alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SERVICE GRAIN COMPANY AND NORVELL D. SEELE 

DOCKET NUMBER: 102 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 102 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Secretary of 

Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Service Grain Company 

Norvell D. Seele 

(St. Louis, Missouri) 

The complaint charges the respondents with improper handling of customers' 

funds, alleging that they failed to treat customers' funds as belonging to such 

customers, failed to keep such funds separate from those of the firm, and used 

the funds of certain customers to margin and guarantee the firm's own trades. 

It also alleges that the respondents commingled trades executed for the firm's 

account with those of customers and failed to maintain records required under 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, September 12, 1961, in St. Louis, Missouri. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
#### Billy G. ASEMANI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-7128.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 14, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 22, 2010.

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

*778Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Asemani v. U.S. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement,*No. 1:10-cv-01875-RDB (D.Md. Aug. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14698]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-518-022]


PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation; Notice of 
Negotiated Rate

June 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 1, 2001, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest 
Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1-A, Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 7, Second 
Revised Sheet No. 7B and Fourth Revised Sheet No. 7C. GTN requests that 
these tariff sheets become effective June 1, 2001.
    GTN states that these sheets are being filed to reflect the 
implementation of four negotiated rate agreements. GTN further states 
that a copy of this filing has been served on GTN's jurisdictional 
customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426 in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14698 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 4.3

(SKY LOGO)

|    |  |                                                                
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|To: |  | The Toronto-Dominion Bank
14/18 Finsbury Square
London EC2A 1DB

Attention: Brian Cripps, Corporate Services

21st March 2003

By Courier

Dear Sirs,

£300,000,000 revolving credit facility Agreement
dated 8thMarch 2001 (as amended from time to time)
(the Agreement)

Cancellation Notice

We write to you in your capacity as Agent pursuant to the Agreement.



| | 1 |  | In accordance with clause 7.6 of the Agreement, we hereby give you
irrevocable notice of the cancellation of £100,000,000 of the total of
the undrawn Commitments, such cancellation to take effect on 25th
March 2003. For the avoidance of doubt, the Facility shall hereafter be
available in a maximum amount of £200,000,000.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2 |  | By counter-signing this letter where indicated below, you accept
and acknowledge the cancellation referred to in paragraph 1 above.                                                                                                                                                                                               
|
| | 3 |  | Terms defined in the Agreement shall have the same meaning in this
letter.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

Yours faithfully

For and on behalf of

British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC

| |                      | 
| | -------------------- | 
| | M.D. Stewart        
| | Authorised Signatory

|                                                                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|B. Cripps                                                                                            | 
|Accepted and agreed
for and on behalf of
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
(acting in its capacity as Agent) | 

British Sky Broadcasting Group plc
 Grant Way  Isleworth  Middlesex TW7 5QD
T 0870 240 3000  F 0870 240 3060
sky.com

1
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Tee Kai Shen                                               |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Tee Kai Shen                                                         |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  March 9, 2010                                                   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM TOY BIZ,
INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000933730
<NAME> TOY BIZ, INC.
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                       430
<INVENTORY>                                     22,685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               116,432
<PP&E>                                          34,412
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           277
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,366
<SALES>                                        150,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,812
<CGS>                                          106,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,650)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (20,185)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,465)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,465)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 648, Misc.

#### Edwards *v.*Heinze, Warden.

Supreme Court of California.

Certiorari denied.
No. 687, Misc.

#### Kamrowski *v.*Ragen, Warden.

Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois.

Certiorari denied.
H. Res. 1292 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 19, 2010. 

Whereas the Emporia State University (ESU) Lady Hornet 

basketball team defeated the Fort Lewis Skyhawks by a 

score of 65 to 53 to win the 2010 NCAA Women’s Division II National Championship in St. Joseph, Missouri, 

on March 26, 2010; 

Whereas this is ESU’s first ever women’s national basketball 

championship and the first national championship in any 

sport since being crowned the 1984 NCAA NAIA Women’s Softball National Champions; 

Whereas the ESU coaching staff of head coach Brandon 

Schneider and assistant coaches Jory Collins and Kiel 

Unruh guided the Lady Hornets to a final record of 30 

wins and only 5 losses; 

Whereas the 2010 National Champions consisted of seniors 

Cassondra Boston, Jamie Augustyn, Lacy Corker, and 

Sophia Lenard, juniors Ashley Ferrell, Negesti Taylor, 

Kayla Krueger, Dava Logsdon, and Alli Volkens, sophomore Brittney Miller, and freshmen Rachel Hanf, Jocelyn 

Cummings, and Kelsey Newman; 

Whereas ESU was led by the overall Most Outstanding Player of the tournament, Alli Volkens, who recorded 16 
2 

•HRES 1292 EH 

points, 15 rebounds, and five blocks in the championship 

game; and 

Whereas the students, staff, alumni, and friends of Emporia 

State University along with the city of Emporia, Kansas, 

deserve much credit for their support of the Lady Hornet 

basketball team: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the Emporia State University 

Lady Hornet basketball team for winning the 2010 

NCAA Division II National Championship; and 

(2) recognizes the achievements of all the team’s 

players, coaches, and support staff. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register: April 20, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 76)]
[Notices]
[Page 21091]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20ap04-41]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, May 7, 2004.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, Room 1012.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-9006 Filed 4-16-04; 11:52 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
[ARTICLE] 6 
[CIK] 0000744822
[NAME] Fidelity Investment Trust
[SERIES]
 [NUMBER] 11
 [NAME] Fidelity Overseas Fund
[MULTIPLIER] 1,000
<TABLE>
<S>
<C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                 year          
 
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]             oct-31-1997   
 
[PERIOD-END]                  oct-31-1997   
 
[INVESTMENTS-AT-COST]         3,258,631     
 
[INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE]        3,754,218     
 
[RECEIVABLES]                 140,349       
 
[ASSETS-OTHER]                1,744         
 
[OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS]          0             
 
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                3,896,311     
 
[PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES]      64,838        
 
[SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT]       0             
 
[OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES]     54,021        
 
[TOTAL-LIABILITIES]           118,859       
 
[SENIOR-EQUITY]               0             
 
[PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON]      2,996,113     
 
[SHARES-COMMON-STOCK]         110,720       
 
[SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR]         100,205       
 
[ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT]     41,157        
 
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII]        0             
 
[ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS]       246,303       
 
[OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS]      0             
 
[ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC]      493,879       
 
[NET-ASSETS]                  3,777,452     
 
[DIVIDEND-INCOME]             75,068        
 
[INTEREST-INCOME]             21,652        
 
[OTHER-INCOME]                (8,109)       
 
[EXPENSES-NET]                43,002        
 
[NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME]       45,609        
 
[REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT]      255,298       
 
[APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT]     239,293       
 
[NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS]         540,200       
 
[EQUALIZATION]                0             
 
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME]     36,607        
 
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS]      161,279       
 
[DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER]         0             
 
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD]       132,728       
 
[NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED]   128,556       
 
[SHARES-REINVESTED]           6,343         
 
[NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS]        662,827       
 
[ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR]       35,462        
 
[ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR]     205,444       
 
[OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR]       0             
 
[OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR]    0             
 
[GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES]         29,985        
 
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]            1             
 
[GROSS-EXPENSE]               43,802        
 
[AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS]          3,574,283     
 
[PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN]         31.080        
 
[PER-SHARE-NII]               .430          
 
[PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC]       4.610         
 
[PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND]          .370          
 
[PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS]     1.630         
 
[RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL]          0             
 
[PER-SHARE-NAV-END]           34.120        
 
[EXPENSE-RATIO]               123           
 
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]        0             
 
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]          0             
 
</TABLE>
IV 

House Calendar No. 200 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1403 

[Report No. 111–497] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 4213) 

to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain expiring 

provisions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2010 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the 

bill (H.R. 4213) to amend the Internal Revenue Code 

of 1986 to extend certain expiring provisions, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 4213) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

4 to extend certain expiring provisions, and for other pur5 poses, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to conVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:18 May 27, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1403.RH HR1403

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1403 RH 

1 sider in the House, without intervention of any point of 

2 order, a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on 

3 Ways and Means or his designee that the House concur 

4 in the Senate amendment with the amendment printed in 

5 part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accom6 panying this resolution as modified by the amendment 

7 printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules. 

8 The Senate amendment and the motion shall be consid9 ered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour 

10 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

11 minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. 

12 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

13 the motion to final adoption without intervening motion. 

14 SEC. 2. House Resolution 1392 is laid on the table. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 200 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1403 

[Report No. 111–497] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendpiring provisions, and for other purposes. nal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain ex- ment to the bill (H.R. 4213) to amend the InterMAY 26, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Yvonne NELSON; D. N.; D. N, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, City of Conway; Employment Security Commission; Horry County Schools; Horry County Police Department; Horry Georgetown Technical College; Housing Authorities; Social Security Administration; Waccamaw Mental Health Department, Defendants-Appellees, and Medicaid, Defendant.

No. 11-1979.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.

Yvonne Nelson, D.N., D.N., Appellants Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; John Betts McCutcheon, Jr., Lisa Arlene Thomas, Thompson & Henry, PA, Conway, South Carolina; Kimberly Kelley Blackburn, Kenneth Lendren Childs, Allen Dean Smith, Childs & Halligan, Columbia, South Carolina; Christie Valerie Newman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

*238Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yvonne Nelson and her two minor children appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Nelson v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs.,*No. 4:10-cv-03119-RBH, 2011 WL 3841084 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 25, 2011; entered Aug. 26,2011). We deny Nelson’s motion for settlement and motion for explanation as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: KERMIT W. QUAINTANCE, "Q" COMMODITIES CO., AND EARL B. HOGLUND 

DOCKET NUMBER: 176 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 176 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Kermit W. Quaintance, 

"Q" Commodities Co., 

(Minneapolis, Minnesota) 

and Earl B. Hoglund 

(Rochester, Minnesota) 

The complaint charges that during 1968, Kermit W. Quaintance converted over $ 

400,000 of customers' funds to his own use. In connection with such conversion, 

the complaint alleges that customers' funds were handled improperly and 

inaccurate and false reports and records were made. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

a time, date and place to be specified later. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Vyrex Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George Konrad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George Konrad      
|George Konrad          
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 14, 2008