alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In re Dennis D. ANTWINE, petitioner.

No. 16-6731.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, FILED AS
PART OF FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY
REPORT FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          96,678
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  245,759
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               366,422
<PP&E>                                         833,131
<DEPRECIATION>                               (664,336)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 574,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,214,021
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,306,475
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,997,050)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   574,567
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               335,576
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  914,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (782,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (782,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (782,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), I, Kun Lin Lee, certify that:

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report of ACL Semiconductors Inc. (the Company) on Form
 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), as filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, fully complies with
 the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934; and
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.                                                                                                                                                                   

|      |                 |                             | 
|----- | --------------- | --------------------------- | 
|Date: | March 31,
 2011 | /s/ Kun Lin
 Lee            | 
|      |                 |                             | 
|      |                 | Kun Lin Lee                
|      |                 | Chief
 Financial Officer of
|      |                 | ACL
 Semiconductors Inc.   
|      |                 |                            

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to ACL Semiconductors Inc. and will be retained by ACL
Semiconductors Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
#### Lauwrens WALOJO; Leliana W. Wijaya Kwo, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73477.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 22, 2008.*

Filed July 30, 2008.

*530Anthony S. Wilaras, Houston, TX, for Petitioners.

Ada E. Bosque, Lyle Davis Jentzer, OIL, David M. McConnell, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, District Director, Office of the District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lauwrens Walojo and his wife, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence. *Lolong v. Gonzales,*484 F.3d 1173, 1178 (9th Cir.2007). We grant the petition for review and we remand.

Because there is no evidence that the BIA reviewed the petitioners’ asylum and withholding claim, as requested by petitioners in their brief to the BIA, pursuant to the disfavored group analysis set forth in *Sael v. Ashcroft,*386 F.3d 922 (9th Cir.2004), we remand to the agency to determine *Sael’s*application in this case. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-17, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (holding that when an agency has not reached an issue, the proper course is to remand to the agency in the first instance to address). We also remand for consideration of pattern and practice persecution against ethnic Chinese Christians in Indonesia pursuant to *Lolong v. Gonzales,*484 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir.2007).

Accordingly, we grant the petition for review regarding petitioners’ claims for asylum, withholding of removal and CAT relief, and remand. *See Ventura,*537 U.S. at 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353.

*531PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 18

- 12854 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:17

- cr - 80112

- KAM

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus GIORGI ABRAKHAMIA, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ ( August 6, 2019 )

Before WILSON, EDMONDSON , and HULL , Circuit Judges.

Case: 18-12854 Date Filed: 08/06/2019 Page: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM:

Giorgi Abrakhamia appeals his above

- guidelines 78

- month sentence for alien smuggling, arguing that he was not competent to proceed with his sentencing hearing and that the district court abused its discretion in imposing several
sentence enhancem ents. First, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to continue sentencing or in declining to hold a hearing to evaluate Abrakhamia’s competence : he had been evaluated by medical staff before sentencing, was found to have no disabil ities or limitations, and told counsel that he could proceed with sentencing. For background, see United States v. Perkins , 787 F.3d 1329, 1339 (11th Cir. 2015 ) ; United States v. Edouard , 485 F.3d 1324, 1350 (11th Cir. 2007). Second, the district court did not err in applying a sentencing enhancement for brandishing or otherwise using a dangerous weapon : that Abrakhamia’s coconspirator would use any available weapon, including a knife, to maintain control of the boat after pushing its captain over board was reasonably foreseeable. For background, see United States v. Pringle , 350 F.3d 1172, 1175

- 76 (11th Cir. 2003). Third, the district court did not err in applying an enhancement for creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury bec ause the evidence showed that

Case: 18-12854 Date Filed: 08/06/2019 Page: 2 of 33 Abrakhamia and his codefendant worked together to throw the captain overboard and take control of the boat. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1, comment. (n.3). In addition,
this enhancement did not amount to double

- counting because this c onduct (throwing someone overboard and so on) was in addition to the conduct considered in the dangerous weapon enhancement, which involved stabbing the captain

. Fourth, the district court did not err in imposing an enhancement for inflicting a bodily in jury : that using or brandishing the knife would result in a stab wound was reasonably foreseeable. Fifth, the district court did not err in imposing a special skill enhancement : Abrakhamia drove the boat away from the captain on the open ocean , and the boat was later found at a marina in Florida ; seemingly a predetermined destination; driving a boat on the ocean from the Bahamas to Florida requires skills not possessed by the general public

. For background, see United States v. De La Cruz Suarez , 601 F.3d 1202, 1219 (11th Cir. 2010) ; United States v. Calderon , 127 F.3d 1314, 1339 (11th Cir. 1997).
AFFIRMED. Case: 18-12854 Date Filed: 08/06/2019 Page: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,440,039
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,221,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,009,123
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       5,819,636
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    142,962,373
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             160,791,350
<DEPOSITS>                                 110,375,397
<SHORT-TERM>                                26,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,036,281
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,720
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,366,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             160,791,350
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,990,408
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              246,519
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                57,690
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,294,617
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,494,925
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,233,239
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,061,378
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  102,638
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,178,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,027,768
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,027,768  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   644,286
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    329,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Donell Thomas HAYNIE, petitioner, v. Kim HOLLAND, Warden.

No. 16-6193.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. —, original.

#### Ex parte Otto Van Dyke.

November 9, 1936.

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
Exhibit 23.2 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference, constituting a part of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 Registration Statement File No. 333-33342 ofour report dated October 3, 2003, except for Note 2, paragraph 1, of the June 30, 2003 financial statements which is dated October 21, 2003, and except for Note 2, paragraphs 2 through 4, of the June 30, 2003 financial statements which are datedMarch 18, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Voxware, Inc. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004. 

 

/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, P.C. 

 

Princeton, New Jersey 

October 12, 2004****
WENJING LIU, aka Linda Liu, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6114.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
No. 774.

#### Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 3d Cir.

*W. A. Seifert, William R. Spofford*and *Norman D. Keller*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack*and *Hilbert P. Zarky*for respondent.

Certiorari denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KENDERRICK DESHAWN McCLAIN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-422

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed May 10, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Lisa Lott, Assistant Public Defender,

Bartow, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
No. 568, Misc.

#### Scott *v.*Ragen, Warden.

Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois.

Certiorari denied.
|   | EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification |
|--------|------------------------------------------|

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Oro Volcanico Corp. (the “Company”) certifies that:

1.         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date:  June 17, 2008 | By: /s/ Francis Mailhot |
|----------------------|-------------------------|

Francis Mailhot, Chief Executive Officer 

and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
     As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

         The undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed by GTSI Corp. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of GTSI Corp.



Dated:  May 10, 2004           /s/ DENDY YOUNG
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Dendy Young
                               Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


         The undersigned hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 filed by GTSI Corp. with the Securities and
Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of GTSI Corp.

Dated:  May 10, 2004           /s/ THOMAS A. MUTRYN
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Thomas A. Mutryn
                               Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President


                                     - 22 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ELITE CARE, RX, LLC

v.

PREMIER COMP SOLUTIONS, LLC; 

LAUNDRY OWNERS' MUTUAL LIABILITY 

INSURANCE ASSOCIATION; UPMC 

BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 

D/B/A UPMC WORK PARTNERS; 

LACKAWANNA CASUALTY COMPANY; 

AND BRICK STREET MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY

PETITION OF: PREMIER COMP 

SOLUTIONS, LLC, AND BRICK STREET 

MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 156 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Can a purported medical provider seeking payment for 

prescription medication in accordance with the provision of 

the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (hereinafter 

“WCA”), specifically 77 P.S. § 501(a)(1), and corresponding 

Medical Cost Containment Regulations (hereinafter “MCCR”), 

34 Pa. Code §§ 127.1 – 127.755, circumvent the exclusivity 

provisions of the WCA by initiating litigation outside the forums 

established by and under the WCA and MCCR for 

adjudicating such issues? Alternatively phrased, is the liability 

of the Employer and its Insurer or carrier exclusive in place of 

any and all other liability, given the WCA provides for an 

exclusive remedy barring any tort action flowing from a workrelated injury?
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 19, 2023

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00010-CV

ANGELA WARNER A/N/F TO BARBARA ANN WARNER A/K/A 

BARBARA WILLIAMS WARNER, Appellants

V.

FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. D/B/A FIDELITY NATIONAL 

TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND COMMONWEALTH LAND 

TITTLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-76521-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from an order signed January 3, 2023. The clerk’s record was 

filed January 13, 2023. No brief was filed.

On August 31, 2023, we issued an order stating that unless appellant filed a 

brief on or before October 2, 2023, the appeal was subject to dismissal without 

further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
2

Appellant filed no brief or other response. We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the consolidated financial statements accompanying the filing of
Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                 450,040
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                          100,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       681,578
<PP&E>                                 416,045
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,188,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  264,094
<BONDS>                                      0
<COMMON>                                 4,272
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                             672,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         1,188,627
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             0
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     3,865,736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     113,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (4,119,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (4,119,612)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                        (4,119,612)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (1.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (1.35)
        


</TABLE>
3844
Kennett Pike


Suite
204-4, Mall Building, Powder Mill Square


Greenville,
Delaware 19807


Phone:
(302) 656-1708


 


TO:
Visionary Enhancement, LLC


 


Dear
Sirs:


 


Reference
is made to our promissory note payable to you in the principal amount of $100,000 with a Funding Date of January 15, 2016 (the
“Note”).


 


The
Note is modified by the addition of the following two paragraphs (shown below in bold) to be inserted at the end of the Note.


 


If
the DSIT Closing Date shall not have occurred by September 1, 2016, this Note and all interest accrued thereunder shall be payable
on September 1, 2016. 


 


The
obligation to pay the principal of and any interest accrued on this Note shall be parri passu with the indebtedness of Acorn under
the Loan and Security Agreement with Leap Tide Capital Partners III, LLC. 


 


The
Note as originally executed and delivered to you remains in full force and effect, as modified pursuant hereto.


 


	 	Very
    truly yours,
	 	 
	 	Jan
    H Loeb
	 	President
    and CEO