alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 526.

#### Blumen et al. *v.*Haff, District Director of Immigration.

November 25, 1935.

Petition for writ *645of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*Messrs. Roger O’Donnell*and *Stephen M. White*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Keenan,*and *Messrs. Bart W. Butler*and *W. Marvin Smith*for respondent.
----

----

I Atti per i quali la pubblicazione è una condizione di applicabilità

----

REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 1936/2004 DELLA COMMISSIONE

del 9 novembre 2004

recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all'importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni ortofrutticoli

LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNITÀ EUROPEE,

visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunità europea,

visto il regolamento (CE) n. 3223/94 della Commissione, del 21 dicembre 1994, recante modalità di applicazione del regime di importazione degli ortofrutticoli (1), in particolare l'articolo 4, paragrafo 1,

considerando quanto segue:

HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO:

Articolo 1

I valori forfettari all'importazione di cui all'articolo 4 del regolamento (CE) n. 3223/94 sono fissati nella tabella riportata nell'allegato.

Articolo 2

Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il 10 novembre 2004.

Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri.

Fatto a Bruxelles, il 9 novembre 2004.

Per la Commissione

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Direttore generale dell'Agricoltura

----

(1)GU L 337 del 24.12.1994, pag. 66. Regolamento modificato da ultimo dal regolamento (CE) n. 1947/2002 (GU L 299 dell'1.11.2002, pag. 17).

----

ALLEGATO

al regolamento della Commissione, del 9 novembre 2004, recante fissazione dei valori forfettari all'importazione ai fini della determinazione del prezzo di entrata di alcuni ortofrutticoli

----

(1)  Nomenclatura dei paesi stabilita dal regolamento (CE) n. 2081/2003 della Commissione (GU L 313 del 28.11.2003, pag. 11). Il codice «999» rappresenta le «altre origini».

----

----

REGOLAMENTO (CE) N. 1937/2004 DELLA COMMISSIONE

del 9 novembre 2004

che modifica gli allegati I, II, III e IV del regolamento (CE) n. 44/2001 del Consiglio, concernente la competenza giurisdizionale, il riconoscimento e l’esecuzione delle decisioni in materia civile e commerciale

LA COMMISSIONE DELLE COMUNITÀ EUROPEE,

visto il trattato che istituisce la Comunità europea,

visto il regolamento (CE) n. 44/2001 del Consiglio, del 22 dicembre 2000, concernente la competenza giurisdizionale, il riconoscimento e l’esecuzione delle decisioni in materia civile e commerciale (1), in particulare l’articolo 74,

considerando quanto segue:

HA ADOTTATO IL PRESENTE REGOLAMENTO:

Articolo 1

Il regolamento (CE) n. 44/2001 viene modificato come segue.

Articolo 2

Il presente regolamento entra in vigore il settimo giorno successivo alla pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea.

Il presente regolamento è obbligatorio in tutti i suoi elementi e direttamente applicabile in ciascuno degli Stati membri.

Fatto a Bruxelles, il 9 novembre 2004.

Per la Commissione

António VITORINO

Membro della Commissione

----

(1)GU L 12 del 16.1.2001, pag. 1. Regolamento modificato da ultimo dall’atto di adesione del 2003.

----
H. Res. 1653 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 23, 2010. 

Resolved, 

SECTION 1. (a) Each of the bills and the amendment of 

the Senate specified in subsection (b)— 

(1) in the opinion of this House, contravenes the 

first clause of the seventh section of the first article of 

the Constitution of the United States and is an infringement of the privileges of this House; and 

(2) shall be respectfully returned to the Senate with 

a message communicating this resolution. 

(b) The bills and amendment of the Senate specified in 

this subsection are as follows: 

(1) The Senate amendment to H.R. 5875. 

(2) S. 951. 

(3) S. 1023. 

(4) S. 2799. 
2 

•HRES 1653 EH 

(5) S. 3162. 

(6) S. 3187. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        201


        <NAME>      Fidelity Hong Kong and China  Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

6-MOS


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

OCT-31-1998


<PERIOD-END>

APR-30-1998


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

179,643


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

174,957


<RECEIVABLES>

2,140


<ASSETS-OTHER>

399


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

177,496


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

2,739


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

1,027


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

3,766


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

209,861


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

15,715


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

16,040


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

1,418


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

0


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

(32,862)


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

(4,687)


<NET-ASSETS>

173,730


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

3,471


<INTEREST-INCOME>

273


<OTHER-INCOME>

(129)


<EXPENSES-NET>

1,228


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

2,387


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

(31,479)


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

29,382


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

290


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

969


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

6,497


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

6,904


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

81


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

(3,686)


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

2,039


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

3,137


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

0


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

666


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

0


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

1,229


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

179,776


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

11.060


<PER-SHARE-NII>

 .140


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

(.100)


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .060


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

0


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

11.060


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

139


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
Exhibit (d)(74)

FORM OF
David Earl BRITT, petitioner, v. Butch CONWAY, Sheriff, Gwinnett County, Georgia.

No. 16-5998.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
| Subsidiary                       | Country of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Ritelco S.A.                     | Uruguay                  |
| Palermo Invest S.A.              | Argentina                |
| Solares de Santa María S.A. | Argentina                |
| Nuevas Fronteras S.A.            | Argentina                |
| Inversora Bolivar S.A.           | Argentina                |
| Hoteles Argentinos S.A.          | Argentina                |
| Llao Llao Resorts S.A.           | Argentina                |
| Unicity S.A.                     | Argentina                |
| Alto Palermo S.A.                | Argentina                |
| E-Commerce Latina S.A.           | Argentina                |
| Tyrus S.A.                       | Uruguay                  |
| Efanur S.A.                      | Uruguay                  |

----
FLYTENOW, INC., petitioner, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION.

No. 16-14.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-5110 Commodity Fu tu rn Tnding Commi.u1on 

TO: J. Christopher Giancarlo, Acting Chairman 

Sharon Y. Bowen, Commissioneh 

FROM: A. Roy Lavik, Inspector Genera t'('£__ 

DATE: April 14, 2017 

SUBJECT: OIG Risk Assessment ofthe U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(CFTC) Purchase Card and Convenience Check Program 

The Government Charge Card Abuse Prevention Act of2012 (P.L. No. 112-194) requires 

the Inspector General to report to the head ofthe agency the results of analyses or audits 

ofthe agency's purchase card and convenience check programs, to conduct periodic 

assessments, and to conduct analyses and audits as necessary. We conducted this 

assessment during Fiscal Year 2017 in accordance with the Quality Standards for 

Inspection and Evaluation, as published by the Council ofthe Inspectors General on 

Integrity and Efficiency. 

During Fiscal Year 2016, CFTC noted $3,068,759 in charges on thirty-three purchase 

cards issued to CFTC staff. Over the same period approximately $107,015-40 in 

expenses were paid by convenience checks. During this period, the OIG received no 

allegations regarding purchase cards or convenience checks. My office previously 

reported1 that nothing came to our attention that would warrant the OIG to conclude 

that internal controls over purchase card and convenience check programs were not 

operating as intended. Annually, the OIG engages an independent public accounting 

firm to conduct an audit ofthe CFTC's financial statements and report on the CFTC's 

compliance with laws and regulations related to its financial statements. The auditors 

concluded that the CFTC was generally in compliance with applicable laws and 

regulations and did not identify any matter related to purchase card and convenience 

check usage. 2 

Our last report addressing purchase card transactions, which targeted potentially 

suspicious purchases during FY2011-FY2012, resulted in no recommendations3. 

Accordingly, there are no outstanding recommendations regarding the purchase card 

and convenience checking programs. As such, we conclude the current risk ofillegal, 

improper, or erroneous purchases is low. 

1 Review of Management Assurances for Internal Control (2014-2015) (June 6, 2016). 


2 Financial Statements Audit Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 (Nov. 14, 2016) 


3 A Review of 75 Purchases bv the Commodity Futures Trading Commission: March 2011-2012 (Dec. 21, 


2012).
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                       Computations of Net Loss Per Share

            The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
loss per share as calculated in accordance with FASB 128.



<Table>
<Caption>
                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,       NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                        --------------------------------      --------------------------------
                                                             2001               2000               2001               2000
                                                        -------------      -------------      -------------      -------------
<S>                                                     <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>
Numerator:
    Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share
   NET LOSS                                             $  (1,285,096)     $  (1,635,564)     $  (4,980,417)     $  (8,835,637)
                                                        =============      =============      =============      =============

Denominator:
    Denominator for basic loss per share
    Weighted average shares                               111,999,393         80,687,459         99,373,321         78,654,882


Effect of dilutive securities:
    Stock options and warrants                                     --                 --                 --                 --


    Dilutive potential common shares                               --                 --                 --                 --
                                                        -------------      -------------      -------------      -------------

Denominator for diluted earnings per share
    Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed
      conversions                                         111,999,393         80,687,459         99,373,321         78,654,882
                                                        =============      =============      =============      =============


BASIC LOSS PER SHARE                                    $       (0.01)     $       (0.02)     $       (0.05)     $       (0.11)
                                                        =============      =============      =============      =============
DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE                                  $       (0.01)     $       (0.02)     $       (0.05)     $       (0.11)
                                                        =============      =============      =============      =============
</Table>


            Because MigraTEC incurred a net loss for the nine months ended
September 30, 2001 and 2000, there were no adjustments for potentially dilutive
securities as the adjustments would have been anti-dilutive.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-90848 and 33-92200) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan,
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1992 Stock Option Plan and the Amended and
Restated 1984 Incentive Stock Option Plan of SDL, Inc. of our report dated
January 30, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of SDL, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1997.

                                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose, California
March 2, 1998
245 Summer Street

Fidelity® Investments 

Boston, MA 02210

September 30, 2016

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention: File Room

| RE:

Fidelity Oxford Street Trust (the trust): File Nos. 002-77909 and 811-03480 

Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (the fund)

________________________________________________________________________

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Transmitted herewith pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933 is certification that the Prospectuses and Statements of Additional Information with respect to the above referenced funds do not differ from those filed in the most recent post-effective amendment, which was filed electronically.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Marc Bryant

Marc Bryant

Secretary of the Trust |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 Independent Auditors Consent The Board of Directors
GenVec, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-101963 and No. 333-76886) on Form S-3, in the
registration statement (No. 333-105320) on Form S-4 and in the registration statements
(No. 333-110446, No. 333-55590,
No. 333-55586 and No. 333-55584) on Form S-8 of our report dated
February 20, 2004, with respect to the balance sheets of GenVec, Inc. as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003
annual report on Form 10-K of GenVec, Inc. KPMG LLP /s/KPMG LLP Baltimore, Maryland
March 15, 2004
Hermelindo ANGELES-TREJO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5956.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Michael L. CALLOWAY, Sr., petitioner, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et al.

No. 16-447.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Ronan Aguiar DE SOUZA, petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General.

No. 16-532.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.1


 





FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment
to Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), effective as of February 25, 2016, is made by and between BioLife Solutions
Inc. (“BioLife Solutions” or the “Company”), and Daphne Taylor (“Executive”) and amends that
certain employment agreement, dated February 19, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”), between BioLife Solutions and Executive.


 


WHEREAS, the parties
previously entered into the Employment Agreement to provide for Executive’s services as the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company;


 


WHEREAS, Executive
and the Company desire to amend Executive’s Employment Agreement on the terms set forth herein;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained in this Amendment and other good and valuable
consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.             Nothwithstanding any other provisions
in the Employment Agreement to the contrary, if Executive voluntarily resigns from all positions, offices, and corresponding duties
and responsibilities in all capacities with the Company and biologistex CCM, LLC, effective as of the date of this Amendment, Employer
will pay Executive:


 


	a.  	(i) her salary through the date of termination, (ii) for any unused vacation time, and (iii) for any unreimbursed business expenses that are subject to reimbursement under the company’s then current policy on business expenses.
	b.  	severance pay of six (6) months’ worth of Executive’s salary at the rate in effect on the termination date, payable in the form of a lump sum.


Such payments
will be subject to all appropriate deductions and withholdings.  Upon resignation, Executive will have no rights to any
unvested benefits or any other compensation.


 


Executive shall
only be entitled to such severance pay if, within thirty (30) days following the date of resignation, both the Company and Executive
have signed (and then Executive does not rescind, as may be permitted by law) a general release of claims in a form acceptable
to Employer.


 


2.             The Employment Agreement remains unchanged except as set
forth in this Amendment.


 


3.             To the extent there is any conflict or any inconsistency
between this Amendment and the Employment Agreement, the provisions within this Amendment control.


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have duly signed and delivered this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement as of the day and year first above
written.


 


 


 


	BioLife Solutions Inc.	 
	 	 
	 /s/ Michael Rice                                           	 /s/ Daphne Taylor                                       
	By:  Michael Rice                                 	Daphne Taylor
	Its:  President & Chief Executive Officer
Ernie Little WALDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6736.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1682 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 243
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1682

                          [Report No. 111-655]

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 
   3081) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign 
 operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 
                   30, 2010, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 
   3081) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign 
 operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 
                   30, 2010, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution, it shall be in 
order to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 3081) making 
appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and 
related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for 
other purposes, with the Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in 
the House, without intervention of any point of order except those 
arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a single motion offered by the 
chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House 
concur in the Senate amendments. The Senate amendments and the motion 
shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption without 
intervening motion or demand for division of the question.
                                                 House Calendar No. 243

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1682

                          [Report No. 111-655]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 
   3081) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign 
 operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 
                   30, 2010, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 29, 2010

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Federal Register: November 17, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 221)]
[Notices]
[Page 63913]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17no98-43]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

"FEDERAL REGISTER" CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 63 FR 59549.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 10:00 a.m., Thursday,
November 19, 1998.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has
cancelled the meeting to discuss Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 418-5100.
Catherine D. Dixon,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-30829 Filed 11-13-98; 2:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----