alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1*

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Cognex Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 29, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         Date: August 12, 2003

                                   /s/ Robert J. Shillman
                                   ----------------------
                                   Robert J. Shillman
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Chairman of the Board of Directors
                                   (duly authorized officer, principal executive
                                   officer)
Mica Alexander MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA.

No. 16-5839.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED  September 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,771,044
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,367,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,642,640
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      31,348,646
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    178,930,487
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,200,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             230,313,979
<DEPOSITS>                                 148,021,270
<SHORT-TERM>                                54,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,753,182
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,721
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,369,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             230,313,979
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,096,323
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              307,045
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                85,224
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,488,592
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,133,251
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,838,991
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,649,601
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  179,154
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             601,412
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,877,264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,548,015
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,548,015
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   880,781
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,000,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1

 



GMS INC.   INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR   CERTAIN DEFINITIONS FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.01 PAR   VALUE, OF GMS INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation byCthe   hOolder Mhereof iMn persoOn or bNy Attorney upon surrender of this   certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until   countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS   WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by   facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: SIG TO COME SIG   TO COME TITLE TITLE COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER   & TRUST COMPANY (Brooklyn, New York) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY   AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of CUSIP 36251C 10 3 


    




 










The following   abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,   shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to   applicable laws or regulations: UTMA – Custodian TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN – as   tenants in common – as tenants by entireties (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform   Transfers to Minors Act – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not   as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though   not in the above list. For value received hereby sell, assign, and transfer   unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE   (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF   ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate,   and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the   said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of   substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT   MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN   EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.   SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION   (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER   AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.   MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM   (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT   ACCEPTABLE.
No. 683, Misc.

No. 689, Misc.

#### Edgeman *v.*Ohio et al.; and Brown v. Minnesota.

The motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1809/2004

of 18 October 2004         

amending Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 laying down detailed rules for the application of the quota buy-back programme in the raw tobacco sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco (1), and in particular Article 14(a) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following subparagraph is hereby added to Article 36(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98:

‘Producers whose quotas have been bought back under the 2004 harvest shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to 40 % of the premium in 2005. That amount shall be paid before 31 May 2005.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 October 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 70. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2319/2003 (OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 17).

(2)OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 17. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1983/2002 (OJ L 306, 8.11.2002, p. 8).

(3)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 (OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 48).

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-409-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Technical 
Conference

June 7, 2001.

    On July 17, 2000, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (Natural) 
submitted its filing to comply with Order No. 637. Several parties have 
protested various aspects of Natural's filing.
    Take notice that a technical conference to discuss the various 
issues raised by Natural's filing will commence on Tuesday, July 10, 
2001, at 10:00 a.m.
    The technical conference will be held in a room to be designated at 
the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Parties protesting aspects of 
Natural's filing should be prepared to discuss alternatives.
    All interested parties and Staff are permitted to attend.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14850 Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15422]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1171]


Approval for Expansion of Subzone 49D Merck & Company, Inc., 
Plant (Pharmaceuticals); Rahway, New Jersey

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, grantee of 
FTZ 49, has requested authority on behalf of Merck & Company, Inc. 
(Merck), to add capacity and to expand the scope of authority under 
zone procedures within Subzone 49D at the Merck plant in Rahway, New 
Jersey (FTZ Docket 3-2001, filed 1/18/2001);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (66 FR 8195, 1/30/01);
    Whereas, pursuant to section 400.32(b)(1) of the FTZ Board 
regulations (15 CFR 400), the Secretary of Commerce's delegate on the 
FTZ Board has the authority to act for the Board in making decisions 
regarding manufacturing activity within existing zones when the 
proposed activity is the same, in terms of products involved, to 
activity recently approved by the Board and similar in circumstances 
(15 CFR 400.32(b)(1)(i)); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to add capacity and to expand the scope of 
authority under zone procedures within Subzone 49D on behalf of Merck & 
Company, Inc., is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of May 2001.
Faryar Shirzad,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15422 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000869801
<NAME> GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-6
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         374,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               625,160
<PP&E>                                      12,223,291
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,479,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,369,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,369,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,369,423
<SALES>                                        951,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               986,369
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,317,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (331,423)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (331,423)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (331,423)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

KEVIN DOUCETTE,

 Defendant-Appellant.

No. 12-50370

D.C. No. 09-217-GHK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. King, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 9, 2013

Pasadena, California

Before: REINHARDT, KLEINFELD, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Kevin Doucette appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether a district court may modify an

FILED

NOV 12 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1
otherwise final sentence under § 3582. United States v. Wesson, 583 F.3d 728, 730

(9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

Section 3582(c)(2) allows modification of a term of imprisonment when: (1)

the sentence is based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by

the Sentencing Commission; and (2) such reduction is consistent with applicable

policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission. Id. Doucette argues that

he is eligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 750, which made

permanent earlier modifications to the drug quantity table in United States

Sentencing Guideline (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2D1.1 for offenses involving crack cocaine. 

But Doucette was sentenced as a career offender pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. 

Therefore, his sentence was not based on a Guideline range that has been lowered,

and was ineligible for modification under § 3582. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2);

Wesson, 583 F.3d at 731–32.

Because Doucette cannot satisfy the first requirement for a sentence

modification under § 3582(c)(2), we need not consider Doucette’s ex post facto

challenge to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10—the Guideline that sets out the policy statements

relevant to the second requirement for a sentence modification under § 3582(c)(2).

AFFIRMED. 

2
In re Ashish DAVID, petitioner.

No. 16-6175.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	6

<CIK>	0000744822

<NAME>	Fidelity Investment Trust

<SERIES>

	<NUMBER>	11

	<NAME>	Fidelity Overseas Fund

<MULTIPLIER>	1,000



<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>
year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>
oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>
oct-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>
3,413,124
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>
4,526,512
<RECEIVABLES>
55,023
<ASSETS-OTHER>
16,334
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>
0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>
4,597,869
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>
47,291
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>
0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>
68,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>
115,825
<SENIOR-EQUITY>
0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>
2,939,066
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>
104,614
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>
106,128
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>
45,498
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>
0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>
382,958
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>
0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>
1,114,522
<NET-ASSETS>
4,482,044
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>
66,824
<INTEREST-INCOME>
15,672
<OTHER-INCOME>
28
<EXPENSES-NET>
48,682
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>
33,842
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>
434,643
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>
551,091
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>
1,019,576
<EQUALIZATION>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>
20,938
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>
53,393
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>
0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>
105,210
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>
108,779
<SHARES-REINVESTED>
2,055
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>
878,702
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>
17,038
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>
78,029
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>
0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>
0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>
36,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>
0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>
50,354
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>
3,964,152
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>
33.950
<PER-SHARE-NII>
 .320
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>
9.280
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>
 .200
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>
 .510
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>
0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>
42.840
<EXPENSE-RATIO>
127





</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 3, 2020

No. 04-19-00798-CV

Stephen W. MABERY and Damon Thorpe,

Appellants

v.

MORANI RIVER RANCH HOLDINGS LP, Morani GP LLC, Morani River Ranch LLC, 

Kevin L. Reid and Stewards of Wildlife Conservation Inc.,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI03565

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellees’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellees’ Brief is due August 31, 2020.

It is so ORDERED on August 3, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Hakeem SULTAANA, petitioner, v. Peter J. CORRIGAN, Judge, Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, et al.

No. 16-6141.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 28, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### DAVIS, Director General of Railroads, et al. v. ROZENSWEIG et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 4, 1922.)

No. 240.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. Action by Benjamin Rozensweig and Edmund J. Stafford, administrators of the estate of Prances Adlaide Doherty, deceased, against James C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and the named defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

See, also, 280 Fed. 247. Locke, Babcock, Spratt & Hollister, of Buffalo, N. Y.

(Raymond O. Vaughan, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Charles P. O’Neil and Edmund J. Stafford, both of Detroit, Mich., for defendants in error.

Before-ROGERS, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, J. Jeffrey Meder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Cost-U-Less, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2003


/s/ J. Jeffrey Meder
-----------------------------------------
J. Jeffrey Meder
President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 439.

#### Rand *v.*Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. J. B. Faegre*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Reed*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.