alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
       a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ SCOTT W. FRIEDLANDER

Scott W. FriedlanderPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
23














Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements, (Form
S-8 No. 333-18495, 333-77473, 333-37426, 333-88528, 333-115925, 333-126074, and
333-134644) pertaining to the Stock Incentive Plans and Executive Nonqualified
Excess Plan of ATC Technology Corporation of our reports dated February 25,
2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ATC
Technology Corporation, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of ATC Technology Corporation, included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.











/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP





Chicago,
Illinois


February
25, 2009
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 99-30877

____________________

CAROL MARIE MCCOY BOOTH,

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

SAMUEL TIMOTHY MCGRAW, also known as Tim McGraw

Defendant - Appellee

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CV-741

_________________________________________________________________

August 8, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, REYNALDO G. GARZA and PARKER, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: RAWLIN L. STOVALL, STOVALL & STOVALL, INC. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 206; 75-7 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

NOTE: LATER BECAME CFTC DOCKET # 75-7 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 206 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Rawlin L. Stovall 

Stovall & Stovall, Inc. 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that on various dates during the period May-December 

1972, Rawlin L. Stovall, under the guise of trading in cash commodities, 

solicited and accepted customers' orders for futures transactions without being 

registered as a futures commission merchant under the Act. The complaint also 

charges that he bucketed his customers' orders and entered into fictitious 

transactions. In addition, it charges that he failed to make his records 

available for inspection by the Department of Agriculture. The corporation, of 

which he is president, is charged with being unfit to engage as a futures 

commission merchant. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before a referee in Chicago, 

Illinois, at a date and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ALEXANDER K. RUXTON 

DOCKET NUMBER: 85 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 85 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Alexander K. Ruxton 

141 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago 4, Illinois 

The complaint charges that the respondent, while acting as a floor broker in 

wheat futures on the Chicago Board of Trade for various commission merchants, 

took the opposite side of his principals' orders without their prior consent, 

matched orders received from the same principal and offset orders received from 

different principals. The respondent is a registered floor broker under the 

Commodity Exchange Act. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, August 19, 1958, in Room 1200, Board of Trade Building, 

141 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         925,259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,770,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                   583,623
<INVENTORY>                                  8,263,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,243,161
<PP&E>                                       4,870,162
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,127,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,899,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,844,264
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,348
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,334,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,899,902
<SALES>                                     17,051,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,051,749
<CGS>                                       11,838,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,611,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (636,668)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (13,035,512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (2,145,020)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (10,890,492)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.97)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 12.1
                           NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC.
                        RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT RATIO)
                      FISCAL YEARS ENDING 1995 THROUGH 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Year Ended September 30,
                                       --------------------------------------------------------
                                         1999        1998         1997        1996       1995
                                         ----        ----         ----        ----       ----
<S>                                    <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Income (loss) before Income Taxes,
   Extraordinary Item and Change in
   Accounting Principle                $ 17,887    $  9,461    $  6,526    $ (1,136)   $ 17,096

Interest Expense(a)                      26,546      26,400      25,853      24,326      19,909
Capitalized Interest                       (455)       (235)       (204)       (413)          0
Interest Portion of Rental charge(b)        752         956         882         751         506
Income before Income Taxes,
   Extraordinary Item, Interest and
   Interest Portion of Rental charge   $ 44,730    $ 36,582    $ 33,057    $ 23,528    $ 37,511
Interest Expense                       $ 26,546    $ 26,400    $ 25,853    $ 24,326    $ 19,909
Interest Portion of Rental Charge           752         956         882         751         506
Interest Expense plus Interest
   Portion of Rental Charge            $ 27,298    $ 27,356    $ 26,735    $ 25,077    $ 20,415
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges         1.64        1.34        1.24       --(c)        1.84
</TABLE>

------------

(a)   In addition, the Company guaranteed certain obligations of a less than 50%
      owned entity in the amounts of $0.2 million, $0.4 million and $1.2 million
      as of September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The less than 50%
      owned entity incurred approximately $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $0.2
      million of interest expense on these obligations in the years ended
      September 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. This amount was not
      included in the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges as
      the Company had not been required to honor the guarantees and does not
      expect to be required to do so.

(b)   Interest portion of rentals is assumed to equal 33% of operating lease and
      rental expense for the period.

(c)   In 1996, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $1,549.



                                      -21-
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 11.1
                                   GTSI CORP.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      THREE                       SIX
                                                                  MONTHS ENDED                MONTHS ENDED
                                                                    June 30,                    June 30,
                                                            -------------------------- ---------------------------
                                                                2000         1999          2000          1999
                                                            -------------------------- ------------- -------------
<S>                                                          <C>           <C>         <C>           <C>
Net income (loss)                                                273           69        (1,301)       (1,824)

Basic:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding            9,336        9,200         9,308         9,332

Net income (loss) per common share and common share
equivalent                                                      0.03         0.01         (0.14)        (0.20)

Diluted:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding            9,351        9,859         9,308         9,332

Net income (loss) per common share and common share
equivalent                                                      0.03         0.01         (0.14)        (0.20)

</TABLE>
**SILVER
      STAR CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Cliffe
      R. Bodden, solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      hereby certify that the report of Silver Star Capital Holdings, Inc. on
      Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
      such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of Silver Star Capital Holdings,
      Inc.





Date:
      October 19, 2007




/s/
                Cliffe R. Bodden
              
              Chief
                Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certificate
      of Principal Accounting Officer as required by 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
      ended
      December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), of Aurora Oil & Gas Corporation ("Aurora")
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2008, I,
      Barbara E. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Principal
      Accounting Officer) of Aurora, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      my
      knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April
                11, 2008
            By:
            /s/
              Barbara E.
              LawsonBarbara
                E. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Principal Accounting
                Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been
      provided to Aurora Oil & Gas Corporation and will be retained by Aurora Oil
& Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its staff upon request.
No. 174.

#### Ham, Insurance Commissioner, *v.*Equitable Life Assurance Society.

Jurisdictional statement distributed September 10, 1936.

Decided October 12, 1936.

*506
      *Messrs. Ray E. Lee*and *James A. Greenwood*for appellant.

*Messrs. John U. Loomis*and *James H. McIntosh*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *Seattle & Renton Ry.*v. *Linhoff,*231 U. S. 568, 570; *Gasguet*v. *Lapeyre,*242 U. S. 367, 369; *Enterprise Irrigation Dist.*v. *Canal Co.,*243 U. S. 157, 165, 166.
Exhibit
31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION
13(a) OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, John M.
Philpott , certify
that:
  1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Miravant Medical
Technologies;
   2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      annual report;
   3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
   4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
      have:
   a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
      prepared;
   b)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
   c)
    disclosed
      in this report any changes in registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.
   5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent functions):
   a)
    all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial information;
and
   b)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
   Date: March 28,
2005
 By:  /s/
John M. Philpott
 Name:
John M. Philpott
 Title:
Chief Financial Officer
 (Duly
Authorized Officer and Principal Accounting
 and
Financial Officer)
#### Rafael Antonio ROSALES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74412.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 11, 2010.

Edgardo Quintanilla, Esquire, Quintanil-la Law Firm, Inc., Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner.

*657David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, OIL, Liza Murcia, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le-fevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *657*See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rafael Antonio Rosales, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings held in ab-sentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of motions to reopen, *Karapetyan v. Mukasey,*543 F.3d 1118, 1129 (9th Cir.2008), and de novo questions of law, *Cerezo v. Mukasey,*512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Rosales’ motion to reopen because he had received both oral and written notice of his next scheduled hearing at which he did not appear. *See Khan v. Ashcroft,*374 F.3d 825, 828-29 (9th Cir.2004) (notice proper where INS adhered to statutorily imposed procedural requirements). Rosales’ due process claim therefore fails. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error and prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Federal Register: July 22, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 140)]
[Notices]
[Page 43817]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22jy04-36]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, August 6, 2004.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-16799 Filed 7-20-04; 11:22 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
No. 191.

#### Lowendahl *v.*Hessey, Trustee in Bankruptcy.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Neil P. Cullom*for petitioner.

*Mr. Sylvan Hayes ¡Lauchheimer*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
No. 76-811.

#### Regents of the University of California *v.*Bakke.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari granted.