alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, FILED AS
PART OF FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  239,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                   123,720
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,198
<PP&E>                                         935,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                 510,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 680,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,480,069
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,697,040
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,592,488)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   680,869
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,219
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,017,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,026,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,026,384)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,026,384)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.037)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.037)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-130214) and the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-62825, 33-62827, 33-62829, 33-62831, 33-62833, 33-62835, 33-62837, 33-62839, 33-62841, 33-62943, 33-63249, 333-03275, 333-03277, 333-118732, 333-19241, 333-77615, 333-59854, 333-108384, 333-133434, 333-135893,333-135894 and 333-135897) of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation of our report dated February 13, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Fort Worth, Texas 

February 16, 2007
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00606-CR

DARYL LAPAUL JONES APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Daryl LaPaul Jones attempts to appeal his conviction for 

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court’s certification of 

Appellant’s right of appeal states that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the 

defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On 

December 14, 2012, we notified Appellant that this appeal could be dismissed 

unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

grounds for continuing it. We have not received a response. Therefore, in 

accordance with the trial court’s certification, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 25.2(d) (“The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows 

the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under 

these rules.”), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2006); Jackson v. State, 168 S.W.3d 239, 243 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2005, no 

pet.).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 25, 2013
Joseph Earl SMITH, Jr., petitioner, v. Daniel PARAMO, Warden.

No. 16-6535.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 21 (Wednesday, January 31, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8363-8364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 2000-ASW-19]


Revision of Class E Airspace, Atlanta, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises the Class E Airspace at Atlanta, TX.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 65 FR 67625 is 
effective 0901 UTC, March 22, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Forth Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal

[[Page 8364]]

Register on November 13, 2000, (65 FR 67625). The FAA uses the direct 
final rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA 
believes that there will be no adverse public comment. this direct 
final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were 
anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written 
notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received 
within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on 
March 22, 2001. No adverse comments were received, and, thus, this 
action confirms that this direct final rule will be effective on that 
date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on January 8, 2001.
Robert N. Stevens,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 01-1550 Filed 1-30-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1686 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1686

 Expressing support for designation of October 2, 2010, as World MRSA 
                                  Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2010

Mrs. Biggert submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of October 2, 2010, as World MRSA 
                                  Day.

Whereas MRSA is an acronym for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, 
        which causes deadly infections in patients in health care facilities and 
        within our communities;
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have estimated that 
        hospital-acquired MRSA infections alone killed more than 19,000 United 
        States residents in 2006;
Whereas patient and consumer organizations around the globe are lending their 
        voices to the call of world unity in leadership and commitment in 
        preventing and stopping MRSA, which is pandemic and spreading at 
        alarming rates;
Whereas leading patient and consumer advocates call upon health care officials 
        and leaders to step up and take a more comprehensive approach to 
        eradicate this preventable disease and focus on a broad and pro-active 
        prevention program; and
Whereas as an integral part of its multi-faceted program, the MRSA Survivors 
        Network, the first consumer organization in the United States to raise 
        the alarm concerning the MRSA epidemic and other multi-drug resistant 
        health care-acquired infections, has announced ``World MRSA Day'', which 
        will be held on October 2, 2010, and commemorated each year after on 
        this date, in addition, the month of October will also be designated 
        ``World MRSA Awareness Month'' in order to call attention to this 
        worldwide epidemic: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of World MRSA Day.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1749 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives all 

documents in the possession of the President relating to a review being 

conducted by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence described 

in a document dated December 1, 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2010 

Mr. HOEKSTRA (for himself, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. ROGERS

of Michigan, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. 

CONAWAY, and Mr. KING of New York) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives all documents in the possession of the President relating to a review being conducted by the Office 

of the Director of National Intelligence described in a 

document dated December 1, 2010. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested to transmit 

2 to the House of Representatives not later than 7 days 

3 after the adoption of this resolution all documents (includ4 ing records, memos, correspondence, or other communica5 tions) in the possession of the President that refer or re6 late to a review being conducted by the Office of the DirecVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:36 Dec 03, 2010 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1749.IH HR1749

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1749 IH 

1 tor of National Intelligence described in a document enti2 tled ‘‘FACT SHEET: U.S. Government Mitigation Ef3 forts in Light of the Recent Unlawful Disclosure of Classi4 fied Information’’, issued by the White House on Decem5 ber 1, 2010, including copies of all documents known to 

6 have been stolen from the Government to cause such re7 view. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
HEATHER S., petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES.

No. 15-9318.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: THE SIEGEL TRADING CO., INC., JOSEPH E. SIEGEL, ALVIN C. WINOGRAD AND D. 

PETER ANDERSON 

DOCKET NUMBER: 159 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 159 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

The Siegel Trading Co., Inc., 

Joseph E. Siegel, 

Alvin C. Winograd 

(Chicago, Illinois) and 

D. Peter Anderson 

(New York, New York) 

The complaint charges The Siegel Trading Co., Inc., and two of its principal 

officers, Joseph E. Siegel and Alvin C. Winograd, with mishandling certain 

customers' accounts and failing to maintain required records. It charges that 

in April 1968, six customers trading in potato futures were cheated by the 

manner in which certain trades were closed out. It also charges that on May 7, 

1968, certain trades in cotton futures were bucketed. It further charges that 

in October 1967 a customer was given a false report in an attempt to deceive 

him. D. Peter Anderson is charged with cheating in connection with the potato 

transactions. The recordkeeping violations alleged in the complaint occurred 

between August 1, 1967 and April 19, 1968. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, June 24, 1969, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Michael WONSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6452.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Exhibit 99.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Union Bankshares Company

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Union Bankshares Company and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period  ended December 31, 1998.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards.  Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
represent fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Union Bankshares Company and Subsidiary as
of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their consolidated cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

BERRY, DUNN, MCNEIL & PARKER

Portland, Maine
January 22, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel Workgroup.                    

*Date:*                         June 27, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hameed Khan, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864, Population Research; 93.865; Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 33548)    
Dated: June 18, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-15757  Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549  FORM 8-K  CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)May 28, 2020   ALL STATE PROPERTIES HOLDINGS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)  Nevada000-1289532-0252180(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(Commission
File Number)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)106 Glenwood DriveLiverpool, N.Y. 13090(Address of principal offices)(315) 451-7515(Registrant’s Telephone Number)(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)  Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:  £Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)  £Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))  £Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) unde the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))  Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  Title of each classTradingSymbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registeredn/a  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).  Emerging growth company£  If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.£  1    ECTION 3 – SECURITIES AND TRADING MARKETS  Item 3.03Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders.  On May 28, 2020, themajority of the shareholders and board of directors of the Registrant approved a name change for the Registrant to Petro U.S.A., Inc. to reflect a change in the business to becomean operator of truck stopsand travel centers in the United States, offering dieselfueland gasoline, full service and fast food restaurants, maintenance and repair service for trucks, and groceries and convenience goods, among other products and services.  The majority of the shareholders and board of directors of the Registrantapproved a 100,000 to 1 reverse split of all issued common shares from its current 2,964,181,540 issued and outstanding shares.  SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.  Dated: May 28, 2020All State Properties Holdings, Inc.By:/s/ Joseph C. PassalaquaJoseph C. Passalaqua, Chief Executive Officer  2