Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2001 / Notices 32343

1Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, 95

FERC ¶ 61,267 (2001).

SoCalGas under a June 15, 1989

Settlement Agreement. Kern River’s

filing may be viewed on the web at

http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm

(call 202–208–2222 for assistance).

On April 6, 2001, the Commission

authorized Kern River to construct the

California Action Project, which will

increase Kern River’s design-day

mainline capacity by 135,000 Mcf. This

additional capacity was alloca5ted as a

result of an open season Kern River

conducted in march 2001; Kern River

ultimately entered into transportation

service agreements with 43 shippers as

a result of the open season. Kern River

intends to commence service using the

California Action Project in July 2001.

SoCalGas asserts that, pursuant to a

June 15, 1989 Settlement Agreement,

Kern River has certain obligations to

SoCalGas in the event Kern River

intends to add incremental capacity to

its system in excess of 700 Mcf.

SoCalGas asserts that Kern River must

provide it with written notice of intent

to add capacity, and must notify

SoCalGas of the amount of capacity

available after it has awarded any

capacity to Enhanced Oil Recovery and

congeneration shippers who were

granted prior rights under the

Settlement Agreement. After such notice

is provided, SoCalGas asserts that it

must be given 30 days to evaluate

whether it wants to contract for such

capacity pursuant to Kern River’s

standard tariff terms and conditions.

SoCalGas states that if it had been given

this opportunity it would have elected

all of the available capacity in the

California Action Plan and potentially

some or all of the capacity offered in

other open seasons Kern River has

conducted with regard to proposed

future expansions. SoCalGas has

inquired how Kern River intends to

comply with its obligations under the

Settlement Agreement. Kern River

requests that the Commission declare

that Kern River has no obligation under

the 1989 Settlement Agreement to

provide SoCalGas any preferential

notice of, or opportunity to elect, any of

the capacity on Kern River’s pending

expansions.

There are two ways to become

involved in the Commission’s review of

this petition. First, any person wishing

to obtain legal status by becoming a

party to the proceeding should on or

before June 15, 2001, file with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, a motion to intervene in

accordance with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10).

A person obtaining party status will

be placed on the service list maintained

by the Secretary of the Commission and

will receive copies of all documents

filed by the applicant and by all other

parties, A party must submit 14 copies

of filings made with the Commission

and must mail a copy to the applicants

and to every other party in the

proceeding. Only parties to the

proceeding can ask for court review of

Commission orders in the proceeding.

However, a person does not have to

intervene in order to have comments

considered. The second way to

participate is by filing with the

Secretary of the Commission, by June

15, 2001, an original and two copies of

the comments in support of or in

opposition to matters raised in the

petition. The Commission will consider

these comments in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but the

filing of a comment will not serve to

make the filer a party to the proceeding.

The Commission’s rules require that

person filing comments in opposition

provide copies of their protests only to

the party or parties directly involved in

the protest.

Comments, protests and interventions

may be filed electronically via the

internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR

2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on

the Commission’s web site at http://

www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–14996 Filed 6–13–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EL01–87–000]

South Eastern Energy Corporation and

Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.,

Complainants, v. City of Dalton, GA,

Georgia Transmission Corporation,

Georgia Power Company, Municipal

Electric Authority of Georgia,

Respondents; Notice of Complaint

June 8, 2001.

Take notice that on June 6, 2001,

South Eastern Electric Corporation

(SEEC) and Morgan Stanley Capital

Group Inc. (MSCG) (collectively

Complainants), tendered for filing a

complaint pursuant to Section 206 of

the Federal Power Act against the City

of Dalton, Georgia (Dalton), the Georgia

Transmission Corporation (GTC),

Georgia Power Company (Georgia

Power), and the Municipal Electric

Authority of Georgia (MEAG)

(collectively the Georgia Interstate

Transmission System (ITS) Members).

Complainants contend that the ITS

Members have treated Complainants’

request to interconnect a new generation

facility to the ITS in an unjust,

unreasonable, and potentially unduly

discriminatory and preferential manner

in violation of the Federal Power Act.

Copies of the filing were served upon

the City of Dalton, GTC, Georgia Power,

and MEAG.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest this filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions or protests

must be filed on or before June 18, 2001.

Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room. This filing may

also be viewed on the Internet at

http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm

(call 202–208–2222) for assistance.

Answers to the complaint shall also be

due on or before June 18, 2001.

Comments, protests and interventions

may be filed electronically via the

internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions

on the Commission’s web site at http:/

/www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–15009 Filed 6–13–01 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP01–387–000]

Texas Eastern Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Technical

Conference

June 8, 2001.

In the Commission’s order issued on

May 25, 2001,1 the Commission directed

32344 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2001 / Notices

that a technical conference be held to

address issues raised by the filing.

Take notice that the technical

conference will be held on Thursday,

July 12, 2001, at 9 a.m., in a room to be

designated, at the offices of the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

All interested parties and Staff are

permitted to attend.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–14995 Filed 6–13–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EC01–70–000]

Wisvest-Connecticut, LLC and

Bridgepower Harbor Power, LLC, New

Haven Harbor Power, LLC, and NRG

Connecticut Power Assets, LLC;

Notice of Filing

June 8, 2001.

Take notice that on June 4, 2001,

Wisvest-Connecticut, LLC (Wisvest) and

NRG Connecticut Power Assets LLC

(NRG Connecticut) [together Applicants]

filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission a request for a protective

order in the above-captioned

proceeding.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest such filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and

385.214). All such motions and protests

should be filed on or before June 14,

2001. Protests will be considered by the

Commission to determine the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceedings. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. This

filing may also be viewed on the

Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/

online/rims.htm (call 202–208–2222 for

assistance). Comments, protests and

interventions may be filed electronically

via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18

CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the

instructions on the Commission’s web

site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/

doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01–14954 Filed 6–13–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER98–2440–002, et al.]

Central Illinois Light Company, et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

June 7, 2001.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Central Illinois Light Company

[Docket No. ER98–2440–002]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001,

Central Illinois Light Company (CILCO),

tendered for filing a triennial market

power study for sales under its Market

Rate Power Sales Tariff.

Comment date: June 25, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Duke Energy Mohave, LLC

[Docket No. ER01–1619–001]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001,

Duke Energy Mohave, LLC (Duke

Energy) tendered for filing the following

tariff revised sheets as part of its FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1,

proposed to be effective on May 22,

2001.

First Revised Sheet No. 1

First Revised Sheet No. 2

Original Sheet No. 3

Duke Mohave states that the purpose

of this filing is to comply with Duke

Energy Mohave, LLC, 95 FERC 61,256

(2001). The revised sheets incorporate

the changes directed by Ordering

Paragraph (B) of the cited order.

Duke Mohave states that copies of its

filing have been mailed to all affected

customers and interested state

commissions.

Comment date: June 25, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. American Electric Power Service

Corporation

[Docket No. ER01–2215–000]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001, the

American Electric Power Service

Corporation (AEPSC) tendered for filing

an unexecuted Interconnection and

Operation Agreement between Indiana

Michigan Power Company and Duke

Energy Vigo, LLC. The agreement is

pursuant to the AEP Companies’ Open

Access Transmission Service Tariff

(OATT) that has been designated as the

Operating Companies of the American

Electric Power System FERC Electric

Tariff Revised Volume No. 6, effective

June 15, 2001.

AEP requests an effective date of

August 2, 2001.

A copy of the filing was served upon

the Indiana Utility Regulatory

Commission and the Michigan Public

Service Commission.

Comment date: June 25, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Automated Power Exchange, Inc.

[Docket No. ER01–2216–000]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001,

Automated Power Exchange, Inc.

tendered for filing a new rate schedule

under which APX will offer power

exchange services in the APX West

Wide Market.

Comment date: June 25, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Sunrise Power Company, LLC

[Docket No. ER01–2217–000]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001,

Sunrise Power Company, LLC (Seller), a

limited liability company organized

under the laws of the State of Delaware,

tendered for filing an order: (1)

Accepting Seller’s proposed marketbased rate tariff; (2) granting waiver of

certain Commission regulations under

the Federal Power Act; and (3) granting

the blanket approvals normally

accorded sellers permitted to sell at

market-based rates. Seller is

constructing, and intends to own and

operate a 560 MW electric generating

facility in Kern County, California.

Comment date: June 25, 2001, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Duke Energy Corporation

[Docket No. ER01–2218–000]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001,

Duke Energy Corporation (Duke)

tendered for filing a Service Agreement

with Carolina Power & Light Company

for Firm Transmission Service under

Duke’s Open Access Transmission

Tariff.

Duke requests that the proposed

Service Agreement be permitted to

become effective on May 7, 2001.

Duke states that this filing is in

accordance with Part 35 of the

Commission’s Regulations and a copy

has been served on the North Carolina

Utilities Commission.