alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James W. SLATER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-7484.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 2006.

Decided: Dec. 21, 2006.

James W. Slater, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James W. Slater seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recom*290mendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dis-positive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Slater has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version file d by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 KENT M. WEISNER, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3

v. NO. 31,832 4 SAN JUAN COUNTY NM BOARD 5 OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and 6 OFFICE OF COUNTY CLERK, 7 Defendant-Appellee. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY 9 Judge Thomas J. Hynes, District Judge 10 Kent M.Weisner 11 Kirtland, NM 12 Pro se Appellant 13 Douglas A. Echols 14 Aztec, NM 15 for Appellee 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 GARCIA, Judge. 182 Plaintiff is appealing, pro se, from a district court order dismissing his 1 complaint. We issued a calendar notice pr oposing to dismiss. Plaintiff has responded 2 with a memorandum in opposition. Not persuaded by Plaintiff’s arguments, we 3 dismiss the appeal. 4 Plaintiff is appealing from a district c ourt order dismissing his complaint. The 5 judgment was filed on December 1, 2011. [RP 63] On December 7, 2011, Plaintiff 6 filed a motion to reconsider that order. [RP 64] Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from 7 the underlying order on December 1, 2011. [RP 67] There is no indication in the 8 record proper that the district court rule d on Plaintiff’s motion to reconsider, and 9 Plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition indicates that no ruling has been entered. The 10 district court was required to rule on the post-judgment motion and it was not deemed 11 denied by the passage of time. SeeRule 1-059(E) NMRA; Albuquerque Redi-Mix, 12 Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co. , 2007-NMSC-051, ¶ 15, 142 N.M. 527, 168 P.3d 99 13 (holding that a Rule 1-059(E) motion is not subject to automatic denial). Thus, we 14 conclude that Plaintiff’s appeal is prem ature without an order denying his motion. See 15 generally Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. Kapnison , 113 N.M. 231, 236, 824 P.2d 1033, 16 1038 (1992) (discussing principles of finality). 17 For these reasons, we dismiss Plai ntiff’s appeal as premature. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 193 ____________ ____________________ 1 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 2

WE CONCUR: 3

_______________________________ 4 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 5

_______________________________ 6 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 7
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP93-618-012]

      ( print page 32944)    
Take notice that on May 23, 2001, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing its “Amended Annual Reports on Deferred Revenue Recovery Mechanism and Revenue Reconciliation of the Years Ending October 31, 1998, 1999, and 2000.”

GTN states that the purpose of this filing is to revise certain schedules included in these previously filed Reports to reflect the crediting of ITS-1 (E-1) revenues to the deferred account for Avista Corporation and to correct a mechanical error in its January 29, 2001 filing.

GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served on GTN's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory agencies, as well as the Office Service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations, on or before July 5, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15381  Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Form 10-K of Community Bank Shares of Indiana,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, I, Paul A Chrisco,
Chief Financial Officer of Community Bank Shares of Indiana, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  Such
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)  The
information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.








By:         /s/ Paul A.
Chrisco


Paul A.
Chrisco


Senior Vice
President,


Chief
Financial Officer





Date:  March
31, 2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
SEC Exhibit








EXHIBIT 4.4


Description of Assumed Junior Deferrable Interest Subordinated Debentures of River Valley Bancorp and Agreement to Furnish Copies of Related Instruments and Documents


As a result of the merger of River Valley Bancorp (“River Valley”) into the Registrant, German American Bancorp, Inc. (“German American”) or its subsidiaries became liable on March 1, 2016, for all financial obligations of River Valley and its subsidiaries, including certain junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the “Debentures”) issued by River Valley in the aggregate unpaid principal amount of $7,217,000.


The Debentures were issued to the RIVR Statutory Trust I (the “RIVR Trust”) on March 26, 2003.  The common capital securities of the Trust were wholly owned by River Valley and are now wholly owned by German American.


The Trust also issued preferred capital securities to an unaffiliated investor(s) with notional amounts that approximate the principal amount of the Debentures held by the Trust.  The Debentures and the common and capital securities have a term of 30 years and bear interest at the rate of the 3-Month LIBOR plus 3.15%.  German American has also assumed River Valley's guarantee obligation with respect to the payment of amounts owed by the Trust to the holders of the preferred capital securities.


German American believes that the indebtedness represented by the Debentures is presently immaterial in amount and significance due to the long-term nature of the principal repayment obligation thereunder and the subordination and other issuer-protective provisions of the Debentures that qualify them for Tier 1 capital treatment under the guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board.  German American agrees to furnish a copy of all instruments and documents that evidence (or that are related to) the Debentures to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
No. 477, Misc.

#### Wagner *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S. Erdahl*and *Philip R. Monahan*for the United States.

Certiorari denied.
Received CFTC ~ 

jlee~.,-·sr· SsctiOft 

t 1~ D<i 

secretary 

COMMENT 

Page 1 of 1 

r~ !'~~ -~- c~ 

- - • ~ 0 ----~ 1' 

From: Jason Gowen Uasong@b4grain.com] 

Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:07 PM 

To: secretary 

Subject: My position on doubling Speculative positions 

Mr. Stawick, 

My name is Jason Gowen. I work with a small grain elevator in Central Nebraska. I wanted to send 

you a note voicing my position on doubling speculative limits for corn, soybeans, wheat (Chicago, 

Kansas City, and Minneapolis), soybean oil and soybean meal. I am very opposed to increasing these 

limits. 

The main reason backing my opposition, is that the volatility of short hedgers' (the farmer and the 

country elevator) cash grain position is increased, while the volatility of long hedgers' (hedge funds, 

speculative traders with no ties to agriculture) position is reduced. Lack of convergence due to 

inflexible contract rules means that by design, the longs are advantaged relative to the shorts. 

In short, farmer's and country elevators, that are already taking a huge risk in the market, will be at an 

even greater risk if speculative limits are doubled. 

Please note my concerns and thank you for your time. 

Sincerely, 

Jason Gowen 

National Futures Association ID: 0389748 

• BRANCH MANAGER APPROVED 

• ASSOCI A TED PERSON REGISTERED 

• NFA ASSOCIATE MEMBER APPROVED 

No virus found in this outgoing message. 

Checked by A VG Free Edition. 

Version: 7.5.516 I Virus Database: 269.19.6- Release Date: 1/17/2008 12:00 AM 

/ 

1118/2008
# FCM Data November 2011

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF November 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002011FROM REPORTS FILED BY January 2,&KFF0000 &K0000002012	&P of &N
Exhibit 31.2
       a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ PETER WHITFIELDPeter WhitfieldSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Tyrone HURT, Appellant v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

No. 06-7147.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 22, 2006.

Tyrone Hurt, Washington, DC, pro se.

BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and RANDOLPH and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 30, 2006 be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted as it fails to allege a cognizable violation of federal or constitutional law. *See Baker v. U.S. Parole Commission,*916 F.2d 725, 726 (D.C.CSr.1990) (dismissal for failure to state a claim is appropriate if it appears beyond a doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief). To the extent appellant seeks damages against any individual judge, the district court correctly held that judges are entitled to judicial immunity for damages based on acts committed within their judicial jurisdiction. *See Stump v. Sparkman,*435 U.S. 349, 98 S.Ct. 1099, 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encore Wire Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Frank J. Bilban, Vice-PresidentFinance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 7, 2004 /s/ FRANK J. BILBANFrank J. BilbanVice President  Finance, Chief FinancialOfficer, Treasurer and Secretary
 25
Order entered February 16, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00488-CR

JOE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-80945-2022

ORDER

Appellant’s fifth motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is 

before the Court. Appellant’s brief was originally due November 15, 2022. The 

motions detail appellant’s counsel’s illnesses, professional schedule, and even 

ballet rehearsal and performance periods. The Court observes that the fourth 

motion for extension and this motion were both requests for 15 days while the 

previous extensions were for 30 days. The Court GRANTS the motion and 

ORDERS the brief filed on or before MARCH 1, 2023. Further extensions will 
not be permitted. If the brief is not filed by March 1, 2023, the Court will abate the 

case for the trial court to conduct a hearing and determine why appellant’s brief 

has not been filed and whether counsel should be removed and new counsel 

appointed for appellant. 

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1486 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1486

  Expressing support for designation of June 11, 2011, as ``National 
                     Minority Golf Awareness Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2010

Mr. Clay submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for designation of June 11, 2011, as ``National 
                     Minority Golf Awareness Day''.

Whereas golf has a long tradition in United States society;
Whereas the efforts of organizations such as The First Tee have made golf more 
        accessible to people of all backgrounds;
Whereas, according to the National Golf Foundation, of the 26,000,000 people in 
        the United States who play golf, only 2,000,000 are ethnic minorities;
Whereas the social impacts of playing golf are immeasurable;
Whereas players practice courtesy, perseverance, and respect for their fellow 
        athletes;
Whereas the principles and behaviors promoted by the game of golf have positive 
        effects in every aspect of life;
Whereas playing golf helps everyone maintain a health lifestyle;
Whereas the benefits include walking between 4 and 8 miles in a single game, 
        burning up to 1,000 calories, and reducing stress and lowering 
        cholesterol;
Whereas in celebrating the talented and visionary individuals that have inspired 
        minorities to participate in golf, such as Nancy Lopez, the first Latina 
        to win an LPGA tournament, Tiger Woods, the first African-American to 
        win the Masters, and K.J. Choi, the first Korean to win on the PGA Tour, 
        we also celebrate the story of the United States, a story of overcoming 
        expectations and rising to our full potential; and
Whereas June 11, 2011, would be an appropriate date to designate as ``National 
        Minority Golf Awareness Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Minority Golf 
        Awareness Day'';
            (2) requests that ``National Minority Golf Awareness Day'' 
        be observed with the goal of honoring all minorities who play, 
        teach, and promote the game of golf;
            (3) recognizes the considerable contributions that 
        minorities have made to golf; and
            (4) urges public and private sector efforts to encourage 
        minority participation in golf.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                   EXIBIT 31.2
                           RULE 13(a)-14(a)/15d-14(a)
                                  CERTIFICATION


       I, Samuel Brill, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report of TTR Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K,
for the year ended December 31, 2003;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

March 29, 2004





                           /s/ SAMUEL BRILL
                           ---------------------------

                             CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
                          (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)