alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIAN YACOB PARASIAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71785

Agency No. A096-497-428

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Julian Yacob Parasian, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

MAR 02 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71785

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Gormley

v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for

review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that, even if Parasian

were credible and had established harm rising to the level of persecution, he failed

to show that the harm he suffered in Indonesia was on account of a protected

ground. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481-84 (1992) (evidence must

compel the conclusion persecutors are motivated by a protected ground);

Bolshakov v. INS, 133 F.3d 1279, 1280-81 (9th Cir. 1998) (concluding petitioners

failed to show extortion was on account of an enumerated ground). In addition, the

record does not compel the conclusion that Parasian established a well-founded

fear of future persecution because, even as a member of a disfavored group,

Parasian did not present evidence of individualized risk. See Lolong v. Gonzales,

484 F.3d 1173, 1179 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc). Further, substantial evidence

supports the agency’s finding that Parasian did not demonstrate a pattern or

practice of persecution of Christians in Indonesia. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558

F.3d 1049, 1060-62 (9th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, Parasian’s asylum claim fails.
3 09-71785

Because Parasian did not establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily fails

to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Zehatye v.

Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Parasian’s CAT claim

because he failed to establish it is more likely than not he will be tortured if

returned to Indonesia. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1068.

We grant the government’s motion to strike the appendix from Parasian’s

opening brief. See Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc) (the

court may not consider evidence that is not part of the administrative record).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**Exhibit23**

 

 

# Consent of IndependentAuditors

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.333-18495, Form S-8 No. 333-77473, Form S-8 No. 333-37426 and Form S-8 No.333-88528) of Aftermarket Technology Corp. of our report dated February 6, 2003with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofAftermarket Technology Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2002.

 
|              | /s/ Ernst & Young  LLP |
|-------------------|----------------------------|
|              |
| Chicago, Illinois |
| February 25, 2003 |

 

----
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Robert W. DecherdRobert W. DecherdChairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2010/s/ Alison K. EngelAlison K. EngelSenior Vice President/Chief
Financial OfficerMay 13, 2010
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1074

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - Dom South - Platts Gas Daily

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the average price published by Platts Gas Daily for the 

location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the arithmetic average of the Platts 

Gas Daily Dom South published price for each calendar day of the corresponding contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
Synetic, Inc.'s 9/30/96 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          25,437
<SECURITIES>                                   140,598
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                       700
<INVENTORY>                                      5,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,360
<PP&E>                                          34,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,867
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           221
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,223
<SALES>                                         11,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,185
<CGS>                                            6,126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,138
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,389
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 6 
<CIK> 0000744822
<NAME> Fidelity Investment Trust
<SERIES>
 <NUMBER> 131
 <NAME> Fidelity Latin America Fund
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 year          
 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             oct-31-1997   
 
<PERIOD-END>                  oct-31-1997   
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>         677,615       
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>        817,989       
 
<RECEIVABLES>                 16,834        
 
<ASSETS-OTHER>                0             
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>          0             
 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                834,823       
 
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>      8,819         
 
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>       0             
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>     17,462        
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>           26,281        
 
<SENIOR-EQUITY>               0             
 
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>      781,226       
 
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>         52,116        
 
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>         44,301        
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>     8,496         
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>        0             
 
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>       (121,521)     
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>      0             
 
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>      140,341       
 
<NET-ASSETS>                  808,542       
 
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>             18,356        
 
<INTEREST-INCOME>             3,990         
 
<OTHER-INCOME>                (810)         
 
<EXPENSES-NET>                11,182        
 
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>       10,354        
 
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>      65,035        
 
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     64,920        
 
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         140,309       
 
<EQUALIZATION>                0             
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>     9,459         
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>      0             
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>         0             
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>       43,053        
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>   35,963        
 
<SHARES-REINVESTED>           724           
 
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        250,653       
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>       8,573         
 
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>     (187,528)     
 
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>       0             
 
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>    0             
 
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>         6,464         
 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0             
 
<GROSS-EXPENSE>               11,256        
 
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>          867,983       
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>         12.590        
 
<PER-SHARE-NII>               .200          
 
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>       2.920         
 
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>          .230          
 
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>     0             
 
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>          0             
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>           15.510        
 
<EXPENSE-RATIO>               130           
 
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>        0             
 
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>          0
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury
 DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 16, 2001 to be assured of consideration. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) *OMB Number:*
                     1545-0035. *Form Number:*
                    IRS Forms 943, 943-PR, 943-A and 943A-PR. *Type of Review:*
                    Revision. *Title:*
                    Employer's Annual Tax Return for Agricultural Employees (943); Planilla Para La Declaracion Anual De La Contribucion Del Patrono De Empleados Agricolas (943-PR); Agricultural Employer's Record of Federal Tax Liability (943-A); and Registro De La Obligacion Contributiva Del Patrono Agricola (943A-PR). *Description:*
                    Agricultural employers must prepare and file Form 943 and Form 943-PR (Puerto Rico only) to report and pay FICA taxes and (943 only) income tax voluntarily withheld. Agricultural empoyers may attach Forms 943-A and 943A-PR to Forms 943 and 943-PR to show their tax liabilities for semiweekly periods. The information is used to verify that the correct tax has been paid. *Respondents:*
                     Business or other for-profit. *Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers:*
                    392,443. *Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:* Form
Recordkeeping
Learning about the law or the form
Preparing the form
Copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS943
10 hr., 3 min
40 min
1 hr., 47 min
16 min943-PR
8 hr., 51 min
40 min
1 hr., 46 min
16 min943-A
8 hr., 22 min

8 min943A-PR
8 hr., 22 min

8 min
 *Frequency of Response:*
                    Annually. *Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden:*
                    5,011,539 hours. *Clearance Officer:*
                    Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224. *OMB Reviewer:*
                    Alexander T. Hunt, (202), 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. Mary A. Able, Departmental Reports, Management Officer.


[FR Doc. 01-15087 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JONATHAN DIAZ-FUNDORA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-604

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 8, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Wayne M. Durden, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, VILLANTI, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
# Delegation of Authority Under Section 703 of the Security Assistance Act of 2000

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in my by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of Defense the authority vested in me under section 703 of the Security Assistance Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-280).

The authority delegated by this memorandum may be redelegated not lower than the Assistant Secretary level.

Any reference in this memorandum to the provision of any Act shall be deemed to include references to any hereafter-enacted provision of law that is the same or substantially the same as such provision.

                        You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 01-14955

Billing code 5001-08-M
```

[Federal Register: November 18, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 222)]
[Notices]
[Page 69510-69511]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18no02-28]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, December 13, 2002.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

[[Page 69511]]


FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-29319 Filed 11-14-02; 12:10 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

VICTOR MANUEL GALLEGOS

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 4

- 002 7 5

- CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20120C01669 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’s fourth motion for extension of time to file the brief

until April 11

, 201 5

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

APPELLANT ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Charles L. Roberts, the Appellant ’s Attorney, prepare

the Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 11 , 201 5

.

If the Appellant’s brief is not filed wi th this Court by April 11 , 2015, this Court will find it

necessary to send this case back to the trial court for a hearing as to why the Appellant’s brief has

not been filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17 th day of March , 201 5

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### Philip J. BERG, Esquire, on his Behalf and on Behalf of the Government of the United States of America, Appellant v. Barack Hussein OBAMA and United States of America, Appellees.

No. 09-5362.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 30, 2010.

Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 20, 2010.

Philip J. Berg, Esquire, Lafayette Hills, PA, pro se.

Erie Fleisig-Greene, Mark B. Stern, U.S. Department of Justice, Ronald C. Ma-chen, Jr., Esquire, U.S., R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

BEFORE: ROGERS, GARLAND, and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed June 9, 2009, and September 21, 2009, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s qui tam action. The False Claims Act “give[s] the government an unfettered right to dismiss [a qui tam] action,” *Swift v. United States,*318 F.3d 250, 252 (D.C.Cir.2003), and the government’s decision to dismiss the action is not reviewable, *see Hoyte v. American National Red Cross,*518 F.3d 61, 65 (D.C.Cir.2008). Appellant has not shown that he is entitled to discovery of the information the Department of Justice used in deciding to dismiss his qui tam action. *See Swift,*318 F.3d at 254 (“[A] party is not entitled to discovery of information relating to prosecutorial decisions absent a substantial threshold showing.”) (citing *United States v. Armstrong,*517 U.S. 456, 463, 116 S.Ct. 1480, 134 L.Ed.2d 687 (1996)). Nor has appellant demonstrated that the Department of Justice and the Attorney General have a *8conflict of interest because the case involves claims against the President.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
|   | (1) | TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|             | IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones SociedadAnónima |                        |
|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|             |                                                     |                        |   |
| October31, 2017. | By:                                                      | /s/ EduardoS. Elsztain |   |
|             |                                                     | EduardoS. Elsztain          |   |
|             |                                                     | ChiefExecutive Officer      |   |
|             |                                                     |                        |   |
relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 

88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). 

Having considered the writ petition and appendices, we 

conclude that the district court did not arbitrarily exercise its discretion in 

striking petitioners' witnesses and permitting petitioners to procure new 

witnesses, and petitioners have failed to otherwise demonstrate that the 

law compels relief in their favor. Id.; Int'l Game Tech, Inc., 124 Nev. at 

197; 179 P.3d at 558. We therefore decline to grant this petition for 

extraordinary relief. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; 

Smith, 107 Nev. at 679; 818 P.2d at 853. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

LRf actria. 

Saitta 

J. 

cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge 

Carroll, Kelly, Trotter, Franzen, & McKenna 

Rogers, Mastrangelo, Carvalho & Mitchell, Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'The stay imposed by our November 20, 2014, order is hereby 

vacated. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A .434.
Order entered April 3, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00054

- CV

FATIMA DOLORES RODAS , Appellant

V.

LA MADELEINE OF TEXA S, INC., ET AL. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10

- 04672



### O RDER Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang

- Miers and Brown

We DENY appellant’s March 31, 2014 motion for an extension of time to file a notice of

appeal of the order on the contest to her affidavit of ind igence.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
H. Res. 1216 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 21, 2010. 

Whereas Reverend Daniel P. Coughlin has served honorably 

and faithfully as Chaplain of the House of Representatives since being sworn in as the 59th Chaplain on March 

23, 2000; 

Whereas Reverend Coughlin was born on November 8, 1934, 

in Chicago, Illinois; 

Whereas Reverend Coughlin graduated from St. Mary of the 

Lake University in Mundelein, Illinois, becoming a 

Licentiate of Sacred Theology in 1960, and from Loyola 

University in Chicago, Illinois, with a degree in Pastoral 

Studies in 1968; 

Whereas Reverend Coughlin was ordained for the Archdiocese 

of Chicago on May 3, 1960; 

Whereas Reverend Coughlin was appointed the first Director 

of the Office for Divine Worship for the Archdiocese of 

Chicago; 

Whereas Reverend Coughlin spent a year-long sabbatical in 

residence with the Trappist monks of the Abbey of 

Gethsemani in Kentucky, and served the poor through 

the Missionaries of Charity in Calcutta, India, in 1984; 

Whereas Reverend Coughlin served as scholar-in-residence at 

North American College in Vatican City; 
2 

•HRES 1216 EH 

Whereas Reverend Coughlin was pastor at St. Francis Xavier 

Parish in La Grange, Illinois, from 1985 through 1990; 

Whereas Reverend Coughlin worked as Vicar for Priests of 

the Archdiocese of Chicago under both Joseph Cardinal 

Bernardin and Francis Cardinal George from 1995 

through 2000; 

Whereas the Office of the Chaplain of the House of Representatives has served the House since May 1, 1789; 

Whereas Reverend Coughlin is the first person of Roman 

Catholic faith to hold the Office of Chaplain of the House 

of Representatives; and 

Whereas Reverend Coughlin opens proceedings in the House 

of Representatives with prayer, and additionally provides 

pastoral counseling and arranges memorial services for 

the House and its staff: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Reverend Daniel P. Coughlin on his 10th year of faithful service as Chaplain of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Clerk.