alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

J.D., FATHER OF A.D., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-4112

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

________________________________________/

Opinion filed May 5, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Seminole County,

Julian E. Collins, Judge.

Sara Howeller, Oviedo, for Appellant.

Gale Forman Collins, Appellate Counsel, 

Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford, for 

Guardian ad Litem.

Rosemarie Farrell, Children's Legal 

Services, Department of Children and 

Families, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

J.D. ("Appellant"), father of A.D., a child, appeals the trial court's order adjudicating 

A.D. dependent. Appellant argues, and the Department of Children and Families properly 

concedes, that no competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court's finding that 
2

Appellant and A.D.'s mother subjected A.D. to abuse as defined by section 39.01(2), 

Florida Statutes (2015). We agree and reverse the order adjudicating A.D. dependent.1

REVERSED.

SAWAYA, BERGER, and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

 

1 We note that the Guardian ad Litem Program ("GAL") does not concede error, 

arguing that we must affirm because the order adjudicating A.D. dependent makes 

findings regarding A.D.'s mother, who did not appeal. We disagree that Appellant lacks 

standing to challenge the trial court's order in its entirety. Reversal of a dependency 

adjudication is appropriate where only one parent appeals, despite findings relating to 

both parents. See, e.g., S.D. v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs., 42 So. 3d 938, 940 

(Fla. 2d DCA 2010).
H. Res. 1225 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 25, 2010. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution, it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

4872) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to Title II of the 

concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2010 (S. 

Con. Res. 13), with the Senate amendments thereto, and to 

consider in the House, without intervention of any point of 

order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a single motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Education and Labor or his designee that the House concur in 

the Senate amendments. The Senate amendments and the 

motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Education and Labor. The previous question shall be consid-
2 

•HRES 1225 EH 

ered as ordered on the motion to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: KROLL, DALON & CO., INC. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 173 

DATE: AUGUST 17, 1970 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

Docket No. 173 

Name: Kroll, Dalon & Co., Inc. 

Effective On or about August 17, 1970 

Order 

Respondent Kroll, Dalon & Co., Inc., shall cease and desist from: (1) failing 

to treat and deal with customers' funds as belonging to such customers as 

required by section 4d of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 6d, Supp. IV, 

1969) and the regulations thereunder; (2) failing to hold customers' funds in 

segregated accounts as required by section 4d of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 

U.S.C. 6d, Supp. IV, 1969) and the regulations thereunder; and (3) engaging as 

futures commission merchant within the meaning of the Commodity Exchange Act 

without meeting the minimum financial requirements prescribed by section 1.17 of 

the regulations (34 F.R. 559) issued under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

Done at Washington, D. C. 

August 12, 1970 

Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Exhibit 23

 

 

 

# Consentof Independent Auditors

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-18495, Form S-8 No. 333-77473 andForm S-8 No. 333-37426) of Aftermarket Technology Corp. of our report datedFebruary 2, 2002 (except for Note 21, as to which the date is March 8,2002) with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofAftermarket Technology Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2001.

 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 8, 2002
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1337

Crude Oil Fixed Swap - Argus WTS - Argus Media TMA

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Argus Media for the 

location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the Argus Media

Argus WTS price for the trade month period beginning with the first business day after the 25th 

calendar day two months prior to the contract month through the last business day that falls on 

or before the 25th calendar day of the month prior to the contract month. If the 25th calendar 

day is a weekend or holiday, the Trade month period shall end on the first business day prior to 

the 25th calendar day.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in barrels. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity in 

barrels multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per barrel. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.01 per barrel. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
```

[Federal Register: November 17, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 222)]
[Notices]
[Page 66919]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17no06-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings Notice

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, December 29, 2006.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9288 Filed 11-15-06; 3:31 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Versatech USA (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, xx, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification
as of May 6, 2013.





|/s/ Joe Arcaro          | 
|----------------------- | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 







---
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE V. RAY E. STUART 

DOCKET NUMBER: 31 

DATE: MAY 23, 1942 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING ADMINISTRATION 

COMMODITY EXCHANGE BRANCH 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

CE-A Docket No. 31 

Secretary of Agriculture, Complainant, v. Ray E. Stuart Freeport, Illinois, 

Respondent. 

The following order has been issued in the above-entitled matter: 

ORDER 

IT IS ORDERED that all contract markets refuse Ray E. Stuart all trading 

privileges thereon for a period of five years beginning on the effective date of 

this order. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the registration of Ray E. Stuart as a futures 

commission merchant be, and the same hereby is, revoked. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy hereof be sent by registered mail to the 

respondent and to each contract market and that this order shall be effective 

ten days after its date. 

(SEAL) 

Done at Washington, D. C., this 23rd day of May, 1942. Witness my hand and 

the seal of the Department of Agriculture. 

(S) Thomas J. Flavin 

Assistant to the Secretary of Agriculture 

LOAD-DATE: December 15, 2008 
Page 2
Order entered November 10 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00495

- CR

MELQUIADES HERNANDEZ , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. F13

- 55932

- H



### O RDER The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.

On October 24, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the

reporter’s record had not been filed. On November 10, 2014, we received the reporter’s record.

Theref ore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the October 24, 2014 order

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
CENTRAL BANK OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION
(BANK OF RUSSIA)

DEPUTY GOVERNOR

12, Neglinnaya St.,
107016, Moscow,
Russian Federation
http://www.ebr.ru

Tel. (7-495) 771-40-46
Fax. (7-495) 621-91-47

date 257 Of. L015
our no_O15-$1/988

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

USA

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick,

The Bank of Russia is pleased to know that Open Joint Stock Company «Moscow Exchange
MICEX-RTS» (MOEX) is committed to apply to the CFTC to register as a Foreign Board of
Trade (FBOT).

By the present the Bank of Russia confirms that as of February 5", 2015, MOEX is duly licensed
as an exchange in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Law of November 21", 2011,
Ne 325-FZ "On the organized trading", and that there is no violation of any federal laws or other
regulatory acts of the Russian Federation and the Bank of Russia regulations by MOEX. The
Bank of Russia also affirms that MOEX is in good standing with respect to payable stamp duties
or any fines related to MOEX activity and that the operating activity of MOEX has not been
suspended in any violation or breach. The Bank of Russia assures that MOEX is able to continue
its activities on an ongoing basis.

The Bank of Russia hereby also confirms that as of February 5", 2015, Bank "National Clearing
Centre" Closed Joint Stock Company (NCC) is duly licensed as a clearing company in
accordance with the requirements of the Federal Law of February 7, 2011, No 7-FZ
"On clearing and clearing activity", and that there is no violation of any federal laws or other
regulatory acts of the Russian Federation and the Bank of Russia regulations by NCC. The Bank
of Russia also affirms that NCC is in good standing with respect to payable stamp duties or any
fines related to NCC activity and that the operating activity of NCC has not been suspended in
any violation or breach. The Bank of Russia assures that NCC is able to continue its activities on
an ongoing basis.


2

Furthermore, subject to compliance with the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures
(PFMI) by CPSS-IOSCO in April, 2012, the Bank of Russia has developed and adopted its own
regulation, which contains requirements for the central counterparties. Under such requirements
set out in the Bank of Russia Ordinance Ne 2919-U "On the assessing the management quality of
a credit organization performing central counterparty functions", NCC management quality was
recognized by the Bank of Russia as satisfactory on October 1s, 2013. Information on the
consideration of NCC management quality assessment is published in the Bulletin of the Bank of
Russia Ne 59 (1455), on October 31%, 2013, and disclosed on the Bank of Russia web-site.

Should you or your colleagues have any questions or need further clarifications, please do not
hesitate to contact Ms. Elizaveta Medina, Head of Foreign Authorities & International
Organizations Cooperation Unit at Financial Market Development Department
(Tel: +7 (495) 937-58-67, E-mail: MedinaEV@cbr.ru).

Yours sincerely,

Viadimir Chistyukhin

/
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

June 30, 2006

Securities and ExchangeCommission450 Fifth Street, N.WWashington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code.

CarlosFelices, the Chief Executive Officer and Valerio Cavallo, the Chief FinancialOfficer of Telecom Argentina S.A. (“Telecom”) each certifies that, to the bestof his knowledge:

1.                                       thisAnnual Report on Form 20-F (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Telecom.

|        | /s/ CARLOS FELICES      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name: Carlos Felices    |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ VALERIO CAVALLO     |
|   | Name: Valerio Cavallo   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: PACIFIC TRADING COMPANY, STEPHEN J. KLEMEN JR., AND RAYMOND S. BUCK 

DOCKET NUMBER: 226; 75-1 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

NOTE: LATER BECAME CFTC DOCKET # 75-1 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D.C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 226 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Acting Secretary of 

Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Pacific Trading Company 

Stephen J. Klemen, Jr. 

Raymond S. Buck 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that as of June 25, 26, and 27, 1973, the firm and its 

partners failed to submit Series '01 reports and the individual partners failed 

to submit Series '03 reports in accordance with CEA's requirements. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when there has been a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. A determination is considered as having been made when a 

decision of the Administrative Law Judge becomes final or, after appeal, a 

decision is made by the Judicial Officer of the Department. Complaints are 

filed in the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and 

are a matter of public record. Pending disposition of a complaint, it is the 

policy of the CEA not to comment or elaborate on charges contained therein or to 

discuss evidence on which it is based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before the Administrative Law 

Judge in Chicago, Illinois, at a date and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: August 6, 2008 
Page 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Markus R. Ernst, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 , that:



| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GBS Enterprises Incorporated for the
    fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GBS Enterprises Incorporated.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date July 1,2013 | /s/Markus R. Ernst                           | 
|---------------- | -------------------------------------------- | 
|                 | Markus R. Ernst                              | 
|                 | Chief Financial Officer                      | 
|                 | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)**

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Capital Trust  (the "Trust") on FormN-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each ofthe undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of such officer'sknowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Report.

Dated:	 December 26, 2013

Dated:December 26, 2013

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typedform within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In re GOODMAN.

(District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

June 24, 1909.)

No. 2,996.

Bankruptcy (§ 408*) — Right op Discharge — Concealment op Property.

A bankrupt *hold*not entitled to a discharge ou tbe ground that he concealed property from his trustee and made false oaths in the bankruptcy proceedings.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Dec. Dig. § 408.*]

In Bankruptcy. On application for discharge.

Howard K. Heckler, for bankrupt.

George Wentworth Carr, for objecting creditors.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The conclusion of the special referee (David W. Amram, Esq.) appears by the following quotation from his report:

> “From the testimony I find and conclude that the bankrupt, at some time prior to his bankruptcy and within four months immediately preceding the filing of the petition in bankruptcy against him, concealed merchandise to the value of at least 84,000, or its equivalent in cash, with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors; that subsequent to his bankruptcy, and after the appointment of his trustee, he concealed the same from his said trustee; that in filing his schedules in bankruptcy, and failing to state therein that he had such merchandise or cash, he was guilty of making a false oatli in these bankruptcy proceedings; and that in testifying under oath before me at the first meeting of creditors that he had no goods secreted or money in his pocket lie was again guilty of making a false oatli in these bankruptcy proceedings; and for these reasons liis discharge should he refused.”

*288No exceptions have been filed to this report, and no sufficient reason has been shown why it should not be confirmed.

The recommendation of the referee is approved, and the clerk is directed to enter an order that the discharge is refused.
U.S, COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

January 22, 2016

Mr. Gregory Compa

Chief Compliance Officer
ICAP SEF (US) LLC
Harborside Financial Center
1100 Plaza Five

Jersey City, NJ 07311

Re: Application of ICAP SEF (US) LLC for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Mr, Compa:

By submissions dated September 4, 2013 through January 21, 2016, ICAP SEF (US)
LLC (“ISUL”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”),
pursuant to Section 5h of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and
Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap execution facility
(“SEF”).

The Commission has reviewed ISUL’s application and has determined to grant ISUL
registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying Order of
Registration.

Sincerely,

LAL | Dbcit-

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Kerrisdale Mining Corporation. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Huoqi Chen , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Huoqi Chen Huoqi Chen, Chief Executive Officer March 2, 2009