alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: P. J. TAGGARES COMPANY, CHEF-REDDY FOODS, PETER J. TAGGARES, KENNETH L. 

RAMM IDAHO POTATO PACKERS CORP., ROBERT H. ABEND IDAHO POTATO PACKERS OF IDAHO, 

INC., HAROLD ABEND, SIMPLOT EASTERN IDAHO PRODUCE COMPANY, INC. SAN JACINTO 

PACKING CO., AGRI-EMPIRE, INC., JAMES MINOR, UNIVERSAL LAND-SNAKE RIVER, EDWARD 

SPIEGEL, MODIE J. SPIEGEL, J. R. SIMPLOT COMPANY, INC., AND JACK R. SIMPLOT 

DOCKET NUMBER: 200 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 200 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

P. J. Taggares Company, 

Chef-Reddy Foods, 

Peter J. Taggares, 

Kenneth L. Ramm 

(Othello, Washington) 

Idaho Potato Packers Corp., 

Robert H. Abend 

(Bronx, New York) 

Idaho Potato Packers of Idaho, Inc., 

Harold Abend, 

Simplot Eastern Idaho Produce Company, Inc. (Blackfoot, Idaho) 

San Jacinto Packing Co., 

Agri-Empire, Inc., 

James Minor 

(San Jacinto, California) 

Universal Land-Snake River 

Edward Spiegel 

(Pasco, Washington) 

Modie J. Spiegel 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

J. R. Simplot Company, Inc., 

Jack R. Simplot (Boise, Idaho) 

The complaint charges attempted manipulation of the price of the May 1971 

Idaho potato future on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. It alleges that a 

number of large long traders, acting in concert, attempted to raise the price of 
Page 2 

the future. It also alleges that at the same time a large short trader 

attempted to hold the price down. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee in 

Chicago, Illinois, at a place therein and date to be specified later. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3 
Page 4
William A. TENDRICH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9278.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

*63Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2064/2004

of 30 November 2004         

prohibiting fishing for black scabbardfish by vessels flying the flag of Spain

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Catches of black scabbardfish in the waters of ICES sub-areas V, VI, VII and XII (Community waters and waters not under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of third countries) by vessels flying the flag of Spain or registered in Spain are hereby deemed to have exhausted the quota allocated to Spain for 2004.

Fishing for black scabbardfish in the waters of ICES sub-areas V, VI, VII and XII (Community waters and waters not under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of third countries) by vessels flying the flag of Spain or registered in Spain is hereby prohibited, as are the retention on board, transhipment and landing of this stock caught by the above vessels after the date of application of this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 3 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2004.

For the Commission

Joe BORG            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1954/2003 (OJ L 289, 7.11.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 356, 31.12.2002, p. 1.

----
Juan ADAME, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-390.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
MERIDIAN FUND, INC.

			     Meridian Value Fund
			     Meridian Growth Fund




		     SUPPLEMENT DATED JULY 3, 2003 TO THE
	    STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2002


Effective July 3, 2003, the following information is added to the
Statement of Additional Information under the section, PURCHASE, REDEMPTION
AND PRICING OF SHARES and the heading, PRICE OF SHARES, paragraph 1, second
sentence:

Securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. ("NASDAQ") are valued
at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price ("NOCP"), and if no NOCP is available,
then at the last-reported sales price.  If no sale is shown on NASDAQ, the
last reported bid price is used.





	     PLEASE RETAIN THIS SUPPLEMENT WITH THE STATEMENT OF
		ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR FUTURE REFERENCE



[MERIDIAN FUND, INC. LETTERHEAD]]

VIA EDGAR

July 3, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Meridian Fund, Inc.
	   File Nos. 2-90949, 811-4014

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

      On behalf of Meridian Fund, Inc., and pursuant to Rule 497(e) under the
Securities Act of 1933, we are transmitting on EDGAR for filing a supplement,
dated as of the date hereof, to the November 1, 2002 Statement of Additional
Information of the Meridian Fund, Inc.

      If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at
the number set forth below.

					Sincerely,




					/s/ Gregg B. Keeling
					 Gregg B. Keeling

Writer's Direct Dial Number
(415) 461-8770

Attachment
R.F. MANAGEMENT CORP.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                               Years Ended September 30,
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                          1997           1996           1995
                                          ----           ----           ----

NET INCOME (LOSS)                     $(1,627,720)   $  (952,214)   $   (50,244)

PRIMARY
  Weighted average shares               3,416,388      3,327,500      2,607,802
  Assumed conversions
    A warrants and B warrants                  --             --        515,604

        Total weighted average
          shares outstanding            3,416,388      3,327,500      3,123,406

  Earnings (loss) per share amounts   $     (0.48)   $     (0.29)   $     (0.02)

FULLY DILUTED
  Weighted average shares               3,416,388      3,327,500      3,327,500
  Assumed conversions
    A warrants and B warrants           1,955,000      1,955,000      1,955,000

        Total weighted average
          shares outstanding            5,371,388      5,282,500      5,282,500

  Earnings (loss) per share amounts   $     (0.30)   $     (0.18)   $     (0.01)
Maria T. SERRA, petitioner, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON.

No. 15-1441.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Ronald Bert SMITH, Jr., applicant, v. ALABAMA.

No. 16A569.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 8, 2016.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. The order heretofore entered by Justice THOMAS is vacated.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF HEMPSTEAD & CO. INCORPORATED

We consent to the use, in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, of Voxware, Inc. (the "Company"), of our identity and the results of our report dated February 16, 2004, used to determine the fair value of the guarantee made by certain stockholders of the Company in connection with the Company's credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank, originally filed as Exhibit 23.3 with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.



Hempstead & Company, Inc.

/s/ Hempstead & Co. IncorporatedHaddonfield, New JerseySeptember 25, 2007

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000854066
<NAME>                         GEODYNE INST/PENSION ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHIP P-3
                                
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                            772,210
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     197,418
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  969,628
<PP&E>                         10,596,646
<DEPRECIATION>                  8,593,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,972,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                      2,972,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,972,752
<SALES>                           786,242
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,400,763
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     457,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   943,631
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               943,631
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      943,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        5.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        
 

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-400-001]


PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

June 14, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 7, 2001, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest 
Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1-A, substitute tariff sheets intended to 
address certain issues raised by the Commission in its June 1, 2001 
Order in this docket.
    GTN's filing provides further clarification and explanation as 
requested by the Commission. GTN requests that the original, revised 
and substitute tariff sheets filed in this docket become effective July 
1, 2001.
    GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served on 
GTN's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15508 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the Trustees and Shareholders of Fidelity Investment Trust:

In  planning and performing our audits of the financial  statements
of  Fidelity  Europe  Capital  Appreciation,  Fidelity  Diversified
International and Fidelity Worldwide (the "Funds") (each  a  series
of Fidelity Investment Trust) for the period ended October 31, 1999
(on  which  we have issued our reports dated December 3, 1999),  we
considered their internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding  securities,  in  order  to  determine  our   auditing
procedures  for  the  purpose  of expressing  our  opinion  on  the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-
SAR, and not to provide assurance on the Funds' internal control.

The  management  of the Funds is responsible for  establishing  and
maintaining  internal control.  In fulfilling this  responsibility,
estimates  and judgments by management are required to  assess  the
expected  benefits  and  related  costs  of  controls.   Generally,
controls  that  are relevant to an audit pertain  to  the  entity's
objective  of preparing financial statements for external  purposes
that  are  fairly  presented in conformity with generally  accepted
accounting principles.  Those controls include the safeguarding  of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because   of   inherent  limitations  in  any   internal   control,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be  detected.
Also,  projections of any evaluation of internal control to  future
periods  are  subject  to the risk that the  internal  control  may
become  inadequate  because of changes in conditions  or  that  the
degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our   consideration  of  the  Funds'  internal  control  would  not
necessarily disclose all matters in internal control that might  be
material  weaknesses under standards established  by  the  American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness  is
a  condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal  control  components does not reduce to a  relatively  low
level  the  risk  that misstatements caused by error  or  fraud  in
amounts  that  would  be  material in  relation  to  the  financial
statements  being  audited may occur and not be detected  within  a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their
assigned  functions.   However, we noted no matters  involving  the
Funds'  internal control and its operation, including controls  for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses
as defined above as of October 31, 1999.

This  report  is  intended solely for the information  and  use  of
management, the Board of Trustees of Fidelity Investment Trust, and
the  Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended  to  be
and  should  not  be  used  by anyone other  than  these  specified
parties.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

December 3, 1999
Boston, Massachusetts
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (333-163365) and Forms S-8 (333-37011 and 333-39322) of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation of our report, dated March 10, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation for the yearended December 31, 2010. 

 

Indianapolis, Indiana 

March 10, 2011
#### Abdul Aziz MAQSOOD, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-60022

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 15, 2006.

Imran B. Mirza, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Ann Carroll Varnon, John Clifford Cunningham, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Caryl G. Thompson, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, District Directors Office, Attn: Joe A. Aguilar, New Orleans, LA, Sharon A. Hudson, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Houston, TX, for Respondent.

Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Abdul Aziz Maqsood, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. Maqsood argues that the BIA erroneously determined that he failed to show past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution.

Maqsood’s claims of past persecution are based on his assertion that when he was 14-years old members of the MQM party fired at a car in which he was riding with his mother because his father was a member of a rival political party. He also claims that the MQM made threatening telephone calls to his house. Maqsood admitted at the hearing before the IJ that he had no proof that the MQM was involved in the attack on his car.

*398Maqsood’s also fears future persecution if returned to Pakistan. Maqsood admitted, however, that he and his family remained in Pakistan without suffering any harm for one-and-a-half years after the attack on his car. And, he admitted that his father returned to Pakistan to attend a wedding and complete a business deal without incident.

We conclude from a review of the record that the BIA’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, and the record does not compel a conclusion contrary to the IJ’s findings that Maqsood failed to show past persecution on account of a protected ground or a well-founded fear of future persecution.1

The petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. *See Eduard v. Ashcroft,*379 F.3d 182, 187 (5th Cir.2004); *Mikhael v. INS,*115 F.3d 299, 304 (5th Cir.1997).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council will meet in Rapid City, South Dakota, June 14-16, 2001. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss emerging issues in urban and community forestry.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held June 14-16, 2001. A tour of local projects will be held on June 14 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Hotel Alex Johnson, 523 Sixth Street, Rapid City, South Dakota. Individuals, who wish to speak at the meeting or to propose agenda items, must send their names and proposals to Suzanne M. del Villar, Executive Assistant, National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council, 20628 Diane Drive, Sonora, California 95370. Individuals may fax their names and proposed agenda items to (209) 536-9089.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Suzanne M. del Villar, Cooperative Forestry Staff, (209) 536-9201.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Challenge Cost-Share Grant categories, identified by the Council, are advertised annually to solicit proposals for projects to advance the knowledge of, and promote interest in, urban and community forestry. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), the meeting will be closed from approximately 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on June 16, in order for the Council to determine the categories for the 2002 Challenge Cost-Share grant program. Otherwise, the meeting is open to the public.

Council discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Council members, however, persons who wish to bring urban and community forestry matters to the attention of the Council may file written statements with the Council staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided. This notice is being provided less than 15 days prior to the meeting because of administrative delays in authorizing closure of a portion of the meeting.

Dated: June 11, 2001.

Ann M. Veneman,

Secretary, Department of Agriculture.

[FR Doc. 01-15162 Filed 6-12-01; 2:26 pm]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Exhibit






   Exhibit 10.29
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of March 18, 2014, amends that certain employment agreement, dated April 1, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”), between Lion Ribbon Company, LLC (“LR”), and Carey Edwards (“Employee”).


WHEREAS, LR and the Employee previously entered into the Employment Agreement, which, among other things, provides for the employment of the Employee in the position of Executive Vice President of Sales; 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement as specifically provided herein; 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:


1.    Modification of Employment Term Set Forth in Section 1.1 of the Employment Agreement.  The parties acknowledge and agree that Section 1.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be modified to provide that the Employment Term (as such term is defined in such Section 1.1) shall continue until March 31, 2016.  
    
2.    Miscellaneous.    Except as expressly modified hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect.  Upon the execution and delivery hereof, the Employment Agreement shall thereupon be deemed to be amended as hereinabove set forth, and this Amendment and the Employment Agreement shall henceforth be read, taken and construed as one and the same instrument.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original instrument, but all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement, and shall become binding when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties hereto and delivered to the other party.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by LR and by the Employee as of the date first above written.


LION RIBBON COMPANY, LLC (“LR”)




By:  /s/ Christopher J. Munyan                             
        Christopher J. Munyan
        President




/s/ Carey Edwards                                                 
Carey Edwards (“Employee”)


1