alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-Oll60

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Gerald McAfee <geraldm832@gmail.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 11:05 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Gerald McAfee

8101 Holly Hill Rd.

Charlottte, NC 28227
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John G. Day, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

       A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Dated: August 13, 2004

                                                     /s/ John G. Day
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     John G. Day
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation (BKFC) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert D. Fulkerson, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of BKFC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of BKFC.



/s/    MARTIN J. GERRETYMartin J. Gerrety Treasurer and Assistant Secretary March 12, 2004
James LEGATE, petitioner, v. Bryan COLLIER, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

No. 16-5915.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                                  STATEMENT RE:
                       COMPUTATIONS OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                               -------------------------------
                                                                   2002               2001
                                                               ------------       ------------
<S>                                                            <C>                <C>
Numerator:
           Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share

           Net loss                                            $ (1,571,529)      $ (1,870,941)
                                                               ============       ============

Denominator:
           Denominator for basic loss per share --
                 weighted average shares                        121,566,761         88,311,958

Effect of dilutive securities:
           Stock options and warrants                                    --                 --
                                                               ------------       ------------

           Dilutive potential common shares                              --                 --
                                                               ------------       ------------

           Denominator for diluted earnings per share -
                 adjusted weighted average shares and
                 assumed conversions                            121,566,761         88,311,958
                                                               ============       ============

           Basic loss per share                                $      (0.01)      $      (0.02)
                                                               ============       ============
           Diluted loss per share                              $      (0.01)      $      (0.02)
                                                               ============       ============
</TABLE>

The Company incurred a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and
2001. Therefore, the Company did not make adjustments for potentially dilutive
securities, as the adjustments would have been anti-dilutive.
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, petitioner, v. IMPERIAL PREMIUM FINANCE, LLC.

No. 15-1385.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SAMIR SAUNDERS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 380 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 1679 EDA 

2019 entered on March 22, 2021, 

affirming, vacating and 

remanding the Judgment of 

Sentence of the Bucks County Court 

of Common Pleas at No. CP-09-CR0002212-2018 entered on April 26, 

2019

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TIMOTHY DESHAN DAVIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 381 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 1572 EDA 

2019 entered on March 22, 2021, 

affirming, vacating and 

remanding the Judgment of 

Sentence of the Bucks County Court 

of Common Pleas at No. CP-09-CR0004661-2017 entered on May 3, 

2019

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VERNON GEORGE KLINE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 382 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 1180 EDA 

2019 entered on March 22, 2021, 

affirming, vacating and 

remanding the Judgment of 

Sentence of the Bucks County Court 

of Common Pleas at No. CP-09-CR-
[380 - 385 MAL 2021] - 2

:

:

0007906-2017 entered on July 30, 

2018

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH THOMAS MORRIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 383 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 1184 EDA 

2019 entered on March 22, 2021, 

vacating and remanding the Order 

of the Bucks County Court of 

Common Pleas at No. CP-09-CR0005089-2017 entered on March 18, 

2019

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER L. HENNEGHAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 384 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 1218 EDA 

2019 entered on March 22, 2021, 

vacating and remanding the Order 

of the Bucks County Court of 

Common Pleas at No. CP-09-CR0007376-2017 entered on March 18, 

2019

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARRIUS J. PRINCE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 385 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 1243 EDA 

2019 entered on March 22, 2021, 

affirming, vacating and 

remanding the Judgment of 

Sentence of the Bucks County Court 

of Common Pleas at No. CP-09-CR0000025-2018 entered on August 6, 

2018
[380 - 385 MAL 2021] - 3

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: August 9, 2024

AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2024, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are 

GRANTED, the orders of the Superior Court are VACATED, and the cases are 

REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of the Court’s decision in 

Commonwealth v. Torsilieri, __ A.3d __, 2024 WL 2789201 (Pa. filed May 31, 2024).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1635 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1635

 Supporting the goals and ideals of an annual ``National Yellow Ribbon 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2010

 Mr. Murphy of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of an annual ``National Yellow Ribbon 
                                 Day''.

Whereas the yellow ribbon is often worn on clothing or tied around a tree in the 
        front yard of a home as a widely recognized symbol of support for our 
        Nation's troops;
Whereas the yellow ribbon unites communities across America in support of our 
        Nation's troops and their families;
Whereas the yellow ribbon recognizes the sacrifices and dedication of the United 
        States military;
Whereas, on April 9, 2004, United States Army Staff Sergeant Keith Matthew 
        ``Matt'' Maupin became the first Prisoner of War in Operation Iraqi 
        Freedom; and
Whereas the State of New York has officially recognized April 9 as annual 
        ``Yellow Ribbon Day'', reminding the American people of the powerful 
        symbolism associated with the yellow ribbon: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and 
ideals of an annual ``National Yellow Ribbon Day''.
                                 <all>
```
Lambert DEHLER, petitioner, v. Gary C. MOHR, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.

No. 16-6243.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Isaac J. WALKER, petitioner, v. Leroy CARTLEDGE, Warden.

No. 16-5887.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit32**

Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned,James J. Leto, President and Chief Executive Officer of GTSI Corp. (“theCompany”) and Joe Ragan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2007 filed by GTSI Corp. with the Securities and ExchangeCommission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Reportfairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of GTSI Corp.

Date:       May 15, 2007
| /s/ JAMES J. LETO |                                              |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|              | James J. Leto                                     |
|              | President and Chief Executive Officer             |
|              |                                              |
| /s/ JOE RAGAN     |                                              |
|              | Joe Ragan                                         |
|              | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                   |                                                   |  |  |

 

1

----
Cynthia CADET, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6418.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 8.1- Subsidiaries

Organizational Structure.

Corporate Structure

Novogen Limited is a company limited by shares and is incorporated and
domiciled in Australia. Novogen Limited has prepared a consolidated financial
report incorporating the entities that it controlled during the financial year,
which included the following

|                                 |                              |               |                      |   |       |       |  |  | 
|-------------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------- | - | ----- | ----- |  |  | 
|                                 |                              |               | Country of Ownership |   |       |       | 
|Name of Entity                   |                              | Incorporation |                      | %
|Novogen Laboratories Pty Ltd     |                              | Australia     |                      |   | 100.0 |      
|Novogen Research Pty Ltd         |                              | Australia     |                      |   | 100.0 |      
|Phytosearch Pty Ltd              |                              | Australia     |                      |   | 100.0 |      
|Phytogen Pty Ltd                 |                              | Australia     |                      |   | 100.0 |      
|Central Coast Properties Pty Ltd |                              | Australia     |                      |   | 100.0 |      
|Novogen Inc                      |                              | US            |                      |   | 100.0 |      
|                                 | Glycotex Inc                 |               | US                   |   |       | 97.6  | 
|Novogen Limited                  |                              | UK            |                      |   | 100.0 |      
|                                 | Novogen BV                   |               | Netherlands          |   |       | 100.0 | 
|Novogen New Zealand Limited      |                              | New Zealand   |                      |   | 100.0 |      
|Novogen Canada Limited           |                              | Canada        |                      |   | 100.0 |      
|Marshall Edwards Inc             |                              | US            |                      |   | 95.1  |      
|                                 | Marshall Edwards Pty Limited |               | Australia            |   |       | 95.1  |
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Riviana Foods Inc.:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No. 333-40865, 333-15843 and 333-02484) on Form S-8 and registration
statement (No. 333-17901) on Form S-3 of Riviana Foods Inc. of our report dated
August 12, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Riviana Foods
Inc. as of June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income,
capital accounts and retained earnings, comprehensive income and accumulated
other comprehensive loss for the year ended June 30, 2002, and all related
financial statement schedules, which report appears in the June 30, 2002, annual
report on Form 10-K of Riviana Foods Inc.



KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
September 13, 2002
Shane Elliott HARE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5348.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



Board of Directors
The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation
Florence, Kentucky


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation of our Report of
Independent Auditors, dated January 24, 2001, on the consolidated balance sheets
of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2000, which report is included in Form 10-K of The Bank of Kentucky
Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2000




                                                Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


March 28, 2001
Indianapolis, Indiana
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-3249

_____________________________

DEVIN DAENARD GARMON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

April 9, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROWE, TANENBAUM, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Devin Daenard Garmon, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
| **Shareholder Fees - BroadlyDiversifiedInternationalEquityFunds-RetailComboPRO**   | Dec. 30, 2024 USD ($) |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| BroadlyDiversifiedInternationalEquityFunds-RetailComboPRO | Fidelity Overseas Fund |                  |
| **Shareholder Fees:**                                                              |                  |
| (fees paid directly from your investment)                                          | none                  |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Other Expenses
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form N-1A -Section 3 -Subsection table -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph 10
+ Details**Name:**rr_ShareholderFeeOther**Namespace Prefix:**rr_**Data Type:**rr:NonNegativeMonetaryType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**rr_ShareholderFeesAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**rr_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**dei_DocumentInformationDocumentAxis=fmr_BroadlyDiversifiedInternationalEquityFunds-RetailComboPROMember**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
| X                                                                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**dei_LegalEntityAxis=fmr_S000007100Member**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |