alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1172/2004

of 24 June 2004         

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 32nd partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 32nd partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1290/2003 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 48,455 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 June 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 181, 19.7.2003, p. 7. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2126/2003 (OJ L 319, 4.12.2003, p. 4).

----
##### 



FORM 10-Q Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encore Wire Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Rego, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: May 9, 2005 /s/ VINCENT A. REGOVincent A. RegoChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
 23
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-effective Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-68019) and related Prospectus of
Marvel Enterprises, Inc. (formerly Toy Biz, Inc.) of our report dated February
5, 1999 (except for Note 3, as to which the date is February 11, 1999 and Notes
1 and 5, as to which the date is February 25, 1999), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Marvel Enterprises, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



New York, New York
March 30, 1999
Exhibit 31.1

**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, P. Douglas Richard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Community Financial Corporation (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidatedfinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

Date: November 12, 2003

/s/ P. Douglas Richard            P. Douglas RichardPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        21


        <NAME>      Fidelity Europe Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

year


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

oct-31-1997


<PERIOD-END>

oct-31-1997


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

651,002


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

895,539


<RECEIVABLES>

25,086


<ASSETS-OTHER>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

920,625


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

991


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

3,526


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

4,517


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

579,544


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

29,501


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

25,511


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

12,951


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

0


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

79,010


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

244,603


<NET-ASSETS>

916,108


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

25,725


<INTEREST-INCOME>

1,380


<OTHER-INCOME>

(3,335)


<EXPENSES-NET>

10,365


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

13,405


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

79,961


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

86,807


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

180,173


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

6,428


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

46,295


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

12,685


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

10,730


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

2,034


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

224,346


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

6,366


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

50,963


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

0


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

6,863


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

15


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

10,419


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

874,766


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

27.120


<PER-SHARE-NII>

 .440


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

5.440


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .240


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

1.730


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

31.050


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

119


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
secretary 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

twincapitaldpj@aol.com 

Thursday, December 06, 200710:47 AM 

secretary 

Ice clear 

·,\ COMMENT 

• 

• 

07-1~ 

(}) 

To allow market participants anymore leverage would be a sin unless it is made public 

knowledge. As a floor broker for 18 years I have seen it all and I have never proclaimed 

my innocence although I have a perfect record to do so and since the electronic platform 

has taken over the trading I have seen only things that would raise my concerns on where 

these markets are going. Positions in my opinion are either smoke screens or are joint 

ventures between different funds that would hinder on collusion so to really answer the 

question no more latitude should be given to any of these bigger hedge funds to make money 

of the honest trader. 

Regards 

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T 

0 

~-1 

(") '~:\ 

<"J 

CJ : : -·~:-:::? :::0 \"Y1 

-- C? t:-) Pl ....., ... 

-- I -~·"""'? 

(") r•-: '' fT1 (.('.• cr. r'i""1 ::'< 

("'";; ~ :. ) l'l 

::;i:;) - 0 rn 

-, 

:-:z--. .. ;:a 0 

> co 

1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1               3657088.88       6767902.92                0       157583953.09
A10                34753.32                0                0            1604000
A11               940364.99                0                0           41794000
A12               102223.32                0                0            4381000
A13                  162890                0                0            6981000
A14               246176.67                0                0           11362000
A15                  225000                0                0           10000000
A16              1275749.99                0                0           56700000
A2                535302.55       1095535.48                0        23904464.52
A3                  1304846       2507657.86                0        58388343.15
A4                 597496.2       1029483.81                0         23970516.2
A5                102080.51        220603.68                0         5136539.32
A6                 48029.39                0                0                  0
A7                222723.75         377326.4                0          9622673.6
A8               1114465.44       1746278.66                0        48253721.34
A9                1673708.6       2286154.07                0        72713845.92
AAPO                      0          6698.81                0          1537411.6
B1                244616.15         34995.21                0        10849857.79
B2                110165.05         15760.39                0         4886329.42
B3                  57935.4          8288.34                0         2569703.66
B4                 45060.88          6446.48                0         1998658.51
B5                 25749.08          3683.71                0         1142090.29
B6                 32190.03          4605.17                0         1427776.44
RI                     0.56              100                0                  0
RII                    3.79              100                0                  0


</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: LEONARD B. FELDMAN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 184 

DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 1971 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

Docket No. 184 

Name: Leonard B. Feldman 

Effective On or about November 22, 1971 

Effective upon the date of service of this order upon respondents Robert E. 

O'Grady, Carl D. Leaven, Leonard B. Feldman and Time Trading Co., they shall 

cease and desist from: (1) entering into, or offering to enter into, any futures 

transaction subject to the Commodity Exchange Act if such transaction is, is of 

the character of, or is commonly known to the trade as, a "wash sale"; and (2) 

executing any futures transaction subject to the Commodity Exchange Act if such 

transaction is not executed openly and competitively in accordance with section 

1.38 of the regulations issued under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR 1.38). 

Done at Washington, D. C. 

NOV 18 1971 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than July 13, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. Danvers Bancorp, Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts; to acquire Revere 
MHC, Revere, Massachusetts, and thereby indirectly acquire RFS Bancorp, 
Inc., Revere, Massachusetts, and Revere Federal Savings Bank, Revere, 
Massachusetts, and thereby engage in operating a savings association, 
pursuant to Sec. 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 13, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-15345 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 23

- 2710 LT Case No. 2011

- CT

- 000621

_____________________________ G ABRIEL I GLESIAS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 appeal from the County Court for Citrus County

. Bruce Carney , Judge

. Gabriel Iglesias, DeFuniak Springs , pro se

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

December 26, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

E DWARDS , C.J
, E ISNAUGLE , and H ARRIS , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00345

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

v. MICHAEL CLACK
On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 12

- CR

- 3866

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause o n appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 11, 2014
Page 1 of2 

secretary 

From: joshua.c.hall@gmail.com on behalf of Joshua Hall [halljc@beloit.edu] RecelvecfCFTC 

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:11 PM Recor~,. Section 

To: secretary 5/(</j tJ7 

Subject: Re: Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts 

May 13,2008 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Center 

COMMENT 

• 

IJ ~--·; 

· ... ~, 

\) 

C:l ,·:.,-

-r1 

__ , .:·:;;;;. 

::~:::.~:lor ;::,":) ~-

-··· -< : ) (T"J r·· 1155 21st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 c.r: .J::: :,n 

. rTJ rl 

c-; ;-f< 

Re: Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulation of Event Contracts :::0 =- r'rTJ f'T1 :::;;:: 

f. :;! § ,-

r ::0 v w ~; l> VI --{ 

Dear Commissioners and Secretary, 

CFTC Acting Chairman Walt Lukken asks, "What public purpose is served in the oversight of these 

markets and what differentiates these markets from pure gambling outside the CFTC's jurisdiction?" 

My comment focuses only on the first part of the Acting Chairman's statement. It is my understanding 

that the CFTC is asking for comment because of outside requests for clarification as to whether "event 

contracts" are legal, not because of any documented harm (or even potential harm) to citizens of the 

United States. Given that in the absence of non-pecuniary third-party effects voluntary market exchange 

makes all parties to the exchange better off, it is unclear how regulation of these voluntary markets 

(beyond the current laws and regulations designed to protect consumers against fraud and theft) would 

make anyone better off. 

New markets, especially financial ones, often seem scary to outsiders, but this fear should not motivate 

your decision as it motivated the Bush Administration's ending of the Policy Analysis Market in 2003 

(Hanson 2007). For a good overview of the academic research on these types of markets- prediction 

markets - see Hanson (2006a; 2006b ). The information provided through these markets would appear to 

be welfare enhancing based on what we know about the importance of information to wealth creation. 

Limiting the creation of these markets because of speculative and unfounded fears is ill-advised. 

Sincerely, 

Joshua Hall 

Assistant Professor of Economics & Management* 

Beloit College 

700 College Street 

Beloit, WI 53511 

*For identification purposes only. The views presented here are mine and do not necessarily represent 

the views ofBeloit College. 

5/13/2008 

0 
Page 2 of2 

References 

Hanson, Robert. 2006a. "Decision Markets for Policy Advice. Promoting the General Welfare: 

American Democracy and the Political Economy of Government Performance," 151-173, ed. Eric 

Patashnik and Alan Gerber, Brookings Institution Press, November 2006. 

Hanson, Robert. 2006b. "Foul Play in Information Markets. Information Markets: A New Way of 

Making Decisions in the Public and Private Sectors," 126-141, ed. Bob Hahn and Paul Tetlock, AEI 

Spring Press, May 2006. 

Hanson, Robin. 2007. "The Policy Analysis Market: A Thwarted Experiment in the Use of Prediction 

Markets for Public Policy." Innovations 2(3): 73-88. 

5/13/2008
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Robert W. DecherdRobert W. DecherdChairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2009/s/ Alison K. EngelAlison K. EngelSenior Vice President/Chief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2009
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. CARGILL, INCORPORATED, AND CARGILL GRAIN 

COMPANY, LIMITED 

DOCKET NUMBER: 58 

DATE: MAY 3, 1954 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 

FOURTH DIVISION 

No. 4849 Civil 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, vs. CARGILL, INCORPORATED, and CARGILL, 

GRAIN COMPANY, LIMITED, Defendants. 

STIPULATION 

WHEREAS, the defendants maintain the truth of their answers herein and 

maintain that they have not violated, nor do they intend to violate, any law or 

any rule, regulation or order issued thereunder; and 

WHEREAS, the defendants nevertheless desire to avoid every appearance of 

placing themselves in a position of antagonism to the United States Government: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, 

through their respective attorneys, that final judgement may be entered in the 

form annexed hereto upon consent, without notice, without trial or adjudication 

of any issue of fact or law herein, without the taking of any testimony, and 

without any findings of fact, upon condition that neither this stipulation and 

consent nor the final judgement to be entered herein shall be or be considered 

as evidence, admission, or adjudication that the defendants or either of them 

has violated or is now violating or intends to violate any law or any rule, 

regulation, or order issued thereunder. 

Dated, May 3, 1954. 

George E. MacKinnon /s/ 

GEORGE E. MacKINNON 

United States Attorney 

221 Federal Courts Building 

St. Paul, Minnesota 

DORSEY, COINAN, BARKER, SCOTT & BARBER 

By James E. Dorsey /s/ 

1300 First National-Soo Line Building 

Minneapolis 2, Minnesota 

Attorneys for defendants Cargill, Incorporated 

and Cargill Grain Company, Limited 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose G. Luna, Appellant.

[873 NYS2d 501]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cohen, J.), rendered April 3, 2007, convicting him of attempted assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Miller, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent ot the  reference  to our firm under  "Experts"  in the  Registration
Statement  (Form  S-3  No.333-68019)  and  the  related   Prospectus  of  Marvel
Enterprises,  Inc.  for the  registration  of Class B  Warrants,  8%  Cumulative
Convertible   Exchangeable   Preferred   Stock  and  Common  Stock  and  to  the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 20, 2001 with respect to
the consolidated  financial  statements of Marvel Enterprises,  Inc. included in
its Annual Report on (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                                /s/ Ernest & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 2001