6574 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2001 / Notices

This action does not affect current

contracts awarded prior to the effective

date of this addition or options that may

be exercised under those contracts.

Deletions

I certify that the following action will

not have a significant impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

The major factors considered for this

certification were:

1. The action will not result in any

additional reporting, recordkeeping or

other compliance requirements for small

entities.

2. The action will not have a severe

economic impact on future contractors

for the commodities and services.

3. The action will result in

authorizing small entities to furnish the

commodities and services to the

Government.

4. There are no known regulatory

alternatives which would accomplish

the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in

connection with the commodities and

services deleted from the Procurement

List.

After consideration of the relevant

matter presented, the Committee has

determined that the commodities listed

below are no longer suitable for

procurement by the Federal Government

under 41 U.S.C. 46–48c and 41 CFR 51–

2.4. Accordingly, the following

commodities are hereby deleted from

the Procurement List:

Commodities

Arming Adapter, Self Adjusting

1325–01–158–8635

1325–01–159–8083

Air Freshener Deodorant, General Purpose

6840–00–932–4692

Envelope, Wallet

7530–00–281–4844

7530–00–281–4846

Louis R. Bartalot,

Deputy Director (Operations).

[FR Doc. 01–1647 Filed 1–19–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6353–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

Public Meeting: With the Community

College of the Air Force Board of

Visitors To Review and Discuss

Academic Policies and Issues Relative

to the Operation of the College

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force,

DOD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The Community College of

the Air Force (CCAF) Board of Visitors

will hold a meeting to review and

discuss academic policies and issues

relative to the operation of the college.

Agenda items include a review of the

operations of the CCAF and an update

on the activities of the CCAF Policy

Council.

Members of the public who wish to

make oral or written statements at the

meeting should contact First Lieutenant

Matthew M. Groleau, Designated

Federal Officer for the Board, at the

address below no later than 4:00 p.m. on

April 1, 2001. Please mail or

electronically mail all requests.

Telephone requests will not be honored.

The request should identify the name of

the individual who will make the

presentation and an outline of the issues

to be addressed. A minimum of 35

copies of the presentation materials

must be given to First Lieutenant Matt

Groleau no later than 3 days prior to the

time of the board meeting for

distribution. Visual aids must be

submitted to First Lieutenant Matt

Groleau on a 31⁄2’’ computer disk in

Microsoft PowerPoint format no later

than 4:00 p.m. on April 1, 2001 to allow

sufficient time for virus scanning and

formatting of the slides.

DATES: The meeting will be held on

Wednesday, May 9, 2001 at 1:00 p.m. on

the First Floor Conference Room,

Community College of the Air Force,

130 West Maxwell Boulevard, Maxwell

Air Force Base, Alabama 36112.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: First

Lieutenant Matt Groleau, Community

College of the Air Force, 130 West

Maxwell Boulevard, Maxwell Air Force

Base, Alabama 36112–6613, (334) 953–

7322, or through electronic mail at

matthew.groleau@maxwell.af.mil.

Janet A. Long,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01–1570 Filed 1–19–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–05–U

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Census Bureau

The Census 2000 Count Question

Resolution Program

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment

request.

SUMMARY: The Department of

Commerce, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork and

respondent burden, invites the general

public and other Federal agencies to

take this opportunity to comment on

proposed and/or continuing information

collections, as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13 (44

U.S.C.3506(c)(2)(A)).

DATES: Written comments must be

submitted on or before March 23, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments

to Madeleine Clayton, Departmental

Forms Clearance Officer, Department of

Commerce, Room 6086, 14th and

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20230 (or via the Internet at

mclayton@doc.gov).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information and

instructions should be directed to

Robert A. Rinaldi, Assistant Division

Chief, Decennial Management Division,

U.S. Census Bureau, SFC–2, Room 2002,

Washington, DC 20233–001. Telephone:

301–457–8226; fax: 301–457–8328; or email:

Count.Question.Resolution@census.gov

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Abstract

This notice provides information

concerning the Census 2000 Count

Question Resolution (CQR) program that

will be implemented to respond to

challenges to the Census 2000 housing

unit counts and group quarters counts

received from local and tribal

governmental entities in the U.S. and

Puerto Rico. This program will become

effective on June 30, 2001, and will end

on September 30, 2003.

After the release of Census 2000

Public Law 94–171 redistricting data

containing population counts and the

Demographic Profiles and Summary File

1 (SF1) that contain the number of

housing units and group quarters

population counts, some governmental

entities may want to challenge these

official Census 2000 counts.

Challenges to the overseas counts of

persons in the military and Federal

civilian personnel stationed overseas

and their dependents living with them

will not be accepted. These overseas

counts are obtained using

administrative records and will be used

solely for reapportioning seats in the

U.S. House of Representatives and do

not provide the substate geographic

information required for the CQR

program.

No additional data will be collected as

part of the CQR program. We will only

use those data that have already been

collected. The Census Bureau will

respond to all questions and will notify

all affected governmental entities of any

corrections to their official counts as a

result of CQR. All challenges should be

sent to the Census Bureau’s

headquarters. (The specific mailing

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2001 / Notices 6575

address and a glossary of terms are

provided in the Exhibit at the end of

this notice’s Method of Collection

section.)

Background

The Census Bureau implemented the

Local Update of Census Addresses

(LUCA) program for Census 2000.

Participating local and tribal

governments were given the opportunity

to review and update the Census

Bureau’s address list before it was used

for the actual census enumeration. In

cases where the local or tribal

government and the Census Bureau

could not agree on the housing unit

address list, the governmental unit

could use an appeal process

administered by the Census Address

List Appeals Office. The Census Bureau

also used the LUCA Special Places

program to involve local and tribal

governments in helping to identify

special places, such as college

dormitories, nursing homes and other

types of group living arrangements.

In addition to LUCA, governmental

units with city-style address areas had

another opportunity to update the

Census 2000 address list for the New

Construction program. We also

conducted the Boundary and Validation

program, in which we provided local

officials with maps that showed

boundaries of their jurisdiction and

asked them to make corrections, if

necessary.

The Census Bureau had a

comprehensive program to improve the

quality of the housing unit counts. A

number of extensive operations afforded

other opportunities for additions,

corrections, and deletions of census

addresses and corrections of population

counts. Between May and August 2000,

the Coverage Edit Follow-up operation

resolved population count discrepancies

and obtained additional information on

households with more than six persons.

The Coverage Improvement Follow-up

(CIFU) operation (June–August 2000)

enumerated housing units that were

inaccurately classified as vacant or

nonexistent in an earlier census

operation. It also enumerated added

housing units discovered in an earlier

census operation; housing units added

through the LUCA 98 and 99 appeals

process; new addresses from periodic

postal updates; blank or missing mail

return forms; and addresses provided in

the New Construction update by local

and tribal governments.

During July and August 2000, the

Residual Nonresponse Follow-up

operation completed questionnaires for

housing units where identification

numbers existed for forms that were

checked out of the Local Census Office,

were not included in CIFU, and did not

have census data captured. The Field

Verification operation (July–August

2000) verified specific addresses that

did not match the Decennial Master

Address File. Another operation,

Population Unknown Supplementary

(July–August 2000), was conducted to

determine the number of people in

housing units that the Nonresponse

Follow-up operation (April–June 2000)

had identified as occupied, but the

number of occupants were unknown.

Data collection for Census 2000 ended

in the Local Census Offices on or before

August 30, 2000. This schedule was

needed to allow the Census Bureau time

to produce the state level apportionment

counts by December 31, 2000, as

required by law.

The Census Bureau also conducted

the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation

operation that includes a coverage

measurement survey that is expected to

determine and correct for the number of

people and housing units missed or

erroneously included in Census 2000.

This survey, a nationwide sample

survey of about 314,000 housing units,

was conducted by the Census Bureau

independently of Census 2000. All

enumeration activities, as well as person

interviewing follow-up, were completed

by late November 2000.

Although many local and tribal

governments participated in the LUCA

and New Construction programs and the

Census Bureau conducted an extensive

quality improvement program, the

Census Bureau still expects to receive

challenges after it releases the official

Census 2000 housing unit and group

quarters population counts contained in

the Demographic Profiles, which are

scheduled for release between June and

September 2001. The CQR start date of

June 30, 2001, also is coordinated with

the release of the Summary File 1 (SF1)

on a state-by-state basis between June

and September 2001. The SF1 will

contain block-level data on the number

of housing units. It also will show group

quarters population counts by blocks.

The Bureau of the Census (Census

Bureau) must be contacted directly by

officials of local and tribal governments

in order to initiate the challenge

process. However, the Census Bureau

also will accept challenges from county

clerks, city planners, local planning

board representatives, and state

legislative representatives with

redistricting functions within each state

and state equivalents who are acting on

the behalf of a local or tribal

jurisdiction.

Types of Corrections That Will Be

Considered for the Census 2000 CQR

Program

Corrections for three types of

challenges will be made as a result of

the Census 2000 CQR program. (For

acceptable documentation to initiate

such challenges, refer to the Method of

Collection section, ‘‘Criteria for

Acceptable Documentation Necessary to

Initiate the Census 2000 CQR Process.’’)

(1) Boundary corrections—Census

2000 respects the proper alignment of

the jurisdictional boundaries of

functioning governmental units as

legally in effect on January 1, 2000. The

Census Bureau needs to ensure that the

geographic assignment information

provided does not, in fact, reflect

boundary changes made after January 1,

2000. Problems, such as the inaccurate

reporting of jurisdictional boundaries

and the inaccurate recording of such

boundaries by the Census Bureau, will

be addressed by the CQR program. The

boundaries of other geographic and

statistical areas, such as census

designated places, census tracts, voting

districts, school districts, and the like

are not in the scope of the Census 2000

CQR program.

(2) Geocoding corrections—placement

of living quarters and associated

population within the correct

boundaries, census blocks, and the like.

Even if the CQR process does not result

in a change to the total count for a local

or tribal jurisdiction, we will send a

letter to the local or tribal government

official when the Census Bureau moves

group quarters or housing units to

different blocks within the jurisdiction.

(3) Coverage corrections—specific

living quarters and persons residing

therein that were identified during the

Census 2000 process but erroneously

included or excluded due to processing

errors; these corrections could be

additions or deletions.

Changes That Result in Corrections

The corrected CQR counts that are

issued are based on the housing unit

and population counts as of April 1,

2000. The new official census counts

may be used by the governmental

entities for all programs requiring

official Census 2000 data. The Census

Bureau will not make corrections to the

data concerning the characteristics of

the population and housing inventory.

The corrected counts will be reflected in

the Census Bureau’s decennial file

modified for use in making postcensal

estimates that will be released on a flow

basis beginning in December 2002. An

inventory of corrections also will be

available on the American FactFinder

6576 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2001 / Notices

Internet Data Access System (errata) and

updated periodically. The base files for

the census will remain unrevised so that

none of the standard Census 2000 data

products will reflect the corrections.

Challenges That Do Not Result in

Corrections

When a local or tribal government

provides evidence that the Census

Bureau missed housing units or group

quarters that existed on April 1, 2000,

but the CQR research and Census 2000

records show that all of the Census

Bureau’s boundary information,

geocoding, and processing were

correctly implemented, the Census

Bureau will respond by sending a letter

to the official or his/her representative

stating that the Census Bureau will

maintain the documentation for

consideration in the context of address

list updating activities over the decade.

Internal Census Bureau Review

Changes to the boundaries or counts

for a jurisdiction also may result from

Census Bureau initiated research and

review of census files. The Census

Bureau reviews Census 2000 data by

checking for data reasonableness,

internal and intra-product consistency,

and consistency with historical and

external data sources. This review

process begins with an analysis by

Census Bureau staff, the Federal-State

Cooperative Program for Population

Estimates and others. These reviewers

identify, address, and/or explain issues

or problems related to coverage, content,

processing, and geocoding. Unresolved

potential problems will be forwarded to

the CQR staff for additional analysis.

Changes made as result of this internal

review and/or research will be

incorporated into the CQR process and

documented in the same way that

changes based on jurisdictional CQR

challenges will be documented. In cases

where changes to the housing unit and/

or population counts are made, new

official counts will be issued to the

affected jurisdictions.

II. Method of Collection

Criteria for Acceptable Documentation

Necessary To Initiate the Census 2000

CQR Process

The Census Bureau will require

documentation before committing

resources to investigate concerns raised

by local and tribal officials or their

representatives about boundary and

geographic assignment errors or the

accuracy of the census housing unit or

group quarters population counts. In

general, when submitting a challenge,

governmental entities must:

• Specify whether the challenge

disputes the location of a governmental

unit boundary or the number of housing

units and/or group quarters population

counts in one or more tabulation blocks.

• For boundary disputes, indicate on

a map the location of the governmental

unit boundary in dispute; that is, it must

be shown where the Census Bureau

incorrectly depicts the boundary and

show the correct boundary legally in

effect as of January 1, 2000. (For types

of maps that can be used, refer to the

section ‘‘Types of Acceptable Paper

Maps.’’)

• For housing unit challenges,

identify the specific Census 2000

tabulation block that is being contested

and a list of the addresses of all housing

units in that block on April 1, 2000. (See

the section ‘‘Challenge Criteria: Housing

Unit Count.’’)

• For group quarters (see Census

Bureau group quarters definition listed

under ‘‘Definition of Key Terms’’)

challenges, provide the name of the

group quarters and evidence, e.g., a

listing of patients residing in the XYZ

Nursing Home as of April 1, 2000, that

supports the number of persons residing

there on April 1, 2000, as necessary, and

show the specific Census 2000

tabulation block in which the group

quarters population is being contested.

• Provide electronic or paper versions

of documentation to support the

challenge.

Boundary Challenge Criteria

All governmental unit boundary

challenges must be based on boundaries

that were legally in effect on January 1,

2000. The Census Bureau will compare

the maps and appropriate supporting

documentation submitted by the

challenging entity with the information

used by the Census Bureau to depict the

boundaries for Census 2000.

Maps submitted by local and tribal

governments must show the correct

location of the boundary and the portion

of the boundary that the Census Bureau

depicted incorrectly, including the

Census 2000 tabulation block numbers

associated with the boundary. The local

or tribal government also should

provide the Census Bureau with a list of

addresses in affected tabulation blocks,

indicating their location in relationship

to the boundary requiring correction.

For boundary changes affected by

legal actions not recorded by the Census

Bureau, local or tribal governments

must submit the effective date and the

ordinance number or law that

effectuated the change in boundaries,

provide evidence that the state

certifying official has approved the

boundary change, and provide a

statement that the boundary is not

under litigation. The change also must

be certified by a local official.

Regardless of whether the Census

Bureau changes boundaries or does not

change boundaries as a result of the

CQR evidence and the Census Bureau’s

research, the Census Bureau will notify

the complainant and any affected

adjacent governmental entity(es) of the

results.

Types of Acceptable Paper Maps

• Paper Census 2000 Public Law 94–

171 County Block Maps—These maps

will accompany the Redistricting Data

Summary Files.

• Paper Census 2000 Redistricting

Block Maps for Washington, DC.

• Paper Census 2000 Redistricting

Municipio Block Maps for Puerto Rico—

These maps will accompany the Puerto

Rico Redistricting Data File.

• Paper Census 2000 Block Maps—

These maps will be provided to local

and tribal jurisdictions and will show

tabulation block numbers. They are a

companion map for the Demographic

Profiles that will contain information on

population totals, including group

quarters and selected population and

housing characteristics.

• Paper Maps based on the 2000

TIGER/Line File—These maps are

generated by local or tribal governments

based on information from the Census

Bureau’s 2000 TIGER/Line files using

commercial geographic information

systems.

• Other Paper Maps Showing Census

Bureau 2000 Tabulation Block Numbers

and Boundaries—These maps should

show geographic boundaries as of

January 1, 2000, that identify census

tabulation blocks, census tracts, legal

and statistical entities and state

boundaries; maps depicting data

collection blocks cannot be used. In

general, maps should be comparable to

Census 2000 maps.

Challenge Criteria

Housing Unit Count

Supporting evidence that specifically

reflects the validity of any address list

source must reflect residential addresses

that existed as viable living quarters on

April 1, 2000. Challenges to housing

unit counts must specify the tabulation

block(s) for which the counts are being

challenged.

SF1 can be used to obtain tabulation

block housing unit counts.

Complainants must provide a complete

address list for all units that should be

included in each contested block. (Refer

to the section ‘‘Types of Address Lists.’’)

Local or tribal officials must certify

that the addresses on their lists existed

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2001 / Notices 6577

and could be lived in on April 1, 2000.

See Census Bureau ‘‘housing unit’’

definition listed under ‘‘Definitions of

Key Terms.’’

Group Quarters Population Count

Supporting evidence that specifically

reflects the validity of any address list

source should be dated no later than

April 1, 2000. Challenges to group

quarters population counts must specify

the tabulation block(s) for which the

counts are being challenged. A group

quarters is defined as a place where

people live or stay other than the usual

house, apartment, or mobile home. Two

general types of group quarters are

recognized: institutional (for example,

nursing homes, mental hospitals or

wards, hospital or wards for chronically

ill patients, hospices, and prison wards)

and noninstitutional (for example,

college or university dormitories,

military barracks, group homes, shelters,

missions, and flophouses). Group

quarters may have housing units on the

premises for staff and/or guests.

SF1 can be used to obtain tabulation

block group quarters population counts.

Complainants must provide a complete

address list (refer to the section ‘‘Types

of Address Lists’’) for all group quarters

units that should be included in each

contested block. (For the definition of

group quarters, see the section

‘‘Definitions of Key Terms.’’)

The local or tribal official should

certify that the addresses on their lists

existed and could be lived in on April

1, 2000.

Types of Address Lists

• City-Style Address Lists—Must

contain city-style addresses (house

number, street name, post office name,

state, and ZIP Code) organized by

Census 2000 tabulation block within

census tract. Housing unit identifiers in

multi-unit buildings (such as apartment

numbers) must be included, if

applicable.

• Non-City-Style Address Lists—Noncity-style addresses must be keyed to

the local or tribal government’s mapspotted maps, that is, maps that show

the exact location of the housing unit.

The list should be focused on the

specific area and/ or addresses where

the problem exists. All housing units in

the disputed block must be map spotted

and a description of the housing unit

and location must be supplied. The

following is an example of a mapspotted address and housing unit

description: Map Spot 4567–01, Derby

Road, 2-story house on left with red

brick chimney, 6 houses from the

intersection of Highways 12 and 19,

Anytown, Georgia 10020.

Group Quarters Information

Provide the name, address, and

telephone number for the administrative

office of the facility (special place and

group quarters) as of April 1, 2000. In

addition, provide the census tract and

tabulation block number for the location

of the group quarters.

Statistical Corrections

The data produced by the Census

Bureau may be corrected by applying

statistical techniques to the data files.

Challenges to the Census Bureau will be

investigated based on the data without

the statistical correction.

Census Bureau Actions

The Census Bureau will investigate

challenges to determine whether

information about the existence of a

housing unit or occupied group quarters

on April 1, 2000, was identified but

does not appear in the final census files

due to an error in processing the

information. The Census Bureau will

not collect new information.

Definitions of Key Terms

American FactFinder—The

generalized electronic system for access

and dissemination of much of Census

Bureau data. The system is available

through the Internet and offers

prepackaged data products and the

ability to build custom products. The

system serves as the vehicle for

accessing and disseminating data from

Census 2000 (as well as the 1997

Economic Censuses and the American

Community Survey).

Census Block—A geographic area

bounded on all sides by visible or

nonvisible features shown on census

maps. A block is the smallest geographic

entity for which the Census Bureau

collects and tabulates decennial census

information. See also block boundary,

block number, collection block,

statistical entity, and tabulation block.

Census Tract—Small, relatively

permanent statistical subdivisions of

counties delineated by local committees

of census data users in accordance with

Census Bureau guidelines for the

purpose of collecting and presenting

decennial census data. These

neighborhoods contain between 1,000

and 8,000 people, typically

approximately 1,700 housing units and

4,000 people.

Census Designated Place—A

geographically defined statistical entity

delineated for each decennial census

according to Census Bureau guidelines

comprising a densely settled

concentration of population that is not

incorporated or established by law but

is locally recognized and identified by

a name.

County—A type of governmental unit

that is the primary legal subdivision of

every state except Alaska and Louisiana

(which have boroughs and parishes,

respectively).

Demographic Profile—A one-page

table containing data at the place level

that shows information on total

population, sex, age, race, Hispanic or

Latino origin, household relationship,

group quarters population, household

type, housing occupancy, and housing

tenure.

Group quarters—A place where

people live or stay other than the usual

house, apartment, or mobile home. The

Census Bureau recognizes two general

types of group quarters: institutional (for

example, nursing homes, mental

hospitals or wards, hospital or wards for

chronically ill patients, hospices, and

prison wards) and noninstitutional (for

example, college or university

dormitories, military barracks, group

homes, shelters, missions, and

flophouses). Special places may have

housing units on the premises for staff

or guests.

Housing unit—A house, an apartment,

a mobile home or trailer, a group of

rooms, or a single room that is occupied

as a separate living quarters, or, if

vacant, is intended for occupancy as a

separate living quarters. A housing unit

is defined as a living quarters that is

closed to the elements and has all

exterior windows and doors installed

and final usable floors in place. For

vacant units, the criteria of separateness

and direct access are applied to the

intended occupants, whenever possible.

If that information cannot be obtained,

the criteria are applied to the previous

occupants.

Local Census Office—A temporary

Census Bureau office established for

Census 2000 data collection purposes.

These offices managed address listing

field work, conducted local recruiting,

and created a local presence. They were

called ‘‘district office’’ in previous

censuses.

Municipio—A primary legal

subdivision of Puerto Rico (synonymous

to a county).

Overseas counts—Counts of military

and Federal civilian personnel stationed

overseas and their dependents living

with them.

Postcensal Estimates—Population

estimates for the years following the last

published decennial census. Existing

data series, such as births, deaths,

Federal tax returns, medicare

enrollment, and immigration and

housing unit information are used to

update the decennial census counts

6578 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2001 / Notices

during the estimating process. These

estimates are used in Federal funding

allocations, monitoring recent

demographic trends, and benchmarking

may federally funded survey totals.

Public Law 94–171—The Federal law

amending Section 141 of Title 13

directing the Secretary of Commerce

(who delegates that responsibility to the

Director of the Census Bureau) to

provide selected decennial census data

tabulations to the states by April 1 of the

year following the census. These

tabulations are used by the states to

redefine the areas included in each

Congressional District and the areas

used for state and local elections, a

process called redistricting.

Special Place—A place containing

one or more group quarters, including

hotels and campgrounds. A special

place also may include housing units

occupied by staff or guests.

Summary File 1—A data file that

presents counts and basic crosstabulations of information collected

from all people and housing units. This

information includes age, sex, race,

Hispanic or Latino origin, household

relationship, and whether the residence

is owned or rented. Data will be

available down to the block level for

many tabulations, but limited to the

census tract level in cases where there

are concerns with disclosure.

Summaries also will be included for

other geographic areas, such as ZIP

Code Tabulation Areas and

Congressional Districts.

Exhibit—Additional Information

This section provides additional

information on how the Census 2000

CQR program will operate.

1. Where Should a Governmental Unit

Submit a Challenge for the Census 2000

CQR program?

Governmental units challenging the

completeness or accuracy of the Census

2000 counts should submit their

challenge in writing to: Count Question

Resolution Program, Room 2002, SFC—

2, Decennial Management Division, U.S.

Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233–

0001.

2. Will the Census Bureau Make

Corrections to the Census Counts Based

on Information Submitted by

Governmental Units?

The Census Bureau will make

corrections if research indicates they are

warranted. Our experience has shown

that many of the questions received

from the local or tribal officials do not

reflect errors in census counts.

Questions may result from an incorrect

or incomplete understanding of the

procedures used to take the census. In

other instances, questions about census

counts reflect a local or tribal official’s

reliance on different enumeration

concepts, definitions, geographic

assignments, and/or the currency of the

information in comparison to the

census. The Census Bureau’s

determination of whether a correction is

necessary will be based on the quality

and completeness of the information

provided by local and tribal

governmental unit representatives and

the results of the Census Bureau’s

review of the census records.

3. Will the Census Bureau Incorporate

Corrections From the CQR Process Into

the Apportionment or Redistricting Data

or Subsequent Data Products?

The Census Bureau will not change

the apportionment counts to reflect

corrections resulting from the CQR

process. The apportionment counts

were delivered to the President on

December 28, 2000.

The Census Bureau will begin

delivery of the counts required for

redistricting purposes in March 2001

and will complete this delivery by the

statutory deadline of April 1, 2001. The

Census Bureau will not incorporate CQR

corrections into the redistricting data

and subsequent data products for

Census 2000. This process will allow

the Census Bureau to maintain

consistency between data products

while maintaining the schedule for

timely release of the data. However, the

Census Bureau will issue a revised

official Census 2000 population and

housing unit counts for the affected

governmental entity(es), maintain a list

of CQR corrected areas on the American

Factfinder, and will incorporate any

corrections into its Postcensal Estimates

program beginning in December 2002.

III. Data

OMB Number: Not available.

Form Number: None.

Type of Review: Regular collection.

Affected Public: Local governmental

jurisdictions in the United States and

Puerto Rico.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

Approximately 3,000 annually.

Estimated Time Per Response: 5.2

hours ( based on an average challenge of

40 housing units).

Estimated Total Annual Burden

Hours: 15,600 hours.

Estimated Total Annual Cost:

$244,440.00.

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.

Legal Authority: Title 13, USC,

Section 141.

IV. Request for Comments

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether

the proposed collection of information

is necessary for the proper performance

of the functions of the agency, including

whether the information shall have

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden

(including hours and cost) of the

proposed collection of information; (c)

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the

burden of the collection of information

on respondents, including through the

use of automated collection techniques

or other forms of information

technology.

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for OMB

approval of this information collection;

they also will become a matter of public

record.

Dated: January 12, 2001.

Madeleine Clayton,

Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office

of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 01–1564 Filed 1–19–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration

Action Affecting Export Privileges;

Randy Reyes

In the Matter of: Randy Reyes,

currently incarcerated at: Wachenhut

FCI, USM #05425–089, P.O. Box 17001,

1500 Cadet Road, Taft, California 93268;

and with an address at: 5250 Colodny

Drive, #3, Agoura Hills, California

91301–2656.

Order Denying Export Privileges

On January 14, 2000, Randy Reyes

(Reyes) was convicted in the United

States District Court for the Eastern

District of Wisconsin of violating

Section 38 of the Arms Export Control

Act (22 U.S.A. 2778 (1990 & Supp.

2000)) (the AECA) and the International

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50

U.S.C.A. 1701–1706 (1991 & Supp.

2000)) (IEEPA). Specifically, Reyes was

convicted of knowingly and willfully

exporting and attempting to export from

the United States aircraft component

parts which were designated as defense

articles on the United States Munitions

List without having first obtained from

the Department of State a license or

written authorization, and of knowingly

and willfully exporting and attempting

to export from the United States to Iran