alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: EUGENE C. CASHMAN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 212 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 212 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Eugene C. Cashman 

(Chicago, Illinios) 

The complaint charges that Eugene C. Cashman, while trading for his own 

account, exceeded the 3,000,000 bushel speculative trading limits fixed by the 

Commodity Exchange Commission on soybean and corn futures. In soybean futures, 

on February 27, 1973, he sold 3,105,000, and on February 28 purchased 4,565,000. 

In corn futures, on March 1, 1973, he purchased 3,605,000 and sold 3,175,000. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition of the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before a referee in Chicago, 

Illinois, at a date and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palmdale  Executive Homes, Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Suzette M. Major,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 12, 2009



                                        By: /s/ SUZETTE M. MAJOR
                                            ________________________________
                                                Suzette M. Major
                                                President
#### CARAMELLI v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

March 30, 1922.)

No. 2997.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. Suit by the United States against Charles Caramelli. From the decree, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

John T. Duffy, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.

Chas. F. Clyne and C. W. Middlekauff, both of Chicago, 111., for the United States.

Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal is taken from a decree closing premises owned and occupied by appellant and enjoining the further maintenance of a nuisance thereon, all pursuant to section 22, title 2, National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 314). No assignment of error is presented that has not been decided adversely to appellant in one or more of the many similar cases we have decided during the last few months. The record has also been examined to ascertain whether the evidence supports the decree. Satisfied that it does, we find no reversible error. The decree is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 952 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 952

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the meaning of 
    ``combat with the enemy'' for purposes of service-connection of 
                             disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2009

Mr. Hall of New York (for himself, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Hare, 
 Mr. Crowley, Mr. Courtney, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Kagen, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. 
 Blumenauer, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Rodriguez, Ms. McCollum, Mr. McDermott, 
  Ms. Kaptur, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Donnelly of Indiana, and Mr. Nye) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the meaning of 
    ``combat with the enemy'' for purposes of service-connection of 
                             disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Compensation Owed for Mental Health 
Based on Activities in Theater Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Act'' or 
the ``COMBAT PTSD Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MEANING OF ``COMBAT WITH THE ENEMY'' FOR 
              PURPOSES OF SERVICE-CONNECTION OF DISABILITIES.

    (a) Clarification.--Section 1154(b) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``In the case'' and inserting ``(1) In the 
        case''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term `combat with 
the enemy' includes service on active duty--
            ``(A) in a theater of combat operations (as determined by 
        the Secretary in consultation with the Secretary of Defense) 
        during a period of war; or
            ``(B) in combat against a hostile force during a period of 
        hostilities.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of section 
1154 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall 
apply with respect to a claim for disability compensation under chapter 
11 of such title pending on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Brenda Louise NIEHAUS, also known as Brenda Louise Alexander, also known as Linda Alexander, also known as Linda Louise Alexander, Appellant.

No. 07-3525.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 20, 2008.

Filed: Sept. 12, 2008.

*521Robert L. Teig, Martin Joseph McLaughlin, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, LA, for Appellee.

Brian Dean Johnson, Brenda Louise Niehaus, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Appellant.

Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After revoking her supervised release, the district court1 sentenced Brenda Louise Niehaus to 7 days in prison and 1 year of supervised release with a special condition requiring her to reside in a residential re-entry center for up to 120 days. On appeal, Niehaus argues that her confinement in a residential re-entry center is unreasonable, and that her revocation sentence is greater than necessary to meet the statutory goals of sentencing.

Niehaus’s challenge to this condition of her sentence is moot because she has been released from the residential re-entry center. *Cf. Spencer v. Kemna,*523 U.S. 1, 5-7, 18, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998) (habeas challenge to parole revocation became moot upon expiration of sentence). After careful review, we conclude that her revocation sentence, which is within statutory limits, *see*18 U.S.C. § 3583, is not unreasonable, *see United States v. Tyson,*413 F.3d 824, 825-26 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (court reviews revocation sentences under “unreasonableness” standard announced in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 258-63, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)); *see also United States v. Long Soldier,*431 F.3d 1120, 1123 (8th Cir.2005) (reasonableness of sentence is reviewed for abuse of discretion, which occurs if court fails to consider relevant factor that should have received significant weight, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or considers only appropriate factors but commits clear error of judgment in weighing factors).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Security Solutions Group, Inc. (Formerly Corporate Equity Investments, Inc.).. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q, for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Matt Allen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 4, 2009

   /s/   MATT ALLEN

Name:  Matt Allen

Its:  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive & Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Meetesh Patel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

** **

Date:  April 8, 2010                                                     /s/ Meetesh Patel 

                                                                                        Meetesh Patel

                                                                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

----
Exhibit 31.2








CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER








I, Jeffrey Yesner, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Options Media Group Holdings, Inc.; and





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: December 8, 2011





/s/ Jeffrey YesnerJeffrey Yesner

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14414]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-38,293]


Dresser Rand, Painted Post, New York; Dismissal of Application 
for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Dresser Rand, Painted Post, New 
York. The application contained no new substantial information which 
would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, 
dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-38,293; Dresser Rand, Painted Post, New York (May 24, 2001)

    Signed at Washington, DC this 25th day of May, 2001.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-14414 Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 December 5, 2019 Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge

No. 18-2345 RISA STEGALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 14 C 00178 Robert M. Dow, Jr., Judge
.

O R D E R The opinion of this court issued on December 4, 2019, is amended as follows: Page 3, “Fed. R. Evid. 59” should be “Fed. R. Civ. P. 59.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          57,606                  90,357
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   2,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                         405,625                 405,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 999,138               1,035,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                     487
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     999,138               1,034,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   999,138               1,035,001
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   704                   1,249
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,216                  10,847
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,512)                 (9,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,512)                 (9,598)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,512)                 (9,598)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2
 DIGITILITI, INC.
2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan
 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 OPTIONEE:
    
    []GRANT DATE:
    
    []NUMBER OF OPTION SHARES:
    
    []EXERCISE PRICE PER SHARE:
    
    $ [] per ShareEXPIRATION DATE:
    
    []
 THIS AGREEMENT
  NOW, THEREFORE,
 1. Grant of Option.
 2. Purchase Price.
 3. Term and Exercise of Option.




---



##### 



Exhibit A
  4. Limitations on Exercise of Option.
   5. Nontransferability of Option.
 6. Termination of Employment for Cause.
 7. Termination of Employment Not for Cause.
  2




---



##### 



8. Termination of Employment due to Disability of Optionee.
 9. Termination of Employment due to Death of Optionee.
 10. No Right to Continued Employment.
 11. Adjustments.
 12. Effect of Certain Transactions.
   3




---



##### 



13. Limitation on Payments and Benefits.
 14. Interpretation.
  4




---



##### 



15. Definitions; Option Plan Governs.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 COMPANY:Digitiliti, Inc.By[Name of Officer of the Company]Its: [Title]
  5




---



##### 



Check one:
 o
    
    Enclosed is cash, or a cashiers or certified check payable to Digitiliti, Inc. for the total exercise price of the shares
being purchased.o
    
    Attached is a certificate(s) for
_________  shares of common stock duly endorsed in blank
and surrendered for the exercise price of the shares being purchased.*
 *
    
    The use of this alternative is subject to the approval of Digitiliti, Inc.   (Signature)(Print or Type Name)
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Swav Enterprises Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the Registrant), on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pui Shan Lam, the
Principal Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Registrant.

| | /s/ Pui Shan Lam                                     
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Pui Shan Lam                                         
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and
      Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                        
| | Date: February 22, 2010                              

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of China Quest Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report'),
I, Chin Yung Kong, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





October
7, 2008





/s/ Chin Yung KongName:
      Chin Yung KongTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
Order entered May 21 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00016 - CV JAMES DAVID HORTON A ND ROBBIE LESA HORTO N, Appellant s V. SUSAN MCMILLION MART IN, SHANNON PRITCHAR D, BROOKE DAVES AND KIMBERLY STOVALL, Appellee s On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 14 - 11551



### O RDER Appellants’ motion for leave to use power point in oral arguments filed May 18, 2015 is DENIED

. /s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES PRESIDING JUSTICE
IV 

House Calendar No. 209 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1495 

[Report No. 111–519] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5618) to continue Federal unemployment programs, and waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from 

the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2010 

Mr. CARDOZA, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5618) to continue Federal unemployment programs, and waiving a 

requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect 

to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the 

Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 5618) to continue Federal unemployment programs. All 

4 points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 

5 except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1495 RH 

1 The amendment printed in the report of the Committee 

2 on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered 

3 as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 

4 read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as 

5 amended, are waived. The previous question shall be con6 sidered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage 

7 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

8 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

9 minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 

10 and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instruc11 tions. 

12 SEC. 2. The requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

13 for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Com14 mittee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the 

15 House is waived with respect to any resolution reported 

16 through the legislative day of July 3, 2010. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 209 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1495 

[Report No. 111–519] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5618) 

olutions reported from the Committee on Rules. XIII with respect to consideration of certain resand waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule to continue Federal unemployment programs, 

JUNE 30, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS