alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FOUNTAIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               4
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      430
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   577
<PP&E>                                             264  
<DEPRECIATION>                                     252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              536
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                         117 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       734
<SALES>                                          1,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,142
<CGS>                                              598
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (122) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (122)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.003) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.003)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FOUNTAIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS 
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        1,170
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 411
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,911
<PP&E>                                        342
<DEPRECIATION>                                263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         459
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   2
<COMMON>                                      2
<OTHER-SE>                                    1,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,131
<SALES>                                       1,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,238
<CGS>                                         653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (70)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (854)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (854)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.36)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                              R.F. MANAGEMENT CORP.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                                               Years Ended September 30,
                                        --------------------------------------
                                           1996          1995          1994
                                        -----------   -----------   ----------
NET INCOME (LOSS)                       $  (952,214)  $   (50,244)  $    3,157
                                        ===========   ===========   ==========
PRIMARY
   Weighted average shares                3,327,500     2,607,802    2,350,000
   Assumed conversions
      A warrants and B warrants                --         515,604         --
                                        -----------   -----------   ----------
         Total weighted average
            shares outstanding            3,327,500     3,123,406    2,350,000
                                        ===========   ===========   ==========
   Earnings (loss) per share amounts    $     (0.29)  $     (0.02)  $  -Nil-
                                        ===========   ===========   ==========

FULLY DILUTED
   Weighted average shares                3,327,500     3,327,500    2,350,000
   Assumed conversions
      A warrants and B warrants           1,955,000     1,955,000         --
                                        -----------   -----------   ----------
         Total weighted average
            shares outstanding            5,282,500     5,282,500    2,350,000
                                        ===========   ===========   ==========
   Earnings (loss) per share amounts    $     (0.18)  $     (0.01)  $  -Nil-
                                        ===========   ===========   ==========
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1575 

Expressing support for designation of the third week of October as Male 

Breast Cancer Awareness Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of the third week of 

October as Male Breast Cancer Awareness Week. 

Whereas each year 450 men will die from male breast cancer 

and the numbers are increasing; 

Whereas men are typically diagnosed at a late stage due to 

a lack of awareness that men can develop the disease; 

Whereas it behooves each of us, men, women, parents, siblings, educators, physicians, and citizens, to promote 

awareness of the disease and to save lives; 

Whereas we must educate the world to the reality of this disease; and 

Whereas in remembrance of the many men who have lost 

their lives or are fighting for their lives, due to a lack of 

awareness, it is appropriate that we designate the third 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1575 IH 

week of October as Male Breast Cancer Awareness Week: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation, as well as the goals and ideals, of Male 

3 Breast Cancer Awareness Week. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Fidelity® Select Portfolios®**

Industrials Sector

**Fund**/Ticker

**Defense and Aerospace Portfolio**/FSDAX

**Summary Prospectus**

**April 29, 2015**

**As Revised October 16, 2015**
Exhibit
      31.2




I,
      R. Jerry Giles, certify that:






1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Financial Corporation
      (the "Registrant");






2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;






3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;






4.
      The
      Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:






a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;






b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report;






c)
      disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and






5.
      The
      Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
      (or persons performing the equivalent functions):






a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and






b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.






Date:
      February 12, 2008






/s/
      R. Jerry
      Giles


R.
      Jerry
      Giles


Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

EDWARD JAMES KAUSHAS

, 2 nd

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2 5 39 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No s . C 3

- 1 7

- 683, C3

- 18

- 292

Attorney Registration No. 202592

( Lackawanna County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30 th day of November , 2018, following consideration of the

responses to this Court’s Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed

on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute. It is provided that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action

by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217;

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County

shall enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent’s

clients or fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g) ; and

4. All financial institutions in which Respondent holds fiduciary funds shall fre eze

such accounts pending further action.Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order and to

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E.

208(f)(6) are specifically preserved.

Final ly, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s Motion for Leave to Supplement the

Record in Support of the Petition is granted.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to

confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

1.       Sirrom Investments, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

2.       Sirrom Funding Corporation
         Jurisdiction of organization: Delaware

3.       Harris Williams & Co., Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Virginia

4.       Tandem Capital, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

5.       Sirrom Capital West, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

6.       SCC Canada, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: The Province of Ontario

7.       SWS 1, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

8.       SWS 3, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

9.       Vision 2000, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

10.      Vision 2000 Technologies, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

11.      SWS 4, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

12.      IOL 2000, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

13.      Multimedia 2000, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

14.      SWS 5, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

15.      SWS 6, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

16.      Recycling Technologies, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee

17.      SWS 2, Inc.
         Jurisdiction of organization: Tennessee
#### In the Matter of Robert Williams, Appellant, v George Alexander, as Chair of the Division of Parole, Respondent.

[885 NYS2d 234]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), entered September 2, 2008 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s .application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination of the Board of Parole rendered in March 2007 which denied his request for parole release and *1413ordered him held for an additional 24 months. The Attorney-General has advised that petitioner reappeared before the Board in December 2008 and, thus, the instant appeal must be dismissed as moot *(see Matter of Lebron v Travis,*47 AD3d 1142 [2008], *lv denied*10 NY3d 707 [2008]; *Matter of Kalwasinski v New York State Div. of Parole,*36 AD3d 1200 [2007], *lv denied*8 NY3d 811 [2007]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Kane and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
EXHIBIT 23.1
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  reference  to our firm under  "Experts"  in the  Registration
Statement  (Form  S-3  No.333-88189)  and  the  related   Prospectus  of  Marvel
Enterprises,  Inc.  for the  registration  of Class B  Warrants,  8%  Cumulative
Convertible   Exchangeable   Preferred   Stock  and  Common  Stock  and  to  the
incorporation  by reference of our report dated February 8, 2000 with respect to
the consolidated  financial  statements of Marvel Enterprises,  Inc. included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended  December 31, 1999,  filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2000
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

January 22, 2016

Mr. William Shields
Chief Compliance Officer
GFI Swaps Exchange LLC
55 Water Street

New York, NY 10041

Re: Application of GFI Swaps Exchange LLC for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility
Dear Mr. Shields:

By submissions dated July 19, 2013 through January 19, 2016, GFI Swaps Exchange
LLC (“GFT”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”),
pursuant to Section 5h of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and
Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap execution facility
(“SEF”).

The Commission has reviewed GFI’s application and has determined to grant GFI
registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying Order of
Registration.

Sincerely,

Detcf | Debt

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<CIK>                           0000850428   
<NAME>                          GEODYNE INST/PENSION ENERGY INCOME P-2 LTD PSHP
                                    
<S>                             <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998       
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998       
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998       
<CASH>                              165,411       
<SECURITIES>                              0       
<RECEIVABLES>                       173,238       
<ALLOWANCES>                              0       
<INVENTORY>                               0       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    338,649       
<PP&E>                            5,888,261       
<DEPRECIATION>                    4,752,547       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,474,363       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0       
<BONDS>                                   0       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0       
<PREFERRED>                               0       
<COMMON>                                  0       
<OTHER-SE>                        1,474,363       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,474,363       
<SALES>                             167,958       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    228,865       
<CGS>                                     0       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        77,191       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     151,674       
<INCOME-TAX>                              0       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 151,674       
<DISCONTINUED>                            0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0       
<CHANGES>                                 0       
<NET-INCOME>                        151,674       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          1.58       
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0       
                                
 

</TABLE>
tse_EX_10-5



			

					

						 


					

					

						 


				
	

					

						


					

					

						Exhibit 10.5


					

						 


					

						Trinseo S.A.


					

						4, rue Lou Hemmer


					

						L-1748 Luxembourg – Findel


					

						Grand Duchy of Luxembourg


				









		
			 
		

		


		
			March 1, 2016
		

		
			 
		

		
			Ms. Marilyn Horner
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dear Ms. Horner:
		

		
			 
		

		
			RE: Definition of Retirement for Purposes of Equity Awards under 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "Plan")
		

		
			 
		

		
			This letter confirms that the following definition of "Retirement" is applicable to all Stock Options granted to you under the Plan to date and in the future unless otherwise notified:
		

		
			 
		

		
			"Retirement" means a retirement from active Employment after the Optionee has attained age fifty-five (55) with at least six (6) years of continuous service with the Company.
		

		
			 
		

		
			This letter confirms that the following definition of "Retirement" is applicable to all Restricted Stock Units granted to you under the Plan to date and in the future unless otherwise notified:
		

		
			 
		

		
			"Retirement" means a retirement from active Employment after the Grantee has attained age fifty-five (55) with at least six (6) years of continuous service with the Company.
		

		
			 
		

		
			**
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Trinseo S.A.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Christopher D. Pappas

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Name:

					
					
						Christopher D. Pappas

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Title:

					
					
						Chief Executive Officer and President
#### Ivan Von STAICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of California; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-16390.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*262Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 12, 2010.

Ivan Von Staich, San Luis Obispo, CA, pro se.

Grant Lien, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ivan Von Staich, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his action alleging defendants violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (“RLUIPA”) by considering grooming violations during his parole hearings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment. *San Jose Christian Coll. v. City of Morgan Hill,*360 F.3d 1024, 1029 (9th Cir.2004). We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a motion to amend. *Chappel v. Lab. Corp. of Am.,*232 F.3d 719, 725 (9th Cir.2000). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. *Dittman v. California,*191 F.3d 1020, 1027 n. 3 (9th Cir.1999). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants because, as a result of a settlement in another case, Von Staich had all recent grooming violations removed from his central file, and the consideration of his earlier violations did not impose a substantial burden on his religious exercise. *See San Jose Christian Coll.,*360 F.3d at 1034 (“[A] substantial *263burden on religious exercise must impose a significantly great restriction or onus upon such exercise.”) (internal quotation marks omitted); *cf. Warsoldier v. Woodford,*418 F.3d 989, 996 (9th Cir.2005) (finding a substantial burden because the grooming policy put pressure on inmates to abandon their religious beliefs).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Von Staich’s motion to file a Fourth Amended Complaint after properly finding undue delay and prejudice to the defendants. *See Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions, Inc.,*194 F.3d 980, 986 (9th Cir.1999).

Von Staich’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.