alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (193)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,775
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,817
<PP&E>                                           3,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,747)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                5
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,537
<SALES>                                          8,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,908
<CGS>                                            3,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,676
<INCOME-TAX>                                       591
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,085
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,085
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32358-32359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15032]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation; Grant to the 
University of Hawaii

AGENCY: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, ACF, DHHS.

ACTION: Award announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 32359]]

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a noncompetitive grant award is 
being made to the University of Hawaii to develop a virtual Data Center 
for Children and Families that contains the most comprehensive 
collection of data and information on Hawaii's children and families. 
As a Congressional setaside, this one-year project is being funded 
noncompetitively. The cost of this one-year project is $100,000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: K.A. Jagannathan, Administration for 
Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 
L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Phone: 202-205-4829.

    Dated: June 7, 2001.
Howard Rolston,
Director, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 01-15032 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
Exhibit 31.1

**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**
I, P. Douglas Richard, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community FinancialCorporation (the "Registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report; and
c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: August 13, 2004
/s/ P. Douglas Richard
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 302 AND 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    I have reviewed the report;
 (2)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading:
  (4)
    
    I:
           
 /s/ G. Dale Garlow
    
    /s/ G. Dale GarlowG. Dale Garlow, President
    
    G. Dale Garlow, Chief Executive Officer
SSC MYSTIC OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, dba Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center, petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

No. 15-1373.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         7437776
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                146356
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   88502480
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        16789265
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          16830643
<LOANS>                                      102272573
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1930548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               222129471
<DEPOSITS>                                   163045349
<SHORT-TERM>                                  28105250
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            6534980
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       5062875
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               222129471
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4627373
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              3244130
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 19853
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               7891356
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2830853
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3113891
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4777465
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    60000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                2283
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1603068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1948674
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1324674
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     558000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    540000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1930548
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   327000
<RECOVERIES>                                    114000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Carlos RUIZ-ARAGON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6017.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Isaac Perlmutter, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Marvel Entertainment, Inc.;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 25, 2009



| |  |                                         
| |  | ----------------------------------------
|
| | 
| |  | /s/ Isaac Perlmutter                    
| |  | Isaac Perlmutter Chief
Executive Officer
Nelson ROMERO, petitioner, v. Johnny SAUSCEDA, et al.

No. 15-9779.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for rehearing denied.
SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUND SAMRUK-KAZYNA JSC, aka National Welfare Fund Samruk-Kazyna, petitioner, v. ATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC. et al.

No. 16-201.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Paul H. Fischer, Ph.D., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of GenVec, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which the report is beingprepared;
b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)]
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: March 15, 2004
/s/ Paul H. Fischer Ph.D.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: WILLIAM R. THOMPSON, JR. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 148 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 148 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Acting Assistant 

Secretary of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

William R. Thompson, Jr. 

(Toledo, Ohio) 

The complaint charges that the respondent, while employed by a futures 

commission merchant, deceived, cheated and defrauded certain of its customers. 

The complaint alleges that during the period from March 22 through June 14, 

1967, the respondent followed the practice of placing unprofitable trades in 

accounts of certain customers without their authorization or knowledge. The 

complaint further alleges that the respondent used funds received from one 

customer to margin the account of another. The complaint also alleges that the 

respondent withheld or altered confirmations and statements which would have 

advised the customers of the status of their accounts. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, November 29, 1967, in Toledo, Ohio. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. I, William J. Rex, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rexhall
Industries, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: May 14, 2004
    /S/ William J. Rex
William J. Rex
President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32816-32817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[DA 01-1288]


Low Power Television Auction No. 81--Non-Mutually Exclusive 
Proposals--June 25, 2001, FCC Form 346 Application Deadline

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document identified those proposals filed during the 
limited low power television/television translator/Class A television 
auction filing window that are not mutually exclusive and announces a 
June 25, 2001, deadline for filing an FCC Form 346.

DATES: FCC Form 346 must be filed by each party identified in the 
Public Notice by June 25, 2001.

ADDRESSES: To submit by mail, applicants must send an original and two 
copies of the FCC Form 346 application to: Federal Communications 
Commission, Mass Media Services, P.O. Box 358185, Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania 15251-5190. To hand carry, in person or by courier, 
applicants must deliver an original and two copies of the FCC Form 346 
application to: Mellon Bank, Three Mellon Bank Center, 525 William Penn 
Way, 27th Floor, Room 153-2713, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Applicants 
should send a courtesy copy of each FCC Form 346 application to Hossein 
Hashemzadeh, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau, Federal 
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. 
Applicants may also file their FCC Form 346 application electronically. 
Instructions for use of the electronic filing system are available in 
the CDBS User's Guide, which can be accessed from the electronic filing 
web site at: http://www.fcc.gov/mmb. For assistance with electronic 
filing, call the Mass Media Bureau Help Desk at (202) 418-2MMB.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shaun Maher, Video Services Division, 
Mass Media Bureau at (202) 418-1600.

[[Page 32817]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of a Public Notice 
released May 25, 2001. It does not include the attachment. The complete 
text of the Public Notice, including attachment, is available for 
public inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC 
Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. 
It may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, 
International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS, Inc.) 1231 20th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20035, (202) 857-3800. It is also available 
on the Commission's web site at http://www.fcc.gov.
    In this Public Notice, the Mass Media Bureau identifies those 
proposals filed during the limited low power television, television 
translator, and Class A television auction filing window that are not 
mutually exclusive. Parties must now file FCC Form 346 by June 25, 
2001, in order to implement their proposals.

Federal Communications Commission.
Robert H. Ratcliffe,
Deputy Chief, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 01-15316 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
|GRAPHIC |  |                                                                                        |  |                                                                 
|------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|        |  | KPMGLLPChartered AccountantsBox 10426, 777 Dunsmuir Street
Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3
Canada |  | Telephone (604) 691-3000
Telefax      (604) 691-3031
www.kpmg.ca

Comments by Auditor for U.S. Readers on Canada  U.S. Reporting Difference

In
the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there is a change in accounting principles that has a
material effect on the comparability of the company's financial statements, such as the changes described in Notes 1(p) and 1(s) to the financial statements. Our report to the
shareholders dated February 5, 2004, included herein, is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a reference to such a change in accounting principles in
the auditors' report when the change is properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.

GRAPHIC

Chartered
Accountants

Vancouver,
Canada
February 5, 2004

GRAPHIC

---
Ernest McDUFFIE, III, petitioner, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA.

No. 16-400.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.