alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

The following notice of scheduled meetings is published pursuant to the provisions of the 

Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

TIMES AND DATES: 

The Commission has scheduled meetings for the following dates:

December 5, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.

December 20, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.

January 5, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.

PLACE: 

Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St., NW., 

Washington, DC

Conference Center (Room 1300)

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The Commission has scheduled these meetings to consider various rulemaking matters, including 

the issuance of proposed rules and the approval of final rules. The Commission may also 

consider and vote on dates and times for future meetings. The agenda for the December 5, 2011 

meeting was posted on the Commission’s website at http://www.cftc.gov seven (7) days prior to 

the meeting. The agenda for the December 20, 2011 meeting will be made available to the 

public and posted on the Commission’s website at http://www.cftc.gov at least seven (7) days 

prior to the meeting. In the event that the times or dates of the meetings change, an

announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on 

the Commission’s website.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

David A. Stawick, Secretary of the Commission, 

202–418–5071.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2011– Filed ]

BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             9
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,568
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       28,179
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         28,179
<LOANS>                                      63,847
<ALLOWANCE>                                  432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               101,688
<DEPOSITS>                                   89,644
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,620
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          614
<LONG-TERM>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     309
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               101,688
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,253
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,327
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             51
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,631
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,746
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,798
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,833
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                50
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           (2)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,279
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   958
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                 958
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               4.23
<LOANS-NON>                                  317
<LOANS-PAST>                                 610
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             345
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                4
<RECOVERIES>                                 41
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            432

<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         432
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      0
        

</TABLE>
Martin S. STANCIK, Jr., petitioner, v. DEUTSCHE NATIONAL BANK.

No. 15-9656.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3


                           CERTIFICATION OF CONTROLLER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant at the dates and for the periods indicated. No purchaser or seller of
securities shall be entitled to rely on the foregoing statement for any purpose,
and the undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing
statement except as required by law.



                                                      FIRST FEDERAL CAPITAL CORP


/s/ Kenneth C. Osowski                                           August 13, 2003
Kenneth C. Osowski
Vice President and Controller



                                       40
Stevenson Gilberto HARRISON, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6383.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 50299 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GREGORY DOTSON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:20

- MJ

- 96

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gregory Dotson is charged in a criminal complaint with possession of five grams or more of actual methamphetamine with intent to distribute and felony possession of a firearm. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(viii); 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He appeals the distric t court’s order of detention pending trial. “Absent an error of law, we must uphold a district court’s pretrial detention order if it is supported by the proceedings below, a deferential

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 12, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50299 Document: 00515414047 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2020No. 20

- 50299

2 standard of review that we equate to the abuse

- of

- discretion standa rd.” United States v. Hare , 873 F.2d 796, 798 (5th Cir. 1989) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We review q uestions of law de novo, United States v. Olis , 450 F.3d 583, 585 (5th Cir. 2006), and we review factual findings supporting
an orde r of detention for clear error , United States v. Aron , 904 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1990). Dotson does not dispute that, in light of the drug charge, a rebuttable presumption arises that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure his appearance at trial and the safety of the community. See § 3142(e)(3)(A)

. Although Dotson’s recent behavior during his pretrial release in a related Texas case is relevant to the consideration of his history and characteristics, so, too, is his lengthy criminal history. See § 3142(g)(3). Moreover, Dotson ignores that the charged offenses involve both a controlled substance and a firearm and that his criminal history supports the district court’s finding that his release would pose a danger to the community. See § 3142(g) (1) and (4). The proceedings below amply support Dotson’s pretrial
detention such that the district court did not abuse its discretion, particularly given the applicable presumption against release. See Hare , 873 F.2d at 798; § 3142(e)(3)(A). AFFIRMED. Case: 20-50299 Document: 00515414047 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2020
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: INDIANA FARM BUREAU COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION INC. and LOUIS M. JOHNSTON 

DOCKET NUMBER: 234; 75-14 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

NOTE: LATER BECAME CFTC DOCKET # 75-14 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D.C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 234 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Indiana Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Inc., and Louis M. Johnston 

(Indianapolis, Indiana) 

The complaint charges that Indiana Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Inc., 

and Louis M. Johnston manipulated upward the price of the July 1973 corn future 

on the Chicago Board of Trade on July 20, 1973. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when there has been a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. A determination is considered as having been made when a 

decision of the Administrative Law Judge becomes final or, after appeal, a 

decision is made by the Judicial Officer of the Department. Complaints are 

filed in the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and 

are a matter of public record. Pending disposition of a complaint, it is the 

policy of the CEA not to comment or elaborate on charges contained therein or to 

discuss evidence on which it is based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before an Administrative Law 

Judge in Indianapolis, Indiana, at a place, date, and time to be specified at a 

later date. 

LOAD-DATE: August 6, 2008 
Page 2
Order entered April 3, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00054-CV

FATIMA DOLORES RODAS, Appellant

V.

LA MADELEINE OF TEXAS, INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-04672

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Brown

We DENY appellant’s March 31, 2014 motion for an extension of time to file a notice of 

appeal of the order on the contest to her affidavit of indigence.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Fernando Contreras ALCALA, petitioner, v. Claudia Garcia HERNANDEZ.

No. 16-5965.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          72,796
<SECURITIES>                                    74,656
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,438
<INVENTORY>                                     73,728
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               364,437
<PP&E>                                          95,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 732,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          250,751
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       413,486
<OTHER-SE>                                    (53,648)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   732,691
<SALES>                                        172,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,037
<CGS>                                          129,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,941
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,465)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,877)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         114,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      327
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,179
<PP&E>                                       5,494,570
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,657,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          213,649
<BONDS>                                      3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,444,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,657,749
<SALES>                                        621,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               664,217
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  447,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             116,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                100,499
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,499
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,499
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.85
        

</TABLE>
No. 152.

#### Realty Acceptance Corp. *v.*Montgomery.

October 14, 1935.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the *591Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*Mr. R. Randolph Hicks*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Robert H. Richards*and *Thomas J. Crawford*for respondent.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION, CHARLES W. METCALF, DANIEL F. RICE AND COMPANY, 

DANIEL F. RICE, LAWRENCE J. RYAN, AND PHILIP R. O'BRIEN 

CITATION: 6 Agric. Dec. 415 

DOCKET NUMBER: 34 

DATE: MAY 6, 1947 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER POSTPONING EFFECTIVE DATE OF SANCTIONS 

(A. D. 1482) 

 

In re GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION et al. CEA Doc, No. 34. Decided May 6, 1947. 

Postponement of Effective Date of Sanctions

The effective date of the sanctions ordered against D. F. R. and D. F. R. and 

Company is postponed until further order in connection with the petitions to 

reconsider the order of April 28, 1947, which order shall remain unchanged as to 

the other respondents. 

 

 

Messrs. Rooks and Freeman, of Chicago, Illinois, for Daniel F. Rice and Daniel 

F. Rice & Company. 

 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer

Order Postponing Effective Date of Sanctions

On May 5, 1947, respondents Daniel F. Rice and Daniel F. Rice and Company 

filed petitions to reconsider the order entered in this proceeding on April 28, 

1947. * They also filed motions for suspension and a stay pending disposition 

of the petitions to reconsider. 

* 6 Agric. Dec. 288 (6 A. D. 288). -- Ed. 

Section 0.21 (b) of the rules of practice (17 CFR, Cum. Supp., 0.21 (b)) 

requires the filing by complainant within 20 days of answers to the petitions to 

consider. In view of the time that will necessarily be spent in taking action 

upon the petitions to reconsider, the effective date of the sanctions ordered 

against Daniel F. Rice and Daniel F. Rice and Company, namely the 40th day after 

April 28, 1947, is postponed until further order in connection with the 

petitions to reconsider. The order of April 28, 1947, * remains unchanged as to 

the other respondents. 

* 6 Agric. Dec. 288 (6 A. D.288). -- Ed. 

Copies hereof shall be served upon all parties to the proceeding and upon the 

contract markets. 

 

LOAD-DATE: March 12, 2008 
Page 2
Steven SJURSET, Individually and as Next Friend of N.S. and T.B., petitioner, v. Charles BUTTON, et al.

No. 15-1365.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: LOUIS ROMOFF 

CITATION: 29 Agric. Dec. 777 

DOCKET NUMBER: 166 

DATE: JULY 7, 1970 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STAY ORDER 

(No. 13,286) 

In re Louis ROMOFF. CEA Docket No. 166. Decided July 7, 1970. 

Stay order -- After order on stipulation 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer

STAY ORDER

Respondent has filed a petition for reconsideration of the part of the order 

entered June 12, 1970, ordering contract markets to refuse trading privileges to 

respondent for a period of 30 days. 

Pending action upon the petition, the part of the order referred to above is 

stayed. 

LOAD-DATE: June 10, 2008 
Page 2
GRAMAR, LLC-SERIES OAK, petitioner, v. MP 200 WEST RANDOLPH, LLC.

No. 16-264.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Jay MELLEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PARK POLICE, et al.

No. 16-6361.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.6


 


按期申报协议


Timely Reporting Agreement


 


本按期申报协议(下称“本协议”)由下列各方于2016年4月13日在中华人民共和国(下称“中国”)建德签订:


This Timely Reporting Agreement
(this “Agreement”) has been executed by and among the following parties on 13 April 2016 in Jiande, the People’s
Republic of China (“China” or the “PRC”):


 


甲方:Natural
Destiny Inc.,一家依照美国法律设立和存在的公司地址为CSC
Services of Nevada, Inc. 2215 Renaissance Dr, Las Vegas, NV 89119;


Party
A:Natural Destiny Inc. , an enterprise, organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, with its
registered address at CSC Services of Nevada, Inc. 2215 Renaissance Dr, Las Vegas, NV 89119;


乙方:杭州野之缘农业开发有限公司,一家依照中国法律设立和存在的有限责任公司,地址为建德市新安江街道新安江广场东侧明珠商务大厦1幢902室。


Party
B:Hangzhou Yezhiyuan Agricultural Development Co., Ltd., a limited liability company organized and existing under the
laws of the PRC, with its address at Room 902, Unit 1, Pearl Business
Building, East of Xin’anjiang Square, Xin’anjiang Street, Jiande City.


 


鉴于:


Whereas:


 


乙方知晓甲方股票登记在美国证券交易所(“SEC”),其必须向SEC申报各种综合其运营的报告。乙方了解如果甲方未能按期申报报告将对甲方导致重大的损害。


Party B is aware that Party
A’s securities are registered with the US Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and that it must file various
reports with the SEC that consolidate Party A with its own operations. Party B acknowledges that Party A’s failure to file
timely reports may result in material damages for Party A.


 


双方特此商定按照以下条款签订本协议。


The Parties hereby have mutually
agreed to execute this Agreement upon the following terms.


 


乙方同意其有义务使甲方接触到其高管及董事人员,并且及时提供甲方需要的全部信息使得甲方可以按要求向SEC申报所有必要的和规定的报告。


Party B agrees that it
is obligated to make its officers and directors available to Party A and promptly provide all information required by Party A
so that Party A can file all necessary SEC and other regulatory reports as required.


 


本页其余部分刻意留为空白


The Remainder
of this page is intentionally left blank


 






    


     

    

 


有鉴于此,各方已使得经其授权的代表于文首所述日期签署了本协议并即生效,以昭信守。


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Parties have caused their authorized representatives to execute this Agreement as of the date first above written. 


 


		甲方:	Natural
                                         Destiny Inc.



Party
A: Natural Destiny Inc.


签字:


By:              /s/Jianrong Xia                          


		姓名:	夏建荣








		Name:	Jianrong Xia



职位:      【】


		Title:	【】



 


		乙方:	杭州野之缘农业开发有限公司



Party
B:Hangzhou Yezhiyuan Agricultural Development Co., Ltd.


签字:


By:              /s/
Jianrong Xia                      


		姓名:	夏建荣



		Name:	Jianrong
                                         Xia



职位:.     【】


		Title:	【】
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: DAVID G. HENNER 

DOCKET NUMBER: 161 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA Docket No. 161 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

David G. Henner 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges attempted manipulation and manipulation of prices in 

the November 1968 shell egg future on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. It 

alleges that on June 25, 1968, the respondent intentionally distorted the 

closing prices in that future. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, July 23, 1969, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2