alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1755 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1755

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 8, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 3082) making appropriations for military 
construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes, with the Senate 
amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of any 
point of order, a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations 
or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment with the amendment 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 
The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion 
shall be debatable for one hour, with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations and 
20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption without intervening 
motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2010134EN.01001401.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/14

---

Order of the Court of 21 January 2010 — Iride SpA, Iride Energia SpA v European Commission

(Case C-150/09 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Aid declared compatible with the common market on condition that its recipient repays earlier aid declared unlawful - Compatibility with Article 87(1) EC - Errors of law - Distortion of the appellants’ arguments - Failure to state grounds - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2010/C 134/21

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Iride SpA, Iride Energia SpA (represented by: L. Radicati di Brozolo, M. Merola and T. Ubaldi, avvocati)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Righini and G. Conte, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

APPEAL against the judgment of 11 February 2009 in Case T-25/07 Iride SpA and Iride Energia SpA, by which the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/941/EC of 8 November 2006 concerning State aid C 11/06 (ex N 127/05) which Italy is planning to implement for AEM Torino (OJ 2006 L 366, p. 62) in the form of subsidies intended to reimburse ‘stranded’ costs incurred in the energy sector, in so far as, first, the conclusion of that decision is that the aid constitutes State aid and/or, secondly, that decision makes payment of the aid subject to the condition that AEM Torino reimburse unlawful aid previously granted under the regime for undertakings known as ‘municipalizzate’ (local administrative bodies)

Iride SpA and Iride Energia SpA

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Iride SpA and Iride Energia SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iride SpA and Iride Energia SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 153, 04.07.2009.

1

---
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1834/2004

of 21 October 2004         

altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1772/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, undenatured and exported in the natural state, as fixed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1772/2004 are hereby altered to the amounts shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 October 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 316, 15.10.2004, p. 58.

----

ANNEX

AMENDED AMOUNTS OF REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 22 OCTOBER 2004

----

(1)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 %, the refund amount applicable shall be calculated in accordance with Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

----
##### 



Exhibit 10.35
 RENT SCHEDULE
EXHIBIT A
  APEX
TESTING CORP.
 3155 East Patrick Lane, Suite 12, Las Vegas NV 89120
  Cam
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    TOTALDate
    
    Square Ft
    
    Rents
    
    Cam**
    
    RENT01-July-2006
- 31-December-2006
    
    
    3,444
    
    
    $
    2,499.32
    
    
    $
    398.88
    
    
    $2,898.20 Per Mo.01-January-2007 - 31-December-2007
    
    
    3,444
    
    
    $
    2,574.30
    
    
    $
    398.88
    
    
    $2,973.18  Per Mo.
 
 **
    
    Cams are subject to change /s/ Bill
McDonald                                6/14/2006Bill McDonald                                      Date
    
    
    MCM Legacy LP
    
    DatePresident
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1490/2004

of 20 August 2004         

determining the world market price for unginned cotton

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Protocol 4 on cotton, annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2001 (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 of 22 May 2001 on production aid for cotton (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The world price for unginned cotton as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 is hereby determined as equalling 19,843 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 August 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 210, 3.8.2001, p. 10. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1486/2002 (OJ L 223, 20.8.2002, p. 3).

----
Roger Harold PETERMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5074.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated May 19, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-210236) of Smart Trust 244, comprising
Smart Trust, Sustainable Impact Investing Trust, Series 6.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


May 19, 2016
Jesse Jay WALKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6421.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
IV 

House Calendar No. 251 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1755 

[Report No. 111–675] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 3082) 

making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2010, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2010 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the 

bill (H.R. 3082) making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2010, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 3082) making appropriations for military construc4 tion, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related 

5 agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 1755 RH 

1 and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment there2 to, and to consider in the House, without intervention of 

3 any point of order, a motion offered by the chair of the 

4 Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the 

5 House concur in the Senate amendment with the amend6 ment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules ac7 companying this resolution. The Senate amendment and 

8 the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall 

9 be debatable for one hour, with 40 minutes equally divided 

10 and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 

11 of the Committee on Appropriations and 20 minutes 

12 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

13 minority member of the Committee on Energy and Com14 merce. The previous question shall be considered as or15 dered on the motion to final adoption without intervening 

16 motion. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

House Calendar No. 251 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1755 

[Report No. 111–675] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendother purposes. fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the tions for military construction, the Department ment to the bill (H.R. 3082) making appropriaDECEMBER 8, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43924

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

LUCOUS L. INMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 655

Filed: August 24, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bonner County. Hon. Richard S. Christensen, District Judge. 

Appeal from order revoking probation, dismissed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Lucous L. Inman pled guilty to burglary, Idaho Code § 18-1401. The district court 

imposed a unified sentence of four years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year,

suspended the sentence and placed Inman on supervised probation. Subsequently, Inman 

admitted to violating several terms of his probation, and the district court revoked probation, 

ordered execution of the underlying sentence, and retained jurisdiction. Following the period of

retained jurisdiction, the district court suspended the sentence and placed Inman on probation. 

On appeal, “mindful of the fact that he has been subsequently returned to probation,” Inman

continues to assert that the district court erred in revoking probation and retaining jurisdiction. 
2

A case becomes moot when the issues presented are no longer live or the defendant lacks 

a legally cognizable interest in the outcome. Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 481 (1982); 

Bradshaw v. State, 120 Idaho 429, 432, 816 P.2d 986, 989 (1991). Even where a question is 

moot, there are three exceptions to the mootness doctrine: (1) when there is the possibility of 

collateral legal consequences imposed on the person raising the issue; (2) when the challenged 

conduct is likely to evade judicial review and thus is capable of repetition; and (3) when an 

otherwise moot issue raises concerns of substantial public interest. State v. Barclay, 149 Idaho 6, 

8, 232 P.3d 327, 329 (2010). The only relief Inman has requested on appeal cannot be granted 

because Inman has been placed back on probation. Therefore, any judicial relief from this Court 

would have no effect on either party. See id.

Accordingly, Inman’s appeal from the order revoking probation is dismissed.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1619 

Honoring the bicentennial ‘‘call for independence’’ that led to the establishments of the independent sovereign nations of Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2010 

Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California (for herself, Ms. RICHARDSON, Mr. 

BACA, Mr. RANGEL, and Mr. MEEK of Florida) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the bicentennial ‘‘call for independence’’ that led 

to the establishments of the independent sovereign nations of Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela. 

Whereas Argentina struggled to secure ‘‘unification, freedom, 

and independence’’ from foreign rule; 

Whereas Chile fought persistently to liberate their country 

with ‘‘reason and force’’ and Chile’s war of independence 

succeeded after its three-part revolutionary history, 

patria vieja, reconquista, and patria nueva; 

Whereas Colombia battled fervently for ‘‘liberty, order and 

glory’’ to achieve sovereignty; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1619 IH 

Whereas Mexico organized to create an independent country 

after el grito de Dolores; 

Whereas Venezuela moved to secure independence for a nation under ‘‘god and federation for its brave people’’; 

Whereas the independence of Brazil, Costa Rica, El Salvador, 

Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua is celebrated in the 

month of September; and 

Whereas there are millions of people in the United States 

who trace their roots to these Latin America countries: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) acknowledges 1810 as a critical year for the 

3 people of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa 

4 Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, 

5 Nicaragua, and Venezuela towards their march for 

6 independence as part of Hispanic Heritage Month 

7 commemorations; 

8 (2) recognizes the numerous contributions that 

9 these Latin American countries have made; and 

10 (3) looks forward to closer collaboration and 

11 stronger ties between the people of the Americas in 

12 confronting the many shared challenges in our hemi13 sphere throughout the next 200 years. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Edward Hugh OKUN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-7608.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Clear-Lite Holdings, Inc., for the period ending January 31, 2010, I,
Thomas J. Irvine, Principal Executive Officer of Clear-Lite Holdings, Inc.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:
 
 1.
Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2010,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended January 31, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Clear-Lite Holdings,
Inc.
 
 
 Date:  
March 17, 2010
 
 /s/
Thomas J.
Irvine
 Thomas J.
Irvine
 Principal
Executive Officer
William Thomas BARNES, petitioner, v. Hubert CORPENING, Administrator, Marion Correctional Center.

No. 16-6159.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RT01-34-002; RT01-75-003]


Southwest Power Pool, Inc.; Entergy Services, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing

June 13, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 5, 2001, Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) 
submitted an errata to the compliance filing required by the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission's March 28, 2001 Order in the proceeding 
captioned above.
    Copies of this filing were served on all parties included on the 
Commission's official service lists established in this proceeding, as 
well as on affected state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 18, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15382 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Kelly Patrick RIGGS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA.

No. 16-6597.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Dominique Damor CORNEJO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6595.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 US.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended.  The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         July 2, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jon M. Ranhand, Scientist Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5E03, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program; 93.864; Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 18, 2001.

Anna P. Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-15756  Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1334 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1334

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                           May 6, 2010.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Owens (to rank immediately after Mr. Murphy of 
New York).
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Patrick Murphy of Pennsylvania.
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Garamendi (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Owens), Mr. Boswell (to rank immediately after Mr. Garamendi), Mr. Johnson of 
Georgia (to rank immediately after Mr. Boren).
    Committee on Foreign Affairs: Mr. Deutch (to rank immediately after Mr. 
McMahon).
    Committee on Homeland Security: Mr. Owens (to rank immediately after Ms. 
Titus).
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Deutch (to rank immediately after Ms. Chu), 
Mr. Polis.
    Committee on Natural Resources: Mr. Lujan (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Heinrich).
    Committee on Science and Technology: Mr. Garamendi (to rank immediately 
after Mr. Peters).
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Johnson of Georgia.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```