alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re BALSARA.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

May 28, 1909.)

Aliens (§ 61*) — Naturalization—Construction of Statute — “Free White Persons.”

Qusere, whether the words “free white persons,” as used in the naturalization statutes, should be held to include all branches of the Aryan race, or limited to those races who were represented in this country at the time the first naturalization statute was enacted.

[Bd. Note. — For other cases, see Aliens, Dec. Dig. § 61.*

Citizenship under state and federal laws, see note to City of Minneapolis v. Reum, 6 C. C. A. 37.]

Carl A. Hansemann, for petitioner.

Hugh Govern, Asst. U. S. A tty.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

UACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The phrase “free white persons” must be taken, as used with the same meaning in the various successive statutes in which it appears. There is much force in the argument that the Congress which framed the original act for naturalization of aliens (Act April 14, 1802, c. 28, 2 Stat. 153) intended it to include only *295•white persons belonging to those races whose emigrants had contributed to the building up on this continent of the community of people which declared itself a new nation, admission to the privileges of citizenship in which was by that statute sought to be restricted. No doubt such interpretation is unscientific, and, it may be, not always easy of application; but there are equally serious objections to accepting the words “white persons” as including all branches of the great race or family known to ethnologists as the Aryan, Indo-European, or Caucasian. To do so will bring in, not only the Parsees, of which race the applicant is a member, and which is probably the purest Aryan type, but also Afghans, Hindoos, Arabs, and Berbers. Individuals of those races may be desirable citizens, but it may well be doubted whether Congress intended to make citizenship here free for all of them upon merely the meager examination of qualifications and antecedents which the statutes provide for.

It seems desirable that some authoritative interpretation of this statute should be secured, and the representative of the government is prepared to appeal from an order admitting to citizenship. Therefore, since the applicant appears to be a gentleman of high character and exceptional intelligence, such an order may be entered upon his application.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0176

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NATALIE AMANDA RICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 3, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 30 2020

06/30/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0176
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1612 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1612

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 16, 2010.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States was signed on September 17, 1787, 
        by 39 delegates from 12 States;
Whereas the Constitution was subsequently ratified by each of the original 13 
        States;
Whereas the Constitution was drafted in order to form a more perfect Union, 
        establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common 
        defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of 
        liberty for the citizens of the United States;
Whereas the Constitution has provided the means and structure for this Nation 
        and its citizens that is unparalleled by any other country;
Whereas the Constitution's contributions to the welfare of the human race reach 
        far beyond the borders of the United States;
Whereas the House of Representatives continues to strive to preserve and 
        strengthen the values and rights bestowed by the Constitution upon the 
        United States and its citizens;
Whereas the Constitution is recognized by many to be the most significant and 
        important document in history for establishing freedom and justice 
        through democracy;
Whereas the Constitution deserves the recognition, respect, and reverence of all 
        people in the United States;
Whereas every person in the United States should celebrate the freedom and 
        responsibilities of the Constitution;
Whereas the preservation of such values and rights in the hearts and minds of 
        United States citizens would be advanced by official recognition of the 
        signing of the Constitution; and
Whereas September 17, 2010, is designated as ``Constitution Day'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports ``Constitution Day''; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe the day 
        with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Rocky 
Flats

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Rocky Flats. The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) 
requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, July 12, 2001, 6 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Broomfield City Hall, One DesCombes Drive, Broomfield, CO.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Korkia, Board/Staff Coordinator, 
Rocky Flats Citizens Advisory Board, 9035 North Wadsworth Parkway, 
Suite 2250, Westminster, CO, 80021; telephone (303) 420-7855; fax (303) 
420-7579.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Board is to make recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas 
of environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

    1. Quarterly update by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
    2. Recommendation on Environmental Restoration RFCA Standard 
Operating Protocal (RSOP) document.
    3. Radionuclide Soil Action Level Review, Board recommendation 
development, Part I: Presentation and discussion on sensitivity 
analysis for identifying parameters.
    4. Other Board business may be conducted as necessary.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Ken Korkia at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received at least five days prior 
to the meeting and reasonable provisions will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Each individual wishing to make public 
comment will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Public Reading Room located at the Office of 
the Rocky Flats Citizens Advisory Board, 9035 North Wadsworth Parkway, 
Suite 2250, Westminister, CO 80021; telephone (303) 420-7855. Hours of 
operations for the Public Reading Room are 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday-
Friday, except Federal holidays. Minutes will also be made available by 
writing or calling Deb Thompson at the address or telephone number 
listed above.

    Issued at Washington, DC on June 19, 2001.
Belinda Hood,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-15846 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
# C_2010246EN.01001001.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez

(Case C-256/09) (1)

1

(Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Provisional, including protective, measures - Recognition and enforcement)

2010/C 246/16

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bianca Purrucker

Applicant:

Defendant: Guillermo Vallés Pérez

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Chapter 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1) — Application of the recognition and enforcement rules in that regulation to a provisional measure awarding custody of a child to its father and ordering the return of the child, retained by its mother in another Member State, to its father

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions laid down in Article 21 et seq. of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, do not apply to provisional measures, relating to rights of custody, falling within the scope of Article 20 of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.

1

---
# C_2012049EN.01000402.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — A2A SpA, formerly AEM SpA v European Commission

(Case C-320/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - State aid - Aid granted to public utilities - Tax exemptions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Standing - Legal interest - Article 87 EC - Concept of ‘aid’ - Article 88 EC - Concept of ‘new aid’ - Article 10 EC - Duty of loyal cooperation - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Articles 1 and 14 - Lawfulness of a recovery order - Principle of legal certainty - Duty to state reasons)

2012/C 49/07

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: A2A SpA, formerly AEM SpA (represented by: A. Santa Maria, A. Giardina and G. Pizzonia, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Righini, V. Di Bucci and D. Grespan, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (now the General Court) (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 June 2009 in Case T-301/02 AEM v Commission by which the General Court dismissed the action brought for annulment of Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 2003/193/EC of 5 June 2002 on State aid granted by Italy in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding (OJ 2003 L 77, p. 21).

AEM

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal.

| 2. | Orders A2A SpA to pay the costs of the main appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders A2A SpA to pay the costs of the main appeal.

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
Leslie J. WOODS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6330.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# C_2012049EN.01000302.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — A2A SpA, formerly ASM Brescia SpA v European Commission

(Case C-318/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - State aid - Aid granted to public utilities - Tax exemptions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Standing - Legal interest - Article 87 EC - Concept of ‘aid’ - Article 88 EC - Concept of ‘new aid’ - Article 10 EC - Duty of loyal cooperation - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Articles 1 and 14 - Lawfulness of a recovery order - Principle of legal certainty - Duty to state reasons)

2012/C 49/05

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: A2A SpA, formerly ASM Brescia SpA (represented by: A. Santa Maria, A. Giardina, C. Croff and G. Pizzonia, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Righini, V. Di Bucci and D. Grespan, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (now the General Court) (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 June 2009 in Case T-189/03 ASM Brescia SpA v Commission by which the General Court dismissed the action brought for annulment of Articles 2 and 3 of Commission Decision 2003/193/EC of 5 June 2002 on State aid granted by Italy in the form of tax exemptions and subsidised loans to public utilities with a majority public capital holding (OJ 2003 L 77, p. 21).

ASM Brescia SpA

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal.

| 2. | Orders A2A SpA to pay the costs of the main appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders A2A SpA to pay the costs of the main appeal.

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.

1

---
Robert Todd GRIFFIN, petitioner, v. Timothy KEITH, Warden.

No. 16-6684.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Petro USA, Inc. f/k/a All State Properties Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A2 for the year ended June 30, 20189 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Joseph C. Passalaqua, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 2nd day of June 2022.

 

s/Joseph C. Passalaqua

Joseph C. Passalaqua

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Petro USA, Inc., and will be retained Petro USA, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15292]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6998-9]


Draft Great Lakes Strategy Notice of Availability, Public 
Meetings and the Opportunity To Comment; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency published a notice in the 
Federal Register of June 5, 2001, concerning a notice of availability 
of and request for comments on a draft of the Great Lakes Strategy, and 
a notice of public meetings which will be held in Duluth, MN, Detroit, 
MI, Buffalo, NY, and Chicago, IL during the weeks of June 25, 2001 and 
July 2, 2001. The notice contained a date which has been changed from 
Wednesday June, 27, 2001 to Tuesday, June 26, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted Smith, 312-353-6571.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of June 6, 2001, in FR Doc. 01-14081 page 
30187, in the third column, under the DATES section the Date for 
``Wednesday June 27, 2001'' is changed to ``Tuesday, June 26, 2001.''

    Dated: June 8, 2001.
Gary Gulezian,
Great Lakes National Program Director.
[FR Doc. 01-15292 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
VISA INC., et al., petitioners, v. Sam OSBORN, et al.

No. 15-961.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1771 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 255
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1771

                          [Report No. 111-684]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            December 17 (legislative day, December 16), 2010

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported through the legislative day of December 24, 2010.
    Sec. 2.  It shall be in order at any time through the legislative 
day of December 24, 2010, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the 
House suspend the rules. The Speaker or her designee shall consult with 
the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter 
for consideration pursuant to this section.
                                                 House Calendar No. 255

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1771

                          [Report No. 111-684]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

            December 17 (legislative day, December 16), 2010

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
In re Garvester BRACKEN, petitioner.

No. 16-5213.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Nos. 526 and 527.

#### Sioux Tribe of Indians *v.*United States.

Court of Claims.

*Ralph H. Case*and *James S. Y. Ivins*for petitioner.

*Solicitor Géneral Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech*and *John R. Benney*for the United States.

Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Industry Sector Advisory Committee on small and Minority Business will hold a meeting on January 29, 2001, from 9:15 a.m. to 3 p.m. The meeting will be opened to the public from 9:15 a.m. to 3 p.m.

# DATES:

The meeting is scheduled for January 29, 2001, unless otherwise notified.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Department of Commerce, Conference room 4830, located at 14th Street between Pennsylvania and Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Millie Sjoberg, (202) 482-4792, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (principal contact), or Dominic Bianchi, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 1724 F Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20508, (202) 395-6120.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following topics will be discussed:
    - Discussion on 2001 APEC Small and Medium-sized enterprise (SME) Ministerial;
    - Discussion on 2001 Summit of the Americas;
    - Discussion on infrastructure security;
    - Discussion on trade finance;
    - Discussion on customs issues;
    - Discussion on electronic commerce;
    - Discussion on SME advocacy and outreach; and,
    - Committee business.

Dominic Bianchi,

Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison.

[FR Doc. 01-1532  Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190-01-M