alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2



I, Michael J. ODonnell, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Storage Computer Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the regristrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter. ( the regristerants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect the regristerants internal control over
financial reporting: and



5. The registrants other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):



a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



|                     |  |                         
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2004 |  | /S/ Michael J. ODonnell
|                     |  | Michael J. ODonnell    
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
In re Nigel WHITTAKER, petitioner.

No. 15-9276.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation (BKFC) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Zapp, Chief Executive Officer and President of BKFC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of BKFC.



/s/    ROBERT W. ZAPPRobert W. ZappChief Executive Officer and PresidentMarch 11, 2005
02/01/2008 15:58 FAX 203 761 2250 

Lou is Dreyfus 8 

LOUIS DREYFUS SUGAR 

Louis Dreyfus Sugar Cl)n1\)<"~ll,\' 

2.0 We>tport Hoart 

14J001 

Td.,ph<JJr" 20:3 7fi 1-21 no ~~"'. Pax ~0:1 7~1-22Fi0 

PO (:lox 810 IV I t-;;ugal'f£<1 lou istl r cy fu:i. i! rJ n1 

COMMENT 

David A. St nvick, Secretary · 

Commodity Futures Trading C01runission 

Three Lafa) ette Center 

1155 21st S:reet, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. -20581 

Wlll\ln, Conn~r:Licllt 

D6B~f7-08W 

•J.', 

l February 2008 

RE: lCE CLEAR SECTION 4(C) REQUEST 

Dear Mr. S awick: 

I am writin.§ to voice my own and my company's support for ICE Clear U.S. Inc. arid 

ICE Futures U. S., Inc.'s exemption requests related to their plans to clear over the 

counter S\va) transactions in sugar, coffee and cocoa, as published in the Federal Register 

on December 6, 2007, at 72 F.R. 68862. 

We support [CE's plan to offer OTC swap market participants the ability to substitute a 

swap positic n for a cleared-only, cash-settled futures contract, as this will offer such OTC 

market parti :ipants additional flexibility in managing their overall position. We also 

SLtpport ICE's request that Floor Members, subject to certain conditions, be deemed ESPs 

for the purpr >Se of entering into the OTC trc:msactions, as described in the request for 

exemption. 

Further, we Jclieve the exemption requests arc appropriate to this goal, and that granting 

the exempti1 1n request will therefore benetit participants in the OTC S\vap market. In 

addition, we believe that granting the relief requested will not affect the ability ofiCE 

Clearing US or ICE Futures US to satisfy their respective self-regulatory duties under the 

Commodity Exchange Act (the 11 Act") or effect the ability of the Conunission to fulfill 

its regulator l obligation under the Act. 

Beyond thes:; specific exemption requests, we also believe that the current regulatory 

distinctions hat treat agricultural swap contracts differently than swap contracts in nonagricultural · >roducts are unnecessary and have the effect of limiting innovation and 

flexibility in the agricultural markets. Therefore, we request that the Commission support 

in its future. ·egulatory interpretations harmonious treatment of agricultural and nonagricultural . :waps wherever possible. 

In closing, v. e believe that all of the conditions for the exercise of the Commission's 

Exemptive f ,uthority tmder Section 4(c) are met by the ICE proposals and thus, they 

should be gr mted in all respects. 

V ~ry )91ly yr~UJ: 

~~~···~ 

.lfi.'J?aul Care er : 

Vice President (Chainnan ofthe ICE Future's World Sugar Committee) 

~ < •• _· -,, 

. -·· .. ~ .,.,
Juan M. TIDWELL, Sr., petitioner, v. Shawn HATTON, Acting Warden, et al.

No. 16-5729.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF NE LP

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
											      State or Jurisdiction
					 Subsidiary                                             of Incorporation
<S>                                                                                               <C>
1. Northeast Energy, LLC (100%-Owned) ....................................................        Florida

2. Northeast Energy Associates, A Limited Partnership (99%-Owned) (a) ....................        Massachusetts

3. North Jersey Energy Associates, A Limited Partnership (99%-Owned) (a) .................        New Jersey

(a)  Northeast Energy, LLC owns the remaining 1% interest.

</TABLE>

SUBSIDIARIES OF NJEA

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
											      State or Jurisdiction
					 Subsidiary                                             of Incorporation
<S>                                                                                               <C>
1. ESI Tractebel Urban Renewal Corporation (100%-Owned) ..................................        New Jersey

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          24,903
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,959
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,125
<PP&E>                                          81,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,922
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         40
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                   (107,035)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,575
<SALES>                                        390,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               391,898
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  364,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,605
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (35,790)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,395
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,395
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.29
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Vladlena Belolipskala, Appellant, v Mathias Guerrand, Respondent.

[885 NYS2d 484]

— Order, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about March 10, 2008, which denied petitioner’s objection to an earlier Support Magistrate’s order denying her second motion to amend the caption on an order of filiation, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the objection sustained and the caption amended to include respondent’s alias of GuerrandHermes.

The court should not have denied the motion for petitioner’s failure to file timely objections to the Support Magistrate’s order. The time to file such objections begins to run on service of that order with notice of entry *(Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Dietrich,*208 AD2d 474 [1994]), which concededly never took place. Moreover, given that respondent stated his name as Guerrand-Hermes on his tax returns and his passport, and the child may have an interest in various trusts or other assets relating to the Hermes family, the court should have conformed respondent’s name on the order of filiation to match that of the child *(see Matter of J.O.T.,*120 Misc 2d 817 [1983]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Catterson, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
GRUNENTHAL GMBH, petitioner, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., et al.

No. 16-296.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Jerry JAMGOTCHIAN, petitioner, v. KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION, et al.

No. 16-171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky denied.
Order filed, January 31, 2018

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

____________ NO. 01

- 17

- 00934

- CV
HOUSTON COPPERWOOD APTS., L.P. , Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTR ICT , Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case 2016

- 77217



### ORDER The reporter’s record in this case was due January 26, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal
, if any
, within 30 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1579 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1579

        Establishing an earmark moratorium for fiscal year 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2010

 Mr. Peters submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        Establishing an earmark moratorium for fiscal year 2011.

    Resolved, That (a) it shall not be in order to consider--
            (1) a bill or joint resolution reported by any committee, 
        or any amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that 
        includes a congressional earmark or limited tax benefit; or
            (2) a bill or joint resolution not reported by any 
        committee, or any amendment thereto or conference report 
        thereon, that includes a congressional earmark or limited tax 
        benefit.
    (b) For the purposes of this resolution, the terms ``congressional 
earmark'' and ``limited tax benefit'' have the meaning given those 
terms in clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives.
    (c) The point of order under subsection (a) shall only apply to 
legislation providing or authorizing discretionary budget authority, 
credit authority, or other spending authority, or providing a Federal 
tax deduction, credit, or exclusion in fiscal year 2011.
    (d) This resolution shall not apply to any authorization of 
appropriations to a Federal entity if such authorization is not 
specifically targeted to a State, locality, or congressional district.
    Sec. 2.  The Committee on Rules may not report a rule or order that 
would waive the point of order set forth in the first section of this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15489]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 198: Next-Generation Air/Ground 
Communications System (NEXCOM)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION:  Notice of RTCA Special Committee 198 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 198: Next-Generatiaon Air/Ground 
Communications System (NEXCOM).

DATES: The meeting will be held on June 28, 2001, starting at 9:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA Headquarters, 1140 
Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is 
hereby given for a Special Committee 198 meeting. NOTE: WG-1, 
``Response,'' will meet at RTCA June 29, 2001; WG-2, ``Principles,'' 
will meet at RTCA June 26-27, 2001. The agenda will include:

June 28

<bullet> Opening Session (Welcome and Introductory Remarks, Review 
Minutes of Previous Meeting, Introduction of Working Group Chairs and 
Secretaries).
<bullet> Review Position Papers for WG-1 and Second Draft of WG-1 
Response to Chairman's Report.
<bullet> Review Position Papers for WG-2 and Revised Draft of WG-2 
Principles of Operation.
<bullet> Working Groups Review Status of Action Items.
<bullet> Closing Session (Date and Place of Next Meeting).

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 4, 2001.
Jane P. Caldwell,
Program Director, System Engineering Resource Management.
[FR Doc. 01-15489 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 10, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Mark L. Grannell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Mark L. Grannell |
|----------------------|

Mark L. Grannell 

Chief Executive Officer 

August 10, 2007

 

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 1 

secretary 

From: afordyce@optonline.net 

Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:48 PM .~- .-:· ~- .. 

To: secretary 

Subject: BLOCK TRADING 

to whom it may concern 

COMMENT 

I have b_een a floor trader for 12 years on what is now the ICE Exchange in various markets. I ani 

writing to comment on the proposed rules of trading off the centralized markets(block trading). 

I do believe in a centralized, competitive, transparent market where price discovery is made.I do 

understand that in some markets quantity and liquidity are problems, and some traders are force to look 

outside the market for interest. All markets are unique; not all should be regarded as the same. Who is 

to decide the minimum quantity of these block trades? I believe it should be the market's own 

committee to decide, which are made up of off the floor traders, brokers, and locals. I also believe that 

the price of the trades should not exceed the bid & offer of the centralized market. 

I fell that the CFTC should govern the exchanges for the good of the market place. 

Respectfully 

Alastair Fordyce 

11117/2008 

. ·' 

.. Ji, .. ·: .; ~''
Darris Donnell HARDY, petitioner, v. Dave DAVEY, Warden, et al.

No. 16-6150.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RENAISSANCE COSMETICS INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,698
<SECURITIES>                                     1,934
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     54,820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,086
<PP&E>                                          41,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,387)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 240,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          334,659
<BONDS>                                          4,072
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          124,258
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                   (230,742)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   240,484
<SALES>                                        179,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,696
<CGS>                                          115,724
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               233,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (196,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       912
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (197,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (197,446)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   268.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>