alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21
 Life Time Fitness, Inc.
List of Subsidiaries
 Name
    
    State or Province of FormationLTF Club Operations Company, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaLTF Club Operations Company Canada Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaLTF Management Services, LLC
    
    DelawareBloomingdale LIFE TIME Fitness, L.L.C.
    
    IllinoisFCA Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Operations Holdings, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaFCA Construction Company, LLC
    
    DelawareFCA Restaurant Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Minnetonka Restaurant Company, LLC
    
    DelawareFCA Construction Company Canada Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaLife Time Fitness Financial, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Financial & Insurance, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Triathlon Series, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Club Management Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF TIAA Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Michigan Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Minnesota Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF USA Real Estate Company, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Company, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaLTF CMBS I, LLC (99%)
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Company Canada Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaLTF CMBS Managing Member, Inc.
    
    DelawareLTF CMBS I, LLC (1%)
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate VRDN I, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Voyager I, LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Voyager II (WBL), LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate Voyager III (Bloomington), LLC
    
    DelawareLTF Real Estate CBC I (Chan Club), LLC
    
    DelawareNon-profit corporation: Life Time Fitness Foundation
    
    Minnesota
 NOTES:
Russell L. OVERTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-1504.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals is granted limited to the following question: "Whether the petitioners' convictions must be set aside under *Brady v. Maryland* , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963)." The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
Felix D. GUZMAN-RIVADENEIRA, petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General.

No. 16-6541.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Imran Ahmad JAMALI, petitioner, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, et al.

No. 16-6514.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2009267EN.01005203.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/52

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 4 June 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge (Belgium)) — Carlos Cloet, Jacqueline Cloet v Westvlaamse Intercommunale voor Economische Expansie, Huisvestingsbeleid en Technische Bijstand CVBA (WVI)

(Case C-129/08) (1)

1

2009/C 267/88

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 7.6.2008.

1

---
<PAGE>

                           EXHIBIT 23.1

        CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-19883) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan, the 
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-11841) pertaining to the 1996 
Nonstatutory Employee and Consultant Option Plan and the Registration 
Statement (Form S-8 No. 033-95886) pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock 
Purchase Plan, the 1995 Employee and Consultant Stock Plan and the 1995 
Director Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 15, 1997, with respect 
to the consolidated financial statements of DSP Communications, Inc. (the 
"Company") included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended 
December 31, 1996.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of DSP 
Communications, Inc. listed in item 14(a)2 of this Annual Report.  This 
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our 
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, 
the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in 
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly 
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 21, 1997
Murray Allen WOODWORTH, petitioner, v. J.T. SHARTLE, Warden.

No. 16-6094.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          506672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   815558
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1473385
<PP&E>                                           26423
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2206861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           762302
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       3852825
<OTHER-SE>                                      231207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2206861
<SALES>                                         618468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                618468
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   697672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (64072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (64072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (64072)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.049)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.049)


</TABLE>
Robert V. WOODARD, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 16-6420.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        161


        <NAME>      Fidelity Europe Capital Appreciation Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

6-MOS


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

OCT-31-1998


<PERIOD-END>

APR-30-1998


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

511,058


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

626,549


<RECEIVABLES>

49,320


<ASSETS-OTHER>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

675,869


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

34,311


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

3,794


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

38,105


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

496,605


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

34,475


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

22,458


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

1,384


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

0


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

24,338


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

115,437


<NET-ASSETS>

637,764


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

3,660


<INTEREST-INCOME>

478


<OTHER-INCOME>

(409)


<EXPENSES-NET>

2,345


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

1,384


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

24,792


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

85,343


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

111,519


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

3,531


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

46,118


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

13,319


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

4,701


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

3,399


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

265,715


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

4,580


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

61,740


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

0


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

1,611


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

0


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

2,419


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

434,715


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

16.570


<PER-SHARE-NII>

 .050


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

4.120


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .160


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

2.090


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

18.500


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

114


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
mbcc-ex104_27.htm



Exhibit 10.4

 

AMENDMENT TO SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment dated as of January 1, 2016 (“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (“Mission”) is made to that certain Shared Services Agreement dated as of June 13, 2003 by and between Mission Broadcasting, Inc. and Nexstar Broadcasting of Abilene, L.L.C., as amended by those certain amendments dated June 1, 2004 and December 30, 2005, as extended by letter agreement on June 1, 2013 (collectively, the “Agreement”).

 

WHEREAS, Mission is the licensee of television broadcast station KRBC-TV, Abilene, Texas;

 

WHEREAS, Nexstar is the licensee of television broadcasting station KTAB-TV, Abilene, Texas; 

 

WHEREAS, Mission and Nexstar have entered into the Agreement for their mutual benefit;

 

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1. Paragraph 4(g) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in its place: “4(g) Services Fee. In consideration for the services to be provided to the Stations by Nexstar personnel as described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f), Mission will pay Nexstar the fee (“Services Fee”) described in Section 4(g).

 

(i)Base Amount. Subject to the remaining provisions of this Section 4(g), the base amount of the Services Fee will be $29,166.67 per month.

 

(ii) Payment Terms. The Services Fee will be payable monthly, in arrears, from and after the month during which this Agreement is executed, and will be prorated on a daily basis for the first and last months during which the sharing arrangements described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f) are in effect.” 

 

2.These revised payment terms are effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.

 

3. As so amended, all sections and provisions of the Agreement are hereby ratified in full. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date above.

 


			
	
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

 
	
 
	
MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

	
By: /s/ Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
By: /s/ Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Name: Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
 

Name: Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Title: EVP & Chief Financial Officer
	
 
	
 

Title: President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          22,496
<SECURITIES>                                    22,198
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,113)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,391
<PP&E>                                          51,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                (35,562)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,953
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,972)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,161
<SALES>                                         51,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,608
<CGS>                                            8,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,288
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,322
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,966
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,966
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
1297.

#### Bass *v.*The State.

Hill, C. J.

1. The right to make a statement in his behalf is a personal right granted to the defendant, and extends no further than to permit him personally to make to the court and jury just such statement as he deems proper in his defense. His counsel has no right to ask him questions While he is making his statement. The trial judge, however, *845in liis discretion, can permit the defendant’s counsel to make suggestions to the defendant relating to his statement, while he is making it or when he has concluded it. *Walker*v. *State,*116 *Ga.*540 (42 S. E. 787, 67 L. R. A. 426) *; Brown*v. *State,*58 *Ga.*214; *Echols*v. *State,*109 *Ga.*508 (34 S. E. 1038).

Accusation of trespass, from city court of Sparta — Judge Little. June *15,*1908.

Submitted October 6,

Decided October *12,*1908.

*R. H. Lewis,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. W. Moore, solicitor,*contra.

2. The trial judge, in refusing to allow the defendant’s counsel to examine him or to call his attention to “one other matter,” did not err in saying, in the hearing of the jury, “I have allowed him to make a free and full statement.” The use of the word “full” was not an expression relating to the credibility or weight of the statement.

3. The evidence supports the verdict. . *Judgment affirmed.*
Maurice Devlon HAIRE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6933.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


	Principal
    Amount: $100,000	Funding
    Date: January 15, 2016


 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, Acorn Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the order of
Visionary Enhancement, LLC or the holder of this Note (the “Lender”), on the Maturity Date (as defined below) at such
place of payment as the holder of this Promissory Note (this “Note”) may specify from time to time in writing, in
lawful money of the United States of America, a single payment equal to 115% of the Principal Amount set forth above, which payment
shall be in full satisfaction of any and all obligations of the Borrower to Lender under this Note. The Maturity Date shall be
the third business day following the date of the receipt by the Borrower of proceeds upon the closing of the contemplated sale
by the Borrower of a portion of its shares of DSIT Solutions Ltd. (the “DSIT Closing Date”).


 


By
written notice, the Lender, assuming that he is not at such time in possession of material inside information, may by written
notice to the Borrower on or prior to the day preceding Maturity Date, elect to all (but not part) of the amount payable to Lender
under this Note into Common Stock of the Borrower at a conversion price equal to the closing price of the Common Stock of the
Borrower on the principal market for such Common Stock on the trading day immediately preceding the Maturity Date.


 


This
Promissory Note has been negotiated and delivered to Lender and is payable in the State of Delaware. This Note shall be governed
by and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, excluding any conflicts of law rules or principles
that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.


 


	 	ACORN
    ENERGY, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	John
    A. Moore
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer
Cheri RODGERS, petitioner, v. CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SYSTEM, et al.

No. 15-9208.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15871]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 10, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Milton Allen Willnerd, Lincoln, Nebraska; to acquire voting 
shares of Wheeler County Bancshares, Inc., Ericson, Nebraska; and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Ericson State Bank, 
Ericson, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 20, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-15871 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sports Properties Acquisition
Corp. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Larry D. Hall                    
| |  | Larry D. Hall Chief Financial
Officer

Date: November 12, 2009
ERIC F., petitioner, v. Sheriff's Deputy DALRYMPLE, et al.

No. 15-9286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00541-CV

LONE STAR SPORTSMAN, INC. d/b/a Alan Warren Outdoors,

Appellant

v.

Mike Malik d/b/a Hunt 

Mike MALIK d/b/a Paradice Hunt Club,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-19979

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 27, 2013

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of 

service to appellee, who has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant. See id. 42.1(d). 

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is denied as moot.

 PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3348]


State of Louisiana

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on June 
11, 2001, I find that the following Parishes in the State of Louisiana 
constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by Tropical Storm 
Allison occurring on June 5, 2001 and continuing: Ascension, 
Assumption, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, Lafayette, Lafourche, 
Livingston, St. Martin, Terrebonne and Vermilion Parishes. Applications 
for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed 
until the close of business on August 10, 2001, and for loans for 
economic injury until the close of business on March 11, 2002 at the 
address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small 
Business Administration, Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter 
Blvd., Suite 102, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous Parishes may be filed 
until the specified date at the above location: Acadia, Cameron, East 
Feliciana, Iberia, Jefferson, Jefferson Davis, Pointe Coupee, St. 
Charles, St. Helena, St. James, St. John The Baptist, St. Landry, St. 
Mary, Tangipahoa, West Baton Rouge and West Feliciana Parishes in 
Louisiana.
    The interest rates are:

For Physical Damage

Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere: 6.625%
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere: 3.312%
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere: 8.000%
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 4.000%
Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 7.125%

For Economic Injury

Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available 
Elsewhere: 4.000%

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 334808 
and for economic injury the number assigned is 9L8800.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 12, 2001.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-15453 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P