alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telynx, Inc. a Delaware corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Talieh Safadi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Telynx, Inc., and will be retained by Telynx, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Talieh Safadi
--------------------------
Talieh Safadi
Chief Executive Officer
August 29, 2006
Yvoune Kara PETRIE, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA BOARD OF MEDICINE, et al.

No. 16-524.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

*525Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In re Gary Allen KACHINA, petitioner.

No. 16-6326.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,470,330)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,413
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,264
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (86,353)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (86,353)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (86,353)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
----

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2004/344/EC of 23 March 2004 fixing the allocation of performance reserve by Member States for Community Structural Funds assistance under Objectives 1, 2 and 3 and the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance outside Objective 1

(Official Journal of the European Union L 111 of 17 April 2004)

In Annex 1 ‘Objective 1 and Objective 1 transitional performance reserve amounts’, the tables from page 43 to page 46 relating to Germany are replaced by the tables in Annex I to this corrigendum.

In Annex 2 ‘Objective 2 and Objective 2 transitional performance reserve amounts’, the tables from page 61 to page 63 relating to Austria are replaced by the tables in Annex II to this corrigendum.

----

ANNEX I

----

ANNEX II

----
EXHIBIT 31.5





CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 350)








I, Robert Stewart, certify that:


|   |                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Acacia Research Corporation; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;







Dated:April 30, 2018/s/ Robert StewartRobert StewartPresident(Principal Executive Officer)
KMART CORPORATION, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, ex rel. James GARBE.

No. 16-408.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
II-Ol030

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Beth Dennis <bethdennis@hughes.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:59 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Beth Dennis

890 Nittany Ridge

Howard, PA 16841
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                       519
<INVENTORY>                                     23,227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,893
<PP&E>                                          37,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,949
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,207
<SALES>                                        130,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,861
<CGS>                                          114,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   115
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,297
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,425
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,872
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,872
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF DSP COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          77,799
<SECURITIES>                                    59,034
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                       132
<INVENTORY>                                      1,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               147,260
<PP&E>                                           5,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,030
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,354
<SALES>                                         85,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,899
<CGS>                                           44,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,858
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,108
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
4.35


 


Letter of Consent 


 


I, Kai Wang (ID Card No.: 41050419821217106X),
am the duly married spouse of Kuan Song (ID Card No.: 410503198209212012). I hereby acknowledge, understand and agree that:


 


1. In accordance with the Equity Pledge
Agreement he signed on May 27, 2015, Kuan Song pledges to Shanghai HJX Digital Technology Co., Ltd. 90% of the equity interest
he holds in Beijing HJX Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“Beijing HJX Technology”) and in Shanghai HJX Electronic
Technology Co., Ltd. (“HJX Electronic”), respectively.


 


2. In accordance with the provisions of
the Exclusive Purchase Agreement entered into on May 27, 2015, Kuan Song irrevocably grants Shanghai HJX Digital Technology Co.,
Ltd. the right to at any time purchase or designate any third party to purchase all or part of the equity interest he holds in
Beijing HJX Technology and HJX Electronic and I have no objections against the above grant and its exercise.


 


3. In accordance with the Power of Attorney
he signed on May 27, 2015, Kuan Song irrevocably grants Gao Weiji his shareholder’s voting right at the shareholders’
meetings of Beijing HJX Technology and HJX Electronic, including but not limited with respect to the sale or transfer of all or
any part of the equity interest he holds in Beijing HJX Technology and HJX Electronic, and his right to vote on such matters as
the designation or appointment of a director of the company at the shareholders’ meetings of Beijing HJX Technology and HJX
Electronic.


 


4. I have no objections against the equity
pledge, the exclusive right to purchase, and the setup, grant and exercise of the Power of Attorney as described above and acknowledge
that I will not now or in the future assert any claims or take any actions that would oppose, prevent or hinder the exercise of
any of the above rights.


 


	 	/s/ Kai Wang (Signature)
	 	 
	 	May 27, 2015
Michael S. GORBEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6961.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

The CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.130

                                LEASE ADDENDUM
                                --------------
                                    NO. 1
                                    -----
                                      TO
                                      --
                             OFFICE BUILDING LEASE
                             ---------------------



This lease addendum constitutes an addendum to that certain Office Building
Lease (the "Agreement") dated April 10, 2000, including all exhibits and prior
addenda between Dixie Sun Ventures, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, as
"Lessor", and Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as
"Lessee", for the premises located at 2250 West Center Street Building 2,
Springville, Utah 84663.

The following terms are hereby incorporated as part of the Agreement, and to the
extent that they modify or conflict with any provisions of the same, these terms
shall control. All other terms and conditions shall remain the same.

49.    INITIAL POSSESSION AND RENT PRORATION
       -------------------------------------
       Lessee is taking possession of the premises commencing April 10, 2000.
Therefore, the prorated rent due upon occupancy from April 10, 2000 through
April 30, 2000 is $2,380.00. Lessee hereby pays and Lessor hereby acknowledges
receipt of the aforementioned prorated rent.

50.    OFFICIAL LEASE COMMENCEMENT
       ---------------------------
       In reference to Section 4. of the agreement the initial lease term shall
commence May 1, 2000 and shall expire April 30, 2003.


51.    ACCEPTANCE
       ----------
       This Lease Addendum is signed and accepted by both Lessee and Lessor on
this 10th day of April 2000  .
     ----        ------------


LESSOR:                                LESSEE:

DIXIE SUN VENTURES, LLC/               MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS, INC.





By: /s/ Bradley W. Wilkinson           By: /s/ Robert Alan Terril
    ------------------------------         -------------------------------------
    Bradley W. Wilkinson, Manager          Robert Alan Terril, Utah Area Manager








WITNESS: /s/ Bailey H. Butters         WITNESS: /s/ Bailey H. Butters
         -------------------------              --------------------------------

Bailey H. Butters                      Bailey H. Butters
----------------------------------     -----------------------------------------
Print Name                             Print Name
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

May 17, 2024

CR-2023-0866

Enrico Morris Cornley v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: 

CC-14-787.61) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on May 17, 2024, the following action was taken 

in the above-reference cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
**OFFICE OF**  **ME Al7** **’ ORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **7EXAS If?**  **AUSVlN :u**  **‘ i.** **.P**flo8orsbleT. lr.TrImbLe, Paage2

*It 

### 1~ true 

### thr:t

no vaoanoy existed nhoa rei+ pondeAt xa6 acyoLAte6, ii by vaaanay IS wamt that then 

### va6 AO gearson

### xho couldthen lsrfully diwharga thedutiesoi thb orrloe, 

### ror relator couldlawfully disohcrge the dutiae of tho otiloe UAttl hie suooessor 

## putairfbd; but it la true, ii 

### it be held 

### thathis term

## or Orrho should oontinue ror 

### two y0arr 

### framthe dateof 

### hispualIlI~eA.Ion, thatt&a tina wa6 Dear at haAd =heA the 

## l ppOIAtM!At Ol XWpOAdeAt wei6 mat-is, UbaA 

### his tdlnt Or OrriO 

### 68 lfSWdby &W sauld esppir.,

### nnd it wa6 the duty OS the oity OWA011 to apgolnt hia SUCO~SOUZ. Them was A0 talid objeOtIOA to makw 

### the appointrrvrat Of 

### hlr 8UOee8mOr before the axpiriition of the tenn for nhIeh he was elaleoted l . . ."
In city oixoAaton V. Mahoney, 80 8.i. 1142, 1143, it Hamam *

Vi ax-0anaro of the doctrine anawnoed la 

### Stats+Aatlln, 84 Texas 

### 48, 19 S. W. SOS. Sut ia t&e osw alted the .owrtgob8 no further than to deolar*,tbs wefl-mittled rulk 

### that an appointment may bb made ln aatlo~patfon qf 8 YaOa~oy. 5uoh s ~oar6b it3s nbp~sslty, an4 18 uriIY*rmlly followed both IA elaotIoAa.md appointment88 and the lew not 

### oalygsrmftei

but authorlesa

It, to the 

## hadthat 

### YaOaAties may be prarluea agaIAet, 8Aa 

### holdfug over avold04. . . .a The rCCS&AStiOA Or s cOUDtY sUpriAtbAd4JAt 011xO~08Ikber 6th to beaozneettectirs moambar 51et, Is, of ocurae, mereY.9 8A annmAcan%At by the oilids holder of hie intention to rerfgn the office on Zwceinbsr3lJlat.Until rruahdate DO Ycloa~oywill .. srlat In the 

## 0rtice 0r county Fuperlatsndent sAd th8 c~raloaers court is powrlses to appOiAt angoAe to nsfmm the duties 

### or the oifloe

prior to the 6rr6QtiTb data or the resignation -- **iA** other words pxior to the actiUel~6xi6teAOi3 **Or** (I YaOaAO9 fA the 0fri00. T&Is doer aot, 

### however, preYeat the oomilebloners oourt rrom antIoLpetlA$ th% Yaaanay aAd rrom zaak,IAg prOYISi@A thsrefor in @dYaAcs. ThO **SppOiAtmbAt** bW3W3B eff6OtIYe OAl9.- _

Eonorab1.eT. E. TrImble, page 3

when the ofiloe aotually becomes taoant, uhloh, under the facts d your request, would 

## not be prior to Dscezabor Slat.
Sour* very truly hTTOhNiiY OFTAX.46


### BY
1264.

#### Jackson *v.*The State.

Accusation of trespass, from city court of Fitzgerald- — Judge Jay. June 9, 1908.

Submitted October 5,

Decided October 12, 1908.

*E. Wall, E. S. Fuller,*for plaintiff in error.

*O. H. Elkins, solicitor,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

Where there is no error of law assigned and the verdict is supported by the evidence, the judgment of the court below, refusing a new trial, will be affirmed. *Judgment affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NEW COMMERCE BANCORP FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,608,350
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,838,023
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,295,007
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         965,005
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           945,329
<LOANS>                                     13,050,883
<ALLOWANCE>                                    195,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,547,342
<DEPOSITS>                                  18,390,695
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            144,548
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,002,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              27,547,342
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                565,686
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              143,382
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               135,113
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               844,181
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             256,940
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             256,940
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          587,241
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  195,800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,370,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (934,151)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (668,020)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (668,020)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.67)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.37
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              195,800
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           195,800
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 589.

#### Haskell *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

December 16, 1935.

*Mr. T. Hardy Todd*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wide-man, Mr. Sewall Key,*and *Miss Helen R. Carloss*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.