alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# I3S/-/6 ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 09-15-00286-CR 

### STYLE: Brian Vanorman v. The State ofTexas

TRIAL COURT: 

# TRIALCOURTS: TRIAL COURTJUDGE: Judge LisaBenge Michalk DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED 221st District Court 15-03-02762 CR OFFENSE: PUNISHMENT: COUNTY: 

### Miscellaneous/Other Criminal 

## including Misdemeanoror Felony Montgomery 

## Appellant's MOTION FOR REHEARING IS: DENIED 

# DATE: 11-02-16 JUDGE: PER CURIAM
DATE: 09-21-16 

### JUSTICE: LeanneJohnson 

# PUBLISH: ~NO PC NO S YES
CLK RECORD: RPT RECORD: STATE BR: APPBR: DNP: YES 08-21-16 08-12-15 05-04-16 

### 02-03-16; 06-21-16 SUPPCLKRECORD: SUPPRPTRECORD: SUPP BR: PROSE BR: 

# I3S/-/6 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# APPELLANTS Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

### DATE: _ JUDGE:


### CCAIS:. JUDGE: MOTION FOR REHEARING IN ON 

### CCA# Disposition: 

### PD-1:

## $81-16

DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP: \ STAY 0 MOTION FOF 

### F MANDATE IS: ON JUDGE:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1525 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1525

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 26, 2010.
Whereas Nelle Harper Lee was born on April 28, 1926, to Amasa Coleman Lee and 
        Frances Finch in Monroeville, Alabama;
Whereas Nelle Harper Lee wrote the novel ``To Kill a Mockingbird'' portraying 
        life in the 1930s in the fictional small southern town of Maycomb, 
        Alabama, which was modeled on Ms. Lee's hometown of Monroeville, 
        Alabama;
Whereas ``To Kill a Mockingbird'' addressed the issue of racial inequality in 
        the United States by revealing the humanity of a community grappling 
        with moral conflict;
Whereas ``To Kill a Mockingbird'' was first published in 1960 and was awarded 
        the Pulitzer Prize in 1961;
Whereas ``To Kill a Mockingbird'' was the basis for the 1962 Oscar-winning film 
        of the same name starring Gregory Peck;
Whereas ``To Kill a Mockingbird'' is one of the great American novels of the 
        20th century, having been published in more than 40 languages and having 
        sold over 30 million copies;
Whereas in 2007, Nelle Harper Lee was inducted into the American Academy of Arts 
        and Letters;
Whereas in 2007, President George W. Bush awarded the Presidential Medal of 
        Freedom to Nelle Harper Lee for her great contributions to literature 
        and observed ```To Kill a Mockingbird' has influenced the character of 
        our country for the better'' and ``As a model of good writing and humane 
        sensibility, this book will be read and studied forever''; and
Whereas ``To Kill a Mockingbird'' is celebrated each year in Monroeville, 
        Alabama, through annual public performances featuring local amateur 
        actors: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the historic milestone of the 50th anniversary of the 
        publication of ``To Kill a Mockingbird''; and
            (2) honors Nelle Harper Lee for her outstanding achievement in the 
        field of American literature in authoring ``To Kill a Mockingbird''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 447, Misc.

#### Lucas *v.*Texas, 336 U. S. 950.

Rehearing denied.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Meridian      Interstate Bancorp as of and for the period covered by the      Report. |
|--|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                              |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:  May      11, 2009 | /s/      Richard J. Gavegnano                     |
|                                | Richard      J. Gavegnano                         |
|                                | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer         |
|                                |                                              |
|                                |                                              |
|                                |                                              |
|                                |                                              |
| Dated:  May      11, 2009 | /s/      Deborah J. Jackson                       |
|                                | Deborah      J. Jackson                           |
|                                | President      and Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|                                | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 1, 2013

d0325 

# Order

April 1, 2013

145696(29)(31)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145696

COA: 307702

Wayne CC: 83

- 008596

- FY

ELIJAH BURKE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 26,

2012 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously. The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1


March 9, 2016


Mortimer B. Zuckerman 
Chairman of the Board 
Boston Properties, Inc. 
510 Madison Avenue, Suite 2901
New York, NY 10022 
Dear Mort: 
This letter (this “Amendment”) amends the terms of that certain Transition Benefits Agreement dated March 10, 2013 (the “Agreement”), between Boston Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) and you as supplemented by that certain letter agreement, dated March 9, 2015 (the “Letter Agreement”), between the Company and you. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement or the Letter Agreement, as applicable.  In connection with your transition from Chairman of the Board to Chairman Emeritus of the Company as of the end of your current term as a director on the date of the Company’s 2016 annual meeting of stockholders, you and the Company agree as follows:
		
	1.
	For so long as you hold the title of Chairman Emeritus of the Company, the Company shall provide you with the compensation and Agreed Benefits in accordance with the terms set forth in Sections 1 and 2 of the Letter Agreement, and the references in the Letter Agreement to your service as “non-executive Chairman” and “a member of the Board” shall be replaced with references to your holding the title of “Chairman Emeritus.” 


		
	2.
	You shall be entitled to retain the title of Chairman Emeritus for so long as you are generally willing and able to attend meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company.


		
	3.
	You agree to continue to abide by all policies of the Company, whether now existing or hereafter in effect, as if you were a director of the Company, including, but not limited to, the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Company’s insider trading policies, and you agree to abide by the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Policy Regarding Special Trading Procedures to the same extent as if you were an “Insider” as defined therein, in each case, for so long as you hold the title of Chairman Emeritus.


		
	4.
	The Letter Agreement and the Agreement will remain in full force and effect and, unless otherwise modified herein, the provisions of Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Agreement will govern this Amendment as if set forth herein in their entirety.




[SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON SEPARATE PAGE] 



 
Please indicate your acceptance of the terms set forth herein by countersigning this letter agreement. 
 
	
	
	




	/s/ Owen D. Thomas

	Owen D. Thomas
Chief Executive Officer
Boston Properties, Inc.

	




	AGREED AND ACCEPTED


 
this _1_ day of March, 2016

	






	/s/ Mort Zuckerman

	Mortimer B. Zuckerman
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 3 (Thursday, January 4, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 852-853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

December 27, 2000.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 5, 
2001 to be assured of consideration.

Financial Management Service (FMS)

    OMB Number: 1510-0019.
    Form Number: FMS 1133.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Claim Against the United States for the Proceeds of a 
Government Check.
    Description: If a payee claims non-receipt of a Treasury check, the 
FMS-1133 claims form and a copy of the negotiated check are sent to the 
payee. If the payee wishes to submit a claim of nonreceipt, he or she 
answers the questions on the form, signs the form and returns it to the 
Financial Management Service for adjudication by a claims analyst. This 
may result in the issuance of a replacement check if the claim is 
valid.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 53,895.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 11 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other (as needed).
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 10,229 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Juanita Holder, Financial Management Service, 
3700 East West Highway, Room 144, PGP II, Hyattsville, MD 20782.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New

[[Page 853]]

Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-147 Filed 1-3-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1341/2004

of 22 July 2004         

opening an invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on maize imported into Spain from third countries

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   An invitation to tender is hereby opened for the reduction in the import duty referred to in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 on maize to be imported into Spain.

2.   Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 shall apply save as otherwise provided for in this Regulation.

Article 2

The invitation to tender shall be open until 9 September 2004. During that period, weekly invitations shall be issued with quantities and closing dates as shown in the notice of invitation to tender.

Article 3

Import licences issued under these invitations to tender shall be valid 50 days from the date they are issued within the meaning of Article 10(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95.

Article 4

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 336, 23.12.1994, p. 22.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15354]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Federal Salary Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Salary Council will meet at the time and location 
shown below. The Council is an advisory body composed of 
representatives of Federal employee organizations and experts in the 
fields of labor relations or pay policy. A provision of law enacted in 
2000 requires the President's Pay Agent (the Secretary of Labor and the 
Directors of the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of 
Personnel Management) to determine whether five additional metropolitan 
areas (Austin, TX, Las Vegas, NV, Louisville, KY, Nashville, TN, and 
Raleigh, NC) should become separate locality pay areas under the 
locality pay program for General Schedules employees in 2002. The law 
authorizes the required determinations to be made by using salary 
surveys conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, salary survey data 
compiled by organizations or entities for private sector businesses, or 
a combination of these data sources. The Federal Salary Council will 
review the results of special studies directed by the Office of 
Personnel Management and develop recommendations for the Pay Agent on 
locality pay methodology as it pertains to the five metropolitan areas. 
The Pay Agent will submit a report to Congress later this year. The 
meeting is open to the public.

DATES: July 23, 2001, at 9:30 a.m.
    Location: Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Room 
5303 (Pendleton Room), Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Winstead, Associate Director 
for Compensation Administration, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E 
Street NW., Room 7H31, Washington, DC 20415-8200. Phone (202) 606-2838; 
FAX (202) 606-0824; or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcccddc5d0d9ddcad9fcd3ccd192dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="78081901141d190e1d38170815561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    For the President's Pay Agent.
Steven R. Cohen,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 01-15354 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE> 84
EXHIBIT 99.1

           Case No. 98-WY-1 22-CB:  SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
                      date: September 2, 1999

     All defendants sign the following agreement. Norman Rounds signs
on behalf of all plaintiffs, and Mr. Rounds represents that he has
complete authority from all plaintiffs to settle all claims on behalf
of plaintiffs.

     In exchange for a dismissal and complete releases from plaintiffs
and Norman Rounds, defendants agree as follows:

     1. To pay $60,000 in cash on the date of closing, which is
scheduled for no later than October 4, 1999.

     2. To cancel a note of $50,000 which is owed by Norman Rounds to
Crosby Enterprises.

     3. To pay to plaintiffs on September 7, 1999, the number of shares
of Metalline stock, based upon Schwab closing price as of September 2,
1999, which equals $80,000. This payment shall be made by delivering
the shares to Idaho Stock Transfer to hold these shares in escrow to be
released to plaintiffs and to Mr. Rounds, as Mr. Rounds designates, in
the amount of 5,000 shares every thirty days, beginning with the first
5,000 shares to be delivered September 7, 1999. Mr. Rounds and/or
plaintiffs will be limited in their ability to sell the shares of stock
as follows:

          (a) Plaintiffs and Mr. Rounds shall be able to sell no more
     than 5000 shares of stock total per month so long as the stock is
     trading at less than $4.50 per share.

          (b) Whenever the stock closes at over $4.50 per share Schwab
     NAV closing price for five consecutive trading days, the transfer
     agent will be authorized to release to plaintiff all remaining
     shares.

     This Agreement contains all essential terms of the agreement which
has been reached between the undersigned parties. All of the
undersigned parties agree that these terms constitute the total
agreement, and agree to be bound by these terms.

/s/ illegible                           /s/ John P. Ryan
Norman P. Rounds, Individually and      /s/ Merlin Bingham
for all Plaintiffs                      Personally and for
                                        Metalline Mining Co.
/s/ illegible                           /s/ Robert E. Jorgensen
/s/ Howard Crosby
Personally and for
Crosby Enterprises
as President of Royal Silver
Exhibit










Exhibit 10.1
SOTHEBY’S NEVADA, INC.
5600 Spring Mountain Road, Suite 104
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102


 
March 30, 2016


Acquavella Contemporary Art, Inc.
c/o Mr. William R. Acquavella
300 Pleasure Drive
Flanders, NY 11901


Dear Bill:


This letter agreement amends the Agreement of Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”) of Acquavella Modern Art, a Nevada general partnership, dated May 29, 1990, between Sotheby’s Nevada, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (“Sotheby’s Partner”), and Acquavella Contemporary Art, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (“Acquavella Partner”).


By prior letters of amendment, we have agreed to extend the term of the Partnership Agreement through March 31, 2016.  By this letter of amendment, we are agreeing to extend the term of the Partnership Agreement for one additional year through March 31, 2017.  Accordingly, each of the Sotheby’s Partner and the Acquavella Partner hereby agree to amend Section 1.5 (iii) of the Partnership Agreement, as heretofore amended, to delete the reference to March 31, 2016 and substitute therefor the date of “March 31, 2017.”


Except as amended hereby, the Partnership Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed.


Please sign this letter agreement in the space provided below.  Upon execution on behalf of the Acquavella Partner, this letter agreement shall be effective as of the date of this letter.


SOTHEBY’S NEVADA, INC.


 


By: /S/ THOMAS SMITH


Thomas Smith, President  






AGREED AND ACCEPTED 
ACQUAVELLA CONTEMPORARY ART, INC.




By: /S/ WILLIAM R. ACQUAVELLA


William R. Acquavella, President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                 MEDICAL DEFENSE HOLDING CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                For the Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                            1996         1995
                                                                            ----         ----

<S>                                                                    <C>           <C>
           Weighted average common shares outstanding.................   1,019,602     1,019,602

           Weighted average common stock options
             expressed as common stock equivalents....................  23,281,244    23,980,378

           Weighted average common shares outstanding.................  24,300,846    24,999,980

           Net (loss) income (applicable to common  stock) (1)........ $(5,501,042)  $ 1,198,665

           Earnings per common share (1).............................. $     (0.23)  $      0.05
                                                                       ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
------------
(1)  Net income per common share is computed using net income divided by the
     weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents
     outstanding. All of the Company's outstanding shares of preferred stock are
     convertible to common stock at a ratio of two shares of common stock for
     each one share of preferred stock. Since the Company's preferred stock has
     no stated dividend rate, and thus, no effective yield, these securities are
     considered common stock equivalents for the purpose of computing net income
     per common share.

     Other than the preferred stock discussed above, the Company does not have
     any other potentially dilutive stocks. Therefore, the computations for
     fully diluted net income per common share are not presented since the
     results do not differ from primary net income per common share.

     Net income per share information is not computed for the periods ending
     December 31, 1994 and 1993, as the conversion of MDA to a stock insurance
     company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of MDHC was not completed until June
     26, 1995, and therefore, all of the earnings for those periods are
     attributable to the preconversion earnings of MDA. In addition, the net
     income of $617,713 recorded by the subsidiary as of June 30, 1995, is
     virtually entirely attributable to preconversion results and, therefore, is
     also excluded for 1995 earnings per share presentation purposes.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2542** 

In R e: CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
.
Submitted : March 26, 2013 Decided: April 5, 2013

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Charles Everette Hinton , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charles Everette Hinton pe titions for a writ of mandamus seeking a n order from this court directing the district
court to file his civil complaint . Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the court has docketed the complaint
. See Hinton v. Bridges , No. 3:13

- cv - 00119

- RJC (filed Jan. 16, 2013; entered Feb. 22, 2013). Accordingly, because Hinton has received the relief he requested , we den y as moot the mandamus petition. We also deny as moot Hinton’s motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion objecting to the application of th e provisions of t he Prison Litigation Reform
Act , 28 U.S.C . § 1915(b) (2006), to his case . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the de cisional process.
PETITION DENIED