alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-03-1999
<CASH>                                      31,316,533
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      20,347,104
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                237,935,640
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     112,276,635
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       110,200,000
<LOANS>                                  1,401,983,700
<ALLOWANCE>                                (7,663,526)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,950,510,821
<DEPOSITS>                               1,466,536,584
<SHORT-TERM>                               205,505,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         19,924,283
<LONG-TERM>                                127,007,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    36,534,228
<OTHER-SE>                                  95,002,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,950,510,821
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             75,292,579
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           19,758,214
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            95,050,793
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          45,310,267
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          55,585,309
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       39,465,484
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  300,543
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             40,414,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             25,629,161
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  25,629,161
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,601,344
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.29
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,274,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              6,500,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             7,624,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  261,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            7,663,526
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         7,663,526
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1*

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Cognex Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
October 3, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  November 8, 2004

                                       /s/ Robert J. Shillman
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert J. Shillman
                                       President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chairman of the Board of Directors
                                       (principal executive officer)


* This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
IV 

House Calendar No. 210 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1496 

[Report No. 111–520] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2010 

Mr. CARDOZA, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported through the legislative day of July 3, 2010. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 210 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1496 

[Report No. 111–520] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluJUNE 30, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Carlos Samuel TREJO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6284.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
VINH HOAN CORPORATION, petitioner, v. CATFISH FARMERS OF AMERICA, et al.

No. 16-92.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
  By:
    /s/ CHARLES C. UNGUREANCharles C. UngureanPresident and Chief Executive Officer of
Oxford Resources GP, LLC (the general partner
of Oxford Resource Partners, LP)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of PLXTechnology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Michael J. Salameh,****President****of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of myknowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,"filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 29, 2004
                          /s/ Michael J.Salameh	 
Michael J. Salameh, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
               FROM THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
               ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                              51,673
<SECURITIES>                                        11,531
<RECEIVABLES>                                       70,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,192
<INVENTORY>                                         94,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   258,337
<PP&E>                                              88,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                      35,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     317,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               72,201
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               216
<OTHER-SE>                                         238,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       317,789
<SALES>                                             43,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    56,727
<CGS>                                               22,312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       34,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15,096 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      80
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,057)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (349)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (708)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (708)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       ($0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       ($0.03)
<FN>
<F1>  EXCLUDES SG&A AS SG&A IS PART OF 5-03(b)(4).
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Valenitaini MATAELE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Claude E. FINN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-17282.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.*

Filed Dec. 12, 2006.

Valenitaini Mataele, Represa, CA, pro se.

Stan M. Helfman, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Valenitaini Mataele, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his convictions for infliction of corporal injury on the mother of his child, assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury, forcibly dissuading a witness, and battery. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Mataele contends that the inclusion of the pre-1999 version of California Jury Instruction, Criminal No. 2.50.02 in written instructions to the jury, and the prosecution’s discussion of evidence of prior offenses at closing argument, violated his due process rights, because they impermissibly lowered the government’s burden of proof by permitting the jury to convict him based solely on a preponderance of the evidence finding that he committed prior domestic violence offenses. We disagree.

The trial judge expressly told the jury they could not find Mataele guilty based solely on evidence of his prior offenses. We conclude that the California Court of Appeal’s decision denying Mataele’s due process claim was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court precedent. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *Estelle v. McGuire,*502 U.S. 62, 74-75, 112 S.Ct. 475, 116 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991) (holding that a specific limiting instruction precluded a reasonable likelihood that ambiguous instructions would have led a jury to convict the defen*750dant of the charged offense based solely on evidence of prior acts); *cf. Gibson v. Ortiz,*387 F.3d 812 (9th Cir.2004).

Mataele’s motion to expand the Certificate of Appealability is denied. *See*9th Cir. R. 22 — 1(e); *Hiivala v. Wood,*195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 23 - 00145 - CR CHARLES ANDREW CAMARILLO , A PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 428th District Court

Hays County, Texas 1 Trial Court No . CR

- 21 - 5594 - D , Honorable Joe Pool , Presiding 

### June 13 , 2023 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. Appellant , Charles Andrew Camarillo, was convicted of burglary of a habitation 2 and , pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, sentenced to twenty - five year s’ confinement. The trial court’s certification of A ppellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea bargain case from which A ppellant has no right of appeal and that Appellant has waived the right

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001.

2 See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 30.02(c)(2)
.2

of appeal. The cert ification comports with the record before the Court. Notwithstanding the certification, A ppellant filed a notice of appeal , pro se, challenging h is conviction. We are required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” By letter of May 16, 2023 , we notified A ppellant of the consequences of the trial court’s certification and directed him to file a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal by May 26
. To date, Appellant has not filed a response or had any further communication with this Court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal based on the trial court’s certification. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). Per Curiam D o not publish.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15247]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel P01 Program Project Applications.
    Date: June 20-22, 2001.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Melville Marriott Long Island, 1350 Old Walt Whitman 
Road, Long Island, NY 11747.
    Contact Person: Raymond A. Petryshyn, Phd., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 6116 Executive Blvd., 8th Fl., room 8133, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301/594-1216.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: June 11, 2001.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-15247 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 11, 2011
By: /s/ Randy ButlerRandy ButlerChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23**

 

**KraftCPA’s**

**Kraft Bros., Esstman, Patton & Harrell, PLLC**

**Certified Public Accountants & Consultants**

 

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in First Southern Bancshares, Inc.’s Registration Statement No. 333-03832 on Form S-8 and in First Southern Bancshares,Inc.’s Registration Statement No. 333-32619 on Form S-8 of our report dated December 5, 2003 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 appearing in this Form 10-KSB/A. 

 

/s/ KRAFT BROS., ESSTMAN, PATTON & HARRELL, PLLC 

 

Nashville, Tennessee 

December 16, 2003
**Supplement to the**

**Fidelity**®**Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and Fidelity Value Discovery Fund (FVDFX)**

**Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund is a Class of shares of Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund;**
Exhibit 10.6
 2010 CASH AWARD AGREEMENT
THERMADYNE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 
     Terms of Plan to Control
  Grant of Cash Award
 dollars ($_________)
 Restrictions
  Page 1 of 7




---



##### 



3.2
    
    The following terms shall have the following meaning when used herein:
 a.
    
    ROIOC for a fiscal year of the Company means Adjusted
Operating EBITDA for such year divided by Invested Operating Capital for such
year.b.
    
    Invested Operating Capital for a fiscal year of the Company
is the sum of the following items from the consolidated year end balance sheet
as shown on the Companys audited financial statement for such year:
 Accounts receivables, less allowances for doubtful accountsInventoriesNet property, plant and equipmentPatents and trademarks included in intangiblesOther assetsLong term receivablesLess accounts payable
 c.
    
    Adjusted Operating EBITDA for a fiscal year of the Company is
the sum of the following items from the consolidated year end statements of
operations as shown on the Companys audited financial statement for such year:
 Net income (loss) from continuing operationsInterest expenseNet periodic postretirement benefits in excess of cash paymentsRestructuring costsLIFOMinority interestSeverance accrualStock compensation expenseProvision for income tax
  Page 2 of 7




---



##### 



Termination of Employment
     Page 3 of 7




---



##### 



Non-Assignability
  Withholding Taxes
  Right of Discharge Reserved
  Nature of Payments
   Committee Determinations
 T
 Page 4 of 7




---



##### 



Section Headings
  Notices
  Successors and Assigns
  Other Payments or Awards
  Governing Law and Venue
  Severability
  Page 5 of 7




---



##### 



Entire Agreement; Modification
  Authority to Receive Payments
  Counterparts
   THERMADYNE HOLDINGS
CORPORATION
    
    
    
    GRANTEEBy:Nick H. Varsam
    
    
    
    Grantees Name:General Counsel & Secretary
    
    
    
    Date of Signature:Grantees Address:
 Page 6 of 7




---



##### 



2010 CASH AWARD AGREEMENT
THERMADYNE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION
       Date of this Designation
    
    
    
    Signature of Participant
  Page 7 of 7
Christopher T. MIDDLETON, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 16-5723.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00757-CV

Michael TATSCH,

Appellant

v.

CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC

and Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company,

Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12977

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgments are 

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED and REMANDED in part. Specifically, the trial court’s no 

evidence summary judgment in favor of appellee Chrysler Group, LLC with regard to appellant 

Michael Tatsch’s implied warranty claim is AFFIRMED. The trial court’s no evidence summary 

judgment in favor of appellee Chrysler Group, LLC as to appellant Michael Tatsch’s express 

warranty claim is REVERSED and the claim is REMANDED to the trial court for further 

proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion.

The trial court’s traditional summary judgment in favor of appellee Infinity County Mutual 

Insurance Company is REVERSED because it did not address appellant Michael Tatsch’s claims 

against appellee Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company. The trial court’s no evidence 

summary judgment in favor of appellee Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company with regard 

to appellant Michael Tatsch’s claims based on sections 541.060(a)(2), (3), and (8) of the Texas 

Insurance Code is AFFIRMED. The trial court’s no evidence summary judgment in favor of 

appellee Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company with regard to appellant Michael Tatsch’s 

claim based on section 541.060(a)(7) of the Texas Insurance Code is REVERSED and that claim 

is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion.
04-13-00757-CV

We order that each party bear its own costs of appeal. 

SIGNED December 3, 2014.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

- 2 -