alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 1622 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 30, 2010. 

Whereas veterans of service in the United States Armed 

Forces have served the Nation with honor and great sacrifices; 

Whereas the people of the United States owe the security of 

the Nation to those who defended it; 

Whereas United States veterans past and present have served 

the Nation in times of peace and war at great personal 

sacrifice for both themselves and their families; 

Whereas historic contributions include involvement in the 

Revolutionary War, War of 1812, Eastern Indian Wars, 

Mexican War, Civil War, Western Indian Wars, SpanishAmerican War, World War I, World War II, Korean 

War, Vietnam Conflict, Lebanon crisis of 1958, Persian 

Gulf War, Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi 

Freedom, and other conflicts; 

Whereas veterans have served the United States in hundreds 

of deployments, large and small, responding to acts of aggression against the United States and its allies, protecting and evacuating civilians, bringing stability to 

areas experiencing political turmoil, and providing comfort and support in the wake of natural disasters; 
2 

•HRES 1622 EH 

Whereas the service and sacrifice of generations of men and 

women have shaped the history of the United States and 

transformed its society; 

Whereas as civilians, veterans continue to provide a valuable 

service by working and volunteering in their communities 

across the Nation; 

Whereas on Veterans Day each year, the Nation honors those 

who have defended democracy by serving in the Armed 

Forces; 

Whereas the observance of Veterans Day is an expression of 

faith in democracy, faith in American values, and faith 

that those who fight for freedom will defeat those whose 

cause is unjust; 

Whereas section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, provides that ‘‘Veterans day, November 11th’’ is a legal public holiday; 

Whereas we must honor and express the Nation’s gratitude 

to all veterans for their unwavering commitment to country, justice, and democracy; and 

Whereas as the Nation reaffirms its obligation to provide veterans and their families with the essential support they 

were promised and have earned: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes and honors the courage, service, and 

sacrifice of all veterans and their historic contributions 

to the United States; 

(2) encourages the people of the United States to 

demonstrate their support for Veterans Day each year 

by treating that day as a special day of reflection; 
3 

•HRES 1622 EH 

(3) encourages schools and teachers to educate students on the historic contributions veterans have made 

to the country and its history, both while serving as 

members of the United States Armed Forces and after 

completing their service; and 

(4) requests that the President issue a proclamation 

each year in connection with the observance of Veterans 

Day calling on the people of the United States to recognize the historic contribution of all veterans by observing 

that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 


1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 


Telephone: (202) 418-5000 


Facsimile: (202) 418-5521 


www.cftc.gov 

July 6, 2017 

Paul Chou 

Chief Executive Officer 

LedgerX LLC 

152 Madison A venue 

21 st Floor 

New York, NY 10016 

Re : Application of LedgerX LLC for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility 

Dear Mr. Chou: 

By submissions dated January 13, 2017 through June 28, 2017, LedgerX LLC 

("LedgerX") has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("Commission"), 

pursuant to Section 5h of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and Commission 

Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap execution facility ("SEF"). 

The Commission has reviewed LedgerX's application and has determined to grant 

LedgerX registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying 

Order of Registration. 

Sincerely, 

d1J#_ J- 0~ Christopher J. Kirkpatrick 

Secretary of the Commission
Exhibit 31.2
       a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 6, 2008/s/ PETER WHITFIELDPeter WhitfieldSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        91


        <NAME>      Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

year


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

oct-31-1997


<PERIOD-END>

oct-31-1997


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

753,041


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

492,781


<RECEIVABLES>

39,113


<ASSETS-OTHER>

14,687


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

546,581


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

42,279


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

5,134


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

47,413


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

895,065


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

48,218


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

76,044


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

0


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

(10,148)


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

(124,069)


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

(261,680)


<NET-ASSETS>

499,168


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

23,658


<INTEREST-INCOME>

1,792


<OTHER-INCOME>

(1,871)


<EXPENSES-NET>

14,198


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

9,381


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

26,296


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

(357,059)


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

(321,382)


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

17,985


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

20,889


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

49,788


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

1,073


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

(763,996)


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

0


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

(149,937)


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

1,970


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

7,911


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

22


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

14,267


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

1,049,177


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

16.610


<PER-SHARE-NII>

 .150


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

(6.170)


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .250


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

0


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

10.350


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

136


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-20596

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARINO RAMIREZ, also known as

Servio Marino Victoria, and

JOSE R. ARGUELLAS, also known

as Jose R. Arguelles, also

known as Brazil, also known as

Raul Lnu,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR-H-95-112-3

_________________________________________________________________

July 30, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marino Ramirez and Jose R. Arguellas appeal their convictions

for conspiracy to distribute in excess of five kilograms of

cocaine. The defendants challenge the district court’s admission

of the results of ion scan evidence under Daubert v. Merrell Dow

Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). The district court did

not commit plain error in admitting the evidence under the
-2-

reliability prong of the Daubert analysis, nor did it abuse its

discretion in admitting the evidence under the relevance prong.

Id. at 591-95. The district court did not err in finding that the

probative value of the evidence was not outweighed by any

prejudicial effect. Id. at 595. Finally, Ramirez challenges the

sufficiency of the evidence against him. The evidence was

sufficient to sustain Ramirez’ conviction when viewed in the light

most favorable to the jury’s verdict. See United States v.

Resio-Trejo, 45 F.3d 907, 910 (5th Cir. 1995). The judgment of

conviction of each of the defendants is therefore

A F F I R M E D.
Jonathan BOHANNON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-449.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Consent of Independent Accountants

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (File No's. 333-81055,  333-29363,  333-19383,  33-91364
and 33-90292) of Commonwealth  Industries,  Inc. and  subsidiaries of our report
dated January 23, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements,  which
appears in the Annual  Report to  Stockholders,  which is  incorporated  in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated January 23, 2001 relating to the financial  statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
March 23, 2001
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Community Financial Corporation (the "Company") that the quarterly report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

| Dated: February 13, 2006 | /s/ P. Douglas RichardP. Douglas RichardPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ R. Jerry GilesR. Jerry GilesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial statement information from the Form 10-Q of
Howell Corporation for the six months ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              19
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3523
<ALLOWANCES>                                       144
<INVENTORY>                                         51
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3902
<PP&E>                                          306559
<DEPRECIATION>                                  202816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  150272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16610
<BONDS>                                          17581
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        690
<COMMON>                                          5081
<OTHER-SE>                                       86136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    150272
<SALES>                                          16971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16971
<CGS>                                            11543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    11543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    28
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2495
<INCOME-TAX>                                       912
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1583
<DISCONTINUED>                                     458
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
Raghurami REDDY, as Guardian of the Person and Estate of Devavaram Christopher and as Representative of the Estate of Ruth Christopher, Deceased, petitioner, v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, LLC.

No. 16-356.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District denied.
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 10, 2007 (the “Report”), I, John Hillring, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ John Hillring |
|-------------------|

John Hillring

Chief Accounting Officer

August 10, 2007

 

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00646-CR

Joseph Urtado, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-09-904068, HONORABLE BRENDA KENNEDY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

 Joseph Urtado appeals from his conviction for aggravated assault. The clerk’s

record, which was due to be filed on December 21, 2009, has not been filed. Urtado’s retained

counsel has filed a motion seeking to withdraw as attorney of record. The motion further states that

Urtado is indigent and requires appointed counsel at this time. It appears that no request for a free

record has been filed and no finding of indigency has been made by the trial court. See Tex. R. App.

P. 20.2. 

To avoid further delays and protect the rights of the parties, the appeal is abated and

the trial court is instructed to determine, following a hearing if necessary, whether Urtado is

presently indigent. If the court finds that Urtado is indigent, it shall order the preparation of the

record at no cost to Urtado, and take all necessary steps to assure that Urtado is effectively
 At this time, we take no action on counsel’s motion to withdraw. 1

2

represented by counsel, including appointing new counsel for the appeal if necessary. Unless and

until new counsel is appointed, Jodi Callaway Cole remains counsel of record. Copies of all 1

findings, conclusions, and orders, as well as a transcription of the reporter’s notes if a hearing is held,

shall be tendered for filing in this Court no later than February 8, 2010.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson 

Filed: January 8, 2010

Do Not Publish
Michael Shannon TAYLOR, petitioner, v. Grantt CULLIVER, Superintendent, Holman Correctional Facility, et al.

No. 16-5697.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, petitioner, v. John Gary HARDWICK, Jr.

No. 15-1379.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ROBERT E. WILLEY, EARLE M. COMBS III, RICHARD A. FRYMIRE, AND HOWARD S. 

FISHER 

DOCKET NUMBER: 144 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 144 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Robert E. Willey, 

Earle M. Combs III, 

Richard A. Frymire, and 

Howard S. Fisher 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that during the period from May 21, 1965, through May 

19, 1966, Robert E. Willey, Earle M. Combs III, Richard A. Frymire, and Howard 

S. Fisher entered into transactions which were, or were of the character of, 

wash sales or fictitious sales. The complaint also charges that the respondents 

executed purchases and sales of commodities for future delivery in a manner 

which was not open and competitive. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

Constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, March 7, 1967, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 


Before the 


U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 


) 

DANIEL J. EMILY, 

Complainant, 

v. 

GUY K. GLEICHMAN and UNITED 

STRATEGIC INVESTORS GROUP LLC, 

Respondents. 

) 

) CFTC Docket No. 14-R007 

) 

) 

') ORDER 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~) 

Daniel J. Emily appeals from the May 23, 2017 Initial Decision ("ID") ofthe Judgment 

Officer ("JO"). The JO determined that Respondents churned Emily's futures and options 

account, in violation ofthe CEA and its regulations. (ID at 4-6.) This appeal is remanded to the 

JO for further proceedings. 

Specifically, the JO should explain how each ofthe elements of churning has been 

proven by the complainant. See, e.g., Ferriola v. Kearse-McNeil, 1999-2000 Transfer Binder, 

Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) if 28,172 at 50,154, 2000 WL 873653 at *9 (CFTC June 30, 2000) 

("To prove churning, complainant must show that: (1) respondent controlled the level and 

frequency of trading in the account, (2) respondent chose an overall volume oftrading that was 

excessive in light of the complainant's trading objectives, and (3) respondent acted with either 

intent to defraud or in reckless disregard ofthe customer's interests."). Ifthe JO finds that the 

existing record is inadequate to determine whether the facts support the churning charge, the JO 

should conduct whatever further proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 

Dated: October 31, 2017 

1 By the Commission pursuant to delegated authority. 17 C.F.R. § l 2.408(a) (2)(ii). 

2
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION** **PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,** **AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** **SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Salameh, Chief Executive
        Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
        purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
        that
        to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d), as
                  applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the Company
                  at the dates and for the periods indicated.
  This
        Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission.
  Date:
        August 6 ,
        2007
  By: /s/
        Michael J. Salameh
 Michael
        J.
        Salameh
 Chief
        Executive Officer
Richard W. KIMBALL, Individually and as Next Friend of A.S. and C.S., Minors, et al., petitioners, v. ORLANS ASSOCIATES P.C., et al.

No. 16-469.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.