alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                        
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,102
<SECURITIES>                                    29,706
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,392
<PP&E>                                          15,394
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,429
<OTHER-SE>                                       (254)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,037
<SALES>                                         47,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,950
<CGS>                                           32,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,528)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,528)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.40)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.4

 

YOUR COMMUNITY BANKSHARES, INC.

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS AGREEMENT

MODIFICATION

 

THIS RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS MODIFICATION (the “Modification”) is made as of the 2nd day of May, 2016 by and between James Rickard (the “Executive”), and Your Community Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”), an Indiana corporation with its principal place of business at 101 West Spring Street, New Albany, Indiana 47150.

 

Recitals

 

WHEREAS, the Company awarded Executive restricted stock units under that certain Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement dated as of December 15, 2014 (the “Award Agreement”);

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive adopted a modification to the Award Agreement effective November 30, 2015 (the “Amendment”) to provide that any unvested restricted stock units awarded to Executive under the Award Agreement would become fully vested in the event of Executive’s death, disability or a Change in Control of the Company;

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to revoke the Amendment with respect to certain unvested restricted stock units awarded to Executive under the Award Agreement that were originally scheduled to vest on December 15, 2016; and

 

WHEREAS, Executive desires to accept the revocation of the Amendment with respect to certain unvested restricted stock units awarded to Executive under the Award Agreement that were originally scheduled to vest on December 15, 2016.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual undertakings herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the mutuality, receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.                                      Revocation. The Amendment is hereby revoked with respect to the 2,000 unvested restricted stock units awarded to Executive under the Award Agreement, which will now vest on December 15, 2016.

 

2.                                      Ratification. Executive and the Company hereby ratify and reaffirm all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the Award Agreement and other documents related thereto, except as amended herein, and agree the same shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[Remainder of Page Left Blank; Signature Page Follows]

 

1











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Modification effective as of the date first above written.

 

	
YOUR COMMUNITY   BANKSHARES, INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
 /s/ Paul Chrisco
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
CFO
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
JAMES RICKARD
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ James D. Rickard
    	
 
    
				


 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 FILED AS
PART OF FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          96,009
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  345,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                   123,720
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               334,882
<PP&E>                                         935,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                 468,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 898,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,771,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,697,040
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,566,104)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   898,779
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               689,734
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,322,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (726,819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (750,001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (750,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.031)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.031)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

                         COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                           For the Three Months Ended


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 June 30, 1998                   June 30, 1997
                        ------------------------------  ------------------------------
                                  Weighted                        Weighted
                                   Average   Per-Share             Average   Per Share
                         Income     Shares     Amount    Income     Shares     Amount
                        --------  ---------  ---------  --------  ---------  ---------
<S>                     <C>       <C>          <C>      <C>       <C>          <C>  
Basic EPS

Income available to
  common stockholders   $506,360  2,564,495    $0.20    $495,174  2,550,710    $0.20

Effect of Dilutive
 Securities

Options                       --     45,661                   --     22,080

Diluted EPS

Income available to
  common stockholders   $506,360  2,610,156    $0.19    $495,174  2,572,790    $0.20
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6072

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RONALD WILLIAM HAMMOND, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR96-175-CCB, CA-97-4282-CCB) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald William Hammond, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia,United States Attorney, Gregory Welsh, Assistant United States Attorney, Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronald William Hammond seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and declining to grant relief from the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hammond , Nos. CR-96-175-CCB; CA-97-4282-CCB (D. Md. Dec. 22, 1998).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1
 Written Certification of Chief Executive Officer
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GTSI Corp.;
    a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ STERLING E. PHILLIPS, JR.

Sterling E. Phillips, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
ACCEPTED

03-14-00541-CR

3726634

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/12/2015 10:12:41 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

STATE OF TEXAS 

v. 

ROBERT TORRES 

No. 03-14-00541-CR 

§ IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL 

DISTRICT 

§ 

§ COURT OF APPEALS 

§ 

§ AT AUSTIN, TEXAS 

APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE 

APPELLANT'S BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

Now comes ROBERT TORRES, Appellant in the above styled and numbered 

cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time of 45 days to file 

appellant's brief, pursuant to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, 

and for good cause shows the following: 

1. This case is on appeal from the299TH Judicial District Court of Travis 

County, Texas. The case below was styled the State of Texas v. Robert Torres, 

numbered D1DC-12-302414. 

2. Appellant was convicted of the offense of Driving While IntoxicatedThird Degree Felony, for which he received probation. 

3. The brief in this case was originally due on November 12, 2014. 

Appellant requested and received a 90 day extension which.was granted and the due 

date was extended to January 12, 2015. 

1 

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/12/2015 10:12:41 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
4. Appellant requests a 45 day extension of time from the present date to 

file the brief. 

5. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the requested 

extension. In addition to the present case, the undersigned counsel has been working 

on many other cases which have interfered with his preparation of the present case. 

6. In the present case, counsel will be able to file the brief within the next 

45 days. For this reason, counsel seeks an extension of time in order to adequately 

fulfill his obligations under the 6th and 14th Amendments to the United States 

Constitution. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this 

Court grant this Motion To Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief for 45 additional 

days from the filing of this motion, and for such other and further relief as the Court 

may deem appropriate. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Law Office of Jamie Spencer 

812 San Antonio Street, Suite 403 

Austin, TX 78701 

Tele: 512/472-9909 

Fax: 512/472-9908 

Cell: 512/964-9900 

Email: J amie@austindefense. com 

2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This is to certify that on January 12, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above · 

and foregoing document was served by U.S. Mail on the State at the following 

address: 

Travis County District Attorney's Office 

P.O. Box 1748 

Austin, TX 78767 

3
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garth A. Allred, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

 

1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date:  July 15, 2008 | By: /s/ Garth A. Allred   |
|----------------------|--------------------------------|

Garth A. Allred, 

Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6263

GERALD ERNEST MANNING, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

R. DAVID MITCHELL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (1:06-cv-00105-JAB)

Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 28, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Ernest Manning, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Ernest Manning, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Manning has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Manning’s motion

for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny

Manning’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 147 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Select Committee on Energy 

Independence and Global Warming in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2009 

Mr. MARKEY of Massachusetts submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Select Committee 

on Energy Independence and Global Warming in the 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Select Committee on Energy 

4 Independence and Global Warming (hereafter in this reso5 lution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the ex6 penses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 

7 applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 

8 committee salaries and expenses, not more than 

9 $4,167,500 for the One Hundred Eleventh Congress. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 147 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $2,096,900 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2009, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2010; and 

7 (2) not more than $2,070,600 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2010, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2011. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
H. Res. 1517 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 15, 2010. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 5114) to extend the authorization for the national flood insurance program, to identify priorities essential 

to reform and ongoing stable functioning of the program, and 

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 

rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by 

the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Financial Services. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be 

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Fi-
2 

•HRES 1517 EH 

nancial Services now printed in the bill. The committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those 

arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 

11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except 

those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question. All points 

of order against such amendments are waived except those 

arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion 

of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 

shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall 

be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto 

to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. The Chair may entertain a motion that the 

Committee rise only if offered by the chair of the Committee 
3 

•HRES 1517 EH 

on Financial Services or his designee. The Chair may not entertain a motion to strike out the enacting words of the bill 

(as described in clause 9 of rule XVIII). 

Attest: 

Clerk.