alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15289]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Contract Review 
Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act as amended (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of an 
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Technical Review 
Committee (TRC) meeting. This TRC's charge is to provide review of 
contract proposals and recommendations to the Director, AHRQ, with 
respect to the technical merit of proposals submitted in response to a 
Request for Proposals (RFPs) regarding ``Developing Tools to Enhance 
Quality and Patient Safety Through Medical Informatics'', Issued on 
January 31, 2001. The contract will constitute AHRQ's participation in 
the Small Business Innovation Research program.
    The upcoming TRC meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), section 10(d) (of 5 
U.S.C., Appendix 2, implementing regulations, and procurement 
regulations, 41 CFR 101-6.1023 and 48 CFR 315.604(d). The discussions 
at this meeting of contract proposals submitted in response to the 
above-referenced RFP are likely to reveal proprietary information and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. Such information is exempt from disclosure under the above-
cited FACA provision that protects the free exchange of candid views, 
and under the procurement rules that prevent undue interference with 
Committee and Department operations.
    Name of TRC: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality--
``Developing Tools to Enhance Quality and Patient Safety Through 
Medical Informatics''.
    Date: July 16 & 17, 2001 (Closed to the public).
    Place: Sheraton Four Points Hotel, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Embassy I 
Room, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain information regarding this 
meeting should contact Eduardo Ortiz, Center for Primary Care Research, 
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 6010 Executive Blvd, Suite 
201, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, 301-594-6236.

    Dated: June 6, 2001.
John M. Eisenberg,
Director.
[FR Doc. 01-15289 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
#### Amanda Leticia SALAZAR-MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76500.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 5, 2008.

Sung U. Park, Esquire, Law Offices of Sung U. Park, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Amanda Leticia Salazar-Miranda, Lake Elsinore, CA, pro se.

Janet A. Bradley, Esquire, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAS-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*555Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Amanda Leticia Salazar-Miranda, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) order denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings held in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Perez v. Mukasey,*516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), and review de novo due process claims, *Vargas-Hernandez v. Gonzales,*497 F.3d 919, 921 (9th Cir.2007). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to reopen because Salazar-Miranda was properly served with an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) that included a date, time and location for her hearing. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c)(3)(B) (1993) (repealed) (a deportation order issued in absentia may be rescinded “if the alien demonstrates that the alien did not receive notice” of the hearing). The agency also did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion as untimely to the extent that Salazar-Miranda based the motion on “exceptional circumstances.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c)(3)(A) (1993) (repealed) (motion to reopen based on exceptional circumstances must be filed within 180 days of the deportation order).

Salazar-Miranda contends that because the government did not provide a copy of the OSC, the agency violated due process by denying her motion without properly reviewing the evidence. As both the IJ and BIA orders indicate, however, the OSC was available for review by the agency as part of the administrative record. Salazar-Miranda therefore has not established a due process violation. *See Vargas-Hernandez,*497 F.3d at 926.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Salazar-Miranda’s contention that someone else signed her name on the OSC because she did not exhaust the contention before the agency. *See Rodriguez Serrano v. Gonzales,*469 F.3d 1317, 1319 (9th Cir.2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*556ed by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-5133 JEROME J. UNGS and VELMA T. UNGS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 06-CV-137, Judge Lawrence J. Block. ON MOTION ORDER The appellants move without opposition for a 6-day extension of time, until April 21, 2009, to file their response to the court's November 7, 2008 order. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

# APR 1 7 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Jan Horbaly Clerk coustniSeAss "

THE FEDETAL cIRCUIT—
APR 17 2009 but CLERK Date

cc: Sallie W. Gladney, Esq. Deborah K. Snyder, Esq. s20
Exhibit 99.3

Certification Pursuant to Section 302  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,Dennis Campbell,certify that:

Date:
May 18, 2004

|/s/DENNIS CAMPBELLPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to Ballard Power Systems Inc. and will be retained by Ballard Power Systems Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



Certification Pursuant to Section 302  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, David Smith,certify that:

Date:
May 18, 2004

|/s/DAVID SMITHChief Financial Officer
|-------------------------------------



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to Ballard Power Systems Inc. and will be retained by Ballard Power Systems Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
No. 803.

#### United States *v.*25.406 Acres of Land in Arlington County, Virginia, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir.

*Solicitor General Perlman*for the United States.

*Francis M. Shea, Warner W. Gardner*and *Gardner L. Boothe*for respondents.

Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black took .no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                       168
<INVENTORY>                                      4,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,351
<PP&E>                                             654
<DEPRECIATION>                                     790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,826
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,852
<PREFERRED>                                         10
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                       (348)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,018
<SALES>                                         12,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,279
<CGS>                                            9,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.86)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-068]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

DATES: June 14, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Blackburn, Patent Counsel, NASA 
Langley Research Center, Mail Code 212, Hampton, VA 23691-2199; 
telephone (757) 864-3521, fax (757) 864-9190.

NASA Case No. LAR-15602-1: Passive Fetal Heart Monitoring System and 
Method for Simultaneously Making A Plurality of Acoustic Signal Sensor 
Elements;
NASA Case No. LAR-15944-1: Phenyethynyl Containing Imide-Silanes;
NASA Case No. LAR-15945-1: A Novel Surface Treatment for Titanium 
Alloys;
NASA Case No. LAR-15959-1: Structural Tailored High Displacement Ferro-
Electric Sensors and Actuators;
NASA Case No. LAR-15990-1: Dual Transmission Interface for Passive 
Fetal Heart Monitoring;
NASA Case No. LAR-16020-1: Single Vector Force Balance Calibration 
System;
NASA Case No. LAR-16079-1: Liquid Crystalline Thermosets from Oligo-
Esters, Ester-Imides and Ester-Amides.

    Dated: June 4, 2001.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-15011 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33062-33063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-450-000]


Southwest Gas Storage Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

June 14, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 8, 2001, Southwest Gas Storage Company 
(Southwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet No. 147, to be effective 
July 8, 2001.
    Southwest states that the purpose of this filing is to add a 
general statement in section 17.6 of the General Terms and Conditions 
to address the ``shipper must have title'' rule and state that 
Southwest will only provide service for others utilizing capacity 
acquired on another pipeline (off-system capacity) pursuant to its 
existing rates and tariff. Southwest requests that the Commission grant 
a generic waiver of the ``shipper must hold title'' policy for any 
future service that Southwest may provide utilizing off-system 
capacity.
    Southwest states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance

[[Page 33063]]

with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and 
interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of 
paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the 
Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15503 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Fernando SANCHEZ-ALMARAZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5979.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
No. 785.

#### San Diego Electric Railway Co. *v.*State Board of Equalization.

Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, of California.

*Per*
      *912
      *Curiam:*

*.William L. Holloway*and *C. Coolidge Kreis*for appellant.

*Fred N. Hawser,*Attorney General of California, *James E. Sabine*and *Irving H. Perluss,*Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Erik SOLANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9249.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15580]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Changes to Section IV of the Field Office 
Technical Guide (FOTG) of the Natural Resources Conservation Service in 
Indiana

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in Section IV of the 
FOTG of the NRCS in Indiana for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS in Indiana to issue a revised 
conservation practice standard in Section IV of the FOTG. The revised 
standards are Grade Stabilization Structure (410), Nutrient Management 
(590), Tree/Shrub Pruning (660) and Wetland Creation (658). These 
practices may be used in conservation systems that treat highly 
erodible land and/or wetlands.

DATES: Comments will be received on or before July 23, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Address all requests and comments to Jane E. Hardisty, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 6013 
Lakeside Blvd., Indianapolis, Indiana 46278. Copies of this standard 
will be made available upon written request. You may submit your 
electronic requests and comments to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1773766565727b7b397565786079577e79396264737639707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c181d0e0e191010521e0e130b123c151252090f181d521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane E. Hardisty, 317-290-3200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that after enactment of the 
law, revisions made to NRCS state technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland 2 provisions of the law, shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS 
in Indiana will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 
Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in 
Indiana regarding disposition of those comments and a final 
determination of changes will be made.

    Dated: May 16, 2001.
Jane E. Hardisty,
State Conservationist, Indianapolis, Indiana.
[FR Doc. 01-15580 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
H. Res. 1621 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 17, 2010. 

Whereas Catholic Charities USA was founded in 1910 on the 

campus of Catholic University of America in Washington, 

DC, as the National Conference of Catholic Charities; 

Whereas under the leadership of Msgr. John O’Grady, who 

served as Executive Secretary from 1920 to 1961, the 

National Conference of Catholic Charities became a leading voice for compassionate social reforms grounded in 

Catholic teachings; 

Whereas in 1986, the National Conference of Catholic Charities changed its name to Catholic Charities USA; 

Whereas this year, 2010, Catholic Charities USA is celebrating its centennial anniversary; 

Whereas Catholic Charities USA is the national office for 

over 1,700 local Catholic Charities agencies and institutions nationwide; 

Whereas Catholic Charities’ mission is to provide service to 

people in need, to advocate for justice in social structures, and to call people of goodwill to do the same by 

working with individuals, families, and communities to 

help them meet their needs, address their issues, eliminate oppression, and build a just and compassionate society; 
2 

•HRES 1621 EH 

Whereas Catholic Charities USA has the goal of providing 

strong leadership and support to assist local diocesan 

agencies in their efforts to reduce poverty, support families, and empower communities; 

Whereas Catholic Charities USA, inspired by Catholic teachings, maintain programs focused on poverty in the United 

States, parenthood, immigration, human trafficking, disaster response and relief, and climate change; 

Whereas Catholic Charities USA and its members provide 

help and create hope for more than 8.5 million people 

each year, regardless of faith; and 

Whereas Catholic Charities USA supports local agencies 

through advocacy, networking, national voice, training, financial support, and leadership: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes and celebrates the 100th anniversary 

of the historic founding of the National Conference of 

Catholic Charities, now called Catholic Charities USA; 

and 

(2) honors and praises Catholic Charities USA for 

being a national leader in the efforts to fight poverty 

and to strengthen the United States in times of need 

and crisis. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Charles B. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 16-6148.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Frances Morris FINLEY, petitioner, v. Richard Parker EVANS.

No. 16-6382.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until December 19, 2016, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Miguel Angel CABADA, aka Miguel Barraza, aka Miguel Angel Cabada-Barraza, aka Jorge Leon Hernandez, aka Amado Rivas, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5994.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1626/2004

of 16 September 2004         

fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on sorghum imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 238/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 10 to 16 September 2004, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 238/2004, the maximum reduction in the duty on sorghum imported shall be 39,28 EUR/t and be valid for a total maximum quantity of 3 000 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 September 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 23.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4.

(4)OJ L 256, 10.10.2000, p. 13.

----