alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1465 

Reaffirming the longstanding friendship and alliance between the United 

States and Colombia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2010 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. MACK, Mr. MARIO DIAZBALART of Florida, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. SIRES, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART

of Florida, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. 

INGLIS, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. 

POE of Texas, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. DREIER, Mr. 

SCHOCK, Mr. PIERLUISI, Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas, and Mr. DANIEL

E. LUNGREN of California) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Reaffirming the longstanding friendship and alliance between 

the United States and Colombia. 

Whereas nearly 15,000,000 Colombians participated in the 

first round of Colombia’s presidential elections on May 

30, 2010; 

Whereas no candidate received an outright majority of the 

vote, thereby requiring a runoff election between Juan 

Manuel Santos and Antanas Mockus, the two candidates 

with the highest vote totals; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1465 IH 

Whereas Juan Manuel Santos, of the National Unity Party, 

received 46.7 percent of the votes and Antanas Mockus, 

of the Green Party, received 21.5 percent of the votes; 

Whereas in the second round on June 20, 2010, Juan 

Manuel Santos received 69 percent of the votes and was 

thereby declared President-elect of Colombia; 

Whereas Colombia has overcome tremendous challenges to 

build their democracy; and 

Whereas Colombia remains a vital ally and friend of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) reaffirms the longstanding friendship and 

3 alliance between the United States and Colombia; 

4 (2) recognizes Colombia’s commitment to the 

5 democratic process as demonstrated by the free and 

6 fair nature of these multiparty, internationally rec7 ognized elections; and 

8 (3) congratulates President-elect Juan Manuel 

9 Santos on his recent victory in Colombia’s June 20, 

10 2010, presidential election. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PAUL EDWARD JOHNSON,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00156-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20150D05061)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until December 15, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza, the State’s attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 15, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 31

st day of October, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
| **Shareholder Fees - FidelitySystematicMunicipalBondIndexETF-PRO**                         | Dec. 27, 2024 USD ($) |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| FidelitySystematicMunicipalBondIndexETF-PRO | Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF |                  |
| **Shareholder Fees:**                                                                      |                  |
| (fees paid directly from your investment)                                                  | none                  |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Other Expenses
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form N-1A -Section 3 -Subsection table -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph 10
+ Details**Name:**rr_ShareholderFeeOther**Namespace Prefix:**rr_**Data Type:**rr:NonNegativeMonetaryType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**rr_ShareholderFeesAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**rr_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**dei_DocumentInformationDocumentAxis=fmr_FidelitySystematicMunicipalBondIndexETF-PROMember**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
| X                                                                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**dei_LegalEntityAxis=fmr_S000089371Member**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
Scott Lynn DILLARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6274.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 200.

#### Parks *v.*United States.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. W. O. Cooper, Jr.,*for petitioner.

No appearance for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and motion for leave to proceed further *in forma pauperis*denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2013

t0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2013

146782

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Pl aintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146782

COA: 308317

Saginaw CC: 11

- 035523

- FC

ANDREA ROSE MICSAK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Leroy BURTON, III, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 15-9191.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two denied.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Marvel Entertainment, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Isaac PerlmutterIsaac PerlmutterChief Executive Officer
Thomas PAYNE, petitioner, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI, et al.

No. 16-290.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
## I N T H E CO U R T O F CR I MI N A L A PP EA LS O F T E X AS
N O . A P
- 76,351

E X PA R T E D O U G L A S A L B E R T O SA N C H E Z , A ppl i c a nt

ON APP LI CATI ON F OR A W RI T OF HABEAS CO RPUS CAUSE NO . 9 9 7 7 4 7 I N THE 1 8 2 J UDI CI AL DI S TRI CT CO URT ND FRO M H AR RI S CO UN TY

P e r c u r ia m. O P I N I O N Pur s uant t o t he pr ovi s i ons of A r t i cl e 11.07 of

t he Texas C ode of

C r i m i nal Pr oce dur e, t he cl er k of t he t r i al cour t t r ans m i t t ed t o t hi s C our t t hi s appl i ca t i on f or w r i t of habe as cor pus . E

x p a r te Young , 4 1 8 S

. W. 2 d

8 2 4 , 8 2 6 (T ex . C ri m . A

p p . 1 9 6 7 )

. A p p l i cant w as co n v i cted o f ag g rava t ed

sex u al assault o f a ch i l d

an d sen t en ced

t o l i fe i m p ri so n m ent

. T h e F i rst C o urt o f A p p eals aff i rm ed hi s convi ct i on. S

a n c h e zv
. S ta te , N o. 01- 06- 00516- C R ( T ex. A pp. – H ous t on [ 1 D i s t .] , J ul y 6, st 2 0 0 7 )

. A

p p l i cant co n t en d s t h at h i s ap p ell ate co un sel rend e r e d i n e ffect i v e assi st an ce b ecau se co un sel fai l ed t o t i m ely n o t i fy A p p l i cant t h at h i s co n v i cti o nh ad b een aff i rm ed an d fai l ed t o a dv i s e h i m o f h i s r i g h t t o p e t i t i o nf o r d i s c r e t i o n a r yr e v i e w p ro se. T h e tr i al court h as ent ered fi n d i n g s o f fact an d

co n clusi o n s o f l aw

t h at app ell ate co un sel2

f a i l e d t o t i m e l y n o t i f

y Ap p l i c a n t o f h i s r i g h t t o p e t i t i o n f o r d i s c r e t i o n a r yr e v i e w p ro se. S e e Ex par t e W i l s on , 9 5 6 S

. W. 2 d

2 5 (T ex . C ri m . A

p p . 1 9 9 7 ). We fi n d , t h erefore, t h at A p p l i cant i s en t i t l ed t o t he oppor t uni t y t o f

i l e a n out

- of

- t i m e pe t i t i on f

or di s cr et i onar y r evi ew

of t he j udgm ent of

t he Fi r s t C our t of

A ppea l s i n C aus e N o. 01- 06- 00516- C R t hat af f i r m ed hi s convi ct i on i n C aus e N o. 997747 f r om t he 182nd J udi ci al D i s t r i ct C our t of H ar r i s C ount y. A ppl i ca nt s hal l f

i l e hi s pet i t i on fo r d is c re tio n a ry re v ie w w ith th e F ir s t C o urt o f A p p e a ls w ith in 3 0 d a y s o f th e d a te o nw h ic hth is C o urt ’s man d a te issu e s.

D el i ver ed: M ay 19, 2010 D o n o t pu b li sh
Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

www.cftc.gov

Proposed Rulemaking Q & A

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking?

The notice of rulemaking proposes to broaden the scope of Part 160 of the Commission’s regulations to cover two 

new entities created by Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: swap 

dealers and major swap participants.

Which entities are currently subject to Part 160?

Part 160 currently applies to futures commission merchants, retail foreign exchange dealers, commodity trading 

advisors, commodity pool operators, and introducing brokers, regardless of whether they are required to register 

with the CFTC.

Does the Dodd-Frank Act require that the CFTC promulgate the proposed regulations?

The Dodd-Frank Act does not require that the CFTC promulgate proposed regulations. Title X of the Dodd-Frank 

Act includes an amendment to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which affirms the Commission’s jurisdiction 

to promulgate regulations to provide certain protections for nonpublic, consumer information.

What other proposals are included in the proposed rulemaking?

The CFTC also proposes to:

• Rename Part 160 as “Privacy of Consumer Financial Information under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act” to 

harmonize the title of this part with other parts of the Commission’s regulations; and 

• Change all references in Part 160 from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to the Bureau of Consumer 

Financial Protection (Bureau) to reflect the creation of, and transfer of authority from the FTC to, the 

Bureau pursuant to Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act.

When would the proposed regulations become effective?

The CFTC proposes to make the proposed regulations become effective on July 21, 2011, which is the designated 

transfer date of authority from various federal agencies to the Bureau.
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES, petitioners, v. MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE.

No. 16-565.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 12, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00345-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

v.

MICHAEL CLACK

On Appeal from the

28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-CR-3866-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 11, 2014
----

            COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1329/2004

of 19 July 2004         

amending Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 opening and providing for the administration of autonomous Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural and industrial products

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 26 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quotas listed in the Annex are hereby added to Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 with effect from 1 July 2004.

Article 2

For the quota period from 1 January to 31 December 2004, in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2505/96, the quota amount of the tariff quota 09.2950 is fixed at 8 400 tonnes.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 July 2004.

For the Council

The President

C. VEERMAN            

----

(1)OJ L 345, 31.12.1996, p. 1. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 226/2004 (OJ L 39, 11.2.2004, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

----

(1)  Control of the use for this special purpose shall be carried out pursuant to the relevant Community provisions.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1719 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1719

Recognizing the cultural and religious significance of Eid al-Adha and 
  wishing Muslim-Americans and Muslims around the world a prosperous 
                                holiday.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2010

    Mr. Honda (for himself, Mr. Carson of Indiana, and Mr. Ellison) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                   on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the cultural and religious significance of Eid al-Adha and 
  wishing Muslim-Americans and Muslims around the world a prosperous 
                                holiday.

Whereas Eid al-Adha, or the Festival of the Sacrifice, is an Islamic holiday 
        which honors Abraham's symbolic sacrifice of his son to God, as 
        referenced in the Quran, Old Testament, and New Testament;
Whereas Abraham is a respected figure in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam;
Whereas for more than 14 centuries, Eid al-Adha has been observed;
Whereas Eid al-Adha is a holiday of great importance to millions of Muslim-
        Americans and approximately 1,500,000,000 Muslims around the world;
Whereas during Eid al-Adha, Muslim-Americans recognize the importance of 
        sacrifice, freedom, and justice;
Whereas Eid al-Adha is celebrated around the world with prayers, charity and 
        social events;
Whereas many communities across the United States hold day-long festivals in 
        observance of Eid al-Adha;
Whereas Islam is one of the world's major religions, sharing the belief in one 
        God and one humanity;
Whereas Muslim-Americans have made significant contributions to the flourishing 
        of the United States, including as ambassadors to foreign nations, award 
        winning scientists, doctors, and engineers, and athletes;
Whereas Muslim-Americans have contributed to the defense of the United States 
        with an estimated 10,000 Muslim-Americans serving in the United States 
        Armed Forces; and
Whereas Muslim-Americans contribute to the success and pluralism of the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the cultural and religious significance of 
        Eid al-Adha;
            (2) expresses its appreciation and respect for the 
        contributions of Muslim-Americans to the United States; and
            (3) wishes Muslim-Americans and Muslims around the world 
        who observe Eid al-Adha a prosperous holiday.
                                 <all>
```
mbcc-ex1014_37.htm



Exhibit 10.14

 

AMENDMENT TO SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment dated as of January 1, 2016 (“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (“Mission”) is made to that certain Shared Services Agreement dated as of January 1, 2013 by and between Mission Broadcasting and Nexstar Broadcasting (“Agreement”).

 

WHEREAS, Mission is the licensee of television broadcast stations KLRT-TV, Little Rock, Arkansas and KASN, Pine Bluff, Arkansas;

 

WHEREAS, Nexstar is the licensee of television broadcasting stations KARK-TV, Little Rock, Arkansas and KARZ-TV, Little Rock, Arkansas; 

 

WHEREAS, Mission and Nexstar have entered into the Agreement for their mutual benefit;

 

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1. Paragraph 4(g) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in its place: “4(g) Services Fee. In consideration for the services to be provided to the Stations by Nexstar personnel as described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f), Mission will pay Nexstar the fee (“Services Fee”) described in Section 4(g).

 

(i)Base Amount. Subject to the remaining provisions of this Section 4(g), the base amount of the Services Fee will be $291,666.67 per month.

 

(ii) Payment Terms. The Services Fee will be payable monthly, in arrears, from and after the month during which this Agreement is executed, and will be prorated on a daily basis for the first and last months during which the sharing arrangements described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f) are in effect.” 

 

2.These revised payment terms are effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.

 

3. As so amended, all sections and provisions of the Agreement are hereby ratified in full. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date above.

 


			
	
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

 
	
 
	
MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

	
By: /s/ Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
By: /s/ Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Name: Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
 

Name: Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Title: EVP & Chief Financial Officer
	
 
	
 

Title: President
Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, petitioner, v. James Erin McKINNEY.

No. 15-1222.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Dodd-Frank Title VII Final Rules and Interpretive Orders the CFTC may

consider in 2012

NOTE: This outline is tentative and for preliminary purposes, and is subject to change.

January to March  Client Clearing Documentation, Clearing Member Risk 

Management, Straight Through Processing

 Commodity Options

 DCMs

 End-User Exception

 Entity Definitions

 External Business Conduct

 Internal Business Conduct (Duties, Recordkeeping, CCOs) 

 Product Definitions

 Registration of SDs and MSPs

 Reporting of Historical Swaps

 Segregation for Cleared Swaps

April and after  Block Rule

 Capital and Margin

 Conforming Rules

 Disruptive Trade Practices

 Extraterritoriality

 Governance and Conflict of Interest 

 Implementation (clearing and trade execution)

 Internal Business Conduct (Documentation)

 Process for Making a Swap Available to Trade (SEFs and 

DCMs)

 SEFs

 Segregation for Uncleared Swaps
Dennis M. TEMPLE, petitioner, v. Owen McCLELLAND LLC, et al.

No. 15-9170.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.