alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33128-33129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15532]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 12, 2001.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 20, 2001 
to be assured of consideration.

Departmental Offices/Office of Financial Institutions Policy

    OMB Number: 1505-0179.
    Form Number: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Financial Subsidiaries (Interim Final Rule).
    Description: Pursuant to Section 5136A(b)(3) of the Revised 
Statutes, the interim rule finds three general types of activities to 
be financial in nature, and creates a mechanism by which national banks 
or others may request that the Secretary define particular activities 
within one of the three categories.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 5.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 20 hours.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 100 hours.

    OMB Number: 1505-0182.
    Form Number: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Merchant Banking Investments.
    Description: The rule requires financial holding companies engaged 
in merchant banking activities to have and maintain certain policies, 
procedures, records and systems to monitor and manage such activities 
and the risks associated with such activities in a safe and sound 
manner.

[[Page 33129]]

    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 450.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Recordkeeper: 50 hours.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Recordkeeping Burden: 22,500 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Lois K. Holland (202) 622-1563, Departmental 
Offices, Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20220.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-15532 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RT01-74-003]

                    Take notice that on June 11, 2001, Carolina Power & Light Company                           ( print page 33065)                        (CP&L), Duke Energy Corporation (Duke), and South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G), collectively the Applicants, tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), on behalf of GridSouth Transco, LLC (GridSouth), a revised pro forma GridSouth Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) tariff sheet intended to comply with the Commission's May 30, 2001 order in the above-referenced docket, 95 FERC ¶61,282 (2001).                 

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 22, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr., 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15505  Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1724 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1724

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 1, 2010.
Whereas, for more than 50 years, the community of Jacksonville, Arkansas, has 
        supported and served the members of the Armed Forces and their families 
        at Little Rock Air Force Base;
Whereas, after September 11, 2001, Little Rock Air Force Base restricted access 
        to much of the community for security reasons, and in response to the 
        tragedy and the restrictions caused by the terrorist attacks of 
        September 11, 2001, the community and air base came together to address 
        a need for a new education facility for both military members and 
        civilians;
Whereas, recognizing the need to raise funds for a new educational facility, the 
        City Council of Jacksonville, Arkansas, held a special election in which 
        the citizens of Jacksonville overwhelmingly voted to adopt a temporary 
        one-cent sales tax, which raised $5,000,000;
Whereas these funds were donated to the Air Force to help build a new Joint 
        Education Center on Federal property outside the base perimeter, so that 
        the facility could be accessible to community people, students, and 
        faculty, as well as air base personnel;
Whereas, in 2009, local individuals and businesses raised over $50,000 for the 
        base's 2010 Air show and more than $22,000 was donated in support of 
        Little Rock Air Force Base rodeo teams that compete at McChord Air Force 
        Base;
Whereas community leaders sponsor numerous events, including dances and 
        community sporting and musical events, for members of the Armed Forces 
        and their families at Little Rock Air Force Base and provide discounted 
        or free tickets;
Whereas the community sponsors a quarterly dinner for families of deployed 
        members and over 15,000 volunteer hours are provided by retirees at the 
        Airman's Attic, the Base Clinic, the Retirees Activities Office, and 
        other base activities; and
Whereas, on March 3, 2009, the City of Jacksonville, Arkansas, was awarded the 
        Abilene Trophy, which honors a civilian community for exceptional 
        support of Air Mobility Command base at Little Rock Air Force Base: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends the City of 
Jacksonville, Arkansas, for its outstanding support in creating a unique and 
lasting partnership with Little Rock Air Force Base, members of the Armed Forces 
stationed there, and their families.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on May 23, 2001, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Center for Manufacturing Sciences (NCMS): Advanced Embedded Passives Technology has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, SAS Circuits, Inc., Littleton, CO has been  added as a party to this venture. Also, HADCO Corporation, Salem, NH and Ormet Corporation, Carlsbad, CA have been dropped as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and National Center for Manufacturing Sciences (NCMS): Advanced Embedded Passives Technology intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On October 7, 1998, National Center for Manufacturing Sciences (NCMS): Advanced Embedded Passives Technology filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on January 22, 1999 (64 FR 3571).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 5, 1999. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 21, 2000 (65 FR 15176).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 01-15672 Filed 6-21-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10554

Summary Calendar

 

HORACE JEFFERY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NFN KEENE; NFN PAUL;

NFN GENTRY; R. MORRELL,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:98-CV-51-X

- - - - - - - - - -

October 2, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Horace Jeffery, Texas prisoner # 669340, seeks leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the dismissal as frivolous of

his civil rights claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

By moving for IFP, Jeffery is challenging the district court’s

certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal

because his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v.

Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Because Jeffery has

not demonstrated that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on 
No. 98-10554

-2-

appeal, his motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

Jeffery is cautioned that any future frivolous appeals or

pleadings filed by him or on his behalf will invite the

imposition of sanctions. Jeffery should review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

Jeffery has filed several motions, including one for

appointment of counsel. All of these motions are DENIED.

IFP DENIED; MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION

WARNING ISSUED.
Tony Bernard ALEXANDER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6464.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2489]

Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of these document are available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by July 3, 2001. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired.

*Subject:*                     Amendment FM Table of Allotments, Order to Show Cause [MM Docket No. 80-120].                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

*Subject:*                     Amendment FM Table of Allotments, Order to Show Cause [MM Docket No. 91-352].                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

*Subject:*                     Amendment of the FM Table of Allotments [MM Docket No. 90-195].                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

*Subject:*                     Amendment of the FM Table of Allotments [MM Docket No. 92-214].                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15317 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
C. Ray NAGIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-8880.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

*42Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Division of Clearing and Risk ♦ 202-418-5430

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Proposed Rules Regarding Margin for Uncleared Swaps

Would the proposed rules impose margin requirements on commercial end users?

No. The rule requires a swap dealer (SD) or major swap participant (MSP) to collect margin if its counterparty is another 

SD/MSP or a financial entity other than an SD/MSP. An SD/MSP would collect initial and variation margin from a nonfinancial end user only to the extent the parties had mutually agreed to this in their privately-negotiated credit support 

arrangements.

What products would the proposed rules cover?

The rules would apply to uncleared swaps entered into after the effective date of the regulation. The proposal would not apply 

retroactively.

Did the Commission consult with other US authorities in developing these rules?

Yes. Staff of the Commission consulted with staff of the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Farm Credit Administration, and the Federal Housing Finance 

Agency (collectively, the Prudential Regulators) in developing these rules. Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission 

also participated in these consultations. The proposed rules of the Commission and the Prudential Regulators are very similar.

Are the proposed rules similar to international standards?

Yes. The proposed rules are very similar to the standards issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the 

International Organization of Securities Commissions in September of 2013. In a few instances the Commission and the 

Prudential Regulators are stricter. For example the international standards would permit limited rehypothecation of initial 

margin. The proposed rules would prohibit it.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,482

EX PARTE TED PATRICK CAMMACK, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 15,013 IN THE 115 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM UPSHUR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that he was denied the right to appeal his conviction.

Both trial counsel and appellate counsel have submitted affidavits responding to Applicant’s

allegation. Trial counsel states that he inadvertently failed to timely file a motion for new trial and

erroneously informed appellate counsel that such a motion was filed. Appellate counsel states that
2

he relied on trial counsel’s assertion that a motion for new trial had been filed and therefore missed

the deadline for timely filing a notice of appeal. We find, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity

to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 15,013 from the 115th

Judicial District Court of Upshur County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may

give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful

appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which

the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he

must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the

mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: January 26, 2011

Do Not Publish
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, et al., petitioners, v. ACORDA THERAPEUTICS, et al.

No. 16-360.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 9, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                              AS OF MARCH 31, 1998




1.       Just Like Home, Inc., a Florida corporation

2.       Just Like Family, Inc., a Florida corporation

3.       Just Like Home IV, Inc. , a Florida corporation (Inactive)

4.       Project Market Decisions, Inc., a Nevada corporation

5.       Just Like Home Corporate Center, Inc., a Florida corporation

6.       JLH Series I, Inc., a Florida corporation

7.       JLH Management Corp., a Florida corporation

8.       JLH Franchising Corp., a Florida corporation

9.       Edgewood Double Drive, Inc., a Florida corporation

10.      JLH Realty, Inc., an Ohio corporation

11.      Charis Place, Inc., a Florida corporation
Michael M. MURRAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6238.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
      23.4





**Consent
      of Schlumberger DCS**





We
      hereby
      consent to the use of the name Data & Consulting Services (DCS) Division of
      Schlumberger Technology Corporation, the reference to our reserve estimate
      report for Aurora Oil & Gas Corporation (f/k/a Cadence Resources
      Corporation) (the "Company") dated February 14, 2008, and the use of information
      contained therein in the Form 10-K to be filed on or about March 7, 2008. We
      also consent to the incorporation by reference of the Form 10-K containing
      the
      foregoing into the Form 3 Registration Statements filed by the Company on
      December 21, 2007 (File Nos. 333-129695 and 333-130769) and any amendments
      to
      these Form 3 Registration Statements.





Pittsburgh,
      Pennsylvania


March
      7,
      2008


SCLUMBERGER
                DCS/s/
                Charles M. Boyer IICharles
                M. Boyer II, P.G.Operations
                ManagerPittsburgh
                Consulting Services