alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND>THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           22,032,425
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          29,298,868
<RECEIVABLES>                            0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     290,837
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>             1,216,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  30,806,617
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                  0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>           37,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                 37,952
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                          0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        23,502,222
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>              400,000
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>              400,000
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                   0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                  0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>         7,266,443
<NET-ASSETS>                    30,768,665
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                  280,010
<INTEREST-INCOME>                   22,389
<OTHER-INCOME>                           0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    (315,785)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>            (13,386)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           236,026
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>        1,564,909
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            1,787,549
<EQUALIZATION>                           0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                    0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                  0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>              0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                      0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           1,787,549
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               97,499
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                    316,175
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            29,874,891
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   58
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          0
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     59
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                       1.06
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                   0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                     0
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not 
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with 
the Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM *Synetic
Inc's 12/31/98 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          57,514
<SECURITIES>                                    14,128
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                       786
<INVENTORY>                                     10,473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,104
<PP&E>                                          74,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 458,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,748
<BONDS>                                        166,197
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           240
<OTHER-SE>                                     254,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   458,472
<SALES>                                         43,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,661
<CGS>                                           22,819
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,360
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,337
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,023
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arthur O. Whipple, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
  This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Date: May 6, 2011
  By: /s/ Arthur O. Whipple


Arthur O. Whipple
 Chief Financial Officer
  42
| **Material Released     Pursuant to FOIA Requests Which** |
|------------------------------------------------------------|

| **has Been, or is Likely     to Be, the Subject of Future** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|

| **FOIA     Requests** |
|------------------------|

| **____________________________________________** |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| Documents which do not have PDF links are     availabe on request to [email protected] by using the |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| electronic request form. Electronic     distribution of the documents is possible, depending on the requester's |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ability to receive them. Paper copies of     documents are available within the Washington, D.C., area through |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| the Commission's Public Reading Room     and outside the area through use of the electronic request form. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Fees of 15 cents per page apply to paper     copies |
|------------------------------------------------------|

| **Request Form** | **If     you are unfamiliar with PDF files, click here for help** |
|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **____________________________________________** |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| FILE NUMBER: | **RF05-005** | PLACED ON THE PUBLIC RECORD: | 11/01/2005 | CATEGORY: | **C** |
|--------------|--------------|------------------------------|------------|-----------|-------|

| **FOREX CAPITAL, LLC,     CFTC FORM 1-FR-FCM FOR THE PERIOD** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|

| **09/01/2005 -     09/30/2005** |
|----------------------------------|

| **____________________________________________** |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT NUMBER: | 1 |
|------------------|---|

|  | Forex Capital, LLC, CFTC     Form 1-FR-FCM for the period 09/01/2005 - |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 09/30/2005 | PAGES: | 12 | PDF SIZE: | 72 KB | PDF LINK: |
|-------|------------|--------|----|-----------|-------|-----------|

| **------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Generation Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K, as amended on Form 10-K/A, for the annual period ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 29, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ SCOTT K. GINSBURG                                         
|                      |  |     |  | Scott K. Ginsburg                                             
|                      |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer



|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 29, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ OMAR A. CHOUCAIR   
|                      |  |     |  | Omar A. Choucair       
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-09505) pertaining to the Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 1990
Stock Option Plan and the Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 1995 Amended and
Restated Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated October 7, 1996, with respect
to the financial statements of Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended August 31, 1996.



                                      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 26, 1996
EX-4.18



		

			Exhibit 4.18

		




		
			﻿
		

		
			May 6, 2016
		

		
			Perceptron, Inc.
		

		
			47827 Halyard Dr.
		

		
			Plymouth,  Michigan 48170
		

		
			Re:Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 16, 2010, by and between Perceptron, Inc. (“Company”) and Comerica Bank  (as amended, “Credit Agreement”)
		

		
			Gentlemen:
		

		
			Company has advised the Bank that it has violated the provisions of Section 7.11 of the Credit Agreement for the period ended March 31, 2016 (the “Covenant Violation”). Company has requested that the Bank waive any Event of Default under the Credit Agreement resulting from the Covenant Violation. The Bank hereby waives the Covenant Violation (“Waiver”).
		

		
			This Waiver shall not be deemed to amend or alter in any respect the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement, or to constitute a waiver or release by the Bank of any right, remedy Default or Event of Default under the Credit Agreement, except to the extent expressly set forth above. Furthermore, this Waiver shall not affect in any manner whatsoever any rights or remedies of the Bank with respect to any other non-compliance by the Company with the Credit Agreement or the Loan Documents whether in the nature of an Event of Default or otherwise, and whether now in existence or subsequently arising.
		

		
			Except as specifically defined to the contrary herein, capitalized terms used in this Waiver shall have the meanings given them in the Credit Agreement.
		

		
			Very truly yours,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			COMERICA BANK
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			By: /s/ Norman L. Bird
		

		
			Norman L. Bird
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Its:Senior Vice President
		

		 


		

			Detroit_11151894_1
o~-( 

1\Jcl 

CMEGroup 

A CME/Chfcaao Board of Thlde/NYMEX Company 

November 4, 2008 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Mr. David Stawick 

Secretary of the Commission 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Center 

1155 21st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20851 

secretary@cftc.gov 

COMMENT -~ 

RE: Proposed Rules for Trading Off the Centralized Market- 73 Fed. Reg. 

54097 (September 15, 2008) 

Dear Mr. Stawick: 

CME Group Inc. hereby requests an extension of time until Monday, January 5, 2009 to 

submit comments on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's proposal with respect to 

amendments to Regulation 1 .38, and guidance and acceptable practices for Core Principle 9 for 

designated contract markets. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this request, do not hesitate to contact 

me at (312)-338-2483 or lisa.dunsky@cmeqroup.com. 

Sincerely, 

'., 

Lisa A. Dunsky 

I' I 

cc: Gabrielle Sudik (via e-mail) ·~ :-

'· 1 

~: -.. .r::: 

20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 r 312 930 1000 F 312 466 4410 cmegroup.com 

·_,-,r 

,.) 

'; 

.. ~ .l .
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Industries, Inc., an Indiana corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tena Mayberry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  May 13, 2011
By: /s/ Tena MayberryTena MayberryChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.1







 AMENDMENT NUMBER 2


TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This AMENDMENT is in clarification and amendment of that certain EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated March 28, 2013, (“Effective Date”) by and between T Bancshares, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiary T Bank, N.A. ("Company"), and Patrick Howard ("Executive"), to which this AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 is attached and of which it is hereby made a part.


 


The Agreement is hereby supplemented and amended as follows:







1.  Definitions. All terms defined in the Agreement and not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings where used herein.



 


2.  Paragraph 3.a. is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following to be and read: “So long as Executive is employed by the Company in good standing, commencing on May 15, 2015, the Company agrees to compensate the Executive on a salary basis of $9,583.34 semi-monthly.”


 


3.  General.


 


(a) Except as expressly amended and supplemented hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.


 


(b) In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall prevail.









Executed this 11th day of May, 2015












EXECUTIVE


 


	
           /s/ Shari Jensen                     

	
            /s/ Patrick Howard                       


	
WITNESS

	
Patrick Howard 


	 	 
	
T BANK N.A. 

	 
	 	 
	 	 
	
           /s/ Ron Denheyer                  

	
            /s/ Dan Basso                               


	
WITNESS

	
Chairman of the Board 


	 	 
	
T BANCSHARES, INC. 

	 
	 	 
	 	 
	
           /s/ Ron Denheyer                  

	
            /s/ Dan Basso                               


	
Witness

	
Chairman of the Board
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### Jeanblanc v. Oliver Carr Co. et al.

December 28, 1990

Case No. (Chancery) 900110

By JUDGE ALFRED D. SWERSKY

Upon review of the memoranda filed by counsel, complainant’s Motion to Disqualify Counsel for Defendants must be denied.

Complainant, a limited partner in the Duke Street Partnership, has moved to disqualify counsel for defendants asserting a conflict of interests in that counsel represented and represents Duke Street as well as other Carr entities that are in conflict with the business interests of Duke Street.

The complainant has brought this action in his own name, and Duke Street is not a party nor has Duke Street complained of the activities of counsel in representing Carr in various real estate transactions that Jeanblanc alleges conflict with Duke Street’s business purposes.

Defendants argue that Jeanblanc lacks standing to raise this issue because the partnership, not he personally, was and is the "client." This argument is without merit, and complainant has standing to raise the issue. However, he fails in his factual assertions to alleged grounds sufficient to remove counsel.

The facts that he claims create the conflicts are the very facts to be decided at trial and are very much in dispute. Moreover, complainant has failed to allege *45and show that counsel, by virtue of its representation of Duke Street, has obtained some privileged information from or about him personally, nor does he assert that counsel has obtained an unfair advantage over him personally. *See*Vol. 2A, Michie’s Jurisprudence, *Attorney and*Client, § 14, p. 74 (Supp.).

Counsel’s continued representation of the Carr interests in business transactions would not be improper *per se*as complainant seems to argue. Complainant is but one member of a multi-party entity, Duke Street, represented by counsel. Carr and its interests were also members of the same multi-party entity, and no prohibition exists that would prevent counsel from representing the Carr interests in the other business transactions. Absent some unfair advantage over Jeanblanc gained by counsel in its representation of Duke Street, they are not barred from representing the Carr interests in this lawsuit.

The remaining arguments of complainant hinge on the acceptance by the Court of its argument that the conflict of interests exists as a matter of fact and that this *per se*disqualifies counsel. These arguments are likewise without merit.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D19-650 

_____________________________ 

WILLIAM LESLIE RHOW, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Linda F. McCallum, Judge. 

July 8, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 
2 

William Leslie Rhow, pro se, Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Thaxton YOUNG, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6312.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2*

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Cognex Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
April 4, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

        Date: May 10, 2004

                                        /s/ Richard A. Morin
                                        --------------------
                                        Richard A. Morin
                                        Senior Vice President Of Finance,
                                        Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
                                        (principal financial officer)

* This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
1047.

#### Kennedy *v.*Rumble *et al.*

Practice. Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

Argued April 22,

Decided June 18, 1908.

*O. T. Lester, C. J. Lester, Persons & Persons,*for plaintiff in error. *B. H. Manry, Bloodworth & Bloodworth,*contra.

Hill, C. J.

Where a case is submitted to the decision of the trial judge on the law and the facts, and the bill of exceptions sets out the evidence and the judgment, and assigns error as follows: “To which ruling and order the plaintiff excepted, now excepts, and assigns the same as error,” the assignment of error, according to repeated rulings of, the Supreme Court, is too general, and presents no question for consideration. The assignment should have stated whether the judgment complained of was contrary to law or contrary to evidence, or contrary to both. Civil Code, § 5584; *Carter*v. *Jackson,*115 *Ga.*679 (42 S. E. 46) ; *Kimball*v. *Williams,*108 *Ga.*812 (33 S. E. 994); *Wheeler*v. *Worley,*110 *Ga.*513 (35 S. E. 639) *Collins*v. *Carr,*111 *Ga.*867 (36 S. E. 959), and eases cited. *Writ of error dismissed.*
(March 26, 2009)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Abram McDonald, Appellant.

[877 NYS2d 228]

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on or about May 7, 2008, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.
WELLS FARGO & CO., et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.

No. 15-1112.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 28, 2016.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.