alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010037EN.01002002.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany), lodged on 1 December 2009 — Viamex Agrar Handels GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-485/09)

2010/C 37/22

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Viamex Agrar Handels GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does point 48(5) of Chapter VII of the Annex to Council Directive 91/628/EEC of 19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during transport and amending Directives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEC, (1) in the version of Council Directive 95/29/EC of 29 June 1995 amending Directive 91/628/EEC on the protection of animals during transport, (2) apply to rail transport? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does point 48(5) of Chapter VII of the Annex to Council Directive 91/628/EEC of 19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during transport and amending Directives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEC, (1) in the version of Council Directive 95/29/EC of 29 June 1995 amending Directive 91/628/EEC on the protection of animals during transport, (2) apply to rail transport?

1

2

| 2. | In situations in which the breach of Directive 91/628/EEC has not resulted in the death of the animals, are courts generally under an obligation to examine whether the competent authority of the Member State applied Article 5(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 615/98 of 18 March 1998 laying down specific detailed rules of application for the export refund arrangements as regards the welfare of live bovine animals during transport (3) in a manner consistent with the principle of proportionality? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In situations in which the breach of Directive 91/628/EEC has not resulted in the death of the animals, are courts generally under an obligation to examine whether the competent authority of the Member State applied Article 5(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 615/98 of 18 March 1998 laying down specific detailed rules of application for the export refund arrangements as regards the welfare of live bovine animals during transport (3) in a manner consistent with the principle of proportionality?

3

---

(1)  OJ 1991 L 340, p. 17.

1

(2)  OJ 1995 L 148, p. 52.

2

(3)  OJ 1998 L 82, p. 19.

3

---
# C_2011331EN.01001801.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 — El Jirari Bouzekri v OHIM — Nike International (NC NICKOL)

(Case T-207/09) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark NC NICKOL - Earlier Community figurative mark NIKE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94)

2011/C 331/32

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mustapha El Jirari Bouzekri (Malaga, Spain) (represented by: E. Ragot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Nike International Ltd (Beaverton, Oregon, United States of America) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2009 (Case R 554/2008-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Nike International Ltd and Mustapha El Jirari Bouzekri.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), of 25 February 2009 (Case R 554/2008-2). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), of 25 February 2009 (Case R 554/2008-2).

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mustapha El Jirari Bouzekri. Nike International shall pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mustapha El Jirari Bouzekri. Nike International shall pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.

1

---
Wali SHABAZZ, petitioner, v. Michael OVERMYER, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Forest, et al.

No. 15-9394.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
II-00129

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Charlotte Flynn <wflynn4@gmail.com>

Saturday, December 4, 2010 11:14 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Charlotte Flynn

7710 West Rim Drive

Austin, TX 78731
Scott M. TANNER, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 15-9369.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joerg Ott , hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 3)
of GBS Enterprises Incorporated, a Nevada corporation  (the “Company”), for the fiscal quarter ended September30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report  fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: July 17, 2013 | /s/Joerg Ott                 
|------------------- | -----------------------------
|                    | Joerg Ott                    
|                    | Chief Executive Officer      
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer)
Christopher LAWRENCE, et ux., petitioners, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.

No. 17-917.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF THE REGISTRANT AT MAY 31, 1999 AND FEBRUARY 28,
1999 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF THE
REGISTRANT FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 1999 AND 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENT IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         742,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,783,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,308,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,135,000
<PP&E>                                       6,040,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,707,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,543,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,707,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,533,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,618,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Capital Return Futures
                    Fund 2, L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>
<CIK>               0000851786
<NAME>              P-B Capital Return Futures Fund 2, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-2000

<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-2000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos

<CASH>                          3,365,515

<SECURITIES>                    11,684,722

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  15,050,237

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,410,346

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      13,639,891

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    15,050,237

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                (976,001)

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                935,749

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (1,911,750)

<EPS-BASIC>                   (24.57)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
# C_2011055EN.01001201.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/12

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Skoma-Lux sro v Celní ředitelství Olomouc

(Case C-339/09) (1)

1

(Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 2204 and 2206 - Beverage fermented on the basis of fresh grapes - Alcohol content of 15,8 % to 16,1 % by volume - Addition of corn alcohol and beet sugar during the course of production)

2011/C 55/19

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skoma-Lux sro

Applicant:

Defendant: Celní ředitelství Olomouc

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Nejvyšší správní soud — Interpretation of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1789/2003 of 11 September 2003 (OJ 2003 L 281, p. 1) — Red dessert wine Kagor — Classification under heading 2204 or heading 2206 of the combined nomenclature

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005, must be interpreted as meaning that a beverage fermented on the basis of fresh grapes, sold in 0.75 litre bottles, with an alcohol content of 15,8 % to 16,1 % by volume, to which beet sugar and corn alcohol have been added during the course of its production, must be classified under heading 2206 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.

1

---
Matthew Gregory MELANDER, petitioner, v. WYOMING, et al.

No. 16-6850.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Quincy SIMS, petitioner, v. M.D. BITER, Warden.

No. 15-9528.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of K & F Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dirkson
R. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ DIRKSON R. CHARLES
----------------------------
Dirkson R. Charles
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3680 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 415 North Main Street in Henning, Tennessee, as the ‘‘Paula Croom Robinson and Judy Spray 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3680 RFS

1 SECTION 1. PAULA CROOM ROBINSON AND JUDY SPRAY 

2 MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located 415 North Main Street in Henning, 

5 Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Paula 

6 Croom Robinson and Judy Spray Memorial Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Paula Croom Robin12 son and Judy Spray Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Stanley Earl CORBETT, Jr., petitioner, v. G.J. BRANKER, et al.

No. 16-6156.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
James Forrest MANNING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6443.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
II-00256

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

virginia Smith <ivmsmith@comcast.net>

Friday, December 3, 2010 7:58 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

virginia Smith

9580 NW 25th Ct

Sunrise, FL 33322
BULK JULIANA, LTD., et al., petitioners, v. WORLD FUEL SERVICES (SINGAPORE) PTE, LTD.

No. 16-26.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Nelson DelGIUDICE, petitioner, v. Jarvis PRIMUS, et al.

No. 16-9224.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Dekelvin MARTIN, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 15-9270.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
Jerome HUDSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5568.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF William Lawrence SUMMERS.

No. D-2944.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

William Lawrence Summers, of Cleveland, Ohio, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
II-00560

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mike VanLandingham <mikevan40@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:48 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mike VanLandingham

6012 Larsen Ln

Shawnee, KS 66203