alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-OlO04

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lenore Greenberg <lenoreg@nyc.rr.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:16 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Lenore Greenberg

120 Boerum Place, Apt 1J

Brooklyn, NY 11201
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ASA V. WILDER 

DOCKET NUMBER: 154 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 154 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging the following respondent with violation of the 

Commodity Exchange Act: 

Asa V. Wilder 

San Mateo, California 

The complaint charges that during the period from February 20, 1963 through 

July 25, 1963, the respondent willfully deceived a customer of his futures 

commission merchant employer. The complaint alleges that the respondent, for a 

period of time, concealed from the customer the extent of the losses sustained 

by such customer in trading in commodity futures. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, May 28, 1968, in San Francisco, California. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Ronnie Maurice JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6214.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
H. Res. 1771 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 21, 2010. 

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported through the 

legislative day of December 24, 2010. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the legislative day of December 24, 2010, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker 

or her designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or his 

designee on the designation of any matter for consideration 

pursuant to this section. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 2ND DISTRICT COURT OF CHEROKEE CO UNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 5th

day of August, 2015 , the caus e upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JIMMY DESHAWN MOSLEY , JR. , Appellant

NO. 12

- 14

- 00305

- CR; Trial Court No. 18,611

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in t hese words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and brief filed herein, and the

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judg ment of the court

below be in all things affirmed

, and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of

Tyler, this th e 29 th day of September , 2015.

PAM ESTES , CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
Jeremy Daniel SCHUH, petitioner, v. WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN, et al.

No. 16-6190.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the amended quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Henry P. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
-------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
September 30, 2005


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                        Computation of Per Share Earnings

                 For the Years Ended December 31, 1997 and 1996
                                 (In Thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                  1997                 1996
                                                  ----                 ----
<S>                                             <C>                  <C>      
BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Average shares outstanding                      1,516,676            1,486,968
                                                ---------            ---------
                                                ---------            ---------

Net income (loss)                                $7,844.7             $1,405.5
                                                ---------            ---------
                                                ---------            ---------
Basic net income (loss) per share                  ($5.17)               $0.95
                                                ---------            ---------
                                                ---------            ---------

DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Average shares outstanding                      1,516,676            1,486,968

Net effect of dilutive stock options and
  warrants based on the treasury stock
  method using average market price                    --               72,557
                                                ---------            ---------

Total                                           1,516,676            1,559,525
                                                ---------            ---------
                                                ---------            ---------
Net income (loss)                               ($7,844.7)            $1,405.5
                                                ---------            ---------
                                                ---------            ---------
Diluted net income (loss) per share                ($5.17)               $0.90
                                                ---------            ---------
                                                ---------            ---------

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1743 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1743

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 15, 2010.
Whereas Gerda Weissmann was born in Bielsko, Poland in 1924;
Whereas within months of the German invasion of Poland in 1939, Ms. Weissmann's 
        brother Arthur was taken away by the Germans and the remainder of her 
        family was forced to live in a ghetto;
Whereas Ms. Weissmann was soon separated from her parents, who were sent to 
        Auschwitz;
Whereas Ms. Weissmann was forced to spend the next 3 years in a succession of 
        slave-labor and concentration camps;
Whereas in 1945, Ms. Weissmann was forced to walk in a 350-mile death march 
        during which 2,000 women, including Ms. Weissmann, were subjected to 
        starvation, exposure, and arbitrary execution;
Whereas the death march ended in Volary, Czechoslovakia, when the survivors were 
        liberated by the United States Army;
Whereas Ms. Weissmann was one of less than 120 women to survive the death march;
Whereas one of the American Army officers who helped liberate the survivors was 
        German-born Lieutenant Kurt Klein, whose parents had been murdered in 
        Auschwitz;
Whereas Ms. Weissmann and Lieutenant Klein fell in love, got married, and moved 
        to the United States to start a family;
Whereas upon moving to the United States, Mrs. Weissmann Klein worked vigilantly 
        to promote Holocaust education and remembrance, teach tolerance, and 
        combat hunger;
Whereas Mrs. Weissmann Klein's first book, All But My Life, was published in 
        1957, and chronicles her courageous struggle for survival during the 
        Holocaust;
Whereas One Survivor Remembers, a documentary about Mrs. Weissmann Klein's 
        experiences during the Holocaust, won an Academy Award in 1996;
Whereas Mrs. Weissmann Klein's lifelong work has been to repay this country for 
        her freedom and the boundless opportunities given to her, she founded 
        Citizenship Counts, a nonprofit organization that teaches today's youth 
        to appreciate and celebrate the majesty of their American citizenship;
Whereas Mrs. Weissmann Klein's life and work have inspired generations of 
        Americans and countless individuals from around the world; and
Whereas, on November 17, 2010, President Barack Obama announced that Gerda 
        Weissmann Klein would be awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Gerda Weissmann 
Klein on being selected to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
February  29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F. Fisbeck, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18,
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 
 Date:  April
      14, 2008
              By: /s/ John F. FisbeckJohn
      F. Fisbeck,Chief
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21

                            J. RAY MCDERMOTT, S.A.
                  SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                       FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999



                                                                  PERCENTAGE
                                           JURISDICTION OF            OF
       NAME OF COMPANY                       ORGANIZATION          OWNERSHIP

Hydro Marine Services, Inc.                     Panama                100

McDermott Holdings (U.K.) Limited           United Kingdom            100
  McDermott Marine Construction Limited     United Kingdom            100

McDermott Far East, Inc.                        Panama                100
  P.T. McDermott Indonesia                     Indonesia              100

McDermott South East Asia Pte. Ltd.            Singapore              100

J. Ray McDermott Holdings, Inc.                Delaware               100
  J. Ray McDermott, Inc.                       Delaware               100

J. Ray McDermott International, Inc.            Panama                100
  J. Ray McDermott Contractors, Inc.            Panama                100
    J. Ray McDermott Middle East, Inc.          Panama                100
    J. Ray McDermott Far East, Inc.             Panama                100


The subsidiaries omitted from the foregoing list do not, considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, constitute a significant subsidiary.
H. Res. 16 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 29, 2009. 

Whereas life insurance is an essential part of a sound financial plan; 

Whereas life insurance provides financial security for families 

by helping surviving members meet immediate and longterm financial obligations and objectives in the event of 

a premature death in their family; 

Whereas approximately 68,000,000 United States citizens 

lack the adequate level of life insurance coverage needed 

to ensure a secure financial future for their loved ones; 

Whereas life insurance products protect against the uncertainties of life by enabling individuals and families to 

manage the financial risks of premature death, disability, 

and long-term care; 

Whereas individuals, families, and businesses can benefit 

from professional insurance and financial planning advice, including an assessment of their life insurance 

needs; and 

Whereas numerous groups supporting life insurance have designated September 2009 as ‘‘National Life Insurance 

Awareness Month’’ as a means to encourage consumers 

to— 

(1) become more aware of their life insurance needs; 
2 

•HRES 16 EH 

(2) seek professional advice regarding life insurance; 

and 

(3) take the actions necessary to achieve financial 

security for their loved ones: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Life 

Insurance Awareness Month’’; and 

(2) calls on the Federal Government, States, localities, schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and 

the citizens of the United States to observe the month 

with appropriate programs and activities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000850625
<NAME> CHRISKEN GROWTH & INCOME L.P. II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         181,865
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               340,305
<PP&E>                                       5,584,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                 366,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,557,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          179,221
<BONDS>                                      4,631,025
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     747,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,557,401
<SALES>                                        953,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,027,476
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  664,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             196,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                166,298
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            166,298
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   166,298
<EPS-BASIC>                                      13.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    13.00


</TABLE>
#### Diane WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Ray NAGIN, Mayor, City of New Orleans; Derek Mercadel, Legal Department; Sharon McDonald, Sanitation Department; Warren Riley; Nicole Powell, Officer; Lejean Jackson, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-30155

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 19, 2010.

Diane Willis, New Orleans, LA, pro se.

Nolan Patrick Lambert, Lambert & Lambert, New Orleans, LA, Victor L. Pa-pai, Jr., City Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Diane Willis (“Willis”), a resident of New Orleans, filed a *pro se*suit against the City of New Orleans, its mayor and various other city officials, alleging damages related to Sanitation Department mis-bill-ing and multiple instances of police inattention and harassment. The district court gave the *pro se*plaintiffs petition a liberal interpretation, and viewing the petition in that light considered whether she had stated a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court concluded that she had not. The district court concluded that even if Willis’ inattention claims were substantiated, such individual behavior did not qualify as a violation of § 1983. The district court also found that her police inattention and harassment claims did not state a § 1983 claim either, and thus dismissed all of her related claims. Finding that she had stated no federal claim, the district court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims.

On appeal, Willis simply repeats her earlier arguments alleging police harassment and inaction. She makes no legal argu*474ment expressing how the district court erred in dismissing her claims, and offers no substantive argument to challenge the district court’s ruling. To the extent that Willis rephrases her argument, she still fails to take into account the reasoning of the district court. Moreover, even if we construe her brief as “naked assertion that the district court erred,” that is not enough to form an appeal that can be entertained by this court. *American States Ins. Co. v. Bailey,*133 F.3d 363, 372 (5th Cir.1998) (“Failure to provide any legal or factual analysis of an issue results in waiver”); *Brinkmann v. Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.1987). In sum, Willis has raised no issue that can be noticed or entertained by this court on appeal.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRM.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
AMERICAN GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, LTD.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
PRIMARY AND FULLY-DILUTED

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                 Three Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                   September 30,                      September 30,
                                1996               1995           1996            1995
                             ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                            <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>       
Weighted average number
of shares for computation      12,532,102      12,296,003      12,532,102      12,355,155
                             ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Net loss                     $ (8,628,000)   $ (3,578,000)   ($10,725,000)    (17,288,000)

Dividends and accretion
on preferred stock                467,000         325,000       1,342,000       1,083,000
                             ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

Net loss for common
stockholders                 $ (9,095,000)   $ (3,903,000)   $(12,067,000)   $(18,371,000)
                             ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
Net loss per common
share                        $      (0.73)   $      (0.32)   $      (0.96)   $      (1.49)
                             ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------

</TABLE>
Anthony Eric EMERSON, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 16-6212.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.