alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 February 2011 – Commission v Cyprus**

**(Case C-251/09)**

Public works contracts and supply contracts – Water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Directive 93/38/EEC – Contract notice – Award criteria – Equal treatment of tenderers – Principle of transparency – Directive 92/13/EEC – Review procedure – Requirement to state reasons for a decision to eliminate a tenderer

1.                     *Approximation of laws – Procedure for awarding public contracts in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors
– Directive 93/38 – Award of contracts – Principle of equal treatment of tenderers – Extent (Council Directive 93/38, Art.
4(2)) (see paras 38-40)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Proof of failure – Burden of proof on Commission – Production of evidence showing
failure – Presumptions – Not permissible (Art. 226 EC) (see paras 46-47)*

3.                     *Approximation of laws – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directives
89/665 and 92/13 – Member States' duty to provide for a review procedure (Council Directives 89/665 and 92/13, Art. 1(1))
(see paras 56-58)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Infringement of Articles 4(2) and 31(1) of Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (OJ 1993 L 199, p. 84) – Infringement of Article 1(1) of Council Directive 92/13/EEC of 25 February 1992 coordinating the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of Community rules on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (OJ 1992 L 76, p. 14) – Requirement to state reasons for a decision to eliminate a tenderer – Requirement to ensure that decisions taken by the contracting authorities may be reviewed effectively and as rapidly as possible – Principles of equal treatment and transparency. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1714 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1714

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 16, 2010.
Whereas, on August 5, 2010, 33 Chilean miners were trapped by the collapse of a 
        gold and copper mine near Copiapo, Chile;
Whereas, on August 22, 2010, all 33 miners were discovered alive after an 
        intensive 17-day rescue effort;
Whereas, on August 27, 2010, the Chilean government asked the National 
        Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to provide technical advice 
        that might be of assistance to the trapped miners;
Whereas NASA's vast knowledge and experience with extreme isolation, analog 
        missions, undersea environments, and space flight uniquely suited the 
        agency to help with this historic rescue;
Whereas sustaining, supporting, and rescuing the trapped miners was an extremely 
        challenging task;
Whereas, on August 30, 2010, NASA employees from the Johnson and Langley Space 
        Centers traveled to Chile to assist with the rescue efforts;
Whereas the NASA team worked closely with the Chilean government, including the 
        Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Mining, the Chilean Navy, and the 
        Chilean Space Agency;
Whereas NASA assisted the Chilean government by sharing knowledge acquired 
        during space flight missions for the provision of medical care and 
        psychological support in extreme isolation;
Whereas NASA engineers provided recommendations for the design requirements for 
        the Phoenix capsule used to rescue the miners;
Whereas the Chilean Navy used the Phoenix capsule to bring the miners to the 
        surface nearly 69 days after the mine's initial collapse;
Whereas, on October 13, 2010, all 33 miners were successfully rescued; and
Whereas NASA's help was instrumental in the historic rescue of all 33 miners: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the engineers, scientists, psychologists, and 
        staff of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for helping 
        to successfully rescue 33 trapped Chilean miners from a collapsed mine 
        near Copiapo, Chile; and
            (2) recognizes that the experience and knowledge of the National 
        Aeronautics and Space Administration has acquired through space flight 
        is beneficial to human life on Earth and was critical to the successful 
        rescue of the Chilean miners.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Richard Ammar CHICHAKLI, aka Robert Cunning, aka Raman Cedorov, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6263.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Demetrius BROCK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6949.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: BERKSHIRE FOODS, INC. AND HAROLD W. FOX, AND EARL E. BARNES 

DOCKET NUMBER: 91 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 91 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Berkshire Foods, Inc. 

and Harold W. Fox 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

Earl E. Barnes 

(Oklahoma City, Oklahoma) 

The complaint charges attempted manipulation and manipulation of the price of 

cash eggs in Chicago, and of egg futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, in 

November 1958. It is alleged that large purchases of November 1958 egg futures 

near the end of trading in that future concentrated a substantial part of the 

open contracts in the hands of Berkshire Foods, Inc., Earl E. Barnes and 

customers of Earl E. Barnes, who is an agent and associate broker of Berkshire 

Foods, Inc. The long futures position thus acquired was in excess of the supply 

of refrigerator eggs in Chicago available for delivery. The resulting "squeeze" 

was aided, the complaint charges, by the purchasing and holding of November 

futures during part of the period involved by certain other traders who, 

although not customers of Berkshire Foods, Inc., were closely identified with 

respondent Harold W. Fox. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, January 26, 1960, in Room 1200, Board of Trade Building, 

141 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
# C_2011055EN.01001202.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 December 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-340/09) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/22/EC - Article 4(2) to (5) - Keeping of wild animals - Zoos)

2011/C 55/20

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and D. Recchia, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: B. Plaza Cruz and N. Díaz Abad, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 4(2), (3), (4) and (5) of Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos (OJ 1999 L 94, p. 24)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take, within the period prescribed, all the measures necessary with respect to the zoos which are the subject of the present action in the Autonomous Communities of Aragon, Asturias, the Balearic Islands, the Canary Islands, Cantabria, Castile and Leon, Valencia, Extremadura and Galicia concerning the inspection, licensing and, if appropriate, the closure of those establishments in accordance with Article 4(2), to (5) of Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take, within the period prescribed, all the measures necessary with respect to the zoos which are the subject of the present action in the Autonomous Communities of Aragon, Asturias, the Balearic Islands, the Canary Islands, Cantabria, Castile and Leon, Valencia, Extremadura and Galicia concerning the inspection, licensing and, if appropriate, the closure of those establishments in accordance with Article 4(2), to (5) of Council Directive 1999/22/EC of 29 March 1999 relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.

1

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00189

- CV

Bill Trevino HALL

, Appellants

v.

Jackline ROLLINS

, A ppellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- CI

- 16578 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On May 24, 2021, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record, notifying this

court that the clerk’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record based on the recalculated, corrected

costs.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide pro of to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee.

It is f urther ORDERED that the clerk’s record must be filed no later than ten (10) days after the date appellant’s written proofs are filed with this court. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecu tion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of June, 2021

.___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
II-01043

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Matthew Filipowicz <matt@headzup.tv>

Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:50 AM

dfadefinitions <dfadefinitions@CFTC.gov>

Re: No loopholes in Dodd-Frank

1) Securities and Exchange Commission/Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Commercial Risk (CFTC RIN

3235-AK65, SEC File Number $7-12-10)

Dear Commissioners Shapiro and Gensler: Don’t let the American Bankers Association (ABA) redefine important terms like

"commercial risk" to keep banks that engage in risky derivatives trading from complying with transparency and business

conduct requirements. Commercial risk should not be expanded to include financial risk. Accepting the ABA argument

would open the door for exemptions for risky hedge funds and insurance companies.

2) Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Re: Position Limits (RIN 3038-AD 17 )

Dear Commissioner Gensler: The CFTC needs to set strong position limits to crack down on the energy and food commodity

speculation that serves no productive purpose. I urge the Commission to define limits that will address not only manipulation,

but also excessive speculation, which will require a stricter approach.

3) U.S. Department of the Treasury, Re: FX Swaps (75 FR 66426 Document Number 2010-27274)

Dear Secretary Geithner: Just say "no" to foreign exchange traders who want to exempt foreign currency derivatives from the

clearing and transparency requirements of the

Dodd-Frank Act. $4 trillion dollars a day is traded in these highly-leveraged swaps and this number may increase to over $10

trillion in a decade. As the head of the Financial

Stability Oversight Board your job is to decrease risk in the system, not encourage off-book trading and opaque markets.

Matthew Filipowicz

4414 N Maplewood Ave

Chicago, IL 60625
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Proposed Rulemaking Q & A 

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking? 

The goal of the proposed rulemaking is to implement financial resources requirements for DCOs in accordance 

with DCO Core Principle B, which has been revised by the Dodd-Frank Act. The proposed rulemaking would also 

establish additional or enhanced financial resources requirements for SIDCOs, in anticipation of the possible 

designation by the Financial Stability Oversight Council of certain DCOs as systemically important. 

Financial resources requirements are important because, in the event of a default by one of a DCO’s clearing 

members, the DCO would continue to have obligations to other clearing members and therefore must have 

sufficient resources to meet those obligations in a timely fashion. A DCO also needs sufficient financial resources 

to cover its operating costs in the ordinary course of business.

What clearinghouses are covered by the proposed regulations? 

The proposed rulemaking would apply to all clearinghouses registered with the CFTC as DCOs. Certain provisions 

in the regulations would only apply to those DCOs that are designated as systemically important by the Financial 

Stability Oversight Council.

How does the proposal differ between SIDCOs and non-systemically important DCOs? 

A SIDCO would remain subject to the requirements that are applicable to non-systemically important DCOs, but in 

addition, would have to comply with two higher standards. The proposed rulemaking would require a SIDCO to 

maintain sufficient financial resources to meet its financial obligations to its clearing members notwithstanding a 

default by the clearing members creating the two largest financial exposures for the SIDCO in extreme but plausible 

market conditions. A non-systemically important DCO would be required to have sufficient financial resources to 

be able to withstand a potential default by one of its clearing members. 

The proposed rulemaking also would prohibit a SIDCO from counting the value of assessments to meet the 

obligations arising from a default by the clearing member creating the single largest financial exposure. However, a 

SIDCO would be able to count the value of assessments, after a 30 percent haircut, to meet up to 20 percent of the 

obligations arising from a default by the clearing member creating the second largest financial exposure. This is the 

standard proposed for non-systemically important DCOs in connection with the largest potential exposure.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc., a Florida
      corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Ashvin Mascarenhas, President and Chief Financial of the Company,
      certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------










/s/
      Ashvin Mascarenhas


Ashvin
      Mascarenhas,


President
      and


Chief
      Financial Officer


October
      4, 2006
Joseph E. CARLIN, petitioner, v. Jeffrey BEZOS, et al.

No. 16-5047.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
No. 634, Misc.

#### Thomas *v.*Furness (Pacific) Limited et al.

C. A. 9th Cir.

*Herbert Resner*for petitioner.

*Farnham P. Griffiths*for respondents.

Certiorari deniéd.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation
(BKFC) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin J. Gerrety, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of BKFC, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of BKFC.



/s/ Martin J. GerretyMartin J. GerretyTreasurer and Assistant SecretaryMarch 10, 2006
Jovica PETROVIC, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5525.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2010051EN.01002901.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 November 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-206/09) (1)

1

2010/C 51/53

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 180, 1.8.2009.

1

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2816

_____________________________ G REGORY H ARRIS ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Judge T HOMAS R EBULL , Assistant State Attorney G RISKA M ENA R ODRIGUEZ , Assistant S tate Attorney S TEVEN D EMANOVICH , Assistant State Attorney N ATALIE S NYDER , Assistant Public Defender K ELLY F OSTER , Regional Counsel J ELANI D AVIS and J OHNNY B ROUDY , Respondent s

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Juris diction

.

August 22, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

. R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Gregory Harris, pro se
, Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent State of Florida.

No appearance for Respondent s Judge Thomas Rebull, Assistant State Attorney Griska Mena Rodriguez, Assistant State Attorney Steven Dema novich, Assistant State Attorney Natalie Snyder, Assistant Public Defender Kelly Foster, Regional Counsel Jelani Davis or Johnny Broudy

.
Neil PARROTT, et al., Appellants, v. Linda H. LAMONE, et al.

No. 16-588.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Motion of The Campaign Legal Center, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is dismissed for want a jurisdiction.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
                              A Nevada Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of International Building Technologies
Group,  Inc.  ("Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Kenneth Yeung, Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: March 30, 2010                      /s/  Kenneth Yeung
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Kenneth Yeung
                                      Its: Chief Financial Officer