alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8571

WOODROW WILSON MORRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICK JACKSON; LYNN PHILLIPS; FRANKLIN FREEMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CA-95-440-3-MU)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Woodrow Wilson Morris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Morris v. Jackson, No. CA-95-440-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Jose ESTRADA-RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General.

No. 16-304.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
NO. 12-21-00086-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RUSK STATE HOSPITAL, TEXAS 

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 

COMMISSION AND KERRI TAYLOR, 

APPELLANTS

V.

DAVID MCGOWAN,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 2ND 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellants, Rusk State Hospital, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, and 

Kerri Taylor, and Appellee, David McGowan, filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal. The 

parties ask that this Court set aside the trial court’s orders granting McGowan’s Rule 202 petition

and denying Appellants’ plea to the jurisdiction, and remand the case to the trial court to dismiss 

McGowan’s Rule 202 petition.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 sets forth the actions that this Court may take in 

accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). This includes setting aside the trial court’s judgment without regard

to the merits and remanding the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance 

with the agreement. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). 

Accordingly, we grant the agreed motion to dismiss. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). 

We render judgment setting aside the trial court’s May 14, 2021 order granting McGowan’s 

Rule 202 petition and its May 24, 2021 order denying Appellants’ plea to the jurisdiction,

without regard to the merits. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). We remand the case to the trial 

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See id. 
Opinion delivered November 17, 2021.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 17, 2021

NO. 12-21-00086-CV

RUSK STATE HOSPITAL, TEXAS HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION AND KERRI TAYLOR,

Appellants

V.

DAVID MCGOWAN,

Appellee

Appeal from the 2nd District Court

of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2021-040098)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the agreed motion of the Appellants

and Appellee to dismiss, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED 

and DECREED by this Court that the motion be granted; judgment is rendered setting aside the 

trial court’s May 14, 2021 order granting Appellee’s Rule 202 petition and its May 24, 2021 

order denying Appellants’ plea to the jurisdiction, without regard to the merits; the cause is 

remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement, 

and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND THE STATEMENTS OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,926,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,715,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,785,069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,715,943
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               854,331
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (836,398)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0196

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DANE ANTHONY GIBSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 4, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 25 2022

02/25/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0196
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the amended quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Henry P. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
-------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
November 1, 2005


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
arcx-ex101_229.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

Arc Terminals Holdings LLC

c/o Arc Logistics Partners LP

725 Fifth Avenue, 19th Floor

NY, NY 10022   

 

January 15, 2016

 

 

Center Oil Company

600 Mason Ridge Center Drive, 2nd Floor

St. Louis, Missouri 63141

 

Dear Gentlemen:

 

Reference is made to that certain Storage and Throughput Agreement by and between Arc Terminals Holdings LLC (as successor by assignment to Arc Terminals LP) (“Arc”) and G.P. & W., Inc. d/b/a/ Center Oil Company and d/b/a Center Marketing Company (“Center” and, together with Arc, the “Parties”) dated July 1, 2007 as the same has been amended, modified or supplemented to date (the “Throughput Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Throughput Agreement.

 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Center hereby agrees as follows:

 

1.Center hereby acknowledges and agrees that, for the avoidance of doubt and notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary contained in the Throughput Agreement, commencing July 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015, the Throughput Volume Fee Per Barrel was $0.43 per Barrel.

 

2. Center agrees that this letter agreement constitutes an amendment to and an integral part of the Throughput Agreement and that, except as amended hereby, the Throughput Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects and, except as amended hereby, shall continue in full force and effect.

 

If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please execute this letter agreement in the space provided below.

 

 

 

Arc Terminals Holdings LLC

 

 

By: __/s/ John Blanchard_____________ 

        Name:  John Blanchard

        Title:    President

 

Accepted and agreed to by 

G.P.&W., INC. as of the date first written above:

 

G.P.&W., INC., a Missouri corporation doing business as

Center Oil Company and Center Marketing Company

 

 

By: __/s/ Gerald L. Jost, Jr._____________ 

       Name: Gerald L. Jost, Jr.

       Title: Director of Distribution
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation (BKFC) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W.
Zapp, Chief Executive Officer and President of BKFC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
BKFC.



/s/ Robert W. ZappRobert W. ZappChief Executive Officer and PresidentMarch 12, 2010
PNA INTERMEDIATE HOLDING CORPORATION



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PNA Intermediate Holding Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, the undersigned, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                 |  |                            |  |                                                             
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | PNA Group, Inc.
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | By:             |  | /s/ Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.
|                    |  |  |  |                 |  |                            |  | Maurice S. Nelson, Jr. Chief Executive Officer and
President



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                           
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William S. Johnson
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | William S. Johnson Chief Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND THE STATEMENTS OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       8,186,824
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,161,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,015,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,161,402
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               448,937
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,885
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (559,223)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (282,646)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# FCM DATA January 2008
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 165 

Commemorating the 200th anniversary of the birth of Abraham Lincoln, 

the 16th President of the United States of America. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2009 

Mr. FRANKS of Arizona (for himself and Mr. KING of Iowa) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 

and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 200th anniversary of the birth of Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the United States 

of America. 

Whereas Abraham Lincoln was born February 12, 1809; 

Whereas, due to his leadership, the United States completed 

the implementation of the promise that was contained in 

the Declaration of Independence, that all men are created 

equal, and fulfilled the potential of the Constitution, 

namely the commitment to equality under the law; 

Whereas Lincoln asserted the Dred Scott decision was erroneous and insisted that judges must leave political matters to the people, rather than the whims and preferences 

of judges; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 165 IH 

Whereas Lincoln defeated Steven Douglas and was elected 

President of the United States in 1860; 

Whereas Lincoln believed that a president, even acting as 

commander-in-chief, must exercise authority not as a dictator, benevolent or otherwise, but within the limits set 

forth by the Constitution; 

Whereas Lincoln defended the maxim that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed; 

Whereas Lincoln stated on June 17, 1858, ‘‘A house divided 

against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free.’’; 

Whereas, at a time of profound national crisis, Abraham 

Lincoln affirmed the importance of the Union and esteemed its preservation as essential to pursuing the 

noble goals for which it was constituted; namely, the formation of a more perfect union marked by liberty, security and justice for all; 

Whereas, on January 1, 1863, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation; and 

Whereas, on October 20, 1864, Lincoln proclaimed, ‘‘the last 

Thursday in November next as a day which I desire to 

be observed by all my fellow-citizens wherever they may 

then be as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to Almighty 

God the beneficent Creator and Ruler of the Universe’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) celebrates the extraordinary life of Abraham 

3 Lincoln, and expresses its deep gratitude for his val4 iant leadership in preserving the Union, defending 

5 the natural rights of all individuals, and defending 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 165 IH 

1 the Declaration of Independence and the Constitu2 tion of the United States; and 

3 (2) recognizes the magnitude of his life’s legacy 

4 and the impact it has left on the United States of 

5 America and the rest of the world. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Customer Clearing Documentation 

and Timing of Acceptance for Clearing 

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking? 

The goal of the proposed rulemaking is to facilitate customer access to clearing and minimize the time between 

submission and acceptance or rejection of trades for clearing by DCOs and clearing members. 

How would the proposed rulemaking affect clearing documentation? 

The proposed rulemaking would prohibit arrangements involving futures commission merchants (FCMs), swap 

dealers (SDs), major swap participants (MSPs), or derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) that would (a) disclose 

to an FCM, SD, or MSP the identity of a customer’s original executing counterparty; (b) limit the number of 

counterparties with whom a customer may enter into a trade; (c) restrict the size of the position a customer may 

take with any individual counterparty, apart from an overall credit limit for all positions held by the customer at the 

FCM; (d) impair a customer’s access to execution of a trade on terms that have a reasonable relationship to the best 

terms available; or (e) prevent compliance with specified time frames for acceptance of trades into clearing. 

How would the proposed rulemaking affect the timing of acceptance for clearing? 

The proposed rulemaking would also (1) permit DCOs to screen trades against applicable product and credit criteria 

before accepting or rejecting them “as quickly as would be technologically practicable if fully automated systems 

were used;” (2) require DCOs to coordinate with clearing members to establish systems for prompt processing of 

trades, and (3) require reciprocal coordination with DCOs by FCMs, SDs, and MSPs that are clearing members. 

What registrants are covered by the proposed rulemaking? 

The proposed regulations would apply to swap dealers, major swap participants, and futures commission merchants 

that are clearing members, and derivatives clearing organizations. 

By when must comments on the rules be submitted? 

Comments on the rules must be submitted within sixty (60) days of the publication of the proposal in the Federal 

Register. 

Is the Commission requiring automatic trade processing? 

No. The proposed rules are intended to establish a performance standard, not the prescription of a particular 

method of trade processing. The Commission expects that fully automated systems will be in place at some DCOs, 

FCMs, SDs, and MSPs. Others might have systems with some manual steps. The proposed rules would 

accommodate trade processing with manual steps provided that the process could operate within the same time 

frame as automated systems. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
Gary SAMPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-235.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Opinion issued February 27 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 19 - 01010 - CV

——————————— HALDOR TOPSOE, INC . , Appella nt

V. ORION ENGINEERED CAR BONS, LLC AND ORION ENGINEERED

CARBONS GMBH , Appell e e s
On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2019 - 69832
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Haldor Topsoe , Inc., has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief J ustice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman
.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------

      Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries of Commonwealth Aluminum Corporation
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              NAME                            STATE OF INCORPORATION
                              ----                            ----------------------

       <S>                                                           <C>
       Commonwealth Industries, Inc. (1)                             Delaware

       Commonwealth Aluminum Lewisport, Inc. (1)                     Delaware

       Commonwealth Aluminum Sales Corporation (3)                   Delaware

       Commonal Corporation (1)                                      Barbados

       Alflex Corporation (1)                                        Delaware

       Barmet Aluminum Corporation (2)                                 Ohio

<FN>
       -------------------------------------------------------------------
         (1)  Subsidiary of Commonwealth Aluminum Corporation

         (2)  Subsidiary of Alflex Corporation

         (3)  Subsidiary of Commonwealth Aluminum Lewisport, Inc.
</TABLE>





                                       44