alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Correction. 

Notice is hereby given in accordance with provisions of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 43 CFR 10.9, of the completion of an inventory of human remains and associated funerary objects in the possession of the Putnam Museum of History and Natural Science, Davenport, IA. 

This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 43 CFR 10.2 (c). The determinations within this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of these Native American human remains and associated funerary objects. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations within this notice. 

This notice corrects the list of tribes to which the human remains and associated funerary objects may be repatriated in the Notice of Inventory Completion published March 26, 1997 (Federal Register Document 97-7602, pages 14441-14442). 

                    In the sixth paragraph, the final sentence which reads “Repatriation of the human remains and associated funerary objects to the Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma may begin after that date if no additional claimants come forward,” is corrected to read “                    **Repatriation of the human remains and associated funerary objects to the Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma; the Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa; the Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska; and the Sac and Fox Nation, Oklahoma may begin after that date if no additional claimants come forward**                    .”                 

Dated: April 20, 2001. 

John Robbins, 

Assistant Director, Cultural Resources Stewardship and Partnerships. 

[FR Doc. 01-15303 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-F
EXHIBIT 32.1



CYBERSOURCE CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CyberSource Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), I, William S. McKiernan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the
best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |  |  |                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 11, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    WILLIAM S. MCKIERNAN
|                     |  |  |  |                            
|                     |  |  |  | William S. McKiernan       
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         6540437
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               2438195
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  109089090
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         4293731
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           4278702
<LOANS>                                      114860050
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2390459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               244105172
<DEPOSITS>                                   184906217
<SHORT-TERM>                                  26963794
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            4466670
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       7279925
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               244105172
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4745568
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              3609559
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                117189
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               8472316
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2795771
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3493857
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4978459
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   110000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               40842
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1622874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2481767
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1705412
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     515000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    122000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               1390000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   214000
<RECOVERIES>                                     59000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricky Page REYNOLDS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-6700.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 2006.

Decided: Dec. 19, 2006.

*259Ricky Page Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Page Reynolds seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and his motion for reconsideration. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reynolds has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 29 October 2004         

on a Community financial contribution for 2004 to cover expenditure incurred by Belgium and Portugal for the purpose of combating organisms harmful to plants or plant products

(notified under document number C(2004) 4181)

(Only the French, Dutch and Portuguese texts are authentic)

(2004/772/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (1) (hereinafter ‘the Directive’), and in particular Article 23 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The allocation of a Community financial contribution for 2004 to cover expenditure incurred by Belgium and Portugal relating directly to necessary measures as specified in Article 23(2) of Directive 2000/29/EC and taken for the purpose of combating the organisms concerned by the eradication programmes listed in the Annex to this Decision, is hereby approved.

Article 2

1.   The total amount of the financial contribution referred to in Article 1 is EUR 576 549.

2.   The maximum amounts of the Community financial contribution for each eradication programme and for each year of implementation of the eradication programme shall be as indicated in the Annex to this Decision.

3.   The resulting maximum Community financial contribution for the concerned Member States shall be as follows:

Article 3

Subject to the verifications by the Commission under Article 24 of Directive 2000/29/EC, the Community financial contribution as set out in the Annex shall be paid only when:

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium and the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2004.

For the Commission

David BYRNE            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 157, 15.6.2002, p. 38.

(3)OJ L 306, 23.11.2001, p. 25.

(4)OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 16.

(5)OJ L 293, 11.11.2003, p. 13.

(6)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

----

ANNEX

ERADICATION PROGRAMMES

SECTION I

Programmes whose Community financial contribution corresponds to 50 % of eligible expenditure

SECTION II

Programmes whose Community financial contribution rates differ, in application of degressivity

----
Travis BECKLES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-8544.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Motion of respondent for additional time to argue granted and the time is divided as follows: 25 minutes for petitioner, 25 minutes *489for respondent, and 15 minutes for the Court-appointed *amicus curiae* .

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15348]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 3, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Scherrie Viola Giamanco, Springfield, Illinois; to retain voting 
shares of First Nokomis Bancorp, Inc., Nokomis, Illinois, and thereby 
indirectly retain voting shares of First National Bank of Nokomis, 
Nokomis, Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Barbara M. Brown, James A Brown, Robert E. Brown, John D. 
Harmon, Teresa A. Harmon, Mary C. Tracy, and Richard A. Montera, all of 
Eaton, Colorado; to acquire voting shares of Farmers Bank, Ault, 
Colorado (in organization).
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579:
    1. Joseph Willy Edmonds, Seattle, Washington; to acquire additional 
voting shares of NWI Financial Corporation, Seattle, Washington, and 
thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Northwest 
International Bank, Seattle, Washington.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 13, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-15348 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT
32.2








SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Teen Education Group,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter  ending June 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Robert L.  Wilson,  President of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that, to my
knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The  information  contained  in
the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial  condition and results of
operations of the Company.








Date:
March 30, 2010











By: /s/
ROBERT L. WILSON


___________________________


Robert L.
Wilson


Principal
Financial Officer
Jay J. BAUER, petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General.

No. 15-1489.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 8 September 2004         

approving the second phase of the technical action plan 2004 for the improvement of agricultural statistics

(notified under document number C(2004) 3374)

(2004/637/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 96/411/EC of 25 June 1996 on improving Community agricultural statistics (1), and in particular Article 4(1) and Article 6(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The second phase of the 2004 technical action plan for improving agricultural statistics (TAPAS 2004 — Phase 2), as set out in the Annex to this Decision, is approved.

Article 2

This decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2004.

For the Commission

Joaquín ALMUNIA            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 162 of 1.7.1996, p. 14. Decision last amended by Decision No 787/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 138, 30.4.2004, p. 12).

(2)OJ L 114, 21.4.2004, p. 32.

----

ANNEX

Second phase of the 2004 technical action plan for improving agricultural statistics (TAPAS 2004 — Phase 2)

The measures covered by the second phase of the 2004 technical action plan for improving agricultural statistics (TAPAS) aim to develop or improve statistics in the following areas:

The Commission will make a financial contribution to projects developed as part of these measures which will not exceed the amounts shown in tables A and B for each Member State.

The measures proposed by the Member States concern:

1.   The physical aspects of European agriculture

This measure is a continuation of work undertaken in previous years. The aim is to improve the statistical data on areas, productions and uses of crops, in particular fruit and vegetables, livestock, and productions and uses of the animal products, particularly milk production.

2.   Statistics on the structure of the farms

Statistics on the structure of the farms are of great importance for the monitoring of the potential of agricultural production. In 2003, therefore before joining the European Union, the 10 adherent countries have carried out a survey on the structure of the agricultural holdings, but they were not obliged to transmit the individual data to Eurostat. The second phase of the TAPAS 2004 annual action plan will enable them to prepare this transmission and to consolidate these statistics. It will also allow methodological work and the implementation of Community typology of the agricultural farms.

TABLE A

Technical action plan 2004, phase 2

EU-15

Maximum financial contribution of the Community in incurred expenditure

TABLE B

Technical action plan 2004, phase 2

Countries which adhered to the European Union on 1 May 2004

Maximum financial contribution of the Community in incurred expenditure

----
Kenworth SCARLETT, petitioner, v. BRONX SUPREME COURT, et al.

No. 15-9186.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
[MERIDIAN FUND, INC. LOGO]
				MERIDIAN FUND, INC.

SUPPLEMENT DATED DECEMBER 19, 2002 TO PROSPECTUS AND SAI DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2002

Effective December 30, 2002 PFPC Trust Company will serve as Custodian of all
securities and funds owned by the Meridian Growth Fund and the Meridian Value
Fund. The address is PFPC Trust Company, 8800 Tinicum Boulevard, Suite 200,
Philadelphia, PA 19153.

Effective immediately, all purchases, redemption requests and correspondence
should be addressed to Meridian Fund, Inc., c/o PFPC Inc., P.O. Box 9792,
Providence, RI 02940.

Also, effective January 17, 2002 all overnight mail should be sent to Meridian
Fund, Inc., c/o PFPC Inc., 760 Moore Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406.






			[MERIDIAN FUND, INC. LETTERHEAD]




			       December 31, 2002

						    Writer's Direct Dial Number
							  (415) 461-8770

VIA EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Meridian Fund, Inc.
	   File Nos. 2-90949, 811-4014

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

      On behalf of Meridian Fund, Inc., and pursuant to 17 C.F.R. 230.497(e)
under the Securities Act of 1933, we are transmitting on EDGAR for filing a
supplement,dated as of the date hereof, to the November 1, 2002 Prospectus
and statementof additional information of the Fund..

      If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at
the number set forth above.

					Sincerely,




					Gregg Keeling
Exhibit 21


               SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Subsidiaries of the Registrant at December 31, 1998 include:

Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc.
No. 741.

#### Republic of the United States of Brazil, trading as Lloyd Brasileiro, *v.*General Foods Corp.

C. A. 2d Cir.

*Frank J. McConnell*for petitioner.

*Henry N. Longley*and *John W. R. Zisgen*for respondent.

Certiorari denied.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 18-BG-573

IN RE SCOTT M. MARINELLI

2018 DDN 28

A Suspended Member of the Bar of the 

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg. No. 480602

BEFORE: Easterly and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Ruiz, Senior Judge. 

O R D E R

(FILED—June 30, 2022)

On further consideration of the court’s May 29, 2018, order suspending 

respondent Scott M. Marinelli and staying this matter; the certified copy of the order

from the state of New Jersey suspending Mr. Marinelli from the practice of law in 

that state for two years and until further order of that court; the court’s April 19, 

2022, order lifting the stay and directing Mr. Marinelli to show cause why the

functional reciprocal discipline of a two-year suspension with a fitness requirement 

should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing 

that Mr. Marinelli has not filed either a response to the court’s show cause order or 

his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14(g) affidavit, it is 

ORDERED that Scott M. Marinelli is hereby suspended from the practice of 

law in the District of Columbia for two years with reinstatement conditioned on a 

showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 

930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (explaining that a rebuttable presumption in favor of 

identical reciprocal discipline applies unless one of the exceptions is established). It 

is
No. 18-BG-573

FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of reinstatement, Mr. Marinelli’s 

suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully 

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the  incorporation by reference in  Post-Effective  Amendment
No.  2 to  the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-68019)  of  Marvel
Enterprises,  Inc. (formerly Toy Biz, Inc.) and in the related Prospectus of our
report  dated  February 27, 2004,  with  respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements  and schedules of Marvel  Enterprises,  Inc.  included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.





/s/Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 10, 2004