alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>               <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS             6-MOS              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>               JUN-30-1997       JUN-30-1997       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                          0               19,608             59,063
<SECURITIES>                    0                    0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0                    0                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0                    0                  0
<INVENTORY>                     0                    0                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0               19,608             59,063
<PP&E>                          0                    0                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0                    0                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0               19,608             59,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0                    0              4,641
<BONDS>                         0                    0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0                    0                  0
<PREFERRED>                     0                    0                  0
<COMMON>                        0                    0                  0
<OTHER-SE>                      0           (1,320,452)        (1,284,997)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0               19,608             59,063
<SALES>                         0                    0                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               93                  424                  0
<CGS>                           0                    0                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0                    0                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>           22,857               46,320                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0                    0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0                    0                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>           (12,323)             (35,455)                 0
<INCOME-TAX>              (12,323)             (35,455)                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0                    0                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0                    0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0                    0                  0
<CHANGES>                       0                    0                  0
<NET-INCOME>              (12,323)             (35,455)                 0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0                    0                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0                    0                  0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, David W. Cathell, ChiefFinancial Officer, certify, that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q/Aof Fulton Bancshares Corporation.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thequarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements and other financial information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report.

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed in this quarterlyreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

(a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: June 2, 2005 | By:                                                | /s/David W.  Cathell |   |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|               | David W.  Cathell ,                                |
|               | Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
RICHARD MOONEY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4165

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Adrian G. Soud , Judge

.

Richard Mooney, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFI RMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Daniel BRADLEY, petitioner, v. Blake KUNTZ, et al.

No. 16-6226.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 490, Misc.

#### Coyle *v.*California et al.

Supreme Court of California.

Certiorari denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 1 2 , 2019

NO. 03

- 17

- 00551

- CV

Nicholas Vincent Russo, Appellant

v.

Maria Camila Bernal, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF J USTICE ROSE, JUSTICE S GOODWIN AND KELLY
AFFIRMED

— OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on June 2, 2017

. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s order . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. The appellant shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the cou rt below.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
  FORM 10-Q/A
 Amendment No. 1
  þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 2007
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM  TO
 Commission file number: 0-23378
  Thermadyne Holdings Corporation
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    74-2482571
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)16052 Swingley Ridge Road, Suite 300
Chesterfield, Missouri
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    63017
(Zip Code)
 (636) 728-3000
  þ o
 o þ o
 o þ




---



##### 



Part I.FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 4. Controls and Procedures.Part II.OTHER INFORMATIONItem 6. Exhibits.SIGNATURESExhibit Index302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Explanatory Note




---



##### Table of Contents








---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit 12*
    
    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.Exhibit 18*
    
    Preferability Letter from Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.Exhibit 31.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.Exhibit 31.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 *
    
    Previously filed with the Initial Report.




---



##### Table of Contents



THERMADYNE
HOLDINGS CORPORATION
(Registrant)Date: August 13, 2007
    /s/ Patti S. WilliamsPatti S. WilliamsVice President
     General Counsel Date: August 13, 2007
    /s/ Mark F. JollyMark F. JollyVice President  Global Controller
     (Principal Accounting Officer)




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description31.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>   0000850660
<NAME>  THERMADYNE HOLDINGS CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-01-2000
<CASH>                                          17,931
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,278
<INVENTORY>                                    108,424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               205,146
<PP&E>                                          88,244
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 386,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,468
<BONDS>                                        726,477
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           65,488
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                   (563,553)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   386,284
<SALES>                                        268,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               268,281
<CGS>                                          171,312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,055
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,785
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,640)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,640)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.88)


</TABLE>
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: February 25, 2016 521070

________________________________ ELENA T. LEVENSON et al., Respondents, v ESTATE OF NICK LAVIERO et al., MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendants, and TERESA HORNUNG RUDOLPH et al., Appellants.

________________________________ Calendar Date: January 7, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose and Lynch, JJ.

__________ Young/Sommer LLC, Albany (Michael J. Moore of counsel), for appellants. The Ayers Law Firm, PLLC, Palatine Bridge (Kenneth L. Ayers of counsel), for respondents.

__________ Rose, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Melkonian, J.), entered January 26, 2015 in Ulster County, which, in an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15, denied, among other things, a motion by defendants Teresa Hornung Rudolph and Axel Rudolph to compel joinder of certain parties.Plaintiffs commenced this action to quiet title to a twoacre parcel of real property located in the Town of Shandaken, Ulster County (hereinafter the disputed property). Defendants Teresa Hornung Rudolph and Axel Rudolph (hereinafter collectively-2- 521070

referred to as defendants) also assert title to the disputed property, but plaintiffs allege that defendants' claim is based upon a deed actually describing a separate parcel, which is located half a mile away from the disputed property. Defendants thereafter moved to join the record owners of the separate parcel as necessary parties. Supreme Court denied defendants' motion, and this appeal ensued. We affirm. In an action to quiet title, joinder of a party is necessary only when "it appears to the court that a person not a party to the action may have an estate or interest in the real property which may in any manner be affected by the judgment" (RPAPL 1511 [2]; see CPLR 1001 [a]; Sorbello v Birchez Assoc., LLC, 61 AD3d 1225, 1226 [2009]). The function of the judgment in such an action is to resolve each party's claim to the disputed property (see RPAPL 1521 [1]; Glenn Acres Tree Farm, Inc. v Town of Hartwick Historical Socy., Inc., 84 AD3d 1529, 1530 [2011]; Keller v Village of Castleton-on-Hudson, 173 AD2d 979, 979 [1991]). Here, plaintiffs do not make a claim to the separate parcel that they contend is actually described in defendants' deed. Rather, plaintiffs raise the point only to show an alleged weakness in defendants' claim to the disputed property. Nor do plaintiffs seek a judgment resolving the question of who owns the separate parcel. Accordingly, the judgment in this action will have no bearing upon the validity or invalidity of defendants' interest in the separate parcel. Inasmuch as the record owners of the separate parcel will not be inequitably affected by the judgment in this action, they are not necessary parties (see Ellison Hgts. Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ellison Hgts. LLC, 112 AD3d 1302, 1305 [2013]; compare Sorbello v Birchez Assoc., LLC, 61 AD3d at 1226). Peters, P.J., Garry and Lynch, JJ., concur.-3- 521070

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MAY 2, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-13426

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-60416 CV-PCH

TROPICAL AVIATION GROUND

SERVICES, INC., A Florida corporation, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus

KENNETH JENNE, II, 

Sheriff of Broward County, 

ROBERT SIERRA, 

Defendants-Appellants.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

 (May 2, 2005)

Before BLACK, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Appellant Robert Sierra, an employee of the Broward County Sheriff’s

Office, conducted a warrantless search on the commercial premises of Appellee

Tropical Aviation Ground Services, Inc. (Tropical Aviation). Pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983, Tropical Aviation brought suit against Sierra, alleging a violation

of the Fourth Amendment. Sierra filed a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the

complaint based on qualified immunity. The district court denied Sierra’s motion,

and this appeal followed. The district court did not err in denying Sierra’s motion

to dismiss.

AFFIRMED.
H. Res. 1612 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 16, 2010. 

Whereas the Constitution of the United States was signed on 

September 17, 1787, by 39 delegates from 12 States; 

Whereas the Constitution was subsequently ratified by each 

of the original 13 States; 

Whereas the Constitution was drafted in order to form a 

more perfect Union, establish justice, insure domestic 

tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the 

general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty for the 

citizens of the United States; 

Whereas the Constitution has provided the means and structure for this Nation and its citizens that is unparalleled 

by any other country; 

Whereas the Constitution’s contributions to the welfare of the 

human race reach far beyond the borders of the United 

States; 

Whereas the House of Representatives continues to strive to 

preserve and strengthen the values and rights bestowed 

by the Constitution upon the United States and its citizens; 

Whereas the Constitution is recognized by many to be the 

most significant and important document in history for 

establishing freedom and justice through democracy; 
2 

•HRES 1612 EH 

Whereas the Constitution deserves the recognition, respect, 

and reverence of all people in the United States; 

Whereas every person in the United States should celebrate 

the freedom and responsibilities of the Constitution; 

Whereas the preservation of such values and rights in the 

hearts and minds of United States citizens would be advanced by official recognition of the signing of the Constitution; and 

Whereas September 17, 2010, is designated as ‘‘Constitution 

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports ‘‘Constitution Day’’; and 

(2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Stephen James SCIPIO, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 15-9165.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with Quarterly Report of Goldspan Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, John C. Baird, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Leon M. Caldwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.





By:
            /s/John
      BairdName:
            John
      C. BairdTitle:
            Principal
      Executive Officer,
              Chairman
      of the Board and DirectorDate:
            December
      11, 2009








By:
            /s/Leon CaldwellName:
            Leon
      M. CaldwellTitle:
            Principal
      Financial Officer, President and DirectorDate:
            December
      11, 2009








This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Goldspan Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Goldspan Resources, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
SEC Exhibit



Exhibit 10.4



February 1, 2016
E. Clinton Cain
AdCare Health Systems, Inc.
1145 Hembree Road
Roswell, GA  30076


Dear Clinton,
On behalf of AdCare Health Systems, Inc. (“AdCare”), this letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) outlines the terms of potential payments from AdCare to you.  In this agreement, the terms “you” and “your” refer to you, Clinton Cain.  The terms “us,” “we,” and “our” refer to AdCare, and are collectively referred to as the “parties.” 
The parties agree that termination “for cause” means due to negligence or misconduct in the performance of your material duties that directly results in an economic loss to AdCare, and termination “without cause” means due to any other reason, including, but not limited to, the relocation of the offices of AdCare and/or its successors or affiliates from the greater Atlanta area and/or any adverse change to compensation such as any reduction in salary, regardless of whether your salary has increased between the date of signing this Letter Agreement and your last day of employment. Your last day of employment referred to herein shall be known as the “Termination Date.” 
If you are terminated without cause, you will be paid twelve (12) months of severance pay comprised of salary continuation. This amount will be the greater of either (i) your salary upon the date of signing this Letter Agreement, or (ii) your salary at the Termination Date (“Severance”). Severance is subject to all applicable withholdings and is to begin immediately after the Termination Date until Severance is paid in full. You will not receive Severance if you are terminated for cause or you voluntarily terminate your employment, except for, as specified above, you voluntarily terminate your employment with AdCare and/or its successors or affiliates upon a reduction in compensation. Such voluntary termination resulting from any reduction in salary shall be considered termination “without cause” for purposes of this Letter Agreement. Such Severance shall only be applicable to the extent your Termination Date is within 24 months of the date of this Letter Agreement.
This Letter Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties as it relates to potential salary continuation payments, and any modifications must be made in writing and executed by both parties. 


This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Georgia. The undersigned accepts the terms of this Letter Agreement as outlined above. 
Regards,
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Allan J. Rimland      2/1/2016
	 
	/s/ E. Clinton Cain     2/1/2016

	Allan J. Rimland, President, Date
	 
	Name, Date