alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN GAMING &
ENTERTAINMENT, LTD. FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         214,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               296,000
<PP&E>                                           8,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 17,770,000
<COMMON>                                       126,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,695,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               275,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (271,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (271,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (452,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
Nathaniel GARNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6050.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 I, Jack C. Rusch, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First
Federal Capital Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 7, 2004
    
    /s/ Jack C. Rusch
Jack C. Rusch
President and Chief Executive Officer
(duly authorized officer)
 26
1259.

#### Boyer *v.*The State.

Accusation of misdemeanor, from city court of Sparta — Judge Tittle. June 15, 1908.

Submitted July 14,

Decided July 31, 1908.

*T. L. Reese,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. W. Moore, solicitor,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

No error of law appears, and there is some evidence to support the verdict. *Judgment affirmed.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER01-2192-000 and EL01-85-000]

Take notice that on May 31, 2001, ISO New England Inc. (the ISO) submitted Market Rule IX (Standard Market Design) under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act and Section 6.17(e) of the Interim Independent System Operator Agreement, together with a request under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act that the New England Power Pool (NEPOOL) be directed to file conforming changes to the Restated NEPOOL Agreement and the NEPOOL Open Access Transmission Tariff.

Copes of said filing have been served upon NEPOOL Participants and upon all non-Participant entities that are customers under the NEPOOL Open Access Transmission Tariff, as well as upon the governors and utility regulatory agencies of the six New England States.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 21, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15225 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6135

WILLIE COLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District 

Judge. (2:14-cv-00120-AWA-DEM)

Submitted: June 29, 2015 Decided: July 9, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Coley, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren Catherine Campbell, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Coley seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. His notice of 

appeal was received in the district court shortly after expiration 

of the appeal period. Because Coley is incarcerated, the notice 

is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to 

prison officials for mailing to the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 

4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The record does 

not conclusively reveal when Coley delivered the notice of appeal 

to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and remand the case for the limited 

purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information 

from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely 

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as 

supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further 

consideration.

REMANDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         615,054
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,600,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,137,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,405,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                 501,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,073,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      3,990,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,889
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,760,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,073,564
<SALES>                                      6,183,509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,510,731
<CGS>                                        4,278,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,278,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,160,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             378,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 71,489
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,454
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,035
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,035
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the Company's financial statements for the twelve months ended December 31, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        74,091,837
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              81,334,519
<CASH>                                       2,955,161
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           1,373,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,930,625
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             58,654,324
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          6,059,398
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          252,429
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       516,614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  7,436,095  
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,402,099  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,930,625  
<PREMIUMS>                                  12,091,778  
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          5,278,764  
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             107,234  
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     586  
<BENEFITS>                                  13,300,937
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    154,784
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         2,207,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,365,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                   782,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            582,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   582,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              63,205,000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         13,505,569
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            (204,632)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             265,569
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            17,008,044
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             58,654,324
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      (204,632)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM RIVIANA FOODS INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                           4,562
<SECURITIES>                                     4,405
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                       529
<INVENTORY>                                     48,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,687
<PP&E>                                         107,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,825
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,883
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,889
<SALES>                                        460,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               460,183
<CGS>                                          334,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (132)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,002)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,559
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,025
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,025
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
        

</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Jasper v. Schweppe

February 25, 1992

Case No. (Law) 109522

By Judge J. Howe Brown

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. The Motion for Judgment alleges an injury which occurred on or about November 10, 1988, and was originally filed on October 18, 1990, within the two year statute of limitations. A voluntary nonsuit was taken by order entered on April 8, 1991. On October 9, 1991, the Motion for Judgment was refiled.

When an action is voluntarily nonsuited, the plaintiff may recommence his action within six months from the date of the order entered by the Court. Code § 8.01-229(E)(3). A month is to be computed not by counting days, but by looking at the calendar; and it runs from a given day in one month to a corresponding number in the next month. *Cousins*v. *Commonwealth,*187 Va. 506, 508 (1948). Further, when a statute requires any act to be done within a certain time after any event, that time shall be allowed in addition to the day on which the event took place. Code § 1-13.3. In other words, the day on which the event occurred shall be excluded from the computation. *See Hurley*v. *Bennett,*163 Va. 241, 244 (1934) (where the final decree from which appeal was obtained was entered on April 24, 1933, the six months period did not begin to run until April 25, 1933).

In calculating the appropriate time table, the *Cousins*Court made the following observations:

> *150From July 22, 1947, the day of the judgment, four calendar months would extend to November 22, 1947. Since the day of judgment must be excluded in the computation of time, the four-month period began to run with the advent of July 23rd, and expired with the departure of November 22nd, that is, at midnight of November 22nd. The following day, November 23rd, was a day within another period of time.

*Cousins,*187 Va. at 508. *See also In re Ford,*53 B.R. 444 (W.D. Va. 1985) (the first day, July 13,1982, is excluded; counting forward one year, the clock stops on July 13, 1983, the last day included in the year); *aff’d*773 F.2d 52 (4th Cir. 1985); *McMillon v. Budget Plan of Virginia,*510 F. Supp. 17, 18 (E.D. Va. 1980) (the initial date, 10 May 1979, would not be included in calculating the running of one year; the one-year period would therefore commence on 11 May 1979 and end on 10 May 1980). Applying this analysis, in the present case, the six months time period started to run from April 9, 1991, and expired on October 8, 1991. The refiling on October 9, 1991, was therefore not done within six months from the date the nonsuit order was entered.

Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss is granted.
No. 645, Misc.

#### Edmondson *v.*Wright, Warden.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Salameh, Chief Executive Officer of PLX Technology, Inc.,certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form
10-Q of PLX Technology, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 3, 2004



/s/ Michael J. Salameh	   Michael J. Salameh
   Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

---