alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 476.

#### Windt et al. *v.*Lindy et al.

November 11, 1935.

*Mr. C. E. Pigford*for petitioners.

*Mr. Jerome J. Rothschild*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                        Exhibit 11
                                                        ----------

                         SYNETIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                   QUARTERS ENDED     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                    DECEMBER 31,        DECEMBER 31,
                                                 ------------------  ------------------
                                                  1997      1996      1997      1996
                                                 -------  ---------  -------  ---------
<S>                                    <C>       <C>      <C>        <C>      <C>
 
Basic earnings(loss)
  from operations....................  (A)       $ 2,293  $(25,934)  $ 3,785  $(23,545)
 
Assumed conversion of convertible
  debentures(1)......................                 -          -         -         -
                                                 -------   -------  --------  --------
 
Diluted earnings from operations.....  (B)       $ 2,293  $(25,934)  $ 3,785  $(23,545)
                                                 =======  ========   =======  ========
 
Weighted average shares
  outstanding - basic................  (C)        17,662    16,886    17,638    16,841
 
Common stock equivalents for
  dilutive earnings per
  share using the treasury
  stock method.......................              1,675        -      1,753         -
                                                 -------   -------  --------   -------
 
Additional equivalent shares upon
  assumed conversion of convertible
  debentures(1)......................                 -         -         -         -
                                                 -------   -------  --------   -------
 
Weighted average shares and common
  equivalent shares outstanding
  for diluted earnings per share.....  (D)        19,337    16,886    19,391    16,841
 
EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
Basic................................  (A)/(C)   $   .13  $  (1.54)  $   .21  $  (1.40)
 
Diluted..............................  (B)/(D)   $   .12  $  (1.54)  $   .20  $  (1.40)
 
---------------------------
</TABLE>

(1) The Convertible Debenture conversion is not included in the computation of
    earnings per share as it is anti-dilutive for all periods presented.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1*

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Cognex Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
April 4, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

        Date: May 10, 2004

                                          /s/ Robert J. Shillman
                                          ----------------------
                                          Robert J. Shillman
                                          President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chairman of the Board of Directors
                                          (principal executive officer)

* This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### Carolyn De GUZMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIH FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-1825.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.

Carolyn de Guzman, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey William Larroca, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn de Guzman appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on her employment discrimination and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Guzman v. NIH Fed. Credit Union,*No. 8:08-cv-03213-PJM, 2010 WL 2802127 (D.Md. July 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

 Office of Public Affairs 

 Three Lafayette Centre 

 1155 21st Street, NW 

 Washington, DC 20581 

 www.cftc.gov

Q & A – Protection of Cleared Swaps Customers 

Before And After Commodity Broker Bankruptcies 

What is the goal of the Request for Comment? 

Section 724 of the Dodd-Frank Act amends the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) by inserting a new section 4d(f), 

concerning the protection of the collateral of the swaps customers of futures commission merchants. The goal of 

the request for comment is to obtain reliable information the Commission can use to implement the requirements 

of the statute in a cost-effective manner. 

What stakeholders are potentially affected? 

Swaps customers, futures commission merchants, and derivatives clearing organizations will be affected by the 

regulations that the Commission will ultimately propose and promulgate, and the request for comments directs 

questions to each of those groups. 

By when must responses to the request for comments be submitted? 

Responses to the request for comments must be submitted within forty-five (45) days of the publication of the 

proposal in the Federal Register. 

What information is the Commission seeking? 

The Commission is seeking information concerning the costs and benefits of various models by which the collateral 

of swaps customers may be protected, both at individual entities and across the industry. 

What Models Are Being Considered? 

The Commission is considering a range of models, including 

1) a model requiring individual segregation of each customer’s collateral at all levels (at the FCM, DCO and at 

each custodian), 

2) a model of individual customer protection, where collateral of multiple customers may be commingled, but 

the value of the collateral for each customer’s positions is treated on an individual basis, 

3) a model where the collateral of non-defaulting customers may be used in the event of an FCM default, but 

only after other elements of the clearinghouse’s default resources package, including the clearinghouse’s 

own contribution and the clearing member-funded guarantee fund, and 

4) the current futures model, which treats an FCM’s customers on an omnibus basis. 

When will rules implementing the requirements of the statute be proposed? 

The Commission will consider the comments promptly after the deadline for responses closes, and will 

expeditiously move to propose rules. 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission ♦ Office of Public Affairs ♦ 202-418-5080
No. 674, Misc.

#### Hall *v.*Illinois.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3700]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Gifts to the Tsars 1500-1700, Treasures from the Kremlin,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Indianapolis Museum of Art, Indianapolis, IN from on or about September 23, 2001 to on or about January 13, 2002, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-5997). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: June 12, 2001.

Helena Kane Finn,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 01-15539 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 2.21

                        Amendment to Employment Agreement


         This amendment is made to that certain Employment Agreement dated
November 1, 1998, by and between MLC Enterprises, Inc., a Texas Corporation
("Company") now known as IDS Fabricated Systems, Inc. and Michael L. Moore, a
Texas resident, ("Employee") in connection with the acquisition of all the
outstanding common stock of Company from Employee by Industrial Data Systems,
Corp. pursuant to a Stock Acquisition Agreement of even date therewith.

         Whereas, since the acquisition date additional undisclosed liabilities
of MLC Enterprises, Inc. have come to the attention of the parties; and

         Whereas, Employee's entitlement to prior commissions was premised, in
part, on the absence of such undisclosed liabilities; and

         Whereas, the parties hereto desire to adjust Employee's Compensation
for accrued unpaid commissions as a dollar for dollar offset against such
undisclosed liabilities of Company;

         Now therefore in consideration of the premises and the further
consideration of a dollar for dollar credit against any undisclosed liabilities
of Company as of the Acquisition Date, Paragraph 4(c) of the Employment
Agreement is amended to reduce the amount of accrued unpaid commissions by
$125,000.00 as of November 1, 1998 and deleting payments due on May 1, 1999;
August 1, 1999; November 1, 1999; February 1, 2000 and May 1, 2000.



         Signed this 16th day of January, 1999.


         IDS Fabricated Systems, Inc.
         formerly known as
         MLC Enterprises, Inc.
         by: /s/ William A. Coskey
            ---------------------------
         William A. Coskey, President



         /s/ Michael L. Moore
         ------------------------------
         Michael L. Moore
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7662

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAUL CASTILLO RAMOS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:04-cr-00293-AW-1; 8:07-cv-02982-AW)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raul Castillo Ramos, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Richard Pauze, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raul Castillo Ramos seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his motion for reconsideration 

of the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ramos has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Donald W. REINARD, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 16-5948.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department denied.
No. 438.

#### Quigley *v.*United States.

October 21, 1935.

*Messrs. Eugene D. O’Sullivan*and *Charles J. Southard*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Keenan,*and *Mr. David V. Cahill*for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
H. Res. 1334 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 6, 2010. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Owens (to rank immediately after Mr. Murphy of New York). 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Patrick Murphy 

of Pennsylvania. 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Garamendi (to 

rank immediately after Mr. Owens), Mr. Boswell (to rank immediately after Mr. Garamendi), Mr. Johnson of Georgia (to 

rank immediately after Mr. Boren). 

COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Mr. Deutch (to rank 

immediately after Mr. McMahon). 

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. Owens (to 

rank immediately after Ms. Titus). 

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Deutch (to rank 

immediately after Ms. Chu), Mr. Polis. 
2 

•HRES 1334 EH 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Mr. Luja ́n (to 

rank immediately after Mr. Heinrich). 

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: Mr. 

Garamendi (to rank immediately after Mr. Peters). 

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Johnson of Georgia. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### In re THE LEX GROUP VA.

No. 2010-1115.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 7, 2010.

Sean T.C. Phelan, Hanify & King, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. On the brief was Edward A. Pennington.

Christina J. Hieber, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, and William Lamarca, Associate Solicitor.

RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is Ordered And Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
EXHIBIT 4.28


 


Letter of Consent 


 


I, Kai Wang (ID Card No.: 41050419821217106X),
am the duly married spouse of Kuan Song (ID Card No.: 410503198209212012). I hereby acknowledge, understand and agree that:


 


1. In accordance with the Equity Pledge
Agreement he signed on May 27, 2015, Kuan Song pledges to Acorn Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 90% of the equity interest
he holds in Shanghai Acorn Network Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Network”) and in Beijing Acorn Trade
Co., Ltd. (“Beijing Acorn”), respectively.


 


2. In accordance with the provisions of
the Exclusive Purchase Agreement entered into on May 27, 2015, Kuan Song irrevocably grants Acorn Information Technology (Shanghai)
Co., Ltd. the right to at any time purchase or designate any third party to purchase all or part of the equity interest he holds
in Shanghai Network and Beijing Acorn and I have no objections against the above grant and its exercise.


 


3. In accordance with the Power of Attorney
he signed on May 27, 2015, Kuan Song irrevocably grants Gao Weiji his shareholder’s voting right at the shareholders’
meetings of Shanghai Network and Beijing Acorn, including but not limited with respect to the sale or transfer of all or any part
of the equity interest he holds in Shanghai Network and Beijing Acorn, and his right to vote on such matters as the designation
or appointment of a director of the company at the shareholders’ meetings of Shanghai Network and Beijing Acorn.


 


4. I have no objections against the equity
pledge, the exclusive right to purchase, and the setup, grant and exercise of the Power of Attorney as described above and acknowledge
that I will not now or in the future assert any claims or take any actions that would oppose, prevent or hinder the exercise of
any of the above rights.


 


	 	/s/ Kai Wang (Signature)
	 	 
	 	May 27, 2015
Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-08481 of Harrington  Financial  Group,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated
July 23, 1997 (August 7, 1997 as to Note 19), appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Harrington Financial Group, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 1997.


/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana

September 26, 1997
SEC Exhibit






                                                                               Exhibit 10.47












June 2015
 Marco Palmieri




Dear Marco,


Your contributions to Novelis are very important.  In recognition of this, the Company has put in place an enhancement to the existing long-term incentive plan (LTIP). This “Bridge” plan was developed to supplement the LTIP while the new Novelis portion of the Plan matures. This program will provide you with a cash incentive in addition to your other compensation such as your base salary, annual bonus opportunity and long-term incentive opportunity.


The Bridge plan is in place for FY2016 and will be reviewed and considered for FY2017.





You will receive three payments in the total amount of $100,000



First Payment in December 2015        $30,000
Second Payment in December 2016        $30,000
Third Payment in December 2017        $40,000
 


















Because this opportunity is designed to enhance our LTIP as a retention incentive, in the event that you voluntarily terminate your employment prior to December 31, 2018, or are terminated for cause, you will be required to repay any payments made under the Bridge plan in the previous 12 months, less applicable taxes, and you will not be entitled to any other payments thereafter.  If you are terminated involuntarily without cause, any unpaid cash installments will be immediately cancelled, but you will not be required to repay any cash payments you have received.


Your acceptance of any payments under this award shall constitute your acceptance of the terms and  conditions set forth above.


I am very pleased that we are able to offer you this opportunity and I look forward to your continuing to be a key member of the team as we focus on building an even more successful Novelis.


Sincerely,


/s/ Steve Fisher


Steve Fisher
  Interim President & CEO and Senior Vice President and CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000850428
<NAME> GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION ENERGY INCOME P-2 LTD PSHP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         373,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  159,928
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               533,660
<PP&E>                                       6,201,845
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,913,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,822,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,822,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,822,131
<SALES>                                        469,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               553,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  890,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (337,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (337,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (337,252)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>