alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          57,866
<SECURITIES>                                    40,872
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,208
<INVENTORY>                                     69,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259,108
<PP&E>                                          60,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,850
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           219
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,816
<SALES>                                         58,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,365
<CGS>                                           27,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,777<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,306
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,078
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,228
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,228
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES SG&A AS SG&A IS PART OF 5-03(b)(4)
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 15 November 2004         

appointing four Italian members and three Italian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

(2004/783/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Italian government,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following shall be appointed to the Committee of the Regions

for the remainder of their terms of office, which end on 25 January 2006.

Done at Brussels, 15 November 2004.

For the Council

The President

M. VAN DER HOEVEN            

----

(1)OJ L 24, 26.1.2002, p. 38.

----
II-00634

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Alice Artzt <Guitartzt@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:04 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Alice Artzt

51 Hawthorne Ave.

Princeton, NJ 8540
Arturo ZUAREZ-MALDONADO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6578.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
Pierce Carson, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.

|Date: February 12, 2010 | By:
      /s/ W. Pierce Carson                        
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                        | W.
      Pierce Carson,                               
|                        | Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Director and
|                        | Principal
      Accounting Officer                    

---
GREAT STUFF INC., et al., petitioners, v. Andrew Cody COTTER.

No. 16-468.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3624 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require the disclosure 

of the total number of domestic and foreign employees of certain public 

companies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 5, 2019 

Mrs. AXNE (for herself and Mr. MCNERNEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require 

the disclosure of the total number of domestic and foreign employees of certain public companies, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Outsourcing Account5 ability Act of 2019’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3624 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRED DISCLOSURE OF NUMBER OF DOMESTIC 

2 AND FOREIGN EMPLOYEES. 

3 Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

4 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(s) DISCLOSURE OF NUMBER OF DOMESTIC AND

7 FOREIGN EMPLOYEES.— 

8 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term 

9 ‘covered subsidiary’ means, with respect to an issuer, 

10 any subsidiary of the issuer that is— 

11 ‘‘(A) a consolidated subsidiary; or 

12 ‘‘(B) a subsidiary with respect to which the 

13 issuer accounts for the investment of the issuer 

14 by using the equity method of accounting. 

15 ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—Except as provided in 

16 paragraph (3), beginning in the first full fiscal year 

17 that begins after the date of enactment of this sub18 section, each issuer that is required to file a report 

19 with the Commission under subsection (a) shall dis20 close annually to the Commission and to share21 holders of the issuer— 

22 ‘‘(A) the total number of employees of the 

23 issuer and covered subsidiaries with respect to 

24 the issuer who are domiciled in the United 

25 States, listed by number in each State; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3624 IH

1 ‘‘(B) the total number of employees of the 

2 issuer who physically work in and are domiciled 

3 in any country other than the United States, 

4 listed by number in each country; 

5 ‘‘(C) the total number of employees of cov6 ered subsidiaries with respect to the issuer who 

7 physically work in and are domiciled in any 

8 country other than the United States, listed by 

9 the number of employees at each such covered 

10 subsidiary in each such country; and 

11 ‘‘(D) as compared with the previous re12 porting year, the percentage amount by which 

13 the numbers described in subparagraphs (A), 

14 (B), and (C) increased or decreased with re15 spect to the applicable number. 

16 ‘‘(3) EXEMPTION FOR EMERGING GROWTH COM17 PANIES.—An emerging growth company shall not be 

18 subject to paragraph (2). 

19 ‘‘(4) RULES.—The Commission may promul20 gate such rules as the Commission considers nec21 essary to implement the requirement under para22 graph (2).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation (BKFC) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin J.
Gerrety, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of BKFC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
BKFC.



/s/ Martin J. GerretyMartin J. GerretyTreasurer and Assistant SecretaryMarch 12, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Proceedings Clerk
12:39 pm, May 05, 2016
SHUNLIAN HOU
v. : CFTC Docket No. 13-R012
KEM H. CHONG

ORDER OF SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE

Our review of the record and appellate submissions establishes that the Judgment Officer
committed no error material to the outcome of the proceedings in his Order Granting Summary
Disposition. The order properly dismissed the complaint on grounds of res judicata based on a
previous National Futures Association arbitration award dealing with the same subject matter,
consistent with our decision in Plank v. Chesapeake Investment Services, Inc., [2005-2007
Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) { 30,087 (CFTC May 31, 2005). Accordingly,
pursuant to Section 14 of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 12.406(b),
we summarily affirm the Order Granting Summary Disposition without opinion.!

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By the Commission (Chairman MASSAD and Commissioners BOWEN, and GIANCARLO).

Pursuant to Commission Regulation 12.406(b), 17 C.F.R. § 406(b), neither the initial decision nor the
Commission's order of summary affirmance shall serve as a Commission precedent in other proceedings.

? Under sections 6(c) and 14(e) of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 9 and 18(e), a party may appeal a
reparation order of the Commission to the United States Court of Appeals for only the circuit in which a hearing was
held; if no hearing was held, the appeal may be filed in any circuit in which the appellee is located. The
Commission has ruled that telephonic hearings are “held” in Washington, D.C., although parties may speak from
several different locations. Dubois v, Alaron, (2000-2002 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) {[ 28,406 at
51,027 n.17 (CFTC Oct. 26, 2000). The statute also states that such an appeal must be filed within 15 days after
notice of the order and that any appeal is not effective unless, within 30 days of the date of the Commission order,
the appealing party files with the court a bond equal to double the amount of any reparation award.


Christopher W Kirkpatrick

Secretary of the Commission
Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Dated: May 5, 2016
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 20

- 00216

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.F. , J.J.L., and J.A.R., Children

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- PA

- 02310

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellants in re lation to this appeal because appellants qualify as indigent under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.

SIGNED November 25, 2020.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 5) (2001-3)] 

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board. 

# ACTION:

Approval of rail cost adjustment factor. 

# SUMMARY:

The Board has approved the third quarter 2001 rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads. The third quarter 2001 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.079. The third quarter 2001 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.585. The third quarter 2001 RCAF-5 is 0.562. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

July 1, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

H. Jeff Warren, (202) 565-1533. Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Additional information is contained in the Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, call, or pick up in person from: DA· TO· DA OFFICE SOLUTIONS, Suite 405, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001, telephone (202) 293-7776. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS: 1-800-877-8339.] 

This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or energy conservation. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Decided: June 19, 2001.

By the Board, Chairman Morgan, Vice Chairman Clyburn, and Commissioner Burkes. 

Vernon A. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15890 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Order filed, January 09, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 01115

- CV

____________ HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT , Appellant

V.
PERX, AS NEXT FRIEND OF WRRX, A MINOR , Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd Dis trict Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 34695



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due December 13, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cynthia Martinez Montalvo , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this or der

. PER CURIAM
1196.

#### Jackson *v.*The State.

Accusation of cheating and swindling, from city court of Fitzgerald — Judge Jay. April 18, 1908.

Submitted June 9,

Decided June 18, 1908.

Russell, J.

1. The solicitor of a city court may amend an accusation in that court at any time before the defendant therein has pleaded to the merits, provided the affidavit of the prosecutor will legally support the accusation as amended, unless such amendment is forbidden by the act creating the court. *Goldsmith*v. *State,*2 *Ga. App.*283 (58 S. E. 486). The act creating the city court of Fitzgerald (Acts of 1905, p. 222) not forbidding the amendment of accusations, the court did not err in allowing the accusation in the present case to be amended by alleging that the defendant was a laborer, instead óf a farm laborer, although the affidavit averred the defendant to be a farm laborer.

2. On the trial of an accusation charging the violation of the labor-contract law of 1903 (Acts of 1903, p. 90), evidence that R. & Brother furnished certain goods to the defendant will not, without more, suppox't an allegation that the defendant procured from D. & Company valuable merchandise and supplies.

3. A conviction ixpon an accusation alleging that the defendant was a laborer can not be supported by evidence which cleax'ly discloses that the contract between the parties was one of- a .different nature. An agreement whereby certain turpentine boxes are placed by the owner under the control of another, who agi'ees to chip and dip the same upoxx a counter-agreement of the owner to pay him $2.75 per barrel for all the turpentine yielded by said boxes, is not a contract of hire, but one ixx the nature of a rental.

4. From what has been said, consideration of the other assignments of error Is unnecessary. *Judgment reversed.*

*462*Eason & Bull,*for plaintiff in error.

*O. H. Elkins, solicitor,*contra.
Exhibit 32.2   Certification of CEO
      and CFOPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant
      toSection 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K ofGolden Spirit Enterprises, Ltd.for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jaclyn Cruz, as the
equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:  (1)   The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  /s/Jaclyn CruzName: Jaclyn CruzDate: April 15,
2009  This
certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Case 1:12-cv-06014-KBF Document 28 Filed 10/19/12 Page 1 of 3 

Dan M. Berkovitz 


General Counsel 


Jonathan L. Marcus 

Deputy General Counsel 

Robert B. Wasserman 

USDCSDNY 

DOCUMENT 

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

DOC#:,______________ 

DATEFIL 

Chief Counsel, Division of Clearing and Risk 

Martin B. White 

Assistant General Counsel 

Robert A. Schwartz 

Assistant General Counsel 

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Plaza 

lIS5 21 st Street N. W. 

Washington, DC 20581 

(202) 418-5000 

rschwartz@cftc.gov 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, et ai., 

Plaintiffs, 

Case No. I: 12-cv-060 14-KBF 

v. 

JAMES W. GIDDENS, Trustee for the SIPA 

Liquidation of MF Global, Inc., 

Defendant. 

NOTICE OF UNOPPOSED MOTION TO INTERVENE 

TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK: 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the accompanying Memorandum ofLaw ofthe 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission in Support of Its Unopposed Motion to Intervene, the 

Case 1:12-cv-06014-KBF Document 30 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:12-cv-06014-KBF Document 28 Filed 10/19/12 Page 2 of 3 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission hereby respectfully moves, pursuant to Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) and (b)(2), to intervene in the above-captioned matter. The 

original parties to this action have indicated that they do not oppose the relief requested herein. 

Respectfully submitted, 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

By: 	 lsI Robert A. Schwartz 

Dan M. Berkovitz, General Counsel 

Jonathan L. Marcus, Deputy General Counsel 

Robert B. Wasserman, 

Chief Counsel, Division of Clearing and Risk 

Martin B. White, Assistant General Counsel 

Robert A. Schwartz, Assistant General Counsel 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Plaza 

1155 21st Street N.W. 

Washington, DC 20581 

(202) 418-5000 

jmarcus@cftc.gov 

rwasserman@cftc.gov 

mwhite@cftc.gov 

rschwartz@cftc.gov 

Dated: October 19,2012 

2 


Case 1:12-cv-06014-KBF Document 30 Filed 10/22/12 Page 2 of 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

CODY EDWARD DAVIS , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3262

[ February 1, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jack S. Cox , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CF

- 001230

- AXXX

- MB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

G ERBER , C.J., T AYLOR and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Latwon JAMES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7024.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Chiquita NEWELL, petitioner, v. ALDEN VILLAGE HEALTH FACILITY FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS.

No. 16-5890.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 23, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# FCM Data January 2015

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF January 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002015FROM REPORTS FILED BY March 3,&KFF0000 &K0000002015	&P of &N