alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED ST ATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

CHAZON QTA QUANTITATIVE TRADING 

TRADING ARTISTS, LLC 

and 

LAWRENCE I. FEJOKWU 

v. 

NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION 

CFTC Docket No. CRAA 16-01 

ORDER DENYING 

MOTION FOR 

RECONSIDERATION 

On June 30, 2017, Lawrence Fejokwu filed a motion to reconsider the Commission's 

Summary Affirmance of a disciplinary action undertaken by the National Futures Association 

("NF A") against Appellants for failure to provide NF A with certain requested documents during 

the course of its investigation, namely the 2011 bank statements of Chazoneering, an entity 

affiliated with Appellants. 1 The Commission rules relating to reviews of NF A decisions do not 

provide for motions for reconsideration. 17 C.F.R. Part 171. However, the Commission has 

previously said that such relief is available "in truly extraordinary circumstances." Oshinsky v. 

NFA, [1994-1996 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ~ 26,754, at 44,116, CFTC No. 

CRAA 95-1, 1996 WL 411123, at *l (CFTC July 22, 1996). Such "extraordinary 

circumstances" include: 

(1) a clear and convincing showing of fraud on the forum by an adverse party; (2) the 

discovery of previously unknown and non-discoverable evidence which would probably 

produce a different result; (3) a factual error in a jurisdictional ruling (e.g., a respondent's 

1 In affirming NFA's choice of sanction, the Commission adopted the rulings ofNFA. See NFA Appeals 

Committee Decision (Nov. 23, 2015) and NFA Initial Decision (Feb. 27, 2015), available at 

https://www.nfa.futures.org/BasicNet/Case.aspx?entityid=0424320&case=14BCC00006&contrib=NFA. 
registration status); or the type of egregious factual or legal error that goes to the heart of 

the challenged decision's validity. 

Id. (quoting Kohler v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. , [1 986-1987 Transfer Binder] 

Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCI-I)~ 23,437 at 33, 173 (CFTC Dec. 30, 1986)). None of these 

circumstances are present here, and their absence compels denial of this Motion. 

Fejohvu's Motion fo r Reconsideration is therefore DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

By the Commission (Acting Chairman GIANCARLO and Commissioner BOWEN.) 

Dated: July 28, 2017 

2
Chaz Z. RODGERS, petitioner, v. LANCASTER POLICE & FIRE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 16-5486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-456-000]

Take notice that on June 11, 2001, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective date of July 11, 2001:

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 301

Second Revised Sheet No. 368

Tennessee states that the revised tariff sheets are being filed to modify Tennessee's tariff to provide for a general waiver of the “shipper must have title rule” in the event that Tennessee is transporting gas for others on acquired off-system capacity and to include a general statement that Tennessee will only transport for others using off-system capacity pursuant to its existing tariff and rates.

Tennessee states that copies of the filing has been mailed to each of Tennessee's customers and affected state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15504 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jane A. Dietze, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Dated: October 18, 2005

                                          /s/ JANE A. DIETZE
                                          ------------------
                                          Jane A. Dietze
                                          Interim Chief Financial Officer
JUNNE KYOO KOH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6752.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Darlene BURLEY, petitioner, v. Eric ALI.

No. 15-9312.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Ferrill VOLPICELLI, petitioner, v. Quentin BYRNE, Warden.

No. 15-9221.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
David Jerome GANT, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 15-9163.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District I denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1729 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1729

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
Nations should forthwith take the procedural actions necessary to amend 
Article 23 of the Charter of the United Nations to establish India as a 
        permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2010

Mr. Bilirakis submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
Nations should forthwith take the procedural actions necessary to amend 
Article 23 of the Charter of the United Nations to establish India as a 
        permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.

Whereas the United Nations Security Council is charged with maintaining peace 
        and security among the nations of the world;
Whereas the United Nations Security Council currently has five permanent 
        members;
Whereas the Republic of India achieved its independence from the British Empire 
        on August 15, 1947, and has since that time maintained a democratic 
        system of government;
Whereas India is the largest democratic country in the world in which all 
        political views are freely expressed and respected;
Whereas India is the world's second most populous country, with over one billion 
        citizens residing within its borders;
Whereas India is one of the largest contributors of troops to United Nations-
        mandated peacekeeping missions; and
Whereas the people of India have demonstrated a strong commitment to promote the 
        peaceful development of the South Asian region and to global peace: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the United Nations should forthwith take the procedural actions 
necessary to amend Article 23 of the Charter of the United Nations to 
establish India as a permanent member of the United Nations Security 
Council.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of GenVec, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form
10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Paul H. Fischer, as President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant for the dates and periods covered by the
  Report.





This
certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by
any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by
law.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
GenVec, Inc. and will be retained by GenVec, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




March
      12, 2010/s/
      Paul H. Fischer, Ph.D.Paul
      H. Fischer, Ph.D.President
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


May 19, 2016


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 244


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on May 18, 2016, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the
evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-210236) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                  


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 1, 2013

s0325 

# Order

April 1, 2013

146145

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146145

COA: 306336

Oakland CC: 2011

- 235544

- FH

WILLIE DAVIS McCALL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 25, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1602/2004

of 14 September 2004         

fixing the export refunds on eggs applicable from 15 September 2004         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 8(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The codes of products for which, when they are exported, the export refund referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 is granted and the amount of that refund shall be as shown in the Annex hereto.

However, in order to qualify for the refund, products falling within the scope of Chapter XI of the Annex to Directive 89/437/EEC must also satisfy the health marking conditions laid down in that Directive.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States

Done at Brussels, 14 September 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 49. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 102, 17.4.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 444/2003 (OJ L 67, 12.3.2003, p. 3).

(3)OJ L 212, 22.7.1989, p. 87. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003.

----

ANNEX

Export refunds on eggs applicable from 15 September 2004

----
Timothy A. MARR, petitioner, v. John F. HARKNESS, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar.

No. 16-6227.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
secretary 

From: sternb73@aol.com 

Received CFTC 

Reco1~9 Section ''It;/) r 

Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 4:45 PM 

To: secretary 

Subject: " Proposed Rules for Trading Off the Centralized Market" 

November 5, 2008 

To Whom It May Concern: 

Page 1 of 1 

COMMENT 

,;"'· 

· ...... 

<.~ -

1"'11 

C:J 

I have been a floor broker/trader on NYBOTIICE for over 20 years. Currently I am tradiQ,g for ~self 

on the electronic platform. : ' .,":::: 

I am a shareholder ofiCE. ::...i 0 

What has become apparent to me is that the ICE Board and management team have very limited 

commodity experience. 

They don't seem to know what is in the best interest of all the market users. It seems ICE's main goal is 

to increase 

volume, hence profits. This is very short-sighted. I trade a relatively small market in cocoa. Very long 

trading hours 

have produced a lack ofliquidity and an increase in volatility. ICE believes longer hours equals more 

volume---this is not 

true. Market participants would be better served if the hours were shortened. · There is no volume for 

much of the trading 

session. The liquidity would improve dramatically and the volatility would be lessened if the hours 

were shortened. 

Block trading only adds to this unhealthy situation. I personally see no reason for block trading. Why 

can't all trades 

be done via the electronic platform for everyone to see and participate in. The CFTC should get input 

from product 

committees of the exchanges in regards to block trading. They use the market and and need it to be 

competitive. 

The exchange itself seems to be motivated by volume and profit. 

Thank you. 

Scott Stem 

I am available at stemb73@aol.com 

Instant access to the latest & most popular FREE games while you browse with the Games Toolbar- Download 

Now! 

1116/2008 

"
# C_2011055EN.01001501.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 December 2010 — AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA v European Commission, Electrabel SA

(Case C-480/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Aid declared compatible with the common market - Condition requiring prior repayment by the beneficiary of earlier aid declared unlawful - Concept of ‘economic unit’ - Joint control by two separate parent companies - Distortion of the pleas in law relied on in the application - Errors and defective reasoning)

2011/C 55/26

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA (represented by: L. Radicati di Brozolo and M. Merola, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent), Electrabel SA (represented by: L. Radicati di Brozolo and M. Merola, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 8 September 2009 in Case T 303/05 ACEAElectrabel Produzione SpA v Commission by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/598/EC of 16 March 2005 concerning State aid that Italy (Regione Lazio) intends to grant for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (OJ 2006 L 244).

ACEAElectrabel Produzione SpA

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | orders AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | orders Electrabel SA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders Electrabel SA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
Nicholas QUEEN, petitioner, v. A. MATEVOUSIAN, Warden.

No. 16-6234.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
CONSENT  LETTER  OF  RONALD  R.  CHADWICK,  P.C.

Ronald R. Chadwick, P.C.
Certified Public Accountant
3025 S. Parker  Road
Suite 109
Aurora, Colorado 80014
---------------------
Telephone:  (303) 306-1967
Telephone:  (303) 306-1944


CONSENT  OF  INDEPENDENT  CERTIFIED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTANT

I  hereby  consent  to  the  use in this Form 10-KSB filing by Anything Internet
Corporation,  of  my report dated September 28th, 2000 relating to the financial
statements of Anything Internet Corporation which appear in said filing.  I also
consent  to the reference to my firm under the heading "Experts" in said filing.




/s/  Ronald  R.  Chadwick,  P.C.
RONALD  R.  CHADWICK,  P.C.

Aurora,  Colorado
October  9th,  2000


<PAGE>
**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Trustees of Fidelity Investment Trust and the Shareholders of Fidelity International Small Cap Opportunities Fund: 

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Fidelity International Small Cap Opportunities Fund (the “Fund”), a fund of Fidelity Investment Trust, as of and for the year ended October 31, 2016, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), we considered the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting, including controls over safeguarding securities, as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al., petitioners, v. Angel MENDEZ, et al.

No. 16-369.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 2, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition.
Foster RICH, petitioner, v. Ralph W. SHRADER, et al.

No. 16-415.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Office of External Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 202.418.5080 

Statement 

Statement by Acting Chairman Walt Lukken on Nomination of 

Gary Gensler 

Washington, DC – Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Acting Chairman 

Walt Lukken issued the following statement on the President-Elect’s announcement 

today that Gary Gensler will be nominated to serve as Chairman of the CFTC in the 

next administration. 

“President-elect Obama has made an outstanding choice in Gary Gensler to lead the 

CFTC. Gary has the rare combination of intelligence, market and government 

experience and independence that will help lead this agency in its vigorous oversight of 

the futures markets going forward. I look forward to our continued work with Gary and 

the incoming Administration to facilitate a seamless transition at this agency.”