alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1917/2004

of 2 November 2004         

establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (2), and in particular Article 173(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The unit values provided for in Article 173(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 are hereby established as set out in the table in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 November 2004.

For the Commission

Olli REHN            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 (OJ L 311, 12.12.2000, p. 17).

(2)OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2286/2003 (OJ L 343, 31.12.2003, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7605

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TIMOTHY WAYNE EDDINGTON , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. ( 0:07

- cr - 01149

- CMC

- 1 )

Submitted : December 16, 2022 Decided: June 28, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Timothy Wayne Eddington , Appellant Pro Se. Elliott Bishop Daniels, Assistant U nited States Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7605 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Timothy Wayne Eddington appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s order granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (stating standard of review), cert. denied , 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. The court denied the compassionate release motion after assuming that Eddington had demonstrated extraordinary and compelling circumstances, discussing the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and suffic iently explaining the reasons for the denial. See United States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 188

- 91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of straightforward compassionate release motion). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7605 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 94.

#### Cannon *v.*Louisiana.

Jurisdictional statement distributed September 10, 1936.

Decided October 12, 1936.

*Mr. II. P. Viering*for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937) . Treating the papers whereon the appeal was al-' lowed as a petition for a writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938) , certiorari is denied. The motion for leave to proceed further herein *in forma pauperis*is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statement of Operations as reported
on the first quarter Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          73,661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,095
<INVENTORY>                                     15,338
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,777
<PP&E>                                         102,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 825,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           402
<OTHER-SE>                                     479,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   825,650
<SALES>                                         75,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,660
<CGS>                                           37,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,273)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,809
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,082)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,082)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)


</TABLE>
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|            | IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima |                                            |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|            |                                                      |                                            |   |
| March 16, 2016. | By:                                                       | /s/ Matías Gaivironsky                |   |
|            |                                                      | Matías Gaivironsky                         |   |
|            |                                                      | Chief Financial and Administrative Officer |   |
|            |                                                      |                                            |   |

----
SEC Exhibit








Exhibit 10.76


SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Second Amendment (the “Amendment”) to that certain Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement made and entered into as of December 31, 2008 by and between Sprint Nextel Corporation, now known as Sprint Communications, Inc., and JAIME A. JONES (the “Agreement”), and amended effective December 13, 2012, is entered into on this 24th day of March, 2016. Certain capitalized terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the covenants and agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby agree Section 8 of the Agreement shall be amended, effective in connection with 2016 assignment of Executive’s Place of Performance to Atlanta, Georgia, as shown in double underline (deletions in strikethrough) below:


8.    Place of Performance. In connection with his employment by the Company as Area President - South, the Executive shall be based at the principal executive offices of the Company in the vicinity of Atlanta, Georgia or Overland Park, Kansas (the “Place of Performance”), except for travel reasonably required for Company business.  If the Company relocates the Executive’s place of work more than 50 miles from his place of work prior to such relocation, the Executive shall relocate to a residence within (a) 50 miles of such relocated executive offices or (b) such total miles that does not exceed the total number of miles the Executive commuted to his place of work prior to relocation of the Executive’s place of work.  To the extent the Executive relocates his residence as provided in this Section 8, the Company will pay or reimburse the Executive’s relocation expenses in accordance with the Company’s relocation policy applicable to senior executives, except that the requirement to list his home in the vicinity of Overland Park for a period of at least 90 days before a corporate buyout of the property commences will be reduced to at least 20 days. 


In all other respects, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement shall remain the same. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by an officer pursuant to the authority of its Board, and the Executive has executed this Amendment, as of the date set forth above.








SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.                     EXECUTIVE




/s/ Sandra J. Price                    /s/ Jaime A. Jones                        
By: Sandra J. Price,                     JAIME A. JONES
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darrell J. Chesher, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 856] —

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Stephen K. Lindley, A.J.), rendered June 14, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Fahey, Garni and Gorski, JJ.
Page 1 of 1 

secretary 

From: jason kenul Ukenul@gmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:44 PM 

To: secretary . -:. 

'l. . 

Subject: Proposed Rules For Trading Off the Centralized Market .. 

COMMENT 

To Whom It May Concern 

As it stands now, block trading causes price discrepancies within the market. A commodities market is 

a place where fair value is found on behalf ofboth the buyer and the seller. The integrity of this fair 

value comes into question with the block trading system. Block trading allows for a second market of 

the same commodity. This cause prices discrepancies between the two markets. The liquidity, which 

can be found within a single market, is diminished by the split of business between the two. The locals 

in the ring allow for a liquidity that can not be found out side. Customers are not receiving the best 

possible price by leaving a market when they can just as easily fill the. order within the ring and receive 

the market price. 

Sincerely, 

JasonKenul 

floor trader 

11118/2008 

:. ' 

' j 

.1 

:_,... ...
**Fidelity**®**Total Emerging Markets Fund**

**Class**/Ticker

**Fidelity Total Emerging Markets Fund**/FTEMX

In this summary prospectus, the term "shares" (as it relates to the fund) means the class of shares offered through this summaryprospectus.

**Summary Prospectus**

**December 29, 2012**
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

### :> state OF TEXAS

. PENALTY FOR 

### 10/16/2014 PRIVATE U$ BECK, CORY JOEL 

## On this day, fine applicatio and.presented to the " ^*



## <, 

## ,£©f?fJOEL BECK 0 2 1M 0004279596 BOWES S5 J®' 2014 OCT18 MAILED FROM ZlftCjQQF.JfiZnj « WR-82,280-02 

## v«--5f Wabeas Corpus has been received Abel Acosta, Clerk
No. 109.

#### Timmons et al. *v.*Security Savings Bank.

Jurisdictional statement distributed September 10, 1936.

Decided October 12, 1936.

*Mr. C. H. E. Boardman*for appellants.

*Mr. Earl C. Mills*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *Gibbes*v. *Zimmerman,*290 U. S. 326, 332; *Doty*v. *Love,*295 U. S. 64.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ACL Semiconductors
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Kenneth Lap-Chan, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations
of the Company for the periods presented.
|
|

|Date: |  | April 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Kenneth Lap-Yin Chan      
|----- |  | -------------- |  | ------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | Kenneth Lap-Yin
    Chan      
|      |  |                |  | Chief Financial
    Officer of
|      |  |                |  | ACL Semiconductors
    Inc.   



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ACL Semiconductors,Inc. and will be retained by
ACL Semiconductors Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
\ p www.cfic.gov
\ RECEIVED CFTC
0: o ook,
Office of Proceedings @)
Office of Proceedings
Proceedings Clerk
* 1:26 pm, Mar 09, 2015
AZUBUEZE JIAGBOGU, *
Complainant, *
*
v. * CFTC Docket No. 14-Ro04
* Served via USPS
TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC., *
Respondent. *
*
*

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING and AWARDING COSTS

By Order dated December 9, 2014, Azubueze Jiagbogu was ordered to show
cause: one, why his complaint against TradeStation Securities Incorporated should not
be dismissed with prejudice, based on his failure to comply with a discovery order and
his failure to participate in this proceeding; two, why TradeStation should not be
awarded costs and attorney’s fees incurred in connection with the discovery-related
motions filed July 3 and 30, August 6, and November 17, 2014; and three, why
TradeStation should not be awarded its total costs and attorney's fees incurred in
connection with defending this matter. Jiagbogu was warned that failure to file a timely,
complete, responsive, and good faith reply would subject him to the contemplated
sanctions.

Jiagbogu has failed to file any written response to the December 9th Order. Asa
result, it is concluded that Jiagbogu: has ceased to participate in this proceeding; has
failed to substantiate his thin complaint; and has failed to rebut TradeStation’s
compelling showing that Jiagbogu’s complaint was frivolous and vexatious and that
Jiagbogu has acted in bad faith throughout this proceeding, causing TradeStation to
incur needless costs and attorney’s fees totaling at least $3,970.1

Accordingly, pursuant to CFTC rules 12.35(e), and 12.304(c), (i) and (m): one,
Azubueze Jiagbogu’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice to his right to file a
claim against TradeStation Securities Incorporated, and/or its agents and principals, in
the reparations forum or in any alternative forums, based on the same set of facts as
alleged in his reparations complaint; and two, Azubueze Jiagbogu is ordered to pay,

' See TradeStation’s motion for sanctions (filed November 17, 2014), request for sanctions (filed December 8,
2014), and compliance with December 9" order (filed December 22, 2014).


no later than the close of business on March 20, 2015, $3,970 to TradeStation Securities
Incorporated.

March 9, 2015.
Ya of x

Philip V. McGuire,
Judgment Officer
MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Dannel P. MALLOY, et al.

No. 15-1538.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: PETER F. SCHOENFELD 

DOCKET NUMBER: 163 

DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 1969 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

Docket No. 163 

Name: Peter F. Schoenfeld 

Effective Sept. 22, 1969 

Effective immediately, respondent Peter F. Schoenfeld shall cease and desist 

from wilfully causing, aiding, abetting, counseling, commanding or inducing 

Commodity Consultants, Inc., or any other futures commission merchant, to engage 

as futures commission merchant without meeting the minimum financial 

requirements prescribed by section 1.17 of the regulations (34 F.R. 599) issued 

under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

Done at Washington, D.C. 

September 22, 1969 

Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Ketjol MANOKU, petitioner, v. Catherine S. BAUMAN, Warden.

No. 15-9157.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

      Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C.
             Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Robert W. Raiford, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ENGlobal
Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of ENGlobal Corporation.


Date:  March 30, 2006                            //s// Robert W. Raiford
                                                 Robert W. Raiford
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



                                       81
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 01N-0135]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Focus Group Study of Radiation Disclosure Statement Options 
for Foods Treated With Ionizing Radiation

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Focus Group Study of Radiation 
Disclosure Statement Options for Foods Treated with Ionizing 
Radiation'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Schlosburg, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of March 29, 2001 
(66 FR 17183), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0468. 
The approval expires on October 31, 2001. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: June 8, 2001.
Margaret M. Dotzel,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-15084 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S