alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM 3

        U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                Washington, D.C. 20549

INITIAL STATEMENT OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

          Filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the
Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934, Section 17(a)
          of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of
1935 or
          Section 30(f) of the Investment Company Act
of 1940


1.   Name and Address of Reporting Person
     Brown               David                   A.B.
     (Last)              (First)              (Middle)
     NS Group, Inc.
     530 West Ninth Street
     (Street)
     Newport        KY              41071
     (City)              (State)                (Zip)

2.   Date of Event Requiring Statement (Month/Day/Year)
     4/20/00

3.   IRS Identification Number of Reporting Person, if
     an Entity
     (Voluntary)

4.   Issuer Name and Ticker or Trading symbol
     NS Group, Inc.  (NSS)

5.   Relationship of Reporting Person to Issuer
     (Check all applicable)

          X    Director
               Officer (give title)
               10% Owner
               Other (specify)

6.   If Amendment, Date of Original (Month/Day/Year)






7.   Individual or Joint/Group Filing (Check applicable
line)

     X    Form filed by one Reporting Person
          Form filed by more than one Reporting Person

Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Beneficially Owned

1.        Title of Security (Instr. 4)
          See Note 1 under Explanation of Responses.

2.         Amount of Securities Beneficially Owned
  (Instr. 4)

3.         Ownership Form:  Direct (D) or Indirect (I)
          (Instr. 5)

4.         Nature of Indirect Beneficial Ownership
  (Instr. 4)

Table II - Derivative Securities Beneficially Owned
(e.g., puts, calls,
warrants, options, convertible securities)

1.   Title of Derivative Security (Instr. 4)
     Stock Option  (right to buy)  See Note 2

2.   Date Exercisable and Expiration Date
     (Month/Day/Year)

     Date Exercisable         Expiration Date
           See Note 2                   4/20/10

3.   Title and Amount of Underlying Derivative Security
     (Instr. 4)

     Title                    Amount or Number of
     Shares
     Common Stock             4,000 Shares

4.   Conversion or Exercise Price of Derivative
Security
     (Instr. 5)

     $14.5625

5.   Ownership Form of Derivative Security:  Direct (D)
     or Indirect (I) (Instr. 5)

     D


6.   Nature of Indirect Beneficial Ownership (Instr. 5)


/s/ David A.B. Brown
Signature of Reporting Person      Date:  May 1, 2000

Explanation of Responses:

Note 1:     As of the date of the event requiring
filing of this Form 3
(April 20, 2000), Mr. Brown did not beneficially own
any non-
derivative securities of NS Group, Inc.

Note 2:  Acquired by Mr. Brown upon appointment to the
Board pursuant to the 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan in a transaction exempt pursuant to Rule
16(b)(3).  Exercisable in annual increments of 33 1/3%
beginning with the first anniversary of the date of
grant.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JOHN B. BURRELL 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 140 

DATE: JULY 13, 1972 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: John B. Burrell 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 140 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that John B. Burrell has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued and 

the said John B. Burrell is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into 

a stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of 

Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said 

John B. Burrell stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) John B. Burrell, an individual whose address is 141 W. Jackson Blvd., 

Room 863, Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was at all times material herein a 

member of the Chicago Board of Trade, a duly designated contract market under 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) The registration of John B. Burrell as floor broker under the Commodity 

Exchange Act for the calendar year 1971 expired on December 31, 1971, and the 

said John B. Burrell did not submit an application for registration as a floor 

broker under the Act for the calendar year 1972 until January 19, 1972. 

(3) During the period from January 1 through January 19, 1972, John B. 

Burrell acted as floor broker by executing for others orders for the purchase or 

sale of commodities for future delivery on or subject to the rules of the 

Chicago Board of Trade. 

The Commodity Exchange Authority has advised John B. Burrell that by reason 

of the acts set forth above, he has violated section 4e of the Act and section 

1.8 of the regulations thereunder. 

The said John B. Burrell agrees to desist from such acts and practices in the 

future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation is admissible 

as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based upon acts 

or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be brought 

against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the said 

Act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to issue press releases on stipulations of compliance and to make them 

a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 

13 day of July 1972 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

John B. Burrell 

Witnessed by: 
Page 2 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINALS] 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINALS] 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 41010 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

NARCISO VALDEZ, also known as Ramon Torres Morales, also known as Ramon Torres, also known as Chicho

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11

- CR

- 196

- 2

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Narciso Valdez has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores

, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Valdez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

us to make a fair evaluation of Valdez ’s claims of ine ffective assistance of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 14, 2015
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-41010 Document: 00513192064 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2015No. 14

- 41010

2 counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied , 135 S. Ct. 123 ( 201 4).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Valdez ’s response. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further respons ibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 14-41010 Document: 00513192064 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/14/2015
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: FELIX ENDICO 

DOCKET NUMBER: 146 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 146 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Felix Endico 

(New Rochelle, New York) 

The complaint charges that the respondent exceeded the speculative trading 

limits on potato futures on December 21, 1966, and February 14, 1967. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, August 9, 1967, in New York, New York. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: MURLAS BROTHERS COMMODITIES, INC., MURLAS BROTHERS COMPANY, GEORGE J. 

MURLAS, NICHOLAS J. MURLAS AND HENRY C. GATLIN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 78 

DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1958 

DOCUMENT TYPE: SUMMARY OF CASE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Washington, September 29, 1958 

Trading Privileges Denied in Potato Futures Case: 

The U. S. Department of Agriculture today announced the issuance by Judicial 

Officer Thomas J. Flavin of a consent order imposing sanctions on two Chicago 

firms and three individuals on charges of attempting to manipulate prices of 

potato futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange in May 1957, in violation of 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The respondents, Murlas Brothers Company, Murlas Brothers Commodities, Inc., 

George J. Murlas, Nicholas J. Murlas, and Henry C. Gatlin, were charged in a 

complaint of Jan. 27, 1958, with purchasing cash potatoes and delivering them 

against short futures positions on the New York Mercantile Exchange, with the 

purpose and intent of depressing the price of the 1957 May potato future. 

Hearings in the proceeding were held in Chicago on May 21 and 22. The 

respondents subsequently filed a stipulation waiving further hearings and 

consenting to the entry of the order which imposes the following sanctions, 

effective Nov. 21, 1958 : 

Suspension of the floor-broker registrations of George J. Murlas and Henry C. 

Gatlin for 30 days; and refusal of all trading privileges to Murlas Brothers 

Commodities, Inc., Murlas Brothers Company, George J. Murlas, Nicholas J. 

Murlas, and Henry C. Gatlin for 30 days, provided that the refusal of trading 

privileges to Murlas Brothers Commodities, Inc., shall not be construed to 

prohibit the corporation from trading for the accounts of customers and carrying 

positions for customers. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Scott Frohman, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Options Media Group Holdings, Inc.; and





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: December 8, 2011





/s/ Scott FrohmanScott Frohman

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	6

<CIK>	0000744822

<NAME>	Fidelity Investment Trust

<SERIES>

	<NUMBER>	91

	<NAME>	Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund

<MULTIPLIER>	1,000



<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>
6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>
OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>
APR-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>
319,116
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>
338,298
<RECEIVABLES>
12,455
<ASSETS-OTHER>
2,668
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>
0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>
353,421
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>
16,909
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>
0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>
1,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>
18,863
<SENIOR-EQUITY>
0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>
821,454
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>
38,657
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>
40,194
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>
(17,834)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>
0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>
(487,383)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>
0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>
18,321
<NET-ASSETS>
334,558
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>
2,975
<INTEREST-INCOME>
437
<OTHER-INCOME>
0
<EXPENSES-NET>
1,999
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>
1,413
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>
(53,155)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>
123,155
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>
71,413
<EQUALIZATION>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>
0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>
0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>
7,103
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>
8,640
<SHARES-REINVESTED>
0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>
63,849
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>
0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>
(434,228)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>
19,247
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>
0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>
1,011
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>
0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>
2,022
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>
275,561
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>
6.740
<PER-SHARE-NII>
 .040
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>
1.870
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>
0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>
0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>
0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>
8.650
<EXPENSE-RATIO>
149





</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ROY D. SIMMONS 

DOCKET NUMBER: 108 

DATE: AUGUST 14, 1962 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ADMISSION OF FACTS, WAIVER OF HEARING AND CONSENT TO ENTRY OF AN 

ORDER 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Roy D. Simmons, Respondent 

CEA Docket No. 108 

Admission of Facts, Waiver of Hearing and Consent to Entry of an Order 

Respondent Roy D. Simmons hereby submits this stipulation and waiver in 

accordance with the provisions of section 0.4(b) of the Rules of Practice under 

the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR 0.4(b)). 

Respondent Roy D. Simmons hereby admits the following facts: 

(1) That he is now, and was at all times material herein, a registered floor 

broker under the Commodity exchange Act and a member of the Chicago Mercantile 

Exchange; 

(2) That the Chicago Mercantile Exchange is now, and was at all times 

material herein, a duly designated contract market under the Commodity Exchange 

Act; 

(3) That on each day during the period January 2 through January 11, 1962, he 

held open contracts in shell egg futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange of 

25 or more carlots in a single future; 

(4) That he submitted reports to the Commodity Exchange Authority which 

purported to show all transactions executed for him and his position in egg 

futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange on each business day during the 

period January 2 through January 11, 1962, but that such reports did not show 

the actual transactions executed for him or the true positions held by him; 

(5) That on January 3, 4, and 5, 1962, he held speculative net short 

positions of 69, 84, and 54 carlots, respectively, in the January 1962 shell egg 

future on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange; 

(6) That on January 10, 1962, he held a speculative net long position of 54 

carlots in the January 1962 shell egg future on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange; 

(7) That on January 2, 1962, he made speculative sales of 70 carlots of 

January 1962 shell egg futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange; and 

(8) That on January 9, 1962, he made speculative purchases of 69 carlots of 

January 1962 shell egg futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. 

Respondent Roy D. Simmons hereby waives hearing on the charges in the 

complaint and consents to the entry of an order suspending his registration as a 

floor broker under the Commodity Exchange Act for a period of thirty (30) days, 

and directing all contract markets to refuse all trading privileges to him for 

the same period, such refusal to apply to all trading done and positions held by 

the said Roy D. Simmons, directly or indirectly. 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 
Page 2 

ROY D. SIMMONS 

8/14/62 

(Date) 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
Order entered October 21 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 01368

- CV

FREDIS BENITEZ, ET AL.

, Appellant s

V.

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial C ourt Cause No. 13

- 03671



### O RDER

We GRANT appellants’ October 1, 2013, motion for an extension of time to file a notice

of appeal. The notice of appeal filed with the trial court on October 1, 2013 is deemed timely for

jurisdictional purposes.

/s/ ADA BROW N

JUSTICE
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading 

Energy and Environmental Markets A

CFTC Market Surveillance of COmarketsWe are committed

Rafa

Division of Marke

Market 

Wednesday, M
The US has a large CO2 f

Source: Gapminder.org using Trendalyzer Visualization Softwa
Are the BRIC countries fo

Source: Gapminder.org using Trendalyzer Visualization Softwa
The path has not been 

Source: Gapminder.org using Trendalyzer Visualization Softwa
Abatement does not hav

needlessly costly

Source: Gapminder.org using Trendalyzer Visualization Softwa
The market can help us find 

cost‐effective reducti

Source: Pathways to a Low‐Carbon Economy, McKinsey & Co., 
Emissions Markets

History in the U.S.

• Environmental Financial Markets emerge following th

phase down trading program for gasoline in 1982‐198

• SO2 begins trading through EPA annual auction with C

Trade in 1995

• NOX begins trading in 1999

• Chicago Climate Exchange launched in 2003. Carbon F

Traded

• NYMEX’s Green Exchange launched in 2008

• Several bills currently before Congress for National M

Allowances
Active Futures Contracts Trade i

Emissions Markets

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2, Mar.05)

Nitrogen Oxide (NOX, Feb.07)

Mandatory Carbon Dioxide (CO

Certified Emission ReductionEuropean Union Allowance

RGGI Allowance

Voluntary Carbon 

Carbon Financial In

California Climate 

Emission 
Emissions Markets

The role of the CFTC

The CFTC will be a force to ensure e

market integrity

1. It makes sense we regulate emissions f

markets

2. We are already doing it.

3. The upcoming issues are not new to us

We are c
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: LANDON V. BUTLER 

CITATION: 18 Agric. Dec. 20 

DOCKET NUMBER: 65 

DATE: JANUARY 12, 1959 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER TERMINATING SUSPENSION OF TRADING PRIVILEGES 

(No. 5757) 

In re LANDON V. BUTLER et al. CEA Docket No. 65. Decided January 12, 1959. 

Trading Privileges Restored

All contract markets are notified that they need no longer refuse trading 

privileges to respondent Butler pursuant to the order of June 20, 1955. 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer

ORDER TERMINATING SUSPENSION OF TRADING PRIVILEGES

On June 20, 1955, an order was entered in this proceeding under the Commodity 

Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. Chapter 1) directing the contract markets to refuse 

respondents all trading privileges thereon "until further order of the Secretary 

of Agriculture." The order was entered in connection with findings, after 

default by respondents, that the respondents had violated the Commodity Exchange 

Act. 

By a letter dated December 17, 1958, respondent Landon V. Butler has 

requested restoration of his trading privileges. His letter states that he has 

been in bankruptcy since 1955, that he is trying to start again in the business 

world in order to support his family and that it is necessary to use the futures 

market for hedging in order to operate a grain business. 

Since the trading privileges of respondent Butler have now been suspended for 

three and a half years and in view of his plea that he needs to hedge on the 

futures market in order to engage in the grain business, his request is granted. 

Accordingly, all contract markets are hereby notified that they need no longer 

refuse trading priveleges to respondent Landon V. Butler pursuant to the order 

of June 20, 1955. We should point out, however, to respondent Butler, that any 

futures trading he might do upon contract markets will naturally get special 

attention in the administration of the Commodity Exchange Act. 

A copy hereof shall be served upon respondent Butler and upon all contract 

markets. 

LOAD-DATE: June 8, 2008 
Page 2
H. Res. 1484 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 29, 2010. 

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable Robert C. Byrd, a Senator 

from the State of West Virginia. 

Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the 

House as the Speaker may designate, together with such 

Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed to attend the funeral. 

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions 

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of 

the deceased. 

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased Senator. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7071

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD ALFONZO ABBOTT, a/k/a Bibby,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-92-65, CA-95-468-6)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Alfonzo Abbott, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Abbott, Nos. CR-92-65; CA-95-

468-6 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 1992, and June 23, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process. We deny the motions for bail and

for appointment of counsel.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION
                                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I,
Raymond E. McElhaney, Principal Executive Officer and I, Frank L. Jennings, Principal
Financial Officer of Blue Star Energy, Inc. (the Company) certify that:

1.       
          I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2.       
          Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
          the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
          were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
          report; and

3.       
          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
          included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
          and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.

Date:    December 7, 2007

/s/ Raymond E. McElhaneyRaymond
E. McElhaney Principal Executive Officer

/s/ Frank L. JenningsFrank L. Jennings Principal Financial Officer

---