alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. Hamilton *et al. v.*The State.

1. Charge of the Court—Penalty.—In a felony case the jury were correctly instructed as to the term of confinement to which the accused, if guilty, were amenable; hut were not instructed that such confinement was to he in the penitentiary. *Held,*that the charge is erroneous because not the law of the case.

2. Same—Intent in Theft.—When there was evidence, in a theft case, tending to exonerate the accused from a guilty intent in taking the property, the defense was entitled to an instruction directing the attention of the jury to the question of intent.

Appeal from the District Court of Guadalupe. Tried below before the Hon. E. Lewis.

*John Ireland,*for the appellants.

*George McCormick,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Winkler, J.

On the trial below, the court instructed the jury as follows:

> “ If the jury find the defendants guilty of the theft as charged in the indictment, they will so say, and will assess the punishment, if the value of the property be worth $20 or over, not less than two nor more than five years ; if the value was less than $20, for a term not less than one nor more than two years.”

This charge is not the law of the case, in that it fails to say where the confinement must be.

The following charge was asked by the defendants, and was refused:

> “In this cause the intent is the gist of the offense, and, if you believe from the evidence that the defendants had no criminal intent in taking the hogs, then you will acquit the defendants.”

*495Under the evidence the accused were entitled to a charge calling the attention of the jury to the question of intent.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
---

Exhibit 3.1.1

DEAN HELLERSecretary of State204
North Carson Street, Suite 1Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299(775) 684-5708Website: secretaryofstate.biz

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT (PURSUANT TO NRS
      78.385 AND 78.390)


|Important: Read attached instructions before completing
      form. | ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of IncorporationFor Nevada Profit Corporations(Pursuant
to NRS 78.385 and 78.390  After Issuance of Stock)

|1. Name of
      corporation:
|-----------------------------
|SWAV Enterprises Ltd.        

|2. The articles
      have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):                                                                                                  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Article 1 of the Articles of Incorporation of the
      corporation is hereby amended to change the name of the corporation from
      SWAV Enterprises Ltd. to GBS Enterprises Incorporated.

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the
corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power,
or such greater proportion of the voting power as maybe required in the case of
a vote by classes or series, or as maybe required by the provisions of the
articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 60%.

4. Effective date of filing (optional): Effective
immediately upon filing

5. Officer Signature (required): /s/ Joerg Ott, President
and Chief Executive Officer

*If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference
of any relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding
shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the
affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a
majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment
required regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power
thereof.

IMPORTANT:Failure to include any of the above
information and submit the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.

This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees. See
attached fee schedule.

Nevada Secretary of State AM 78.385 Amend 2003 Revised on
11/03/03

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

          - [Docket No. 00-095-1] 

# AGENCY:

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of reestablishment. 

# SUMMARY:

We are giving notice that the Secretary of Agriculture has reestablished the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Foreign Animal and Poultry Diseases for a 2-year period. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the Committee is necessary and in the public interest. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Joe Annelli, Chief Staff Veterinarian, Emergency Programs, Veterinary Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 41, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-8073. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Foreign Animal and Poultry Diseases is to advise the Secretary of Agriculture regarding program operations and measures to suppress, control, or eradicate an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease, or other destructive foreign animal or poultry diseases, in the event these diseases should enter the United States. The Committee also advises the Secretary of Agriculture of means to prevent these diseases. 

Done in Washington, DC, this 11th day of June, 2001. 

Paul W. Fiddick, 

Assistant Secretary for Administration. 

[FR Doc. 01-15366 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-34-U
In re Richard CLARK, petitioner.

No. 16-6566.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
EX-10.46



 Exhibit 10.46 

[Form of Termination Agreement] 
 May [●],
2016 
 [●] 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”), dated as of
November 23, 2009, among US Foods Holdings Corp. (formally known as USF Holding Corp.) (the “Parent”), US Foods, Inc. (formally known as U.S. Foodservice, Inc.) (the “Company”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Parent, and [●]. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Consulting Agreement. 

Upon the terms and conditions of this letter agreement, the parties hereby agree to terminate the Consulting Agreement pursuant to
Section 13 thereof, in connection with the Company’s initial public offering of shares of its common stock pursuant to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-209442) (the “IPO”).
In connection with and as consideration for such termination, the Company agrees to pay in cash a fee of $[15.33] million to [●] (the “Termination Fee”) on the closing date of the Company’s IPO and, in consideration
thereof, [●] will waive any right to any Transaction Fee in connection with the IPO. Upon the payment of the Termination Fee, the Consulting Agreement will terminate, provided that Sections 3 and 4 thereof shall survive solely as
to any portion of any Transaction Fee accrued, but not paid or reimbursed, prior to such termination. The termination of the Consulting Agreement shall not affect the Indemnification Agreement which shall survive such termination. 

This letter agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, with each executed counterpart constituting an original, but all together
one and the same instrument. This letter agreement sets forth the entire understanding and agreement among the parties with respect to the transactions contemplated herein and supersedes and replaces any prior understanding, agreement or statement
of intent, in each case written or oral, of any kind and every nature with respect hereto. This letter agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York applicable to agreements made and to be performed
within that state. 
 [Remainder of the page left intentionally blank.] 







 If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding and agreement, please sign and return
this letter agreement, whereupon this letter agreement shall constitute a binding agreement with respect to the matters set forth herein. 
  

			
	 Sincerely,
  

US FOODS HOLDING CORP.

		
	By:	 	 
	 Name: Juliette Pryor
 Title:
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer



  

			
	US FOODS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 
	 Name: Juliette Pryor
 Title:
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer



 Acknowledged and agreed as of the 

date first above written: 
 [●] 

 

			
		
	By:	 	 
	 Name:
 Title:
	 	

 [Signature Page to Letter Agreement Terminating Consulting Agreement]
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1254 

Directing the Secretary of the Interior to transmit to the House of Representatives certain information relating to the Secretary’s Treasured Landscape Initiative, potential designation of National Monuments, and High 

Priority Land-Rationalization Efforts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2010 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of Utah) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of the Interior to transmit to the 

House of Representatives certain information relating to 

the Secretary’s Treasured Landscape Initiative, potential 

designation of National Monuments, and High Priority 

Land-Rationalization Efforts. 

1 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Interior is di2 rected to transmit to the House of Representatives, not 

3 later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this 

4 resolution, copies of all Department of the Interior docu5 ments, maps, records (including electronic records), com6 munications and other information dating from July 1, 

7 2009, and later referring to or relating to— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1254 IH 

1 (1) the document containing ‘‘Attachment 4 

2 Prospective Conservation Designation: National 

3 Monument Designations under the Antiquities Act’’ 

4 and marked ‘‘Internal Draft—NOT FOR RE5 LEASE’’, including that document in full, all at6 tachments in full, and all iterations of that docu7 ment, and related similar documents; and 

8 (2) the Secretary’s Treasured Landscape Initia9 tive, potential designation of National Monuments, 

10 and High Priority Land-Rationalization Efforts, in11 cluding any list of participants in, attendees at, or 

12 invitees to meetings thereon, and any related memo13 randa, notes, and other work products. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: PENNSYLVANIA CO-OPERATIVE POTATO GROWERS, INC. AND OWEN L. BARKLEY 

DOCKET NUMBER: 103 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT -- CEA DOCKET NO. 103 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Pennsylvania Co-operative Potato Growers, Inc. 

Owen L. Barkley 

(Harrisburg, Pennsylvania ) 

The complaint charges that the respondent corporation, a futures commission 

merchant, and the respondent individual, general manager of the corporation, 

defrauded a customer by placing in the account of the customer certain potato 

futures contracts which had been made for the account of the corporation. The 

complaint also charges that the respondents failed to treat customers' funds as 

belonging to such customers; failed to keep such funds separate from those of 

the corporation; and used the funds of certain customers to margin and guarantee 

the respondents' own trades. It also alleges that the respondents commingled 

trades made for their own accounts with those of customers and failed to 

maintain records required under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, October 31, 1961, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
Victory LEDGERWOOD, aka Gail Ledgerwood, petitioner, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.

No. 16-350.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

VICTOR MANUEL GALLEGOS,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-14-00275-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120C01669)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s fourth motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until April 11, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Charles L. Roberts, the Appellant’s Attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 11, 2015.

If the Appellant’s brief is not filed with this Court by April 11, 2015, this Court will find it 

necessary to send this case back to the trial court for a hearing as to why the Appellant’s brief has 

not been filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of March, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JOSEPH E. SIEGEL 

DOCKET NUMBER: 159 

DATE: MARCH 2, 1970 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

Docket No. 159 

Name: Joseph E. Siegel 

Effective March 2, 1970 

Effective immediately, respondents Joseph E. Siegel and Alvin C. Winograd 

shall cease and desist from willfully causing, aiding, counseling, commanding or 

inducing respondent The Siegel Trading Co., Inc., to engage in any act or 

practice from which the said firm is directed to cease and desist by this order. 

Done at Washington, D.C. 

March 2, 1970 

Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

For terms of order, see The Siegel Trading Co., Inc. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2 
Page 3
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palmdale  Executive Homes, Corp.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Suzette M.  Major,  President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: July 24, 2009



                                        By: /s/ SUZETTE M. MAJOR
                                            ________________________________
                                                Suzette M. Major
                                                President
Justin KRIVI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6359.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Conversion
Services International, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2009, I, William
Hendry, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.




Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. Such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Conversion Services International,
Inc.




Dated:
March 26, 2010




/s/
      William HendryWilliam
      HendryChief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000934667
<NAME> NORTHEAST ENERGY ASSOCIATES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          49,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,508
<PP&E>                                         503,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 566,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,662
<BONDS>                                        490,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (187,479)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   566,392
<SALES>                                        272,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               272,262
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  186,559<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,924
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,924
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES DEPRECIATION OF $24,978
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11
 
 
                              CEC RESOURCES LTD.
                Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings
                                  (Unaudited)
                     (In Thousands Except Per Share Data)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
 
 
                                                 1998    1997    1996
                                                 ----    ----    ----
<S>                                            <C>      <C>     <C> 
Basic:
 
Weighted average shares outstanding:            1,545   1,580   1,505
 
Incremental shares attributable to dilutive
 stock options and warrants outstanding based     
 on average market prices during the period
 calculated using the treasury stock method         4       4       6
                                               ------  ------  ------
 
Diluted common and common equivalent shares     1,549   1,584   1,511  
                                               ======  ======  ====== 
Net earnings                                   $  240  $  605  $  526
                                               ======  ======  ====== 
 
Earnings per share:
    Basic earnings per share                   $ 0.16  $ 0.38  $ 0.35
                                               ======  ======  ====== 
    Diluted earnings per share                 $ 0.16  $ 0.38  $ 0.35
                                               ======  ======  ====== 
</TABLE>
Stevie Wayne JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6360.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 314.

#### Mitchell *v.*Citizens State Bank of Chicago et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Abraham Teitelbaum*and *Esther Melnick*for petitioner.

*Messrs. James Todd*and *Wrn. H. Beckman*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Steven JONES, petitioner, v. Tom BUTT, et al.

No. 16-439.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
----

            COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION         

of 16 September 2004         

on the implementation by the consular offices of the Member States of the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Community and the National Tourism Administration of the People’s Republic of China on visa and related issues concerning tourist groups from the People’s Republic of China (ADS)

(notified under document number C(2004) 2886)

(2004/645/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 211, second indent, thereof,

Whereas:

HEREBY RECOMMENDS:

In order to facilitate the effective implementation of the ADS MoU, the following common implementation procedures should be applied by the Member States:

Done at Brussels, 16 September 2004.

For the Commission

António VITORINO            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 83, 20.3.2004, p. 14.

----

ANNEX

General information concerning the group

For each member of the group

----