alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1

# SUBSIDIARIES OF
REGISTRANT

|Name                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Semitool Europe Ltd.                                            
  Semitool Halbleitertechnik Vertriebs GmbH                       
  Semitool France SARL                                            
  Semitool Italia SRL                                             
  Semitool Japan Inc.                                             
  Semitool Korea, Inc.                                            
  Semitool (Asia) Pte Ltd.                                        
  Rhetech, Inc.                                                   
  Semitool Austria GmbH                                           
  Semitool Israel, Limited                                        
  Semitool Schweiz GmbH                                           
  Semitool Semiconductor Equipment Technology (Shanghai) Co., LTD.
  Semitool (Taiwan) Inc. |  | United Kingdom
Germany
France
Italy
Japan
Korea
Singapore
Delaware
Austria
Israel
Switzerland
China
Nevada
Michael A. COX, petitioner, v. Phillip HALL, Warden.

No. 16-5071.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Barbara Jean FELDMAN, et vir., petitioners, v. H.A. BERKHEIMER, INC., dba Berkheimer Tax Administrator, et al.

No. 16-5314.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
NUMBER 13-19-00337-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

JAVIER ALONZO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 398th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the honorable O. Rene Flores’ motion to 

withdraw.

Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel, if 

any, rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 
2

255 (Tex. App.BHouston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the 

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with 

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of 

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s attorney should 

remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to appointed 

counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge appellant’s 

current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter an order 

to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name, 

address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be 

included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to be 

included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or 

before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

Appellant’s brief shall be due thirty days after the receipt of the supplemental 

record.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

20th day of October, 2020.
EXHIBIT 21.1





SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT





Name

                    

                    Jurisdiction of IncorporationSemitool Europe Ltd.

                    

                    United KingdomSemitool Halbleitertechnik Vertriebs GmbH

                    

                    GermanySemitool France SARL

                    

                    FranceSemitool Italia SRL

                    

                    ItalySemitool Japan Inc.

                    

                    JapanSemitool Korea, Inc.

                    

                    KoreaSemitool (Asia) Pte Ltd.

                    

                    SingaporeRhetech, Inc.

                    

                    DelawareSemitool Austria GmbH

                    

                    AustriaSemitool Israel, Limited

                    

                    IsraelSemitool Schweiz GmbH

                    

                    SwitzerlandSemitool Semiconductor Equipment Technology (Shanghai) Co., LTD.

                    

                    ChinaSemitool (Taiwan) Inc.

                    

                    NevadaSemitool (Philippines) Inc.

                    

                    Nevada
IV 

House Calendar No. 248 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1742 

[Report No. 111–665] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 3307) to reauthorize child nutrition 

programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2010 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 3307) to 

reauthorize child nutrition programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (S. 

3 3307) to reauthorize child nutrition programs, and for 

4 other purposes. All points of order against consideration 

5 of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 

6 9 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. All 

7 points of order against the bill are waived. The previous 

8 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1742 RH 

1 passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

2 of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

3 ranking minority member of the Committee on Education 

4 and Labor; and (2) one motion to recommit. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 248 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1742 

[Report No. 111–665] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 3307) to 

other purposes. reauthorize child nutrition programs, and for 

NOVEMBER 30, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations of the
Company in its Annual filing on Form 10K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                1,230,845  
<SECURITIES>                                                  0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                         3,963,340  
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0  
<INVENTORY>                                                   0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      5,372,511  
<PP&E>                                                7,226,448  
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1,390,692  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       16,013,081  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 7,042,019  
<BONDS>                                                       0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0  
<PREFERRED>                                                   0  
<COMMON>                                                    346  
<OTHER-SE>                                            1,653,114  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         16,013,081  
<SALES>                                                       0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     11,369,924  
<CGS>                                                         0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        13,198,771  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       1,339,619  
<INCOME-TAX>                                            320,932  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,660,551) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0  
<CHANGES>                                                     0  
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,624,720) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.48) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.30) 
        


</TABLE>
Anthony Jerome JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6965.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### October 29, 2013 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

RONALD JENNINGS FOGLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 13-1372 v. D. Colorado ARCHER THOMAS ELLIOTT, JR., Defendant - Appellee. (D.C. No. 1:13-CV-01766-LTB)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before LUCERO , McKAY , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

After examining Ronald Fogle’s appellate filings and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Fogle filed the instant action in federal district court against Tom Elliott, his attorney in a previous civil case, alleging he suffered losses by virtue of Elliott’s malpractice. He labeled his action a “claim for reimbursement,” and

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.recognized a proper civil complaint would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 1 After affording Fogle several opportunities to cure deficiencies in his filing, the district court dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The district court further certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, thereby, denied Fogle in forma pauperisstatus for purposes of appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). After Fogle filed a notice of appeal, this court ordered him to file an ifp application. When he filed his application on September 23, 2013, his prison trust account revealed a balance exceeding $1500. Accordingly, this court entered an assessment order pursuant to the terms of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Having now reviewed the entire record, it is clear the district court’s disposition of Fogle’s action is irrefutably correct. Fogle’s arguments to the contrary are frivolous. Accordingly, this court dismisses the appeal pursuant to the terms of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Our dismissal counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Furthermore, given the large balance in Fogle’s prison trust

1 Although Elliott was the only party defendant identified in Fogle’s action, his “claim for reimbursement” focused on an unidentified “Federal Board of Trustees” that Fogle asserted could aid him in obtaining more than $3,000,000 from Elliott. As noted by the district court, the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure do establish a fund to recompense Colorado state victims of attorney misconduct. Those rules do not, however, establish subject matter jurisdiction over a claim against the fund in federal court. -2-account, his motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied , and he is hereby orderedto immediately remit the full balance of the appellate filing fee. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge

-3-
# C_2010234EN.01003003.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/30

---

Order of the President of the Court of 29 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria)) — Ronald Seunig v Maria Hölzel

(Case C-147/09) (1)

1

()

2010/C 234/51

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 4.7.2009.

1

---
[LOGO]
                                                              DIXON HUGHES PLLC
                                       Certified Public Accountants and Advisors


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Teche Holding Company Inc.
Franklin, Louisiana


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-87354,  333-55913, 333-95583 and 333-125218 of Teche Holding Company Inc. on
Form S-8 of our report dated December 19, 2005, incorporated by reference in the
Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Teche  Holding  Company  Inc. for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2005.


                              /s/Dixon Hughes PLLC


Asheville, North Carolina
December 28, 2005


                                               500 Ridgefield Court, PO Box 3049
                                                        Asheville, NC 28802-3049
                                               Ph. 828.254.2254 Fx. 828.254.6859
                                                            www.dixon-hughes.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on E-Commerce will meet in closed session on September 25-26, 2001, and October 23, 2001, at SAIC, Inc., 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. This Task Force will review the DoD's current implementation status of e-commerce tools and make any appropriate recommendations that might enhance opportunities for cost reduction, capital and manpower efficiency.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will review and evaluate the Department's new procurement approaches and its current implementation status in light of the fact that the Department has one of the largest acquisition systems in the world for both goods and services.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. § 552b(c)(4), and that accordingly these meetings will be closed to the public.

Dated: June 18, 2001.

Patricia L. Toppings, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 01-15786 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
Carey RAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7015.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
NENG SAYPAO PHA, petitioner, v. Gary SWARTHOUT, Warden.

No. 16-6671.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 10.3




---



##### 



First Amendment Borrower Bank of America Wells Fargo Lenders
 BACKGROUND
 Credit Agreement
     Aggregate Commitments
 Aggregate Commitments
 Commitment
 Commitment




---



##### 



First
Amendment Effective Date Accordion Amount
 Accordion Amount
 First Amendment Effective Date
   REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES TRUE; NO EVENT OF DEFAULT
   Replacement Notes




---



##### 



CONDITIONS TO EFFECTIVENESS
     Section
   REFERENCE TO THE CREDIT AGREEMENT




---



##### 



COSTS, EXPENSES AND TAXES
 GUARANTORS ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS
 GOVERNING LAW; BINDING EFFECT
 HEADINGS
 ENTIRE AGREEMENT




---



##### 



BORROWER :
 ENCORE WIRE LIMITEDBy:
    
    EWC GP Corp., its general partnerBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.By:Name:Title:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,as a LenderCommitment: $90,000,000By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as a
LenderCommitment: $60,000,000By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:EWC GP CORP.By:Name:Title:EWC LP CORP.By:Name:Title:EWC AVIATION CORP.By:Name:Title:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000863832
<NAME> GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         261,654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               343,204
<PP&E>                                      10,301,112
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,946,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,697,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,697,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,697,486
<SALES>                                        502,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,633
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,246,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (684,853)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (684,853)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (684,853)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009282EN.01003304.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/33

---

Order of the President of the Court of 29 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-114/09) (1)

1

2009/C 282/62

Language of the case: Spanish

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009.

1

---