alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


 


		


 


December 3, 2015


 


Ms. Mary Walton

Long Island High Technology Incubator, Inc.

25 Health Sciences Drive

Stony Brook, NY 11790


 


Ms. Walton,


 


I am writing to notify you that Applied DNA Sciences, Inc. (APDN),
would like to exercise our option to renew our lease at 50 Health Sciences Drive, Stony Brook, NY 11790, for an additional 3-year
term from its original expiration date of May 31, 2016 to May 31, 2019. However, APDN will have the right to terminate the lease
sooner, only if the new mezzanine space in the Innovation and Discovery Center becomes available prior to May 31, 2019. In accordance
with the renewal option, all other terms and conditions set forth in our lease agreement dated June 14, 2013, shall remain the
same.


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/ Beth Jantzen


 


Beth Jantzen

Chief Financial Officer


 


	Accepted:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Mary Walton	 
	Mary Walton	 
	Long Island High Technology Incubator, Inc.	 


 


50 Health Sciences Drive • Stony Brook,
NY 11790 • tel 631 240.8811 • fax 631 240.8900
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1804/2004

of 14 October 2004         

amending the list of competent courts and redress procedures in Annexes I, II and III to Council Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility of both spouses

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 of 29 May 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility for children of both spouses (1), and in particular Article 44(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 is amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2004.

For the Commission

António VITORINO            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 30.6.2000, p. 19. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (01-081)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Science Advisory Committee, Sun-Earth Connection Advisory Subcommittee. 

# DATES:

Monday, July 23, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.; Tuesday, July 24, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Conference Room 6H46, 300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC, 20546. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. George L. Withbroe, Code S, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-2150. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

—State of the Sun-Earth Connection Theme 

—Geospace Management Operations Working Group 

—Living With a Star Science Architecture Committee 

—Solar/Heliospheric Management Operation Working Group 

—Report of Discipline Scientists

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

Dated: June 19, 2001.

Beth M. McCormick, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 01-15868 Filed 6-22-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the  provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for  Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis  Panel NCCAM H-12 SEP.                    

*Date:*                         June 21, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Four Points by  Sheraton Bethesda, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Cecelia Maryland, Grants Technical Assistant, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Room 5B50, Bethesda,  MD 20892, (301) 480-2419.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days  prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

Dated: June 18, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-15760  Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 6 
<CIK> 0000744822
<NAME> Fidelity Investment Trust
<SERIES>
 <NUMBER> 191
 <NAME> Fidelity Germany Fund
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                year         
 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            oct-31-1998  
 
<PERIOD-END>                 oct-31-1998  
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>        33,399       
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>       34,841       
 
<RECEIVABLES>                104          
 
<ASSETS-OTHER>               18           
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>         0            
 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               34,963       
 
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>     30           
 
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>      0            
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>    138          
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>          168          
 
<SENIOR-EQUITY>              0            
 
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>     36,591       
 
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>        2,352        
 
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>        962          
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>    17           
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>       0            
 
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>      (3,259)      
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>     0            
 
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>     1,446        
 
<NET-ASSETS>                 34,795       
 
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>            418          
 
<INTEREST-INCOME>            86           
 
<OTHER-INCOME>               (42)         
 
<EXPENSES-NET>               414          
 
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>      48           
 
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>     (3,233)      
 
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>    828          
 
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>        (2,357)      
 
<EQUALIZATION>               0            
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>    7            
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>     1,169        
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>        0            
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>      2,771        
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>  1,474        
 
<SHARES-REINVESTED>          93           
 
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>       22,063       
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>      0            
 
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>    1,687        
 
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>      0            
 
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>   0            
 
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>        174          
 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           2            
 
<GROSS-EXPENSE>              418          
 
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>         23,737       
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>        13.240       
 
<PER-SHARE-NII>              .030         
 
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>      2.650        
 
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>         .010         
 
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>    1.240        
 
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>         0            
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>          14.790       
 
<EXPENSE-RATIO>              176          
 
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>       0            
 
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>         0
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Opinion filed April 11, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00225-CV

IN RE FOX CORPORATE HOUSING, LLC D/B/A FOX INSURANCE 

HOUSING, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-47448

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Thursday, March 28, 2024, relator Fox Corporate Housing, LLC d/b/a 

Fox Insurance Housing filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See 

Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, 

relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Ursula Hall, presiding judge of the 

165th District Court of Harris County, to rule on relator’s “Motion to Designate 

Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. as Responsible Third Party.” The court requested 
2

the real party in interest to file a response to relator’s petition by April 4, 2024. On 

April 3, 2024, the trial court provided our court a copy of the “Order Granting 

Defendant Leave to Designate Responsible Third Party Penske Truck Leasing Co., 

L.P.” 

A petition for a writ of mandamus for failure to rule is dismissed as moot 

when the trial court rules after the petition for writ of mandamus is filed. See In re

4KBC Trucking, LLC, No. 14-23-00675-CV, 2023 WL 7141209, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 31, 2023, orig. proceeding); In re Mem'l

Hermann Health Sys., No. 14-24-00138-CV, 2024 WL 859381, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 29, 2024, orig. proceeding). 

Because respondent ruled on the relator’s motion after relator filed its 

petition for writ of mandamus, relator received the relief requested. Thus, this 

mandamus is now moot. As such, we dismiss relator's petition for writ of 

mandamus as moot.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher, Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2
 
                    AMENDMENT OF DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN



Pursuant to Section 8.2 of the CB Commercial Real Estate Services Group, Inc.
Deferred Compensation Plan the following provisions of such Plan are amended
effective December 1, 1997:

1.   Section 2.7 of such Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     "Compensation" has the same meaning as it has under the CAP Plan without
     --------------                                                          
     regard to deferrals under this Plan, the limitations of Code section 401(a)
     (17), income earned from the exercise of stock options, stock appreciation
     or other rights, car allowances, reimbursements for moving or other
     expenses or the imputed value of life insurance and includes any amount
     payable pursuant to a formal severance plan of the Company.

2.   Section 5.2 of such Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     If any portion of a Participant's Account is allocated to the CBC Stock
     Fund during the Plan Year, the Participant's Account shall be credited with
     units ("CBC Stock Fund Units") equal to the number of shares of Stock which
     could be purchased based on the average closing price of the Stock for the
     last five trading days of the month preceding the first day of the calendar
     quarter in which the deferred amount would otherwise have been paid to
     Participant.  In the event dividends are paid or payable during the Plan
     Year on Stock underlying CBC Stock Fund Units credited to a Participant's
     Account, the Participant's Account shall be credited with the number of
     whole shares equal to the number of shares which could be purchased with
     such dividends based on the average closing price of the Stock for the five
     trading days preceding the date the dividend is paid.



In witness whereof I have caused this Amendment to be executed this 17th day of
January, 1998.



        /s/ James J. Didion
-----------------------------------------
James J. Didion, Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angelica Maria MAURICIO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-50422

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 2, 2012.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*390Wesley David Lloyd, Esq., Ñaman, Howell, Smith & Lee, P.L.L.C., Waco, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Angelica Mauricio pleaded guilty of possession with intent to distribute at least five kilograms of cocaine and was sentenced to 120 months in prison. She appeals the denial of her motion to suppress evidence that she contends was unconstitutionally obtained during a traffic stop. We agree with the government that Mauricio waived her right to appeal by entering an unconditional guilty plea.

A voluntary and unconditional guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects in the prior proceedings, including the right to raise any further objections based on a denial of a motion to suppress. *United States v. Stevens,*487 F.3d 232, 238 (5th Cir.2007). Although a defendant may plead guilty conditionally and preserve appeal rights, the plea must be in writing, must have the consent of the prosecution and approval of the court, and must explicitly designate the issues being preserved for appeal. Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2); *United States v. Wise,*179 F.3d 184, 186-87 (5th Cir.1999).

There was no written plea agreement or other evidence in the record that Mauricio expressed an intent to appeal such that any technical noncompliance with Rule 11(a)(2) might be excused. *See Stevens,*487 F.3d at 238. Because the record lacks any evidence of a reservation of rights, Mauricio may not appeal the suppression ruling. *See Wise,*179 F.3d at 187. The appeal is entirely without merit, and it is DISMISSED as frivolous. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report
of Semitool, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Raymon F. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at           the dates
and for the periods indicated.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Semitool, Inc. and will be retained by Semitool, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated:  December 13, 2007 |  | By: /s/Raymon F. Thompson
Raymon F. ThompsonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DEBBIE VAUGHN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D 2 02 3

- 1166

[ March 21, 2024 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County; Ashley C. Zuckerman, Judge; L.T. Case No.

502022MM003655AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas,

Senior Assista nt Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT MAY 21, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK

Honora ble J . Owen F orre ster, United States District Judge f or the Nor

thern District of * Georg ia, sitting by

designation. [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 14309

________________________ D
. C
. D ocketN o. 06 -000 25 C R -1-K D -B U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f
- A p p e lle e , v ersu s F E D E R I C O F L O R E S
- E S P I N O S A , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e So u th e rn D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( M ay 21, 2007) Be f o r e ED M O N D SO N , Ch i e f J u d g e , H U LL, Ci r c u i tJ u d g e , a n d FO RRESTER, * D i stri ctJudg e. P E R C U R I A M: A ft erre vi ew and o ra l ar gu m ent , w e f i nd no re vers i bl e e rr or i n the di stri ct2

co u rt ’ s o rd er o f A p ri l 2 0 , 2 0 0 6 , w h i ch d en i ed d efen d an tF ed eri co F l o resE sp in o sa ’s m o ti o n to su p p re ss . A cc o rd in g ly, w e a ff irm F lo re s- E sp in o sa ’s
c onvi c t i on. AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Donald M. Prest, certify that;

(1)         I have reviewed this report on Form10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 2) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 of Bear River Resources, Inc.;

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)         disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:  February 19, 2008
Richard GREEN, petitioner, v. Robert Jon GREEN, et al.

No. 16-474.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
De Vaughan SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6075.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.