alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I, Cesar
Martinez, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Spantel Communications, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 6. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Dated:
      April 29, 2005
    
    /s/
      Cesar MartinezCesar
      Martinez, Treasurer(chief
      financial officer)
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: RICHARD D. KOHN, MARSHALL J. STEIN, THOMAS CURTEAN AND BRIAN MCGUIRE 

DOCKET NUMBER: 199 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 199 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Richard D. Kohn, 

Marshall J. Stein, 

Thomas Curtean and 

Brian McGuire 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that on August 21, 1969, and on March 24, 1970, the 

respondents entered into noncompetitive transactions in live cattle futures on 

the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before a referee in Chicago, 

Illinois, at a date and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1096/2004

of 10 June 2004         

fixing the export refunds on milk and milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 on products exported in the natural state shall be as set out in the Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 186/2004 (OJ L 29, 3.2.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1948/2003 (OJ L 287, 5.11.2003, p. 13).

(3)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(4)OJ L 91, 1.4.1984, p. 71. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 222/88 (OJ L 28, 1.2.1988, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 10 June 2004 fixing the export refunds on milk and milk products

----
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    RULE 13A-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rexhall Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                         REXHALL INDUSTRIES, INC.

November 22, 2004        /s/ William J. Rex
                         ---------------------------------------
                         William J. Rex
                         President and Chief Executive Officer




November 22, 2004        /s/ Dianna Miller
                         ---------------------------------------
                         Dianna Miller
                         Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fountain Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 1, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Brendon K. Rennert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Brendon K. Rennert
-------------------------
Brendon K. Rennert
Chief Financial Officer
August 1, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 18-0646

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

ZACHARY BRENNAN NEWBARY,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to the Court sitting en banc. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Zachary Newbary, to all counsel of 

record, and to the Honorable John W. Larson, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 18 2020

03/18/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0646
Exhibit
32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mantra Venture Group Ltd. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Larry Kristof, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:
 
 1
              The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 By:/s/
Larry Kristof
 Larry
Kristof
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 April
14, 2009
**EXHIBIT INDEX**

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that itmeets all of the requirements for the effectiveness of this Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933and has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment No. 64 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Boston, and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 17th day of May 2013.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following personsin the capacities and on the dates indicated.

POWER OF ATTORNEY
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: MILLER-LANE & CO., AND GEORGE C. LANE 

DOCKET NUMBER: 171 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA Docket No. 171 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Miller-Lane & Co., 

and George C. Lane 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that on September 30, 1969, the respondent corporation, 

a registered futures commission merchant under the Act, failed to meet minimum 

financial requirements prescribed for futures commission merchants. It also 

charges that the respondent corporation was undersegregated on September 30, 

1969, and during the period January 15 through January 23, 1970. It further 

charges that required records were not properly prepared and maintained. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, June 3, 1970, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
#### Estate of Saul Schneider, Appellant, v Victor M. Finmann et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[876 NYS2d 121]—

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff, Estate of Saul Schneider, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J), entered May 14, *8932008, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Victor M. Finmann and Victor M. Finmann, EC., which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In 2005 the decedent Saul Schneider transferred ownership of a life insurance policy on his own life from a limited liability partnership that he controlled to himself. He allegedly was acting on the advice of the defendant Victor M. Finmann, through Finmann’s professional corporation, the defendant Victor M. Finmann, PC. (hereinafter collectively Finmann). Schneider died in October 2006. The transfer of ownership of the policy allegedly resulted in an increased estate tax liability. Schneider’s estate commenced this action against, inter alia, Finmann seeking damages for legal malpractice. The Supreme Court granted that branch of Finmann’s motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm.

“The well-established rule in New York with respect to attorney malpractice is that absent fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances, an attorney is not liable to third parties, not in privity, for harm caused by professional negligence” *(Estate of Spivey v Pulley,*138 AD2d 563, 564 [1988]). Inasmuch as the estate was not in privity with Finmann, and there is no allegation that one of the exceptions to the privity requirement is applicable here, the estate may not maintain an action for legal malpractice against Finmann in its own right *(see Deeb v Johnson,*170 AD2d 865 [1991]; *cf. Estate of Nevelson v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo,*259 AD2d 282, 285 [1999]). Moreover, Schneider himself did not have a claim during his lifetime against Finmann for legal malpractice, since the only alleged damage suffered from the malpractice was the increase in estate tax liability, which could not have been incurred while Schneider was alive. Consequently, the estate may not maintain this action under EPTL 11-3.2 (b) *(see*EPTL 11-3.2 [b]; *Deeb v Johnson,*170 AD2d at 866; *Rutter v Jones, Blechman, Woltz & Kelly, P.C.,*264 Va 310, 314, 568 SE2d 693, 695 [2002]; *cf. Nembach v Giaimo & Vreeburg,*209 AD2d 222, 222-223 [1994]). Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Santucci and Balkin, JJ., concur.
#### Hope FIELDS, Appellant, v. RETAILERS CREDIT ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 10-17096.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 10, 2012.

Hope Fields, Davis, CA, pro se.

Mark Ewell Ellis, Andrew M. Stein-heimer, Ellis Law Group LLP, Sacramento, CA, for Appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hope Fields appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s judgment concluding that her adversary proceeding brought against Retailers Credit Association (“RCA”) was barred by the doctrine of collateral estop-pel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review decisions of the bankruptcy court independently without deference to the district court’s determinations. *Leichty v. Neary (In re Strand),*375 F.3d 854, 857 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly concluded that collateral estoppel precludes Fields from relitigating a debt dispute with RCA because the issue was already decided against her in a prior default judgment. *See Gayden v. Nourbakhsh (In re Nourbakhsh),*67 F.3d 798, 800 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (preclusive effect of a state court judgment rests upon the preclusion law of the state in which the judgment was issued); *Four Star Elec., Inc. v. F & H Constr.,*7 Cal.App.4th 1375, 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 1, 3 (Ct.App.1992) (California law provides that collateral estoppel may be applied based on a prior default judgment).

We decline to address issues raised for the first time on appeal, including Fields’s *711contentions that, in the prior action, she was improperly served and that RCA committed extrinsic fraud. *See Fla. Partners Corp. v. Southeast Co. (In re Southeast Co.),*868 F.2d 835, 339-40 (9th Cir.1989) (declining to address issue not raised before bankruptcy court).

Fields’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Voxware, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, William G. Levering III, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Voxware, Inc. and will be
retained by Voxware, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

|                                    | /s/ William G. Levering III   | 
|----------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | 
|Dated:     September 28,
      2009 | William G. Levering III      
|                                    | Chief
      Financial Officer

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of June 11, 2001.

A closed meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 12, 2001, at 10 a.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), (9)(A), 9(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (7), (9)(i), (9)(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matters of the closed meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 12, 2001 will be: institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

Dated: June 5, 2001.

Jonathan G. Katz, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14574  Filed 6-6-01; 11:06 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
```

[Federal Register: November 18, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 222)]
[Notices]
[Page 69511]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18no02-30]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, December 27, 2002.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 02-29321 Filed 11-14-02; 12:10 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 440 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1504

Copper Fixed Swap - LME Copper 3rd Wednesday - LME

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the price published by LME for the location specified in 

Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the LME Official Cash Settlement Price for Grade A

Copper for the Monday prior to the third Wednesday during the contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be metric tons. Each contract based shall be valued as the contract quantity 

in metric tons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars per metric ton. The minimum price fluctuation shall be 

$0.01 per metric ton. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the third Tuesday of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.