alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT01-17-001]

                    Take notice that on June 8, 2001, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 406A, with an effective date of June 1, 2001.                          ( print page 33064)    

Tennessee states that the referenced sheet is being filed to comply with the Tennessee's May 25, 2001, Letter Order in the captioned proceeding. In compliance with the Letter Order, Tennessee has revised Article XXXI of the General Terms and Conditions of its Tariff to reflect the Commission-approved language regarding gathering affiliate access. Tennessee requests that the referenced sheet be made effective June 1, 2001, subject to Tennessee's reserved rights to seek rehearing of the Letter Order and, if applicable, to modify the filing to reflect the outcome of any such rehearing or judicial review of these proceedings.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15520 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2009312EN.01001001.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden lodged on 1 July 2009 — Handelsmaatschappij J. van Hilst and Others v The Jaguar Collection Limited and Others

(Case C-238/09)

2009/C 312/15

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Handelsmaatschappij J. van Hilst and Others

Applicants:

Defendants: The Jaguar Collection Limited and Others

Defendants:

By order of 20 July 2009 the case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice

---
II-01032

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Beth Hachtman <raqueral4@gmail.com>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:56 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Beth Hachtman

14-30 Seagirt Blvd

Far Rockaway, NY 11691
Exhibit 31.2
I, Dennis LaLumandiere, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Laserscope; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: May 7, 2004 /s/ Dennis LaLumandiere   Dennis LaLumandiere   Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                            <C>              <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS            9-MOS               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            JUL-1-2000      DEC-31-1999        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-2000     SEP-30-2000        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                           0              153,713            235,133
<SECURITIES>                     0                    0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                    0                    0                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                     0                    0                  0
<INVENTORY>                      0                    0                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 0                    0                  0
<PP&E>                           0                    0                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                   0                    0                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   0              153,713            235,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            0              535,228            609,977
<BONDS>                          0                    0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0                    0                  0
<PREFERRED>                      0                    0                  0
<COMMON>                         0                    0                  0
<OTHER-SE>                       0                    0            235,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     0              153,713                  0
<SALES>                          0                    0                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               855                2,629                  0
<CGS>                            0                    0                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    0                    0                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>            14,877               45,854                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0                    0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               0                    0                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>            (14,022)             (43,225)                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                     0                    0                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          8,054               36,554                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                   0                    0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0                    0                  0
<CHANGES>                        0                    0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                (5,968)              (6,671)                 0
<EPS-BASIC>                    0                    0                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0                    0                  0


</TABLE>
# C_2010288EN.01002602.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/26

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2010 — The Wellcome Foundation Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Serono Genetics Institute SA

(Case C-461/09 P) (1)

(Appeals - Community trade mark - Word mark FAMOXIN - Application for a declaration of invalidity made by the proprietor of the national word mark LAMOXIN - Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity)

(2010/C 288/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: The Wellcome Foundation Ltd (represented by: R. Gilbey, avocat)

Other parties to the main proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Serono Genetics Institute SA

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 23 September 2009 in Joined Cases T-493/07, T-26/08 and T-27/08 GlaxoSmithkline — Laboratórios Wellcome de Portugal — The Wellcome Foundation v OHIM, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the national word mark ‘LANOXIN’ for goods in Class 5 against Decision R 8/2007-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 14 September 2007 dismissing the appeal brought against the decision of the Cancellation Division rejecting the application for a declaration of invalidity submitted by the applicant concerning the Community word mark ‘FAMOXIN’ for goods and services in Class 5

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders The Wellcome Foundation Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders The Wellcome Foundation Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 13.02.2010.

---
Charles BROWNLEE, petitioner, v. Steven RIVARD, Warden.

No. 15-9398.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.28.1

                                                                          FORM 1


                            COMPANIES ACT OF BARBADOS
                                   (SECTION 5)


                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION


1.   NAME OF COMPANY                                                COMPANY NO:

     DeCrane International Sales, Inc.                              17952

2.   THE CLASSES AND ANY MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES THAT THE COMPANY IS AUTHORIZED
     TO ISSUE

     The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of one
     class designated as common shares.

3.   RESTRICTION IF ANY ON SHARE TRANSFERS

     See attached schedule

4.   NUMBER (OR MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM NUMBER) OF DIRECTORS

     There shall be a minimum of 2 and maximum of 8 directors.

5.   RESTRICTIONS IF ANY ON BUSINESS THE COMPANY MAY CARRY ON

     The company is not allowed to engage in any business activity, which would
     conflict with the provisions of the Barbados Foreign Sales Corporation Act
     Cap, 59C of the laws of Barbados.

6.   OTHER PROVISIONS IF ANY

     A)   An invitation to the public to subscribe for shares or debentures of
          the Company is prohibited.

     B)   The number of shareholders of the Company shall be limited to not more
          than 25

7.   INCORPORATORS                                          DATE  3 JANUARY 2000

     NAMES                    ADDRESS                        SIGNATURE

     Ikins D. Clarke         Hothersal Turning               /s/ Ikins D. Clarke
                             St. Michael, Barbados           -------------------



                                        1

<PAGE>

                                                                          FORM 1


                            COMPANIES ACT OF BARBADOS
                                   (SECTION 5)


                      SCHEDULE TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION


1.   NAME OF COMPANY                                                 COMPANY NO:

     DeCrane International Sales, Inc.                               17952

3.   RESTRICTION IF ANY ON SHARE TRANSFERS

     The right to transfer shares of the Company shall be restricted in that no
     shareholder shall be entitled to transfer any share or shares of the
     Company without the previous express sanction of the holders of more than
     50% of the common shares of the Company for the time being outstanding
     expressed by a resolution passed at a meeting of the shareholders or by an
     instrument or instruments in writing signed by the holders of more than 50%
     of such shares.

7.   INCORPORATORS                                         DATE  3 JANUARY 2000

     NAMES                    ADDRESS                        SIGNATURE

     Ikins D. Clarke         Hothersal Turning               /s/ Ikins D. Clarke
                             St. Michael, Barbados           -------------------


                                       2
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Greenstar International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending April 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas Diemer Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting
officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 16, 2008

By: /s/ Thomas Diemer
    -----------------
    Thomas Diemer, Chief Financal Officer
    principal financial and accounting officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
II-00724

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Annette Bumgarner <abumgarner@comcast.net>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:01 PM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Annette Bumgarner

3587 Round Barn blvd

Santa Rosa, CA 95403
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Swap Trading Relationship Documentation 

Requirements for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants 

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking? 

The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the CFTC to adopt regulations setting forth standards for the timely and accurate 

confirmation, processing, netting, documentation, and valuation of swaps. The goal of the proposed rulemaking is 

to establish standards for accurate swap trading relationship documentation as well as standards for documenting 

the use of the end-user clearing exception. 

What registrants are covered by the proposed regulations? 

The proposed regulations would apply to swap dealers and major swap participants. 

By when must comments on the rules be submitted? 

Comments on the rules must be submitted within sixty (60) days of the publication of the proposal in the Federal 

Register. 

What are the trading relationship documentation requirements? 

The proposed regulations would require swap dealers and major swap participants to document all terms governing 

their trading relationship in writing, including terms related to credit support arrangements, swap valuation 

methodologies, and limitation of termination rights if a party becomes subject to a special resolution regime. The 

proposed regulations also require swap dealers and major swap participants to document certain information related 

to clearing of their swaps. 

What are the end user exception documentation requirements? 

The proposed regulations require swap dealers and major swap participants to document certain information related 

to the qualifications of their counterparties to invoke the end-user clearing exception. Such information must be 

sufficient to provide the swap dealer or major swap participant with a reasonable basis to believe that its 

counterparty meets the statutory conditions required for an exception from a mandatory clearing requirement. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
# C_2010051EN.01002807.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-192/09) (1)

1

2010/C 51/52

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 1.8.2009.

1

---
Title VII Rulemakings ‐ SEC/CFTC and ISDA/SIFMA

Agenda ‐ August 3, 2010 (11am)

I.     Major Issues: Rulemaking

A. Clearing  

• Criteria: standardization (legal and contractual), liquidity, product/process

uniformity

• Timing of clearing requirement

• Clearinghouse core principles

B. SEFs

• Definition

• Existing models for execution

• Interaction of clearing requirement v. execution requirement

C. Data and Reporting issues

• Challenges of real‐time reporting

• Leverage existing processes/initiatives   

• Proprietary information

D. Capital

• FCM/derivatives‐related v. consolidated bank capital

II. Definitions  

• Major Swap Participant/Major Security‐Based Swap Participant, substantial

position/exposure, highly leveraged, commercial risk, security ('33/'34 Acts v.

'40 Act)

III.    Clarifications

• Reporting of pre‐enactment swaps

• Position limits for security‐based swaps

• Sec. 739 (legal certainty): application to security‐based swaps

IV.   Other Issues

• Registration: swap dealer v. broker‐dealer

• Trading issues (Volcker Rule/Sec. 716)