alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552(b)(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         June 20, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Julian L. Azorlosa, Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3190, MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1507.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 18, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-15765  Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2011030EN.01000501.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Barsoum Chabo v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen

(Case C-213/09) (1)

1

(Customs union - Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 - Common Customs Tariff - Recovery of import customs duties - Imports of processed foodstuffs - Preserved mushrooms - CN subheading 2003 10 30 - Levy of an additional amount - Principle of proportionality)

2011/C 30/07

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Barsoum Chabo

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Hamburg — Validity of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2005 L 286, p. 1) as regards the additional amount charged on the import of products falling under subheading 2003 1030 000 — Preserved mushrooms — Principle of proportionality

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Examination of the question referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of the amount of the specific customs duty of EUR 222 per 100 kilograms of net drained weight, which applies under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff and is charged on imports of preserved mushrooms of the genus Agaricus coming under subheading 2003 10 30 of the Combined Nomenclature in that annex and effected outside the quota opened by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1864/2004 of 26 October 2004 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for preserved mushrooms imported from third countries, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1995/2005 of 7 December 2005.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 29.8.2009.

1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 6, 2022

No. 04-22-00038-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF EMILY D. PRIETO, Deceased,

Appellant

From the County Court At Law No 1, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-PB7-000086L1

Honorable Hugo Martinez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On January 28, 2022, appellant Eduardo David Prieto filed a notice of appeal challenging 

the trial court’s October 19, 2021 orders granting appellee Victor G. Prieto’s motion for 

summary judgment and motion to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant filed his 

brief on July 8, 2022, making appellee’s brief due by August 8, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(b) (setting appellee’s brief deadline as thirty days after appellant’s brief is filed). Appellee 

did not file a brief, and this court notified appellee’s attorney of the deficiency on August 18, 

2022. We also instructed appellee’s attorney to file a response by August 29, 2022 with a 

reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief. On August 26, 2022, appellee’s 

attorney, Ryan Solis, filed a response, stating he did not represent appellee on appeal and 

appellee indicated he would not be hiring appellate counsel. Accordingly, appellee is advised if 

he wishes to file a brief, he must file his brief by October 6, 2022. If the brief is not filed, this 

case will be set at issue without an appellee’s brief. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
# C_2010288EN.01001301.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/13

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2010 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-265/09 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Application for registration of the figurative sign ‘α’ - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Mark consisting of a single letter)

(2010/C 288/19)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings: BORCO-Marken-Import Matthiesen GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: M. Wolter, Rechtsanwalt)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2009 in Case T-23/07 Borco-Marken-Import Matthiesen v OHIM (α), by which the Court annulled the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 November 2006, dismissing the action brought against the decision of the examiner refusing the registration of the figurative sign ‘α’ as a Community trade mark for goods in Class 33 — Distinctive character of a mark consisting of a single letter

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 26.9.2009.

---
# C_2010179EN.01001302.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 May 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Nantes (France)) — Scott SA, Kimberly Clark SNC, now Kimberly Clark SAS v Ville d’Orléans

(Case C-210/09) (1)

(State aid - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 14(3) - Recovery of aid - Principle of effectiveness - Assessments vitiated by a procedural defect - Annulment)

(2010/C 179/21)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour administrative d’appel de Nantes

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Scott SA, Kimberly Clark SNC, now Kimberly Clark SAS

Defendant: Ville d’Orléans

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour administrative d’appel de Nantes — Interpretation of Article 14(3) of Council Regulation No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999, laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ 1999 L 83, p. 1) — Aid granted by the French authorities in favour of Scott SA and Kimberly Clark — Obligation to recover immediately the aid declared incompatible with the common market — Effect on that obligation of possible annulment, on grounds of procedural defect, of the assessments issued by the national authorities for the recovery of that aid

Operative part of the judgment

Article 14(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article [88] of the EC Treaty is to be interpreted as not precluding, in circumstances in which amounts corresponding to the aid in question have already been recovered, annulment by the national court of assessments issued in order to recover the unlawful State aid on grounds of there being a procedural defect, where it is possible to rectify that procedural defect under national law. That provision does, however, preclude those amounts being paid once again, even provisionally, to the beneficiary of that aid.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 29.8.2009.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation
(BKFC) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin J. Gerrety, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of BKFC, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of BKFC.



/s/ Martin J. GerretyMartin J. GerretyTreasurer and Assistant SecretaryMarch 13, 2009
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1381 

CA 13-00644 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IRA HALFOND, ARTHUR T. LYNCH, SANDRA KNOBLOCK, 

PAUL J. BULINSKI, JOHN J. GRECO AND DONNA M. 

LAWRENCE, ADJACENT UPLAND LAND OWNERS, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WHITE LAKE SHORES ASSOCIATION, INC., 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

GORMAN, WASZKIEWICZ, GORMAN & SCHMITT, UTICA (WILLIAM P. SCHMITT OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LAW OFFICES OF IRA HALFOND, P.C., CRARYVILLE (IRA HALFOND OF COUNSEL),

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT PRO SE, AND FOR ARTHUR T. LYNCH, SANDRA KNOBLOCK,

PAUL J. BULINSKI, JOHN J. GRECO AND DONNA M. LAWRENCE, ADJACENT UPLAND

LAND OWNERS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Oneida County

(Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered November 29, 2012. The judgment

awarded attorney fees and expenses to plaintiffs. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously vacated on the law without costs. 

Same Memorandum as in Halfond v White Lake Shores Assoc., Inc.

([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 14, 2014]).

Entered: February 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Tony Ray JONES, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 15-9242.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15122]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3337; Amendment #4]


State of Iowa

    In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated June 6, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration 
is hereby amended to include Pottawattamie and Webster Counties in the 
State of Iowa as disaster areas caused by flooding and severe storms 
beginning on April 8, 2001 and continuing through May 29, 2001.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in Boone, Cass, Hamilton, Harrison, Humboldt, Mills, 
Montgomery, Shelby and Wright Counties in the State of Iowa; and 
Douglas, Sarpy and Washington Counties in the State of Nebraska may be 
filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. 
Any counties contiguous to the above named primary counties and not 
listed here have been previously declared.
    The number assigned for economic injury in the State of Nebraska is 
9L8400.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is July 1, 2001 and for 
economic injury the deadline is February 1, 2002.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 7, 2001.
Allan I. Hoberman
Acting Associate Administrator, For Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-15122 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 21, 2011 

h0914 

Order 

 

September 21, 2011 

142857 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142857 

 COA: 300565 

Jackson CC: 02-000770-FC 

JOHN DAVID RUELAS, III, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Natalie DeMOLA, petitioner, v. Mary LATTIMORE, Warden.

No. 16-6563.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
----

----

----

|        1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  /s/    Matthew      K. Rose                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |  /s/    Thomas      N. Hund                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |          Matthew      K. Rose         Chairman,      President and         Chief      Executive Officer |   |   |          Thomas      N. Hund          Executive      Vice President and          Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 1 7 3 DB 2022 (No. 22 RST 2023)

:

SCOTT AARON SHELDON : Attorney Registration No. 206221

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9 th day of March

, 202 3 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinar y Board Member dated February 28 , 202 3

, is approved and it is ORDERED

that SCOTT AARON SHELDON

, who has been on Administrative Suspension

, h as

demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law

required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby

reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses

incu rred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by

the Petitioner

.
# C_2011013EN.01000801.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt Leverkusen v Verigen Transplantation Service International AG

(Case C-156/09) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 13(A)(1)(c) - Exemptions for activities in the public interest - Provision of medical care - Removal and multiplication of cartilage cells for the purpose of reimplantation in the patient)

2011/C 13/12

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof — Germany

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt Leverkusen

Applicant:

Defendant: Verigen Transplantation Service International AG

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Article 13A(1)(c) and the first paragraph of Article 28bF of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Removal of joint cartilage cells from cartilage material taken from a human being by persons established in other Member States and subsequent multiplication of those cells with a view to their being implanted in a patient by the same persons — Determination of the place where services are supplied — Exemption of those services as ‘the provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13(A)(1)(c) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995, must be interpreted as meaning that the removal of joint cartilage cells from cartilage material taken from a human being and the subsequent multiplication of those cells for reimplantation for therapeutic purposes constitute ‘provision of medical care’ in accordance with that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 01.08.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Maiden
Holdings, Ltd (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:




The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:May15,
      2009
                  By:
                  /s/ MICHAEL
      J. TAITName:
                  Michael
      J. TaitTitle:
                  Chief Financial
      Officer


The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the
Report.