alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010317EN.01000802.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-132/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Jurisdiction of the Court - Statute of the European Schools - Establishment Agreement of 1962 - Conventions of 1957 and 1994 - Arbitration clause - Article 10 EC - Financing of the European Schools - Costs of furniture and teaching equipment)

2010/C 317/15

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: J.-C. Halleux, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have regard to the third paragraph of Article 1 of the Agreement signed on 12 October 1962 between the Board of Governors of the European Schools and the Kingdom of Belgium (‘the Establishment Agreement’) and of Article 10 EC — Refusal by the Belgian authorities to pay the expenses for teaching equipment and materials for the European Schools — Justified on the basis of the internal legal order — Absence of a succession of established acts or declarations of the parties, within the meaning of Article 31(3)(a) and (b) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, calling into question the Establishment Agreement

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that the Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to rule on the action of the European Commission, brought on the basis of Article 226 EC, on the ground that the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Establishment Agreement concluded on 12 October 1962 between the Board of Governors of the European School and the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium, read in conjunction with Article 10 EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to rule on the action of the European Commission, brought on the basis of Article 226 EC, on the ground that the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Establishment Agreement concluded on 12 October 1962 between the Board of Governors of the European School and the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium, read in conjunction with Article 10 EC;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 04.07.2009.

1

---
Troy McKENZIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6762.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
II-01134

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Mike Wygant <bucanaider@yahoo.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:02 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Mike Wygant

9113 Suffield ct.

Tampa, FL 33615
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. No. A-1-CA-36971 4 DANIELLE ORTEGA, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY 7 Mark Terrence Sanchez, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Templeman and Crutchfield 12 C. Barry Crutchfield 13 Lovington, NM 14 for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 ZAMORA, Judge. 17{1} Summary dismissal was proposed for th e reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED. 3

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

5 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7

8 HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge 9

10 DANIEL J. GALLEGOS, Judge 11
II-00309

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Barbara Bennigson <BBennigson@aol.com>

Friday, December 3, 2010 4:43 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Barbara Bennigson

2339 Ramona Street

Palo Alto, CA 94301
Frank CARABALLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6641.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 11

AMERICAN GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, LTD.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE


                                      Three Months Ended
                                            March 31,
                                        1998          1997
                                        ____          ____
          
Weighted average number
 of shares for computation           12,532,102     12,532,102
                                     ==========     ==========
          
Net loss                            $(1,911,000)   $(1,975,000)
          
Dividends and accretion
on preferred stock                      467,000        467,000
                                     __________     __________
          
Net loss for common 
stockholders                        $(2,378,000)   $(2,442,000)
                                     ==========     ==========
          
Loss for common stockholders
per common share                         $(0.19)        $(0.19)
                                          =====           ====
Byron WRIGHT, Jr., petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 16-5903.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Life Time Fitness, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 30, 2015



/s/ Bahram AkradiBahram AkradiChairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Eric J. BussEric J. BussExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99

                               CERTIFICATION UNDER
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



To my  knowledge,  this Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2002,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained  in this  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition and
results of operations of Central Bancorp, Inc.



                                 By:/s/ John D. Doherty
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    John D. Doherty
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer



                                 By:/s/ Michael K. Devlin
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Michael K. Devlin
                                    Senior Vice President, Treasurer
                                    and Chief Financial Officer


Date:  March 20, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         424,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  235,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    339,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,012,000
<PP&E>                                         768,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 362,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,116,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          347,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,738,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,116,000
<SALES>                                        383,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               383,000
<CGS>                                          286,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  286,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               588,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (461,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (461,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (461,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
SANDOZ INC., petitioner, v. AMGEN INC., et al.

No. 15-1039.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 13, 2017.

Motion of Apotex, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
#### In the Matter of Jack Sweet, Petitioner, v R. Woods, as Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[873 NYS2d 921]-

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

After an incident arising out of petitioner’s insistence that there was a problem with his food, he was charged in a misbehavior report with refusing a direct order, making threats and creating a disturbance. At the conclusion of the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and videotape depicting the incident in question *(see Matter of Mc-Eachin v Napoli,*56 AD3d 1089, 1089 [2008]). Petitioner’s assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased is neither substantiated by the record nor is there any indication that the determination in issue flowed from any purported bias *(see Matter of Randolph v Napoli,*56 AD3d 832, 833 [2008]). We have *1184examined petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claims that he was denied adequate employee assistance and was deprived of the right to present witness testimony, and find them to be unavailing.

Peters, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                            EXHIBIT 11
KENAN TRANSPORT COMPANY
Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings
(In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
                                                 Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                                    September 30,           September 30,    
                                                --------------------    --------------------
                                                  1998        1997        1998        1997  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>     

Net income                                       $1,241      $  834      $3,570      $2,620
                                                ============================================

Shares:
Beginning shares outstanding                      2,422       2,395       2,395       2,389

Shares issued under executive incentive plan        --          --           16           6
                                                --------------------------------------------
      Basic shares outstanding                    2,422       2,395       2,411       2,395 

Dilutive effect of outstanding options              --          --            1         --
                                                --------------------------------------------
      Diluted shares outstanding                  2,422       2,395       2,412       2,395
                                                ============================================

Basic and diluted earnings per share             $  .51      $  .35      $ 1.48      $ 1.09
                                                ============================================

</TABLE>
# C_2011355EN.01000301.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium)) — Airfield NV, Canal Digitaal BV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (Sabam) (C-431/09), Airfield NV v Agicoa Belgium BVBA (C-432/09)

(Joined Cases C-431/09 and C-432/09) (1)

1

(Copyright - Satellite broadcasting - Directive 93/83/EEC - Articles 1(2)(a) and 2 - Communication to the public by satellite - Satellite package provider - Single communication to the public by satellite - Persons to whom that communication may be attributed - Authorisation from copyright holders for the communication)

2011/C 355/03

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Airfield NV, Canal Digitaal BV (C-431/09), Airield NV (C-432/09)

Appellants:

Respondents: Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (Sabam) (C-431/09), Agicoa Belgium BVBA (C-432/09)

Respondents:

Re:

Re:

References for a preliminary ruling — Hof van beroep te Brussel — Interpretation of Article 1(2)(a) and (b) and Article 2 of Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission (OJ 1993 L 248, p. 15) — Exclusive right of the author to authorise communication of his works — Transmission by a broadcasting organisation of programme-carrying signals to a digital television supplier via an independent satellite — Subsequent retransmission of those signals — Authorisation of the copyright holders

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2 of Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission must be interpreted as requiring a satellite package provider to obtain authorisation from the right holders concerned for its intervention in the direct or indirect transmission of television programmes, such as the transmission at issue in the main proceedings, unless the right holders have agreed with the broadcasting organisation concerned that the protected works will also be communicated to the public through that provider, on condition, in the latter situation, that the provider’s intervention does not make those works accessible to a new public.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.

1

---
Robert Sanchez LOPEZ, petitioner, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, et al.

No. 16-438.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II-00681

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Charlie Williams <wmsassoc@san.rr.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:36 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Charlie Williams

12078 Callado Road

San Diego, CA 92128-2646
II-01010

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Richard Bey <Booky301 @aol.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:11 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Richard Bey

2175 South Ocean Blvd

Delray Beach, FL 33483