alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: NEVIN F. HENCH 

DOCKET NUMBER: 230 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT -- CEA DOCKET NO. 230 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Nevin F. Hench 

(Brooklyn Center, Minnesota) 

The complaint charges that during the period from June 1972 through July 

1973, Nevin F. Hench cheated and deceived a number of his customers while 

pursuing a course of conduct in which he acted as a futures commission merchant 

without being registered. The complaint alleges that he induced 15 persons to 

give him a total of approximately $ 39,900 to trade in regulated commodity 

futures for their individual accounts, but instead of using the money for that 

purpose, he converted it for his own use. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when there has been a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. A determination is considered as having been made when a 

decision of the Administrative Law Judge becomes final, or after appeal, a 

decision is made by the Judicial Officer of the Department. Complaints are 

filed in the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and 

are a matter of public record. Pending disposition of a complaint, it is the 

policy of the CEA not to comment or elaborate on charges contained therein or to 

discuss evidence on which it is based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before the Administrative Law 

Judge at a place, date, and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., petitioners, v. Jon HUSTED, Ohio Secretary of State, et al.

No. 16-580.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                            J. RAY MCDERMOTT, S.A.
                  SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                       FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998



 
 
                                                                   PERCENTAGE
                                                 JURISDICTION OF       OF
         NAME OF COMPANY                           ORGANIZATION     OWNERSHIP
         ---------------                           ------------     ---------

  J. Ray McDermott Holdings, Inc.                     Delaware         100
     J. Ray McDermott, Inc.                           Delaware         100
 
  J. Ray McDermott International, Inc.                 Panama          100
     Varsy International N.V.                   Netherlands Antilles   100
     J. Ray McDermott Contractors, Inc.                Panama          100
       McDermott-ETPM Far East, Inc.                   Panama           87
 
  McDermott Holdings (U.K.) Limited                United Kingdom      100
     McDermott Subsea Constructors Limited         United Kingdom       67
 

The subsidiaries omitted from the foregoing list do not, considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, constitute a significant subsidiary.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1378-DR]


West Virginia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of West Virginia (FEMA-1378-DR), dated June 3, 2001, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective June 11, 2001.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Robert J. Adamcik,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-15714 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-U
II-00313

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Gary Clark <gclark@teleport.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 3:38 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Gary Clark

30116 NE 172 Ave

Yacolt, WA 98675
Exhibit 31.14
**Certification**
I, Clint Tryon, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004of Meadow Valley Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.                  Date: March 30, 2005 /s/ Clint Tryon   Clint Tryon   Principal Accounting Officer
In re Elizabeth REYNOLDS, petitioner.

No. 16-7248.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00281-CV

JONATHAN STICKLAND AND JACKIE 

SCHLEGEL, TEXANS FOR VACCINE 

FREEDOM, AND TEXANS FOR VACCINE 

CHOICE PAC, Appellants

V.

JACKIE SCHLEGEL AND TEXANS FOR 

VACCINE CHOICE, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 17th District Court

of Tarrant County (017-330567-21)

November 22, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in part of the trial court’s orders on the parties’ motions under the Texas 

Citizens Participation Act (TCPA). We affirm the trial court’s order denying the 

TCPA motion filed by Jackie Schlegel, Texans for Vaccine Freedom, and Texans for 

Vaccine Choice PAC. We reverse the trial court’s order denying Jonathan Stickland’s 

TCPA motion, render judgment granting his TCPA motion, and remand the case to 
the trial court to determine Stickland’s attorney’s fees, costs, and the potential award 

of sanctions under the TCPA. We deny Texans for Vaccine Choice’s request for 

sanctions.

It is further ordered that Jackie Schlegel, Texans for Vaccine Freedom, and 

Texans for Vaccine Choice PAC must pay all costs of this appeal.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Martin P. Moore, Chief Financial Officer of Cost-U-Less, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
     certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
     (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.

Dated: August 12, 2002                  /s/  Martin P. Moore
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Martin P. Moore
                                        Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.178


                                    CONTRACT

     THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed in Three (3) original counterparts this
25th day of June A.D. 2001 between the Utah Department of Transportation,
hereinafter called "Department," first party, and Meadow Valley Contractors
hereinafter called "Contractor," Second party.

     WITNESSETH, That for an in consideration of payments, hereinafter
mentioned, to be made by the Department, the Contractor agrees to furnish all
labor equipment; to furnish and deliver all materials not specifically mentioned
as being furnished by the Department and to do and perform all work in the
GRADING, DRAIN., SURFACING, SIGNALS, SIGNING, STRUCTURES, LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING
in Salt Lake County, State of Utah, the same being identified as SP-0151(1)0 for
the approximate sum of Ten Million Four Hundred Thirty Nine Thousand Ninety Four
Dollars and 84/100 ($10,439,094.84).

     The Contractor further covenants and agrees that all of said work and labor
shall be done and performed in the best and most workmanlike manner and in
strict conformity with the plans and specifications. The said Plans, and
Specifications and the Notice to Contractors, Instruction to Bidders, the
Proposal, Special Provisions and Contract Bond are hereby made a part of this
agreement as fully and to the same effect as if the same had been set forth at
length herein.

     In consideration of the foregoing premises, the Department agrees to pay to
Contractor in the manner and in the amount provided in the said specification
and proposal.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have subscribed their names through
their proper officers thereunto duly authorized as of the day and year first
above written.


Attest:                                UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION



/s/ ILLEGIBLE                          /s/ ILLEGIBLE
------------------------------         ------------------------------
Secretary                              for Director of Transportation -
                                       First Party


/s/ Val Martin                         Meadow Valley Contractors
------------------------------         ------------------------------
Witness to: Company Representative     Second Party


Approved as to form:                   by /s/ ROBERT TERRIL
                                       ------------------------------

by /s/ ILLEGIBLE
------------------------------         ------------------------------
UDOT Legal Counsel                     Company Representative


APPROVED /s/ CHERISE YOUNG 6/28/01     94-279836-5501
         ---------------------         ------------------------------
         Contract Administrator        Utah Contractor License Number


                                       FUNDS AVAILABLE
                                                       --------------


                                       /s/ JANET GLADMAN      6/27/01
                                       ---------------------  -------
                                       Budget Officer          Date
Marcus BORGES, petitioner, v. Dave DAVEY, Warden.

No. 16-6395.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF I.K. AND E.K.,

CHILDREN

,

Appellant, **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 0 55

- CV

Appeal from the

3 83 rd District C ourt

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2019DCM7783 )

O R D E R

The first supplemental reporter’s record for May 22, 2021 and August 9, 2021 per this

Court’s order of November 29, 2022 has been filed. Therefore, the Court reestablishes the appellate

timetable, and the Appellants brief is now due January 2, 2023

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 9 th day of December , 20 2 2

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**ASADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Paul D. Melnuk,as Chief Executive Officer of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation (the “Company”)certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) theaccompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filedwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| By:                              |   | /s/ Paul D.  Melnuk            |                    |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                             |   |                           |                    |
|                             |   |                           | Paul D. Melnuk          |   |
|                             |   |                           | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                             |   | (Principal  Executive Officer) |                    |
|                             |   |                           |                    |
|                             |   |                           |                    |
| Date:  August 3,  2006 |   |                           |                    |

 

----
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Craig Sessions, M.D., P.A. and Craig 

Sessions, M.D., Appellant

No. 06-13-00010-CV v.

TH Healthcare, Ltd., d/b/a Nacogdoches 

Medical Center, Appellee

Appeal from the 145th District Court of 

Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

C1127428). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s denial of Sessions’ motion 

for partial summary judgment, reverse the trial court’s grant of the Hospital’s motion for 

summary judgment, and remand to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

We further order that the appellant and appellee shall each pay one half of all costs of 

appeal.

RENDERED AUGUST 28, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on June 4, 2001, a proposed Consent 
Decree (``Decree'') in United States v. IBM Corporation, Civil No. 01-
B-1017, was lodged with the United States District Court for the 
District of Colorado. The United States filed this action pursuant to 
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability 
Act for recovery of costs incurred by the United States in responding 
to releases of hazardous substances at the Rocky Flats Industrial Park 
Superfund Site in Jefferson County, Colorado.
    Pursuant to the proposed Consent Decree, IBM Corporation will pay 
$460,000, in reimbursement of past costs.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Decree. 
Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General of the 
Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to, United States v. IBM 
Corporation, D.J. Ref. #90-11-3-1719/2.
    The Decree may be examined at the office of the U.S. Attorney, 1225 
17th Street, Denver, Colorado; at U.S. EPA Region 8, Office of 
Enforcement, 999 18th Street, Denver, CO. A copy of the Decree may be 
obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, U.S. Department of 
Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044. In requesting a copy, 
please enclose a check in the amount of $3.75 for the Decree (25 cents 
per page reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Robert D. Brook,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 01-15668 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
**Exhibit 10.36****FIRST AMENDMENT OF LEASE**     **THISFIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT** is made and entered into this31 day of  OCT. 2006, by and between JPET LASVEGAS, LLC hereinafter referred to as “Landlord”, and MEADOW VALLEYCORPORATION, INC., hereinafter referred to as “Tenant”.     WHEREAS,on. July 9, 2001 Landlord and Tenant entered into a certain LeaseAgreement, hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Lease”, providing for the Leaseby Landlord to Tenant of a certain demised premises commonly known as Space F consistingof approximately 4,320 +/- square feet located in the City of North Las Vegas, County ofClark, State of Nevada, which demised premises are more particularly described in theLease; and,     WHEREAS,JPET II, Company Limited Partnership assigned all of its right, title andinterest in the Lease Agreement to JPET LAS VEGAS, LLC under an assignmentdated June 20, 2002; and,     WHEREAS,the parties desire to amend the terms of the Lease in certain respects, andLandlord does hereby consent to enter into such an agreement;     NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises hereincontained, the parties hereto agree that the Lease shall be, and the same ishereby, amended as follows: 1. The term of the Lease shall hereby be extended for thirty-six(36) monthscommencing October 1, 2006 and continuing thereafter until September 30,2009 (the “Extension Period”).  2. During the Extension Period, Tenant’s basic rent shall be;             Months Rent/Sq. Ft. Monthly Rent Annual Rent1-12 $0.8200  $3,542.40  $42,508.80 13-24 $0.8611  $3,719.95  $44,639.40 25-36 $0.9041  $3,905.71  $46,868.52  3. The effective date of this Amendment is the date of full execution by bothparties.  4. The Lease hereinabove defined shall remain in full force and effect as thereinstated, except as herein specifically modified or amended.     INWITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to Lease Agreement is executed the date andyear first hereinabove written.         LANDLORD:           JPET LAS VEGAS, LLC           By: /s/ J. Steven Price       J. Steven Price, Manager           TENANT:           MEADOW VALLEY CORPORATION, INC.,         Attest:             /s/Nancy A. McCafferty By: /s/ Robert Terril                    its   V.P.                    Fed Tax ID# 88-0171959