alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00152-CR

RASHARD TYREAL HOLMES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 27,999

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rashard Tyreal Holmes, appellant, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion 

was signed by both Holmes and his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules 

of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2(a), we grant 

the motion.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: October 2, 2014

Date Decided: October 3, 2014

Do Not Publish
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

The undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed by GTSI Corp. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of GTSI Corp.

|                    |  |                                                                
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Dendy YoungDendy Young
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed by GTSI Corp. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of GTSI Corp.

|                    |  |                                                                                       
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Thomas A. MutrynThomas A. Mutryn
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

-22-
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements of Vyrex Corporation on Forms S-3 (File No. 334-40665) and S-8 (File No. 333-50571) of our report, which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Corporations ability to continue as a going concern, dated
February 28, 2002 on the financial statements of Vyrex Corporation as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for the period from January 2, 1991 (date of inception) to December 31, 2001, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.





San Diego, California


March 25, 2002
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Ted B. Lyon III v. Building Galveston, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00571

- CV

Trial court case number: 10

- CV

- 2353

Trial court: 405th District Court of Galveston County

Party filing motion: App el l ant

The en banc court has unanimously voted to deny appell ant ’s motion for en banc reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas

- Molloy

___________________________  Acting for the Court

* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hi ghtower, Countiss, Rivas

- Molloy, Guerra, and Farris

.

Date: ____ June 22, 2021

_____
Exhibit (j)(2)

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 145 to Registration Statement No. 002-90649 on Form N-1A of our reports dated December 16, 2014 relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity International Small Cap Opportunities Fund and Fidelity Total International Equity Fund, our report dated December 17,2014 relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity International ValueFund, our report dated December 18, 2014 relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund, Fidelity Diversified InternationalFund and Fidelity Worldwide Fund, our reports dated December 19, 2014 relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity Emerging Europe, Middle East, Africa(EMEA) Fund, Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund and Fidelity International Small Cap Fundand our report dated December 22, 2014 relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund, Fidelity Series International Value Fund andFidelity Series International Small Cap Fund, each a fund of Fidelity Investment Trust, appearing in the Annual Reports on Form N-CSR of Fidelity Investment Trust for the year ended October 31, 2014, and to the references to us under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectuses and "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" or "Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firms" in the Statements of Additional Information, which are a part of suchRegistration Statement.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

December 22, 2014
Stephen HARRIS, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 16-6273.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1621 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1621

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 17, 2010.
Whereas Catholic Charities USA was founded in 1910 on the campus of Catholic 
        University of America in Washington, DC, as the National Conference of 
        Catholic Charities;
Whereas under the leadership of Msgr. John O'Grady, who served as Executive 
        Secretary from 1920 to 1961, the National Conference of Catholic 
        Charities became a leading voice for compassionate social reforms 
        grounded in Catholic teachings;
Whereas in 1986, the National Conference of Catholic Charities changed its name 
        to Catholic Charities USA;
Whereas this year, 2010, Catholic Charities USA is celebrating its centennial 
        anniversary;
Whereas Catholic Charities USA is the national office for over 1,700 local 
        Catholic Charities agencies and institutions nationwide;
Whereas Catholic Charities' mission is to provide service to people in need, to 
        advocate for justice in social structures, and to call people of 
        goodwill to do the same by working with individuals, families, and 
        communities to help them meet their needs, address their issues, 
        eliminate oppression, and build a just and compassionate society;
Whereas Catholic Charities USA has the goal of providing strong leadership and 
        support to assist local diocesan agencies in their efforts to reduce 
        poverty, support families, and empower communities;
Whereas Catholic Charities USA, inspired by Catholic teachings, maintain 
        programs focused on poverty in the United States, parenthood, 
        immigration, human trafficking, disaster response and relief, and 
        climate change;
Whereas Catholic Charities USA and its members provide help and create hope for 
        more than 8.5 million people each year, regardless of faith; and
Whereas Catholic Charities USA supports local agencies through advocacy, 
        networking, national voice, training, financial support, and leadership: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes and celebrates the 100th anniversary of the historic 
        founding of the National Conference of Catholic Charities, now called 
        Catholic Charities USA; and
            (2) honors and praises Catholic Charities USA for being a national 
        leader in the efforts to fight poverty and to strengthen the United 
        States in times of need and crisis.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 01N-0135]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION: 

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Focus Group Study of Radiation Disclosure Statement Options for Foods Treated with Ionizing Radiation” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Schlosburg, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of March 29, 2001 (66 FR 17183), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0468.  The approval expires on October 31, 2001.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                

Dated: June 8, 2001.

Margaret M. Dotzel,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-15084 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Sydney CETNER, as Trustee of the Cetner Family Trust, petitioner, v. George A. CARTER and Songgin P. Carter, as Trustees of the Carter Family Trust dated March 1, 1991.

No. 16-77.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Tim FLORENCE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-7043.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 28, 2010.

Christopher Tim Florence, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Tim Florence appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in the denying the motion. *United States v. Stewart,*595 F.3d 197, 200 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Florence,*No. 1:04-cr-00497-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. July 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADDED BY **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| 1.     | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                         |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report. |

|                                   |   |   |   |                                                                          |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                September 5, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/                Scott Newman.                                              |
|                                   |   |   |   | Scott                Newman                                                   |
|                                   |   |   |   | Chairman,                President and Chief Executive                Officer |

----
secretary 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Daniel Schaffer [ds_ 4986@yahoo.com] 

Tuesday, November 04, 2008 4:46 PM 

secretary 

"Proposed Rules for Trading Off the Centralized Market" 

To Whom It May Concern, 

. '.>'' 

COMMENT 

Hello, my name is Daniel Schaffer and I am an options market maker in cocoa, orange 

juice, cotton, and coffee for Prime International Trading, Ltd. I would like to take just 

a few minutes of your time to discuss block trading. During the previous two years I have 

done most of my trades in the cocoa market. I noticed that once the block trading began 

the liquidity in that market got significantly worse. The blocks became increasingly 

prevalent, this only exacerbated the problems. A couple of months ago, I believe in 

September, blocks accounted for 28% of options volume for that month. This led ICE to 

increase the minimum block size from 100 to 200 lots. This has not seemed to make much 

difference. 

Over the last six months there have been several traders who have exited this market. I 

also know that myself as well as several others will be leaving after the next expiration. 

The way that I personally see what happened is a few players are giving the ability to 

make some trades that others aren't. Now, instead of 15 to 20 traders competing with each 

other you have 3 or 4. With this diminishing amount of competition comes the increase in 

liquidity issues (futures and options). These issues have become so severe I no longer 

wish to participate in that market. And so the vicious cycle continues. 

The prevailing logic appears to be the larger the market the larger the minimum block 

size. However, what this does not account for is that the smaller markets already have 

liquidity issues, which are only exacerbated by small block sizes. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. Have a good day. 

Daniel Schaffer 

~ . ..: .. " 

1
Joseph MESSSER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 16-5309.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
#### John Iodice et al., Respondents, v City of White Plains, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[873 NYS2d 920]

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for injury to property, the defendant City of White Plains appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (O. Bellantoni, J.), entered November 18, 2007, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion, among other things, to adjudicate it in contempt of court to the extent of directing a hearing on the issue of its alleged violation of an order entered May 31, 2007.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An order directing a judicial hearing on a motion to adjudicate a party in contempt does not decide the motion, nor does it affect a substantial right *(see*CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]) and is, therefore, not appealable as a matter of right *(see Sloboda v Sloboda,*24 AD3d 533, 534 [2005]; *Liebling v Yankwitt,*109 AD2d 780 [1985]). Moreover, we decline to grant leave to appeal from the order. Accordingly, the instant appeal must be dismissed *(see Kornblum v Kornblum,*34 AD3d 749, 751 [2006]; *Palma v Palma,*101 AD2d 812 [1984]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Miller, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 159 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 2, 2009. 

Whereas for over 200 years the citizens of the State of New 

Hampshire have elected State senators to serve in the 

legislature; 

Whereas from 1931 to 1933, E. Maude Ferguson served as 

the first female member of the New Hampshire State 

Senate; 

Whereas Vesta Roy served as the first female State senate 

president, and in 1983 she became the first female Governor of the State of New Hampshire; 

Whereas women currently hold the offices of both the Speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives and 

the State Senate President of New Hampshire; 

Whereas the New Hampshire State Senate was comprised of 

13 women and 11 men for the legislative session beginning on December 3, 2008; and 

Whereas the New Hampshire State Senate had nine women 

chairing committees and five men chairing committees 

for the legislative session beginning on December 3, 

2008: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 

New Hampshire State Senate for becoming the 1st statewide 
2 

•HRES 159 EH 

legislative body with a majority of women in the United 

States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Robert Allen STANFORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-1490.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tredegar Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin A. OLeary, Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kevin A. OLeary                                 
|Kevin A. OLeary                                     
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                        
|May 5, 2011                                          



32
No. 531.

#### George Allison & Co., Inc. et al. v. United States et al.

Jurisdictional statement submitted November 2, 1935.

Decided November 11, 1935.

*Mr. John A. Kelly for*appellants.

*Messrs. Daniel W. Knowlton*and *Nelson Thomas*for the United States et al.

Per *Curium:*

The decree is affirmed. *Standard Oil Co.*v. *United States,*283 U. S. 235, 241; *Brady*v. *United States,*283 U. S. 804.
#### Jaime Mateo et al., Respondents, v T & H Enterprises et al., Appellants.

[874 NYS2d 88]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), *412entered February 28, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant T & H Enterprise’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal is the most drastic sanction contemplated by the CPLR for failure to comply with discovery and should be imposed only when the conduct of the offending party was willful, contumacious, or in bad faith *(see Palacios v New York City Tr. Auth.,*50 AD3d 520 [2008]; *Cespedes v Mike & Jac Trucking Corp.,*305 AD2d 222 [2003]; *Tsai v Hernandez,*284 AD2d 116, 117 [2001]).

Here, the motion court’s August 15, 2007 order directed completion of all depositions of plaintiffs, as well as all independent medical examinations (IMEs), by November 14, 2007 or plaintiffs would be precluded from giving testimony at trial. Given that all plaintiffs were deposed and had appeared for orthopedic IMEs by November 14, 2007, and that neurological IMEs have now been completed, defendant failed to show any willful, contumacious or bad faith conduct on the part of plaintiffs and it was well within the motion court’s discretion to allow plaintiffs 45 additional days to appear for neurological IMEs *(see Nussbaum v D’Amico,*29 AD3d 449 [2006]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Buckley, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.