alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of -- )

)

HDT Expeditionary Systems, Inc. )

)

 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Richard W. Arnholt, Esq.

Sylvia Yi, Esq.

 Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Karin S. Wiechmann, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: April 27, 2020

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62354, Appeal of HDT 

Expeditionary Systems, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: April 27, 2020

ASBCA No. 62354

Under Contract No. N68335-10-D-0027

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit a(6)

Supplement To
Trust Instrument of
Daily Tax-Exempt Money Fund

This Supplement to the Trust Instrument of Daily Tax-Exempt Money
Fund, (the "Trust"), dated June 20, 1991 is adopted pursuant to a
resolution of the shareholders adopted at a meeting on May 9, 1997 as
follows:

1. The second paragraph of Section 7.01 of the Trust Instrument is
amended and restated as  follows:

 VOTING POWERS.

Section 7.01. On any matter submitted to a vote of the Shareholders,
all Shares shall be voted by individual Series, except (i) when
required by the 1940 Act, Shares shall be voted in the aggregate and
not by individual Series; and (ii) when the Trustees have determined
that the matter affects the interests of one or more Series, then the
Shareholders of all such Series shall be entitled to vote thereon.
The Trustees may also determine that a matter affects only the
interests of one or more classes of a Series, in which case any such
matters shall be voted on by such class or classes.  A Sshareholder of
each Sseries shall be entitled to one vote for each dollar of net
asset value (number of shares owned times net asset value per share)
of such Series, on any matter on which such Sshareholder is entitled
to vote and each fractional dollar amount shall be entitled to a
proportionate fractional vote.  There shall be no cumulative voting in
the election of Trustees.  Shares may be voted in person or by proxy,
or in any manner provided for in the Bylaws.  A proxy may be given in
writing.  The Bylaws may provide that proxies may also, or may
instead, be given by any electronic or telecommunications device or in
any other manner.  Notwithstanding anything else herein or in the
Bylaws, in the event a proposal by anyone other than the officers or
Trustees of the Trust is submitted to a vote of the Shareholders of
one or more Series or of the Trust, or in the event of any proxy
contest or proxy solicitation or proposal in opposition to any
proposal by the officers or Trustees of the Trust, Shares may be voted
only in person or by written proxy.  Until Shares are issued, the
Trustees may exercise all rights of Shareholders and may take any
action required or permitted by law, this Trust Instrument or any
Bylaws of the Trust, to be taken by Shareholders.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being a trustee of the Trust,
has executed this instrument.

     /s/ J. Gary Burkhead
    J. Gary Burkhead, as Trustee and
                      not individually.

dated as of: May 9, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Diversified Industries,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Amy Gallo, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

4/13/05                /s/ Amy Gallo
Date                   -----------------------------------------
                       Amy Gallo, Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biomedical Library Review Committee, June 14, 2001, 8:30 a.m. to June 15, 2001, 5:00 p.m. National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Board Room, Bethesda, MD 20894 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 12, 2001, 66FR18962.                

On June 14, 2001 the meeting will be closed to the public from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon; open to the public from 12:00 noon to 2:30 p.m.; and closed to the public from 2:30 p.m. to adjournment. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

Dated: June 13, 2001.

Anna P. Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy, NIH.

[FR Doc. 01-15466  Filed 6-19-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40826 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LARRY BENARD HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-13-11

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1997 Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry Benard Holland appeals his guilty-plea conviction to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and distribution of cocaine base. A notice of appeal must “designate the judgment, or order or part thereof appealed from.” Fed. R. App. P. 3(c). Although Holland stated in his notice of appeal that he was appealing “the order regarding the Government’s Motion for Downward Departure,No. 96-40826 - 2 - and its effect on sentencing entered in this action on the 5th day of August, 1996,” he argues in his appellate brief the type of sentencing guidelines issue which he reserved as his right to appeal. This demonstration of an intent to appeal his sentence, combined with the lack of prejudice to the Government, who has already replied in its appellate brief to Holland’s sentencing issue, allows this court to liberally construe Holland’s notice of appeal such that it is not jurisdictionally defective for failing to correctly designate the ruling from which it is appealing. See United States v. Winn , 948 F.2d 145, 154 (5th Cir. 1991). Because all of the acts of his coconspirators were reasonably foreseeable to him as relevant conduct, the district court did not commit plain error by calculating as the amount of drugs attributable to Holland, the entire amount of drugs seized or obtained during the course of the conspiracy. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B); United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
Order filed, January 3, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00616-CV

____________

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION 

OF C.H., Appellant

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 3

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 21-CMH-007856

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 29, 2021. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Robin Rosen, the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned  officer of  Conversion  Services  International,  Inc.,  a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's
knowledge and belief, that:

      (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the ten months  December 31, 2003
(the "Form  10-KSB") of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information  contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents,  in all
materials  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  April 14, 2004               /s/ Scott Newman
     ------------------------       --------------------------------------------
                                    Scott Newman, Chief Executive Officer
                                    since January 30, 2004


      This certification  shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the  Securities  Exchange Act, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  Such  certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
Exhibit (d)(125)

**SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENT**

**between**

**FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY**

**and**

**FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (Far East) INC.**

**and**

**FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST ON BEHALF OF**
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3347]


State of Texas

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on June 
9, 2001, I find that the following Counties in the State of Texas 
constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by Tropical Storm 
Allison occurring on June 5, 2001 and continuing: Anderson, Angelina, 
Brazoria, Cherokee, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Hardin, Harris, 
Houston, Jasper, Jefferson, Leon, Liberty, Madison, Montgomery, 
Nacogdoches, Newton, Orange, Polk, Sabine, San Augustine, San Jacinto, 
Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Tyler, and Walker Counties. Applications for 
loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed 
until the close of business on August 8, 2001, and for loans for 
economic injury until the close of business on March 8, 2002 at the 
address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small 
Business Administration, Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter 
Blvd., Suite 102, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed 
until the specified date at the above location: Austin, Brazos, 
Freestone, Henderson, Limestone, Gregg, Grimes, Matagorda, Navarro, 
Panola, Robertson, Rusk, Upshur, Van Zandt, Waller, Wharton and Wood 
Counties in Texas; Beauregard, Calcasieu, Cameron, DeSoto, Sabine and 
Vernon Parishes in Louisiana.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere.................      6.625
    Homeowners without credit available elsewhere............      3.312
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere.................      8.000
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without                  4.000
   creditavailable elsewhere.................................
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit          7.125
   available elsewhere.......................................
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without           4.000
   credit available elsewhere................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 334708. 
For economic injury the numbers assigned are 9L8600 for Texas and 
9L8700 for Louisiana.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 11, 2001.
James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-15121 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
SYMONS INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., et al., petitioners, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY.

No. 16-220.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors
Digital Generation Systems, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-25701, 333-04676, 333-60611 and 333-65978) on
Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-70045, 333-65980 and 333-112122) on Form S-3 of Digital Generation
Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Digital Generation Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Digital Generation Systems, Inc.

KPMG
LLP

Dallas,
TX
March 27, 2006

---



QuickLinks
TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., petitioner, v. Michelle K. LEE, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office.

No. 16-446.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Derrick RANKINE, petitioner, v. Michael OVERMYER, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Forest, et al.

No. 15-9234.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Page 1 of 1 

secretary COMMENT 

From: L.C. Couch [lccouch@sbcglobal.net] ··, ..... 

Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 3:05 PM 

To: secretary 

Subject: Request to permit clearing of certain OTC agricultural swaps 

I am against any process that will take hedging of commodities away from the commodity futures market . On 

6/24/08 the index funds were long 896,140,000 bu. of cbot soft wheat against a one year total USA production of 

477,000,000 bu. Until this abuse is corrected, any process that removes product away from the futures market will 

aid in the destroying of the grain infrastructure presently taking place. 

Lonnie Couch 

7114/2008
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)**

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Investment Trust  (the "Trust") onForm N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of suchofficer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Report.

Dated:	June 25, 2014

Dated:	June 25, 2014

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typedform within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: February 25, 2016 521070 

________________________________

ELENA T. LEVENSON et al.,

Respondents,

v

ESTATE OF NICK LAVIERO et al., MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendants,

and

TERESA HORNUNG RUDOLPH et al.,

Appellants.

________________________________

Calendar Date: January 7, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose and Lynch, JJ.

__________

Young/Sommer LLC, Albany (Michael J. Moore of counsel), for

appellants.

The Ayers Law Firm, PLLC, Palatine Bridge (Kenneth L. Ayers

of counsel), for respondents.

__________

Rose, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Melkonian, J.),

entered January 26, 2015 in Ulster County, which, in an action

pursuant to RPAPL article 15, denied, among other things, a

motion by defendants Teresa Hornung Rudolph and Axel Rudolph to

compel joinder of certain parties.

Plaintiffs commenced this action to quiet title to a twoacre parcel of real property located in the Town of Shandaken,

Ulster County (hereinafter the disputed property). Defendants

Teresa Hornung Rudolph and Axel Rudolph (hereinafter collectively
-2- 521070 

referred to as defendants) also assert title to the disputed

property, but plaintiffs allege that defendants' claim is based

upon a deed actually describing a separate parcel, which is

located half a mile away from the disputed property. Defendants

thereafter moved to join the record owners of the separate parcel

as necessary parties. Supreme Court denied defendants' motion,

and this appeal ensued. 

We affirm. In an action to quiet title, joinder of a party

is necessary only when "it appears to the court that a person not

a party to the action may have an estate or interest in the real

property which may in any manner be affected by the judgment"

(RPAPL 1511 [2]; see CPLR 1001 [a]; Sorbello v Birchez Assoc.,

LLC, 61 AD3d 1225, 1226 [2009]). The function of the judgment in

such an action is to resolve each party's claim to the disputed

property (see RPAPL 1521 [1]; Glenn Acres Tree Farm, Inc. v Town

of Hartwick Historical Socy., Inc., 84 AD3d 1529, 1530 [2011];

Keller v Village of Castleton-on-Hudson, 173 AD2d 979, 979

[1991]). Here, plaintiffs do not make a claim to the separate

parcel that they contend is actually described in defendants'

deed. Rather, plaintiffs raise the point only to show an alleged

weakness in defendants' claim to the disputed property. Nor do

plaintiffs seek a judgment resolving the question of who owns the

separate parcel. Accordingly, the judgment in this action will

have no bearing upon the validity or invalidity of defendants'

interest in the separate parcel. Inasmuch as the record owners

of the separate parcel will not be inequitably affected by the

judgment in this action, they are not necessary parties (see

Ellison Hgts. Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ellison Hgts. LLC, 112

AD3d 1302, 1305 [2013]; compare Sorbello v Birchez Assoc., LLC,

61 AD3d at 1226). 

Peters, P.J., Garry and Lynch, JJ., concur.
-3- 521070 

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000745467
<NAME> MERIDIAN FUND, INC.
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 2
   <NAME> MERIDIAN VALUE FUND

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       23,070,117
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      28,917,482
<RECEIVABLES>                                  252,083
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               5,823,517
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                               914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,993,996
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                        33,269
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                       28,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                             61,956
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    27,021,672
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        1,539,720
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        1,117,589
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  (1,036,038)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                      3,099,042
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     5,847,364
<NET-ASSETS>                                34,932,040
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                               71,211
<INTEREST-INCOME>                               80,988
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                 216,040
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                       (63,841)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     2,815,578
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                    1,300,135
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        4,051,872
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                    (857,416)
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                   (2,220,086)
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        432,369
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    137,658
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            127,423
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                      10,019,585
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      (114,781)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    2,503,549
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          176,137
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                287,946
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                        28,550,131
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            22.29
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                  (.01)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           2.78
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                       (2.37)
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              22.69
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   1.52


</TABLE>