alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3 (1 of 2)



LOGO

April 16, 2014

Mtro. Emilio R. Lozoya Austin

Director General

Petróleos Mexicanos

Avenida Marina Nacional No. 329

Torre Ejecutiva Piso 44

11311 México D.F.

México

Dear Mtro. Lozoya Austin:

We hereby consent to all references to our firm as set forth in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ending
December 31, 2013 (the Form 20-F), under the heading Exploration and Production (Reserves), and to the filing of our audit letter dated February 24, 2014, as an exhibit to the Form 20-F. We have audited the
estimates of proved oil, condensate, natural gas, and oil equivalent reserves owned by the United Mexican States (Mexico), as of January 1, 2014, for 29 fields located offshore Mexico in the Northeastern Marine Region. These
estimates were prepared by Pemex-Exploración y Producción in accordance with the reserves definitions of Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



Sincerely,NETHERLAND, SEWELL INTERNATIONAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.By:

LOGORobert C. Barg, P.E.President


TMS:ART

1601 ELM STREET, SUITE 4500 
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201-4754  PH 214-969-5401  FAX 214-969-5411



---

Exhibit 10.3 (2 of 2)



LOGO

April 16, 2014

Mtro. Emilio R. Lozoya Austin

Director General

Petróleos Mexicanos

Avenida Marina Nacional No. 329

Torre Ejecutiva Piso 44

11311 México D.F.

México

Dear Mtro. Lozoya Austin:

We hereby consent to all references to our firm as set forth in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ending
December 31, 2013 (the Form 20-F), under the heading Exploration and Production (Reserves), and to the filing of our audit letter dated February 24, 2014, as an exhibit to the Form 20-F. We have audited the
estimates of proved oil, condensate, natural gas, and oil equivalent reserves owned by the United Mexican States (Mexico), as of January 1, 2014, for 114 fields located onshore Mexico in the Southern Region. These estimates were
prepared by Pemex-Exploración y Producción in accordance with the reserves definitions of Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



Sincerely,NETHERLAND, SEWELL INTERNATIONAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.By:

LOGORobert C. Barg, P.E.President


TMS:ART

1601 ELM STREET, SUITE 4500 
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201-4754  PH 214-969-5401  FAX 214-969-5411
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                                                EXOGEN, INC.

                                             EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   CALCULATION OF SHARES USED IN COMPUTING
                                             NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                    (in thousands, except per share data)


                                                                         For the years ended September 30,    
                                                                      ------------------------------------- 
                                                                         1996          1995           1994
                                                                      --------      --------      ---------   
<S>                                                                   <C>           <C>           <C>
Net loss ........................................................     $(10,588)     $ (7,051)     $  (3,401)
                                                                      ========      ========      =========


Net loss per share 
------------------ 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common Stock ....................................................        9,875
                                                                      -------- 
     Total ......................................................        9,875
                                                                      ======== 

Net loss per share ..............................................     $  (1.07)
                                                                      =========


Pro forma net loss per share
----------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common Stock ....................................................                      7,489          1,261
Redeemable Preferred Stock:
     Series A ...................................................                         --          3,750
     Series B ...................................................                         --          1,840
Stock options ...................................................                         85            169
                                                                                    --------      ---------
     Total ......................................................                      7,574          7,020
                                                                                    ========      =========


Pro forma net loss per share ....................................                   $  (0.93)     $   (0.48)
                                                                                    ========      =========


</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JOSEPH J. DROWINSKI 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 89 

DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1965 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Joseph J. Drowinski 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 89 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Joseph J. Drowinski 

has violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) 

and the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 

CFR, Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has boon issued 

and the said Joseph J. 

Drowinski is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into a 

stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of 

Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said 

Joseph J. Drowinski stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) Joseph J. Drowinski, an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was on August 13, 1965, a 

registered floor broker under the Commodity Exchange Act and a member of the 

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, a duly designated contract market under 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) On August 13, 1965, Joseph J. Drowinski executed 140 transactions in 

regulated commodity futures on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. 

However, with respect to 133 of such transactions, in each instance he failed to 

prepare a trading card or other record 

clearly identifying the opposite floor broker or other trader with whom such 

transaction was executed. 

The Secretary of Agriculture has advised Joseph J. Drowinski that his failure 

to keep full and complete records of futures transactions, as described above, 

was in violation of section 4g of the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.35 of 

the regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said Joseph J. Drowinski agrees to desist from such acts and practices in 

the future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation shall be 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 

7 day of October 1965 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Witnessed by: 
Page 2 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                   SUBSIDIARIES OF BRYLANE INC./BRYLANE, L.P.

VP Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation/(1)/

VGP Corporation, a Delaware corporation/(2)/

VLP Corporation, a Delaware corporation/(2)/

Brylane, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership/(3)/

Brylane Capital Corp., a Delaware corporation/(4)/

B.L. Management Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation/(4)/

B.L. Catalog Distribution, Inc., a Delaware corporation/(4)/

B.N.Y. Service Corp., a Delaware corporation/(4)/

K.S. Management Services, Inc./(4)/

B.L. Management Services Partnership, a New York general partnership/(5)/

B.L. Catalog Distribution Partnership, an Indiana general partnership/(6)/

C.O.B. Management Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation/(4)/

Chadwick's Tradename Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation/(4)/

--------------------------
/(1)/  100% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of VP Holding
Corporation are owned by Brylane Inc.

/(2)/ 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of each of these
entities is owned by VP Holding Corporation.

/(3)/  VGP Corporation owns the sole general partnership interest in Brylane,
L.P., with a 16.6% profit and loss interest therein; VLP Corporation owns the
sole limited partnership interest in Brylane, L.P., with a 83.4% profit and loss
interest therein.

/(4)/ 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of each of these
entities is owned by Brylane, L.P.

/(5)/  B.N.Y. Service Corp. owns a 99% general partnership interest in this
partnership; B.L. Management Services, Inc. owns the remaining 1% general
partnership interest.

/(6)/ Brylane, L.P. owns a 99% general partnership interest in this partnership;
B.L. Catalog Distribution, Inc. owns the remaining 1% general partnership
interest.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference, into the
Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information constituting part
of Post-Effective Amendment No. 74 to the Registration Statement on
Form N-1A of Fidelity Investment Trust: Fidelity Europe Capital
Appreciation Fund, Fidelity France Fund, Fidelity Germany Fund,
Fidelity Hong Kong and China Fund, Fidelity Japan Small Companies
Fund, Fidelity Latin America Fund, Fidelity Nordic Fund, Fidelity
Southeast Asia Fund, and Fidelity United Kingdom Fund, of our report
dated December 18, 1997 on the financial statements and financial
highlights included in the October 31, 1997 Annual Report to
Shareholders of the aforementioned funds.
We further consent to the references to our Firm under the headings
"Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus and "Auditor" in the
Statement of Additional Information.  
/s/PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 18, 1997
----

Corrigendum to Decision No 1/2004 (2004/480/EC) of the Joint Veterinary Committee set up under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Trade in Agricultural Products of 28 April 2004 on the amendment to Appendix 5 to Annex 11 to the Agreement

(Official Journal of the European Union L 160 of 30 April 2004)

Decision No 1/2004 (2004/480/EC) should read as follows:

DECISION No 1/2004 OF THE JOINT VETERINARY COMMITTEE SET UP UNDER THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE SWISS CONFEDERATION ON TRADE IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS

of 28 April 2004                     

on the amendment to Appendix 5 to Annex 11 to the Agreement

(2004/480/EC)

THE COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products (hereinafter called the Agriculture Agreement), and in particular Article 19(3) of Annex 11 thereto,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Point III of Chapter 1 of Appendix 5 to Annex 11 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products is hereby replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision, drawn up in duplicate, shall be signed by the joint chairmen or other persons empowered to act in the name of the Parties.

It shall take effect at the date of the last signature.

Done at Bern, 28 April 2004.

On behalf of the Swiss Confederation

The head of delegation

Hans WYSS                        

Done at Brussels, 27 April 2004.

On behalf of the European Commission

The head of delegation

Alejandro CHECCHI LANG                        

ANNEX

‘III.   Rules for animals sent for grazing in border areas

----

(1)OJ L 235, 4.9.2001, p. 23.

(2)OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29.

----
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE V. CORN PRODUCTS REFINING COMPANY 

DOCKET NUMBER: 16 

DATE: JULY 28, 1939 

DOCUMENT TYPE: COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

C.E.A. DOCKET NO. 16 

Secretary of Agriculture, Complainant, v. Corn Products Refining Company, 

Respondent. 

Complaint and Notice of hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

There being reason to believe that the respondent hereinafter named has 

violated and is violating the Commodity Exchange Acts (7 U.S.C., 1934 ed., and 

Supp. 17 § 1-17a) and the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, 

this complaint is issued alleging the following: 

1. 

The respondents, Corn Products Refining Company, is a New Jersey corporation, 

having the principal place of business in New York, New York. 

2. 

The respondent entered into transaction between June 3 and June 9 [ILLEGIBLE 

TEXT], resulting in the purchase of [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] September corn futures 

contracts, on and subject to the rules of the board of Trade of the City of 

Chicago, a duly designated contract market, which transactions resulted in 

giving the respondent a such long petitions on June 3, [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] 

in the [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] September were futures on the Board of Trade of the City 

of Chicago of 6,213,000 bushels, over [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] bushels of which did not 

represent hedging or spreading operation and constituted a [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] long 

position in an [ILLEGIBLE TEXT], the limitation on such position as fixed by the 

Commodity Exchange Commission under date of December 22 [ILLEGIBLE TEXT], all in 

violation of the Commodity Exchange Act and the rules, regulations, and orders 

promulgated pursuant to said act. 

THEREFORE, the respondent is hereby notified to be and appear before a 

referee to be appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture at a hearing to be held 

at 10 am, on August 14, 1983, in South Building, Department of Agriculture, 

Washington, D.C., or as such other time and places as may be determined by the 

referee, and then and there show cause, if any there be, why an order shall not 

be made directing that all contracts markets, until further notice of the 

Secretary of Agriculture, refuse all trading privileges to the respondent. 

IT IS ORDERED that this complaint and notice of hearing be served on the 

named respondent, by delivery of a true copy hereof to is by an employee of the 

Department of Agriculture or by registered mail, at least three days prior to 

the date herein set for hearing. 

Done at Washington, D. C., this 

28 day of July [ILLEGIBLE TEXT]. 
Page 2 

Witness may hand and seal of 

the Department of Agriculture. 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Acting Secretary of Agriculture. 

LOAD-DATE: June 11, 2008 
Page 3
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PowerVerde, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George Konrad, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George Konrad      
|George Konrad          
|Chief Financial Officer
|April 15, 2009
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)**

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Investment Trust  (the "Trust") onForm N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of suchofficer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Report.

Dated:	 December 26, 2013

Dated:	 December 26, 2013

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typedform within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-428-000]

Take notice that on May 25, 2001, Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet proposed to be effective June 25, 2001:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 303

The revised tariff sheet adds another permissible type of transportation discount to Northern's General Terms and Conditions by providing for upward or downward adjustments to rate components to achieve an agreed-upon overall rate so long as all rate components remain within their respective minimum and maximum amounts.

Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the                           ( print page 30727)                        Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the  instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14346  Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

501 

KAH 13-00585 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. 

DWIGHT M. DILBERT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARK BRADT, SUPERINTENDENT, ATTICA CORRECTIONAL 

FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court,

Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), entered January 2, 2013 in a

habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ

of habeas corpus on the ground that the evidence adduced at trial was

legally insufficient to support the conviction of murder in the second

degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2] [depraved indifference]) inasmuch as

the evidence established that his acts against the victim were

intentional and manifested an intent to kill. We conclude that

Supreme Court properly denied the petition. “ ‘Habeas corpus relief

is not an appropriate remedy for asserting claims that were or could

have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion’ ”

(People ex rel. Martinez v Graham, 98 AD3d 1312, 1312, lv denied 20

NY3d 853; see People ex rel. Smith v Graham, 109 AD3d 1113, 1113;

People ex rel. Lewis v Graham, 96 AD3d 1423, 1423, lv denied 19 NY3d

813).

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court