alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-Q FOR THE 9-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      25,948,956
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       8,190,469
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                250,149,688
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     116,205,651
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       116,701,857
<LOANS>                                  1,176,006,462
<ALLOWANCE>                                  7,623,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,736,593,274
<DEPOSITS>                               1,311,758,730
<SHORT-TERM>                                99,150,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         25,275,886
<LONG-TERM>                                177,913,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    36,534,228
<OTHER-SE>                                  85,960,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,736,593,274
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             70,871,741
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           16,399,252
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            87,270,993
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          43,456,559
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          52,364,422
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       34,906,571
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  205,141
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             34,210,903
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,707,552
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  22,707,552
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,269,021
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.75
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,550,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              7,200,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             7,637,527
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  219,140
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            7,623,526
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         7,623,526
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of ACL Semiconductors Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Chun-Lun Yang, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of
                  the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated
                  result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



Date:    April 14, 2005          /s/ CHUNG-LUN YANG
                                --------------------------------------
                                       Chung-Lun Yang
                                       Chief Executive Officer of
                                       ACL Semiconductors Inc.


This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ACL Semiconductors, Inc. and will be retained by ACL Semiconductors
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
In the Matter of Patricia BALLNER.

No. D-2913.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Patricia Ballner, of New York, New York, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on July 18, 2016, is discharged.
Oscar GOMEZ, aka Carlos Eduardo Guzman, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION.

No. 16-6509.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Harold H. HODGE, Jr., et ux., petitioners, v. COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND, et al.

No. 16-6048.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# C_2009069EN.01002801.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/28

---

Action brought on 21 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-28/09)

(2009/C 69/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Oliver, A. Alcover San Pedro and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by prohibiting lorries with a total weight of more than 7.5 tonnes, carrying certain goods, from being driven on a section of the A12 motorway, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 EC and 29 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by prohibiting lorries with a total weight of more than 7.5 tonnes, carrying certain goods, from being driven on a section of the A12 motorway, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 EC and 29 EC;

| — | order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The adoption of a sectoral prohibition against driving lorries with a total weight of more than 7.5 tonnes, loaded with certain goods, on the A12 motorway must be regarded as constituting a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction and is thus incompatible with Articles 28 EC and 29 EC. The disputed measure is neither appropriate nor necessary to achieve the improvement in air quality on the A12 required by Community law as it is not properly focused and does not take less restrictive measures, such as, for instance, permanent speed restrictions or emissions-dependent prohibitions on driving, into consideration. Furthermore, the defendant has not proved that there is a suitable alterative to road transport.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-447-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

June 13, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 8, 2001, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Original Sheet No. 415 and Sheet 
Nos. 416 through 499, to be effective July 9, 2001.
    Natural states that the purpose of this filing is to establish a 
new section 51 of the General Terms and Conditions of Natural's Tariff, 
addressing the use of offsystem capacity acquired by Natural.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15383 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Christopher E. MORRIS, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 15-9193.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Jose MAGUEYAL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6841.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
| **Nature of Operations (Details)**                                                  | 12 Months Ended |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]** |            |
| Number of reportable operating segments                                             | 5               |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Number of segments reported by the entity. A reportable segment is a component of an entity for which there is an accounting requirement to report separate financial information on that component in the entity's financial statements.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_NumberOfReportableSegments**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_OrganizationConsolidationAndPresentationOfFinancialStatementsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
Raymond CLAUDIO, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-6745.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          18,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  330,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (112,737)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      45,548,269
<DEPRECIATION>                            (22,843,454)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,464,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,290,634
<BONDS>                                     49,500,989
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,327,379)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,464,244
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,497,368
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,463,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (14,585)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,828,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,135,494)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,135,494)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,135,494)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (17.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (17.80)
        

</TABLE>
II-01183

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

arlene Shannon <arleneshannon43 @yahoo.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 6:36 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

arLene Shannon

3680 E. 100 N.

LaGrange, IN 46761
Lawrence E. BURTON, petitioner, v. Keith COOLEY, Warden.

No. 16-6189.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1

DIGITAL GENERATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|Name of Subsidiary                                           |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|StarGuide Digital Networks, Inc.                             |  | Nevada                       
|Digital Generation Systems of New York, Inc.                 |  | New York                     
|Starcom Mediatech, Inc.                                      |  | Delaware                     
|Musicam Express, L.L.C.                                      |  | Delaware                     
|Corporate Computer Systems, Inc.                             |  | Delaware                     
|Corporate Computer Systems Consultants, Inc.                 |  | Delaware                     
|DG Systems Acquisition Corporation d/b/a AGT Broadcast, Inc. |  | Delaware                     
|DG Systems Acquisition II Corporation d/b/a SourceTV, Inc.   |  | Delaware                     
|Media DVX, Inc.                                              |  | Delaware                     

---



QuickLinks
The GEO GROUP, INC., petitioner, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, et al.

No. 16-302.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Stephen W. Webster, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|/s/ STEPHEN W. WEBSTER                                   
|Stephen W. Webster                                       
|Senior Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer
|                                                         
|Date: February 24, 2011
TO: All Court of Appeals Ju dges, Professor Bacigal, Prof essor Spratt, and Alice Armstrong

FROM: Marty Ring

DATE: September 4, 2018

The following cases in whic h the Court of Appeals issued published opinions have been disposed of by the Supreme Court:

1. Robert Ryan Grasty

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 0281-17-1 Opinion rendered by Judge Humphreys on December 5, 2017 Refused (171721)On August 9, 2018 the Suprem e Court issued an opinion in th e following case, which had been appealed from this Court

1. Francisco Garcia-Tirado

v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Record No. 1982-15-4 Memorandum opinion rendered by Senior Judge Annunziata on Ma rch 7, 2017 Judgment of Court of Appeals af firmed by opinio n rendered on August 9, 2018 (170458)
Lianne R. SUMMERS, petitioner, v. Carolyn w. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 15-9801.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 01/01-0339]


Chestnut Venture Partners, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under 
Section 312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Chestnut Venture Partners, L.P., 75 
State Street, Suite 2500, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, a Federal 
Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended 
(``the Act''), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has 
sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and Sec. 107.730, 
Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') rules and regulations (13 CFR 107.730 (2001)). 
Chestnut Venture Partners, L.P., proposes to make an equity investment 
in Florida Digital Network, Inc. The financing is contemplated to 
implement a new business plan which involves a substantial change in 
size, scope and nature of Florida Digital Network, Inc.'s operations 
and service offerings.
    This financing is brought within the purview of Sec. 107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because Media/Communications Partners III, L.P. and 
M/C Investors, LLC, Associates of Chestnut Venture Partners, L.P., 
presently own greater than 10 percent of Florida Digital Network, Inc., 
and therefore, Florida Digital Network, Inc., is considered an 
Associate of Chestnut Venture Partners, L.P., as defined in Sec. 107.50 
of the regulations.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Acting Associate 
Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 
Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: June 13, 2001.
Harry Haskins,
Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 01-15642 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M