alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 1529 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 16, 2010. 

Whereas Bob Sheppard served as the public-address announcer for the New York Yankees from opening day in 

1951 through 2007; 

Whereas Bob Sheppard served as the public-address announcer for the New York Giants from 1956 through 

2005; 

Whereas Bob Sheppard announced at 62 World Series 

games, 2 All-Star Games, and introduced more than 72 

Hall of Famers throughout his career, with his oftenheard, booming voice eventually earning him the nickname ‘‘The Voice of God’’; 

Whereas Bob Sheppard utilized his great oratory skills not 

only in the sports arena, but as the chairman of the 

speech department at John Adams High School in 

Queens, New York, and as an adjunct professor of speech 

at St. John’s University; 

Whereas Bob Sheppard was honored for his 50 memorable 

years of service as the announcer at Yankee Stadium 

with ‘‘Bob Sheppard Day’’, celebrated on May 7, 2000, 

and with a permanent plaque in Monument Park behind 

Yankee Stadium in the Bronx; 
2 

•HRES 1529 EH 

Whereas Bob Sheppard’s clear, distinctive voice has set the 

standard of sports announcing, and has become ingrained 

in the fans and players as a widely recognized and revered Yankees tradition; 

Whereas Bob Sheppard’s voice will continue to live on as the 

recorded introduction of Yankees’ shortstop Derek Jeter; 

Whereas Bob Sheppard lived for 70 years in Baldwin, New 

York, and spent 4 years playing in semi-professional football leagues on Long Island, including the Valley Stream 

Red Raiders and the Hempstead Monitors; and 

Whereas Bob Sheppard died on July 11, 2010, at his home 

in Baldwin, New York, at age 99: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the legacy of Bob Sheppard and his 

distinctive announcements as a revered tradition not 

only to the New York Yankees and the New York Giants, but also to the games of baseball and football and 

the field of sports announcing; and 

(2) commends Bob Sheppard for his 52 years of 

service as a public-address announcer and his long tenure as a speech professor. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.11


 




 



UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE












April 6, 2016




U.S. $100,000.00 












FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Eos Petro, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Issuer"), hereby promises to pay to the order of Agra Capital Advisors, LLC, a California limited liability company (the "Payee"), at such place as the Payee shall direct in writing, the principal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), with interest at 5.00% on the unpaid balance.  All references to Dollars herein are to lawful currency of the United States of America.







All unpaid principal of this Note and accrued interest shall be due and payable on July 1, 2016 (the "Maturity Date"). This Note may be prepaid at any time in whole or in part without penalty.







In any action at law or in equity to enforce or construe any provisions or rights under this Note, the unsuccessful party or parties to such litigation, as determined by a court pursuant to a final offer, judgment or decree, shall pay to the successful party or parties all costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by such successful party.







This Note and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions of the State of California, or of any other state.

















Eos Petro, Inc.


A Nevada corporation












By: /s/ Nikolas Konstant


    Nikolas Konstant


    Its: Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: GEORGE SIROTA AND SONS, GEORGE SIROTA, NORMAN L. SIROTA, BENJAMIN SIROTA, 

HARRY A. ASPINWALL, AND DYKE CULLUM 

CITATION: 13 Agric. Dec. 1 

DOCKET NUMBER: 54 

DATE: JANUARY 13, 1954 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER 

AGRICULTURE DECISIONS

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

(No. 3754) 

In re GEORGE SIROTA AND SONS, GEORGE SIROTA, NORMAN L. SIROTA, BENJAMIN SIROTA, 

HARRY A. ASPINWALL, AND DYKE CULLUM. CEA Docket No. 54. Decided January 13, 

1954. 

Remand of Proceeding to Office of Hearing Examiner

Since the facts alleged in complainant's motion and the reply thereto had not 

been introduced in evidence in the proceeding and it seems appropriate in the 

public interest that evidence should be received as to whether the sanction 

ordered against George Sirota and Sons should apply to Sirota and Company, 

accordingly, the proceeding is referred back to the Office of the Hearing 

Examiner for the purpose of obtaining evidence on this issue by hearing or 

stipulation or both. 

Mr. Benj. M. Holstein for Commodity Exchange Authority. Mr. Donald Marks of 

Baer, Marks, Friedman, Berliner & Klein, of New York, New York, for respondents. 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer

ORDER

On July 31, 1953, an order was entered in this proceeding providing for 

sanctions applicable to all respondents including suspension of the registration 

under the act of George Sirota and Sons as a futures commission merchant. On 

August 18, 1953, the complainant filed a motion to have the order clearly state 

that the suspension applies to the registration of Sirota and Company. The 

motion recites that Sirota and Company, a partnership, was formed after the 

referee's report was issued in this proceeding recommending sanctions against 

the respondents and that it consists of the four partners who comprised George 

Sirota and Sons plus an additional partner. 

Pending action upon the complainant's motion, the order of July 31, 1953, was 

stayed as to the suspension of the registration of George Sirota and Sons. The 

Sirota respondents filed a reply to the complainant's motion. 

The facts alleged in the complainant's motion and in the reply thereto have 

not been introduced in evidence in the proceeding and it seems appropriate in 

the public interest that evidence should 

be received as to whether the sanction ordered against George Sirota and Sons 

should apply to Sirota and Company. Accordingly, the proceeding is referred 
Page 2 

back to the Office of Hearing Examiners for the purpose of obtaining evidence on 

this issue by hearing or stipulation or both. 

LOAD-DATE: June 8, 2008 
Page 3
Exhibit 31.2

I, R. Jerry Giles, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Financial Corporation (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report;

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2005

/s/ R. Jerry Giles                      R. Jerry GilesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IV 

House Calendar No. 16 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 219 

[Report No. 111–25] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) making 

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2009, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2009 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

38) making further continuing appropriations for the 

fiscal year 2009, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the joint reso3 lution (H.J. Res. 38) making further continuing appro4 priations for the fiscal year 2009, and for other purposes. 

5 All points of order against consideration of the joint reso6 lution are waived except those arising under clause 10 of 

7 rule XXI. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 219 RH 

1 All points of order against provisions in the joint resolu2 tion are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

3 as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without 

4 intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 

5 divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

6 member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one 

7 motion to recommit. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 16 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 219 

[Report No. 111–25] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

purposes. priations for the fiscal year 2009, and for other (H.J. Res. 38) making further continuing approMARCH 6, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
```

[Federal Register: October 20, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 54433]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20oc97-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, November 14, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-27805 Filed 10-16-97; 1:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Protection of Collateral of Counterparties to Uncleared Swaps 

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking? 

Section 724(c) of the Dodd-Frank Act amends the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) by inserting a new section 

4s(1), which requires that swap dealers and major swap participants notify their counterparties that such 

counterparties have a right to require that any initial margin which they post to guarantee uncleared swaps be 

segregated at an independent custodian. The goal of the proposed rulemaking is to implement that portion of the 

statute by proposing rules concerning such notifications and such segregated accounts. 

What registrants are covered by the proposed regulations? 

The proposed regulations will apply to swap dealers and major swap participants. 

By when must comments on the rules be submitted? 

Comments on the rules must be submitted within sixty (60) days of the publication of the proposal in the Federal 

Register. 

Do the proposed rules require that margin be segregated? 

No. The counterparty has the right to elect to require segregation of initial margin, but also may elect not to require 

such segregation. The proposed regulations do require that the counterparty’s chief risk officer, chief executive 

officer, or a similar high-level decisionmaker be advised of this right. 

Do the proposed rules require address how much margin is required, or what assets a 

counterparty may post as margin? 

No. These rules only address the counterparty’s right to require segregation, and the requirements for segregated 

accounts. 

What other matters do the proposed rules address? 

1) As required by Section 713(c) of the Dodd-Frank Act, the proposed rules clarify that securities held in a 

portfolio margining account carried as a futures account are customer property and that the owners of those 

accounts are customers for the purposes of the commodity broker provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. 

2) The rulemaking changes certain time periods in its regulations concerning commodity broker bankruptcies 

to seven calendar days to conform to Public Law 111-16, the Statutory Time-Periods Technical 

Amendments Act of 2009. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                               13,160,402
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     14,497,682
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       14,497,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   358,712
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                           14,138,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         14,497,682
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,192,358
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,408,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (215,858)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (215,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (215,858)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (21.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (21.22)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,640
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    135
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,969
<PP&E>                                         300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          298
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2
<COMMON>                                       2
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,151
<SALES>                                        329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               329
<CGS>                                          169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (54)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (620)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (620)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.26)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.26)   
                                                       
                                               

</TABLE>
II-00497

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

StanDorothy Thomas <sthomas95663 @roadrunner.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:34 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

StanDorothy Thomas

1103 East 7th St.

Moscow, ID 83843
Stanley W. COTTRELL, Jr., petitioner, v. Peggy SMITH, et al.

No. 16-570.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

*649Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3212

JOHN MILKOVITS,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent,

and

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Intervenor.

Donald P. Russo , Law Offices of Donald P. Russo, of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania,

argued for petitioner.

Joyce G. Friedman , Attorney, Office of the Gener al Counsel, United States Merit

Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the

brief were B. Chad Bungard , General Counsel, and Calvin M. Morrow , Acting Assistant

General Counsel.

Tara J. Kilfoyle , Trial Attorney, Civil Division, United States Department of

Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for interv enor. With her on the brief were Gregory

G. Katsas , Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director and Todd M.

Hughes , Deputy Director.

Appealed from: Meri t Systems Protection BoardNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3212

JOHN MILKOVITS,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent,

and

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Intervenor.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

in CASE NO(S). PH0752070462-I-1

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, CLEVEN GER, and LINN, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED December 8, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1906/2004

of 29 October 2004         

fixing the refunds applicable to cereal and rice sector products supplied as Community and national food aid

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1) and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice (2) and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For Community and national food aid operations under international agreements or other supplementary programmes, and other Community free supply measures, the refunds applicable to cereals and rice sector products shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 411/2002 (OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 27).

(3)OJ L 288, 25.10.1974, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 29 October 2004 fixing the refunds applicable to cereal and rice sector products supplied as Comunity and national food aid

----