alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Teresa Figueroa OCAMPO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-73707.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 13, 2010.

*290Teresa Figueroa Ocampo, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

OIL, Timothy Bo Stanton, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Teresa Figueroa Ocampo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reopen as untimely and number-barred because it was her second motion to reopen, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and the second motion was filed more than 90 days after the BIA’s final order of removal, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i). Petitioner presented insufficient evidence to qualify for the changed country conditions exception. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii); *Malty v. Ashcroft,*381 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir.2004) (“The critical question is ... whether circumstances have changed sufficiently that a petitioner who previously did not have a legitimate claim for asylum now has a well-founded fear of future persecution.”).

We lack jurisdiction to review petitioner’s contention that she and her children belong to a particular social group because she failed to exhaust that issue before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
| May      14, 2009 |   | /s/ John      Wang                                                                                                           |
|-------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   | Name:  John      Wang                                                                                                   |
|              |   | Title:       Chief Executive Officer, President        and Director (Principal Executive   Officer) |

| May      14, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Robert J. Eu                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   | Name:  Robert      J. Eu                                                                                                                                                                        |
|              |   | Title:       Chairman of the Board, Chief        Financial Officer, Secretary and   Director        (Principal Financial and        Accounting Officer) |

----
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF DOT VN, INC.
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dot VN, Inc.
for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, the undersigned, Dr. Lee Johnson, President
of Dot VN, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1) such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended July 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Dot VN, Inc.
 Date:
      September 14, 2010
                    
                    
                    /s/
      Dr. Lee JohnsonDr.
      Lee JohnsonPresidentand Chief Financial
      Officer
  75
No. 757.

#### Great Northern Railway Co. et al. *v.*Lehman et al.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

*Edwin C. Matthias, Anthony Kane, James L. Hetland*and *A. Rea Williams*for petitioners.

*Bert McMullen*for respondents.

Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  amended quarterly report of Castmor Resources Ltd. on
Form  10-Q  for the quarter ended February 29, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the Report), I, Fidel Thomas,
President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  Chief  Financial  Officer  and Principal
Accounting  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 10, 2009     By /s/ Fidel Thomas
                            Fidel Thomas
                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                            Chief Financial Officer, and
                            Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3339; Amendment #2]


State of Wisconsin

    In accordance with a notice received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated June 8, 2001, the above-numbered Declaration 
is hereby amended to include Bayfield County as a disaster area caused 
by flooding occurring between April 10, 2001 and continuing through May 
29, 2001.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in Ashland County in the State of Wisconsin may be 
filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. 
Any counties contiguous to the above named primary counties and not 
listed here have been previously declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is July 10, 2001 and for 
economic injury the deadline is February 11, 2002.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: June 11, 2001.
James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-15119 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Issac MARTINEZ-MEMIJE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-75346.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 11, 2008.

*664Issac Martinez-Memije, Corona, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le-fevre Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Oil, Ana T. Zablah-Mon-roe, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Issac Martinez-Memije, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s deportation order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales,*468 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cii'.2006), and deny the petition for review.

We reject Martinez-Memije’s contentions that the agency erred and violated due process in deciding that his 1998 felony conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11351 is an aggravated felony. *See Rendon v. Mukasey,*520 F.3d 967, 976 (9th Cir.2008) (“[Possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell contains a trafficking element and is an aggravated felony.”). Martinez-Memije’s plea agreement establishes that he pled guilty because he “willfully [and] unlawfully possessed tar heroin [in] a sufficient quantity for sale.” *See Parrilla v. Gonzales,*414 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2005) (a written plea agreement is a judicially noticeable document under the modified categorical approach described in *Shepard v. United States,*544 U.S. 13, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005)).

We also reject Martinez-Memije’s contention that his conviction does not bar him from establishing good moral character for purposes of suspension of deportation and voluntary departure. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(8) (“No person shall be regarded as, or found to be, a person of good moral character who, during the period for which good moral character is required to be established, is ... one who at any time has been convicted of an aggravated felony[.]”); *Castiglia v. INS,*108 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir.1997) (section 1101(f)(8) “evidences [congressional] intent that aggravated-felony convictions be an absolute bar to a finding of good moral character”).

In light of our disposition, we need not address Martinez-Memije’s conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11352(a).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
{"agency":"CFTC","generated":"2018-04-18 09:47:45","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2018"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"6"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CFTC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["46"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["25"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["36"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2018","quarter":"Q2"}
January 9, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOHNATHAN WAYNE HUNT, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00051-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before February 5, 2001 to be assured of consideration. 

## Financial Management Service (FMS) 

*OMB Number:*                     1510-0007.                 

*Form Number:*                     Standard Form 1199A.                 

*Type of Review:*                     Reinstatement.                 

*Title:*                     Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form.                 

*Description:*                     The Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form is used by recipients to authorize the deposit of Federal payments into their accounts at a financial institution. This information is used to route the Direct Deposit payment to the correct account at the correct financial institution. It identifies persons who have executed the form.                 

*Respondents:*                     Individuals or households, Business or other for-profit, Federal Government.                 

*Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers:*                     604,000.                 

*Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:*                     10 minutes.                 

*Frequency of Response:*                     Other (one-time).                

*Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden:*                     102,680 hours.                

*Clearance Officer:*                     Juanita Holder, Financial Management Service, 3700 East West Highway, Room 144, PGP II, Hyattsville, MD 20782.                 

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                 

Lois K. Holland, 

Departmental Reports, Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-146 Filed 1-3-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR T I N B R I T O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 70263 A ge nc yN o. A 094- 461- 353 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M art i n B r i t o, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of E lS a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a lf r om an i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n f o ra s y lu m an dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence 

# FI LED SEP 27 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 70263 2 th e a g e n c y ’s f

a c tu a l f in d in g s , H

usye v v . Mukasey , 52 8 F . 3d11 72 , 11 77 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) , an dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he r e c or d doe s notc om pe lthe c onc l us i on tha tB r i t o f i l e d hi s a s y l um appl i cat i on w i thi n a re as on abl e per i odaf t erw i thd raw alof hi s t em po raryprot ec t ed s ta tu s . Se e id. a t 1 1 8 1 - 8 2 . T h u s , w e d e n yth e p e titio n a s to h is a s y lu m c la im . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t B r ito f a ile dto e s t abl i s h the i nc i de nthe e xpe r i e nc e d i n E lS a l va dorr os e t o the l e ve lof p e r s e c u tio n . See Pra s a d v . I NS , 4 7 F .3 d3 3 6 , 3 3 9 - 4 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 5 ) ( s in g le in c id e n t o f

d e te n tio n an db e a tin g d idn o t c o m p e l f in d in g o f p a s t p e r s e c u tio n ) . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e a ls o s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s f in d in g th a t B r ito f

a ile dto m e e t h is bu rden of proo f f

or w i thh ol di ng of re m ov albecause he di d n otshow i ti s m ore lik e lyth an n o t h e w ill b e p e r s e c u te din E l S a lv a d o r . Se e Na g o u lko v . I NS , 333 F .3 d1 0 1 2 , 1 0 1 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( p o s s ib ilityo f f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n to o s p e c u la tiv e ) . Th u s , w e d e n yth e p e t i t i o n a s t o h i s w i th h o l d i n g o f r e mo v a lc l a i m. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Petróleos Mexicanos, a decentralized public entity of the Federal Government of the United Mexican States (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge,
that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 20-F) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.





|                        |  |                                                                                         
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 24, 2006 |  | /S/ LUIS RAMÍREZ CORZO
Y HERNÁNDEZ                                                      
|                        |  | Name:  Luis Ramírez Corzo y Hernández Title:    Director General/Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Dated: October 24, 2006 |  | /S/ JUAN JOSÉ SUÁREZ
COPPEL                                                             
|                        |  | Name:  Juan José Suárez Coppel Title:    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Petróleos Mexicanos, a decentralized public entity of the Federal Government of the United Mexican States (the Company), does hereby certify, to
such officers knowledge, that:

The Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the Amendment No. 1) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Amendment No. 1 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 8, 2011



/s/  Juan José Suárez
CoppelName:

Juan José Suárez CoppelTitle:

Director General/Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 8, 2011



/s/  Ignacio Quesada MoralesName:

Ignacio Quesada MoralesTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rex S. ALADO, a.k.a. Rex, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10770.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.*

Filed Dec. 12, 2006.

USHA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Hagatna, GU, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Teker Torres & Teker, P.C., Hagatna, GU, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rex S. Alado appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his *711plea agreement, in which Alado agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess crystal methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.

We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. *See United States v. Jeronimo,*398 F.3d 1149, 1153-54 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 198, 163 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005); *United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# FCM Data May 2016

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF May 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002016FROM REPORTS FILED BY June 29,&KFF0000 &K0000002016	&P of &N
```
[Federal Register: August 8, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 153)]
[Notices]
[Page 41561]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08au01-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, August 31, 2001.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-20055 Filed 8-6-01; 3:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
**Fidelity**®**Total Emerging Markets Fund**

**Class**/Ticker

**Fidelity Total Emerging Markets Fund**/FTEMX

In this summary prospectus, the term "shares" (as it relates to the fund) means the class of shares offered through this summary prospectus.

**Summary Prospectus**

**December 30, 2014**

**As Revised October 16, 2015**