alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 31(c)                                                                                                                  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ESI TRACTEBEL ACQUISITION CORP.(the registrant)Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification                                          
|I, Michael L. Leighton, President (equivalent to the Chief Executive Officer) of ESI Tractebel Acquisition Corp., certify that:
|1.                                                                                                                             
|2.                                                                                                                             
|3.                                                                                                                             
|4.                                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                                               
|5.                                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                                               
|Date:  March 23, 2004                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                                               
|
Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

www.cftc.gov

Final Rule on Amendments to Compliance Obligations of Commodity Pool 

Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) is adopting as final a rule that amends 

compliance obligations of CPOs and CTAs. This rule includes a requirement for CPOs and CTAs that are 

registered solely with the CFTC to file reports similar to those imposed by the Commission and the Securities and 

Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on previously adopted Form PF, as well as several other registration and 

compliance modifications.

§ 4.27 Reporting Requirements

The rule will require CPOs and CTAs to file reports regarding their direction of commodity pool assets. Reports must 

include a description of certain information, such as the amount of assets under management, use of leverage, 

counterparty credit risk exposure, and trading and investment positions for each pool.

Compliance Dates

The new CPO and CTA reporting requirements under § 4.27 will become effective on July 2, 2012. The compliance 

dates for this reporting is as follows:

 60 days after the end of CPOs first calendar quarter ending after July 2, 2012 for CPOs having at least $5 billion 

in assets under management;

 60 days after the end of CPOs first calendar quarter ending after December 14, 2012 for all other Large CPOs 

with assets of $1.5 billion; and

 90 days after calendar year end 2012 for all other CPOs and CTAs

Other Changes to CPO and CTA Compliance Obligations

The Commission believes that it is necessary to rescind or modify several of its exemptions and exclusions to more 

effectively oversee its market participants and manage the risks that such participants pose to the markets. Specifically, 

the Commission will:

 Reinstate trading criteria for registered investments companies claiming exclusion from the CPO definition 

under § 4.5 and add an alternative trading threshold based on net notional value of commodity interest positions;

 Rescind the exemption from CPO registration under § 4.13(a)(4);

 Revise § 4.7 so that CPOs may no longer claim exemption from the requirement that an exempt pool’s annual 

report contain certified financial statements;

 Modify the participant qualification criteria of § 4.7 to incorporate the SEC’s accredited investor standard by 

reference rather than by direct inclusion of its terms;

 Require all persons claiming exemptive or exclusionary relief under § 4.5, 4.13, and 4.14 to confirm their notice 

of claim of exemption or exclusion on an annual basis; and 

 Amend the risk disclosure statement that must be included in CPO and CTA disclosure documents to describe 

certain risks specific to swaps transactions.
Donnika IVY, et al., petitioners, v. Mike MORATH, Texas Commissioner of Education.

No. 15-486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit with instructions to dismiss as moot. See *United States v.*

*415*Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
David HILL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6619.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
II-00306

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

janet perlman <jperlman@berkeley. edu>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:00 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

janet perlman

2243 stuart st

Berkeley, CA 94705
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2081/2004

of 6 December 2004         

laying down rules for the communication of the information necessary for implementing Council Regulation (EEC) No 2358/71 on the common organisation of the market in seeds

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2358/71 of 26 October 1971 on the common organisation of the market in seeds (1), and in particular Articles 4(2) and 9 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Member States shall communicate to the Commission by electronic transmission, for each species and group of varieties set out in the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 2358/71, the information listed in the Annex to this Regulation by the dates specified therein.

Article 2

Regulation (EEC) No 3083/73 and Regulation (EEC) No 1117/79 are repealed.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 246, 5.11.1971, p. 1. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 (OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 48).

(3)OJ L 314, 15.11.1973, p. 20. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1679/92 (OJ L 176, 30.6.1992, p. 17).

(4)OJ L 139, 7.6.1979, p. 11. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2811/86 (OJ L 260, 12.9.1986, p. 8).

----

ANNEX

----

(1)  In the case of species of seed harvested on the second moving, the relevant date is 1 September of the year of harvest.

(2)  These data apply only to basic and certified seed.

(3)  Figures for quantities to relate to seed satisfying ‘certification requirement’; for items 4 and 6 the requirements applied may be those relating to acceptance for certification.

(4)  For species which may be marketed within the Community, as ‘commercial’ seed, data shall be given separately in respect of:

(5)  Costs of preparation for marketing, certification and transport charges, VAT and sums received in respect of aid are not included in this price.

(6)  Marketing year as specified in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 2358/71 (OJ L 246, 5.11.1971, p. 1).

(7)  In Member States outside the euro zone, the conversion rate to apply is that applying on 1 August of the marketing year.

----
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69616, 333-49027, 333-69618, 333-89496, 333-114965, and 333-114969) of Speedway Motorsports of our report dated March 13, 2009 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP       
|Charlotte, North Carolina        
|                                 
|March 13, 2009
Evelyn Sokol KEMPTON, petitioner, v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.

No. 15-9585.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1277/2004 of 12 July 2004 amending for the 37th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

(Official Journal of the European Union L 241 of 13 July 2004)

On page 13, in point (2), under (a):

for:

‘Abulaziz’,

read:

‘Abdulaziz’.

----
Rowland J. MARTIN, petitioner, v. Edward BRAVENEC, et al.

No. 16-421.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Dennis MADDREY, petitioner, v. Michael CLARK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion, et al.

No. 16-6527.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
William SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6487.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CyberSource
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Pellizzer, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 26, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Steven D. Pellizzer
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                         |  | Steven D. Pellizzer Chief
Financial Officer

This certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
<PAGE>   1
THE SANTA CRUZ OPERATION, INC.                                        EXHIBIT 11

COMPUTATION OF NET PROFIT (LOSS) PER SHARE
(In thousands, except earnings (loss) per share)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                                                                         December 31,
                                                                                                    1996               1995
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                                               <C>                <C>   
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                                               36,909              32,968

Common equivalent shares from outstanding stock options (1)                                           774                  --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Average common and common equivalent shares outstanding                                            37,683              32,968
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net profit (loss)                                                                                 $ 3,966            $(32,703)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Earnings (loss) per share (2)                                                                     $  0.11            $  (0.99)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

(1)   Common equivalent shares from outstanding stock options are not
      included in three months ended 1995 calculations as they are
      antidilutive.

(2)   Fully diluted earnings per share have not been presented because the
      effects are not material.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), I, Kenneth Lap-Yin Chan, certify that:

| 1. | The Annual Report of ACL Semiconductors Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                       |   |   |                                                                  |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: January      6, 2010 |   |   | /s/ Kenneth Lap-Yin Chan                                              |
|                       |   |   | Kenneth Lap-Yin ChanChief Financial Officer ofACL Semiconductors Inc. |

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACL Semiconductors Inc. and will be retained by ACL Semiconductors Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Marlon Jessie BLACHER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-6062.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Romell BROOM, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 16-5580.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.

Justice BREYER and Justice KAGAN would grant the petition for writ of certiorari.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,273,426
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,654,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,470,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,654,991
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,327
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (496,749)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   173,213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II-01097

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Paul Bulger <paul.bulger@azry.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:15 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Paul Bulger

1094 Suffolk Dr

Santa Rosa, CA 95401
COMMON SENSE ALLIANCE, petitioner, v. SAN JUAN COUNTY, WASHINGTON.

No. 15-1366.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.