alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1703 

Congratulating the Warner Robins Little League softball team from Warner 

Robins, Georgia, on winning the 2010 Little League Softball World Series. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, 

Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. BARROW, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. WESTMORELAND, and Mr. SCOTT of Georgia) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Warner Robins Little League softball 

team from Warner Robins, Georgia, on winning the 2010 

Little League Softball World Series. 

Whereas, on August 18, 2010, the Warner Robins Little 

League softball team from Warner Robins, Georgia, defeated the Burbank Little League softball team from 

Burbank, California, by a score of 8–6 to win the 2010 

Little League Softball World Series Championship in 

Portland, Oregon; 

Whereas the 2010 Warner Robins Little League Softball 

World Championship team consists of players Hayley 

Tierce, Sierra Stella, Taylor Brown, Chelsea Whaley, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1703 IH 

Peyton Stallworth, Melissa Cox, Amber Coy, Ashley Killebrew, Kayla Quakenbush, Avery Lamb, and Mary Catherine Tucker; 

Whereas the 2010 Warner Robins Little League Softball 

World Championship team is led by Manager Roger Stella, Coach Susan Shirah, Coach Bobby Killebrew, and 

President Mark Knight; 

Whereas with this title, the Warner Robins Little League has 

become the Little League Softball World Series champions for a second year in a row, which has only occurred 

five times in the history of the Little League Softball 

World Series; 

Whereas the championship victory of the Warner Robins Little League softball team has demonstrated a commitment 

to excellence and hard work that only comes with countless hours of practice; and 

Whereas the State of Georgia and the City of Warner Robins 

are proud to welcome home the Little League Softball 

World Champions for a second consecutive year: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the Warner Robins Little 

3 League softball team from Warner Robins, Georgia, 

4 on winning the 2010 Little League Softball World 

5 Series Championship; and 

6 (2) respectfully requests that the Clerk of the 

7 House transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to 

8 the City of Warner Robins and each player, manVerDate Mar 15 2010 05:31 Oct 01, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1703.IH HR1703

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1703 IH 

1 ager, and coach of the Warner Robins Little League 

2 softball team. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
##### 



FORM 10-Q Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encore Wire Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank J. Bilban, Vice-PresidentFinance, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: May 9, 2005 /s/ FRANK J. BILBANFrank J. BilbanVice President  Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
 24
```

[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15862]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-2329-000]

New England Power Pool and ISO New England Inc.; Notice of Filing

June 19, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 19, 2001, the New England Power Pool 
Participants Committee and ISO New England Inc. (the Joint Filers) made 
a joint filing requesting the Commission accept as a rate schedule for 
the New England Markets the substance of the standard market design 
(SMD Document).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before July 3, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15862 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
1099.

#### McLeod *v.*Faircloth Brothers.

Certiorari, from Wilcox superior court' — -Judge Whipple. February 11, 1908.

Submitted May 8,

Decided July 31, 1908.

*Herbert L. Grice,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. A. Holt, Hal Lawson,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

Section 4644 of the Civil Code requires that “the plaintiff in certiorari shall cause written notice to be given to the opposite party in interest, his agent or attorney, of the sanction of the writ of certiorari, and also the time and place of hearing, at least ten days before the sitting of the court to which the same shall be returnable.” This requirement of the statute was not complied with, and no reason was shown for a failure to comply therewith. Consequently the judgment dismissing the certiorari, on motion of the defendant in certiorari, must be affirmed. *Johnson*v. *State,*2 *Ga. App.*182 (58 S. E. 415), and decisions of the Supreme Court therein cited. *Judgment affirmed.*
Steven SOLARI, petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY.

No. 16-621.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (333-37011 and 333-39322) and Form S-3 (333-16365) of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation of our report, dated March 9, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 2009.



/s/ Crowe Horwath LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana

March 9, 2010
Kevin Wright CARTER, petitioner, v. Stu SHERMAN, Warden.

No. 16-6769.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
18,000

19,00020,00021,00022,00023,000

sands of Barrels per Day

United States Petroleum Products Consumed

15,00016,00017,000

,

1990

1991

1991

1992

1992

1993

1993

1994

1994

1995

1995

1996

1996

1997

1997

1998

1998

1999

1999

2000

2000

2001

2001

2002

2002

2003

2003

2004

2004

2005

2005

2006

Thous

Source: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy

Lowest Consume

Demand in over 1

Years
325000

350000375000400000

sands of Barrels

United States Crude Oil Stocks

Highest Oil Supply in 

20 Years.

250000275000300000

1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 

Thous
$45

$50$55$60$65$70$75$80

WTI Price Per Barrel

West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil Price

+100% Price Increase in 2009

$30$35$40

Jan‐09

Feb‐09

Mar‐09

Apr‐09

May‐09

Jun‐09

Source: Energy Information Administration
NATURAL GAS MARKET

Commodity 

Brokers/

Middlemen

23%

Physical

Commodity 

Brokers/

Middlemen

15%

OIL MARKET

Physical 

Hedgers

10%

Spec

LONG POSITIONS HELD IN OTC MARK

Speculators Hedgers

17% 75

Source: CFTC Special Call Data for June 30th, 2008

Speculators
Mary Patricia HYNOSKI, petitioner, v. ATWOOD MALONE TURNER AND SABIN, et al.

No. 16-6403.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico denied.
Earl Lee WRIGHT, petitioner, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, HINDS COUNTY.

No. 16-6282.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
H. Res. 1755 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 8, 2010. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

3082) making appropriations for military construction, the 

Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider 

in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a 

motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House concur in the Senate 

amendment with the amendment printed in the report of the 

Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. 

The motion shall be debatable for one hour, with 40 minutes 

equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations and 20 

minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Com-
2 

•HRES 1755 EH 

merce. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the motion to final adoption without intervening motion. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,406,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,953,014
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,453,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,406,631
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               151,455
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (158,963)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (158,963)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (158,963)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.91)


</TABLE>
Dorothy Lee ANDERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6705.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT I, Robert Waters, Director and the
Chief Financial Officer of 2Uonline.com, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the
Company for the year ended December 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. Dated: April 11, 2003

/s/ Robert Waters
-------------------
Robert Waters

Director and Chief Financial Officer
David M. KISSI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6362.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
II-01215

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

terry paige <paitmp@yahoo.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 2:21 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

terry paige

2514 celosia drive

charlotte, NC 28262-0109
# C_2011089EN.01001203.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/12

---

Order of the President of the Court of 17 November 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-486/09) (1)

1

2011/C 89/24

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
1

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-1838

___________

Carlos F. Calhoun, also known as *

William Anderson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

John Baldwin, Director, Iowa *

Department of Corrections; Elizabeth * [UNPUBLISHED]

Robinson, and all members, Iowa *

Board of Parole, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: December 16, 2009

Filed: December 17, 2009 

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Calhoun, currently incarcerated in federal prison after escaping from an

Iowa work release program, appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson

v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we affirm for the reasons stated by
-2-

the district court, see Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78, 86 n.7, 88 n.9 (inmate not

entitled to revocation hearing while in prison on separate offense; no due process

violation where “pending warrant and detainer adversely affect[ed] [inmate’s] prison

classification and qualification for institutional programs”). See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-87592, No. 33-60369, No. 33-60373 and No. 33-60371) of J. Ray
McDermott, S.A. of our report dated May 19, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of J. Ray McDermott, S.A. included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 1999.

                                            Ernst & Young LLP


New Orleans, Louisiana
June 9, 1999
Ronald M. VanPELT, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 16-6553.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District denied.
Glenn Lee SELDEN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA, et al.

No. 16-6248.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

MAGDY ABOELGHAR 

v. 

RICHARD LEYTON MULCAHY, 

R.J. O'BRIEN ASSOCIATES, INC., and 

RM TRADING, LLC 

JOHN Y. ABOULGHAR 

v. 

RICHARD LEYTON MULCAHY, 

R.J. O'BRIEN ASSOCIATES, INC., and 

RM TRADING, LLC 

CFTC Docket No. 06-R043 

CFTC Docket No. 06-R044 

ORDER OF SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE 

Our review of the record and the complainants' appellate submission establishes that the 

presiding Administrative Law Judge committed no error material to the outcome of the 

proceedings and that the findings of the presiding Administrative Law Judge are supported by 

the weight of the evidence; we therefore adopt them. In addition, complainants have not raised 

important questions of law or policy that merit extended discussion. Accordingly, pursuant to 
Section 14 of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation l2.406(b ), we 

summarily affirm the initial decision and order of the Administrative Law Judge without 

opinion. 1 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 

By the Commission (Chairman GENSLER and Commissioners CHILTON, O'MALIA and 

WETJEN). 

Mel ssa D. Jurgens 

Secretary of the Com lSSlon 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Dated: September 5, 2013 

1 Pursuant to Commission Regulation 12.406(b), 17 C.F.R. § 406(b), neither the initial decision nor the 

Commission's order of summary affirmance shall serve as a Commission precedent in other proceedings. 

2 Under Sections 6(c) and 14(e) of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 9 and 18(e)(2000), a party may 

appeal a reparation order of the Commission to the United States Court of Appeals for only the circuit in which a 

hearing was held; if no hearing was held, the appeal may be filed in any circuit in which the appellee is located. The 

Commission has ruled that telephonic hearings are "held" in Washington, D.C., although parties may speak from 

several different locations. Dubois v. Alaron, [2000-2002 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ~ 28,406 at 

51,027 n.l7 (CFTC Oct. 26, 2000). The statute also states that such an appeal must be tiled within 15 days after 

notice of the order and that any appeal is not effective unless, within 30 days of the date of the Commission order, 

the appealing party files with the court a bond equal to double the amount of any reparation award.
Michael CORNISH, petitioner, v. TOWN OF BROOKLINE, VERMONT.

No. 16-448.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Vermont denied.
1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________________

No. 01-30486

STAR INSURANCE CO. Plaintiff - Appellee

VERSUS

LIVESTOCK PRODUCERS, INC.; GEORGE RONALD STRATTON

Defendants, Appellants
RONNIE STRATTON, doing business as Livestock Producers, Inc.; LIVESTOCK PRODUCERS, INC. Plaintiff - Appellants

VERSUS MEADOWBROOK, INC.; ET AL

Defendants
STAR INSURANCE CO. Defendant - Appellee

___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana

(99-CV-2)

___________________________________________________ November 6, 2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.2

PER CURIAM: Livestock Producers, Inc. (“LPI”) and Ronnie Stratton (“Stratton”) (collectively referred to as the “Plaintiffs”) appeal
the district court’s decision to deny their motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Although the parties have not
contested this court’s jurisdiction, we are under a c ontinuing obligation to ensure that we have jurisdiction to hear this appeal. MCG, Inc. v. Great Western Energy Corp. , 870 F.2d 170, 173 (5th Cir. 1990). Therefore, we can raise the issue sua sponte
. Id. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we have jurisdiction over all “final decisions” of the district court. However, in this case, it is not
clear whether the district court has entered a “final decision” because it has not entered a final judgment. We therefore REMAND this case back to the district court for further clarification. If
all claims have been ruled upon, the district court shall enter final judgment.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000568

31-MAY-2019

08:09 AM