32686 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[CFDA No.: 84.133E]

Office of Special Education and

Rehabilitative Services; National

Institute on Disability and

Rehabilitation Research

ACTION: Notice Inviting Applications

and pre-application meeting for New

Rehabilitation Engineering Research

Centers for Fiscal Year 2001–2003.

Note to Applicants: This notice is a

complete application package. Together

with the statute authorizing the

programs and applicable regulations

governing the programs including the

Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR),

this notice contains information,

application forms, and instructions

needed to apply for a grant under these

competitions.

This notice of final funding priorities

for Technology for Successful Aging,

Wheelchair Transportation Safety, and

Mobile Wireless Technologies for

Persons with Disabilities are published

elsewhere in this issue of the Federal

Register.

National Education Goals

The eight National Education Goals

focus the Nation’s education reform

efforts and provide a framework for

improving teaching and learning. This

notice would address the National

Education Goals that promote new

partnerships to strengthen schools and

expand the Department’s capacities for

helping communities to exchange ideas

and obtain information needed to

achieve the goals.

This notice addresses the National

Education Goal that every adult

American will be literate and will

possess the knowledge and skills

necessary to compete in a global

economy and exercise the rights and

responsibilities of citizenship.

Eligible Applicants: Parties eligible to

apply for grants under this program are

States, public or private agencies,

including for-profit agencies, public or

private organizations, including forprofit organizations, institutions of

higher education, and Indian tribes and

tribal organizations.

Program Authority: 29 U.S.C.

764(b)(3).

Applicable Regulations: The

Education Department General

Administrative Regulations (EDGAR),

34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 80, 81, 82, 85,

86 and 97, and the program regulations

34 CFR part 350.

Pre-Application Meeting: Interested

parties are invited to participate in a

pre-application meeting to discuss the

funding priorities and to receive

technical assistance through individual

consultation and information about the

funding priorities. The meeting will be

held on July 12, 2001 you may attend

either in person or by conference call at

the Department of Education, Office of

Special Education and Rehabilitative

Services, Switzer Building, Room 3065,

330 C St. SW., Washington, DC between

10 a.m. and 12 noon. NIDRR staff will

also be available from 1:30 p.m. to 4

p.m. on that same day to provide

technical assistance through individual

consultation and information about the

funding priority. For further information

or to make arrangements to attend

contact William Peterson, Switzer

Building, Room 3425, 330 C St., SW,

Washington, DC 20202.

William.Peterson@ed.gov on the

Internet or Telephone (202) 205–9192. If

you use a telecommunication device for

the deaf (TDD), you may call (202) 205–

4475.

Assistance to Individuals With

Disabilities at the Public Meetings

The meeting site is accessible to

individuals with disabilities, and a sign

language interpreter will be available. If

you need an auxiliary aid or service

other than a sign language interpreter in

order to participate in the meeting (e.g.

other interpreting service such as oral,

cued speech, or tactile interpreter;

assistive listening device; or materials in

alternative format), notify the contact

person listed in this notice at least two

weeks before the scheduled meeting

date. Although we will attempt to meet

a request we receive after this date, we

may not be able to make available the

requested auxiliary aid or service

because of insufficient time to arrange

it.

APPLICATION NOTICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 REHABILITATION ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTERS, CFDA NO. 84–133E

Funding priority Deadline for transmittal of

applications

Estimated number

of awards

Maximum award

amount (per

year) 1

Project period

(months)

84.133E–1 Technology for Successful Aging ........ August 13, 2001 ................. 1 $900,000 60

84.133E–3 Wheelchair Transportation Safety ....... August 13, 2001 ................. 1 900,000 60

84.133E–8 Mobile Wireless Technologies for Persons with Disabilities.August 13, 2001 ................. 1 1,000,000 60

Available Date: June 15, 2001.

1The Secretary will reject without consideration or evaluation any application that proposes a project funding level that exceeds the stated

maximum award amount in any year (See 34 CFR 75.104(b)).

Note.—The estimate of funding level and awards in this notice do not bind the Department of Education to a specific level of funding or number of grants.

For Applications Contact: The Grants

and Contracts Service Team (GCST),

Department of Education, 400 Maryland

Avenue SW., Switzer Building, 3317,

Washington, DC 20202, or call (202)

205–8207. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf

(TDD) may call the TDD number at (202)

205–9860. The preferred method for

requesting information is to FAX your

request to (202) 205–8717.

Individuals with disabilities may

obtain a copy of the application package

in an alternative format by contacting

the GCST. However, the Department is

not able to reproduce in an alternative

format the standard forms included in

the application package.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donna Nangle, U.S. Department of

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,

room 3414, Switzer Building,

Washington, DC 20202–2645.

Telephone: (202) 205–5880. Individuals

who use a telecommunications device

for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD

number at (202) 205–4475. Internet:

Donna.Nangle@ed.gov.

Individuals with disabilities may

obtain this document in an alternative

format (e.g., Braille, large print,

audiotape, or computer diskette) on

request to the contact person listed in

the preceding paragraph.

Selection Criteria: The Secretary uses

the following selection criteria to

evaluate applications under the RERC

program.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32687

(a) Importance of the problem (6

points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the

importance of the problem.

(2) In determining the importance of

the problem, the Secretary considers the

following factors:

(i) The extent to which the applicant

clearly describes the need and target

population (3 points).

(ii) The extent to which the proposed

project will have beneficial impact on

the target population (3 points).

(b) Responsiveness to an absolute or

competitive priority (5 points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the

responsiveness of an application to the

absolute or competitive priority

published in the Federal Register.

(2) In determining the application’s

responsiveness to the absolute or

competitive priority, the Secretary

considers the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the applicant

addresses all requirements of the

absolute or competitive priority (3

points).

(ii) The extent to which the

applicant’s proposed activities are likely

to achieve the purposes of the absolute

or competitive priority (2 points).

(c) Design of research activities (22

points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the extent

to which the design of research

activities is likely to be effective in

accomplishing the objectives of the

project.

(2) In determining the extent to which

the design is likely to be effective in

accomplishing the objectives of the

project, the Secretary considers the

following factors:

(i) The extent to which the research

activities constitute a coherent,

sustained approach to research in the

field, including a substantial addition to

the state-of-the-art (7 points).

(ii) The extent to which the

methodology of each proposed research

activity is meritorious, including

consideration of the extent to which—

(A) The proposed design includes a

comprehensive and informed review of

the current literature, demonstrating

knowledge of the state-of-the-art (3

points);

(B) Each research hypothesis is

theoretically sound and based on

current knowledge (3 points);

(C) Each sample population is

appropriate and of sufficient size (3

points);

(D) The data collection and

measurement techniques are

appropriate and likely to be effective (3

points); and

(E) The data analysis methods are

appropriate (3 points).

(d) Design of development activities

(20 points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the extent

to which the design of development

activities is likely to be effective in

accomplishing the objectives of the

project.

(2) In determining the extent to which

the design is likely to be effective in

accomplishing the objectives of the

project, the Secretary considers the

extent to which the plan for

development, clinical testing, and

evaluation of new devices and

technology is likely to yield significant

products or techniques, including

consideration of the extent to which:

(i) The proposed project will use the

most effective and appropriate

technology available in developing the

new device or technique (3 points);

(ii) The proposed development is

based on a sound conceptual model that

demonstrates an awareness of the stateof-the-art in technology (4 points);

(iii) The new device or technique will

be developed and tested in an

appropriate environment (3 points);

(iv) The new device or technique is

likely to be cost-effective and useful (3

points);

(v) The new device or technique has

the potential for commercial or private

manufacture, marketing, and

distribution of the product (4 points);

and

(vi) The proposed development efforts

include adequate quality controls and,

as appropriate, repeated testing of

products (3 points).

(e) Design of training activities (4

points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the extent

to which the design of training activities

is likely to be effective in accomplishing

the objectives of the project.

(2) In determining the extent to which

the design is likely to be effective in

accomplishing the objectives of the

project, the Secretary considers the

extent to which the type, extent, and

quality of the proposed clinical and

laboratory research experience,

including the opportunity to participate

in advanced-level research, are likely to

develop highly qualified researchers (4

points).

(f) Design of dissemination activities

(7 points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the extent

to which the design of dissemination

activities is likely to be effective in

accomplishing the objectives of the

project.

(2) In determining the extent to which

the design is likely to be effective in

accomplishing the objectives of the

project, the Secretary considers the

following factors:

(i) The extent to which the materials

to be disseminated are likely to be

effective and usable, including

consideration of their quality, clarity,

variety, and format (5 points).

(ii) The extent to which the

information to be disseminated will be

accessible to individuals with

disabilities (2 point).

(g) Design of utilization activities (3

points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the extent

to which the design of utilization

activities is likely to be effective in

accomplishing the objectives of the

project.

(2) In determining the extent to which

the design is likely to be effective in

accomplishing the objectives of the

project, the Secretary considers the

extent to which the potential new users

of the information or technology have a

practical use for the information and are

likely to adopt the practices or use the

information or technology, including

new devices (3 points).

(h) Plan of operation (4 points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the

quality of the plan of operation.

(2) In determining the quality of the

plan of operation, the Secretary

considers the adequacy of the plan of

operation to achieve the objectives of

the proposed project on time and within

budget, including clearly defined

responsibilities, and timelines for

accomplishing project tasks (4 points).

(i) Collaboration (4 points Total).

(1) The Secretary considers the

quality of collaboration.

(2) In determining the quality of

collaboration, the Secretary considers

the extent to which the applicant’s

proposed collaboration with one or

more agencies, organizations, or

institutions is likely to be effective in

achieving the relevant proposed

activities of the project. (4 points).

(j) Adequacy and reasonableness of

the budget (4 points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the

adequacy and the reasonableness of the

proposed budget.

(2) In determining the adequacy and

the reasonableness of the proposed

budget, the Secretary considers the

following factors:

(i) The extent to which the costs are

reasonable in relation to the proposed

project activities (2 point).

(ii) The extent to which the budget for

the project, including any subcontracts,

is adequately justified to support the

proposed project activities (2 points).

(k) Plan of evaluation (8 points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the

quality of the plan of evaluation.

(2) In determining the quality of the

plan of evaluation, the Secretary

32688 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

considers the extent to which the plan

of evaluation provides for periodic

assessment of progress toward the

following factors:

(i) Implementing the plan or

operation; (4 points); and

(ii) Achieving the project’s intended

outcomes and expected impacts (4

points).

(l) Project staff (8 points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the

quality of the project staff.

(2) In determining the quality of the

project staff, the Secretary considers the

extent to which the applicant

encourages applications for employment

from persons who are members of

groups that have traditionally been

underrepresented based on race, color,

national origin, gender, age, or disability

(2 point).

(3) In addition, the Secretary

considers the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the key

personnel and other key staff have

appropriate training and experience in

disciplines required to conduct all

proposed activities (3 points).

(ii) The extent to which the

commitment of staff time is adequate to

accomplish all the proposed activities of

the project (3 points).

(m) Adequacy and accessibility of

resources (5 points total).

(1) The Secretary considers the

adequacy and accessibility of the

applicant’s resources to implement the

proposed project.

(2) In determining the adequacy and

accessibility of resources, the Secretary

considers the following factors:

(i) The extent to which the applicant

is committed to provide adequate

facilities, equipment, other resources,

including administrative support, and

laboratories, if appropriate (2 points).

(ii) The extent to which the applicant

has appropriate access to clinical

populations and organizations

representing individuals with

disabilities to support advanced clinical

rehabilitation research (2 point).

(iii) The extent to which the facilities,

equipment, and other resources are

appropriately accessible to individuals

with disabilities who may use the

facilities, equipment, and other

resources of the project (1 point).

Additional Selection Criterion

We will use the selection criteria in

34 CFR 350.54 to evaluate applications

under this program. The maximum

score for all the criteria is 100 points;

however, we will also use the following

criterion so that up to an additional 10

points may be earned by an applicant

for a total possible score of 110 points.

Up to 10 points could be added based

on the extent to which an application

includes effective strategies for

employing and advancing in

employment qualified individuals with

disabilities in projects awarded under

these absolute priorities. In determining

the effectiveness of those strategies, we

will consider the applicant’s prior

success, as described in the application,

in employing and advancing in

employment qualified individuals with

disabilities.

Thus, for purposes of this competitive

preference, applicants can be awarded

up to a total of 10 points in addition to

those awarded under the published

selection criteria for these priorities.

That is, an applicant meeting this

competitive preference could earn a

maximum total of 110 points.

Instructions for Application Narrative

We will reject without consideration

or evaluation any application that

proposes a project funding level that

exceeds the stated maximum award

amount per year (See 34 CFR 75.104(b)).

We strongly recommend the

following:

(1) a one-page abstract;

(2) an Application Narrative (i.e., Part

III that addresses the selection criteria

that will be used by reviewers in

evaluating individual proposals) of no

more 125 pages for Project applications,

double-spaced (no more than 3 lines per

vertical inch) 8′′ x 11′′ pages (on one side

only) with one inch margins (top,

bottom, and sides). The application

narrative page limit recommendation

does not apply to: Part I—the

electronically scannable form; Part II—

the budget section (including the

narrative budget justification); and Part

IV—the assurances and certifications;

and (3) a font no smaller than a 12-point

font and an average character density no

greater than 14 characters per inch.

Instructions for Transmittal of

Applications

If you want to apply for a grant and

be considered for funding, you must

meet the following deadline

requirements:

(a) If You Send Your Application by

Mail.

You must mail the original and two

copies of the application on or before

the deadline date to: U.S. Department of

Education, Application Control Center,

Attention: CFDA #84.133E (Applicant

must insert priority name), Washington,

DC 20202–4725.

You must show one of the following

as proof of mailing:

(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service

postmark.

(2) A legible mail receipt with the

date of mailing stamped by the U.S.

Postal Service.

(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or

receipt from a commercial carrier.

(4) Any other proof of mailing

acceptable to the Secretary.

If you mail an application through the

U.S. Postal Service, we do not accept

either of the following as proof of

mailing:

(1) A private metered postmark.

(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by

the U.S.Postal Service.

(b) If You Deliver Your Application by

Hand

You or your courier must hand

deliver the original and two copies of

the application by 4:30 p.m.

(Washington, DC time) on or before the

deadline date to: U.S. Department of

Education, Application Control Center,

Attention: CFDA #84.133E (Applicant

must insert priority name), Room #3633,

Regional Office Building #3, 7th and D

Streets, SW, Washington, DC.

The Application Control Center

accepts application Deliveries daily

between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.

(Washington, DC time), except

Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal

holidays. The Center accepts

application deliveries through the D

Street entrance only. A person

delivering an application must show

identification to enter the building.

Notes:

(1) The U.S. Postal Service does not

uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before

relying on this method, an applicant should

check with its local post office.

(2) If you send your application by mail or

if you or your courier deliver it by hand, the

Application Control Center will mail a Grant

Application Receipt Acknowledgment to

you. If you do not receive the notification of

application receipt with 15 days from the

date of mailing the application, you should

call the U.S. Department of Education

Application Control Center at (202) 708–

9493.

(3) You must indicate on the envelope

and—if not provided by the Department—in

Item 3 of the Application for Federal

Assistance (ED Form 424; revised November

12, 1999) the CFDA number—and letter, if

any—of the competition under which you are

submitting your application.

Application Forms and Instructions

The Appendix to this application is

divided into four parts. These parts are

organized in the same manner that the

submitted application should be

organized. These parts are as follows:

PART I: Application for Federal

Assistance (ED 424 (Rev. 11/12/99)) and

instructions.

PART II: Budget Form—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524) and

instructions.

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32689

PART III: Application Narrative.

Additional Materials

Estimated Public Reporting Burden.

Assurances—Non-Construction

Programs (Standard Form 424B).

Certification Regarding Lobbying,

Debarment, Suspension, and Other

Responsibility Matters: and Drug-Free

Work-Place Requirements (ED Form 80–

0013).

Certification Regarding Debarment,

Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary

Exclusion: Lower Tier Covered

Transactions (ED Form 80–0014) and

instructions. (NOTE: ED Form GCS–014

is intended for the use of primary

participants and should not be

transmitted to the Department.)

Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

(Standard Form LLL (Rev. 7–97)) if

applicable) and instructions.

You may submit information on a

photocopy of the application and budget

forms, the assurances, and the

certifications. However, the application

form, the assurances, and the

certifications must each have an original

signature. We will not award a grant

unless we have received a completed

application form.

Electronic Access to This Document

You may view this document, as well

as all other Department of Education

documents published in the Federal

Register, in text or Adobe Portable

Document Format (PDF) on the Internet

at the following site: www.ed.gov/

legislation/FedRegister. To use PDF you

must have Adobe Acrobat Reader,

which is available free at the previous

site. If you have questions about using

PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing

Office (GPO), toll free at 1–888–293–

6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at

(202) 512–1530.

Note: The official version of this document

is the document published in the Federal

Register. Free Internet access to the official

edition of the Federal Register and the Code

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO

Access at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/

index.html

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Numbers: 84.133E, Rehabilitation

Engineering Research Centers)

Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and

764(b)(3).

Dated: June 12, 2001.

Francis V. Corrigan,

Deputy Director, National Institute on

Disability and Rehabilitation Research.

Appendix

Apllication forms and Instructions

Applicants are advised to reproduce and

complete the application forms in this

Section. Applicants are required to submit an

original and two copies of each application

as provided in this Section. However,

applicants are encouraged to submit an

original and seven copies of each application

in order to facilitate the peer review process

and minimize copying errors.

Frequent Questions

1. Can I Get an Extension of the Due Date?

No! On rare occasions the Department of

Education may extend a closing date for all

applicants. If that occurs, a notice of the

revised due date is published in the Federal

Register. However, there are no extensions or

exceptions to the due date made for

individual applicants.

2. What Should Be Included in the

Application?

The application should include a project

narrative, vitae of key personnel, and a

budget, as well as the Assurances forms

included in this package. Vitae of staff or

consultants should include the individual’s

title and role in the proposed project, and

other information that is specifically

pertinent to this proposed project. The

budgets for both the first year and all

subsequent project years should be included.

If collaboration with another organization

is involved in the proposed activity, the

application should include assurances of

participation by the other parties, including

written agreements or assurances of

cooperation. It is not useful to include

general letters of support or endorsement in

the application.

If the applicant proposes to use unique

tests or other measurement instruments that

are not widely known in the field, it would

be helpful to include the instrument in the

application.

Many applications contain voluminous

appendices that are not helpful and in many

cases cannot even be mailed to the reviewers.

It is generally not helpful to include such

things as brochures, general capability

statements of collaborating organizations,

maps, copies of publications, or descriptions

of other projects completed by the applicant.

3. What Format Should Be Used for the

Application?

NIDRR generally advises applicants that

they may organize the application to follow

the selection criteria that will be used. The

specific review criteria vary according to the

specific program, and are contained in this

Consolidated Application Package.

4. May I Submit Applications to More Than

One NIDRR Program Competition or More

Than One Application to a Program?

Yes, you may submit applications to any

program for which they are responsive to the

program requirements. You may submit the

same application to as many competitions as

you believe appropriate. You may also

submit more than one application in any

given competition.

5. What Is the Allowable Indirect Cost Rate?

The limits on indirect costs vary according

to the program and the type of application.

An applicant for an RRTC is limited to an

indirect rate of 15%. An applicant for a

Disability and Rehabilitation Research

Project should limit indirect charges to the

organization’s approved indirect cost rate. If

the organization does not have an approved

indirect cost rate, the application should

include an estimated actual rate.

6. Can Profitmaking Businesses Apply for

Grants?

Yes. However, for-profit organizations will

not be able to collect a fee or profit on the

grant, and in some programs will be required

to share in the costs of the project.

7. Can Individuals Apply for Grants?

No. Only organizations are eligible to apply

for grants under NIDRR programs. However,

individuals are the only entities eligible to

apply for fellowships.

8. Can NIDRR Staff Advise Me Whether My

Project Is of Interest to NIDRR or Likely To

Be Funded?

No. NIDRR staff can advise you of the

requirements of the program in which you

propose to submit your application.

However, staff cannot advise you of whether

your subject area or proposed approach is

likely to receive approval.

9. How Do I Assure That My Application

Will Be Peferred to the Most Appropriate

Panel for Review?

Applicants should be sure that their

applications are referred to the correct

competition by clearly including the

competition title and CFDA number,

including alphabetical code, on the Standard

Form 424, and including a project title that

describes the project.

10. How Soon After Submitting My

Application Can I Find Out if it Will Be

Funded?

The time from closing date to grant award

date varies from program to program.

Generally speaking, NIDRR endeavors to

have awards made within five to six months

of the closing date. Unsuccessful applicants

generally will be notified within that time

frame as well. For the purpose of estimating

a project start date, the applicant should

estimate approximately six months from the

closing date, but no later than the following

September 30.

32690 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

11. Can I Call NIDRR To Find Out if My

Application Is Being Funded?

No. When NIDRR is able to release

information on the status of grant

applications, it will notify applicants by

letter. The results of the peer review cannot

be released except through this formal

notification.

12. If My Application Is Successful, Can I

Assume I Will Get the Requested Budget

Amount in Subsequent Years?

No. Funding in subsequent years is subject

to availability of funds and project

performance.

13. Will All Approved Applications Be

Funded?

No. It often happens that the peer review

panels approve for funding more applications

than NIDRR can fund within available

resources. Applicants who are approved but

not funded are encouraged to consider

submitting similar applications in future

competitions.

BILLING CODE 4000–01–U

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32691

32692 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32693

32694 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32695

32696 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32697

32698 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

BILLING CODE 4000–01–C

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32699

Public reporting burden for these

collections of information is estimated to

average 30 hours per response, including the

time for reviewing instructions, searching

existing data sources, gathering and

maintaining the data needed, and completing

and reviewing the collection of information.

Send comments regarding this burden

estimate or any other aspect of these

collections of information, including

suggestions for reducing this burden, to: the

U.S. Department of Education, Information

Management and Compliance Division,

Washington, DC 20202–4651; and to the

Office of Management and Budget,

Paperwork Reduction Project 1820–0027,

Washington, DC 20503.

Rehabilitation Engineering Research

Centers (CFDA No. 84.133E) 34 CFR part 350

Subpart B.

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P

32700 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32701

32702 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32703

32704 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32705

32706 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

[FR Doc. 01–15155 Filed 6–14–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000–01–C