[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 18

- 14256 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:17

- cv - 00211

- MTT

- CHW

TRAVIS JONATHAN MITCHELL, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus WARDEN, B ALDWIN STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants,
LARRY JORDAN, Deputy Warden of Security, Baldwin State Prison, CAPTAIN DEXTER SPIKES, Baldwin S tate Prison, Defendants

- Appellees.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

________________ ________ ( September 18, 2019) Case: 18-14256 Date Filed: 09/18/2019 Page: 1 of 42 Before MARCUS , WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Travis Mitchell, a federal prisoner , appeals pro se the dismissal without prejudice of his complaint against Deputy Warden Larry Jordan and Captain Dexter Spikes of the Bald win State Prison. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Mitchell complained that the offic er s exhibited deliberate in difference to his safety by failing to confiscate a contraband weapon that another inmate used to stab him , but the
district court ruled that Mitchell had failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See id

. § 1997e(a). We affirm.
We review de novo a dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies

. Johnson v. Meadows , 418 F.3d 1152, 1155 (11th Cir. 2005). The Act
state s that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). The failure to exhaust administrative remedies requires dismissal of a civil action

. See Chandler v. Crosby , 379 F.3d 1278, 1286 (11th Cir. 2005).
U nder the standard operating procedures of the Georgia Department of Corrections, a prisoner must file a grievance no later than 10 calendar days from the date he knew, or should have known, the facts supporting his grievance. Offic er s must respond to the grievance within 40 days, subject to a 10

- day

Case: 18-14256 Date Filed: 09/18/2019 Page: 2 of 43 e xtension. The failure to respond is treated as a denial that can be appealed

. The prisoner must appeal within “7 calendar days” of the date that he receives the

re sponse , that he receives a decision on his grievance, or that the time for a decision expires. The operating procedures waive the requirement to appeal for grievances that allege “sexual assault and physical force involving non

- compliance with Department policies” because those grievances are automatically referred to the Internal Investiga tions Unit. T he operating procedures define “physical force involving non

- compliance” as “staff use of force” that violates the “intent of and the purpose of written policy and procedures” of the Department. The district court did not err by dismissing Mit chell’s complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust. The district court accepted as true Mitchell’s allegation that he gave an officer in the infirmary a grievance on December 1 7 , 2015, which was 7 days after h is stabb ing

. S ee Turner v. Burnside , 54 1 F.3d 1077,
108 3 (11th Cir. 2008)

. But Mitchell never appealed after the deadline expired for Deputy Warden Jordan and Captain Spikes to file a respon se . Mitchell argued that he did not have to appeal because his grievance involved the use of physical force in violation of department policies, but that exception d id not apply to Mitchell because he was injured by an inmate, not by a prison officer. Mitchell filed a second grievance about the s tabbing on February 4, 2016, on the ground that he

“ never got [a] receipt” that verifi ed the fil ing of his first grievance. After t he

Case: 18-14256 Date Filed: 09/18/2019 Page: 3 of 44 Warden denied Mitchell’s second grievance on May 10, 2016, Mitchell allowed the 7

- day deadline to appeal to expire before he filed an appeal on May 20, 2016.
We AFFIRM the d ismissal of Mitchell’s complaint. Case: 18-14256 Date Filed: 09/18/2019 Page: 4 of 4