alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-2171-000]

Take notice that on June 7, 2001, Commonwealth Edison Company (ComEd) submitted for filing two errata to its May 30, 2001 filing in Docket No. ER01-2171-000 of Service Agreements with EnergyUSA-TPC Corp., Ameren Energy, Inc. and Conoco Gas & Power Marketing, a Division of Conoco, Inc. (CONC). Specifically, ComEd corrected a typo in its transmittal to clarify that it is requesting a May 1, 2001 effective date for the Service Agreements filed on May 30, 2001 in Docket No. ER01-2171-000.

ComEd notes that the requested May 1, 2001 effective date was correctly indicated on its Order 614 designations and the Notice of Filing that were submitted as part of its May 30, 2001 filing. ComEd also corrected the order of an Order 614 designation and one of the CONC Service Agreements.

Copies of the filings were served on the affected customers and on the parties designated on the official service list.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene  or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 28, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15457  Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           1,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      839
<ALLOWANCES>                                        64
<INVENTORY>                                     14,973
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,184
<PP&E>                                          13,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,600
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,598
<SALES>                                         63,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,205
<CGS>                                           52,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,768
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    39
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    592
<INCOME-TAX>                                       205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69616, 333-49027, 333-69618, 333-89496, 333-114965, 333-114969, 333-150418, and 333-17687) of Speedway Motorsports of our report dated March 9, 2011 relating to the financial statements and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina 

March 9, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1600 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1600

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 15, 2010.
Whereas more than 75,000 physician assistants in the United States provide high-
        quality, cost-effective medical care in virtually all health care 
        settings and in every medical and surgical specialty;
Whereas the physician assistant profession's patient-centered, team-based 
        approach reflects the changing realities of health care delivery and 
        fits well into the patient-centered medical home model of care, as well 
        as other integrated models of care management;
Whereas approximately 47 percent of physician assistants currently practice in 
        primary care and emergency medicine, regularly providing access to 
        needed medical care to underserved populations such as frontier 
        communities, rural towns, the urban poor, and at-risk groups (such as 
        the elderly);
Whereas physician assistants practice in teams with physicians and extend the 
        reach of medicine and the promise of improved health to the most remote 
        and in-need communities of our Nation;
Whereas nearly 300,000,000 patient visits were made to physician assistants in 
        2009;
Whereas physician assistants may provide medical care, have their own patient 
        panels, and are granted prescribing authority in all 50 States;
Whereas the physician assistant profession was created 40 years ago in response 
        to health care workforce shortages and is a key part of the solution to 
        today's health care workforce shortage;
Whereas the American Academy of Physician Assistants recognizes October 6-12, 
        2010 as National Physician Assistant Week; and
Whereas the physician assistant profession is positioned to be able to adapt and 
        respond to the evolving needs of the health care system by virtue of--

    (1) comprehensive educational programs that prepare physician 
assistants for a career in general medicine; and

    (2) a team-based approach to providing patient-centered medical care: 
Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports--
            (1) the critical role of the physician assistant profession for the 
        significant impact the profession has made and will continue to make in 
        health care; and
            (2) the goals and ideals of National Physician Assistant Week.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Joel MORALES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6593.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         438,277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,916
<INVENTORY>                                    143,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               612,079
<PP&E>                                          35,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 623,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,674,730
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,265
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,054,321)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   623,674
<SALES>                                        384,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               384,348
<CGS>                                          451,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  451,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (4,835)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,536,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,502,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,502,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,502,645)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.69)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
               FROM THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
               ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                              47,062
<SECURITIES>                                        37,210
<RECEIVABLES>                                       75,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,276
<INVENTORY>                                         87,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   272,388
<PP&E>                                              49,607
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     331,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               86,787
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               212
<OTHER-SE>                                         237,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       331,140
<SALES>                                             68,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    78,898
<CGS>                                               31,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       39,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    17,132  <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     14,316
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4,867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 14,316
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         9,449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        $0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        $0.43
<FN> 
<F1>  EXCLUDES SG&A AS SG&A IS PART OF 5-03(b)(4).
</FN> 
         

</TABLE>
Bruce E. GARDNER, petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS.

No. 16-297.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Servando GONZALES-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 05-20418, 05-41028, 06-40174

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 18, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Servando Gonzales-Reyes (Gonzales) seeks to appeal three judgments arising from his offense of illegally reentering the United States. Gonzales fails to show that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for an extension of time to file appeals in case No. 05-20418 and case No. 05-41028. *See United States v. Clark,*51 F.3d 42, 43 n. 5 (5th Cir.1995).

The appeals in case No. 05-20418 and case No. 05-41028 are dismissed for failure to comply with the rule requiring a timely notice of appeal. *See Burnley v. City of*
      *417
      *San Antonio,*470 F.3d 189, 192 n. 1 (5th Cir.2006); Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(l)(A)(i). In case No. 06-40174, Gonzales makes no argument relative to the judgment. He has thus waived appeal of any issue pertaining to that judgment. *See United States v. Ragsdale,*426 F.3d 765, 785 n. 9 (5th Cir. 2005), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1417, 164 L.Ed.2d 114 (2006). The judgment in appeal No. 06-41074 is affirmed.

DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Tyris Lamar FRANKLIN, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-6208.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1388/2004

of 30 July 2004         

amending Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 on certain detailed implementing rules concerning the keeping of accounts for the purpose of determining the incomes of agricultural holdings

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation No 79/65/EEC of the Council of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community (1), and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 3

The liaison agency shall forward all the farm returns, presented in the form laid down in Annex III to Regulation (EEC) No 2237/77, to the Commission not later than nine months after the end of the accounting year to which they relate. However, for the accounting year 2003 the farm returns shall be forwarded to the Commission not later than fourteen months after the end of that accounting year.

The farm returns shall be regarded as having been forwarded to the Commission when the liaison agency, after the data have been introduced in the Commission’s data delivery and control system and after the subsequent computer checks have been executed, confirms the data to be ready to be loaded in the Commission’s database.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ 109, 23.6.1965, p. 1859/65. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 660/2004 (OJ L 104, 8.4.2003, p. 97).

(2)OJ L 190, 14.7.1983, p. 25.

(3)OJ L 263, 17.10.1977, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1837/2001 (OJ L 255, 24.9.2001, p. 1).

----
Krishna REDDY, petitioner, v. NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al.

No. 16-5738.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Cost-U-Less, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Jeffrey Meder,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      May
      14, 2007








/s/
                J. Jeffrey MederJ.
                Jeffrey MederPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer








*.*
A P P E N D I C E S
10
1

A P P E N D I C E S
Curt N. DANIELS, petitioner, v. John HOLTZ, et al.

No. 16-248.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Iowa denied.
Jonathan GODWIN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-6689.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Jimmy Earl VAN-CLEAVE, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 15-9263.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District denied.
secretary 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

steve.campbell@ldcommodities.com 

Monday, November 23, 2009 4:30 PM 

secretary 

Fw: KCBT/KCBTCC Section 4(c) Petition 

Subject: KCBT/KCBTCC Section 4{c) Petition, 74 FR 586e6 

To whom it concerns: 

COMMENT 

Louis Dreyfus Commodities is a major exporter and merchandiser of US Wheat and has been an 

active participant in the KCBT, CME, MGX wheat futures contracts, for several decades. 

We fully support the request from KCBT/KCBTCC to list and clear certain 

calendar swaps. We believe that by bringing these OTC contracts to a well 

established, well funded exchange it will strengthen the integrity of the contracts, allow 

for open competition, and lead to a more efficient marketplace. As a long time futures, 

cash, and OTC trade house, we very well know and understand the importance of these qualities 

in developing a transparent, financially sound contract. 

In addition, we support the request to commingle customer funds to margin, secure or 

guarantee the clear-only contracts. KCBT/KCBTCC have maintained a level of integrity for 

over 15e/1ee years respectfully, and we feel they are well-qualified to oversee the position 

concentration, risk management, and financial oversight required. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Steve Campbell 

Vice President 

Louis Dreyfus Commodities 

816-218-2333 

Received CFTC 

Records Section 

!IJJtl/o9 

1