alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bennie CASEY, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 16-6142.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Kathryn HARDY, et al., petitioners, v. STATE LAND BOARD, et al.

No. 15-1351.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

*371Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palmdale Executive Homes, Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tricia A. Nickson, Treasurer/Chief Fiancial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May 16, 2011
By:
/s/TRICIA A. NICKSONTricia A. NicksonTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,985,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,833,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,032,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,197,000
<PP&E>                                       5,069,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,651,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,323,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,839,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,651,000
<SALES>                                     51,020,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,020,000
<CGS>                                       42,542,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,542,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,374,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,104,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,640,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,464,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,464,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6469

DENNIS JAMES BROWN, 

 Petitioner – Appellant, 

 v. 

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Respondent – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate 

Judge. (3:08-cv-00065-MHL) 

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 2, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Dennis James Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Dennis James Brown seeks to appeal the magistrate 

judge’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) 

petition.∗ The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

Brown's motion to review records, deny a certificate of 

appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

 ∗

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate 

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006). 

2 
3 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Carri WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES.

No. 16-5938.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1558]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with part 211 of title 49 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration 
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain 
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is 
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory 
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the 
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

Carthage, Knightstown & Shirley Railroad Company

[Docket Number FRA-2000-8364]

    The Carthage, Knightstown & Shirley Railroad Company (CKSI) seeks a 
permanent waiver of compliance for two locomotives from the 
requirements of the Safety Glazing Standards, 49 CFR part 223, which 
requires certified glazing in all locomotive windows, except those 
locomotives used in yard service. The railroad indicates that the 
locomotives number CKSI 468 and CKSI 215 are General Electric 45 ton 
center cab locomotives used passenger excursion service through mostly 
rural areas, 10 mile round trip in the Knightstown, Indiana area. The 
railroad operates May through October, on weekends, Friday, Saturday, 
and Sunday.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings 
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate 
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since 
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party 
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in 
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for 
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the 
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2000-8364 ) and must be submitted in triplicate to the Docket Clerk, 
DOT Central Docket Management Facility, Room Pl-401, Washington, DC 
20590-0001. Communications received within 45 days of the date of this 
notice will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments 
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All 
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for 
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room Pl-401 (Plaza Level), 400 
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC. All documents in the public docket 
are also available for inspection and copying on the Internet at the 
docket facility's Web site at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC on January 10, 2001.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 01-1558 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1367-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa, (FEMA-1367-DR), dated May 2, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 6, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 2, 2001: 

Webster County for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance). 

Pottawattamie County for Individual and Public Assistance. 

Muscatine County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance). 

Grundy, Lucas, and Union Counties for Public Assistance. 

Des Moines, Lee, Scott, and Wapello Counties for Categories C through G under the Public Assistance program (already designated for Categories A and B).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Lacy E. Suiter, 

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate. 

[FR Doc. 01-15263 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Ken CALDWELL, et ux., petitioners, v. Michael L. PESCE, Presiding Justice, Appellate Term of the New York Supreme Court, Second Judicial District, et al.

No. 16-5533.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16

- 228 V

Filed: July 15, 2016

UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

GARY FRIEDLAND

, *

*

Petitioner, * Damages Decision B ased on Proffer;

v. * Influenza ;

* Shoulder Injury; SIRVA ;

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

John R. Howie, Jr. Howie Law, PC, Dallas TX

, for petitioner.

Althea Walker Davis , U

. S

. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On February 16, 2016

, p etitioner filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”)

. Peti tioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury after receiving an

influenza vaccination on September 19, 2014

. Petit ion at 1

. The case was assigned to

the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 15, 2016 , respondent filed a Rule 4 (c) Report and Proffer on Damages

(“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $ 96,522.75

. Proffer at 6

. In the

Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award.

On July 15, 2016

, a ruling on entitlement was issued , finding petitioner entitled to

compensation for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ( “ SIRVA ” )

. Based

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanatio n for the action in this case, the

undersigned intend s to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services)

. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agree s that the ident ified material fits

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012 ).2 on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as

stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the Proffer, the undersigned award s petitioner

a lump sum payment of $ 9 6,522.75 in the form of a check payable to petitioner,

G ary Friedland

. Th is amount represent s compensation for all damages that would be

available under § 300aa

- 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this

decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-12854

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 9:17-cr-80112-KAM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GIORGI ABRAKHAMIA, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(August 6, 2019)

Before WILSON, EDMONDSON, and HULL, Circuit Judges.

Case: 18-12854 Date Filed: 08/06/2019 Page: 1 of 3 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Giorgi Abrakhamia appeals his above-guidelines 78-month sentence for 

alien smuggling, arguing that he was not competent to proceed with his sentencing 

hearing and that the district court abused its discretion in imposing several 

sentence enhancements. First, the district court did not abuse its discretion in 

declining to continue sentencing or in declining to hold a hearing to evaluate 

Abrakhamia’s competence: he had been evaluated by medical staff before 

sentencing, was found to have no disabilities or limitations, and told counsel that 

he could proceed with sentencing. For background, see United States v. Perkins, 

787 F.3d 1329, 1339 (11th Cir. 2015); United States v. Edouard, 485 F.3d 1324, 

1350 (11th Cir. 2007).

Second, the district court did not err in applying a sentencing enhancement 

for brandishing or otherwise using a dangerous weapon: that Abrakhamia’s 

coconspirator would use any available weapon, including a knife, to maintain 

control of the boat after pushing its captain overboard was reasonably foreseeable. 

For background, see United States v. Pringle, 350 F.3d 1172, 1175-76 (11th Cir. 

2003).

Third, the district court did not err in applying an enhancement for creating a 

substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury because the evidence showed that 

Case: 18-12854 Date Filed: 08/06/2019 Page: 2 of 3 
3

Abrakhamia and his codefendant worked together to throw the captain overboard 

and take control of the boat. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1, comment. (n.3). In addition, 

this enhancement did not amount to double-counting because this conduct 

(throwing someone overboard and so on) was in addition to the conduct considered 

in the dangerous weapon enhancement, which involved stabbing the captain. 

Fourth, the district court did not err in imposing an enhancement for 

inflicting a bodily injury: that using or brandishing the knife would result in a stab 

wound was reasonably foreseeable.

Fifth, the district court did not err in imposing a special skill enhancement: 

Abrakhamia drove the boat away from the captain on the open ocean, and the boat

was later found at a marina in Florida; seemingly a predetermined destination; 

driving a boat on the ocean from the Bahamas to Florida requires skills not 

possessed by the general public. For background, see United States v. De La Cruz 

Suarez, 601 F.3d 1202, 1219 (11th Cir. 2010); United States v. Calderon, 127 F.3d 

1314, 1339 (11th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 18-12854 Date Filed: 08/06/2019 Page: 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1595 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1595

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 15, 2010.
Whereas, on September 14, 1960, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed into law 
        tax legislation enabling real estate investment trusts (hereinafter 
        referred to as ``REITs'') to be established throughout the United States 
        under regulations set by the Federal Government;
Whereas the passage of this legislation enabled REITs to provide all investors 
        with the same opportunity to invest in large-scale commercial real 
        estate that previously was open only to large financial institutions and 
        wealthy individuals through direct investment in such real estate;
Whereas REITs have placed within the reach of the average American investor 
        large-scale commercial real estate investment through publicly traded, 
        regulated securities, which provide investors with transparency and 
        liquidity;
Whereas REITs, by expanding the opportunity to invest in commercial real estate, 
        a separate and distinct asset class important to the creation of 
        balanced investment portfolios, have enabled millions of Americans to 
        gain the benefits of dividend-based income, portfolio diversification 
        and improved overall investment performance;
Whereas REITs have helped millions of Americans successfully invest for their 
        retirement security over the past half-century; and
Whereas September 14, 2010, will mark the 50th anniversary of the legislation 
        that created this REIT investment opportunity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States House of Representatives recognizes the 
50th anniversary of the passage of the legislation that created real estate 
investment trusts (REITs) and the enhanced opportunities for investment and 
retirement security that have been afforded to Americans from all walks of life 
as a result of this landmark legislation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<CIK>                            0000854066  
<NAME>                           GEODYNE INST/PENSION ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-3
                                  
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                              196,106
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       137,904
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    334,010
<PP&E>                           10,598,092
<DEPRECIATION>                    8,663,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    2,269,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                        2,269,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      2,269,045
<SALES>                             764,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,382,005
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       387,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     994,784
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 994,784
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        994,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          5.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        
 

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
18.1

















February 25, 2009











Mr. John
M. Pinkerton


Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer


ATC
Technology Corporation


1400 Opus
Place, Suite 600


Downers
Grove, Illinois 60515





Dear Mr.
Pinkerton:





Note 2 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of ATC Technology Corporation,
included in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, describes an
accounting change regarding the date of the Company’s annual goodwill and other
indefinite lived intangibles impairment assessment from the last day of the
third quarter to the first day of the fourth quarter.  There are no
authoritative criteria for determining which date is preferable based on the
particular circumstances, however, we conclude that such change in the method of
accounting is to an acceptable alternative method which, based on your business
judgment to make this change and for the stated reasons, is preferable in your
circumstances.








Very truly yours,








/s/ Ernst & Young
LLP