alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1654 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1654

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 16, 2010.
Whereas close to 600 colleges and universities in the United States and 
        thousands of undergraduate students and faculty pursue undergraduate 
        research every year, providing research opportunities that will shape 
        the trajectory of students' lives and careers and researchers' and 
        institutions' purpose and contributions to academia and the research 
        enterprise;
Whereas students and faculty engaged in undergraduate research contribute to 
        research across many disciplines, including arts and humanities, 
        biology, chemistry, health sciences, geosciences, mathematics, computer 
        science, physics and astronomy, psychology, and social sciences;
Whereas research at the undergraduate level provides both students and faculty 
        members opportunities for improving and assessing the research 
        environment at their institution, develops critical thinking, 
        creativity, problem solving, and intellectual independence, and promotes 
        an innovation-oriented culture;
Whereas undergraduate research is essential to pushing the Nation's innovation 
        agenda forward by increasing the interest and persistence among young 
        people in the crucial science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 
        (STEM) disciplines, and to cultivating the interest of would-be 
        researchers who pursue a new aspiration of graduate education after 
        participating in undergraduate research; and
Whereas the week of April 11, 2011, would be an appropriate week to designate as 
        ``Undergraduate Research Week'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Undergraduate Research Week'';
            (2) recognizes the importance of undergraduate research and of 
        providing research opportunities for the Nation's talented youth to 
        cultivate innovative, creative, and enterprising young researchers, in 
        collaboration with dedicated faculty;
            (3) encourages institutions of higher education, Federal agencies, 
        businesses, philanthropic entities, and others to support undergraduate 
        research and undergraduate researchers and their faculty mentors;
            (4) encourages opportunities, including through existing programs, 
        for females and underrepresented minorities to participate in 
        undergraduate research; and
            (5) supports the role undergraduate research can and does play in 
        crucial research that serves the Nation's best economic and security 
        interests.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Anthony Gene TRAPPIER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5995.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
James E. TOWNSEND, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-8825.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

*41Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Anne HISLOP, petitioner, v. MONTANA.

No. 16-491.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

*487Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
#### Brett J. WADDOUPS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent.

No. 06-3127.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 21, 2006.

Before NEWMAN, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

*996JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 86
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20105 Summary Calendar

PAULINE SKINNER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

JESSE BROWN, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS’ AFFAIRS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CV-865)

December 12, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DEMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff Pauline Skinner, an African-American woman over

forty years of age, filed this suit against Jesse Brown, Secretary

of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, alleging discrimination and

retaliation on the basis of her race and age in violation of Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §2000eet seq. , and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended

29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.

. Plaintiff asserts claims of disparate

treatment based on her race and age, retaliation based on her race

and age, and a racially hostile work environment. The district

court granted Defendant’s motion for su mmary judgment and denied

Plaintiff’s.

We have carefully reviewed the brief s, record excerpts, and

the relevant portions of the re cord itself. We affirm

substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its

memorandum opinion and order signed October 31, 1996 and filed

November 1, 1996. AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1536 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1536

  Supporting Take a Child to a Park Week; declaring the third week in 
           July as ``National Take a Child to a Park Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2010

Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Holden) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting Take a Child to a Park Week; declaring the third week in 
           July as ``National Take a Child to a Park Week''.

Whereas, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, childhood 
        obesity rates in the United States have more than tripled in the last 30 
        years;
Whereas obese children and adolescents are at a greater risk for serious health 
        problems;
Whereas a lack of physical activity is cited as one of the major contributing 
        factors to obesity in children and adults;
Whereas, according to the Institute of Medicine, opportunities for 
        extracurricular physical activity outside of school hours to complement 
        formal physical education is an increasingly important strategy to 
        prevent obesity in children and young adults;
Whereas, according to the American Heart Association, parents should try to be 
        role models for active lifestyles and provide children with 
        opportunities for increased physical activity;
Whereas local parks offer children and families close to home recreation 
        opportunities to engage in physical activity and reconnect with nature;
Whereas local parks and playgrounds play an instrumental role in helping 
        children of all ability levels develop motor skills, cognitive 
        abilities, and socializing attributes through both structured and 
        unstructured activities and programs; and
Whereas local parks provide families with cost-effective means of spending time 
        together, bonding, and engaging in healthy activities: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the importance of engaging children in 
        physical activity to combat the rising rate of childhood 
        obesity;
            (2) recognizes the value of local parks in providing 
        opportunities for children and families to engage in positive, 
        healthy behaviors; and
            (3) supports the annual designation of ``Take a Child to a 
        Park Week''.
                                 <all>
```
Hector CORTES-MEDINA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6209.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Stephen Marty WARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6119.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, John R. Beall, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ENGlobal Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ENGlobal Corporation.





Date:April 12, 2012//s// John R. BeallJohn R. BeallChief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-12685

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

MARK T. STINSON, SR., 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN T FOWLKES, 

Federal Judge, 

U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, 

Memphis, TN, 

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

USCA11 Case: 24-12685 Document: 15-1 Date Filed: 09/23/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-12685

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 1:24-cv-22833-DMM

____________________

Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Mark Stinson appeals from the district court’s order transferring his case to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of 

Tennessee under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). We lack jurisdiction over this 

appeal because transfer orders under § 1406(a) are non-appealable 

interlocutory orders. See Middlebrooks v. Smith, 735 F.2d 431, 432 

(11th Cir. 1984); Stelly v. Emps. Nat’l Ins. Co., 431 F.2d 1251, 1253-54 

(5th Cir. 1970). 

All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for 

rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other 

requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

USCA11 Case: 24-12685 Document: 15-1 Date Filed: 09/23/2024 Page: 2 of 2
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1987/2004

of 19 November 2004         

applying a reduction coefficient to refund certificates for goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, as provided for by Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 of 13 July 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds (2), and in particular Article 8(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The amounts for applications of refund certificates for use from 1 December 2004 are subject to a reduction coefficient of 0,685.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 November 2004.

For the Commission

Olli REHN            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 318, 20.12.1993, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2580/2000 (OJ L 298, 25.11.2000, p. 5).

(2)OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 886/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 14).

----
Gilbert RAMOS, petitioner, v. Robert LeGRAND, Warden, et al.

No. 16-5673.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 158.

#### Brame *v.*Keystone Credit Corp. et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. M. J. Fulton*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Hartwell Cabell*aUd *John S. Eggleston*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Charles N. TAYLOR, Jr., petitioner, v. Dee MARGO, et al.

No. 16-339.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                  STATEMENT RE:
                       COMPUTATIONS OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,          SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                           -------------------------------     -------------------------------
                                                                2002              2001              2002              2001
                                                           -------------     -------------     -------------     -------------
<S>                                                        <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Numerator:
    Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share

    NET LOSS                                               $  (1,413,955)    $  (1,824,380)    $  (2,985,484)    $  (3,695,321)
                                                           =============     =============     =============     =============

Denominator:
    Denominator for basic loss per share
    Weighted average shares                                  146,659,453        98,095,728       134,182,700        92,951,533


   Effect of dilutive securities:
      Stock options and warrants                                      --                --                --                --

   Dilutive potential common shares                                   --                --                --                --
                                                           -------------     -------------     -------------     -------------


   Denominator for diluted earnings per share
      Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed
      conversions                                            146,659,453        98,095,728       134,182,700        92,951,533
                                                           =============     =============     =============     =============


BASIC LOSS PER SHARE                                       $       (0.01)    $       (0.02)    $       (0.02)    $       (0.04)
                                                           =============     =============     =============     =============
DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE                                     $       (0.01)    $       (0.02)    $       (0.02)    $       (0.04)
                                                           =============     =============     =============     =============

</Table>


The Company incurred a net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001.
Therefore, the Company did not make adjustments for potentially dilutive
securities as the adjustments would have been anti-dilutive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999,
FILED AS PART OF FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN TS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  267,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               306,055
<PP&E>                                         834,765
<DEPRECIATION>                               (731,535)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 430,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,498,924
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,185,679
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,342,135)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   430,833
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               764,492
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,594,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               634,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             210,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,671,883)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,671,883)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 41,014
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,630,869)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.053)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.053)


</TABLE>
Jose Martin NOGALES, petitioner, v. Michael McDONALD, Warden, et al.

No. 16M49.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FRED MINOR,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 106 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**Exhibit 99.7**

|   | **KPMG LLP**                       | Telephone        (604) 691-3000                                                          |
|--------|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **Chartered   Accountants**        | Fax                     (604) 691-3031 |
|   | PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir   Street | Internet              www.kpmg.ca                          |
|   | Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3               |                                                                                                              |
|   | Canada                             |                                                                                                              |

**COMMENTS BY AUDITORS FOR US READERS ON CANADA – US REPORTING DIFFERENCES**

To the Board of Directors of Ballard Power Systems Inc.

In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there is a change in accounting principles that has a material effect on the comparability of the Company’s financial statements, such as the changes described in note 18(i) to the financial statements. Our report to the shareholders dated February 19, 2007, included herein, is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a reference to such a change in accounting principles in the auditors’ report when the change is properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.

Chartered Accountants Vancouver, Canada February 19, 2007

KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadian member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of Concentra Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 33-97040) of our report dated
May 29, 1998, except for note M, for which the date is June 1, 1998, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Concentra Corporation as of
March 31, 1998 and 1997, and for each of the three years in the period ended
March 31, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.






                                             /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Boston, Massachusetts
June 23, 1998
SEC Exhibit



Exhibit 10.5



AIRGAS, INC.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN II 
Amendment No. 1
This AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Airgas, Inc. (the “Company”) Deferred Compensation Plan II (As Amended and Restated Effective September 1, 2015) (the “Plan”) is made and entered into effective as of April 5, 2016.
		
	1.
	    Section 2.12 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence immediately after the end thereof:


“Notwithstanding the foregoing, for Bonuses earned in respect of calendar year 2016 and each subsequent calendar year, “Deferral Period” means the calendar year.”
		
	2.
	Section 3.1(b)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following at the end thereof:


“or, in the case of Salary or Directors’ Fees earned in respect of calendar year 2017 or any subsequent calendar year, no later than 11:59pm on December 31 of the year before such Salary or Directors’ Fees are earned (or such earlier date as the Committee may determine in its discretion).”
		
	3.
	Section 3.1(b)(ii) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following at the end thereof:


“or, in the case of a Bonus earned in respect of calendar year 2016 or any subsequent calendar year, no later than 11:59pm on June 30 of the Deferral Period to which the Deferral Commitment relates (or such earlier date as the Committee may determine in its discretion).”
		
	4.
	Miscellaneous.  Except as expressly contemplated hereby, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment shall be construed and interpreted according to the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions thereof.






[Signature page follows.]


    










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, has executed this Amendment on behalf of the Company as of the date first above written.


AIRGAS, INC.




By: /s/ Michael L. Molinini 
Name: Michael L. Molinini
Title: President and CEO








[Signature Page to Amendment No. 1 to the Airgas, Inc. DCP II]