alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 11.1

                       DIGITAL GENERATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
                 STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE
                                 COMMON SHARES
                 (in thousands, except for per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Year Ended    Year Ended    Year Ended
                                      December 31,  December 31,  December 31,
                                          1999          1998          1997
                                      ----------------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>           <C>           <C>

Net Loss                              $    (8,763)  $   (30,237)  $   (14,775)
                                      ========================================
Weighted Average common shares
  outstanding                              26,653        16,272        11,893
                                      ========================================
Basic and diluted net loss per
  common share (1)                    $     (0.33)  $     (1.97)  $     (2.52)
                                      ========================================
</TABLE>

(1) For the year ended December 31, 1998, the net loss per share was computed as
a net loss of $30,237,000 plus $1,764,000 relating to the preferred stock deemed
dividend divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding.

    For the year ended December 31, 1997, the net loss per share was computed as
net loss of $14,775,000 plus $15,161,000 relating to the preferred stock  deemed
divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding.
  (See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Page 1 of 1 

COMMENT 

secretary 

From: TOR062365@aol.com 

Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 4:38 PM 

To: secretary 

Subject: Block Trading 

To whom it may Concern, 

I trade coffee options on the Ice exchange. I believe having a secondary market like block trading, in which 

only certain players know the markets, is bad for liquidity and in the long run will damage these relatively small 

markets. 

I believe that the CEO and board of the exchange are doing what they believe is right, even though 

according to the Chicago Tribune, back in the 90's Jeff Sprecher unsuccessfully argued that a system hiding 

bids and offers would be prone to manipulation, a prophetic warning realized in 2000 when rolling blackouts hit 

California. 

I urge the CFTC to either abolish block trading or make the minimum size a significant, news worthy amount. 

Thank-you 

John Santoro 

New year ... new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines. 

' ...... 

'""" ·-- ·.:::. 

. ·,v. --· 

1/6/2009
Exhibit 10.3

 

FIRST AMENDMENT
 TO THE
 PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 

WHEREAS, Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Penn National Gaming, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”); and

 

WHEREAS, Section 12.2 of the Plan provides that the Company may amend the Plan at any time by action of the Board; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to address the eligibility of certain employees to participate in the Plan.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective November 1, 2013 as follows:

 

1.             Section 2.1 is amended by adding the following to the end thereof:

 

“Any Employee who becomes an Employee during the 24-month period commencing on November 1, 2013 and who had been a participant in the Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan shall be eligible to participate in the Plan as soon as practicable following the date he becomes an Employee.”

 

2.             In all other respects, the Plan shall remain as previously written.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been adopted this 6th day of January, 2014.

 

	
ATTEST:
    	
 
    	
PENN   NATIONAL GAMING, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Tammy L. Albrecht
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Robert S. Ippolito
Brent D. EVANS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6431.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.225
        CIT Equipment Financing
        1540 West Fountainhead Parkway
        Tempe, AZ 85282

[CIT] Logo

                                        NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT

Ken Nelson
Ready Mix, Inc.
3430 East Flamingo Road
Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89121-5018
(602)437-5400

        RE: Equipment Schedule 2, dated June 20, 2000 to Master Lease Agreement
            dated June 20, 2000 between Ready Mix, Inc.(Lessee)and The CIT
            Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.,(Lessor) attached hereto and made a
            part hereof (collectively the "Agreement")

Dear Mr. Nelson:

This will serve as notice to you that The CIT Group/Equipment Financing,
Inc.("CIT") has sold and assigned its interest in the above Agreement to
General Electric Capital Corporation(GE Capital) Effective immediately, GE.
Capital is entitled to all of the rights of CIT under the Agreement and all
future payments are to be made to GE Capital, with respect to the Agreement
without offset, deduction, defense, abatement, deferment or diminution. From
this date forward, any and all notices or instructions relating to the
Agreement, shall not be valid unless signed by GE Capital, and all payments
relating to the Agreement shall be made directly to GE Capital at the following
address(or such address as GE Capital may specify to you in writing):

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION
COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT FINANCING
44 OLD RIDGEBURY ROAD
DANBURY, CT 06810
888-223-9760

This Notice may not be revoked or amended except by in writing signed by GE
Capital


Sincerely,
The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.



By: /s/ Richard Johnson
    -----------------------------------

Title: Richard Johnson
       Vice President
       --------------------------------


                                        CIT ACCOUNT #: 00108640
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Bryan Mejia, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Tamiko A. Amaker, J. at plea; Erika M. Edwards, J. at sentencing), rendered March 13, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Tamiko A. Amaker, J. at plea; Erika M. Edwards, J. at sentencing), rendered March 13, 2015, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. It charged all the elements of third-degree assault (<i>se</i>e Penal Law ยง 120.00[1]), and set forth sufficient factual allegations to warrant the conclusion that the victim suffered a "physical injury," i.e., "substantial pain" (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 10.00[9]). The instrument recited that defendant "forcefully squeez[ed]" the victim's neck, and "thr[e]w her onto the floor," causing the victim's "face to strike the floor," and as a result of defendant's actions, the victim suffered "redness to the neck, scratches on her hand, and substantial pain." Based on these allegations, "a jury could certainly infer that the victim felt substantial pain" (<i>People v Henderson</i>, 92 NY2d 677, 680 [1999]; <a href="../2012/2012_02609.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Mercado</i>, 94 AD3d 502</a> [2012], <i>lv denied </i>19 NY3d 999 [2012]; <a href="../2011/2011_01329.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Lang</i>, 81 AD3d 538</a> [2011], <i>lv denied </i>16 NY3d 896 [2011]), a term which simply means "more than slight or trivial pain" (<a href="../2007/2007_03757.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Chiddick</i>, 8 NY3d 445</a>, 447 [2007]; <i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 10.00[9]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: October 04, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                       726
<INVENTORY>                                     24,743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,693
<PP&E>                                          54,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,790
<SALES>                                         70,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           55,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   127
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,606
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          54,779
<SECURITIES>                                    73,924
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,222
<INVENTORY>                                     33,877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               246,092
<PP&E>                                          60,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 408,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,252
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       190,296
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,294
<SALES>                                        183,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,092
<CGS>                                          168,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  168,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (70,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,956)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,913)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.84)
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 1336 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 20, 2010. 

Whereas, on March 28, 2010, the University of Texas 

Longhorns men’s swimming and diving team won the 

2010 NCAA Division I national championships with 500 

points; 

Whereas the University of Texas at Austin, located in Austin, 

Texas, was founded in 1883 and serves over 50,000 students today; 

Whereas the University of Texas Longhorns have won more 

than 40 national championships, and University of Texas 

athletes have won 116 Olympic medals; 

Whereas 2010 marked the 10th NCAA national championship for the University of Texas men’s swimming and 

diving team; 

Whereas head coach Eddie Reese led the team to excellence 

and became the first men’s swimming and diving coach 

to win NCAA team titles in four separate decades; and 

Whereas senior Dave Walters and sophomore Jimmy Feigen 

were named the 2010 Big 12 Co-Swimmers of the Year, 

and sophomore Drew Livingston was named the 2010 

Big 12 Diver of the Year: Now, therefore, be it 
2 

•HRES 1336 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the University of Texas men’s swimming and diving 

team for winning the 2010 NCAA Division I national championship. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
CHU VUE, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-5802.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Investment Trust  (the "Trust") on
Form N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of such
officer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Report.

Dated:	June 24, 2005

|/s/Christine Reynolds  
|-----------------------
|Christine Reynolds     
|President and Treasurer





Dated:	June 24, 2005



|/s/Timothy F. Hayes    
|-----------------------
|Timothy F. Hayes       
|Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Exhibit 27 contains summary financial information extracted
from NS Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements as of and for the three and six month
periods ended March 28, 1998, included in the Company's quarterly
report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such condensed consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000745026
<NAME> NS GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,471
<SECURITIES>                                    71,731
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                       646
<INVENTORY>                                     81,011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,325
<PP&E>                                         292,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 453,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,205
<BONDS>                                         76,106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       279,588
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   453,001
<SALES>                                        247,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,299
<CGS>                                          213,529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,838
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,273
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,273
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- The Boeing Company Under ContractNo. F33657-01-C-0047 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59858

Andrew E. Shipley, Esq. Seth H. Locke, Esq.

Perkins Coie LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Charles W. Goeke, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Philadelphia, PA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 24 November 2015

Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59858, Appeal ofThe Boeing Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Exhibit
10.2


 


Payment
Extension Agreement


 


Party
A: Tianjin Binhai Shisheng Trading Group Co., Ltd


Party
B: Hezhong (Tianjin) International Development Co., Ltd


 


Party
A and Party B had entered into an equity transfer agreement on November 30, 2013, by which Party A acquires 100% equity of Tianjin
Zhonghe Auto Sales Service Co., Ltd. As per this acquisition agreement, a payment of RMB ONE HUNDRED TWENTY MILLION was originally
due on November 30, 2015. After friendly consultation, the two parties hereby conclude an arrangement as below:


 


1.
On request of Party A, Party B agreed to further extend this due payment to November 30, 2016, and the annual interest rate for
the extension is 6%.


 


2.
This agreement is made in two copies with equivalent validity.


 


3.
Any issue not covered herein shall be negotiated separately between the parties.


 


Party
A: /s/ Cheng Weihong             Party B: /s/
Fan Jie


 


	 	Date:
    May 12, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1673 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1673

Recognizing 75 Texas World War II veterans visiting Washington, DC, on 
    September 27, 2010, to visit the memorials built in their honor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2010

Mr. Paul submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing 75 Texas World War II veterans visiting Washington, DC, on 
    September 27, 2010, to visit the memorials built in their honor.

Whereas 16,000,000 brave Americans served in the Armed Forces during World War 
        II, and more than 400,000 sacrificed their lives;
Whereas there are more than 1,600,000 veterans living in the State of Texas, of 
        which more than 157,000 served during World War II;
Whereas, on September 27, 2010, the Dow Chemical Company will fly 75 Texas World 
        War II veterans who retired from the company to Washington, DC, as part 
        of the Honor Flight program;
Whereas the visit will allow the veterans to visit the memorials built in their 
        honor and pay tribute to those with whom they served in the Armed 
        Forces, as well as to those who followed in their footsteps; and
Whereas Congress thanks these Texas veterans for their bravery, sacrifice and 
        service to the country during World War II, and expresses appreciation 
        for their many years of hard work as part of Dow's Texas Operations: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 75 World War 
II veterans visiting Washington, DC, from Texas on September 27, 2010, 
for their service and dedication and wishes them a memorable visit to 
Washington.
                                 <all>
```
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Danny Neal Thompson, * From the 220 th District Court

of Comanche County

Trial Court No. CR04002

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00 300

- CR * October 11, 2018

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey , C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J. ;

Gray, C.J., sitting by assignment; and

Wright, S.C.J., sitting by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of th e trial court is in all things affirmed.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

The Boeing Company 

Under Contract No. F33657-01-C-0047 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59858 

Andrew E. Shipley, Esq. 

Seth H. Locke, Esq. 

Perkins Coie LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Charles W. Goeke, Esq. 

Senior Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Philadelphia, PA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 24 November 2015 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59858, Appeal of The Boeing 

Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREYD. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals