alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60241 Summary Calendar

__________________ ROBERT E. TUBWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BARBARD DUNN, Circuit Clerk of Hinds County Mississippi, ET AL., Defendants, BARBARA DUNN, Circuit Clerk of Hinds County, Mississippi; J.D. MCADORY, Sheriff, Hinds County, Mississippi; L.L. STEVENS, Deputy Circuit Clerk, Hinds County, Mississippi; and BOBBY GALLIGER, Chief Jailer, Hinds County, Mississippi, Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:91-cv-191BN

--------------------- November 27, 1995 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Robert E. Tubwell has applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Tubwell argues that there were genuine issues of material fact precluding entry of summary judgment andNo. 95-60241 -2-
that a sworn declaration filed in support of the defendants' motion for summary judgment did not comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e). We have carefully reviewed the magistrate judge's memorandum opinion and the record and hold that Tubwell has failed to raise a non-frivolous issue for appeal. Therefore, the application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. Tubwell has been previously warned by this court that he may be sanctioned for filing further frivolous pleadings. Accordingly, Tubwell is BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal in this court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court or of this court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to Tubwell, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar.
MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
No. 574.

#### Electric Auto-Lite Co. *v.*P. & *D.*Manufacturing Co., Inc.

January 6, 1936.
Opinion filed August 8, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-13-00210-CR

__________

ALEXANDER NICHOLAS TENORIO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 238th District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR39848

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Alexander Nicholas Tenorio, Appellant, filed an untimely pro se notice of 

appeal from his conviction for the offense of unlawful possession of a firearm by a 

felon. We dismiss the appeal. 
2

The clerk’s record indicates that Appellant’s sentence was imposed on 

May 8, 2013, and that his pro se notice of appeal was filed in the district clerk’s 

office on July 12, 2013. When the appeal was filed in this court, we notified 

Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely. We 

requested that Appellant respond on or before July 25, 2013, and show grounds to 

continue this appeal. We also informed him that the appeal may be dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. Appellant has not responded. 

Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Therefore, pursuant to TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.2, his notice of appeal was due to be filed within thirty days after the 

date that his sentence was imposed in open court. A notice of appeal must be in 

writing and filed with the clerk of the trial court. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). The 

clerk’s record in this case reflects that Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with 

the clerk of the trial court sixty-five days after sentence was imposed and was, 

therefore, untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a 

timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain the 

appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 

918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1993). Because we have no jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal. 

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

August 8, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-443-000]

Take notice that on June 1, 2001, Discovery Gas Transmission LLC (Discovery) filed to comply with the terms of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Sheet Nos. 34, 44, and 53 relating to lost and unaccounted for gas for the calendar year 2000.

Discovery states that it has reviewed the amount of lost and unaccounted for gas experienced by the Discovery system during the 2000 calendar year, and based on that review it proposes to retain the current retention rate of 0.5 percent for the period commencing July 1, 2001.

In the June 1, 2001 filing, Discovery filed a request for waiver of section 4 of its FT-1, FT-2, and IT Rate Schedules related to the recovery mechanism for lost and unaccounted for gas.

                    Discovery states that copies of this filing are being mailed to its customers, state commissions and other interested parties.                          ( print page 31900)    

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 13, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14848  Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1148 

Expressing support for the mission and goals of the World Economic Forum. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2010 

Mr. BAIRD (for himself and Mr. FORTENBERRY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the mission and goals of the World 

Economic Forum. 

Whereas the World Economic Forum is embarking on its 

40th year as a crucial nexus through which the world’s 

leading policy makers, heads of state, business 

innovators, nongovernmental organizations, and cultural 

and religious leaders join together to discuss key issues 

of global importance; 

Whereas the World Economic Forum has drawn attention to 

the clear connection between global economics and overall 

human advancement, and has called upon its members to 

act to improve the state of the world; 

Whereas the World Economic Forum serves as a key international forum for discussing such matters as the rule of 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1148 IH 

law, financial regulation, international trade, currency 

and market stability, and global economic development; 

Whereas the World Economic Forum has demonstrated a 

commitment to advancing public-private cooperation on 

food security, water security, environmental sustainability, and education in addition to international economic stability; 

Whereas the World Economic Forum has promoted the development of the next generation of world leaders through 

the Forum of Young Global Leaders community; 

Whereas the World Economic Forum has helped to bridge 

economic and political divides, serving as an important 

venue to bring international accord and foster improved 

relations between nations; 

Whereas the World Economic Forum reaches beyond the 

bounds of economic policy, encouraging public and private solutions to the problems of hunger, disease, and 

basic education through their Global Health Initiative 

and Global Education Initiative; and 

Whereas the World Economic Forum continues to focus 

international policy towards partnership, peace, and prosperity: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses support for the mission and goals 

3 of the World Economic Forum and encourages the 

4 ongoing pursuit of productive international collabo5 ration through economic, political, cultural, and in6 tellectual engagement; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1148 IH 

1 (2) honors and congratulates Klaus Schwab for 

2 creating the World Economic Forum and for his 40 

3 years of successful leadership; and 

4 (3) honors the 40th anniversary of the World 

5 Economic Forum’s leadership in global economic 

6 and social development. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 29293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13695]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: Vol. 66, No. 80, 
Wednesday, April 25, 2001, page 20790

Previously Announced Time and Date of Meeting: 10:00 a.m., June 7, 
2001.

Changes in Meeting: No requests were received from outside 
participants, therefore, the Commission Hearing on Agenda and 
Priorities for FY 2003 is canceled.

Agenda: For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-0709.

Contact Person for Additional Information: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway., Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: May 25, 2001.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-13695 Filed 5-25-01; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 01-10]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 01-10 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: June 5, 2001.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 32331)          ( print page 32332)          ( print page 32333)    

[FR Doc. 01-14981 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SIDNEY MADUFF, ROY SIMMONS, JOSEPH SIEGEL, AND THE SIEGEL TRADING CO., 

INC. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 125 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 125 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Sidney Maduff 

Roy Simmons 

Joseph Siegel 

The Siegel Trading Co., Inc. 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges attempted manipulation of the price of the January 1964 

frozen egg future on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange on January 24, 1964. It 

alleges that Sidney Maduff, Roy Simmons and Joseph Siegel, in his capacity as 

president of The Siegel Trading Co., Inc., acting pursuant to an agreement, 

arrangement or understanding, purchased January 1964 frozen egg futures on the 

last day of trading in an effort to cause an artificial or arbitrary price in 

such future. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, April 1, 1965, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
Wdesk | Exhibit






INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT TO THE
MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.
401(k) RETIREMENT PLAN


The MDU Resources Group, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan (as amended and restated March 1, 2011) (the “K-Plan”), is hereby further amended, effective August 18, 2014 as follows:


By adding the following entry to Schedule A of the K-Plan for USI Industrial Services, Inc.:


USI Industrial Services, Inc. (“USII”) shall not make a matching contribution of each USII Mechanics group employee’s participating savings contribution.


Effective August 18, 2014.




Explanation: This amendment updates Schedule A to reflect that there are no matching contributions for employees of the USII Mechanics group.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MDU Resources Group, Inc., as Sponsoring Employer of the Plan, has caused this amendment to be duly executed by a member of the MDU Resources Group, Inc. Employee Benefits Committee (“Committee”) on this 10th day of March, 2016.


	
				
	 
	MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.
	 

	 
	  EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Doran N. Schwartz
	 

	By:
	Doran N. Schwartz, Chairman
	 










1
Cite as 2015 Ark. 384 

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS 

Opinion Delivered October 22, 2015

IN RE SUPREME COURT

COMMITTEE ON CHILD 

SUPPORT; ADMINISTRATIVE 

ORDER NUMBER 10(III)(g)

PER CURIAM 

The Supreme Court Committee on Child Support submitted its report to the court, 

including the following recommendations: (1) a proposed revision to Administrative Order 

Number 10(III)(g) on health insurance, (2) revisions to the family support charts, and (3) 

study of the guideline models. 

Regarding the first recommendation, the proposed revision regarding health 

insurance is to add the underlined text: 

Administrative Order Number 10 

. . . .

Section III. Calculation of Support. 

. . . . 

g. Health Insurance. In addition to the award of child support, the court order shall 

provide for the child's health care needs, which normally would include health 

insurance if available to either parent at a reasonable cost. Health insurance coverage 

shall be considered reasonable if the cost of dependent coverage does not exceed 5% 

of the net income of the parent who is to provide such coverage. In applying the 5% 

standard for the cost of health insurance, the cost of dependent coverage is the 

difference between self-only and self with dependents or family coverage or the cost 

of adding the child(ren) to existing coverage.
Cite as 2015 Ark. 384 

The purpose of this amendment is to provide an income-based threshold to determine that 

the cost of health insurance is reasonable. We approve this recommendation and adopt the 

amendment, effective immediately. 

The committee advised the court that the study of guideline models, in particular, 

consideration of following the national trend and moving from the percentage-of-obligor 

income model to an income shares model, is still ongoing. We agree that this study needs 

to continue, and we await the committee’s report.

Finally, we decline to make any change to the support charts at this time. 

We thank the committee for its report on these recommendations and its hard work 

on these important issues.
No. 543.

#### Mississippi Central R. Co. et al. *v.*Smith.

Jurisdictional statement distributed December 12, 1936.

Decided December 21, 1936.

*Mr. Thomas Brady, Jr.,*for appellants.

*Messrs. Wm. H. Watkins, S. B. Laub,*and *Charles F. Engle*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dsmissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied. The motion of the appellee to allow damages is granted, and it is ordered that damages of five hundred dollars, payable to the appellee, be taxed against appellants. *Mississippi Central R. Co.*v. *Roberts,*296 U. S. 536; *Mississippi Central R. Co.*v. *Aultman,*296 U. S. 537.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EC01-70-000]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001, Wisvest-Connecticut, LLC (Wisvest) and NRG Connecticut Power Assets LLC (NRG Connecticut) [together Applicants] filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a request for a protective order in the above-captioned proceeding.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 14, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14954 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M