alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-440-000]


Kern River Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

June 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 31, 2001, Kern River Gas Transmission 
Company (Kern River) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be 
effective July 1, 2001.

First Revised Sheet No. 178
First Revised Sheet No. 179
First Revised Sheet No. 180
First Revised Sheet No. 181
Original Sheet No. 181-A

    Kern River states that the purpose of this filing is to revise 
Section 22 of Kern River's tariff to increase the scope of the pooling 
services that Kern River is providing to its customers.
    Kern River states that it has served a copy of this filing upon its 
customers and interested state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14690 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
23.1
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 333-29413) pertaining to the Miravant Medical Technologies 401(k) -
Employee Stock Ownership Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-34953 and Form S-8 No.
333-93385) pertaining to the Miravant Medical Technologies 1989 Stock Option
Plan, the Miravant Medical Technologies 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Miravant
Medical Technologies 1994 Stock Option Plan, the Miravant Medical Technologies
Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan and the Miravant Medical Technologies
1996 Stock Compensation Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-44728 and Form S-8 No.
333-117386) pertaining to the Miravant Medical Technologies 2000 Stock
Compensation Plan and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-3/A2 No. 333-60251, Form S-3 No. 333-84003, Form S-3/A4 No.
333-71696 and Form S-2/A1 No. 333-120963) and in the related Prospectuses of our
report dated March 8, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Miravant Medical Technologies included in its Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
 
 /S/ ERNST
& YOUNG LLP
 
 Woodland
Hills, California
 March 25,
2005
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1545 

Expressing support for designation of the week beginning on the third Monday 

in September as ‘‘National Postdoc Appreciation Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2010 

Mr. STEARNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of the week beginning 

on the third Monday in September as ‘‘National Postdoc 

Appreciation Week’’. 

Whereas research is the mechanism by which humankind 

achieves innovation and progress; 

Whereas in order for the United States to maintain a leadership role in the world, citizens must be well educated to 

harbor the world’s best scientists, engineers, and researchers in all fields of study; 

Whereas postdoctoral scholars (postdocs) make up one of the 

most substantial driving forces for innovation and research; 

Whereas the base of available knowledge is increasing exponentially; 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1545 IH 

Whereas given such rapid rates of knowledge expansion, increasing levels of training and education are required beyond the average undergraduate level and even beyond 

graduate study levels to generate the next generations of 

innovators in every field of study; 

Whereas postdocs conduct work and studies in a complex 

transition period while being both trainees and paid professionals; and 

Whereas the week beginning on the third Monday in September would be an appropriate week to designate as 

‘‘National Postdoc Appreciation Week’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National 

3 Postdoc Appreciation Week’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the accomplishments and con5 tributions postdocs make to relevant departments, 

6 institutions, fields, and communities around the 

7 United States and the world; 

8 (3) recognizes the career development and other 

9 professional needs of postdocs in every field of study; 

10 and 

11 (4) encourages the improvement of training and 

12 career opportunities in various research fields at all 

13 levels of training and stages of all research careers. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: TYSON FOODS, INC., DONALD TYSON, JOE FRED STARR, ROBERT BONE, KEITH ESTEP, 

BALL EGG FARMS, INC., NORMAN BELL, WILLIAM R. NEWTON, AND RUTH NEWTON 

DOCKET NUMBER: 202 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 202 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Tyson Foods, Inc., 

Donald Tyson, 

Joe Fred Starr, 

Robert Bone, 

(Springdale, Arkansas) 

Keith Estep, 

(Oklahoma City, Oklahoma) 

Bell Egg Farms, Inc., 

Norman Bell, 

(Joplin, Missouri) 

William R. Newton, and 

Ruth Newton 

(Cameron, Texas) 

The complaint charges attempted manipulation and manipulation of the price of 

the September 1970 shell egg future on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange on 

September 21, 1970. It alleges that the respondents demanded and received 

prices for the September 1970 shell egg future which were arbitrary and 

artificial. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before a referee at a time and 

place to be specified later. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
April 25,1997                                                          (Logo)EDS



                       Consumer Asset Management Division
                     of Electronic Data Systems Corporation
                        Annual Statement as to Compliance



The  management of the Consumer  Asset  Management  Division of Electronic  Data
Systems  Corporation has reviewed the activities of the Division during the year
ended December 31, 1996 and of the  performance  under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement relating to Equicon Mortgage Loan Trust 1994-2,  dated October 1, 1994
has been made under my  supervision,  and to the best of my knowledge,  based on
such review,  the Consumer Asset Management  Division of Electronic Data Systems
Corporation  has fulfilled all its  obligations  under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement relating to Equicon Mortgage Loan Trust 1994-2,  dated October 1, 1994
for the year ended December 31, 1996.


/s/Mark S. O'Bryan
Mark S. O'Bryan
Chief Operating Officer
Consumer Asset Management Division



                                              Consumer Asset Management Division
                                              190 South Warner Road
                                              Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-2127
                                              (610) 989-1000
                                              Fax:(610) 975-3665
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40137

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROSARIO FELIX-TERRAZAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-776-ALL

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rosario Felix-Terrazas (Felix) appeals his conviction and

sentence for illegal reentry. He raises a constitutional

challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) and also argues that

the district court plainly erred in requiring him to submit to

DNA testing as a condition of his supervised release. Felix’s

appeal waiver is unenforceable because the magistrate judge

advised him at his rearraignment hearing that he could appeal an

illegal sentence. See, e.g., United States v. Robinson, 187 F.3d
No. 05-40137

-2-

516, 517-18 (5th Cir. 1999). We need not decide the

applicability of the sentencing waiver in the plea agreement

because the appellate issues are foreclosed. 

Felix’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Felix contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the

basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States

v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126

S. Ct. 298 (2005). Felix properly concedes that his argument is

foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent,

but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Felix’s supervised release claim is not ripe for review and

is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See United

States v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1101 (5th Cir. 2005),

petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
Exhibit (d)(126)

**SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENT**

**between**

**FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS**

**and**

**FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY**

**and**

**FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST ON BEHALF OF FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL SMALL CAP**
ACCEPTED03-15-00028-CR4790088THIRD COURT OF APPEALSAUSTIN, TEXAS4/7/2015 2:04:28 PMJEFFREY D. KYLECLERKNo.03-15-00028-CRNAKIADESHAWNLEWIS,AppellantVS.THESTATEOFTEXAS,Appellee)))))))COURTOFAPPEALS,THIRDSUPREMEJUDICIALDISTRICTAUSTIN,TEXASMOTIONTOWITHDRAWASCOUNSELTOTHEHONORABLEWSTICESOFSAIDCOURT:COMESNOWKIRKHAWKINS,attorneyofrecordforNAKIADESHAWNLEWIS,andrespectfullyrequeststhathebeallowedtowithdrawascounselforAppellant,andforcausewouldshowtheCourtthefollowing:I.TheundersignedattorneywasunabletofindanyreversibleerrorandfiledafrivolousappellatebriefonbehalfofAppellant.TheundersignedattorneyrespectfullyrequeststhathebeallowedtowithdrawasattorneyofrecordforAppellant.II.Appellant'scurrentaddressisTDCJ#1964121,1210CoryellRoad,Gatesville,Texas76528.AppellanthasbeendeliveredacopyofthismotionbymailingsametoAppellantathercurrentaddress.III.

Appellant has been notified in writing of her right to file her own brief and to

review the record in this case.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned attorney prays

the Court grant this motion and allow him to withdraw as counsel of record for

Appellant NAKIA DESHA WN LEWIS

.

E-Mail: kirkhawkinslaw@gmail.com

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that on the 

## 7 ..ft.. day of April, 2015, I spoke by telephone with Ms.

Meagan White, Assistant District Attorney, who stated she had no objection to this

Motion to Withdraw.**~~**

irk Hawkins

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above was served on Ms. Meagan

White, Assistant District Attorney, Tom Green County Courthouse, Court Street

Annex, 124 West Beauregard, San Angelo, Texas 76903; and on Appellant, Ms

. Nakia

DeshawnLewis #1964121, 1210 Coryell Road, Gatesv· le, Texas 76528, on this

### ~ day of April, 2015.

Kirk Hawkins
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1382/2004

of 29 July 2004         

fixing the maximum export refund for butter in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 581/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 581/2004, for the tendering period ending on 28 July 2004, the maximum amount of refund for the products referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 July 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 July 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 64.

(3)OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58.

----

ANNEX

----
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350**




In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Conversion
      Services International, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2007, I, William
      Hendry, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.




Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1.
      Such
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Conversion Services International, Inc.




Dated:
      March 31, 2008




/s/
                William HendryWilliam
                HendryChief
                Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 01-31427

_____________________

WANDA M MARKS

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

SHAW CONSTRUCTORS

Defendant - Appellee

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

No. 00-CV-3203-K

_________________________________________________________________

September 4, 2002

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
#### Valerie K. SPATES-MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, U.S. Postmaster General; * et al., Defendants-Appellees, United States of America, Real-party-in-interest-Appellee, and Jeanne Hannahs; et al., Movants. Valerie K. Spates-Moore, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, U.S. Postmaster General; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 10-56283, 10-56303.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*697Submitted Feb. 21, 2012.**

Filed March 5, 2012.

Valerie K. Spates-Moore, Huntington Beach, CA, pro se.

David Pinchas, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for DefendantsAppellees.

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 Patrick R. Donahoe has been substituted for his predecessor, William J. Henderson, as Postmaster General under Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

In these consolidated appeals, Valerie K. Spates-Moore appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her consolidated employment actions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles,*349 F.3d 634, 639 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Spates-Moore’s claim of harassment by her co-worker, Schleicher, because Spates-Moore failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the alleged conduct was because of her sex or race, or was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of her employment. *See id.*at 642-44 (describing requirements for a sexual or racial harassment claim); *see also Faragher v. City of Boca Raton,*524 U.S. 775, 788, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 141 L.Ed.2d 662 (1998) (noting that Title VII is not a “general civility code” and a violation is not established merely by evidence showing “sporadic use of abusive language, gender-related jokes, and occasional teasing” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Spates-Moore’s claim of sexual harassment by her supervisor, Miracle, because Spates-Moore failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the alleged conduct was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of her employment. *See Vasquez,*349 F.3d at 642-44.

Spates-Moore’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, nor arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam).

Defendants’ motion to strike is granted to the extent that Spates-Moore seeks to introduce evidence that was not part of the district court record.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24

                         NICOLLET PROCESS ENGINEERING, INC.
                      EMPLOYMENT PROPOSAL FOR EVROS PSILOYENIS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 JOB TITLE               PRESIDENT
<S>                      <C>             <C>
 Proposed Start date     July 1, 1998

 Compensation            Annual

 Base Salary             $120,000        Company has 26 pay periods per year

 Car Allowance           $  5,000        Company has 26 pay periods per year

 Bonus/Commission        $100,000        Payable on completion of quarterly
                                         financial statements.  Quarterly
                                         revenue and net income targets to be
                                         defined.
                       ---------------
 On Target Earnings      $225,000
                         --------
                         --------

 Stock Incentive Plan                    subject to creation of 1998 Stock
                                         Incentive Plan

 Number of Options       500,000         5 year plan, vesting 40% after 2
                                         years; Vesting 20% per year
                                         thereafter; Option exercise price at
                                         $0.375

 OTHER EMPLOYEE
 BENEFITS

 Relocation Expenses     $20,000         to cover all moving and temporary
                                         accommodations actual costs plane fare
                                         to be covered by company

 Holidays                                10 holidays scheduled per year

 Vacation                                15 days

 Health and Dental                       Company pays 80% of premium
 Insurance

 Life Insurance                          Company pays 100% of premium for
                                         $50,000 insurance coverage

 Disability Insurance                    Company pays 100% of premium

 401K Plan                               Available after 6 months of
                                         employment; 15% of Salary up to
                                         $10,000 maximum

</TABLE>


Signed and Accepted:     /s/ Evros Psiloyenis          Date:     July 20, 1998
                         --------------------------              --------------
                         Evros Psiloyenis

Signed:                  /s/ Robert A. Pitner          Date:     July 18, 1998
                         --------------------------              --------------
                         Robert Pitner for Nicollet
                         Process Engineering, Inc.