alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  to  the  Registration
Statement of Everlast Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2005 of our report dated February
17, 2006 on our audits of the financial statements of the Company as of December
31,  2005 and for the years  ended  December  31,  2004 and 2003,  which  report
appears in the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K.

/s/Berenson LLP
--------------------------
Berenson  LLP

New York, NY
March 28, 2006
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Order No. 1166] 

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: 

*Whereas,*                    the Rickenbacker Port Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone No. 138, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand FTZ 138 in the Columbus, Ohio area, adjacent to the Columbus Customs port of entry (FTZ Docket 31-2000, filed 6/20/2000);                 

*Whereas,*                    notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (65 FR 39866, 6/28/2000) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                 

*Whereas,*                    the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                 

*Now, Therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                 

The application to expand FTZ 138 is approved, subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including section 400.28, and further subject to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of May 2001. 

Faryar Shirzad, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman,  Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Dennis Puccinelli, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-15421 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Alfie Shannbay DURHAM, petitioner, v. SUNY ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE, et al.

No. 16-6240.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LI JUN SONG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71612

Agency No. A077-292-832

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 25, 2015** 

Before: McKEOWN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Li Jun Song, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v.

FILED

SEP 03 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 
Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the

petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Song’s motion to reopen

where the motion was filed more than two years after the BIA’s final

administrative order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Song failed to establish

materially changed circumstances arising in China to qualify for the regulatory

exception to the time limitation for motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); He v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1128, 1132-33 (9th Cir. 2007)

(documentation insufficient to establish changed circumstances); see also

Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987 (requiring that evidence of changed country conditions

“be ‘qualitatively different’ from the evidence presented at the previous hearing”)

(citation omitted).

Further, in light of our decision in Song v. Holder, No. 08-73864, 2010 WL

2354204 (9th Cir. June 11, 2010), we do not consider any challenge Song raises to

the agency’s underlying adverse credibility determination. 

We also lack jurisdiction to consider Song’s requests for cancellation of

removal, adjustment of status, and humanitarian relief, because he did not present

those requests to the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.

2 11-71612
2004) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review issues or claims not raised before the

agency).

Finally, we deny Song’s motions to not assign his case to a merits panel. 

We also deny Song’s motion for oral argument.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3 11-71612
#### THE JAMES HUGHES.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 1, 1922.)

No. 307.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Libel for collision by Clarence A. Small and others against the steam tug James Hughes, claimed by the A. S. Hughes Towing *&*Transportation Company, and James C. Davis, as Director General of Railroads, operating the Cape Cod Canal. From a decree holding the Director General primarily liable, and the tug secondarily liable, the Director General appeals.

Affirmed.

Alex S. Lyman, of New York City, for appellant. Alexander & Ash, of New York City (Peter Alexander, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees Small and others.

Hunter, Mead & Cheyney, of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, of New York City, of counsel), for claimant of the James Hughes.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.
No. 454, Misc.

#### Martinez *v.*California.

District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, of California.

*Elizabeth Cassidy*for petitioner.

Certiorari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shane Ray DOESCHER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41134

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 12, 2006.

Ernest Gonzalez, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District Of Texas, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gerald W. Cobb, Philips & Hopkins, Denton, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Shane Ray Doescher has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Doescher has responded to counsel’s motion, moving for leave to file a “controlling supplemental amendment.” Doescher has also moved this court to reconsider its previous without-prejudice denial of counsel’s motion to withdraw, and he has filed two motions for the appointment of counsel.

Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Doescher’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. All other motions are DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in. 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Jesse Aaron DAVISON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6327.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|Name of Subsidiary                            |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                             
|StarGuide Digital Networks, Inc.              |  | Nevada                       
|                                             
|Digital Generations Systems on New York, Inc. |  | New York                     
|                                             
|StarCom Mediatech, Inc.                       |  | Delaware                     
|                                             
|CoolCast, Inc.                                |  | Delaware                     
|                                             
|Musicam Express, L.L.C.                       |  | Delaware                     
|                                             
|Corporate Computer Systems, Inc.              |  | Delaware                     
|                                             
|Corporate Computer Systems Consultants, Inc.  |  | Delaware                     
|                                             
|Telmac Systems, Inc.                          |  | Delaware
```

[Federal Register: January 29, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 19)]

[Notices]

[Page 4432]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr29ja98-42]



=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION





Sunshine Act Meeting



AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.



TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Wednesday, February 4, 1998.



PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference

Room.



STATUS: Closed.



MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.



CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 98-2339 Filed 1-27-98; 12:07 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the dates and periods
covered by the Report.
    /s/ Paul H. Fischer, Ph.D.Paul H. Fischer, Ph.D.President and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnell VALLERY, Also Known as Poppa, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30037

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 2010.

Diane Hollenshead Copes, Esq, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Maurice Edwin Lan-drieu, Esq, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Carol Loupe Michel, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Autumn Alycia Town, Law Office of Autumn Town, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ronnell Vallery, federal prisoner #29981-034, moves for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*(“IFP”) on appeal from the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence based on *863the retroactive amendment to the sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine. Vallery was convicted of, *inter alia,*conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base (crack) and was sentenced to 240 months of imprisonment. The district court denied the motion, determining that Vallery was ineligible for a reduction because he had received the statutory mandatory minimum sentence. The court also denied Valleras request to proceed IFP on appeal, certifying that the appeal was not taken in good faith.

The court correctly determined that Val-lery is ineligible for a sentence reduction based on the amendment to the crack cocaine guidelines because he is subject to the mandatory minimum penalty in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). *See United States v. Carter,*595 F.3d 575, 579-81 (5th Cir.2010). We will not review Vallery’s argument that he could have received a reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) and U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, because that argument is raised for the first time on appeal. *See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co.,*183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir.1999). Further, the argument is not cognizable in the context of a § 3582(c)(2) motion, because it is not based on a retroactive amendment to the guidelines. *See United States v. Shaw,*30 F.3d 26, 29 (5th Cir.1994).

Given the forgoing, Vallery has failed to show that his appeal involves “legal points arguable on their merits.” *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 & n. 24 (5th Cir.1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Federal Register: September 10, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 175)]
[Notices]
[Page 47651]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10se97-33]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to Office of
Management and Budget for Review

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of submission of information collection #3038-0023--
regulations and forms relating to registration with the Commission.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has submitted
information collection 3038-0023--Regulations and Forms Relating to
Registration with the Commission to OMB for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13). The Commodity
Exchange Act, as amended, requires the registration of all futures
commission merchants, floor traders, floor brokers, associated persons,
commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators, introducing
brokers, and leverage transaction merchants.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 10, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection
should contact the Desk Officer, CFTC, Office of Management and Budget,
Room 3228, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-7340. Copies of the
submission are available from the Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 418-
5160.
    Title: Regulations and Forms Relating to Registration with the
Commission.
    Control Number: 3038-0023.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: Commission Registrants.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 27,467 hours.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on September 2, 1997.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-23884 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1437 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1437

 Congratulating the McLennan Community College Highlanders men's golf 
  team for winning the 2010 NJCAA Division I Men's Golf Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2010

  Mr. Edwards of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the McLennan Community College Highlanders men's golf 
  team for winning the 2010 NJCAA Division I Men's Golf Championship.

Whereas, on Friday, May 21, 2010, the McLennan Community College Highlanders 
        men's golf team won the 2010 NJCAA Division I Men's Golf Championship at 
        the Robert Trent Jones Golf Trail River Course in Owens Crossroads, 
        Alabama;
Whereas the Highlanders finished the Championship with a three-round total of 
        860 strokes, 4 under par; beating the second place Meridian Community 
        College by 9 strokes;
Whereas the Highlanders have won back-to-back national championships under the 
        leadership of Coach Vince Clark who won the 2009 Eaton Golf Pride 
        National Coach of the Year award;
Whereas Coach Vince Clark was named as one of the 2010 Eaton Golf Pride District 
        Coaches of the Year;
Whereas Juan Salcedo, Tyler Russell, Nathan Anderson, and Jeremy Lambright all 
        were named to the National Junior College Athletic Associated all-
        American team;
Whereas the Highlanders were ranked number 1 in the Nation and have only once 
        finished out of first place during the 2009-2010 academic year;
Whereas the Highlanders were not only recognized as National Champions but 
        recognized for the second year in a row as an Academic All-American 
        Team;
Whereas the McLennan Community College Highlassies women's golf team finished in 
        second place at the NJCAA Women's Golf National Championship in Daytona 
        Beach, Florida;
Whereas both the McLennan Community College men's and women's golf teams have 
        displayed outstanding dedication, teamwork, and sportsmanship throughout 
        the season; and
Whereas the Highlanders and Highlassies have brought pride and honor to the 
        State of Texas: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the McLennan Community College 
        Highlanders men's golf team and the university's athletes, 
        coaches, faculty, students, and alumni on the winning of the 
        2010 NJCAA Division I Men's Golf Championship; and
            (2) recognizes McLennan Community College for its 
        excellence as an institution of higher education.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT
                          -----------------------------
The Board of Directors
Paper Warehouse, Inc. and Subsidiary:

We consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 19, 1999, with respect 
to the consolidated balance sheets of Paper Warehouse, Inc. and Subsidiary as 
of January 29, 1999 and January 30, 1998, and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the 
years in the three-year period ended January 29, 1999, which report appears 
in the Form 10-K of Paper Warehouse, Inc. and Subsidiary dated April 29, 1999.

                                                     /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

April 29, 1999
Minneapolis, Minnesota
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

ALFRED FURST

v.

MF GLOBAL, INCORPORATED and

PATRICK LEROY LAFFERTY

CFTC Docket No. 08-RSi3

ORDER OF SUMMARY

AFFIRMANCE

Upon review ofthe record and the parties' appellate submissions, we have determined

that the findings and conclusions ofthe Judgment Officer are supported by the weight ofthe

evidence; we therefore adopt them. We also find that none ofthe arguments on appeal present

important questions oflaw or policy. Accordingly, we summarily affitm the decision ofthe

Judgment Officer without opinion.1

IT IS SO ORDERED?

By the Commission (Commissioners SOMMERS, CHILTON, O'MALIA and WETJEN;

Chairman GENSLER not participating.)

David

bdvL~_ A. Stawick

Secretary ofthe Commission

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Dated: June 6, 2012

1 Pmsuant to Commission Regulation 12.406(b), 17 C.F.R. § 12.406(b), neither the initial decision nor the

Commission's order ofsummary affimance shall serve as a Commission precedent in other proceedings.

2 Under Sections 6(c) and 14(e) ofthe Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 9 and 18(e)(2006), a party may

appeal a reparation order ofthe Commission to the United States Comt ofAppeals for only the circuit in which a

hearing was held; ifno hearing was held, the appeal may be filed in any circuit in which the appellee is located. The

Commission has ruled that telephonic hearings are "held" in Washington, D.C., although patties may speak from

several different locations. Dubois v. Alaron, [2000-2002 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) 28,406 at

51,026 n.16 (CFTC Oct. 26, 2000). The statute also states that such an appeal must be filed within 15 days after

notice ofthe order and that any appeal is not effective unless, within 30 days ofthe date ofthe Commission order,

the appealing party files with the court a bond equal to double the amount of any reparation award.
James Chandler RYDER, petitioner, v. Terry ROYAL, Warden.

No. 16-5970.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000568 31-MAY-2019 08:09 AM