alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1601 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1601

 Recognizing that the religious freedom and human rights violations of 
             Kashmiri Pandits has been ongoing since 1989.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2010

 Mr. Pallone submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing that the religious freedom and human rights violations of 
             Kashmiri Pandits has been ongoing since 1989.

Whereas Jammu and Kashmir has an ancient culture of religious tolerance and 
        pluralism, where Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Christians 
        practiced their faith freely in an atmosphere of mutual respect and 
        peace until 1989;
Whereas Kashmiri Pandits are the original inhabitants of Kashmir, tracing their 
        heritage and culture back several millennia;
Whereas Kashmiri Pandits have been the victims of documented human rights 
        violations resulting in the severe curtailment of their religious 
        freedom for more than two decades;
Whereas the Kashmiri Pandit population has declined from 400,000 in 1989 to a 
        current level of less than 4,000 in the Kashmir valley and many Pandits 
        continue to live in refugee camps;
Whereas international human rights organizations have noted the campaign of 
        intimidation and violence directed by foreign militants and foreign 
        terrorist organizations against Kashmiri Pandits;
Whereas thousands of Kashmiri Pandits, elected officials, and military personnel 
        have been killed in terrorist attacks; and
Whereas numerous groups that have claimed responsibility for these attacks have 
        been designated as foreign terrorist organizations by the United States 
        Department of State: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) condemns the extremist violence, lack of religious 
        freedom, and human rights violations committed against Kashmiri 
        Pandits, which they have endured for more than two decades; and
            (2) insists that terrorist infrastructure in the region 
        must be dismantled and terrorists should be held accountable 
        for their actions.
                                 <all>
```
### 737

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN QROVCR

**SCLLERS** *Tronnrr GmmAL

Mr. J. E. YeDon8ld, COlBlisdO~Mr Eep8rkeot of rgrleultuH *a stin , fox0.a Attmtioal Yr. U. II.Burke. Chief 

## Clerk. opinionIlo. 0-7699 mobilor bo paid 

## Itom 96 of tbo 6

10 quemtlnt our exFend1

ttlmn appropriated nnder aumher **opinion 8m**  **to The** 

t a rropsl rln pl ut ior eaab of the 7 lupGosiblo to pllre~rtammt aowe hsavr lt h a ve

bee n oa e a very **8t** 8ws3dembl e a x t o y our



### department. , t he

**rqmirlnl:** of t he **trucks** used by yaur Uepartnent d 

### 8nd kept in repr)r artt d e8rO 8rO 8 p8rt Of the word 

### sa8rss la said item

, t0 8UfalllObi1~S

8ad **truekm. It**  **is** 

### OqU8llY would eotor wh8twer mtpplles are neaesmarY tm the **work** of the dep8rtuont. It 18 

### our **0pinf0n th8t**  ym 8~8 **b8Te** aid trucks 8nd other 

### ears repaired 8nd p8f for mu110 out of ~814 

### ltea In the 

### lpproprfation bill. 7m-y tru17 

### wur8
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

LAURENCE ADLAI NEISH,

Respondent

PER CURIAM:

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

:

No. 2074 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 31 DB 2013

Attorney Registration No. 64819

(Allegheny County)

O R D E R

AND NOW, this this 17th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of the

Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 29, 2014, it is

hereby

ORDERED that Laurence Adlai Neish is suspended from the practice of law for a

period of six months, the suspension is stayed in its entirety and respondent is placed

on probation for a period of six months, subject to the following conditions:

1. Respondent shall not commit any violations of the Pennsylvania

Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement; and

2. Upon completion of the period of probation, respondent shall

submit a sworn certification to the Board that he has complied with the above condition.

It is further ordered that the expenses incurred in the investigation and

prosecution of this matter are to be paid by the respondent.
NO. 07-08-0513-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JANUARY 21, 2009

______________________________

DANIEL LUIS CANCINO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 69th DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAM COUNTY;

NO. 4046; HON. RON ENNS, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant appeals from his conviction for aggravated assault. The clerk’s record

was filed on December 22, 2008, but the reporter’s record has not been filed. An

extension motion was filed by the court reporter on January 5, 2009, representing that

appellant has not submitted a request for the reporter’s record.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 69th District Court

of Dallam County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall
2

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

 2. whether appellant is indigent; and, 

3. whether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his

indigency. 

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute

findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be

developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of

law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be

developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing, if any. Additionally, the district court shall then file the

supplemental records and reporter’s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this

court on or before February 20, 2009. Should further time be needed by the trial court to

perform these tasks, then same must be requested before February 20, 2009.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Steven CIOTTA, petitioner, v. Paul BRAZELTON, Warden.

No. 15-9316.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1434 

Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the importance of 

homeownership in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2010 

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. CHILDERS, Mr. BACA, 

Mr. CASTLE, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. CALVERT, and 

Mr. GERLACH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the 

importance of homeownership in the United States. 

Whereas the month of June is recognized as National Homeownership Month; 

Whereas the people of the United States are one of the besthoused populations in the world; 

Whereas owning a home is a fundamental part of the American dream and is the largest personal investment many 

families will ever make; 

Whereas homeownership provides economic security for homeowners by aiding them in building wealth over time and 

strengthens communities through a greater stake among 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1434 IH 

homeowners in local schools, civic organizations, and 

churches; 

Whereas creating affordable homeownership opportunities requires the commitment and cooperation of the private, 

public, and nonprofit sectors, including the Federal Government and State and local governments; 

Whereas homeownership can be sustained through appropriate homeownership education and informed borrowers; 

and 

Whereas affordable homeownership will play a vital role in resolving the crisis in the United States housing market: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) fully supports the goals and ideals of Na3 tional Homeownership Month; 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of homeownership 

5 in building strong communities and families; and 

6 (3) reaffirms the importance of homeownership 

7 in the Nation’s economy and its central role in our 

8 national economic recovery. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Order filed, June 8, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00288-CR

____________

DANIEL CHRISTOPHER WALSH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1639142

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 18, 2022. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court sent past due notice for the reporter’s record on April 29, 

2022. On May 25, 2022 the court determined that the reporter’s record 

submitted by the court reporter did not comply with Appendix C of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. No response was received, and the record has not 

been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Arlene Webb, the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Wilson
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Company's Balance Sheet at December 31, 1998 and the Statement of Operations for
the fiscal year then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-31-1998  
<CASH>                                                    $79,785  
<SECURITIES>                                                    0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                             724,925  
<ALLOWANCES>                                               68,039  
<INVENTORY>                                               534,982  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        1,396,705  
<PP&E>                                                  4,016,457  
<DEPRECIATION>                                          1,825,559  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          5,517,695  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,896,135  
<BONDS>                                                         0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0  
<PREFERRED>                                                     0  
<COMMON>                                                    3,855  
<OTHER-SE>                                              1,367,186  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            5,517,695  
<SALES>                                                 6,028,993  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        6,028,993  
<CGS>                                                   4,854,954  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           1,201,592  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           81,943  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        315,472  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (424,968) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (424,968) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         (1,390,886) 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0  
<CHANGES>                                                       0  
<NET-INCOME>                                           (1,815,854) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (.61) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0  
        


</TABLE>
No. 615.

#### Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R. Co. *v.*Goldhammer.

January 6, 1936.

*Messrs. R. W. Root, A. C. Erdall,*and *C. S. Jefferson*for petitioner.

*Mr. Walter H. Newton*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-83,247-01

IN RE ARTHUR LAMAR MITCHELL , Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 695776 IN THE 185T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 185th District Court of Har ri s C o u n t y , t h at more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , is or dere d to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order that desig nates issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that Relator has2

not f iled an application for a writ of habe as cor pus in Harr is County . Should the response include

an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorney ’s office was serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitt ed with the response . This application for leave to fi le a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order. Filed: June 3, 2015 Do not publish
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel RAMOS-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-40802

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2010.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Ramos-Pineda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ramos-Pineda has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37745

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

JAMES EARL DAVISON, JR. ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2011 Unpublishe d Opinion No. 401

Filed: March 21, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial Distric t, State of Idaho, Valley County. Hon. Michael R. McLaughlin , District Judge.

Order revoking probation and requiring execution of unified two and one

- half

year sentence with one year determinate for possession of a controlled substance

, affirmed

.
Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Eric D. Fredericksen, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

James Ear l Davison, Jr. pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance . Idaho Code
§ 37

- 2732(c)(1) . The district court imposed a unified four year sentence with two year s determinate, suspended the sentence, and placed Davison on supervised probation for four years.
Subsequently, Davison admitted to violating several terms of the probation, and the district court
consequently revoked probation and sua sponte reduced the sentence and ordered execution of a
unified sentence of two and one

- half years with one year determinate. Davison appeals,
contending that the district court abused its discretion in failing to further reduce the
indeterminate portion of his sentence.2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 101 1, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire s entence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007).
When we review a sentence that is ordered into execution following a period of
probation, we will examine the entire record encompassing events before and after the original
judgment. State v. Hanington , 148 Idaho 26, 29, 218 P.3d 5, 8 (Ct. App. 2009). W e base our
review upon the facts existing when the sentence was imposed as well as events occurring
between the original sentencing and the revocation of the probation. Id

. Applying the foregoing standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in ordering execution of Davison ’s reduced

sentence without further modification . Therefore, the order revoking probation and directing

execution of Davison ’s previously suspended and modified sentence is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc.,
an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F. Fisbeck, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: January 13, 2006                  By: /s/ John F. Fisbeck
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John F. Fisbeck,
                                            Chief Executive Officer
No. 415, Misc.

#### Rockower *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir.

*Hancock Griffin, Jr.*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Roberts. Erdahl*and *Philip R. Monahan*for the United States.

Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 4.5


DLCCAPITAL GROUP, LLC
--------------------------------------------------
4400 Route 9 South, Suite 1000, Freehold, NJ 07728

                                                              October 27th, 2005

Mike Pagnano
World Golf League, Inc.
2139 West State Road 434
Longwood, FL 32779

Dear Mike,

     We  hereby propose to amend the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement,
Convertible  Debenture,  Warrant  Agreement  and  Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of October 13, 2005, to change the number of warrants issuable pursuant
to  the  Warrant  Agreement  from  500  million to 200 million.  In addition, we
propose  to  amend  the  exercise  price of the warrants from "the lesser of (i)
$0.25, or (ii) 70% of the average of the 5 lowest Volume Weighted Average Prices
during  the  20  Trading  Days  prior  to  exercise  date"  to  "$0.0015."

     If  this  proposed  amendment to the terms of the Offering is acceptable to
you,  please  execute  below.

                              Very truly yours,

                              DLC CAPITAL GROUP, LLC


                              By:     /s/ JOSEPH FIERRO
                                      -----------------
                                      Joseph Fierro, Chief Executive Officer
Agreed to and Accepted:
WORLD GOLF LEAGUE, INC.


By:     /s/ MICHAEL PAGNANO
        -------------------
        Michael Pagnano, President
        Dated:  October 27, 2005

<PAGE>