alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                Exhibit 23.1





                     Consent of Independent Auditors




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-09505) pertaining to the Nicollet Process Engineering, 
Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan and the Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 1995 
Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated October 16, 
1998, with respect to the financial statements of Nicollet Process 
Engineering, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year 
ended August 31, 1998.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                       ----------------------
                                           Ernst & Young LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 10, 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP99-301-022]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), tendered for filing and approval four Service Agreements between ANR and PCS Nitrogen Ohio, L.P., BP Chemicals, Inc. and Premcor Refining Groups, Inc. (Shipper) pursuant to ANR's Rate Schedule FTS-1 (together referred to as the Shipper Agreements).

ANR states that the Shipper Agreements contain negotiated rate arrangements between ANR and Shipper. ANR requests that the Commission accept and approve the Shipper Agreements to be effective June 1, 2001.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15228 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Norman Kevin WILKERSON, petitioner, v. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA, et al.

No. 16-6468.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-56, 333-17977, 333-45291, and 333-59933) pertaining to the
1992 Stock Plan, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1995 Director Option Plan,
and the 1997 Stock Plan of Perclose, Inc., of our report dated April 28, 1999,
with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Perclose, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 1999.



                                                          /s/    ERNST & YOUNG


San Jose, California
June 22, 1999
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

I Steven A.Schumm, as Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and PrincipalAccounting Officer of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) theaccompanying Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                        |   | By:    |   | /s/ Steven A. Schumm                                            |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |   |   |                                                            |
|                   |   |   |   | Steven A. Schumm

Chief Financial  Officer                      |
|                   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal  Accounting Officer) |
|                   |   |   |   |                                                            |
|                   |   |   |   |                                                            |
| Date: November 8, 2006 |   |   |   |                                                            |

 

----
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Subsidiary                     State of Incorporation          Doing Business As
------------------                     ----------------------          -----------------
<S>                                    <C>                             <C>
Spirit Homes, Inc.                     Arkansas                        Spirit Homes

Delta Homes, Inc.                      Mississippi                     Belmont Homes

Belmont Homes Transportation Inc.      Mississippi                     Belmont Homes

Bellcrest Homes, Inc.                  Georgia                         Bellcrest Homes

Quality Housing Supply, L.L.C. *       Tennessee                       N/A

Ridge Point Manufacturing, L.L.C. *    Alabama                         N/A
</TABLE>

------------------
*  Not wholly owned.
Carl H. VON HUGO, petitioner, v. FORMAS, THE SWEDISH RESEARCH COUNCIL FOR ENVIRONMENT, AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND SPATIAL PLANNING.

No. 16-416.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1207 

Recognizing the National Museum of World War II Aviation in Colorado 

Springs, Colorado, as America’s National World War II Aviation Museum. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2010 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. COURTNEY, 

Ms. MARKEY of Colorado, Mr. KINGSTON, and Mr. BOREN) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the National Museum of World War II Aviation 

in Colorado Springs, Colorado, as America’s National 

World War II Aviation Museum. 

Whereas World War II was one of the most important events 

in the history of the Nation, a time of moral clarity and 

common purpose that remains today as an inspiration to 

all people in the United States; 

Whereas the role of aviation was a critical factor in the success of winning World War II and defeating the enemies 

worldwide; 

Whereas the bravery, courage, dedication, and heroism of 

World War II aviators and support personnel was an important element in the winning of World War II; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1207 IH 

Whereas the National Museum of World War II Aviation in 

Colorado Springs, Colorado, is the only museum in the 

United States that exists to exclusively preserve and promote an understanding of the role of aviation in winning 

World War II; and 

Whereas the National Museum of World War II Aviation is 

dedicated to celebrating the spirit of the United States, 

recognizing the teamwork, collaboration, patriotism, and 

courage of the men and women who fought, as well as 

those on the home front who mobilized and supported the 

national aviation effort: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the National Museum of World War II Aviation in 

3 Colorado Springs, Colorado, as America’s National World 

4 War II Aviation Museum. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Protection of Cleared Swaps 

Customers Before And After Commodity Broker Bankruptcies 

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) is requesting comment on issues concerning the 

protection of the collateral of the swaps customers of futures commission merchants. 

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) 

Section 724 of the Dodd-Frank Act amends the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) by inserting a new 

section 4d(f), concerning the protection of the collateral of the swaps customers of futures commission 

merchants. 

Costs and Benefits 

The Commission is seeking information concerning the costs and benefits of various models by which the 

collateral of swaps customers may be protected both at individual entities and across the industry.

Models Being Considered 

The Commission is considering a range of models, including 

1) a model requiring individual segregation of each customer’s collateral at all levels (at the FCM, 

DCO and at each custodian), 

2) a model of individual customer protection, where collateral of multiple customers may be 

commingled, but the value of the collateral for each customer’s positions is treated on an individual 

basis, 

3) a model where the collateral of non-defaulting customers may be used in the event of an FCM 

default, but only after other elements of the clearinghouse’s default resources package, including the 

clearinghouse’s own contribution and the clearing member-funded guarantee fund, and 

4) the current futures model, which treats an FCM’s customers on an omnibus basis. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, petitioner, v. James Garcia DIMAYA.

No. 15-1498.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
|Fidelity (logo) Investments®||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| | Fidelity Management &
Research Company
82 Devonshire Street
Boston MA  02109-3614
617 563 7000
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| | May 15, 2012
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------



U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention:  File Room



|Re: | Fidelity Investment Trust (the trust):       
|--- | ---------------------------------------------
|    | Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (the fund)
|    | File Nos.002-90649and811-04008               



__________________________________________________________________________

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Transmitted herewith pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933 is certification that the Prospectus and Statementof Additional Information with respect to the above referenced fund do not differ from those filed in the most recent post-effective amendment, which
was filed electronically.

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| | Very truly yours,
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------
|                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                        
|/s/ Scott C. Goebel                                                                                                     
|Scott C. Goebel                                                                                                         
|Secretary of the Trust
# C_2012032EN.01000301.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-157/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 43 EC - Freedom of establishment - Notaries - Nationality requirement - Article 45 EC - Connection with the exercise of official authority)

2012/C 32/04

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and W. Roels, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: D.J.M. de Grave and M.A.M de Ree, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Slovenia (represented by: T. Mihelič, acting as Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 43 EC and 45 EC — Access to and practice of the profession of notary — Nationality requirement — Connection with the exercise of official authority

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by imposing a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 43 EC. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by imposing a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 43 EC.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

| 3. | Orders the Slovenian Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Slovenian Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 1.8.2009.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ralph H. Schmitt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
  This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Date: May 6, 2011
  By: /s/ Ralph H. Schmitt
 Ralph H. Schmitt
 Chief Executive Officer
  41
# FCM Data October 2017
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15540]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3701]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Bernardo Bellotto and the Capitals of Europe''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Bernardo Bellotto and the 
Capitals of Europe,'' imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition 
without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. 
These objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the 
foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston from on or about 
July 29, 2001 to on or about October 21, 2001 is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including the 
exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline H. Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: June 12, 2001.
Helena Kane Finn,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United 
States Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-15540 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
**Exhibit 3.5**

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE BYLAWS OF SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS, INC. 

The Board of Directors of SpeedwayMotorsports, Inc. (“SMI”) pursuant to its authority granted by Article 7 of the Bylaws of SMI, hereby amends such Bylaws by replacing Section 5.01 with the following new Section 5.01: 

**SECTION 5.01. STOCK CERTIFICATES**

(a) StockCertificates. Shares of stock in the Corporation may be represented by certificated or uncertificated shares, but every holder of stock in the Corporation will be entitled to have a certificate signed by, or in the name of the Corporation by theChairman or Vice Chairman, or the President or Vice President, and by the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, or the Treasurer or an Assistant Treasurer, and may be sealed with the seal of the Corporation, certifying the number of shares owned byhim in the Corporation. Where such certificate is signed (1) by a transfer agent other than the Corporation or its employee, or (2) by a registrar other than the Corporation or its employee, the signatures of the officers of theCorporation may be facsimiles. In case any officer who has signed or whose facsimile signature has been placed upon a certificate shall have ceased to be such officer before such certificate is issued, it may be issued by the Corporation with thesame effect as if he were such officer at the date of issue. 

(b) Transfer of Stock. Stock of the Corporation shall be transferable in themanner prescribed by the laws of the State of Delaware and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, through such procedures for the transfer of uncertificated shares as are authorized by the Board of Directors. 

(c) New Certificates. The Corporation shall issue a new certificate of stock in the place of any certificate theretofore issued by it, alleged to havebeen lost, stolen or destroyed, if the owner: (1) so requests before the Corporation as notice that the shares of stock represented by that certificate have been acquired by a bona fide purchaser; (2) files with the Corporation a bondsufficient (in the judgment of the directors) to indemnify the Corporation against any claim that may be made against it on account of the alleged loss or theft of that certificate or the issuance of a new certificate; and (3) satisfies anyother requirements imposed by the directors that are reasonable under the circumstances. A new certificate may be issued without requiring any bond when, in the judgment of the directors, it is proper so to do.