alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           20425
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 20425
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   21635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            30474
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (4608359)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     21635
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               (15931)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 99937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              120080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (235948)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (235948)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (235948)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Vincent J. TABONE.

No. D-2912.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Disbarment order entered.
EXHIBIT 23.1

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We have issued our reports dated December 12, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financialstatements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report ofSemitool, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Semitool, Inc. on Forms S-3(File No. 333-112964) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-114284, File No. 333-62474, File No. 333-89562 andFile No. 333-142815).

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

Salt Lake City, Utah

December 12, 2008
# C_2011063EN.01000401.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v Landeshauptmann von Wien

(Case C-208/09) (1)

1

(European citizenship - Freedom to move and reside in the Member States - Law of a Member State with constitutional status abolishing the nobility in that State - Surname of an adult, a national of that State, obtained by adoption in another Member State, in which that adult resides - Title of nobility and nobiliary particle forming part of the surname - Registration by the authorities of the first Member State in the register of civil status - Correction of the entry by the authorities on their own initiative - Removal of the title of nobility and nobiliary particle)

2011/C 63/06

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein

Applicant:

Defendant: Landeshauptmann von Wien

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Interpretation of Art. 18 EC — Constitutional law of a Member State aimed at abolishing the nobility in that State and prohibiting its nationals from bearing foreign noble titles — Refusal of the authorities of that Member State to enter in the register of births a noble title and a noble particle forming part of a surname which an adult person, being a national of that State, acquired in another Member State, in which she resides, following her adoption by a national of that latter State

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 21 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding the authorities of a Member State, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, from refusing to recognise all the elements of the surname of a national of that State, as determined in another Member State — in which that national resides — at the time of his or her adoption as an adult by a national of that other Member State, where that surname includes a title of nobility which is not permitted in the first Member State under its constitutional law, provided that the measures adopted by those authorities in that context are justified on public policy grounds, that is to say, they are necessary for the protection of the interests which they are intended to secure and are proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued.

---

(1)  OJ C 193, 15.08.2009.

1

---
Robert Paul PATTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6536.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Alfonza A. PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. Martin BITDER, Warden.

No. 16-6790.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Alicia BRUMANT, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-50.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District denied.
# C_2010051EN.01002803.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 2 December 2009 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-42/09) (1)

1

2010/C 51/48

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 69, 21.3.2009.

1

---
Exhibit 10.3(a)
                   AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                                  ROBERT MARCUS

                          EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 20, 1999


SECTION 3. COMPENSATION

Effective September 20, 1999 Executive's base salary will be $120,000 per year.
Due to the staging of Executive's prior salary, the increase of $36,000 per year
will be added to the current bi-weekly rate until January 14, 2000 at which time
the bi-weekly payroll will be adjusted to $4,615.00. Until then, the bi-weekly
rate will be $4,965.00

Further, until the earlier of:

         Company raising $2 million or,

         March 17, 2000

Employee will be paid at the rate of $105,600 per year or $4,062.00 bi-weekly
plus the adjustment for a total of $4,412.00. The difference between $4,615 and
$4,062 or $553.00 per bi-weekly pay period will be accrued and repaid at the
earlier of the two events listed above.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date
first above written.

Intraco Systems, Inc.



By: /s/ WALT NAWROCKI
   ------------------------------
   Walt Nawrocki, CEO


By: /s/ ROBERT MARCUS
    -----------------------------
    Robert Marcus, CFO

<PAGE>

                                  ROBERT MARCUS
                             6341 Via Venetia North
                             Delray Beach, FL 33484
                        (561) 496-5252 fax (561) 496-1152
                                  RAM18@ibm.net

December 29, 1999

Jack Berger
Walt Nawrocki
Intraco Systems, Inc.
3998 FAU Boulevard
Boca Raton, FL 33431

Jack & Walt:

As agreed, below are the revisions to my Employment Agreement. Please sign where
indicated.

         3.  Compensation.

         Base salary is increased to $145,000 per year effective with the
         payroll period beginning January 17, 2000. Any agreed temporary
         reduction will be accrued and paid upon the terms of any such separate
         agreement. Further increases will be at the discretion of the board of
         directors.

         4. Benefits. I will be entitled to all benefits according to the
         regular policies of the Company except as follows:

         A. Vacation. I will be entitled to at least 4 weeks vacation each year.

         B. Medical, dental, disability and other group insurance provided by
         the Company to any other employee(s), will be provided to me at no
         cost. This includes any coverage of dependents.

         5. Term and Termination. The current term is three years ending January
         19, 2002. The new term adds two years and ends January 19, 2004.

In addition to the above there will be a bonus of $12,000.00 paid per my
instructions. This bonus is contingent on GKM raising at least $3 million for
Intraco.

Jack Berger, President    /s/ JACK BERGER                   Date: 1/4/00
                       ------------------------------------

Walt Nawrocki, CEO        /s/ WALT NAWROCKI                 Date: 1/4/00
                       ------------------------------------

Robert Marcus             /s/ ROBERT MARCUS                 Date: 1/4/00
                       ------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

                 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
                              A Nevada Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of International Building Technologies
Group,  Inc.  ("Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Kenneth Yeung, Chief Executive Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: April 15, 2009                         /s/ Kenneth Yeung
                                              ---------------------------------
                                         By:  Kenneth Yeung
                                         Its: Chief Executive Officer
Ken BLEVINS, petitioner, v. David HUDSON, et al.

No. 16-170.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14913]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Meetings; Sunshine Act

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207.

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, June 19, 2001, 2 p.m.

LOCATION: Room 410, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public--Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(f)(1) and 16 
CFR 1013.4(b)(3)(7)(9) and (10) and submitted to the Federal Register 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3).

Matter to be Considered:   

Compliance Status Report

    The staff will brief the Commission on the status of various 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of 
the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207, (301) 504-
0800

    Dated: June 7, 2001.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14913 Filed 6-8-01; 2:23 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
SUPPLEMENT TO THE
FIDELITY EQUITY-INCOME LL FUND PROSPECTUS
DATED JANUARY 20, 1996
   The following information replaces the similar information found in the
"Fund in Detail" section beginning on page 9.
Bettina Doulton is Vice President and manager of Equity-Income ll, which
she has managed since December 1996. She also manages other Fidelity funds.
Since joining Fidelity in 1986, Ms. Doulton has worked as an analyst and
manager.    
The following is in addition to the information found in the "Investment
Principles and Risks" section found on page 10.
CASH MANAGEMENT. The fund may invest in money market securities, in a
pooled account of repurchase agreements, and in a money market fund
available only to funds and accounts managed by FMR or its affiliates,
whose goal is to seek a high level of current income while maintaining a
stable $1.00 share price. A major change in interest rates or a default on
the money market fund's investments could cause its share price to change.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Credit Ratings Q & A 

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking? 

To comply with the requirements of section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act, the notice of rulemaking proposes to remove references to credit ratings found in Commission 

regulations and substitute in other appropriate standards of credit-worthiness. 

What registrants are covered by the proposed regulations? 

The proposed regulations would apply to futures commission merchants (FCMs), designated clearing organizations 

(DCOs), commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs). 

By when must comments on the rule be submitted? 

Comments on the rule must be submitted within thirty (30) days of the publication of the proposal in the Federal 

Register. 

What is the Commission doing to develop a uniform standard of credit-worthiness? 

The Commission has consulted with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of 

the Federal Reserve (FRB) and other federal regulators. We will continue to work with the federal interagency 

community towards the goal of developing uniform standards of credit-worthiness. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
In re Agustin SANTOS-PINEDA, petitioner.

No. 15-9619.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

THOMAS COST 

v. 

MARK GOSCENSKI, TRENTON JAMES 

KIMMINAU and GLOBAL FUTURES 

EXCHANGE & TRADING COMPANY, 

IN CORPORA TED 

CFTC Docket No. 07-R059 

ORDER OF SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE 

Our review of the record and the complainants' appellate submission establishes that the 

Judgment Officer committed no error material to the outcome of the proceedings and that the 

findings of the Judgment Officer are supported by the weight of the evidence; we therefore adopt 

them. In addition, the complainants have not raised important questions of law or policy 

regarding the alleged untimely assignment of futures contracts or wrongful liquidation of 

positions in their accounts. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 14 of the Commodity Exchange 

Act and Commission Regulation 12.406(b), we summarily affirm the initial decision and order of 

the Judgment Officer without an opinion. I 

I Pursuant to Commission Regulation 12.406(b), 17 C.F.R. § 12.406(b), neither the initial 

decision nor the Commission's order of summary affirmance shall serve as Commission 

precedent in other proceedings. 

1 
IT IS SO ORDERED? 

By the Commission (Chairman GENSLER and Commissioner SOMMERS, CHILTON, 

O'MALIA AND WETJEN). 

Melissa D. Jurgens 

Secretary of the Commissi n 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Dated: April4, 2013 

2 Under Section 6(c) and 14(e) ofthe Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 9 and 18(e) (2006), 

a party may appeal a reparation order of the Commission to the United States Court of Appeals 

for only the circuit in which a hearing was held; if no hearing was held, the appeal may be filed 

in any circuit in which the appellee is located. The Commission has ruled that telephonic 

hearings are "held" in Washington, D.C., although parties may speak from several locations. 

Dubois v. Alaron, [2000-2002 Transfer Binder] Comm. Put. L. Rep. (CCH) ~ 28,406 at 51,026 n. 

16 ( CFTC Oct. 26, 2000). The statute also states that such an appeal must be filed within 15 

days after notice of the order and that any appeal is not effective unless, within 30 days of the 

date of the Commission order, the appealing party files with the court a bond equal to double the 

amount of any reparation award.
#### George Brown *v.*The State.

Aggravated Assault—Indictment.—The 8th clause of Article 488, of the Penal Code (Pasc. Dig., Art. 2150), declares an assault to be aggravated “when committed with deadly weapons, under circumstances not amounting to an intent to murder or maim.” *Held,*that an indictment based on this provision need not allege that the assault was committed under circumstances not amounting to an intent to murder or maim.

Appeal from the County Court of Denton. Tried below before the Hon. Thomas E. Hogg, County Judge

The indictment charged that the assault was committed “ with a certain stick, of the length of three feet, and of the *62thickness of one inch, which said stick was then and there a deadly weapon.”

No brief for the appellant.

*H. H. Boone,*Attorney General, and *W. B. Dunham,*for the State.

White, J.

The defendant was indicted for an aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. It is objected that the indictment is insufficient, in that it does not allege that the assault was committed under “circumstances not amounting to an intent to murder or maim.” Pasc. Dig., Art. 2150, subdiv. 8. Such an allegation it not necessary. The offense is complete when it is shown to have been committed with a deadly weapon, and the defendant cannot complain, because under the indictment he could not possibly have been convicted of a higher grade of crime than an aggravated assault. *The State*v. *Lutterloh, 22*Texas, 213.

The other errors complained of are not well taken, and the judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
# C_2011152EN.01000502.xml

| 21.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 31 March 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-407/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Breach of the obligation to comply with a judgment of the Court - Financial penalties - Imposition of a lump sum payment)

2011/C 152/08

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: A. Samoni-Rantou and N. Dafniou, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 228 EC — Non-compliance with the judgment of the Court of 18 July 2007 in Case C-26/07 — Failure to adopt all the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims (OJ 2004 L 261, p. 15) — Request that a penalty payment be set

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 18 July 2007 in Case C-26/07 Commission v Greece by the date of expiry of the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion that was issued by the Commission of the European Communities on 23 September 2008 pursuant to Article 228 EC, the Hellenic Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 228(1) EC; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 18 July 2007 in Case C-26/07 Commission v Greece by the date of expiry of the period prescribed in the reasoned opinion that was issued by the Commission of the European Communities on 23 September 2008 pursuant to Article 228 EC, the Hellenic Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 228(1) EC;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay to the European Commission, into the account ‘European Union own resources’, a lump sum of EUR 3 million; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay to the European Commission, into the account ‘European Union own resources’, a lump sum of EUR 3 million;

| 3. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.

1

---
Nicholas MORGAN, petitioner, v. Mark BRADT, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, et al.

No. 16-6734.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Sontay T. SMOTHERMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5577.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of American Church Mortgage Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.











Dated:
March 31, 2011
By:
/s/ Scott J. Marquis


Chief Financial Officer