alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009113EN.01003902.xml

| 16.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/39

---

Action brought on 11 March 2009 — von Oppeln-Bronikowski and von Oppeln-Bronikowski v OHIM — Pomodoro Clothing (promodoro)

(Case T-103/09)

2009/C 113/79

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Anna Elisabeth Richarda von Oppeln-Bronikowski and Baron Zebulon Baptiste von Oppeln-Bronikowski (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: V. Knies, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pomodoro Clothing Company Ltd. (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 January 2009 in case R 325/2008-1 |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 January 2009 in case R 325/2008-1

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘promodoro’, for goods and services in classes 25, 28 and 35 — application No 3 587 557

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: United Kingdom trade mark registration of the word mark ‘POMODORO’ for goods in class 25

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially rejected the application

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Rule 22 of Commission Regulation No 2868/95 (1) as the Board of Appeal wrongly took into account proof of use submitted out of time by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal; Infringement of Article 43(2) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal failed to conclude that the evidence submitted by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal within the required time limit did not constitute sufficient proof of use of the trade mark cited in the opposition proceedings; Infringement of Article 8(2) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly held that there was a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks in question.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1995 L 303, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Robert Klein, President and Chief Executive Officer of Golden Spirit Mining
Ltd., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 20, 2005

/s/ Robert Klein
-------------------
Robert Klein
President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2009129EN.01002101.xml

| 6.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/21

---

Action brought on 13 March 2009 — Cerafogli v ECB

(Case F-23/09)

2009/C 129/35

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Maria Concetta Cerafogli (Fankfurt, Germany) (represented by: L. Lévi, M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision of the Board of Directors of the Bank appointing, on a temporary basis, an adviser to the Oversight Division and of vacancy notice ECB/074/08, as well as all decisions adopted on the basis of that vacancy notice. In addition, an application to order the defendant to pay compensation for the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of Board of Directors of 17 July 2008 appointing Mr L. on a temporary basis to the position of adviser in the Oversight Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of Board of Directors of 17 July 2008 appointing Mr L. on a temporary basis to the position of adviser in the Oversight Division;

| — | annul vacancy notice ECB/074/08; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul vacancy notice ECB/074/08;

| — | consequently, (i) annul all decisions taken on the basis of the vacancy notice, including the decision to appoint Mr L to the position of adviser in the Oversight Division taken following the recruitment procedure, and (ii) order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 10 000, fixed ex aequo et bono, as compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant as well as EUR 2 500 to compensate for the material damage connected to the intervention of the applicant’s advisers at the pre-litigation stage; |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, (i) annul all decisions taken on the basis of the vacancy notice, including the decision to appoint Mr L to the position of adviser in the Oversight Division taken following the recruitment procedure, and (ii) order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 10 000, fixed ex aequo et bono, as compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant as well as EUR 2 500 to compensate for the material damage connected to the intervention of the applicant’s advisers at the pre-litigation stage;

| — | on the assumption that giving effect to a judgment annulling the decision or decisions would be very difficult, order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 45 600; |
| --- | --- |

—

on the assumption that giving effect to a judgment annulling the decision or decisions would be very difficult, order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 45 600;

| — | order the European Central Bank to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Central Bank to pay the costs.

---
Terry EDWARDS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-7710 (16A752).

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 26, 2017.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Kai Walter WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-9301.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District denied.
# C_2014015EN.01002002.xml

| 18.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/20

---

Order of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — France v Commission

(Case T-485/09) (1)

1

2014/C 15/31

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Riviana Foods Inc. (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
A. Hafner, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



Date: September 12, 2003                       By: /s/ Joseph A. Hafner, Jr.
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Joseph A. Hafner, Jr.
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the  Annual Report of Golden Spirit Enterprises Ltd.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),



I,Carlton Parfitt, Director  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this amended certification as of the 30th day of March 2007.



/s/Carlton Parfitt

------------------------

Carlton Parfitt

Director
Karl POPOVSKI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7229.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# C_2012138EN.01003903.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/39

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 February 2012 — Wagner-Leclercq v Council

(Case F-24/09) (1)

(2012/C 138/93)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009, p. 47.

---
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Jason Eric FISHER.

No. D-2905.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                        |                                                        |                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                        | **Inform                Worldwide Holdings, Inc**           |
|                                                   |                                                   |                             |
| Date:                 December                13, 2005 | By:                                               | /s/                Ashvin Mascarenhas |
|                                                        | Ashvin                Mascarenhas,                          |
|                                                        | Title President                Chief Financial Officer |
# C_2009256EN.01002801.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/28

---

Action brought on 29 July 2009 — Gühring OHG v OHIM (combination of the colours ochre yellow and silver grey)

(Case T-300/09)

2009/C 256/52

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gühring OHG (Albstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30. April 2009 in Case R 1329/2008-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30. April 2009 in Case R 1329/2008-1;

| — | Annul the decision of the defendant’s Examination Division dated 22 July 2008, in which it refused registration of the applicant’s mark Nr. 6 703 565; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the defendant’s Examination Division dated 22 July 2008, in which it refused registration of the applicant’s mark Nr. 6 703 565;

| — | Declare, that the trade mark applied for No. 6 703 565 complies with the conditions laid down in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1);
  in the alternative, |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare, that the trade mark applied for No. 6 703 565 complies with the conditions laid down in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1);

1

in the alternative,

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30. April 2009 in Case R 1329/2008-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30. April 2009 in Case R 1329/2008-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: a mark made up of the combination of the colours of ochre yellow and silver grey for goods in Class 7 (registration application No. 6 703 565)

Community trade mark concerned

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejection of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 because the trade mark applied for has a distinctive character. In addition, infringement of procedural law, in particular of Articles 75 and 76 (1) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

1

---
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Office of External Affairs 

Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 

 202.418.5080 

ALLEGATIONS OF MANIPULATIVE CONDUCT 

(SUCCESSFUL MANIPULATION HIGHLIGHTED) 

Chart with CFTC Press Release 5521-08, CFTC v. Optiver US, LLC, et al.

The following chart shows the dates and energy futures contracts defendants are 

alleged to have attempted to manipulate or succeeded in manipulating and the price 

change in dollars during the five-minute closing range allegedly affected by the 

misconduct. 

ALLEGATIONS OF MANIPULATIVE CONDUCT 

(SUCCESSFUL MANIPULATION HIGHLIGHTED)

DATE 

FUTURES CONTRACT

INTENDED DIRECTION OF 

PRICE CHANGE/ ACTUAL 

PRICE CHANGE (US$)

March 2 New York Harbor Gasoline Lower, -.0264 

New York Harbor Gasoline Higher 

March 6 

Light Sweet Crude Oil Higher 

March 8 New York Harbor Gasoline Lower 

New York Harbor Gasoline Higher 

March 9 

New York Harbor Heating Oil Lower 

New York Harbor Heating Oil Higher 

March 13 

New York Harbor Gasoline Higher 

Light Sweet Crude Oil Lower 

March 14 

New York Harbor Gasoline Lower 
CFTC CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 2 OF 2 

New York Harbor Gasoline Lower 

March 15 

Light Sweet Crude Oil Lower 

New York Harbor Gasoline Higher, +.0309 

March 16 

Light Sweet Crude Oil Higher, +.79 

New York Harbor Gasoline Lower 

March 19 Light Sweet Crude Oil Lower, -.49 

New York Harbor Heating Oil Lower 

March 20 New York Harbor Heating Oil Lower, -.0186 

March 21 New York Harbor Gasoline Higher 

Source: CFTC, July 24, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Wednesday, June 27, 2001.

# Place:

Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

Open.

# Matters to be Considered:

The Commission will consider and act upon the following:

1. Secretary of Labor on behalf of McGill v. U.S. Steel Mining, Docket No. SE 2000-39-DM (Issues include whether the judge erred in finding that the operator established an affirmative defense to the miner's prima facie case of discrimination).

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Wednesday, June 27, 2001.

# Place:

Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

Open.

# Matters to be Considered:

The Commission will consider and act upon the following:

1. Proposed Settlement Judge Rule (Notice of proposed rulemaking was published at 64 Fed. Reg. 61236 (Nov. 10, 1999)).

Any person attending an open meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and § 2706.160(d).

# Contact Person for More Info:

Jean Ellen, (202) 653-5629/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 01-16099  Filed 6-22-01; 11:50 am]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-54104) of DeCrane Holdings Co. of our reports
dated March 9, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of DeCrane Holdings Co. for the four month
period ended December 31, 1998 and the years ended December 31, 1999 and
2000, and of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc. (predecessor) for the eight
months ended August 31, 1998, which appear in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 30, 2001
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3639 

To direct the Secretary of State to establish a standard parental leave policy 

applicable to Department of State employees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2019 

Ms. HOULAHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of State to establish a standard 

parental leave policy applicable to Department of State 

employees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Standardizing State 

5 Department Parental Leave Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STANDARDIZING DEPARTMENT PARENTAL LEAVE 

7 POLICIES. 

8 (a) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3639 IH

1 (1) afford every employee at the Department of 

2 State equal access to leave and workplace flexibilities 

3 for childbirth, adoption, and foster care; 

4 (2) encourage the Department to work towards 

5 a parental leave policy that will help recruit and re6 tain a dynamic, multi-talented, and diverse work7 force capable of meeting the national security and 

8 foreign policy goals of the United States; and 

9 (3) determine the impacts of flexible leave poli10 cies on recruitment and retention rates. 

11 (b) ESTABLISHING STANDARD PARENTAL LEAVE

12 POLICIES.— 

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days 

14 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec15 retary of State shall establish and implement a 

16 standard parental leave policy applicable to Depart17 ment of State employees across all bureaus and of18 fices within the Department and Missions abroad. 

19 Nothing in this section shall be construed to provide 

20 any new category of leave not otherwise provided by 

21 law. 

22 (2) REPORTS.—Not later than 180 days after 

23 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

24 shall submit to the appropriate congressional com25 mittees a report describing— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3639 IH

1 (A) the steps taken to implement the pol2 icy required under paragraph (1) across all bu3 reaus and offices within the Department and 

4 Missions abroad; and 

5 (B) any costs associated with such policy. 

6 (3) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT7 TEES.—For purposes of paragraph (2), the term 

8 ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

9 (A) the Committee on Foreign Relations of 

10 the Senate; 

11 (B) the Committee on Appropriations of 

12 the Senate; 

13 (C) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of 

14 the House of Representatives; and 

15 (D) the Committee on Appropriations of 

16 the House of Representatives. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Suran WIJE, petitioner, v. Ann STUART, et al.

No. 17-6206.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.