alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.37


                                FOURTH AMENDMENT

         THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT, made as of this 22nd day of January, 1997 by and
between  CONVERSE  INC., a corporation  organized and existing under the laws of
the State of  Delaware,  having its  principal  place of business at One Fordham
Road,  North Reading,  Massachusetts  01864  (hereinafter  called  "Converse" or
"Licensor");

                                       AND

ACTIVE APPAREL GROUP, INC., a corporation  organized and existing under the laws
of the  State of New  York,  having  its  principal  place of  business  at 1350
Broadway, Suite 2300, New York, New York 10018 (hereinafter called "Licensee").

                                   WITNESSETH

         WHEREAS, the Licensor and the Licensee entered into a Trademark License
Agreement dated May 20, 1994, as amended on October 3, 1995 and June 1, 1996 and
January  7, 1997,  with  respect  to the  license  of certain of the  Licensor's
trademarks in the United States (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, Converse and Licensee desire to further amend the Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

         1. Paragraph 6.2 shall be revised to read as follows:

            "6.2 In the event that  Licensee  sells  $5,000,000.00  of  Finished
Articles in Account Year 3, this Agreement shall be automatically renewed for an
additional  two (2) years.  The Guaranteed  Minimum  License Fee for each of the
Accounting Years in such renewal period shall be the greater of (i) seventy-five
percent  (75%) of the actual  royalties  payable for the prior  Contract Year in
accordance with Article 5.1 hereof or (ii) an amount equal to the


<PAGE>

Guaranteed  Minimum  License  Fee for the prior  Contract  Year plus ten percent
(10%) of such Guaranteed Minimum License Fee."

         2. As amended  hereby,  the  Agreement  shall  remain in full force and
effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties have executed this Fourth Amendment as
of the date first above written.


/S/ [ILLEGIBLE]                           By  /S/ [ILLEGIBLE]
---------------                           --  ---------------

WITNESS:                                  ACTIVE APPAREL GROUP, INC.


/S/ RITA CINQUE                           By  /S/ GEORGE HOROWITZ, PRESIDENT
---------------                           --  ------------------------------


                                       -2-
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1578 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1578

            Supporting the goals and ideals of Jubilee Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2010

Mr. Hastings of Florida (for himself, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, 
Mr. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Kilpatrick of Michigan, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. 
 Clay, and Ms. Moore of Wisconsin) submitted the following resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Supporting the goals and ideals of Jubilee Day.

Whereas six months after the end of the Civil War, the Fisk School was 
        established in Nashville, Tennessee;
Whereas the Fisk School was designed by its founders to be an educational 
        institution open to all, regardless of race or age;
Whereas the Fisk School was incorporated as Fisk University in 1867;
Whereas funding for the opening of the school was secured through the sale of 
        slave paraphernalia;
Whereas in 1871, a group of students at Fisk University formed a choral group, 
        the Fisk Jubilee Singers, with the goal of raising money to finance the 
        institution;
Whereas in that same year, the Fisk Jubilee Singers took all the funds in the 
        University treasury with them for travel expenses and set off on a tour 
        of the United States and Europe;
Whereas during their first tour, the Jubilee Singers raised enough money to 
        preserve their university and pay for the construction of Jubilee Hall, 
        the South's first permanent structure built for the education of 
        African-American students;
Whereas the Jubilee Singers introduced the world to the spiritual as a musical 
        genre, emerging as the first internationally recognized group of 
        African-American musicians;
Whereas the Fisk Jubilee Singers continue to tour and perform and have received 
        countless awards and honors;
Whereas, on every October 6, Fisk University celebrates the original group of 
        nine students and their music professor, George L. White, who toured 
        internationally in hopes of raising money to save Fisk University from 
        closing; and
Whereas, on October 6, 2010, the Fisk University community will celebrate its 
        139th Jubilee Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the contributions of the Jubilee Singers to 
        the United States musical landscape;
            (2) celebrates the hard work, perseverance, and 
        accomplishments of the original Jubilee Singers and the 
        continued success of the generations of Jubilee Singers who 
        followed; and
            (3) supports the goals and ideals of Jubilee Day.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Dockets No. FAA-2001-9852; No. FAA-2001-9854]


Notice of Alternative Policy Options for Managing Capacity at 
LaGuardia Airport and Proposed Extension of the Lottery Allocation; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for comments on alternative policy options for managing 
capacity and mitigating congestion and delay at LaGuardia Airport (LGA) 
and the proposed extension of the lottery allocation; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a correction to an FAA notice that was published on 
June 12, 2001 (66 FR 31731). That notice requested comments on the 
feasibility and effectiveness of a limited number of demand management 
options that could replace the current temporary administrative limits 
on the number of aircraft operations at LGA which are scheduled to 
expire on September 15, 2001. The reasons for this correction is that 
the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is making a correction in 
section 3 of the document that it submitted to the FAA, which was 
attached as an appendix to the June 12, 2001, Federal Register notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rich Yarges, telephone (425) 227-2143.

Correction

    In the Federal Register notice FR Doc. 01-14739, published on June 
12, 2001 (66 FR 31731), make the following corrections:
    1. On page 31737, column 2, in lines 44-45 under section (2), A 
Potential Auction Based Approach, remove the phrase ``and AIR-21 slot 
exemptions''.
    2. On page 31737, column 3, in lines 2-3, remove the phrase ``and 
AIR-21 slot exemptions''.
    3. On page 31745, column 3, in lines 18-19 under section 3. 
Allocation and Auction of Reservations, remove the phrase ``and AIR-21 
slot exemptions''.

    Issued in Washington, DC on June 14, 2001.
Louise Maillett,
Acting Assitant Administrator for Policy, Planning, and International 
Aviation.
[FR Doc. 01-15487 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# C_2010346EN.01001502.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands)) — Albron Catering BV v FNV Bondgenoten, John Roest

(Case C-242/09) (1)

1

(Social policy - Transfers of undertakings - Directive 2001/23/EC - Safeguarding of employees’ rights - Group of companies in which staff employed by an ‘employer’ company and assigned on a permanent basis to an ‘operating’ company - Transfer of an operating company)

2010/C 346/25

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Gerechtshof te Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Albron Catering BV

Applicant:

Defendant: FNV Bondgenoten, John Roest

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Gerechtshof te Amsterdam — Interpretation of Article 3(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16) — Company with all the personnel of a group of companies which makes it available to operating companies of the group according to their needs — Transfer of the activity of an operating company outside the group — Classification

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

In the event of a transfer within the meaning of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses, of an undertaking belonging to a group to an undertaking outside that group, it is also possible to regard as a ‘transferor’, within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) of that directive, the group company to which the employees were assigned on a permanent basis without however being linked to the latter by a contract of employment, even though there exists within that group an undertaking with which the employees concerned were linked by such a contract of employment.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009, p. 21.

1

---
**EXHIBIT
      21.1**





**SUBSIDIARIES
      OF AURORA OIL & GAS CORPORATION**





Celebration
      Mining Company (a Washington corporation)




Aurora
      Operating, LLC (a Michigan limited liability company)




Hudson
      Pipeline & Processing Co., LLC (a Michigan limited liability
      company)




Aurora
      Holdings, LLC (a Michigan limited liability company)




Indiana
      Royalty Trustory, LLC (a Michigan limited liability company)




Bach
      Services & Manufacturing Company, L.L.C. (a Michigan limited liability
      company)




Kingsley
      Development Company, L.L.C. (a Michigan limited liability company)




AOK
      Energy, LLC (a Michigan limited liability company)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        231


        <NAME>      Fidelity United Kingdom Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

6-MOS


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

OCT-31-1998


<PERIOD-END>

APR-30-1998


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

6,322


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

7,410


<RECEIVABLES>

177


<ASSETS-OTHER>

55


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

7,642


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

157


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

48


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

205


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

5,676


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

468


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

402


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

37


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

0


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

636


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

1,088


<NET-ASSETS>

7,437


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

128


<INTEREST-INCOME>

12


<OTHER-INCOME>

(13)


<EXPENSES-NET>

72


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

55


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

643


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

529


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

1,227


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

115


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

484


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

298


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

275


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

44


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

1,728


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

115


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

568


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

0


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

27


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

1


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

132


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

7,137


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

14.210


<PER-SHARE-NII>

 .110


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

2.460


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .190


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

 .800


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

15.880


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

204


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
Kenneth E. BAPTISTE, petitioner, v. C. HOPSON, et al.

No. 16-6847.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2009102EN.01001202.xml

| 1.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 18 February 2009 — Ėtablissements Rimbaud SA v Directeur général des impôts, Directeur des services fiscaux d’Aix-en-Provence

(Case C-72/09)

2009/C 102/18

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de Cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ėtablissements Rimbaud SA

Applicant:

Defendants: Directeur général des impôts, Directeur des services fiscaux d’Aix-en-Provence

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 40 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area preclude legislation such as that imposed by Article 990D et seq. of the Code général des impôts, in the version applicable at the relevant time, which exempts from the 3% tax on the market value of immovable property situated in France companies which have their registered office in France and which, in respect of a company which has its registered office in a country in the European Economic Area and which is not a member of the European Union, makes that exemption subject either to the existence of a convention on administrative assistance between France and that State for the purposes of combating tax avoidance and tax evasion or to the existence of a requirement in a treaty containing a clause prohibiting discrimination on grounds of nationality to the effect that those legal persons cannot be more heavily taxed than companies established in France?

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Generation Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                                                                 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  |    
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 12, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    SCOTT K. GINSBURG
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          | 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Scott K. Ginsburg Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  |    
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 12, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    OMAR A. CHOUCAIR
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                         | 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Omar A. Choucair Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Henry P.
Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
---------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
May 24, 2004


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15484]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE & TIME: Thursday, June 21, 2001, at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.
    The following item has been added to the agenda:

Final Draft of the Fourth National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) Report 
to the Congress


PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Ron Harris, Press Officer Telephone 
(202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-15484 Filed 6-5-01; 12:18 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from HCW Pension
Real Estate Fund Ltd Partnership 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000745538
<NAME> HCW PENSION REAL ESTATE FUND LTD PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,392
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       88
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          14,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,271)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,071
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,143
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       376
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    23.47<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Kendrick Jermaine FULTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6610.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jean COULTER, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ;

Jean Coulter, petitioner, v. Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

No. 16-197.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.