alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-272-032]

Take notice that on June 11, 2001, Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern) tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, proposed to become effective on June 12, 2001:

Twentieth Revised Sheet No. 66 

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 66A

Northern states that the above sheets are being filed to implement a specific negotiated rate transaction with Kaztex Energy Management, Inc. in accordance with the Commission's Policy Statement on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines.

Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15506  Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL LOWMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 145 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         153,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               237,173
<PP&E>                                       5,494,570
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,731,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,241
<BONDS>                                      3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,507,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,731,743
<SALES>                                        308,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               329,945
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 92,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             92,834
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    92,834
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.25
        

</TABLE>
AGREEMENT FOR THE
                          SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO A LEASE


On this 26th day of August 1996, it is hereby agreed by and between HILLCREST
DEVELOPMENT, a limited partnership, as Lessor, and NICOLLET PROCESS ENGINEERING
INC., a Minnesota corporation, as Tenant, that the Lease Agreement dated January
1, 1993 and the first six (6) Amendments to that same Lease, the last of which
is dated October 7, 1994, shall be amended as follows:

1.       Lessor and Tenant agree that, as per Paragraph #5 of the Sixth
         Amendment to a Lease dated October 7, 1994, the rental rate for the
         recently renovated portion of Suite 1075, consisting of 1384 rentable
         square feet, shall be as follows:

              September 1, 1996-August 31, 1997     $463.64 per month NET.
              September 1, 1997-December 31, 1999   $474.02 per month NET.

         Operating Expenses and Real Estate Taxes shall be escrowed and paid to
         Lessor at their then current levels.

2.       The remaining balance of Suite 1075 is 2200 rentable square feet of
         which Tenant shall continue to lease 1200 rentable square feet as
         storage space. Tenant shall retain its First Right of Refusal on the
         remaining 1000 rentable square feet, as per Paragraph #4 of the Sixth
         Amendment to a Lease dated October 7, 1994. Accordingly, the net rental
         rates for said 1200 square feet shall remain at the following:

              September 1, 1996-December 31, 1996   $200.00 per month NET.
              January 1, 1997-December 31, 1998     $260.00 per month NET.
              January 1, 1999-December 31, 1999     $275.00 per month NET.

         Operating Expenses and Real Estate Taxes shall be escrowed and paid to
         Lessor at their then current levels.

3.       Lessor and Tenant agree that the construction for Suite 1075 totaling
         $29,768.00 (as per Invoice #42-1199) shall be amortized at 10.25%
         interest over forty (40) months, beginning September 1, 1996 and
         continuing through December 31, 1999, and shall be payable by Tenant to
         Lessor as Additional Rent in monthly installments of $881.11.

Except as herein stated, all terms and conditions of the aforementioned Lease
shall remain in full force and effect.



Tenant:                                   Lessor:

NICOLLET PROCESS ENGINEERING INC.         HILLCREST DEVELOPMENT
a Minnesota corporation

By:   /s/ Robert A. Pitner                By:   /s/ Scott M. Tankenoff
      -----------------------------             ------------------------------
      Robert A. Pitner                          Scott M. Tankenoff

Its:  President & CEO                     Its:  General Partner

Date: 8/29/96                             Date:  9/3/96
      -----------------------------              -----------------------------
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: WILLIAM E. HENNER 

DOCKET NUMBER: 181 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 181 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

William E. Henner 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that on February 14, 1969, the respondent entered into 

a noncompetitive trade which was of the character of an accommodation trade. It 

further charges that in connection with this transaction the respondent caused 

false records to be entered and failed to keep full and complete records. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, November 3, 1971, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Edward H. FLINT, petitioner, v. Wesley JACKSON, et al.

No. 16-378.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)



                                 CONSENT OF AUDITORS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement

of CEC Resources Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-98954) of our report dated

February 16, 1999, on our audits of the financial statements of CEC Resources

Ltd. as of November 30, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended November 30,

1998, 1997, and 1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 

10-K.



                           PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                           Chartered Accountants


Calgary, Canada
February 16, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              9
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         131,601
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,133,250
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,087
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,389
<LOANS>                                      2,902,439
<ALLOWANCE>                                     47,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,413,236
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,527,247
<SHORT-TERM>                                   406,710
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             46,609
<LONG-TERM>                                     72,708
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,548
<OTHER-SE>                                     306,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,413,236
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 60,890
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,347
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   211
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                78,448
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              29,834
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,412
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           44,202
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,275
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 143
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 36,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,070
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      20,070
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,135
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.44
<LOANS-NON>                                     18,209
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,352
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    35
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                46,537
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,590
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,913
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               47,135
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            47,135
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Starsha SEWELL, petitioner, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES.

No. 16-5479.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Michael GARRY, petitioner, v. AMERICAN STANDARD TRANE, INC., et al.

No. 16-5345.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of PLXTechnology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Rafael Torres,****Chief Financial Officer****ofthe Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of myknowledge:

the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and 

the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,"filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: May 4, 2005
                          /s/ RafaelTorres	 
Rafael Torres, Chief FinancialOfficer
EX-10.28



 Exhibit 10.28 

Amendment to Employment Agreement 

This Second Amendment (this “Amendment “), dated as of April 1, 2016, to the Employment Agreement, made as of May 1, 2014
and as amended as of September 1, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement “), between the Florida Community Bank, National Association (the “Company”) and Kent Ellert (“Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive now wish to amend the Employment Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Section 7(n) of
the Employment Agreement; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein. 
 I.
     The second sentence of Section 5(b)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“In consideration of the payment by the Company to Executive of amounts that may hereafter be paid to Executive pursuant to this Agreement
(including, without limitation , pursuant to Sections 3 and 4 hereof) and other obligations undertaken by the Company hereunder , Executive agrees that during (I) his employment with the Company , and (2) the period beginning on the date
of termination of employment and ending on the second anniversary of the date of termination of employment (the “Covered Time”), Executive shall not, directly or indirectly , engage (as owner, investor, partner, stockholder,
employer, employee, consultant, advisor, director or otherwise) in any Competing Business in any Restricted Area (each as defined below) , provided that the provisions of this Section 5(b)(i) will not be deemed breached merely because Executive
owns less than 5% of the outstanding common stock of a publicly-traded company.” 
  

	 	2.	The foregoing amendment to the Employment Agreement shall be effective as of April 1, 2016 

  

	 	3.	As part of the consideration for Executive’s agreement to amend the foregoing provision of the Employment Agreement, the Company (i) shall make a $950,000 lump sum cash payment to Executive within 30 days
hereof and (ii) shall grant 60,606 shares of restricted stock to Executive under the FCB Financial Holdings, Inc. 2016 Incentive Plan subject to the terms and provision s of a Restricted Stock Agreement. 


 

	 	4.	Except as specifically modified herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with all of the term s and conditions thereof. 


 

	 	5.	This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. Signatures delivered
by facsimile shall be effective for all purposes. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has
caused this Amendment to be duly executed effective as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	 FLORIDA COMMUNITY BANK,
 NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION

		
	By:	 	/s/ Vincent S. Tese
	Name:	 	Vincent S. Tese
	Title:	 	Executive Chairman
		
		 	/s/Kent Ellert
		 	Kent Ellert
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PowerVerde, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George Konrad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George Konrad      
|George Konrad          
|Chief Executive Officer
|April 14, 2010
SEC Exhibit






Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment to the Executive Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") effective as of January 1, 2016, is hereby made by and between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Stephen C. Thompson (the "Executive").




Background Information


     The parties to this Amendment (the "Parties") entered into the Agreement dated as of January 9, 2013, regarding the Executive's employment relationship with the Company.  The Parties desire to amend the Agreement to provide for the extension of the Current Term, as defined therein, for a period of two years, subject to further extension each year thereafter, as provided in the Agreement.  




Agreement


In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the Company and Executive hereby agree as follows:


1.    The first sentence of Section 2.b of the Agreement shall be revised to read as follows:  “Subject to Paragraph 2(c), the Current Term of this Agreement shall extend through December 31, 2017, subject to further extension as provided below.”


2.    All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.


	
				
	 
	 
	CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION

	 
	 
	 
	 

	[CORPORATE SEAL]
	 
	By:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	ATTEST:
	 
	Title:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Date:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	EXECUTIVE:

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Date:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00065-CV 

IN RE T.H. RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. CIV-13-0225

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and 

motion for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. 

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency 

relief are denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, MEIER, and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 3, 2016

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-38022 and 333-50500)
of TTR Technologies, Inc.("TTR") of our report dated March 20, 2003 relating to
the financial statements which appear in TTR's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003.





                /s/ BRIGHTMAN ALMAGOR & CO.

                CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (ISRAEL)
                A MEMBER OF DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU



Tel Aviv, Israel
March 29, 2004
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2710

LT Case No. 2011-CT-000621

_____________________________

GABRIEL IGLESIAS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 appeal from the County Court for Citrus County.

Bruce Carney, Judge.

Gabriel Iglesias, DeFuniak Springs, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. 

Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

December 26, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

EDWARDS, C.J, EISNAUGLE, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Gerardo MONTES-NUNEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5592.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Rafael BEAN, petitioner, v. Kenneth TRIBLEY, et al.

No. 16-6033.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.