alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.                                 EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED           NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                    SEPTEMBER 30,                SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                 1999           1998          1999            1998
                                                ------         ------        ------          ------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>          <C>             <C>
Net Income                                      2,748           3,960           923             618

Basic weighted average shares of common         9,211           9,788         9,291           8,333
    stock outstanding

Net loss per common share and common (Basic)     0.30            0.40          0.10            0.07
    share equivalent

Diluted weighted average shares of common       9,308           9,849         9,406           8,562
    stock outstanding

Net loss per common share and common (Basic)     0.30            0.40          0.10            0.07
    share equivalent
</TABLE>
Rlollved CFTC 

ftloorde Section . S/~l) D'/ • 0~ 

Ch~oardofTrade Bernard W. Dan 

President and 

Chief Executive Officer 

· May 30, 2007 .. 

. ,Eileen Donovan 

Acting Secretary ·' 

Office of the Secretariat 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

Re: OCC Clearing Credit Default Options 

Dear Ms. Donovan: 

. ... . ~ .. ~; ..... 

COMMENT 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced proposal. While we 

express no view on the merits of the exemption, we would like to comment on one aspect 

of the Commission's analysis. 

The proposed finding that Credit Default Options and Credit Default Basket 

Options are "novel instruments'' should be repudiated or clarified. 

In relying on legislative history to support the view that the Commission can grant an 

exemption under section 4( c) without determining that it has jurisdiction over the product 

in question, the Commission is proposing to find that Credit Default Options and Credit 

Default Basket Options are "novel instruments." 72 Fed. Reg. at 27092. They are not. 

"Novelty" is a term fraught with meaning under the patent and other laws. Because the 

Commission could be treated by courts and patent examiners as having some expertise in 

these matters, this finding could have significant and unintended negative consequences, 

including the deterrence of the very kind of innovation the Commission is seeking to 

promote as well as the proliferation of wasteful litigation. The cost of correcting this 

misstatement and the confusion that could result from it in the litigation or patent 

examination context could be unlimited, and far outweighs the benefit, if any, that some 

might see in making such a finding at all. 

Binary options, credit default swaps, baskets and any combination thereof are well~ 

known in the art, obvious and not novel. Whether or not the Commission decides to grant 

an exemption in this case, this finding should be repudiated explicitly. Alternatively, it 

should be made clear that the finding is not based on the judgment of any person having 

ordinary skill in the art of designing, offedng or trading financial instruments and should 

not be relied on in any matter relating to patent or intellectual property law. 

141 W. Jackson Blvd. 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-2994 

312 435-3606 

Fax: 312 347-4259 

::::'8 ... ) rr1 

~--· (j 

' I 'j 

.--4::: •:-) -- - !:'"1 
Eileen Donovan 

May 30,2007 

Page Two 

Thank you for the opportunity to express our views in this matter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1373-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Nebraska, (FEMA-1373-DR), dated May 16, 2001, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 8, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Nebraska is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 16, 2001:

Dundy County for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.

[FR Doc. 01-15258 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the accompanying Annual  Report of GreenMan
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
2009 (the "Report"), I, Lyle Jensen, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
January 12, 2010




/s/           Lyle
Jensen


Lyle
Jensen


President
and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RT01-34-002]

Take notice that on May 25, 2001, Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) submitted the compliance filing required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's March 28, 2001 Order in the proceeding captioned above.

Copies of this filing were served on all parties included on the Commission's official service lists established in this proceeding, as well as on affected state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 18, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14757 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6420
RANDY SCOTT BALLON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DON WOOD, Superintendent; THEODIS BECK, Secretary of Corrections, Respondents - Appellees.

No. 07-7446
RANDY SCOTT BALLON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK; DONALD WOOD, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:06-cv-00393-JAB; 1:06-cv-00980) Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 28, 2007- 2 - Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy Scott Ballon, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, Randy Scott Ballon seeks to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petitions. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the records and conclude that Ballon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are- 4 - adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register: August 4, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 150)]
[Notices]
[Page 44262]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04au06-39]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURE TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, August 11, 2006.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-6712 Filed 8-2-06; 10:33 am]

BILLING CODE 6151-01-M
```
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTIONS 302 AND 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Vyrex
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Dale Garlow, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) I have reviewed the report;



(2) To the best of my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading:



(3) To the best of my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report;



(4) I:



(a) am responsible for establishing internal controls;



(b) have designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made
known to me, particularly during the period of January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003;



(c) have evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys internal controls as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and



(d) have presented in
the Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of my internal controls based on my evaluation of that date;



(5) I have disclosed to the Companys auditors and the board of directors:



(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls;



(6) I have indicated in the Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses; and



(7) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.



Date:    March
28, 2004



|                          |  |  |  |                                         |  |  |  | 
|------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                          |  | 
|/s/    G. DALE
GARLOW     |  |  |  | /s/    G. DALE
GARLOW                  
|G. Dale Garlow, President |  |  |  | G. Dale Garlow, Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1





                           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-09505) pertaining to the Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 1990
Stock Option Plan and the Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. 1995 Amended and
Restated Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated October 31, 1997, with respect
to the financial statements of Nicollet Process Engineering, Inc. included in 
the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended August 31, 1997.


                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 28, 1997
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JAMES T. MCKERR 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 78 

DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1965 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: James T. McKerr 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 78 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that James T. McKerr has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has boon issued and 

the said James T. 

McKerr is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into a stipulation 

of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of Practice under the 

Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said James T. McKerr 

stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) James T. McKerr, an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was on August 13, 1965, a 

registered floor broker under the Commodity Exchange Act and a member of the 

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, a duly designated contract market under 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) On August 13, 1965, James T. McKerr executed 151 transactions in 

regulated commodity futures on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. 

However, with respect to 142 of such transactions, in each instance he failed to 

prepare a trading card or other record 

clearly identifying the opposite floor broker or other trader with whom such 

transaction was executed. 

The Secretary of Agriculture has advised James T. McKerr that his failure to 

keep full and complete records of futures transactions, as described above, was 

in violation of section 4g of the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.35 of the 

regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said James T. McKerr agrees to desist from such acts and practices in the 

future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation shall be 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 29 day of September 1965 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Witnessed by: 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 
Page 2 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Order No. 1171] 

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: 

*Whereas,*                     the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, grantee of FTZ 49, has requested authority on behalf of Merck & Company, Inc. (Merck), to add capacity and to expand the scope of authority under zone procedures within Subzone 49D at the Merck plant in Rahway, New Jersey (FTZ Docket 3-2001, filed 1/18/2001);                 

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (66 FR 8195, 1/30/01);                 

*Whereas,*                     pursuant to section 400.32(b)(1) of the FTZ Board regulations (15 CFR 400), the Secretary of Commerce's delegate on the FTZ Board has the authority to act for the Board in making decisions regarding manufacturing activity within existing zones when the proposed activity is the same, in terms of products involved, to activity recently approved by the Board and similar in circumstances (15 CFR 400.32(b)(1)(i)); and,                 

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                 

*Now, Therefore*, the Board hereby orders:                 

The application to add capacity and to expand the scope of authority under zone procedures within Subzone 49D on behalf of Merck & Company, Inc., is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of May 2001. 

Faryar Shirzad, 

Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Dennis Puccinelli, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-15422 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the periodic report of China Jo-Jo Drugstores, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lei Liu, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date: August 15, 2011
/s/ Lei LiuLei LiuChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)