alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-66,244-02

EX PARTE LAFARRIS BORENS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F-05-60566-R IN THE 265 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Borens v. State, No. 05-07-01516-CR(Tex.App.—Dallas Apr. 15, 2009) (unpublished). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of

his right to petition pro se for discretionary review. The trial court found that appellate counsel

discharged his duties appropriately. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of
2

fact and conclusions of law addressing Applicant’s claim that he never received counsel’s

correspondence.

Based on an affidavit from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the trial court has

entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that Applicant never received notice his conviction

had been affirmed. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. 

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionaryreview of the judgment of the Fifth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 05-07-01516-CR

that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. F-05-60566-R from the 265 District Court of Dallas th

County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of

the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: August 21, 2013

Do not publish
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Final Regulations to Expand the Scope of Consumer Privacy 

Protections Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act 

What is the goal of the final regulations? 

The final regulations broaden the scope of Part 160 of the CFTC’s regulations to cover two new entities created by 

Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: swap dealers and major swap 

participants. 

Which entities are currently subject to Part 160? 

Part 160 currently applies to futures commission merchants, retail foreign exchange dealers, commodity trading 

advisors, commodity pool operators, and introducing brokers, regardless of whether they are required to register 

with the CFTC. 

Does the Dodd-Frank Act require that the CFTC promulgate the final regulations? 

The Dodd-Frank Act does not expressly require that the CFTC promulgate the final regulations. Title X of the 

Dodd-Frank Act includes an amendment to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which affirms the CFTC’s 

jurisdiction to promulgate regulations to provide certain protections for nonpublic, consumer information. 

What other provisions are included in the final regulations? 

The final regulations also: 

• Rename the title of Part 160 to read “Privacy of Consumer Financial Information under the Gramm-LeachBliley Act.” The change in title was intended to harmonize the title of this part with other parts of the 

Commission’s regulations; and 

• Change all references in Part 160 to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to now read the Bureau of 

Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau). This change reflects the creation of, and transfer of authority 

from the FTC to, the Bureau pursuant to Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act. 

When do the final regulations become effective? 

The final regulations become effective 120 days after the date such regulations are published in the Federal Register. 

What changes were made to the final regulations from the proposed regulations? 

The final regulations are substantially similar to the proposed regulations. In response to six comment letters, the 

CFTC has made minor changes to the final regulations to ensure consistency with the other federal agencies’ final 

regulations. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
Robinson Alirio DIAZ, petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General.

No. 16-516.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
statements of operations and the balance sheet and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  889,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                    73,490
<INVENTORY>                                    190,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,047,171
<PP&E>                                         729,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                 387,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,866,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,337,789
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,653,600
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,866,561
<SALES>                                      2,285,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,285,215
<CGS>                                        1,634,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,174,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (43,905)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,504,082)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,504,082)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.75)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.75)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



Annual CEO Certification

(Section 303A.12 (a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual)



As the Chief Executive Officer of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, and as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed
Company Manual, I hereby certify that as of the date hereof I am not aware of any violation by the Company of NYSEs Corporate Governance listing standards, other than has been notified to the Exchange pursuant to Section 303A.12(b) and
disclosed as an attachment hereto.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Matthew K. Rose                            
|Matthew K. Rose                                
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 20, 2004                                   



[No attachment accompanied this Annual
CEO Certification.]



E-14
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1071 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a threefifths vote on a stand-alone bill to increase the statutory limit on the 

public debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2010 

Mr. AKIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require a three-fifths vote on a stand-alone bill to increase the statutory limit on the public debt. 

1 Resolved, That rule XXVIII of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives (relating to the statutory limit on the 

3 public debt) is amended by striking clauses 1 through 4, 

4 by redesignating clause 5 as clause 3, and by inserting 

5 before clause 3 the following new clauses: 

6 ‘‘1. It shall not be in order to consider any bill or 

7 joint resolution, or amendment thereto or conference re8 port thereon, that increases the statutory limit on the pub9 lic debt if there is any other matter in such measure. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1071 IH 

1 ‘‘2. A bill or joint resolution, or amendment thereto 

2 or conference report thereon, that increases the statutory 

3 limit on the public debt may not be considered as passed 

4 or agreed to unless so determined by a vote of not less 

5 than three-fifths of the Members voting, a quorum being 

6 present.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

###### [Notice 01-068]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of inventions for licensing. 

# SUMMARY:

The inventions listed below are assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

# DATES:

June 14, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda Blackburn, Patent Counsel, NASA Langley Research Center, Mail Code 212, Hampton, VA 23691-2199; telephone (757) 864-3521, fax (757) 864-9190.

*NASA Case No. LAR-15602-1:*                         Passive Fetal Heart Monitoring System and Method for Simultaneously Making A Plurality of Acoustic Signal Sensor Elements;                    

*NASA Case No. LAR-15944-1:*                         Phenyethynyl Containing Imide-Silanes;                     

*NASA Case No. LAR-15945-1:*                         A Novel Surface Treatment for Titanium Alloys;                     

*NASA Case No. LAR-15959-1:*                         Structural Tailored High Displacement Ferro-Electric Sensors and Actuators;                     

*NASA Case No. LAR-15990-1:*                         Dual Transmission Interface for Passive Fetal Heart Monitoring;                     

*NASA Case No. LAR-16020-1:*                         Single Vector Force Balance Calibration System;                     

*NASA Case No. LAR-16079-1:*                         Liquid Crystalline Thermosets from Oligo-Esters, Ester-Imides and Ester-Amides.                    

Dated: June 4, 2001.

Edward A. Frankle,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-15011 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
Daquan Tyrek BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6820.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
COMPART'S BOAR STORE, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-505.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Ian Deshon SPENCE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6364.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jason A. LENZ, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-6963.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
Steven Carmichael WARREN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7095.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Diana G. Purcel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Paper Warehouse, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual
period ended January 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Paper
Warehouse, Inc.

| |                                                                                           |                
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
| | By: /s/                                                                                   | Diana G. Purcel
| |                                                                                           |                
| | Name: Diana G. Purcel
Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 1, 2003
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 333-69616, 333-49027, 333-69618, 333-89496, 333-114965, 333-114969 and 333-150418 on Forms S-8 of our report dated March 14, 2007, relating to the 2006 consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows before retrospective application of adjustments for discontinued operations (not presented herein) of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and subsidiaries.



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP
|DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP       
|Charlotte, North Carolina   
|                            
|March 13, 2009
Exhibit 8.1

Company Subsidiaries

Novogen Limited is a company
limited by shares and is incorporated and domiciled in Australia. Novogen Limited has prepared a consolidated financial report incorporating the entities that it controlled during the financial year ended June 30, 2017, which included the
following:



|                             |  |                          |  |                |        | 
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------- | ------ | 
|Name of entity               |  | Country of incorporation |  | Equityholding% |       
|                             |  |                         
|Novogen Laboratories Pty Ltd |  | Australia                |  |                | 100.00 | 
|Novogen Research Pty Ltd     |  | Australia                |  |                | 100.00 | 
|Novogen North America Inc.   |  | United States (Delaware) |  |                | 100.00 | 
|Glioblast Pty Ltd            |  | Australia                |  |                | 100.00 |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7224

JAMES C. MCNEILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RENE SMITH-HARRIS; BIANCA PIRTLE; CHARLOTTE WILLIAMS; ERIK 

HOOKS; ELDRIDGE WALKER; JOHNNY HAWKINS; THOMAS MCCURDY; 

KENNETH LITTLE; BILLY O. COOPER; SGT. DAVID GILLIS; SGT. J. CURTIS 

JONES; CHICQUITA A. LUCAS; SGT. WILSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03010-D)

Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James C. McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James C. McNeill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2012) complaint.*

 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v. SmithHarris, No. 5:19-ct-03010-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The district court dismissed the complaint in part for failure to state a claim and in 

part without prejudice as to McNeill’s ability to assert in a habeas corpus petition his claims 

of due process violations in connection with disciplinary proceedings.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 8

- 0 0 3 4 6

- C R

Style: Ex parte Arelius Alphonsa McGregor

Date motion filed * : May 1 5 , 201 8

Type of motion: Designation of Lead Counsel for Defendant

Part ies filing motion: Appell ant ’ s appointed counsel Olubukunola Oyewuwo

Document to be filed: N otice of Appearance by new lead appellate counsel Mark Bennett

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

.

Ordered that motion i s:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: May 29, 2018.

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

The designation of lead counsel for defendant, construed as notice of additional

counsel because only the appointed counsel sign ed it

, and the new lea d appellate

counsel did not, is granted

. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 6. 1(c) , 6.2

. T he Clerk of this Court is

directed to add Mark Bennett as additional counsel. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.2. Mr.

Bennett is ordered to file a notice of appearance as new lead appellate counsel by May

29, 2018

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.1(c), 6.2.

Judge ’ s signature: /s/ L a ura C. Higley

 Acting for the Court

Date: M a y 22, 2018
**Exhibit 4.4****REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT**     This REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of March 15, 2006, isby and between GENVEC, INC. (the “Company”) and KINGSBRIDGE CAPITAL LIMITED, an entityorganized and existing under the laws of the British Virgin Islands, with registered address PalmGrove House, 2nd Floor, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands (the “Investor”).     WHEREAS, the Company and the Investor have entered into that certain Common Stock PurchaseAgreement, dated as of the date hereof (the “Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which theCompany may issue, from time to time, to the Investor up to $30 million worth of shares of CommonStock as provided for therein;     WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of, and in partial consideration for the Investor enteringinto, the Purchase Agreement, the Company has issued to the Investor a warrant, exercisable fromtime to time within five (5) years following the six-month anniversary of the date of issuance (the“Warrant”) for the purchase of an aggregate of up to 520,000 shares of Common Stock at aprice specified in such Warrant;     WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of, and in partial consideration for, the Investor’s agreementto enter into the Purchase Agreement, the Company has agreed to provide the Investor with certainregistration rights with respect to the Registrable Securities (as defined in the PurchaseAgreement) as set forth herein;     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the representations, warranties, covenantsand agreements contained herein, in the Warrant, and in the Purchase Agreement, and for other goodand valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, intendingto be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows (capitalized terms used herein andnot defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Purchase Agreement):**ARTICLE I**
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15612]



[[Page 33276]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-078]


U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration 
announces a meeting of the U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission.

DATES: Tuesday, July 10, 2001, 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 EStreet, 
SW, Room 6H46 (MIC 6), Washington, DC 20546. Attendees must check in at 
the Security Desk to be cleared to the 6th floor conference room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Beverly Farmarco, Code ZC,National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
1903.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Opening Comments
--AIAA Presentation
--Air Force Presentation
--North Carolina Status
--Presentation by Chip Forbes of C. Forbes, Inc.
--Special Recognition
--Web Site Demo/Web Trend Reports
--Paris Air Show Report by Aviation Week
--Roger Richman Agency Presentation
--Presentation by new Outreach Contract (not yet selected)
--Adjourn

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: June 15, 2001.
Beth M. McCormick,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-15612 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Robert W. DecherdRobert W. DecherdChairman of the Board, President and 
Chief Executive Officer  /s/ Alison K. EngelAlison K. EngelSenior Vice President/Chief Financial Office