alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

December 11, 2023

Submitted via Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Office of the Secretariat

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20581

Re: Confidential Treatment Request – Exhibit B - AEGIS SEF Self Certification

Dear Sir:

AEGIS SEF, LLC (“AEGIS SEF”) hereby requests that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading

Commission (the “Commission”) accord confidential treatment to Exhibit B (“Exhibit”), which 

were submitted to the Commission as 40.2 Listing products for trading by certification on this 

date. This request pertains to all material in the Exhibit. The Exhibit bears the designation 

“Confidential Treatment Requested by AEGIS SEF, LLC.”

This request for confidential treatment is made pursuant to Commission Regulations 40.8, as 

Exhibit contains information that would reveal the trade secrets or confidential commercial or 

financial information of AEGIS SEF and its affiliates. 

Please contact the undersigned at 832-413-5973 or afurman@aegis-sef.com with any questions 

regarding this matter.

Andrew Furman

Chief Compliance Officer

AEGIS SEF, LLC

2829 Technology Forest Blvd

Suite 260

The Woodlands, TX 77381
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |   |                                                                                                                      |   |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: November 16, 2009 | By:    | /s/Wallace Boyack                                                                                                    |   |
|                         |   | Wallace Boyack                                                                                                            |   |
|                         |   | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer |   |
|                         |   |                                                                                                                      |   |
Fourth Amendment to Frisch's Executive Savings Plan



 EXHIBIT 10 (k) 
  
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE FRISCH’S 
 EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, Frisch’s Restaurants, Inc. (“Employer”) adopted the Frisch’s Executive Savings Plan (“Plan”) effective as of November 5, 1993; and 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of Article VIII of the Plan, the Employer has the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any
time; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Employer previously amended the Plan to
adopt a prototype plan sponsored by Fidelity Management Trust Company and to make amendments to the prototype plan; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Employer wishes to further amend the Plan to remove the Life Insurance Option from the Investment Options listed in Section 4.2.

  
 NOW THEREFORE, effective as of the date noted below, the
Employer hereby modifies and amends the Plan as follows: 
  
 1.
Section 2.12 of the Plan Document shall be amended effective September 27, 2005, by deleting the Life Insurance Option. 
  
 2. Section 4.2 of the Plan Document shall be amended effective September 27, 2005 by deleting the Life Insurance Option. 
  
 3. In all other respects the Plan shall remain unchanged. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer, by its duly authorized officer, has caused
this Amendment to be executed this 30th day of August 2005. 
  

			
	 FRISCH’S RESTAURANTS, INC.

		
	By:	 	/s/    DONALD H. WALKER        
	 	 	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
1051.

#### LOWRY NATIONAL BANK *v.*MADDOX.

1. The defenses of the maker of a promissory note payable to order can be cut off only by the payee’s formal indorsement of it before maturity.

2. A guaranty -written upon it by the payee is not such an indorsement.

Complaint, from city court of Dublin — -Judge Burclh January 31, 1908.

Argued April 22,

Decided May 7, 1908.

*Ira 8. Chappell, Payne, Jones*<£ *Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. L. Grinev, Ilines & Jordan,*contra.

*330Powell, J.

The defendant executed his promissory note prom-' ising to pay Brooke, or order, a sum of money on a day fixed. He-had a good defense to the note, as against the original payee. Before its maturity Brooke pledged it to the plaintiff as collateral security, and wrote upon it the following: “For value received I hereby guarantee .the payment of this note at maturity. George *W.*Brooke.” The plaintiff claimed protection as a bona fide purchaser for value of commercial paper. The defenses by the maker of the note against the original payee were admitted by the court, and the trial resulted in favor of the defendant.

1. To enable the holder of a promissory note payable to the order of a named payee to assert successfully the rights of a bona fide purchaser for value, it must appear that the note was formally indorsed by the payee in writing before its maturity. *Benson*v. *Abbott,*95 *Ga.*70 (22 S. E. 127); *Farris*v. *Wells,*68 *Ga.*604; *Haug*v. *Riley,*101 *Ga.*375 (29 S. E. 44, 40 L. R. A. 244); *Burch*v. *Daniel,*101 *Ga.*228 (28 S. E. 622).

3. The indorsement of a negotiable instrument does not lose its force and efficacy because it includes a guarantee as well as a transfer. *Vanzant*v. *Arnold,*31 *Ga.*210; *Baldwin Fertilizer*Co. v. *Carmichael,*116 *Ga.*762 (42 S. E. 1002). An indorsement by the original payee of such a note, containing words of guaranty alone, without words of transfer, but accompanied by a physical transfer of the paper, may operate to pass title to the instrument and give to the holder the right to treat the payee as indorser with, an enlarged liability. *Pattillo*v. *Alexander,*96 *Ga.*60 (22 S. E. 646, 29 L. R. A. 616), and cit. But such a guaranty, in the absence of the ordinary words of transfer or assignment, does not constitute the holder such a purchaser for value as to protect him from defenses already accrued to the maker against the original payee. Trust Co. *v.*National Bank, 101 U. S. 68 (25 L. ed. 876); *Pattillo*v. *Alexander,*supra, pp. 71, 73); *Andrews*v. *John Church Co.,*1 *Ga. App.*560 (58 S. E. 130). The bank, never having received a perfect formal'indorsement of the negotiable instrument, was .exposed to the same vulnerability from the defendant’s pleas as the original payee would have suffered if he had been the plaintiff. The defendant, having fully established his pleas, was entitled to the verdict which was rendered in his favor.

*Judgment affirmed.*
No. 166.

#### D. A. Schulte, Inc. *v.*Graves, President of the State Tax Commission, et al.

Motion to dismiss submitted September 10, 1935.

Decided October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Walter H. Liebman, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Mr. Henry Epstein*for appellees.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein, is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *Magnano Co.*v. *Hamilton,*292 U. S. 40, 43; *Liggett Co.*v. *Lee,*288 U. S. 517, 538; *Tax Commissioners*v. *Jackson,*283 U. S. 527, 537.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.5.2
The confidential portions of this exhibit have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a confidential treatment request in accordance with Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  REDACTED PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT ARE MARKED BY AN ***.





Amendment Number 4 to Supply Agreement
This Fourth Amendment (“Fourth Amendment”) is entered into on the 22nd day of October, 2015 (“Amendment Effective Date”), by and between Endo Ventures Limited, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Ireland (registered number 442731) having its principal office at 
Minerva House, Simmonscourt Road, Ballsbridge, Dub1in 4, Ireland for itself and its subsidiaries, each of which shall be bound by this Fourth Amendment as if each had separately executed this Fourth Amendment, (collectively “Endo”), and Noramco, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Georgia and having a place of business at 500 Swedes Landing Road, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (“Company”) (each individually a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”) as the Fourth Amendment to the Supply Agreement dated 27th day of April, 2012 as entered into by and between the Parties and as amended on December 12, 2013 (the “First Amendment”), on April 29, 2015 (the “Second Amendment”), on January 1, 2015 (the “Third Amendment”) and on April 16, 2015 (the “Assignment of Contract”) (as amended, the “Agreement”).
The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1.Replacement of Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 is hereby replaced with the attached Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1
was updated to add the Product Price for ***.
2.Addendum A to Exhibit 3. Exhibit 3 is amended with the attached Addendum A to Exhibit 3.
This Addendum A adds ***.
3.Except as expressly and specifically amended hereby, all other provisions, terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
4.This Fourth Amendment may be executed in several counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
5.Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Fourth Amendment to the Agreement has been executed by the authorized officers of the Parties hereto with effect as of the Amendment Effective Date.
ENDO VENTURES LIMITED
	
		
	By:
	/s/Michael Moes

	Name:
	Michael Moes

	Title:
	VP




NORAMCO, INC. 
	
		
	By:
	/s/John Giannone

	Name:
	John Giannone

	Title:
	Director of US Sales








Page 1 of 3










EXHIBIT 1
PRODUCT PRICES
***


Page 2 of 3









ADDENDUM A EXHIBIT 3
***




Page 3 of 3
No. 449.

#### Wheeler *v.*Clark, U. S. Marshal.

October 28, 1935.

*Mr. Lin William Price*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed,*Assistant *Attorney General Keenan,*and *Mr. W. Marvin Smith*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE V. WILLIAM B. MASSEY, JOHN S. REDDY, AND PHILIP 

J. REDDY 

DOCKET NUMBER: GFA-2 AND 3 

DATE: 1933 

DOCUMENT TYPE: SUMMARY OF CASE 

NOTE: PROCEEDING BEFORE THE GRAIN FUTURES COMMISSION UNDER THE GRAIN FUTURES ACT 

GFA Dockets No. 2 and No. 3 

William B. Massey, 

John S. Reddy, and 

Philip J. Reddy, respondents 

On March 12, 1930, the Secretary of Agriculture issued a complaint charging 

the respondents with manipulating the price of grain. 

It was charged that customers' orders were taken into the personal accounts 

of William B. Massey and John S. Reddy at arbitrary prices and cleared through 

the office of Philip J. Reddy as having been made and executed on the trading 

floor of the Chicago Board of Trade. It was contended that the practice of 

taking price differences constituted manipulation of the price of grain. 

Hearing on this matter commenced in Chicago, Illinois, on April 7, 1930. 

The Grain Futures Commission found that although the practices may have 

amounted to fraud they did not constitute manipulation. Thus, on November 9, 

1933, the complaints were dismissed. 

LOAD-DATE: December 15, 2008 
Page 2
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of President and ChiefExecutive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Kevin T. Bottomley, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danvers Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, quarterly this report does not contain any untrue statement ofmaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport, based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

a.               All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.              Any fraud, whetheror not material, this involves management or other employee who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:                    May 15,2008

 
| /s/ Kevin T. Bottomley                |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Kevin T. Bottomley                    |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
John Gary HARDWICK, Jr., petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 15-8866.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
*Certiorari Granted.*

(See *also No. 500, ante, p. 38, and No. 670, supra.)*

No. 583.

#### Reilly, Postmaster, *v.*Pinkus, trading as American Health Aids Co., also known as Energy Food Center.

C. A. 3d Cir.

*Solicitor General Perlman*for petitioner.

*Bernard G. Segal*and *Irving R. Segal*for respondent.

Certiorari granted.
mflx-ex1097_356.htm



EXHIBIT 10.97 

Facility Offer Letter

 

To:MFLEX Suzhou Co., Ltd:

According to the application from MFLEX Suzhou Co., Ltd (“Applicant”), our bank agrees to issue this Facility Offer Letter (“Letter”) for the purpose of comprehensive credit line. The details of the Letter are listed as follows:

 

1. The total amount of credit line granted by the Letter should not exceed CNY 300,000,000.00 (revolving use; short-term loan; trade financing business and letter of guarantee business; undertaking capital business).

 

Of such credit line, the loan interest rate of US dollar should be negotiated and determined by both parties based on lending cost in the market of US dollar on actual loan day.  

 

2. The purpose of such loan should comply with relevant laws and regulations, supervisory rules and policies. 

 

3. Such loan will be approved to be granted after obtaining permission of verification procedures set by our bank and in compliance with loan conditions required by our bank.

 

4. The authoritative institution to approve such loan is China Construction Bank Suzhou Branch.

 

5. The Letter validates from the date of execution to May 5, 2017.

 

6. Laws of PRC shall apply to the Letter.

 

China Construction Bank

Suzhou Industrial Park Sub-branch

President sign: /s/ Wei Xin 

May 4, 2016

 

 

 



 

The Price of Financing Service


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Business
	
Price Quoted In the Market
	
MFLEX Price

	
USD
	
USD Loan
	
Negotiated by CCB and MFLEX according to the variation of market price

	
USD time deposit
	
Negotiated by CCB and MFLEX according to the variation of market price

	
USD Purchase
	
Selling Rate
	
Middle Rate

	
USD Sale
	
Buying Rate
	
Middle Rate

	
Account Fee
	
RMB 600.00 per year
	
Free

	
RMB
	
Seven-day Call
	
1.485%

	
Agreement Deposit
	
1.15%

	
Account Fee
	
RMB 360.00 per year
	
Free

	
Receipts Management
	
RMB 200.00 per year
	
Free

	
Remit
	
Outward Remittances(Overseas) Commission
	
1‰ of amount, 

Min RMB50.00,

Max RMB1000.00
	
Free

	
Outward Remittances(Overseas) Cable Charges
	
RMB 80.00
	
RMB 50.00

	
Import L/C
	
Opening
	
1.5‰ of amount,

Min RMB500.00;0.05% of amount for per season as the expiry extend for 3 months 
	
0.3‰ of amount,

Min RMB200.00

	
Amendment
	
RMB 200.00

	
Acceptance
	
1‰ of amount per month, Min RMB150.00
	
Free

	
Dishonor
	
Free

	
Buty-free Guarantee
	
1‰ of amount for per season,

Min RMB500.00
	
Free

	
DRAFT
	
Issue Bank Acceptance Bill
	
0.05‰ of amount

	
Online Banking
	
USB-KEY
	
RMB 50.00 per person
	
Free

	
Annual Charge
	
RMB 100.00 per person a year
	
Free




 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         8883318
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                149068
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   72825300
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        26998978
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          27254657
<LOANS>                                      104659319
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2166766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               219773738
<DEPOSITS>                                   173352540
<SHORT-TERM>                                  12234250
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            9519886
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       6069300
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               219773738
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                6976452
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              5064908
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 26613
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              12067973
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4326960
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4954694
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          7113279
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    90000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2539239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2878981
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1964981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     525000
<LOANS-PAST>                                     58000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2166766
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   147000
<RECOVERIES>                                    140000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Rigoberto CORREA-HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 16-6010.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
Frances STEVENS, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, et al.

No. 16-280.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                        For the three months ended
                                                                          1998              1997
                                                                      ------------      ------------

<S>                                                                   <C>               <C>          
Net loss                                                              $ (1,242,051)     $   (750,001)
                                                                      ============      ============

Weighted average number of common shares issued at January 1            30,199,154        18,002,253

Less weighted average number of common shares
     held in treasury at January 1                                        (854,903)         (854,903)
                                                                      ------------      ------------

Weighted average number of common shares
     issued and outstanding at January 1                                29,344,251        17,147,350

Issuance of stock in connection with the conversion of debentures             --           6,434,063

Issuance of stock in connection with the exercise of warrants                5,750              --

Issuance of stock in connection with private offerings                   2,186,500              --

Treasury stock received in exchange for cash                              (731,111)             --

Issuance of stock for services rendered                                     30,369              --
                                                                      ------------      ------------

Shares used for computation                                             30,835,759        23,581,413
                                                                      ============      ============

Net loss per common share                                             $      (0.04)     $     (0.031)
                                                                      ============      ============
</TABLE>



               Note: Basic and diluted calculations are the same.