alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3549] 

# AGENCY:

United States Department of State. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Gauguin's Nirvana: Portrait of Meyer de Haan” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art, Hartford, CT from on or about January 26, 2001, through on or about April 29, 2001, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, including a list of exhibit objects, contact Jacqueline Caldwell, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/619-6982). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-                              ( print page 4886)                            44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                     

Dated: January 10, 2001.

William B. Bader, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 01-1515 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14797]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1173]


Approval for Expanded Manufacturing Authority Rotorex Company, 
Inc. (Air Cleaners) Walkersville, MD

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Maryland Department of Transportation, grantee of FTZ 
73, has requested authority on behalf of the Rotorex Company, Inc. 
(Rotorex), to expand the scope of manufacturing activity (air cleaners) 
conducted under zone procedures within Subzone 73A at the Rotorex 
facility in Walkersville, Maryland (FTZ Doc. 45-2000, filed 7-27-00);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (65 FR 47712, 8-3-00);
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby approves the request subject to 
the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of May 2001.
Faryar Shirzad,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14797 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
No. 586, Misc.

#### Jackson *v.*Hiatt, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S, Erdahl*and *Philip R. Monahan*for respondent.

Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT INDEX**

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that itmeets all of the requirements for the effectiveness of this Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933and has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment No. 74 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Boston, and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 17th day of May 2013.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following personsin the capacities and on the dates indicated.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

	We, the undersigned Directors or Trustees, as the case may be, of the following investment companies:

in addition to any other investment company for which Fidelity Management & Research Company ("FMR") or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and for which the undersigned individuals serve as Directors or Trustees (collectively, the "Funds"), hereby revoke all previous powers of attorney we have given to sign and otherwise act in our names and behalf in matters involving any investment companyfor which FMR or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and hereby constitute and appoint Thomas C. Bogle, Joseph R. Fleming, John V.O'Hanlon, Robert W. Helm and Anthony H. Zacharski, each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for us and in our names in the appropriate capacities, all Registration Statements ofthe Funds on Form N-1A, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-EffectiveAmendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith,and generally to do all such things in our names and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate,to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of theSecurities and Exchange Commission.  We hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause tobe done by virtue hereof.  This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after December 1, 2011.

	WITNESS our hands on this first day of December 1, 2011.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

KELVIN MONTERO, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 474 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justices Eakin and Donohue did not participate in the decision of this matter.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1511/2004

of 25 August 2004         

fixing the import duties in the rice sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1503/96 of 29 July 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 as regards import duties in the rice sector (2), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duties in the rice sector referred to in Article 11(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 are fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information given in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 August 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 411/2002 (OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 27).

(2)OJ L 189, 30.7.1996, p. 71. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2294/2003 (OJ L 340, 24.12.2003, p. 12).

----

ANNEX I

Import duties on rice and broken rice

----

(1)  The duty on imports of rice originating in the ACP States is applicable, under the arrangements laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 (OJ L 348, 21.12.2002, p. 5) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 638/2003 (OJ L 93, 10.4.2003, p. 3).

(2)  In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1706/98, the duties are not applied to products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and imported directly into the overseas department of Réunion.

(3)  The import levy on rice entering the overseas department of Réunion is specified in Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 3072/95.

(4)  The duty on imports of rice not including broken rice (CN code 1006 40 00), originating in Bangladesh is applicable under the arrangements laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 (OJ L 337, 4.12.1990, p. 1) and amended Commission Regulation (EEC) No 862/91 (OJ L 88, 9.4.1991, p. 7).

(5)  No import duty applies to products originating in the OCT pursuant to Article 101(1) of amended Council Decision 91/482/EEC (OJ L 263, 19.9.1991, p. 1).

(6)  For husked rice of the Basmati variety originating in India and Pakistan, a reduction of EUR/t 250 applies (Article 4a of amended Regulation (EC) No 1503/96).

(7)  Duties fixed in the Common Customs Tariff.

(8)  The duty on imports of rice originating in and coming from Egypt is applicable under the arrangements laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2184/96 (OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p. 1) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 196/97 (OJ L 31, 1.2.1997, p. 53).

----

ANNEX II

Calculation of import duties for rice

----

(1)  Duties fixed in the Common Customs Tariff.

----
Hasan K. AKBAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-1257.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that thi s

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50732 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICTOR CARLOS ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CR-295-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Victor Carlos Alvarez appeals the revocation of his probation following his 1999 guilty-plea conviction for bank fraud. He asserts that there was insuf ficient evidence to support his revocation and ensuing sentence and that the district court, when it truncated Alvarez’s cross-examination of his probation officer, denied Alvarez his due process rights. The district court did not abuse its di scretion in revoking Alvarez’s probation in light of Alvarez’s plea of true to eight violations of the conditions of probation. See United States v.2

Teran , 98 F.3d 831, 836 (5th Cir. 1996). Moreover, Alvarez’s admissions of violations of the conditions of probation waived his due process protections. See United States v. Holland , 850 F.2d 1048, 1050-51 (5th Cir. 1988). Alvarez conclusionally asserts that the district court did not afford him an adequate opportunity to allocute, that the district court erred in quashing a subpoena duces tecum, and that his actual sentence was excessive in comparison to the suggested guideline sentencing range. These assertions are not adequately briefed, and

we do not consider them. See United States v. Torres-Aguilar , 352 F.3d 934, 936 n.2 (5th Cir. 2003); FED . R. APP . P. 28(a)(9). Nor do we consider Alvarez’s arguments, raised for the first time in his reply brief, that he was never notified of his default in rest itution and that the admissions he made at his revocation hearing were involuntary. See United States v. Avants , 367 F.3d 433, 449 (5th Cir. 2004). AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

p0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146554

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146554

COA: 306574

Wayne CC: 10-010956-FC

DEVI LOREN SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
clvs-ex1037_742.htm



Exhibit 10.37

EXECUTION COPY

 

May 9, 2016

The Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors of Clovis Oncology, Inc.

Re: Waiver of Base Salary

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Effective the date hereof, I hereby voluntarily waive my right to receive any “Base Salary” (as defined in my Employment Agreement with Clovis Oncology, Inc. (the  Company”), dated August 24, 2011 (my “Employment Agreement”)) in excess of an amount equal to $1.00, plus the cost of the employee portion of any premiums to be paid pursuant to any health and welfare benefit plans maintained by the Company and any tax withholdings related to health and welfare benefits, with such waiver to continue in effect until the earliest to occur of (i) the Company entering into a definitive agreement with respect to a transaction that if consummated would constitute a Change in Control (as defined in my Employment Agreement) or the public announcement of a proposal or transaction that if consummated would constitute a Change of Control, (ii) approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to commercially distribute, sell or market Rucaparib, and (iii) my termination of employment pursuant to Section 8(d) or Section 8(e) of my Employment Agreement.  For purposes of clarity, I anticipate that the Base Salary I received prior to the waiver contemplated by this letter will be reinstated following the occurrence of any of the foregoing events, and that any Severance Benefits (as defined in my Employment Agreement) to which I may become entitled will be calculated based on the Base Salary I received prior to the waiver contemplated by this letter.  Further, to the extent I become eligible for any disability insurance benefits that are determined by reference to my Base Salary while the waiver contemplated by this letter is in effect, I anticipate that the Base Salary I received prior to the waiver contemplated by this letter will be used to determine such benefits.  I hereby acknowledge and agree that I consent to the reduction of my Base Salary resulting from the waiver contemplated by this letter, and that such reduction will in no way constitute “Good Reason” for purposes of my Employment Agreement.  

 

Sincerely,

/s/ Patrick J. Mahaffy

Patrick J. Mahaffy
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50343

Conference Calendar

 

JOSEPH WARREN POLK, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BILLY BURKE; CAROLYN HARRINGTON; 

DAN SMITH, Sheriff,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-97-CV-72

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Joseph Warren Polk, Jr., Texas inmate #805394, appeals the

district court’s summary judgment for the defendants. Polk has

also moved for leave to supplement his reply brief and for the

relief which he requested in his civil rights complaint. IT IS

ORDERED that the motions are DENIED.

Our independent review of the district court’s judgment is 
No. 98-50343

-2-

based on the appellate record and not upon consideration of any

evidence which was not presented to the district court. See

United States v. Flores, 887 F.2d 543, 546 (5th Cir. 1989).

We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate

record. For essentially the same reasons as explained by the

district court in its order granting summary judgment for the

defendants, see Polk v. Burke, No. W-97-CA-072 (W.D. Tex. Mar.

18, 1998), we conclude that the district court did not err in its

summary-judgment determination. See Little v. Liquid Air Corp.,

37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc); Brewer v.

Wilkinson, 3 F.3d 816, 825 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
Exhibit 31.2
 Section 302 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of A. H. Belo Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Alison K. Engel

Alison K. EngelSenior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

www.cftc.gov 

Office of Proceedings 

MATIHEW CARPENTER, 

Complainant, 

V. 

INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC, 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CFTC Docket No. 13-Roo9 

ORDER 

The parties have amicably settled this matter and filed a joint stipulation of 

dismissal. Accordingly, pursuant to CFTC rule 12.21, the complaint in this matter is 

dismissed. 

Dated March 29, 2016. 

L};A 1/ A/f {/ l • 

~i;r.McGuire, Judgment Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF FOUNTAIN  PHARMACEUTICALS,  INC.  FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1996,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               3
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       93
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        106
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   253
<PP&E>                                             264  
<DEPRECIATION>                                     240
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                          84 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       408
<SALES>                                            110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   110
<CGS>                                               39
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (154) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (154) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (154)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.003) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.003)
        

</TABLE>