alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

Nominations for the following properties being considered for listing in the National Register were received by the National Park Service before May 26, 2001. 

Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded to the National Register, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW, NC400, Washington, DC 20240. Written comments should be submitted by June 27, 2001. 

Carol D. Shull, 

Keeper of the National Register Of Historic Places.

### California 

Orange County 

Ebell Society of Santa Ana Valley, 625 N. French St., Santa Ana, 01000682 

### Florida 

Sarasota County 

Appleby Building, 501-513 Kumquat Court, Sarasota, 01000683 

### Missouri 

Bates County 

Bates County Courthouse, 1 North Delaware, Butler, 01000684 

### South Dakota 

Hanson County 

Saint Peter's Grotto, O.5 mi N of Chicago and North Western Railroad Tracks, Farmer, 01000686 

### Wisconsin 

Brown County 

Holy Cross Church and Convent, 3001 Bay Settlement Rd., Green Bay, 01000685 

In order to preserve the following resource the comment period for the following resource has been shortened to three (3) days: 

A request for a MOVE has been made for the following resource: 

### Iowa 

Polk County 

Vail, Mrs. Marian D.-Prof. Charles Noyes Kinney House (Drake University and Related Properties in Des Moines, Iowa, 1881-1918 MPS) 1318 27th St., Des Moines, 88001340 

[FR Doc. 01-14789 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
In thousands except share data at 9/30/97, or 12 months ended 9/30/97.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,018
<SECURITIES>                                     4,526
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,786
<INVENTORY>                                      1,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,740
<PP&E>                                           1,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                     895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,698
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,789
<SALES>                                          7,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,481
<CGS>                                            3,864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,152)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,152)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
James STEVENSON, Sr., petitioner, v. Mary BERGHUIS, Warden.

No. 16-5892.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
----

----

I Actos cuya publicación es una condición para su aplicabilidad

----

REGLAMENTO (CE) No 1571/2004 DE LA COMISIÓN

de 6 de septiembre de 2004

por el que se establecen valores globales de importación para la determinación del precio de entrada de determinadas frutas y hortalizas

LA COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS,

Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea,

Visto el Reglamento (CE) no 3223/94 de la Comisión, de 21 de diciembre de 1994, por el que se establecen disposiciones de aplicación del régimen de importación de frutas y hortalizas (1), y, en particular, el apartado 1 de su artículo 4,

Considerando lo siguiente:

HA ADOPTADO EL PRESENTE REGLAMENTO:

Artículo 1

Los valores globales de importación a que se refiere el artículo 4 del Reglamento (CE) no 3223/94 quedan fijados según se indica en el cuadro del anexo.

Artículo 2

El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el 7 de septiembre de 2004.

El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro.

Hecho en Bruselas, el 6 de septiembre de 2004.

Por la Comisión

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director General de Agricultura

----

(1)DO L 337 de 24.12.1994, p. 66; Reglamento cuya última modificación la constituye el Reglamento (CE) no 1947/2002 (DO L 299 de 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANEXO

del Reglamento de la Comisión, de 6 de septiembre de 2004, por el que se establecen los valores globales de importación para la determinación del precio de entrada de determinadas frutas y hortalizas

----

(1)  Nomenclatura de países fijada por el Reglamento (CE) no 2081/2003 de la Comisión (DO L 313 de 28.11.2003, p. 11). El código «999» significa «otros orígenes».

----

Corrección de errores

----

Corrección de errores del Reglamento (CE) no 595/2004 de la Comisión, de 30 de marzo de 2004, por el que se establecen disposiciones de aplicación del Reglamento (CE) no 1788/2003 del Consejo por el que se establece una tasa en el sector de la leche y de los productos lácteos

(Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea L 94 de 31 de marzo de 2004)

En la página 26, en el artículo 15, en el apartado 3:

en lugar de:

«3.   Los Estados miembros declararán cada año, a más tardar en septiembre, a la sección de Garantía del Fondo Europeo de Orientación y de Garantía Agrícola (FEOGA) los importes derivados de la aplicación del artículo 3 del Reglamento (CE) no 1788/2003 junto con el gasto declarado.»,

léase:

«3.   Cada año, a más tardar en la declaración del gasto relativo al mes de septiembre, los Estados miembros declararán a la sección de Garantía del Fondo Europeo de Orientación y de Garantía Agrícola (FEOGA) los importes derivados de la aplicación del artículo 3 del Reglamento (CE) no 1788/2003.».

----
Dion T. MILLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5944.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Timothy WOULARD, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 16-5939.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
FCA U.S. LLC, fka Chrysler Group LLC, petitioner, v. The CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY.

No. 15-1211.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1672/2004

of 24 September 2004         

on the issue of import licences for rice against applications submitted during the first 10 working days of September 2004 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 327/98

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/96 of 18 June 1996 on the implementation of concessions set out in Schedule CXL drawn up in the wake of the conclusion of GATT XXIV.6 negotiations (1),

Having regard to Council Decision 96/317/EC of 13 May 1996 concerning the conclusion of the results of consultations with Thailand under GATT Article XXIII (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 327/98 of 10 February 1998 opening and providing for the administration of certain tariff quotas for imports of rice and broken rice (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2458/2001, and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Import licences for rice against applications submitted during the first 10 working days of September 2004 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 327/98 and notified to the Commission shall be issued for the quantities applied for, reduced by the percentages set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

2.   The available quantities carried over to the subsequent tranche are set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 September 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 146, 20.6.1996, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 122, 22.5.1996, p. 15.

(3)OJ L 37, 11.2.1998, p. 5. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2296/2003 (OJ L 340, 24.12.2003, p. 35).

----

ANNEX

Reduction percentages to be applied to quantities applied for under the tranche for September 2004 and quantities carried over to the following tranche:

(a)   semi-milled and wholly milled rice falling within CN code 1006 30 

(b)   husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 

----

(1)  Issue for the quantity applied for.

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF R.A.,

A JUVENILE

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-09-00073-CV

Appeal from

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 07,01209)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

R.A., a juvenile, filed notice of appeal from an order of the juvenile court waiving

jurisdiction and transferring the case for prosecution in a criminal court. Pending before the Court

is the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal for jurisdiction. We grant the motion and dismiss the

appeal.

The State filed a petition to waive juvenile court jurisdiction and to transfer the case to

criminal court. See TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. §54.02 (Vernon 2008)(providing for waiver of juvenile

court’s exclusive original jurisdiction and transfer to criminal court). The petition alleges that R.A.

committed two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Following a hearing, the juvenile

court entered an order waiving the court’s exclusive jurisdiction and transferring the case to a district

court for prosecution. The County Attorney’s Office forwarded the case to the District Attorney’s

Office. R.A. filed notice of appeal. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the attempted appeal

from the transfer order.

A juvenile has the right to appeal as provided for by the Family Code. TEX.FAM.CODE ANN.

§ 56.01(d)(Vernon 2008). The Family Code authorizes an appeal by or on behalf of a child from an
order entered under: Section 54.03 with regard to delinquent conduct or conduct indicating a need

for supervision; Section 54.04 disposing of the case; Section 54.05 respecting modification of a

previous juvenile court disposition; or Chapter 55 by a juvenile court committing a child to a facility

for the mentally ill or mentally retarded. TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. § 56.01(c). A person may also

appeal an order entered under Section 54.11(i)(2) transferring the person to the custody of the

institutional division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. §

56.01(c)(2). The Family Code does not authorize an interlocutory appeal of a transfer order entered

pursuant to Section 54.02. 

The Code of Criminal Procedure provides for an appeal of an order of a juvenile court

certifying the defendant to stand trial as an adult and transferring the defendant to a criminal court

under Section 54.02 of the Family Code. TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 44.47(a)(Vernon 2006).

However, such an appeal may be taken “only in conjunction with the appeal of a conviction of or an

order of deferred adjudication for the offense for which the defendant was transferred to criminal

court.” TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 44.47(b). The record establishes that the criminal

prosecution of R.A. remains pending. Consequently, he does not have a right to appeal the transfer

order at this stage of the proceedings. We grant the State’s motion and dismiss the appeal.

November 24, 2009 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1617 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1617

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                    September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2010.
Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers have suffered the supreme sacrifice of 
        motherhood by losing a son or daughter who served in the Armed Forces, 
        and thus perpetuate the memory of all whose lives are sacrificed in war;
Whereas the American Gold Star Mothers assist veterans of the Armed Forces and 
        their dependents in the presentation of claims to the Department of 
        Veterans Affairs and aid members of the Armed Forces who served and died 
        or were wounded or incapacitated during hostilities;
Whereas the services rendered to the United States by the mothers of America 
        have strengthened and inspired Americans throughout the history of the 
        United States;
Whereas Americans honor themselves and the mothers of America when they revere 
        and emphasize the role of the home and the family as the true 
        foundations of the United States;
Whereas by doing so much for the home, the American mother is a source of moral 
        and spiritual guidance for the people of the United States and thus acts 
        as a positive force to promote good government and peace among all 
        mankind; and
Whereas the last Sunday in September of each year is observed as Gold Star 
        Mothers Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and purpose of Gold Star Mothers Day, which 
        is observed in remembrance of the supreme sacrifice made by mothers who 
        lose a son or daughter serving in the Armed Forces; and
            (2) urges the President to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
        people of the United States to observe Gold Star Mothers Day with 
        appropriate ceremonies and activities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Pamela J. HOLMES, petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

No. 16-6163.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
No. 415.

#### Schick *v.*Goldstein.

October 21, 1935.

*Mr. Oscar A. Lewis*for petitioner.

*Mr. M. M. Edelstein*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New York denied.
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

FIRST FOUNDATION INC. 

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q 

for the Quarter ended March 31, 2014

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of First Foundation Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Quarterly Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 14, 2014

 

| /s/ JOHN M. MICHEL                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| John M. Michel                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                             |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7825
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CEDRIC LEE COLEY, a/k/a Pee Wee, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-99, CA-95-941-5-F) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cedric Lee Coley, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Blaise Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Coley , Nos. CR-94-99, CA-95-941-5-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      28,074,422
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       9,861,770
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                260,153,399
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     122,567,557
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       121,440,118
<LOANS>                                  1,320,844,992
<ALLOWANCE>                                (7,643,526)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,874,744,517
<DEPOSITS>                               1,445,719,924
<SHORT-TERM>                                87,576,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         20,506,594
<LONG-TERM>                                192,559,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    36,534,228
<OTHER-SE>                                  91,848,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,874,744,517
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             48,989,080
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           13,324,113
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            62,313,193
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          30,371,973
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          36,625,551
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       25,687,642
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  232,928
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             26,621,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             17,291,114
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,177,065
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.29
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,214,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              6,555,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             7,624,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  213,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            7,643,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         7,643,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Charles BROOKS, petitioner, v. George PATAKI, former Governor of New York, et al.

No. 16-5730.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.