alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Adekunle BALOGUN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-71993.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 14, 2010.

Helen A. Sklar, Stone & Grzegorek, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Joanne E. Johnson, Esquire, Oil, Anh-Thu P. Mai-Windle, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Adekunle Balogun, a native of Nigeria, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Lin v. Holder,*588 F.3d 981, 984 (9th Cir.2009), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Balogun’s motion to reopen to apply for relief under the Convention Against Torture as untimely where the motion was not filed within 90 days of the BIA’s final decision, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Balogun failed to demonstrate eligibility for any of the regulatory exceptions to the time limit, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Room 940. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

*Agreement No.:*                     011642-004.                 

*Title:*                     East Coast United States/East Coast of South America Vessel Sharing Agreement.                 

*Parties:*                     A.P. Moller-Maersk Sealand, P&O Nedlloyd Limited, P&O Nedlloyd B.V., Oceanica AGW Com. E Rep. Ltda., Compania Sud Americana de Vapores, S.A., Companhia Libra de Navegacao S.A., Alianca Navegacao e Logistica Ltda., Hamburg-Sud.                 

*Synopsis:*                     The proposed amendment: deletes Euroatlantic Container Line and Braztrans Transportes Maritimos Limitada as parties to the agreement; adds Companhia Libra de Navegacao S.A. as a party to the agreement; revises slot allocations; and reflects the various trade names used by certain parties.                 

Dated: January 12, 2001.

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 01-1514 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
No. —,- original.

#### Ex parte Van Dyke.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Otto Van Dyke, pro se.*

The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied, without prejudice to appropriate application to the proper Court of the State of Michigan. *Mooney*v. *Holohan,*294 U. S. 103.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

www.cftc.gov 

Office of Proceedings 

Robert Walker, 

Complainant, 

v. 

Platinum Trading Solutions, Incorporated, 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-) 

CFrC Docket No. 15-Roo3 

FINAL DECISION 

The parties have elected the Voluntary decisional procedure. By electing the 

Voluntary decisional procedure: the parties have waived the opportunity for an oral 

hearing, waived the right to receive a written statement of the findings of fact upon 

which the final decision is based, and waived the right to appeal this final decision to the 

Commission and to the U.S. Court of Appeals; and complainant has waived the right to 

prejudgment interest in connection with the reparations award. 1 

After carefully reviewing the evidentiary record, 2 it has been concluded that 

complainant has established: that an agent of respondent violated Section 40(1)(A) of 

the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 USC § 60(1)(A) (2012); that this violation caused 

1 CFTC rules 12.lOO(b) and 12.106(c). 2 Respondent's motion to strike complainant's recording, filed simultaneously with respondent's final statement, is 

hereby denied. See Venesky v. Murlas Commodities, Comm. Fut. L. Rep., 23,218 (CFTC 1986), and Stoller v. 

Siegel Trading Co., Comm. Fut. L. Rep.~ 22,224 (CFTC 1984). 
$6,665 in damages; and that respondent is liable for the violation of its agent pursuant 

to Section 2(a)(1)(B) of the Act, 7 U.S.C § 2(a)(1)(B) (2012).3 

Accordingly, Platinum Trading Solutions, Incorporated is ORDERED to pay to 

Robert Walker reparations of $6,665, plus post-judgment interest on that amount at 

0.52 %, compounded annually from the date of this final decision to the date of 

payment, plus Sso in costs for the filing fee.4 

February 8, 2016. 

/Rf,/// A,FJ ~ Philip V. McGuire, 

Judgment Officer 

3 This conclusion shall not be deemed a finding of the Commission for 1he purposes of Section 8a of the Commodity 

Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §I 2a (2012). CFTC rule 12.106(b)(3). 4 Respondent's requests for various forms of extraordinary relief beyond dismissal of the complaint. also 

simuhancously filed wilh responden1·s final statement, arc hereby denied. See CFTC rule 12.104(b). 

2
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Options Media Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, the  undersigned, in his capacity as an Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2.
The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Scott FrohmanScott Frohman


Acting Principal Financial Officer and Director
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Quarterly Report of AMERELITE SOLUTIONS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Knapp, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer f the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 12, 2011
By:
/s/ Robert L. KnappRobert L. KnappPrincipal Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register: March 18, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 52)]
[Notices]
[Page 13178-13179]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18mr05-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, April 15, 2005.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

[[Page 13179]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-5487 Filed 3-16-05; 11:47 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       Computations of Net Loss Per Share

         The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
loss per share as calculated in accordance with FASB 128.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              For the three months ended
                                                                      March 31,
                                                          -----------------------------------
                                                               2001               2000
                                                         --------------      --------------
<S>                                                      <C>                 <C>
Numerator:
    Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share -
    Net loss                                             $   (1,870,941)     $   (4,225,090)
                                                         ==============      ==============

Denominator:
    Denominator for basic loss per share -
    Weighted average shares                                  88,311,958          74,983,972

Effect of dilutive securities:
    Stock options and warrants                                       --                  --


    Dilutive potential common shares                                 --                  --
                                                         --------------      --------------

    Denominator for diluted earnings per share -
    adjusted weighted average shares and assumed
    conversions                                              88,311,958          74,983,972
                                                         ==============      ==============

    Basic loss per share                                 $       ( 0.02)     $        (0.06)
                                                         ==============      ==============
    Diluted loss per share                               $        (0.02)     $        (0.06)
                                                         ==============      ==============
</TABLE>



         As MigraTEC incurred a net loss for the three months ended March 31,
2001 and 2000, there were no adjustments for potentially dilutive securities as
the adjustments would have been anti-dilutive.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Intelligence Agency, Science and Technology Advisory 
Board, Standing Committee on Emerging Chemical and Biological 
Technology Advisory Committee of Experts Closed Panel Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (d) of section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, as amended by section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Science and Technology 
Advisory Board, Standing Committee on Emerging Chemical and Biological 
Technology Advisory Committee of Experts has been scheduled as follows:

DATES: June 13-14, 2001 (9 am to 5 pm).

ADDRESSES: Battelle Memorial Institute, 505 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 
43201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jack A. McNulty, Chairman, 
Standing Committee on Emerging Chemical and Biological Technology 
Advisory Committee of Experts, DIA Science and Technology Advisory 
Board, Washington, DC 20340-1328, (202) 231-3507.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in section 552b(c)(I), 
title 5 of the U.S. Code, and therefore will be closed to the public. 
The Advisory Committee of Experts (ACE) will receive classified 
briefings on and discuss several cutting-edge technologies and advise 
the Director, DIA, on related scientific and technical matters.

    Dated: June 12, 2001.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-15213 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
IV 

House Calendar No. 208 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1490 

[Report No. 111–518] 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill 

(H.R. 4173) to provide for financial regulatory reform, to protect consumers and investors, to enhance Federal understanding of insurance 

issues, to regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2010 

Mr. PERLMUTTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4173) to provide for financial 

regulatory reform, to protect consumers and investors, 

to enhance Federal understanding of insurance issues, 

to regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 4173) to provide for financial regVerDate Mar 15 2010 20:29 Jun 30, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1490.RH HR1490

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1490 RH 

1 ulatory reform, to protect consumers and investors, to en2 hance Federal understanding of insurance issues, to regu3 late the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and for 

4 other purposes. All points of order against the conference 

5 report and against its consideration are waived. The con6 ference report shall be considered as read. The previous 

7 question shall be considered as ordered on the conference 

8 report to its adoption without intervening motion except: 

9 (1) two hours of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit 

10 if applicable. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 208 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1490 

[Report No. 111–518] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report 

poses. counter derivatives markets, and for other purof insurance issues, to regulate the over-theand investors, to enhance Federal understanding financial regulatory reform, to protect consumers to accompany the bill (H.R. 4173) to provide for 

JUNE 30, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Alonzo REED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roy A. CASTRO, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-16531.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.*

Filed Dec. 8, 2006.

*634Alonzo Reed, Represa, CA, pro se.

Lisa A. Tillman, Esq., Jennifer A. Neill, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alonzo Reed, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition claiming that his constitutional rights were violated when he was found guilty of theft in prison disciplinary proceedings in 2001. He contends that the district court erred in concluding that he could not state a claim either for habeas relief or for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court correctly concluded that Reed could not proceed under *635§ 2254 because he received only a “counseling chrono” and did not lose any sentencing credit as a result of the disciplinary decision. *See Ramirez v. Galaza,*334 F.3d 850, 859 (9th Cir.2003).

Reed contends that he suffered an “atypical and significant hardship” as a result of the disciplinary decision, and therefore could state a due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, because prison officials search him when he leaves the prison law library and often accuse him of theft and search his cell. These conditions are insufficient to create a due process liberty interest. *Cf. id.*at 861 (discussing overcrowding, violence, and isolation).

Reed also contends that he stated a claim of retaliation for exercising his First Amendment right to file a complaint against the prison official who subsequently reported him for theft. This contention lacks merit because Reed’s habeas petition includes only two due process claims.

Finally, as a three-judge panel, we lack authority to address respondent’s contention that *Rosas v. Nielsen,*428 F.3d 1229 (9th Cir.2005), was incorrectly decided and that a certificate of appealability is required in cases concerning administrative decisions that affect petitioners’ sentences. *See Marshall v. Taylor,*395 F.3d 1058, 1061 n. 15 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 139, 163 L.Ed.2d 140 (2005).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

      ( print page 32796)    

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (d) of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, as amended by section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Science and Technology Advisory Board has been scheduled as follows:

# DATES:

June 26, 2001 (8:30 am to 4 pm).

# ADDRESSES:

The Defense Intelligence Agency, 200 MacDill Blvd, Washington, DC 20340.

# DATES:

June 27, 2001 (8:30 am to 4 pm).

# ADDRESSES:

4600 Sangamore Road, Bethesda, MD 20816 National Imagery Mapping Agency (NIMA)

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Victoria J. Prescott, Director/Executive Secretary, DIA Science and Technology Advisory Board, Washington, DC 20430-1328, (202) 231-4930.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The entire meeting is devoted to the discussion of classified information as defined in section 552b(c)(I), Title 5 of the U.S. Code, and therefore will be closed to the public. The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several current critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, on related scientific and technical matters.

June 12, 2001.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 01-15215  Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jesters Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Yanhua Xu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14thday of March, 2008.

YANHUA XU
Yanhua Xu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial 
Officer

















---
No. 509.

#### Purcell *v.*New York Central R. Co.

Jurisdictional statement submitted November 2, 1935.

Decided November 11, 1935.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion for leave to file statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The. appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly'presented *546federal question. *Home for Incurables*v. *City of New York,*187 U. S. 155, 158; *Henkel*v. *Cincinnati, 177*U. S. 170; *Seaboard Air Line Ry.*v. *Duvall,*225 U. S. 477, 481; *Fullerton*v. *Texas,*196 U. S. 192, 193-194; *Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.*v. *Johnson, ante,*p. 535. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

*Messrs. T. J. Johnston*and *Irving I. Goldsmith*for appellant.

*Mr. Charles E. Nichols*for appellee.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (No. 333-68019 and No. 333-101426) and Forms S-8 (No. 333-76655, No. 333-101422, and No. 333-127196) of Marvel Entertainment, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

New York, New York

March 1, 2007

 

 

 

----