alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-87882, 33-87776, 33-89382, 333-02340, 333-06303, 333-16963,
333-20853, 333-52603, 333-80861, 333-39462, 333-57670, 333-63550 and 333-97101,
and Form S-3 No. 333-63564) of Applix, Inc. of our report dated January 25,
2002, except for Note 17, as to which the date is February 8, 2002, and Note 2,
as to which the date is May 12, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements, as restated, and schedule of Applix, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2001.



                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 30, 2003
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-20694 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALVIRA RIOS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CR-42-ALL

-------------------- Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Alvira Rios, former federal prisoner # 13646-074, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rios has not filed a response. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Article III, § 2 of the Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to actual cases and controversies. SeeNo. 04-20694 -2- Spencer v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). The case-or-controversy requirement demands that “some concrete and continuing injury other than the now-ended incarceration or parole -- some ‘collateral consequence’ of the conviction -- must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” Id. Rios has served the sentence that was imposed upon the revocation of her supervised release. The order revoking Rios’s term of supervised release imposed no further term of supervised release. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy for this court to address, and the appeal is dismissed as moot. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied as unnecessary. MOTION DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1

                             CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                              (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Conversion Services International, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), Scott Newman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Scott Newman
-----------------------------
Scott Newman
Chief Executive Officer
November 21, 2005
Corrective Modification



 Exhibit 10.1 
 [Bank of America Letterhead] 
  
 November 7, 2005 
  
 Corrective Modification

  
 Via Telecopy: 813.254.9640 

  
 Kforce Inc. 
 1001 East Palm Avenue 
 4th Floor 
 Tampa, Florida 33605 
 Attention: William L. Sanders 
  

	 	Re:	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”), dated as of November 3, 2000, among Kforce, Inc. (the “Borrower”), certain of
its affiliates, and Bank of America, N.A. (the “Agent’”), as agent for itself and certain financial institutions party thereto. 

  
 Mr. Sanders: 
  
 Reference is hereby made to the Credit Agreement. All capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to
such terms in the Credit Agreement. 
  
 In order to correct a
scrivener’s error in Section 7.10 of the Credit Agreement, as amended as of October 28, 2005, such provision is hereby restated as follows: 
  
 7.10 Distributions; Capital Change; Restricted Investments. No Credit Party shall (i) directly or indirectly declare or make,
or incur any liability to make, any Distribution, except (A) in connection with an with an Eligible Securities Repurchase, (B) Distributions to the Borrower by a Subsidiary, or (C) Distributions by the Borrower if, after giving effect
thereto the Borrower has Availability of not less than $15,000,000; (ii) make any change in its capital structure which could have a Material Adverse Effect; or (iii) make any Investments in or to any Person if, after giving effect thereto
the Borrower has Availability of not less than $15,000,000. 







 Except as expressly provided hereinabove, the Credit Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to be or operate as a waiver of or consent to any Event of Default. 
  

			
	BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as
	Administrative Agent
		
	By:	 	 /s/ MARK HERDMAN


	Name:	 	Mark Herdman
	Title:	 	Vice President


  
 [Signatures
continued on following page] 








			
	Accepted and agreed:
	
	KFORCE INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ JUDY M. GENSHINO


	Title:	 	Assistant Treasurer
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

March 3, 2016

 

Kathleen A. Browne

80 Georgian Ct.

Rochester, NY 14610

  

 

Dear Kathy:

 

In connection with the change in your position as Chief Financial Officer of Torvec, Inc. to a full time role your annual compensation will be modified as follows:

 

	
 Effective March 1, 2016
	
 $150,000

	
 Effective June 1, 2016
	
 $200,000



                                       

 

Your employment continues at the convenience of the Company and your roles and responsibilities can be changed from time to time as deemed necessary by management. You will be eligible to participate in all of the Company’s benefit programs. In the event that Torvec terminates your employment status without cause, or removes you as the company’s Chief Financial Officer, or there is a change in control of the company, you will receive 6 months’ pay as severance. 

 

Please review and sign this offer letter as confirmation of your acceptance of the terms of your employment and return to my attention. 

 

Sincerely,

/s/ Richard A. Kaplan

 

Richard A. Kaplan

Chief Executive Officer

Torvec, Inc.

 

 

Accepted: /s/ Kathleen A. Browne

 

Date: March 3, 2016
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Andrea Fehsenfeld, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boreal Productions
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
5th day of February, 2008.


/s/ Andrea Fehsenfeld
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register: June 2, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 105)]
[Notices]
[Page 29714]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jn97-54]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, June 20, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-14458 Filed 5-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
#### DICKINSON v. MATHESON MOTOR CAR CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

July 1, 1909.)

No. 11.

Corporations (§• 30*) — Promoter’s Contract — Ratification—Question for Jury.

G., who was the owner of certain patent rights, agreed that plaintiff should receive 25 per cent, of the actual stock of any company which should be organized to exploit or purchase the patents. Defendant company was thereafter organized, partly through plaintiff’s endeavors, and purchased the patent right from G. *Held,*that defendant’s acceptance of the benefit of whatever value was contributed' by plaintiff’s services did not constitute such a ratification of the understanding between plaintiff and G. as would warrant a submission of the question of defendant’s liability to plaintiff thereon to the jury.

[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Corporations, Dec. Dig. § 30.*]

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

For opinion below, see 161 Fed. 874.

John J. Lordan, John M. Coleman, and Ralph W. Rymer, for plaintiff in error.

John D. Coons and Willard, Warren & Knapp, for defendant in error.

Before DADLAS, GRAY, and BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judges.

*

For other oases see same topic & § number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below Dickinson, the plaintiff, recovered a verdict against the Matheson Motor Car Company, the defendant, for breach of an alleged contract to convey to him certain shares of its capital stock. The contract was *647said to have been made with the Matheson Motor Car Company, limited, a limited partnership of the state of Michigan, the business of which was subsequently taken over by the defendant. It seems to have been assumed and accepted that, if the Michigan company was liable, the defendant should be so held as its successor. On the trial the court below held that under the Michigan statute the contract was ultra vires. Its ruling in that regard is not before us for review. It, however, submitted to the jury the question whether the defendant had enjoyed such fruit from the transaction as to amount to a ratification. The jury, by its verdict for the plaintiff, found such was the case. Subsequently the defendant moved for judgment non obstante veredicto, on the ground that there was no evidence to warrant submission of that question to the jury. In an opinion reported in 161 Fed. 874, the court so held, and to a judgment non obstante veredicto for defendant this writ of error was sued out.

It will thus be seen the case stands on its own particular facts, and, if the court was right in holding there was no evidence showing retention of the fruits of the transaction by the defendant, error is not established. We have examined the testimony, and are of opinion the court below was clearly right. Its analysis of the facts and the grounds of its conclusion are so thorough and satisfactory that a discussion thereof by this court could be but a repetition.

We content ourselves, therefore, with adopting its opinion and affirming the judgment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Deafness and Other Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         June 20, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Governor's House, 1615 Rhode Island Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Melissa Stick, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NIDCD/NIH, 6120 Executive Blvd, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 6, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-14958  Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 23


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation
of our reports included or incorporated by reference in this Form
10-K, into 
the Company's previously filed Registration Statements, File Nos.
33-24182, 
33-24183, 33-51899, 33-28995, 33-37454, 33-39695, 33-56637 and
333-03657.



                                         /s/Arthur Andersen LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio                        Arthur Andersen LLP
 December 16, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32790-32791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15323]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-588-852]


Notice of Extension of Time for the Preliminary Results of the 
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review: Structural Steel Beams from Japan

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of an extension of time for the preliminary results of 
the antidumping duty new shipper review of structural steel beams from 
Japan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 32791]]

SUMMARY: On February 16, 2001, the Department of Commerce 
(``Department'') published a notice of initiation of an antidumping 
duty new shipper review of structural steel beams from Japan. The 
Department is extending the time limit for the preliminary results of 
the new shipper review, which covers the period February 11, 2000 
through November 30, 2000.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 18, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita H. Chen or Robert Bolling, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone 202-482-0409 and 202-482-3434, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Applicable Statute and Regulations

    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (``Act''), are references to the provisions effective 
January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act 
by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. In addition, unless otherwise 
indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are to the 
regulations codified at 19 C.F.R. part 351 (2000).

Extension of Time

    On January 31, 2001, pursuant to a request from Yamato Kogyo Co., 
Ltd., the Department initiated this antidumping duty new shipper review 
of the antidumping duty order on structural steel beams from Japan. See 
Initiation of New Shipper Antidumping Duty Review: Structural Steel 
Beams from Japan, 66 FR 10668 (February 16, 2001). Under section 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, the Department may extend the deadline for 
completion of the preliminary results of a new shipper review from 180 
days after the date on which the review is initiated to 300 days if it 
concludes that the case is extraordinarily complicated. The Department 
has concluded that this case is extraordinarily complicated. See 
Memorandum from Edward C. Yang to Joseph A. Spetrini (June 5, 2001).
    Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, 
the Department is extending the time limit for the preliminary results 
by 120 days until November 27, 2001.

    Dated: June 12, 2001.
Edward C. Yang,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 01-15323 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1632 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1632

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require officers 
   and employees of the House to read the Constitution of the United 
                           States each year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2010

 Mr. Conaway submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require officers 
   and employees of the House to read the Constitution of the United 
                           States each year.

Whereas the United States Constitution articulates principles envisioned by the 
        Founding Fathers;
Whereas the United States Constitution is the written set of the fundamental 
        principles by which the United States is governed;
Whereas Article I of the United States Constitution establishes the legislative 
        branch;
Whereas the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land;
Whereas the United States Constitution is the world's oldest written national 
        constitution;
Whereas the United States Constitution confers honor and responsibility upon 
        Members of Congress;
Whereas the United States Constitution should be known by those who legislate; 
        and
Whereas the United States Constitution is a dynamic governing document of and 
        for the people of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``A Modest Effort to Read and 
Instill the Constitution Again Resolution of 2010'' or the ``AMERICA 
Resolution of 2010''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

    It is the sense of the House of Representatives that Members of 
Congress, who swear to uphold the Constitution of the United States and 
are responsible for writing laws regarding the powers granted to the 
Government and proposing constitutional amendments, should read this 
important document, including its amendments.

SEC. 3. ANNUAL READING OF THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRED FOR HOUSE OFFICERS 
              AND EMPLOYEES.

    Clause 3(a) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(7)(A) The committee shall provide a copy of the 
        Constitution of the United States to each new Member, Delegate, 
        Resident Commissioner, officer, and employee of the House.
            ``(B) Not later than January 31 of each year, each officer 
        and employee of the House shall file a certification with the 
        committee attesting that the officer or employee has read the 
        Constitution of the United States in its entirety in the 
        previous year.''.
                                 <all>
```