alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1
                                                                 ------------

        HCI DIRECT, INC. (FORMERLY, HOSIERY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC.)
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

          The following table lists each  significant  subsidiary of HCI Direct,
     Inc. (formerly,  Hosiery Corporation of America, Inc.) and its jurisdiction
     of organization.

                                                                Jurisdiction
                                                                      of
Subsidiary                                                      Organization
----------                                                      -------------

U.S. Textile Corporation (100% owned).......................... North Carolina
The Stonebury Group, Inc. (100% owned)......................... Nevada
Hosiery Corporation International, Inc. (100% owned)........... Delaware
Enchantress Hosiery of Canada (100% owned)..................... Ontario, Canada
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 15, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 15, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0069. CITY OF ADRIAN, GEORGIA v. JOE MILLS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15CV137
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Cost-U-Less, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin
P. Moore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully  complies
with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2005



/s/   Martin P. Moore
Martin P. MooreChief Financial Officer


---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,207
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,309
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               317,355
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,125
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         94,171
<ALLOWANCE>                                        213
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 446,797
<DEPOSITS>                                     136,175
<SHORT-TERM>                                   245,571
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,062
<LONG-TERM>                                     35,995
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           407
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 446,797
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,087
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               28,387
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                34,474
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,466
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,408
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,066
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       92
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 733
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,263
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,263
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    1.43
<LOANS-NON>                                        336
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   120
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       92
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  213
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               213
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: RALPH W. MOORE 

CITATION: 10 Agric. Dec. 1401 

DOCKET NUMBER: 47 

DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 1951 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER VACATING STAY ORDER 

(No. 2971) 

In re RALPH W. MOORE. CEA Doc. No. 47. Decided November 14, 1951. 

Vacation of Stay Order -- Prior Order Reinstated -- Effective Date of 

Suspension of Trading Privileges

Where the order of November 15, 1950, suspending the respondent's trading 

privileges for 90 days, was stayed pending the outcome of the appeal filed by 

respondent in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, 

which Court upheld the order, and the United States Supreme Court denied 

certiorari, the Judicial Officer ordered that the stay order be vacated, the 

order of November 15, 1950, be reinstated, and the effective date of the 

suspension of respondent's trading privileges to commence on January 15, 1952. 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer 

ORDER VACATING STAY ORDER

On November 15, 1950, a decision and order (9 Agric. Dec. 1299 (9 A.D. 1299)) 

were entered in this proceeding suspending for 90 days the respondent's trading 

privileges on the contract markets because of violations of the Commodity 

Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. Chapter 1) and the regulations thereunder. The effective 

date of the order was postponed (9 Agric. Dec. 1316 (9 A.D. 1316)) on November 

26, 1950, because of an appeal filed by the respondent in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 

On July 5, 1951, the court unanimously upheld the decision and order of 

November 15, 1950, and on October 22, 1951, the United States Supreme Court 

denied the respondent's application for a writ of certiorari. 

Accordingly, the stay order of November 28, 1950, is vacated and the order of 

November 15, 1950, is reinstated. Commencing on January 15, 1952, all contract 

markets shall refuse to Ralph W. Moore the privileges of trading thereon, either 

directly or indirectly, for a period of 90 days. 

Copies of this order shall be served on the respondent and on each contract 

market. 

LOAD-DATE: June 8, 2008 
Page 2
RODNEY MCCUTCHEON

,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL D. CREWS, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS

,

Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR RE HEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 5781

Opinion filed July 17, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Rodney McCutcheon, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Susan A. Maher and Marcu s O. Graper, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits

.

ROBERTS, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ.

, CONCUR.
Mike REDFORD, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 16-5946.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 6 
<CIK> 0000744822
<NAME> Fidelity Investment Trust
<SERIES>
 <NUMBER> 81
 <NAME> Fidelity Worldwide Fund
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 year          
 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             oct-31-1997   
 
<PERIOD-END>                  oct-31-1997   
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>         1,035,111     
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>        1,139,928     
 
<RECEIVABLES>                 36,027        
 
<ASSETS-OTHER>                0             
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>          0             
 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,175,955     
 
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>      8,150         
 
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>       0             
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>     6,614         
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>           14,764        
 
<SENIOR-EQUITY>               0             
 
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>      913,417       
 
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>         67,255        
 
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>         57,776        
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>     12,156        
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>        0             
 
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>       130,811       
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>      0             
 
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>      104,807       
 
<NET-ASSETS>                  1,161,191     
 
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>             22,551        
 
<INTEREST-INCOME>             4,848         
 
<OTHER-INCOME>                (1,824)       
 
<EXPENSES-NET>                12,372        
 
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>       13,203        
 
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>      131,823       
 
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     21,778        
 
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         166,804       
 
<EQUALIZATION>                0             
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>     9,780         
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>      21,858        
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>         0             
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>       90,094        
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>   82,695        
 
<SHARES-REINVESTED>           2,080         
 
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        283,973       
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>       10,438        
 
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>     29,075        
 
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>       0             
 
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>    0             
 
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>         7,971         
 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0             
 
<GROSS-EXPENSE>               12,628        
 
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>          1,067,502     
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>         15.180        
 
<PER-SHARE-NII>               .210          
 
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>       2.430         
 
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>          .170          
 
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>     .380          
 
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>          0             
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>           17.270        
 
<EXPENSE-RATIO>               118           
 
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>        0             
 
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>          0
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1509 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1509

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 14, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1722) to improve teleworking in executive 
agencies by developing a telework program that allows employees to telework at 
least 20 percent of the hours worked in every 2 administrative workweeks, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in 
the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Oversight and 
Government Reform now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Oversight and Government Reform; and (2) one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  House Resolution 1496 is laid on the table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Henry P. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
-------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
February 13, 2006


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Getenet GEBRE-SELASSIE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-1000.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 28, 2008.

Decided: Sept. 11, 2008.

Mare Seguinót, Seguinót & Associates, P.C., McLean, Virginia, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jamie M. Dowd, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Getenet Gebre-Selassie, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen as untimely. • We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.**See In re: GebreSelassie*(B.I.A. Oct. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*

*

 Because we agree that Gebre-Selassie’s motion to reopen is untimely, we decline to address the Board's alternate finding that the motion would be denied on its merits. To the extent, however, that Gebre-Selassie argues that his attorney's ineffective assistance prevented him from timely filing his motion to reopen and requests equitable tolling on this ground, we note that the Board did grant him the benefit of equitable tolling. Moreover, his ineffective assistance of counsel claim is foreclosed by our recent holding in *Afanwi v. Mukasey,*526 F.3d 788, 796-99 (4th Cir.2008) (holding that there is no constitutional right under the Fifth Amendment to effective assistance of counsel in removal proceedings).
Exhibit 23











CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-68019 and No. 333-101426) and Form S-8 (No. 333-76655, No.
333-101422, and No. 333-127196) of Marvel Entertainment, Inc. of our report
dated February 27, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements,
financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.








/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





New York,
New York


February
27 ,
2008
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 4.3    
    


 
  Execution Version    
    


 
    TERMINATION OF VOTING AGREEMENT
  May 6, 2016    
    


        WHEREAS, the undersigned are parties to that certain Voting Agreement; dated as of November 6, 2013 (the
"Voting Agreement") that sets forth their agreement with respect to the voting for members of the board of directors of The Container Store
Group, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware (the "Company"); 


        WHEREAS,
capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings set forth in the Voting Agreement; 


        WHEREAS,
the undersigned desire to terminate the Voting Agreement; 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties agree that the Voting Agreement is hereby terminated and shall be of no further force or effect; provided that each LGP Stockholder hereby agrees to vote all
Shares owned or held of record by such LGP Stockholder at the annual meeting of the Company's stockholders to be held in 2016 (the "2016 Annual
Meeting"), in favor of, or to take all actions by written consent in lieu of any such 2016 Annual Meeting as are necessary, to cause the election of William A. "Kip" Tindell,
III as a member of the Board of Directors to the extent such person is nominated for election as a Director by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. 


        This
termination agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original counterpart, and all of which shall be considered to be but one
agreement and shall become a binding agreement when each party shall have executed one counterpart and delivered it to the other party hereto. 








        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has signed this termination agreement as of the date first above written: 

 






								
	 	 	 	By:	 	 /S/ WILLIAM A. "KIP" TINDELL, III







 
	 	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	William A. "Kip" Tindell, III
	
 	

 	
 	
By:	
 	
/s/ SHARON TINDELL







 
	 	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	Sharon Tindell
	
 	

 	
 	
By:	
 	
/s/ MELISSA REIFF







 
	 	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	Melissa Reiff




 

 [Signature Page to Termination of Voting Agreement] 









        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has signed this termination agreement as of the date first above written: 

 






						
	 	 	 	GREEN EQUITY INVESTORS V, L.P.
	 	 	 	By:	 	GEI Capital V, LLC,

its General Partner
	
 	

 	
 	
By:	
 	
/s/ TIM FLYNN







 
	 	 	 	Name:	 	Tim Flynn
	 	 	 	Title:	 	Partner
	
 	

 	
 	
GREEN EQUITY INVESTORS SIDE V, L.P.
	 	 	 	By:	 	GEI Capital V, LLC,

its General Partner
	
 	

 	
 	
By:	
 	
/s/ TIM FLYNN








 
	 	 	 	Name:	 	Tim Flynn
	 	 	 	Title:	 	Partner
	
 	

 	
 	
TCS CO-INVEST LLC
	
 	

 	
 	
By:	
 	
/s/ TIM FLYNN







 
	 	 	 	Name:	 	Tim Flynn
	 	 	 	Title:	 	Partner




 

 [Signature Page to Termination of Voting Agreement] 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.3

Execution Version


TERMINATION OF VOTING AGREEMENT May 6, 2016
Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

attention: Office of the Secretariat 

Subject: ''Proposed Rules for Trading Off the Centralized Market." 

To Whom it May Concern 

11/17/08 

COMMENT 

I have been an option trader for over 15 years and still trade on the floor as I execute orders 

for my customers. There is a major problem arising on our exchange. It is the implementation of the 

block trading system. While I might agree that this procedure has some merits for electronic future 

trading, it not only doesn't work for the option market; block trading is a major destructing force for 

trading our markets as we know it. Let me explain. 

Trading as we know it. We, the traders, and not Board members who have no experience in 

commodities. Their goal, as any corporation, is to raise the stock price for the share holder and not 

help the actual end user. Such an example is the extending of trading hours that does not raise volume. It only extends periods of inactivity and illiquidity ultimately forcing and spooking participants 

away. Block trading is worse. 

Block trading in options at any volume is a mistake. The option market is where "size" orders 

can be traded at one current price very easily. There is no limit to the amount of contracts or number 

of trade combinations that can be executed in an options market. The futures price is harder to pinpoint on large orders, especially in an electronic system, and therefore maybe necessary in executing a few thousand lots comfortably at one price. Futures, trade with limits and the options don't 

have limits. Option markets already trade fairly with open and competitive price discovery systems. 

So to use large orders or complex combinations as a reason for block trading is just an excuse. It 

will not raise the volume of trading. 

I know trading will never be the same as it used to be as we transition to a new modernized 

system, but the basic principles must remain the same. Prearranged trades and non competitive 

trades are not the ways to entice, protect, and keep customers to the "new'' system. Especially when 

fair price discovery was the cornerstone to assuring fair, liquid, and transparent markets. 

Please re-evaluate any proposed changes in setting ridiculous limits or allowing block trading 

at all. At the very least, don't leave this a vague rule for all Exchanges to set as a one size fits all solution to skew near term results to the benefit of the shareholders. Instead, make it something substantial to benefit the long term health of all the markets. Make trading fair for all who participate. 

Remember that every commodity is different. So have a committee of trading professionals in each 

commodity make these decisions on what's best for their markets. 

Commodity trading and investment is a necessary function in our economy. This is where we 

need CFTC regulation. The time to act is now. Before it's too late. 

Sincerely 

Jeffrey Chason 

', __ .
SCWC-11-0000512

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

PATRICK LOPEZ, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-11-0000512; CIVIL NO. 09-1-1613)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Pollack, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Lee, in place of McKenna, J., recused)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Patrick Lopez’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on February 8, 2013, is

hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The

parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding

scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 21, 2013.

Eric A. Seitz for 

petitioner

Kimberly Tsumoto Guidry

for respondent

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Randal K.O. Lee

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000512

21-MAR-2013

11:58 AM