alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ATTACHMENT A-Products Offered for Clearing by Eurex Clearing AG 

Interest Rate Swaps: 

Products: 

Single currency interest rate swaps ("IRS") 

Forward rate agreements ("FRA") 

Overnight index swap ("OIS") 

Single currency basis swaps 

Zero Coupon swaps 

Compounding - flat and straight (for IRS and basis swaps) 

Linear interpolation of stub periods 

Front and back stubs (for IRS and OIS) 

Negative par-swap rates 

Variable notional -Amortizing and roller coaster (for IRS and basis swaps) 

Variable index spread on floating rates that can differ period per period (IRS and basis swaps) 

Fixed coupon rates that can differ period per period (IRS and basis swaps) 

IMM - International Monetary Markets- roll dates 

Currencies: 

Euro, U.S. dollar, British pounds and Swiss franc 

Terms: 

Swaps entered into under ISDA® 2000/2006 and German Master agreements--standard swaps 

and forward rate agreement with standard day count and business day conventions, fee legs, 

constant nationals, front or back stubs and floating rate indexes for each currency. 

Characteristics: 

IRS EUR. G8P, USD Up to SO Y.:•"' 

CHF Up to JO yt·.w, 

OIS EUR. GBP. USD. CHF Up 10 3 yea" 

FRA EUR. GBP USD. CHF Up to 2 yea" 

f't.t•n var•IIJ (h< d/flwll 

B~" /tenor (fl 1UOoJt\ 

Pl.un v~mll.1 (fix~d/lloJ ) 

• ISDA. Gt"tn w fr,Jil"'l"V/tlr ti!J, rt' rncnh 

Const.1nt rJOl>o<>als 

Ft nt. end \lull<. forw rd >IMl<. 

EUR (Eunbor) and GBP (L•bor). l m. Jm 6m. 12m 

• USO and CHF ( bor) 1m. Jm. 6m 

Zero coupon 

V,lndble nollon.tl - dmOrttzJng & rolk r coos IN 

• Ne"H<lllve Ullf'rt.,\t fdtf"\ 

• IMM roll d.l(P< 

V,ul,lbiP sp e,ld~ flxrd (OUJ)()f1' 

• (011lpnull<iii1Y, 

. I 

4 
Credit Default Swaps: 

Indexes RED Codes 

Markit iTraxx Europe 21666VAS4 14 

Markit iTraxx Europe HiVol 21667LAP1 14 

Markit iTraxx Europe Crossover 21667KAX6 14 

Series* 

13 

12 

11 

13 

12 

11 

13 

12 

11 

Term 

3Y, 5Y, 7Y, 10Y 

3Y, 5Y, 7Y, 10Y 

3Y, 5Y, 7Y, 10Y 

5
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15760]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel NCCAM H-12 SEP.
    Date: June 21, 2001.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Four Points by Sheraton Bethesda, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Cecelia Maryland, Grants Technical Assistant, 
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National 
Institutes of Health, Building 31, Room 5B50, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 480-2419.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Dated: June 18, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-15760 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Shaun Eric McKINLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6200.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re Megan Marie Lange

, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11

- 2 3

- 00 210

- C R * September 29 , 20 2 3

* Memorand um Opinion by Trotter, J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Megan Marie Lange ’s motion to dismiss her petition

for writ of mandamus and writ of prohibition and concludes that the motion should be

granted . Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the motion to dismiss is

granted and the proceeding is dismissed

. W e also withdraw our order dated September

18, 2023, staying the proceedings in the trial court.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1260 

Expressing support for designation of April 2010 as Student Financial Aid 

Awareness Month to raise awareness of student financial aid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2010 

Mr. BISHOP of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of April 2010 as Student 

Financial Aid Awareness Month to raise awareness of 

student financial aid. 

Whereas education is the key to a successful future for many 

people in the United States; 

Whereas the ability of some students to attend an institution 

of higher education is conditional on the availability of 

student financial assistance; 

Whereas the cost of higher education continues to rise for 4- 

year private colleges and universities, 4-year public colleges and universities, 2-year community colleges, and for 

profit institutions; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1260 IH 

Whereas students and families across the United States are 

making important decisions about financing their education at an institute of higher education; 

Whereas efforts to increase awareness about student financial 

aid options are necessary for students across the United 

States to receive all of the financial aid available to them; 

Whereas increasing awareness about the Free Application for 

Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) ensures that more eligible 

students may benefit from Federal financial assistance; 

Whereas students must complete and submit a new FAFSA 

each school year to be considered for all forms of Federal 

financial aid; 

Whereas each year, about 14,000,000 students apply for financial aid by filling out the FAFSA; 

Whereas increasing access to Federal financial aid helps reduce students’ reliance on costly private loans; and 

Whereas the designation of April 2010 as Student Financial 

Aid Awareness Month will help call attention to the critical role financial assistance plays in helping students attending an institution of higher education: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of Student Finan3 cial Aid Awareness Month; and 

4 (2) encourages students and families across the 

5 United States to participate in Student Financial 

6 Aid Awareness Month. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: POINT CONVERSIONS, LLC, a Delaware 

Limited Liability Company,

Petitioner

______________________

2020-152

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States 

District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 

0:18-cv-60912-BB, Judge Beth Bloom.

______________________

ON PETITION AND MOTION

______________________

Before MOORE, O’MALLEY, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. 

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

Tropical Paradise Resorts LLC d/b/a Rodeway Inn & 

Suites (“Rodeway”) filed the underlying suit against Point 

Conversions, LLC (“PC”) in the Southern District of Florida. After the district court dismissed all claims, PC appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the

Eleventh Circuit. On May 26, 2020, the Eleventh Circuit 

affirmed. PC subsequently asked the Eleventh Circuit to 

transfer the case to this court, which the Eleventh Circuit 

denied on July 16, 2020. After the Eleventh Circuit denied 

Case: 20-152 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 11/25/2020
2 IN RE: POINT CONVERSIONS, LLC

rehearing, PC filed this petition seeking mandamus to direct the district court to vacate its order or, alternatively, 

to direct the Eleventh Circuit to transfer. 

We must dismiss this request. PC was content with the 

Eleventh Circuit adjudicating its appeal until it received 

an unfavorable ruling. To the extent PC believes that the 

Eleventh Circuit erred in exercising jurisdiction or erred in 

affirming the district court’s judgment, the proper course 

is to seek review by the Supreme Court of the United 

States, which has jurisdiction to review decisions of the 

Eleventh Circuit. It cannot seek mandamus from this 

court, which does not have such authority. See In re Roberts, 846 F.2d 1360, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1988) (noting that this 

court as “a co-equal member of a system of thirteen appellate courts. . . is not . . . possessed of jurisdiction to review 

and reverse the judgements of the other twelve”); see also 

Baker Perkins, Inc. v. Werner & Pfleiderer Corp., 710 F.2d 

1561, 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (citation omitted) (noting that 

a petitioner must “show that the action sought to be corrected by mandamus is within this court’s statutorily defined subject matter jurisdiction”). 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) PC’s motion to file an untimely reply is granted. 

ECF No. 21 is accepted for filing.

(2) The petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. 

(3) PC’s motion to schedule argument is denied. 

November 25, 2020

Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

s29

Case: 20-152 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 11/25/2020
H. Res. 201 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 4, 2009. 

Whereas on the morning of September 11, 2001, terrorists 

hijacked and destroyed four civilian aircraft, crashing two 

of them into the towers of the World Trade Center in 

New York City and a third into the Pentagon outside 

Washington, DC; 

Whereas the passengers and crew aboard United Flight 93 

acted heroically to prevent the terrorist hijackers from 

taking additional American lives, by crashing the plane in 

Shanksville, Pennsylvania and sacrificing their own lives 

instead; 

Whereas thousands of innocent men, women, and children 

were brutally murdered in the attacks of September 11, 

2001; 

Whereas pursuant to Public Law 107–306, the 9/11 Commission was formed to ascertain, evaluate, and report on the 

evidence regarding the terrorist attacks; 

Whereas the 9/11 Commission was also required in Public 

Law 107–306 to make a full and complete accounting of 

the circumstances surrounding the terrorist attacks, report on the United States’ preparedness for, and immediate response to, terrorist attacks, and make findings, 

conclusions, and recommendations for corrective meas-
2 

•HRES 201 EH 

ures that could be taken to prevent, prepare, and respond 

to acts of terrorism; 

Whereas the 9/11 Commission stated in its report that it 

‘‘interviewed more than 1,200 individuals’’ to assist in 

making its recommendations; 

Whereas one of the groups representing the victims, ‘‘Voices 

of September 11’’, testified before the 9/11 Commission; 

Whereas Beverly Eckert was the widow of Mr. Sean Rooney, 

who died in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on 

the World Trade Center and following her husband’s 

death, Beverly Eckert co-founded ‘‘Voices of September 

11’’, an advocacy group for survivors and 9/11 families; 

Whereas Beverly Eckert was instrumental in the development 

and growth of this important advocacy group, which now 

claims more than 5,500 members; 

Whereas Beverly Eckert worked admirably with the 110th 

Congress and was a key proponent in the final passage 

of the ‘‘Implementing the 9/11 Commission Recommendations Act of 2007’’ as the legislation to effectuate the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission to 

prevent, prepare, and respond to acts of terrorism; and 

Whereas the United States will forever be grateful for the 

services of Beverly Eckert and mourn her loss: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) acknowledges Beverly Eckert’s service to the 

Nation and particularly to the survivors and families of 

the September 11, 2001, attacks; 
3 

•HRES 201 EH 

(2) recognizes Beverly Eckert’s work to help bring 

about implementation of the 9/11 Commission recommendations to prepare, prevent, and respond to acts 

of terrorism; and 

(3) extends its deepest condolences to the family of 

Beverly Eckert and the families of all those who lost 

their lives due to the crash of Continental Connection 

Flight 3407. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 ADOPTED
        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report
        of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form
        10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F. Fisbeck,
        Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section
        18,
        U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002:
 
 1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  Date:
                    April 16, 2007
                By:
                    /s/ John F. FisbeckJohn
                    F. Fisbeck,Chief
                    Executive Officer
Jason T. MYERS, petitioner, v. Paul D. MATHIAS, Judge, Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District, et al.

No. 16-6789.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Calvin LATIMER, et ux., petitioners, v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 16-5134.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 10.20

                                                    LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT


         This  agreement  amends the  Promissory  Note dated  September 30, 1996
("Note")  executed by  SEMITOOL,  INC  ("Borrower")  in favor of Bank of America
National Trust & Savings Association, doing business as Seafirst Bank, successor
by  name  change  to  Bank  of  America  NW,  NA  doing   business  as  Seafirst
Bank("Bank"), regarding a loan in the maximum principal amount of $15,000,000.00
(the  "Loan").  For mutual  consideration,  Borrower and Bank agree to amend the
above loan documents as follows:

         1.       Interest Rate.  The Adjusted LIBOR Rate margin as shown in 
Exhibit A, Article 1 to the note is changed to 1.75%.

         2. Other Terms. Except as specifically amended by this agreement or any
prior amendment,  all other terms,  conditions,  and definitions of the Note and
all other security agreements,  guaranties, deeds of trust, mortgages, and other
instruments  or agreements  entered into with regard to the Loan shall remain in
full force and effect.

         DATED October 2, 1997.


Bank:                                           Borrower:

SEAFIRST BANK                                   SEMITOOL, INC

By     /s/Joe Poole                             By: /s/ Raymon F. Thompson
-------------------                             -------------------------------
Title    VP                                       Raymon F. Thompson, President
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2021

No. 04-20-00403-CV

IN RE EUGENIO VILLARREAL

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On August 12, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary 

stay. After considering the petition, response, reply, and sur-reply, this court concludes relator did 

not show he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is 

denied and the stay granted by this court on August 13, 2020 is lifted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on February 3, 2021.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of February, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016-CVT-000921-D3, styled Tina Botello v. Eugenio Villarreal, in the 

341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca Palomo presiding.
David E. PAYNE, petitioner, v. AMERICAN CORRECTIONS ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 16-6788.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Darius J. WHITSON, I, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT; Gusdorf Law Firm, LLC; Randall E. Gusdorf, Attorney at Law, Appellees.

No. 12-1123.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 7, 2012.

Filed: June 7, 2012.

Darius J. Whitson, I, St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Darius J. Whitson brought this pro se action seeking to assert claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983, and state law. He now appeals from the district court’s128 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) pre-service dismissal of his complaint, without prejudice. *526Upon carefully reviewing the record and concluding that the dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court, this court affirms. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Curtis T. HOLDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5259.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Adrian CHAVEZ-NAVA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6640.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
H. Res. 1756 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 8, 2010. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

5281) to amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify and 

improve certain provisions relating to the removal of litigation 

against Federal officers or agencies to Federal courts, and 

for other purposes, with the Senate amendments thereto, and 

to consider in the House, without intervention of any point 

of order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a 

single motion offered by the chair of the Committee on the 

Judiciary or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendments numbered 1 and 2, and that the House concur in the Senate amendment numbered 3 with the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
2 

•HRES 1756 EH 

the motion to final adoption without intervening motion or 

demand for division of the question. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
II-00438

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Michael Bush <surfdog4u@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:07 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Michael Bush

1869 Wandering Road

Encinitas, CA 92024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               1,179
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                           206
<INVENTORY>                                          8,820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    21,944
<PP&E>                                               3,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      24,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,048
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                58
<OTHER-SE>                                          16,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        24,460
<SALES>                                             22,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    22,507
<CGS>                                               15,719
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       24,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        85
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (583)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,229)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.22)



</TABLE>
Robert Bruce LLOYD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7098.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.