alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 305, Misc.

#### Chadwick *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir.

Certiorari denied.
# C_2019319EN.01001901.xml

| 23.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Ítélőtábla — Hungary) — Tibor-Trans Fuvarozó és Kereskedelmi Kft. v DAF Trucks NV

(Case C-451/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Special jurisdiction - Article 7(2) - Tort, delict or quasi-delict - Place where the harmful event occurred - Claim for compensation for damage caused by a cartel found to be contrary to Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area)

(2019/C 319/20)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Győri Ítélőtábla

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Tibor-Trans Fuvarozó és Kereskedelmi Kft.

Defendant: DAF Trucks NV

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, must be interpreted as meaning that, in an action for compensation for damage caused by an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, consisting, inter alia, of collusive arrangements on pricing and gross price increases for trucks, ‘the place where the harmful event occurred’ covers, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, the place where the market which is affected by that infringement is located, that is to say, the place where the market prices were distorted and in which the victim claims to have suffered that damage, even where the action is directed against a participant in the cartel at issue with whom that victim had not established contractual relations.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 10.9.2018.

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 8

- 10689 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RONNIE BERNARD ELLIS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 176

- 1

Before KING, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ronnie Bernard Ellis appeals his 320

- month sentence following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance . Ellis contends that the district court erred by finding that the offense involved the importation of methamphetamine for the purposes of applying a two

- level enhancement to h is offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(5) because there was insufficient evidence connecting him

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 5, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10689 Document: 00515333391 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/05/2020No. 1 8

- 10689

2 to methamphetamine imported from Mexico. We rev iew the district court’s factual determination that Ellis’s offense involved the importation of methamphetamine for clear error. See United States v. Serfass , 684 F.3d 548,
550 , 553

- 54 (5th Cir. 2012). The two

- level § 2D1.1(b)(5) enhancement applies if “ the offense involved the importation of amphetamine or methamphetamine” and the defendant does not receive a mitigating role adjustment. Considering the record as a whole , the district court plausibly inferred that the methamphetamine involved in the offe nse had been imported from Mexico

. See id. at 550 , 553

- 54

. Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err by applying the § 2D1.1(b)(5) enhancement. See United States v. Foulks , 747 F.3d 914, 915 (5th Cir. 2014). AFFIRMED. Case: 18-10689 Document: 00515333391 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/05/2020
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

Petitioner *

* Misc. Docket AG

v. * No. 29

*

EPHRAIM CHUKWUEMEKA UGWUONYE * September Term, 201 9

*

Respondent *

ORDER

UPON CONSID ERATION of a certified copy of the Order of the District of

Columbia Court of Appeals dated May 2 , 201 9

, wherein the Respondent, Ephraim

Chukwuemeka Ugwuonye , was disbarred from the practice of law for violating the District

of Columbia Rules of P rofessional Conduct

, it is this 27th day of September , 201 9

,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Ephraim

Chukwuemeka Ugwuonye , be, and hereby is, temporarily suspended from the practice of

law in the State of Maryland, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19

- 737(d), pending further order

of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Ephraim

Chukwuemeka Ugwuonye from the register of attorneys in this Court and ce rtify that fact

to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all

judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19

- 736(d).

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1508 

Celebrating the 200th Anniversary of John James Audubon in Henderson, 

Kentucky. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2010 

Mr. WHITFIELD (for himself, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. 

ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. CHANDLER, and Mr. YARMUTH) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the 200th Anniversary of John James Audubon 

in Henderson, Kentucky. 

Whereas, John James Audubon arrived in the river town of 

Henderson, Kentucky, in 1810 with his wife and infant 

son, determined to make his fortune; 

Whereas, as a businessman in Henderson, he met with some 

initial success, and in 1816 he undertook his most ambitious project to date, building a steam-powered saw-andgrist mill in the city on the banks of the Ohio River; 

Whereas, Audubon loved the frontier spirit in Henderson, and 

throughout his years there, he roamed the woods, observing and painting the many species of birds abundant in 

the area; 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

HRES 1508 IH 

Whereas, Audubon ultimately lived in Henderson, Kentucky, 

for nine years, longer than anywhere else in the United 

States, during which time two of his four children were 

born; 

Whereas, he went on to publish his ornithological works in 

the masterpiece, ‘‘The Birds of America’’; 

Whereas, present-day Henderson, Kentucky, boasts the John 

James Audubon State Park & Museum, where Audubon’s 

life is interpreted through his art and personal memorabilia, framed within a timeline of world events and paying 

reverence to its namesake through its Nature Center, 

which is comprised of three areas: a wildlife Observation 

Room; the Discovery Center with hands-on exhibits; and 

the Learning Center, where the park naturalist and art 

educator conduct environmental and art programs; 

Whereas, Henderson’s position on the Mississippi Flyway migration route also offers visitors the chance to take part 

in many of the same spectacular birdwatching opportunities that Audubon enjoyed, both at the park and at the 

nearby 10,000 acre Sloughs Wildlife Management Area, 

a National Audubon Society Important Birding Area; 

and 

Whereas, in celebration of the bicentennial of Audubon’s 

1810 arrival in Henderson County, the Friends of Audubon, Ohio Valley Art League, and the Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources are planning a full 

slate of events, which can be found at 

www.audubon2010.com. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Represenatives honors 

2 John James Audubon for his life’s contribution to nature 

3 and art in Henderson, Kentucky, for 200 years and the 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

HRES 1508 IH 

1 continued showcase of his life, nature, and art at the John 

2 James Audubon State Park & Museum. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL LOWMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 145 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, petitioner, v. G.G., By His Next Friend and Mother, Deirdre GRIMM.

No. 16-273.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted limited to Questions 2 and 3 presented by the petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       
<S>                            <C>
<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
combined statement of operations for the period January 1, 1998 to January 13,
1998 of Northeast Energy Associates, A Limited Partnership and North Jersey 
Energy Associates, A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.

<CIK>                          0000934667
<NAME>                         Northeast Energy Associates,
                               A Limited Partnership
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                     U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   JAN-13-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                1
<CASH>                              $0
<SECURITIES>                        $0
<RECEIVABLES>                       $0
<ALLOWANCES>                        $0
<INVENTORY>                         $0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    $0
<PP&E>                              $0
<DEPRECIATION>                      $0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      $0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               $0
<BONDS>                             $0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               $0
<PREFERRED>                         $0
<COMMON>                            $0
<OTHER-SE>                          $0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        $0
<SALES>                        $13,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               $13,109
<CGS>                               $0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   $7,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  $136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              $2,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 $2,909
<INCOME-TAX>                        $0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             $2,909
<DISCONTINUED>                      $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     $0
<CHANGES>                           $0
<NET-INCOME>                    $2,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       $0
<EPS-DILUTED>                       $0

        

</TABLE>
Joshua MOSES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6013.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Henry
P. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
---------------------------
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
August 16, 2004


A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Deryke Matthew PFEIFER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6255.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-1999
<CASH>                                              65
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,085
<PP&E>                                          15,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,873
<BONDS>                                          1,497
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,528
<SALES>                                         63,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,491
<CGS>                                           56,437
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       324
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (521)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (521)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice #3523]

The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State Department—Overseas Security Advisory Council on February 13, 14, and 15, in San Diego, California. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and (4), it has been determined the meeting will be closed to the public. Matters relative to classified national security information as well as privileged commercial information will be discussed. The agenda will include updated committee reports, a world threat overview and a round table discussion that calls for the discussion of classified and corporate proprietary/security information as well as private sector physical and procedural security policies and protective programs at sensitive U.S. Government and private sector locations overseas.

For more information contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security Advisory Council, Department of State, Washington, D.C. 20522-1003, phone: 202-663-0533.

Dated: January 10, 2001.

Peter E. Bergin,

Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 01-1517  Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
secretary 

From: Lelliott, Jeff [Jeff.Lelliott@admis.com] 

Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 12:52 PM 

To: secretary 

Subject: ICE Clear Section 4(c) 

On the ICE proposal to clear OTC swap transactions. 

My personal views are as follows 

. ·~·· 

COMMENT 

Page 1 of 1 

!J?-16 

@ 

_, 

1. There is no mention of the OTC swap being subject to speculative limits. This may have a~::i,mpac:~,bn spd,t..J 

month activity especially near or during spot months. L~ ~,::l :.~)· ;"~~ 

2. These transactions are for a few large investment houses and hedge funds and these tran§.~ctions may C::J 

have a detrimental impact or distortion on normal futures market price discovery. :.,' -::-

3. These markets are generally small and these large transactions may remove liquidity and f~nsp@ency 

from them. One can see the impact of these transactions in the oil markets and unfettered~liese 

transactions could have influence pricing towards them 

4. The normal trade participants of these markets I would have thought to be significantly less capitalized 

than those of Energy and metal markets and most certainly smaller than the investment houses and funds. 

The trade should not be put at a disadvantage to the investment community when they are transacting their 

normal course of business, hedging. 

I would also like to point out that as a member of an ICE trade committee there was no comment sought by ICE 

on this subject prior to submission. 

Jeff Lelliott 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 

This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 

information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this 

message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the 

intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 

strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email reply. 

1/7/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               4,612
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              13,993
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             17
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              33,976
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                34,167
<LOANS>                                            309,294
<ALLOWANCE>                                          1,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     391,439
<DEPOSITS>                                         320,031
<SHORT-TERM>                                        10,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  4,719
<LONG-TERM>                                          2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               470
<OTHER-SE>                                          53,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     391,439
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     24,176
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    2,996
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     1,457
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    28,629
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  15,913
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17,207
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               11,422
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          560
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      12
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     11,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,390
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                             986
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           986
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        3.01
<LOANS-NON>                                            474
<LOANS-PAST>                                         1,052
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     1,244
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          447
<RECOVERIES>                                             6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    1,431
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 1,431
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0

<FN>
Note: Allowance for Purchase loans  68
</FN>


</TABLE>