CFTC Letter 03-30

CFTC letter No. 03-30

July 16, 2003

Exemption

Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight

July 16, 2003 

Re: Request for Exemption from Rule 155.4(a) 

Dear : 

This is in response to your letter dated April 22, 2003, to the Division of Trading and Markets of the 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission).[1] By your correspondence, you request on 

behalf of yourself and “X”, a registered introducing broker (IB), that the Commission grant an 

exemption from Rule 155.4(a)[2], which generally requires that each IB establish and enforce internal 

controls to ensure, to the extent possible, that each order received from a customer that is executable at 

or near the market price is transmitted to the futures commission merchant (FCM) carrying the account 

of the customer before any order in the same commodity for any proprietary account or any other 

account in which an affiliated person has an interest. 

Based upon your representations, we understand the facts to be as follows. Your firm is an IB 

guaranteed by “Y”. Your firm has clients that follow the trading systems devised by registered 

Commodity Trading Advisors. Your firm generally places these orders together in one bunched order 

with proprietary orders. You are requesting an exemption from Commission Rule 155.4(a) so that 

customer and proprietary account orders may be bunched contemporaneously. You state that your firm 

uses a standard procedure to allocate orders when you receive split fills. You note that, pursuant to Rule 

155.4(a), the customer’s order is filled first and the proprietary account is at a disadvantage. You would 

disclose to your customers that you include proprietary accounts in the same bunched order as the 

customers. 

As the Commission has stated, the Part 155 Rules are intended to prevent FCMs and IBs and their 

affiliated persons from using their knowledge of customer orders to the customer’s disadvantage and 

have helped the Commission to deter such practices as, among others, “front-running,” and “trading 

ahead.”

[3] Rule 155.4(a)(1) requires that IBs establish and enforce internal controls to insure that IBs and 

their employees do not take advantage of their relationship with customers by using their knowledge of 

customer orders to trade ahead of or against the interests of such customers for their own benefit or that 

of their preferred customers. 

The Commission has determined to deny your request. Rule 155.4 was patterned after Rule 155.3,[4]

which requires that FCMs establish and enforce internal controls “to insure that FCMs and their 

file:///S|/Website%20Management/LegacyDataCopyasof2010-04-21/tm/letters/03letters/tm03-30.htm (1 of 3) [5/6/2010 5:38:17 PM]
CFTC Letter 03-30

employees do not take advantage of their relationship with customers by using their knowledge of 

customer orders to trade ahead of or against the interests of such customers for their own benefit or that 

of their preferred customers.”

[5] Rule 155.4 was designed “to ensure that the ‘customer first’ principle, 

which applies to orders given to an FCM, is extended to an introducing broker as well.”

[6] The 

Commission promulgated Rule 155.4 to deter IBs and their affiliated persons from using their 

knowledge of customer orders to the customer’s disadvantage. The Commission has stated that Rules 

155.3 and 155.4 deter abusive customer practices such as “front running” and “bucketing.”

[7] Following 

the success of Rules 155.3 and 155.4, the Commission recently expanded Rule 155’s requirements to 

certain parties trading on derivatives transaction execution facilities.[8]

In addition, when the Commission recently expanded its rules concerning bunching of discretionary 

orders by third-party account controllers, it specifically denied extending the rule’s coverage to IBs.[9]

Therefore, following the Commission’s objectives in creating Rule 155 and in light of the important 

customer protection issues at stake, the Commission does not find that it is appropriate to grant an 

exemption from Rule 155.4(a). 

If you would like to discuss this matter further, please feel free to contact Lawrence B. Patent, Deputy 

Director, or Trabue Bland, attorney, both in the Commission’s Division of Clearing and Intermediary 

Oversight, at (202) 418-5439 or (202) 418-5466, respectively. 

Very truly yours, 

Jean A. Webb 

Secretary of the Commission 

[1] Your letter was addressed to the Director, Division of Trading and Markets. The Commission 

reorganized last year and the functions formerly performed by the Division of Trading and Markets, 

which has been eliminated, are now performed by two new Divisions, the Division of Clearing and 

Intermediary Oversight and the Division of Market Oversight. Rule 155.10 gives the Commission the 

authority to grant an exemption from Part 155. This authority has not been specifically delegated to the 

Division of Trading and Markets, and consequently the Commission, rather than any staff unit, is 

responding to your request. 

[2] 17 CFR 155.4(a) (2003). 

[3] 66 Fed. Reg. 53510, 53513-53514 (October 23, 2001). 

[4] 17 CFR 155.3 (2003). 

file:///S|/Website%20Management/LegacyDataCopyasof2010-04-21/tm/letters/03letters/tm03-30.htm (2 of 3) [5/6/2010 5:38:17 PM]
CFTC Letter 03-30

[5] 41 Fed. Reg. 56134, 56139 n. 18 (December 23, 1976). 

[6] 48 Fed. Reg. 14933, 14954 (April 6, 1983). 

[7] 66 Fed. Reg. 53510, 53513-53514 (October 23, 2001). 

[8] Id.

[9] 68 Fed. Reg. 34790 (June 11, 2003). In adopting the rule change, the Commission required thirdparty account managers to adopt a standard that allocations be fair and equitable and make certain 

information available to customers concerning trading. As IBs were not included in the definition of 

“account manager,” these requirements are not applicable to IBs. 

file:///S|/Website%20Management/LegacyDataCopyasof2010-04-21/tm/letters/03letters/tm03-30.htm (3 of 3) [5/6/2010 5:38:17 PM]