alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Peter LIOUNIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
DELAWARE, plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA and Wisconsin.

No. 145, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion of Arkansas, et al. for leave to amend the Bill of Complaint granted.
Zenna McCLAM, petitioner, v. LAKE CITY FITNESS CENTER, fka IH3 Wellness Center, et al.

No. 16-5019.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 11  

                     GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,
                                                          -------------------
                                                            1999       1998
                                                          --------   --------
<S>                                                       <C>        <C>

Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (1,893)  $ (3,509)
                                                          ========   ========

Weighted average shares of common
   stock outstanding (basic and diluted). . . . . . . . .    9,466      6,756
                                                          ========   ========

Net loss per common share and common
   share equivalent (basic and diluted) . . . . . . . . . $  (0.20)  $  (0.52)
                                                          ========   ========

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Robert R. PURCELL, petitioner, v. MWI CORPORATION.

No. 16-361.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1719 

Recognizing the cultural and religious significance of Eid al-Adha and wishing 

Muslim-Americans and Muslims around the world a prosperous holiday. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2010 

Mr. HONDA (for himself, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, and Mr. ELLISON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the cultural and religious significance of Eid 

al-Adha and wishing Muslim-Americans and Muslims 

around the world a prosperous holiday. 

Whereas Eid al-Adha, or the Festival of the Sacrifice, is an 

Islamic holiday which honors Abraham’s symbolic sacrifice of his son to God, as referenced in the Quran, Old 

Testament, and New Testament; 

Whereas Abraham is a respected figure in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam; 

Whereas for more than 14 centuries, Eid al-Adha has been 

observed; 

Whereas Eid al-Adha is a holiday of great importance to millions of Muslim-Americans and approximately 

1,500,000,000 Muslims around the world; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1719 IH 

Whereas during Eid al-Adha, Muslim-Americans recognize 

the importance of sacrifice, freedom, and justice; 

Whereas Eid al-Adha is celebrated around the world with 

prayers, charity and social events; 

Whereas many communities across the United States hold 

day-long festivals in observance of Eid al-Adha; 

Whereas Islam is one of the world’s major religions, sharing 

the belief in one God and one humanity; 

Whereas Muslim-Americans have made significant contributions to the flourishing of the United States, including as 

ambassadors to foreign nations, award winning scientists, 

doctors, and engineers, and athletes; 

Whereas Muslim-Americans have contributed to the defense 

of the United States with an estimated 10,000 MuslimAmericans serving in the United States Armed Forces; 

and 

Whereas Muslim-Americans contribute to the success and 

pluralism of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the cultural and religious signifi3 cance of Eid al-Adha; 

4 (2) expresses its appreciation and respect for 

5 the contributions of Muslim-Americans to the United 

6 States; and 

7 (3) wishes Muslim-Americans and Muslims 

8 around the world who observe Eid al-Adha a pros9 perous holiday. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement (SEIS) in Conjunction With Proposed Flood Control Measures 
(Levee 37) on the Upper Des Plaines River at Mount Prospect in Cook 
County, IL

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The project involves proposed construction of flood control 
measures along the Upper Des Plaines River at Prospect Heights and 
Mount Prospect in Cook County, Illinois. Alternatives under 
consideration include earthen levees, concrete floodwalls, and 
temporary road closures.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Keith Ryder, (312) 353-6400 ext. 
2020; U.S. Corps of Engineers, Suite 600, 111 North Canal Street, 
Chicago, IL 60606-7206.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SEIS will document changes to the 
recommended plan (pertinent to the Levee 37 Project Area) originally 
proposed in the 1999 environmental impact statement.

Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-15736 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-HN-M
# FILED
May 21, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON NOVEMBER SESSION, 1996

STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) No. 02C01-9512-CR-00358 Appellee ) ) SHELBY COUNTY vs. ) ) Hon. Joseph B. Brown, Jr., Judge DARYL CONNER, ) ) (Rob bery) Appellant )
For the Appellant : For the Appellee : MELANIE E. TA

YLOR CHARLES W. BU RSON and Attorney General and Repor ter WILLIAM JOHNSON Attorneys at Law MICHAEL J. F AHEY, II 50 Front Street, Suite 1150 Assistant Attorney Gener al Memphis, TN 38103 Criminal Justice Div ision 450 James Robertson Parkwa y Nashville, TN 37243-0493
WILLIAM GIBBONS District Attorney General DAVID SHAPIRO GLEN BAITY Asst. District Attor

neys General Criminal Justice Comple x Third Floor, 201 Poplar Memphis, TN 38103

OPINION FILED: AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO R ULE 20
David G. Hay

es Judge2 OPINION
The appellant, Daryl Conner, was convicted by a Shelby County jur

y of robbery. The sole issue presented on appeal is whethe r the evidence adduced at trial is sufficient to sup port the jury’s v erdict.
On May 9, 1994, Mrs. Loi s Boggan, who was eighty-four years

old, was at home cooking dinner. Two men entered her kitchen through a back door and forced Mrs. Boggan’s w edding band and engagement ri ng from her hand. The assailants fled when Mrs . Boggan’s husband came into the room. One week later, Mrs. Boggan p

ositively identified the appellant in a photographi c lineup as one of the assailants. She again identified the appellant at tri al. Additionally, on the evening of the offense, a neighbor observed two men run f rom the Boggan’s house and drive away

in a car matching the desc ription of a car owned by the co-defendant, David Parris h. Parrish testified at tr ial that he and the appellant committ ed the rob bery.
After thoroughly rev

iewing the record, the briefs, and the law gov erning the issue presented by the ap pellant, we conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support the finding by the trier of fact of guilt beyo nd a reasonable doubt and that no e rror of la w requiring a reversal of the judgm ent is app arent. Ac cordingly, pursuant to Ct. of Crim. App. R ule 20, we affirm the judgment of the t rial court.

____________________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, Jud ge CONCUR:

_____________________________ GARY R. WADE , Judge

_____________________________ WILLIA M M. BARKER, Judge
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

www.cftc.gov

Open Meeting of the Commission 

Friday, November 4, 2016 

10:00 a.m. 

AGENDA 

1. Call to Order 

2. Opening Statements 

Chairman Timothy G. Massad 

Commissioner Sharon Y. Bowen 

Commissioner J. Christopher Giancarlo 

3. Staff Presentation: Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking –

Regulation Automated Trading 

Vince McGonagle, Division of Market Oversight 

Sebastian Pujol, Division of Market Oversight 

Marilee Dahlman, Division of Market Oversight 

Joseph Otchin, Division of Market Oversight 

Motion / Commissioners’ Questions and Discussion / Vote 

4. Adjournment
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of E.B. and * From the 326th District Court

M.B., children, of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 8773-CX.

No. 11-19-00001-CV * August 22, 2019

 * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# C_2011298EN.01000301.xml

| 8.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom)) — Generics (UK) Ltd v Synaptech Inc

(Case C-427/09) (1)

1

(Patent law - Medicinal products - Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products - Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 - Article 2 - Scope)

2011/C 298/04

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Generics (UK) Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: Synaptech Inc

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) — Interpretation of Article 13(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 of 18 June 1992 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (OJ 1992 L 182, p. 1) — Concept of first authorisation to place the product on the market — Account taken only of authorisations issued in accordance with Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to medicinal products (OJ, English Special Edition 1965-1966, p. 24) — Authorisation delivered in accordance with the legislation applicable in Austria before the latter acceded to the EEA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

A product, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which was placed on the market in the European Community as a medicinal product for human use before obtaining a marketing authorisation in accordance with Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to medicinal products, as amended by Council Directive 89/341/EEC of 3 May 1989, and, in particular, without undergoing safety and efficacy testing, is not within the scope of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 of 18 June 1992 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products, as amended by the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, as that scope is defined in Article 2 of that regulation, as amended, and may not be the subject of a supplementary protection certificate.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---
In re Jeffrey Robert HASTINGS, petitioner.

No. 16-6675.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Roger F. CARLSON, et ux., petitioners, v. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC., et al.

No. 16-137.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
----

----

I Veröffentlichungsbedürftige Rechtsakte

----

VERORDNUNG (EG) Nr. 1682/2004 DES EUROPÄISCHEN PARLAMENTS UND DES RATES

vom 15. September 2004

zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1655/2000 über das Finanzierungsinstrument für die Umwelt (LIFE)

DAS EUROPÄISCHE PARLAMENT UND DER RAT DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION —

gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, insbesondere auf Artikel 175 Absatz 1,

auf Vorschlag der Kommission,

nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses, (1)

nach Anhörung des Ausschusses der Regionen,

gemäß dem Verfahren des Artikels 251 des Vertrags (2),

in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe:

HABEN FOLGENDE VERORDNUNG ERLASSEN:

Artikel 1

Die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1655/2000 wird wie folgt geändert:

Artikel 2

Diese Verordnung tritt am dritten Tag nach ihrer Veröffentlichung im Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union in Kraft.

Diese Verordnung ist in allen ihren Teilen verbindlich und gilt unmittelbar in jedem Mitgliedstaat.

Geschehen zu Straßburg am 15. September 2004.

Im Namen des Europäischen Parlaments

Der Präsident

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

Im Namen des Rates

Der Präsident

A. NICOLAÏ

----

(1)ABl. C 80 vom 30.3.2004, S. 57.

(2)  Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments vom 21. April 2004 (noch nicht im Amtsblatt veröffentlicht) und Beschluss des Rates vom 26. Juli 2004.

(3)ABl. L 192 vom 28.7.2000, S. 1. Geändert durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 788/2004 (ABl. L 138 vom 30.4.2004, S. 17).

(4)ABl. L 242 vom 10.9.2002, S. 1.

(5)ABl. C 61 vom 10.3.2004, S. 1.

(6)  Kommission/Europäisches Parlament und Rat, Rechtssache C-378/00, Slg. 2003, I-937.

(7)ABl. L 184 vom 17.7.1999, S. 23.

(8)ABl. C 172 vom 18.6.1999, S. 1. Geändert durch den Beschluss 2003/429/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates (ABl. L 147 vom 14.6.2003, S. 25).

(9)ABl. L 248 vom 16.9.2002, S. 1.“

(10)ABl. L 242 vom 10.9.2002, S. 1.“

----
<PAGE>

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-45902 and 333-110425), Form S-4 (No.
333-128819) and Form S-8 (No. 333-104939) of AmeriGas Partners, L.P. of our
report dated December 13, 2005 relating to the financial statements,
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appears in the Annual Report to Unitholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated December 13, 2005 relating to the financial statement
schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 13, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which could 
constitute clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 18, 2001.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Rockville, MD 20852, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, Scientist Review Administrator, 
Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E03, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the time limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 18, 2001.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-15755 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Ronald Bert SMITH, Jr., applicant, v. ALABAMA.

No. 16-7070 (16A545).

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 8, 2016.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. The order heretofore entered by Justice THOMAS is vacated.

Justice GINSBERG, Justice BREYER, Justice SOTOMAYOR, and Justice KAGAN would grant the application for stay of execution.
Darien VASQUEZ and Brandon Valentin, petitioners, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 16-5579.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
# Determination Under Subsection 402(d)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974, as Amended—Continuation of Waiver Authority for the People's Republic of China

#  Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me under the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, Public Law 93-618, 88 Stat. 1978 (hereinafter the “Act”), I determine, pursuant to section 402(d)(1) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2432(d)(1), that the further extension of the waiver authority granted by section 402 of the Act will substantially promote the objectives of section 402 of the Act. I further determine that continuation of the waiver applicable to the People's Republic of China will substantially promote the objectives of section 402 of the Act. 

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

[FR Doc. 01-14519

Billing code 4710-10-M
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5128 September Term, 2021

1:22-cv-00895-TNM

Filed On: August 26, 2022

Jonathan Burrs,

Appellant

v.

United States of America, et al.,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Wilkins and Katsas, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed.

R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 18, 2022,

be affirmed. Appellant has not shown that the district court erred in dismissing the

complaint because it was barred by a pre-filing injunction issued by the U.S. District

Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. See Burrs v. United Techs. Corp., No.

18-cv-491 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 16, 2019). To the extent appellant seeks to challenge the

pre-filing injunction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is the proper forum

to review a decision of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.

See 28 U.S.C. § 1294(1).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost-U-Less, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin
P. Moore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 8, 2003


                                                        /s/ Martin P. Moore
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Martin P. Moore
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Cost-U-Less, Inc. and will be
retained by Cost-U-Less, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.