alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000745467
<NAME> MERIDIAN FUND, INC.
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 1
   <NAME> MERIDIAN FUND

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       92,588,486
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     131,448,150
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,345,121
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               5,574,787
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                             7,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,375,478
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      176,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                            176,639
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    96,415,335
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        5,440,123
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        7,065,474
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      158,311
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                      2,765,529
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                    38,859,664
<NET-ASSETS>                               138,198,839
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                              684,462
<INTEREST-INCOME>                              296,994
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 885,093
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         96,363
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     2,764,459
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                    2,352,305
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        5,213,127
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    1,007,190
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                    11,919,392
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        246,077
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  2,402,835
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            531,407
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    (47,484,666)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      1,069,138
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                   11,919,516
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          671,246
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                885,093
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       163,536,707
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            26.28
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                    .03
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           1.02
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                       (1.93)
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              25.40
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   1.09


</TABLE>
Annamarie RIETHMILLER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

No. 16-6047.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1

DG FASTCHANNEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|Name of Subsidiary                                                           |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|StarGuide Digital Networks, Inc.*                                            |  | Nevada                       
|Digital Generation Systems of New York, Inc.*                                |  | New York                     
|Starcom Mediatech, Inc.*                                                     |  | Delaware                     
|Musicam Express, L.L.C.*                                                     |  | Delaware                     
|Corporate Computer Systems, Inc.*                                            |  | Delaware                     
|Corporate Computer Systems Consultants, Inc.*                                |  | Delaware                     
|DG FastChannel, Inc. Acquisition Corporation d/b/a AGT Broadcast, Inc.*      |  | Delaware                     
|DG FastChannel, Inc. Acquisition II Corporation d/b/a SourceEcreative, Inc.* |  | Delaware                     
|Media DVX, Inc*                                                              |  | Delaware                     
|FastChannel Network, Inc*                                                    |  | Delaware                     
|Pathfire, Inc                                                                |  | Georgia                      

---

---



QuickLinks
No. 486, Misc.

#### McAffee *v.*Clemmer, Director.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

*Edward E. O’Neill*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S. Erdahl*and *Joseph M. Howard*for respondent.

Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31899-31900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-443-000]


Discovery Gas Transmission LLC; Notice of Lost and Unaccounted 
for Gas Filing

June 7, 2001.

    Take notice that on June 1, 2001, Discovery Gas Transmission LLC 
(Discovery) filed to comply with the terms of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Sheet Nos. 34, 44, and 53 relating to lost and 
unaccounted for gas for the calendar year 2000.
    Discovery states that it has reviewed the amount of lost and 
unaccounted for gas experienced by the Discovery system during the 2000 
calendar year, and based on that review it proposes to retain the 
current retention rate of 0.5 percent for the period commencing July 1, 
2001.
    In the June 1, 2001 filing, Discovery filed a request for waiver of 
section 4 of its FT-1, FT-2, and IT Rate Schedules related to the 
recovery mechanism for lost and unaccounted for gas.
    Discovery states that copies of this filing are being mailed to its 
customers, state commissions and other interested parties.

[[Page 31900]]

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before June 13, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14848 Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of EmoCapital Corp. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January 31,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Juanming Fang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Juanming Fang                                   

Juanming Fang, 

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 12, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1537 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1537

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 21, 2010.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported through 
the legislative day of July 23, 2010, providing for consideration or disposition 
of a measure addressing unemployment compensation.
    Sec. 2.  It shall be in order at any time through the legislative day of 
July 23, 2010, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the 
rules. The Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or his 
designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this 
section.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Jeanetta CARTER, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION, et al.

No. 16-5728.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jesus CORRAL, Appellant.

No. 11-3726.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 19, 2012.

Filed: June 19, 2012.

*530Kenneth P. Elser, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Smith, AR, Matthew J. Wilson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Smith, AR, for Appellee.

Jesus Corral, Atlanta, GA, pro se.

Naif Samuel Khoury, Fort Smith, AR, for Appellant.

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jesus Corral directly appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute more than 500 grams of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(vm), and 846. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief citing *Anders v. California 386*U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

After carefully and independently reviewing the record, consistent with *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), this court has found no nonfrivolous issue. This court grants counsel leave to withdraw, and affirms.

1

. The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Proposed Rulemaking Q & A – Duties for Swap Dealers and Major Swap 

Participants 

What is the goal of the proposed rulemaking? 

The Dodd-Frank Act sets forth certain duties for swap dealers and major swap participants, including the duty to: 

1) monitor trading to prevent violations of applicable position limits; 

2) establish risk management procedures adequate for managing the day-to-day business of the swap dealer or 

major swap participant; 

3) disclose to the Commission and to applicable prudential regulators general information relating to swap 

trading practices and financial integrity; 

4) establish and enforce internal systems and procedures to obtain information needed to perform all of the 

duties prescribed by Commission regulations; 

5) implement conflicts of interest systems and procedures; and 

6) refrain from taking any action that would result in an unreasonable restraint of trade or impose a material 

anticompetitive burden on trading or clearing. 

The goal of the proposed rulemaking is to set forth business conduct standards for swap dealers and major swap 

participants to ensure compliance with the aforementioned duties. 

What registrants are covered by the proposed regulations? 

The proposed regulations would apply to swap dealers and major swap participants. 

By when must comments on the rules be submitted? 

Comments on the rules must be submitted within sixty (60) days of the publication of the proposal in the Federal 

Register. 

Do the proposed risk management procedures account for the size and complexity of a swap 

dealer or major swap participant? 

Yes. The Commission recognizes that an individual firm must have the flexibility to implement specific policies and 

procedures unique to its circumstances. The proposed regulations would establish the general parameters for the 

design, implementation, review, and testing of a swap dealer’s or major swap participant’s risk management 

program, as well as a limited number of additional elements that the Commission believes are essential to an 

appropriate risk management program. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
EXHIBIT 3.3

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

PLX
Technology, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Delaware, (the "Corporation") hereby certifies as follows:

FIRST: That, on
March 16, 2004, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution proposing and
declaring advisable the following amendment to the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation:



SECOND: That the
stockholders of the Corporation have approved at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders held on May 24, 2004 said amendment in accordance with the
provisions of Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

THIRD: That the
aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with applicable provisions of
Sections 242 and 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, PLX Technology, Inc. has caused this Certificate of Amendment to
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by its Chief
Executive Officer and attested to by its Secretary this 24th day of May, 2004.

|                                              |  | PLX TECHNOLOGY, INC.
|--------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|                                              |  | By                  
|ATTEST:                                       |  |                     
|/s/RAFAEL TORRES
      Rafael TorresSecretary |  |                     

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

        Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S.
           C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Michael L. Burrow, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ENGlobal
Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of ENGlobal Corporation.


Date:  March 24, 2005                          //s// Michael L. Burrow
                                               Michael L. Burrow
                                               Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
SEC Exhibit










FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE 


HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION 
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


(Formerly designated the Holly Corporation Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan)


THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT (the “Fifth Amendment”) to the HollyFrontier Corporation Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), is made by HollyFrontier Corporation (the “Company”).  


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the Company previously adopted the Plan, under which the Company is authorized to grant equity-based incentive awards to certain employees and other service providers of the Company and its subsidiaries; 


WHEREAS, Section 10(f) of the Plan provides that the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) may amend the Plan from time to time without approval of the stockholders of the Company, except that any amendment to the Plan of which approval of the stockholders is required by any federal or state law or regulation or the rules of any stock exchange on which the shares of the Company are listed or quoted must be approved by the stockholders of the Company; 


WHEREAS, the Board now desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the “Shares”) available for awards under the Plan by 4,500,000 Shares, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company;


WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the Fifth Amendment shall be made effective as of May 11, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company.   


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as of the Effective Date, subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders, as set forth below:


1.      Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


Overall Number of Shares Available for Delivery.  Subject to adjustment in a manner consistent with any adjustment made pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan, the total number of Shares that may be delivered in connection with Awards under the Plan shall not exceed 16,500,000, including all Shares delivered with respect to Options granted under the Plan prior to the Amendment Effective Date.  


RESOLVED FURTHER, that except as provided above, the Plan shall continue to read in the current state.  


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank.]
EX-10.14



 Exhibit 10.14 

Multi Packaging Solutions International Limited: 

Summary of Director Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors 

Each non-employee member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Multi Packaging Solutions International Limited (the “Company”) that
is not affiliated with any fund controlled by The Carlyle Group or Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC (each, a “Non-Employee Director”) is eligible to receive the following compensation in respect of service for each fiscal year ending after
the Company’s initial public offering (prorated for any partial fiscal year of service): 
 Annual Board Retainer: Each
Non-Employee Director shall be paid an annual retainer of $75,000, payable quarterly in equal installments. 
 Annual Committee Chair
Retainers: The Chairs of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall each be paid an additional retainer in the amount set forth below, payable quarterly in equal
installments. 
  

			
	 Audit Committee Chair Retainer:
	  	$15,000/year
	 Compensation Committee Chair Retainer:
	  	$10,000/year
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair Retainer:
	  	$7,500/year

 Annual Equity Awards: Subject to the terms and provisions of the 2015 Incentive Award Plan and any
applicable award agreement, each Non-Employee Director shall be entitled to an annual grant of common shares with an aggregate fair market value (based on the closing share price on the grant date) equal to $75,000 (rounded up to the nearest whole
share). The common shares granted to each Non-Employee Director shall be fully vested as of the grant date.  
 Effective
Date: This Director Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors was adopted and approved by the Board, effective as of November 30, 2015. The Board may amend or terminate this Director Compensation Program for
Non-Employee Directors from time to time in its sole and absolute discretion.
##### 



FORM 10-Q  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encore Wire Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Frank J. Bilban, Vice-PresidentFinance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. Date: August 6, 2004 /s/ FRANK J. BILBANFrank J. BilbanVice President  Finance, Chief
FinancialOfficer, Treasurer and Secretary
Cesar HERNANDEZ-DE-LA-ROSA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6101.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.