alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 1538 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 27, 2010. 

Whereas, on July 11, 2010, terrorists allegedly associated 

with the Somalia-based al Shabaab terrorist organization 

carried out multiple suicide attacks against civilian targets in the city of Kampala, Uganda; 

Whereas Nate ‘‘Oteka’’ Henn, a United States citizen and 

committed volunteer of Invisible Children Inc., a nonprofit organization based in San Diego, California, and at 

least 70 other civilians were killed in the attack; 

Whereas al Shabaab was designated as a foreign terrorist organization under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act and as a specially designated global terrorist 

under section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 on February 26, 2008; 

Whereas the attacks for which al Shabaab has claimed responsibility, were allegedly in retaliation for the presence 

of Ugandan peacekeeping forces contributing to the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM); 

Whereas Uganda currently has 3,400 peacekeeping troops deployed to Somalia in support of AMISOM and reportedly 

has committed to deploying an additional 2,000 troops; 

and 
2 

•HRES 1538 EH 

Whereas it is in the interest of the United States and the 

international community to support efforts in Somalia to 

achieve lasting peace, democracy, rule of law, respect for 

human rights, and to eradicate extremism and terrorism 

from Somalia and the region: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) strongly condemns the terrorist attacks in Kampala, Uganda, on July 11, 2010; 

(2) encourages the Administration to help Ugandan 

and Somali authorities bring those responsible for these 

attacks to justice; 

(3) expresses its condolences to the families of Nate 

‘‘Oteka’’ Henn and all the victims of these attacks; 

(4) strongly condemns al Shabaab’s destabilizing 

role in Somalia and the region; 

(5) recognizes the contributions of Uganda’s peacekeeping efforts in Somalia; and 

(6) calls on the Administration to work with the 

international community to address the security threat 

emanating from Somalia. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) of Teche Holding Company (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Patrick O. Little, President and Chief Executive Officer, and J. L. Chauvin, Senior Vice President and Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ‘1350, as adopted pursuant to ‘906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|  

 

/s/ Patrick O. Little                                                   |   |  

 

  | /s/ J.L. Chauvin                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Patrick O. Little

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |   |                   | J.L. Chauvin

Senior Vice President and Treasurer

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

December 29, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Riviana Foods Inc. (the "Company") Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph A. Hafner, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         3.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         4.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: September 16, 2002                    By: /s/ Joseph A. Hafner, Jr.
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Joseph A. Hafner, Jr.
                                                Chief Executive Officer
CA Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. 403-717-3898






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


 


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 


 


In connection with the Annual Report for Digatrade Financial Corp
(FNA: Bit-X Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned, Brad J. Moynes, Chief Executive Officer do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of our knowledge:


 


 


(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities


Exchange Act of 1934; and


 


(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the


Financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


 


 


	 	By: /s/ Brad J. Moynes
	 	Brad J. Moynes
	 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	May 4, 2016
Richard Allen SHAFFER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-8946.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Walter Richard ROBERTS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6246.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Jimmie Lee SMITH, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 16-6409.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1415 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1415

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 28, 2010.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Djou.
     Committee on the Budget: Mr. Djou.
     Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: Mr. Shuster.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40529

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EMILY TOVAR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:10-CR-2284-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Emily Tovar has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tovar has

not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions

of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 30, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-40529 Document: 00511680248 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2011
No. 11-40529

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-40529 Document: 00511680248 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/30/2011
Miguel Galindo SIFUENTES, petitioner, v. P.D. BRAZELTON, Warden.

No. 16-6378.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


             CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant at the dates and for the periods indicated. No purchaser or seller of
securities shall be entitled to rely on the foregoing statement for any purpose,
and the undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing
statement except as required by law.



                                                      FIRST FEDERAL CAPITAL CORP


/s/ Jack C. Rusch                                                August 13, 2003
Jack C. Rusch
President and Chief Executive Officer
(duly authorized officer)





                                       38
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Irby Gene DEWITT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6751.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 27, 2010.

Irby Gene Dewitt, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*811PER CURIAM:

Irby Gene Dewitt seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying construing his motions as motions for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) and denying relief. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dewitt has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Orvil D. HASSEBROCK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5826.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ALLEN JOHNSON 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 80 

DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1965 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Allen Johnson 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 80 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Allen Johnson has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued and 

the said Allen Johnson is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into a 

stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of 

Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said 

Allen Johnson stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) Allen Johnson an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was on August 13, 1965, [overstruck> 

ILLEGIBLE TEXT <overstruck] and a member of the Board of Trade of the City of 

Chicago, a duly designated contract market under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) On August 13, 1965, Allen Johnson executed 96 transactions in regulated 

commodity futures on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. However, with 

respect to 95 of such transactions, in each instance he failed to prepare a 

trading card or other record 

clearly identifying the opposite floor broker or other trader with whom such 

transaction was executed. 

The Secretary of Agriculture has advised Allen Johnson that his failure to 

keep full and complete records of futures transactions, as described above, was 

in violation of section 4g of the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.35 of the 

regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said Allen Johnson agrees to desist from such acts and practices in the 

future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation shall be 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 29 day of September 1965 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Witnessed by: 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 
Page 2 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
Exhibit 10.9

 

Spousal Consent

 

The undersigned, Xu Xiaoping, a citizen of Canada with Passport Number: BA812867, is the lawful spouse of Chen Ling, a PRC citizen with PRC Identification Card No.: 321025196001100223.  I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents (hereinafter referred to as the “Transaction Documents”) by Chen Ling on June 18th, 2013, and the disposal of the equity interests of Beijing Dasheng Zhixing Technology Co., Ltd.  (“Dasheng Zhixing”) held by Chen Ling and registered in his/her name according to the following documents:

 

(1)                                 The Equity Interest Pledge Agreement entered into between Beijing Dasheng Online Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “WFOE”) and Dasheng Zhixing;

 

(2)                                 The Exclusive Option Agreement entered into between the WFOE and Dasheng Zhixing;

 

(3)                                 The Power of Attorney executed by Chen Ling.

 

I hereby undertake not to make any assertions in connection with the equity interests of Dasheng Zhixing which are held by Chen Ling.  I hereby further confirm that Chen Ling can perform the Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents without the authorization or consent from me.

 

I hereby undertake to execute all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction Documents (as may be amended from time to time).

 











 

I hereby agree and undertake that if I obtain any equity interests of Dasheng Zhixing which are held by Chen Ling for any reasons, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement entered into between the WFOE and Dasheng Zhixing as of June 18th, 2013 (the “Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement”) (as may be amended from time to time) and comply with the obligations thereunder as a shareholder of Dasheng Zhixing.  For this purpose, upon the WFOE’s request, I shall sign a series of written documents in substantially the same format and content as the Transaction Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement (as may be amended from time to time).

 

	
/s/ Xu Xiaoping
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Xu Xiaoping
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Date: June 18,   2013
## EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost-U-Less, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin
P. Moore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 9, 2005

| | /s/   Martin P. MooreMartin P. Moore
Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-09505) pertaining to the Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 1990
Stock Option Plan and the Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 1995 Amended and
Restated Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated November 3, 2000, with respect
to the financial statements of XBOX Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended August 31, 2000.

Minneapolis, Minnesota                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
December 29, 2000
EXHIBIT32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Kenneth Chahine, Chief Executive
Officer of Avigen, Inc. (the Company), and Andrew A. Sauter, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

**1.**The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
32.1, (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2.The information contained in the Annual
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

**In Witness
Whereof,**the undersigned have set their
hands hereto as of the 14th day of March, 2008.

| | /s/ KENNETHG. CHAHINE        
| | -----------------------------
| | Kenneth G.
      Chahine     
| | Chief
      Executive Officer
|
| | /s/ ANDREWA. SAUTER          
| | Andrew A.
      Sauter       
| | Chief
      Financial Officer

85

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Missy SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6852.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 27, 2010.

*806Missy Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Missy Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 478, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-pealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Digital Generation Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the SEC onthe date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and datesindicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: January 20, 2006 | By:    | /s/ SCOTT K. GINSBURG |                                                           |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |                  | Scott K. Ginsburg                                              |
|                    |   |                  | Chairman  of the Board of Directors and ChiefExecutive Officer |
|                    |   |                  |                                                           |
| Dated: January 20, 2006 | By:    | /s/ OMAR A. CHOUCAIR  |                                                           |
|                    |   |                  | Omar A. Choucair                                               |
|                    |   |                  | Chief Financial Officer                                        |

 

----