alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

<PAGE>


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-3520 of Wells  Financial  Corp. on Form S-8 (filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on April 12, 1996) of our report,  dated February 10, 2000,
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Wells  Financial  Corp. for the
year ended December 31, 1999.

                                               /s/  McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
                                               -------------------------------
                                               McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


Rochester, Minnesota
March 22, 2000
Lavert JONES, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHCARE AND FAMILY SERVICES, et al.

No. 16-6408.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
#### FARMERS’ LOAN & TRUST CO. v. TREAT, Collector.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

June 10, 1909.)

Turner, Rolston & lloran, tor plaintiff.

Henry L. Stimson, U. S. Atty., for defendant.

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

TMs cause is in all respects similar *to*Central Trust Co. v. Treat, 171 Fed. 301, in which, a memorándum of decision is filed to-day, and will be similarly disposed of.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER01-1707-001]

Take notice that on June 1, 2001, Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCPL) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), a Notice of Cancellation of KCPL Rate Schedule FERC No. 121.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 22, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the  appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15584 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Office of Management and Budget
 Section 1014(e) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-344) requires a monthly report listing all budget authority for the current fiscal year for which, as of the first day of the month, a special message had been transmitted to Congress. This report gives the status, as of June 1, 2001, of two deferrals contained in one special message for FY 2001. The message was transmitted to Congress on January 18, 2001. Deferrals (Attachments A and B) As of June 1, 2001, $1.4 billion in budget authority was being deferred from obligation. Attachment B shows the status of each deferral reported during FY 2001. Information From Special Message The special message containing information on the deferrals that are covered by this cumulative report is printed in the edition of the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     cited below: 66 FR 8985, Monday, February 5, 2001 Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Director.
 Attachment A—Status of FY 2001 Deferrals
[In millions of dollars]
Budgetary resourcesDeferrals proposed by the President
1,946.7Routine Executive releases through June 1, 2001
−551.8Overturned by the CongressCurrently before the Congress
1,394.9


BILLING CODE 3110-01-P [FR Doc. 01-15916 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3110-01-C
#### Justo ESCALANTE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margarita PEREZ, Chairman California Board of Prison Terms; et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 06-56270.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 13, 2010.

Justo Escalante, Soledad, CA, pro se.

Collette C. Cavalier, Esq., Office of the Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Justo Escalante appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253,1 and we affirm.

Escalante contends that the Board’s 2003 decision to deny him parole was not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due process rights. The state court did not unreasonably conclude that some evidence supports the Board’s decision. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *see also Hayward v. Marshall,*603 F.3d 546, 562-63 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether the 2003 decision of the California Board of Prison Terms ("Board”) to deny parole violated due process.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: DANIEL N. DEWEY 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 146 

DATE: MAY 30, 1974 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Daniel N. Dewey 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 146 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Daniel N. Dewey has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued and 

the said Daniel N. Dewey is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into 

a stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of 

Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said 

Daniel N. Dewey stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) Daniel N. Dewey, an individual whose address is 141 W. Jackson Boulevard, 

Room 1068, Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was at all times material herein 

a member of the Chicago Board of Trade, a duly designated contract market under 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) The registration of Daniel N. Dewey as floor broker under the Commodity 

Exchange Act for the calendar year 1973 expired on December 31, 1973, and the 

said Daniel N. Dewey did not submit an application for registration as a floor 

broker under the Act for the calendar year 1974 until January 30, 1974. 

(3) During the period from January 1 through January 30, 1974, Daniel N. 

Dewey acted as floor broker by executing for another person orders for the 

purchase or sale of commodities for future delivery on or subject to the rules 

of the Chicago Board of Trade. 

The Commodity Exchange Authority has advised Daniel N. Dewey that by reason 

of the acts set forth above, he has violated section 4e of the Act and section 

1.8 of the regulations thereunder. 

The said Daniel N. Dewey agrees to desist from such acts and practices in the 

future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation is admissible 

as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based upon acts 

or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be brought 

against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the said 

Act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to issue press releases on stipulations of compliance and to make them 

a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, 

this 30 day of MAY 1974. 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Daniel N. Dewey 

Witnessed by: 
Page 2 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
# C_2010179EN.01001401.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2010 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland

(Case C-311/09) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - VAT - International carriage of persons - Flat-rate taxation of transporters domiciled outside the national territory)

(2010/C 179/22)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Martinez del Peral Cagigal and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: M. Dowgielewicz und M. Szpunar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 73, 168 and 273 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — International carriage of persons by road — National rules requiring transporters domiciled abroad to pay VAT under a flat-rate system based only on the number of persons transported to the national territory and which does not allow any right to deduct

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by charging value added tax in the manner set out in Chapter 13, Paragraph 35(1), (3), (4) and (5), of the Regulation of the Minister for Finance of 27 April 2004 on the implementation of certain provisions of the Law on the taxation of goods and services, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 73, 168 and 273 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by charging value added tax in the manner set out in Chapter 13, Paragraph 35(1), (3), (4) and (5), of the Regulation of the Minister for Finance of 27 April 2004 on the implementation of certain provisions of the Law on the taxation of goods and services, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 73, 168 and 273 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256 of 24.10.2009.

---
Michael D. BIKUNDI, Sr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6878.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report
of Semitool, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Raymon F. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at           the dates
and for the periods indicated.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Semitool, Inc. and will be retained by Semitool, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated:  December 13, 2006 |  | By: /s/Raymon F. Thompson
Raymon F. ThompsonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Scott DAHL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-8955.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
II-00394

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Timothy Johnston <tjohnst@hotmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:39 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Timothy Johnston

825 Fell St., Apt. 1

San Francisco, CA 94117
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Globalstar Telecommunications Limited:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-6477, 333-22063, and 333-25457 on Form S-3 and 333-29447 on Form S-8 of
Globalstar Telecommunications Limited of our reports dated March 6, 1998, on the
financial statements of Globalstar Telecommunications Limited and the
consolidated financial statements of Globalstar, L.P. appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Globalstar Telecommunications Limited and Globalstar,
L.P. for the year ended December 31, 1997.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
March 27, 1998
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIEDPUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

                Wehave issued our report dated March 12, 2002 (except for Note 17 as to which thedate is April 23, 2002) accompanying the consolidated financial statements andschedule included in the Annual Report of Paper Warehouse, Inc. andSubsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2002, which reportexpressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included anexplanatory paragraph relating to an uncertainty regarding the Company'sability to continue as a going concern. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report inthe Registration Statements of Paper Warehouse, Inc. and subsidiaries on FormsS-8 (No. 333-36064, No. 333-36066, No. 333-43358) and Form S-3 (No. 333-44944).

 

 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

April 25, 2002

 

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40672

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DARWIN SANTIAGO MARTINEZ-ANDINO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-289-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Darwin Santiago 

Martinez-Andino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Andino has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40672 Document: 00513013606 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 14-40672

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-40672 Document: 00513013606 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
Exhibit 10.36


                                 THIRD AMENDMENT

         THIS THIRD AMENDMENT,  made as of this 7th day of January,  1997 by and
between  CONVERSE  INC., a corporation  organized and existing under the laws of
the State of  Delaware,  having its  principal  place of business at One Fordham
Road,  North Reading,  Massachusetts  01864  (hereinafter  called  "Converse" or
"Licensor");

                                       AND

ACTIVE APPAREL GROUP, INC., a corporation  organized and existing under the laws
of the  State of New  York,  having  its  principal  place of  business  at 1350
Broadway, Suite 2300, New York, New York 10018 (hereinafter called "Licensee").

                                   WITNESSETH

         WHEREAS, the Licensor and the Licensee entered into a Trademark License
Agreement  dated May 20,  1994,  as amended on October 3, 1995 and June 1, 1996,
with  respect to the  license of certain  of the  Licensor's  trademarks  in the
United States (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, Converse and Licensee desire to further amend the Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

         1. Paragraph 5.1(b) shall be revised to read as follows:

            "(b) The Licensee will pay to Licensor a guaranteed  minimum  annual
license fee  commencing  May 20, 1994,  regardless  of its Net Sales of Finished
Articles sold under this Agreement for each  Accounting Year commencing with the
year 1994 (the "Guaranteed Minimum Fee"), in the amount set forth herein:


<PAGE>

                  ACCOUNTING YEAR              GUARANTEED MINIMUM LICENSE FEE
1        May 20, 1994 to September 30, 1996            $280,000
2        October 1, 1996 to September 30, 1997         $280,000.00
3        October 1, 1997 to September 30, 1998         $350,000.00"

         2. As amended  hereby,  the  Agreement  shall  remain in full force and
effect.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have executed this Third Amendment as
of the date first above written.


WITNESS:                               CONVERSE INC.


/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]                        By  /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
---------------                            ------------------------------

WITNESS:                               ACTIVE APPAREL GROUP, INC.


  /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]                      By  /s/ GEORGE HOROWITZ, PRESIDENT
-----------------                          ------------------------------


                                       -2-
Randy WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-7027.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly of Kerrisdale Mining Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Huoqi Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Huoqi ChenHuoqi Chen, Chief Financial Officer December 5, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation
(BKFC) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin J. Gerrety, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of BKFC, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of BKFC.



/s/ Martin J. GerretyMartin J. GerretyTreasurer and Assistant SecretaryMarch 15, 2007