alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Jul. 30, 2015                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| L N | Strategic Advisers Value Multi-Manager Fund                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| **Supplement to  Strategic Advisers® Value Multi-Manager Fund  Class L and Class N July 30, 2015  Prospectus***Effective October 1, 2015, the fund changed its classification from a non-diversified fund to a diversified fund.* |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Supplement Text Block.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**frst_SupplementTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**frst_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**dei_DocumentInformationDocumentAxis=frst_LNMember**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
| X                                                                                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**dei_LegalEntityAxis=frst_S000034420Member**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
Sunoco, Inc. Amendment No.1 - Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 SUNOCO, INC. 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATON PLAN 
  
 Amendment
No. 2005-1 
  

	1.	There is added a new Section 3.13 as follows effective January 1, 2005: 

  
 “3.13 Distributions in 2005 under IRC Section 409A Transition Rules. 
  

	 	(a)	Certain Participants Not Employed by the Company on January 1, 2005. In accordance with the transition guidance set forth in Section 18(c) of IRS Notice 2005-1, the
Deferred Bonus Account of a Participant who on January 1, 2005 (i) was not employed by the Company, and (ii) was employed by a subsidiary or affiliate of the Company that has not adopted the Plan, shall be distributed to the
Participant on or before December 31, 2005, and such Participant shall cease to participate in the Plan as of the date of such distribution. 

  


	 	(b)	Revocation of Participant’s Election to Defer for Bonus Awarded under Incentive Plan for Calendar Year 2004 and Paid in 2005. In accordance with the transition guidance
set forth in Section 20 of IRS Notice 2005-1, a Participant who elected pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Plan to defer all or a portion of his or her bonus awarded under the Incentive Plan with respect to calendar year 2004 and payable in
2005, may cancel such deferral election on or before December 31, 2005, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 20(a), (b) and (c) of IRS Notice 2005-1, and in the form and manner prescribed by the Committee, and the amount in
the Participant’s Deferred Bonus Account attributable to the cancelled deferral, including Dividend Equivalents and/or Interest Equivalents credited to the Participant’s Deferred Bonus Account with respect to such cancelled deferral, shall
be distributed to the Participant on or before December 31, 2005.”
Exhibit (n)(2)

**SCHEDULE I, DATED OCTOBER 20, 2005  TO MULTIPLE CLASS OF SHARES PLAN FOR**

**FIDELITY ADVISOR FUNDS, DATED OCTOBER 20, 2005**

**FIDELITY ADVISOR SERIES I**
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ImmunoBiotics, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Lahey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Thomas LaheyThomas Lahey

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





May 24, 2010
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: RICHARD D. KOHN, MARSHALL J. STEIN, AND THOMAS CURTEAN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 199 

DATE: DECEMBER 26, 1972 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

CEA Docket No. 199 

Name: Richard D. Kohn, Marshall J. Stein, and Thomas Curtean 

Effective on December 26, 1972 

Order 

Effective on the date of service of this order upon the respondents, Richard 

D. Kohn, Marshall J. Stein, and Thomas Curtean shall cease and desist from 

executing any futures transaction subject to the Commodity Exchange Act if such 

transaction is not executed openly and competitively in accordance with section 

1.38 of the regulations issued under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR 1.38). 

Done at Washington, D.C. 

DEC 18 1972 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Judicial Officer 

Office of the Secretary 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2 
Page 3
#### CHILTON v. CITY OF EDEN

No. 423P98

Case below: 130 N.C.App. 610

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 November 1998.
EXHIBIT
      23.1




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




We
      hereby
      consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of our report dated
      March 13, 2007, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Aurora Oil &
Gas Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the related
      consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for
      each of the two years in the period then ended, appearing in such Annual
      Report.




We
      also
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
      333-129695 and 333-130769) on Form S-3 of Aurora Oil & Gas Corporation and
      subsidiaries of our report referred to above, which report appears in the
      December 31, 2007, Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Aurora Oil & Gas
      Corporation.





/s/
      RACHLIN LLP


Miami,
      Florida


April
      11,
      2008
```

[Federal Register: June 22, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 119)]
[Notices]
[Page 33270]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22jn99-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, July 30, 1999.

.PLACE: 1155 21st St, N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-15996 Filed 6-18-99; 2:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
Ex-10.3



 






Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT TO

CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT



THIS AMENDMENT, made the 19th day of August, 2005, by CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the
“Company”), a North Carolina corporation with its principal office at Concord, North
Carolina, and Matthew Dowd (“Employee”), an employee of the Company.



WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have previously entered into a Change in Control
Agreement dated March 10, 2003 (the “Agreement”); and



WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to provide that any Compensation
payable to the Employee under the terms of the Agreement shall be paid in the form of a
single lump sum.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms contained herein, the Employee’s
employment with the Company, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Employee agree that the
Agreement shall be and hereby is amended by deleting Section IA and substituting therefor
the following:



“A. If a Change in Control (as defined in Section IA(iii) hereof) occurs and if, within
two years following the Change in Control, the employment of the Employee is terminated (A)
by the Company other than for Cause (as defined in Section IA(i) hereof), or (B) by the
Employee for Good Reason (as defined in Section IA(ii) hereof), an amount equal to the
Employee’s Compensation (as defined in Section IA(iv) hereof), less applicable withholdings,
shall be paid by the Company to the Employee in a single lump sum within 30 days of
termination of the Employee’s employment under circumstances entitling the Employee to
Compensation hereunder.”



Except as amended herein, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties hereto effective as
of the day and year first above stated.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ RICHARD L. GARNER, JR.	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	     Richard L. Garner, Jr.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EMPLOYEE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ MATTHEW DOWD
	 	(Seal)
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Matthew Dowd
	 	 






39
----

----

II Aktid, mille avaldamine ei ole kohustuslik

Komisjon

Euroopa ühenduste võõrtöötajate sotsiaalkindlustuse halduskomisjon

----

OTSUS nr 198,

23. märts 2004,

mis käsitleb nõukogu määruste (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 ja 574/72 kohaldamiseks vajalike näidisvormide väljavahetamist ja kasutuselt kõrvaldamist

(E 110, E 111, E 111 B, E 113, E 114, E 119, E 128 ja E 128 B)

(EMPs ja Euroopa Liidu–Šveitsi lepinguga hõlmatud riikides kohaldatav tekst)

(2004/562/EÜ)

VÕÕRTÖÖTAJATE SOTSIAALKINDLUSTUSE HALDUSKOMISJON,

võttes arvesse ühenduse piires ümber asuvate palgatööliste, füüsilisest isikust ettevõtjate ja nende pereliikmete suhtes kohaldatavat sotsiaalkindlustuse korda käsitleva 14. juuni 1971. aasta määruse (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 (1) artikli 81 punkti a, mille kohaselt halduskomisjoni ülesanne on tegeleda kõigi määrusest (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 ja sellele järgnevatest määrustest tulenevate haldusküsimustega,

võttes arvesse nõukogu 21. märtsi 1972. aasta määruse (EMÜ) nr 574/72 (2) (millega määratakse kindlaks määruse (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 (3) üksikasjalikud rakenduseeskirjad ja millega vastavalt viimatinimetatud määruse tingimustele kehtestatakse määruste kohaldamiseks vajalikud dokumendivormid) artikli 2 lõiget 1,

võttes arvesse 7. oktoobri 1993. aasta otsust nr 153, mis käsitleb nõukogu määruste (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 ja (EMÜ) nr 574/72 kohaldamiseks vajalikke näidisvorme (E 001, E 103–E 127), (4)

võttes arvesse 5. oktoobri 1999. aasta otsust nr 177, mis käsitleb nõukogu määruste (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 ja (EMÜ) nr 574/72 kohaldamiseks vajalikke näidisvorme (E 128 ja E 128 B), (5)

võttes arvesse 18. aprilli 2000. aasta otsust nr 179, mis käsitleb nõukogu määruste (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 ja (EMÜ) nr 574/72 kohaldamiseks vajalikke näidisvorme (E 111, E 111 B, E 113–E 118 ja E 125–E 127), (6)

võttes arvesse 27. juuni 2002. aasta otsust nr 187, mis käsitleb nõukogu määruste (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 ja (EMÜ) nr 574/72 kohaldamiseks vajalikke näidisvorme (E 111 ja E 111 B), (7)

võttes arvesse 18. juuni 2003. aasta otsust nr 191, mis käsitleb vormide E 111 ja E 111 B asendamist Euroopa ravikindlustuskaardiga

ning arvestades järgmist:

OTSUSTAB:

Halduskomisjoni eesistuja

Tim QUIRKE

----

(1)EÜT L 149, 5.7.1971, lk 2. Määrust on viimati muudetud Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 631/2004 (ELT L 100, 6.4.2004, lk 1).

(2)EÜT L 74, 27.3.1972, lk 1. Määrust on viimati muudetud Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 631/2004.

(3)EÜT L 244, 19.9.1994, lk 65.

(4)EÜT L 302, 1.12.2000, lk 65.

(5)EÜT L 54, 25.2.2002, lk 1.

(6)ELT L 93, 10.4.2003, lk 40.

(7)ELT L 276, 27.10.2003, lk 19.

----

LISA 1

----
```

[Federal Register: September 1, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 169)]
[Notices]
[Page 47773]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01se99-78]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, September 3, 1999.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Catherine D. Dixon,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-22812 Filed 8-27-99; 4:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Security Solutions Group, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q, for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Phil Viggiani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date:  May 4, 2010  /s/   PHIL VIGGIANI Name:  Phil Viggiani Its:  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive & Financial Officer)
S07A0193.

#### MUNGIN v. ST. LAWRENCE et al.

(641 SE2d 541)

CARLEY, Justice.

Charles Mungin is the defendant in a pending criminal action. Acting pro se, he filed a pre-trial habeas corpus petition. After reviewing the pleading, the habeas court found that it failed to allege any viable ground for relief. Accordingly, the habeas court denied the petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing, concluding that the issues Mungin raised therein could be asserted in the pending criminal prosecution. Mungin appeals from the habeas court’s dismissal order.

“[W]hen the habeas court is able to determine from the face of the petition that it is without merit... it [is] appropriate to dismiss the petition without a hearing. [Cits.]” *Mitchell v. Forrester,*247 Ga. 622, 623 (278 SE2d 368) (1981). Here, the habeas corpus court noted that all of the issues Mungin raised in his petition relate to matters that he can assert in the context of his pending prosecution.

> “Where the proceedings under which the petitioner is detained are still pending undisposed of, and the ordinary established procedure is still available to him, the orderly procedure by trial and appeal should not be interfered with by a writ of habeas corpus [cits.], there being another adequate remedy [cits.], and no necessity for issuance of this high extraordinary writ [cit.]”

*Jackson v. Lowry,*170 Ga. 755, 756-757 (154 SE 228) (1930). Mungin contends that this principle does not apply here, because one of the grounds upon which he sought habeas corpus relief was that he stands acquitted because of the State’s failure to comply with his demand for a speedy trial under OCGA § 17-7-170.

However, the issue of whether Mungin’s prosecution is barred pursuant to OCGA § 17-7-170 is a statutory defense which he can raise in the trial court where the criminal action is pending. That *672claim is not relevant to the validity of his current pre-trial detention, and relates exclusively to the asserted illegality of any future post-conviction imprisonment. “ ‘A writ of habeas corpus looks only to the lawfulness of the present confinement. It does not deal with the lawfulness of a possible future imprisonment. . . . [Cit.]’ [Cits.]” *Mullennix v. Balkcom,*213 Ga. 490 (99 SE2d 832) (1957), overruled on other grounds, *Hollis v. Allen,*235 Ga. 211, 212 (219 SE2d 108) (1975). Therefore, the alleged failure of the State to comply with Mungin’s statutory demand for a speedy trial does not constitute an exception to the rule that pre-trial habeas corpus relief cannot be predicated upon a claim which can be raised in the pending prosecution. Instead, that ground, as all the others asserted in his petition, clearly falls outside the ambit of cognizable pre-trial habeas corpus claims. Therefore, the habeas court correctly dismissed Mungin’s petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See *Tabor v. State,*279 Ga. 98 (610 SE2d 59) (2005).

Decided February 26, 2007.

Charles Mungin, *pro se.*

*R. Jonathan Hart, Emily E. Garrard,*for appellees.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1477 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1477

Expressing support for the designation of May as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome 
    Awareness Month to increase the knowledge of this little-known, 
                  potentially fatal, genetic disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2010

 Mr. Kildee submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of May as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome 
    Awareness Month to increase the knowledge of this little-known, 
                  potentially fatal, genetic disease.

Whereas Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome represents multiple genetic disorders involving 
        mutations in connective tissue that are characterized by looseness, 
        instability, and dislocation of the joints and fragile skin that easily 
        bruises and scars;
Whereas there are 6 major types of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome that are characterized 
        by distinctive features, with vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome being the 
        most severe;
Whereas it is estimated that the prevalence of all types of the syndrome affect 
        up to 1 in 5,000 people worldwide;
Whereas a network of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome support groups can help connect 
        those managing life with the disease as well as better inform the health 
        care community and the public;
Whereas early and accurate diagnosis can provide the opportunity to create 
        lifesaving medical plans and ensure the quality of life;
Whereas there is currently no treatment for Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and no known 
        cure;
Whereas further medical research and awareness bring hope for treatment and a 
        cure; and
Whereas the month of May would be an appropriate month to designate as Ehlers-
        Danlos Syndrome Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome 
        Awareness Month;
            (2) honors those bravely suffering from Ehlers-Danlos 
        Syndrome; and
            (3) encourages scientific research and funding to find a 
        cure for Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.
                                 <all>
```
No. 750.

#### American Surety Co. *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir.

*Cyril Coleman*and *William H. Timbers*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison*and *Paúl A. Sweeney*for the United States.

*Alexander M. Heron*filed a bfief for the Association of Casualty & Surety Companies, as *tmicus curiae,*supporting the petition.

Certiorari denied.
# C_2010296EN.01004801.xml

| 30.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/48

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 apply

2010/C 296/16

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 (2).

1

2

The Sanctions Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1572 (2004) concerning Côte d'Ivoire has adopted the list of persons and entities to which the provisions of paragraphs 9 and 11 of UNSCR 1572 (2004) apply.

The persons and entities concerned may submit at any time a request to the UN Committee, together with any supporting documentation, for the decisions to include them in the UN list to be reconsidered. Such request should be sent to the following address:

| United Nations — Focal point for delisting |
| --- |
| Security Council Subsidiary Organs Branch |
| Room S-3055 E |
| New York, NY 10017 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |

United Nations — Focal point for delisting

Security Council Subsidiary Organs Branch

Room S-3055 E

New York, NY 10017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

See for more information at: http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1572/pdf/guidelines_ci_eng.pdf

Further to the UN decision, the Council of the European Union has determined that the persons and entities that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the lists of persons and entities which are subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP and in Regulation (EC) No 560/2005.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 285, 30.10.2010, p. 25.

1

(2)  OJ L 95, 14.4.2005, p. 1.

2

---
**Fidelity® Select Portfolios®**

Consumer Discretionary Sector

**Fund**/Ticker

**Construction and Housing Portfolio**/FSHOX

**Summary Prospectus**

**April 29, 2011**

**As Revised February 2, 2012**
Exhibit (m)(30)

DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICE PLAN

FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST: FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL