alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3 v. No. 35,368 4 GILBERTO VICENTE, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY 7 John A. Dean, Jr., District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 Charles J. Gutierrez, Assistant Attorney General 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 for Appellee 13 Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender 14 Sergio Viscoli, Director 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellant 17

MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 192 {1}Defendant has appealed from a convi ction for trafficking a controlled 1 substance, specifically and exclusively cha llenging the denial of a motion to suppress. 2 We previously issued a notice of proposedsummary disposition, proposing to reverse. 3 The State has filed a response with this Court indicating that it does not oppose our 4 proposed summary disposition. 5
{2} Accordingly, for the reasons previous ly stated, we reverse and remand for 6 further proceedings. 7
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 8

_______________________________________ 9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 10 WE CONCUR: 11

12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 13

14 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 15
II-00619

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

BEric Groomer <B7Eric@verizon.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:28 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

BEric Groomer

2235 Gleason Avenue 1A

Bronx, NY 10462
EXHIBIT
23.1
 
 
 
 Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 
 
 The Board
of Directors and Stockholders:
 GenVec,
Inc.:
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-140373, No. 333-133366, No. 333-123968, No. 333-101963 and No.
333-76886), on Form S-4 (No. 333-105320)and on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-110446, No. 333-55590, No. 333-55586 and No. 333-55584) of GenVec, Inc.
of our reports dated March 16, 2009, with respect to (1) the balance sheets of
GenVec, Inc., as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related statements of
operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and (2) the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2008 which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
GenVec, Inc.
 
 Our
report refers to the adoption of FASB Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 07-3,
Accounting for Advance
Payments for Goods or Services to be Used in Future Research and Development
Activities, on January 1, 2008.
 
 /s/
KPMG LLP
 
 
 McLean,
Virginia
 March 16,
2009
# C_2011347EN.01000401.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2011 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-493/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement - Free movement of capital - Foreign and national pension funds - Corporation tax - Dividends - Exemption - Difference in treatment)

2011/C 347/04

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and M. Afonso, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes and H. Ferreira, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 63 TFEU and of Article 40 EEA — Restrictions on movements of capital — Foreign and national pension funds — Dividends — Taxation — Difference in treatment

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | By reserving the benefit of the corporation tax exemption to pension funds resident in Portuguese territory alone, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992. |
| --- | --- |

1.

By reserving the benefit of the corporation tax exemption to pension funds resident in Portuguese territory alone, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992.

| 2. | The Portuguese Republic is to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Portuguese Republic is to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.

1

---
Doctor R. CRANTS, petitioner, v. GOTTLIEB & GOTTLIEB, P.A.

No. 16-644.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2

I, R. Jerry Giles, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Financial Corporation (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report;

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006

/s/ R. Jerry GilesR. Jerry GilesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1530 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1530

  Approving certain regulations issued by the Office of Compliance to 
   implement the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 with 
  respect to employing offices and covered employees of the House of 
  Representatives under the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2010

Mr. Owens submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Approving certain regulations issued by the Office of Compliance to 
   implement the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 with 
  respect to employing offices and covered employees of the House of 
  Representatives under the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF REGULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The regulations described in subsection (b) are 
hereby approved, insofar as such regulations apply to employing offices 
and covered employees of the House of Representatives under the 
Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 and to the extent such 
regulations are consistent with the provisions of such Act.
    (b) Regulations Approved.--The regulations referred to in 
subsection (a) are the adopted regulations issued by the Office of 
Compliance on March 21, 2008, under section 4(c)(4) of the Veterans 
Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 to implement section 4(c) of such 
Act, as published in the Congressional Record on March 31, 2008 (Volume 
154, daily edition), beginning on page H1811.
                                 <all>
```
II-00379

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Gilbert Lawall <glawall@classics.umass.edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 10:17 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC PIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (PIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Gilbert Lawall

71 Sand Hill Rd

Amherst, MA 1002
Jornay Rechurnd RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. Dave DAVEY, Warden.

No. 16-6649.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1380.

#### Kimberly *v.*The State.

Russell, J.

1. The trial judge may properly overrule a motion for a continuance, even where all the statutory requirements for procuring the presence of a witness who is absent have apparently been complied with, if a counter-showing has been made by which it is satisfactorily made to appear to him that the real purpose of the continuance is merely to secure delay. The credibility of witnesses introduced in sup-' port of a motion for continuance, and upon a counter-showing thereto, respectively, is to be determined by the trial judge, and his discretion *853in refusing a continuance, where a counter-showing is made, will not be controlled, unless manifestly abused.

Accusation of assault and battery, from city court of Eastman - — Judge Griffin. Augtst 33, 1908.

Submitted October 8,

Decided October 13, 1908.

*John F. DeLacy,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. M. Morrison, solicitor,*contra.

2. In a ease in which it appeared that the accused relied, for his defense, upon the right of a parent to protect his child, and in which it appeared, from the evidence,' that his son and another young man were quarreling, it was not reversible error to charge the jury, that “in order for the parent to be justified in taking the part of his child, the child would have to be justified in what it was doing; in other words, if the child was justified in it, the parent would be justified; but if the contrary appear, he would not be justified,” where this instruction was immediately qualified by the statement: “provided the parent knew of the want of justification in the child.” As a general rule, a parent has the right to protect his child from any assault; but under the evidence in this case, even the instruction given was as favorable as the defendant was entitled to receive.

3. The charge upon the subject of opprobrious words as a justification was erroneous, because not justified by evidence that opprobrious words were used. Threats of personal violence are not necessarily opprobrious oif abusive, and the language used by the court, though inappropriate, suggested a defense to which the defendant was not entitled.

4. Where the jury, after having been charged by the court,- returns into court and requests an instruction upon a specific question, it is not error for the judge to confine his instruction to the specific point suggested by the jury’s inquiry. ' *Judgment, affirmed.*
----

----

|   | 1. | This Annual Report of Eagle Mountain Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| Date:     September 9, 2016 | /s/Ronald Cormick                                     |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                 | Ronald Cormick                                        |   |
|                                                 | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	6

<CIK>	0000744822

<NAME>	Fidelity Investment Trust

<SERIES>

	<NUMBER>	121

	<NAME>	Fidelity Japan Fund

<MULTIPLIER>	1,000



<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>
year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>
oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>
oct-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>
637,595
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>
950,026
<RECEIVABLES>
25,346
<ASSETS-OTHER>
0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>
0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>
975,372
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>
28,075
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>
0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>
56,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>
84,131
<SENIOR-EQUITY>
0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>
610,735
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>
40,947
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>
26,313
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>
13,253
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>
0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>
(45,150)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>
0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>
312,403
<NET-ASSETS>
891,241
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>
2,145
<INTEREST-INCOME>
1,207
<OTHER-INCOME>
57
<EXPENSES-NET>
5,529
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>
(2,120)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>
63,006
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>
308,967
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>
369,853
<EQUALIZATION>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>
834
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>
0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>
34,652
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>
20,092
<SHARES-REINVESTED>
74
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>
625,847
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>
0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>
(87,259)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>
4,690
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>
0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>
3,879
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>
5
<GROSS-EXPENSE>
5,588
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>
450,450
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>
10.090
<PER-SHARE-NII>
(.070)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>
11.740
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>
 .030
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>
0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>
0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>
21.770
<EXPENSE-RATIO>
124





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         270,330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          57,239
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 508,150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,190
<OTHER-SE>                                    (187,284)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   508,150
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  373,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (377,770)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (377,770)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,065
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (372,705)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.34)


</TABLE>