alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tena Mayberry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 13, 2011
By: /s/ Tena MayberryTena MayberryChief Executive Officer
Anthony MINOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6699.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 440.

#### Southern Pacific Co. *v.*Hackley, Administratrix.

October 28, 1935.

*Messrs. Robert T. Devlin, W. H. Devlin,. A. I. Diepenbrock,*and *Horace B. Wulff*for petitioner.

*Mr. Herman A. Bachraek*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, 3d Appellate District, of California, denied.
Allen Lee GODFREY, Sr., petitioner, v. Bobby D. RUSSELL, et al.

No. 16-6164.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,009
<SECURITIES>                                     3,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,879
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,724)
<INVENTORY>                                        233
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,578
<PP&E>                                          32,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,143)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       118,947
<OTHER-SE>                                    (98,846)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,206
<SALES>                                         22,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,455
<CGS>                                            3,479
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,030
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,897)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,897)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Diversified Industries,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Amy Gallo, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

7/13/05                /s/ Amy Gallo
Date                   -----------------------------------------
                       Amy Gallo, Chief Financial Officer
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1702 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that adding art and 

design into Federal programs that target the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields encourages innovation and economic growth in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. LANGEVIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee 

on Science and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

adding art and design into Federal programs that target 

the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics 

(STEM) fields encourages innovation and economic 

growth in the United States. 

Whereas the innovative practices of art and design play an 

essential role in improving Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education and advancing STEM research; 

Whereas art and design provide real solutions for our everyday lives, distinguish United States products in a global 

marketplace, and create opportunity for economic growth; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1702 IH 

Whereas artists and designers can effectively communicate 

complex data and scientific information to multiple stakeholders and broad audiences; 

Whereas the tools and methods of design offer new models 

for creative problem-solving and interdisciplinary partnerships in a changing world; 

Whereas artists and designers are playing an integral role in 

the development of modern technology; and 

Whereas artists and designers are playing a key role in manufacturing: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of art and design 

3 in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathe4 matics (STEM) fields; 

5 (2) encourages the inclusion of art and design 

6 in the STEM fields during reauthorization of the El7 ementary and Secondary Education Act and the 

8 America Competes Act; 

9 (3) encourages institutions of higher education 

10 to incorporate the role of art and design into their 

11 STEM curricula; and 

12 (4) encourages the Secretary of Commerce, the 

13 Secretary of the Department of Education, the 

14 Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, 

15 and the Director of the National Science Foundation 

16 to develop a STEM to STEAM Council representa17 tive of artists, designers, education and business 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1702 IH 

1 leaders, and Federal agencies in order to facilitate a 

2 comprehensive approach to incorporate art and de3 sign into the Federal STEM programs. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11107

Summary Calendar

ROBERT LEE BROWN,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ROBERT WILKIE, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17-CV-1150

Before SMITH, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Lee Brown seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on 

appeal from the district court’s grant of the appellee’s Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 racial discrimination 

complaint. Brown also moves for the appointment of counsel. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 17, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11107 Document: 00515162340 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/17/2019
No. 18-11107

2

By moving to proceed IFP, Brown is challenging the district court’s 

certification that his appeal was not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 

117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Our inquiry into Brown’s good faith “is 

limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits

(and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 

1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Although Brown addresses the district court’s dismissal of his claims, his 

arguments are conclusional, at best, and merely reciting a cause of action, 

supported by only conclusory assertions, is not enough. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 

556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). Moreover, Brown does not address the overarching 

issue, namely that his arguments essentially raise an employment 

discrimination claim and that the exclusive remedy for federal employees to 

bring such a claim is Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. See Jackson v. 

Widnall, 99 F.3d 710, 716 (5th Cir. 1996).

Brown fails to identify a legal or factual basis upon which the district 

court wrongly resolved the merits of his claims or to present any ground upon 

which the disposition of his claims was erroneous. See Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678. 

Thus, he has failed to show that “the appeal involves legal points arguable on 

their merits.” Howard, 707 F.2d at 220 (internal quotation marks and citation 

omitted). Accordingly, Brown’s IFP motion is DENIED. Brown’s motion for 

the appointment of counsel is likewise DENIED. Additionally, because this 

appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; Baugh, 117 F.3d 

at 202 n.24.

 Case: 18-11107 Document: 00515162340 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/17/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
                      This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information
                      extracted  from  Greenland   Corporation  March  31,  1999
                      financial  statements  and is qualified in its entirety by
                      reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                            0000852127
<NAME>                                           Greenland Corporation



<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1999

<CASH>                                                     34,074
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              40,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                53,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           178,885
<PP&E>                                                     51,235
<DEPRECIATION>                                             (21,736)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             4,971,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      473,222
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   19,766
<OTHER-SE>                                                 4,478,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               4,971,625
<SALES>                                                    598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           634
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              1,265,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           1,164,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         7,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (2,437,973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (2,437,973)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (2,437,973)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.16)



</TABLE>
Israel NAVA-ARELLANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6661.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1510 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4636) to prohibit United States 

assistance to foreign countries that oppose the position of the United 

States in the United Nations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2010 

Mr. GOHMERT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4636) to prohibit United States assistance to foreign countries that 

oppose the position of the United States in the United 

Nations. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 the House shall immediately proceed to consider in the 

3 House the bill (H.R. 4636) to prohibit United States as4 sistance to foreign countries that oppose the position of 

5 the United States in the United Nations. All points of 

6 order against the bill and against its consideration are 

7 waived. The bill shall be considered as read. The previous 

8 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1510 IH 

1 passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

2 of debate equally divided and controlled by Representative 

3 Gohmert of Texas or his designee and an opponent; and 

4 (2) one motion to recommit. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-87815 and 333-32120) pertaining to the Broadbase Software,
Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, and 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan; Options and purchase rights issued under the Rubric, Inc.
1997 Stock Option Plan and assumed by the Registrant in connection with its
acquisition of Rubric, Options granted pursuant to stock option agreements
entered into outside of the Rubric 1997 Stock Option Plan, the Broadbase
Software, Inc. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, the Broadbase Software, Inc. 1999
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and Options granted pursuant to stock option
agreements entered into outside of the Broadbase Software, Inc. 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan of our report dated January 11, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Broadbase Software, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                          /s/  Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 13, 2000
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 53/2004 of 12 January 2004 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 as regards Community tariff quotas and reference quantities for certain agricultural products originating in Egypt

(Official Journal of the European Union L 7 of 13 January 2004)

On pages 26 to 29 in the heading of the fifth column:

for:

               ‘Quota volume’,

read:

               ‘Quota volume (in tonnes net weight)’.

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Philip J. Myers, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for American Church Mortgage Company; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Dated:	April
25, 2019



By: /s/ Philip
J. Myers

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Globalstar Telecommunications Limited for the year ended
December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000933401
<NAME> GLOBALSTAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,034,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,323
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    358,968
<COMMON>                                        88,743
<OTHER-SE>                                     583,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,034,902
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,151)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (81,861)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.99)


</TABLE>
# C_2010346EN.01001601.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Halle (Germany)) — Günter Fuß v Stadt Halle

(Case C-243/09) (1)

1

(Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 2003/88/EC - Organisation of working time - Fire fighters employed in the public sector - Operational service - Article 6(b) and Article 22(1)(b) - Maximum weekly working time - Refusal to work longer than that time - Compulsory transfer to another service - Direct effect - Consequence for national courts)

2010/C 346/26

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Halle

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Günter Fuß

Applicant:

Defendant: Stadt Halle

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht Halle — Interpretation of Article 22(1)(b) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9) — National legislation providing, in breach of that directive, for working time of more than 48 hours during a seven-day period for officials working as on-call professional firefighters — Compulsory transfer of an official who refused to work such hours to a post at the same grade in the administration — Concept of ‘detriment’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(b) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as precluding national rules, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which allow a public-sector employer to transfer compulsorily to another service a worker employed as a fire fighter in an operational service on the ground that that worker has requested compliance, within the latter service, with the maximum average weekly working time laid down in that provision. The fact that such a worker suffers no specific detriment by reason of that transfer, other than that resulting from the infringement of Article 6(b) of Directive 2003/88, is irrelevant in that regard.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 26.9.2009.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference to Registration  Statements
on Form S-8, File Numbers 333-16273 and 333-16207,  of our report dated July 23,
1998,  except  for  Note  15 as to  which  the  date is July  24,  1998,  on the
consolidated  financial  statements of AmTrust  Capital  Corp.,  which report is
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AmTrust Capital
Corp.


/s/ Olive LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
October 12, 1998
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-25701, 333-04676,
333-60611, 333-65978, 333-137959 and 333-162548) on Form S-8 and Registration Statements (Nos. 333-146728 and
333-162464) on Form S-3 of DG FastChannel, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 1, 2011, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of DG FastChannel, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of DG FastChannel, Inc. and subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 1, 2011

---



QuickLinks
Jack HALL, petitioner, v. Mary BERGHUIS, Warden.

No. 16-6186.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth circuit denied.