alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.10

 

Spousal Consent

 

The undersigned, Huang Jiajia, a PRC citizen with PRC Identification Card No.: 320623198512176631, is the lawful spouse of Shu Ting, a PRC citizen with PRC Identification Card No.: 360702198602110645.  I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents (hereinafter referred to as the “Transaction Documents”) by Shu Ting, and the disposal of the equity interests of Beijing Dasheng Zhixing Technology Co., Ltd.  (“Dasheng Zhixing”) held by Shu Ting and registered in his/her name according to the following documents:

 

(1)                                 The Equity Interest Pledge Agreement entered into by and among, Shu Ting, Beijing Dasheng Online Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “WFOE”) and Dasheng Zhixing on June 18, 2013;

 

(2)                                 The Exclusive Option Agreement entered into by and among, Shu Ting, the WFOE and Dasheng Zhixing on June 18, 2013;

 

(3)                                 The Power of Attorney executed by Shu Ting on June 18, 2013.

 

I hereby undertake not to make any assertions in connection with the equity interests of Dasheng Zhixing which are held by Shu Ting.  I hereby further confirm that Shu Ting can perform the Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents without the authorization or consent from me.

 

I hereby undertake to execute all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction Documents (as may be amended from time to time).

 











 

I hereby agree and undertake that if I obtain any equity interests of Dasheng Zhixing which are held by Shu Ting for any reasons, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents and the Amended and Restated Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement entered into between the WFOE and Dasheng Zhixing as of December 14, 2015 (the “Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement”) (as may be amended from time to time) and comply with the obligations thereunder as a shareholder of Dasheng Zhixing.  For this purpose, upon the WFOE’s request, I shall sign a series of written documents in substantially the same format and content as the Transaction Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement (as may be amended from time to time).

 

 

	
/s/ Huang Jiajia
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Huang Jiajia
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Date:   December 14, 2015
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1488 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Ovarian Cancer Awareness 

Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2010 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. 

ISSA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Ovarian Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas ovarian cancer is the deadliest of all gynecologic 

cancers; 

Whereas ovarian cancer is the 5th leading cause of cancer 

deaths among women in the United States; 

Whereas more than 22,000 women will be diagnosed with 

ovarian cancer this year; 

Whereas more than 15,000 women will die from ovarian cancer; 

Whereas those deaths are those of our mothers, sisters, 

daughters, family members, and community leaders; 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1488 IH 

Whereas the mortality rate for ovarian cancer has not significantly decreased since the ‘‘War on Cancer’’ was declared, nearly 40 years ago; 

Whereas all women are at risk for ovarian cancer, and 90 

percent of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer do not 

have a family history that puts them at higher risk; 

Whereas the Pap test is sensitive and specific to the early detection of cervical cancer, but not to ovarian cancer; 

Whereas there is currently no reliable early detection test for 

ovarian cancer; 

Whereas many people are unaware that the symptoms of 

ovarian cancer often include bloating, pelvic or abdominal 

pain, difficulty eating or feeling full quickly, urinary 

symptoms, and several other symptoms that are easily 

confused with other diseases; 

Whereas, in June 2007, the first national consensus statement on ovarian cancer symptoms was developed to provide consistency in describing symptoms to make it easier 

for women to learn and remember them; 

Whereas, due to the lack of a reliable early detection test, 75 

percent of cases of ovarian cancer are detected at an advanced stage, making the overall 5-year survival rate only 

45 percent; 

Whereas certain factors are known to reduce the risk for 

ovarian cancer and play an important role in the prevention of the disease; 

Whereas awareness of the symptoms of ovarian cancer by 

women and health care providers can lead to an earlier 

diagnosis; 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1488 IH 

Whereas, each year during the month of September, the 

Ovarian Cancer National Alliance and its partner members hold a number of events to increase public awareness of ovarian cancer; and 

Whereas September 2010 should be designated as ‘‘National 

Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month’’ to increase the 

awareness of the public regarding the cancer: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of National Ovarian Cancer Aware3 ness Month. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SYNETIC,
INC'S 12/31/97 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          76,641
<SECURITIES>                                     9,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                       782
<INVENTORY>                                      5,906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,963
<PP&E>                                          44,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 384,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,862
<BONDS>                                        159,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           229
<OTHER-SE>                                     194,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   384,179
<SALES>                                         30,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,273
<CGS>                                           16,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,776
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,347
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,429
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    356
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,785
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
Antwon THOMAS, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 16-6162.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-12-00902-CR and 01-12-00903-CR

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 1271999 and 1272000

Style: Michael Gregory Petty

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: June 10, 2013

Type of motion: Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: February 7, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 3; most recent due date June 10, 2013

Date Requested: June 25, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: June 25, 2013

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of 

Date: June 17, 2013
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ROBERT E. O'GRADY, CARL D. LEAVEN, LEONARD B. FELDMAN, DONALD T. BARCLAY, 

TIME TRADING CO., AND RITTENHOUSE INVESTMENTS, INC. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 184 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 184 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Robert E. O'Grady, 

Carl D. Leaven, 

Leonard B. Feldman, 

Donald T. Barclay, 

Time Trading Co., and 

Rittenhouse Investments, Inc. 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that on December 15, 1969, the respondents 

noncompetitively entered into wash and fictitious transactions in pork bellies 

on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, November 10, 1971, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
July 27, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 27th day of July, 2016.

10-15-00035-CV	TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, MARK HUSSEY, PH.D. IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS INTERIM PRESIDENT OF TEXAS A&M AND DAVID VAUGHT, PH.D., INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DEPARTMENT HEAD OF DEPARTMENT HISTORY v. ERNEST STARKS, PH.D. - ON APPEAL FROM THE 272ND DISTRICT COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 14-001701-CV-272 – AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Davis:

“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in that portion of the order of the court below denying Appellee David Vaught’s motion for summary judgment; it is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that that portion of the order be, and hereby is, reversed and judgment is here rendered in favor of Appellee David Vaught in his individual capacity.  It is further the opinion of this Court that there was error in that portion of the order of the court below denying Appellee Mark Hussey’s and Appellee David Vaught’s plea to the jurisdiction; it is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that that portion of the order be, and hereby is, reversed and the cause remanded in accordance with the opinion of this Court.  It is further ordered that the order of the court below, in all other respects, is affirmed.  It is further ordered that Appellee Ernest Starks pay costs of appeal, and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
Doyle Lee HAMM, petitioner, v. Richard F. ALLEN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 15-8753.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. —, original.

#### Ex parte Tinkoff.

November 18, 1935.

*Mr. Paysoff Tinkoff, pro se.*

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
In re Michael HABINIAK, petitioner.

No. 16-295.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arthur O. Whipple, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods indicated.
  This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
  Date: November
4, 2009
  By: /s/ Arthur O.
Whipple


Arthur O.
Whipple
 Chief Financial
Officer
  42
Exhibit 31.2





SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION





I, J.L. Chauvin, Vice President and Treasurer, certify that:





1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Teche Holding Company;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





Date:  January 5, 2011

By:
/s/ J.L. ChauvinJ.L. Chauvin

Senior Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit
31.1



Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant
to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a),

As
Adopted Pursuant To

Section
302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
Robert Silzer, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DSG Global Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report.
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       



|Date:
    July 9, 2020 | /s/
    Robert Silzer                                  
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                       | Robert
    Silzer                                      
|                       | Chief
    Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|                       | (Principal
    Executive Officer and                   
|                       | Principal
    Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-583-001]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 12, 2001.
    Take notice that on November 21, 2000, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company (Florida Gas) filed an explanation of imbalance trading in 
compliance with a Commission order issued October 27, 2000 in Docket 
No. RM96-1-014. The filing provides an explanation of imbalance trading 
on Florida Gas' system.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before June 19, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15237 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: HARRY STURM 

DOCKET NUMBER: 182 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 182 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Harry Sturm 

(Miami Beach, Florida) 

The complaint charges that during the period from February 14 through May 10, 

1968, Harry Sturm exceeded the speculative position limit of 150 carlots of May 

1968 potato futures established by the Commodity Exchange Commission. It 

further charges that in connection with his trading he failed to report his 

transactions and positions as required. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, October 21, 1971, in Miami, Florida. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUIQUAN WANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72746

Agency No. A098-467-416

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2011** 

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Guiquan Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

FILED

JUL 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72746

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence,

Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition

for review.

The IJ found Wang not credible for several reasons, including his lack of

candor and responsiveness and his inability to provide details of his claim. 

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. See id. at

1040-44 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the REAL ID

Act’s “totality of the circumstances”). Accordingly, in the absence of credible

testimony, Wang’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v.

Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Because Wang’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony found to be not

credible, and he does not point to any evidence that shows it is more likely than not

that he would be tortured if returned to China, his CAT claim also fails. See id. at

1156-57. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco VILLAGOMEZ-SIERRA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50442

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 19, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western *423District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Pedro Galindo Nieto, Nieto Law Office, Uvalde, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Francisco Villagomez-Sierra has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.