alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JOSEPH A. FRIEDMAN AND JOSEPH A. FRIEDMAN CO. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 115 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT -- CEA DOCKET NO. 115 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging the following respondent with violation of the 

Commodity Exchange Act: 

Joseph A. Friedman and 

Joseph A. Friedman Co. 

New York, New York 

Joseph A. Friedman is a member of the New York Mercantile Exchange and a 

registered floor broker under the act. Joseph A. Friedman Co. is a partnership 

composed of Joseph A. Friedman and his wife and is a registered futures 

commission merchant under the act. The complaint charges that the respondents 

unlawfully took the opposite side of customers' orders for their own account and 

cheated or defrauded customers. The charges pertain to transactions in May 1963 

potato futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange during January and February 

1963. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, February 19, 1964, in New York, New York. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6833

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LARRY AMBROSE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-98-64, CA-99-747) Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Ambrose, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Larry Ambrose seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ambrose , Nos. CR-98-64; CA-99-747 (E.D. Va. May 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 482, Misc.

#### Adams *v.*Ragen, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir.

Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned officer of Storage Computer Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that, as of the date of this statement,
the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002.



The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation.





|Dated: March 31, 2003 |  | /S/    PETER N.
HOOD                                      |  | 
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                      |  | Name:     Peter N. Hood Title:    Chief Financial Officer |  |
CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY

#### Michael D. Wright v. Commonwealth of Virginia

February 5, 1992

Case No. CH91-6

By Judge William R. Shelton

This matter came to be heard on december 12, 1991, on plaintiff’s Petition for expungement of his criminal arrest record relating to three counts of unlawfully brandishing a firearm. The Commonwealth’s Attorney appeared and objected to the petition.

The warrants which have been filed as part of the petition show that Michael Wright was found guilty of all three charges. Only after performing the required one hundred hours of community services were the charges dismissed. While the plaintiff admitted that he had done the acts so charged in the warrants for his arrest, counsel for the plaintiff argues that the charges were “otherwise dismissed” and that the plaintiff is thus entitled to have his record expunged under § 19.2-392.2.

Virginia Code § 19.2-392.2, however, applies to innocent persons, not those who are guilty. “One who is guilty cannot occupy the status of innocent” *Gregg v. Commonwealth,*227 Va. 504, 507 S.E.2d (1984). After considering the evidence presented at the December 23rd hearing, the arguments made on behalf of Michael Wright and the Commonwealth, and the law as set forth in *Gregg, supra,*the Court is of the opinion that the petition should be, and is hereby, denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Customs Service 

# ACTION:

Notice of Application for Recordation of Trade Name. 

# SUMMARY:

Application has been filed pursuant to section 133.12, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 133.12), for the recordation under section 42 of the Act of July 5, 1946, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1124), of the trade name “RED BULL GMBH”. The trade name is owned by Red GmbH, an Austrian corporation incorporated in the State of Salzburg, Brunn 115, A-5330 Fuschl am See, Oesterreich, Austria. 

The application states that the trade name is used on a product called Red Bull Energy Drink and Point of Sale and other promotional materials for Red Bull Energy Drink. 

                        The merchandise is manufactured in the United States. Before final action is taken on the application, consideration will be given to any relevant data, views, or arguments submitted in writing by any person in opposition to the recordation of this trade name. Notice of the action taken on the application for recordation of this trade name will be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before August 13, 2001. 

# ADDRESSES:

Written comments should be addressed to U.S. Customs Service, Attention: Office of Regulations and Rulings, Intellectual Property Rights Branch, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Ronald Reagan Building, Room 3.4A, Washington, DC. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gwendolyn Savoy, Intellectual Property Rights Branch, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20229 (202) 927-2330. 

Dated: June 8, 2001. 

Joanne Roman Stump, 

Chief, Intellectual Property Rights Branch. 

[FR Doc. 01-14988 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1490 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 208
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1490

                          [Report No. 111-518]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4173) to provide for financial regulatory reform, to protect 
consumers and investors, to enhance Federal understanding of insurance 
 issues, to regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2010

  Mr. Perlmutter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4173) to provide for financial regulatory reform, to protect 
consumers and investors, to enhance Federal understanding of insurance 
 issues, to regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4173) to provide for financial regulatory reform, to protect consumers 
and investors, to enhance Federal understanding of insurance issues, to 
regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against 
its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
conference report to its adoption without intervening motion except: 
(1) two hours of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable.
                                                 House Calendar No. 208

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1490

                          [Report No. 111-518]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4173) to provide for financial regulatory reform, to protect 
consumers and investors, to enhance Federal understanding of insurance 
 issues, to regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 30, 2010

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LCS Golf, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Mitchell,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                               /S/MICHAEL MITCHELL
                               -----------------------
                               Michael Mitchell
                               Chief Executive Officer

July 3, 2003
<PAGE> 85

EXHIBIT 99.2

                   IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
                        Judge Clarence A. Brimmer

CIVIL ACTION NO. 98-WY-122-CB

JOAN G. ROUNDS, individually, JOAN G. ROUNDS, as custodian for Justin
Rounds; JOAN G. ROUNDS, as custodian for Kelly Rounds; JOAN G. ROUNDS,
as trustee for John N. Gromer; JGR VENTURES, a Colorado partnership; NORMAN
P. ROUNDS, for his individual retirement account; STANFORD
SQUARE, L.L.L.P.; OVERSIGHT MANAGEMENT COMPANY; CHRISTINE M.
FENIMORE; MICHAEL FLEMING; R. DAVID PRESETON; and PATRICIA BROOKS,

                              Plaintiffs.

v.

ROYAL SILVER MINES, INC., METALLINE MINING COMPANY, CROSBY
ENTERPRISES, INC., HOWARD CROSBY, ROBERT E. JORGENSEN, JOHN
RYAN, MERLIN BINGHAM and DANIEL GORSKI,

                              Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           ORDER OF DISMISSAL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon the Stipulation for Dismissal
with Prejudice on the settlement between the parties hereof, and the Court
being fully advised in the premises;

     IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-entitled matter be
and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, each part to bear her, his or its
own costs and attorneys' fees.

     DATED AT Denver, Colorado this 7th day of October, 1999.

                                   BY THE  COURT

                                   /s/ Clarence A. Brimmer
                                   Clarence A. Brimmer
                                   U.S. District Judge

<PAGE> 86

Civil Action NO, 98-WY-122-CB
Order of Dismissal
October 7, 1999
Page 3

                         CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing Order of Dismissal
signed by U.S. District judge Clarence A. Brimmer on October 7, 1999 was
served on October 8, 1999, by:

(X) delivery to

Judge Clarence A. Brimmer
Magistrate Judge 0. Edward Schlatter

AND

(X) depositing the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid,
addressed to:

Brice A. Tondre, Esq.
TONDRE & SCHUMACHER, PC
1900 Wazee Street #305
Denver, CO 80202

Jeffrey L. Supinger, Esq,
WITHERSPOON, KELLEY, DAVENPORT & TOOLE
1100 US Bank Bldg.
422 W. Riverside
Spokane, WA 99201

William J. Schroder, Esq.
PAINE, HAMBLEN, COFFIN, BROOKE & MILLER LLP
717 Sprague, #1200
Spokane, WA 99201-3501

                                   JAMES R. MANSPEAKER, CLERK

                                        /s/ LaDonna Bush
                                   By:  Deputy Clerk
All
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Benjamin F. McGraw, III certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Valentis, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: September 29, 2003 |  |                                                                                                                  
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | /s/ BENJAMIN F. MCGRAW, IIIBenjamin F. McGraw III, Pharm.D.
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-90725) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan, 1999 Stock
Option Plan, 1999 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, and 1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of CyberSource Corporation of our report dated January 17, 2000,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
CyberSource Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1999.

   Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of CyberSource
Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 26, 2000
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00496-CR

Luis Ramirez Montoya, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-01-409, HONORABLE CHARLES RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING

Luis Ramirez Montoya seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for aggravated sexual 

assault of a child. Sentence was imposed on June 19, 2002. There was no motion for new trial. The 

deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore July 19, 2002. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Notice of appeal 

was filed on July 29, 2002. No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. Tex. R. App. P. 

26.3. There is no indication that notice of appeal was properly mailed to the district clerk within the time 

prescribed by rule 26.2(a). Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to 

dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See 

Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
2

The appeal is dismissed.

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 30, 2002

Do Not Publish
#### Juan ORTIZ-ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-73463.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 10, 2010.

Rosario Maria Hernandez, Esquire, Robert W. Yarra A Professional Law Corporation, Fresno, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, James Arthur Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Aviva Poczter, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Ortiz-Ortiz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, *619and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s factual findings, *Lopez v. Ashcroft,*366 F.3d 799, 802 (9th Cir.2004), and we grant the petition for review.

Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s conclusion that Ortiz-Ortiz failed to establish past persecution on account of a protected ground because his credible testimony and documentary evidence establish that he and his family were targeted by guerrillas because of their pro-government political opinion. *See Lopez v. Ashcroft,*366 F.3d 799, 804 (9th Cir.2004) (harm by guerrillas was punishment for alien’s pro-establishment political views).

Because Ortiz-Ortiz established a nexus to a protected ground, we remand to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this disposition, *see INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam), taking into consideration Ortiz-Ortiz’s age at the time of the past harms, *see Hernandez-Ortiz v. Gonzales,*496 F.3d 1042, 1045-46 (9th Cir.2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
  /s/ FRANK J. BILBANFrank J. BilbanVice President  Finance, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary 28