N/F OF

C.M., A MINOR CHILD, 

LESLIE MUNOZ, VIRGINIA MUNOZ,

JESSICA LOPEZ, AS N/F OF A.F. 

AND J.L., MINOR CHILDREN AND 

HEIRS TO THE EST. OF 

ROGER FRANCEWARE, DEC., AND 

ROSA FRANCEWARE, IND.,

 Appellees. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00254-CV

Appeal from

168th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2010-4169)

J U D G M E N T

This Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes that there was error in 

the judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and render that Appellees take 

nothing against Appellants. We further order that the Appellants recover from Appellees all costs, 

for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2017.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, J., (Senior Judge)

(Larsen, J., Senior Judge, sitting by assignment)
II-00418

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Joseph Shulman <jhshulmanl @cox.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:30 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Joseph Shnlman

6249 Romo Street

San Diego, CA 92115
Terry EDWARDS, applicant, v. Bryan COLLIER, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.

No. 16A750.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 26, 2017.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied.