alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Simon Au, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Here Enterprises,
      Inc. for the quarter ended August 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Here Enterprises, Inc.                                                                   



Dated: October 15, 2008



| | /s/ Simon Au                                           
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Simon Au                                               
| | President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director           
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Here
Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Here Enterprises, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-075]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Prospective Patent License.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Next Vital Signs, Inc., of 
Cleveland, Ohio, has applied for a partially exclusive license to 
practice the invention described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 
6,125,297, entitled ``Body Fluids Monitor,'' which is assigned to the 
United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to 
the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Johnson Space 
Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by August 17, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Cate, Patent Attorney, NASA 
Johnson Space Center, Mail Stop HA, Houston, TX 77058-8452; telephone 
(281) 483-1001.

    Dated: June 11, 2001.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-15204 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
No. 777.

#### Snyder *v.*United States.

Court of Claims.

Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
10.1


THIRD
AMENDMENT TO THE


PEOPLESBANK,
A CODORUS VALLEY COMPANY


SALARY
CONTINUATION AGREEMENT


THIS
THIRD AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”) is adopted this 10th day of May, 2016, by and between PeoplesBank, A Codorus Valley
Company, located in York, Pennsylvania (the “Bank”) and Larry J. Miller (the “Executive”).


The
Bank and the Executive executed the Salary Continuation Agreement on October 1, 1998 and two subsequent amendments thereto (collectively,
the “Agreement”) to provide retirement benefits to the Executive. The Bank and the Executive now wish to amend the
Agreement to allow for monthly increases in the benefit for up to one hundred two (102) months following the Executive’s
Normal Retirement Age.


Now,
therefore, the Bank and the Executive amend the Agreement as follows.


Section
2.1.1 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced by the following:


		2.1.1	Amount
                                         of Benefit. The initial annual benefit under this Section 2.1 (pursuant to the Second
                                         Amendment adopted December 23, 2008) is One Hundred Thirty Thousand Four Hundred Thirty-Three
                                         Dollars ($130,433). 
                                         If Termination of Employment occurs after Normal Retirement Age, this benefit shall be
                                         increased by .3274% per month for up to a maximum of one hundred two (102) months, for
                                         each full month between Normal Retirement Age and the commencement of benefit payments
                                         hereunder.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a duly authorized representative of the Bank have signed this Amendment.


	Executive:	 	 	Bank:	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	 	 
	Larry
    J. Miller	 	 	Title:
Exhibit 23


        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to
the incorporation of our reports included or incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements, File
Nos. 33-24182, 33-24183, 33,51899, 33-28995, 33-37454, 33-
39695, 33-56637, 333-03657, 333-73161, 333-73163, 333-73169
and 333-85925.





                               /s/Arthur Andersen LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio               Arthur Andersen LLP
April 10, 2000
Michael Anthony LINDSEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6266.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32805-32806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-301-017]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate Filing

June 12, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 4, 2001, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
tendered for filing and approval a Service Agreement between ANR and 
Dynegy Marketing and Trade (Dynegy) pursuant to ANR's Rate Schedule FSS 
(the Agreement).
    ANR states that the Agreement contains a negotiated rate 
arrangement between ANR and Dynegy to be effective June 1, 2001 through 
March 31, 2004 and contains a right to extend the term for one 
additional year upon specified circumstances. ANR is also tendering for 
filing Third Revised Sheet No. 14P which is being provided for future 
use. ANR Requests that the Commission accept and approve the Agreement 
and tariff sheet effective June 1, 2001.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in

[[Page 32806]]

determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15230 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Dayne DeShawd DOUGLAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6218.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1538]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4558-N-04]


Mortgage Review Board: Administrative Actions--Clarification

AGENCY: Office of Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing 
Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Public Notice, Mortgagee Review Board, Clarification of 
Administrative Action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with Section 202(c) of the National Housing Act, 
notice is given of the cause and description of administrative actions 
taken by HUD's Mortgage Review Board against HUD-approved mortgagees. 
This notice provides clarification regarding the description of and the 
cause for administrative action against a HUD-approved mortgagee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D. Jackson Kinkaid, Secretary to the 
Mortgage Review Board, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-3041 
extension 3574 (this is not a toll-free number). Hearing or speech-
impaired persons may access this number via TTY by calling the toll-
free Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 202(c) of the National Housing Act 
(added by Section 142 of the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development Reform Act of 1989, Pub. L. 101-235, approved December 15, 
1989), requires that HUD ``publish a description of and the cause for 
administrative actions against a HUD-approved mortgage'' by the 
Department's Mortgage Review Board. In compliance with the requirements 
of Section 202(c)(5), notice is hereby given of a clarification of a 
previously published description and cause for an administrative action 
against a HUD-approved mortgagee. The specific mortgagee that is the 
subject of this clarification is James B. Nutter & Company, Kansas 
City, Missouri, pursuant to an administrative action originally 
reported at 65 FR 53734 (#44) published on September 5, 2000. The 
clarification regarding the administrative action taken against this 
mortgagee is noted below:
    1. James B. Nutter & Company, Kansas City, Missouri.
    Action: Proposed settlement agreement of disputed matters that 
included a payment to the Department.
    Cause: A review by HUD's Quality Assurance Division discovered 
alleged failures to comply with HUD/FHA Loss Mitigation and other HUD/
FHA requirements.

    Dated: January 10, 2001.
William C. Apgar,
Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner, Chairman, 
Mortgagee Review Board.
[FR Doc. 01-1538 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-27-M
#### Randy MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-4308.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 27, 2010.

Before: MERRITT, GIBBONS, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellee Randy Miller appeals the decision of the district court to grant the motion for summary judgment filed by *97Defendant-Appellee Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) and deny Miller’s motion for summary judgment. This dispute involves an insurance policy issued by Allstate to Miller and that policy’s scope with respect to damage caused by a fire and the City of Cleveland’s subsequent demolition of certain buildings on the property. After carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, the parties’ briefs, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we find that the district court’s opinion diligently and correctly sets out the undisputed facts and the governing law. Because this court’s issuance of a full opinion would be duplicative and would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s well-reasoned order of July 20, 2009, granting Allstate’s motion for summary judgment.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1151/2004

of 23 June 2004         

on the issue of import licences for garlic imported under the autonomous tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1077/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1077/2004 of 7 June 2004 opening and providing for the administration of an autonomous tariff quota for garlic (1), and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences made by traditional importers pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1077/2004 and submitted to the Commission by the Member States on 17 and 18 June 2004 shall be issued for 3,143 % of the quantity applied for.

2.   Applications for import licences made by new importers pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1077/2004 and submitted to the Commission by the Member States on 17 and 18 June 2004 shall be issued for 1,061 % of the quantity applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 June 2004.

It shall apply until 31 December 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 June 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture

----

(1)OJ L 203, 8.6.2004, p. 7.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1575 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1575

Expressing support for designation of the third week of October as Male 
                     Breast Cancer Awareness Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2010

 Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida submitted the following resolution; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for designation of the third week of October as Male 
                     Breast Cancer Awareness Week.

Whereas each year 450 men will die from male breast cancer and the numbers are 
        increasing;
Whereas men are typically diagnosed at a late stage due to a lack of awareness 
        that men can develop the disease;
Whereas it behooves each of us, men, women, parents, siblings, educators, 
        physicians, and citizens, to promote awareness of the disease and to 
        save lives;
Whereas we must educate the world to the reality of this disease; and
Whereas in remembrance of the many men who have lost their lives or are fighting 
        for their lives, due to a lack of awareness, it is appropriate that we 
        designate the third week of October as Male Breast Cancer Awareness 
        Week: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation, as well as the goals and ideals, of Male Breast Cancer 
Awareness Week.
                                 <all>
```
Dennis G. SHIPTON, petitioner, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Warden.

No. 16-6099.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
Community Financial Corporation (the "Company") that the quarterly report of
the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such
period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

|Date: November 14, 2002 | By: | /s/ P. Douglas RichardP. Douglas Richard
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2002 | By: | /s/ R. Jerry GilesR. Jerry Giles
Chief Financial Officer
Kimberly Clark SAENZ, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 16-5933.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14869]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

    Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, 
Washington, DC 20549.
    Extension: Rule 17a-5 and Form X-17A-5, SEC File No. 270-155, OMB 
Control No. 3235-0123
    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 17a-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is the basic 
reporting rule for brokers and dealers, and Form X-17A-5, the Financial 
and Operational Combined Uniform Single Report, is the basic document 
for reporting the financial and operational condition of securities 
brokers and dealers.
    The staff estimates that approximately 7,230 respondents respond to 
this collection of information 33,870 times annually, with a total 
burden of 12 hours for each response, based upon past submissions. The 
staff estimates that the average number of hours necessary to comply 
with the requirements of Rule 17a-5 is 406,440 hours. The average cost 
per hour is $113. Therefore, the total cost of compliance for the 
respondents is $45,927,720.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in 
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Direct your written comments to Michael E. Bartell, Associate 
Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, 450 5th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549.

    Dated: June 5, 2001.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14869 Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
No. 113.

#### Lily-Tulip Cup Corp. et al. *v.*American Lace Paper Co.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. S. Mortimer Ward*for petitioners.

*Mr. Drury W. Cooper*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Allen J. ZAKKI, petitioner, v. CHEAPOAIR, INC.

No. 16-6055.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 7, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-54938, No. 333-43090, No. 333-90725, No. 333-54936, No. 333-117507, No. 333-135598, No. 333-147179) of CyberSource Corporation of our reports datedFebruary 26, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of CyberSource Corporation, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of CyberSource Corporation, included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/    ERNST &YOUNG LLP 

San Jose, California 

February 26, 2009
Daniel ZOLA, petitioner, v. Dan WITHERS, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Danny Withers, et al.

No. 16-33.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Robert Frank MILLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 15-9138.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 3, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 13
 Section 906  Corporate Responsibility for Financial Reports
  (i)
    
    the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   
 Section 906  Corporate Responsibility for Financial Reports
  (iii)
    
    the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 June 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (iv)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
First Federal Bancorporation
Bemidji, Minnesota


We hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Form 10-KSB in the
previously filed Registration  Statement of First Federal Bancorporation on Form
S-8 (No.  33-98242)  of our  report,  dated  October 27,  2000,  relating to the
consolidated   financial   statements  of  First  Federal   Bancorporation   and
subsidiaries.




                                         /s/  McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

                                         McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


Duluth, Minnesota
December 21, 2000