alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1727 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1727

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 7, 2010.
Whereas the mission of Rotary International is to provide service to others, 
        promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace 
        through its fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders;
Whereas Rotary International, founded in 1905, in Chicago, Illinois, is the 
        world's first service club and one of the largest nonprofit service 
        organizations;
Whereas there are more than 1,200,000 Rotary International club members 
        comprised of professional, community, and business leaders in more than 
        34,000 clubs in over 200 countries and geographical areas;
Whereas the Rotary International motto, ``Service Above Self'', inspires members 
        to provide humanitarian service, meet high ethical standards, and 
        promote international goodwill and peace;
Whereas Rotary International promotes international understanding through 
        scholarships, exchange programs, humanitarian grants, and service 
        projects;
Whereas annual dues from members worldwide help finance Rotary programs and 
        service opportunities that are designed to help Rotarians meet the needs 
        of their own communities and assist people worldwide;
Whereas the core values of Rotary International are service, fellowship, 
        diversity, integrity, and leadership; and
Whereas the Four-Way Test of Rotary International promotes universal values and 
        asks the following questions, ``Of the things we think, say or do: Is it 
        the truth?; Is it fair to all concerned?; Will it build goodwill and 
        better friendships?; and Will it be beneficial to all concerned?'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes Rotary International 
for 105 years of service to the world and commends members on their dedication 
to the mission and principles of their organization.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

(Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation



In connection with the Annual Report of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Matthew K. Rose, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas N. Hund, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: February 16, 2006



|                                                |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Matthew K. Rose                             |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas N. Hund                                  
|Matthew K. Rose                                 |  |  |  | Thomas N. Hund                                      
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and will be retained by Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II-00672

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Peter Barnhart <jpbarn@msn.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:41 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Peter Barnhart

46 Thompson St.

Brunswick, ME 04011
# C_2010051EN.01002805.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 30 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-183/09) (1)

1

2010/C 51/50

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I,Debra A. Goodling, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fulton BancsharesCorporation.

2.Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport.

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

(c)disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: November 14, 2005 | By:                             | /s/Debra A. Goodling |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------|----------------------|
|                    | Debra A. Goodling ,             |
|                    | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
II-00426

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lillian Deslandes <lildeslandes@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:08 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Lillian Deslandes

6800 SW 40th Street

Miami, FL 33155
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                   AMENDMENT

This Amendment shall be effective as of April 1, 2001 and amends that certain
Monitoring Receivable Financing Agreement (the "Financing Agreement") by and
among SAI Funding Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Funding"), McGinn,
Smith Acceptance Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Agent"), and Security
Associates International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as Collection Agent
("SAI", and, in its capacity as collection agent, the "Collection Agent") dated
January 16, 2001.

1.   The definition of "Minimum Monthly Revenue" contained in Section 1.01 of
     the Financing Agreement is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced
     with the following:

     "Minimum Monthly Revenue" means the amounts listed below during the
     stated time periods:

     April 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002              $1,700,000
     April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2002               $1,725,000
     July 1, 2002 through September 30, 2002           $1,750,000
     October 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002         $1,775,000
     January 1, 2003 and thereafter                    $1,800,000

2.   Section 5.01 (m) of the Financing Agreement is hereby amended by adding
     the following at the end thereof:

     Funding shall, on the first Business Day of each month, make a request
     under Section 2.02(b) of the Purchase Agreement to purchase all of the
     Receivables originated by the Sellers during such month and shall purchase
     all such Receivables under the Purchase Agreement by no later than the last
     Business Day on such month.

3.   Except as amended hereby, the remaining provisions of the Financing
     Agreement remain in full force and effect.


<PAGE>
FUNDING:                               SAI FUNDING CORPORATION


                                       By:
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Title:
                                                 ---------------------


COLLECTION AGENT:                      SECURITY ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                       By:
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Title:
                                                 ---------------------


AGENT:                                 MCGINN, SMITH ACCEPTANCE CORP.


                                       By: /s/ JUDITH M. MCGINN
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Title: Chairman
                                                 ---------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               9,185
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                           785
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                 120
<DEPRECIATION>                                          58
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      14,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                             13,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                12
<OTHER-SE>                                          (3,257)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        14,143
<SALES>                                                217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       217
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     364
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (6,840)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        931
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (5,909)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (1.000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.000)
        


</TABLE>
Jeremy WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Randy WHITE, Warden, et al.

No. 16-6554.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: LOUIS ROMOFF 

CITATION: 31 Agric. Dec. 381 

DOCKET NUMBER: 166 

DATE: MARCH 8, 1972 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STAY ORDER AND DENIAL OF PETITION TO RECONSIDER ORDER 

(No. 14,455) 

In re LOUIS ROMOFF. CEA Docket No. 166. Decided March 8, 1972. 

Reconsideration denied -- Finality of decision -- Effective date of denial of 

trading privileges stayed until March 27, 1972

As the matters set forth in respondent's petition for reconsideration were 

fully considered when the final decision and order were issued (31 Agric. Dec. 

158 (31 A.D. 158)), the petition is denied. Respondent's request for 

reconsideration by the Secretary or other official of the Department cannot be 

granted where the final authority to decide this matter has been delegated to 

the Judicial Officer (36 F.R. 3210). 

Decision by Donald A. Campbell, Judicial Officer

STAY ORDER AND DENIAL OF PETITION TO RECONSIDER ORDER

On March 7, 1972, the respondent filed a Petition to Reconsider the Decision 

and Order entered in this case on February 11, 1972. The Decision and Order was 

preceded by a Tentative Decision and Order, and exceptions were filed to the 

Tentative Decision and Order. The matters set forth in the present petition 

were fully considered when the final Decision and Order was issued. 

Accordingly, the Petition to Reconsider is denied. 

The respondent requests reconsideration by the Secretary of Agriculture or 

some other official of the Department, but final authority to decide this matter 

has been delegated to the Judicial Officer who issued the final decision and 

order (36 F.R. 3210). 

The respondent also requests that the effective date of the order be stayed 

until 10 days after a decision has been rendered on the Petition to Reconsider. 

This is denied as to the cease and desist provisions of the order, which shall 

remain in effect, but the period of the denial of trading privileges to the 

respondent as set forth in the order shall become effective on March 27, 1972. 

The respondent "reserves the right to hereafter petition for a further stay 

of said Order if and at such time as Respondent files a Petition for Review of 

the Order with the Court of Appeals * * * ." A further stay of the denial of 

trading privileges will be issued in the event of such an appeal to the Court of 

Appeals. 

 

LOAD-DATE: June 9, 2008 
Page 2
## QuickLinks

## 

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-09505 and No. 333-83679) pertaining to the
Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan and the Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 1995 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated October 18, 1999, with
respect to the financial statements of Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended August 31, 1999.



Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 10, 1999



## QuickLinks

Consent of Independent Auditors
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection
with the Annual Report of American Church Mortgage Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Dated:	March 31,
    2017 | By:/s/ Scott J. Marquis              
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                          | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                          | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joselito VILLAMIL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-50300.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 11, 2010.

Asha Muldro Olivas, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jonathan D. Libby, Esquire, Deputy Federal Public Defender, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Joselito Villamil appeals from specified conditions of supervised release imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). We have *633jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Villamil contends that one of his supervised release conditions must be vacated or modified to the extent that it delegates to the probation officer the ultimate decision of whether he must undergo inpatient mental health or sex offender treatment, and may require him to undergo penile plethysmographic (“PPG”) testing. This contention lacks merit because the condition does not contemplate either inpatient treatment or PPG testing. Therefore it is not ripe. Moreover, there is no authority requiring district courts to include language eliminating all potential forms of treatment not contemplated at the time of sentencing. *Cf. United States v. Esparza,*552 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.2009); *United States v. Weber,*451 F.3d 552, 568-69 (9th Cir.2006).

Villamil also contends that supervised release conditions which define computer and computer-related devices to include PDAs, cellular telephones, and electronic games, are impermissibly overbroad. This contention lacks merit. *See United States v. Goddard,*537 F.3d 1087, 1090 (9th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.