alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
mbcc-ex109_32.htm



Exhibit 10.9

 

AMENDMENT TO SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment dated as of January 1, 2016 (“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (“Mission”) is made to that certain Shared Services Agreement dated as of February 16, 1999 by and between VHR Broadcasting of Springfield, Inc. and Quorum Broadcasting of Missouri, Inc., as amended by those certain amendments dated February 16, 1999 and December 30, 2003, and as extended by letter agreement on February 2, 2009 (collectively, the “Agreement”).

 

WHEREAS, Mission, as successor to VHR Broadcasting of Springfield, Inc., is the licensee of television broadcast station KOLR, Springfield, Missouri;

 

WHEREAS, Nexstar, as successor to Quorum Broadcasting of Missouri, Inc., is the licensee of television broadcasting station KOZL-TV, Springfield, Missouri; 

 

WHEREAS, Mission and Nexstar have entered into the Agreement for their mutual benefit;

 

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1. Paragraph 4(g) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in its place: “4(g) Services Fee. In consideration for the services to be provided to the Stations by Nexstar personnel as described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f), Mission will pay Nexstar the fee (“Services Fee”) described in Section 4(g).

 

(i)Base Amount. Subject to the remaining provisions of this Section 4(g), the base amount of the Services Fee will be $208,333.33 per month.

 

(ii) Payment Terms. The Services Fee will be payable monthly, in arrears, from and after the month during which this Agreement is executed, and will be prorated on a daily basis for the first and last months during which the sharing arrangements described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f) are in effect.” 

 

2.These revised payment terms are effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.

 

3. As so amended, all sections and provisions of the Agreement are hereby ratified in full. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date above.

 


			
	
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

 
	
 
	
MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

	
By: /s/ Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
By: /s/ Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Name: Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
 

Name: Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Title: EVP & Chief Financial Officer
	
 
	
 

Title: President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	6

<CIK>	0000744822

<NAME>	Fidelity Investment Trust

<SERIES>

	<NUMBER>	171

	<NAME>	Fidelity International Value Fund

<MULTIPLIER>	1,000



<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>
year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>
oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>
oct-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>
484,853
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>
571,352
<RECEIVABLES>
8,454
<ASSETS-OTHER>
5,495
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>
0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>
585,301
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>
35,236
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>
0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>
14,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>
49,360
<SENIOR-EQUITY>
0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>
402,795
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>
32,123
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>
33,074
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>
3,735
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>
0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>
42,423
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>
0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>
86,988
<NET-ASSETS>
535,941
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>
6,357
<INTEREST-INCOME>
1,988
<OTHER-INCOME>
6
<EXPENSES-NET>
5,037
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>
3,314
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>
65,476
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>
68,198
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>
136,988
<EQUALIZATION>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>
1,596
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>
0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>
47,826
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>
48,889
<SHARES-REINVESTED>
113
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>
127,185
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>
3,828
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>
(21,191)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>
0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>
0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>
3,681
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>
1
<GROSS-EXPENSE>
5,338
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>
441,946
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>
12.360
<PER-SHARE-NII>
 .110
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>
4.260
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>
 .050
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>
0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>
0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>
16.680
<EXPENSE-RATIO>
121





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy E. Butler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
            906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:  February 16, 2010


By:  /s/ Randy E. Butler


Randy E. Butler


Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               1,355
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       13,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                           288
<INVENTORY>                                          7,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    23,804
<PP&E>                                               3,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      26,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,172
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                56
<OTHER-SE>                                          16,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        26,204
<SALES>                                             43,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    43,896
<CGS>                                               26,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       36,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        64
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3,962
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3,962
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .68



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ACL Semiconductors
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Kenneth Lap-Chan, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations
of the Company for the periods presented.
|
|

|Date: |  | April 16, 2008 |  | /s/ Kenneth Lap-Yin Chan      
|----- |  | -------------- |  | ------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | Kenneth Lap-Yin
    Chan      
|      |  |                |  | Chief Financial
    Officer of
|      |  |                |  | ACL Semiconductors
    Inc.   



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACL Semiconductors,Inc. and will be retained by
ACL Semiconductors Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit (j)(2)

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 117 to Registration StatementNo. 002-90649 on Form N-1A of Fidelity Investment Trust, including Fidelity Series International Value Fund and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund, to the reference to usunder the heading "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms" in the Statement ofAdditional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement.
Recent Delivery Performance o

CBOT Corn, Soybean, and WheFutures Contracts

Scott H. Irwin, Philip Garcia, Darrel L. and Eugene L. Kunda
Delivery Location Basis on the First and Last Day o

for CBOT Corn Futures, Illinois River North of 

2001Z-2008H

-60-50-40-30-20-10

0

1020

2001Z

2002K

2002U

2003H

2003N

2003Z

2004K

2004U

2005H

2005N

2005Z

2006K

2006U

2007H

2007N

2007Z

Contract

Basis (cents/bu.) 
Delivery Location Basis on the First and Last Day o

for CBOT Soybean Futures, Illinois River North o

2001X-2008H

-120-100

-80-60-40-20

0

2040

2001X

2002K

2002U

2003H

2003Q

2004F

2004N

2004X

2005K

2005U

2006H

2006Q

2007F

2007N

2007X

Contract

Basis (cents/bu.) 
Delivery Location Basis on the First and Last Day o

for CBOT Wheat Futures, Toledo, 2001Z-20

-100

-80-60-40-20

0

2040

2001Z

2002K

2002U

2003H

2003N

2003Z

2004K

2004U

2005H

2005N

2005Z

2006K

2006U

2007H

2007N

2007Z

Contract

Basis (cents/bu.) 
Perfect Basis Predictability

-100

-80-60-40-20

0

20406080

100

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 

x = Initial Basis (cents/bu.)

y = Change in Basis (cents/bu.) Intercept = 0 Slope = -1

R2 = 1 (all points on line)
Predictability of CBOT Corn Basis Change to Firs

Delivery, All Delivery Locations Pooled, 2001Z

Note: September 20observations omitte

y = -0.75x - 9.10

R

2 = 0.37

y = -0.87x - 0.61

R

2 = 0.87

-40-30-20-10

0

10203040506070

-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 

x = Initial Basis (cents/bu.)

y = Change in Basis (cents/bu.)Blue: 2001Z-2005Z Red: 2006H-2008H
Predictability of CBOT Soybean Basis Change to F

Delivery, All Delivery Locations Pooled, 2001X

Note: September 20observations omitted 

y = -0.36x - 5.71

R

2 = 0.19

y = -0.87x - 9.03

R

2 = 0.78

-100

-80-60-40-20

0

20406080

100

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 

x = Initial Basis (cents/bu.)

y = Change in Basis (cents/bu.) Blue: 2001X-2005X Red: 2006F-2008H
Predictability of CBOT Wheat Basis Change to Fir

Delivery, All Delivery Locations Pooled, 2001Z

y = -0.57

R2 = 

y = -0.41x - 9.94

R2 = 0.18

-40-20

0

20406080

100120

-120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 

x = Initial Basis (cents/bu.)

y = Change in Basis (cents/bu.)Blue: 2001Z-2005Z Red: 2006H-2008H
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Danny Neal Thompson, * From the 220th District Court

of Comanche County

Trial Court No. CR04002.

Vs. No. 11-16-00300-CR * October 11, 2018

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.; 

Gray, C.J., sitting by assignment; and

Wright, S.C.J., sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7028
BILLY TRUMAN WINGO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusSERGEANT KING, Pulaski Correctional Unit; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HAMMER, Pulaski Correctional Unit, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-365) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 25, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy Truman Wingo, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wingo v. King , No. CA-96-365 (W.D. Va. June 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Fidelity**®**China Region Fund**

**Class**/Ticker

**Fidelity China Region Fund**/FHKCX

In this summary prospectus, the term "shares" (as it relates to the fund) means the class of shares offered through this summaryprospectus.

**Summary Prospectus**

**December 29, 2012**
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Henry P. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
---------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2005


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2


           CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Diversified Industries, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Amy Gallo, Chief Financial Officer, certify the
following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     3.   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     4.   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                            /s/ Amy Gallo
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Amy Gallo
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            January 14, 2004
#### John RUCKER, Carolyn Williams, Wanda Anderson, Melanie House, Thomas R. Prince, Jr., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OASIS LEGAL FINANCE, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant, Global Financial Credit, L.L.C., et al., Defendants.

No. 09-14695.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 3, 2010.

William M. McErlean, Brad E. Rago, Barnes And Thornburg LLP, Chicago, IL, Sara Anne Ford, Ivan B. Cooper, Joshua Kerry Payne, Lana K. Alcorn, Lightfoot, Franklin & White LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Appellant.

Brian D. Turner, Jr., Hill Turner, LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Appellee.

BEFORE EDMONDSON, BIRCH and HILL, Circuit, Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This case involves a proposed class action by John Rucker, *et al.*(Rucker), filed in the State of Alabama, for declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief for alleged harms suffered due to alleged illegal gambling contracts with Oasis Legal Finance, LLC (Oasis), a Delaware limited liability company, with its principal place of business located in Illinois. The contracts contained a forum selection clause which stated Illinois was the exclusive forum for disputes.

Oasis seeks to enforce this clause by moving the district court to dismiss for improper venue. Rucker argues that, because these contracts are alleged illegal gambling contracts, they are void *ab ini-tio,*and therefore the forum selection clause is an unenforceable nullity. Oasis claims that an Alabama forum will be a financial burden to it.

Without reaching these arguments, the district court denied Oasis’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue on the basis that: the agreements provide that issues of law will be determined under Alabama law; that the underlying legal issue as to the validity of these agreements is an issue of Alabama law; that an Illinois court would have to interpret Alabama law without the ability to certify the question to the Supreme Court of Alabama; that all of the plaintiffs are, or have been residents of Alabama; that the agreements were consummated in Alabama; and, finally, that enforcement of the forum selection clause is unreasonable under the circumstances.

We have reviewed the record in this case, the briefs, the arguments of counsel *870presented, and the well-reasoned memorandum opinion of the district court, denying Oasis’s motion to dismiss the case for improper venue. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Eric HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6669.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 27, 2010.

John Eric Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornell Wallace, Office of The United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

*816Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Eric Hughes appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of an order denying Hughes’ motion to correct his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Hughes,*No. 3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 31, 2009). We deny Hughes’ motion to supplement the appellate brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
COMMIL USA, LLC, petitioner, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 15-1446.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana
      corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2007,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, John F. Fisbeck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
                July 16, 2007
            By:
                /s/ John F. FisbeckJohn
                F. Fisbeck,Chief
                Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-438-001]


Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

June 14, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 11, 2001, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas 
Transmission LLC (KMIGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheet, to 
be effective July 1, 2001:

Substitute Original Sheet No. 1480

    KMIGT states that this tariff sheet is being submitted to clarify 
language in the original filing in this docket.
    KMIGT states that a copy of this filing has been served upon all 
KMIGT customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 first Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15501 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M