alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 198 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1392 

[Report No. 111–494] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and 

providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2010 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of May 26, 2010, providing 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1392 RH 

1 for consideration or disposition of the Senate amendment 

2 to the bill (H.R. 4213) to amend the Internal Revenue 

3 Code of 1986 to extend certain expiring provisions, and 

4 for other purposes. 

5 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the 

6 calendar day of May 30, 2010, for the Speaker to enter7 tain motions that the House suspend the rules. The 

8 Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority 

9 Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter 

10 for consideration pursuant to this section. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 198 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1392 

[Report No. 111–494] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

the rules. providing for consideration of motions to suspend tions reported from the Committee on Rules, and with respect to consideration of certain resoluMAY 25, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, filed 

on May 15, 2023, by Bar Counsel and the Respondent, Stephen Anthony Glessner, in 

which Respondent consents to the imposition of an indefinite suspension from the practice 

of law, it is this 16th of May 2023,

ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that, effective immediately,

the Respondent, Stephen Anthony Glessner, be indefinitely suspended from the 

practice of law in the State of Maryland for violations of Rules 19-301.1, 19-301.3, 19-

301.4, 19-301.5, 19-301.15(a) and (c), 19-301.16(d), 19-305.3(a) and (b), 19-308.1(b), 19-

308.4(a) and (d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct, Maryland Rule 

19-407(a) and (b), and §10-304(a) of the Business Occupations & Professions Article; and

it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Stephen 

Anthony Glessner from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact 

to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of 

all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

 /s/ Shirley M. Watts

 Senior Justice

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

STEPHEN ANTHONY GLESSNER

*

*

*

*

*

*

 IN THE

 SUPREME COURT

 OF MARYLAND

 AG No. 44

 September Term, 2022
# FCM Data July 2012

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF July 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002012FROM REPORTS FILED BY September 04,&KFF0000 &K0000002012	&P of &N
----

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                    |   |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                  Eduardo                  Biancardi |   |   |   |   |
| Eduardo                  Biancardi                      |   |   |   |   |
| Chief                    Executive Officer              |   |   |   |   |
| Date:                November 8, 2007                   |   |   |   |   |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique Barragan CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-4600.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 2006.

Decided: Dec. 19, 2006.

Angela Parrott, Federal Defenders of Western North Carolina, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Kevin Zolot, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Enrique Barragan Contreras pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine and 100 kilograms or more of marijuana. He was sentenced to 168 months in prison. On appeal, Barragan Contreras’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that there were no meritorious issues for appeal but raising the question of whether Barragan Contreras’s motion to substitute counsel was properly denied. Barragan Contreras has filed a pro se supplemental brief raising the following issues: (1) whether the search of his home was proper, (2) whether his sentence was properly enhanced for possession of a firearm, and (3) whether the district court correctly calculated the amount of marijuana attributable to him. We affirm.

Regarding the claim raised by counsel, while the court initially denied Barragan Contreras’s motion to substitute counsel, the court granted the motion when Barragan Contreras renewed it, and he was appointed substitute counsel for sentencing. Barragan Contreras does not allege any prejudice, and there is no indication in the record that the denial of the first motion hindered his defense. Accordingly, any error was harmless.

As to the pro se claims, claim one was waived by Barragan Contreras’s guilty plea. Claim two was foreclosed by his plea agreement. Finally, claim three is without merit. Even removing all marijuana amounts from the calculated drug *255total would not have changed Barragan Contreras’s offense level. Thus, any error was harmless.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Barragan Contreras’s conviction and sentence. We deny his motion to extend time to supplement his pro se brief. This court requires that counsel inform her client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Federal Register: September 22, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 183)]
[Notices]
[Page 49499]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22se97-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 8, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-25260 Filed 9-18-97; 2:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
#### Manuel Del Toro AGUILAR; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-70957.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 12, 2008.

*693Manuel Del Toro Aguilar, Baldwin Park, CA, pro se.

Anita Sanchez Zamora, Baldwin Park, CA, pro se.

Kurt B. Larson, Esquire, Oil, Stacy S. Paddack, Esquire, Lisa Marie Arnold, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le-fevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Manuel Del Toro Aguilar and his wife Anita Sanchez Zamora, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying their application for cancellation of removal based on then* failure to establish the requisite exceptional or extremely unusual hardship to their qualifying United States citizen children.

Petitioners contend that the immigration judge erred in finding that the female petitioner did not establish ten years continuous residence, and that the male petitioner was ineligible for cancellation relief because of his felony conviction. Petitioners further contend that the BIA violated their due process rights by depriving them of a fan* and full hearing by not considering the IJ’s rulings on these issues.

Petitioners fail to present a colorable due process claim. The BIA’s determination that petitioners failed to establish hardship is dispositive of their cancellation of removal claims, and it was unnecessary for the BIA to consider the IJ’s findings on the other cancellation factors. *See INS v. Bagamasbad,*429 U.S. 24, 25, 97 S.Ct. 200, 50 L.Ed.2d 190 (1976). We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to demonstrate the requisite hardship to their qualifying relatives. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*694ed by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL01-83-000]

Take notice that on May 25, 2001, CE Generation, L.L.C. tendered for filing a Petition for Enforcement Action and/or Declaratory Order and Motion to Consolidate.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 25, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically                           ( print page 31227)                        via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14560  Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1352 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Taiwanese American Heritage Week and 

recognizing the close relationship between the United States and Taiwan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2010 

Mr. WU (for himself, Mr. HONDA, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. 

ROHRABACHER, Mr. SIRES, Mr. INGLIS, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. 

DEFAZIO, Mr. HOLT, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. KIND, Mr. 

COURTNEY, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. 

BOSWELL, Mr. DONNELLY of Indiana, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. PETRI, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. TONKO, Mr. 

PERLMUTTER, Mr. SERRANO, and Mr. GRAYSON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Taiwanese American Heritage Week and recognizing the close relationship between the United States and Taiwan. 

Whereas in 1992, Congress passed Public Law 102–450 to 

designate May of each year as Asian/Pacific American 

Heritage Month; 

Whereas since 1999, the second week of May, beginning on 

Mother’s Day, has been recognized as Taiwanese American Heritage Week; 

Whereas May 9, 2010, through May 16, 2010, marks the 

12th annual Taiwanese American Heritage Week; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1352 IH 

Whereas Taiwanese Americans are a vital and vibrant part 

of United States society and have made profound contributions in such diverse fields as the arts, science, technology, business, public service, and athletics; 

Whereas distinguished Taiwanese Americans include Dr. 

Yuan Tseh Lee, 1986 Nobel Laureate in chemistry, Dr. 

Min Kao, co-founder, chairman, and CEO of Garmin 

Ltd., Vienna Teng, popular musician and songwriter, and 

Jason Wu, acclaimed fashion designer who designed First 

Lady Michelle Obama’s inaugural gown, which is now 

part of the permanent ‘‘First Ladies at the Smithsonian’’ 

exhibition at the National Museum of American History; 

Whereas for more than 60 years, the United States and Taiwan have fostered a close relationship that has been of 

mutual political, economic, cultural, and strategic benefit; 

Whereas Taiwan is one of the United States’ strongest allies 

and is dedicated to the principles of democracy, human 

rights, and the rule of law; and 

Whereas Taiwanese Americans are committed to deepening 

the friendship and understanding between the people of 

Taiwan and the people of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of Taiwanese 

3 American Heritage Week; 

4 (2) recognizes the significant contributions of 

5 Taiwanese Americans and the important role that 

6 Taiwanese Americans play in strengthening the fab7 ric of United States society; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1352 IH 

1 (3) remains committed to enhancing peace, sta2 bility, and prosperity in Taiwan and across the Tai3 wan Strait. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teen Education Group,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for  the quarter  ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
L. Wilson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: July 31, 2008



                                        By: /s/ ROBERT L. WILSON
                                            ___________________________
                                                Robert L. Wilson
                                                Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

           Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
          U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
                         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, William A. Coskey, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ENGlobal
Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of ENGlobal Corporation.


Date: March 8, 2010                     //s// William A. Coskey
                                        William A. Coskey
                                        Chief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
No. 432. No. 433. No. 434.

#### Bedell *v.*United States; L. E. Chapman *v.*Same; and H. E. Chapman *v.*Same.

October 21, 1935.

*Messrs. Eugene*
      *629
      *D. O’Sullivan*and *Louis H. Salinger*for petitioners.

*628Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*629
      *Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Keenan,*and *Messrs. Mahlon D. Kiefer*and *W. Marvin Smith*for the United States.
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

            EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
               (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                            1996         1995

Earnings before extraordinary items                     $261,967     $190,430
Preferred dividend requirement of                
  predecessor company                                       -          (6,349)

Net earnings before extraordinary items
  available to common shareholders                       261,967      184,081

Extraordinary items                                      (28,667)         817

Net earnings available to common shareholders           $233,300     $184,898
                                                    

Computation of primary earnings per common share

Shares used in calculation of per share data:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding              60,801       47,620
  Dilutive effect of assumed exercise of certain
    stock options                                            669          503
  Dilutive effect of assumed conversion of
    certain preferred shares                                  33          -

  Weighted average common shares used to calculate
    primary earnings per share                            61,503       48,123

Primary earnings per common share                           (*)          (*)


Computation of fully diluted earnings per common share

Shares used in calculation of per share data:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding              60,801       47,620
  Dilutive effect of assumed exercise of certain
    stock options                                          1,060          608
  Dilutive effect of assumed conversion of
    certain preferred shares                                  33          -

  Weighted average common shares used to calculate
    fully diluted earnings per share                      61,894       48,228

Fully diluted earnings per common share                     (*)          (*)

Reported earnings per share based on
  weighted average common shares outstanding
Before extraordinary items                                 $4.31        $3.87
Extraordinary items                                         (.47)         .01

Net earnings                                               $3.84        $3.88

(*)  Dilution less than 3%

                               E-2