alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010317EN.01001002.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Oasis East sp. z o.o. v Minister Finansów

(Case C-395/09) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Directive 2006/112/EC - Accession of a new Member State - Right to deduct input tax - National legislation excluding the right to deduct tax on the provision of certain services - Commercial partners established in a territory classified as a ‘tax haven’ - Option for Member States to retain rules excluding the right to deduct at the time when the Sixth VAT Directive entered into force)

2010/C 317/19

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Oasis East sp. z o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Minister Finansów

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Interpretation of Article 17(6) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) and of Article 176 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — National legislation, already in force prior to accession, which excluded a right to a reduction of tax relating to the provision of services in respect of which payment is made in favour of a person having its place of residence, registered office or central management in a territory regarded as being a ‘tax haven’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 17(6) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995, the provisions of which have, in essence, been reproduced in Article 176 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, must be construed as not authorising the retention of national legislation, applicable when Sixth Directive 77/388 entered into force in the Member State concerned, which excludes in general the right to deduct input value added tax paid at the time of the purchase of imported services, the price of which is directly or indirectly paid to a person established in a State or territory classified as a ‘tax haven’ by that national legislation.

---

(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Henry P. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
--------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
May 5, 2006

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Alvie Lerone BYRD-GREEN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 15-9283.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Phillip Jerome GARDNER, petitioner, v. S. RYAN, et al.

No. 16-6658.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 13.1**
Section 906 Certification
By the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Each of Christopher Naughton, Chief Executive Officer, and David Ross Seaton, Chief FinancialOfficer of Novogen Limited, a New South Wales corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:
 (1) The Company’s periodic report on form 20-F for the period ended June30, 2004 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
* * *     Chief Executive Officer   Chief Financial Officer          Christopher Naughton   David Seaton     Date: xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2004   Date: xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2004
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
OSC AR WALKER AND LUANNE B -WALKER,
A ppellant s,

v. Case No

. 5D 23

- 92 LT Cas e No. 16

- 2020 -SC- 605- XXXX- MA

M IKE MCCANN D/B/A JAXCO FURNITURE & MATTRESS OUTLET, INC. , A ppellee

. ________________________________/
D ecision filed May 2, 2023 Appeal from the C ounty C ourt for Duval County , Roberto Arias , Judge. Oscar Walker, Jacksonville, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
A FFIRMED.

LAM BERT, C.J., SOUD and MACIVER , JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), I, Ben Wong, certify that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report of USmart Mobile Device Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2014 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:     April 15, 2015 | /s/ Ben Wong                                          | 
|------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|                         | Ben Wong                                              | 
|                         | Chief Executive Officer of 
USmart Mobile Device Inc. | 



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to USmart Mobile Device Inc. and will be retained by USmart Mobile Device Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Larry D. CHEATHAM, petitioner, v. Ronald BAILEY, et al.

No. 16-6584.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Manuel Robert Anderson LEMAR, petitioner, v. AMERICAN TRADING CORPORATIONS, et al.

No. 16-6407.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         366,415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,632,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (309,198)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,423,498
<PP&E>                                       6,060,755
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,391,396)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,146,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,250,587
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,371,090
<COMMON>                                         7,506
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,517,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,146,551
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,267,325
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,100,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             742,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,575,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,575,726
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,575,726
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Robert STRINGER, petitioner, v. Robert GILMORE, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al.

No. 16-6623.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
II-Oll90

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

John Peck <frisiard@gmail.com>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 6:00 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

John Peck

9 Hickory lane

Higganum, CT 06441
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on May 14, 2001, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), RxHub LLC has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are AdvancePCS, Dallas, TX; Express Scripts, Inc., Maryland Heights, MO; and Merck-Medco Managed Care, L.L.C., Franklin Lakes, NJ.

The nature and objectives of the venture are the development and operation of an electronic prescription and information routing service for the purpose of facilitating error-free prescription benefit communications.

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-15671  Filed 7-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Jackie ABBOTT, et al., petitioners, v. BANNER HEALTH NETWORK, fka Banner Health, Inc., et al.

No. 16-482.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 17, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.
William R. MACPHEAT, petitioner, v. Mary E. REED.

No. 16-5009.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
Travis Wade AMARAL, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 15-9187.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.
IV 

House Calendar No. 11 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 168 

[Report No. 111–17] 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill 

(H.R. 1) making supplemental appropriations for job preservation and 

creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, for 

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 12), 2009 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1) making supplemental appropriations for job preservation and creation, infrastructure 

investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to 

the unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, 

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 1) making supplemental approVerDate Nov 24 2008 02:37 Feb 13, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR168.RH HR168

wwoods2 on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 168 RH 

1 priations for job preservation and creation, infrastructure 

2 investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the 

3 unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, for 

4 the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other 

5 purposes. All points of order against consideration of the 

6 conference report are waived except those arising under 

7 clause 9 of rule XXI. The conference report shall be con8 sidered as read. All points of order against the conference 

9 report are waived. The previous question shall be consid10 ered as ordered on the conference report to its adoption 

11 without intervening motion except: (1) 90 minutes of de12 bate and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable. 


wwoods2 on PROD1PC60 with BILLS

wwoods2 on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 11 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 168 

[Report No. 111–17] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report 

F

other purposes. fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for and State and local fiscal stabilization, for the ciency and science, assistance to the unemployed, creation, infrastructure investment, energy effimental appropriations for job preservation and to accompany the bill (H.R. 1) making suppleEBRUARY 13 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 12), 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


wwoods2 on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
II-01165

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Scptt Kuhle <scottkuhle@adelphia.net>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 10:36 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Scptt Kuhle

540 NW State Street

Pullman, WA 99163
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Termination--TIG 
Insurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 18 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 2000 Revision, published June 30, 2000 at 65 FR 40868.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6765.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Certificate 
of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above named Company, under 
the United States Code, title 31, sections 9304-9308, to quality as an 
acceptable surety on Federal bonds is terminated effective today.
    The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal 
bonds at 65 FR 40901, June 30, 2000.
    With respect to any bonds, including continuous bonds, currently in 
force with above listed Company, bond-approving officers should secure 
new bonds with acceptable sureties in those instances where a 
significant amount of liability remains outstanding. In addition, in no 
event, should bonds that are continuous in nature be renewed.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/index.html. A hard copy may be purchased 
from the Government Printing Office (GPO), Subscription Service, 
Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular 
from GPO, use the following stock number: 048-000-00536-5.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6A04, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: June 18, 2001.
Wanda J. Rogers,
Acting Assistant Commissioner, Financial Operations, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 01-15918 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M