alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
December 17, 2007 

David Stawick 

Recel·ved CFTC 

Aeco~s SecUon 1:1pi/o 7 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW . ~ ,. 

Washington, DC 20581 r 

' COMMENT 

Dear Sir, • 

Tempel Grain Elevators, LLP is very concerned about the proposed rule change to increase the 

limits for speculative trading. We have 14 country grain elevators in Southeastern Colorado. 

Colorado had a record wheat harvest this year. As a result, we have our elevators and ground 

piles full of wheat because of the lack of demand for ordinary protein wheat. This lack of 

demand and the futures rally has been very costly for our company, as well as many other grain 

handlers. The industry has been telling us to be patient, as the supply and demand information 

tells the market that our carry over is going to be at historical lows. The market, however, is 

telling us that the terminals are full of wheat, we are over $2.00 too high in the world market, and 

domestic demand is for high protein wheat. Therefore, the cash and futures market don't concur. 

Tempel Grain uses the futures market to hedge purchases and sales of grain. Since the Kansas 

City wheat futures have divorced from the cash market, a large number of hedge shorts are left 

with product that has been artificially overpriced in the world market. Tempel Grain went from 

borrowing 7 million dollars in our biggest year, to borrowing 58 million dollars this year. These 

margin calls and the inability to move our product may very well break our company. 

Tempel Grain asks you to please analyze Section 4a(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act. It 

states: 

Excessive speculation of any commodity under contracts of sale of such commodity for future 

delivery made on or subject to the rules of contract markets or derivatives transaction execution 

facilities causing sudden or unreasonable fluctuations or unwarranted changes in the price of 

such commodity, is an undue and unnecessary burden on interstate commerce in such 

commodity. 

We have good reason to believe that the speculative and fund positions are causing unreasonable 

fluctuations in the wheat market and a great burden on the grain industry. The way I read 

Section 4a(a), the speculative funds are not meant to exude this much power on the market. 

Tempel Grain hopes that you will keep in mind the power this outside money has on markets 

developed to help the industry hedge their product. If in fact there is a shortage of grain; the 

market, by way of basis and product offering, will ration itself. We fear that if these funds and 

specs are allowed to keep adding to their positions, only the large corporations will be able to 

survive these markets. We appreciate your time and would be available to answer any questions 

you might have. Tony Leighty, elevator manager/merchandiser or I can be reached at (719)829-

4408. 

Sincerely yours, 

Kelly Spitzer 

Vice-President 

Tempel Grain Elevators, LLP
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Markus R. Ernst, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 , that:



| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GBS Enterprises Incorporated for the
    fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GBS Enterprises Incorporated.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: March 29, 2013 | /s/Markus R. Ernst                          
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                     | Markus R. Ernst                             
|                     | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>
 
                                                        Exhibit 11
                                                        ----------


                         SYNETIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                      SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                  ---------------------
                                                   1998           1997
                                                  -------       -------
 
Basic earnings from operations.........  (A)      $ 2,004       $ 1,492
                                                          
Assumed conversion of convertible                         
 debentures(1).........................                 -             -
                                                  -------       -------
                                                          
Diluted earnings from operations.......  (B)      $ 2,004       $ 1,492
                                                  =======       =======
                                                          
Weighted average shares                                   
 outstanding - basic...................  (C)       18,409        17,615
                                                          
Common stock equivalents for dilutive                     
 earnings per share using                                 
 the treasury stock method.............             2,246         1,830
                                                  -------       -------
                                                          
Additional equivalent shares upon                         
 assumed conversion of convertible                        
 debentures(1).........................                 -             -
                                                  -------       -------
                                                          
Weighted average shares and common                        
 equivalent shares outstanding                            
 for diluted earnings per share........  (D)       20,655        19,445
                                                          
EARNINGS PER SHARE                                        
                                                          
Basic..................................  (A)/(C)  $   .11       $   .08
                                                          
Diluted................................  (B)/(D)  $   .10       $   .08
 
--------------------
 
(1) The Convertible Debenture conversion is not included in the computation of
 earnings per share as it is anti-dilutive for all periods presented.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                                         
<ARTICLE>                       5                                              
<CIK>                           0000863832                                     
<NAME>                          GEODYNE INST/PENSION ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-5
                                                                               
<S>                             <C>                                            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                                          
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998                                    
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998                                    
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998    
<CASH>                                217,856     
<SECURITIES>                                0     
<RECEIVABLES>                         267,180     
<ALLOWANCES>                                0     
<INVENTORY>                                 0     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      485,036     
<PP&E>                             10,051,729     
<DEPRECIATION>                      8,843,872     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      1,692,893     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0     
<BONDS>                                     0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0     
<PREFERRED>                                 0     
<COMMON>                                    0     
<OTHER-SE>                          1,692,893     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        1,692,893     
<SALES>                               248,386     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      387,439     
<CGS>                                       0     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          99,107     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       288,332     
<INCOME-TAX>                                0     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   288,332     
<DISCONTINUED>                              0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0     
<CHANGES>                                   0     
<NET-INCOME>                          288,332     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            2.29     
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0     
                                
 

</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE V. HENRY J. NOVOTNY 

DOCKET NUMBER: 2 

DATE: MAY 13, 1937 

DOCUMENT TYPE: COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

Docket No. 2 C.E.A. 

Secretary of Agriculture, Complainant, v. Henry J. Novotny, Respondent. 

Complaint and notice of hearing on the suspension or revocation of 

registrations under the Commodity Exchange Act 

Henry J. Novotny, hereinafter called the registrant, having filed with the 

Department of Agriculture on August 26, 1936, an application on form 1-R for 

registration as futures commission merchant, and an application on form 2-R for 

registration as floor broker, pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and the 

rules and regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture; and the said 

registrations having been issued by the Secretary of Agriculture on September 2, 

1936 and September 4, 1936, respectively; and 

The Secretary of Agriculture having reason to believe that 

(a) The said registrant is presently expelled from membership in a commodity 

exchange, namely, the Chicago Open Board of Trade, pursuant to the action of the 

board of directors of that exchange on March 16, 1937; and 

(b) The said registrant has violated section 305 of the rules and regulations 

governing registration, as amended, made and promulgated by the Secretary of 

Agriculture pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act, by reason of the said 

registrant's having failed to report on form 3-R the fact of the expulsion 

referred to in (a) above, within ten days after the date thereof, which rendered 

the information stated under Item 14 of the aforesaid application for 

registration as futures commission merchant, and the information stated under 

Item 10 of the aforesaid application for registration as floor broker, no longer 

accurate; 

WHEREFORE, the said Henry J. Novotny is hereby notified to be and appear at a 

hearing to be held at 10:00 o'clock a.m., Eastern Standard Time, on the seventh 

day of June 1937, at the office of the Commodity Exchange Administration, United 

States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., before a referee to be 

designated by the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct such hearing, and then and 

there show cause if any there be, why the registrations of the said registrant 

should not be suspended or revoked. 

IT IS ORDERED that this complaint and notice of hearing be served on the said 

Henry J. Novotny by an employee of the Department of Agriculture or by 

registered mail at least three days prior to the date herein set for hearing. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Secretary of Agriculture has hereunto set his hand 

and caused the official seal of the Department of Agriculture to be affixed in 

the city of Washington, this 13th day of May 1937. 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Secretary of Agriculture. 
Page 2 

LOAD-DATE: June 11, 2008 
Page 3
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1473 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1473

      Supporting backcountry airstrips and recreational aviation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2010

 Mr. Rehberg (for himself, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Boyd, Mr. Simpson, and Mr. 
Minnick) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Supporting backcountry airstrips and recreational aviation.

Whereas recreational aviation represents a significant portion of the Nation's 
        aviation activity;
Whereas recreational aviators utilize backcountry airstrips as access points for 
        a variety of activities;
Whereas backcountry airstrips provide multiple benefits to the general public, 
        including search and rescue, fire management, research, disaster relief, 
        and wildlife management;
Whereas recreational aviation helps State economies by providing efficient 
        access for visitors seeking recreational activities;
Whereas backcountry airstrips serve as emergency landing sites in the event of 
        mechanical problems or inclement weather;
Whereas backcountry airstrips provide access for those who do not have the 
        physical ability to access backcountry areas by other means; and
Whereas recreational airstrips have a small footprint on the landscape, provide 
        for dispersed recreational activity, and act as internal trailheads 
        within backcountry areas: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the value of 
recreational aviation and backcountry airstrips located on the Nation's 
public lands and commends aviators and the various private 
organizations that maintain these airstrips for public use.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, P. Douglas Richard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Financial Corporation (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2006

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1* CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned officer of Cognex Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies
that the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
July 4, 2004 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: August 6, 2004 /s/ Robert J. ShillmanRobert J. ShillmanPresident, Chief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors(principal executive officer)
 *         This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6839

JAMES F. KANE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00238-MR)

Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 2, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Anthony Martinez, Federal Public Defender, Joshua B. Carpenter, Appellate 

Chief, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Asheville, 

North Carolina, for Appellant. William T. Stetzer, Acting United States Attorney, 

Elizabeth M. Greenough, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-6839 Doc: 52 Filed: 10/02/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

James F. Kane appeals the district court’s order dismissing Kane’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

petition for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jones v. 

Hendrix, 143 S. Ct. 1857, 1867-69 (2023) (holding that petitioner cannot use § 2241 

petition to mount successive collateral attack on validity of federal sentence), we conclude 

that Kane cannot pursue his challenge in a § 2241 petition.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing Kane’s § 2241 petition. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 20-6839 Doc: 52 Filed: 10/02/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 6 
<CIK> 0000744822
<NAME> Fidelity Investment Trust
<SERIES>
 <NUMBER> 191
 <NAME> Fidelity Germany Fund
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 year          
 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             oct-31-1997   
 
<PERIOD-END>                  oct-31-1997   
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>         12,807        
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>        13,425        
 
<RECEIVABLES>                 410           
 
<ASSETS-OTHER>                0             
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>          0             
 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                13,835        
 
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>      1,006         
 
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>       0             
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>     97            
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>           1,103         
 
<SENIOR-EQUITY>               0             
 
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>      10,427        
 
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>         962           
 
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>         633           
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>     0             
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>        0             
 
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>       1,687         
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>      0             
 
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>      618           
 
<NET-ASSETS>                  12,732        
 
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>             191           
 
<INTEREST-INCOME>             46            
 
<OTHER-INCOME>                (19)          
 
<EXPENSES-NET>                239           
 
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>       (21)          
 
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>      1,713         
 
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     289           
 
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         1,981         
 
<EQUALIZATION>                0             
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>     5             
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>      248           
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>         0             
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>       1,167         
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>   860           
 
<SHARES-REINVESTED>           22            
 
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        5,554         
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>       6             
 
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>     286           
 
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>       0             
 
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>    0             
 
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>         89            
 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0             
 
<GROSS-EXPENSE>               271           
 
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>          11,938        
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>         11.340        
 
<PER-SHARE-NII>               (.020)        
 
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>       2.210         
 
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>          .010          
 
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>     .350          
 
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>          0             
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>           13.240        
 
<EXPENSE-RATIO>               200           
 
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>        0             
 
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>          0