alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### AUSTIN, NICHOLS & CO. v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 19, 1909.)

No. 259 (5,242).

Customs Duties (p 47*) — Dutiable Value — Coverings—“Cases and Similar Coverings.”

Customs Administrative Act .lime 10, 1890, c. 407, § 19, 20 Stat. 189 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1921), providing that the value of “cases * * * and similar coverings” shall be added to the dutiable value of their contents, includes tin cans and stoneware receptacles.

[Ed. Note — For other cases, see Customs Duties, Dec. Dig. § 47.*]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

The decision of the Circuit Court affirmed the Board of General Appraisers in sustaining the action of the collector.

For decision below, see 165 Fed. 236.

Walden & Webster (W. Wickham Smith, of counsel), for importers.

J. Osgood Nichols (Henry A. Wise, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for the United States.

Before UACOMBE, COXE, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

*80PER CURIAM.

This appeal was argued contemporaneously with’ the *Kimpton*Case, 171 Fed. 78. The only difference between the two cases is that in the Kimpton Case the imported merchandise was ink in stone bottles; here it consists of vegetables in tin cans and fish paste and páté de foie gras in stoneware receptacles. In other words, the former controversy involved the consideration of liquid in bottles; the latter, of solids in tin cans and terrines. The facts differ sufficiently to warrant us in distinguishing the present controversy from that before the Supreme Court in United States v. Nicholls, 186 U. S. 298, 22 Sup. Ct. 918, 46 L. Ed. 1173.

The history of previous tariff legislation, and the difficulties, embarrassments, trickery, and fraud engendered by the chaotic condition of the law on the subject of coverings at the date of the passage of the customs administrative act, lead us to believe that it was the intention of Congress to set at rest the vexed questions by requiring the value of all coverings to be included in the value of ad valorem goods, as provided in section 19 (Act June 10, 1890, c. 407, 30 Stat. 139 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1924]). It is unnecessary to add to the able presentation of this subject by General Appraiser Somerville in writing the opinion of the Board.

Even if the doctrine of ejusdem generis be applicable, so that the section reads “cartons, cases, crates, boxes, sacks, and similar coverings. of any kind,” we fail to understand why the coverings here involved may not be included. Webster defines “case” as “a covering, box or sheath; that which incloses or contains.” It is not easy to perceive why a tin box containing vegetables, if not actually a case, is not similar to one. So, too, an earthenware receptacle containing meat paste is a case, or, if not, it is a covering similar to a case.

We think the decision of the Circuit Court should be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Billserv, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael R. Long,
Chief Executive Officer, and Terri A. Hunter, Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2003                               /s/ Michael R. Long
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Michael R. Long
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 14, 2003                               /s/ Terri A. Hunter
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Terri A. Hunter
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1038 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1038

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 27, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3726) to establish the Castle Nugent 
National Historic Site at St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources now 
printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as 
amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit 
with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4474) to authorize the continued use of 
certain water diversions located on National Forest System land in the Frank 
Church-River of No Return Wilderness and the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness in the 
State of Idaho, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 
of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

#### Wright v. Walton et al.

October 4, 1991

Case No. CL910256

By JUDGE ALFRED D. SWERSKY

Defendants' motion to transfer venue will be granted.

Plaintiff asserts that venue is proper under Section 8.01-262(3) and has shown that defendant "regularly and systematically conducts affairs or business activity" in Alexandria. However, this Code section establishes "a logical forum when considered in the context of fairness and convenience." *See*Reviser’s Note § 8.01-262.

No unfairness or inconvenience results to plaintiff if this case is transferred to Fairfax where the defendants’ office is located and where the incidents giving rise to plaintiff’s claim occurred. The Court finds, pursuant to § 8.01-265, that Fairfax is a fair and convenient forum for this cause.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, the undersigned officer of Valentis, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)            the accompanyingAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(ii)        theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: September 26, 2005 | /s/ BENJAMIN  F. MCGRAW, III       |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                               | Benjamin F. McGraw, III, Pharm.D.  |
|                               | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                               | *(Principal Executive Officer)*         |

 

----
nt contains**so~e** \hiS docume f poor quahtv

that are o . pages

. f \mag\09·

at the t,me o

. . . ......

### ~clf-'/kl8 (() e:t /li:k**~J'i)**

---

.. RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRlMI"!Al4PPfALS

OCT 1**~ 201~** 

Abet Acosta.**Cler~**



## . v)t,.._. 

# fd**~._,_J** .(l)

### ()1M_./()~**c~~ 0~** **tWLt~** .t, {<....**~· ~**  1**,~** . 

# \r •,;f**~ ~0'~**  C&uuc 

# 1: (vW

### 1-~"J**~.J** .;,.

### !..,~**~** .

### ~~**~ ~**  

## (ewJ ';t--

### c't%!~~**~~** Y-k,

### ~**~** '

### ~ p

.

·.. \_

·-.**-.-~** \ jfWl

### ~**-~** k;

### ~J-~**~~~** '



## .**L),~ ~~** 

..tti 0 10£;1**~9** 7

### ·.~_2,.,0~**~~-!v1** 

### k<t1 

## w**~·** 

## e;;::;:Jl**~oct; ~-k:.A_)~CJ)** 

## ~__.,J./v,~**~. ·~** **~~** D\**~~~·** .**~**J I**-~-**

### ~- 

## 7**~e;J-** 

# I**Au:tk~** 

### <**~**

'

### ~,_J**1-fJJ~** I 1\.,

### ~p.e®<Mt-**GwJ:-:~flo ~**  

### +o**~** Wo% 

# .q**«V)~~/~~ .~**  a.e_e

### ~**tJA£l'1~'1)-lv ~~**  

### s;tt**J!~A.A~** 

### .w;_, q,-6-t Me 

### A-.v.t'jn.zzr («}**t0~-0**. " L

., )

### ~**~~~** JA

### ArP~·**~c-__~· -~** 

# ~~**.P~.** ·

_

# ~~~

# 1**~,.Qf<!l. ·~.~**  c\-L

# ~**~~** I**~ ~**  S>(}vd--

### ~~**~ ~**  lll'l

### ~**~ ~.**  

# SC+M**~~~2.0\'), ~~** **~~~**

. §I

### (-~£J**J.Q~**

j

### ~-~~~~-#,at,_,~~ 7_. 

### -tw.**~ ~**  lLflJM**~- ~+j**  

# t-**f.Pj~,** 2-6USC f**174~**

## 'i?K.~ dv..

## ()d-,tL~20lS, PI

## ~~ 

## .£oJ**~**
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION, CHARLES W. METCALF, DANIEL F. RICE AND COMPANY, 

DANIEL F. RICE, LAWRENCE J. RYAN, AND PHILIP R. O'BRIEN 

CITATION: 6 Agric. Dec. 416 

DOCKET NUMBER: 34 

DATE: MAY 15, 1947 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER POSTPONING EFFECTIVE DATE OF SANCTIONS 

(A. D. 1483) 

 

In re GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION et al. CEA Doc. No. 34. Decided May 15, 1947. 

Postponement of Effective Date of Sanctions

The effective date of the sanctions ordered against P. R. O. and L. J. R. is 

postponed until further order in connection with the petitions to reconsider the 

order of April 28, 1947, which order shall remain unchanged, excepting the stay 

order issued by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. 

 

Messrs. Howard W. Vesey and William A. Clineburg, of Washington, D. C., for 

Philip R. O'Brien. Messrs. Bowden, Taylor & Norville, of Chicago, Illinois for 

Lawrence J. Ryan. 

 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer

Order Postponing Effective Date of Sanctions

On May 13, 1947, respondent Philip R. O'Brien and Lawrence J. Ryan filed 

petitions to reconsider the order entered in this proceeding on April 28, 1947, 

* requesting at the same time suspension and a stay of that order pending 

disposition of their petitions to reconsider. 

* 6 Agric. Dec. 288 (6 A. D. 288). -- Ed. 

Section 0.21 (b) of the rules of practice (17 CFR, Cum. Supp., 0.21 (b)) 

requires the filing by complainant within 20 days of answers to the petitions to 

consider. In view of the time that will necessarily be spent in taking action 

upon the petitions to reconsider, the effective date of the sanctions ordered 

against Philip R. O'Brien and Lawrence J. Ryan, namely the 40th day after April 

28, 1947, is postponed until further order in connection with the petitions to 

reconsider. The order of April 28, 1947, * remains unchanged except that, 

according to my information, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh 

Circuit has issued a stay in connection with the appeal of General Foods 

Corporation and Charles W. Metcalf. 

* 6 Agric. Dec. 288 (6 A. D. 288). -- Ed. 

Copies hereof shall be served upon all parties in the proceeding and upon the 

contract markets. 

 

LOAD-DATE: March 12, 2008 
Page 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Robert W. Raiford, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ENGlobal Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ENGlobal Corporation.





Date:March 10, 2011//s// Robert W. RaifordRobert W. RaifordChief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





1
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,300
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,827
<PP&E>                                          15,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 435,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,159
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           137
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   435,731
<SALES>                                        183,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,239
<CGS>                                          152,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (173)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,074
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,753
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,381
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,372
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,993)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,621)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   ($.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements accompanying the filing of Form 10KSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              74,445
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   103,488
<PP&E>                                             311,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     490,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,937,936
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                4,177
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,102,344)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       490,545
<SALES>                                             54,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    54,922
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,251,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 410,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,578,540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,578,540)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,578,540)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (1.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.54)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15248]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel VHAM SEP (Teleconference for June 28, 2001).
    Date: June 28, 2001.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38A, HPCC 
Conference Room B1N30Q, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Merlyn M. Rodrigues, Medical Officer/SRA, 
National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20894.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: June 11, 2001.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-15248 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 11.1

                     GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,
                                                          -------------------
                                                            1997       1996
                                                          --------   --------
<S>                                                       <C>        <C>

Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $  (3,404) $ (1,818)
                                                          ========   ========

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding . . .     6,725     6,675

Weighted average effect of common share equivalents . . .         -         -
                                                           --------  --------

Weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . .     6,725     6,675
                                                           ========  ========

Net loss per common share and common share equivalent . . $   (0.51)    (0.27)
                                                           ========  ========

</TABLE>
# FCM Data June 2015

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF June 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002015FROM REPORTS FILED BY July 28,&KFF0000 &K0000002015	&P of &N