alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Office of Proceedings 

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 


1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 


www.cftc.gov 

) 

Ken Jones, 

Complainant, 

v. 

Jeff Michael Gilfillan, and 

R.J. O'Brien Associates LLC 

d/b/a RJO Futures, 

Respondents. 

) 

) 

) 

) CFfC Docket No. 16-Roo4 

) Served electronically 

) 

) 

) 

) 

~~~~~~~~) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Complainant and respondents have amicably settled their dispute and have filed 

a joint stipulation of dismissal. Accordingly, pursuant to Commission rule 12.21, the 

complaint in this matter is hereby dismissed. 

March 1, 2017. 

f4///Wd~ Philip V. McGuire, 

Judgment Officer
No. 804.

#### Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. *v.*United States ex rel. Deavers.

C. A. 5th Cir.

*C. S. Burg, M. E. Clinton, Dan Moody*and *J. B. Robertson*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Perlman, Newell A. Clapp*and *Samuel D. Slade*for respondent.

Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. I, Michael R. Pieper , certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rexhall
Industries, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: May 14, 2004
    /S/ Michael R. Pieper
Michael R. Pieper
Chief Financial Officer
No. 61.

#### John A. Nelson Co. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. J. 8. Seidman*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wide-man,*and *Messrs. Sewall Key*and *A. F. Prescott*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PLX Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ralph H. Schmitt, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the dates and for the periods indicated.
  This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
  Date: May
6, 2010
  By: /s/ Ralph H.
Schmitt
 Ralph H.
Schmitt
 Chief
Executive Officer
  37
Opinion issued August 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00405-CV

———————————

IN RE SARAH HADEN, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Sarah Haden, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging 

the trial court’s March 22, 2019 order granting reconsideration, vacating its newtrial order, and reinstating its prior modification order in the underlying suit affecting 

the parent-child relationship.

1 We deny the petition.

 

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of H.G. and L.G., Children, cause number 

2012–59856, pending in the 311th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable Germaine Tanner presiding.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Goodman, and Landau.
#### Clarence EPPS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Probation and Parole; Chesapeake Circuit Court, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-6598.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 13, 2006.

Decided: Dec. 27, 2006.

Clarence Epps, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Epps, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Epps v. Virginia Dept. of Corr.,*No. 1:06-cv-00274-TSE (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 77Q1 - Additional Items

Item 15
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 159 

Honoring the New Hampshire State Senate for becoming the 1st statewide 

legislative body with a majority of women in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2009 

Mr. HODES (for himself and Ms. SHEA-PORTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the New Hampshire State Senate for becoming 

the 1st statewide legislative body with a majority of 

women in the United States. 

Whereas for over 200 years the citizens of the State of New 

Hampshire have elected State Senators to serve in the 

legislature; 

Whereas, from 1931 to 1933, E. Maude Ferguson served as 

the 1st female member of the New Hampshire State Senate; 

Whereas Vesta Roy served as the 1st female State Senate 

President, and in 1983 she became the 1st female Governor of the State of New Hampshire; 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 159 IH 

Whereas, in 1994, the Honorable Sylvia Larsen was elected 

to the New Hampshire State Senate and has served 7 

consecutive terms thus far; 

Whereas, in 1996, the Honorable Terie Norelli was elected to 

the New Hampshire House of Representatives and has 

served 6 consecutive terms thus far, and in 2008 was reelected to serve as Speaker of the New Hampshire House 

of Representatives for a 2nd consecutive term; 

Whereas, in 2008, the Honorable Sylvia Larsen was re-elected to serve as State Senate President of New Hampshire 

for a 2nd consecutive term; 

Whereas the Honorable Sharon Carson, Jacalyn Cilley, Martha Fuller Clark, Betsi DeVries, Peggy Gilmour, Margaret Hassan, Molly Kelly, Sylvia Larsen, Bette Lasky, 

Amanda Merrill, Deborah Reynolds, Sheila Roberge, and 

Kathleen Sgambati comprise the majority female body of 

the New Hampshire State Senate and were elected to office on November 4, 2008, and sworn in on December 3, 

2008; 

Whereas the New Hampshire State Senate was comprised of 

13 women and 11 men for the legislative session beginning on December 3, 2008; and 

Whereas the New Hampshire State Senate had 9 women 

chairing committees and 5 men chairing committees for 

the legislative session beginning on December 3, 2008: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the New Hampshire State Senate for becoming the 1st 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 159 IH 

1 statewide legislative body with a majority of women in the 

2 United States. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
H. Res. 150 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 15, 2009. 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph was born April 15, 1889; 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph was in New York during the 

height of the Harlem Renaissance and was a student in 

politics and economics at City College, which served as 

the intellectual center of the movement; 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph was the cofounder of The Messenger in 1917, a widely read and respected magazine 

known for its radical persuasion; 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph was the leader of the successful 

movement to organize the Pullman Company (one of the 

most powerful businesses in the Nation) which led to the 

formation of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters 

(BSCP), an organization that advanced the claims of African-Americans to dignity, respect, and a decent livelihood; 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph was selected by the porters at 

the Pullman Company as a representative because he was 

a good orator and a tireless fighter for the rights of African-Americans and was dedicated to the porters’ cause 

for over a decade; 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph was able to gain an international charter from the American Federation of Labor 
2 

•HRES 150 EH 

(now AFL–CIO) after Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal 

legislation forced the Pullman Company to negotiate with 

the Brotherhood, and was able to successfully negotiate 

the first-ever contract between a company and a black 

union, in 1937; 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph was one of the central figures 

speaking out for African-American rights during the 

1930s and 1940s and focused on labor and employment 

issues; 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph was a leader in the movement 

challenging discrimination in defense industry jobs and 

used the threat of a march on Washington as part of an 

effort to lobby President Roosevelt to sign an executive 

order banning discrimination within the Government and 

the defense industries; 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph was, in 1947, a leader in the 

movement to end segregation in the military and called 

for African-Americans to refuse to register for the draft 

until these practices were ended and was successful in 

this effort, which saw President Truman issue an executive order barring discrimination in the military on July 

26, 1948; 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph was the leading force behind the 

March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom and worked 

with many old friends and foes of his earlier labor struggles to ensure the success of the event, which took place 

on August 28, 1963, drew a crowd of over 250,000 people, and was the occasion of a meeting with President 

Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.; and 

Whereas A. Philip Randolph died in 1979 as an elder statesman of the civil rights movement, a much admired figure 
3 

•HRES 150 EH 

and role model for the young people of this Nation: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that A. Phillip Randolph should be recognized for his 

lifelong leadership and work to end discrimination and secure 

equal employment and labor opportunities for all Americans. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 756.

#### Estate of MacManu’s et al. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 6th Cir.

*John J. Sloan*and *Harold Goodman*for petitioner.

*Solicitor ■ General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack, Morton K. Rothschild*and *Joseph W. Bishop, Jr.*for respondent.

Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

   I, Thomas Diemer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Greenstar
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: December 14, 2007

By: /s/ Thomas Diemer
    -----------------
    Thomas Diemer, Chief Financial Officer,
    principal accounting and financial officer
No. 508.

#### Irving Trust Co., Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. *v.*Los Angeles et al.

November 11, 1935.

*Mr. A. B. Memhard*for petitioners.

*Messrs. David M. Wood, John H. Hoffman, W. Morton Carden, Budolph L. Von Bermuth, Harry G. Gray,*and *Walter Gordon Merritt*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
## 386
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF ‘TEXAS **AUSTIN --ZiZ**  Board **Of IASlWMUO**  

### CQ8Wi§dOA~rS AUStiA, Texas Centlemenr Attention of liir.

afoul- **MO9A** 

### ment QAthe abote 

### ata
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14588]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure (#10719).
    Date/Time: June 25, 2001, 12 pm-3 pm.
    Place: Room 320, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Open teleconference Meeting. Persons wishing to 
attend the meeting at NSF should contact Richard Hilderbrandt to 
arrange for a visitor's pass.
    Contact Person: Dr. Richard Hilderbrandt, Program Director, 
Division of Advanced Computational Infrastructure and Research, 
Suite 1122, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230, Tel: (703) 292-7093, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cfbda7a6a3abaabdad8fa1bca9e1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6849e9f9a92938494b6988590d8919980">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Purpose of Meeting: To develop a plan for the preparation of a 
report to the National Science Foundation concerning the broad topic 
of advanced cyberinfrastructure and the evaluation of the existing 
Partnerships for Advanced Computational Infrastructure.
    Agenda: Tentative.
    Noon--Gathering and review of agenda for meeting.
    12:15  Sharing of developments since last meeting and further 
clarification of charge and approach. Summary of new material on 
worksite.
    12:30  Sub-committee activities.
    1:15  Develop interview list and process.
    1:45  Discussion of overall flowchart of process.
    2:15  Preliminary discussion of outline/structure of report.
    2:45  Next steps and next meeting.
    3:00  Adjourn.

    Dated: June 6, 2001.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-14588 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-Mst


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Genaro GASCA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6071.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1



May 9, 2016


Mr. Timothy A. Knox
6904 Paradise Lane
Midland, Texas 79707


Re:    Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) dated as of August 4, 2014, between CSI Compressco GP Inc. (the “Company”) and Timothy A. Knox


Dear Tim:


In order to address the challenges that the Company continues to face with the downturn in the oil and gas market, we are implementing workweek schedule and wage reductions. 


Please sign below to confirm your consent and agreement that your current Base Salary set forth in Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement will be reduced by 10% from $400,000 to $360,000 (on an annual basis) effective May 14, 2016. You also understand that your incentive compensation under the CICP (as defined in the Employment Agreement) for 2016 will be based on your Base Salary in effect on December 31, 2016. You further acknowledge and agree that this salary reduction does not constitute “Good Reason” for termination as defined in Section 4.4 of the Employment Agreement.


In this very difficult market, we appreciate your continued commitment and hard work. 


Sincerely, 


/s/Bass C. Wallace, Jr.            
Bass C. Wallace, Jr., General Counsel


Agreed to and acknowledged 
on May 9, 2016 by:


/s/Timothy A. Knox                 
Timothy A. Knox




CSI Compressco LP    P.O. Box 60760, Midland, TX 79711.
1-432-563-1170    www.csicompressco.com
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Salameh, Chief Executive Officert of PLX Technology, Inc.,certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form
10-Q of PLX Technology, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 4, 2004



/s/ Michael J. Salameh	   Michael J. Salameh
   Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

---