alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of American  Church  Mortgage  Company
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

Dated:   March 5, 2009             By:        /s/ Philip J. Myers
         -------------                       ----------------------------------
                               Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer
                              (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
                               Financial Officer)

4340361v2
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ROBERT P. TALLIAN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 236 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D.C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 236 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Robert P. Tallian 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that during July 1973, Robert P. Tallian, a registered 

floor broker, unlawfully matched numerous customers' buy and sell commodity 

futures orders. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when there has been a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. A determination is considered as having been made when a 

decision of the Administrative Law Judge becomes final or, after appeal, a 

decision is made by the Judicial Officer of the Department. Complaints are 

filed in the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and 

are a matter of public record. Pending disposition of a complaint, it is the 

policy of the CEA not to comment or elaborate on charges contained therein or to 

discuss evidence on which it is based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before an Administrative Law 

Judge in Chicago, Illinois, at a place, date, and time to be specified at a 

later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
COORDINATED ACTI

COORDINATED ACTI

CBOT, KCBT & MG

CBOT, KCBT & MG

WHEAT DAILY PRICE 

WHEAT DAILY PRICE 

Jeff Borchardt, President, KCB

Jeff Borchardt, President, KCB

CFTC Agricultural Advisory Comm

CFTC Agricultural Advisory Comm

July 29, 2008 July 29, 2008
U.S. Wheat Futures Weekly Nearby Close

Source: Barchart

$4.00$6.00$8.00

$10.00$12.00$14.00$16.00$18.00$20.00

1/1/2007

2/1/2007

3/1/2007

4/1/2007

5/1/2007

6/1/2007

7/1/2007

8/1/2007

9/1/2007

10/1/2007

11/1/2007

12/1/2007

1/1/2008

2/1/2008

3/1/2008
Analysis of Wheat Prices to Monthly Price Limit Mov

January 2, 2007 - February 8, 2008

$4.00$6.00$8.00

$10.00$12.00$14.00$16.00$18.00$20.00

January-07 February-07 March-07April-07May-07 June-07July-07 August-07 September-07 October-07 November-07 Decemb

CBOT

KCBT

MGEX

U.S. Wheat Futures Weekly Nearby Close
FEBRUARY 11, 2008 PRICE LIMI

FEBRUARY 11, 2008 PRICE LIMI

CBOT, KCBT & MGE

CBOT, KCBT & MGE

• An initial price limit of 60 An initial price limit of 60

¢ per 

pe

• Expanded limit provisions tha

Expanded limit provisions tha

by 50% each time the price lim

by 50% each time the price lim

reached; reached;

• The trigger for expanded limit

The trigger for expanded limit

or more contract months with

or more contract months with

year (or the remaining month 

year (or the remaining month 

year) close at limit bid or offe

year) close at limit bid or offe

• Expanded limits remain in effe

Expanded limits remain in eff

contract closes limit bid or of

contract closes limit bid or of

consecutive business days. consecutive business days.
MARCH 28, 2008 PRICE LIMIT AM

MARCH 28, 2008 PRICE LIMIT A

CBOT & KCBT CBOT & KCBT

• Capping the expanded limit pro

Capping the expanded limit pr

$1.35 per bushel; $1.35 per bushel;

• The trigger for expanded limits The trigger for expanded limits 

or more of the nearest 5 non or more of the nearest 5 non

-s

contract months (or the remain

contract months (or the remain

contract mont contract month in a crop year) 

a crop year) 

limit bid or offer; and limit bid or offer; and

• Any day that the market is und

Any day that the market is und

expanded price limit level and 

expanded price limit level and 

close limit bid or offer, the mar

close limit bid or offer, the mar

back to the preceding price lim

back to the preceding price lim
COORDINATED PRICE LIMIT 

COORDINATED PRICE LIMIT 

CBOT, KCBT & MGE

CBOT, KCBT & MGE

Summary: Summary:• Restoration of price disco

Restoration of price disco

price transparency functio

price transparency functi

• Minimal inter Minimal inter-market spre

market spre

disconnect disconnect

• Exchanges, regulators & 

Exchanges, regulators & 

working together quickly 

working together quickly 

address a critical market 

address a critical market
Exhibit (j)(2)

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 140 to Registration StatementNo. 002-90649 on Form N-1A of our report dated December 10, 2013 relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity International Value Fund, our report dated December 11, 2013 relating to the financialstatements and financial highlights of Fidelity Total International Equity Fund, our reports dated December 12,2013 relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity International Small Cap OpportunitiesFund and Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund, our reports dated December 13, 2013 relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund, Fidelity Diversified International Fund, Fidelity Worldwide Fund, Fidelity International Small Cap Fund and Fidelity Emerging Europe, MiddleEast, Africa (EMEA) Fund, and our reports dated December 16, 2013 relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund, Fidelity Series International Value Fund, Fidelity SeriesInternational Small Cap Fund, and Fidelity Europe Capital Appreciation Fund, each a fund of Fidelity InvestmentTrust, appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of Fidelity Investment Trust for the year ended October 31,2013, and to the references to us under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectuses and "IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firms" in the Statements of Additional Information, which are a part of such Registration Statement.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

December 20, 2013
<PAGE>
 
                              ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.



                                  EXHIBIT 11

                              ETEC SYSTEMS, INC.
           COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE AND EQUIVALENTS
                   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                        ----------------------------
                                           OCTOBER 31,   OCTOBER 31,
                                              1996          1995
                                        --------------- ------------
<S>                                        <C>           <C>
Weighted average common shares                  
 outstanding                                    19,719        12,912
Weighted average common stock
 equivalents calculated by the treasury          
 stock method applied to options and
 warrants issued                                 1,399         1,938
                                        --------------- ------------
Weighted average common shares and              
 equivalents                                    21,118        14,850
                                        =============== ============
Net income                                     $ 6,984       $ 2,662
                                        =============== ============
Net income per share                           $  0.33       $  0.18
                                        =============== ============
 
</TABLE>
No. 520.

#### Commissioner of Internal Revenue *v.*Hartz.

C. A. 8th Cir.

*Solicitor General Perlman*for petitioner.

*Donald B. Smith*for respondent.

Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion the petition should be granted.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 12, 2019

NO. 03-17-00551-CV

Nicholas Vincent Russo, Appellant

v.

Maria Camila Bernal, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND KELLY 

AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on June 2, 2017. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial 

court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. The appellant shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of GenVec, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Jeffrey W. Church, as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Corporate Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for
the dates and periods covered by the Report. This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used
by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law. A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
GenVec, Inc. and will be retained by GenVec, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. March 15, 2004 /s/Jeffrey W. ChurchJeffrey W. ChurchChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate
Secretary
EXHIBIT
      23.1




Consent
        of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
  Voxware,
        Inc.
 Lawrenceville,
        NJ
  We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
        Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-27069, No. 333-33342, No. 333-47864, No.
        333-124659 and No. 333-135358) of Voxware, Inc. of our report dated September
        8,
        2006 ,
        relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appear in this Annual
        Report on Form 10-K.
 
  /s/
        BDO Seidman, LLP
 
 
 Bethesda,
        Maryland
 September
        28, 2006
Timothy ROBERTSON, petitioner, v. Richard BROWN, Superintendent, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility.

No. 16-5934.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
23.1








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We
have issued our reports dated December 14, 2009 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting
included in the Annual Report of Semitool, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
reports in the Registration Statements of Semitool, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No.
333-112964) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-114284, File No. 333-62474, File No.
333-89562 and File No. 333-142815)








/s/ GRANT THORNTON
LLP





Salt Lake City,
Utah


December 14,
2009
Exhibit 4.5


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO WARRANT


 


THIS AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO WARRANT (this “Amendment”) is hereby entered into between Sensus Healthcare, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), and the undersigned warrant holder (“Holder”) as of March 30, 2016 (the
“Effective Date”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the
Company previously issued a warrant, dated as of March 31, 2011 (the “Warrant”), to acquire equity interests
of the Company in connection with an engagement letter, dated March 15, 2010, to conduct a private securities offering; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Warrant is set to expire on March 31, 2016 if not exercised prior to such date; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and Holder desire to extend the exercise period of the Warrant until April 30, 2016.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy
of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Holder hereby agree that the terms of the Warrant are hereby modified and, to
the extent inconsistent with the terms of the Warrant superseded as follows:


 


1.          Amendment
to Term of Warrant. In accordance with Section 7 of the Warrant, the Expiration Date is hereby extended to April 30,
2016.


 


2.          Capitalized
Terms. Capitalized terms herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Warrant, except as otherwise expressly provided
in this Amendment.


 


3.          Effect
of Amendment. Except and to the extent modified by this Amendment, the provisions of the Warrant shall remain in full force
and effect and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Amendment as if fully stated herein.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company and Holder have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the Effective Date.


 


	 	SENSUS HEALTHCARE, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Arthur Levine
	 	Name:	Arthur Levine
	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 
	 	INVESTORS CAPITAL ALLIANCE, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ William McCall
	 	Name:	William McCall
	 	Title:	Managing Partner
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESS R. SMITH,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

B. GRONSETH, CBCC Law Librarian; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 35156

D.C. No. 3:16

- cv

- 05775

- BHS

DWC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2017 **

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Washington state prisoner Jess R. Smith appeals pro se from the district

court’s order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary

injunction

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a). We review for an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 35156

abuse of discretion, Am. Hotel & Lodging Ass’n v. City of L os A ngeles , 834 F.3d

958, 962 (9th Cir. 2016) , and w e affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Smith’s motion for

mandatory preliminary injunctive relief because Smith failed to establish that he is

likely to succeed on the merits of his claims and that absent such relief he is likely

to suffer irreparable harm

. See Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council , 555 U.S. 7, 20

(2008) ( setting forth standards for issuance of prelimin ary injunction ); Park Vill.

Apartment Tenants Ass’n v. Mortimer Howard Trust , 636 F.3d 1150, 1160 (9th

Cir. 2011) (stating that mandatory injunctions are not generally granted unless

“extreme or very serious damage will result” (citation and int ernal quota tion marks

omitted)); see also Lewis v. Casey , 518 U.S. 343, 348

- 49, 352

- 54 (1996) (setting

forth elements of an access

- to

- courts claim and actual injury requirement).

The district court properly determined that Smith’s allegations regarding the

denial of access to legal supplies and to his legal materials are outside the scope of

his motion fo r preliminary injunctive relief.

AFFIRMED.
James ST. LOUIS, petitioner, v. David PIERCE, Warden, et al.

No. 16-6222.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FultonBancshares Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Debra A. Goodling, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: May 11, 2006 | By:    | /s/ DEBRA A.  GOODLING            |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                    |   | Debra A. Goodling,                |
|                    |   | *Interim Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, J. JeffreyMeder, certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Cost-U-Less, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors:

     (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

     (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date:  May 11,2004

/s/ J. JeffreyMeder
|Exhibit 31(b)                                                                                                           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ESI TRACTEBEL FUNDING CORP.(the registrant)Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification                                       
|I, Mark R. Sorensen, Treasurer (equivalent to the Chief Financial Officer) of ESI Tractebel Funding Corp., certify that:
|1.                                                                                                                      
|2.                                                                                                                      
|3.                                                                                                                      
|4.                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|5.                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|Date:  March 23, 2004                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|