alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 1, 2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                               9,467
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          305
<ALLOWANCES>                                           (77)
<INVENTORY>                                            293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    10,497
<PP&E>                                                 609
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (321)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      11,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,916
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                10
<OTHER-SE>                                           8,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        11,153
<SALES>                                              1,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,284
<CGS>                                                  824
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (241)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     (50)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        643
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    643
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       (130)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           513
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.07



</TABLE>
H. Res. 1513 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 21, 2010. 

Whereas, July 23, 2010, marks the start of the Saratoga 

Race Course’s 142nd season; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course is the oldest continuously 

operating thoroughbred race track in the United States; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course is the oldest organized 

sporting venue in the United States; 

Whereas 2010 marks the 141st running of the Travers 

Stakes, the oldest major thoroughbred race in the United 

States; 

Whereas horseracing enjoys a rich history whose traditions 

are beloved throughout the world; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course welcomes an average of 

nearly 30,000 visitors per day throughout its race season 

and 1,000,000 visitors annually, tripling the population 

of Saratoga Springs each summer; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course welcomes the best 

thoroughbreds from across the United States and from 

around the world; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course has a total economic impact of approximately $200,000,000 throughout Saratoga 

County and the surrounding communities; 
2 

•HRES 1513 EH 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course contributes more than 

2,500 jobs to Saratoga Springs and the surrounding area 

as well as nearly 17,000 jobs in related fields; 

Whereas Saratoga Springs is a top destination for tourists 

from around the world; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course has been able to maintain 

its Victorian charm and original traditions; and 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course has been recognized by 

Sports Illustrated Magazine as one of the world’s greatest sporting venues and has contributed to the town of 

Saratoga receiving the first ‘‘Great American Place’’ 

Award from American Heritage Magazine: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the Saratoga Race Course as it 

celebrates its 142nd season; and 

(2) recognizes the Saratoga Race Course’s important place in horseracing history. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2004 (the "Report"), I, J.
Richard Iler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ J. Richard Iler
-------------------------
J. Richard Iler
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2004


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1263 

Expressing support for Mathematics Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2010 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for Mathematics Awareness Month. 

Whereas current educational and economic trends indicate 

that the demand for employees with a high quality mathematics education could exceed the supply of individuals 

with such an education; 

Whereas students who pursue a postsecondary education in 

mathematics have a broad range of career choices upon 

graduation; 

Whereas Mathematics Awareness Month began in 1986 as 

Mathematics Awareness Week; 

Whereas April 2010, is recognized as Mathematics Awareness 

Month; 

Whereas the theme for Mathematics Awareness Month 2010, 

‘‘Mathematics and Sports’’, highlights uses for an education in mathematics across a broad range of subjects 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1263 IH 

and helps to show students that mathematics can be fun; 

and 

Whereas Mathematics Awareness Month encourages colleges, 

universities, and other organizations to hold events that 

draw and retain students to the field of mathematics: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of Mathe3 matics Awareness Month; and 

4 (2) encourages colleges, universities, and other 

5 organizations to hold events to honor Mathematics 

6 Awareness Month. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No. 597, Misc.

#### In re Federal Security Administrator and the Attorney General of the United States.

*Robert L. Stern*argued the cause for petitioners, and *Solicitor General Perlman*was on the petition.

*Walter M. Bastían*argued the cause and was on the return to the rule to show cause for Clark, Associate Judge, et ah, respondents.

*Charles S. Rhyne*argued the cause and was on the answer for Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc., intervenor.

On petition for writs of prohibition and/or mandamus. Argued and decided May 16, 1949.

*Per Curiam:*

The rule to show cause is discharged and the petition for writs of prohibition and/or mandamus is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harrell Ray BLACKLOCK, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-20980

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 12, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Larry Chris lies, Rockport, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Harrell Ray Blacklock, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. *348738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Blacklock has filed a response and requested the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Blacklock’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Blacklock’s motion for the appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

OSCAR WALKER AND 

LUANNE B-WALKER, 

Appellants, 

v.

Case No. 5D23-92

LT Case No. 16-2020-SC-605-XXXX-MA

MIKE MCCANN D/B/A JAXCO 

FURNITURE & MATTRESS OUTLET, INC., 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed May 2, 2023

Appeal from the County Court 

for Duval County, 

Roberto Arias, Judge.

Oscar Walker, Jacksonville, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., SOUD and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                           MARVEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
                             387 PARK AVENUE SOUTH
                              NEW YORK, NY 10016


February 4, 1999

Mr. William H. Hardie, III
3206B Ramsbury Ct.
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

          Re:  Employment Letter dated August 27, 1997

Dear Tuck:

          I write to memorialize our discussions surrounding your employment by
Marvel Enterprises, Inc.

          As we have discussed, the Company has determined to seek candidates
for the positions you currently hold, EVP-Business Affairs and General Counsel.
In order to ensure that the process of identifying and selecting your successor
does not unnecessarily disrupt the activities of the Company and to further
ensure that a smooth transition of your responsibilities is achieved, this
letter will serve as the Company's agreement to pay you upon termination of your
employment at any time after March 1, 1999 (for any reason other than cause) (i)
as a lump sum, $130,000, which represents an amount equal to one-half of your
annual current base salary and (ii) $130,000, which represents the balance of
your annual current base salary, over the six month period immediately following
your termination of employment in accordance with the Company's standard payroll
practices.  You acknowledge and agree that this arrangement is in substitution
for, and in full satisfaction of, the 1-year severance benefit provided for in
your Employment Letter identified above as well as any severance benefit
available under the Company's current severance policy.

          Further, you acknowledge that you are forfeiting any and all stock
options granted to you upon termination of your employment.  Finally, you agree
to provide the Company with no less than 5 hours of consulting services per week
in connection with the transition of your activities for a period of six months
following termination of your employment.  You agree that such services are to
be provided either at the Company's offices in New York or by telephone as the
Company shall reasonably request; provided, however, that the Company shall
reimburse for your reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses.
<PAGE>
 
          The Company and you agree to execute mutually acceptable general
releases, except with respect to the obligations set forth herein,
simultaneously with the payment of the amounts set forth in clause (i) above.

          If the foregoing is satisfactory, please so indicate by executing and
signing in the space provided below whereupon this letter will represent the
binding agreement of both parties.


Sincerely,

/s/ Eric Ellenbogen

Eric Ellenbogen
President and CEO


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

/s/ William H. Hardie, III
--------------------------
William H. Hardie, III

Date:

                                      -2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
      ( print page 33109)    
*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         June 21, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1:30 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Clare K. Schmitt, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4182, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1148, schmittc@csr.nih.gov.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 13, 2001.

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-15465  Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1114

ANTHONY M. AMATO; A. MICHAEL SCOTT, SR.,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

CITY OF RICHMOND; W. R. SHUMAN, Detective,

Individually and as a police officer for the

City of Richmond; ROBERT HOSICK, Detective

Sgt., Individually and as a police officer for

the City of Richmond; TERESA P. GOOCH, Captain, Individually and as a police officer for

the City of Richmond; LAUREL MILLER, Major,

Individually and as a police officer for the

City of Richmond; PHILIP MANGANO, Detective

Sgt., Individually and as a police officer for

the City of Richmond, MARTY M. TAPSCOTT,

Chief, Individually and as Police Chief for

the City of Richmond,

Defendants - Appellees,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Party in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-94-193)

Argued: January 31, 1996 Decided: March 5, 1996
2

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Ronald J. Bacigal, Youth Advocacy Clinic, T. C. Williams

School of Law, UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellants. Scott Charles Oostdyk, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE &

BOOTHE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Michael J.

Kelly, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants. Kenneth D. Crowder,

MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Richmond, Virginia; William Joe

Hoppe, Senior Assistant City Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Michael

HuYoung, Richmond, Virginia; Jane Chittom, SHUFORD, RUBIN & GIBNEY,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants, Anthony M. Amato and A. Michael Scott, Sr., appeal

from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the

defendants on appellants' complaints alleging violations of 42

U.S.C. § 1983 and of various state laws. We have reviewed the district court's opinion, the record, the briefs, and the contentions

advanced by both parties at oral argument and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court

on the reasoning of that court. Amato v. City of Richmond, 875 F.

Supp. 1124 (E.D.Va. 1994).

AFFIRMED
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the
Prospectuses and Statement of Additional Information in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 38 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A of Newbury
Street Trust: Treasury Fund, Prime Fund, and Tax-Exempt Fund of our
report dated December 8, 1999 on the financial statements and
financial highlights included in the October 31, 1999  Annual Report
to Shareholders of Newbury Street Trust: Treasury Fund, Prime Fund,
and Tax-Exempt Fund.

We further consent to the references to our Firm under the headings
"Financial Highlights" in the Prospectuses and "Auditor" in the
Statement of Additional Information.

 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
December 21, 1999
**Fund**/Ticker

**Fidelity**®**International Capital Appreciation Fund**/FIVFX

**Summary Prospectus**

**December 29, 2012**
Exhibit (d)(179)

FORM OF

SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENT

between

FIL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (U.K.) LTD.

and
No. 416.

#### Missouri ex rel. Woods *v.*Sevier.

October 21, 1935.

*Mr. George A. Edwards*for petitioner.

*Mr. Walter Sloat*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1403/2004

of 30 July 2004         

fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 1 August 2004         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 as regards import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information given in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 125. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1110/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 12).

----

ANNEX I

Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 1 August 2004

----

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal (Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96), the importer may benefit from a reduction in the duty of:

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flat-rate reduction of EUR 24/t, where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

----

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating duties

period from 16.-29.7.2004         

1.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:

2.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 25,80 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 30,06 EUR/t.

3.   

----

(*1)  A discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  A discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*4)  Fob Duluth.

----
Christopher MORIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6336.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-54938, No. 333-43090, No. 333-90725) pertaining to the 1998 Stock
Option Plan, 1999 Stock Option Plan, 1999 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, and
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CyberSource Corporation of our report dated
January 17, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of CyberSource Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 30, 2001

                                      52