alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Community
Financial Corporation (the "Company") that the quarterly report of the Company
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and
the results of operations of the Company for such period.





Date:
      November 12, 2008
            
            /s/ P. Douglas
  RichardP.
      Douglas Richard
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/ R. Jerry GilesR.
      Jerry Giles
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Duly
      Authorized Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          80,107
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    739,057
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          11,081
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            11,477
<LOANS>                                      1,993,477
<ALLOWANCE>                                     29,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,969,928
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,283,266
<SHORT-TERM>                                   337,349
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             27,045
<LONG-TERM>                                     48,531
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,653
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,969,928
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                134,627
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               35,312
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   563
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               170,502
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              62,998
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,626
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           89,878
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,525
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (243)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 73,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,122
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      35,122
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.39
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,883
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,051
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 6,378
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                25,721
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,621
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,808
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               29,433
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            29,433
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
In re Otis BRASCOM, petitioner.

No. 15-9141.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4892-4893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1554]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2000-8267]


Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with part 211 of title 49 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR) notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration 
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain 
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is 
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory 
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the 
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

Oil Creek & Titusville Lines

    The Oil Creek & Titusville Lines (OCTL), seeks a waiver of 
compliance from certain provisions of the Safety Glazing Standards, 49 
CFR 223, which requires certified glazing, for one locomotive. The OCTL 
is located in Titusville, Pennsylvania. The OCTL states they operate a 
short line freight operation and additionally an excursion railroad 
operation over 15.8 miles of track through rural countryside and one 
community on an average of two (2) round trips per week freight and 
three (3) round trips per week for passenger excursions.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings 
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate 
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since 
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party 
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in 
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for 
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the 
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2000-8267) and must be submitted in triplicate to the Docket Clerk, DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room P1-401, Washington, DC 20590-
0001. Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice 
will be considered by FRA before final action been taken. Comments 
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All 
written communications concerning the proceedings are available for 
examination during regular business hours (9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.) at DOT 
Central Docket Management Facility, Room P10401 (Plaza Level), 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC.

[[Page 4893]]

All documents in the public docket are also available for inspection 
and copying on the internet at the docket facility's Web site at http://dms.dot.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 11, 2001.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program 
Development.
[FR Doc. 01-1554 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        47378205
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        11379036
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  343892579
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        82594259
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          80622071
<LOANS>                                     1720276815
<ALLOWANCE>                                    7818526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2322131080
<DEPOSITS>                                  1684500404
<SHORT-TERM>                                 176865000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           24847495
<LONG-TERM>                                  297097559
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      36534227
<OTHER-SE>                                   102286395
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              2322131080
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               35146246
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              6679742
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              41825988
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            19636202
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            26819131
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         15006857
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   302487
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               14764617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8995771
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     5790411
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5790411
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.77
<LOANS-NON>                                    1199000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                5200000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               7663529
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   147490
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              7818526
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           7818526
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1165

EFRAIN A. HERRERA GUEVARA,

 Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: November 30, 2023 Decided: December 29, 2023

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Anser Ahmad, AHMAD AND ASSOCIATES, McLean, Virginia, for 

Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Anthony C. 

Payne, Assistant Director, Jeffery R. Leist, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1165 Doc: 27 Filed: 12/29/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Efrain Herrera Guevara, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of 

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration 

Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under 

the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and Herrera Guevara’s 

claims and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the 

administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence 

supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Herrera Guevara (B.I.A. Feb. 1, 2023). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1165 Doc: 27 Filed: 12/29/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32824-32825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration on Aging

[Program Announcement No. AoA-01-08]


Fiscal Year 2001 Program Announcement; Availability of Funds and 
Notice Regarding Applications

AGENCY: Administration on Aging, HHS.

ACTION: Announcement of availability of funds and request for 
applications for innovative programs and activities of national 
significance under the National Family Caregiver Support Program, title 
III-E, sections 375 and 376, of the Older Americans Act as amended 
(Pub. L. 106-501). These grants and cooperative agreements are to 
develop services and systems which demonstrate new or improved 
approaches to sustaining the efforts of families and other informal 
caregivers of older individuals and grandparents of older individuals 
who are relative caregivers of children.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Administration on Aging announces that under this program 
announcement it will hold a competition for grants and cooperative 
agreements for approximately 24 to 28 projects nationwide. The projects 
will be approved for varying periods and amounts from one to three 
years and a maximum federal share of $250,000 per year. Funding after 
the first year is contingent on the availability of federal funds and 
the grantee's performance

[[Page 32825]]

relative to project goals and the grantee's compliance with the terms 
and conditions of the grant. The federal share of the costs of any of 
the projects will not exceed 75 percent. The purpose of these projects 
is to demonstrate new or improved approaches to sustaining the efforts 
of families and other informal caregivers.
    The deadline date for the submission of applications is August 10, 
2001. Eligibility for grant awards is limited to public and/or 
nonprofit agencies, organizations, and institutions with demonstrated 
expertise in aging and caregiving.
    Application kits are available by writing to the Department of 
Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging, Office of Program 
Operations and Development, 330 Independence Ave., SW., Wilbur J. Cohen 
Building, Room 4733, Washington, DC 20201, by calling 202/619-0011, or 
on the web at http://www.aoa.gov/t4/fy2001.

    Dated: June 13, 2001.
Norman L. Thompson,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 01-15286 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154-01-U
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Voxware, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Thomas J. Drury, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Voxware, Inc. and will be retained by Voxware, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                           | /s/ Scott J. Yetter                   | 
|-------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | 
|Dated:  September 25, 2007 | Scott J. Yetter                      
|                           | President and Chief Executive Officer



---
No. 212.

#### Marvel *v.*Zerbst, Warden.

Argued December 17, 1936.

Decided December 21, 1936.

*Salinger*v. *Loisel,*265 U. S. 224, 235, 237. *Mr. John B. Boddie*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General McMahon,*and *Messrs. Guy K. Bard, William W. Barron, John T. M. Reddan,*and *Lee A. Jackson*were on the brief for respondent.

*Per Curiam:*

Judgment affirmed.
UNITED STATES OFAMERICA 

Before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

JINMING CAO, ) 

Complainant, ) 

v. ) CFTC Docket No. 08-Rl6 

INTERACTIVE BROKERS, LLC, ) 

Respondent. ) 

) 

TUO CAO, ) 

Complainant, ) 

v. ) CFTC Docket No. 08-R21 

INTERACTIVE BROKERS, LLC, ) 

Respondent. ) 

) 

SHUHONG FAN, ) 

Complainant, ) 

v. ) CFTC Docket No. 08-R24 

INTERACTIVE BROKERS, LLC, ) 

Respondent. ) 

) 

JINMING CAO, and ) 

SHUHONG FAN, ) 

Complainants, ) 

v. ) CFTC Docket No. 08-R25 

INTERACTIVE BROKERS, LLC, ' ) 

Respondent. ) 

ORDER OF SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE 

RECEIVED CFTC 

Office of Proceedings 

Proceedings Clerk 

12:35 pm, May 30, 2013 

Our review of the record and the complainants' appellate submission establishes that the 

Judgment Officer committed no error material to the outcome of the proceedings and that the 

findings of the Judgment Officer are supported by the weight of the evidence; we therefore adopt 

them. In addition, the complainants have not raised important questions of law or policy 

regarding the alleged untimely assignment of futures contracts or wrongful liquidation of 

I ~ . 
I ' 

positions in their accounts. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 14 of the Commodity Exchange 

Act and Commission Regulation 12.406(b), we summarily affirm the initial decision and order of 

the Judgment Officer without an opinion. 1 

IT IS SO ORDERED? 

By the Commission (Chairman GENSLER and the Commissioner SOMMERS, CHILTON, 

O'MALIA AND WETJEN). 

Meli sa D. Jurgens 

Secretary of the Commission 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Dated: May 30, 2013 

1 Pursuant to Commission Regulation 12.406(b), 17 C.F.R. § 406(b), neither the initial decision 

nor the Commission's order of summary affirmance shall s~rve as Commission precedent in 

other proceedings. 

2 Under Section 6(c) and 14(e) of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 9 and 18(e) (2006), 

a party may appeal a reparation order of the Commission to the United States Court of Appeals 

for only the circuit in which a hearing was held; if no hearing was held, the appeal may be filed 

in any circuit in which the appellee is located. The Commission has ruled that telephonic 

hearings are "held" in Washington, D.C., although parties may speak from several locations. 

Dubois v. A/aron, [2000-2002 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ~ 28,406 at 51,026 n. 

16 (CFTC Oct. 26, 2000). The statute also states that such an appeal must be filed within 15 

days after notice of the order and that any appeal is not effective unless, within 30 days of the 

date of the Commission order, the appealing party files with the court a bond equal to double the 

amount of any reparation award.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                         ----------------------------

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-92094) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of
Toy Biz, Inc. of our report dated March 9, 1998, except as to Note 7, as to
which the date is March 25, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Toy Biz, Inc. included in Toy Biz Inc.'s Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


/s/ Ernst & Young
New York, New York
March 30, 1998
Tod HOUTHOOFD, petitioner, v. STATE TREASURER.

No. 16-5863.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Alan G. GIMENEZ, petitioner, v. J.T. OCHOA, Warden, et al.

No. 16-6041.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Thomas Lopez-Pierre, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Steven M. Statsinger, J.), rendered January 3, 2017, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the second degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Steven M. Statsinger, J.), rendered January 3, 2017, affirmed. </p><p>Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (<i>see Anders v California</i>, 386 US 738 [1967]; <i>People v Saunders</i>, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders</i>, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: May 21, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), I, Chung-Lun Yang, certify that:

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual
 Report of ACL Semiconductors Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
 the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), as filed with the Securities
 and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, fully complies with the
 requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
 and
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                    

|                   |                             | 
|------------------ | --------------------------- | 
|Date: May 4,
 2010 | /s/
 Chung-Lun Yang         | 
|                   |                             | 
|                   | Chung-Lun
 Yang             | 
|                   | Chief
 Executive Officer of | 
|                   | ACL
 Semiconductors Inc.    | 

This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
ACL Semiconductors Inc. and will be retained by ACL Semiconductors Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---