alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhib - Booking Agreement


		
			FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED BOOKING CONTRACT
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			This First Amendment to Amended and Restated Booking Contract (“First Amendment”), dated May 9, 2016, is by and between WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (“Promoter”), with offices at 1241 East Main Street, Stamford, Connecticut 06902, and PAUL LEVESQUE (“Wrestler”), with respect to a certain Amended and Restated Booking Contract by and between Promoter and Wrestler effective as of January 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”).
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			In consideration of the promises, covenants and agreements set forth herein and for other good and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			1.The parties agree that the “Term” of the Agreement shall be extended to run an additional three years.  Thereafter, the Term shall extend on a year-to-year basis unless either party terminates it by written notice to the other party at least ninety (90) days prior to the then effective end of the Term.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			2.All terms not defined in this First Amendment shall have the same meaning given them in the Agreement.  Except as expressly or by necessary implication modified by this First Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed without limitation or exception and shall remain in full force and effect.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment as of the date first above written.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT,
		

		
			INC. (“Promoter”)
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
						 

					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Mark Carrano  

					
					
						 

					
					
						/s/ Paul Levesque

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						Mark Carrano

					
					
						 

					
					
						Paul Levesque

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						VP, Talent Relations

					
					
						 

					
					
						(“Wrestler”)

				



		
			﻿
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       
<S>                            <C>
<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
combined balance sheet as of December 31, 1998 and the combined statements of 
operations for the period January 14, 1998 to December 31, 1998 of Northeast 
Energy Associates, A Limited Partnership and North Jersey Energy Associates, 
A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
financial statements.

<CIK>                          0000934666
<NAME>                         North Jersey Energy Associates,
                               A Limited Partnership
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                     U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-14-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                1
<CASH>                           $35,152
<SECURITIES>                          $0
<RECEIVABLES>                    $29,746
<ALLOWANCES>                          $0
<INVENTORY>                       $4,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 $70,239
<PP&E>                          $513,553
<DEPRECIATION>                   $20,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                $1,403,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            $45,896
<BONDS>                         $445,213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 $0
<PREFERRED>                           $0
<COMMON>                              $0
<OTHER-SE>                      $425,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  $1,403,045
<SALES>                         $302,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                $302,693
<CGS>                                 $0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   $204,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  $6,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               $61,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  $30,000
<INCOME-TAX>                          $0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              $30,000
<DISCONTINUED>                        $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       $0
<CHANGES>                             $0
<NET-INCOME>                     $30,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         $0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         $0

        

</TABLE>
No. 379, Misc.

#### In re Bush, 336 U. S. 971.

Rehearing denied.
----

----

I Actes dont la publication est une condition de leur applicabilité

----

RÈGLEMENT (CE) No 1571/2004 DE LA COMMISSION

du 6 septembre 2004

établissant les valeurs forfaitaires à l'importation pour la détermination du prix d'entrée de certains fruits et légumes

LA COMMISSION DES COMMUNAUTÉS EUROPÉENNES,

vu le traité instituant la Communauté européenne,

vu le règlement (CE) no 3223/94 de la Commission du 21 décembre 1994 portant modalités d'application du régime à l'importation des fruits et légumes (1), et notamment son article 4, paragraphe 1,

considérant ce qui suit:

A ARRÊTÉ LE PRÉSENT RÈGLEMENT:

Article premier

Les valeurs forfaitaires à l'importation visées à l'article 4 du règlement (CE) no 3223/94 sont fixées comme indiqué dans le tableau figurant en annexe.

Article 2

Le présent règlement entre en vigueur le 7 septembre 2004.

Le présent règlement est obligatoire dans tous ses éléments et directement applicable dans tout État membre.

Fait à Bruxelles, le 6 septembre 2004.

Par la Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Directeur général de l'agriculture

----

(1)JO L 337 du 24.12.1994, p. 66. Règlement modifié en dernier lieu par le règlement (CE) no 1947/2002 (JO L 299 du 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEXE

du règlement de la Commission, du 6 septembre 2004, établissant les valeurs forfaitaires à l'importation pour la détermination du prix d'entrée de certains fruits et légumes

----

(1)  Nomenclature des pays fixée par le règlement (CE) no 2081/2003 de la Commission (JO L 313 du 28.11.2003, p. 11). Le code «999» représente «autres origines».

----

Rectificatifs

----

Rectificatif au règlement (CE) no 595/2004 de la Commission du 30 mars 2004 portant modalités d'application du règlement (CE) no 1788/2003 du Conseil établissant un prélèvement dans le secteur du lait et des produits laitiers

(«Journal officiel de l’Union européenne» L 94 du 31 mars 2004)

Page 26, à l’article 15, paragraphe 3:

au lieu de:

«3.   Chaque année, au plus tard en septembre, les États membres présentent au Fonds européen d'orientation et de garantie agricole (FEOGA) les montants obtenus après application de l'article 3 du règlement (CE) no 1788/2003 ainsi que les déclarations de dépenses.»

lire:

«3.   Les États membres déclarent au Fonds européen d'orientation et de garantie agricole (FEOGA) les montants résultant de l'application de l'article 3 du règlement (CE) no 1788/2003, chaque année au plus tard dans la déclaration des dépenses relatives au mois de septembre.»

----

----

Rectificatif au règlement (CE) no 794/2004 de la Commission du 21 avril 2004 concernant la mise en œuvre du règlement (CE) no 659/1999 du Conseil portant modalités d'application de l'article 93 du traité CE

(«Journal officiel de l’Union européenne» L 140 du 30 avril 2004)

Page 1, dans le titre:

au lieu de:

«Règlement (CE) no 784/2004 de la Commission»

lire:

«Règlement (CE) no 794/2004 de la Commission».

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES BENTON BAGWELL,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent

- Appellee. No. 18

- 35675

18

- 35676

D.C. Nos. 1:16

- cv

- 00264

- BLW

1:05

- cr

- 00174

- BLW

- 1

1:16

- cv

- 00265

- BLW

1:05

- cr

- 00132

- BLW

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 15, 2017 **

Before: SCHRO E DER, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Charles Benton Bagwell appeals from the

district court’s judgment s denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Reviewing de novo, see United States v.

Reves , 774 F.3d 562, 564 (9th Cir. 2014), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 35675

In both appeals, Bagwell contends that his conviction for armed bank

robbery , in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d)

, is not a crime of violence for

purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924( c)( 3 )

. Th is argument is foreclosed

. See United States

v. Watson

, 881 F.3d 782, 78 4 (9th Cir.), cert. denied , 139 S. Ct. 203 (2018)

( federal armed bank robbery by force and violence or by intimidation is

categorically a crime of violence under the force clause of section 924(c)(3))

.

Moreover, contrary to Bagwell ’s contention, Watson is not “ clearly irreconcilable ”

with Stokeling v. United States , 139 S. Ct. 544 (2019 )

. S ee Miller v. Gammie , 335

F.3d 889, 900 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)

.

In light of this disposition, we do not reach the parties’ remaining

arguments.

AFFIRMED.
07./ ;tj 

DB. Commodity Services LLC 

Received CFTC 

Rec9~J Section 

I&(Jij67 

@ 

Deutsche Bank l/l 

Group 

DB Commodity Serv1ces LLC 

60 Wall Street 

5th Floor 

New York. NY 10005 

David Stawick 

Secretary 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21 51 Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 

December 14, 2007 

'• COMMENT 

Re: Revision of Federal Speculative Position Limits 

Comment File 07-014 

Dear Mr. Stawick: 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced proposaL We 

support the Commission's proposal to increase single-month and a11-month position 

C) 

-., 

() 

a 

... , 

-·: 

---

r1·~ 

<_r; 

r.·1 

n 

:::D 

r:·i 

_, 

:x> 

;:c 

j> 

-! 

I imi ts in Rule 150.2, but we express no vie\V on the Commission's proposal to aggregate 

certain positions. 

Although we think that financial innovations like over-the-counter derivatives and 

exchange-traded notes linked to commodity futures argue for further loosening position 

limits and related mles, we agree with the Commission's proposal to raise the limits 

contained in Rule 150.2. We further agree that, if the current framework for determining 

the proper size ofposjtion limits under Rule 150.2 is maintained, the Commission should 

review the limits periodically and increase them based on increased open interest. 

Thank you again for giving us the opportunity to comment on the above.,.rcferenced 

proposal and the position limits regulatory framework generally. 

Respectfully submitted, 

DB Commodity Services LLC 

H'.-<<'1 

l. ·~ ,. r-r-··1 

C? 

..X:: 

-o 

:3: 

w 

0 

-.....! 

:.:.o :_ .. )r•l 

·~-.... (J .. 'fTI 

:--~- :."")< 

:- 111 

0
# The Attorney General of Texas September 23, 1980

HonorableEvansN. Wentz Executw Director Texas Commissionfcr the Blind Austin, Texas i ’ AlBnncdby&?&T OpinionNo. hB+247 Re: Whethera terminated employee of the State Commission for the Blind was entitled to be paid fcr accrued sick leave Dear Mr. Wentz: You have requested our opinion as to whether an employee terminated by the State Commissionfor the Blindon June25,1979, is entitled to be paid for accrued sick leave. We assume that there is no question of wrongful termination. The 1975-77General Appropriations Act, which expired on August 31, 1977, contained a provision requiring that all state employees, lpon separation, be paid for are-half of their accrued sick leave. Acts l975,64th Leg., ch. 743, art. V, sec. 7(b), at 2850. See Attorney General Opinion H1083(1977). Neither of the appropriations3 enacted since 1975,however, has contained anyprovisionpermitting paymentfor sick leave. The side leave ~provisions of the General Appropriations Act are applicable to all employees Paid with funds appropriatedthereby. Attorney General Opinion H-996 fl977). On June 25, 1979, when the employee of whom you inquire was terminated, the 1977-79General Appropriations Act was in effect. That indivi&al’s compensation, as well as that of other employees of the Commission for the Blind, was clearly included within the agency’s appropriation. Acts l977,65th Leg., ch. 872, art. II, at 2729-34. As a result, unlike the situation in Attorney General Opinion H-1083 (1977), agency policy regard@ payment of sick leave is irrelevant. The statute controls, andtherefore, no payment maybe made. Neither cb we believe that refusal of the Commission to pay this employee for accrued sick leave constitutes a violation of the Federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29.U.S.C. section 794. The individualhas not been denied anybenefits to which he waslawfully entitled.

P. 780Honorable EvansN. Wentz - Page Two (HN-247)

SUMMARY An employee of the State Commission for the Blindwhowas terminated cn June 25, 1979, is not entitled to be paid for accrued sick leave.

MARK WHITE Attorney General of Texas JOHNW. FAINTER,JR. First Assistant Attorney General RICHARD E. GRAY III Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared by Rick Gilpin Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE SusanGarrison, Acting Chairman Carla cox Rick Gilpin Bruce Youngblood

P. 781
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 141 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 141

   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 
             Commerce in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2009

 Mr. Waxman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 
             Commerce in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Energy and Commerce (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $24,999,160 for the One Hundred 
Eleventh Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $11,898,160 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2009, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2010; and
            (2) not more than $13,101,000 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2010, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2011.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2



Certifications
of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), Zahir Loaiza, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer) of DSG Global, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



| | 1. | Our
    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2021, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”),
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | 2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations
    of the Company.                                                                                                    



|Date:
    June 14, 2022 | /s/
    Zahir Loaiza                                           
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Zahir
    Loaiza                                               
|                        | Chief
    Financial Officer (Acting)                           
|                        | (Principal
    Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)
No. 706.

#### Court Square Building, Inc. *v.*City of New York.

Court of Appeals of New York.

*M. Carl Levine, David Morgulas*and *Albert*
      *917
      *Foreman*for petitioner.

*916Certiorari denied.

*917
      *John P. McGrath*for respondent.
NHUONG VAN NGUYEN, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, et al.

No. 16-5240.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two denied.
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
BTHC XV, Inc.
File No. 0-52808

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BTHC XV, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Timothy P. Halter,
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 8, 2008                     By:       /s/ Timothy P. Halter
      ----------------                         ---------------------------------
                                                               Timothy P. Halter
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to BTHC XV, Inc. and will be retained by BTHC XV, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       FORM 10-Q





                                   EXHIBIT 11





                                                                              16
<PAGE>   2
                                                                       FORM 10-Q




                            ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION

                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     Quarter Ended
                                                                                        March 31,

                                                                             1997                      1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                      <C>                       <C>
Common shares outstanding at
   beginning of period  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           7,112,917                 7,104,417

Treasury Shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            (128,500)                  (77,500)

Weighted average number of common
   shares issued during the period  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               8,356                     1,890

Incremental shares related to assumed
   exercise of warrants and stock options . . . . . . . . . . .             196,637                    84,592
                                                                        -----------               -----------

Weighted common and common
   equivalent shares outstanding  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           7,189,410                 7,113,399
                                                                        ===========               ===========

Weighted common and common
   equivalent shares used in the
   calculation of income per
   common and common equivalent
   share  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           7,189,410                 7,113,399
                                                                        ===========               ===========

Net income (in thousands) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         $     4,057               $       184
                                                                        ===========               ===========

Net income per common and

   Common equivalent share  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         $       .56               $       .03
                                                                        ===========               ===========
</TABLE>





                                                                              17
Thomas DeMARCO, et ux., petitioners, v. MEDICAL MALPRACTICE JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION OF RHODE ISLAND.

No. 15-1319.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey denied.
No. 50.

#### Munoz et al. *v.*Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. William Cattron Rigby, Benjamin J. Horton,*and *Nathan R. Margold*for petitioners.

*Mr. Henri Brown*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.