alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.3
                                                                                                                          


1 APR 2016
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL 


ATTENTION: SUPER MICRO COMPUTER TAIWAN, INC.


RE: The Summary of Credit Facilities
According to Super Micro's needs of debt finance, CTBC Bank Co ., Ltd. would like to propose the indicative bank facilities and terms below
	
					
	Product Type
	Proposed Line


amount
	Tenor
	Proposed Rate
	Notes

	Short term Loan I guarantee
	NTD700MM (NTD100MM)
	1year
	l1+0.25%/


5‰ annually
	1.    Collateral: Bade factory
2.    NTD100MM guarantee line included

	OA loan
	USD40MM
	1year
	COF(1M)+0.30%
	1.   Clean loan
2.    each transaction's tenor ≤ 90 days
3.    OA loan needs to provide list once drawdown
4.    Be financed 80% of Invoice
amount for each transaction

	Total Cap
	USD40MM




l l1: CTBC Bank's cost of NTD fund
l  COF: CTBC Bank's cost of USD fund 


Collateral : Bade factory


Terms:
l Shared revolving line of credit facility of USD40MM for SUPER MICRO COMPUTER TAIWAN, INC. and SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, B.V.
l Tenor: from 1st April 2016 to 31st March 2017

Yours faithfully, 
For and on behalf of 
CTBC BANK CO ., LTD.


中國信託商業銀行(股)公司    CTBC Bank Co., Ltd. 
11568 臺北市南港區經貿二路168號 No.168, Jingmao 2nd Rd., Nangang Dist., Taipei City 11568, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tel: 886-2-3327-7777










1 APR 2016
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL 


ATTENTION: SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, B.V.


RE: The Summary of Credit Facilities
According to Super Micro's needs of debt finance, CTBC Bank Co., Ltd. would like to propose the indicative bank facilities and terms below
	
					
	Product Type
	Proposed Line


amount
	Tenor
	Proposed Rate
	Notes

	OA loan
	USD40MM
	1year
	COF(1M)+0 .30%
	1.  Clean loan
2.    Guarantor: SUPER MICRO COMPUTER TAIWAN , INC.
3.    each transaction's tenor  ≤  90 days
4.    OA loan needs to provide list once drawdown
5.   Be financed 80% of Invoice
amount for each transaction




l  COF: CTBC Bank's cost of USD fund


Guarantor:
l  SUPER MICRO COMPUTER TAIWAN, INC.


Terms:
l Shared revolving line of credit facility of USD40MM for SUPER MICRO COMPUTER TAIWAN, INC. and SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, B.V.
l Tenor: from 1st April 2016 to 31st March 2017



Yours faithfully, 
For and on behalf of 
CTBC BANK CO ., LTD.


中國信託商業銀行(股)公司    CTBC Bank Co., Ltd. 
11568 臺北市南港區經貿二路168號 No.168, Jingmao 2nd Rd., Nangang Dist., Taipei City 11568, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Tel: 886-2-3327-7777
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pluristem Life Systems Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yossi Keret, the Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:  September 28, 2004



/s/ Yossi Keret
Yossi Keret
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
994.

#### Ingram *v.*Savannah Electric Company.

Action for damages, from city court of Savannah — Judge Freeman. December 31, 1907.

Submitted March 12,

Decided April 20, 1908.

The plaintiff sued for $1,000. There was a verdict in his favor for $1. He made a motion for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and to the evidence, and without evidence to support it. The motion was overruled, and he excepted.

*George W. Owens,*for plaintiff.

*Osborne & Lawrence,*for defendant.

Hill, C. J.

In a suit to recover damages resulting from an assault and battery, the extent of the injury, and the existence and character of mitigating circumstances, are to be determined exclusively by the jury; and a verdict for nominal damages, approved by the trial judge, will not be disturbed by this court. *Judgment affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 23
                        HOWELL CORPORATION
                   Independent Auditors' Consent

To Howell Corporation:

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-28389 of Howell  Corporation  on Form S-8 of our report  dated  February  28,
2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Howell Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 1999.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
March 22, 2000
Exhibit 10.29

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO WARRANT

This Amendment No. 2 to Warrant is made and entered into as of the 30th day of December, 2005, by and among Digital Generation Systems, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and Omar A. Choucair ("Choucair").

WHEREAS,
the Corporation and Choucair entered into that certain Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated as of August 25, 2003, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to
Warrant dated on or about June 24, 2004 (the "Warrant"); and

WHEREAS,
the Corporation and Choucair wish to amend the terms of the Warrant as described herein;

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, benefits and covenants herein contained, the Corporation and Choucair hereby agree as follows:

1.     Unless
otherwise defined, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Warrant. All references to Section herein shall be to Sections
of the Warrant.

2.     The
first sentence of Section 7 in the Warrant shall read as follows:



[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 2 to Warrant as of the date first above written.

| |  | DIGITAL GENERATION SYSTEMS, INC.                 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                              
| |  |                                                  
| |  | CHOUCAIR:                                        
| |  | /s/OMAR A. CHOUCAIROmar A. Choucair, individually

---



QuickLinks
Torrance L. COTTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-502.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2a
  Certification
    of Principal Financial Officer
  Pursuant
    to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
    1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on
    Form 10-K
    of Everlast Worldwide Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    for the registrant and we have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
    caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
    designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
    regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
    preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
    accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and  c)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter ( the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have
    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
    control over financial reporting, to the registrants
    auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal controls over financial
    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and  b)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Michelle Stopyra YANEY, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, et al.

No. 16-6118.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two denied.
In re Milton Veran WILLIAMS, petitioner.

No. 16-5678.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 159 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 159

Honoring the New Hampshire State Senate for becoming the 1st statewide 
    legislative body with a majority of women in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2009

  Mr. Hodes (for himself and Ms. Shea-Porter) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the New Hampshire State Senate for becoming the 1st statewide 
    legislative body with a majority of women in the United States.

Whereas for over 200 years the citizens of the State of New Hampshire have 
        elected State Senators to serve in the legislature;
Whereas, from 1931 to 1933, E. Maude Ferguson served as the 1st female member of 
        the New Hampshire State Senate;
Whereas Vesta Roy served as the 1st female State Senate President, and in 1983 
        she became the 1st female Governor of the State of New Hampshire;
Whereas, in 1994, the Honorable Sylvia Larsen was elected to the New Hampshire 
        State Senate and has served 7 consecutive terms thus far;
Whereas, in 1996, the Honorable Terie Norelli was elected to the New Hampshire 
        House of Representatives and has served 6 consecutive terms thus far, 
        and in 2008 was re-elected to serve as Speaker of the New Hampshire 
        House of Representatives for a 2nd consecutive term;
Whereas, in 2008, the Honorable Sylvia Larsen was re-elected to serve as State 
        Senate President of New Hampshire for a 2nd consecutive term;
Whereas the Honorable Sharon Carson, Jacalyn Cilley, Martha Fuller Clark, Betsi 
        DeVries, Peggy Gilmour, Margaret Hassan, Molly Kelly, Sylvia Larsen, 
        Bette Lasky, Amanda Merrill, Deborah Reynolds, Sheila Roberge, and 
        Kathleen Sgambati comprise the majority female body of the New Hampshire 
        State Senate and were elected to office on November 4, 2008, and sworn 
        in on December 3, 2008;
Whereas the New Hampshire State Senate was comprised of 13 women and 11 men for 
        the legislative session beginning on December 3, 2008; and
Whereas the New Hampshire State Senate had 9 women chairing committees and 5 men 
        chairing committees for the legislative session beginning on December 3, 
        2008: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the New 
Hampshire State Senate for becoming the 1st statewide legislative body 
with a majority of women in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Norris Lynn FISHER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9361.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 23.1

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-29413) pertaining to the Miravant Medical Technologies
401 (k) - Employee Stock Ownership Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-34953) pertaining
to the Miravant Medical Technologies 1989 Stock Option Plan, the Miravant
Medical Technologies 1994 Stock Option Plan and the Miravant Medical
Technologies 1996 Stock Compensation Plan and to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3/A No. 333-39905) and in
the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 12, 1998, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Miravant Medical Technologies
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1997.

                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP



March 26, 1998
Woodland Hills, California

                                      65
H. Res. 1549 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 22, 2010. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

1264) to amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 

to provide for the national flood insurance program to make 

available multiperil coverage for damage resulting from windstorms or floods, and for other purposes. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the 

bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
2 

•HRES 1549 EH 

Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1772 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1772

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require House 
     officers and employees to take annual factual training on the 
                             Constitution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2010

    Mr. Garrett of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. 
Conaway, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. McHenry, Ms. 
  Foxx, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. Coffman of Colorado, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. 
    Neugebauer, Mr. Olson, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Latta, Mr. Pitts, Mrs. 
   Bachmann, Mr. Fleming, Mr. Reed, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Wilson of South 
Carolina, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Graves 
    of Georgia, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, and Mr. Herger) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require House 
     officers and employees to take annual factual training on the 
                             Constitution.

    Resolved, That (a) rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
``Constitutional training for officers and employees
    ``7.(a)(1) The Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and 
Civil Liberties of the Committee on the Judiciary shall offer annual 
factual training on the Constitution to each officer and employee of 
the House. Such training shall--
            ``(A) involve the same class of employees for whom the 
        Committee on Standards of Official Conduct has determined 
        ethics training to be appropriate under clause 3(a)(6); and
            ``(B) include such knowledge of the Constitution as may be 
        determined appropriate by the Subcommittee on the Constitution, 
        Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties of the Committee on the 
        Judiciary.
    ``(b)(1) A new officer or employee of the House shall receive 
training under this clause not later than 60 days after beginning 
service to the House.
    ``(2) Not later than January 31 of each year, each officer and 
employee of the House shall file a certification with the Subcommittee 
on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties of the Committee 
on the Judiciary that the officer or employee attended training on the 
Constitution in the last year as established by this clause.''.
    (b) The amendment made by this resolution shall take effect 
immediately before noon, January 5, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
Juan Humberto CASTILLO-ALVAREZ, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 16-6324.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
##### 



Exhibit 10.10
 EXECUTION COPY
 ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
ENCORE WIRE LIMITED
 WAIVER
TO MASTER NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT




---



##### 



1. WAIVER
  2. ISSUANCE OF NEW NOTES
  3. REAFFIRMATION; REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
 Reaffirmation of Note Agreement
 Note Agreement
 No Default or Event of Default
 Authorization
 Parent
 2




---



##### 



Subsidiary Guarantor
 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
  Consent of Holders to Waiver
 Reaffirmation of Subsidiary Guaranty
 Amendment to Credit Agreement
 Legal Opinion
 Fees of Special Counsel
 5. MISCELLANEOUS
 Ratification
 Binding Effect
 Governing Law
 3




---



##### 



Counterparts
 4




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 ENCORE WIRE CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Daniel L. JonesName:
    Daniel L. JonesTitle:
    President and Chief Executive OfficerENCORE WIRE LIMITED
By its General Partner, EWC GP CORP.By:
    /s/ Frank J. BilbanName:
    Frank J. BilbanTitle:
    Vice President Finance, Treasurer and
Secretary S-1




---



##### 



METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    /s/ Judith A. GulottaName:
    Judith A. GulottaTitle:
    DirectorMETLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CONNECTICUTBy:
    /s/ Judith A. GulottaName:
    Judith A. GulottaTitle:
    Director S-2




---



##### 



GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    /s/ Tad AndersonName:
    Tad AndersonTitle:
    Asst V.P., InvestmentsBy:
    /s/ Eve HamptonName:
    Eve HamptonTitle:
    Vice President, Investments S-3




---



##### 



SCHEDULE I
 Principal Amount of SeniorHolder
    
    NotesMetropolitan Life Insurance Company
    
    $
    37,000,000Metlife Insurance Company of Connecticut
    
    
    8,000,000Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
    
    
    10,000,000
 Schedule I




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 REAFFIRMATION OF SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY
    EWC AVIATION Corp.By:
    /s/ Frank J. BilbanName:
    Frank J. BilbanTitle:
    Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Exhibit A
No. 636. No. 651.

#### Carter *v.*Carter Coal Co. et al.; and Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al. *v.*Carter et al.

December 23, 1935.

*Messrs. Frederick H. Wood, William D. Whitney, and Richard H. Wilmer*for Carter. *Mr.*

*Karl J. Hardy*for Carter Coal Co.

*Solicitor General Reed*for the Commissioner.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2014/2004

of 25 November 2004         

fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported in the natural state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(d), (f), (g) and (h) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, exported in the natural state, shall be set out in the Annex hereto to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

(3)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 63.

----

ANNEX

EXPORT REFUNDS ON SYRUPS AND CERTAIN OTHER SUGAR PRODUCTS EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 26 NOVEMBER 2004

----

(1)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(2)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(3)  The basic amount is not applicable to syrups which are less than 85 % pure (Regulation (EC) No 2135/95). Sucrose content is determined in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(4)  The basic amount is not applicable to the product defined under point 2 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 12).

----
Glenn Darnell DEAN, petitioner, v. M. Eliot SPEARMAN, Warden, et al.

No. 16-6349.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.