alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Tyrone D. JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joe McGRATH, Warden; Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 05-16890.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.

Filed Dec. 8, 2006.

Tyrone D. Johnson, Vacaville, CA, pro se.

Charles Victor Fennessey, Mary J. Graves, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: NOONAN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Johnson appeals from the denial of his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

Johnson’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is unavailing. The district court correctly determined that there is no constitutional right to effective assistance when seeking discretionary review. *Wainwright v. Torna,*455 U.S. 586, 587-88, 102 S.Ct. 1300, 71 L.Ed.2d 475 (1982). The claim of instructional error was not certified for review, and we decline to certify it now.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
William L. APAGAR, petitioner, v. Robert A. McDONALD, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 16-5135.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Guidelines Regarding Large Trader 

Reporting for Physical Commodity Swaps 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has published final large swaps trader reporting rules in the Federal 

Register. The swaps reporting rules are necessary for fulfilling the Commission’s regulatory responsibilities under 

the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended by the by Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

Consumer Protection Act of 2010. 

Background 

The Commission is in the process of implementing the swaps reporting rules of new part 20, which become effective on 

September 20, 2011. See 76 FR 43851 (July 22, 2011). 

Clearing organizations and members that are involved with clearing swaps directly or indirectly linked to one or more of 

the 46 futures contracts specified in regulation 20.2 should therefore begin preparations to report under new part 20. 

Staff is developing guidance that will set forth a detailed description of the reporting requirements, reporting format, file 

layout and delivery mechanism for the electronic position reports that are to be submitted under new part 20. The 

guidance will be disseminated through the Commission’s website prior to the reporting rules’ effective date. 

Format 

The forthcoming guidance will: 

• Specify the standard data format that must be used when submitting reports (xml-based format like FpML). 

• Provide details on how files will be transmitted via secure FTP to the Commission. 

• Include instructions on establishing a secure FTP account with the Commission. 

• Specify the file layout and provide data element descriptions. 

For questions concerning any technology aspect of the reporting requirements, please contact 

swapstechsupport@cftc.gov. The e-mail subject heading must read “Large Swaps Trader Reporting – Regulation 20.10” 

and include the full contact information of the party with questions.

Compliance 

Regulation 20.10 allows for modified compliance with the reporting rules as permitted by the Commission following the 

effective date of part 20 and for six months thereafter. Although part 20 of the Commission’s regulations is not yet 

effective, the Commission encourages any entity that may want to report under regulation 20.10 to contact the 

Commission via e-mail at submissions@cftc.gov and DMOSubmissions@cftc.gov. The e-mail subject heading must 

read “Large Swaps Trader Reporting – Regulation 20.10” and include the full contact information of the party inquiring 

into use of regulation 20.10. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
SEC Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1


AGREEMENT
LIMITING PSU AWARDS




This Agreement is entered into as of May 13, 2016 between Cimpress N.V. and Robert Keane, Cimpress’ Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Management Board. Subject to the approval of Cimpress’ 2016 Performance Equity Plan (the “Plan”) by Cimpress’ shareholders at the upcoming Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, the parties agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Until June 30, 2023, Cimpress shall not grant any long-term incentive compensation (including but not limited to equity or long-term cash awards) to Mr. Keane other than performance share units (“PSUs”) under the Plan.


		
	2.
	Until June 30, 2023, the maximum number of PSUs that Cimpress may grant to Mr. Keane under the Plan per fiscal year is 75,000 PSUs (subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalization, combinations or reclassifications of shares, or other similar changes in Cimpress’ capitalization).


		
	3.
	This Agreement may be modified or terminated only by a written instrument executed by both parties.






Signature /s/Robert S. Keane
Robert S. Keane






Cimpress N.V.:






Signature /s/Scott Vassalluzzo
Name: Scott Vassalluzzo
Title: Member, Supervisory Board and Chairman, Compensation Committee






Signature /s/Lawrence Gold
Name: Lawrence Gold
Title: Senior Vice President and Secretary
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned directors of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation hereby authorize and
appoint Robert W. Zapp, President and CEO and Martin J. Gerrety, Executive Vice President and CFO, and each of them individually, without need to act jointly, as our agents, as attorneys-in-fact, with full power to act for us and all of us, for the
purpose of subscribing our names to the Form 10-K thereof to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for the purpose of making any changes or amendments necessary or desirable to such documents and to any documents ancillary
thereto, with the same powers and to the same effect as we may do if personally present:

Signed and dated this
17thday of February 2006.



|                          |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|/s/ Charles M. Berger     |  |  |  | /s/ Rodney S. Cain   
|Charles M. Berger         |  |  |  | Rodney S. Cain       
|                          |  | 
|                          |  |  |  | /s/ R.C. Durr        
|Ruth Seligman-Doering     |  |  |  | R.C. Durr            
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Harry J. Humpert      |  |  |  | /s/ David F. Meyer   
|Harry J. Humpert          |  |  |  | David F. Meyer       
|                          |  | 
|/s/ John F. Miracle       |  |  |  | /s/ Mary Sue Rudicill
|John F. Miracle, M. D.    |  |  |  | Mary Sue Rudicill    
|                          |  | 
|/s/ John P. Williams, Jr. |  |  |  | /s/ Herbert H. Works 
|John P. Williams, Jr.     |  |  |  | Herbert H. Works     
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Robert W. Zapp        |  |  |  |                      
|Robert W. Zapp            |  |  |  |
CUONG MACH BINH TIEU, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6691.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Joint CFTC‐SEC Staff Roundtable 

International Issues Relating to the

Implementation of Title VII of the Dodd­Frank Act

August 1, 2011, 9:00 a.m.

Panel One:  Cross‐border Transactions

David Kelly, UBS

Dennis Klejna, MF Global

Nadine Le Gall, Man Investments

William Mansfield, Rabobank

John Nicholas, Newedge

Robert Reilly, Shell

Thomas Riggs III, Goldman Sachs

Marcus Stanley, Americans for Financial Reform

Wally Turbeville, Better Markets  

Suparna Vedbrat, Blackrock  

Luke Zubrod, Chatham Financial

Panel Two: Global Entities

Chris Allen, Barclays

Angie Karna, Nomura Securities

Sarah Lee, Bank of America  

John McCarthy, GETCO   

Stephen O’Connor, Morgan Stanley

Robert Reilly, Shell   

Marcelo Riffaud, Deutsche Bank  

Marcus Stanley, Americans for Financial Reform

Wally Turbeville, Better Markets

Panel Three:  Market Infrastructure

Pete Axilrod, DTCC  

James Cawley, Javelin Capital Markets

Matthias Graulich, Eurex

Iona Levine, LCH

Verett Mims, Boeing  

Stephen O’Connor, Morgan Stanley

Lee Olesky, Tradeweb

Jonathan Short, ICE

Marcus Stanley,  Americans for Financial Reform  

Kim Taylor, CME

Wally Turbeville, Better Markets
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Diversified Industries,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period
ending November 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

11/29/04                    /s/ Carter M. Fortune
Date                       ------------------------------------------
                           Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer
Michael E.D. GILYARD, petitioner, v. Jerry CHRISMAN, Warden.

No. 16-6191.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Thomas Dewayne ELLASON, petitioner, v. Brad LIVINGSTON, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.

No. 15-9188.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Wayne M. ANDERSON, petitioner, v. Ashton B. CARTER, Secretary of Defense, et al.

No. 15-1389.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1700 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1700

  Supporting raising awareness and educating the public about Alper's 
                                disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

    Mr. King of New York (for himself, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Lance, Mr. 
    Burgess, Mr. Castle, Mr. Marchant, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. 
   Reichert, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Markey of Massachusetts, Mr. Frank of 
   Massachusetts, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Towns, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Lewis of 
 Georgia, Mr. Bishop of New York, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Ackerman, 
  Mr. Jones, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, and Mr. Israel) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting raising awareness and educating the public about Alper's 
                                disease.

Whereas Alper's disease is a rare, genetically determined disease of the brain 
        that causes progressive degeneration of grey matter in the cerebrum;
Whereas the first symptom is usually convulsions with symptoms developing within 
        the first 3 months to 5 years of life;
Whereas Alper's disease is an autosomal recessive disorder and both parents have 
        to be carriers of the disease;
Whereas symptoms may include seizures, developmental delay, progressive mental 
        retardation, hypotonia (low muscle tone), spasticity (stiffness of the 
        limbs), dementia, blindness, and liver conditions such as jaundice and 
        cirrhosis;
Whereas researchers believe that Alper's disease is caused by an underlying 
        metabolic defect and a number of individuals with Alper's disease have 
        mutations in the ``polymerase-gama'' gene, which results in the 
        depletion of mitochondrial DNA; and
Whereas there is currently no cure for Alper's disease: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports raising awareness and educating the public 
        about Alper's disease;
            (2) applauds the efforts of advocates and organizations 
        that encourage awareness, promote research, and provide 
        education, support, and hope to those impacted by Alper's 
        disease;
            (3) recognizes the commitment of parents, families, 
        researchers, health professionals, and others dedicated to 
        finding an effective treatment and cure for Alper's disease; 
        and
            (4) supports increased funding for research into the 
        causes, treatment, and cure for Alper's disease.
                                 <all>
```
Robert Lawrence WILKENS, Jr., petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 16-6414.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1573 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1573

 To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit bills 
      and joint resolutions from containing more than one subject.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2010

   Mr. Polis of Colorado (for himself and Mr. Lamborn) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit bills 
      and joint resolutions from containing more than one subject.

    Resolved, That (a) rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause--
    ``11.(a) No bill, joint resolution, or amendment to any bill or 
joint resolution that contains more than a single subject may be 
received or considered in the House. A question of order on the number 
of subjects in any such bill, joint resolution, or amendment thereto, 
may be raised at any time.
    ``(b) The single subject of any bill or joint resolution shall be 
expressed in the title.
    ``(c) Paragraphs (a) and (b) do not apply to a bill, joint 
resolution, or amendment thereto that complies, consolidates, revises, 
or rearranges the statutory law.''.
    (b) The amendment made by this resolution shall take effect 
immediately before noon, January 3, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from the balance sheet as
of May 31, 1997, and statement of operations for the year ended May 31, 1997,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000934799
<NAME> IHF HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,560
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,953
<INVENTORY>                                    121,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               365,928
<PP&E>                                          79,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 468,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,561
<BONDS>                                        401,196
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (78,077)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   468,680
<SALES>                                        836,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               836,162
<CGS>                                          583,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  597,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               217,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,550)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,177)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,373)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,373)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2011 – Commission v Italy**

**(Case C-303/09)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – State aid – Aid to firms investing in the municipalities seriously affected by natural disasters in 2002 – Recovery

1.                     *State aid – Commission decision finding aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery – Obligations of
the Member States – Duty to recover – Implications (Arts 88(2) EC and 249 EC; Council Regulation No 659/1999, recital 13 and
Art. 14(3); Commission Decision 2005/315, Art. 5(3)) (see paras 29-31, 41)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Failure to comply with a Commission decision concerning State aid – Decision ordering
recovery of unlawful aid – Defences – Absolutely impossible to implement – Criteria for assessment – Difficulties in implementing
– Duty of the Commission and the Member State to work together in seeking a solution consistent with the Treaty (Arts 88(2)
EC and 249 EC) (see paras 33-38)*

3.                     *State aid – Commission decision finding aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery – Action before
the national court against national implementing measures – Preliminary plea challenging the legality of that decision – Grant
by that court of provisional suspension measures – Whether permissible – Conditions (Art. 88(2) EC; Commission Decision 2005/315)
(see paras 45-46)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Articles 2, 5 and 6 of Commission Decision 2005/315/EC of 20 October 2004 on the aid scheme implemented by Italy for firms investing in municipalities seriously affected by natural disasters in 2002 (notified under document No C(2004) 3893) (OJ 2005 L 100, p. 46). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to recover from the beneficiaries all the aid granted under the aid scheme declared incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2005/315/EC of 20 October 2004 on the aid scheme implemented by Italy for firms investing in municipalities seriously affected by natural disasters in 2002, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of that decision; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
II-Oll81

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Becky Daiss <beckydaiss@verizon.net>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 6:44 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Becky Daiss

1276 N Wayne St #1128

Arlington, VA 22201
Fernando NUNEZ, petitioner, v. Mark GARMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

No. 16-6199.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Scott Troy COOK, petitioner, v. Christian PFEIFFER, Warden.

No. 16-6028.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.