alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011013EN.01001201.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Plovdiv — Bulgaria) — Vasil Ivanov Georgiev v Tehnicheski universitet — Sofia, filial Plovdiv

(Joined Cases C-250/09 and C-268/09) (1)

1

(Directive 2000/78/EC - Article 6(1) - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age - University lecturers - National provision providing for the conclusion of fixed-term employment contracts beyond the age of 65 - Compulsory retirement at the age of 68 - Justification for differences in treatment on grounds of age)

2011/C 13/19

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Rayonen sad Plovdiv

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vasil Ivanov Georgiev

Applicant:

Defendant: Tehnicheski universitet — Sofia, filial Plovdiv

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rayonen sad Plovdiv — Interpretation of Article 6(1) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16) — National law permitting university professors who have reached the age of 65 to conclude an employment contract only for a fixed duration — National law fixing 68 as the final retirement age for university professors — Justification for differences of treatment on grounds of age

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, in particular Article 6(1), must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which university professors are compulsorily retired when they reach the age of 68 and may continue working beyond the age of 65 only by means of fixed-term one-year contracts renewable at most twice, provided that that legislation pursues a legitimate aim linked inter alia to employment and labour market policy, such as the delivery of quality teaching and the best possible allocation of posts for professors between the generations, and that it makes it possible to achieve that aim by appropriate and necessary means. It is for the national court to determine whether those conditions are satisfied.

Since this is a dispute between a public institution and an individual, if national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings does not satisfy the conditions set out in Article 6(1) of Directive 2000/78, the national court must decline to apply that legislation.

---

(1)  OJ C 220, 12.09.2009.

1

---
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1530 

Approving certain regulations issued by the Office of Compliance to implement 

the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 with respect to 

employing offices and covered employees of the House of Representatives 

under the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2010 

Mr. OWENS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee 

on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Approving certain regulations issued by the Office of Compliance to implement the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 with respect to employing offices and 

covered employees of the House of Representatives under 

the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF REGULATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The regulations described in sub4 section (b) are hereby approved, insofar as such regula5 tions apply to employing offices and covered employees of 

6 the House of Representatives under the Congressional AcVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:52 Jul 16, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1530.IH HR1530

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1530 IH 

1 countability Act of 1995 and to the extent such regula2 tions are consistent with the provisions of such Act. 

3 (b) REGULATIONS APPROVED.—The regulations re4 ferred to in subsection (a) are the adopted regulations 

5 issued by the Office of Compliance on March 21, 2008, 

6 under section 4(c)(4) of the Veterans Employment Oppor7 tunities Act of 1998 to implement section 4(c) of such Act, 

8 as published in the Congressional Record on March 31, 

9 2008 (Volume 154, daily edition), beginning on page 

10 H1811. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Nov 05 08 02:25p 

To whom it may concern, 

I believe the current minimum size 

requirements for block trading are ridiculously 

low. I propose forming a committee in each 

commodity representing all sectors that actually 

trade said market, and having them make 

recommendations to the cftc on whether there 

should be block trading in their market and if so 

what the size should be. 

Sincerely, 

Alan Ra inowitz 

.(}tJ--\-~~ 

: i 

p. 1 

[' .. .) 

'\.) 

Received CFTC 

Records Section 

'¢/~ 

~ ' ; 

' l '.
# C_2011130EN.01000402.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia)) — Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky

(Case C-240/09) (1)

1

(Environment - Aarhus Convention - Public participation in the decision-making process and access to justice in environmental matters - Direct effect)

2011/C 130/07

Language of the case: Slovakian

Referring court

Referring court

Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic — Interpretation of Article 9(3) of the Council Decision of 17 February 2005 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Aarhus Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters (OJ 2005 L 124, p. 1) — Direct effect of that provision — Interpretation of the concept of ‘acts of public authorities’ — Inclusion or not of the decisions of a public authority, the unlawfulness of which lies in their effect on the environment

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(3) of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters approved on behalf of the European Community by Council Decision 2005/370/EC of 17 February 2005 does not have direct effect in European Union law. It is, however, for the referring court to interpret, to the fullest extent possible, the procedural rules relating to the conditions to be met in order to bring administrative or judicial proceedings in accordance with the objectives of Article 9(3) of that convention and the objective of effective judicial protection of the rights conferred by European Union law, in order to enable an environmental protection organisation, such as the Lesoochranárske zoskupenie, to challenge before a court a decision taken following administrative proceedings liable to be contrary to European Union environmental law.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 26.9.2009.

1

---
Phillip Jerome GARDNER, petitioner, v. Dale A. ARTUS, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, et al.

No. 16-6128.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.1

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
 CLOUD PEAK ENERGY INC. 2009 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
 (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE MARCH 12, 2016)

 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of May 11, 2016, to the Cloud Peak Energy Inc. 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective March 12, 2016 (the “Plan”), as approved by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Cloud Peak Energy Inc. (the “Company”), is hereby adopted by the Company.

 

W I T N E S S E T H:

 

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan;

 

WHEREAS, subject to certain limitations, Section 15.1 of the Plan gives the Board the authority to amend the Plan;

 

WHEREAS, the Board, based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board, which committee has previously been appointed by the Board pursuant to Section 3.1 to administer the Plan (the “Committee”), has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its subsidiaries, subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock of the Company available under the Plan by an additional 1,600,000 shares from 5,500,000 shares to 7,100,000 shares; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to make the amendment to the Plan described above.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended effective as of the date hereof as follows:

 

1. The second sentence of Section 4.1 is amended as follows:

 

“The aggregate number of Shares that may be made the subject of Awards or Options granted under the Plan shall not exceed 7,100,000, no more than 2,000,000 of which may be granted as Incentive Stock Options.”

 

* * *

 

Except as expressly amended herein, the Plan remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this First Amendment to the Plan, to be effective as of May 11, 2016.

 

	
 
    	
CLOUD PEAK ENERGY INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Bryan J. Pechersky
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Bryan J. Pechersky
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Executive Vice President, General   Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Community Financial Corporation (the "Company") that the quarterly report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

| Dated: November 14, 2005 | /s/ P. Douglas RichardP. Douglas RichardPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ R. Jerry GilesR. Jerry GilesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
In re Joseph Ray JORDAN, petitioner.

No. 16-6638.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit j(3)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference constituting part of
Post-Effective Amendment No. 79 to the Registration Statement on Form
N-1A of Fidelity Investment Trust of our report dated December 3,
1999, appearing in the Annual Report to Shareholders of Fidelity
Diversified International Fund and Fidelity Worldwide Fund, for the
year ended October 31, 1999.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference constituting part of
Post-Effective Amendment No. 79 to the Registration Statement on Form
N-1A of Fidelity Investment Trust of our report dated December 3,
1999, appearing in the Annual Report to Shareholders of Fidelity
Europe Capital Appreciation Fund, for the year ended October 31, 1999.

We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Financial
Highlights" in the Prospectuses and "Auditor" in the Statements of
Additional Information.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
December 21, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3348; Amendment #1] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated June 14, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby amended to include Beauregard, Iberia, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. James, St. John the Baptist, St. Mary, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa and Washington Parishes in the State of Louisiana as disaster areas caused by Tropical Storm Allison occurring on June 5, 2001 and continuing. 

In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in Allen, Calcasieu, Plaquemines and Vernon Parishes in the State of Louisiana; Amite, Hancock, Marion, Pearl River, Pike, and Walthall in the State of Mississippi; and Newton County in the State of Texas may be filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. Any counties contiguous to the above named primary counties and not listed here have been previously declared. 

The economic injury number assigned is 9L9100 for Texas and 9L9400 for Mississippi. 

All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is August 10, 2001, and for loans for economic is March 11, 2002. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: June 18, 2001. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 01-15739 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Federated Investors, Inc. 

Federated Investors Tower 

1001 Liberty Avenue 

Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3779 

412-288-1941 Phone 

412-992-3008 Fax 

gmaloney@fedel'atedinv.com 

April 13,2010 

MI'. David A. Stawick 

Secretary 

Eugene F. Maloney, Esq. 

ExeC/ftille Vice President 

G.r:r.c. OfFICL~ OF TilE SECr\ni\RIJ~T 

2010 APR ll\ AfT111 28 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

115521 st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 

Deal' Mr. Stawick: 

derated WORLD-CLASS INVESTMENT MANAGBR. 

® 

This letter will serve to provide the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") with our additional 

thoughts with respect to possible revisions to the CFTC's Rule 1.25 "Investment of Customer Funds." We wish 

to incOl'porate by reference prior comment letters submitted on this subject on our behalf by our outside counsel, 

Pickard and Djinis LLP, dated serially July 10, August 24 and September 14,2009. 

It is our understanding that the CFTC is mindful of the benefits that are associated with the use of money market 

mutual funds for the investment of customer funds - i.e., broad diversification, same-day liquidity at pal' and the 

mitigation of operational risk. These three characteristics have led to the use of money market mutUal funds in 

circumstances where an institutional investor with liquidity needs has elected to use money market mutual funds 

in lieu of the direct purchase of money market instruments. Notwithstanding the attractive features of money 

market mutual funds, to include their present eligibility under Rule 1.25, we are not unmindful of the fact that 

given recent events in the short-term liquidity markets, it is prudent for the CFTC to revisit and possibly revise 

the list of el igible investments under CFTC Rule 1.25. 

With the foregoing as a frame of reference, Federated Investors concurs with the position of the Futures Industry 

Association set forth in its comment letter dated July 20, 2009, and specifically that section having to do with 

concentration (see p. 3 of attached letter), to-wit: 

We recommend that the rule be amended to provide (i) that an FCM's investment in anyone 

money market mutual fund may not exceed 5 percent of assets under management in that fund 

and (ii) that no more than 25 percent of invested customer funds may be invested in anyone 

money market mutual fund. 

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to further comment on this important matter. 

Sincerely, 

t:5~~ Eugene F. Maloney 

Executive Vice President and 

Corporate Counsel 

lme 

Enclosure 

ce: Phyllis P. Dietz, Associate Director, Div. of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, CFTC
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of International Surf Resorts, Inc. a
Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), Eduardo Biancardi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
International Surf Resorts, Inc., and will be retained by International Surf
Resorts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
 
 /s/
      Eduardo BiancardiEduardo
      Biancardi
                    Chief
      Executive Officer
                    May
      15, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1704 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1704

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 8, 2010.
Whereas in 490 BC, Athenian warriors defeated foreign invaders and won against 
        overwhelming odds in one of the most significant battles in human 
        history;
Whereas the Athenian victory helped continue the development of a new form of 
        government called ``democracy'';
Whereas according to legend, a messenger named Phidippides ran from the 
        battlefield of Marathon, Greece, to Athens 26 miles away to carry news 
        of the victory and it is said, that upon delivering the news to the 
        citizens of Athens, Phidippides died from exhaustion;
Whereas Phidippides' run inspired the spiritual origin of what has become the 
        sport of marathoning;
Whereas the first official marathon race was introduced in the first modern 
        Olympics in 1896 held in Athens, Greece;
Whereas officials from the Boston Athletic Association brought the long distance 
        Olympic running event to Boston, Massachusetts, where it has been run 
        annually since 1897;
Whereas a ceremony took place in Marathon, Greece, in 2007 at the Tomb of the 
        Athenians, the burial cite of the Greek warriors who gave their lives 
        defending their country;
Whereas this ceremony created the symbolic Flame of Marathon that embodies the 
        strength of the human spirit, fair competition, and peace;
Whereas Hopkinton, Massachusetts, and Marathon, Greece, have a twin-city 
        relationship, the Flame of Marathon traveled from Marathon, Greece, and 
        was presented to the Town of Hopkinton in 2008;
Whereas the Flame of Marathon has burned continuously in Hopkinton, 
        Massachusetts, since its arrival in the United States;
Whereas the Flame of Marathon reminds us of the sacrifice of the United States 
        Armed Forces and their families, the defenders of democracy;
Whereas the 35th Marine Corps Marathon received the Flame of Marathon as part of 
        its celebration of the 2500th anniversary of the Battle of Marathon; and
Whereas the Flame of Marathon was displayed at events leading to and including 
        the Marine Corps Marathon in view of 30,000 runners who embodied the 
        marathon spirit as they ran through Washington, DC: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives joins with the Greek Embassy in 
Washington, DC, the people of Hopkinton, Massachusetts, the people of Marathon, 
Greece, and the hundreds of thousands of runners participating in marathons 
throughout the United States, in celebrating the 2500th anniversary of the 
Battle of Marathon, Greece, one of the most significant battles in human 
history.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         211,095
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               375,020
<PP&E>                                         386,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                 259,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 259,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          278,351
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               50
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,517
<OTHER-SE>                                     448,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   761,668
<SALES>                                        195,461      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,461
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,140,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (59,272)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (887,885)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (887,885)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (90,712)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   418,140
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17