alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.55



|     |  |  |  |                                                                               
|---- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |  |  |  | Pfizer Inc. 235
East 42ndStreet
New York, NY 10017-5755                       
|LOGO |  |  |  |                                                                               
|     |  |  |  | Olivier Brandicourt, MD President & General Manager Primary Care Business Unit

December 16, 2010

Adolor Corporation

700 Pennsylvania Drive

Exton,
Pennsylvania 19341

Attn: Michael R. Dougherty

President and Chief Executive Officer

Dear Mr. Dougherty:

Reference is made to
the License and Collaboration Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2007 (the License Agreement and the terms used herein shall be defined as therein), by and between Adolor Corporation (Adolor)
and Pfizer Inc (Pfizer). Pfizer hereby notifies you that it is exercising its right to terminate the License Agreement pursuant to Section 14.2.3.(a). Pfizer has concluded that, based on its evaluation of all results
and data from the Phase 2a Studies listed in the Development Plan for each of ADL 5859 and ADL 5747, it would not be commercially reasonable for Pfizer to continue Development. The License Agreement shall be terminated effective March 16, 2011.

Pfizer also would like to confirm that after March 16, 2011, certain rights and obligations of Pfizer and Adolor will survive
termination of the License Agreement as set forth in Section 15.4, including but not limited to, the provisions in Section 10.1.1.

Pfizer promptly will begin to work with Adolor to develop and implement a transition plan pursuant to Section 15.3 of the License Agreement.

Pfizer has greatly appreciated the chance to work with Adolor on this program and please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like to
discuss any matters further.

Sincerely,



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Olivier Brandicourt
|Olivier Brandicourt    

cc:



|                   |  |  |  |                            
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|Pfizer             |  |  |  | Adolor                     
|Dr. Mikael Dolsten |  |  |  | John M. Limongelli, Esq.   
|Ms. K. Peck        |  |  |  |                            
|Ms. A. Schulman    |  |  |  | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
|Mr. P. Buckley     |  |  |  | Mr. R. Sunberg
H. Res. 1737 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 2, 2010. 

Resolved, That: (1) Representative Charles B. Rangel of 

New York be censured; (2) Representative Charles B. Rangel 

forthwith present himself in the well of the House for the 

pronouncement of censure; (3) Representative Charles B. 

Rangel be censured with the public reading of this resolution 

by the Speaker; and (4) Representative Rangel pay restitution to the appropriate taxing authorities or the U.S. Treasury for any unpaid estimated taxes outlined in Exhibit 066 

on income received from his property in the Dominican Republic and provide proof of payment to the Committee. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10554 Summary Calendar

HORACE JEFFERY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus NFN KEENE; NFN PAUL; NFN GENTRY; R. MORRELL, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:98-CV-51-X

- - - - - - - - - - October 2, 1998 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Horace Jeffery, Texas prisoner # 669340, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). By moving for IFP, Jeffery is challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Because Jeffery has not demonstrated that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue onNo. 98-10554 -2- appeal, his motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Jeffery is cautioned that any future frivolous appeals or pleadings filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Jeffery should review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. Jeffery has filed several motions, including one for appointment of counsel. All of these motions are DENIED.
IFP DENIED; MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Azco Mining, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, W. Pierce Carson, President & Chief Executive Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                                                                             
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
      Report.

|Date: February 19, 2007 | By: | /s/ W. Pierce Carson        
|----------------------- | --- | ----------------------------
|                        |     | W. Pierce Carson            
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer,    
|                        |     | President, Director and     
|                        |     | Principal Accounting Officer

18

---
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1762 

Condemning the anti-Christian violence that has occurred in Iraq and has 

forced Iraqi Christians to flee their homes and communities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2010 

Mr. ACKERMAN (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Georgia, and Mr. ELLISON) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the anti-Christian violence that has occurred 

in Iraq and has forced Iraqi Christians to flee their 

homes and communities. 

Whereas Iraq has been home to a native Christian population 

since the first century A.D.; 

Whereas the Iraqi Christian community includes a diversity 

of churches and numbered as many as 1,000,000 in the 

early 1990s before the first Persian Gulf War; 

Whereas Iraqi Christians have historically suffered from official discrimination, periods of persecution, and even massacres; 

Whereas since 2003, Iraqi Christians have been particularly 

targeted by al Qaeda in Mesopotamia and other violent 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1762 IH 

Islamist militants for abduction, torture, bombings, and 

murder; 

Whereas Iraqi churches have been deliberately attacked in a 

wave of anti-Christian animus; 

Whereas the Iraqi Christian population has been decimated, 

with Iraqi Christians seeking refuge in other countries or 

in safer areas of Iraq; 

Whereas Iraqi Christians are entitled to the protection of 

their government to be secure in their homes, schools, 

and places of worship; and 

Whereas all people are entitled to absolute freedom of conscience with regard to their religious beliefs or lack thereof: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns in the strongest terms the anti3 Christian violence that has occurred in Iraq and has 

4 forced Iraqi Christians to flee their homes and com5 munities; 

6 (2) calls on the Government of Iraq to enhance 

7 its efforts to guarantee the protection and survival 

8 in place of the vulnerable Iraqi Christian population 

9 and all other Iraqi religious minorities; and 

10 (3) urges the President and the Secretary of 

11 State to make the protection of vulnerable minority 

12 groups in Iraq, including Iraqi Christians, a priority 

13 in their discussions with Iraqi leaders, and a central 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1762 IH 

1 element in United States efforts on the ground in 

2 Iraq. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 233 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 233

 Recognizing the thousands of Freemasons in every State in the Nation 
and honoring them for their many contributions to the Nation throughout 
                              its history.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2009

Mr. Latta (for himself, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Terry, and Mr. Skelton) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                   on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the thousands of Freemasons in every State in the Nation 
and honoring them for their many contributions to the Nation throughout 
                              its history.

Whereas Freemasons, whose long lineage extends back to before the Nation's 
        founding, have set an example of high moral standards and charity for 
        all people;
Whereas the Founding Fathers of this great Nation and signers of the 
        Constitution, most of whom were Freemasons, provided a well-rounded 
        basis for developing themselves and others into valuable citizens of the 
        United States;
Whereas members of the Masonic Fraternity, both individually and as an 
        organization, continue to make invaluable charitable contributions of 
        service to the United States;
Whereas the Masonic Fraternity continues to provide for the charitable relief 
        and education of the citizens of the United States;
Whereas the Masonic Fraternity is deserving of formal recognition of their long 
        history of care-giving for the citizenry and their example of high moral 
        standards; and
Whereas Freemasons have always revered and celebrated St. John's Day, June 24th, 
        as dedicated to their patron saints: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the 
thousands of Freemasons in every State in the Nation and honors them 
for their many contributions to the Nation throughout its history.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

The Board of Directors 

Adolor Corporation: 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-51222, No. 333-62428, No. 333-100585, and No. 333-105912) on Form S-8 and registration statements (No. 333-107998 and No. 333-64298) on Form S-3 of Adolor Corporation of ourreports dated February 22, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Adolor Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and for the period from August 9, 1993 (inception) to December 31, 2004, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Adolor Corporation. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 1, 2005
Scott William ECKERT, petitioner, v. MISSOURI.

No. 16-6338.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

 No. 00-60127

Summary Calendar

________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GEORGE SYLVESTER HENDERSON,

also known as G,

 DefendantAppellant.

-------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:99-CR-92-ALL

------------------------------------------------------

December 21, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for George Sylvester Henderson has moved for leave to withdraw

and has filed briefs as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Henderson has

responded to the motion. Our independent review of the briefs, Henderson’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdrawis GRANTED, counselis excused fromfurther

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Henry SHELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6647.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s tha tthi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f or ** d e c is io n w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). LSS/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DA VI D B . J OH NS ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. M . C R U T C H F I E L D ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 16482 D . C . N o. 1: 05 -c v-00 35 1-A W IDLB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A nthonyW . I s hi i , C hi e f D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner D avi d B . John son app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha tthe 

# FI LED JAN 11 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSL SS/ Res ea r ch 08- 16482 2 d e f e n d a n ts f ir e dh im f

r o m h is p r is o n jo b a n dd is c ip lin e dh im in r e ta lia tio n f o rh is gr i e va nc e a c t i vi ty . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de n o v o . B ru ce v. Y

l st , 3 5 1 F .3 d1 2 8 3 , 1 2 8 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e a f f irm . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ygr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e ntbe c aus e J ohns on f a i l e d t o r a i s e atr i abl e i s s ue a s t o w he the rthe de f e nda nt s ’ c onduc tw a s ba s e d on r e ta lia to rym o tiv e , r a th e rth a n le g itim a te p e n o lo g ic a l g o a ls . Se e i d. a t1288–89 (s ett i ng forth requi re m ent s of r et al i at i on cl ai m and n ot i ng thatthe “ pl ai nt i ff bear s the bur de n of

pl e a di ng a nd pr ovi ng the abs e nc e of l e gi t i m a t e c orr e c t i ona l goa l s f or the c onduc tof

w hi c h he c om pl a i ns ” ) ( c i t a t i on a nd i nt e rna l quot a t i on m a rks om i tt ed). John son’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. A F F I R M E D .
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Proposed Interpretive Order on Disruptive Trading Practices 

What is the purpose of the Proposed Interpretive Order? 

The Proposed Interpretive Order provides guidance on the types of trading, practices, and conduct that constitute violations 

of the three statutory disruptive practices set forth in section 4c(a)(5) of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) as amended by 

Dodd-Frank Act section 747. 

What are the three practices prohibited by the statute? 

New CEA section 4c(a)(5) makes it unlawful for any person to engage in any trading, practice, or conduct on or subject to the 

rules of a registered entity that– 

A. violates bids or offers; 

B. demonstrates intentional or reckless disregard for the orderly execution of transactions during the closing period; or 

C. is, is of the character of, or is commonly known to the trade as, “spoofing” (bidding or offering with the intent to 

cancel the bid or offer before execution). 

Does the proposed interpretive order prohibit any additional practices? 

No. The Commission is not, at this time, proposing to prohibit any additional practices that are disruptive of fair and 

equitable trading. 

Does the proposed interpretive order impose any affirmative duties on market participants? 

No. The Commission is not, by this order, proposing to impose any affirmative duties on market participants (e.g., the 

prohibition on violating bids or offers does not impose a duty of best execution). 

Is the Commission seeking comment on the Proposed Interpretive Order? 

Yes. The Commission seeks comment on the Proposed Interpretive Order. Comments are due 60 days from the date of 

publication in the Federal Register. 

Are commenters required to respond to all of the proposed guidance? 

No. The Commission invites comment on any or all of the guidance proposed in the Interpretive Order. 

What is the effect of the Proposed Interpretive Order? 

The Proposed Interpretive Order is a proposal – it does not bind the Commission or the public. 

What is the next step? 

Upon receipt and consideration of all of the comments received, the Commission will consider whether to issue a Final 

Interpretive Order, which will have binding effect. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
Simei Moreira DA SILVA, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 15-7820.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



I, John M. Greeley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Tarantella, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tarantella, Inc.



By:

/s/ John M. GreeleyName: John M. GreeleyTitle: Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)April 2, 2004