alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
mbcc-ex102_25.htm



Exhibit 10.2

 

AMENDMENT TO SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment dated as of January 1, 2016 (“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (“Mission”) is made to that certain Shared Services Agreement dated as of January 5, 1998 by and between Bastet Broadcasting, Inc. and Nexstar Broadcasting of Northeastern Pennsylvania, L.P., as amended by those certain amendments dated as of November 16, 2004, December 30, 2005, and April 1, 2009 (collectively, the “Agreement”).

 

WHEREAS, Mission, as successor to Bastet Broadcasting, Inc., is the licensee of television broadcast station WYOU, Scranton, Pennsylvania;

 

WHEREAS, Nexstar is the licensee of television broadcasting station WBRE-TV, Wilkes- Barre, Pennsylvania; 

 

WHEREAS, Mission and Nexstar have entered into the Agreement for their mutual benefit;

 

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

 

1. Paragraph 4(g) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in its place: “4(g) Services Fee. In consideration for the services to be provided to the Stations by Nexstar personnel as described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f), Mission will pay Nexstar the fee (“Services Fee”) described in Section 4(g).

 

(i)Base Amount. Subject to the remaining provisions of this Section 4(g), the base amount of the Services Fee will be $200,000 per month.

 

(ii) Payment Terms. The Services Fee will be payable monthly, in arrears, from and after the month during which this Agreement is executed, and will be prorated on a daily basis for the first and last months during which the sharing arrangements described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f) are in effect.” 

 

2.These revised payment terms are effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.

 

3. As so amended, all sections and provisions of the Agreement are hereby ratified in full. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date above.

 


			
	
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

 
	
 
	
MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

	
By: /s/ Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
By: /s/ Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Name: Thomas E. Carter
	
 
	
 

Name: Dennis Thatcher

	
 

Title: EVP & Chief Financial Officer
	
 
	
 

Title: President
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32960-32961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-930-01-1310-EI-241A: MSES 46739 and MSES 46740]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Leases; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management Interior.

ACTION: Correction to Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated 
Oil and Gas Leases.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management published in the Federal 
Register on March 29, 2001, a notice announcing the proposed 
reinstatement of oil and gas leases MSES 46739 and MSES 46740. That 
notice contained errors which this notice corrects.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida V. Doup, Chief, Branch of Use 
Authorization, Division of Resources Planning, Use and Protection at 
(703) 440-1541.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau of Land Management published in 
the Federal Register on March 29, 2001 (66 FR 17196), a notice 
announcing the proposed reinstatement of oil and gas leases MSES 46739 
and MSES 46740. That notice incorrectly stated the increased rental for 
reinstated leases as $10. The correct rental rate for the reinstated 
leases would be $5. The notice also incorrectly stated the cost of 
publishing the notice as $148. The correct publication cost is $158.


[[Page 32961]]


    Dated: May 31, 2001.
Ida V. Doup,
Chief, Branch of Use Authorization, Division of Resources Panning, Use 
and Protection.
[FR Doc. 01-15367 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-M
No. 257.

#### Speaks *v.*Hoage, Deputy Commissioner, et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. I. Irwin Bolotin*for petitioner.

No appearance for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and motion for leave to proceed further *in forma pauperis*denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ANDREW HRISHENKO,

Petitioner

v.

LAURA A. COOMBS,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 50 WM 2014

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3 rd day of September, 2014, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED

.
# FCM Data May 2011

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF May 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002011FROM REPORTS FILED BY June 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002011	&P of &N
No. 810.

#### Carter Oil Co. *v.*Ramsey et al.

C. A. 7th Cir.

*William M. Acton*for petitioner.

*Charles Wham*for respondents.

Certiorari denied.
Jill Sommers 

Commissioner 

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

www.cftc.gov 

MEMORANDUM 

(202) 418-5030 

(202) 418-5067 Facsimile 

TO: Comment File 

FROM: Commissioner Jill Sommers 

DATE: July 8, 2009 

SUBJECT: Proposal to Revise Adjusted Net Capital Requirements for Futures Commission 

Merchants and Introducing Brokers 

On June 24,2009, Commissioner Sommers met with members of the Futures Industry 

Association's board to discuss issues of general interest to FIA members. Included in the 

discussion were questions raised by board members regarding the proposal to revise the adjusted 

net capital requirements for FCMs and IBs. Board members were particularly interested in 

whether the Commission had conducted an economic analysis to support the proposal to raise the 

risk-based capital requirement to 10 percent of the total risk margin requirement. 

.!~~ z Wd ~ar 1nr sooz 

lVH:t~l3-H03.$ 3Hl.:JO 301.:1.:10 

·oT.-ro
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ralph H. Schmitt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
  This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Date: August 4, 2010
  By: /s/ Ralph H. Schmitt
 Ralph H. Schmitt
 Chief Executive Officer
  40
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SYNETIC,
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995.
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          10,952
<SECURITIES>                                   143,833
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                       675
<INVENTORY>                                      5,299
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,172
<PP&E>                                          31,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           219
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     169,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,803
<SALES>                                         11,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,036
<CGS>                                            6,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,203
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,924
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,924
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                               EXHIBIT  11.1

                   GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                 (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    THREE                SIX
                                                                MONTHS ENDED        MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  JUNE 30,            JUNE 30,
                                                             ------------------  ------------------
                                                               1999      1998      1999      1998
                                                             --------  --------  --------   --------
<S>                                                          <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $     69  $    168  $ (1,824)  $(3,341)

Basic:

  Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding . . .     9,200     8,422     9,332     7,589

  Net loss per common share and common share equivalent . .  $   0.01  $   0.02  $  (0.20)  $ (0.44)

Diluted:

  Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding . . .     9,859     8,631     9,332     7,589

  Net loss per common share and common share equivalent . .  $   0.01  $   0.02  $  (0.20)  $ (0.44)

</TABLE>
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1541 

Expressing support for designation of October 7, 2010, as national 

‘‘Jumpstart’s Read for the Record Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2010 

Ms. MARKEY of Colorado (for herself and Mr. COURTNEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of October 7, 2010, as 

national ‘‘Jumpstart’s Read for the Record Day’’. 

Whereas Jumpstart, a national early education organization, 

is working to ensure that all children in the United 

States enter school prepared to succeed; 

Whereas year-round, Jumpstart recruits and trains college 

students and community volunteers to work with preschool children in low-income communities, helping them 

to develop the language and literacy skills they need to 

succeed in school and in life; 

Whereas since 1993, Jumpstart has engaged over 20,000 

adults in service to more than 70,000 young children in 

communities across the Nation; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1541 IH 

Whereas Jumpstart’s Read for the Record, presented in partnership with Pearson, is a world record-breaking campaign, now in its fifth year, that harnesses the power of 

reading by bringing adults and children together to read 

the same book on the same day; 

Whereas the goals of the campaign are to raise national 

awareness of the early literacy crisis, provide books to 

children in low-income households through donations and 

sponsorship, celebrate the commencement of Jumpstart’s 

program year, and raise money to support Jumpstart’s 

year-long work with preschool children; 

Whereas Jumpstart hopes to engage 2,500,000 children to 

read Ezra Jack Keats’ ‘‘The Snowy Day’’ during this 

record-breaking celebration of reading, service, and fun, 

all in support of the Nation’s preschool children; and 

Whereas October 7, 2010, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as national ‘‘Jumpstart’s Read for the Record 

Day’’ because it is the date Jumpstart aims to set a new 

world record for the world’s largest shared reading experience: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Jumpstart’s 

3 Read for the Record Day’’; 

4 (2) commends Jumpstart’s Read for the Record 

5 in its fifth year; 

6 (3) encourages adults, including grandparents, 

7 parents, teachers, and college students, to join chil8 dren in creating the world’s largest shared reading 

9 experience and to show their support for early litVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:44 Jul 21, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1541.IH HR1541

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1541 IH 

1 eracy and Jumpstart’s early education programming 

2 for young children in low-income communities; and 

3 (4) respectfully requests the Clerk of the House 

4 to transmit a copy of this resolution to Jumpstart, 

5 one of the Nation’s leading nonprofit organizations 

6 in the field of early childhood education. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Vincent Joseph GUARINO, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 15-9084.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arthur O. Whipple, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
  This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Date: August 4, 2010
  By: /s/ Arthur O. Whipple


Arthur O. Whipple
 Chief Financial Officer
  41
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. John Gregory McKOY, Jr., Defendant — Appellant.

No. 06-4340.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 2006.

Decided: Dec. 19, 2006.

J. Bradley Bennett, Salvini & Bennett, LLC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Gregory McKoy, Jr., appeals his sentence imposed for possession with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine and cocaine base and possession of a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking offense after pleading guilty. Counsel has filed an *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), brief and McKoy has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. The Government elected not to file a reply brief. Counsel raises issues of whether McKoy’s sentence was reasonable. We affirm.

This court reviews the imposition of a sentence for reasonableness. *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 260-61, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); *United States v. Hughes,*401 F.3d 540, 546-47 (4th Cir.2005). After *Booker,*courts must calculate the appropriate guideline range, making any appropriate factual findings. *United States v. Davenport,*445 F.3d 366, 370 (4th Cir.2006). The court then should consider the resulting advisory guideline range in conjunction with the factors under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp.2006), and determine an appropriate sentence. *Davenport,*445 F.3d at 370. A sentence imposed within the properly cal*324culated guideline range is presumptively reasonable. *United States v. Green,*436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 2309, 164 L.Ed.2d 828 (2006). Because the district court adequately explained the basis for its sentencing decision, taking into consideration McKoy’s arguments, we conclude that the resulting 180-month sentence was reasonable. *See United States v. Montes-Pineda,*445 F.3d 375, 380 (4th Cir.2006), *petition for cert. filed,*— U.S.L.W.-(U.S. July 21, 2006) (No. 06-5439); *Green,*436 F.3d at 457.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm McKoy’s convictions and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### QIANGQIANG CHEN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71551.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 21, 2012.*

Filed March 2, 2012.

*588Jisheng Li, Law Office of Jisheng Li, Honolulu, HI, for Petitioner.

Donald Anthony Couvillon, Esquire, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, District Director, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Honolulu, HI, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Qiangqiang Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Gu v. Gonzales,*454 F.3d 1014, 1018-19 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Chen’s experiences in China, including the mistreatment he suffered during his detention and the imposition of a daily reporting requirement did not rise to the level of persecution. *See id.*at 1020-21. The record supports *589the IJ’s denial of Chen’s asylum claim, because Chen failed to establish an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution in light of the fact that his similarly situated father lives in China unharmed. *See Aruta v. INS,*80 F.3d 1389, 1395 (9th Cir.1996).

Because Chen did not establish eligibility for asylum, it necessarily follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Sandra D. ROGERS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 15-9133.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




SCHEDULE




TO




JO-ANN STORES, INC.




SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	MAXIMUM SUPPLEMENTAL
	PARTICIPANT	 	RETIREMENT BENEFIT AMOUNT
	David Bolen
	 	$	600,000	 
	David Holmberg
	 	$	600,000	 
	Rosalind Thompson
	 	$	600,000	 






This Schedule is effective as of  October 30, 2005 , and supersedes any
and all previous Schedules.
Antonio T. TOY, petitioner, v. Debbie ASUNCION, Warden.

No. 15-9131.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Lantis Laser Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stanley B. Baron, CEO and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Stanley B. BaronStanley B. BaronCEO and CFO


Dated: May 13, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lantis Laser Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William A. Coskey, hereby certify that, to my knowledge, this Amended Form 10-K of ENGlobal Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ENGlobal Corporation.








Date:
April 29, 2013
/s/ William A. CoskeyWilliam A. CoskeyChief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies this Amended Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Larry KIRKBRIDE, petitioner, v. TEREX USA, LLC, dba Cedarapids.

No. 15-1208.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.