alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SYNETIC,
INC'S 3/31/98 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          82,921
<SECURITIES>                                     3,206
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                       783
<INVENTORY>                                      5,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,839
<PP&E>                                          47,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 387,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,231
<BONDS>                                        159,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           230
<OTHER-SE>                                     201,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   387,177
<SALES>                                         46,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,710
<CGS>                                           24,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,064
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,161
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
State of Delaware
Secre’ of State
Division 0} Gesporacrons
Delivered 01:11 PM 04/08/2014
FILED 01:11 PM 04/08/2014
SRV 140443131 - 5513425 FILE

STATE OF DELAWARE
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

LEDGERX LLC
FIRST: The name of the Limited Liability Company is LedgerX LLC.

SECOND: The name of the Registered Agent is The Corporation Trust Company whose address in
the State of Delaware is Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, County of New
Castle, Wilmington, 19801,

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation this 8th

day of April, 2014,
an f
(ea)

Authorized Person

By

Name;__Jenny E. Kamachaitis
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

HARRY TUN

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2550 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No. C1-18-214

(District of Columbia Court of Appeals,

No. 17-BG-0769)

Attorney Registration No. 50775

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2019, having failed to respond to a Notice 

and Order directing him to provide reasons against the imposition of reciprocal discipline, 

Harry Tun is suspended for one year from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of 

Pennsylvania. He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00606 - CR DARYL LAPAUL JONES APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 2 97TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Daryl LaPaul Jones attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal sta tes that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On December 14, 2012, we notified Appellant that this appeal could be dismissed unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 grounds for continuing it . We have not received a response. Therefore, in accordance with the trial court’s certification, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (“The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that sho ws the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.”), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Jackson v . State , 168 S.W.3d 239, 243 (Tex. App.

–– Fort Worth 2005, no pet.).

PER CURI AM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: April 25, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999,
FILED AS PART OF FORM 10-QSB/A QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-QSB/A QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  267,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325,528
<PP&E>                                         834,765
<DEPRECIATION>                               (731,535)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 517,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,645,660
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,185,679
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,404,130)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   517,806
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               749,492
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,304,561
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               137,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             210,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,902,395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,902,395)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (318,023)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,220,418)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.065)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.065)


</TABLE>
#### Romana DeLeon, Respondent, v Westhab, Inc., Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 589]-

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Liebowitz, J.), dated May 6, 2008, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion is granted.

A defendant who moves for summary judgment in a slip-and-fall action has the initial burden of demonstrating that it neither created the hazardous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence for a sufficient length of time to discover and remedy it *(see Sloane v Costco Wholesale Corp.,*49 AD3d 522 [2008]; *Frazier v City of New York,*47 AD3d 757, 758 [2008]). Here, the defendant met this burden by submitting evidence that the alleged hazardous condition on the subject stairs ' had not been created by its employees, and that it had neither actual nor constructive notice of it *(see Costello v Zaidman,*58 AD3d 593 [2009]; *Cunningham v Bay Shore Middle School,*55 AD3d 778, 779 [2008]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted. Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Dillon and Eng, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In connection with this Quarterly Report of AMERELITE SOLUTIONS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Knapp, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer f the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Date: December 15, 2010
By:
/s/  Robert L. KnappRobert L. KnappPrincipal Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 146 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 146

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         March 5, 2009.
Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education and professional 
        success, and is a source of pleasure throughout life;
Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read if the United 
        States is to remain competitive in the global economy;
Whereas Congress, through the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-
        110) and the Reading First, Early Reading First, and Improving Literacy 
        Through School Libraries programs, has placed great emphasis on reading 
        intervention and providing additional resources for reading assistance; 
        and
Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned about reading and 
        education have joined with the National Education Association to use 
        March 2 to celebrate reading and the birth of Theodor Geisel, also known 
        as Dr. Seuss: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors Theodor Geisel, also known as Dr. Seuss, for his success 
        in encouraging children to discover the joy of reading;
            (2) honors the 12th anniversary of Read Across America Day;
            (3) encourages parents to read with their children for at least 30 
        minutes on Read Across America Day in honor of the commitment of the 
        House of Representatives to building a Nation of readers; and
            (4) encourages the people of the United States to observe the day 
        with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TFYAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTInSs 787H

.... . , OFFICIAL.BUSINESS

U. '-jA SfM'E^-TB^AS

PENALTY FOR

4/8/2015 PRIVATE USE

FLORES, PETER Tr. O^No D-%

art. ^^^eW'-cat-on «^TM *e^ated prescribed form p,7

L^?T^°^G#/ooB Abel Acosta, Clerk

k ^*UL°NGER li

4^P°%

y^Mi'.t.-4'jjuTn-gt fe/<* <f°'g1^iggs5glg

;3 "By laiBaaff pitnev bowes

02 ir $ 00.266

0002003152 APR 09 2015

-MAILED FROMZIPCODE 78701

>3-A WR-83,052-01

A?

DELVALLE.TX 78617' RETUsTM^DREss

"EWiJiissB 7aWfi @2 34^4'tHifI• *f• HiifFfIM«i^1•11;|V-•"----ii-ii*• nffitl^1"-11"*-r,iV-

~^
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 4, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00104

- CV

IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF CHARLES INNESS THRASH , an Incapacitated Person

,

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PC2912 Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presidin g



### ORDER

On October 31, 2019, appellees Tonya Barina and Mary C. Werner filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellants Laura A. Martinez and Brittany A. Martinez opposed that relief.

After consideration of the motion and response, the motion to dismiss is DENIED

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sa id

court on this 4th day of December, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP99-301-018]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), tendered for filing and approval a Service Agreement between ANR and Reliant Energy Services, Inc. (Reliant) pursuant to ANR's Rate Schedule FSS (the “Agreement”).

ANR states that the Agreement contains a negotiated rate arrangement between ANR and Reliant to be effective June 1, 2001 through March 31, 2004 and contains a right to extend the term for one additional year upon specified circumstances. ANR is also tendering for filing Third Revised Sheet No. 14O which is being provided for future use. ANR requests that the Commission accept and approve the Agreement and tariff sheet, effective June 1, 2001.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15239  Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In the Matter of Estrellita LLC et al., Respondents, v Town Board of Town of Alexandria et al., Appellants.

[875 NYS2d 402]-

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Joseph D. McGuire, J.), from an order entered February 28, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order denied the motion of respondents to dismiss the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking, inter alia, to annul the tax assessment of their properties in respondent Town of Alexandria. Respondents appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss the petition. We reject respondents’ contention that a CPLR article 78 proceeding is not an appropriate procedural vehicle for challenging the tax assessments and that RPTL article 7 is the exclusive procedural vehicle for such a challenge. A challenge to an individual property tax assessment on the ground that the assessment was illegal, excessive or unequal should be brought in a certiorari proceeding under RPTL article 7. Here, however, the challenge is to “ ‘the method employed in the assessment of *several properties*rather than the overvaluation or undervaluation of [a] specific propert[y],’ ” and thus a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 is not inappropriate *(Matter of Cayuga Grandview Beach Coop. Corp. v Town Bd. of Town of Springport,*51 AD3d 1364, 1364 [2008], *lv denied 11*NY3d 702 [2008]; *Matter of Board of Mgrs. of Greens of N. Hills Condominium v Board of Assessors of County of Nassau,*202 AD2d 417, 419 [1994], *lv denied*83 NY2d 757 [1994]; *Matter of Averbach v Board of Assessors of Town of Delhi,*176 AD2d 1151, 1152 [1991]). Also contrary to respondent’s contention, the petition does not fail to *1364state a cause of action. Indeed, the petition sufficiently states *“a*cause of action against respondents for purportedly utilizing an unconstitutional reassessment methodology” (Averbach, 176 AD2d at 1153). Present — Martoche, J.P., Centra, Garni and Gorski, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1594 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1594

  Celebrating the 69th anniversary of the first combat action of the 
   American Volunteer Group and recognizing the contribution of the 
   American Volunteer Group and the 23rd Fighter Group known as the 
 ``Flying Tigers'' to the victory of the United States in World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2010

Mr. Kingston submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Celebrating the 69th anniversary of the first combat action of the 
   American Volunteer Group and recognizing the contribution of the 
   American Volunteer Group and the 23rd Fighter Group known as the 
 ``Flying Tigers'' to the victory of the United States in World War II.

Whereas the American Volunteer Group was formed by Lieutenant General Claire 
        Chennault for the defense of China;
Whereas the American Volunteer Group was affectionately known as the ``Flying 
        Tigers'';
Whereas the American Volunteer Group Flying Tigers saw their first combat 
        operation over Yunnan Province in China on December 20, 1941, shooting 
        down nine enemy bombers;
Whereas the American Volunteer Group Flying Tigers faced a numerically superior 
        enemy force, long logistics supply lines, and poor infrastructure, but 
        despite those challenges ultimately destroyed 299 enemy aircraft and 
        probably destroyed an additional 153 enemy aircraft, losing only 12 
        aircraft in combat;
Whereas, on July 4, 1942, the American Volunteer Group Flying Tigers were 
        disbanded, and the 23rd Fighter Group Flying Tigers were activated in 
        their stead;
Whereas the 23rd Fighter Group faced challenges in the Chinese theater similar 
        to those faced by the American Volunteer Group but nonetheless destroyed 
        621 enemy aircraft and by the end of the war had become the third 
        highest scoring Army Air Force Fighter Group of World War II; and
Whereas the 23rd Fighter Group and the 23rd Wing have continued the proud combat 
        tradition of the American Volunteer Group, seeing combat action in 
        Vietnam, Operation Desert Storm, Operation Allied Force, Operation 
        Enduring Freedom, and Operation Iraqi Freedom: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the American Volunteer Group, known as 
        the ``Flying Tigers'', and the 23rd Fighter Group for their 
        contributions to the Nation's defense; and
            (2) celebrates the 69th anniversary of the first combat 
        action of the Flying Tigers.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JOHN C. WEAVER & SONS 

DOCKET NUMBER: 231 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 231 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

John C. Weaver & Sons 

(Memphis, Tennessee) 

The complaint charges that John C. Weaver & Sons, a registered futures 

commission merchant, on numerous occasions failed to file complete, timely and 

accurate required financial reports to the Commodity Exchange Authority. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when there has been a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. A determination is considered as having been made when a 

decision of the Administrative Law Judge becomes final, or after appeal, a 

decision is made by the Judicial Officer of the Department. Complaints are 

filed in the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and 

are a matter of public record. Pending disposition of a complaint, it is the 

policy of the CEA not to comment or elaborate on charges contained therein or to 

discuss evidence on which it is based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before the Administrative Law 

Judge at a place, date, and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
```

[Federal Register: March 16, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 50)]
[Notices]
[Page 13006]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16mr99-41]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 30, 1999.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-6449 Filed 3-12-99; 11:40 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----