alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment No. 2”) is made and entered into by and between Enstar Group Limited (the “Company”) and Richard J. Harris (“Executive”) as of March 24, 2016.  
BACKGROUND
WHEREAS, Executive and the Company are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of May 1, 2007, as amended by certain letter agreements dated May 4, 2011, April 19, 2012 and August 11, 2014 (the “Original Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, Executive and the Company entered into an amendment to the Original Agreement on May 12, 2015 (“Amendment No. 1”).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree that Section 9 of Amendment No. 1 shall hereby be replaced in its entirety with the following:
“9.          Noncompetition; Non-Solicitation.  Notwithstanding Paragraph A on Exhibit A to the Existing Agreement, the “Restriction Period” shall (a) expire with respect to Paragraph A on Exhibit A on the later of June 30, 2016 or the termination of Executive’s employment with the Company, and (b) expire with respect to Paragraph C on Exhibit A on March 31, 2017.”
*          *          *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the dates set forth below.


ENSTAR GROUP LIMITED




		
	By: /s/ Dominic Silvester
	/s/ Richard J. Harris


		
	Name:
	Dominic Silvester                    Richard J. Harris


		
	Title:
	Chief Executive Officer






		
	Date: March 24, 2016
	Date: March 24, 2016
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

ALPHONSO GRIFFIN, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 181 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED. 

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00411-CR

Pamela Hutchins, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 3020524, HONORABLE JON N. WISSER, JUDGE PRESIDING

Sentence was imposed in this cause on May 17, 2002. There was no motion for new trial. 

The deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore June 17. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Notice of appeal 

was filed on June 18. No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. 

 There is no indication that notice of appeal was properly mailed to the district clerk within the time 

prescribed by rule 26.2(a). Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to 

dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See 

Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
2

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

Lee Yeakel, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 26, 2002

Do Not Publish
Terry NORRIS, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 16-104.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

*374Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division denied.
Page 1 of1 

secretary 

From: Marcie Forsyth [mjfnj@comcast.net] 

Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 10:00 AM 

To: secretary ,· 

Subject: Trading off the centralized marketplace 

COMMENT 

To whom it may concern, 

In regards for trading off the centralized market.! have been a broker and a trader for my own account for more 

than 17 years. My experience to date of block trading has been the total lack of true price discovery in the market 

place. The low requirement size and non competitive nature of these trades hurts our industry and the customers 

who use them. Over my career I've seen trading volumes and liquidity increase. This evolution has been good for 

all those in our industry. The requirement size and non competitive nature of the these block trades needs to be 

modified in the best interest of all those concerned to ensure the viability of the marketplace. 

Sincerely, 

John B. Forsyth 

Jlbnj@comcast.net 

0 

-q 

n 

0 -., 

-1 ~5 :::J 

..:::: ~-:~ [11 

rq : .. :1,~ (I) "-....~ 

rr1 =--~ ~ (J :l> (") '~ ;:a :::;: . n 

jij 0 

-1 

:> ':9 

:::a V1 

> 

......... \ "cO 

, . 

11117/2008
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Peter Wardle, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Protosource Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer , including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures , as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small
business issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting..

November 10, 2006

/s/ PETER WARDLE
----------------
Peter Wardle
Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Army Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.7(b)(1)(i), announcement is made of a prospective exclusive license in each of the following countries covered by European Patent Office application number 94926514.4, title “Concrete Armor Unit to Protect Coastal and Hydraulic Structures and Shorelines.” The countries are: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland.

# DATES:

Written objections must be filed not later than August 14, 2001.

# ADDRESSES:

U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199, ATTN: CEWES-OC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Phil Stewart (601) 634-4113, e-mail                        *stewarp@exl.wes.army.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Jeffrey A. Melby and George F. Turk invented The Concrete Armor Unit. Rights to the patent application identified above has been assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army. The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army intends to grant an exclusive license for all fields of use, in the manufacture, use, and sale in the territories and possessions, including territorial waters of Russia to W.F. Baird and Associates, a Delaware corporation with principal offices at 2981 Yarmouth Greenway, Madison, Wisconsin 53711. Pursuant to 37 CFR 404.7(b)(1)(I), any interested party may file a written objection to this prospective exclusive license agreement.

Richard L. Frenette,

Counsel.

[FR Doc. 01-15189 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
No. 617.

#### Allen *v.*Cloisters Building Corp. et al.

January 6, 1936.

*Messrs. Meyer Abrams*and *Max Shulman*for petitioner.

*Mr. Walter E. Beebe*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
#### In re COLE.

(District Court, D. Rhode Island.

July 12, 1909.)

No. 506.

Bankruptcy (§ 140*) — Title oe Trustee-Mortgaged Goods — Delivery to Mortgagee — Retention oe Keys.

Where a key to a storeroom containing the mortgaged goods was delivered to the mortgagee, who visited the room, examined the goods, and retained the key, there was a delivery and retention of the goods by the mortgagee, though the mortgagor retained another key; there being no evidence that the mortgagee had knowledge thereof, or that the mortgagor ever visited the storeroom, or exercised any control over the goods.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Dec. Dig. § 140.*]

*298In Bankruptcy.

James H. Rickard, Jr., for appellant.

Mendell W. Crane, for trustee.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes’

BROWN, District Judge.

Upon the facts found by the referee, I am of the opinion that possession of the mortgaged personal property was delivered to and retained by the mortgagee Terlcel.

A key of the storeroom containing the goods was delivered to the mortgagee, who visited the storeroom, examined the goods, and after-wards retained the key. Under the circumstances he was not required to inquire if the mortgagor retained another key, but was entitled to assume that the key given to him for the express purpose of giving him possession of the goods did in fact give him a possession which was exclusive. The mere fact that the mortgagor retained another key, without evidence that he ever visited the storeroom or exercised any control of the goods after delivery of the key to the mortgagee, is insufficient to show that the mortgagee had knowledge of the existence of a second key, or that he consented to a joint possession of the goods.

There was apparently some conflict in the testimony as to whether there was in fact more than one key; but the referee has expressly found that Terkel received from Cole a key to the storeroom, and bases his opinion that there was not a sufficient taking and retaining of possession upon the ground that such possession was as much retained by the mortgagor as the mortgagee, because, each retained a key to the *storeroom.*I see no reason for disturbing the referee’s finding of fact that each retained a key to the storeroom. Under the circumstances, however, the mere retaining of a second key by the mortgagor is insufficient to show that the mortgagee’s possession was not exclusive.

The decision of the referee disallowing.the claim is overruled, and the claim is allowed.
No. 533, Misc.

#### Marion *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir.

Certiorari denied.
H. Res. 1470 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 20, 2010. 

Whereas William S. Richardson was born on December 22, 

1919, and spent most of his childhood in Palama and 

Kaimuki; 

Whereas William S. Richardson was born to a working class 

family of Hawaiian, Chinese, and Caucasian ancestry; 

Whereas William S. Richardson served as a platoon leader in 

the United States Army during World War II and was 

later inducted into the Infantry Officer Candidate School 

Hall of Fame; 

Whereas William S. Richardson served as Lieutenant Governor of Hawaii from 1962–1966; 

Whereas William S. Richardson led the Hawaii Democratic 

Party from 1956–1962; 

Whereas William S. Richardson served as the Chief Justice 

of the Hawaii Supreme Court from 1966–1982; 

Whereas the William S. Richardson School of Law honors his 

leadership by opening educational and professional avenues for the Islands’ most disadvantaged groups; 

Whereas William S. Richardson upheld traditional Hawaiian 

laws and expanded public rights for Native Hawaiians 

and all people in Hawaii; 
2 

•HRES 1470 EH 

Whereas as William S. Richardson was awarded the Spirit of 

Excellence Award from the American Bar Association; 

and 

Whereas, on June 21, 2010, at the age of 90, William S. 

Richardson passed away in Honolulu, Hawaii: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors the life, achievements, and distinguished 

career of Chief Justice William S. Richardson; 

(2) emphasizes that, among his judicial accomplishments, Chief Justice William S. Richardson changed the 

face of higher education in Hawaii by opening avenues 

for the Islands’ most disadvantaged groups and by building a more equitable society for the people of Hawaii; 

and 

(3) recognizes the William S. Richardson School of 

Law, the educational institution that bears his name, as 

a significant part of the legacy of William S. Richardson. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Notices 63447 

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, 

DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference 

Room. 

STATUS: Closed. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Surveillance Matters. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202–418–5084. 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Staff Assistant. 

[FR Doc. E8–25524 Filed 10–22–08; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6351–01–P 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday 

November 28, 2008. 

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, 

DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference 

Room. 

STATUS: Closed. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Surveillance Matters. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202–418–5084. 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Staff Assistant. 

[FR Doc. E8–25525 Filed 10–22–08; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6351–01–P 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday 

November 14, 2008. 

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, 

DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference 

Room. 

STATUS: Closed. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Surveillance Matters. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202–418–5084. 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Staff Assistant. 

[FR Doc. E8–25526 Filed 10–22–08; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6351–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–105] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–105 

with attached transmittal, and policy 

justification. 

Dated: October 15, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
EXHIBIT 32.2






SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teen Education
Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter  ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
L.  Wilson,  President of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that, to my
knowledge:




(1)  The Report fully  complies with
the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The  information  contained  in
the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial  condition and results of
operations of the Company.






Date: May 17, 2010








By: /s/ ROBERT L. WILSON


___________________________


Robert L. Wilson


Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.3

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Marvel  Enterprises,
Inc. (the  "Company")  for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Allen
S.  Lipson,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) the  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                           /s/
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Allen S. Lipson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           June 30, 2003
FfA 

October 9, 2009 

Mr. David A. Stawick 

Secretary 

Received CFTC 

Rec9rds Section 

/b/JD/~1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Latityette Centre 

1155 21 81 Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 

Re: Joint Audit Committee 

Dear Mr. Stawick, 

Futures Industry A~sociation 

2001 Pennsylvania Ave.. NW 

Suite 600 

Washingr.on, fX~ 200Q6;18Z3 

202.466.5460 

202.296.3184 f<IX 

• www.fi.H:uresindustqr.org 

The Futures Industry Association ("FIA'') is writing to request an extension of time in which 

to tlle comments in response to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's ("Commission's'') 

request for comment with respect to the proposed amendments to the agreement submitted by the Joint 

Audit Committee. Without an extension, the Comment period will end on October 14, 2008. 

PIA's regular membership is comprised of approximately 30 of the largest futures commjssion 

merchants in the U.S. As such, they are directly affected by the terms and conditions of the Joint 

Audit Committee Agreement. FIA member firms have not had an opportunity to give the proposed 

amendments the attention they clearly deserve. The notice was published on September ll, 2008 and 

three of the last four wee.ks have been marked by unprecedented financial market turmoil. We 

respectfully request another 30 days, until at least November 14, 2008, to submit a comment letter. 

Thank you tor your consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please contact 

me at (202) 466-5460. 

Sincerely, 

----k~&/¥r4 

cc: Ananda Radhakrishnan, CFTC 

Robert Wasserman, CFTC 

Thomas I. Smith, CFTC 

John Lawton, CFTC 

Tammy Botsford 

Assistant General Counsel
Freddie Balmore CASTILLO, aka Fredis Castillo, petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General.

No. 16-281.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 556.

#### Updike et al. *v.*Manufacturers Trust Co.

December 9, 1935.

*Mr. William S. Siemon*for petitioners.

*Mr. Basil Robillard*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, denied.