alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2*

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Cognex Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 29, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         Date: August 12, 2003

                                   /s/ Richard A. Morin
                                   --------------------
                                   Richard A. Morin
                                   Senior Vice President of Finance,
                                   Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
                                   (duly authorized officer, principal financial
                                   and accounting officer)

*        This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> EXHIBIT 27 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GOVERNMENT
TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             117
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (10,194)
<INVENTORY>                                     57,199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,561
<PP&E>                                          18,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,152)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,706
<SALES>                                        432,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               432,023
<CGS>                                          393,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   921
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    618
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        


</TABLE>
RECEIVED CFTC 


Office of Proceedings 

Proceedings Clerk 

4:17 pm, Jul 31, 2017 

Office of Proceedings 

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 


Three Lafayette Centre 


1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

www.cftc.gov 

* 


* 


* 


* 


* 

·:<· 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

CHRISTOPHER J. McCARTHY, 

Complainant, 

v. 

ROBERT E. VETERE, 

CLIMMIE SANDERS, 

EVAN ALEXANDER JOOS, and 

TEMPLETON FINANCIAL 

GROUP, INC. 

Respondents. 

C.FTC Dock.et No. 17-Roo2 

Served electronically 

ORDER 

Complainant and respondents have amicably settled their dispute, and filed a 

joint stipulation of dismissal. Accordingly, pursuant to Commission rule 12.21, the 

complaint in this matter is hereby di<;missed. 

DATED: July 31, 2017 

~ Kavita Kumar Puri, 

Judgment Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SCOTT ANTHONY HETRICK,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00093-CR

Appeal from the

91st Judicial District Court

of Eastland County, Texas

(TC# 25315)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Palafox, and Soto, JJ., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.), sitting by assignment
Exhibit 31.2

**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

I, R. Jerry Giles, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Community Financial Corporation (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) forthe Registrant and we have:

> 
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

> 
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

Date: August 14, 2003

/s/ R. Jerry Giles            R. Jerry GilesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 150.

#### Macho, Administrator, *v.*Brown et al., Executors.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. Wm. J. Hughes, Jr., Edward J. Callahan,*and *H. Stanley Hanson*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Preston B. Kavanagh, Karl D. Loos,*and *Preston C. King, Jr.,*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 01, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 01, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0122. LAURIE LEPLEY v. FULTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2015CV264821
In re Samuel MORELAND, petitioner.

No. 15-8902.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION

I,George W. Millward, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fulton BancsharesCorporation.

2.Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport.

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

(c)disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: November 14, 2005 | By:                                           | /s/George W. Millward |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                    | George W. Millward,                           |
|                    | Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-12-00822- CV
RobertGoe pp, Ap plicant f or G uardian of the Pe rson and Estate of Iraida Goepp, Appellan t
v. Debbie P earson as G uardian of the Pe rson of I raida Goe pp; Joh n Crane as G uardian of the Estateof Iraid a Goe pp; Myra G oepp, and Heidi Goepp-Schurm an, App ellees

F ROM TH E P ROB ATE COURT NO . 1 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -P B -11 -00 1181 , H ONO RAB LE GUY S. H ERMAN, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Robert Goepp has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appea l. We g rant Goe pp’s motion and dismiss the appe al. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: June 7, 2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: "PETITION FOR OBJECTIONS 

AND EXCEPTIONS TO UPSET SALE" 

IN RE: "OBJECTION AND EXCEPTIONS 

TO UPSET SALE" 

PETITION OF: MILAGROS ABREU

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 79 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
SHARON KELLER

 PRESIDING JUDGE

BARBARA P. HERVEY

BERT RICHARDSON

KEVIN P. YEARY

DAVID NEWELL

MARY LOU KEEL

SCOTT WALKER

MICHELLE M. SLAUGHTER

JESSE F. MCCLURE, III

 JUDGES

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

DEANA WILLIAMSON

CLERK

(512) 463-1551

SIAN SCHILHAB

GENERAL COUNSEL

(512) 463-1597

SUPREME COURT BUILDING, 201 WEST 14TH STREET, ROOM 106, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701

WEBSITE WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/CCA

March 31, 2021

District Clerk Anderson County

500 North Church Street Room 18

Palestine, TX 75801

* Delivered Via E-Mail *

12th Court Of Appeals Clerk

Katrina Mcclenny

1517 W. Front, Room 354

Tyler, TX 75701

* Delivered Via E-Mail *

Re: Holoman, Harold Wayne

CCA No. PD-1339-18 COA No. 12-17-00364-CR

Trial Court Case No. 349CR-15-32178

The court has issued an opinion on the above referenced cause number.

Sincerely,

Deana Williamson, Clerk

cc: Wm. M. House, Jr. (Delivered Via E-Mail)

Allison Clayton (Delivered Via E-Mail)

Emily Johnson-Liu (Delivered Via E-Mail)

Harold Wayne Holoman

Kerri K Anderson-Donica (Delivered Via E-Mail)

District Attorney Anderson County (Delivered Via E-Mail)

Presiding Judge 349th District Court (Delivered Via E-Mail)

Jason Niehaus (Delivered Via E-Mail)

FILE COPY
#### MIDWEST SEAFOOD, INC., Plaintiff, v. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE (wholly owned subsidiary of Fanner’s Insurance Group), Defendant.

No. 76-1064C(4).

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

May 3, 1977.

Theodore F. Schwartz, Clayton, Mo., for plaintiff.

Bernard C. Brinker, Carter, Brinker, Doyen & Kovacs, Clayton, Mo., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

NANGLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Midwest Seafood, Inc., brought this suit to recover proceeds on an insurance policy issued by defendant Truck Insurance Exchange following a loss by fire.

This case was tried to the Court sitting without a jury. After consideration of the testimony and documents, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1) Plaintiff Midwest Seafood, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the state of Missouri. Its principal place of business is within the *1198state of Missouri. Robert Frederick Regazzi is the President, Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Chief Managing Officer for plaintiff corporation.

2) Defendant Truck Insurance Exchange was at all times relevant herein a reciprocal insuror and a wholly owned subsidiary of Farmer’s Insurance Group, a foreign corporation with its principal place of business in the state of California.

3) Defendant issued an insurance policy, number 14-2571 19 90, to plaintiff, insuring plaintiff’s contents situated in premises at 533 Boonslick, St. Charles, Missouri. The policy was effective from October 31, 1975 to October 31, 1976. As issued, the policy provided contents coverage with a limit of $47,000.00 and a loss of earnings endorsement providing $2,000.00 coverage. On June 29, 1976, at plaintiff’s request, the contents coverage was increased to $62,-000.00.

4) On July 7, 1976, fire occurred in the premises at 533 Boonslick, causing fire and smoke damage to the contents. The Court finds that the fire was intentionally set by Robert Regazzi, or by someone acting by his design or procurement.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties to the suit. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Having found that the fire was intentionally set by plaintiff’s president, the Court must conclude that plaintiff can not recover herein. 5 Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 3113 (1970).

Accordingly, judgment will be entered for defendant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,211,033
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,586,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    473,399
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,525,664
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,320,126
<LOANS>                                     21,144,237
<ALLOWANCE>                                    203,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,662,802
<DEPOSITS>                                  24,233,959
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            330,590
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,699
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,762,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              32,662,802
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,831,124
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              465,672
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               211,073
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,495,769
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,089,125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,135,444
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,360,325
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                (108,220)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                121,428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                351,063
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     157,963
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   157,963
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7.738
<LOANS-NON>                                     67,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 67,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               305,060
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,675
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              203,515
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            54,499
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        149,016
        

</TABLE>
Jerry Kevin DUKE, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 16-5879.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15585]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER01-1300-000 and ER01-1300-001]


Whiting Clean Energy, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 15, 2001.
    Whiting Clean Energy, Inc. (Whiting) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Whiting will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions at market-based rates. Whiting also requested 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Whiting 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Whiting.
    On May 24, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Whiting should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, 
Whiting is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or 
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Whiting's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 25, 2001.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15585 Filed 6-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M