alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2

 

TravelCenters of America LLC

 

Summary of Director Compensation

 

	
Annual Retainer for   Independent Directors:
    	
 
    	
$40,000
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Meeting Fees for Independent Directors:
    	
 
    	
$1,250 per day per board or committee meeting, with   a maximum fee of $2,500 for any one day with multiple board and committee   meetings
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Share Grants for all Directors:
    	
 
    	
9,000 annually to be granted on the day of the first   board meeting following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (or, for Directors   who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first   board meeting attended)
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Chair of the Audit Committee:
    	
 
    	
$20,000 per year
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee:
    	
 
    	
$10,000 per year
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Chair of the Compensation Committee:
    	
 
    	
$10,000 per year
    


 

The Company generally reimburses all Directors for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Directors and for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
Donnie George MORTON, petitioner, v. Frank L. PERRY, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety.

No. 16-6777.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Jose SERNA, et al., petitioners, v. TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al.

No. 16-484.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

*631Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
886.

#### Wilkes *v.*Pope.

Complaint, from city court of Dublin — Judge Burch. October 21, 1907.

Submitted February 5,

Decided March 16, 1908.

C. S. Pope sued W. W. Wilkes on a promissory note for $95.33 principal, appearing to have been executed by the defendant as sole maker, and payable to Emma Wilkes or bearer, which the plaintiff alleged had been transferred to him for value before maturity and without notice of any defense. The defendant filed a plea of non est factum. At the trial he admitted that he had signed the note; -and he offered to testify that, having agreed with Charles Wilkes, the husband of Mrs. Emma Wilkes, to become accommodation security for her at the First National Bank of Dublin for $70, he signed it with the understanding that she was to sign it as principal, above his signature, and that it was to be filled in for the amount of $70 and he made payable to the bank, blank *37spaces being left for that purpose; that “C. S. Pope, the transferee of the note, was not present when it was made,” and, so far as the witness knew, did not have notice of these facts. The court excluded this testimony, on the grounds, that it did not appear that the plaintiff had notice of the facts stated, and that under the Civil Code, §3940, which provides that “when one of two innocent persons must suffer by the act of a third person, he who puts it in the power of the third person to inflict the injury must bear the loss,” the defendant should not be heard to complain. There was no further testimony. The court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff; to which, as well as to the exclusion of the testimony offered, the defendant excepted.

*36Hill, C. J.

1. The transferee of a negotiable paper who receives it before it is due can not be affected by any agreement or understanding between other parties to the paper, unless notice of such agreement or understanding is brought home to the transferee. *Wooten*v. *Inman,*33 *Ga.*41.

2. If A signs his name to a blank note and delivers it to B, designating the payee to be filled in the note by B, A constitutes B his agent for that purpose, and A will be bound to a bona fide holder of the note who became such before maturity, although B violated the private understanding between A and himself with reference to the note. *Moody*v. *Threlkeld,*13*Ga. 55.*

*3.*The testimony of one whose name appears as the maker of a negotiable note, that he signed it as surety, with the understanding that another • should sign as maker before the delivery of the note to the payee, the latter having no notice of such understanding, does not support a plea of non est factum, or constitute a defense as against a bona fide transferee for value before maturity. *Cleghorn*v. *Robison,*8 *Ga.*559; *Benson*v. *Abbott,*95 *Ga.*75 (22 S. E. 127). *Judgment affirmed.*

*37
      *Bari damp, George B. Davis,*for plaintiff in error.

*Peyton L. Wade,*contra.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1*

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Cognex Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 28, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         Date:  November 4, 2003
                                    /s/ Robert J. Shillman
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Robert J. Shillman
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chairman of the Board of Directors
                                    (principal executive officer)

* This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Order entered November 22, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00969-CV

BRIGETTA D'OLIVIO A/K/A BRIGETTA ALIX ANDERSON, ALIX 

BRIGETTA, Appellant

V.

HILARY THOMPSON HUTSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-04855-2019

ORDER

On September 19, 2022, appellant Brigetta D’Olivio a/k/a Brigetta Alix 

Anderson, Alix Brigetta, filed a motion for reconsideration and motion to transfer

this case to one of the Houston courts of appeals. On September 27, pursuant to 

the procedure set forth in Miles v. Ford Motor Company, 914 S.W.2d 135, 137 n. 2 

(Tex. 1995) (per curiam), this Court referred the portion of appellant’s motion 

requesting a transfer to the Texas Supreme Court for determination. On our own 

motion, we abated the case pending the supreme court’s resolution of the transfer 
issue. On November 21, 2022, the Texas Supreme Court denied appellant’s 

request for transfer. Accordingly, we now LIFT THE ABATEMENT and 

REINSTATE the case.

This Court denied appellant’s motions for rehearing and for en banc 

reconsideration on September 13, 2022. In denying appellant’s motions, we did 

not modify our judgment, vacate our judgment, render a new judgment, or issue a 

new opinion. Appellant’s September 19, 2022 motion for reconsideration is, 

therefore, not authorized by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 49.4. A motion for reconsideration not authorized by the rules is a nullity. 

Mapco, Inc. v. Forrest, 795 S.W.2d 700, 702 (Tex. 1990). Accordingly, we 

DISMISS appellant’s motion for reconsideration. 

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE
CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION CORPORATION, petitioner, v. AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al.

No. 16-282.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1.  Certification of President and Treasurer.


                          CERTIFICATION
I, Jeffrey I. Green, president and treasurer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Print
Data Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
     ensure that material information relating to the
     registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
     is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual
     report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
     disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within
     90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report
     (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions
     about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
     procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
     operation of internal controls which could adversely
     affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial data and have
     identified for the registrant's auditors any material
     weaknesses in internal controls; and


<PAGE>    Exhibit 99.1 - Pg. 1


     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
     management or other employees who have a significant
     role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this annual report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 28, 2003


__/s/ Jeffrey I. Green _______
Jeffrey I. Green
President, Treasurer




<PAGE>    Exhibit 99.1 - Pg. 2
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 166 

Recognizing the 450th birthday of the settlement of Pensacola, Florida, and 

encouraging the people of the United States to observe the 450th birthday of the settlement of Pensacola, Florida, and remember how the 

rich history of Pensacola, Florida, has likewise contributed to the rich 

history of the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2009 

Mr. MILLER of Florida (for himself, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, 

Mr. MACK, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. ROONEY, Ms. 

CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Mr. 

MEEK of Florida, Mr. BOYD, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mr. BUCHANAN, 

Ms. KOSMAS, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. 

WEXLER, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. POSEY, and Mr. MICA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 450th birthday of the settlement of Pensacola, Florida, and encouraging the people of the United 

States to observe the 450th birthday of the settlement 

of Pensacola, Florida, and remember how the rich history 

of Pensacola, Florida, has likewise contributed to the 

rich history of the United States, and for other purposes. 

Whereas the settlement of Pensacola, Florida, was first established by the Spanish explorer Don Tristan de Luna 

on August 15, 1559; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 166 IH 

Whereas the settlement of Pensacola, Florida, in 1559 was 

the first European settlement in the United States; 

Whereas a hurricane devastated the early settlement in 1559 

causing widespread, irreparable damage; 

Whereas Don Tristan de Luna and his party were forced to 

abandon the settlement and return to their native Spain 

after the hurricane devastated Pensacola; 

Whereas Pensacola, Florida, was resettled by the Spanish in 

1696; and 

Whereas Pensacola, Florida, has come under five different 

flags of government during its existence, including Spain, 

France, Great Britain, the Confederate States of America, and the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 450th birthday of the city of 

3 Pensacola, Florida; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe and celebrate the 450th birthday of the 

6 settlement of Pensacola, Florida, its rich history 

7 under five flags of government, and how its rich his8 tory has likewise contributed to the rich history of 

9 the United States. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Hermon WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-6455.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
|   | (1) | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|            | IRSA Inversiones yRepresentaciones S.A. |                                      |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|            |                                    |                                      |   |
| October31,2018. | By:                                     | /s/ MatiasGaivironsky                |   |
|            |                                    | MatiasGaivironsky                         |   |
|            |                                    | ChiefFinancial and Administrative Officer |   |
|            |                                    |                                      |   |
ANTHONY COVIELLO

,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW

,
Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOS ITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3371

Opinion filed February 7, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

-- Original Jurisdiction

.
Anthony Coviello, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits

.

ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ.

, CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1694 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1694

                    Commending The Wall that Heals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

 Mr. Graves of Missouri submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                    Commending The Wall that Heals.

Whereas since its inauguration by the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund on Veterans 
        Day, November 11, 1996, The Wall That Heals has offered the opportunity 
        for those who lost their lives in the Vietnam War to be honored by 
        family and friends in their respective hometowns;
Whereas The Wall That Heals is a half-scale replica of the Vietnam Veterans 
        Memorial located in Washington, the District of Columbia;
Whereas The Wall That Heals is the only traveling replica directly affiliated 
        with the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, the District of 
        Columbia;
Whereas The Wall That Heals travels to communities throughout the United States 
        and has been seen by millions of people in more than 300 cities and 
        towns throughout the Nation; and
Whereas the display also features a traveling museum and information center 
        providing a comprehensive educational component to enrich and complete 
        visitors' experiences: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends The Wall That Heals for honoring those that 
        made the ultimate sacrifice and served honorably in the Vietnam 
        War; and
            (2) embraces the remembrance it delivers to communities 
        throughout the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

          - [Announcement Number 01094]

                    A notice announcing the availability of Fiscal Year 2001 funds to fund a competing cooperative agreement program for private and public nonprofit medical organizations or associations which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 22, 2001 (Vol. 66, No. 99, Pages 28174-28177).                

The notice is amended as follows:

On page 28176, Second Column, under Section F. Submission and Deadline, the submission due date should read on or before June 29, 2001.

Dated: June 15, 2001.

Sandra R. Manning,

*Acting Director, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).*

[FR Doc. 01-15596 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
CHRISTINE C. WHITNEY,

Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4967

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2014

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

L. Haldane Taylor, Judge.

Stephen A. Smith of Law Offices of Stephen A. Smith, P.A., Jacksonville, for

Appellant.

Jessica Zagier Wallace of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Miami, and Michael K. 

Winston and Dean A. Morande of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., West Palm 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., petitioner, v. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.

No. 15-1189.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ October 14, 2010
ERRATA

______________________ 2010-1127 (Serial No. 11/014,909) IN RE RICHARD F. SCHWEMBERGER

Decided: October 13, 2010 Precedential Opinion

______________________ Please make the following change: Page 1, correct attorneys name “Frances N. Lynch” to “Frances M. Lynch”
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The CNO Executive Panel will meet to conduct the midterm briefing of the High Impact Environmental Issues Task Force to the Chief of Naval Operations. This meeting will consist of discussions of findings regarding security implications, training impact and readiness effects, and will also include preliminary recommendations for Navy environmental strategy and evaluations of alternative training means. This meeting will be closed to the public. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Friday, June 22, 2001, from 1:30 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the office of the Chief of Naval Operations, 2000 Navy Pentagon, Room 4E630, Washington, DC 20350-2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commander Christopher Agan, CNO Executive Panel, 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311, telephone (703) 681-6205. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), these matters constitute classified information that is specifically authorized by Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense and are, in fact, properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order. Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that the public interest requires that all sessions of the meeting be closed to the public because they will be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code. 

Dated: June 5, 2001. 

J.L. Roth, 

Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Navy, Judge Advocate General's Corps, Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-15021 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-U