alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Juan Carlos DELGADO-LORENZO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-71929.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 21, 2012.*

Filed Feb. 29, 2012.

Frank E. Ronzio, Ronzio & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Edward C. Durant, OIL, Kathryn L. Moore, Esquire, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Depart*561ment of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny petitioner’s request for oral argument.

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Carlos Delgado-Lorenzo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s discretionary determination that petitioner failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his U.S. citizen child. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); *Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey,*552 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir.2009).

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal because petitioner failed to show that the guerillas’ attempt to recruit him was on account of a protected ground. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481-82, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (holding that forced recruitment alone is not enough to show persecution on account of political opinion). Because the Board properly denied relief for lack of a nexus, we need not address petitioner’s contention that he suffered past persecution or has a well-founded fear of future persecution by forces the Guatemalan government is unable or unwilling to control.

Substantial evidence also supports the Board’s denial of CAT relief based on the Board’s finding that petitioner did not establish a likelihood of torture by, at the instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of the Guatemalan government. *See Arteaga v. Mukasey,*511 F.3d 940, 948-49 (9th Cir.2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
H. Res. 146 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 5, 2009. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success, and is a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress, through the No Child Left Behind Act of 

2001 (Public Law 107–110) and the Reading First, 

Early Reading First, and Improving Literacy Through 

School Libraries programs, has placed great emphasis on 

reading intervention and providing additional resources 

for reading assistance; and 

Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned 

about reading and education have joined with the National Education Association to use March 2 to celebrate 

reading and the birth of Theodor Geisel, also known as 

Dr. Seuss: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. 

Seuss, for his success in encouraging children to discover 

the joy of reading; 
2 

•HRES 146 EH 

(2) honors the 12th anniversary of Read Across 

America Day; 

(3) encourages parents to read with their children 

for at least 30 minutes on Read Across America Day in 

honor of the commitment of the House of Representatives to building a Nation of readers; and 

(4) encourages the people of the United States to 

observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
National Medical Financial Services Corporation on Form S-3 (File No.
333-11381) of our report dated March 31, 1998, on our audit of the financial
statements of National Medical Financial Services Corporation as of December
31, 1997 and for the year then ended, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB.


MEDWIG LABRIOLA & CO.


1000 Arrott Building
401 Wood Street
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
April 27, 1998
Michael A. SVEUM, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 15-9118.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District IV denied.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

In the Matter of: 

PAUL COCHRAN 

CFTC Docket No. 02-01 

ORDER PURSUANT TO 

DELEGATED AUTHORITY 

On July 12, 2013, petitioner Paul Cochran ("Cochran") filed with the Commission a 

Motion for Modification ofCFTC Docket No. 02-01, Pursuant to CFTC Regulation 10.26 

("Motion for Modification"). On August 23, 2013, Cochran filed a Notice of Withdrawal of his 

Motion for Modification. 

Accordingly, Cochran's Motion for Modification ofCFTC Docket No. 02-01, Pursuant to 

CFTC Regulation 1 0.26, is hereby dismissed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 

~~ Deputy General Counsel 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Dated: November 20, 20 13 

. • ~I 

1 By the Commission pursuant to delegated authority. 17 C.F.R. § 10.109(5). 

.. 

·' 

-, 

'I 

. ~:; (") 

: 1· • 

. -::: ·~) ~·· ....
Richard Paul RIGGINS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-5941.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6567
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TYRONE LEE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-89-53-R) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 7, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Lee, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lee , No. CR-89-53-R (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Pedro Pete BENEVIDES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6389.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
In re Jaron BRICE, petitioner.

No. 16-6437.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
IV 

House Calendar No. 245 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1736 

[Report No. 111–660] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 

4783) to accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions for the relief of victims of the earthquake in Chile, and to extend 

the period from which such contributions for the relief of victims of 

the earthquake in Haiti may be accelerated. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. PERLMUTTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to 

the bill (H.R. 4783) to accelerate the income tax benefits 

for charitable cash contributions for the relief of victims 

of the earthquake in Chile, and to extend the period 

from which such contributions for the relief of victims 

of the earthquake in Haiti may be accelerated. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 4783) to accelerate the income tax benefits for charVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:57 Nov 29, 2010 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1736.RH HR1736

hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1736 RH 

1 itable cash contributions for the relief of victims of the 

2 earthquake in Chile, and to extend the period from which 

3 such contributions for the relief of victims of the earth4 quake in Haiti may be accelerated, with the Senate 

5 amendments thereto, and to consider in the House, with6 out intervention of any point of order, a single motion of7 fered by the chair of the Committee on Natural Resources 

8 or his designee that the House concur in the Senate 

9 amendments. The Senate amendments shall be considered 

10 as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour, with 

11 50 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

12 ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural 

13 Resources and 10 minutes equally divided and controlled 

14 by the chair and ranking minority member of the Com15 mittee on Ways and Means. The previous question shall 

16 be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption 

17 without intervening motion or demand for division of the 

18 question. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS

hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 245 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1736 

[Report No. 111–660] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendearthquake in Haiti may be accelerated. such contributions for the relief of victims of the in Chile, and to extend the period from which tions for the relief of victims of the earthquake income tax benefits for charitable cash contribu- ments to the bill (H.R. 4783) to accelerate the 

NOVEMBER 29, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1741 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1741

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 1, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 101) making further 
continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2011, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived except 
those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The joint resolution shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the joint 
resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Section 906 Certification

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Ballard Power Systems Inc., a
corporation organized under the laws of Canada (the Company), for the period
ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1. the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d); and

2. the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 13,
      2008 | John Sheridan                       | 
|--------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | 
|                            | John
      Sheridan                  
|                            | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                           
|                           
|Dated: March 13,
      2008 | Dave Smith                          | 
|                            | Dave
      Smith                     
|                            | Chief
      Financial Officer        

---
Ladarius Bradshaw MIKE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-5754.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Hicham AZKOUR, petitioner, v. LITTLE REST TWELVE, INC.

No. 16-322.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000934741
<NAME> SDL. INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,605
<SECURITIES>                                    45,353
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                       780
<INVENTORY>                                     13,441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,117
<PP&E>                                          39,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,214
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,842
<SALES>                                         69,772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,475
<CGS>                                           45,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,847
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,501)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,173
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,052
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,121
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

OMAR ANGELERO COLON, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 298 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of August, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elkyn Taberas, Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 172]—

*792Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Knopf, J.), rendered May 18, 2006, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of reckless endangerment in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484 [2008]; *People v Finger,*95 NY2d 894 [2000]; *People v Bynum,*70 NY2d 858, 859 [1987]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the crime of reckless endangerment in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant led the police on a chase for about one mile over “slushy” and “icy” roads in the rain and snow, reaching speeds of 40 miles per hour, through a busy residential neighborhood with narrow roads. The defendant forced cars to pull over to avoid colliding with him, disregarded several traffic control devices, and stopped only when his vehicle skidded *(see People v MacLean,*48 AD3d 1215 [2008]; *People v Wolz,*300 AD2d 606 [2002]; *People v Kenney,*288 AD2d 323 [2001]; *People v Walker,*258 AD2d 541 [1999]; *People v Finger,*266 AD2d 561 [1999]). Upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s claim that he was denied a fair trial by certain remarks made by the prosecutor during summation also is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Friel,*53 AD3d 667 [2008]; *People v Carrieri,*49 AD3d 660 [2008]; *People v German,*45 AD3d 861, 862 [2007]). In any event, the challenged comments were either fair comment on the evidence or a fair response to the defense summation *(see People v Halm,*81 NY2d 819 [1993]; *People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105 [1976]).

*793The defendant’s contention that trial counsel’s failure to preserve certain claims for appellate review constituted ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit *(see People v Acevedo,*44 AD3d 168 [2007]; *People v Coles,*43 AD3d 1424 [2007]; see *also People v Friel,*53 AD3d 667 [2008]; *People v Rose,*47 AD3d 848 [2008]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 83 [1982]). Fisher, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Arren Taco FRISON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6044.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Alphonso WYNN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6739.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,247-01

IN RE ARTHUR LAMAR MITCHELL, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 695776 IN THE 185TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 185th District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order that designates issues to be investigated

(see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that Relator has
2

not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Harris County. Should the response include

an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was served with the habeas

application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to file a writ of

mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such

response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: June 3, 2015

Do not publish
<PAGE>
                     AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P. SUBSIDIARY LIST

                                   EXHIBIT 21



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiaries of AmeriGas Partners, L.P                                  ownership               state
--------------------------------------                                  ---------               -----
<S>                                                                     <C>                     <C>
AmeriGas Finance Corp.                                                  100%                    DE
AmeriGas Propane, L.P.                                                  98.99%                  DE
            AmeriGas Eagle Propane, L.P.                                99%                     DE
                        AmeriGas Eagle Parts & Service, Inc.            100%                    PA
            AmeriGas Propane Parts & Service, Inc.                      100%                    PA
            AmeriGas Eagle Propane, Inc.                                100%                    DE
                        AmeriGas Eagle Holdings, Inc.                   100%                    DE
AmeriGas Eagle Finance Corp.                                            100%                    DE
AP Eagle Finance Corp.                                                  100%                    DE
</TABLE>
In re Christopher DEATON, petitioner.

No. 16-5767.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.