alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September  30, 2006 (the  "Report") of Tech Holding  Company (the  "Company") as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  we,
Patrick O. Little,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and J. L. Chauvin,
Vice President and Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                     <C>
/s/Patrick O. Little                          /s/J. L. Chauvin
-----------------------------                 --------------------------------------------
Patrick O. Little                             J. L. Chauvin
President and Chief Executive Officer         Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer)                 (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

December 29, 2006

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         433,717
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,323,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,469,212
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,164,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                 659,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,294,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      3,832,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,841
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,028,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,294,075
<SALES>                                      5,515,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,870,098
<CGS>                                        3,334,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,334,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,569,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             362,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                576,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                   229,551
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            346,776
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   346,776
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
        


</TABLE>
Gregory Paul LAWLER, petitioner, v. Eric SELLERS, Warden.

No. 16-6485 (16A390).

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 19, 2016.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
No. 254.

#### Walsh Construction Co. *v.*United States Guarantee Co.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. Edmond M. Cook*and *Reuel B. Cook*for petitioner.

*Mr. Jesse A. Miller*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of First Southern Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ B. Jack JohnsonB. Jack Johnson President and Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Roderick V. SchlosserRoderick V. Schlosser Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Date: December 17, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First Southern Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by First Southern Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew C. Mead, Appellant.

[882 NYS2d 738]

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Warren County (Hall, J.), rendered September 27, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of robbery in the second degree and menacing in the second degree.

Defendant was charged in a four-count indictment with robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and menacing in the second degree. At a hearing to discuss a possible plea agreement, the prosecution acknowledged possession of evidence that would support an affirmative defense to robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and dismissed those counts. Thereafter, defendant pleaded guilty *815to the remaining charges and was sentenced, as agreed, to six years in prison and one year in jail (to run concurrently) followed by five years of postrelease supervision. He now appeals and we affirm.

Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of his plea allocution, premised on County Court’s alleged failure to adequately inquire as to a possible intoxication defense, is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as defendant did not make a motion to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction *(see People v Simpson,*19 AD3d 945, 945 [2005]). Moreover, the narrow exception to the preservation doctrine is inapplicable here because, notwithstanding defendant’s assertion, County Court clearly satisfied its duty to inquire further *(see People v Moore,*270 AD2d 715, 716 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 800 [2000]). Indeed, immediately following defendant’s statement regarding his intoxication, County Court suspended the plea allocution and advised defendant that such intoxication was something a jury would consider when determining whether he possessed a criminal intent and asked defendant if he was certain that he wanted to proceed without a trial and enter a guilty plea. Following defendant’s affirmative response to that question, defense counsel informed County Court that he and defendant had engaged in extensive discussions regarding the matter. Thus, were we to review the merits, we would find that County Court, having ascertained that defendant’s waiver of a possible intoxication defense was knowing and voluntary, properly accepted his guilty plea *(see People v Sterling,*57 AD3d 1110, 1112 [2008], *lv denied*12 NY3d 788 [2009]).

Defendant’s remaining contentions, to the extent that they are properly before us, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, EJ., Spain, Kane and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Richard Gerald PAOLINO, petitioner, v. Ken CAMERON, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Houtzdale, et al.

No. 16-5749.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000934665
<NAME>                        ESI Tractebel Funding Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               21,564
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 490,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21,563
<BONDS>                                        468,724
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   490,288
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             47,303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 202 3

- 1763 LT Case No

. 20 15

- CF

- 002087

- A

____________________________ N ’ J AI O BANTU , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County

. G. Richard Singeltary , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Zachary Wiseman, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for App ellant. Ashley Moody, Attorn ey General, Tallahassee, and Alyssa M. Williams, Assistant Atto rney General, Day tona Beach, for Appellee. August 20, 2024
P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. E ISNAUGLE , B OATWRIGHT , and K ILBANE , JJ., concur
.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
No. 542.

#### Fountain *v.*Filson et ux., 336 U. S. 681.

Rehearing denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00219-CV 

GARY STEVEN DANIELSON APPELLANT

V.

APRIL MARIE DANIELSON APPELLEE 

------------

FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 231-551313-14

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 29, 2014, we received appellant’s “Request For Additional 

Time” to file the brief. The motion did not comply with the Tex. R. App. P. 9.1, 

9.5, and 10.1(a)(5). On October 30, 2014, we requested an amended motion by 

November 10, 2014. No motion was received.

On December 2, 2014, we notified appellant that his brief had not been 

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution 

unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court 

within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J. 

DELIVERED: January 8, 2015
----

----

II Aktid, mille avaldamine ei ole kohustuslik

Nõukogu

----

Nõukogu otsus tollikoostööd ja vastastikust haldusabi tolliküsimustes käsitleva lepingu sõlmimise kohta Euroopa Ühenduse ja India Vabariigi vahel

(2004/804/EÜ)

Nõukogu otsus, mis käsitleb kirjavahetuse teel lepingu sõlmimist Euroopa Ühenduse ning Barbadose, Belize, Kongo Vabariigi, Fidži, Guyana Kooperatiivvabariigi, Côte d’Ivoire’i Vabariigi, Jamaica, Kenya Vabariigi, Madagaskari Vabariigi, Malawi Vabariigi, Mauritiuse Vabariigi, Suriname Vabariigi, Saint Cristopheri ja Nevise, Svaasimaa Kuningriigi, Tansaania Ühendvabariigi, Trinidadi ja Tobago Vabariigi, Uganda Vabariigi, Sambia Vabariigi ja Zimbabwe Vabariigi vahel Mosambiigi Vabariigi ühinemise kohta AKV-EMÜ koostöölepingu V lisa AKV suhkrut käsitleva 3. protokolliga

----

----

EL-Mehhiko ühisnõukogu otsus nr 2/2004, mis käsitleb EL-Mehhiko ühisnõukogu otsuse nr 2/2000 I lisas loetletud teatud toodete tariifse kohtlemise liberaliseerimist (tuunikalafilee tariifikvoodid)

(2004/805/EÜ)

Käesoleva akti eestikeelne versioon avaldatakse Euroopa Liidu Teataja eriväljaandes, mis sisaldab institutsioonide ja Euroopa Keskpanga poolt enne 1. maid vastuvõetud aktide tekste. Selle väljaande köited ilmuvad ajavahemikus 1. maist kuni 2004. aasta lõpuni.

----
No. 184. No. 185. No. 186.

#### Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, *v.*Watts; Same *v.*Sicard; and Same *v.*Sloane.

October 14, 1935.

*Solicitor General Reed*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Samuel Seabury*and *John F. Mc-Cabe*for respondents.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of PLXTechnology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Michael J. Salameh,****Chief Executive Officer****of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of myknowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,"filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: August 3, 2004
                          /s/ Michael J.Salameh	 
Michael J. Salameh, Chief Executive Officer
Kevin Mark TRUDEAU, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-37.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
In re Abdul AZIZ, petitioner.

No. 16-6003.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 50-309] 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is in receipt of and is making available for public inspection and comment the revised License Termination Plan (LTP) for the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station (MYAPS) located in Lincoln County, Maine. 

                    Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (MYAPC) submitted its proposed LTP for MYAPS by application dated January 13, 2000. The NRC published notice of the receipt and availability for comment of the LTP in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 23, 2000 (65 FR 15657). On May 17, 2000, the NRC published notice of the license amendment request and opportunity for hearing associated with the LTP (65 FR 31357).                 

                    On June 1, 2001, MYAPC filed a revised LTP. The MYAPS LTP revision is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, where it may be examined, and/or copied for a fee. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the ADAMS Public                           ( print page 33581)                        Library Component on the NRC Web site, http:                    //                    www.nrc.gov (the Electronic Reading Room). In addition, the revised LTP may be accessed on the MYAPC web site,                     *www.maineyankee.com.*

Comments regarding the MYAPS LTP may be submitted in writing and addressed to Mr. Michael Webb, Mail Stop O-7 D1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-1347 or e-mail mkw@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of June 2001.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Robert A. Gramm, 

Chief, Section 1, Project Directorate IV, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 01-15709 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 30 2000

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

* The Honorable Anthony A. Alaimo, Senior U.S. District Judge for the

Southern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

97-6808-II

 

MARGARET T. ALLEN,

YOLANDA F. LAMAR,

ET AL., 

 Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus

THE ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION,

FOB JAMES,

ET AL., 

 Defendants-Appellants.

--------------------------

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Alabama

--------------------------

(June 30, 2000)

BEFORE: BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and ALAIMO, Senior

District Judge.*
- 2 -

BY THE COURT:

The parties’ “Motion to Withdraw Rehearing Petition...,” construed as a joint

motion to withdraw the rehearing petition, to vacate this Court’s published opinion,

and to remand this matter to District Court to resolve all issues relating to attorneys’

fees, is GRANTED.
Office of Proceedings 

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Thrf;'le Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

www.cftc.gov 

''t7 

'I 

'I 

' ·····:./ 

' '• 

: ' 

'' 

ARMSTRONG-BUTCHER 

PROPERTIES LLC DBPP, 

Complainant, 

' ~ .. •, '' 

v. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CFTC Docket Nos. 11-RooS & 12-R031 

FOREX CAPITAL MARKETS LLC 

d/b/aFXCM, 

Respondent. 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The parties have amicably resolved their dispute and have filed a joint stipulation 

of dismissal. Accordingly, these consolidated proceedings are hereby dismissed. 

Dated July 16, 2014. 

1/)1/_ry;/A 1< Ph~cGuire, Judgment Officer
Ruben M. REBELO, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 16-5816.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department denied.
Richard R. APONTE, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 15-9465.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Carolyn FJORD, et al., petitioners, v. Herbert D. KELLEHER.

No. 16-465.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), I, Chung-Lun Yang, certify that:

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report of ACL Semiconductors Inc. (the
 Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
 Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the
 date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.                                                                                                                                                                   

|                             |                             | 
|---------------------------- | --------------------------- | 
|Date:     September
 7, 2010 | /s/
 Chung-Lun Yang         | 
|                             |                             | 
|                             | Chung-Lun
 Yang             | 
|                             | Chief
 Executive Officer of | 
|                             | ACL
 Semiconductors Inc.    | 

This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
ACL Semiconductors Inc. and will be retained by ACL Semiconductors Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---