alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service

# AGENCY:

Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.

# ACTION:

Request for public comment on proposed policy change on allocating funds under the Labor-Management Cooperation Program. 

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) is publishing the Proposed Policy Change on Allocating Funds Under the Labor-Management Cooperation Program to inform the public. The program is supported by Federal funds authorized by the Labor-Management Cooperation Act of 1978, subject to annual appropriations.

# DATES:

Comments must be submitted on or before July 16, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

Send Comments to: Vella M. Traynham, Director of Arbitration Services, FMCS, 2100 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20427.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vella M. Traynham, 202-606-8181.

## Labor-Management Cooperation Program Proposed Guideline Change

### D. Allocations

Any funds returned to FMCS from a competitive grant can be awarded on a noncompetitive basis, provided the award is made during the period in which the grant period is effective.

C. Richard Barnes,

Director, Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.

[FR Doc. 01-15026  Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6732-01-M
SEC Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.2



First Amendment to the Westmoreland Coal Company 2014 Equity Incentive Plan


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of March 30, 2016, effective as of May 17, 2016, to the Westmoreland Coal Company 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, adopted effective February 20, 2014 (the “Plan”), as approved by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Westmoreland Coal Company (the “Company”), is hereby adopted by the Company.


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan;
WHEREAS, subject to certain limitations, Article 12, Section 1, of the Plan gives the Board the authority to amend the Plan;
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company, and its subsidiaries, subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock of the Company available under the Plan by an additional 350,000 shares from 550,000 shares to 900,000 shares; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to make the amendment to the Plan described above upon receiving the requisite approval by stockholders.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended effective as of the date hereof as follows:


1. The first sentence of Article 3 is amended as follows:
“Subject to adjustment in accordance with Article 10, a total of 900,000 shares of Common Stock will be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan (all of which are eligible for issuance under Incentive Stock Options).”
* * *
Except as expressly amended herein, the Plan remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of CHS Hedging Inc. and should be considered 

a solicitation. The information contained in this presentation is taken from sources which we believe to be reliable, but is not 

guaranteed by us as to accuracy or completeness and is sent to you for information purposes only. There is a risk of loss when trading 

commodity futures and options. CHS Hedging Inc. bases its recommendations solely on the judgment of CHS Hedging Inc. personnel.

Regulations on voice 

recordings

Scott Cordes

President
This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of CHS Hedging Inc. and should be considered 

a solicitation. The information contained in this presentation is taken from sources which we believe to be reliable, but is not 

guaranteed by us as to accuracy or completeness and is sent to you for information purposes only. There is a risk of loss when trading 

commodity futures and options. CHS Hedging Inc. bases its recommendations solely on the judgment of CHS Hedging Inc. personnel.

CHS Hedging Branch Offices
This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of CHS Hedging Inc. and should be considered 

a solicitation. The information contained in this presentation is taken from sources which we believe to be reliable, but is not 

guaranteed by us as to accuracy or completeness and is sent to you for information purposes only. There is a risk of loss when trading 

commodity futures and options. CHS Hedging Inc. bases its recommendations solely on the judgment of CHS Hedging Inc. personnel.

Profile

• Annual Revenues 

$5-250k Avg $20k

• 100-4,000 

trades/yr

• Grains & livestock

• Broker duties

• Order flow
This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of CHS Hedging Inc. and should be considered 

a solicitation. The information contained in this presentation is taken from sources which we believe to be reliable, but is not 

guaranteed by us as to accuracy or completeness and is sent to you for information purposes only. There is a risk of loss when trading 

commodity futures and options. CHS Hedging Inc. bases its recommendations solely on the judgment of CHS Hedging Inc. personnel.

Value to local agriculture

•Trusted local contact

•Easy access

•Market Intel

•Education

•Trade execution

•Consultation

•Risk management choice
This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of CHS Hedging Inc. and should be considered 

a solicitation. The information contained in this presentation is taken from sources which we believe to be reliable, but is not 

guaranteed by us as to accuracy or completeness and is sent to you for information purposes only. There is a risk of loss when trading 

commodity futures and options. CHS Hedging Inc. bases its recommendations solely on the judgment of CHS Hedging Inc. personnel.

Conclusion

•Recording cost / 

Benefit

•Cell Phone

•Risk 

management??
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40930 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. MARIO EDUARDO ACOSTA

- JUAREZ , also known as Jose R. Chavez, also known as Mario Acosta,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:13

- CR

- 1307

- 1

Before JOLLY , GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Mario Eduardo Acosta

Juarez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Teran

- Salas , 767 F.3d 453, 458

- 62 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied , 135 S. Ct. 1892 (2015)

. In Teran

- Salas , we determined that the appellant was not entitled to relief based merely on the existence of a theoretical possibility that a defendant could be

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 1 8 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40930 Document: 00513157908 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015No. 14

- 40930

2 convicted under Texas Health & Safety Code § 481.112(a) for c onduct that would not qualify as a federal drug trafficking offense. See Teran

- Salas , 767 F.3d at 458. Acosta

- Juarez has not demonstrated “a realistic probability that Texas would prosecute under an ‘administering’ theory in a way that does not also cons titute either ‘dispensing’ or ‘distributing’ under the federal sentencing guidelines.” Id. at 461

- 62. Acosta

- Juarez also raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez

- Lugo , 782 F.3d 198, 204

- 05 (5th Cir. 2015 ) , petition for cert. filed (June 19, 2015) (No. 14

- 10355) . In Martinez

- Lugo , 782 F.3d at 204

- 05, we held that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior conviction of a drug trafficking offense is warranted regardless whether the conviction for the prior off ense required proof of remuneration or commercial activity. T he motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 14-40930 Document: 00513157908 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
# C_2009153EN.01005103.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/51

---

Action brought on 24 April 2009 — Lebedef-Caponi v Commission

(Case F-45/09)

2009/C 153/100

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Maddalena Lebedef-Caponi (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s career development report for 2007.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the applicant’s career development report for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant’s career development report for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007;

| — | Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---
II-00872

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Myron Kaliski <mkaliski@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:28 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Myron Kaliski

1027 Grandview AVe

Columbus, OH 43212
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 30, 2022.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00701

- CV

IN RE MONICA NWOKOCH A , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 96662

- F



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 30, 2022 , relator Monica Nwokocha filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App.
P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable K. Randall Huffstetler, presiding judge of the 300th District Court of Brazoria County
, to transfer the underlying proceeding to a district court in Harris County, Texas

.2

Relator has not shown that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. W e also dismiss relator’s motion for emergency relief a s moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.29.1

                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



1.       The name of the limited partnership is DeCrane Aircraft Furniture Co.,
         LP.

2.       The address of the registered office is c/o CT Corporation System, 350
         N. St. Paul Street, Dallas, Texas 75201.

3.       The name of the registered agent at the above address is CT Corporation
         System.

4.       The address where records of the partnership are to be kept or made
         available is 2361 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 180, El Segundo, California
         90245.

5.       The name, mailing address and street address of the business or
         residence of each general partner is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

         GENERAL PARTNER    MAILING ADDRESS          BUSINESS OR RESIDENCE STREET ADDRESS
         ---------------    ---------------          ------------------------------------
<S>                         <C>                      <C>
         DAH-IP Holdings,   2361 Rosecrans Avenue,   2361 Rosecrans Avenue
         Inc.               Suite 180                Suite 180
                            El Segundo, CA 90401     El Segundo, CA  90401
</TABLE>


June 7, 2000                                DeCrane Aircraft Furniture Co., LP

                                            By:   DAH-IP Holdings, Inc.
                                            Its:  General Partner


                                                  By: /s/ STEPHEN A. SILVERMAN
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Stephen A. Silverman
                                                      Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PW Eagle, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Scott Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 14, 2006



/s/ Scott LongScott LongChief Financial Officer
In Re Andre D. LEFFEBRE, petitioner.

No. 16-9241.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
gofba_ex106.htm

EXHIBIT 10.6
  
 AMENDMENT TO
 COMPUTER TOWERS LEASE
  
 This Amendment to the Computer Towers Lease (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 1st day of January 20[__] by and between the SUNRAY TRUST (“Trust”) and GOFBA, INC., a California corporation (the “Corporation”).
  
 RECITALS
  
 This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts and circumstances:
  
 A. The Trust and the Corporation entered into a Computer Towers Lease dated November 1, 2006 pursuant to which the Trust agreed to provide the Corporation with a portion of certain Computer Towers.
  
 B. The Corporation requires [__] additional computer towers for the [____] year.
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the monthly payment to the Trust shall now be $[__________].
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto affix their signatures below and execute this Amendment.
  
  	  
	 	 	 	 	 
	 GOFBA, INC.
	  
	 SUNRAY TRUST
	  

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	 By: 
	/s/ Bill DeLisi 	 	By:	/s/ Anna Chin	 
	  
	Bill DeLisi	 		Anna Chin	 
	 Its:
	Chief Executive Officer	 	Its:	Trustee
**Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 October 2009 – Commission v Luxembourg**

**(Case C‐22/09)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Energy policy – Energy savings – Directive 2002/91/EC – Energy performance of buildings – Failure to transpose the directive within the prescribed time-limit

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Examination of the merits by the Court – Situation to be taken into consideration – Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 10)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt or communicate within the prescribed period all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 65). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15(1) of that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
# C_2010024EN.01002501.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/25

---

Action brought on 4 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-433/09)

2010/C 24/45

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by including the standard fuel consumption tax in the basis of assessment of the value added tax imposed in Austria on the delivery of a motor vehicle, the Republic of Austria did not comply with its obligations under Articles 78 and 79 of Directive 2006/112/EC (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by including the standard fuel consumption tax in the basis of assessment of the value added tax imposed in Austria on the delivery of a motor vehicle, the Republic of Austria did not comply with its obligations under Articles 78 and 79 of Directive 2006/112/EC (1);

1

| — | order Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission complains of the inclusion of the standard fuel consumption tax (SFCT) in the basis of assessment of the value added tax imposed by the Republic of Austria on the delivery of a motor vehicle in the Republic of Austria.

The standard fuel consumption tax essentially consists of a single registration tax, as its main feature is the registration of motor vehicles in the Republic of Austria. Consequently, the case-law of the Court of Justice in Case C-98/05 (2), according to which such a tax is not to be included in the basis of assessment of value added tax, is applicable to the present case.

2

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

(2)  Case C-98/05 De Danske Bilimportører [2006] ECR I-4945.

2

05 De Danske Bilimportører

---
DAVID NETZER CONSULTING ENGINEER, petitioner, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, et al.

No. 17-946.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jacques Montrey DURHAM, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-6440.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

*636Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District denied.
Ricky Joseph JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Gregory C. DOZIER, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections.

No. 16-9276.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-39,022]

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on April 16, 2001, in response to a worker petition which was filed on behalf of workers at General Automotive Manufacturing, LLC, Franklin, Wisconsin.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 7th day of June, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-16075  Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M