alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 10 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 158 

[Report No. 111–15] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2009 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported through the legislative day of February 13, 2009, 

6 providing for consideration or disposition of any measure 

7 relating to the bill (H.R. 1) making supplemental approVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:14 Feb 11, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR158.RH HR158

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 158 RH 

1 priations for job preservation and creation, infrastructure 

2 investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the 

3 unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, for 

4 the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other 

5 purposes. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 10 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 158 

[Report No. 111–15] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluFEBRUARY 11, 2009 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1514/2004

of 26 August 2004         

fixing the rates of the refunds applicable to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 15 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of the refunds applicable to the basic products appearing in Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000 and listed in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999, and exported in the form of goods listed in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 shall, in respect of the products listed in the Annex to this Regulation, be fixed in accordance with that Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 August 2004.

For the Commission

Olli REHN            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 177, 15.7.2000, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 886/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 14).

(3)OJ L 350, 20.12.1997, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 921/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 94).

----

ANNEX

Rates of the refunds applicable from 27 August 2004 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 33124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 199: Airport Security Access Control 
Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 199 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 199: Airport Security Access Control 
Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 10, 2001 from 1-5 pm.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA Headquarters, 1140 
Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is 
hereby given for a Special Committee 199 meeting. Note: Special 
Committee 199 is tasked to revise RTCA DO-230, Standards for Airport 
Security Access Control Systems. In performing its duties, Special 
Committee 199 should: (1) Give special consideration to the new Federal 
Aviation Regulation (FAR) Parts 107 and 108. These FARs are scheduled 
for release in the near future. (2) Consider the draft document 
entitled ``Requirements Security Guidelines for Airport Planning, 
Design and Construction.'' An industry group prepared this document 
during the last two years. (3) Consider all technical developments and 
advances made since the publication of DO-230, (4) Include 
consideration of operational and implementation experience since the 
publication of DO-230. The agenda will include:

July 10

<bullet> Opening Session (Welcome and Introductory Remarks, Agenda 
Overview, RTCA Functional Overview, Previous Committee History)
<bullet> Current Committee Scope, Terms of Reference Overview, 
Presentation, Discussion, Recommendations
<bullet> Organization of work, Assign Tasks and Workgroups, 
Presentation, Discussion, Recommendations, Assignment of 
Responsibilities
<bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Establish Agenda for Next 
Meeting, Date and Place of Next Meeting)
    Attendance is open to interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 13, 2001.
Janice L. Peters,
FAA Special Assistant, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 01-15490 Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 4.7


 


 


	
Boston Therapeutics Inc.


233 Needham Street


Newton, MA  02464


 


	 
	                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  May 6, 2016



 




 CJY Holdings Limited


12 Repulse Bay Road


Repulse Bay, Hong Kong








		Re:	Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 24, 2015 (the "SPA") by and between Boston Therapeutics Inc. and CJY Holdings Limited, as amended










Gentlemen:







Reference is hereby made to the SPA.  By executing this letter, the undersigned investor agrees that the offering amount shall be increased from $1,602,000 to $1,702,000.  Accordingly, it is hereby agreed to by the parties that Section 1(d) of the Agreement shall be amended and restated to state the following:







"d. Subsequent Financing.  The Note is intended to provide necessary bridge financing to the Company prior to an anticipated financing in the near future of an amount up to $1,702,000 which is expected to be structured as convertible preferred stock (the "Preferred Financing").  Upon the closing of the Preferred Financing, the Note shall automatically convert into the Preferred Financing."







We kindly request that you execute this letter below indicating that you agree with the above amendment.







Sincerely,







Boston Therapeutics Inc.







By: /s/ Conroy Chi-Heng Cheng


Name: Conroy Chi-Heng Cheng


Title: Interim CEO







AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:







CJY Holdings Limited







By: /s/ Cheng Chi Him


Name: Cheng Chi Him







Title:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15026]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE


Labor-Management Cooperation Program; Proposed Policy Change

AGENCY: Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.

ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed policy change on 
allocating funds under the Labor-Management Cooperation Program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) is 
publishing the Proposed Policy Change on Allocating Funds Under the 
Labor-Management Cooperation Program to inform the public. The program 
is supported by Federal funds authorized by the Labor-Management 
Cooperation Act of 1978, subject to annual appropriations.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 16, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Send Comments to: Vella M. Traynham, Director of Arbitration 
Services, FMCS, 2100 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20427.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vella M. Traynham, 202-606-8181.

Labor-Management Cooperation Program Proposed Guideline Change

D. Allocations

    Any funds returned to FMCS from a competitive grant can be awarded 
on a noncompetitive basis, provided the award is made during the period 
in which the grant period is effective.

C. Richard Barnes,
Director, Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
[FR Doc. 01-15026 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6732-01-M
Exhibit 99(a)








FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - September 13, 2000

CONTACT:       Linda A. Pleiman
               Director - Investor Relations & Corporate
Communications
               lpleiman@nsgrouponline.com


       NS GROUP, INC. ANNOUNCES SALE OF IMPERIAL ADHESIVES


Newport, Kentucky - NS Group, Inc. announced today that it has
entered into an Agreement to sell for cash, its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Imperial Adhesives, Inc.,  to Sovereign Specialty
Chemicals, Inc. for approximately $27 million.  The transaction
is subject to customary closing conditions, including antitrust
approval under HSR.

Mr. Rene J. Robichaud, President and CEO of NS Group, Inc.
stated, "This is a real win-win situation for NS Group and
Imperial.  It allows us to redeploy a significant amount of
capital while placing Imperial in a growth environment with
Sovereign."

Imperial Adhesives was purchased by NS Group in 1985 and
represents approximately 10% of  its net sales.

NS Group, Inc. is a leading producer of tubular products serving
the energy industry and certain industrial markets.  The Company
manufactures seamless and welded tubular steel products which are
used in the drilling and transmission of oil and natural gas.  NS
Group's industrial products include special bar quality (SBQ)
products used in critical weight bearing applications.  Log on to
www.nsgrouponline.com to learn more about NS Group, Inc.

Sovereign Specialty Chemicals, Inc. is a leading developer,
marketer and distributor of high-performance specialty adhesives,
sealants and coatings that are utilized in a variety of
industrial and commercial applications.  Headquartered in
Chicago, Sovereign was founded by Robert Covalt and a group of
private investors in 1996.  Sovereign has grown organically and
through acquisitions, becoming one of the premier companies in
its field.
or_-;;; 

® 

S T E P T 0 E & ) 0 H N S 0 N nP 

James D. Barnette 

202.429.6207 

jbarnette@steptoe.com 

February 10, 2009 

Mr. David Stawick 

Secretary 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

1330 Connecticut Avenue. NW 

Washington. DC 20036-1795 

Tel202.429.3000 

Fax 202.429.3902 

steptoe.com 

COMMENT 

RE: Proposed Rule Regulating Significant Price Discovery Contracts on , . 1 

Exempt Commercial Markets 

Dear Mr. Stawick: 

The Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers of America ("SIGMA") appreciates the 

opportunity to provide comments on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's ("CFTC's") 

proposed rule that increases the CFTC's oversight of significant price discovery contracts traded 

on exempt commercial markets ("ECMs"). 

SIGMA is a national trade association representing independent chain retailers and 

marketers of motor fuel. SIGMA members represent significant diversity within the industry. 

While 92 percent of our members are involved in gasoline retailing, 66 percent are involved in 

wholesaling, 36 percent transport product, 25 percent have bulk plant operations, and 15 percent 

operate terminals. Therefore, our 270 member companies have considerable interest in rules 

affecting the futures markets and the price of motor fuels. 

As a general matter, SIGMA endorses the rule proposed by the CFTC. In light of the 

dramatic fluctuation in the price of motor fuels in the last year, we agree that greater disclosure 

and transparency is needed in the futures markets. We recognize the importance of preserving 

the existing exemption for commercial markets, while requiring greater transparency and 

oversight when a contract is deemed to have sufficient impact on the price discovery function in 

the broader market. 

We firmly believe that the CFTC should develop a regulatory oversight framework and 

position limits for contracts that perform a significant price discovery function to ensure that they 

WASHINGTON • NEW YORK • CHICAGO • PHOENIX • LOS ANGELES • CENTURY CITY • LONDON • BRUSSELS 

'') 

: "i 
Mr. David Stawick 

February 10, 2009 

Page 2 

do not distort the market. We encourage the CFTC to develop rules that make clear which 

entities qualify for exemptions and which are subject to heightened regulation. We anticipate 

that the CFTC will actively enforce the new requirements to prevent market distortion. 

Again, SIGMA appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule. Please feel 

free to contact us if you have any questions or we can otherwise be of assistance in your 

deliberations. 

Sincerely, 

James D. Barnette 

Counsel to the Society of Independent 

Gasoline Marketers of America
EXHIBIT 23.2

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in: (1)  Post-Effective  AmendmentNo.  2  to   Registration   Statement   (Form  S-3  No.   333-68019)  of  MarvelEntertainment,  Inc.  (formerly  Marvel  Enterprises,  Inc.);  (2)  RegistrationStatement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-101426)  of  Marvel  Entertainment,   Inc.;  (3)Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  333-76655)  pertaining to the 1998 StockIncentive Plan of Marvel  Entertainment,  Inc.; (4)  Registration  Statement andPost-Effective   Amendment  No.  1  to  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.333-101422) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan of Marvel Entertainment,Inc.; and (5) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-127196) pertaining to the2005 Stock  Incentive  Plan of Marvel  Entertainment,  Inc. of our report  datedFebruary 25, 2005,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements andschedule of Marvel  Entertainment Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and for the yearsended  December 31, 2004 and 2003 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 

/s/  Ernst & Young LLP 

 

New York, New York

March 14, 2006
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Louis B. Falos v. Tool America, Inc., et al.

April 29, 1992

Case No. (Law) 109435

By Judge F. Bruce Bach

This case is before the Court on defendant, Hechinger Company, Inc.’s, demurrer to the Motion for Judgment. Oral argument was heard on April 17, 1992. The Court took the demurrer under advisement to more fully consider the issue presented.

The Virginia Supreme Court has not addressed whether a cause of action based on breach of warranty, resulting in personal injury, is a tort or contract action. In *Cauthorn*v. *British Leyland, U.K., Ltd.,*233 Va. 202 (1987), the Court did not determine if a cause of action alleging both negligence and breach of warranties of merchantability and fitness was based in tort or in contract. Justice Poff, joined by Justice Russell, in a concurring opinion stated that:

> an action for breach of warranty in a products liability case sounds in tort when the plaintiff claims damages for personal injury or damages for injury to property other than the product covered by warranty.

*Id.*at 207. Falos alleges that he sustained personal injuries. The Court finds that the breach of an express warranty, as well as implied warranties of fitness and merchantability, when the claim is for personal injuries, are tort actions.

In multi-state tort actions, Virginia follows the “place of the wrong” in determining the substantive rights of the parties. *Mary*
      *387
      *land v. Coard,*175 Va. 571 (1940); *McMillan*v. *McMillan, 219*Va. 1127 (1979). Falos purchased the ladder in Virginia and was injured in Tennessee. The “place of the wrong” has generally been defined as the state where the last event necessary to create liability for an alleged tort takes place. *Quillen v. International Playtex, Inc.,*789 F.2d 1041 (4th Cir. 1986); *Miller v. Holiday Inns, Inc.,*436 F. Supp. 460 (E.D. Va. 1977). Tennessee is the place of the injury and is the appropriate law to be applied in this case.

Hechinger’s demurrer is overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 3, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                           2,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (144)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,559
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,287
<PP&E>                                           1,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,001)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,922
<SALES>                                          6,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,512
<CGS>                                            3,878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (29)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (315)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,891)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,891)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.65)



</TABLE>
H. Res. 129 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 11, 2009. 

Whereas, on February 19, 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order No. 9066, authorizing the 

forced internment of both United States citizens and 

legal residents of Japanese ancestry during World War 

II; 

Whereas in the largest single relocation of individuals in the 

history of our Nation, approximately 120,000 JapaneseAmericans were forced into internment camps by the 

United States Government in violation of their fundamental constitutional rights; 

Whereas due to this unjust internment, these JapaneseAmericans faced tremendous hardships, such as family 

separation, the loss of their homes, businesses, jobs, and 

dignity; 

Whereas following Executive Order No. 9066, JapaneseAmericans in parts of Washington, Oregon, California, 

and southern Arizona were ordered to report to assembly 

centers before being removed to more permanent war relocation centers; 

Whereas the Merced Assembly Center, located in Merced, 

California, was the reporting site for 4,669 JapaneseAmericans; 
2 

•HRES 129 EH 

Whereas as a young child, United States Congressman Mike 

Honda and his family were held at the Merced Assembly 

Center prior to being interned in Amache, Colorado, and 

his public career has been dedicated to educating and 

preventing this type of injustice from reoccurring; 

Whereas in 1998, then Assembly member Mike Honda authored the World War II Internment of Japanese-Americans: California Civil Liberties Public Education Act, 

which became California public law in 1999 and serves 

as an important program to educate the public about the 

internment; 

Whereas February 19th, the 67th anniversary of Executive 

Order No. 9066, is known as the Day of Remembrance; 

Whereas the Merced Assembly Center Commemorative Committee has been charged with the task of establishing a 

memorial to recognize the historic tragedy that took place 

at the Merced Assembly Center; and 

Whereas the unveiling ceremony for the memorial at the 

Merced Assembly Center will take place on February 21, 

2009: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

the historical significance of the Merced Assembly Center to 

the Nation and the importance of establishing an appropriate 

memorial at that site to serve as a place for remembering the 

hardships endured by Japanese-Americans, so that the 

United States remains vigilant in protecting our Nation’s 
3 

•HRES 129 EH 

core values of equality, due process of law, justice, and fundamental fairness. 

Attest: 

Clerk.