alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1435 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1435

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
    States should initiate negotiations to enter into a free trade 
            agreement with the Republic of the Philippines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2010

     Mr. Djou (for himself and Mr. Dreier) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
    States should initiate negotiations to enter into a free trade 
            agreement with the Republic of the Philippines.

Whereas the United States and the Philippines have shared history and commitment 
        to democratic principles;
Whereas the Philippines modeled its governmental institutions on those of the 
        United States and continues to share a commitment to democracy and human 
        rights;
Whereas the human links that bind the United States and the Philippines continue 
        to form a strong bridge between the two countries;
Whereas the Filipino-American community is an integral part of America's 
        cultural fabric;
Whereas the Filipino-American community is the second largest Asian-American 
        group in the United States with a population of approximately 3,100,000 
        people;
Whereas the Filipino and Filipino-American servicemen and servicewomen have 
        fought alongside and in the United States Armed Forces;
Whereas much of Manila was destroyed during the final months of World War II and 
        an estimated one million Filipinos lost their lives fighting alongside 
        Allied Forces;
Whereas the United States and the Philippines have worked aggressively to combat 
        terror and antidemocratic forces;
Whereas the United States and the Philippines have signed a Trade and Investment 
        Framework Agreement;
Whereas United States goods and services trade with the Philippines remains the 
        30th largest goods export market; and
Whereas the Philippines is the 12th largest United States agriculture export 
        market: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the United States should initiate negotiations to enter into a free 
trade agreement with the Republic of the Philippines.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 12.2





SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION





I, Matías I. Gaivironsky, certify that:





1.
 I have reviewed
this amendment to the annual report on Form 20-F of IRSA
Inversiones y Representaciones S.A. (the “Company”) for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019;





2.
 Based on my
knowledge, this amendment to the annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
 The Company’s
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:





a.
 Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervisions, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;





b.
 Designed such
internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;





c.
 Evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation;





d.
 Disclosed in this
report any change in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting; and





4.
 The Company’s
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the
Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):





a.
 All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and





b.
 Any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.








IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones S.A.Date: January 06, 2020
By:
/s/ Matías
I. GaivironskyMatías
I. GaivironskyChief
Financial and Administrative Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Raul DE LA CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-50063

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 2008.

*356Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Turner Ford Gassaway, Bastrop, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Raul De La Cruz appeals his 48-month sentence following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the first time on appeal, De La Cruz argues that the district court erroneously calculated his criminal history score by applying two criminal history points under U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(e) because the instant offense was committed within two years from his release from custody for a 1999 sexual-assault-of-a-child conviction. He asserts that he was placed on deferred adjudication probation and was never actually in custody and that, in any event, he was discharged from probation more than two years before the instant offense.

As De La Cruz correctly concedes, because he did not object in the district court, review is limited to the plain error standard. *See United, States v. Arviso-Mata,*442 F.3d 382, 384 (5th Cir.2006). Under the plain error standard, the appellant must show that (1) there is an error; (2) the error is clear or obvious; and (3) the error affects his substantial rights. *United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 731-37, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). If these factors are established, the decision to correct the forfeited error is within the sound discretion of the court, and the court will not exercise that discretion unless the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. *Id.*at 735-36, 113 S.Ct. 1770.

The district court calculated De La Cruz’s guidelines sentencing range as 46 to 57 months. Athough De La Cruz asserts that the district court miscalculated his criminal history points, he concedes that the district court nevertheless arrived at the appropriate criminal history category and that his guidelines sentencing range was thus unaffected by this miscalculation. The district court sentenced De La Cruz within a properly calculated guidelines sentencing range. De La Cruz has not met his burden of showing that his substantial rights were affected by the district court’s calculation of his criminal history points. *See Olano,*507 U.S. at 734, 113 S.Ct. 1770.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 182.

#### Telling et al. *v.*Bellows Claude Neon Co. et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. R. B. Newcomb*and *Herman J. Nord*for petitioners.

*Messrs. William Bohleber*and *Francis H. Fassett*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY>  0

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00                    1.00
<CASH>                                          64,189                  85,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   2,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                         454,196                 405,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 520,696               1,024,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,572                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     472,125               1,024,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   520,696               1,024,968
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,270                   3,658
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,891                  13,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,379                  (9,546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,379                  (9,546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,379                  (9,546)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gustavo VILLARREAL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40718

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 11, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David Almaraz, Law Office of David Al-maraz, Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gustavo Villarreal appeals the 188-month sentence following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine. He contends that he was entitled to a downward departure for substantial assistance and that the Government’s failure to file a motion pursuant to Section 5K1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines revealed bad faith. Villarreal also contends that his within-Guidelines sentence is unreasonable.

Villarreal was not entitled to a Section 5K1.1 motion. He has neither established that the Government negotiated away its discretion to choose not to file a motion, nor that the Government’s failure to file a motion was based on an unconstitutional motive. *See United States v. Aderholt,*87 F.3d 740, 742-43 (5th Cir.1996). Villarreal has not even shown that he did actually provide substantial assistance. *Id.*

Villarreal’s unreasonable-sentence argument also fails. Villarreal has not established procedural error in the district court’s sentencing process. *See Gall v. United States,*— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). Nor has he established that the district court abused its discretion by imposing a sentence within the applicable Guidelines *340range, which is presumptively reasonable. *See United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez,*517 F.3d 751, 766 (5th Cir.2008).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 719.

#### Kelly, Administrator, et al. *v.*Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp., 337 U. S. 917.

The motion for an ex-, tension of time within which to file petition for rehearing is granted and the petition is denied.
# FCM Data May 2014

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF May 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002014FROM REPORTS FILED BY June 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002014	&P of &N
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and is available for licensing by the Department of the Navy. U.S. Patent No. 5,705,087 entitled “Fuel System Icing Inhibitor and Deicing Composition,” Navy Case No. 76,993. 

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the patent cited should be directed to the Naval Research Laboratory, Code 1008.2, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-5320, and must include the Navy Case number. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Catherine M. Cotell, Ph.D., Head, Technology Transfer Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375-5320, telephone (202) 767-7230.

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404). 

Dated: May 29, 2001. 

J.L. Roth, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps., U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 01-14369 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-U
WILLIE YOUNG, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5569

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 26, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Willie Young, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30820 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LATASHA NIKKOLE WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

* * * * * consolidated with * * * * *

No. 02-30861 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. TOIYA DANNIELLIE MURRAY,
Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CR-50113-1

-------------------- February 20, 2003
Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.No. 02-30820 c/w No. 02-30861 -2-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Latasha Nikkole Wilson in appeal no. 02-30820 has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Wilson has not filed a response. Ou r independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and appeal no. 02-30820 is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
**Exhibit 15**

----

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-08246 on Form F-3, and No. 333-106837 on Form F-3/S-3 of our reports dated 26 July 2007, relating to the financial statements of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the nature and effect of differences between International Financial Reporting Standards and  accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America)and Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc for the year ended 30 June 2007.

 

Deloitte & Touche LLPLondon, United Kingdom26 July 2007

----
No. 347.

#### New York City *v.*Goldstein, Trustee in Bankruptcy.

January 18, 1937.

*Messrs. Paul Windels, Paxton Blair, Oscar S. Cox,*and *Charles S. Levine*for petitioner.

*Mr. S. Frederick Placer*for respondent.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing is granted. The order heretofore entered on October 26, 1936, denying the petition for writ of certiorari herein is vacated, and the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. *In the Matter of Atlas Television Co. Inc.,*273 N. Y. 51 (decided December 31, 1936).
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Amedia Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Frank Galuppo, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

MAY 1, 2006                             /s/ FRANK GALUPPO
                                        -----------------
                                        FRANK GALUPPO
                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO AMEDIA NETWORKS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY AMEDIA NETWORKS, INC.
AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
===================================================================================================
                                                                                      PERIOD FROM
                                                                                      MAY 1, 1990
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                                             (INCEPTION) TO
   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE                                                    DECEMBER 31,
     AMOUNTS)                                 1996          1995          1994            1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding for the period:

   Common stock                               26,181        23,144         8,068         12,947

   Preferred stock                              --           1,307         6,843          3,530

Common equivalent shares pursuant to
   Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83:

   Stock options                                --            --             608            426

   Preferred stock                              --            --             284            199

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shares used in computing per share
   amount                                     26,181        24,451        15,803         17,101
===================================================================================================

Net loss                                    $(45,634)     $(20,619)     $(21,531)     $(119,333)


Net loss per share                          $  (1.74)     $  (0.84)     $  (1.36)     $   (6.98)
===================================================================================================
</TABLE>