alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rafael
Torres, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                           13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
                           Exchange of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                           all material respects, the financial condition and
                           results of operations of the Company at the dates and
                           for the periods indicated.

         Date: May 2, 2003

By:               /s/ Rafael Torres
                  ---------------------------------------------------
                  Rafael Torres
                  Chief Financial Officer
#### Gregory BROWNLOW, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.P. KANE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-56186.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 25, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 12, 2008.

Michael Schafier, Esquire, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Ryan Mitchell Smith, Esquire, Office of the California Attorney General, Los An-geles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

On July 9, 2008, this court denied a certificate of appealability with respect to ground one of appellant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition and concluded that a certificate of appealability was unnecessary with respect to grounds two and three. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). By same order, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why grounds two and three should not be dismissed as moot.

Appellant’s response to the order to show cause indicates appellant has been discharged from parole in connection with the conviction at issue in his habeas petition; therefore, we lack jurisdiction to grant the relief requested in grounds two and three. *See Calderon v. Moore,*518 U.S. 149, 150, 116 S.Ct. 2066, 135 L.Ed.2d 453 (1996) (per curiam) (noting that an appeal is moot “when, by virtue of an intervening event, a court of appeals cannot grant ‘any effectual relief whatever’ in favor of the appellant” (quoting *Mills v. Green,*159 U.S. 651, 653, 16 S.Ct. 132, 40 L.Ed. 293 (1895))). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mateo MENDEZ-ZUNIGA, also known as Mateo Mendez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-50337

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 20, 2012.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

George William Aristotelidis, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mateo Mendez-Zuniga appeals his conviction for illegal reentry. He presents an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by *United States v. Lopez-Ortiz,*313 F.3d 225, 229-31 (5th Cir.2002), which held that an immigration judge’s failure to explain the availability of discretionary relief in an immigration proceeding does not render the proceeding fundamentally unfair. *See id.; see also Romero-Rodriguez v. Gonzales,*488 F.3d 672, 677 n. 5 (5th Cir.2007). The Government’s motion for summary af-firmance is GRANTED, and the judgment *350of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 30 2000 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK

* The Honorable Anthony A. Alaimo, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Georgia , sitting by designation. PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

97-6808-II

MARGARET T. ALLEN, YOLANDA F. LAMAR, ET AL. , Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus THE ALABAMA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, FOB JAMES, ET AL. , Defendants-Appellants.

-------------------------- On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

-------------------------- (June 30, 2000) BEFORE: BIRCH and BARKETT, Circ uit Judges, and ALAIMO, Senior District Judge. *- 2 - BY THE COURT: The parties’ “Motion to Withdraw Rehearing Pe tition...,” construed as a joint motion to withdraw the rehearing petition, to vacate this Court’s published opinion, and to remand this matter to District Court to resolve all issues relating to attorneys’ fees, is GRANTED.
Cowell Nemoy BROWN, petitioner, v. Bob WATTLES, et al.

No. 16-5759.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| A T C | Fidelity Total Emerging Markets Fund                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| **Supplement to the Fidelity Advisor® Total Emerging Markets Fund Class A, Class T, and Class C December 29, 2012 Prospectus**The following information replaces similar information found in the "Fund Summary" section under the heading "Fee Table" beginning on page 3.  **Class A****Class T****Class C** Sell All SharesHold SharesSell All SharesHold SharesSell All SharesHold Shares1 year$	733$	733$	536$	536$	343$	2433 years$	1,105$	1,105$	963$	963$	792$	7925 years$	1,505$	1,505$	1,419$	1,419$	1,371$	1,37110 years$	2,619$	2,619$	2,678$	2,678$	2,944$	2,944 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Supplement Text Block
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**fit_SupplementTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**fit_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              | IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima |                         |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|              |                                                      |                         |   |
| October 31, 2014. | By:                                                       | /s/ Eduardo S. Elsztain |   |
|              |                                                      | Eduardo S. Elsztain          |   |
|              |                                                      | Chief Executive Officer      |   |
|              |                                                      |                         |   |
Page 1 ofl 

secretary 

From: Timothy Shaw [shawtimo@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:08PM 

To: secretary COMMENT 

Subject: Re: Proposed Rules for Trading off the centralized market 

My name is Timothy Shaw, and I am an options local on the NYBOT/ICE. 

The current "trading off the centralized markets" system, which was most likely created in order to 

provide customers with more depth and liquidity, should not be allowed to exist in it's current form. 

Block trading has created a venue for an alternative trading arena without many fixed rules, allowing a 

lack of transparency to occur. 

I believe, in the short term, any sort of trading off the centralized markets should be suspended until the 

CFTC can speak with the members of the various product corr'nnittees to determine what, if any, trading 

should be allowed to occur away from the centralized markets. If, at that time the product committees 

do in fact deem some trading away from the centralized markets necessary, I would ask the CFTC to 

create specific, strict and enforceable rules as to when and where a block trade can occur. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Timothy Shaw 

. -' 

.. : 

(':i - ~ -- . ··. -- ~ '.-. ·, 

.-

11117/2008 

.,
Pete OLAGUE, petitioner, v. WORKER'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, et al.

No. 16-5750.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1361/2004

of 28 July 2004         

amending Regulation (EC) No 1518/2003 laying down detailed rules for implementing the system of export licences in the pigmeat sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat (1), and in particular Articles 8(2) and 13(12) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1518/2003 is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 1. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1365/2000 (OJ L 156, 29.6.2000, p. 5).

(2)OJ L 217, 29.8.2003, p. 35. Regulation amended by Regulation (EC) No 130/2004 (OJ L 19, 27.1.2004, p. 14).

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1549 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1549

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 22, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1264) to amend the National Flood Insurance 
Act of 1968 to provide for the national flood insurance program to make 
available multiperil coverage for damage resulting from windstorms or floods, 
and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Financial Services; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             229
<SECURITIES>                                       408
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2065
<ALLOWANCES>                                       896
<INVENTORY>                                        234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4654
<PP&E>                                            3872
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   13487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            20753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10171)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     13487
<SALES>                                          28200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 28200
<CGS>                                            20259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    20259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 18629
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11646)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.58)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15473]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 119 / Wednesday, June 20, 2001 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 33013]]



NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 2

RIN 3150-AG44


Licensing Proceedings for the Receipt of High-Level Radioactive 
Waste at a Geologic Repository; Licensing Support Network, Design 
Standards for Participating Websites; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a rulemaking appearing in the Federal 
Register on May 31, 2001 (66 FR 29453). This document is necessary to 
correct the omission of a word.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francis X. Cameron, Office of the 
General Counsel, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, telephone 301-415-1642, 
e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b1d03183b150918551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="72140a11321c00115c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 29460, in the third column, in 
Footnote 3, the 21st line, insert the word ``or'' after 
``application''.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of June 2001.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Alzonia W. Shepard,
Acting Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative 
Services, Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-15473 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
H. Res. 1614 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 15, 2010. 

Whereas everyday across the ranks of Federal, State, local, 

and military law enforcement agencies, service dogs perform a variety of functions to prevent and solve crimes 

and to ensure the public safety; 

Whereas service dogs trained to detect bombs, accelerants, 

and other weapons can often discover these dangerous devices at airports, train stations, sporting events and many 

other locations before they are used, preventing mass casualties, and sometimes their mere presence at these locations can prevent dangerous situations; 

Whereas service dogs trained to detect narcotics and other 

contraband are used at our Nation’s borders and ports 

of entry to identify illegal drugs and smuggled goods; 

Whereas service dogs and their handlers perform crucial 

functions in special operations, including crowd control, 

search and rescue missions, locating missing persons, and 

tactical building entries, and these service dogs often 

work in undesirable conditions for little more than food 

and the affection of their handler; 

Whereas service dogs can detect the presence of human remains in operations to locate victims in disaster recovery 

operations; 
2 

•HRES 1614 EH 

Whereas service dogs are used to protect the House of Representatives and Senate chambers, the White House, the 

Supreme Court, and many other public buildings in 

Washington, DC, and throughout the country; 

Whereas many dogs have given their lives in the performance 

of these duties; and 

Whereas these dogs have become an integral component of 

modern law enforcement: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that— 

(1) these dogs perform extraordinary services using 

their special sensory and physical abilities. Their service 

is rendered with incredible efficiency and dedication and 

is an important contribution to the security and public 

safety of our Nation; and 

(2) we all owe a debt of gratitude and our sincere 

appreciation to the loyal service performed by the law 

enforcement service dogs and their handlers. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# FCM Data October 2015

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF October 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002015FROM REPORTS FILED BY December 3,&KFF0000 &K0000002015	&P of &N
Vincent SINGH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6379.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: MARSHALL J. STEIN 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 148 

DATE: MAY 30, 1974 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Marshall J. Stein 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 148 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Marshall J. Stein has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued and 

the said Marshall J. Stein is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering 

into a stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of 

Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said 

Marshall J. Stein stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) Marshall J. Stein, an individual whose address is 141 W. Jackson 

Boulevard, Room 1025, Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was at all times 

material herein a member of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, a duly designated 

contract market under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) The registration of Marshall J. Stein as floor broker under the Commodity 

Exchange Act for the calendar year 1973 expired on December 31, 1973, and the 

said Marshall J. Stein did not submit an application for registration as a floor 

broker under the Act for the calendar year 1974 until January 11, 1974. 

(3) During the period from January 1 through January 11, 1974, Marshall J. 

Stein acted as floor broker by executing for another person orders for the 

purchase or sale of commodities for future delivery on or subject to the rules 

of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. 

The Commodity Exchange Authority has advised Marshall J. Stein that by reason 

of the acts set forth above, he has violated section 4e of the Act and section 

1.8 of the regulations thereunder. 

The said Marshall J. Stein agrees to desist from such acts and practices in 

the future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation is 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said Act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to issue press releases on stipulations of compliance and to make them 

a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 

30 day of May 1974. 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Marshall J. Stein 

Witnessed by: 
Page 2 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3