alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.3



AMENDMENT NO. 1 
TO 
PRODUCT SCHEDULE


This Amendment is made effective as of the last date indicated on the signature page hereto, by and between Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (“CSI”) and Fresenius Kabi AB (“Fresenius”).


WHEREAS, CSI and Fresenius entered into a Supply Agreement dated as of April 4, 2011 and a related Product Schedule (the “Product Schedule”); and


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend certain terms of the Product Schedule.


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


1.    CSI’s address is hereby changed to 1225 Old Highway 8 NW, St. Paul, MN 55112, USA. 


2.     Section 1 of PART A of the Product Schedule is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“1.    Product
Intralipid (injectable lipid emulsion) 10% in a final dosage form, packaged and labeled with CSI’s proprietary trademark in a 100mL FreeFlex (Biofine) bag, meeting the Specifications.


3.     Section 1 of PART C of the Product Schedule is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:  


“1.    Price


Price in 2016: $[*******]* per container


Price after 2016:


	
		
	Containers ordered / year
	Price [USD] per container

	≥ [*******]* containers
	$[*******]*

	≥ [*******]* containers
	$[*******]*

	≥ [*******]* containers
	$[*******]*






		
	▪
	Price FCA (Incoterms 2010)


		
	▪
	100% optical control


		
	▪
	Batch size = 15,500 containers


		
	▪
	Raw materials and packaging materials prices given by FRESENIUS standard suppliers.


		
	▪
	Product related registration fees (e.g., according to 21 CFR 820) are not included and have to be borne by CSI.”




4.    Except as set forth herein, all provisions of the Product Schedule will remain in full force and effect without modification.  




*Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on the dates indicated below.


CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. 




By: /s/ Laurence L. Betterley        
Name: Laurence L. Betterley 
                    Title: CFO


Date: 3/2/16                


    
FRESENIUS KABI AB             FRESENIUS KABI AB




By: /s/Anton Gerdenitsch            By: /s/Dr. Johann Schlogl
Name: Anton Gerndenitsh             Name: Dr. Johann Schlogl 
    Title: Head of Market Unit            Title:            
Contract Manufacturing 


Date: March 9, 2016                Date: March 17, 2016
```

[Federal Register: October 20, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 54433]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20oc97-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, November 7, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-27806 Filed 10-16-97; 1:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351--M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sports Properties Acquisition Corp. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Tony Tavares       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2008
ex10-27.htm


Exhibit 10.27

 

 

On April 7, 2016, we appointed Jamey Johns, 49, as our Chief Accounting Officer. Mr. Johns has also served as our Vice President, Corporate Controller since March 21, 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Johns was Controller of K-Swiss Global Brands Inc. from 2015 to 2016, a leading global provider of athletic footwear and apparel and Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller for Reiter Affiliated Companies from 2010 until 2014, a leading agricultural producer of fresh berries. Mr. Johns is licensed as a Certified Public Accountant in the state of California. He completed an MBA program in Finance with the College of Business and Economics at California State University East Bay in 2002 and earned a Bachelor of Science in Accounting at the University of Redlands in Redlands, California in 1989.

 

Mr. Johns will receive an annual base salary of $155,000 and will be eligible to receive incentive compensation awards of not less than $20,000 during his first year of employment. Subject to approval of our Board of Directors, Mr. Johns will also receive an option to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock, which will vest over a period of four years. Mr. Johns’ employment with us is on an at-will basis.
#### Amarjeet SINGH, also known as Rajinder Singh, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.

No. 10-1826.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 27, 2010.

Filed: Oct. 29, 2010.

Amarjeet Singh, La Porte, IN, pro se.

Scott Baniecke, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Bloomington, MN, Karen Yolanda Drummond, Richard M. Evans, Anthony John Messuri, Annette

*146Marie Wietecha, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Amarjeet Singh, also known as Rajin-der Singh, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion. *See Rodriguez-Cuate v. Gonzales,*444 F.3d 1015, 1018-19 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: DAVID LAIKEN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 113 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT -- CEA DOCKET NO. 113 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging the following respondent with violation of the 

Commodity Exchange Act: 

David Laiken 

New York, New York 

The complaint charges that David Laiken, a member of the New York Mercantile 

Exchange and a registered floor broker under the act, entered into 

noncompetitive transactions in potato futures on the New York Mercantile 

Exchange. The complaint alleges that on January 11, 1963, David Laiken, acting 

in the capacity of a floor broker for a futures commission merchant, filled two 

orders by applying contracts he had previously purchased for his own account. 

The complaint also alleges that on January 11, 1963, he filled six orders, 

totalling 26 contracts, by buying from another broker 26 contracts which he had 

instructed the other broker to sell at a certain price for his (Laiken's) 

account. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, November 26, 1963, in New York, New York. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
No. 729.

#### Kingsland, Commissioner of Patents, *v.*Dorsey.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

*Solicitor General Perlman*for petitioner.

*William E. Leahy, William J. Hughes, Jr.*and *James F. Reilly*for respondent.

Certiorari granted.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00003-CR

JASON KEITH SLOAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 271st District 

Court

of Wise County (CR22167)

February 9, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice 

Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
#### In the Matter of County of Niagara, Respondent, v Richard F. Daines, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Health, et al., Appellants.

[874 NYS2d 924] —

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered July 9, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment granted the petition.

*1461It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs *(see Matter of County of Herkimer v Baines,*50 AD3d 1456 [2009]). Present—Martoche, J.P., Smith, Centra, Fahey and Pine, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32


<PAGE>


     In connection with the quarterly report of Synergy  Resources  Corporation,
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended May 31, 2009 as filed with
the  Securities  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report")  Edward
Holloway,  the Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Frank L. Jennings,
the Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.


 July 8, 2009                             /s/ Edward Holloway
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Edward Holloway, Principal Executive
                                          Officer



 July 8, 2009                             /s/ Frank L. Jennings
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Frank L. Jennings, Principal Financial
                                          Officer
| **Concentration of Risks and Uncertainties - Additional Information (Details) (Mill closures due to economic reasons)** | Jun. 30, 2013 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| Mill closures due to economic reasons                                                                                   |          |
| **Concentration Risk [Line Items]**                                                                                     |          |
| Period for monetary damages would be due from third party                                                               | 1 year        |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Period for Monetary Damages Would Be Due from Third Party
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**joe_PeriodForMonetaryDamagesWouldBeDueFromThirdParty**Namespace Prefix:**joe_**Data Type:**xbrli:durationItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_ConcentrationRiskLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
#### Marsha JAMESON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, Office of the Inspector General; John E. Potter, Postmaster General, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-1099.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 20, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 1, 2010.

Marsha Jameson, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before KING, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marsha Jameson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Rehabilitation Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Jameson v. United States Post Office,*No. 1:09-cv-00583-CMH-TCB, 2009 WL 4730714 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 8, 2009; entered Dec. 9, 2009). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15135]



[[Page 32372]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-610-01-1610-DL]


Notice of Extension of the Public Comment Period for the Draft 
Northern and Eastern Colorado Desert Coordinated Management Plan 
Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY:  California Desert District Office, Riverside, CA., Bureau of 
Land Management, Department of the Interior.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Bureau of Land Management has 
extended the public comment period an additional 30 days for the Draft 
Northern and Eastern Colorado Desert Coordinated Management Plan and 
Environmental Impact. Comments must be submitted or postmarked by July 
9, 2001. The ninety-day notice of availability of draft Northern & 
Eastern Colorado Desert Coordinated Management Plan and Environmental 
Impact Statement was published in the Federal Register on March 12, 
2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dick Crowe, California Desert 
District, 6221 Box Springs Blvd., Riverside, California 92507; phone 
(909) 697-5216.

    Dated: May 29, 2001.
Alan Stein,
Assistant District Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-15135 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
H. Res. 1644 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 30, 2010. 

Whereas 2010 marks the 10th anniversary of the establishment of the Veterans History Project by the United 

States Congress in order to collect and preserve the wartime stories of United States veterans; 

Whereas Congress charged the American Folklife Center at 

the Library of Congress to undertake the Veterans History Project and to engage the public in the creation of 

a collection of oral histories that would be a lasting tribute to individual veterans; 

Whereas the Veterans History Project relies on a corps of 

volunteer interviewers, partner organizations, and an 

array of civic minded institutions nationwide who interview veterans according to the guidelines it provides; 

Whereas these oral histories have created an abundant resource for scholars to gather first-hand accounts of veterans’ experience in World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Persian Gulf War, and 

the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts; 

Whereas there are 17,000,000 wartime veterans in the 

United States whose stories can educate people of all 

ages about important moments and events in the history 

of the United States and the world and provide instruc-
2 

•HRES 1644 EH 

tive narratives that illuminate the meanings of ‘‘service’’, 

‘‘sacrifice’’, ‘‘citizenship’’, and ‘‘democracy’’; 

Whereas more than 70,000 oral histories have already been 

collected and more than 8,000 oral histories are fully 

digitized and available through the website of the Library 

of Congress; 

Whereas the Veterans History Project will increase the number of oral histories that can be collected and preserved 

and increase the number of veterans it honors; and 

Whereas ‘‘National Veterans Awareness Week’’ has been recognized by Congress in previous years: Now, therefore, be 

it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the designation of a ‘‘National Veterans History Project Week’’; 

(2) recognizes ‘‘National Veterans Awareness 

Week’’; 

(3) calls on the people of the United States to interview at least one veteran in their families or communities according to guidelines provided by the Veterans 

History Project; and 

(4) encourages local, State, and national organizations along with Federal, State, city, and county governmental institutions to participate in support of the effort 
3 

•HRES 1644 EH 

to document, preserve, and honor the service of United 

States wartime veterans. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 181.

#### Mississippi Central R. Co. et al. *v.*Aultman et al.

Motion to dismiss submitted September 10, 1935.

Decided October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. Thomas Brady, Jr.,*a'nd *Thomas C. Hannah*for appellants.

*Mr. Lee D. Hall*for appellees.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) *Godchaux Co.*v. *Estopinal,*251 U. S. 179; *Rooker*v. *Fidelity Trust Co.,*261 U. S. 114, 117; *St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co.*v. *Shepherd,*240 U. S. 240, 241. (2) *New York*v. *Kleinert,*268 U. S. 646, 649-651; *Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.*v. *Illinois,*175 U. S. 626, 633; *Dewey*v. *Des Moines,*173 U. S. 193, 197. The motion of the appellees to allow damages is granted, and it is ordered that damages of one hundred dollars, payable to appellees, be taxed against appellants. *Slaker*v. *O’Connor,*278 U. S. 188; *Roe*v. *Kansas,*278 U. S. 191.
Opinion issued December 12, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00577-CV

———————————

MOHAMAD K. JRAB, Appellant

V.

JOHNSTON, LLC, JOSEPH ALAN JOHNSTON, JR., Appellees

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2018-05793

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Mohamad K. Jrab, and Appellees, Johnston, LLC, and Joseph Alan 

Johnston Jr., have filed letters notifying this Court that “the parties have settled the 

underlying dispute in full at mediation[.]” The Clerk of this Court issued a notice of 
2

intent to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, and ten days have passed with no response. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Goodman, and Countiss.
Exhibit 4.6


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO WARRANT


 


THIS AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO WARRANT (this “Amendment”) is hereby entered into between Sensus Healthcare, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), and the undersigned warrant holder (“Holder”) as of April 27, 2016 (the
“Effective Date”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the
Company previously issued a warrant, dated as of March 31, 2011 (the “Warrant”),
to acquire equity interests of the Company in connection with an engagement letter, dated March 15, 2010, to conduct a private
securities offering; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Warrant is set to expire on April 30, 2016 if not exercised prior to such date; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and Holder desire to extend the exercise period of the Warrant until May 30, 2016.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy
of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Holder hereby agree that the terms of the Warrant are hereby modified and, to
the extent inconsistent with the terms of the Warrant superseded as follows:


 


1.          Amendment
to Term of Warrant. In accordance with Section 7 of the Warrant, the Expiration Date is hereby extended to May 30, 2016.


 


2.          Capitalized
Terms. Capitalized terms herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Warrant, except as otherwise expressly provided
in this Amendment.


 


3.          Effect
of Amendment. Except and to the extent modified by this Amendment, the provisions of the Warrant shall remain in full force
and effect and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Amendment as if fully stated herein.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company and Holder have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the Effective Date.


 


	 	SENSUS HEALTHCARE, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Arthur Levine
	 	Name:	Arthur Levine
	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 
	 	INVESTORS CAPITAL ALLIANCE, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ William McCall
	 	Name:	William McCall
	 	Title:	Managing Partner
No. 591.

#### Delaware *v.*Irving Trust Co., Trustee.

December 16, 1935.

*Messrs. Ralph G. Albrecht, Amos J. Peaslee,*and *Martin A. Meyer, Jr.,*for petitioner.

*Mr. Godfrey Goldmark*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.