March 14, 2016

Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

RE: ICE Clear Credit Swap Submission Related to Mandatory Clearing Determinations 

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

ICE Clear Credit LLC (“ICE Clear Credit”) hereby submits (pursuant to the information requirements of Title 17 

of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 §39.5) to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

(“CFTC” or “Commission”) the 5-year tenor in series 24 and 25 of the iTraxx Australia index, maturing on 

December 20, 2020 and June 20, 2021, respectively, (the “Indices” or “Submitted Swaps”) for a mandatory 

clearing determination.

§39.5 Review of swaps for Commission determination on clearing requirement. 

(b) Swap submissions. 

(2) A derivatives clearing organization shall submit swaps to the Commission, to the extent reasonable and 

practicable to do so, by group, category, type, or class of swaps.

Table 1 below identifies the characteristics of the Submitted Swaps; specifically its type, region, rating and 

spread-level, as follows:

Type

The single-name Credit Default Swap (“CDS”) constituents of the Indices reference the debt of 

corporate and financial corporate entities (“Referenced Entities”).

Region

All Referenced Entities are incorporated in Australia. 

Rating

All Referenced Entities are considered investment grade by the administrator of the Indices.

Spread Level

Not applicable. Applicable only when the reference entity selection criteria include spread-level.
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 2

Table 1

Index Classification

Index Name

Swap

Type Region Rating

Spread 

Level Series Maturity (Tenor) Currency

Corporate 

Debt

Australia Investment 

Grade

n/a iTraxx Australia 25 6/20/2021 (5Y) USD

Corporate 

Debt

Australia Investment 

Grade

n/a iTraxx Australia 24 12/20/2020 (5Y) USD

§39.5(b)(3)(i) Statement of Eligibility

“A statement that the derivatives clearing organization is eligible to accept the swap, or group, category, type, 

or class of swaps for clearing and describes the extent to which, if the Commission were to determine that the 

swap, or group, category, type, or class of swaps is required to be cleared, the derivatives clearing organization 

will be able to maintain compliance with section 5b(c)(2) of the Act.”

ICE Clear Credit is a Derivatives Clearing Organization (“DCO”) pursuant to Section 5b of the United States 

Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “CEA”), and as such is supervised by the CFTC. ICE Clear Credit 

became a DCO on July 16, 2011 pursuant to Section 725 of the Dodd-Frank Act (the “Conversion Date”), and 

since the Conversion Date, ICE Clear Credit has cleared commodity-based swaps similar to the Indices submitted 

herein in compliance with section 5b(c)(2) of the CEA.

§39.5(b)(3)(ii) Information Related to the Act’s Swap Submission Review Requirements

“A statement that includes, but is not limited to, information that will assist the Commission in making a 

quantitative and qualitative assessment of the following factors:” 

(A) “The existence of significant outstanding notional exposures, trading liquidity, and adequate pricing 

data.”

Table 2 below provides data describing the outstanding notional exposures, number of Clearing Participants at 

ICE Clear Credit and/or Clearing Members of ICE Clear Europe with un-cleared positions and adequacy of endof-day pricing data for the Submitted Swaps.

Index, Series and Tenor

Three columns identify the Submitted Swaps by index, series and tenor. 

Outstanding Positions among 16 ICE Clearing Entities

This column provides the gross notional amount of the positions in the Depository Trust & Clearing 

Corporation (“DTCC”) Trade Information Warehouse, as-of August 18, 2015, among 16 legal entities 

that are Clearing Participants of ICE Clear Credit (“CPs” or “Clearing Participants”) and/or Clearing 

Members of ICE Clear Europe. Please note that this does not include all Clearing Members / Clearing 

Participants. 

EOD Price Collection Summary
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 3

ICE Clear Credit’s rules require CPs to submit end-of-day pricing data for any swap for which they 

have a relevant cleared interest. ICE Clear Credit recently demonstrated the ability of CPs to provide 

end-of-day price discovery submissions for the Indices. During a two-week price collection period from 

January 18 through February 1, 2016, ICE Clear Credit asked all 30 of its CPs to provide submissions 

for all Indices. This Table 2 entry consists of two columns summarizing the results of the two-week 

price collection period. The first column provides the number of CPs providing submissions. The 

second column provides the average dispersion of submissions. For the purposes of this analysis, ICE 

Clear Credit defines dispersion as the difference between the highest and lowest submission mid-level

after removing the submissions of the two Affiliate Groups with the highest and lowest mid-levels from 

the sample. The table expresses dispersion as a percentage of the bid-offer width (“BOW”) established 

each day for the given swap by ICE Clear Credit.

Table 2

Index Series Tenor Outstanding Positions Among 16 ICE 

Clearing Legal Entities1

ICC EOD Price Collection 

Summary2

One Sided Gross 

Notional

Number of Entities

with Positions

CPs Providing 

Submissions

Average 

Dispersion

(USD millions) (% of ICE 

BOW)

3

iTraxx Australia 25 5Y N/A4 N/A

4 N/A4 N/A4

iTraxx Australia 24 5Y N/A5 N/A515 73%

iTraxx Australia

(data provided for reference)

23 5Y 2,831 14 15 111%

iTraxx Australia

(data provided for reference)

22 5Y 2,619 12 15 107%

(B) Clearinghouse Capabilities

“The availability of rule framework, capacity, operational expertise and resources, and credit support 

infrastructure to clear the contract on terms that are consistent with the material terms and trading 

conventions on which the contract is then traded.”

Rule Framework – ICE Clear Credit maintains a comprehensive set of rules that are publicly available and may be 

viewed at https://www.theice.com/publicdocs/clear_credit/ICE_Clear_Credit_Rules.pdf and are listed herein as 

Exhibit A.

Capacity, Operational Expertise and Resources – ICE Clear Credit is the largest, leading, and most active CDS

clearinghouse in the world as measured by (1) number and diversification of cleared CDS contracts, (2) volume, 

(3) open interest, (4) amount of default resources (margin collateral and guaranty fund deposits), and (5) number 

of active CDS Clearing Participants. Since its launch on March 9, 2009, ICE Clear Credit (f/k/a ICE Trust U.S. 

LLC) has cleared approximately 1,716,000 CDS transactions valued at approximately $49 trillion dollars. ICE 

 

1

Source: DTCC data providing positions among 16 unique legal entities that are CPs of ICE Clear Credit and/or Clearing 

Members of ICE Clear Europe, as-of August 18, 2015

2

Price collection period from January 18, 2016 through February 1, 2016

3 Average Dispersion calculated using Affiliate Group submissions

4

Series 25 will be available for trading starting March 21, 2016

5

Series 24 became available for trading September 21, 2015 and therefore was not captured in the outstanding positions as-of 

August 18, 2015
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 4

Clear Credit currently clears 129 CDS indices, 410 CDS corporate single names, and 21 sovereign single names.

ICE Clear Credit currently maintains a cleared open interest valued at approximately $889 billion. (additional ICE 

Clear Credit’s statistics may be viewed at www.theice.com/clear_credit.jhtml.) 

The following financial institutions have been approved as ICE Clear Credit Clearing Participants: Bank of 

America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays Capital Inc., BNP Paribas, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Citibank 

N.A., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse International, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Deutsche 

Bank AG, London Branch, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Goldman Sachs International, 

HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, National 

Association, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch International, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 

Incorporated, Morgan Stanley Capital Services LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Nomura International PLC, 

Nomura Securities International, Inc., Société Générale, SG Americas Securities LLC, The Bank of Nova Scotia, 

UBS AG, London Branch, UBS Securities LLC, and Wells Fargo Securities LLC. 

Credit Support Infrastructure – As of March 7, 2016, ICE Clear Credit held approximately $19.9 billion USD 

equivalent in margin collateral and approximately $1.8 billion USD equivalent in guaranty fund deposits. On a 

daily basis, ICE Clear Credit processes millions of dollars in settlements.

(C) Impact on Systemic Risk 

“The effect on the mitigation of systemic risk, taking into account the size of the market for such contract and 

the resources of the derivatives clearing organization available to clear the contract.”

The effect on mitigation of systemic risk from the clearing of the Submitted Swaps is believed to be material for 

the following reasons: 

 The swap listed for clearing is actively traded with significant pre-clearing outstanding positions. 

 ICE Clear Credit’s CPs are amongst the most active CDS market participants and continue to clear a 

significant portion of their clearing-eligible portfolio.

 The multi-lateral netting achieved through the clearing process has been significant historically and has

substantially reduced the number and notional amount of outstanding bi-lateral positions.

 ICE Clear Credit has developed a robust risk management framework that has been extensively reviewed 

by regulators, industry participants and third-party experts.

 ICE Clear Credit’s price discovery process is working successfully to provide reliable inputs to its risk 

models.

(D) Competition

“The effect on competition, including appropriate fees and charges applied to clearing.”

ICE Clear Credit’s fee structure is appropriate and its margin and guaranty fund computations suitably account for 

the risk brought to the clearinghouse.
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 5

(E) Insolvency Protection

“The existence of reasonable legal certainty in the event of the insolvency of the relevant derivatives clearing 

organization or one or more of its clearing members with regard to the treatment of customer and swap 

counterparty positions, funds, and property.”

ICE Clear Credit believes that there is reasonable legal certainty in the event of the insolvency of ICE Clear 

Credit or a CP with regard to the treatment of house and customer positions, funds and property in connection 

with the clearing of the submitted swap.

ICE Clear Credit’s CPs consist of several types of institutions, principally futures commission merchants 

(“FCMs”) (including FCMs that are also broker-dealers), U.S. banks and non-U.S. banks. In the event of a CP

insolvency, ICE Clear Credit is of the view, based on the advice of counsel in the relevant jurisdictions, that ICE 

Clear Credit would be permitted to exercise its rights to close out house positions and apply margin and other 

property of the defaulting CP in accordance with its rules. With respect to customer positions, which must be 

carried through an FCM CP, the submitted swap would constitute “commodity contracts” for purposes of the 

commodity broker liquidation provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Under the Bankruptcy Code and the 

Commission’s Part 190 regulations, ICE Clear Credit would have the ability to close out customer positions 

following the insolvency of the CP and/or, in appropriate circumstances, facilitate a transfer of such positions to 

another, solvent CP. Customer property provided in respect of submitted contracts would be subject to the 

protections for customer property under the Part 190 regulations for the cleared swaps account class. Under the 

Commission’s Part 22 regulations for cleared swaps, ICE Clear Credit is required to segregate cleared swap 

customer property. As such, customer property would be subject to distribution to cleared swap customers of the 

insolvent FCM in accordance with those regulations.

With respect to an ICE Clear Credit insolvency, ICE Clear Credit would itself be a commodity broker subject to 

the Bankruptcy Code and Part 190 regulations. ICE Clear Credit believes, based on the advice of counsel, that 

under the applicable provisions of those laws and regulations, ICE Clear Credit rules providing for the termination 

of all outstanding contracts and the application and/or return of remaining member and customer property to 

clearing participants would similarly be enforceable.

§39.5(b)(3)(iii) Product Specifications

“Product specifications, including copies of any standardized legal documentation, generally accepted contract 

terms, standard practices for managing any life cycle events associated with the swap, and the extent to which 

the swap is electronically confirmable.”

The submitted swap is electronically confirmable. Lifecycle events are processed by ICE Clear Credit and DTCC 

subject to determinations committee and industry groups. Product specifications are included below. 

26J. iTraxx Asia/Pacific.

The rules in this Subchapter 26J apply to the clearance of iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched 

Contracts.

26J-102. Definitions.

iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 6

A credit default swap in respect of any Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Index and 

governed by any iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement. An iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract is a CDS Contract for purposes of Chapter 20.

iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Publisher

Markit Group Limited or its successor, or any successor sponsor of the Eligible iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Indexes it publishes.

iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Rules

The rules set forth in Chapters 1 through 8 and 20 through 22, inclusive, as modified by 

the provisions of Subchapter 26E and this Subchapter 26J.

iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement

Any one of the following: 

(a) The iTraxx Asia/Pacific Legacy Untranched Standard Terms Supplement as 

published on September 20, 2014 together with the fourth paragraph of the form 

of confirmation published on September 20, 2014 with respect to such standard 

terms supplement (or any relevant electronic equivalent thereof) (the “Legacy 

2014 Supplement”). 

(b) The iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Standard Terms Supplement as 

published on September 20, 2014 together with the third paragraph of the form of 

confirmation published on September 20, 2014 with respect to such standard 

terms supplement (or any relevant electronic equivalent thereof) (the “New 2014 

Supplement”, and together with the Legacy 2014 Supplement, the “2014 

Supplements”).

(c) Such other supplement as may be specified in relation to any Eligible iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Index by ICE Clear Credit, including any successor to 

any of the documents listed in subparagraphs (a) or (b) of this definition. 

For purposes of each iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract, a reference in the 

iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement to an “iTraxx Master 

Transaction” shall be deemed a reference to an iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched 

Contract. 

Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Index

Each particular series and version of an iTraxx Asia ex-Japan or iTraxx Australia index 

or sub-index, as published by the iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Publisher, determined 

by ICE Clear Credit to be eligible and included in the List of Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Indexes.

List of Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Indexes
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 7

The list of Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Indexes, maintained, updated and 

published by the Board or its designee on the ICE Clear Credit website, specifying the 

following information with respect to each index:

(a) the name (either iTraxx Asia ex-Japan or iTraxx Australia) and series, including 

any applicable sub-index designation;

(b) the “Effective Date”;

(c) one or more eligible “Scheduled Termination Dates” and the applicable “Fixed 

Rate” for each such date;

(d) the Relevant iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement;

(e) the versions (and related annex dates) eligible for clearing (and, if applicable for 

the relevant index, the Applicable Credit Derivatives Definitions for each 

component); and

(f) any inactive versions (and related annex dates), i.e., those that have been 

determined to be fungible with later versions.

Relevant iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement

With respect to an Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Index, the iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Terms Supplement specified for such Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Index in the List of Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Indexes.

26J-309. Acceptance of iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts by ICE Clear 

Credit.

(a) A CDS Participant shall make all reasonable efforts to not submit a Trade for clearance 

as a iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract, and any such Trade shall not be a 

Conforming Trade, if the Novation Time would be:

(i) at a time when the Fallback Settlement Method is applicable to a Credit Event 

with respect to such iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract; or

(ii) at or after the close of business on the calendar day following the Auction Final 

Price Determination Date for a Credit Event with respect to such iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract; 

(such time with respect to any iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract, the “Clearance 

Cut-off Time”); provided that ICE Clear Credit may, by written notice to all CDS 

Participants following consultation with the Risk Committee, designate a time other than 

the time determined pursuant to clause (i) or (ii) above as the Clearance Cut-off Time 

with respect to any iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract. CDS Participants may 

again submit Trades for clearance as such iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract, 

and such Trades shall again be Conforming Trades, following receipt of notice from ICE 
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 8

Clear Credit that a Fungibility Date (as defined in Rule 26J-316) has occurred with 

respect to such iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract.

(b) A CDS Participant shall as soon as reasonably practicable notify ICE Clear Credit if any 

Trade it has submitted for clearance was not at the time of submission, or ceases to be 

prior to the Novation Time, a Conforming Trade.

26J-315. Terms of the Cleared iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract.

(a) Any capitalized term used in this Subchapter 26J but not defined in these iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Rules shall have the meaning provided in the Relevant iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement.

(b) For purposes of the CDS Committee Rules, the CDS Region for each iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract is the Asian Region.

(c) Each iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract will be governed by the Relevant iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement, as modified by these iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Rules. In the event of any inconsistency between the Relevant iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement or the Confirmation (including in electronic 

form) for a iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract and these iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Rules, these iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Rules will govern.

26J-316. Updating Index Version of Fungible Contracts After a Credit Event or a 

Succession Event; Updating Relevant Untranched Standard Terms Supplement.

(a) Where the iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Publisher of an Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Index publishes one or more subsequent versions or annexes of the 

relevant series following a Credit Event or a Succession Event or circumstances giving 

rise to a Successor and Succession Date with respect to a Reference Entity included in 

such series, and the Board or its designee determines that iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Contracts referencing the earlier version or annex of such series are 

fungible with iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts referencing a later version or 

annex of such series that is an Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Index and so 

notifies CDS Participants, iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts referencing the 

earlier version or annex of such series shall become iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched 

Contracts referencing such later version or annex of such series on the date determined 

by the Board or its designee (the “Fungibility Date”). Any iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Contracts referencing the earlier version or annex of such series submitted 

for clearing after the related Fungibility Date shall, upon acceptance for clearing, 

become a iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract referencing the latest version or 

annex of such series that the Board or its designee has determined is fungible with such 

earlier version or annex.

(b) Where a new version of the iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement (a “New 

Standard Terms”) is published as of a date that is subsequent to the date of the 

version that is specified as the Relevant iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms 
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 9

Supplement for any iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract(s) (the “Existing Standard 

Terms”), and the Board or its designee determines that iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched 

Contracts referencing the Existing Standard Terms are fungible with iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Contracts referencing the New Standard Terms, and so notifies CDS 

Participants, iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts referencing the Existing 

Standard Terms shall become iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts referencing the 

New Standard Terms on the date determined by the Board or its designee (the 

“Standard Terms Update Date” and each prior iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms 

Supplement subject to such determination, a “Superseded Standard Terms”). Any 

Trade referencing a Superseded Standard Terms submitted for clearing as a iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract shall, upon acceptance for clearing, become a iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract referencing the New Standard Terms.

(c) The Board or its designee may determine a different Fungibility Date or Standard Terms 

Update Date applicable to individual iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts or groups 

of iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts or may determine a Fungibility Date or 

Standard Terms Update Date applicable to all iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts 

referencing the earlier version or annex of a series described in clauses (a) or (b) of this 

Rule, as it deems appropriate.

26J-317. Terms of iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts.

With respect to each iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract, the following terms will apply:

(a) The following provisions will apply to each iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract or 

component thereof to which the 2003 Definitions apply under the Relevant iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement:

(i) Section 3.2(c)(i) of the 2003 Definitions is hereby amended by replacing the "or" 

at the end of subparagraph (B) thereof with an "and" and adding the following as 

a new subparagraph (C):

"(C) the tenth calendar day after the date of the actual decision by the relevant 

Regional CDS Committee (or Dispute Resolver) to Resolve (i.e., determined 

without regard to any Effectiveness Convention or any time of effectiveness 

specified in a Presented Position) that a Credit Event has occurred for which 

there is Publicly Available Information, as described in CDS Committee Rule 

2101-02(a)(iii), with respect to such iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts; 

or".

(ii) For the purposes of any determination as to whether a Credit Event has occurred 

in respect of a Reference Entity or an Obligation thereof:

(A) at any time up to but excluding June 20, 2009; or

(B) if (1) a Credit Event Resolution Request Date occurs or (2) a Credit Event 

Notice and a Notice of Publicly Available Information are deemed 
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 10

delivered pursuant to Rule 2101-02(f) by a Notifying Party, in either case 

before June 20, 2009, 

the Credit Event Backstop Date with respect to such determination shall be 

deemed to be the Effective Date.

(iii) For the purposes of any determination as to whether a Succession Event has 

occurred in respect of a Reference Entity:

(A) at any time up to but excluding June 20, 2009; or

(B) if (1) a Succession Event Resolution Request Date occurs or (2) a 

Succession Event Notice is deemed delivered pursuant to Rule 2101-

02(f), in either case before June 20, 2009,

the Succession Event Backstop Date with respect to such Reference Entity shall 

be deemed to be the Effective Date.

(iv) Except for purposes of Rule 26J-317(a)(ii) and Section 1.23 of the 2003 

Definitions, a Credit Event Notice and Notice of Publicly Available Information 

with respect to a iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract for a Credit Event other 

than Restructuring will be deemed to have been effectively delivered by the 

Notifying Party on the relevant Event Determination Date determined under the

CDS Committee Rules only when the Resolution is effective, under the CDS 

Committee Rules, that a Credit Event other than Restructuring has occurred for 

which there is Publicly Available Information, as described in CDS Committee 

Rule 2101-02(a)(iii), with respect to such iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched 

Contract. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the 2003 Definitions or any 

Relevant iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement, any delivery of a 

Credit Event Notice and/or Notice of Publicly Available Information by a CDS 

Participant (other than (i) the deemed delivery as provided in this Rule 26J317(a)(iv) or (ii) notices with respect to a Relevant Restructuring Credit Event as 

provided in the CDS Restructuring Rules) shall not be valid. 

(v) Section 1.8(a)(ii)(A)(I)(3)(y) of the 2003 Definitions is hereby modified by 

replacing the term “Auction Final Price Determination Date” with the phrase “date 

that is one Relevant City Business Day prior to the Auction Settlement Date”.

(vi) Section 1.30 of the 2003 Definitions is hereby modified by replacing the term 

“Auction Final Price Determination Date” in clause (ii) of the last sentence thereof 

with the phrase “date that is one Relevant City Business Day prior to the Auction 

Settlement Date”.

(vii) With respect to iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts for which it is Resolved 

by the Regional CDS Committee (or applicable Dispute Resolver) or Credit 

Derivatives Determinations Committee that a Credit Event has occurred for which 

there is Publicly Available Information, as described in CDS Committee Rule 
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 11

2101-02(a)(iii) or the DC Rules, as applicable, Buyer may not deliver a Notice of 

Physical Settlement until after it is determined that the method of settlement for a 

particular Credit Event is the Fallback Settlement Method due to the occurrence 

of one of the events in Section 12.1 of the 2003 Definitions and as further 

provided in the CDS Physical Settlement Rules. For the avoidance of doubt, the 

effectiveness of any Notice of Physical Settlement and obligations relating 

thereto are subject to the suspension and finality provisions of Sections 6.5 and 

9.1(c)(iii) of the 2003 Definitions.

(b) The following provisions will apply to each iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract or 

component thereof to which the 2014 Definitions apply under the Relevant iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement:

(i) Section 8.10(a) of the 2014 Definitions is hereby amended by replacing the "." at 

the end of subparagraph (B) thereof with "; and" and adding the following as a 

new subparagraph (C):

"(C) the tenth calendar day after the date of the actual decision by the relevant 

Regional CDS Committee (or Dispute Resolver) to Resolve (i.e., determined 

without regard to any Effectiveness Convention or any time of effectiveness

specified in a Presented Position) that a Credit Event has occurred for which 

there is Publicly Available Information, as described in CDS Committee Rule 

2101-02(a)(iii), with respect to such iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts.".

(ii) Except for purposes of Section 1.39 of the 2014 Definitions, a Credit Event 

Notice and Notice of Publicly Available Information with respect to a iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract for a Credit Event other than M(M)R 

Restructuring will be deemed to have been effectively delivered by the Notifying 

Party on the relevant Event Determination Date determined under the CDS 

Committee Rules only when the Resolution is effective, under the CDS 

Committee Rules, that a Credit Event other than M(M)R Restructuring has 

occurred for which there is Publicly Available Information, as described in CDS 

Committee Rule 2101-02(a)(iii), with respect to such iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Contract. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the 2014 

Definitions or the Relevant iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Terms Supplement, 

any delivery of a Credit Event Notice and/or Notice of Publicly Available 

Information by a CDS Participant (other than (i) the deemed delivery as provided 

in this Rule 26J-317(b)(ii) or (ii) notices with respect to a Relevant Restructuring 

Credit Event as provided in the CDS Restructuring Rules) shall not be valid. For 

the avoidance of doubt, Section C.2 of the Legacy 2014 Supplement and Section 

5.7 of the New 2014 Supplement shall not apply.

(iii) For the purposes only of Section 1.16(a)(ii)(A)(II) of the 2014 Definitions, Section 

1.17 of the 2014 Definitions is hereby modified by replacing the term “Auction 

Final Price Determination Date” with the phrase “date that is one Relevant City 

Business Day prior to the Auction Settlement Date”.
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 12

(iv) With respect to iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts for which it is Resolved 

by the Regional CDS Committee (or applicable Dispute Resolver) or Credit 

Derivatives Determinations Committee that a Credit Event has occurred for which 

there is Publicly Available Information, as described in CDS Committee Rule 

2101-02(a)(iii) or the DC Rules, as applicable, Buyer may not deliver a Notice of 

Physical Settlement until after it is determined that the method of settlement for a 

particular Credit Event is the Fallback Settlement Method due to the occurrence 

of one of the events in Section 6.1 of the 2014 Definitions, and as further 

provided in the CDS Physical Settlement Rules. For the avoidance of doubt, the 

effectiveness of any Notice of Physical Settlement and obligations relating 

thereto are subject to the suspension and finality provisions of Sections 10.1 and 

10.2 of the 2014 Definitions. 

(c) The Settlement Method for particular iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts will be 

Auction Settlement and the Fallback Settlement Method will be Physical Settlement in 

accordance with the CDS Physical Settlement Rules. 

(d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Relevant iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched 

Terms Supplement, the Reference Obligation for purposes of a New Trade (as defined 

therein) will be the Reference Obligation for the Restructured Entity in question as 

specified by ICE Clear Credit following consultation with the CDS Risk Committee 

(which for the avoidance of doubt may be determined by reference to any Standard 

Reference Obligation).

(e) The following terms will apply to each iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract:

(i) The “Agreement” is the Participant Agreement between the relevant CDS 

Participant and ICE Clear Credit.

(ii) The “Effective Date” is the date specified in the List of Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Indexes for the relevant Index.

(iii) The “Calculation Agent” is ICE Clear Credit, except as provided in the CDS 

Committee Rules.

(iv) “De Minimis Cash Settlement” under the Relevant iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched 

Terms Supplement is not applicable.

(v) The “Fixed Rate” is the rate specified in the List of Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Indexes for the relevant Index and Scheduled Termination Date.

(vi) The “Initial Payment Date” will be the date that is the first Business Day 

immediately following the Trade Date; provided that with respect to a iTraxx 

Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract that is accepted for clearing pursuant to Rule 

309 after the Trade Date thereof, the “Initial Payment Date” will be the date that 

is the first Business Day following the date as of which such iTraxx Asia/Pacific 

Untranched Contract is accepted for clearing pursuant to Rule 309. 
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 13

(f) For each iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract, the following terms will be 

determined according to the particular iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contract 

submitted for clearing:

(i) Which of the Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Indexes is the “Index”.

(ii) The “Annex Date”.

(iii) The “Trade Date”.

(iv) Which of the eligible Scheduled Termination Dates specified for the Index in the 

List of Eligible iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Indexes is the “Scheduled 

Termination Date”.

(v) The “Original Notional Amount”.

(vi) The “Floating Rate Payer”.

(vii) The “Fixed Rate Payer”. 

(viii) The “Initial Payment Payer”.

(ix) The “Initial Payment Amount”.

§39.5(b)(3)(iv) Participant Eligibility 

“Participant eligibility standards, if different from the derivatives clearing organization’s general participant 

eligibility standards.”

The participant eligibility standards related to the Indices are not different from ICE Clear Credit’s general 

participant eligibility standards.

§39.5(b)(3)(v) Price Discovery

“Pricing sources, models, and procedures, demonstrating an ability to obtain sufficient price data to measure 

credit exposures in a timely and accurate manner, including any agreements with clearing members to provide 

price data and copies of executed agreements with third-party price vendors, and information about any price 

reference index used, such as the name of the index, the source that calculates it, the methodology used to 

calculate the price reference index and how often it is calculated, and when and where it is published 

publicly.”

See the ICE Clear Credit End-of-Day Price Discovery Policies and Procedures attached hereto as Confidential 

Exhibit B.

See Markit Data and Settlement Price Data License Agreement dated March 6, 2009, previously submitted as 

Confidential Exhibit C on March 27, 2012.
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 14

See Amendment to Markit Data and Settlement Price Data License Agreement dated December 17, 2010, 

previously submitted as Confidential Exhibit D on March 27, 2012.

§39.5(b)(3)(vi) Risk Management

“Risk management procedures, including measurement and monitoring of credit exposures, initial and 

variation margin methodology, methodologies for stress testing and back testing, settlement procedures, and 

default management procedures.”

See the ICE Clear Credit Risk Management Framework attached hereto as Confidential Exhibit E. See ICE Clear 

Credit Risk Management Model Description document attached hereto as Confidential Exhibit F.

See the ICE Clear Credit Risk Management Backtesting Framework attached hereto as Confidential Exhibit G.

See the ICE Clear Credit Risk Management Stress Testing Framework attached hereto as Confidential Exhibit H.

§39.5(b)(3)(vii) Rules, Policies and Procedures

ICE Clear Credit maintains a comprehensive set of rules that are publicly available and may be viewed at 

https://www.theice.com/publicdocs/clear_credit/ICE_Clear_Credit_Rules.pdf and are listed herein as Exhibit A.

See the ICE Clear Credit Risk Management Framework attached hereto as Confidential Exhibit E. See ICE Clear 

Credit Risk Management Model Description document attached hereto as Confidential Exhibit F.

§39.5(b)(3)(viii) Communication to Members Regarding this Submission

“A description of the manner in which the derivatives clearing organization has provided notice of the 

submission to its members and a summary of any views on the submission expressed by the members (a copy of 

the notice to members shall be included with the submission.”

ICE Clear Credit posted a copy of this submission (absent any confidential exhibits) on its public website on 

March 14, 2016. Written comments relating to the submission have not been solicited or received. ICE Clear 

Credit will notify the CFTC of any written comments received by ICE Clear Credit.

**************

Pursuant to applicable law, ICE Clear Credit respectfully requests confidential treatment of the confidential 

exhibits attached as part of this submission and any other information or documents which may at any time be 

submitted in connection with this submission and which may be marked “Confidential” or for which confidential 

treatment may be requested. 

Confidential treatment of the confidential exhibits attached as part of this submission and any subsequent related 

documents is justified under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, et seq. and the Rules Regarding 
Mr. Christopher Kirkpatrick March 14, 2016

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Page 15

Availability of Information, 12 C.F.R. § 261.15 (2006). The confidential exhibits attached as part of this 

submission contain confidential business and commercial information regarding (together with confidential 

intellectual property) related to ICE Clear Credit’s clearing facility for credit default swaps and ICE Clear Credit’s 

clearing participants, the disclosure of which could have a material adverse effect on, and cause injury to, the 

operations and competitive position of ICE Clear Credit and its clearing participants. We believe that the 

confidential exhibits are entitled to protection pursuant to exemptions (b)(4) and (b)(8) of the Freedom of 

Information Act. In particular, the confidential exhibits provide information that is useful to potential competitors 

and would be competitively harmful to ICE Clear Credit and its clearing participants if disclosed to the public.

In the event that a determination is made to release any confidential portion of this submission, we respectfully 

request an opportunity to discuss or to revise as appropriate prior to such release.

**************

If you should have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at 312-836-6742.

Respectfully submitted,

Eric Nield

General Counsel

cc: Peter Kals, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Julie Mohr, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Tad Polley, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Joe Opron, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Stan Ivanov, ICE Clear Credit LLC

Donald Sternard, ICE Clear Credit LLC

Ian Springle, ICE Clear Credit LLC

Michelle Weiler, ICE Clear Credit LLC

Sarah Williams, ICE Clear Credit LLC

Enc: Exhibit A – ICE Clear Credit Rules available at: 

https://www.theice.com/publicdocs/clear_credit/ICE_Clear_Credit_Rules.pdf

Confidential Exhibit B – ICE Clear Credit End-of-Day Price Discovery Policies and Procedures

Confidential Exhibit E – ICE Clear Credit Risk Management Framework

Confidential Exhibit F – ICE Clear Credit Risk Management Model Description document

Confidential Exhibit G – ICE Clear Credit Risk Management Backtesting Framework

Confidential Exhibit H – ICE Clear Credit Risk Management Stress Testing Framework