Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-43769; File No. SR-NASD-00-73]

                    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)[1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]                                          notice is hereby given that on December 13, 2000, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD” or “Association”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq has designated his proposal as one establishing or changing a due, fee or other charge imposed by the self-regulatory organization under section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act, which renders the rule effective upon Commission receipt of this filing. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.                

## I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

                    The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”), through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (“Nasdaq”) is herewith filing a proposed rule change to increase the fees associated with the Enterprise Wide Network II (“EWN II”) to pass on costs associated with increasing its capacity. Nasdaq has designated this proposal as one establishing or changing a due, fee or                           ( print page 827)                        other charge imposed by the self-regulatory organization under section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act, which renders the rule effective upon Commission receipt of this filing. Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is underlined; proposed deletions are in brackets.                

## NASD Rule 7010. System Services

#### (a)-(e) No Change

#### (f) Nasdaq Workstation Service

(1) No Change

(2) The following charges shall apply to the receipt of Level 2 or Level 3 Nasdaq Service via equipment and communications linkages prescribed for the Nasdaq Workstation II Service:

                    Service Charge: [$1,500]                    *$1,875/*                    month per service delivery platform (“SDP”)                     *from December 13, 2000 through February 28, 2001*;                     *$2,035/month per SDP beginning March 1, 2001.*

Display Charge: $525/month per presentation device (“PD”).

                    Additional Circuit/SDP Charge: [$2,700]                    *$3,075/*                    month                     *from December 13, 2000 through February 28, 2001, and $3,235/month beginning March 1, 2001.**

A subscriber that accesses Nasdaq Workstation II Service via an application programming interface (“API”) shall be assessed the Service Charge for each of the subscriber's SDPs and shall be assessed the Display Charge for each of the subscriber' API linkages, including an NWII substitute or quote-update facility. API subscribers also shall be subject to the Additional Circuit/SDP Charge.

*No change to footnotes.

* * * * *

## II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Nasdaq included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

### A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

#### 1. Purpose

The purpose of this filing is to amend the subscriber fees applicable to NASD members that use the Nasdaq Workstation II (“NWII”).

                    In 1994, Nasdaq rolled out the NWII service, which provided many enhancements to the then-existing Nasdaq Workstation service.[3]                                          As part of the NWII rollout, Nasdaq installed a network, known as the Enterprise Wide Network (“EWN I”), to deliver NWII functionality. To access NWII service, each subscriber location has at least one service delivery platform (“SDP”), or server, that resides on the network and connects to Nasdaq by a dedicated circuit. The SDP functions as the subscriber's gateway from the NWII to the enterprise wide network. Each SDP currently is permitted to support up to eight presentation devices (“PD”), or Nasdaq Workstation IIs, although a firm may elect to have fewer than eight PDs on a single SDP. In addition, a subscriber may obtain NWII service through an application programming interface (“API”), which essentially allows a firm to obtain NWII Service using the firm's own hardware (                    *e.g.,*                     personal computer) and software systems to access, display, interface with, and operate NWII service.                

                    Due to the ongoing growth in the Nasdaq market and increases in daily share volume after EWN I was installed,[4]                                          Nasdaq became concerned in 1997 that its existing enterprise wide network capacity was rapidly approaching maximization. Specifically, the network's bandwidth—the amount of data that can be transmitted through a given communications circuit in a fixed amount of time—could only handle one and one-half billion shares per day. EWN I was expected to reach maximum circuit capacity during the second quarter of 1999.[5]                                          To avoid the potential for any disruption to the Nasdaq market, Nasdaq contracted in late 1997 with MCI Communications Corporation (“MCI”) to build a new network—EWN II—to accommodate increased usage and provide increased circuit capacity.                

                    EWN II is a significant improvement over EWN I. Among other things, the system is fully scaleable and twice as fast as EWN I. The network was originally built with a 128 kilobit (“kb”) data stream feed speed scaleable up to T1 speed (1544 kilobits) levels. Nasdaq began converting subscribers to EWN II in 1998 and completed the conversion in 1999. In conjunction with the conversion, the Nasdaq filed fee increases which became effective in 1998 relating to EWN II.[6] 

Since that time, Nasdaq share volume has continued to increased dramatically. The highest average daily share volume for a month in 2000 was just over 2 billion shares, compared to less than 1.5 billion in 1999, and less than 1 billion in 1998. The highest peak share volume day in 2000 was just under 3 billion shares, compared to under 2 billion in 1999, and just over 1 billion in 1998. The highest actual cumulative share volume for a month occurred twice in 2000 at over 40 billion shares, compared to over 30 billion in 1999, and almost 20 billion in 1998. In March 2000, share volume increased by over 103% compared to March 1999. In April 2000, the peak share volume increased by over 103% compared to April 1999.

                    To accommodate these increases, Nasdaq expanded the EWN II bandwidth from 128 kb to 192 kb in October 2000. The expanded bandwidth also gives Nasdaq the ability to support new products as they are introduced and future trading applications that will be developed. As a result of expansion to a 192 kb bandwidth, the fees that WorldCom [7]                                          charges Nasdaq have increased by $375 per month per circuit. Nasdaq proposes to pass on these costs to subscribers for the billing period covered by December 13, 2000 through February 28, 2001.[8] 

                    In order to accommodate additional increases in volume expected to accompany decimalization, Nasdaq will expand EWN II bandwidth to 256kb, and consequently, the fees that WorldCom charges Nasdaq will increase by an additional $160 per month per circuit. As of December 2000, Nasdaq projects that decimalization in penny increments will significantly increase the number of quote updates, such that on high volume days, a 192 kb                           ( print page 828)                        bandwidth would be inadequate to support quote traffic. Therefore, Nasdaq proposes to pass on the costs associated with the increase to a 256 kb bandwidth effective March 1, 2001.                

                    Under the proposal, the fee charged to a subscriber for an SDP would increase from $1,500 per month for each server to $1,875 per month from December 13, 2000 through February 28, 2001, and then to $2,035 per month, beginning March 1, 2001.[9]                                          The charge for an additional circuit would increase from $2,700 per month to $3,075 per month from December 13, 2000 through February 28, 2001, and then increase again on March 1, 2001 to $3,235 per month.[10] 

Although NASD Rule 7010(f)(2) generally applies to both members and non-member subscribers to NWII service, this filing will only effect a change to the fees charged to NASD members. Nasdaq is filing a separate but virtually identical rule change to impose the proposed new fees on non-member subscribers.

#### 2. Statutory Basis

                    Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of section 15A(b)(5) of the Act,[11]                                          which requires that the rules of the NASD provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system which the NASD operates or controls. The proposed fees, which will only apply to those who utilize NWII service, simply pass on the costs associated with increasing the capacity of EWN II to keep pace with volume increases. Ensuring adequate capacity is absolutely essential to protecting the integrity of the Nasdaq market, maintaining the confidence of the investing public, and preparing for decimalization.                

### B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition. 

### C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others

Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

## III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action 

                    Because the foregoing rule change establishes or changes a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange, it has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) [12]                                          of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.[13]                                          At any time within 60days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.                

## IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All submissions should refer to the File No. SR-NASD-00-73 and should be submitted by January 25, 2001.

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[14] 

Jonathan G. Katz,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                             NWII provides a windows-based environment and several data management facilities not previously available in Nasdaq's former (pre-1994) workstation service.                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                             When Nasdaq installed EWNI, Nasdaq's average daily share volume (for 1994) was 295 million and projections showed that the average daily share volume for 1997 would be 520 million. In 1997, however, average daily share volume was 650 million.                    
        Back to Citation      

5.                             Similar to any other private network, EWN I was designed to have a maximum circuit capacity (                        *i.e.,*                         2,100 circuits).                    
        Back to Citation      

6.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Rel. Nos. 40434 (Sep. 11, 1998), 63 FR 49937, and 40716 (Dec. 2, 1998), 63 FR 66619.                    
        Back to Citation      

7.                             MCI and WorldCom merged in September 1998.                    
        Back to Citation      

8.                             The Commission notes the effective date for this proposed fee increase is December 13, 2000, the date this filing was received by the Commission. Nasdaq has amended its filing to change its stated effective date from December  1, 2000 to December 13, 2000, and has indicated that it intends to submit a separate filing pursuant to Section 19b-2 proposing to recover its fees for the period of December 1-12, 2000.                         *See*                         Letter from Edward S. Knight, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Nasdaq, to Katherine England, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, SEC, dated December 21, 2000.                    
        Back to Citation      

9.                                                     *See Id.*
        Back to Citation      

10.                             As noted above, a T1 circuit supports up to six SDPs, and an SDP supports up to eight PDs. A subscriber will be subject to the additional circuit charge when the subscriber has not maximized capacity on its SDPs by placing eight PDs and/or API servers on an SDP; in such case, the NASD/Nasdaq will charge the additional circuit charge for those “underutilized” SDPs (the difference between the number of SDPs a subscriber has and the number of SDPs the subscriber would need to support its PDs and/or API servers, assuming an eight-to-one ratio). A subscriber also will be subject to the additional circuit charge when the subscriber has not maximized capacity on its T1 circuits by placing six                    
        Back to Citation      

11.                             15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

12.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).                    
        Back to Citation      

13.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).                    
        Back to Citation      

14.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 01-152 Filed 1-3-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M