alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on April 16, 2001, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Saunders Manufacturing Company, Inc., Winthrop, Maine and Meridian, Mississippi.

The company official submitting the petition has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC this 22nd day of May, 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Certifying Officer, Divison of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-14424  Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1534 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1534

   Honoring Special Agent William G. Clark of the Bureau of Alcohol, 
     Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for his heroic actions while 
               protecting the life of a woman in danger.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2010

Mr. Lee of New York (for himself, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Dreier, Mr. 
Burton of Indiana, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, Mr. 
Lance, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Camp, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Moran of 
 Virginia, Mr. Shuster, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
 Miller of Florida, Mr. Boozman, and Mr. Graves of Missouri) submitted 
 the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Honoring Special Agent William G. Clark of the Bureau of Alcohol, 
     Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for his heroic actions while 
               protecting the life of a woman in danger.

Whereas Special Agent William G. Clark is a trained officer who was assigned to 
        the U.S. Virgin Islands to address rising gun crime in 2008;
Whereas Special Agent Clark responded to the plea of a female neighbor who was 
        being threatened by her partner, an intoxicated male with previous 
        history of domestic violence;
Whereas Special Agent Clark was in full compliance with the established policies 
        of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives;
Whereas Eduardo M. Halley, a member of the ATF Miami Field Office in charge of 
        investigating the incident in the U.S. Virgin Islands said that Special 
        Agent Clark ``acted with prudence and restraint, and that he resorted to 
        the use of deadly force only in response to an imminent and deadly 
        threat to his safety and the safety of others''; and
Whereas Special Agent Clark is a resident of Rochester, New York, and this 
        matter is of importance and concern to the Rochester Community: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors Special Agent 
William G. Clark of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and 
Explosives for his heroic actions, exemplary service, and selfless acts 
to protect the lives of others.
                                 <all>
```
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 32004D0527

**2004/527/EC:Council Decision of 28 June 2004 on the request by Burkina Faso to accede to the Protocol on ACP Sugar***Official Journal L 232 , 01/07/2004 P. 0040 - 0041*

 Council Decision  of  28 June 2004  on the request by Burkina Faso to accede to the Protocol on ACP Sugar (2004/527/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133, in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 300(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) The Joint Declaration on Protocol 3 on ACP Sugar to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement(1) provides that any request from an African, Caribbean or Pacific (ACP) State Contracting Party to the Convention not specifically referred to in that Protocol to participate in its provisions shall be examined.

(2) Burkina Faso is an ACP State Contracting Party to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement and it requested in November 2000 to participate in the provisions of the said Protocol.

(3) In a letter of  30 September 2002 , the ACP States signified their assent to the accession of Burkina Faso to the said Protocol.

(4) An examination of the request of Burkina Faso has shown that the country is not a net exporter of sugar and is not capable of exporting sugar on a permanent basis.

(5) It is appropriate to transmit this conclusion to Burkina Faso by letter,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The request by Burkina Faso to accede to Protocol 3 on ACP sugar to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement is not accepted.

The attached letter shall be sent to Burkina Faso.

Done at Luxembourg,  28 June 2004 .

 For the Council 

 The President 

M.  Cullen 

(1) OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 269.

ANNEX

Brussels,

Your Excellency,

I have the honour to refer to your letter dated  8 November 2000  requesting accession to the Protocol on ACP sugar. In conformity with the Joint Declaration annexed to the Protocol on ACP sugar the European Community has examined your request and has come to the conclusion that Burkina Faso is at present not in a position to fulfil on a permanent basis the obligations of the Protocol. In previous cases, the capacity to fulfil these obligations was defined by the fact that the country in question was a net exporter of sugar.

I regret therefore that the Community cannot accept Burkina Faso's request to join the Sugar Protocol.

A copy of this letter is sent to the Secretary General of the ACP States.

Please accept, Your Excellency, the assurance of my highest consideration.

 On behalf of the Council of the European Union
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joseph Deshun JOHNSON, also known as Deshun Joseph Johnson, also known as Buck, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10966

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2010.

Nancy E. Larson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.

John W. Hopping, Hopping Law Firm, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WIENER, PRADO and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Joseph Deshun Johnson pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine. The district court sentenced Johnson to a below-guidelines sentence of 324 months of imprisonment. Johnson appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court clearly erred in adopting the presen-tence report’s (PSR’s) finding that he converted a majority of his powder cocaine into crack cocaine.

The Government argues that Johnson’s argument is not reviewable on appeal because he withdrew his objection to the determination at the sentencing hearing. Perceiving no intentional withdrawal of Johnson’s objection to the PSR, we reject the Government’s assertion of a waiver. *See United States v. Arviso-Mata,*442 F.3d 382, 384 (5th Cir.2006).

Turning to the merits of the appeal, we review the district court’s factual finding for clear error. *United States v. Villanueva,*408 F.3d 193, 203 & n. 9 (5th Cir.2005). “In making its factual findings for sentencing, a district court may adopt the findings of the PSR without additional inquiry if those facts have an evidentiary basis with sufficient indicia of reliability and the defendant does not present rebuttal evidence or otherwise demonstrate that the information is materially unreliable.” *United States v. Ford,*558 F.3d 371, 377 (5th Cir.2009) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The information contained in the offense conduct portion of Johnson’s PSR was gleaned from, inter alia, “investigative material prepared and compiled by FBI and ATF agents/TFOs [task force officers], DPS deputies, and Arlington and Fort Worth Police Department officers.” The PSR stated that the probation officer had personally conducted interviews with two FBI Special Agents and an ATF Special Agent, all of whom were identified by name. Further, in response to Johnson’s objection, the probation officer stated that her information was derived from “the investigative materials and the reports of several reliable codefen-dants.”

The PSR was supported by an adequate evidentiary basis with sufficient indicia of reliability. Johnson did not present any *905rebuttal evidence; nor did he demonstrate that the information was materially unreliable. The district court thus did not clearly err in adopting the finding made in the PSR. *See Ford,*558 F.3d at 377.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 13, original.

#### Nebraska *v.*Wyoming.

December 23, 1935.

*Mr. Ray E. Lee,*Attorney General of Wyoming, and *Messrs. Robert R. Rose*and *William C. Snow*for defendant, in support of the motion.

The motion for leave to file amended and supplemental answer is granted. It is ordered that the State of Colorado be made a party defendant to this suit and that process issue against the State of Colorado in accordance with the prayer of the amended and supplemental answer of the State of Wyoming, returnable on Monday, March 2 next.
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Leeward Group Holdings Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Leeward Group Holdings Inc. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  May 20, 2011 |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|                           |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|                           |   | /s/ Kevin M. Coughlin                                                                                                                                              |   |   |
|                           |   | Kevin M. Coughlin                                                                                                                                                  |
|                           |   | President, Chief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|                           |   | Leeward Group Holdings Inc.                                                                                                                                        |
|                           |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brock Langston CALDWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6833.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 27, 2010.

Brock Langston Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brock Langston Caldwell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Caldwell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32894-32895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15118]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Part 108

RIN 3245-AE40


New Markets Venture Capital Program; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Final rule; Withdrawal of interim final rule; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) published in the 
Federal Register of May 23, 2001 (66 FR 28602), a final rule 
implementing the New Markets Venture Capital Program and withdrawing a 
previous interim final rule. SBA now makes technical corrections to fix 
clerical and/or typographical errors in the previously published final 
rule.

DATES: The technical corrections to this rule are effective on May 23, 
2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Austin Belton, Director, Office of New 
Markets Venture Capital, 202-205-7027; or Louis Cupp, Policy Analyst, 
Office of New Markets Venture Capital, 202-619-0511.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SBA published a final rule in the 
Federal Register on May 23, 2001 (66 FR 28602) implementing the New 
Markets Venture Capital Program and withdrawing a previous interim 
final rule. The published rule contained several clerical and/or 
typographical errors. Because the errors are not significant in nature 
and number, SBA believes that listing the corrections is sufficient. 
Therefore, make the following corrections to FR Doc. 01-12501 published 
on May 23, 2001 (66 FR 28602):

    1. On page 28602, in the first column, under the DATES heading, 
correct the citation ``40 CFR part 108'' under the ``Withdrawal Date'' 
subheading to read ``13 CFR part 108''.

PART 108--[CORRECTED]

    2. On page 28610, in the third column, 2d and 1st lines from the 
bottom, the Authority citation is corrected to read as follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 689-689q.


Sec. 108.150  [Corrected]

    3. On page 28615, in the second column, under Sec. 108.150(c) 
introductory text, correct the first sentence to read as follows:


Sec. 108.150  Management and ownership diversity requirement.

* * * * *
    (c) * * * At least 30 percent of your Regulatory Capital and 
Leverageable Capital must be owned and controlled by three Persons 
unaffiliated with your management and unaffiliated with each other, 
whose investments are significant in dollar and percentage terms as 
determined by SBA. * * *
* * * * *


Sec. 108.2010  [Corrected]

    4. On page 28632, in the first column, under Sec. 108.2010(b), last 
line, correct the citation ``48 CFR 31.001'' to read ``48 CFR 2.101''.


[[Page 32895]]


    Dated: June 11, 2001.
Harry Haskins,
Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 01-15118 Filed 6-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT
31.2








**CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





CERTIFICATION








I, Paul
Commons, Chief Financial Officer of Voxware, Inc., certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended by Form 10-K/A Amendment No.
1 of Voxware, Inc.





2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Paragraph
omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release
34-47986





c) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





d) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Dated: March 31,
    2005
    
    By: /s/ Paul
      CommonsPaul CommonsChief Financial
  Officer(Principal FinancialOfficer and Principal Accounting
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1418 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1418

 Expressing support for increasing awareness of craniofacial anomalies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2010

     Mr. Cantor (for himself and Mr. Ross) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for increasing awareness of craniofacial anomalies.

Whereas there are 100,000 children born each year in the United States with a 
        craniofacial anomaly affecting the head, neck, extremities, or organs;
Whereas craniofacial treatment will often last from infancy to adulthood;
Whereas it is not uncommon for one to undergo multiple surgeries before reaching 
        adulthood;
Whereas most craniofacial conditions affect individuals and their families 
        physically, mentally, and socially;
Whereas in the past 30 years, many medical procedures have been developed to 
        help improve the quality of life for those affected by craniofacial 
        anomalies;
Whereas the number of physicians specializing in treating these rare and complex 
        conditions is very small; and
Whereas many groups have developed to help advocate on the behalf of those with 
        craniofacial anomalies and to encourage greater acceptance and support 
        of individuals with craniofacial anomalies: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports--
            (1) increasing public awareness and acceptance of those 
        living with craniofacial anomalies; and
            (2) promoting continued development of groundbreaking 
        research and medical procedures for individuals living with 
        craniofacial anomalies.
                                 <all>
```