alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Martin P. Moore, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Cost-U-Less, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  November 11, 2003


/s/   Martin P. Moore
------------------------------------------------------
Martin P. Moore
Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: PACIFIC TRADING COMPANY, STEPHEN J. KLEMEN JR., AND RAYMOND S. BUCK 

DOCKET NUMBER: 75-1; 226 

DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1976 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION AND ORDER OF ALJ 

NOTE: FORMERLY CEA DOCKET # 226 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

On Appeal before the 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

In the Matter of PACIFIC TRADING COMPANY, STEPHEN J. KLEMEN, JR. AND RAYMOND 

S. BUCK 

CFTC Docket No. 75-1 

Order Affirming Decision and Order of Administrative Law Judge 

ORDER 

Pacific Trading Co., Stephen J. Klemen, Jr. and Raymond S. Buck have appealed 

the decision and order of the administrative law judge ordering that respondents 

cease and desist from filing incomplete or inaccurate series '01 or '03 reports 

with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, suspending their registration for 

a period of seven days and prohibiting them from trading on or subject to the 

rules of any contract market for a period of seven days. The Division of 

Enforcement has appealed the sanction imposed on the appellants. 

The administrative law judge found that the respondents willfully violated 

sections 4(g) and 4(i) of the Commodity Exchange Act by filing inaccurate 

reports with the Commodity Exchange Authority. n1 

n1 Since the institution of this proceeding, the Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission came into being and took jurisdiction of this matter 

under authority of sections 411 and 412 of Pub. L. No. 93-463 (Oct. 23, 

1974). This matter was formerly docketed as CEA-226. 

The Commission, having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, 

hereby affirms the decision and order of the administrative law judge. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the decision and order herein is affirmed. 

By the Commission (Chairman BAGLEY, Vice-Chairman RAINBOLT, and Commissioner 

SEEVERS). Commissioner DUNN dissenting only from that portion of the order 

imposing a sanction on Pacific Trading Company, suspending its registration as a 

futures commission merchant for a period of seven days. Commissioner MARTIN not 

participating. 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

William T. Bagley 

Chairman 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Dated: February 9, 1976 
Page 2 

LOAD-DATE: August 6, 2008 
Page 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          80,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,986
<PP&E>                                         186,940
<DEPRECIATION>                               (107,037)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          379,570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,423
<OTHER-SE>                                   (169,987)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (162,564)
<SALES>                                          1,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,429,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (39,239)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,388,412
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,388,412
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,388,412
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                        1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                          4516
<SECURITIES>		                  0
<RECEIVABLES>			                0
<ALLOWANCES>			                 0
<INVENTORY>				                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>			             4516
<PP&E>				                      0
<DEPRECIATION>			               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			               4516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>	          115,348
<BONDS>				                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>		         0
<PREFERRED>				                 0
<COMMON>		                      85,045
<OTHER-SE>				                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    200,393
<SALES>				                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>			             0
<CGS>					                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>			                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                34,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>	               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>			              0
<INCOME-TAX>			                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>		           0
<DISCONTINUED>			               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>			              0
<CHANGES>			                    0
<NET-INCOME>		                  (34,863)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
Allied Capital Corporation II and Subsidiaries
Exhibit 11 Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Share
Form 10-Q
March 31, 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     For the Three Months Ended
                                                                               March 31,
                                                                    -----------------------------
                                                                         1997           1996
                                                                    -----------------------------
<S>                                                                     <C>            <C>
Primary Earnings Per Share:

         Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting
              from Operations                                           $3,033,000     $5,949,000
                                                                    =============================

         Weighted average number of
              shares outstanding                                         7,583,306      7,080,110

         Weighted average number of
              shares issuable on exercise
              of outstanding stock options                                  91,073         63,002
                                                                    -----------------------------

         Weighted average number of shares and
              share equivalents outstanding                              7,674,379      7,143,112
                                                                    =============================

         Earnings per Share                                                  $0.40          $0.83
                                                                    =============================

Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:

         Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting
              from Operations                                           $3,033,000     $5,949,000
                                                                    =============================

         Weighted average number of
              shares and share equivalents
              outstanding as computed for
              primary earnings per share                                 7,674,379      7,143,112

         Weighted average of additional
              shares issuable on exercise
              of outstanding stock options                                       -         14,080
                                                                    -----------------------------

         Weighted average of shares and
              share equivalents outstanding, as adjusted                 7,674,379      7,157,192
                                                                    =============================

         Earnings per Share                                                  $0.40          $0.83
                                                                    =============================
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32396-32397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14975]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366]


Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.; Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear 
Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Availability of the Final Supplement 4 
to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement Regarding License Renewal 
for the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2

    Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
(NRC) has published a final plant-specific Supplement 4 to the Generic 
Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS), NUREG-1437, regarding the 
renewal of operating licenses DPR-57 and NPF-5 for the Edwin I. Hatch 
Nuclear Plant

[[Page 32397]]

(HNP), Units 1 and 2, for an additional 20 years of operation. The HNP 
units are operated by the Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. 
(SNC). HNP is located in Appling County, Georgia. Possible alternatives 
to the proposed action (license renewal) include no action and 
reasonable alternative methods of power generation.
    In Section 9.3 of the report:

    The staff recommends that the Commission determine that the 
adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for HNP, Units 1 
and 2 are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal 
for energy planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable. This 
recommendation is based on (1) the analysis and findings in the 
Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of 
Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-1437; (2) the ER [Environmental Report] 
submitted by SNC; (3) consultation with other Federal, State, and 
local agencies; (4) the staff's own independent review; and (5) the 
staff's consideration of public comments.

    The final Supplement 4 to the GEIS is available electronically for 
public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room located at One White 
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, 
or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's 
document management system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC 
Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html (the Public 
Electronic Reading Room).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Andrew J. Kugler, Generic Issues, 
Environmental, Financial, and Rulemaking Branch, Division of Regulatory 
Improvement Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 
DC 20555. Mr. Kugler may be contacted at (301) 415-2828 or by writing 
to: Andrew J. Kugler, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, MS 0-11 F1, 
Washington, DC 20555.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31 day of May, 2001.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David B. Matthews,
Director, Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs, Office of 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 01-14975 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned officer of Storage Computer Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that, as of the date of this statement,
the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002.



The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.





|Dated: March 31, 2003 |  | /S/    THEODORE J.
GOODLANDER                                     |  | 
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                      |  | Name:    Theodore J. Goodlander Title:    Chief Executive Officer |  |
H. Res. 157 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 12, 2009. 

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time through 

the legislative day of February 13, 2009, for the Speaker to 

entertain motions that the House suspend the rules. The 

Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this section. 

SEC. 2. The matter after the resolved clause of House 

Resolution 10 is amended to read as follows: ‘‘That unless 

otherwise ordered, before Monday, May 18, 2009, the hour 

of daily meeting of the House shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; 

noon on Tuesdays; 10 a.m. on Wednesday and Thursday, and 

9 a.m. on all other days of the week; and from Monday, May 

18, 2009, until the end of the first session, the hour of daily 

meeting of the House shall be noon on Mondays; 10 a.m. on 
2 

•HRES 157 EH 

Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all 

other days of the week.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarter Report of Mantra Venture Group Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Warren, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| 

By:/s/ David WarrenDavid WarrenChief Financial OfficerJanuary 18, 2008

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20492

Summary Calendar

 

GARY FARMER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HALLIBURTON COMPANY, doing business as 

Halliburton Energy Services

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H:98-CV-3285)

_________________________________________________________________

November 26, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Gary Farmer appeals from the final judgment, following two

summary judgments, on his claims for age discrimination under §

5.01 of the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act, Tex. Labor Code

Ann. § 21.051, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (AEDA), 29

U.S.C. §§ 621-634, and § 510 of the Employment Retirement Income

Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1140. We affirm the judgment of

the district court for essentially the reasons stated in the

district court’s detailed 27 September 2000 and 12 April 2001

opinions.
2

For Farmer’s ERISA claim, and assuming Farmer established a

prima facie case, Halliburton provided a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for its selection of Jamail over Farmer to

hold the new Travel Manager position created by Halliburton’s 1996

Shared Services Initiative (SSI), and the three year age difference

between Farmer (51) and Jamail (48) was insignificant under

O’Connor v. Consol. Coin Caterers Corp., 517 U.S. 308 (1996).

Consequently, the inference of pretext was insufficient to

withstand summary judgment. Also, Halliburton provided a

legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for including Farmer in the

reduction-in-force (RIF) that resulted from the SSI, and Farmer’s

evidence of pretext was insufficient. 

Claims of age discrimination under the ADEA and the Texas

Commission on Human Rights Act are analyzed under the same

analytical framework — the one announced in McDonnell Douglas Corp.

v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973). See Evans v. City of Houston, Tex.,

246 F.3d 344, 348 (2001). The district court correctly concluded:

Halliburton’s justification for its decision to hire Jamail

(because he was more qualified) was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason; Farmer’s evidence was insufficient to

establish pretext; and Farmer failed to establish a prima facie

case with respect to the RIF, because he did not raise a factual

issue as to whether Farmer was included in the RIF based on

impermissible age discrimination. Rather, as the district court

noted, Farmer raised claims more properly raised for his ERISA

claim. See Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604, 612 (1993).

AFFIRMED
*

The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Untied States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2685

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Nebraska.

*

Rolando Garcia-Landeros, Legal * [UNPUBLISHED]

Name: Alfreo Garcia-Landeros, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: December 21, 2001

Filed: January 2, 2002

___________

Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Rolando Garcia-Landeros pleaded guilty to distributing methamphetamine in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and the district court*

 sentenced him to 60 months

imprisonment and five years supervised release. In this direct criminal appeal,

Garcia-Landeros challenges the court's denial of safety-valve relief.
-2-

We find no clear error, because the court's finding that Garcia-Landeros had

not been forthcoming is supported by the testimony and exhibits introduced at

sentencing. See United States v. Tournier, 171 F.3d 645, 647 (8th Cir. 1999)

(standard of review); United States v. Santana, 150 F.3d 860, 864 (8th Cir. 1998)

(defendant carries burden of demonstrating that he has truthfully provided to

government before sentencing all information regarding relevant crime); United

States v. Velasquez, 141 F.3d 1280, 1283 (8th Cir.) (affirming denial of safety-valve

relief where there was extrinsic support for government's opinion that defendant had

not been fully truthful), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 897 (1998).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 363.

#### Levy *v.*Irving Trust Co., Trustee.

Motion to dismiss submitted September 10, 1935.

Decided October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Jonas J. Shapiro*for appellant.

*Mr. John Neville Boyle*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.