alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1368-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Illinois (FEMA-1368-DR), dated May 9, 2001, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 2, 2001. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that, effective this date and pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive Order 12148, I hereby appoint David J. Fukutomi of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster. 

This action terminates my appointment of Robert R. Colangelo as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Joe M. Allbaugh, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 01-15264 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration on Aging

[Program Announcement AoA-01-07]


Fiscal Year 2001 Program Announcement: Availability of Funds and 
Notice Regarding Applications

AGENCY: Administration on Aging, HHS.

ACTION: Request for applications for Pension Counseling and Information 
Projects to create new, or continue or expand a sufficient number of 
pension counseling and information programs to provide outreach, 
information, counseling, referral, and other assistance regarding 
pension and other retirement benefits, and rights related to such 
benefits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Administration on Aging (AoA) announces that under this 
program announcement it will hold a competition for grant awards for 
two (2) to three (3) projects at a federal share of approximately 
$100,000 to $150,000 per year for a period of three years. Since 1993, 
the AoA has supported 10 model pension counseling and information 
projects throughout the country. This program announcement is designed 
to build on that effort in order to begin to expand the program into a 
national program of pension counseling services, as prescribed in title 
II, section 215 of the Older Americans Act (42 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.), as 
amended in 2000, Pub. L. 106-501.
    The deadline date for submission of applications is August 3, 2001. 
Eligibility for grant awards is limited to State or area agencies on 
aging, nonprofit organizations, including faith-based organizations, 
with a proven record of providing services related to retirement of 
older individuals, services to Native Americans, or specific pension 
counseling.
    Application kits are available by writing to the Administration on 
Aging, Office of Program Development, Department of Health and Human 
Services, 330 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 4266, Washington, DC 
20201, or by calling Nancy Wartow at (202) 619-058 or on the web at 
http://www.aoa.gov/t4/fy2001.

    Dated: June 13, 2001.
Norman L. Thompson,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 01-15287 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154-01-U
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50076

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NELSON RAMON GARCIA, also known

as Domingo Hernandez-Castro,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CR-1588-ALL

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Nelson Ramon Garcia appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Garcia contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction

that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a

separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 04-50076

-2-

alleged in his indictment. Garcia maintains that he pleaded

guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for

that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Garcia acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32806-32807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15234]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-301-019]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

June 12, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 4, 2001, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
tendered for filing and approval ten Service Agreements between ANR and 
Utilicorp United, Inc. pursuant to ANR's Rate Schedules ETS, FSS and 
NNS (the Agreements).
    ANR states that the Agreements contain a negotiated rate 
arrangement to be effective June 1, 2001. ANR requests that the 
Commission accept and approve the Agreement to be effective June 1, 
2001.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web

[[Page 32807]]

site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15234 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE>

                                                       EXHIBIT 11



AMERICAN GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT, LTD.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
PRIMARY AND FULLY-DILUTED


                              Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended
                                   June 30,                   June 30,
                               1997        1996           1997        1996
                               ____        ____           ____        ____

<S>                         <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>

Weighted average number
of shares for computation    12,532,102   12,532,102   12,532,102   12,532,102
                             ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========

Net loss                    $(1,687,000) $(1,943,000) $(3,662,000) $(2,232,000)

Dividends and accretion
on preferred stock              467,000      467,000      933,000      875,000
                             __________   ___________   __________   __________
Net loss for common 
stockholders                $(2,154,000) $(2,410,000) $(4,595,000) $(3,107,000)
                             ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========
Net loss per common 
share                            $(0.17)      $(0.19)      $(0.37)      $(0.25)
                                 =======      ======       =======      =======


</TABLE>
Wayne Jamar RICKS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-5278.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Social Security Administration

# AGENCY:

Social Security Administration (SSA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that SSA will incorporate a change to its Magnetic Media Reporting and Electronic Filing (MMREF) publication under which SSA will no longer accept annual Form W-2 wage reports filed using value added networks (VANs) or dial-up networking, beginning with calendar year 2002. Instead, such wage reports shall be filed by employers or third-party preparers using SSA's Employer Services Online (ESO), 3                         1/2                         inch diskettes,                         1/2                         inch tapes, or 3480/3490 cartridges. The MMREF publication and additional information on wage report filing can be obtained by accessing SSA's employer reporting web site at                         *www.ssa.gov/​employer*                         or by calling 800-772-6270.                     

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before July 15, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

Comments on this change should be mailed or delivered to Norman Goldstein, Senior Financial Executive, Social Security Administration, Room 834, Altmeyer Building, Baltimore, MD 21235; or sent by telefax to (410) 966-8753. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Ruley, Financial Management Analyst, Social Security Administration, Room 834, Altmeyer Building, Baltimore, MD 21235; telefax (410) 966-8753. 

Dated: June 12, 2001. 

Richard Harron, 

Director, Division of Coverage and Support. 

[FR Doc. 01-15351 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191-02-U
Rudy GUTIERREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6108.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN GAMING &
ENTERTAINMENT, LTD. FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         152,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,770,000
<PP&E>                                      12,678,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,987,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,158,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       66,601,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,553,000
<COMMON>                                       126,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (63,250,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,158,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               445,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,292,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,137,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,914,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,914,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,314,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM S32464 (f rev)

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

John L. GATERS

Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Upon further review

Decided 30 November 2018

________________________

Military Judge: L. Martin Powell. 

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 30 days, 

and reduction to E-3. Sentence adjudged 16 February 2017 by SpCM 

convened at McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas. 

For Appellant: Major Rebecca J. Otey, USAF.

Before HUYGEN, MINK, and POSCH, Appellate Military Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

We have this case for further review after returning the record of trial to 

The Judge Advocate General for remand to the convening authority for new 

post-trial processing. United States v. Gaters, No. ACM S32464, 2018 CCA 

LEXIS 364 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 20 Jul. 2018) (unpub. op.). New post-trial 

processing and convening authority action have been accomplished. 

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no 

error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Arti-
United States v. Gaters, No. ACM S32464 (f rev)

2

cles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 

866(c). Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

*

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court

 

* We remind the Government that the final order must resolve Charge II and its 

Specifications 2 and 3, all of which were dismissed by the military judge conditioned 

on “approval on appellate review of the findings of guilt of Specifications 1 and 3 of 

Charge I, and of Charge I.” See United States v. Alford, No. ACM 39216, 2018 CCA 

LEXIS 388, at *1 n.1 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 15 Aug. 2018) (unpub. op.) (also involving a 

conditional dismissal).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000850625
<NAME> CHRISKEN GROWTH & INCOME LP II

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         161,917
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               333,259
<PP&E>                                       5,626,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                 504,648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,455,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          182,481
<BONDS>                                      4,606,699
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     666,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,455,413
<SALES>                                        311,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               328,370
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  251,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,458)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,458)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,458)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
Paul JOHNSON, petitioner, v. CITY OF CANTON, MISSISSIPPI, et al.

No. 16-409.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 5, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.
fteee\ved CfTC .. ReCOrds SeCUon 

_~_1_o_7-----~--------- Naaonal Grain. and Feed AssociaUon 

1250 Eye St., N.W., Suite 1003, Washington, D.C. 20005-3922, Phone: (202) 289-0873, FAX: (202) 289-5388, Web Site: ~ngfo.org 

-r") !"'-l 

n S 

-..1 

Mr. David Stawick 

Secretary 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st St., NW 

Washington, D.C. 20581 

December 7, 2007 

• 

COMMENT 

.. 

Re: Proposed "Revision of Federal Speculative Position Limits" 

Federal Register, November 21, 2007; Page 65483 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

0 

-q 

-1 

:J: 

c:::t 

M 

C'""") 

I 

'-J 

-o 

:::s:: 

~ 

V1 

N 

This letter is to respectfully request a 30-day extension of the comment period on 

the above-referenced proposed rule. 

The National Grain and Feed Association's (NGFA) 900 member companies 

operate about 6,000 facilities nationwide. Members include country elevators, feed 

manufacturers, processors and other end-users, biofuels companies, integrated animal 

feeding operations and many more related commercial businesses. These companies are 

traditional hedgers that utilize exchange-traded agricultural contracts to manage their 

price and inventory risk. As such, efficient and properly functioning futures markets are 

critically important to their business success. 

Given recent changes in the agricultural marketplace, the NGF A is taking a 

deliberative and careful approach to formulating a response to this proposal. While our 

organization generally has been supportive of recent spec limit increases, the magnitude 

of these increases merits special attention. The significant increase in non-traditional 

participation in agricultural markets over the past two to three years has had the dual 

impact of serving as the catalyst for this proposal, in part, while also heightening the 

importance of the decision for traditional hedgers who need to be able to rely on market 

performance. 

The NGF A Risk Management Committee will meet in Washington, DC on 

January 10. At this meeting, the NGFA position on the spec limit proposal will be 

determined. In order that the NGF A response to CFTC is thorough and timely, we 

request that the comment period be extended for an additional thirty days. 

:.:0 

("') rrl 

:..., ("') 

'I fTl 

;-!< 

("")rrl 

0 
Mr. David Stawick 

December 7, 2007 

Page2 

Thank you for your serious consideration of this request. Please address any 

questions to me at (812) 833-3074 or to Todd Kemp on the NGF A staff at (202) 289-

0873. 

Rod Clark 

Chair, Risk Management Committee 

General Manager, CGB/Diversified 

Services, Mt. Vernon, IN