32894 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2001 / Rules and Regulations

will publish another document in the

Federal Register. The document will

include a discussion of any comments

we receive and any amendments we are

making to the rule as a result of the

comments.

Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory

Flexibility Act

This rule has been reviewed under

Executive Order 12866. For this action,

the Office of Management and Budget

has waived its review process required

by Executive Order 12866.

Cattle moved interstate are moved for

slaughter, for use as breeding stock, or

for feeding. Changing the brucellosis

status of Florida from Class A to Class

Free will promote economic growth by

reducing certain testing and other

requirements governing the interstate

movement of cattle from this State.

Testing requirements for cattle moved

interstate for immediate slaughter or to

quarantined feedlots are not affected by

this change. Cattle from certified

brucellosis-free herds moving interstate

are not affected by this change.

The groups affected by this action will

be herd owners in Florida, as well as

buyers and importers of cattle from this

State.

There are an estimated 20,000 cattle

operations in Florida that may be

affected by this rule. Approximately 95

to 98 percent of these are owned by

small entities. Test-eligible cattle offered

for sale interstate from other than

certified-free herds must have a negative

test under present Class A status

regulations, but not under regulations

concerning Class Free status. If such

testing were distributed equally among

all animals affected by this rule, Class

Free status would save approximately

$5 to $6 per head.

Therefore, we believe that changing

the brucellosis status of Florida will not

have a significant economic effect on

the small entities affected by this

interim rule.

Under these circumstances, the

Administrator of the Animal and Plant

Health Inspection Service has

determined that this action will not

have a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.

Executive Order 12372

This program/activity is listed in the

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

under No. 10.025 and is subject to

Executive Order 12372, which requires

intergovernmental consultation with

State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part

3015, subpart V.)

Executive Order 12988

This interim rule has been reviewed

under Executive Order 12988, Civil

Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts

all State and local laws and regulations

that are in conflict with this rule; (2) has

no retroactive effect; and (3) does not

require administrative proceedings

before parties may file suit in court

challenging this rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This interim rule contains no

information collection or recordkeeping

requirements under the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501

et seq.).

List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 78

Animal diseases, Bison, Cattle, Hogs,

Quarantine, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements,

Transportation.

Accordingly, we are amending 9 CFR

part 78 as follows:

PART 78—BRUCELLOSIS

1. The authority citation for part 78

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 111–114a–1, 114g,

115, 117, 120, 121, 123–126, 134b, and 134f;

7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.

§ 78.41 [Amended]

2. Section 78.41 is amended as

follows:

a. In paragraph (a), by adding

‘‘Florida,’’ in alphabetical order.

b. In paragraph (b), by removing

‘‘Florida,’’.

Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of

June 2001.

Craig A. Reed,

Administrator, Animal and Plant Health

Inspection Service.

[FR Doc. 01–15409 Filed 6–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–34–P

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Part 108

RIN 3245–AE40

New Markets Venture Capital Program;

Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business

Administration.

ACTION: Final rule; Withdrawal of

interim final rule; Correction.

SUMMARY: The Small Business

Administration (SBA) published in the

Federal Register of May 23, 2001 (66 FR

28602), a final rule implementing the

New Markets Venture Capital Program

and withdrawing a previous interim

final rule. SBA now makes technical

corrections to fix clerical and/or

typographical errors in the previously

published final rule.

DATES: The technical corrections to this

rule are effective on May 23, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Austin Belton, Director, Office of New

Markets Venture Capital, 202–205–7027;

or Louis Cupp, Policy Analyst, Office of

New Markets Venture Capital, 202–619–

0511.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SBA

published a final rule in the Federal

Register on May 23, 2001 (66 FR 28602)

implementing the New Markets Venture

Capital Program and withdrawing a

previous interim final rule. The

published rule contained several

clerical and/or typographical errors.

Because the errors are not significant in

nature and number, SBA believes that

listing the corrections is sufficient.

Therefore, make the following

corrections to FR Doc. 01–12501

published on May 23, 2001 (66 FR

28602):

1. On page 28602, in the first column,

under the DATES heading, correct the

citation ‘‘40 CFR part 108’’ under the

‘‘Withdrawal Date’’ subheading to read

‘‘13 CFR part 108’’.

PART 108—[CORRECTED]

2. On page 28610, in the third

column, 2d and 1st lines from the

bottom, the Authority citation is

corrected to read as follows:

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 689–689q.

§ 108.150 [Corrected]

3. On page 28615, in the second

column, under § 108.150(c) introductory

text, correct the first sentence to read as

follows:

§ 108.150 Management and ownership

diversity requirement.

* * * * *

(c) * * * At least 30 percent of your

Regulatory Capital and Leverageable

Capital must be owned and controlled

by three Persons unaffiliated with your

management and unaffiliated with each

other, whose investments are significant

in dollar and percentage terms as

determined by SBA. * * *

* * * * *

§ 108.2010 [Corrected]

4. On page 28632, in the first column,

under § 108.2010(b), last line, correct

the citation ‘‘48 CFR 31.001’’ to read ‘‘48

CFR 2.101’’.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 19, 2001 / Rules and Regulations 32895

Dated: June 11, 2001.

Harry Haskins,

Acting Associate Administrator for

Investment.

[FR Doc. 01–15118 Filed 6–18–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2000–NM–272–AD; Amendment

39–12266; AD 2001–12–11]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier

Model DHC–7 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD),

applicable to certain Bombardier Model

DHC–7 series airplanes, that requires

modification of the pressure hoses to the

ground spoiler actuators. This

amendment is prompted by issuance of

mandatory continuing airworthiness

information by a foreign civil

airworthiness authority. The actions

specified by this AD are intended to

prevent blockage of pressure hoses to

the ground spoiler actuators, leading to

uncommanded deployment of the

ground spoilers, resulting in reduced

controllability of the airplane. This

action is intended to address the

identified unsafe condition.

DATES: Effective July 24, 2001.

The incorporation by reference of

certain publications listed in the

regulations is approved by the Director

of the Federal Register as of July 24,

2001.

ADDRESSES: The service information

referenced in this AD may be obtained

from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier

Regional Aircraft Division, 123 Garratt

Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K

1Y5, Canada. This information may be

examined at the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), Transport

Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket,

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,

Washington; or at the FAA, New York

Aircraft Certification Office, 10 Fifth

Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New

York; or at the Office of the Federal

Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,

suite 700, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ezra

Sasson, Aerospace Engineer, ANE–172,

FAA, New York Aircraft Certification

Office, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor,

Valley Stream, New York 11581;

telephone (516) 256–7250; fax (516)

568–2716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A

proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to

include an airworthiness directive (AD)

that is applicable to certain Bombardier

Model DHC–7 series airplanes was

published in the Federal Register on

January 22, 2001 (66 FR 6495). That

action proposed to require modifying

the pressure hoses to the ground spoiler

actuators.

Comment Received

Interested persons have been afforded

an opportunity to participate in the

making of this amendment. No

comments were submitted in response

to the proposal or the FAA’s

determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

The FAA has determined that air

safety and the public interest require the

adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost Impact

The FAA estimates that 30 Model

DHC–7 series airplanes of U.S. registry

will be affected by this AD, that it will

take approximately 4 work hours per

airplane to accomplish the required

actions, and that the average labor rate

is $60 per work hour. There will be no

charge for required parts. Based on these

figures, the cost impact of the AD on

U.S. operators is estimated to be $7,200,

or $240 per airplane.

The cost impact figure discussed

above is based on assumptions that no

operator has yet accomplished any of

the requirements of this AD action, and

that no operator would accomplish

those actions in the future if this AD

were not adopted. The cost impact

figures discussed in AD rulemaking

actions represent only the time

necessary to perform the specific actions

actually required by the AD. These

figures typically do not include

incidental costs, such as the time

required to gain access and close up,

planning time, or time necessitated by

other administrative actions.

Regulatory Impact

The regulations adopted herein will

not have a substantial direct effect on

the States, on the relationship between

the national Government and the States,

or on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government. Therefore, it is

determined that this final rule does not

have federalism implications under

Executive Order 13132.

For the reasons discussed above, I

certify that this action (1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3)

will not have a significant economic

impact, positive or negative, on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has

been prepared for this action and it is

contained in the Rules Docket. A copy

of it may be obtained from the Rules

Docket at the location provided under

the caption ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation

safety, Incorporation by reference,

Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the Federal Aviation

Administration amends part 39 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

adding the following new airworthiness

directive:

2001–12–11 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de

Havilland, Inc.): Amendment 39–12266.

Docket 2000–NM–272–AD.

Applicability: Model DHC–7 series

airplanes, manufacturer’s serial numbers 003

through 113 inclusive; certificated in any

category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

modified, altered, or repaired in the area

subject to the requirements of this AD. For

airplanes that have been modified, altered, or

repaired so that the performance of the

requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in

accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD.

The request should include an assessment of

the effect of the modification, alteration, or

repair on the unsafe condition addressed by

this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not

been eliminated, the request should include

specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless

accomplished previously.

To prevent blockage of pressure hoses to

the ground spoiler actuators, leading to

uncommanded deployment of the ground