© CCH. All rights reserved. Originally published in the CCH Commodity Futures Law Reporter. Reposted by the CFTC with 

permission. Such reposting does not constitute or imply endorsement by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission of the 

accuracy of the reposted material or of any summaries thereof. 

1

Commodity Futures Archive - Selected materials, CFTC Interpretative Letter 

No. 84-4. (Regulation as a Commodity Pool Operator)., ¶22,022, Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission, (Feb. 24, 1984)

¶22,022. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Division of Trading and Markets. February 24, 1984. 

Correspondence in full text.

Commodity Pools: Commodity Pool Operators: Registration: Investment Companies..– A diversified, open-end 

investment company would be eligible for exemption under proposed Commission Rule 4.5 of certain otherwise 

regulated persons for registration as a commodity pool operator and from the provisions of Subpart B of Part 4 of the 

Commission Regulations inasmuch as the option growth trust is a registered investment company; will engage in stock 

index commodity interest transactions solely for bona fide hedging purposes; will not deposit as initial margin or 

premiums for its commodity interest transactions more than 5% of the market value of its total assets; will not be, and 

has not been, marketed as a commodity pool or otherwise as a vehicle for trading in the commodity interest markets; 

and will disclose in writing to its prospective participants the purpose of and the limitations on the scope of its 

commodity interest trading.

See ¶4400, "Definitions" division, Volume 1.

This is in response to your letter dated November 2, 1983, 1 as supplemented by the prospectus dated September 1, 

1983 (the “Prospectus”) enclosed therewith, in which you requested an opinion that “T” (the “Trust”) would not be a 

“commodity pool operator” (“CPO”) as defined in Section 2(a)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended 

(the “Act”), 7 U.S.C. §2 (1982), nor a “pool” as defined in Rule 4.10(d) of the Commissions regulations, 17 C.F.R. 

§4.10(d) (1983).

From the representations made in your letter, as supplemented, we understand the facts to be as follows: The Trust is a 

diversified, open-end investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The investment 

objective of the Trust is “to obtain as high a level of total return as is consistent with reasonable risk,” by investing in 

U.S. and foreign common stocks and trading in certain options on these stocks.

The Trust now seeks to engage in certain stock index commodity interest transactions. These transactions would, 

however, be subject to certain limitations. The Prospectus, at pages 8-9, sets forth, among others, the following 

limitations:

The Trust will not engage in transactions in stock index futures contracts or related options for speculation but 

only as a hedge against changes resulting from market conditions in the values of securities held in the Trust's 

portfolio or which it intends to purchase and where the transactions are economically appropriate to the 

reduction of risks inherent in the ongoing management of the Trust.... The Trust may not purchase or sell stock 

index futures or purchase related options if immediately thereafter the sum of the amount of margin deposits on 

the Trust's existing futures positions and premiums paid for related options would exceed 5% of the market value 

of the Trust's total assets....

[Further,] over the long term, [the Trust's] sale of stock index futures and purchase of put options on stock index 

futures, for the purposes of protecting its portfolio against declines in value, will represent a substantial majority 

(approximately 75%) of the Trust's use of stock index futures and related options for all purposes.

On February 2, 1984, the Commission issued proposed Rule 4.5, which would exempt certain otherwise regulated 

persons from registration as a CPO and from the provisions of Subpart B of Part 4 of the Commission's regulations. 

2 See 49 Fed. Reg. 4778 (February 8, 1984). Based upon our review of the representations you have made to us, it 

appears that the Trust would be eligible for this proposed exemption inasmuch as the Trust: (1) is among the persons 

and qualifying entities covered by the proposal— i.e., it is a registered investment company; (2) will engage in stock 

index commodity interest transactions solely for bona fide hedging purposes; 3 (3) will not deposit as initial margin or 

premiums for its commodity interest transactions more than 5% of the market value of its total assets; (4) will not be, 

and has not been, marketed as a commodity pool or otherwise as a vehicle for trading in the commodity interest 

markets; and (5) will disclose in writing to its prospective participants the purpose of and the limitations on the scope of 

its commodity interest trading.

Accordingly, this Division will not recommend that the Commission take any enforcement action against “T” for failure 

to register as a CPO or to comply with the provisions of Subpart B and Part 4 of the Commission's regulations. 4 This 

position is, however, subject to the condition that the Trust will comply with Rule 4.5 as adopted by the Commission or 

with any other such rule that the Commission may adopt to exempt certain otherwise regulated persons from regulation 
© CCH. All rights reserved. Originally published in the CCH Commodity Futures Law Reporter. Reposted by the CFTC with 

permission. Such reposting does not constitute or imply endorsement by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission of the 

accuracy of the reposted material or of any summaries thereof. 

2

as a CPO. 5 Therefore, this position will cease upon the effective date of Rule 4.5 or of such other rule.

In this connection, we note that previously we have issued opinions to certain registered investment companies that they 

would not be pools within the meaning and intent of Rule 4.10(d) based upon representations similar to those made by 

the Trust. 6 However, in light of the Commission's recent proposal in this area, we believe that such a “no-action” 

position is the appropriate relief that should be afforded at this time. We further note that with respect to such 

investment companies and the filing of certain notices proposed in Rule 4.5, the Commission has stated:

[We do] not believe that it should be necessary for the recipients of such interpretative letters to, in effect, 

“re-submit” an application for exemption— i.e., to file an initial notice of eligibility—in the event the proposal is 

adopted. However, to insure that these person (and entities) would be in compliance with the requirements of the 

proposed rule, the Commission intends to take the position that such persons must file supplemental notices in 

the event that any of the representations they previously had made to the Commission changed or that, to the 

extent that the proposal would require any additional representations, they were not in compliance with them. 

This position would ensure equal treatment of’ all persons claiming exemption under the rule. 49 Fed. Reg. 4778 

at 4782-83.

We believe, and intend to recommend, that the Commission should take this same position with respect to the Trust.

You should be aware that the position we have taken in this letter does not excuse the Trust from compliance with any 

otherwise applicable requirements contained in the Act or in the Commission's regulations thereunder. For example, it 

remains subject to the anti-fraud provisions of Section 4 o of the Act, 7 U.S.C. §6 o (1982), and to the reporting 

requirements for traders set forth in Parts 15, 18 and 19 of the Commission's regulations, 17 C.F.R. Parts 15, 18 and 19 

(1983), as amended.

The position we have taken herein is based upon the representations that have been made to us. Any different, changed 

or omitted facts or conditions might require us to reach different conclusions. In this connection, we request that you 

notify us immediately in the event the Trust's operations and activities change in any way from that as represented to us.

Footnotes

1 Your letter addressed to the Office of the General Counsel was referred to this Division for reply.

2 Section 4m(1) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. §6m(1) (1982), requires each person who comes within the CPO definition to 

register as a CPO with the Commission. The provisions of Subpart B of Part 4 concern the operational, disclosure, 

reporting and recordkeeping requirements of registered CPOs. See 17 C.F.R. §§4.20-4.23 (1983), as amended by 

48 Fed. Reg. 35248 (August 3, 1983).

3 As evidence of its intent to trade stock index commodity interests solely for bona fide hedging purposes, and as 

stated more fully above, the Trust contemplates that a substantial majority of its commodity interest trading will 

consist of sales of stock index futures contracts and purchases of put options on stock index futures contracts. We 

note that this restriction may be different from the restriction the Commission has proposed to evidence such 

intent— i.e., that (1) all transactions be entered into with the requisite intent, and (2) a substantial majority of all 

anticipatory hedge transactions entered into each year are in fact completed. See 49 Fed. Reg. 4778 at 4782.

4 Inasmuch as proposed Rule 4.5 would provide exemption for a registered investment company and any principal 

or employee thereof, the position we are taking herein also would apply to any principal or employee of the 

Trust— e.g., its officers.

5 For example, the rule as adopted may or may not contain the same standards and indicia of bona fide hedging 

transactions and positions contained in the rule as proposed. Moreover, to the extent that the rule as adopted is 

less restrictive than the rule as proposed—with respect to the standards and inclicia of bona fide hedging 

transactions and positions or to any other aspect of the proposal—the Trust would be able to trade commodity 

interests subject to such other restrictions provided, of course, that such trading is conducted in accordance with 

the rule as adopted.

6 See Pension Hedge Fund Inc., Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶21,908 (available November 3, 1983); SteinRoe Bond 

Fund, Inc., Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶21,906 (available October 21, 1983); Prudential-Bache Option Growth 

Fund, Inc., Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶21,905 (available September 13, 1983). See also Piedmont Income Fund, 

Inc., Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶21,910 (available November 21, 1983).