alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-00996

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Dennis Ledden <lcs5779@sbcglobal.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:18 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Dennis Ledden

14941 Trinidad Drive

Rancho Murieta, CA 95683
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE & TIME:

Thursday, June 21, 2001, at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

The following item has been added to the agenda:

Final Draft of the Fourth National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) Report to the Congress

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Ron Harris, Press Officer Telephone (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-15484  Filed 6-5-01; 12:18 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
3844
Kennett Pike


Suite
204-4, Mall Building, Powder Mill Square


Greenville,
Delaware 19807


Phone:
(302) 656-1708


 


TO:
Edgar S. Woolard


 


Dear
Mr. Woolard:


 


Reference
is made to our promissory note payable to you in the principal amount of $200,000 with a Funding Date of January 14, 2016 (the
“Note”).


 


The
Note is modified by the addition of the following two paragraphs (shown below in bold) to be inserted at the end of the Note.


 


If
the DSIT Closing Date shall not have occurred by September 1, 2016, this Note and all interest accrued thereunder shall be payable
on September 1, 2016. 


 


The
obligation to pay the principal of and any interest accrued on this Note shall be parri passu with the indebtedness of Acorn under
the Loan and Security Agreement with Leap Tide Capital Partners III, LLC. 


The
Note as originally executed and delivered to you remains in full force and effect, as modified pursuant hereto. .


 


	 	Very
    truly yours,
	 	 
	 	Jan
    H Loeb
	 	President
    and CEO
Micky Ray CAGE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 15-9556.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Robert G. LUSTYIK, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7158.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Ronald FRANK, petitioner, v. Michael CLARKE, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion, et al.

No. 17-7113.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      15,071,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  969,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,040,569
<PP&E>                                       1,300,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                (74,088)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,267,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,215
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,504
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,173,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,267,393
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               503,817
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,234,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,730,431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,730,431)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,730,431)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2010024EN.01001802.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/18

---

Order of the Court of 20 November 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris — France) — Olivier Martinez, Robert Martinez v Société MGN LIMITED

(Case C-278/09) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - National Court not eligible to refer questions to the Court of Justice for preliminary ruling for the purposes of Article 68(1) EC - Court’s lack of jurisdiction)

2010/C 24/30

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de grande instance de Paris

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Olivier Martinez, Robert Martinez

Applicant:

Defendant: Société MGN LIMITED

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de grande instance de Paris — Interpretation of Articles 2 and 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 12 of 16.1.2001, p. 1) — Competent jurisdiction for the resolution of an action for infringement of privacy and the right of personal portrayal, following the placing online of information and photographs on an internet site disseminated from a server housed in the territory of a Member State other than that in which the plaintiff is domiciled — Determination of the place where the event which gave rise to the damage occurred — Relevance, in order to determine the place, of the number of connections to the internet page at issue effected from the Member State in which the plaintiff is domiciled, the nationality of the plaintiff and, where appropriate, the language in which the information was disseminated

Operative part

Operative part

The Court of Justice of the European Communities has no jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris in Case C 278/09.

---

(1)  JO C 220 of 12.09.2009

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Henry P. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
-------------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
February 19, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 34142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Federal Invention Available for Licensing and Intent To 
Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability and intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the thickspike wheatgrass variety 
designated ``Bannock'' is available for licensing and that the 
Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to 
grant to the University of Idaho of Moscow, Idaho, an exclusive license 
to this variety.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 25, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4-1158, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5257.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's intellectual 
property rights to this invention are assigned to the United States of 
America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. The 
prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply 
with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The 
prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within ninety (90) 
days from the date of this published Notice, Agricultural Research 
Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that 
the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Michael D. Ruff,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 01-16132 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
Lynn M. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. BAE SYSTEMS, INC., et al.

No. 16-6843.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until January 30, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-9913, styled State of Texas v. Eloy Lopez in the 187th

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Raymond Angelini presiding. 

2... Attorney George Preece was appointed on September 3, 2009 to represent relator in the criminal

proceeding pending in the trial court. 

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00699-CR

IN RE Eloy LOPEZ, Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 11, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 29, 2009, relator Eloy Lopez, Jr. filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking

to compel the trial court to rule on his pro se motion to set aside the indictment. 

However, counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending

in the trial court for which he is currently confined.2 A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid

representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v.

State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on a pro
04-09-00699-CR

-2-

se motion filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by

counsel. See Robinson, 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion

by declining to rule on relator’s pro se motion that relates directly to his confinement based on the

criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus

is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Bobby L. MAGWOOD, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-6797.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

*676Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1





                           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-09505) pertaining to the Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 
1990 Stock Option Plan and the Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 1995 
Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated October 31, 
1997, with respect to the financial statements of Nicollet Process 
Engineering, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB/A) for the year
ended August 31, 1997.

                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 22, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 20, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Speer Bancshares, Inc., Speer, Illinois; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of State 
Bank of Speer, Speer, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 21, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-16013 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Deborah RINGGOLD, petitioner, v. JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL, et al.

No. 16-9310.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3675 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3675

To require a review of Department of Homeland Security trusted traveler 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2019

   Mr. Katko (for himself, Mr. Correa, Mrs. Watson Coleman, and Ms. 
   Slotkin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require a review of Department of Homeland Security trusted traveler 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trusted Traveler Reconsideration and 
Restoration Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW.

    Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a 
review of Department of Homeland Security trusted traveler programs. 
Such review shall examine the following:
            (1) The extent to which the Department of Homeland Security 
        tracks data and monitors trends related to trusted traveler 
        programs, including root causes for identity-matching errors 
        resulting in an individual's enrollment in a trusted traveler 
        program being reinstated.
            (2) Whether the Department coordinates with the heads of 
        other relevant Federal, State, local, Tribal, or territorial 
        entities regarding redress procedures for disqualifying 
        offenses not covered by the Department's own redress processes 
        but which offenses impact an individual's enrollment in a 
        trusted traveler program.
            (3) How the Department may improve individuals' access to 
        reconsideration procedures regarding a disqualifying offense 
        for enrollment in a trusted traveler program that requires the 
        involvement of any other Federal, State, local, Tribal, or 
        territorial entity.
            (4) The extent to which travelers are informed about 
        reconsideration procedures regarding enrollment in a trusted 
        traveler program.

SEC. 3. ENROLLMENT REDRESS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Homeland Security shall, with respect to an individual whose enrollment 
in a trusted traveler program was revoked in error extend by an amount 
of time equal to the period of revocation the period of active 
enrollment in such a program upon re-enrollment in such a program by 
such an individual.
                                 <all>
```
II-00519

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Karen Hedwig Backman <madmaker 13 @msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 3:44 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Karen Hedwig Backman

31010 18th Ave S Ap5 4

Federal Way, WA 98003