```

[Federal Register: July 25, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 143)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45709-45711]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr25jy00-5]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 143

RIN 3038-AB59


Adjustment of Civil Monetary Penalties for Inflation

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) is
amending Rule 143.8, which governs the maximum amount of civil monetary
penalties, to adjust for inflation. This rule sets forth the maximum,
inflation-adjusted dollar amount for civil monetary penalties
assessable for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (Act) and
Commission rules and orders thereunder. The rule, as amended,
implements the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of
1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 23, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lawrence B. Patent, Associate Chief
Counsel, or Julie R. Windhorn, Law Clerk, Division of Trading and
Markets, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20581. Telephone Number: (202) 418-5450.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990
(FCPIAA), as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996
(DCIA),\1\ requires the head of each Federal agency to adjust by
regulation, at least once every four years, the maximum amount of civil
monetary penalties (CMPs) provided by law within the jurisdiction of
that agency by the cost-of-living adjustment defined in the FCPIAA, as
amended.\2\ Because the purposes for the inflation adjustments include
maintaining the deterrent effect of CMPs and promoting compliance with
the law, the Commission monitors the impact of inflation on its CMP
maximums and adjusts them as needed to implement the requirements and
purposes of the FCPIAA.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The FCPIAA is codified in a note at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. The
relevant amendments to the FCPIAA contained in the Debt Collection
Improvement Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-134 (1996), are also codified
at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. In addition, the Federal Reports Elimination
Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-362 (1998), is also codified at 28 U.S.C.
2461 note. This statute, among other things, eliminated section 6 of
the FCPIAA, which previously required the President to report
annually to Congress. This amendment is not relevant to the
adjustment of CMPs for inflation.
    \2\ Excluded from this requirement is ``any penalty (including
any addition to tax and additional amount) under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, the Tariff Act of 1930, the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 or the Social Security Act.'' 28
U.S.C. 2461 note, as amended by Pub. L. 104-134.
    DCIA also requires that the range of minimum and maximum CMPs be
adjusted, if applicable. This is not applicable to the Commission
because, for the relevant CMPs within the Commission's jurisdiction,
the Act provides only for maximum amounts that can be assessed for
each violation of the Act or the rules and orders thereunder; the
Act does not set forth any minimum penalties. Therefore, the
remainder of this release will refer only to CMP maximums.
    \3\ Specifically, the FCPIAA states:
    The purpose of [the FCPIAA] is to establish a mechanism that
shall--
      (1)allow for regular adjustment for inflation of civil
monetary penalties;
      (2) maintain the deterrent effect of civil monetary penalties
and promote compliance with the law; and
      (3) improve the collection by the Federal Government of civil
monetary penalties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Relevant Commission CMPs

    The inflation adjustment requirement applies to:

any penalty, fine or other sanction that--
    (A) (i) is for a specific monetary amount as provided by Federal
law; or
    (ii) has a maximum amount provided for by Federal law; and
    (B) is assessed or enforced by an agency pursuant to Federal
law; and
    (C) is assessed or enforced pursuant to an administrative
proceeding or a civil action in the Federal courts. 28 U.S.C. 2461
note.

    The Act provides for CMPs that meet the above definition, and are
therefore subject to the inflation adjustment, in three sections:
section 6(c) of the Act, section 6b of the Act, and section 6c of the
Act.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 7 U.S.C. 9, 13a and 13a-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Penalties may be assessed pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Act, 7
U.S.C. 9, against ``any person'' found by the Commission to have--

    (1) engaged in the manipulation of the price of any commodity or
futures contract;
    (2) made willfully a false or misleading statement or omitted a
material fact in an application or report filed with the Commission;
or
    (3) violated any provision of the Act or of the rules,
regulations or orders thereunder.

    Penalties may be assessed pursuant to Section 6b of the Act, 7
U.S.C. 13a, against: (1) Any contract market that the Commission finds
is not enforcing or has not enforced its rules; or (2) any contract
market, or any director, officer, agent, or employee of any contract
market, that is violating or has violated any of the provisions of the
Act or any of the rules, regulations, or orders thereunder.
    Penalties may be assessed by ``the proper district court of the
United States or the proper United States court of any territory or
other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States'' pursuant
to section 6c of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 13a-1, against ``any person found *
* * to have committed any violation [of any provision of the Act or any
rule, regulation or order thereunder].''

III. Relevant Cost-of-Living Adjustment

    The cost-of-living adjustment is defined by the FCPIAA, as amended
by the DCIA, as the amount by which the Consumer Price Index for the
month of June of the calendar year preceding the adjustment exceeds the
Consumer Price Index for the month of June of the calendar year in
which the amount of such civil monetary penalty was last set or
adjusted pursuant to law.\5\ The

[[Page 45710]]

adjusted CMP maximums are to be rounded based upon the size of the
penalty and a specified formula.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Consumer Price Index means the Consumer Price Index for
all-urban consumers (CPI-U) published by the Department of Labor.
Interested parties may find the relevant Consumer Price Index over
the Internet. To access this information, go to the Consumer Price
Index Home Page at http://stats.bls.gov/cpihome.htm; first select,
Most Requested Series; then select Overall BLS Most Requested
Series; and finally, under Price Indexes, select CPI for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) 1967=100 (Unadjusted)--CUUROOOOAAO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission's initial inflation adjustment, reflected in the
current Rule 143.8, was published in the Federal Register on October
28, 1996, with an effective date of November 27, 1996.\6\ Therefore,
the cost-of-living adjustment for the CMP maximums that can be assessed
and enforced by the Commission would be the amount by which the
Consumer Price Index for all-urban consumers published by the
Department of Labor for June 1999 (i.e., June of the year preceding
this year) exceeds that index for June 1996.\7\ After rounding
according to the applicable formula,\8\ the maximum, inflation-adjusted
CMP for each violation of the Act or Commission rules or orders
thereunder assessed against any person pursuant to sections 6(c) and 6c
of the Act will be $120,000 or triple the monetary gain to such person
for each such violation, and $575,000 for each such violation when
assessed pursuant to section 6b of the Act. The FCPIAA provides that
``any increase under [FCPIAA] in a civil monetary penalty shall apply
only to violations which occur after the date the increase takes
effect.'' Thus, the new CMP maximum may be applied only to violations
of the Act that occur after the effective date of this amendment,
October 23, 2000.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 61 FR 55564.
    \7\ The Consumer Price Index for all-urban consumers published
by the Department of Labor for June 1999 was 497.9, and for June
1996 was 469.5. Therefore, the relevant cost of living adjustment
factor would equal 497.9 divided by 469.5.
    \8\ The FCPIAA, as amended by DCIA, provides in relevant part
for the rounding of any inflation adjustment ``to the nearest--
    (5) multiple of $10,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$100,000 but less than or equal to $200,000; and
    (6) multiple of $25,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$200,000.''
    Calculations of the Commission's inflation-adjusted CMP maximums
are the following:
    (497.9/469.5) x $110,000=$116,653.89
    (497.9/469.5) x $550,000=$583,269.44
    When rounded according to the statutory requirements, the
inflation-adjusted CMP maximums would be $120,000 and $575,000.
    \9\ See also Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244 (1994)
(holding that there is a presumption against retroactivity in
changes to damage remedies or civil penalties in the absence of
clear statutory language to the contrary).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Related Matters

A. Effective Date

    This amendment to Rule 143.8 will implement a statutory change
regarding agency procedure or practice within the meaning of 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(A) and therefore does not require notice.\10\ The Commission
also believes that opportunity for public comment is also unnecessary
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). This amendment does not affect any
substantive change in Commission regulations, nor alter any obligation
that a party has under Commission rules, regulations or orders. No
party must change its manner of doing business, either with the public
or the Commission, to comply with the rule amendments. These changes
are undertaken pursuant to a statutory requirement that all agencies
make such adjustments and are intended to prevent inflation from
eroding the practical, deterrent effect of CMPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b) generally requires notice of proposed
rulemaking to be published in the Federal Register. That provision
states, however, that except when notice or hearing is required by
statute, notice is not required for:
    (A) * * * interpretive rules, general statements of policy, or
rules of agency organization, procedure or practice; or
    (B) when the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the
finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules
issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While higher maximum CMPs may expose persons to potentially higher
financial liability, in nominal terms, for violations of the Act or
Commission rules or orders thereunder, the rule amendments do not
require that the maximum penalty be imposed on any party, nor do they
alter any substantive due process rights that a party has in an
administrative proceeding or a court of law that protect against
imposition of excessive penalties. Further, the rule amendments only
apply to violations of the Act, Commission rules or Commission orders
that occur after the effective date of these amendments.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires that
agencies consider the impact of their rules on small businesses. The
amended rule will potentially affect those persons who are found by the
Commission or the Federal courts to have violated the Act or Commission
rules or orders. Some of these affected parties could be small
businesses. Nevertheless, the Chairman, on behalf of the Commission,
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
    While the Commission recognizes that certain persons assessed a CMP
for violating the Act or Commission rules or orders may be small
businesses, the rule does not mandate the imposition of the maximum
fixed CMP set forth in the rule on any party. As is currently the case,
the imposition of the maximum fixed CMP will occur only where the
administrative law judge, the Commission or a Federal court finds that
the gravity of the offense warrants a CMP in that amount.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Section 6(e) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 9a(1), directs the
Commission to ``consider the appropriateness of [a] penalty to the
gravity of the violation'' when assessing a CMP pursuant to section
6(c) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 9. In addition, the Commission's penalty
guidelines state that the Commission, when assessing any CMP, will
consider the gravity of the offense in question. In assessing the
gravity of an offense, the Commission may consider such factors as
whether the violations resulted in harm to the victims, whether the
violations involved core provisions of the Act and whether the
violator acted intentionally or willfully, as well as other factors.
See CFTC Policy Statement Relating to the Commission's Authority to
Impose Civil Money Penalties and Futures Self-Regulatory
Organizations' Authority to Impose Sanctions; Penalty Guidelines,
[1994-1996 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) para.26,265
(November 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The rule should not increase in real terms the economic burden of
the fixed maximum CMPs set forth in the Act. Instead, the rule
implements a statutory requirement that agencies adjust for inflation
existing CMPs so that the real economic value of such penalties, and
therefore the Congressionally-intended deterrent effect of such CMPs,
is not reduced over time by inflation. Nor does the rule impose any
new, affirmative duty on any party or change any existing requirements
and thus no party who is currently complying with the Act and
Commission regulations will incur any expense in order to comply with
the new rule. Therefore, the Commission believes that this final rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Any agency that regulates the activities of small entities
must establish a policy or program to reduce and, when appropriate,
to waive civil penalties for violations of statutory or regulatory
requirements by small entities. An agency is not required to reduce
or to waive civil penalties, however, if: (1) An entity has been the
subject of multiple enforcement actions; (2) an entity's violations
involve willful or criminal conduct; or (3) the violations involve
serious health, safety or environmental threats. See Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (``SBREFA''), Pub. L.
104-121, Sec. 223, 110 Stat. 862 (March 29, 1996). The Commission
takes these provisions of SBREFA into account when it considers
whether to seek or to impose a civil monetary penalty in a
particular case involving a small entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), which
imposes certain requirements on federal agencies, including the
Commission, in connection with their conducting or sponsoring any
collection of information as defined by the PRA, does not apply to this
rule. The Commission

[[Page 45711]]

believes this rule amendment does not contain information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget.

List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 143

    Civil monetary penalty, Claims.

    In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to authority
contained in sections 6(c), 6b and 6c of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 9, 13a, and
13a-1(d), and 28 U.S.C. 2461 note as amended by Pub. L. No. 104-134,
the Commission hereby amends part 143 of Chapter I of Title 17 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 143--COLLECTION OF CLAIMS OWED THE UNITED STATES ARISING FROM
ACTIVITIES UNDER THE COMMISSION'S JURISDICTION

    1. The authority of citation for part 143 is revised to read as
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 9 and 15, 9a, 12a(5), 13a, 13a-1(d) and
13(a); 31 U.S.C. 3701-3719; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.

    2. Section 143.8 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to
read as follows:


Sec. 143.8  Inflation-adjusted civil monetary penalties.

    (a) Unless otherwise amended by an act of Congress, the inflation-
adjusted maximum civil monetary penalty for each violation of the
Commodity Exchange Act or the rules or orders promulgated thereunder
that may be assessed or enforced by the Commission under the Commodity
Exchange Act pursuant to an administrative proceeding or a civil action
in Federal court will be:
    (1) For each violation for which a civil monetary penalty is
assessed against any person (other than a contract market) pursuant to
section 6(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 9:
    (i) For violations committed between November 27, 1996 and October
22, 2000, not more than the greater of $110,000 or triple the monetary
gain to such person for each such violation; and
    (ii) For violations committed on or after October 23, 2000, not
more than the greater of $120,000 or triple the monetary gain to such
person for each such violation;
    (2) For each violation for which a civil monetary penalty is
assessed against any contract market or other person pursuant to
section 6c of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 13a-1:
    (i) For violations committed between November 27, 1996 and October
22, 2000, not more than the greater of $110,000 or triple the monetary
gain to such person for each such violation; and
    (ii) For violations committed on or after October 23, 2000, not
more than the greater of $120,000 or triple the monetary gain to such
person for each such violation; and
    (3) For each violation for which a civil monetary penalty is
assessed against any contract market or any director, officer, agent,
or employee of any contract market pursuant to section 6b of the
Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 13a:
    (i) For violations committed between November 27, 1996 and October
22, 2000, not more than $550,000 for each such violation; and
    (ii) For violations committed on or after October 23, 2000, not
more than $575,000 for each such violation.
* * * * *
    (c) Unless otherwise amended by an act of Congress, the penalties
set forth in this section or any penalty adjusted for inflation in the
future pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section shall be applicable
only to violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, Commission rules, or
Commission orders which occur after the date on which such future
inflation adjustments become effective.

    Issued in Washington, DC on July 19, 2000 by the Commission.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 00-18728 Filed 7-24-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-U
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----