FORM  10-K/A
                         AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                 
               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
                     Washington, D.C.  20549

[ ]  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) 
     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]

            For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1995

[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) 
     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]

    For the transition period from ____________ to __________

                  Commission file number 0-25170

                     ROYAL SILVER MINES, INC.
       (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

       Utah                              91-29382934             
(State of Incorporation)         (I.R.S. Employer Ident. No.)
               
Address of principal offices :  N. 10220 Nevada, Suite 230
                                Spokane, Washington 99218    
Registrant's Telephone No.:     509/466-3144 


Securities registered pursuant
    to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant
    to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value, $0.01

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed 
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 
months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was 
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to 
such filing requirements for the past 90 days: YES X   NO __

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers 
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, 
and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's 
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or 
any amendment to this Form 10-K:  _____ 

As of October 4, 1996 the aggregate value of the voting 
stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed 
by reference to the average of the bid and ask price ($1.08) 
on such date was $6,519,721.

As of October 4, 1996, the Registrant had outstanding 
10,646,482 shares of common stock ($.01 par value). An index of 
the documents incorporated herein by reference and/or annexed 
as exhibits to the signed originals of this report appears
beginning on page __.

     ----------- Page  --------------                           

                     TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                 
                                                        PAGE
ITEM NUMBER AND CAPTION                                   NO.

                             PART   I

ITEM 1.   Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

ITEM 2.   Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 3.   Legal Proceedings  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of 
           Security Holders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                          PART   II

ITEM 5.   Market for Registrant's Common Equity and 
           Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 6.   Selected Financial Data. . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of
           Financial Condition and Results of
           Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  . .

ITEM 9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants 
           on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  . . . . 

                         PART   III

ITEM 10.  Directors and Executive Officers of the 
           Company  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 11.  Executive Compensation  . . . . . . . . . . . . 

ITEM 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners 
           and Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ITEM 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transaction .

                          PART   IV

ITEM 14.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, 
           and Reports of Form 8-K. . . . . . . . . . . .

Signatures  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

     ----------- Page  --------------                           

                              PART I
                                                                 
ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

GENERAL

Royal Silver Mines, Inc. (generally  referred to as 'Royal' or 
'the Company'), formerly known as Consolidated Royal Mines, 
Inc., and also, Royal Minerals, Inc., is a U.S. mineral 
resource company incorporated under the laws of the State of 
Utah.  The Company is engaged in the business of acquiring  
and exploring mineral properties containing silver, gold, 
copper, and other mineralization, with a primary emphasis 
on silver.  Prior to September 30, 1995, Royal acquired all of 
the outstanding securities of Celebration Mining 
Company ('Celebration'), a development stage company, pursuant 
to a share exchange agreement and plan of reorganization
('Reorganization').  Unless indicated differently by the 
context, all references to 'the Company' and 'Royal' in this 
report shall be read to refer to Royal Silver Mines, Inc., 
the corporate entity that resulted from the business combination 
of Consolidated Royal Mines, Inc. and Celebration Mining 
Company.  

Prior to the Reorganization, Celebration was a non-public, 
closely held Washington corporation.  It was formed in 
February 1994 to identify and acquire mineral properties 
for subsequent exploration and development, if warranted, 
through equity financing and joint venture arrangements. 
The Reorganization has been accounted for as a purchase 
by Celebration of Royal.  Celebration is treated as the 
acquiring company for financial reporting purposes because 
its shareholders constitute greater than 50 percent of the 
combined shareholder group.  In conformity with generally 
accepted accounting principles and the Company's accounting 
policy, Celebration is recognized as the predecessor 
entity.  Consequently,  Celebration's assets and liabilities 
were not adjusted in the accompanying financial statements.  On 
the other hand, for purposes of reporting statutory and 
corporate authority, Royal is deemed to be the 
acquiring corporation, and  Celebration is now  a wholly-
owned subsidiary of Royal.  Prior to the Reorganization, Royal 
had been a majority-owned subsidiary of Centurion Mines 
Corporation ('Centurion').  Currently, however, Centurion holds 
an approximate 14 percent shareholder interest in Royal and is
an affiliate and related party of the Company.  

The Company operates its business as an exploration stage 
company, meaning that it intends to receive income from 
property sales, joint ventures, or other business arrangements 
with larger companies, rather than developing and placing 
its properties into production on its own.  There currently 
are several business arrangements, joint venture prospects, 
and potential property sales from which the Company expects 
to receive income.  The Company has owned royalty interests
in properties situated in Utah's Gold Belt.  There has been no
assurance that the Company would receive royalties from 
these properties; it received no royalty income during the ten
month period ended September 30, 1995 ("Fiscal 1995").

The Company currently has no revenues.  At September 30, 1995, 
the Company's accumulated deficit was $962,735.  Although it 
has recurring losses from operations, the Company has increased 
its operating capital and improved its financial condition 
and ability.   Regarding its losses from operations, the 
Company cannot assure that it will be able to fully carry out 
its plans as budgeted without additional operating capital.  
At September 30, 1995, the Company had a cash balance of 
$151,698 and a deficit working capital of $665,274, as compared 
to a cash balance of $30,076 and working capital of $25,754 
at November 30, 1994.  Royal will need capital resources  
of approximately $25,000-30,000 per month to meet its 
estimated expenditures for the ensuing twelve months.  The Board 
of Directors has instructed management to consult with 
experienced financial and investment advisory firms to 
formulate arrangements for such capital fund raising. 
Currently, the Company is pursuing various alternatives, 
including, if necessary, the private placement of stock.

During the nine months ended June 30, 1996, the Company placed
1,226,832 shares of its common stock for $1,945,779 in cash.
The Company also issued 406,050 shares of its common stock in lieu
of outstanding debt. The stock was issued at $1.50 per share for
a total value of $609,075.  At the end of September, 1996, the Company
reached an agreement with Centurion Mines Corporation, a related
affiliate, for an option to purchase or assign up to 800,000 shares of
Royal common stock, presently owned by Centurion Mines and representing
approximately seven and one-half percent of currently outstanding shares,
at an exercise price of $1.75 per share. The re-purchase option expires
October 1, 1998.

As discussed in greater detail below in the section entitled 
'The Company's Strategy and Business Plan,' a substantial 
portion of Royal's assets consist of investments in 
mineral properties for which additional exploration is required 
to determine if they contain mineralization that is economi-
cally recoverable.  The realization of these investments is
contingent to a large extent  upon the success of Royal's
property transactions as a whole, the existence of economically
recoverable metals and other mineralized material, the ability
of the Company to obtain financing or make other arrangements for
development, and upon future profitable production.  The likelihood
and extent to which these contingencies may be material is 
uncertain, and Royal cannot assure that the outcome of 
these uncertain events will not have a material impact and 
result in adverse consequences to the Company.  If Royal does 
not receive suitable financing or funds from its present or 
future business arrangements to develop these properties, 
and continues to suffer losses from operations, the Company 
will revise its business activities accordingly.

HISTORY

The Company was incorporated in Utah on April 6, 1969 as 
Royal Resources, Inc. for the purpose of acquiring and 
developing mineral properties.  The Company changed its name 
to Royal Minerals, Inc., on January 6, 1983, and became a 
public company in July 1984.  Royal complied with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission reporting requirements 
until August 1986, at which time Royal filed Form 15 with 
the Commission and suspended further reporting requirements.  
On January 31, 1992, Centurion owned 82.3 percent of the 
Company's common stock (see the section entitled 
'Centurion's Acquisition and Control of the Company,' below.)  
Also on January 31, 1992, the Company shareholders authorized a 
5-for-1 reverse stock split, and on March 4, 1994, authorized a 
4-for-1 reverse stock split of the common stock of the Company.  
On March 17, 1994, the Company changed its name to 
Consolidated Royal Mines, Inc.  On November 22, 1994, the 
Company filed a registration statement on Form 10 and renewed 
its reporting requirements, effective January 23, 1995.  During 
the fourth quarter of Fiscal 1995, the Company revised its 
business plan to concentrate on the acquisition of 
silver properties.  That change in focus prompted 
Consolidated Royal Mines, Inc. and Celebration Mining Company 
to implement the Reorganization, which closed on August 8, 
1995, and to change the Company's name to Royal Silver Mines, 
Inc., effective September 18, 1995.


THE COMPANY'S STRATEGY AND BUSINESS PLAN 

Royal's management believes that control of land and mineral 
rights is the key ingredient for financial success in 
the exploration and development phases of the mining 
business.  Previously, Royal had concentrated its main 
exploration efforts in the northern Utah Gold Belt because of 
that area's history of profitable metal production and because 
of Royal's exploration experience in the western United 
States.  After the Reorganization, the Company acquired a number 
of significant mineral properties focusing on silver 
resources.  The Company expects to concentrate its main 
exploration efforts during Fiscal 1996 in Idaho's Coeur d' 
Alene and Lakeview Mining Districts, and Utah's Ashbrook 
Mining District where the Company is involved in a joint venture 
at the Vipont Mine property.  The Company also is involved in 
a joint venture in Australia through an agreement 
between Celebration and an Australian company.

Royal's corporate strategy is directed toward the acquisition 
of land positions for the exploration of mineralization 
in established mining districts that have had large and 
profitable production histories.  This approach is referred to 
in the mining industry as 'headframe geology,' which is defined 
as concentrating efforts near previously known, profitable 
ore deposits.  Royal does not currently have sufficient capital 
of its own to carry out its strategy and business plan.  
In addition to the properties of the two joint ventures 
mentioned above, the Company controls other mineral 
properties.  Its business plan is to explore and develop 
mineral deposits on those properties in conjunction with larger 
and better financed companies.  It expects in this way to 
achieve a major increase in the value of its assets and to 
obtain production income with less risk of its own funds 
for development expenditures and capital investment in 
production facilities.  However, because it currently does not 
have sufficient capital, if the Company is not successful 
in obtaining suitable joint venture commitments and funds, there 
is no assurance that the Company otherwise will obtain the 
capital it would need to achieve its business plan.

The Company's plan of operation for Fiscal 1996 is to proceed 
with its joint ventures and current exploration efforts and to 
seek business arrangements that, in conjunction with the funds 
of other companies or business entities, will provide 
sufficient funding to meet the initial expenditures required 
for the exploration of mineralization on such properties and 
to acquire land positions or other interests in mineral 
properties. As a consequence of the Company's plans, management
expects a reversal of the current trend of diminishing cash flow.  

During September 1996, the Company completed its due diligence review
and signed an option agreement with the Placer Mining Corporation
of Kellogg, Idaho, to purchase a 100 percent ownership interest in 
the Bunker Hill Mine, a silver-lead-zinc mine in Shoshone County,
Idaho. The Bunker Hill Mine is the largest mine in northern Idaho's
historic Coeur d'Alene Mining District, which currently has four
major silver mines in production. The Bunker Hill Mine has
produced over 35 million tons of ore over a one hundred year period.

Under the terms of the option, the Company can acquire the mine by making
payment through one of two alternative purchase arrangements: the Company
may either (1) pay $7 million and issue 500,000 shares of its restricted
common stock to Placer Mining on or before May 10, 1997; or (2) pay
$4 million and issue 500,000 shares to Placer Mining on or before
May 10, 1997, and then pay an additional $3.5 million on or before
May 10, 1998. Under either alternative, Placer Mining will retain a
2-3/4 percent net smelter return royalty on the property. The Company
intends to raise the necessary funds via equity and/or debt financing.

The Board of Directors reasonably believes that the Company is 
able to engage in nearly any size operation or scope of 
mining activity depending on the circumstances and merits of 
each proposed operation or mining activity.  Accordingly, the 
Board has not limited the size of operation or scope of 
project which it believes is reasonable for management to 
consider in achieving the Company's business plan.  Following 
that direction, management of the Company pursued a vigorous 
and fruitful program during the last quarter of Fiscal 
1995, acquiring interests in seven distinct parcels of 
mineral property.  Further, management has been authorized 
to consider and review all reasonable proposals and, upon 
satisfactory assessment, to then make a specific determination 
as to an estimated range of funding amounts that each such 
proposal reasonably might require.  

By further direction of the Board of Directors, management 
may enter into new mining arrangements with joint 
venturers, partners, or other third parties.  Such arrangements 
may be multi-party ventures to which the Company will 
contribute stock, cash, and/or mineral interests.  In 
such arrangements, the Company's participation in revenues 
and profits, if any, will be reduced.  At this time, the 
Company has no agreement or understanding with any third 
parties for the formation of a joint venture mining operation 
other than those described herein.  The Company will 
encounter significant competition from firms currently engaged 
in the mining industry.  In general, all of these companies 
are substantially larger than the Company, and have substan-
tially greater resources and operating histories.  (See 
'Risk Factors,' below.)

Management, together with such professional advisors which 
the Company deems appropriate, will investigate prospec-
tive properties through on-site examination, reviewing 
available geologic reports or publications relating to 
the property, and a general field reconnaissance to secure
 preliminary information regarding characteristics of the 
property.  If, from such preliminary reviews, management deems 
it advisable to further investigate the property, the Company 
may determine the condition of title and ownership by 
using abstractors or title companies, and may obtain a prelimi-
nary feasibility study by one or more geologists, mining 
engineers, or accountants.  If, after the foregoing 
preliminary investigation, management determines that the 
property does not meet the Company's acquisition criteria, 
efforts to acquire the property would be abandoned, in which 
case costs incurred in conducting the investigation would not 
be recoverable.  It should be noted, however, that the Company 
has only a limited amount of funds available for working 
capital which could be used for future exploration expendi-
tures.  Thus, if future exploration is desired, additional 
funds would be needed.  Only a limited amount of such funds 
have currently been identified and there can be no assurance 
that such funds would be available at an acceptable cost, if 
at all.  

Inasmuch as the eventual project, operation or mining 
activity could be of any size or scope, management is not able 
at this time to provide more exact amounts or a detailed listing 
of operation costs, including increases in general and
administrative expense, if any.  However, the Company plans 
to fund any increases in general and administrative 
expense principally from joint venture revenues, or fees it 
may receive or savings it may realize through corporate
restructuring.  Funds required to finance the Company's
exploration and development of mineral properties are expected 
to come primarily from joint venture participant contributions 
with the remainder provided by funds generated from such 
joint venture and other lease or royalty arrangements.  

Management has budgeted approximately $360,000 for Fiscal 1996 
for general and administrative expenses and other operating 
costs.  To date, the Company has made full and timely payment 
of its expenses, in particular to the various governmental 
payees it interacts with, and has met its obligations to the
entities and contractors that provide its personnel, office 
space, and equipment needs.  The Company currently is 
seeking additional sources of working capital sufficient 
to continue its present level of funding its general 
and administrative expenses and meet ongoing payment obligations 
for its leases to governmental bodies.  Operating costs are 
largely dependent upon the level of exploration and develop-
ment activity engaged in, which, in turn, is dependent upon
availability of funds.  The Company has determined not to incur 
any operating costs related to exploration and development 
until sufficient funds are available for payment.

Private Placements.  In July, 1995, the Company completed a 
private placement of 8,700 shares through two Regulation 
S offerings, both at a price of $2.00 per share, for a total 
of $17,400.  During September 1995, the Company completed a 
private placement of 179,000 shares of common stock through 
a domestic offering at a price of $1.50 per share for a total 
of $241,650 after expenses.  In October 1995, the Company 
completed a private placement of 200,000 shares through 
a Regulation S offering at a price of $1.50 per share for a 
total of $300,000.  In December 1995, the Company completed a
private placement of 135,000 shares through a Regulation S 
offering at a price of $1.50 per share for a total of $202,500.  
In the event that amendments are made to certain Regulation 
S registration provisions relating to a 40 day period, during 
which securities cannot come back to U.S. persons, the Company 
has granted, at its expense, certain registration rights. 
Subsequent to the end of Fiscal 1995, the Company completed 
a private placement of approximately 506,000 shares of common 
stock at a price of $1.50 per share, in conversion of approxi-
mately $570,920 of principal, plus interest, related to out-
standing debt of certain notes payable. During the nine months
ended June 30, 1996, the Company placed 1,226,832 shares of its
common stock for $1,945,779 in cash. The Company also issued
406,050 shares of its common stock in lieu of outstanding debt. The
stock was issued at $1.50 per share for a total value of $609,075.

COMPETITION

The mining industry is very competitive.  There is a high degree 
of competition to obtain favorable mining properties and 
suitable mining prospects for drilling, exploration, development
and mining operations.  The Company encounters competition from a
handful of other similarly-situated mining companies in the silver
mining industry in connection with the acquisition of properties capable
of profitably producing silver and other mineralization.  The Company
is unable to ascertain the exact number of such competitor companies,
however, the Company believes that with the acquisition of significant
properties in the Coeur d'Alene Mining District of Northern Idaho, USA,
its competitive position for exploring and developing such properties for
silver mineralization should improve. Nevertheless, the Company may be
unable to acquire attractive mining properties on terms it considers
acceptable. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company's
programs will yield commercially minable reserves.

RISK FACTORS  

The following risk factors with respect to the Company and 
its operations may affect its strategy and business plan:

1.  Recent Status as a Public Reporting Company.  The Company
became a fully reporting public company on January 23, 1995.  
The Company has no current operating history and is subject to 
all risks inherent in a developing business enterprise.  The
likelihood of success of the Company must be considered in 
light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications, 
and delays frequently encountered in connection with a new 
business in general and those specific to the natural 
resource industry and the competitive and regulatory environment 
in which the Company will operate.

2.  Exploration Stage Company.   Mineral exploration, particu-
larly for gold and silver, is highly speculative in 
nature, frequently is nonproductive, and involves many risks, 
often greater than those involved in the discovery of
mineralization.  Such risks can be considerable and may add
unexpected expenditures or delays to the Company's plans.  
There can be no assurance that the Company's mineral explora-
tion activities will be successful or profitable.  Once
mineralization is discovered, it may take a number of years 
from the initial phase of drilling until production is 
possible, during which time the economic feasibility of 
production may change.  

A related factor is that exploration stage companies use the
evaluation work of professional geologists, geophysicists, 
and engineers for estimates in determining whether to acquire 
an interest in property or to commence exploration or develop-
ment work.  These estimates are not always scientifically 
exact, and in some instances may not be correct, and could 
result in the expenditure of substantial amounts of money 
on a property before it can be determined whether or not 
the property contains economically recoverable mineralization.

The economic viability of a property cannot be determined 
until extensive exploration and development has been conducted 
and a comprehensive feasibility study performed.  The Company
currently does not have any such feasibility studies, and has 
not yet prepared feasibility studies on any of its properties. 
Moreover, the market prices of any minerals produced are 
subject to fluctuation, which may negatively affect the 
economic viability of properties on which expenditures have 
been made.  The Company is not able to determine at present 
whether or not, or the extent to which, such risks may 
adversely affect the Company's strategy and business plans.

3.  Lack of Revenue.  The Company needs additional capital but
currently has no revenues.  Substantial expenditures are 
required to establish ore reserves through drilling, to 
determine metallurgical processes to extract the mineraliza-
tion from the ore and, in the case of new properties, to 
construct mining and processing facilities.  The Company lacks 
a constant and continual flow of revenue.  The Company 
currently holds certain royalty interests in several mining
properties sold, but there is no assurance that the Company 
will receive royalty payments, or that the Company will other-
wise receive adequate funding to be able to finance its explora-
tion activities.  The Company is looking for revenue sources on 
an on-going basis, but there can be no assurance that such 
sources can be found or that, if available, the terms of such
financing will be commercially acceptable to the Company.  
Because of the Company's need for additional capital to fund 
its present operations, to complete the acquisition of 
certain mineral rights, and to provide for further exploration 
and development, the lack of consistent revenue could be a
detrimental factor in the progress of the Company.  

4. Realization of Investments in Mineral Properties and 
Additional Capital Needs.  The ultimate realization of the
Company's investments in mineral properties is dependent upon 
the success of future property sales, the existence of 
economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company 
to obtain financing or make other arrangements for development 
and upon future profitable production.  The Company expects to
finance its operations for Fiscal 1996 through the sale of 
equity securities, joint venture arrangements (including 
project financing), and the sale of interests in mineral
properties.  The Company does not have sufficient capital of 
its own to explore and develop its mineral properties and there 
can be no assurance that the Company will be successful 
in obtaining the required funds to finance its long-term 
capital needs.

5.   Retention and Attraction of Key Personnel.  The Company's
success will depend, in large part, on its ability to retain 
and attract highly qualified personnel.  The Company's success 
in retaining its present staff and in attracting additional
qualified personnel will depend on many factors, including 
its ability to provide them with competitive compensation
arrangements, equity participation and other benefits.  There is 
no assurance that the Company will be successful in retaining 
or attracting highly qualified individuals in key management
positions.

6.  Regulatory Concerns.  Environmental and other government
regulations at the federal, state and local level pertaining to 
the Company's business and properties may include: 1) Surface
Impact, 2) Water Acquisition, 3) Site Access, 4) Reclamation, 
5) Wildlife Preservation, 6) Licenses and Permits, and 7)
Maintaining the Fees for unpatented mining claims.  For a 
detailed explanation of the term 'unpatented mining claim' see 
the section below entitled 'Government Regulation and Environmen-
tal Concerns,' which also provides a comprehensive discussion 
of the risks related to this factor that may affect the 
Company's strategy and business plan. 

TRANSACTIONS WITH CENTURION

The Company has disclosed pertinent information and financial 
data with respect to its transactions with Centurion in its
presentation found at Item 13 of this Report, entitled 
'Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.'

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, LICENSES, FRANCHISES

The Company does not own any patents, trademarks, licenses,
franchises, or concessions, except for patented mining claims
granted by governmental authorities and private land owners.
Please refer to the Glossary of Mining Terms at the end of
Item 1 for a definition of the term "patented mining claims",
as well as for the definitions of other mining terminology
as it relates to this Annual Report.

SEASONABILITY

The Company's business is generally not seasonal in nature 
except to the extent that weather conditions at certain times 
of the year may affect the Company's access to its properties.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS

The Company is committed to complying and, to its knowledge, is 
in compliance with all governmental and environmental regula-
tions.  The Company's activities are subject to extensive 
federal, state, and local laws and regulations controlling not 
only the mining of and exploration for mineral properties, but 
also the possible effects of such activities upon the environ-
ment.  Permits from a variety of regulatory authorities are
required for many aspects of mine operation and reclamation.  
The Company cannot predict the extent to which future legisla-
tion and regulation could cause additional expense, capital
expenditures, restrictions and delays in the development of 
the Company's properties, including those with respect to
unpatented mining claims.

As used in this Annual Report, the term 'unpatented mining 
claim' refers to a mining claim on federal lands which has not 
been converted into full fee ownership in the name of a 
private person or entity.  The process of converting ownership 
was established under the (U.S.) General Mining Law of 1872, 
as amended (the 'General Mining Law'), and requires that 
certain conditions be met.  Once met, and all other require-
ments are satisfied, the U.S. government transfers ownership of 
the underlying property (held to that point in the public trust) 
to the private person or entity by granting fee simple and 
conveying full private ownership of the subject mineral 
property, including mineral rights, surface, subsurface and
appurtenant rights, subject to any vested and accrued water 
rights.  The act of granting full fee ownership is accomplished 
by a duly endorsed instrument referred to as a 'patent.'  
Until such time as a mining claim on federal land may be
'patented,' the claim is deemed an 'unpatented mining claim' 
and ownership is held in the public trust by the U.S. govern-
ment subject to existing federal mining laws and other 
applicable statutory or regulatory provisions as may be 
implemented by the federal bureaucracy.

In 1992, the U.S. Congress passed a number of amendments to 
the General Mining Law which governs mining claims and 
related activities on federal lands.  A holding fee of $100 and 
a filing assessment of $35 per claim was imposed upon 
unpatented mining claims located on federal lands.  Since 1992, 
a variety of legislation has been proposed to further amend 
the General Mining Law.  The proposed legislation would, 
among other things, impose royalties and add requirements 
affecting reclamation, environmental controls, and restoration. 
Although such legislative proposals are not currently in 
effect, the likelihood or extent of subsequent enactments is 
not presently known and the potential impact on the Company as 
a result of congressional action is difficult to predict.

The Company's activities are not only subject to extensive 
federal, state, and local regulations controlling the mining of 
and exploration for mineral properties, but also the possible
effects of such activities upon the environment.  Future
legislation and regulations could cause additional expense, 
capital expenditures, restrictions and delays in the development 
of the Company's properties, the extent of which cannot 
be predicted.  Also, as discussed above, permits from a variety 
of regulatory authorities are required for many aspects of 
mine operation and reclamation.  In the context of environmen-
tal permitting, including the approval of reclamation plans, 
the Company must comply with known standards, existing laws 
and regulations that may entail greater or lesser costs and 
delays depending on the nature of the activity to be permitted 
and how stringently the regulations are implemented by the
permitting authority.  While it is possible that the costs 
and delays associated with the compliance of such laws,
regulations, and permits could become such that the Company 
would not proceed with the development or operation of a mine, 
the Company is not presently aware of any material environmen-
tal constraint affecting its properties that would preclude 
the economic development or operation of any specific property.

At present, the Company does not have any environmental control
facilities. Thus, the Company has not made any material capital
expenditures for environmental controls, other than the nominal
costs of preparing the plans and contingencies for such environ-
mental controls, measures and facilities as may be required
in its future activities.

As the Company becomes more active on its properties, it is
reasonable to expect that compliance with environmental regula-
tions will substantially increase costs to the Company.  Such
compliance may include feasibility studies on the surface impact 
of the Company's proposed operations; costs associated with
minimizing surface impact; water treatment and protection;
reclamation activities, including rehabilitation of various 
sites; on-going efforts at alleviating the mining impact on
wildlife; and permits or bonds as may be required to ensure 
the Company's compliance with applicable regulations.  It 
is possible that the costs and delays associated with such
compliance could become so prohibitive that the Company may 
decide to not proceed with the exploration, development, or 
mining operations on any of its mineral properties.  

Future costs of compliance may depend upon the extent and type 
of exploration and testing required.  Moreover, there is no
assurance that the Company will be able to comply with require-
ments imposed on future development, or that the Company will 
be able to economically develop operating mines under such
regulations.  Therefore, management is not able to estimate 
those amounts at this time. 

NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES

The Company has five employees.  The Company arranges for much 
of its work through contracts with various consultants and, 
in addition, leases personnel services, on an hourly basis, 
from Centurion Exploration, Incorporated.  The Company may 
contract with additional consultants from time to time, as 
required by its operations.  Consultants are treated as indepen-
dent contractors.

CENTURION'S ACQUISITION AND CONTROL OF THE COMPANY

In October 1991, Centurion entered into negotiations with the
officers and directors of Royal for the acquisition and control 
of the Company.  In November 1991, Centurion's Board of 
Directors approved this acquisition.  Subsequently, Centurion
entered into subscription and investment agreements with 
several of Royal's principal shareholders, whereby Centurion
exchanged 174,743 restricted shares of Centurion stock and 
$1,600 cash for shares of Royal common stock constituting 
37.2 percent ownership of Royal's outstanding shares.  On 
January 10, 1992, Royal's Board of Directors authorized the
exchange of 100,000 post-split shares of Royal's common stock 
for approximately 4,196 acres of unpatented mining claims and 
state and private mineral leases from Centurion.  On January 
31, 1992, at the Royal annual shareholders meeting, the
shareholders authorized the purchase of approximately 17,000 
acres of mining properties from Centurion for 1,250,000 post-
split shares of Royal common stock.  This acquisition of 
shares gave Centurion an 82.3 percent controlling interest in
Royal.  Because of the changes in the control of shareholdings
brought about by the Reorganization with Celebration, Centurion
currently holds approximately 14 percent of Royal's outstanding
common stock.

SUBSIDIARIES

The Company currently has one subsidiary, Celebration Mining
Company, of which Royal currently is the sole shareholder. 
Celebration was incorporated in the State of Washington in
February 1994.  It is authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of
common stock, par value $.0025, of which as of December 19, 
1995, 2,762,500 shares are issued and outstanding and wholly 
owned by Royal.  

Royal's Reorganization With Celebration.

In May and June 1995, Royal's management began negotiations with
management of Celebration regarding a merger or other reorganization
plan of the two companies.  On June 28, 1995, the boards of directors 
of both companies approved a reorganization and the companies signed
an agreement based on a share exchange.  Royal would acquire 100 percent
of Celebration's interest in the Vipont Mine Joint Venture, the Crescent
Mine Lease, the Australia Joint Venture, and the option rights to acquire
up to 50 percent of the mineral rights on the prospect Mine Property 
in Madison County, Montana.  

The Celebration shareholders approved the Reorganization and 
share exchange agreement at an August 8, 1995 shareholder 
meeting.  In exchange for 100 percent of the issued and out-
standing Celebration shares, Royal agreed to issue to the
Celebration shareholders 4,143,750 shares of Royal common 
stock that together would represent ownership of 63 percent 
of Royal shareholdings outstanding immediately following the
Reorganization.  Also, Royal agreed to honor all of the 
stock rights held by various Celebration shareholders and 
which were subject to certain conditions and events.

Some of those stock rights had been granted contingent upon the
repayment of notes, and others had been granted as options 
under consultant agreements.  In total, those stock rights
permitted the purchase or receipt of approximately 1,755,000
additional shares of Royal common stock.  If all of the 
various stock rights were exercised immediately upon closing 
the Reorganization and that amount of shares were to be added 
to the initial group of 4,143,750 shares, that would result in 
a total issuance from the share exchange of approximately 
5,898,750 shares, or 71 percent ownership by the Celebration
shareholders.  To date, none of the overhanging stock rights 
have been or are expected to be exercised.

In December 1995, stock rights to receive approximately 190,795
shares were extinguished when the Company converted debt of $570,919 
in principal, plus interest, by issuing common stock.  The
noteholders of that debt amount received approximately 
506,000 shares in full satisfaction of the debt.

Termination of Intent to Acquire Fausett International.

On October 18, 1995, the Company entered into an agreement with
Fausett International, an Idaho corporation, which the Company
proposed acquiring as an 81 percent-owned consolidated subsidiary. 
However, as of the date of this filing, management has determined
not to pursue this acquisition because of changes in Fausett
International's financial circumstances, and a projected reduction in its
operations. Thus, the Company provides the following information for
background purposes only.

Fausett International, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Fausett
Mine Services, provides contract mining services throughout the western
United States.  Those services include shaft sinking, underground mine
development, diamond drilling and contract mining.  Fausett International
has had a diverse customer base over the past twenty five years, 
including several major mining companies.  Royal's management originally
approved the intended acquisition because of the view that Fausett's
experienced organization of seasoned professionals would be expected to
provide Royal with the capability to proceed with development of various
underground silver mines.  Thus, during the beginning of Fiscal 1996, the
Company entered into negotiations and a lengthy period of due diligence.
The general terms of the acquisition proposal involved the purchase of all
of the issued and outstanding shares of Fausett International in exchange
for 850,000 Royal shares. However, as of the date of this filing, because
of concerns about the financial circumstances presented by the audited
financial statements of Fausett International, Royal's management has
determined that it is not in the Company's best interests to further
pursue this acquisition.

ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF MINERAL PROPERTIES.  

Royalty Properties.   On January 10 and January 31, 1992, Royal
obtained from Centurion a total of 23,300 acres of 
unpatented mining claims and State and private mineral leases 
in exchange for the equivalent of 1,350,000 post-split shares 
of Royal common stock.  The term 'unpatented mining claim' 
is described above in the section entitled 'Government Regula-
tion and Environmental Concerns'.

During the nine months ended September 30,1992, the Company 
sold unpatented mining claims and state and private mineral 
lease properties to Kennecott Copper Corporation, a Unit of 
RTZ, London ('Kennecott').  The Company sold four unpatented 
mining claims (80 acres) to Kennecott in January 1992, for 
$100,000 retaining a 5 percent production royalty.  In July 
of 1992,  Royal sold approximately 16,880 acres of mining 
claims and state and private mineral leases to Kennecott 
for $250,000 retaining a 2 1/2 percent production royalty.  
On September 30, 1992, Kennecott purchased 6,320 acres of 
mining claims for $250,000, on which Royal retained a 2 1/2 
percent production royalty.

Montanore Project.  On March 29, 1994, Royal entered into 
a preliminary agreement to acquire Montana Reserves 
Company ('Montana Reserves'), a privately held corporation based 
in Spokane, Washington.  At the time of the agreement, 
Montana Reserves owned a 5 percent net proceeds interest in 
the Montanore Project, a silver and copper mineral property 
located in Lincoln and Sanders counties in Montana.  
Montana Reserves also had an option to acquire a 45 percent 
working interest in the Montanore Project from Noranda 
Minerals Corp. for approximately $28 million.  At the date 
of closing the agreement, June 15, 1994, material conditions 
had not been met and the agreement was automatically 
terminated without recourse of liability between or among 
the parties.  Efforts to complete the transaction were 
continued through September 1994, but ultimately were 
not successful.

GLOSSARY OF CERTAIN MINING TERMS

DECLINE -- An underground passageway connecting one or more
levels in a mine, providing adequate traction for heavy,
self-propelled equipment. Such underground openings are often
driven in an upward or downward spiral, much the same as a
spiral staircase.

DEVELOPMENT -- Work carried out for the purpose of opening
up a mineral deposit and making the actual ore extraction possible.

DORE -- Unparted gold and silver poured into molds when
molten to form buttons or bars.  Further refining is necessary to
separate the gold and silver.

EXPLORATION -- Work involved in searching for ore, usually
by drilling or driving a drift.

GRADE -- The average assay of a ton of ore, reflecting metal
content.

HEAP LEACHING -- A process involving the percolation of a
cyanide solution through crushed ore heaped on an impervious pad
or base to dissolve minerals or metals out of the ore.

MILL -- A processing plant that produces a concentrate of
the valuable minerals or metals contained in an ore.  The concentrate
must then be treated in some other type of plant, such as a smelter, to
affect recovery of the pure metal.

MINERALIZED MATERIAL OR DEPOSIT -- A mineralized body which has been
delineated by appropriate drilling and/or underground sampling to support
a sufficient tonnage and average grade of metal(s). Under SEC standards,
such a deposit does not qualify as a reserve until a comprehensive
evaluation, based upon unit cost, grade, recoveries, and other factors,
conclude economic feasibility.

ORE -- Material that can be mined and processed at a positive cash flow.

PATENTED MINING CLAIM -- A parcel of land originally located on federal
lands as an unpatented mining claim under the General Mining Law, the
title of which has been conveyed from the federal government to a private
party pursuant to the patenting requirements of the General Mining Law.

PROVEN AND PROBABLE MINERAL RESERVES -- Reserves that reflect estimates of
the quantities and grades of mineralized material at a mine which the
Company believes could be recovered and sold at prices in excess of the
cash cost of production.  The estimates are based largely on current
costs and on projected prices and demand for such mineralized material.
Mineral reserves are stated separately for each such mine, based upon
factors relevant to each mine. Proven and probable mineral reserves
are based on calculations of reserves provided by the operator of a
property that have been reviewed but not independently confirmed by
the Company. Changes in reserves represent general indicators of the
results of efforts to develop additional reserves as existing reserves
are depleted through production.  Grades of ore fed to process may be
different from stated reserve grades because of variation in grades
in areas mined from time to time, mining dilution and other factors.
Reserves should not be interpreted as assurances of mine life or of the
profitability of current or future operations.

PROBABLE RESERVES -- Resources for which tonnage and grade and/or quality
are computed primarily from information similar to that used for proven
reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are
farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced.  The degree of
assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough
to assume continuity between points of observation.

PROVEN RESERVES -- Resources for which tonnage is computed from dimensions
revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes and for which the
grade and/or quality is computed from the results of detailed sampling.
The sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely
and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and
mineral content of reserves are well established.  The computed tonnage
and grade are judged to be accurate, within limits which are stated, and
no such limit is judged to be different from the computed tonnage or grade
by more than 20 percent.

RESERVES -- That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and
legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.
Reserves are customarily stated in terms of "Ore" when dealing with
metalliferous minerals.

SHAFT -- A vertical or steeply inclined excavation for the purpose of
opening and servicing a mine.  It is usually equipped with a hoist at the
top which lowers and raises a conveyance for handling personnel and
materials.

STOPE -- An underground excavation from which ore has been extracted
either above or below mine level.

TROY OUNCE -- Unit of weight measurement used for all precious metals.
The familiar 16-ounce avoirdupois pound equals 14.583 Troy Ounces.

UNPATENTED MINING CLAIM -- A parcel of property located on federal lands
pursuant to the General Mining Law and the requirements of the state in
which the unpatented claim is located, the paramount title of which
remains with the federal government.  The holder of a valid, unpatented
lode mining claim is granted certain rights including the right to explore
and mine such claim under the General Mining Law.

VEIN -- A mineralized zone having a more or less regular development in
length, width and depth which clearly separates it from neighboring rock.

WASTE -- Barren rock in a mine, or mineralized material that is too low in
grade to be mined and milled at a profit.

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES 

OVERVIEW

The properties in which the Company has an interest are 
divided into the following areas:

      A.  CRESCENT MINE
      B.  CONJECTURE MINE
      C.  VIPONT MINE
      D.  OTHER IDAHO PROPERTIES
      E.  OTHER PROPERTIES
      F.  UTAH GOLD BELT AND ROYALTY INTERESTS
      G.  OPTION TO PURCHASE BUNKER HILL MINE
      H.  OFFICES

A.  CRESCENT MINE

In February 1995, Celebration entered into an agreement to 
acquire a mineral lease on the Crescent Mine.  The Crescent Mine 
is an underground mine, located in the Coeur d'Alene 
Mining District of Shoshone County, Idaho, about five miles east 
of Kellogg, Idaho.

Operations of the Crescent Mine began prior to 1917 and, 
according to records available to the Company, approximately 
25 million ounces of silver have been produced by the 
Crescent Mine.  The mine is not currently in operation and 
is flooded to approximately the 1200 foot level.  The most 
current ore reserve report that the Company has been able to 
obtain was prepared in 1985 by Norman A. Radford, a 
registered professional geologist.  That report, based on 
an assumption that silver prices would remain below ten 
dollars ($10) per ounce, indicated that the Crescent Mine 
contained 141,000 tons of probable reserves averaging 31 ounces
of silver per ton of mineralized material. At current prices of
under six dollars ($6.00), the Company cannot assure that any of 
the mineralization could be mined at a profit.

Host rocks in the Crescent Mine, in common with the rest of 
the District, are members of the Precambrian Belt Super 
Group.  Within the Crescent Mine area, three formations 
are present, in descending order:  Wallace, St. Regis, and 
Revett.  The most favorable rocks in the Crescent Mine are 
the Lower St. Regis and Upper Revett quartzites.  These rocks 
occur in the Crescent Mine from the 1,200-foot level downward.  
The Coeur d'Alene 'Silver Belt' ore structures are 
frequently narrow, fragmented, and sinuous.  They have 
been discovered and mined at levels deeper than is generally 
the case in other mining districts.  The ore at the Crescent 
Mine occurs in thin veins steeply dipping to the south.  
These veins may vary in thickness from several inches to 
several feet.  The Alhambra and the Syndicate Faults are 
major reverse faults and both are present in the Crescent 
Mine.

The Crescent Mine property consists of 12 patented mining 
claims and 2 Idaho state leases located immediately adjacent to 
and west of the world-famous Sunshine Mine (Sunshine 
Mining Company, SSC-NYSE).  The Sunshine Mine has produced 
nearly 400 million ounces of silver since its inception, making 
it the largest primary silver mine in the world.  The 
major structural and stratigraphic features which have produced 
the major ore deposits in the Sunshine Mine are also present in 
the Crescent Mine.

The Crescent is developed to a vertical depth of 5,100 feet by 
2 vertical shafts.  The majority of past production from 
the Crescent Mine occurred in the Revett formation over 1,200 
feet of dip between the 3,100 level and the 4,300 level.  In 
the mid-1980's, the No. 2 shaft was deepened to the 5,100 
level, which opened an additional 800 feet of favorable 
Revett quartzites for development of the downward extensions of 
the East Footwall and Hook veins.

The Company's plans to re-establish significant silver 
production from the Crescent Mine will be dependent upon 
silver prices.  Management estimates that a price of at least 
$6.00 per ounce would need to be sustained for a period of 
six months to justify the capital investment necessary to 
de-water the lower workings of the mine and re-habilitate 
the stopes.  At December 14, 1995, the Comex Spot price for 
silver was $5.15.  Absent a $6.00 silver price, the Company 
intends to pursue development and exploration efforts in the 
upper Crescent.  The workings of the upper Crescent Mine are 
above the water table, and therefore can be developed without 
major capital investment.  The Company believes that a 
processing agreement for Crescent ore can be negotiated with 
the neighboring Sunshine Mine on a favorable basis.

B.  CONJECTURE MINE

In late August of 1995, the Company completed two 
acquisitions which included 6 patented and 6 unpatented 
mining claims comprising the Conjecture Mine property.  Then, 
in September of 1995, the Company acquired property covering 
the 12,000 foot long Conjecture Shear zone by staking an 
additional 44 unpatented claims.

The Conjecture property is located in the Lakeview Mining 
District of Idaho, some 30 miles to the northwest of the 
Coeur d'Alene mining district.  The rock groups of the 
Lakeview District are the same Precambrian belt series 
associated with the world-class silver deposits of the Coeur 
d' Alene mining district to the south.

The history of the Lakeview District in general, and the 
Conjecture Mine in particular, has shown sporadic high grade 
silver production from shallow workings since the late 
1800's.  Most recent production on a neighboring property 
occurred as recently as 1987.  However, within the District, 
only the Conjecture Mine itself has been developed to 
any significant depth.

In the late 1950's and early 1960's, Federal Resources of Salt 
Lake City, Utah invested approximately $3 million in shaft 
sinking and underground development at the Conjecture Mine.  
In all, Federal Resources completed a 2,000 foot deep, 
3 compartment vertical shaft and nearly 12,000 feet of 
drifts, cross-cuts and raises to establish a block of mineralized
material of 336,000 tons at a grade of 11 ounces per ton of silver,
and .03 ounces of gold.

An additional block of 370,000 tons of similar grade was listed 
as a possible block of mineralization between the levels. Since 
obtaining the property, the Company has not been able to re-confirm
these reserve estimates of mineralized material, although an
independent reserve report done in 1981 essentially verified the
earlier numbers. That independent reserve report was prepared by
Richard W. Morris, a registered professional geologist, for a com-
pany known as Minerals Management, Inc.  Nevertheless, no assurance
can be made that this mineralized material constitutes a proven or
probable 'ore reserve', if at all, until it can be re-verified.

The Company's geologists have noted the striking 
similarities between the Lakeview District and the nearby 
Coeur d'Alene District.  High grade silver mineralization has 
been shown to extend laterally for over 2 miles, and vertically 
for over 3,000 feet in the Conjecture Mine.  The same rock 
unit sequence (i.e., Wallace, St. Regis, Revett) is found in 
both districts, with the same important ore minerals (tetrahe-
drite, galena, sphalerite) defining productive ore 
shoots.  However, within the Lakeview District, only the 
Conjecture shaft has penetrated the less favorable 
Wallace formation into the better quartzite units.

If adequate financing is available, of which there can be no
assurance, the Company intends to conduct additional 
exploration along the Conjecture Shear zone.  This program 
would incorporate surface geochemistry, trenching and drilling, 
as well as underground rehabilitation and sampling. Because of
heavy snows in the winter of 1995 and spring of 1996, exploration
activities at the Conjecture were delayed.

C.  VIPONT MINE

The Vipont Mine is located in the Ashbrook Mining District, 
a remote area in the extreme northwestern corner of Box 
Elder County, Utah, approximately 10 miles east of the Nevada 
state line and one mile south of the Idaho state line near 
the headwaters of the Little Birch Creek.  It is accessible 
by asphalt, gravel, and dirt roads.  The mine property consists 
of 53 patented (deeded) mining claims covering nearly 1,000 
acres owned by Celebration Mining Company and United Silver 
Mines.

The Vipont Mine was at one time one of the foremost 
silver producing mines in the State of Utah.  Its greatest 
period of activity was from 1919 through mid-1923 after the 
passage of the Pittman Silver Purchase Act ('Pittman Act') 
which authorized the purchase of 200,000,000 ounces of silver.  
The Mine closed in August 1923 with the expiration of the 
Pittman Act after producing nearly 1,000,000 ounces of silver 
per year.  Some leasing was done in the 1930's and the Mine 
was closed in 1942 when Congress passed War Order L-208 closing 
all gold and silver mines.  From 1977 through 1987, United 
Silver Mines began further development and leached the old 
mill tailings.

The mineralization in the Mine occurs predominantly as the 
mineral argentite in the Vipont limestone.  Two other units, 
the Phelan limestone, and the Sentinel limestone have 
produced high-grade ore.  Neither the Phelan nor the Sentinel 
have been seriously explored for additional ore.

The mineralization in the Vipont limestone occurs as a 
continuous tabular 'manto' mineralization body in the crests 
of folds (crenulations) superimposed upon a shallowly dipping 
(22 degrees) syncline.  The continuity of the mineralization 
down-dip has been shown by past mining operations and by a line 
of drill holes below the old workings.  It is thought by 
geologists that the mineralization will continue to down-dip 
toward an igneous intrusive 4,600 feet southwest of the old 
mine.

There are two distinct mineralization deposits on the 
Vipont Property: the oxide deposit and the sulphide deposit.  
The characteristics of each are unique and require 
different approaches to development and exploration.  According 
to a 1994 report by Dr. Armond H. Beers, the oxide deposit
contains 1,100,000 tons of mineralized material grading 6.9 ounces 
per ton in silver and with a small gold credit.  The Company 
has not independently re-verified those findings and cannot 
and does not make any assurance as to their accuracy or 
compliance with regulatory standards.

The report of Marston and Marston, completed in 1981, provides
different grades and tonnage.  Marston and Marston did not have
access to additional drilling results completed subsequent to their
report; however, based on the information then available, Marston
and Marston reported 1.5 million tons of mineralized material at a silver
grade of 4.47 ounces per ton.  Because the mineralization is oxidized, it 
is believed that recovery of the precious metals can be 
achieved with cyanide heap leaching.  It is also believed 
that mining can be accomplished with open pit methods.  The 
Company will evaluate its plans for development of the 
Vipont Property after further review of all technical data.  
Any development is anticipated to require amendments to the 
United Silver Mines permits to allow construction of leaching 
pads, completion of engineering design of the leach pads 
and recovery plant, selection of a mining contractor, building 
and installing crushing circuits, agglomerating unit, leach 
pads, and recovery plant.

The sulphide deposit is currently defined in the Beers Report as 
478,000 tons of mineralized material at an estimated average grade
of 13.52 ounces per ton in silver. Geologic interpretation of the
manto-type replacement deposit, however, may establish upon further
exploration that this mineralized resource may be larger.  The Company's 
management and professional staff believe that the sulphide deposits
will represent the long-term future of the Vipont Mine.

D.  OTHER IDAHO PROPERTIES

Bismark Mine Property.  In September of 1995, the Company 
obtained a 10-year lease on 3 patented mining claims in 
Shoshone County, known as the Bismark claims.   The claims 
lie about one mile south of the main shaft of the Sunshine Mine 
and are surrounded by Sunshine holdings.  The property is 
developed by a 1,500 foot adit which was driven to the northwest 
to intersect the Bismark vein.  Royal has re-opened and 
re-timbered the portal of the Bismark adit to permit accessing 
and sampling of the Bismark vein.  This work is planned for 
the 1996 field season.

The geology of the Bismark claims, given the proximity to 
the Sunshine Mine, is highly favorable to ore deposition.  
The Bismark vein lies entirely with the Revett formation, which 
is the most favorable rock unit for ore emplacement in the 
Coeur d'Alene mining district.  Limited exploration by 
Sunshine Mining Company on the 2,600 level established the 
downward projection of mineralization in the Bismark 
vein structure.

Bismark Mining Company, the property owner and lessor, will 
receive a 2.5 percent net smelter return on commercial 
production from the claims, under the terms of the Company's 
lease.

Coeur d' Alene Syndicate Property.  No significant mineral
production has to date occurred on the Coeur d'Alene 
Syndicate property and there are no known proven or 
probable reserves.  In September of 1995, the Company acquired 
fee simple ownership of the 24 patented mining claims that 
comprise the Coeur d'Alene Syndicate property, located in 
Burke Canyon some six miles northeast of Wallace, Idaho.  
The property is near the eastern end of the Coeur d'Alene 
mining district, and is an undeveloped portion of a 
major mineralized trend running through the Star-Morning Mines 
and on to the Frisco and Black Bear Mines.

Geologists have long considered the Syndicate property to be 
an outstanding exploration target where the highly productive 
Star fault turns to the southwest and intersects the 
Commander fault.  This structural anomaly, occurring in 
favorable Revett  and Burke formation quartzite rocks is 
exactly what develops major ore shoots within the Coeur 
d'Alene district.

The property is currently developed by an adit from the Black 
Bear property, but could ultimately be accessed by deep shafts 
on either end of the strike.

Subsequent to September 30, 1995, the Company entered into 
an agreement with an independent timber company to sell the 
mature timber for cash.  The transaction was expected to 
close in Fiscal 1996, but has not reached final implementation.

The Liberal King Mine.  In the fourth quarter of 
Fiscal 1995, the Company acquired fee simple ownership of the 
the Liberal King Mine, consisting of 5 patented claims
located southwest of the famous Bunker Hill Mine in the Pine 
Creek area of the Coeur d'Alene Mining District.  At the time 
the mine was last operated by Spokane National in the 1960's, 
that company reported a defined block of mineralized material
totaling 81,000 tons at 12 percent zinc and 2.5 ounces of silver.
Royal has not been able to evaluate this property as yet, and no 
current reserve estimates can be given.

In the early 1980's, Cominco-American conducted an 
exploration program on the Liberal King property in search of 
a large, stratabound zinc-silver deposit.  Such potential has 
not been fully explored at this time.

E.  OTHER PROPERTIES

Frisco Standard Silver Mine.  As of the first quarter of 
fiscal 1995, the Company has fully divested itself of any 
ownership in the Frisco Standard Mine.  In September 1995, 
the Company had acquired fee simple ownership of the 7 
patented claims that comprised this property. 

New Departure Mine.  There are no known proven or probable 
reserves identified at the New Departure Mine.  In August 1995, 
the Company acquired a long term mineral lease for the 
New Departure Mine in Beaverhead County, Montana.  This property 
is located in southeastern Montana near the town of Bannock.  
The property consists of eight patented claims and has a history 
of very high grade silver production.  Royal management has not 
as yet developed an exploration plan for the property, which 
was acquired by lease in September 1995, subject to a 3 percent 
net smelter return.

Australia Joint Venture Property.  There are no known proven 
or probable reserves identified at the Australia Joint 
Venture Property.  On March 21, 1995, Celebration entered into 
a joint venture with Metallurgical Refining & Development PTY, 
LTD. ('Metallurgical'), of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, for 
the exploration of EL 3854, a prospecting license in western 
New South Wales.  For the past three years Metallurgical has 
been engaged in an active program of geophysics, geo-
chemistry, satellite reconnaissance, and other 
proprietary exploration methods seeking to identify large, 
buried, polymetallic deposits.  In July of 1995, the joint 
venture completed an exploratory diamond drill hole to a depth 
of 700 meters (2100 feet).  While the hole did not 
encounter significant mineralization, there was geologic 
indication that a large porphyry system may be nearby.  Results 
of additional scientific testing of the core are being 
evaluated before conducting further magnetics and geophysics 
to determine plans for further drilling.

F.  UTAH GOLD BELT AND ROYALTY INTERESTS

The Company is not currently involved in active exploration 
with respect to any of the property holdings or royalty 
interests within the Utah Gold Belt. Subject to the progress
of Royal's plan for Fiscal 1996 regarding its mineral properties,
the Company does not anticipate pursuing significant exploration
activities within the Utah Gold Belt properties during Fiscal 1996.

The Utah Gold Belt is a major mineralized north-south 
zone, including the Oquirrh Mountain range, situated on the 
west side of the Salt Lake valley.  The Utah Gold Belt is close 
to Salt Lake City, and major highways and railroads make up a 
well-developed infrastructure.  The Utah Gold Belt includes 
the well-known Bingham and Mercur mining districts, plus 
smaller Ophir, Stockton, and Greeley districts.

The Utah Gold Belt has been a major producer of copper, 
gold, silver, and other metals since the late 1800's.  
Discovery and profitable production of new ore bodies has 
continued up to the present time.  Indeed, important new gold 
mines have been developed within the last decade.  
Centurion initiated a land acquisition program in 1987 and 
Royal subsequently purchased Utah Gold Belt properties 
because management recognized that these properties had not 
been fully explored and it offered excellent potential for 
the discovery of new gold ore bodies.

Mayflower/West Canyon Project. This project covers 
approximately 3,060 acres, which are held as private mining 
leases and state mineral leases.  The most important portion 
of this property is the Mayflower Gold Mine, which was 
operated about 1900 and is known to contain gold mineraliza-
tion.  Royal engineers have excavated the Mayflower Mine portal 
and have carried out underground mapping and sampling.  
Geological and geochemical surveys and exploratory drilling 
have been carried out on the surface.

Central Oquirrh Project.  The Central Oquirrh Project 
covers approximately 9,030 acres, which are held as private 
mining leases and state mineral leases.  This project is 
located in the central Oquirrh Mountains of Utah and 
Tooele Counties.

Bates Canyon.  This property consists of approximately 360 
acres held as unpatented lode mining claims which Kennecott 
re-assigned to the Company in December 1995 after paying 
federal claim rental fees through August 31, 1996. 

The Company sold various Utah Gold Belt mining properties 
to Kennecott during 1992, which are described in the 
following paragraphs (the quoted acreage represent what 
Kennecott currently holds). The Company has retained 
production royalty interests on these properties.  These 
sold properties are contiguous to or near properties 
held previously by Kennecott in the Utah Gold Belt.  

Management of the Company believed it was to the 
Company's advantage to allow the ownership of these properties 
to pass to Kennecott, with the Company retaining a 
production royalty interest.  At present gold prices (about 
$380 per ounce), the Company would receive $3.80 for each 
one percent royalty interest for each ounce of gold produced 
by Kennecott from these properties without any commitment on 
the part of the Company to contribute to the exploration,
development, or mining of these properties.  The Company 
has retained royalty interests which varies from property 
to property, within the range of 5 percent of the gross value 
of metals produced. There is no assurance that the Company 
will receive or continue to receive royalties from 
these properties, or of the amount, if any, of such royalties. 

Barneys Canyon.  In January 1992, Kennecott purchased this 
80-acre property underlying, in part, the Barney's Canyon 
South operating gold mine.  This property consists of four
unpatented lode mining claims, and is situated in the 
active excavation and dump portion of said mine which is 
currently under development.  The Company retained a five 
percent production royalty.  management of the Company has no
knowledge as to whether or not gold will be produced from this 
80-acre property, and if gold is produced, when this will occur.

Lion Hill.  This property consists of approximately 1,450 
acres held as unpatented mining claims, and is situated of the 
west flank of the Central Oquirrh Range, just south of the
community of Ophir.  This property has been the site for the
drilling of twelve exploratory hole by the former Centurion 
Mines Corporation-Crown Resources Corporate Joint Venture. 
Some gold mineralization was encountered, but no commercially
minable ore deposits were found. The Company retains a two and 
one-half percent  production royalty on this property.

North Oquirrh Project.  This property consists of 
approximately  2,800 acres held as private and state mineral 
leases situated on the west slope of the Northern Oquirrh Range 
and is relatively unexplored.  The Company retains a two and 
one-half percent production royalty.

Barneys Canyon North.  This property consist of approximately 
720 acres held as unpatented mining claims.  Untested gold
exploration targets have been identified on this property.  
The Company retains a two and one-half percent production 
royalty on this property.

Barneys Canyon South.  This property consists of approximately 
720 acres held as unpatented lode mining claims and 
contains untested gold exploration targets.  The Company 
maintains a two and one-half percent production royalty on 
this property.

Harkers Canyon.  This property consists of approximately 
2,200 acres held as unpatented lode mining claims.  Centurion's
geologists have identified two anomalous gold-bearing zones 
which represent exploration targets.  Kennecott has committed 
to carrying out exploratory work on this property during 1993.  
The Company retains a two and one-half percent  production 
royalty.

G.  OPTION TO PURCHASE THE BUNKER HILL MINE

In September 1996, the Company completed its due diligence review and
successfully exercised its option with the Placer Mining Corporation
of Kellogg, Idaho, to purchase a 100 percent ownership interest in 
the Bunker Hill Mine, a silver-lead-zinc mine in Shoshone County,
Idaho and the largest mine in northern Idaho's historic Coeur d'Alene
Mining District. The Bunker Hill Mine has produced over 35 million
tons of ore over a one hundred year period. Option terms and financing
alternatives regarding the purchase are explained above in more detail
in the section within Item 1 entitled "The Company's Strategy and
Business Plan." 

The Bunker Hill complements Royal's silver focus.  The Bunker Hill has
historically produced in excess of 165 million ounces of silver,
making it the second most productive silver mine in United States
history. Preliminarily, the Company has identified seven near-term
exploration-development projects of potentially high-grade silver zones.
These targets were also identified by past operators.  Detailed
exploration plans for these projects are available to the Company in the
records at the mine.

The Bunker Hill Mine property consists of over 6,500 acres of
patented mining claims, much of which is completely unexplored.
The largest deposit of zinc mineralization in the mine, the Quill,
is open on strike to the west and down dip. The largest and highest
grade deposit of lead-silver mineralization, the Francis, the "J",
and the Emery are all open to depth. Given the extensive vertical
continuity of mineralized material in the Coeur d' Alene Mining
District, the Company believes that the existence of additional
mineralized material at depth that may be economically profitable
is a rational basis for conducting further exploration and development.
Management of the Company notes that the other four largest mines in
the district have been mined and developed at least one thousand
feet deeper, in reference to sea level, than the Bunker Hill Mine.

The Bunker Hill Mine was discovered in 1885 and produced continuously
until its first closure in 1981.  Historical production from the mine
exceeded 39,600,000 tons at a grade of 4.5 ounces per ton of silver,
8.6 percent lead and 3.7 percent zinc.  At present metal prices, this
prior production would have exceeded approximately 5 billion dollars.

Placer Mining acquired the Bunker Hill Mine in 1991 and is
currently producing approximately 50 tons per day of high-
grade lead-silver ore.  Over the next 24 months, the Company 
intends to expand production to approximately 500 tons per day
of lead-zinc-silver ores, as well as to undertake a major underground
diamond drilling program to better define, evaluate, and expand
reserves and other mineralized material.

The proven and probable reserves are contained within 18 known ore
zones. Historically, the Bunker Hill Mine has been mined from over
60 individual ore zones extending within a broad area approximately
1500 feet wide, 11,000 feet long, and 7000 feet deep.  Substantial
inferred resources and potential extensions are believed to be present
within the mine complex.  The Company believes also that projected mining
activities at the Bunker Hill Mine will benefit from the presence of three
workable shafts and over 150 miles of drifts, crosscuts and raises,
which in today's dollars represents an infrastructure that could
cost in excess of $300 million dollars to duplicate.

During Royal's extensive due diligence review, of more than 6 months,
technical staff of the Company completed an extensive review of mine maps,
drill logs, and other technical data which presents a preliminary
overview that approximately 8 million tons of silver and other mineralized
material may be present and economically recoverable from within the mine.
Thus, the Company is preparing plans to implement reasonably significant
exploration activities upon exercise of the option to purchase the mine.

Exploration targets are believed to consist of large tonnage,
bulk-minable deposits as well as high-grade vein deposits.
According to consulting Royal geologist Daniel Gorski, extensive,
minable bulk tonnages may be indicated by prior drilling results.
Management believes that implementation of the option purchase
agreement will allow the Company to extend its exploration
strategy for silver and other mineralized material in a
known mining district.

H.  OFFICES

The Company's executive office is located at North 10220 
Nevada, Suite 230, Spokane, Washington 99218.  In addition, 
the Company maintains its registered corporate office at 331 
South Rio Grande Street, Suite 208, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. 
The Company leases its principal office in Spokane, Washington, 
on a renewable one-year term with rental costs of $970 per 
month, including basic maintenance and janitorial services.
The Company does not currently have any other branch offices. 
                                                                 
ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 

The Company is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings
incidental to the Company or any of its properties.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
                                                                 
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders through
the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the fourth 
quarter of Fiscal 1995.

                             PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
         STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Company's common shares are traded on the NASDAQ Bulletin 
Board under the symbol RSMI.  The prices listed below were 
obtained from the National Quotation Bureau, Inc., and are 
the highest and lowest bids reported during each fiscal quarter 
for the period December 31, 1993, through September 30, 
1995.  These bid prices are over-the-counter market 
quotations based on interdealer bid prices, without 
markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily 
represent actual transactions: 

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Fiscal Quarter Ended          High Bid ($)   Low Bid ($) 
--------------------          ------------   -----------  
<S>                           <C>            <C>
December 31, 1993             2.124          1.500
March 31, 1994                2.50           1.000
June 30, 1994                 4.250          4.250
September 30, 1994            7.750          4.250
December 31, 1994             4.125          3.000
March 31, 1995                2.500          1.125
June 30, 1995                 3.750          0.875
September 29, 1995            3.124          2.750

</TABLE>
          
On October 4, 1996, the average of the high bid and low ask
quotation for the Company's common shares as quoted on the 
NASDAQ Bulletin Board was $1.08.

The approximate number of holders of common stock of record on October
4, 1996, was approximately 350.

Since its inception, the Company has not paid any dividends on 
its common shares.  The Company does not anticipate that 
dividends will be paid in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data included in the following table 
have been derived from and should be read in conjunction with 
and are qualified by the Company's financial statements and 
notes set forth elsewhere in this report.  Historical 
financial data for certain periods may be derived from 
financial statements not included herein. 


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                           For the Ten        From Inception     From Inception 
                          Months Ended           on 2/17/94         on 2/17/94
                               9/30/95          to 11/30/94         to 9/30/95  
                         -------------       -------------       --------------

Results of Operations:
<S>                    <C>                   <C>                 <C>

Revenues               $         0            $       0          $       0
Net Income (loss)      $  (750,939)           $(211,795)         $(962,735) 
Net income (loss) per
   common share        $      (.12)           $    (.07)         $    (.15) 
Balance Sheet Data:
   Total Assets        $ 4,056,698            $ 366,620          $4,056,698
 
Working Capital
   (deficit)           $ (665,274)            $  25,754          $ (665,274) 

Long-Term debt         $       -0-            $  59,000          $        0

Stockholders' equity   $3,235,376             $ 276,321          $3,235,376 
                                                                                          
</TABLE>

ITEM 7.   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
          CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
                                                                 
GENERAL

Pursuant to the Reorganization discussed above in Item 1 of this
Report, the accompanying consolidated financial statements 
include those of Celebration Mining Company and Royal Silver 
Mines, Inc., which was known as Consolidated Royal Mines, 
Inc. before the Reorganization.  All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated.  The accounting 
of financial statements following the Reorganization also 
required a change in fiscal year-end date, namely, from November 30
(Celebration's) to September 30 (Royal's).   The financial state-
ments account for the Reorganization using the purchase method 
of accounting. (See Note 1 to the financial statements.)  
Celebration is treated as the acquiring company for financial
reporting purposes because its shareholders constitute greater 
than 50 percent of the combined shareholder group.  In 
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and 
the Company's accounting policy, Celebration is recognized as 
the predecessor entity.   Consequently, Celebration's assets 
and liabilities were not adjusted in the accompanying 
financial statements.  The financial statements for the period 
from the inception of Celebration on February 17, 1994 to 
November 30, 1994 ('Fiscal 1994') do not include the balance 
sheet data or results of operations of Consolidated Royal 
Mines, Inc.  

There is considerable risk in any mining venture, and there can 
be no assurance that the Company's operations will be successful 
or profitable.  From inception of the Company to September 30,
1995, the Company has an accumulated deficit of 
$962,735.  Exploration for commercially minable ore deposits is
highly speculative and involves risks greater than those 
involved in the discovery of mineralization.  Mining companies 
use the evaluation work of professional geologists, geo-
physicists, and engineers in determining whether to acquire an
interest in a specific property, or whether or not to 
commence exploration or development work.  These estimates are 
not always scientifically exact, and in some instances result 
in the expenditure of substantial amount of money on a 
property before it is possible to make a final determination as 
to whether or not the property contains economically minable 
ore bodies.  The economic viability of a property cannot be 
finally determined until extensive exploration and 
development work, plus a detailed economic feasibility study, 
has been performed.  Also, the market prices for minerali-
zation produced are subject to fluctuation and uncertainty, 
which may negatively affect the economic viability of properties 
on which expenditures have been made.

As of September 30, 1995, $3,869,515 of the Company's total 
assets of $4,056,698 are investments in mineral properties 
for which additional exploration is required to substantiate 
or determine whether they contain ore reserves that 
are economically recoverable.  The realization of these 
investments is dependent upon the success of future property 
sales, the existence of economically  recoverable reserves, 
the ability of the Company to obtain financing, the 
Company's success in carrying out its present plans or making 
other arrangements for development, and upon future 
profitable production.  The ultimate outcome of this matter 
cannot be determined at this time; accordingly, no provision 
for any asset impairment that may result, in the event the 
Company is not successful in developing or selling 
these properties, has been made in the Company's 
financial statements.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company currently has no revenues.  At September 30, 1995, 
the Company's accumulated deficit was $962,735.  Although it 
has recurring losses from operations, the Company has increased 
its operating capital and improved its financial condition 
and ability.   Regarding its losses from operations, the 
Company cannot assure that it will be able to fully carry out 
its plans as budgeted without additional operating capital.  
At September 30, 1995, the Company had negative working capital 
of approximately $665,270.  The following factors explain 
the principal increases and decreases in working capital 
during Fiscal 1995.

The deficit in working capital was primarily due to a change in 
the recording of approximately $670,920 of long term debt to 
an accounting as current notes payable.  The debt 
obligations consisted of promissory notes and 
convertible debentures issued by Celebration prior to and 
unrelated to the Reorganization.  However, it should be noted 
that subsequent to the end of Fiscal 1995, the Company 
retired approximately $570,920 of debt principal, plus interest, 
by issuing approximately 506,000 shares of common stock to 
the noteholders.  On the other hand, the Company's cash 
balance increased significantly from November 30, 1994 to 
September 30, 1995, largely as a result of funds received from 
the private placement of stock. However, during Fiscal 1995, 
the Company accrued significantly more in expenses, many of 
which were a result of the changes brought about by 
the Reorganization and the subsequent activity acquiring 
mineral properties.  In addition, during Fiscal 1994, the 
Company had prepaid approximately $26,980 in expenses, 
mostly general and administrative expenses.  In contrast, 
during Fiscal 1995, the majority of those expenses became due 
and the Company only had approximately $4,350 of prepaid  
expenses.  Also, during Fiscal 1995, Centurion made net 
total advances to the Company of $38,086.  The net result was 
a balance of approximately $300,000 owed by Royal to 
Centurion, which Royal repaid prior to the end of Fiscal 1995 
by issuing 200,000 shares of its common stock to Centurion at 
the then prevailing market price of $1.50 per share.  At 
September 30, 1995, the Company owed only $289 to Centurion.  

The Company has estimated that it will need capital resources 
of approximately $25,000 to 30,000 per month to meet its 
estimated expenditures for the ensuing twelve months.  The Board 
of Directors has instructed management to consult with 
experienced financial and investment advisory firms to 
formulate arrangements for such capital fund raising.  
Currently, the Company is pursuing various alternatives, 
including, if necessary, the private placement of common 
stock. 

The Board of Directors reasonably believes that the Company is 
able to engage in nearly any size operation or scope of 
mining activity depending on the circumstances and merits of 
each proposed operation or mining activity.  Accordingly, the 
Board has not limited the size of operation or scope of 
project which it believes is reasonable for management to 
consider in achieving the Company's business plan.  
Therefore, management has been authorized  to consider and 
review all reasonable proposals and, upon satisfactory 
assessment, to then make a specific determination as to an
estimated range of funding amounts that each such proposal
reasonably might require.  

Inasmuch as the eventual project, operation or mining 
activity could be of any size and scope, management is not able 
at this time to provide a detailed listing or exact range 
of operation costs, including increases in general and
administrative expense, if any.  However, the Company plans to 
fund any increases in general and administrative expense
principally from joint venture revenues or funds it may receive 
or savings it may realize through corporate restructuring 
or business combination arrangements.  Funds required to 
finance the Company's exploration and development of mineral
properties are expected to come primarily from joint venture
participant contributions with the remainder provided by funds
generated from such joint venture and other lease or 
royalty arrangements.

The Company consistently has made full and timely payment of 
its expenses, in particular to the various governmental payees 
it interacts with, and has met its obligations to the 
entities which provide its personnel, office space, and 
equipment needs.  The Company currently is seeking 
alternate sources of working capital sufficient to increase 
the funding of additional general and administrative expenses 
that may become necessary as  the Company's business plan 
develops, and to continue meeting its ongoing payment 
obligations for its leases to governmental bodies.

Results of Operations

Fiscal 1995 as Compared to Fiscal 1994

General and administrative expenses and compensation to 
officers and directors increased from $209,285 during Fiscal 
1994 to $482,979 during Fiscal 1995.  The increase is 
principally due to an increase in the amount of stock issued 
to officers, directors, and a consultant as compensation 
for services and bonus.  As a result, from Fiscal 1994 to 
Fiscal 1995, the net loss increased from $(211,795) to 
$(750,939) and the net loss per share increased from $(.07) 
to $(.03), respectively.

It is uncertain and the Company is unable to fully determine 
the impact of the Company's current lack of operating 
capital.  Hence, other than as described herein, in particular
with respect to the option to purchase the Bunker Hill Mine,
the Company has determined not to incur and does not have any
commitments or plans for material capital expenditures during
Fiscal 1996 for which it does not have a reasonably available source
or basis for making payment. For additional information regarding the
Company's present commitments and plans for which it does have reasonably
definable and available payment sources, for example the option to
purchase the Bunker Hill Mine, please refer to the "Properties"
discussion under Item 2 above, at Section G, entitled "Option to
Purchase The Bunker Hill Mine".

It is uncertain what the scope or impact will be of the decision 
to restrict capital expenditures.  On the one hand, if 
the Company were to continue such restriction, the likely 
effect might be adverse to the preservation of its assets 
and capital base, thereby narrowing the scope of plans for 
future operations and constricting liquidity.  On the other 
hand, if the Company were to discontinue such restriction 
without an increase in sustained cash flow, the likely effect 
of that might be an increase in accumulated deficits which could 
be adverse to the Company's financial condition with respect 
to liabilities and stockholders' equity.  Therefore, the 
Company's plan for the next twelve months is to closely monitor 
its capital expenditures while it pursues a joint 
venture participant or other sources of capital for 
financing operations.


ITEM  8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Consolidated Financial Statements and the Report of 
Independent Public Accountants are filed as part of this report 
on pages F-1 through F-19.

                           C O N T E N T S

Independent Auditors' Reports  . . . . . . . . . . . . .F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-5

Consolidated Statements of Operations . . . . . . . . . F-7

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity . . . . F-8

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . F-10

Notes to the Consolidated Statements . . . . . . . . . .F-12


ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
         ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

A.  Changes or Disagreements with Principal Accountant.

There have been no disagreements with the Company's independent 
public accountants.

B.  Change in Principal Accountant.

As a result of the Reorganization, the Company changed its 
engagement of principal independent accountant to audit its 
financial statements.  The former principal accountant, Hein 
& Associates LLP, was engaged by the predecessor company, 
Celebration.  Following the Reorganization, the CPA firm of 
Jones, Jensen & Company, the auditor for Royal, assumed 
the relationship of principal independent accountant for the
reorganized Company.  This decision was not based on any 
disagreement between or among Celebration, Royal, or Hein &
Associates, nor was it based on any information that would have 
led Hein & Associates to resign or decline to stand for 
re-election.

Hein & Associates' report on the financial statements from 
inception of Celebration on February 17, 1994 to the end of
Celebration's fiscal year on November 30, 1994, did not contain 
an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was its 
report qualified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or 
accounting principles.  That report contained an explanatory 
paragraph regarding Celebration's ability to continue as a going
concern.  During the period described above and up through August 
8, 1995, for the period preceding such dismissal:

(1)  The Company had no disagreements with Hein & Associates 
on any matter of accounting principles or practices, 
financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure;

(2)  Hein & Associates did not advise the Company that 
the internal controls necessary for the Company to develop 
financial statements do not exist;

(3)  Hein & Associates did not advise the Company of any
information leading Hein & Associates to be unable to rely on
management's representations, or unwilling to be associated with 
the financial statements prepared by management;

(4)  Hein & Associates did not advise the Company of any need 
to significantly expand the scope of its audit, or of any 
information that may or would (i) materially affect the fairness 
or reliability of, or prevent it from rendering an unqualified 
opinion regarding, its audit report or any of the underlying 
financial statements, or (ii) cause Hein & Associates to be 
unwilling to rely on management's representations or be 
associated with the Company's financial statements; and

(5)  Hein & Associates did not, as a result of its 
dismissal, expand its audit or conduct any investigation of
information that came to its attention of the type referred to 
above in subparagraph (4), or have any issues that were
unresolved to its satisfaction prior to dismissal.

The Company has provided Hein & Associates with a copy of the 
above disclosures in a timely manner and requested and received 
from Hein & Associates a letter addressed to the Commission 
stating Hein & Associates' agreements with these disclosures.  A 
copy of such letter is attached to this registration statement 
and filed as Exhibit 16.2.

C.  Designation of New Accountant.

The Company has designated the continuing services of the 
accounting firm of Jones, Jensen & Company to serve as principal
independent accountant for the Company effective August 8, 
1995.  During the period of Hein & Associates' engagement as 
principal independent accountant and up to August 8, 1995, prior 
to designating Jones, Jensen & Company as principal accountant:

(1)  Neither the Company nor any person or entity acting on 
its behalf has consulted Jones, Jensen & Company regarding 
the application of accounting principles to any specified trans-
action, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on 
the Company's financial statements, or any matter characterized
as a 'disagreement' or 'reportable event' (as defined by
Regulation S-K, Item 304(a)(1)(iv) and (v)); and

(2)  Jones, Jensen & Company did not provide the Company 
with either a written report or oral advice containing any 
conclusions by Jones, Jensen & Company of any important factors
considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any 
accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issues.


                             PART III

ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

On March 31, 1995, the Company restructured its Board of
Directors and management.  The Board formally named Howard Crosby
as President, Hal Cameron as Vice President, LaRoy Orr as
Treasurer and Carlos M. Chavez as Secretary.   On August 8, 1995,
in accordance with the terms of the Reorganization with
Celebration, the Board appointed Robert E. Jorgensen as Director
and Executive Vice President; Ronald Kitching and James W. Prier
as Directors; and Jerry Stacey as Vice President of Operations. 
On August 31, 1995, upon receiving the resignation of Mr. Orr,
the Board appointed Mr. Jorgensen to the position of Treasurer.
In September 1996, the Board appointed John Ryan to the position of
Vice President, Corporate Development.
 
Information Regarding Directors and Executive Officers.  The 
following table sets forth the name, age, position, and length of
service for each of Royal's present directors and executive 
officers:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                                                     
                                                                          
Name                Age       Position(s) Held                   Director Since
-----------------   ----      -------------------------------    --------------
<S>                 <C>       <C>                                <C>
Howard M. Crosby    43         President and Director            February 1994
E. Hal Cameron      77         Vice President and Director          April 1969
Spenst Hansen       62      Director                          November 1991
Carlos M. Chavez    43      Corporate Secretary and Director     March 1995
Robert E. Jorgensen 42      Executive Vice President,
                              Treasurer and Director            August 1995
Jerry Stacey        51      Vice President, Operations          August 1995
John Ryan           34      Vice President, Corp. Dev.       September 1996
Ronald Kitching     65      Director                            August 1995
James W. Prier      48      Director                            August 1995
 
</TABLE>

The authorized number of directors of the Company is presently 
fixed at ten. Each director serves for a term of one year that 
expires at the following annual shareholders' meeting.  Each 
officer serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors and
until a successor has been qualified and appointed.  There are no 
family relationships, or other arrangements or understandings 
between or among any of the directors, executive officers or 
other person pursuant to which such person was selected to serve 
as a director or officer.

Set forth below is certain biographical information regarding 
each director and executive officer of the Company:

HOWARD M. CROSBY received a B.A. degree from the University of 
Idaho in 1974.  Since 1989, Mr. Crosby has been president of 
Crosby Enterprises, Inc., a family-owned business advisory and 
public relations firm.  From September 1992 to May 1993, Mr. 
Crosby was employed by Digitran Systems, Inc., of Logan, Utah, in 
the marketing department.  In May of 1993, Mr. Crosby entered
into a business consulting relationship with Centurion Mines 
Corporation, and currently serves as president and director of 
Mammoth Mining Company and Gold Chain Mining Company, both 
Centurion subsidiaries.  In July, 1992, Mr. Crosby filed a
Chapter 13 petition for bankruptcy.  The reorganization plan was
approved in October, 1992.

HAL CAMERON founded the Company in 1969, has held the position of
President and Director, and was engaged, virtually full-time, in 
the business affairs of the Company from May 1983 up through 
November 1991.  Mr. Cameron is a graduate of West High School in 
Salt Lake City, Utah, and has been involved in the natural 
resource field since 1953, including the active management of
publicly-held natural resource exploration and development 
companies.  In 1953, Mr. Cameron was one of the founders of 
Federal Uranium Corp., now a publicly-held Nevada corporation 
known as Federal Resources Corporation, and served as an 
independent consultant to Federal Resources from 1955 to 1960. 
He was also one of the founders and a director of Cherokee Utah 
Uranium, a publicly-held Utah corporation, in 1954, and served as 
a consultant until 1960 to its successor, Beaver Mesa Uranium.  
From 1964 until 1974, Mr. Cameron was the vice-president and 
a licensed commercial real estate salesman for Meeks-Wirthlin 
Real Estate Company in Salt Lake City, Utah.  From 1974 to 
the present, Mr. Cameron has been engaged in commercial real 
estate acquisitions, sales, and development for himself.  Mr. 
Cameron was president of Cameo Minerals, Inc., a publicly-held 
Utah corporation, from its inception in 1969 until its merger in 
1981 with Hendon Exploration, Inc., a Texas oil and gas company.

SPENST HANSEN was awarded a Ph.D. degree in geology from the
University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri; a Masters degree in 
mining engineering from the Missouri School of Mines, Rolla, 
Missouri; and a Bachelor of Science degree in geological 
engineering from the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.  
Dr. Hansen is a registered professional geologist in 
California (#2067) and Idaho (#38).  Dr. Hansen has been 
principally employed by Centurion Mines Corporation since 
November, 1984, where he is currently President, Chief 
Executive Officer, a Director, and Chairman of the Board of 
Directors.  Dr. Hansen has worked on mining projects in the 
western United States for more than 20 years.  From 1982 to 1989, 
he also conducted an independent geophysical and geologic 
contracting business as a sole proprietorship under the name 
Axis Geophysics Company.  Dr. Hansen still retains ownership of 
this company. 

CARLOS M. CHAVEZ has been principally employed as Centurion's in-
house legal counsel since March 1994.  Mr. Chavez received his 
J.D. in 1980 from Stanford Law School, Palo Alto, California, and 
has been admitted to the Utah State Bar and the Bar of the 
District of Columbia.  From 1991 to his employment with
Centurion, Mr. Chavez was employed with Suitter, Axland & Hanson
and Jay Gurmankin, Esq., P.C., law firms in Salt Lake City, Utah. 
During 1989 and 1990, Mr. Chavez taught full-time as a Visiting 
Assistant Professor of Law on the faculty of the Whittier 
College School of Law, Los Angeles, California.  Prior to that
position, Mr. Chavez taught and supervised the academic 
support program as Adjunct Professor of Law on the faculty of 
the University of Utah College of Law, and also served in the 
dual capacity as assistant attorney general for Higher Education 
and as associate legal counsel for the University of Utah.  Mr. 
Chavez also serves as a director of Dotson Exploration Company. 

ROBERT E. JORGENSEN received a degree in Business Administration 
from the University of Idaho.  He has served as vice-
president, secretary and director of Celebration Mining Company 
since its inception.  In May 1992, Mr. Jorgensen retired from 
the brokerage business and has since been a private investor.  
From 1987 to 1991, Mr. Jorgensen was an investment broker and 
owner of RCL Northwest, Inc., a regional investment firm.  He was 
a broker with Cohig & Associates, Inc., from January 1992 to May 
1992.  Mr. Jorgensen filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code in August 1992.

JERRY STACEY is a professional mining engineer with over 20 
years experience in open pit and underground mining.  He earned a 
B.S. Degree in Mining Engineering from Montana Tech in 1974 
while working in Butte, Montana mines.  Between 1974 and 1981,
Mr. Stacey worked in senior supervisory positions as a Shift
Foreman for the Anaconda Company; as mine superintendent for Day
Mines at the Sherman Mine, mining 1,000 tons per day of silver
ore; as mine manager for Choctaw Mining supervising the
construction and operation of a tungsten mine and mill complex;
as mine manager for Mountain Mineral's barite mines in British
Columbia; and as a mine manager at the Goodnews Bay platinum
placer operation.  In 1981, Mr. Stacey formed General Mine
Services Corp., a mine consulting and contracting firm for junior
mining and exploration companies, where he continued as CEO until
1994, when he joined with Celebration and has continued full time
as Vice President of Operations with Royal.  His current
responsibilities focus on the engineering, design, installation,
and operation of complete mine and metallurgical plants involving
base and precious metals and industrial minerals.

JOHN RYAN, a professional mining engineer, was recently appointed to
the position of Vice President of Corporate Development for the
Company.  Up through his appointment, Mr. Ryan has served most
recently as a consultant in mine engineering services, and will
continue in these activities during his tenure as Vice President
of Corporate Development, as well as engage in other matters in
accordance with the direction and assignment of the Board of
Directors.  In addition to his professional degree in Mining
Engineering, which he received from the University of Idaho,
Mr. Ryan also holds a juris doctorate (J.D.) law degree from the
Boston College School of Law.

RONALD KITCHING resides in Australia.  Prior to his retirement
five years ago, Mr. Kitching was involved in he mining industry 
from over 35 years holding various positions, including serving 
as president of Overland Drilling Company, an Australian 
exploration drilling company, and as co-founder of Glindeman-
Kitching Enterprises, an exploration drilling company.  He has 
served as a director for Celebration Mining Company since May 
1994.

JAMES W. PRIER has been active in the Canadian resource industry 
for the past 14 years as a principal and through his consulting 
firm, James Prier & Associates, Ltd.  From 1986 to 1990, Mr.
Prier was associated with Energex Minerals, Ltd., a natural
resource company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, serving as 
vice-president of corporate development from 1987 to 1990.  While 
with Energex, Mr. Prior participated in the development, 
evaluation and sale of an open-pit gold deposit in northern 
British Columbia and the subsequent acquisition of a
Houston-based oil and gas company.  Mr. Prier was a founding
director of Minerex Resources Ltd., a gold producer listed on the
Toronto Stock Exchange.  He served as vice-president of corporate 
development for Black Swan Gold Mines Ltd., a Toronto Stock 
Exchange listed resource company, from 1991 to 1993.  He is 
a principal and director of Argosy Mining Corp., a Vancouver-
based resource company engaged in a US $8.5 million diamond
exploration joint venture in Zimbabwe and Tanzania.  Mr. Prier is 
a director and corporate secretary of Urandel Minerals 
Corporation, listed on the Vancouver Stock Exchange.  Prior to 
1979, Mr. Prier was a financial analyst for a private Ontario
investment group.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934. Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
requires certain defined persons to file reports of and changes 
in beneficial ownership of a registered security with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission and the National Association 
of Securities Dealers in accordance with the rules and regulation
s promulgated by the Commission to implement the provisions of 
Section 16.  Under the regulatory procedure, officers, directors, 
and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class
of a company's equity securities are also required to furnish the 
Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.  

Based solely on review of the copies of Forms 3, 4, and 5 
furnished to the Company for transactions occurring between 
October 1, 1994, and September 29, 1995, or with respect to
transactions which occurred between October 1, 1993, and
September 30, 1994, and should have been reported in Fiscal 1994
but were not, or were untimely reported and that untimeliness was
not disclosed in the Form 10-K for Fiscal 1994, and on
representations that no other transactions were required to be
reported and no other Forms were required to be filed, the
Company has determined that the pertinent officers, directors,
and principal shareholders have complied with all applicable
Section 16(a) requirements, except as follows: 

Howard Crosby, President, CEO and a Director of the Company, 
filed Form 5 for Fiscal 1995 on December 22, 1995.  That form 
should have been filed by November 14, 1995.  The Form 5 reported 
two September 1995 transactions.

Robert E. Jorgensen, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and a
Director of the Company, filed Form 3 on December 22, 1995.  That 
Form 3 should have been filed by August 18, 1995.  A Form 5 for 
Fiscal 1995 was filed on December 22, 1995.  That Form 5 should 
have been filed by November 14, 1995.  The Form 5 reported two
September 1995 transactions.

Jerry Stacey, a Vice President and a Director of the Company, 
filed Form 3 on December 22, 1995.  The Form 3 should have been 
filed by August 18, 1995.  

Carlos M. Chavez, Secretary and a Director of the Company, filed 
Form 5 for Fiscal 1995 on December 22, 1995.  That form and the 
two exempt transactions it reported should have been filed 
and disclosed by November 14, 1995.  

Spenst Hansen, a Director of the Company, should have filed a
Form 5 for Fiscal 1995 by November 14, 1995. Registrant believes
that the Form 5 has not been filed, but is unaware of any other
Form 4 or Form 5 transactions that should be reported on that
Form 5 or that otherwise have not been filed.

Ronald Kitching, a Director of the Company, should have filed a 
Form 3 for Fiscal 1995 by November 14, 1995. Registrant believes 
the that Form 3 has not been filed, but is unaware of any Form 4 
or Form 5 transactions that have not been filed.

James W. Prier, a Director of the Company, filed Form 3 on 
December 22, 1995.  That form should have been filed by August 
18, 1995.  

ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation.  The following table sets forth the
compensation paid by Royal during each of the last three fiscal
years to its Chief Executive Officer, and to the other four most 
highly compensated officers and executive officers, but only if 
the total annual salary and bonus of any such executive 
officer exceeded $100,000 for Fiscal 1995 (the 'Named Executive
Officers').  This information includes the dollar value of base
salaries, bonus awards and number of stock options granted, 
and certain other compensation, if any. 

<TABLE>
                                  SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<CAPTION>

                                                      Long  Term  Compensation
                Annual  Compensation               Awards            Payouts
(a)     (b)    (c)     (d)      (e)     (f)      (g)      (h)    (i)
Name                                             Secur
and                                    Restric   ities
Prin-                           Other  ted       Under    LTIP   All
cipal                           Annual Stock     lying    Pay    Other
Posi-                           Compen Award (1) Options/ Outs   Compen
tion   Year  Salary     Bonus   sation  ($)      SAR's(#) ($)    sation
-----  ----  ------     -----  ------- --------- -------- ------ -------
<S>    <C>   <C>        <C>    <C>     <C>       <C>      <C>    <C>
CEO
-----
Howard 1995  $48,000    $0     $0      $----      0       $0     $0
Crosby 1994  $16,000(2) $0     $0      $40,000    0       $0     $0
       1993  $0         $0     $0      $0         0       $0     $0

Named 
Execu-
tive 
Officers
------
None   n/a   n/a        n/a     n/a     n/a        n/a     n/a    n/a


(1)  The above shares were issued for Directors fees, for service to Royal.  
     No awards were made for service to Celebration.
(2)  This represents salary received as an officer of Celebration, $4,000 per 
     month, beginning with June 1994.

</TABLE>

Other than the Company's Stock Option and Award Plan, there 
are no retirement, pension, or profit sharing plans for the 
benefit of the Company's officers and directors.

Option/SAR Grants Table.     Information concerning individual 
grants of stock options, whether or not in tandem with 
stock appreciation rights ('SARs'), and freestanding SARs made 
during Fiscal 1995 to the CEO and each of the Named 
Executive Officers, if any, is reflected in the table below.

<TABLE>

<CAPTION>
                               OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN FISCAL 1995

                                                 Potential Realizable    Alterna-
                                                 Value at Assumed An-     tive to
                                                  nual Rates of Stock     (f) and
                                                   Price Appreciation   (g) Grant
               Individual Grants                      for Option Term  Date Value
-------------------------------------------------    ----------------   ---------
(a)      (b)        (c)            (d)      (e)      (f)       (g)      (h)
      Number of     Percent of   
      Securities    Total Options/                                      Grant
      Underlying    SARs Granted   Exercise  Expira-                    Date
      Options/SARs  to Employees   or Base   tion                       Present
Name  Granted (#)   in Fiscal Year Price     Date    5%($)     10%($)   Value $
----  ------------  -------------  --------  ------  ------    ------   -------
<S>     <C>         <C>            <C>       <C>     <C>       <C>      <C>
CEO
----
Howard
Crosby  0            0              N/A       ---    N/A        N/A      N/A

Named
Execu-
tive
Officers
------
None     n/a         n/a            n/a       n/a    n/a        n/a      n/a  
                                            
</TABLE>

Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises and Fiscal 1995 Year-End 
Option/SAR Value Table.  The following table sets forth 
certain information with respect to each exercise, if any,  of 
stock options and SARs during Fiscal 1995 by the CEO and each 
of the Named  Executive Officers, if any, and the Fiscal 1995 
year-end value of unexercised options and SARs.  The dollar 
values in columns (c) and (e) are calculated by determining 
the difference between the fair market value of the underlying 
stock and the exercise price or base price of the options at 
exercise or Fiscal 1995 year-end, respectively.  The stock's 
fair market value on September 30, 1995 was $2.50 per share.  
There are no outstanding option awards to management.  Even if 
there were, it is possible they might never be exercised.  
Actual gains realized, if any, on stock option exercises and 
Common Stock holdings are dependent on the future performance 
and value of the Common Stock and overall stock market 
conditions.  There can be no assurance that projected gains and 
values would be realized.
                                 
<TABLE>
                                              
<CAPTION>
                        AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN FISCAL 1995
                         AND OPTION/SAR VALUES AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1995

(a)            (b)             (c)               (d)               (e)
                                             Number of          Value of
                                             Securities         Unexercised
                                             Underlying         In-the-Money
                                             Unexercised        Options/SARs
                                             Options/SARs       at FY-End($)
                                             at FY-End (#)
                              Dollar
           Shares Acquired    Value          Exercisable/       Exercisable/
Name       on Exercise (#)    Realized($)    Unexercisable      Unexercisable
----       ---------------    -----------    -------------      -------------
<S>        <C>                <C>            <C>                <C>
CEO
----
Howard
Crosby      0                  $0            0/0                 0/0

Execu-
tive 
Officers
---------
None         n/a                n/a           n/a                 n/a          

</TABLE>

Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards.     The Company does not have 
any formalized long-term incentive plan, (excluding restricted 
stock, stock option and SAR plans) that provide compensation 
intended to serve as incentive for performance to occur over a 
period longer than one fiscal year, whether such performance 
is measured by reference to financial performance of the Company 
or an affiliate, the Company's stock price, or any other measure.

Compensation of Directors.     Directors receive for their 
services a retainer fee payable in shares of the Company's 
Common Stock, currently at the rate of 2,500 shares per quarter 
of completed service.  During Fiscal 1995, 42,500 shares were 
awarded to directors as compensation. The Board has not 
implemented a plan to award options, authorized under the 
Company's Stock Option and Award Plan and none have been 
granted.  There are no contractual arrangements with any member 
of the Board of Directors, other than the employment and 
salary arrangements for compensating two of its members for 
their service as executive officers:  Howard Crosby as 
President and CEO, and Robert Jorgensen as Executive Vice 
President and Treasurer.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.     
There are no compensation committee interlocks.   With respect 
to insider participation, Howard Crosby, Hal Cameron and Carlos 
Chavez (fourth quarter only), participated in deliberations of 
the Company's Board of Directors during Fiscal 1995, 
concerning executive officer compensation.

Board of Directors Report on Executive Compensation.  The 
following is a summary of the Board of Directors Report:

It is the Board's responsibility to review and set compensation
levels of the executive officers of the Company, evaluate the
performance of management and consider management appointments
and related matters.  All decisions are decisions of the full Board.
The Board considers the performance of the Company and how compensation
paid by the Company compares to compensation generally in the mining 
industry and among similar companies.  In establishing 
executive compensation, the Board bases its decisions, in part,
on achievement and performance regarding broad-based objectives 
and targets relating to the continued acquisition of favorable 
silver properties and the progress of exploration and development 
of such properties, as well as the Company's financial 
performance.

For Fiscal 1995, including the Reorganization with Celebration
and its compensation history and policies, the Company's
executive compensation policy consisted of two elements: base
salary and stock awards.  The policy factors which determine the
setting of these compensation elements are largely aimed at
attracting and retaining executives considered essential to the
Company's long-term success.  The granting of stock is designed
as an incentive for executives to keep management's interests in 
close alignment with the interests of shareholders.  The 
Company's executive compensation policy seeks to engender 
committed leadership to favorably posture the Company for 
continued growth, stability and strength of shareholder equity.

As consequence of the Reorganization with Celebration, the
Company continued the payment of salaries paid by Celebration
to its officers.  The President and CEO, Howard Crosby, receives 
$48,000 yearly, the Executive Vice President and Treasurer, 
Robert Jorgensen, receives $60,000 yearly, and the Vice President 
of Operations, Jerry Stacey, receives $70,000 yearly.  These 
amounts were approved by the Board in recognition of the work 
and efforts committed to completing the Reorganization and in
completing the acquisition of a large number of silver 
mining properties prior to the end of Fiscal 1995.  Further, the 
Board recognized the significant role of these three individuals 
in managing the Company's principal office in Spokane, Washington 
and in raising funds for the Company's exploration and 
development activities.  Finally, the Board of Directors took 
into account the reasonableness of these salaries in comparison 
with Executive salaries within the mining region.  On the basis
of the above factors, the Board determined that these salaries 
were proper and fitting.  No other officers received a salary 
during Fiscal 1995.

With respect to stock awards during Fiscal 1995, the Board 
of Directors did not change the amount of shares, 2,500 per 
quarter, which each director is entitled to receive as partial
compensation for service to the Company.

The Board believes that executive compensation during Fiscal 
1995 substantially reflects the Company's compensation policy.

Performance Graph.     The Company is not presently able to provide a
line graph covering five consecutive years that compares (1) the yearly
percentage change in the Company's cumulative total shareholder return
on its Common Stock with (2) the cumulative total return of a broad
equity market index and (3) the cumulative total return of an industry
index, peer line-of-business index, or a group of similarly 
capitalized issuer companies.  The Company has made every reasonable
effort to compile or locate commercially available and reliable
data of its historical stock price for the period required by the SEC,
or to compile such data for a lesser period of sufficient range
in time from which the Company could be able to prepare a meaningful
performance graph. However, the Company has been unable to obtain this
information or prepare such a performance graph. Nevertheless, the
Company continues its search for such data.

ITEM  12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
          MANAGEMENT

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.  
The following table sets forth as of October 4, 1996, the 
beneficial ownership of Common Stock with respect to:  (1) All 
persons known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of more 
than five percent of the outstanding shares of Common Stock 
(the 'Principal Shareholders'); (2) Each director and director 
nominee of the Company; (3) Each Named Executive Officer (as that 
term is defined in the section entitled 'Executive Compensa-
tion', below) who is listed in the  'Summary Compensation 
Table', below,  and (4) All directors and executive officers 
as a group.  At October 4, 1996, the number of shares of common stock
of the Company issued and outstanding was 10,646,482.

<TABLE>

<CAPTION>

Common Stock Beneficially Owned
        No. of Shares         Percent of Class
1.  Name and Address of
        Principal Shareholders
<S>                                      <C>                        <C>
Centurion Mines Corporation              1,537,267                  14%
  331 South Rio Grande
  Suite 201
  Salt Lake City, UT 84101

Howard Crosby                              531,000(1)               5.0%
  105 N. First, Ste. 232
  Sandpoint, ID 83864

James Kontes                               635,000(2)                8%
  P.O. Box 112
  Firth, ID 83236

Thomas Miller                              600,000(3)              7.6%
  2508 Zinfadel Dr.
  Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Robert E. Jorgensen                        552,500(4)               5.2%
  W. 2719 Strong Rd.
  Spokane, WA 99208


2.  Directors

Howard Crosby                              531,000               5.0%
Robert E. Jorgensen                        552,500               5.2%
Ronald Kitching                            150,000               1.9%
Hal Cameron                                 45,528                 *
Spenst Hansen                               42,500                 *
Jerry Stacey                                 9,500                 *
Carlos M. Chavez                            10,000                 *
John Ryan                                       *                  *

3.  Named Executive Officers (Excluding
        Any Director Named Above)

NONE                                           N/A               N/A

4.  All Directors and Executive Officers
        as a Group (8 Persons)           1,341,028              12.1%

</TABLE>

All shares are owned beneficially and of record, unless 
otherwise noted.  Percentage ownership of less than 1% is marked 
with an asterisk (*).

(1) Mr. Crosby is a director, executive officer and 50% 
shareholder of Extol International Corp., a privately-held
Washington corporation. As a 50% shareholder, Mr. Crosby holds
indirect beneficial ownership of one-half of the restricted shares
retained by Extol following the closing of the share exchange with 
Celebration.  Also, the Board approved the release of a 
previously authorized grant of 200,000 restricted shares to 
Crosby Enterprises, Inc. for its work in putting together 
for the Company no fewer than five major business 
proposals, culminating in the reorganization with Celebration.  
Mr. Crosby holds indirect beneficial ownership of those 
restricted shares as a director, executive officer 
and majority shareholder of Crosby Enterprises, a private, 
closely-held Washington corporation.  Mr. Crosby holds all
remaining shares in his name, 15,000 shares of which he received 
in Fiscal 1995 as partial compensation for his service as a 
director and executive officer of the Company during Fiscal 
1995.

(2) Mr. Kontes owns 35,000 issued and outstanding shares, but
received options to purchase 600,000 restricted shares in 
exchange for the options he had held in Celebration.  None 
of these options have been exercised, but are exercisable 
within 60 days.  For purposes of reporting beneficial 
ownership in this Item 12 only, the securities underlying 
Mr. Kontes' options are deemed outstanding and have been added 
to the 6,371,513 actual shares outstanding to compute the 
percentage owned.

(3) Mr. Miller does not own any of the actual shares that are
outstanding, but received options to purchase 600,000 
restricted shares in exchange for the options he had held 
in Celebration.  None of these options have been exercised, 
but are exercisable within 60 days.  For purposes of 
reporting beneficial ownership in this Item 12 only, the 
securities underlying Mr. Miller's options are deemed 
outstanding and have been added to the 6,371,513 actual 
shares outstanding to compute the percentage owned.

(4) The Company notes that in addition to the awards of shares
for his service as a director and officer of the Company, Mr.
Jorgensen initially received 550,000 restricted shares as part
of the share exchange with Celebration.


ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Relationships and Transactions Pertaining to Royal and 
Celebration.  Certain of the directors and/or officers of 
the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other 
companies involved in natural resource exploration and 
development and, consequently, there exists the possibility 
for such directors and officers to be in a position of conflict.  
Any decision made by such directors and officers involving 
the Company, as the case may be, will be made in accordance 
with their duties and obligation to deal fairly and in good 
faith with the Company and such other companies.  In addition, 
such directors and officers are required to declare and refrain 
from voting on any matter in which such directors and officers 
may have a conflict of interest.  In this respect, Howard Crosby, 
who was the President of Celebration and of Royal at the time 
of the Reorganization,  refrained from voting on any matter 
related to the Reorganization or any other matter pertaining 
to both companies. 

The Company has engaged in transactions with its officers, 
directors and principal shareholders, including the issuance 
of the initial shares of the Company.  Such transactions 
may be considered as not having occurred at arm's length.  The 
Company may be engaged in transactions with management and 
others involving conflicts of interest, including conflicts on
salaries and other payments to such parties, as well as 
business opportunities which may arise.  In this regard, the 
directors of the Company are involved in other companies and may 
have conflicts of interest in allocating time between the Company 
and other entities to which they are affiliated.

Relationships and Transactions Pertaining to Royal.  From time 
to time, at the Company's request, Centurion may, at its 
discretion, provide funds to the Company or pay certain 
expenses directly.  The Company is current in its payments 
to Centurion and management intends to continue the 
immediate repayment to Centurion as expenses are incurred.

During 1993, the Company carried over the previous balance of 
$240,891 owed by Centurion, and loaned Centurion $282,200 with 
$19,219 of interest, resulting in cumulative total advances 
made by Royal to Centurion of $542,310.  Also during 1993, 
Centurion paid $70,020 of Royal expenses, paid Royal land 
costs of $127,405, and conveyed properties to Royal with an 
historical cost of $339,830, resulting in total advances 
made by Centurion to Royal of $537,255.  Thus, for 1993 
transactions between Royal and Centurion, including the balance
carried over from 1992 transactions, the net cumulative result 
was a balance of $5,055 owed by Centurion to Royal.

During Fiscal 1994, Royal carried over the previous balance 
owed by Centurion of $5,055 and loaned Centurion $8,075, 
resulting in cumulative total advances made by Royal to 
Centurion of $13,130.  Also during Fiscal 1994, Centurion 
accrued $54,335 of Royal taxes, loaned $83,700 to Royal, 
and paid $140,932 of Royal expenses (including certain land 
costs of Royal), resulting in total advances made by Centurion 
to Royal of $278,967.  Centurion repaid these and previous 
amounts by paying certain of the Company's expenses and by
transferring to the Company $467,236 of mineral properties. 
Thus, for Fiscal 1994 transactions between Royal and Centurion,
including balance carryovers, the net cumulative result was a 
balance of $265,838 owed by Royal to Centurion.

During Fiscal 1995, Centurion made net total advances to the 
Company of $38,086.  The net result was a balance of 
approximately $300,000 owed by Royal to Centurion, which Royal 
repaid prior to the end of Fiscal 1995 by issuing 200,000 
shares of its common stock to Centurion at the then prevailing 
market price of $1.50 per share.  At September 30, 1995, the 
Company owed only $289 to Centurion.  

Relationships and Transactions Pertaining to Celebration.  
In May 1994, Celebration issued, pursuant to Board resolution, 
an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of common stock to 
Extol International Corporation, an affiliate of Howard M. 
Crosby, an officer and director of the Company, and 500,000 
shares of Common Stock to Robert Jorgensen, an officer and 
director of the Company, in exchange for a transfer of the 
rights under an option on the Montana Property.  Mr. Crosby 
and Mr. Jorgensen are considered founders of the Company. The 
Company has not received a fairness opinion or other valuation 
of the rights transferred in exchange for the shares issued 
to Mr. Jorgensen and Extol International Corporation.  The cost 
basis of the rights under the Montana Property was estimated 
to be $4,000.  The perceived value of the shares issued was 
determined as of the time of transfer by Mr. Crosby and Mr. 
Jorgensen as sole officers and directors of the Company.  
The determination was not based on arms length negotiations.  
In June 1994, the Company repaid to Crosby Enterprises, Inc., 
an affiliate of Howard M. Crosby, $20,000 for funds advanced 
on the Montana Property prior to the transfer of the rights 
under the option to the Company.

In August 1994, Celebration issued 100,000 shares of Common 
Stock to Ronald Kitching, a director, as compensation for his 
services as a director.  Mr. Crosby and Mr. Jorgensen also 
received compensation from the Company as executive officers.

In August 1994, Thomas Miller, a director of Celebration up to 
August 8, 1995, received options to purchase up to 400,000 
shares as compensation for his consulting services in 
field exploration management through August 1995.  Mr. Miller was 
also an officer, director and principal shareholder of United 
Silver Mines, Inc., the Company's Joint Venture Partner on the 
Vipont Property and its subsidiary, Bannock Silver Mining 
Company.


                            PART IV

ITEM  14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

A.   Index to Supplemental Schedules and Exhibits.

 1.  Supplemental Schedule No. I --

     Weighted Average Shares, For the Ten Months Ended September 30, 1995

                                               Days               Weighted
      Date Issued          Shares       Outstanding         Average Shares
    -------------       ---------       -----------         --------------
    Feb. 17, 1994       3,450,000            304.00              3,450,000
    Jan. 17, 1995         416,250            256.00                350,526
    Mar. 21, 1995         262,500            193.00                166,653
    Mar. 25, 1995          15,000            189.00                  9,326
     Aug. 8, 1995       2,434,563             53.00                424,447
    Sep. 13, 1995         166,000             17.00                  9,283
    Sep. 29, 1995         800,000              1.00                  2,632
    Sep. 29, 1995          12,750              1.00                     42
    Sep. 29, 1995         200,000              1.00                    658

      TOTAL SHARES:     7,757,063              WEIGHTED AVERAGE: 4,413,566
                        =========                                =========

 2.  Supplemental Schedule No. II --

     Weighted Average Shares, For the Period From Inception on
     February 17, 1994, Through November 30, 1994
                                                                       
                                            Days                 Weighted
       Date Issued        Shares     Outstanding           Average Shares
     -------------     ---------     -----------           --------------     
     Feb. 17, 1994             0          286.00                        0
       May 1, 1994     2,250,000          213.00                1,675,699
     Jul. 16, 1994     1,050,000          137.00                  502,972
     Aug. 20, 1994       150,000          102.00                   53,497

       TOTAL SHARES:   3,450,000             WEIGHTED AVERAGE:  2,232,168
                       =========                                =========

 2.  Supplemental Schedule No. III --

     Weighted Average Shares, For the Period From Inception on
     February 17, 1994 Through September 30, 1995

                                                Days               Weighted
       Date Issued          Shares       Outstanding         Average Shares
     -------------       ---------       -----------         --------------
     Feb. 17, 1994              0            590.00                      0
       May 1, 1994      2,250,000            517.00              1,971,610
     Jul. 16, 1994      1,050,000            441.00                784,831
     Aug. 20, 1994        150,000            406.00                103,220
     Jan. 17, 1995        416,250            256.00                180,610
     Mar. 21, 1995        262,500            193.00                 85,869
     Mar. 25, 1995         15,000            189.00                  4,805
      Aug. 8, 1995      2,434,563             53.00                218,698
     Sep. 13, 1995        166,000             17.00                  4,783
     Sep. 29, 1995        800,000              1.00                  1,356
     Sep. 29, 1995         12,750              1.00                     22
     Sep. 29, 1995        200,000              1.00                    339

      TOTAL SHARES:     7,757,063           WEIGHTED AVERAGE:    3,356,143
                        =========                                =========

All other schedules have been omitted because they are not
applicable or the required information is included in the
financial statements, or notes thereto, or in the above schedules. 

B.  Reports on Form 8-K
   
Royal filed one report on Form 8-K, dated August 8, 1995, during 
the last quarter of the period covered by this report.  

C.  Index to Exhibits

The following documents are incorporated herein by reference 
to Royal's Registration Statement on Form 10, as filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Exh.      Sec       Name Of 
No.       No.       Document     
<S>       <C>       <C>

3.1       3(i)      Articles of Incorporation

3.2       3(i)      Articles of Amendment

3.3       3(i)      Amendment to Articles of Incorporation 
                     Limiting Director Liability

3.4       3(ii)     By-Laws
      
10.1      10        Sale of Mining Properties By Centurion 
                     Mines Corporation to Royal Minerals, 
                     Inc. - June 1992 through September 1993

10.2      10        Deed with Reservation of Mineral Royalty -
                     January 1992 to Kennecott

10.3      10        July 1992 Purchase and Sale Agreement of 
                     16,880 acres to Kennecott

10.4      10        July 1992 Kennecott Option to Purchase 6,320 acres

10.5      10        Deed and Assignment with Reservation of 
                     Mineral Royalty - August 1992 
                     (16,880 acres) to Kennecott

10.6      10        Deed and Assignment with Reservation of 
                     Mineral Royalty - December 1992 (6,320 
                     acres) to Kennecott

16.1      16        Letter from Arthur Andersen LLP 
                     Regarding Change in Certifying Accountant

The following documents are incorporated herein by reference 
to Royal's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 8, 1995, 
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

2.01      2         Agreement and Plan of Reorganization

3.05      3         Articles of Share Exchange ( Utah) 

3.06      3         Articles of Share Exchange (Washington)

4.01      4         Subscription and Investment Agreement

4.02      4         Stock Purchase Option Certificate

19.01     19        Material Furnished to Celebration Security Holders

20.01     20        Letter from Royal to Share Exchange Security Holders

The following document was filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 1995, and is incorporated herein
by reference:

16.21     6         Letter From Hein + Associates LLP 
                     Regarding Change in Certifying Accountant

</TABLE>

                    POWER OF ATTORNEY

The Registrant and each person whose signature appears below 
has designated and appointed Howard M. Crosby and Robert E. 
Jorgensen and each of them as its or his true attorneys-
in-fact ('Attorneys-in-Fact') with full power to act alone 
and authority to execute in the name of each such  person, and 
to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, together 
with any exhibits thereto and other documents therewith, any 
and all amendments to this Form 10-K that may be necessary 
or advisable to enable the Registrant to comply with the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all 
rules, regulations and requirements pertaining thereto, 
which amendments may make such other changes in the Form 10-K 
as the aforesaid Attorneys-in-Fact executing the same 
deem appropriate.  

-------------------------------------------------------------
                        SIGNATURES
-------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly 
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


DATED:  October 4, 1996
                              ROYAL SILVER MINES, INC. 
   
                              By:     /s/ Howard Crosby                    
                                   --------------------------------
                                   Howard Crosby, President  
                                   Principal Executive Officer  

                              By:    /s/ Robert E. Jorgensen
                                   --------------------------------
                                   Robert E. Jorgensen, Principal
                                   Financial and Accounting Officer

               
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934,  this report has been signed below by the following 
persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and 
on the dates indicated.

DATED: October 4, 1996

ROYAL SILVER MINES, INC.
   
By:   /s/  Howard M. Crosby                                       
    --------------------------------------
    Howard M. Crosby, Director and Chairman

By:   /s/  Robert E. Jorgensen                                     
    --------------------------------------
    Robert E. Jorgensen, Director

By:   /s/  Robert E. Jorgensen                                     
    --------------------------------------
    E. Hal Cameron, Director

By:   /s/  Robert E. Jorgensen
    --------------------------------------
    Spenst Hansen, Director

By:   /s/  Robert E. Jorgensen                                     
    --------------------------------------
    Carlos M. Chavez, Director

By:   /s/  Robert E. Jorgensen                                     
    --------------------------------------
    Ronald Kitching, Director

By:   /s/  Robert E. Jorgensen                                     
    --------------------------------------
    James W. Prier, Director