alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Paul Watson Enterprises, Inc. v. Miller and Smith Land, Inc.

February 23, 1992

Case No. (Law) 108599

By Judge Rosemarie Annunziata

The matter before the Court is Plaintiff Paul Watson Enterprises, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, to Strike the Affirmative Defenses of the Defendant Miller and Smith Land, Inc. For the purposes of summary judgment, the Court is limited to the pleadings in this case and cannot consider the documents attached to the summary judgment motion filed by the plaintiff. Va. Sup. Ct. R. 3:18; *see Janney*v. *Rappahannock Area Community Services Bd.,*14 Va. Cir. 249, 250 (1988); *Consolidated Healthcare v. Overseas Partners, Inc.,*14 Va. Cir. 241, 242 (1988). After reviewing the pleadings, I find that a material fact remains in dispute as to whether the plaintiff had a real estate license at the time it contracted and performed the services for the defendant. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is denied.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00588-CV

Maverick Oil Tools, LLC

v.

Dem Well Head Services, LLC

On appeal from the

343rd District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Cause No. S-15-5405-CV-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 14, 2017
| (1)   | the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Goldspan Resources, Inc. for the quarter      ended April 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended April 30, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Goldspan Resources,      Inc.. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                            | /s/Jeff Wiegel                                                             |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |                                                                            |
| Name:                          | Jeff      Wiegel                                                                |
|                           |                                                                            |
| Title:     | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|                           |                                                                            |
| Date:                          | June      10, 2008                                                              |
**EXHIBIT
      23**





**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting
      Firm**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements, (Form
      S-8 No. 333-18495, 333-77473, 333-37426, 333-88528, 333-115925, 333-126074,
      and
      333-134644) pertaining to the Stock Incentive Plans and Executive Nonqualified
      Excess Plan of Aftermarket Technology Corp. of our reports dated February 26,
      2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
      Aftermarket Technology Corp., management’s assessment of effectiveness of
      internal control over financial reporting of Aftermarket Technology Corp.,
      and
      the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Aftermarket
      Technology Corp., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
      December 31, 2006.








/s/
      ERNST
& YOUNG LLP








Chicago,
      Illinois


February
      28, 2007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 20, 2019

t0313 

# Order

Clerk March 20, 2019

157991 & (96)

In re CHURCHILL/ BELINSKI, Minors. SC: 157991

COA: 337790

Clare CC Family Div:

16

- 000046

- NA

_________________________________________/

By order of November 16, 2018, this Court directed the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on the application relating to the minor child, OTC. This Court also reversed

the March 15, 2018 Court of Appeals judgment in part and vacated the Clare Circuit

Court’s February 17, 2017 order of adjudication and March 15, 2017 order of disposition

as they pertained to the minor children SLB and JWC. In lieu of oral argument on the

application, the parties have now filed a joint motion to vacate the circuit court’s orders

of adjudication and disposition and the Court of Appeals judgment as to the minor child,

OTC, and to remand this case to the circuit court with instructions to dismiss without

prejudice the petition against the respondent as to all three children.

On order of the Court, the motion is GRANTED. We VACATE those parts of the

March 15, 2018 Court of Appeals judgment and t he Clare Circuit Court’s orders of

adjudication and disposition pertaining to the minor child, OTC, and we REMAND this

case to the Clare Circuit Court, which shall dismiss without prejudice the petition against

the respondent as to all three children.

The application for leave to appeal as it pertains to the minor child, OTC, is

DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
#### EISFELDT v. CAMPBELL.

(Circuit Court, W. D. New York.

April 27, 1909.)

No. 351.

Copyrights (§ 85*) — Suit for Infringement — Injunction.

Two theatrical plays, although having different names, *held,*so similar in characters, plot, action, and dialogue as to render the production of one by defendant a violation of a preliminary injunction restraining her from producing the other.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Copyrights, Dec. Dig. §■ 85.*]

In Equity. On preliminary injunction.

Love & Keating, for complainant.

John J. Mclnerney, for defendant.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep'r Indexes

HAZEL, District Judge.

The record does not disclose any material dissimilarity between the play “Mrs. Peckham’s Carouse,” the playing of which by the defendant was heretofore restrained, and “Mrs. Mix Mixes,” the play which she subsequently produced. The plot or theme of the latter is not different from that of the former. It is true that subjects of intemperance and their portrayal in plays and on the stage, with the peculiarities of persons under the influence of liquor, are not new or novel; but the play “Mrs. Peckham’s Carouse” illustrates and embodies such peculiarities in its central character, accompanied by farce dialogue and stage situations in a manner hitherto uncommon, and its theme, plot, action, characters, situations, and scenes are found in “Mrs. Mix Mixes.” Such being my opinion regarding the two plays, the only question of importance arises as to the ownership of the original production. The defendant disputes complainant’s title, and claims that she is the absolute owner of the original copyrighted play; it having been presented to her by complainant’s predecessor. This claim of ownership, however, is denied, and," whatever merits it may have, I think the defendant is amply protected by the bond required of the complainant on the original application herein from any loss which she may sustain by reason of the temporary injunction.

The injunction will be continued pendente lite, and the question of contempt reserved to the final hearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1406 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1406

  Directing the Secretary of the Interior to transmit to the House of 
     Representatives certain information relating to the potential 
                   designation of National Monuments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 2010

    Mr. Hastings of Washington (for himself and Mr. Bishop of Utah) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Directing the Secretary of the Interior to transmit to the House of 
     Representatives certain information relating to the potential 
                   designation of National Monuments.

    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Interior is directed to 
transmit to the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after 
the date of the adoption of this resolution, copies of all Department 
of the Interior documents, maps, records (including electronic 
records), communications and other information dating from July 1, 
2009, and later referring to or relating to--
            (1) the document containing ``Attachment 4 Prospective 
        Conservation Designation: National Monument Designations under 
        the Antiquities Act'' and marked ``Internal Draft--NOT FOR 
        RELEASE'', including that document in full, all attachments in 
        full, and all iterations of that document, and related similar 
        documents.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David Lee ANDERSON, Appellant.

No. 10-2371.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 4, 2010.

Filed: Nov. 4, 2010.

Trida Annette Tingle, Lolita A. Velazquez-Aguilu, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.

David Lee Anderson, U.S. Penitentiary, Marion, IL, pro se.

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

David Lee Anderson appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motions to recalculate and reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 709 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Upon de novo review, we find no error. *See United States v. Baylor,*556 F.3d 672, 673 (8th Cir.2009) (per curiam) (standard of review); *United States v. Peters,*524 F.3d 905, 907 (8th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (affirming denial of § 3582(c)(2) motion for resentencing because Amendment 709 is not a covered amendment under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 to which retroactive treatment may be given); *United States v. Walsh,*26 F.3d 75, 76-77 (8th Cir.1994) (noting that policy statements in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 govern whether Guidelines amendments shall apply retroactively). Anderson’s alternative argument for recalculation is also without merit. Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                           1,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                    148,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,716
<PP&E>                                         124,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 314,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,917
<BONDS>                                        174,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   314,735
<SALES>                                        464,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               464,665
<CGS>                                          270,150
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  270,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,795
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,935
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,860
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1406 

Directing the Secretary of the Interior to transmit to the House of Representatives certain information relating to the potential designation of National Monuments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 27, 2010 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of Utah) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of the Interior to transmit to the 

House of Representatives certain information relating to 

the potential designation of National Monuments. 

1 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Interior is di2 rected to transmit to the House of Representatives, not 

3 later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this 

4 resolution, copies of all Department of the Interior docu5 ments, maps, records (including electronic records), com6 munications and other information dating from July 1, 

7 2009, and later referring to or relating to— 

8 (1) the document containing ‘‘Attachment 4 

9 Prospective Conservation Designation: National 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1406 IH 

1 Monument Designations under the Antiquities Act’’ 

2 and marked ‘‘Internal Draft—NOT FOR RE3 LEASE’’, including that document in full, all at4 tachments in full, and all iterations of that docu5 ment, and related similar documents. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 23, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1074 Lower Tribunal No. F95-22615

________________ 

### Rudy Antonio Ramirez, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Mary Pooler, Judge. Rudy Antonio Ramirez, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, SCALES, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R . 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.
1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60222 Summary Calendar

LENIS IRENE MULLINS and EVERETT D. MULLINS, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

VERSUS

WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

(3:95-CV-178)

April 7, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) appeals the denial of its motion for new trial or, in the alternative, a remi ttitur. We affirm. Plaintiffs Lenis Irene Mullins and Everett D. Mullins brought suit against Wal-Mart to recover damages sustained when Mrs.2

Mullins slipped and fell and suffered personal injuries in a WalMart Store. After jury trial, the jury returned a verdict for

p laintiffs, assessing no damages for Mr. Mullins and $50,000 for
Mrs. Mullins. Wal-Mart moved for new trial or, in the alternative,
for remittitur, contendin g, i nter alia, that the district court erred in not granting a mistrial on motions made by Wal-Mart during trial. On appeal, Wal-Mart argues that the district court erred in denying this motion. Specifically, Wal -Mart alleges that the jury, prejudiced by repetitious and leading questions and improper comments by Plaintiffs' counsel in response to Wal-Mart's objections, returned

a verdict against the weight of the evidence. Further, Wal-Mart alleges that because they were forc ed by Plaintiffs' counsel's egregious conduct to make numerous objections, the jury was led to believe Wal-Mart had something to hide. Having reviewed the reco rd, we conclude that the district
court did not abuse its discretion in denying Wal-Mart's motion for new trial or, in the alternative, for remittitur. See Hiltgen v.
Sumrall , 47 F.3d 695, 703 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, FILED AS
PART OF FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,793
<PP&E>                                         833,131
<DEPRECIATION>                               (697,936)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,340,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,792,739
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,819,019)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   346,536
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               335,576
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,789,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,079
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,604,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,604,777)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,604,777)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.034)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.034)


</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vanleo Y.W. Fung, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Swav Enterprises
      Ltd. for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Swav Enterprises Ltd..                                                                   

Date: February 13, 2009

/s/ Vanleo Y. W. Fung
Vanleo Y.W. Fung Chief Financial Officer Principal Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Swav Enterprises
Ltd. and will be retained by Swav Enterprises Ltd. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IV 

House Calendar No. 204 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1448 

[Report No. 111–508] 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 5297) to create the 

Small Business Lending Fund Program to direct the Secretary of the 

Treasury to make capital investments in eligible institutions in order 

to increase the availability of credit for small businesses, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2010 

Mr. PERLMUTTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 5297) 

to create the Small Business Lending Fund Program 

to direct the Secretary of the Treasury to make capital 

investments in eligible institutions in order to increase 

the availability of credit for small businesses, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That during further consideration of the bill 

2 (H.R. 5297) to create the Small Business Lending Fund 

3 Program to direct the Secretary of the Treasury to make 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1448 RH 

1 capital investments in eligible institutions in order to in2 crease the availability of credit for small businesses, and 

3 for other purposes, pursuant to House Resolution 1436, 

4 it shall be in order to consider the amendments printed 

5 in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 

6 this resolution as though they were the last two amend7 ments printed in part C of House Report 111–506. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS

hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 204 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1448 

[Report No. 111–508] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 

poses. credit for small businesses, and for other purinstitutions in order to increase the availability of Treasury to make capital investments in eligible Fund Program to direct the Secretary of the 5297) to create the Small Business Lending 

JUNE 16, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS