alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit
10.3




---



##### 



Second Amendment Borrower Bank of America Wells Fargo Lenders
 BACKGROUND
 Credit
Agreement
    AMENDMENTS
 Aggregate Commitments
 Aggregate Commitments
 Accordion Amount
 Accordion Amount
 Note Purchase Agreement
 1




---



##### 



Note Purchase Agreements
 Private Placement Debt
 Private Placement Debt
 Second
Amendment Effective Date
 Second Amendment Effective Date
   REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES TRUE; NO EVENT OF DEFAULT
   Replacement
Notes
 2




---



##### 



CONDITIONS TO EFFECTIVENESS
     Section
  3




---



##### 



REFERENCE TO THE CREDIT AGREEMENT
   COSTS, EXPENSES AND TAXES
 GUARANTORS ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS
 GOVERNING LAW; BINDING EFFECT
 HEADINGS
 4




---



##### 



ENTIRE AGREEMENT
  
 5




---



##### 



BORROWER:ENCORE WIRE LIMITEDBy:
    
    EWC GP Corp., its general partnerBy:Name:Title:
 6




---



##### 



ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.By:Name:Title:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as a LenderCommitment: $120,000,000By:Name:Title:
 7




---



##### 



WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as a LenderCommitment: $80,000,000By:Name:Title:
 8




---



##### 



EWC GP CORP.
 By:Name:Title:
 EWC LP CORP.
 By:Name:Title:
 EWC AVIATION CORP.
 By:Name:Title:
 9
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: FOX DELUXE FOODS, INC., ROLAND N. GERGEN, HAROLD W. FOX, AND BERT E. FOX 

DOCKET NUMBER: 74 

DATE: JULY 14, 1959 

DOCUMENT TYPE: EXTENSION OF TIME AND POSTPONEMENT OF EFFECTIVE DATE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re Fox DeLuxe Foods, Inc., Roland N. Gergen, Harold W. Fox, and Bert E. Fox, 

Respondents 

CEA Docket No. 74 

Extension of Time and Postponement of Effective Date 

Upon request of respondents, the time for filing a petition for 

reconsideration of the decision and order entered June 26, 1959, is extended to 

and includes August 3, 1959. The effective date of the sanctions ordered is 

postponed until further order in the proceeding. 

Done at Washington, D. C. 

July 14, 1959 

Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)**

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Investment Trust  (the "Trust") on Form N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of such officer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Dated:	 June 26, 2015

Dated:	June 26, 2015

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1






SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Palmdale Executive Homes, Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Suzette M. Major,  President of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that, to my
knowledge:




(1)  The
Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The  information  contained  in
the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial  condition and results of
operations of the Company.






Date: May
17, 2010








By: /s/
SUZETTE M. MAJOR


___________________________


Suzette
M. Major


Presidentand
Director
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30897-30898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-84-000]


Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District v. 
California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of Complaint

June 4, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 1, 2001, Salt River Project Agricultural 
Improvement and Power District (SRP) submitted a Complaint against the 
California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) pursuant to 
Section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA) 16 U.S.C. 824e. SRP alleges 
that the CAISO over collected neutrality adjustment charges from SRP, 
for the time period January 2000 through December 31, 2000, in 
violation of the FPA, the rate cap contained in CAISO's tariff and 
orders of the Commission. SRP also alleges that the CAISO off-set these 
erroneous charges against payments owed by the CAISO to SRP for power 
supplies and that the CAISO's tariff violations are discouraging 
suppliers from providing wholesale power to the CAISO, contrary to the 
Commission's policy goals. SRP seeks refunds of the alleged over 
charges, plus

[[Page 30898]]

interest calculated in accordance with the Commission's regulations.
    Copies of the filing were served upon the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation, the California Public Utilities Commission 
and all parties to Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton and 
Riverside, California v. California Independent System Operator 
Corporation, Docket No. EL00-111-000, where similar issues concerning 
the CAISO's neutrality adjustment charges were raised.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before June 21, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This 
filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the 
complaint shall also be due on or before June 21, 2001. Comments, 
protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet 
in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 
on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14436 Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15423]



[[Page 32934]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1172]


Approval for Expansion of Subzone 24B Merck & Company, Inc., 
Plant (Pharmaceuticals), Riverside, PA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Eastern Distribution Center, Inc., grantee of FTZ 24, 
has requested authority on behalf of Merck & Company, Inc. (Merck), to 
add capacity and to expand the scope of authority under zone procedures 
within Subzone 24B at the Merck plant in Riverside, Pennsylvania (FTZ 
Docket 4-2001, filed 1/18/2001);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (66 FR 8196, 1/30/01);
    Whereas, pursuant to Section 400.32(b)(1) of the FTZ Board 
regulations (15 CFR 400), the Secretary of Commerce's delegate on the 
FTZ Board has the authority to act for the Board in making decisions 
regarding manufacturing activity within existing zones when the 
proposed activity is the same, in terms of products involved, to 
activity recently approved by the Board and similar in circumstances 
(15 CFR 400.32(b)(1)(i)); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to add capacity and to expand the scope of 
authority under zone procedures within Subzone 24B on behalf of Merck & 
Company, Inc., is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of May 2001.
Faryar Shirzad,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15423 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
IV 

House Calendar No. 169 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1137 

[Report No. 111–426] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 2847) 

making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, 

and Science, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2010, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2010 

Ms. MATSUI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the 

bill (H.R. 2847) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, and Science, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2010, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 2847) making appropriations for the Departments 

4 of Commerce and Justice, and Science, and Related Agen5 cies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1137 RH 

1 for other purposes, with the Senate amendment to the 

2 House amendment to the Senate amendment thereto, and 

3 to consider in the House, without intervention of any point 

4 of order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, 

5 a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Ways 

6 and Means or his designee that the House concur in the 

7 Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Sen8 ate amendment with the amendment printed in the report 

9 of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 

10 The Senate amendment and the motion shall be consid11 ered as read. The motion shall be debatable for 1 hour 

12 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

13 minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. 

14 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

15 the motion to final adoption without intervening motion. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 169 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1137 

[Report No. 111–426] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendother purposes. fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for tice, and Science, and Related Agencies for the tions for the Departments of Commerce and Jus- ment to the bill (H.R. 2847) making appropriaMARCH 4, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

             EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


  The following is a list of subsidiaries of AFG at December 31, 1996.  All
corporations are subsidiaries of AFG and, if indented, subsidiaries of the
company under which they are listed.

                                                                  Percentage of
                                                    State of      Common Equity
Name of Company                                     Incorporation  Ownership
American Financial Corporation                      Ohio             100
  American Premier Underwriters, Inc.               Pennsylvania     100
    Pennsylvania Company                            Delaware         100
      Atlanta Casualty Company                      Illinois         100
     Infinity Insurance Company                     Florida          100
       Leader National Insurance Company            Ohio             100
     Republic Indemnity Company of America          California       100
     Windsor Insurance Company                      Indiana          100
  Great American Holding Corporation                Ohio             100
    Great American Insurance Company                Ohio             100
      American Annuity Group, Inc.                  Delaware          81
        AAG Holding Company                         Ohio             100
          Great American Life Insurance Company     Ohio             100
            Loyal American Life Insurance Company   Alabama          100
            Prairie National Life Insurance 
              Company                               South Dakota     100
              American Memorial Life Insurance 
                Company                             South Dakota     100
          American Annuity Group Capital Trust I    Delaware         100
      American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance 
        Company                                     Delaware         100
      American National Fire Insurance Company      New York         100
      Brothers Property Corporation                 Ohio              80
      Great American Management Services, Inc.      Ohio             100
      Mid-Continent Casualty Company                Oklahoma         100
      Millennium Dynamics, Inc.                     Ohio             100
      Stonewall Insurance Company                   Alabama          100
      Transport Insurance Company                   Ohio             100
American Financial Capital Trust I                  Delaware         100
American Financial Enterprises, Inc.                Connecticut       83

   The names of certain subsidiaries are omitted, as such subsidiaries in
the aggregate would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

   See Part I, Item 1 of this Report for a description of certain companies
in which AFG owns a significant portion and accounts for under the equity
method.







                               E-4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000860744
<NAME> GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-4
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         397,075
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  362,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               759,237
<PP&E>                                      10,181,187
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,558,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,382,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,382,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,382,112
<SALES>                                      1,015,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               963,436
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  611,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                351,533
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            351,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   351,533
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1313 

Expressing support for designation of May as ‘‘Child Advocacy Center Month’’ 

and commending the National Child Advocacy Center in Huntsville, 

Alabama, on their 25th anniversary in 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2010 

Mr. GRIFFITH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of May as ‘‘Child Advocacy Center Month’’ and commending the National Child 

Advocacy Center in Huntsville, Alabama, on their 25th 

anniversary in 2010. 

Whereas, in May 1985, the National Child Advocacy Center 

opened its doors in Huntsville, Alabama; 

Whereas there are now more than 900 Child Advocacy Centers in the United States, all based off of the first one 

in Huntsville, Alabama; 

Whereas, in 2009, child advocacy centers served more than 

260,000 children; 

Whereas services are offered to children who are physically 

and sexually abused entirely for free to the family; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1313 IH 

Whereas child advocacy centers work to streamline the investigation process so that the child may be helped most effectively; 

Whereas this is done through a multidisciplinary team managing alleged cases of abuse from the initial investigation 

all the way through prosecution; 

Whereas, during this time, child advocacy centers offer medical, therapeutic, and other support services to victim’s 

and victim’s families; 

Whereas 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 7 boys will be sexually abused 

before the age of 18; 

Whereas child advocacy centers also reach out to the community and sponsor programs that help bring awareness to 

this problem; 

Whereas education and support for communities has proven 

to be successful in preventing abuse from occurring; 

Whereas the United States Department of Health and 

Human Services sponsored the Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect Report to Congress which found that from 1993 to 2006 there was a 

44 percent decrease in the rate of sexual abuse; and 

Whereas May would be an appropriate month to designate as 

‘‘Child Advocacy Center Month’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Child Advocacy 

3 Center Month’’; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1313 IH 

1 (2) commends the National Child Advocacy 

2 Center in Huntsville, Alabama, on their 25th anni3 versary. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JULIAN M. MARKS, STUART A. NEWMAN, MARSHALL K. SMITH, IRWIN M. EISEN, AND 

JAMES S. SCHONBERG 

CITATION: 22 Agric. Dec. 888 

DOCKET NUMBER: 98 

DATE: AUGUST 6, 1963 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STAY ORDER 

(No. 8582) 

In re JULIAN M. MARKS et al. CEA Docket No. 98. Decided August 6, 1963. 

Stay Order as to Respondent Marshall K. Smith 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer

STAY ORDER

In this proceeding under the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. Chapter 1), an 

order was issued July 16, 1963, in part, suspending the registration of 

respondent Marshall K. Smith as a floor broker under the act for a period of 20 

days and ordering all contract markets to deny all trading privileges to this 

respondent for a similar period. On July 31, 1963, Marshall K. Smith filed a 

petition for reconsideration of the order of July 16, 1963. Accordingly, the 

denial of trading privileges to, and the suspension of the registration of, 

Marshall K. Smith contained in the order of July 16, 1963, is hereby stayed 

pending the issuance of a further order in this proceeding. 

LOAD-DATE: June 8, 2008 
Page 2
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)**

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Magellan Fund  (the "Trust") on FormN-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each ofthe undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of such officer'sknowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Report.

Dated:	 November 20, 2013

Dated:	 November 20, 2013

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typedform within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.