alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Tena Mayberry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  February
      14, 2011
            By: /s/ Tena MayberryTena
      MayberryChief
      Executive Officer
In re Donald BENNETT, petitioner.

No. 16-6235.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Jermaine LATHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6579.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.1



|     |                                         |      |                           |  |                          |  |  | 
|---- | --------------------------------------- | ---- | ------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  |  | 
|LOGO |                                         | LOGO |                           |  |                          | 
|     | TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580 |      |                           |  | FAX (713) 651-0849      
|     | 1100 LOUISIANA     SUITE 3800           |      | HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5235 |  | TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191

April 24, 2012

Dr. Juan José Suárez Coppel

Director General

Petróleos Mexicanos

Avenida Marina
Nacional No. 329

Colonia Petróleos Mexicanos,

Torre Ejecutiva, Piso 41

11311 México, D.F. México

Dear Dr. Suárez Coppel:

We hereby consent to the references to Ryder Scott Company L.P. as set forth under the heading Exploration and Production (Reserves) in the annual report on Form 20-F of Petróleos
Mexicanos for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Form 20-F) and to the filing as an exhibit to the Form 20-F our report describing our review of the estimates of proved oil, condensate, natural gas and oil equivalent reserves
owned by the United Mexican States (Mexico) as of January 1, 2012, for 260 fields located onshore in and offshore from Mexico in the Northern Region. These estimates were prepared in accordance with the applicable reserves
definitions of Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



/S/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580


Houston, Texas

April 24, 2012



|                                |  |                             |  |                    |  |                   
|------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------
|1015 4TH STREET, S.W. SUITE 600 |  | CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4    |  | TEL (403) 262-2799 |  | FAX (403) 262-2790
|621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550     |  | DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501 |  | TEL (303) 623-9147 |  | FAX (303) 623-4258
# FCM Data July 2017
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33238-33239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on E-Commerce will 
meet in closed session on September 25-26, 2001, and October 23, 2001, 
at SAIC, Inc., 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. This Task Force 
will review the DoD's current implementation status of e-commerce tools 
and make any appropriate

[[Page 33239]]

recommendations that might enhance opportunities for cost reduction, 
capital and manpower efficiency.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will review and evaluate 
the Department's new procurement approaches and its current 
implementation status in light of the fact that the Department has one 
of the largest acquisition systems in the world for both goods and 
services.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board meetings concern matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and that accordingly these meetings will 
be closed to the public.

    Dated: June 14, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-15593 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
No. 641, Misc.

#### Tabor *v.*Swenson, Warden.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1627 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1627

    Recognizing the 110th anniversary of the Northwest Labor Press.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2010

 Mr. Wu submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing the 110th anniversary of the Northwest Labor Press.

Whereas, in 1900, the first issue of the Northwest Labor Press was published as 
        the Portland Labor Press;
Whereas the paper changed its name to the Oregon Labor Press in 1915, and to the 
        Northwest Labor Press in 1986 to better describe its growing readership 
        and coverage area;
Whereas the Northwest Labor Press was founded to deliver news, editorials, and 
        information about issues that affect organized labor in the Pacific 
        Northwest;
Whereas the Northwest Labor Press is one of the oldest continuous publications 
        dedicated to union news in the United States;
Whereas the Northwest Labor Press has the third largest paid circulation in the 
        Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area with nearly 60,000 subscribers;
Whereas, for 110 years, the Northwest Labor Press has been instrumental in 
        providing news and information in print and online to workers and 
        retirees around the Pacific Northwest that goes unreported by other 
        media;
Whereas the Northwest Labor Press is committed to protecting a worker's right to 
        organize by providing an avenue for open communications between union 
        members and the labor community as a whole; encouraging the purchase and 
        use of union-made goods and services; and endorsing State, local, and 
        Federal policies that support workers;
Whereas, in 1910, the Labor Press added a column on women's interests that later 
        focused on news about women's suffrage and other civil rights;
Whereas the Labor Press continues to provide a comprehensive calendar of union 
        meetings for workers in the Northwest; and
Whereas the Northwest Labor Press is a national model for quality, in-depth 
        reporting on labor issues: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the 110th 
anniversary of the Northwest Labor Press.
                                 <all>
```
Yvonne ROUNDTREE, petitioner, v. MAINE MEDICAL CENTER, et al.

No. 15-9789.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,309-01

EX PARTE ISAAC DIXON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1435751-A IN THE 230TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to ninety days in the county jail. He did not appeal his

conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and his due process rights were violated 

because subsequent forensic testing has revealed that the substance contained no illicit materials. 

The State and the trial court agree that Applicant is entitled to relief.
2

Relief is granted. See Ex parte Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The

judgment in cause number 1435751 in the 230th District Court of Harris County is set aside, and

if in custody, Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to answer the

charges as set out in the information. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within

10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: June 10, 2015

Do not publish
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

____________________________________ 

) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

) 

) 

v. ) Criminal No. 14-005 (ESH) 

) 

JAMES W. GREENE, JR., )

) 

Defendant. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

ORDER 

In a hearing before Magistrate Judge Kay on February 3, 2014, defendant James W. 

Greene, Jr., entered a plea of guilty. On February 21, 2014, the magistrate judge issued a Report 

and Recommendation advising the Court to accept defendant=s plea. Counsel have as of this date 

stated that they have no objection to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court 

hereby adopts the recommendation of the magistrate judge and accepts defendant’s guilty plea. 

SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ 

 ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE 

 United States District Judge 

Date: March 10, 2014
Exhibit 10.26

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO WARRANT NO. 1

This Amendment No. 2 to Warrant No. 1 is made and entered into as of the 30th day of December, 2005, by and among Digital Generation
Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and Scott K. Ginsburg ("Ginsburg").

WHEREAS,
the Corporation issued Warrant No. 1, dated as of December 9, 1998 for 1,460,067 shares of common stock of the Corporation (the "Warrant") to Ginsburg;

WHEREAS,
the Warrant was amended on or about November 30, 2000 pursuant to that certain Amendment No. 1 to Warrant No. 1 and again on or about June 24, 2004
pursuant to resolutions adopted by the unanimous written consent of the board of directors of the Corporation; and

WHEREAS,
the Corporation and Ginsburg wish to further amend the terms of the Warrant as described herein;

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, benefits and covenants herein contained, the Corporation and Ginsburg hereby agree as follows:

1.     Unless
otherwise defined, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Warrant. All references to Section herein shall be to Sections
of the Warrant.

2.     The
introductory heading of the Warrant shall be amended to read "Void after December 31, 2010."

3.     The
entirety of Section 2 in the Warrant shall read as follows:



[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 2 to Warrant No. 1 as of the date first above written.

| |  | DIGITAL GENERATION SYSTEMS, INC.                   
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                
| |  |                                                    
| |  | Name:                                              
| |  |                                                    
| |  | Title:                                             
| |  |                                                    
| |  | GINSBURG:                                          
| |  | /s/SCOTT K. GINSBURGScott K. Ginsburg, Individually

---



QuickLinks
|                                                                 | State of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
| Name of Subsidiary                                                   | or Organization        |
|                                                                 |                   |
| Your Community Bank                                                  | Indiana                |
|   CBSI Holdings, Inc.                                      | Nevada                 |
|   CBSI Investments, Inc.                                   | Nevada                 |
| CBSI Investment Portfolio Management, LLC                            | Nevada                 |
|   CBSI Development Fund, Inc.                              | Indiana                |
|   First Community Service Corporation                      | Indiana                |
|        Nelson Service Corporation | Kentucky               |
| The Scott County State Bank                                          | Indiana                |
IF IT’S WORTH FIXING, 

IT’S WORTH FIXING IT RIGHT

Commissioner Scott D. O’Malia

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

April 7, 2014
© McKinsey & Company 2013

2
© McKinsey & Company 2013

3
© McKinsey & Company 2013

4
5
Percentage of Monthly Volume by Transaction Type

Low Volume Energy Contracts (0 <= ADV < 200)

N=29

N=544

6
Percentage of Monthly Volume by Transaction Type

Medium Volume Energy Contracts (200 <= ADV < 100,000)

N=248

N=6

7
Percentage of Monthly Volume by Transaction Type

High Volume Energy Contracts (ADV <= 100,000)

N=1

N=4

8
Order entered November 8, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05-21-00741-CV IN RE JOHN CREUZOT, DI STRICT ATTORNEY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 305th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC-21-00754
ORDER Before Justices Osborne, Pe dersen, III, and Goldstein In accordance with th e Court’s opinion of this date, we
CONDITIONALLY GRANT relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We
ORDER the juvenile court to vacate its August 20, 2021 inj unctive order and dismiss the proceeding for want of jurisdiction. We further ORDER the juvenile court to file with this Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this order , a certified copy of the order issued in co mpliance with this order. Should the juvenile court fail to comply with this order, the writ will issue.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
mbcc-ex108_31.htm



Exhibit 10.8

 

AMENDMENT TO SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment dated as of January 1, 2016 (“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (“Mission”) is made to that certain Shared Services Agreement dated as of February 16, 1999 by and between VHR Broadcasting of Lubbock, Inc. and Quorum Broadcasting of Texas, Inc., as amended by those certain amendments dated April 1999, December 30, 2003, November 16, 2004, and December 30, 2005, and as extended by letter agreement on February 2, 2009 (collectively, the “Agreement”).

 

WHEREAS, Mission, as successor to VHR Broadcasting of Lubbock, Inc., is the licensee of television broadcast station KAMC, Lubbock, Texas;

 

WHEREAS, Nexstar, as successor to Quorum Broadcasting of Texas, Inc., is the licensee of television broadcasting station KLBK-TV, Lubbock, Texas; 

 

WHEREAS, Mission and Nexstar have entered into the Agreement for their mutual benefit;

 

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1. Paragraph 4(g) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in its place: “4(g) Services Fee. In consideration for the services to be provided to the Stations by Nexstar personnel as described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f), Mission will pay Nexstar the fee (“Services Fee”) described in this Section 4(g).

 

(i)Base Amount. Subject to the remaining provisions of this Section 4(g), the base amount of the Services Fee will be $83,333.33 per month.

 

(ii) Payment Terms. The Services Fee will be payable monthly, in arrears, from and after the month during which this Agreement is executed, and will be prorated on a daily basis for the first and last months during which the sharing arrangements described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f) are in effect.” 

 

2.These revised payment terms are effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.

 

3. As so amended, all sections and provisions of the Agreement are hereby ratified in full. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date above.

 


			
	
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

 
	
 
	
MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

	
By: /s/ Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
By: /s/ Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Name: Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
 

Name: Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Title: EVP & Chief Financial Officer
	
 
	
 

Title: President
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1380** 

JEWEL D. HILL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and their agents, representatives, attorneys, et al , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 00130

- HEH )

Submitted : July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jewel D. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jewel D. Hill appeals the district court ’s orders dismissing without prejudice her civil suit for damages relating to an automobile accident and denying her motions to certify constitutional questions to the United States and Virginia Attorneys G eneral and for judicial recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, w e affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. , No. 3:12

- cv - 00130

- HEH (E.D. Va. Feb. 23 & Feb 24, 2012 )
. We deny Hill’s motions for a transcript at Government expense and to certify questions to the United State s and Virginia Attorneys General. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Paulino GRANDA, petitioner, v. Richard B. IVES, Warden.

No. 16-6083.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JOHN T. LYONS 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 79 

DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1965 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: John T. Lyons 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 79 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that John T. Lyons has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued and 

the said John T. Lyons is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into a 

stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of 

Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said 

John T. Lyons stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) John T. Lyons an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was on August 13, 1965, a registered floor 

broker under the Commodity Exchange Act and a member of the Board of Trade of 

the City of Chicago, a duly designated contract market under the Commodity 

Exchange Act. 

(2) On August 13, 1965, John T. Lyons executed 149 transactions in regulated 

commodity futures on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago but failed to 

prepare a trading card or other 

record clearly identifying the opposite floor broker or other person with whom 

each of such transactions was executed. 

The Secretary of Agriculture has advised John T. Lyons that his failure to 

keep full and complete records of futures transactions, as described above, was 

in violation of section 4g of the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.35 of the 

regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said John T. Lyons agrees to desist from such acts and practices in the 

future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation shall be 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 29 day of September 1965 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Witnessed by: 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 
Page 2 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
William R. CREWS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-5699.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40439

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN H. FURH, IV,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas, Sherman

(4:95-CR-7-1)

March 11, 1997

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of the briefs, the argument of counsel, and

the record, this Court concludes that the appeal presents no

reversible error.

Appellant did not renew his motion for judgment of acquittal

at the close of all the evidence, although after the government

rested, the defense had prod uced evidence; nor was any postjudgment motion for acquittal filed. In any event, we conclude2

that the evidence was plainly sufficient, even had a proper motion

been made at the close of all the evidence.

The court did not err in admitting the documents challenged on

the basis of lack of proof of authority. The defendant had earlier

stipulated to their authenticity, and it was also circumstantially

evidenced.

Finally, the district court did not abuse its discret ion in

admitting the evidence concerning the false financial statement to

the bank. It was relevant to the centrally contested issue in this

c ase, intent; and, the trial court gave a proper li miting

instruction. We are unable to find any abuse of discretion

(moreover, it is clear that the admission of this evidence was

plainly harmless).

AFFIRMED