IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 'R E c E l v ED 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION DEC l a ZOO? 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

One World Capital Group, LLC and 

John Edward Walsh, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)' 

) 

) 

_____________________________ ) 

. MICHAEL W. DOBBINS 

CLERK, U. S. DISTRICT COURT 

CIVIL ACTION NO: 

07C 7002 

JuDGE JOAN H. lEf:l(rMt 

COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF AND FOR 

CIVIL MONETARY PENALTIES UNDER THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT 

I. SUMMARY 

1. Since at least November 28, 2007 ("relevant time"), Defendant One World 

Capital Group, LLC ("One World"), a futures commission merchant ("FCM") registered with the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC" or "Commission") and a forex dealer 

member ("FDM") ofthe National Futures Association ("NFA"), has been unable to demonstrate 

compliance with the minimum adjusted net capital of $1,000,000 required by the Commodity 

Exchange Act, as amended ("Act"), 7 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. (2002), and the regulations 

promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. §§ 1.1 et seq. (2007). 

2. As a registered FCM and NF A FDM, One World has solicited and accepted retail 

customer funds for the purpose of acting as a counterparty, or offering to act as the counterparty, 

1 
6. However, since at least November 2, 2007, NF A staff members have been 

receiving complaints from One World forex customers to the effect that One World is not 

returning funds in response to customers' withdrawal requests. The aggregate amount claimed 

by the complaining One World forex customers is at least $4,000,000, an amount that 

substantially exceeds the $538,515 that One World reported to NFA as ofNovember 23,2007. 

7. Since November 28, 2007, the NFA has requested One World to supply 

supporting documentation for its reported forex liabilities. To date, One World has failed to 

provide any third party documentation or other support for its forex liabilities. 

2 
8. On December 3, 2007, staff from the CFTC's Division of Clearing and 

Intermediary Oversight ("DCIO") requested that One World provide daily net capital 

computations .. On December 4, 2007, John Edward Walsh ("Walsh"), the President of One 

World, told Frank Zimmerle, Branch Chief for DCIO in the CFTC's Chicago office, that Walsh 

could not make his net capital calculation because he was unable to provide information as to the 

forex customer liabilities. 

9. By virtue oftheir conduct, the Defendants have engaged, are engaging, or are 

about to engage in acts and practices that violate Sections 4f(a) and 4f(b) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. 

§§ 6f(a) and 6f(b) (2002) and Commission Regulations ("Regulations") 1.17(a)(4) and 1.18, 17 

C.P.R.§§ 1.17(a)(4) and 1.18 (2007) 

10. Accordingly, the Commission brings this action pursuant to Section 6c ofthe Act, 

7 U.S.C. § 13a-1, to enjoin Defendants' unlawful acts and practices and to compel their 

compliance with the Act. In addition, the Commission seeks restitution to investors for damages 

proximately caused by Defendants' violations, civil monetary penalties and such other relief as 

this Court may deem necessary and appropriate. 

11. Unless restrained and enjoined by this Court, Defendants are likely to continue to 

engage in the acts and practices alleged in this Complaint and similar acts and practices, as more 

fully described below. 

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 

12. The Act establishes a comprehensive system for regulating commodity futures 

contracts and options on commodity futures contracts and those who are registrants pursuant to 

the Act. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Section 6c of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 

§ 13a-1, which provides that whenever it shall appear to the CFTC that any person has engaged, 

3 
is engaging, or is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any provision 

of the Act or any rule, regulation, or order promulgated thereunder, the CFTC may bring an 

action in the proper District Court of the United States against such person to enjoin such 

practice, or to enforce compliance with the Act, or any rule, regulation or order thereunder. 

13. Venue properly lies with this Court pursuant to Section 6c(e) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. 

§ 13a-1(e), because One World's administrative and compliance office is located in this District, 

Walsh resides in this District, and acts and practices in violation of the Act have occurred within 

this District. 

III. THE PARTIES 

14. Plaintiff Commodity Futures Trading Commission is an independent federal 

regulatory agency that is charged with administering and enforcing the Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. 

(2002), and the Regulations promulgated thereunder, 17 C.P.R. §§ 1.1 et seq. (2007). 

15. Defendant One World Capital Group, LLP is a New York Limited Liability 

Companyformed on August 31, 2005. Its principal place ofbusiness is 818 Elm Street in 

Winnetka, Illinois 60093. One World has been registered with the Commission as a FCM since 

December 6, 2005, and as a Commodity Trading Advisor ("CTA") since May 17, 2007. One 

World is also a FDM. 

16. Defendant John "Jack" Edward Walsh is 59 years old and resides in Lake 

Forest, Illinois. Walsh is the managing member and the President of One World. Walsh has 

been registered with the NFA in various capacities from February 1997to October 2000, and 

July 2001 to November 30,2007. From December 2005 to November 30,2007, Walsh was 

registered with the NF A as an associated person ("AP") of One World. At all relevant times, 

4 
Walsh has controlled One World. Walsh signs management reports on behalf of One World, has 

access to One World's bank accounts, and supervises One World's employees. 

IV. THE FACTS 

A. Statutory and Regulatory Background 

17. The NF A is a registered futures association pursuant to Section 17 of the Act, 

7 U.S.C. § 21. It is the industry wide, independent, self-regulatory organization for the U.S. 

futures industry. Its mission is to develop rules, programs and services that safeguard market 

integrity, protect investors and help its Members meet their regulatory responsibilities. 

18. An FCM is defined in Section 1a(12) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § la(12), as an 

individual, association, partnership, corporation, or trust that: (i) is engaged in soliciting or in 

accepting orders for the purchase or sale of any commodity for future delivery on or subject to 

the rules of any contract market; and (ii) in or in connection with such solicitation or acceptance 

of orders, accepts any money, securities, or property (or extends credit in lieu thereof) to margin, 

guarantee, or secure any trades or contracts. An FCM typically handles the mechanics of order 

entry, confirmation, clearance and settlement of trades, calculation of margin, and similar 

activities on behalf of the customers for whom it carries trading accounts. 

19. Section 4f(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6f(b), requires an FCM at all times to meet 

such minimum financial requirements as the Commission may prescribe as necessary to insure 

that the FCM is meeting its obligations as a registrant. These requirements are designed to 

protect both the customers of the FCM and other participants in the market. 

20. FDM members ofNF A are defined by NF A Bylaw 306(a) as FCMs that are the 

·counterparty or that offer to be the counterparty to forex transactions. 

5 
21. Effective July 31, 2006, all FCMs acting as FDMs have been required by 

Regulation 1.17(a)(l)(C), 17C.F.R. § 1.17(a)(1)(C),andSection 11 ofNFA'sFinancial 

Requirements to maintain adjusted net capital of$1,000,000 to ensure that they can meet their 

financial obligations. Pursuant to Regulation 1.17(c)(l), "net capital" is the amount by which 

current assets exceed liabilities. 

B. One World's Business Background 

22. One World has maintained at least five forex related internet websites at various 

times during its registration as an FCM and CT A. These websites include www.l worldfcm.com, 

www.1world-forex.com, www.1wfx.com, www.1worldchina.com and www.owforex.com. 

23. At least two ofthe One World websites, 1worldfcm.com and 1world-forex.com, 

have touted One World's registration status with the NF A and oversight by the CFTC. The 

1world-forex.com website currently states: 

A registered Futures Commission Merchant (FCM), One World Capital 

Group LLC is a member ofthe National Futures Association (NFA) and is 

regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). 

Interested parties can visit the NF A web site at any time to review One 

World Capital Group's unblemished record as an NFA member. NFA ID 

#0359973. 

24. Since December 4, 2007, the 1 worldfcm.com website removed its content and 

only directs the reader to contact Walsh with questions, listing the One World office number. 

25. Since December 2005, One World has acted as a FDM in that it was the 

counterparty or offered to be the counterparty to off-exchange forex transactions with domestic 

and foreign retail customers. One World also provides services to customers in connection with 

off-exchange forex trading, including managed accounts. Walsh has represented to the NF A that 

One World currently carries in excess of2,000 customer accounts trading forex through 

Metatrader, an electronic trading platform licensed to One World by Moneytec. 

6 
26. Since at least December2005, One World also carried accounts for retail 

customers that traded exchange-traded futures contracts. At least as of December 7, 2007, One 

World continued to hold the funds of some of its customers who traded exchange-traded futures 

contracts. 

C. NF A Business Conduct Committee Action 

27. On June 4, 2007, the NF A filed a Business Conduct Committee ("BCC") 

Complaint against One World and Walsh alleging, among other things, that one month after One 

World became registered, it had failed to meet its minimum adjusted net capital requirements as 

of January 31, 2006. Specifically, the NF A asserted that One World failed to include customer 

liabilities in its financial statements. 

28. On November 14,2007, the NFA issued a Decision in which it accepted Walsh's 

and One World's offer of settlement. The Decision recites that One World and Walsh consented 

to findings that they committed the violations alleged against them in the BCC complaint. As 

noted in the Decision, the acceptance ofthe settlement did not relieve One World of its 

obligation to comply with all NF A requirements, including adjusted net capital requirements for 

FCMs that are also FDMs. 

D. NFA Member Responsibility Action 

29. On November 28,2007, the NFA commenced an audit of One World. Pursuant 

to the audit, NFA sent staffto One World's Winnetka office. During the course ofthis audit, 

Walsh has denied audit staff's access to the office and to customer account files. Walsh also has 

failed to provide NF A staff copies of, or access to, bank records and forex trading account 

statements. 

30. On November 30, 2007, the NFA filed a Notice of Member Responsibility Action 

("MRA") against One World alleging that One World and Walsh have failed to cooperate 

7 
promptly and fully with the NF A in an NF A audit, and that One World failed to produce 

adequate and complete support for certain material asset and liability balances. NF A filed the 

MRA to protect customers because it is unable to verify that One World is in full compliance 

with the NFA's capital and other financial requirements. The MRA notified One World and 

Walsh that, inasmuch as One World was unable to demonstrate compliance with the minimum 

financial requirements, One World is required to cease doing business, including the solicitation 

or acceptance of any additional customer funds, and can only accept or place trades for 

liquidation purposes until such time as it has demonstrated it has in place the required 

capitalization, pursuant to Regulation 1.17(a)(4). 

31. NFA staffhas attempted to obtain supporting financial records from One World 

relating to their net capital computation to aid in determining their current net capital and 

customer liabilities. To date, Walsh has failed to cooperate with NF A staff and has failed to 

provide books and records to the NFA. Walsh also has prohibited One World employees from 

providing books and records to the NF A, including information relating to One World's financial 

condition, in particular forex liabilities. 

32. On December 3, 2007, CFTC staff sent a letter to Walsh and One World 

requesting, among other th!ngs, that One World provide a current net capital computation. To 

date, One World and Walsh have failed to provide the requested information. 

33. Despite the NFA's and CFTC's attempts to obtain records and capital 

computations, Walsh has failed to produce the requested books and records and actively 

prevented the release ofbooks and records. Since December 3, 2007, Walsh has also failed to 

provide required net capital computations in violation of the Act and Regulations. In so doing, 

8 
Walsh has knowingly induced, directly or indirectly, One World's violation of the Act and 

Regulations or has failed to act in good faith with respect to these violations. 

E. One World Has Failed to Demonstrate Compliance With the Minimum 

Adjusted Net Capital Requirements of the Act and Regulations 

. 34. As a registered FCM, One World is required pursuant to Regulation 1.1 0( a)-( d), 

17 C.F.R. §§ 1.1 O(a)-( d), to submit a monthly report to the CFTC and NF A that includes a 

statement of financial condition and a statement of the computation of the minimal adjusted net 

capital requirements on a form designated as a 1-FR-FCM ("1-FR"). 

35. One World's most recently filed 1-FR report purports to show that as of October 

31,2007, One World had $357,053 in liabilities to forex customers. NFA staff asked for support 

for that number and, to date, has not received any supporting information from One World or its 

principal, John Walsh. Additionally, on December 4, 2007, Walsh informed Frank Zimmerle, 

the DCIO Branch Chief in the CFTC's Chicago, Illinois office, that Walsh "cannot determine 

what he owes to forex customers, nor can he say whether he has sufficient funds with which to 

pay those forex customers." 

36. During the pendency of the NFA's current audit and the CFTC's information 

requests, Walsh has claimed and continues to claim that he does not have access to forex 

customer information, contending that Moneytec will not allow Walsh access to the information. 

However, a representative ofMoneytec has denied Walsh's claim and asserted that Walsh and 

One World employees have access to the records that could provide customers names, account 

numbers and account balances. Furthermore, on December 5, 2007, in response to an NF A staff 

request for a list of One World's forex customers and account balances, a member of One 

World's staff stated that One World did have access to that information, but that he could not 

provide it because Walsh specifically instructed him not to disclose it. 

9 
37. As part ofthe NFA audit, as ofDecember 5, 2007, the NFA was able to confirm 

through third-party documentation that One World has $554,422 in forex customer accounts. To 

date, this is the only amount the NF A is able to confirm as assets of One World. 

38. Since November 2, 2007, the NFA has received numerous complaints from 

customers stating that One World has not satisfied customer withdrawal requests. According to 

the complaints, Walsh has told customers that he would wire the funds to customers, but no 

funds were ever received. Additionally, Walsh has provided numerous excuses regarding One 

World's inability or failure to provide customers' their funds. For example, Walsh has informed 

customers that: 1) the NF A would not allow him to transfer funds to customers; 2) he had been 

sick; 3) he had been traveling; and 4) he was locked out of one office and did not have a fax 

machine in another office. The aggregate amounts claimed by these customers exceed 

$4,200,000. 

V. VIOLATION OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT 

AND COMMISSION'S REGULATIONS 

COUNT ONE: 

VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 4f(b) OF THE ACT 

ANDREGULATION 1.17(a)(4): 

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COMMISSION'S 

MINIMUM FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS 

39. The allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 38 are re-alleged and 

incorporated by reference. 

40. Pursuant to Section 4f(b) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6f(b), and 

Regulation 1.17(a)(l)(C), 17 C.F.R. §1.17(a)(l)(C), all FCMs acting as FDMs are required to 

maintain a minimum adjusted net capital of $1,000,000. 

10 
41. Pursuant to Regulation1.17(a)(4), 17 C.F.R. § 1.17(a)(4), an FCM that is not in 

compliance with Regulation 1.17, or is unable to demonstrate such compliance, must transfer all 

customer accounts and immediately cease doing business as a FCM until such time as it can 

demonstrate such compliance. 

42: Since at least November 28, 2007, One World has been unable to demonstrate 

compliance with the $1,000,000 minimum adjusted net capital requirement applicable to a FCM 

acting as a FDM, in violation of Section 4f(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6f(b ), and Regulation 

1.17(a)(4), 17 C.F.R. § 1.17(a)(4). 

43. Since at least November 28, 2007, One World has failed transfer all customer 

accounts and immediately cease doing business as a FCM until such time as it can demonstrate 

compliance the adjusted net capital requirements ofRegulation 1.17(a)(l), in violation of Section 

4f(b) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6f(b), and Regulation 1.17(a)(4), 17 C.F.R. § 1.17(a)(4). 

44. Each day One World fails to maintain and is unable to demonstrate compliance 

with the $1,000,000 minimum adjusted net capital requirement applicable to an FDM is alleged 

as separate and distinct violations of Section 4f(b) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6f(b), and Regulation 

1.17(a)(4), 17 C.F.R. § 1.17(a)(4). 

45. Each day One World failed to transfer funds and/or continued doing business as a 

FCM without demonstrating compliance with its adjusted net capital requirement is alleged as 

separate and distinct violations of Section 4f(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6f(b), and Regulation 

1.17(a)(4), 17 C.F.R. § 1.17(a)(4). 

46. Defendant Walsh controlled One World and either knowingly induced or did not 

act in good faith respecting the acts and practices of One World and its employees, officers, 

agents, directors, and/or principals that constitute the violations Section 4f(b) of the Act, 

11 
7 U.S.C. § 6f(b), and Regulation 1.17(a)(4), 17 C.P.R.§ 1.17(a)(4). Defendant Walsh therefore 

is liable as a controlling person for those violations pursuant to Section 13(b) ofthe Act, 7 

U.S.C. § 13c(b). 

COUNT TWO: 

VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 4f(a)(l) OF THE ACT AND 

AND REGULATION 1.18: 

FAILURE TO MAINTAIN REQUIRED BOOKS AND RECORDS 

47. The allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 38 are re-alleged and 

incorporated herein by reference. 

48. Pursuant to Section 4f(a)(1) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6f(a)(1), and Regulation 1.18, 

17 C.P.R. § 1.18, One World is required to maintain records that currently reflect its assets, 

liabilities and capital. Because One World failed to maintain such records, it violated Section 

4f(a)(1) of the Act and Regulation 1.18, 17 C.P.R.§ 1.18. 

49. Each day that One World failed to comply with its recordkeeping requirements is 

. alleged as a separate and distinct violations of Section 4f(a) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. § 6f(a), and 

Regulation 1.18, 17 C.P.R. § 1.18. 

50. Defendant Walsh controlled One World and either knowingly induced or did not 

act in good faith respecting the acts and practices of One World and its employees, officers, 

agents, directors, and/or principals that constitute the violations Section 4f(b) of the Act, 

7 U.S.C. § 6f(b), and Regulation 1.18, 17 C.P.R.§ 1.18. Defendant Walsh therefore is liable as a 

controlling person for those violations pursuant to Section 13(b) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13c(b ). 

VI. RELIEF REQUESTED 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court, as authorize<;! by Section 6c 

ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. § 13a-'-1, and pursuant to its own equitable powers: 

12 
A. Enter an Order finding that Defendants violated Sections 4f(a) and 4f(b) of the 

Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 6f(a) and 6f(b) (2002), and Regulations l.i7(a)(4) and 1.18, 17 C.P.R. 

§§ 1.17(a)(4) and 1.18 (2007); 

B. Enter a Restraining Order, ex parte, pursuant.to Section 6c(a) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 

§ 13a-l, restraining One World, Walsh and their agents, servants, employees, successors, 

assigns, attorneys and all persons insofar as they are acting in active concert or participation with 

them who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, from directly or 

indirectly: 

1. Destroying, mutilating, concealing, altering or disposing of, in any manner, any of 

the books and records, documents, correspondence, brochures, manuals, 

electronically stored data, tape records or other property of One World wherever 

located, including all such records concerning the Defendants' business 

operations; 

2. Refusing to make ·available for inspection by the Commission, when as requested, 

any books, records, documents correspondence, brochures, manual, electronically 

stored data, tape records or other property of One World wherever located, 

including, but not limited to, all such records of One World's business operations; 

3. Dissipating, withdrawing, transferring, removing, concealing or disposing of any 

cash, cashier's checks, funds, assets or other property of, or within the custody, 

control or actual or constructive possession of One World, including, but not 

limited to, all funds, personal property, money or securities held in One World's 

name, safety deposit boxes, all funds in deposit in any financial institution, bank 

or savings and loan account held by, under the actual or constructive control, or in 

the name of One World, funds or property of investors, wherever lo.cated, whether 

held in the name of the One World, Walsh or otherwise; 

and Requiring: 

4. One World to close all open customer positions, cease accepting customer orders, 

and to close all proprietary accounts held by it with any other foreign currency 

transaction entity; and 

5. One World and Walsh to permit representatives ofthe plaintiff Commission to 

immediately inspect the books, records and other electronically stored data, tape 

recordings, and other documents of the· Defendants and their agents, including all 

such records of Defendants' business operations, wherever they are situated and 

whether they are in the possession of the Defendants or others and to copy said 

13 
documents, data, and records either on or off the premises where they may be 

situated; 

C. Enter an order of preliminary injunction incorporating the provisions of the 

statutory restraining order and enjoining Defendants and all persons insofar as they are acting in 

the capacity of their agents, servants, employees, successors, assigns, and attorneys, and all 

persons insofar as they are acting in active concert or participation with Defendants who receive 

actual notice of such order by personal service or otherwise, from directly or indirectly violating 

Sections 4f(a) and 4b(f) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 6f(a) and 6f(b) (2002), and Regulations 

1.17(a)(4) and 1.18,17 C.F.R. §§ 1.17(a)(4), and 1.18 (2007); 

D. Enter an order of permanent injunction prohibiting and enjoining Defendants and 

all persons insofar as they are acting in the capacity of their agents, servants, employees, 

successors, assigns, and attorneys, and all persons insofar as they are acting in active concert or 

participation with Defendants who receive actual notice of such order by personal service or 

otherwise, from directly or indirectly violating Sections 4f(a) and 4f(b) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 

§§ 6f(a) and 6f(b) (2002), and Regulations 1.17(a)(4) and 1.18, 17 C.F.R. §§ 1.17(a)(4), and 1.18 

(2007); 

E. Enter orders of preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendants and 

all persons insofar as they are acting in the capacity of their agents, servants, employees, · 

successors, assigns, and attorneys, and all persons insofar as they are acting in active concert or 

participation with them who receive actual notice of such order by personal service or otherwise, 

from directly or indirectly, engaging in any activity related to trading in any commodity, as that 

term is defined in Section la(4) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. § la(4) ("commodity interest"), including 

but not limited to, the following: 

14 
1. Engaging, directly or indirectly, in any activity related to trading in any 

commodity, as that term is defined in Section la(4) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. 

§ 1 a( 4) ("commodity interest"), including but not limited to, the following: 

a. trading on or subject to the rules of any registered entity, as that term is 

defined in Section 1a(29) ofthe Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1a(29); 

b. engaging in, controlling or directing the trading for any-commodity 

interest account for or on behalf of any other person or entity, whether 

by power of attorney or otherwise; and 

c. entering into any commodity interest transactions for Walsh's personal 

account, or One World's proprietary account or for any account in 

which they have a direct or indirect interest and/or having any 

commodity interests traded on their behalf; 

F. Enter an order requiring Walsh to disgorge, pursuantto such procedure as the 

Court may order, all benefits received including, but not limited to, salaries, commissions, loans, 

fees, revenues and trading profits derived, directly or indirectly, from the acts or practices which 

constitute violations of the Act as described herein, including pre-judgment interest; 

G. Enter an Order directing the Defendants to each pay a civil monetary penalty in 

the amount of not more than the higher of (i) triple the monetary gain to Defendants for each 

violation of the Act and Regulations or (ii) $130,000 for each violation occurring after 

October 23, 2004; 

H. Enter an order directing Defendants, jointly and severally, to make full restitution 

to every customer whose funds were lost as a result of acts and practices which constituted 

violations of the Act and Regulations, described herein, and interest thereon from the date of 

such violations; 

I. Enter an Order requiring Defendants to pay costs and fees as permitted by 

28 U.S.C. §§ 1920 and 2412{a)(2); and 

15 
J. Enter an Order providing such other and further remedial ancillary relief as the 

Court may deem appropriate. 

16 

Respectfully submitted, 

Trial Attorney 

ARDC No. 6278482 

Lead 

Eli~~ Trial Attorney 

ARDC No. 06188119 -

Deputy 

Sco~"iil~ Regional Counsel 

ARDC No. 06191293 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

525 West Monroe Street, Suite 11 00 

Chicago, Illinois 60661 

(312) 596-0549 (Diamond) 

(312) 596-0537 (Streit) 

(312) 596-0560 (Williamson) 

(312) 596-0700 (office number) 

(312) 596-0714 (facsimile)