alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 of Meadow Valley Corporation (the Report);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by the Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: April 27, 2007
    /s/ Bradley E. LarsonBradley E. LarsonChief Executive Officer
Sherman MITCHELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6586.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Marcus ALLEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6732.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana
      corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, John F. Fisbeck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  January
                14, 2008
            By:
                /s/ John F.
                FisbeckJohn
                F. Fisbeck,Chief
                Executive Officer
Andrea Lynn LISTER, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 16-5438.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnny GRAYSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-7180.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 14, 2012.

Johnny Grayson, Appellant Pro Se. Randolph John Bernard, Office of the United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Grayson appeals from the district court’s order denying his “Motion Requesting Home Confinement Due to New Medical Issues and Relocation [of his supervised release] Because of Marriage.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Grayson,*No. 5:08-cr-00046-FPS-JSK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 23, 2011); *see*18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b), 3625 (2006); *Prows v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons,*981 F.2d 466, 469-70 (10th Cir.1992); *United States v. Laughlin,*933 F.2d 786, 789-90 (9th Cir.1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33535-33536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-506-007]


Northwest Pipeline Corp.; Notice of Correction of Compliance 
Filing

June 18, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 11, 2001, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest) submitted revised schedules to correct certain supplemental 
information filed by Northwest on May 25, 2001 relating to Northwest's 
proposed policy on partial capacity turnbacks.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
each person designated on the official service list compiled by the 
Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC

[[Page 33536]]

20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of the Commission's rules and 
regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before June 28, 
2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15694 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Michelle HOPKINS, petitioner, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.

No. 16-5140.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Rony Eleazar GUERRA-GUALA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6839.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael
R. Dougherty, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL R. DOUGHERTY                                            
|Michael R. Dougherty President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director

February 27, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SecureD Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Day, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 19, 2003


                                                /s/ John Day
                                                ------------
                                                John Day
                                                Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          95,747
<SECURITIES>                                    68,064
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                       742
<INVENTORY>                                      3,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,311
<PP&E>                                          25,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           397
<OTHER-SE>                                     198,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,672
<SALES>                                        135,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,930
<CGS>                                           28,502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   249
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,142
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,368
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,368
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
<FN>
OTHER EXPENSES REFERS TO EXPENSES INCURRED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION OF DYNASOFT AB
</FN>


</TABLE>
Erick HOWARD, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 15-1381.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Stark County denied.
IV 

House Calendar No. 207 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1487 

[Report No. 111–516] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2010 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported through the legislative day of July 3, 2010, pro6 viding for consideration or disposition of any of the fol7 lowing: 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1487 RH 

1 (1) A conference report to accompany the bill 

2 (H.R. 4173) to provide for financial regulatory re3 form, to protect consumers and investors, to enhance 

4 Federal understanding of insurance issues, to regu5 late the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and 

6 for other purposes. 

7 (2) A measure that includes a subject matter 

8 addressed by H.R. 4213 or any amendment per9 taining thereto. 

10 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the 

11 legislative day of July 3, 2010, for the Speaker to enter12 tain motions that the House suspend the rules. The 

13 Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority 

14 Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter 

15 for consideration pursuant to this section. 

16 SEC. 3. It shall be in order without intervention of 

17 any point of order to consider concurrent resolutions pro18 viding for adjournment during the month of July. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 207 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1487 

[Report No. 111–516] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

for other purposes. tions reported from the Committee on Rules, and with respect to consideration of certain resoluJUNE 29, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
TEN STIX, INC.
                             A Colorado Corporation

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Ten Stix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Sawyer,
President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated: May 12, 2004                           /s/ Thomas E. Sawyer
                                             _________________________________
                                             By:  Thomas E. Sawyer
                                             Its:   President and C.E.O.
Anthony WEDDINGTON, petitioner, v. Dushan ZATECKY, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility.

No. 15-9174.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Cecil PIERRE, aka Cecile C. Pierre, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6617.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Destry J. MARCOTTE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5952.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# C_2011080EN.01000402.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla La Mancha (Spain)) — CLECE SA v María Socorro Martín Valor, Ayuntamiento de Cobisa

(Case C-463/09) (1)

1

(Social policy - Directive 2001/23/EC - Transfers of undertakings - Safeguarding of employees’ rights - Concept of ‘transfer’ - Cleaning - Cleaning carried out directly by a municipal authority with recruitment of new staff)

2011/C 80/06

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla La Mancha

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CLECE SA

Applicant:

Defendants: María Socorro Martín Valor, Ayuntamiento de Cobisa

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla La Mancha — Interpretation of Art. 1(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16) — Scope — Municipal authority, acting as a public authority, taking over the cleaning of a public building

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(1)(a) and (b) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses must be interpreted as meaning that the directive does not apply to a situation in which a municipal authority which has contracted out the cleaning of its premises to a private company decides to terminate its contract with that company and to undertake the cleaning of those premises itself by hiring new staff for that purpose.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense Retirement Board of Actuaries.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

A meeting of the board has been scheduled to execute the provisions of Chapter 74, Title 10, United States Code (10 U.S.C. 1464 et seq.). The Board shall review DoD actuarial methods and assumptions to be used in the valuation of the Military Retirement System. Persons desiring to: (1) attend the DoD Retirement Board of Actuaries meeting or, (2) make an oral presentation or submit a written statement for consideration at the meeting, must notify Inger Pettygrove at (703) 696-7413 by July 24, 2001.

Notice of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

# DATES:

August 9, 2001, 1:00 pm to 5:00 pm.

# ADDRESSES:

The Pentagon, Room 1E801—Rooms 2 and 3.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher Doyle, Chief Actuary, DoD Office of the Actuary, 1555 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22209-2405, (703) 696-7407.

Dated: June 12, 2001.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 01-15402 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M