alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

# ACTION:

Public Announcement of meeting pursuant to the Government In the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409; 5 U.S.C. Section 552b).

# Agency Holding Meeting:

Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission.

# Date and Time:

 12:00 p.m., Friday, June 22, 2001.

# Place:

 5550 Friendship Boulevard, Suite 400, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

# Status:

 Closed—Meeting.

# Matters Considered:

 The following matter will be considered during the closed portion of the Commission's Business Meeting:

Appeals to the Commission involving approximately two cases decided by the National Commissioners pursuant to a reference under 28 C.F.R. 2.27. These cases were originally heard by an examiner panel wherein inmates of Federal prisons have applied for parole or are contesting revocation of parole or mandatory release.

      ( print page 33110)    

# Agency Contact:

 Sam Robertson, Case Operations, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5962.

Dated: June 15, 2001.

Michael A. Stover,

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 01-15597  Filed 6-18-01; 1:06 pm]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50405

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUSTON BRAZIL TRUEHEART, also known as Juston Trueheart,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:01-CR-39-1

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Juston Brazil Trueheart has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Trueheart has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50405 Document: 00513804886 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 16-50405

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50405 Document: 00513804886 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000850428
<NAME> GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION ENERGY INCOME P-2 LIMITED PART
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         175,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               359,418
<PP&E>                                       6,085,077
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,861,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,583,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,583,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,583,240
<SALES>                                        677,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               766,219
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  968,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (202,226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (202,226)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (202,226)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: EMIL VOJTEK 

CITATION: 22 Agric. Dec. 141 

DOCKET NUMBER: 99 

DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 1963 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER REOPENING HEARING 

(No. 8186) 

In re EMIL VOJTEK. CEA Docket No. 99. Decided February 20, 1963. 

Hearing Reopened 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer

ORDER REOPENING HEARING

In this proceeding under the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. Chapter 1), the 

respondent filed exceptions to the hearing examiner's report and also filed a 

motion to reopen the hearing to adduce additional evidence. The complainant 

does not object to the granting of the motion. Accordingly, the motion is 

granted and the matter is remanded to the hearing examiner for appropriate 

action. 

LOAD-DATE: June 8, 2008 
Page 2
Pedro JUAN-SOLANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6295.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
LaTonya Denise DAVIS, petitioner, v. Todd CLIFFORD, et al.

No. 16M45.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Xavier TAYLOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5871.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 3696]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Pieter Bruegel the Elder, Drawings and Prints''

DEPARTMENT: United States Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and 
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Pieter Bruegel the Elder, 
Drawings and Prints,'' imported from abroad for the temporary 
exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of 
the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY 
from on or about September 24, 2001 to on or about December 2, 2001, is 
in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is 
ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/
619-5997). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: June 1, 2001.
Helena Kane Finn,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United 
States Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-14632 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.29
                              TERMINATION OF LEASE

         WHEREAS, by that certain written Lease Agreement dated the 21st day of
November, 1996("Lease"), Vantage Houston, Inc. as agent for Greenbriar Holdings
Houston, Ltd., as Lessor, leased to MLC Enterprises, Inc. d.b.a. Marine and
Industrial Supply, as Lessee, approximately 3,915 square feet of space located
at 4544 South Pinemont, Suite 204, Houston, Texas 77041("leased premises")

         WHEREAS, Lessee is desirous of terminating its obligations under the
Lease.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises herein
contained it is herewith agreed that Lessee shall be released from all liability
under the Lease, and the Lease shall be canceled and of no further force and
effect, as of Midnight, November 19th, 1998 upon payment by Lessee in the amount
of $1,570.00, to be paid upon execution of this document. Lessee waives all
claim to any monies previously paid to Lessor, including security deposit of
$1,570.00.




     EXECUTED THIS   18TH  DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1998.


                                     LESSOR:

                                     Vantage Houston, Inc. as Agent for
                                     Greenbriar Holdings Houston, Ltd.

                                     By: 
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Stephen Dunn

                                     Title:   Executive Vice President
                                            ----------------------------------


                                     LESSEE:

                                     MLC Enterprises, Inc. d.b.a. Marine and
                                     Industrial Supply

                                     By: /s/ William A. Coskey
                                         -------------------------------------

                                     Title:   President    
                                            ----------------------------------
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Stephen Carl WOODRUFF.

No. D-2942.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Stephen Carl Woodruff, of Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1545 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1545

 Expressing support for designation of the week beginning on the third 
     Monday in September as ``National Postdoc Appreciation Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2010

 Mr. Stearns submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of the week beginning on the third 
     Monday in September as ``National Postdoc Appreciation Week''.

Whereas research is the mechanism by which humankind achieves innovation and 
        progress;
Whereas in order for the United States to maintain a leadership role in the 
        world, citizens must be well educated to harbor the world's best 
        scientists, engineers, and researchers in all fields of study;
Whereas postdoctoral scholars (postdocs) make up one of the most substantial 
        driving forces for innovation and research;
Whereas the base of available knowledge is increasing exponentially;
Whereas given such rapid rates of knowledge expansion, increasing levels of 
        training and education are required beyond the average undergraduate 
        level and even beyond graduate study levels to generate the next 
        generations of innovators in every field of study;
Whereas postdocs conduct work and studies in a complex transition period while 
        being both trainees and paid professionals; and
Whereas the week beginning on the third Monday in September would be an 
        appropriate week to designate as ``National Postdoc Appreciation Week'': 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Postdoc 
        Appreciation Week'';
            (2) recognizes the accomplishments and contributions 
        postdocs make to relevant departments, institutions, fields, 
        and communities around the United States and the world;
            (3) recognizes the career development and other 
        professional needs of postdocs in every field of study; and
            (4) encourages the improvement of training and career 
        opportunities in various research fields at all levels of 
        training and stages of all research careers.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Diversified Industries,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending November 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carter M. Fortune, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

7/15/04                /s/ Amy Gallo
Date                   -----------------------------------------
                       Amy Gallo, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,833
<SECURITIES>                                       987
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                       585
<INVENTORY>                                        398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,522
<PP&E>                                          33,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,308)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,401
<BONDS>                                         11,847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           31,561
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,123
<OTHER-SE>                                    (58,235)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,697
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,175
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   246
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,775)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,775)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.52)


</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1099 KA 12-00107** 
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID COLON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (PATRICK J. MARTHAGE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M. Donalty, J.), rendered September 13, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 [b] [iii]), defendant challenges the validity of his waiver of the right to appeal. We conclude that “County Court did not improperly conflate the waiver of the right to appeal with those rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea” ( People v Bentley , 63 AD3d 1624, 1625, lv denied 13 NY3d 742; see People v Bradshaw , 18 NY3d 257, 264; People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that the record establishes that the court engaged defendant “in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice” ( People v Burt , 101 AD3d 1729, 1730, lv denied 20 NY3d 1060 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Defendant’s valid waiver encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence ( see generally People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827).

Although defendant’s contentions that his plea was coerced and that he is innocent survive the valid waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v Merritt , 115 AD3d 1250, 1251; People v Lewandowski , 82 AD3d 1602, 1602), we conclude that those contentions are without merit. “The court was presented with a credibility determination when defendant moved to withdraw his plea and advanced his belated claims of innocence and coercion, and it did not abuse its discretion in discrediting those claims” ( People v Sparcino , 78 AD3d 1508, 1509, lv denied 16 NY3d 746). Indeed, we conclude that “defendant’s assertions**-2- 1099 KA 12-00107** 

of innocence and coercion were conclusory and belied by defendant’s statements during the plea colloquy” ( People v Wright , 66 AD3d 1334, 1334, lv denied 13 NY3d 912; see People v Allen , 99 AD3d 1252, 1252).

Entered: November 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1594 

Celebrating the 69th anniversary of the first combat action of the American 

Volunteer Group and recognizing the contribution of the American Volunteer Group and the 23rd Fighter Group known as the ‘‘Flying Tigers’’ 

to the victory of the United States in World War II. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2010 

Mr. KINGSTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the 69th anniversary of the first combat action 

of the American Volunteer Group and recognizing the 

contribution of the American Volunteer Group and the 

23rd Fighter Group known as the ‘‘Flying Tigers’’ to 

the victory of the United States in World War II. 

Whereas the American Volunteer Group was formed by Lieutenant General Claire Chennault for the defense of 

China; 

Whereas the American Volunteer Group was affectionately 

known as the ‘‘Flying Tigers’’; 

Whereas the American Volunteer Group Flying Tigers saw 

their first combat operation over Yunnan Province in 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1594 IH 

China on December 20, 1941, shooting down nine enemy 

bombers; 

Whereas the American Volunteer Group Flying Tigers faced 

a numerically superior enemy force, long logistics supply 

lines, and poor infrastructure, but despite those challenges ultimately destroyed 299 enemy aircraft and probably destroyed an additional 153 enemy aircraft, losing 

only 12 aircraft in combat; 

Whereas, on July 4, 1942, the American Volunteer Group 

Flying Tigers were disbanded, and the 23rd Fighter 

Group Flying Tigers were activated in their stead; 

Whereas the 23rd Fighter Group faced challenges in the Chinese theater similar to those faced by the American Volunteer Group but nonetheless destroyed 621 enemy aircraft and by the end of the war had become the third 

highest scoring Army Air Force Fighter Group of World 

War II; and 

Whereas the 23rd Fighter Group and the 23rd Wing have 

continued the proud combat tradition of the American 

Volunteer Group, seeing combat action in Vietnam, Operation Desert Storm, Operation Allied Force, Operation 

Enduring Freedom, and Operation Iraqi Freedom: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the American Volunteer 

3 Group, known as the ‘‘Flying Tigers’’, and the 23rd 

4 Fighter Group for their contributions to the Na5 tion’s defense; and 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1594 IH 

1 (2) celebrates the 69th anniversary of the first 

2 combat action of the Flying Tigers. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 10.1**

Page 1**Financing Agreement with GE Capital for the purchase of chassis from Workhorse Custom Chassis.**   
 
 
 
 - 15 -  
 **Exhibit 10.1**

Page 2**Financing Agreement with GE Capital for the purchase of chassis from Workhorse Custom Chassis.**   
 
 
 - 16 -  
 **Exhibit 10.1**

Page 3**Financing Agreement with GE Capital for the purchase of chassis from Workhorse Custom Chassis.**   
 
 
 
 - 17 -  
 **Exhibit 10.1**

Page 4**Financing Agreement with GE Capital for the purchase of chassis from Workhorse Custom Chassis.**   
 
 
 
 - 18 -  
 **Exhibit 10.1**

Page 5**Financing Agreement with GE Capital for the purchase of chassis from Workhorse Custom Chassis.**   
 
 
 
 - 19 -  
 **Exhibit 10.1**

Page 6**Financing Agreement with GE Capital for the purchase of chassis from Workhorse Custom Chassis.**   
 
 
 - 20 -  
 **Exhibit 10.1**

Page 7**Financing Agreement with GE Capital for the purchase of chassis from Workhorse Custom Chassis.**   
 
 
 
 - 21 -