alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II-01167

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mark Updike <mupdike@verizon.net>

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 10:01 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mark Updike

964 Waterview Drive

Crownsville, MD 21032
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32819-32820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1334-DR]


North Dakota; Amendment No. 7 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of North Dakota (FEMA-1334-DR), dated June 27, 2000, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter 
dated May 31, 2001, the President amended the cost-sharing arrangements 
concerning Federal funds provided under the authority of the Robert T. 
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 51521 
et seq.), in a letter to Joe M. Allbaugh, Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State 
of North Dakota, due to damage resulting from severe storms, 
flooding and ground saturation beginning on April 5, 2000, and 
continuing through August 12, 2000, is of sufficient severity and 
magnitude that special conditions are warranted regarding the cost 
sharing arrangements concerning Federal funds provided under the 
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 
U.S.C. 5121 (Stafford Act).
    Therefore, I amend the declaration of June 27, 2000, to 
authorize Federal funds for Public Assistance at 90 percent of total 
eligible costs.

This adjustment to State and local cost sharing applies only to 
Public Assistance costs eligible for such adjustment under the law. 
The law specifically prohibits a similar adjustment for funds 
provided to States for the Individual and Family Grant program 
(Section 411), mobile home group site

[[Page 32820]]

development (Section 408), and the Hazard Mitigation Grant program 
(Section 404). These funds will continue to be reimbursed at 75 
percent of total eligible costs.
    Please notify the Governor of North Dakota and the Federal 
Coordinating Officer of this amendment to my major disaster 
declaration.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)


Joe M. Allbaugh,
Director.
[FR Doc. 01-15262 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 22, 2015 

# Order

May 22, 2015

148928

- 9 ( 63 )

DOUGLAS LATHAM

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,

v

BARTON MALOW COMPANY

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 148928 COA: 312141 Oakland CC: 2004

- 059653

- NO

________________________________________/

DOUGLAS LATHAM

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,

v

BARTON MALOW COMPANY

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 148929 COA: 313606 Oakland CC: 2004

- 059653

- NO

________________________________________/

On order of the C ourt

, the motion for reconsideration is considered, and it is
DENIED.
Carmon ZAUNBRECHER, et al., petitioners, v. Michelle GAUDIN, et al.

No. 15-1367.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                         For the Three Months Ended

                             December 31, 1998                     December 31, 1997
                               Weighted                               Weighted
                                Average     Per Share                  Average   Per Share
                      Income    Shares      Amount       Income        Shares    Amount

<S>                   <C>       <C>         <C>          <C>           <C>        <C>
Basic EPS
Income available to
 common stockholders  $613,133   2,571,694   $0.24        $539,098      2,553,482  $0.21

Effect of Dilutive
  Securities
Options                    ---       1,532      ---            ---         24,888

Diluted EPS
Income available to
 common stockholders  $613,133   2,573,226   $0.24        $539,098      2,578,370  $0.21
                      ====================================================================
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         For the Nine Months Ended

                                December 31, 1998                December 31, 1997
                    ---------------------------------   -----------------------------------
                                   Weighted                                  Weighted
                                    Average       Per Share                   Average     Per Share
                        Income      Shares        Amount         Income       Shares        Amount
  
<S>                     <C>         <C>           <C>            <C>          <C>          <C>
Basic EPS
Income available to
 common stockholders    $1,492,636   2,568,691     $0.58         $1,363,475    2,551,650    $0.54

Effect of Dilutive
  Securities
Options                      ---        26,291       ---                ---       18,242

Diluted EPS
Income available to
 common stockholders    $1,492,636   2,594,982     $0.58         $1,363,475     2,569,892    $0.53
                        ===========================================================================


</TABLE>
02-27-2008 21:22 LDNDR FISCHER 6208423536 0{-'t..\ ® 

PRGE1 

What are you people thinking? This market is broke and it is up to you to fix it. You say that spec's are 

limited in the number of contract they hold, but what about the funds? I know a there are a lot offund 

contract, so many that it is influencing the market for just from pure speculation. Couldn't you limit the 

amount of contracts of open interest to the hedge or commercial contracts. If not a hedge have they 

would have to put up all the mag in { up to 100% of value) for the contracts at a progressive rate. I am 

from a farming community and this is wrecking our coop's and could have long term consequences on 

the farming community directly. Chemicals have at least tripled, fertilizer has.doubled, fuel has almost 

doubled in the last year because wheat prices have gone through the roof. Why? Because they can. I 

ask you what will happen when the price of wheat crashes. Will all that stuff go down? NO! We went 

through this in the 70's and it has brought farming to their knees. If you want to feed the world you 

better find a way to fix this market. Are we going to let the funds push us into bankruptcy? I thought, 

and taught, that the commodity market was set up for the farmer and the distributer to reduce risk. Do 

you think this is working? 

' " .. 

Sincerely, 

~~~~ COMMENT 

• ~-/" . . 

Londa Fischer 

620-239-4161 

620-842-3764 

FEB 27 2008 21=55 5208423536 PRGE.01 

;::-;:;; ,,.~J r··~·, 

("") 

1l:··'.'"1 ~ • J 

:"'"'"1 ~";.:: ,--, -- .. r•·; 

CJ 

I
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.7


Director Compensation Summary


The members of the Lionsgate’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) who are not employees of Lionsgate (the “Non-Employee Directors”) receive an annual retainer of $50,000, an award of restricted share units with a grant date value of $50,000 granted annually on the date of Lionsgate’s Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (with the value based on the closing price of Lionsgate’s common shares (the “Shares”) on the date prior to the grant date and the number of units rounded to the nearest whole unit) and a fee of $1,400 for each meeting of a committee on which a Non-Employee Director is a member and attends, in person or via teleconference or videoconference. The restricted share units vest in annual installments over three (3) years following the date of grant and are paid upon vesting in an equivalent number of Shares. The non-employee Chairman of the Board receives an additional annual retainer of $52,000, the Chairman of the Audit & Risk Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000, and the Chairman of the Compensation Committee, the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Chairman of the Strategic Advisory Committee each receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000. 


The retainers and fees for the Non-Employee Directors are paid, at the director’s election, either 50% in cash and 50% in the form of Shares, or 100% in the form of Shares. However, the Board retains discretion to provide for the retainers for one (1) or more directors to be paid in a different mix of cash and Shares (including payment of the entire retainer in cash) as it determines appropriate. Retainers are paid in two (2) installments each year, with the number of Shares to be delivered in payment of any retainer to be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the retainer to be paid in the form of Shares by the average closing price of Shares for the previous five (5) business days prior to payment.


Lionsgate requires that Non-Employee Directors maintain an ownership position in Lionsgate of at least $150,000 of Shares; provided, however, that new directors shall have three (3) years from their initial election to the Board to reach this ownership threshold. Pursuant to Lionsgate’s policies, directors are also reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             939
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   939
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1600
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1139
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1498)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II-01027

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Sharon Ouderkirk <sharon51657@aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:00 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Sharon Ouderkirk

257 South Third St.

Fulton, NY 13069
No. 625, Misc.

#### Blake *v.*Ragen, Warden.

Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois.

Certiorari denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe LOZOYA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-40904

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 17, 2012.

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guadalupe Lozoya has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Lozoya has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
TRI-CORP HOUSING INCORPORATED, petitioner, v. Robert BAUMAN.

No. 16-440.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,147
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,237
<PP&E>                                           2,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,122
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               22
<PREFERRED>                                          9
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,954)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,364
<SALES>                                          3,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,053
<CGS>                                            2,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,054)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,056)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.40)
        

</TABLE>
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350)

In connection  with the Annual Report of Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2004 (the "Report") filed by Everlast Worldwide Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange  Commission,  the  undersigned,
George Q Horowitz,  Chief  Executive  Officer of,  does hereby  certify,  to his
knowledge,  that pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ George Q Horowitz
                                      -------------------------------------
                                      George Q Horowitz
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      March 28, 2005

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Everlast  Worldwide Inc. and will be retained by Everlast  Worldwide
Inc and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
```
# C_2010148EN.01002302.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/23

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-223/09) (1)

1

2010/C 148/38

Language of the case: Polish

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 26.09.2009.

1

---
# C_2010234EN.01001802.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/18

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — Kaul GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Bayer AG

(Case C-193/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Application for registration of Community word mark ARCOL - Opposition by proprietor of Community word mark CAPOL - Implementation by OHIM of a judgment annulling a decision of its Boards of Appeal - Right to be heard - Likelihood of confusion - Minimal degree of similarity of the marks required - Rejection for manifest irrelevance of new evidence adduced before the Board of Appeal - Articles 8(1)(b), 61(2), 63(6), 73, second sentence, and 74(2) of Regulation No 40/94)

2010/C 234/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Kaul GmbH (represented by: R. Kunze, Rechtsanwalt and Solicitor)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent), Bayer AG

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 25 March 2009 in Case T-402/07 Kaul GmbH v OHIM by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the Community word mark ‘CAPOL’ for goods in Class 1 against Decision R 782/2000-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 1 August 2007, dismissing for the second time the appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division which rejected the opposition brought against the application for registration of the Community word mark ‘ARCOL’ for goods in Classes 1, 17 and 20, following the annulment in Case C-29/05 P OHIM v Kaul of the Third Board of Appeal’s initial decision to reject the opposition

Kaul GmbH

OHIM

OHIM

Kaul

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Kaul GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Kaul GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.8.2009.

1

---