alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (j)(2)

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 134 to Registration Statement No. 002-90649****on Form N-1A of our reports dated December 14, 2012, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity Total International EquityFund, Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund, Fidelity Diversified International Fund,Fidelity Worldwide Fund, Fidelity International Small Cap Opportunities Fund, Fidelity Emerging Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA) Fund, and Fidelity International Value Fund,         ofour report dated December 17, 2012, relating to the financial statements and financial highlightsof Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund, and of our reports dated December 18, 2012, relating tothe financial statements and financial highlight of Fidelity International Small Cap Fund, FidelityEurope Capital Appreciation Fund, Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund, Fidelity Series International Value Fund, and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Opportunities Fund, each afund of Fidelity Investment Trust, appearing in the Annual Reports on Form N-CSR of FidelityInvestment Trust for the year ended October 31, 2012, and to the references to us under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectuses and "Independent Registered Public AccountingFirms" in the Statements of Additional Information, which are a part of such Registration Statement.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

December 21, 2012
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE REYES,

Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, 

Appellee.

No. 4D22-341

[August 18, 2022]

Appeal of a consolidated order from the Reemployment Assistance 

Appeals Commission; L.T. Case Nos. RAAC 21-01874, RAAC 21-01875, 

RAAC 21-01876, RAAC 21-01877, RAAC 21-01878, RAAC 21-01879, 

RAAC 21-01880 and RAAC 21-01881.

Jose Reyes, Pompano Beach, pro se.

Katie Sabo, Appellate Counsel, Reemployment Assistance Appeals 

Commission, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1351 

Congratulating Dallas Braden and the Oakland Athletics baseball team for 

pitching a perfect game against the Tampa Bay Rays on Mother’s 

Day, May 9, 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2010 

Mr. STARK (for himself, Mr. MCNERNEY, and Ms. LEE of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Dallas Braden and the Oakland Athletics 

baseball team for pitching a perfect game against the 

Tampa Bay Rays on Mother’s Day, May 9, 2010. 

Whereas, on May 9, 2010, Oakland Athletics pitcher Dallas 

Braden pitched a no-hitter without allowing any base 

runners; 

Whereas the Oakland Athletics defeated the Tampa Bay 

Rays in the Oakland Coliseum in Oakland, California, by 

a score of 4–0; 

Whereas Dallas Braden threw 109 pitches with no walks and 

6 strikeouts; 

Whereas players Cliff Pennington and Kevin Kouzmanoff 

scored 1 run each, and Daric Barton scored 2; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1351 IH 

Whereas Dallas Braden was raised in Stockton, California, 

played high school baseball at Stagg High School in 

Stockton, California, and played collegiate baseball for 

American River College and the Texas Tech Red Raiders 

before being drafted by the Oakland Athletics in 2004 

and making his major league debut with the team in 

2007; 

Whereas Dallas Braden’s mother, Jodie Atwood, tragically 

died of cancer when he was in high school, so Braden 

celebrated Mother’s Day with his grandmother, Peggy 

Lindsey, with a hug on the field after his perfect game 

when he presented her with the game ball; 

Whereas the accomplishment was the result of the hard work 

of every player and coach on the Oakland Athletics baseball team, including Dallas Braden, Cliff Pennington, 

Daric Barton, Ryan Sweeney, Kevin Kouzmanoff, Eric 

Chavez, Adam Rosales, Eric Patterson, Landon Powell, 

Rajai Davis, and Manager Bob Geren; 

Whereas this marks the 19th perfect game in Major League 

Baseball history; 

Whereas Hall of Famer James ‘‘Catfish’’ Hunter pitched the 

only other perfect game in Oakland Athletics history 

against the Minnesota Twins on May 8, 1968; and 

Whereas the team has played at their current home in Oakland since 1968, winning 4 World Series, 6 American 

League pennants, and 14 West Division titles: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1351 IH 

1 (1) congratulates Dallas Braden of the Oakland 

2 Athletics for pitching a perfect game on Mother’s 

3 Day, May 9, 2010; 

4 (2) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

5 coaches, and staff of the Oakland Athletics, whose 

6 hard work helped Dallas Braden to complete the 

7 perfect game; and 

8 (3) recognizes the loyalty of Athletics baseball 

9 fans in the East Bay and around the United States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
----

----

|                                           | State of Incorporation |
|------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
| Name of      Subsidiary                        | or      Organization   |
|                                           |                   |
| Your      Community Bank                       | Indiana                |
| CBSI      Holdings, Inc.                       | Nevada                 |
| CBSI      Investments, Inc.                    | Nevada                 |
| CBSI      Investment Portfolio Management, LLC | Nevada                 |
| CBSI      Development Fund, Inc.               | Indiana                |
| First      Community Service Corporation       | Indiana                |
| Nelson      Service Corporation                | Kentucky               |
|                                           |                   |
| The      Scott County State Bank               | Indiana                |
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE V. ARMOUR GRAIN COMPANY 

DOCKET NUMBER: GFA-1 

DATE: 1927 

DOCUMENT TYPE: SUMMARY OF CASE 

NOTE: PROCEEDING BEFORE THE GRAIN FUTURES COMMISSION UNDER THE GRAIN FUTURES ACT 

GFA Docket No. 1 

Armour Grain Company, respondent 

On September 25, 1926, the Secretary of Agriculture issued a complaint 

charging that the respondent attempted to manipulate the price of rye. 

On October 8, 1926, the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia issued a 

temporary order prohibiting hearing on the complaint. 

On May 3, 1927, the case in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia was 

dismissed with the consent of the Government on a showing that Armour Grain 

Company was in the process of going out of business. 

LOAD-DATE: December 15, 2008 
Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
1997 (AUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000933954
<NAME> DH MARKETING & CONSULTING INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         308,838
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,261,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,576,063
<PP&E>                                         488,778
<DEPRECIATION>                               (129,631)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,120,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          243,265
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,526
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,667,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,120,572
<SALES>                                      1,734,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,899,343
<CGS>                                          858,777
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,386,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,598
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,349,715)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,788)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,344,927)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,344,927)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.50)   
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-445-000]


Trunkline LNG Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 1, 2001, Trunkline LNG Company (Trunkline 
LNG) tendered for filing a cost and revenue study.
    Trunkline LNG states that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with Ordering Paragraph (D) of the Commission's November 3, 1997 Order 
Issuing Certificate, Trunkline LNG Co., 81 FERC para. 61,147 (1997), as 
clarified by the Commission's February 27, 1998 Order Denying 
Rehearing, 82 FERC para. 61,198 (1998).
    Trunkline LNG states that copies of this filing are being served on 
all customers, the parties to the proceeding and appropriate state 
regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14687 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             229
<SECURITIES>                                       408
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2065
<ALLOWANCES>                                       896
<INVENTORY>                                        234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4654
<PP&E>                                            3872
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   13487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            20753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10171)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     13487
<SALES>                                          28200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 28200
<CGS>                                            17365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    17365
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 21523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11646)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.58)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palmdale  Executive Homes, Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Suzette M.  Major,  President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 12, 2009



                                        By: /s/ SUZETTE M. MAJOR
                                            ________________________________
                                                Suzette M. Major
                                                President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Airspace Docket No. 00-AEA-05FR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action corrects an error in the geographic coordinates of a final rule that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 28, 2001 (66 FR 16848), Airspace Docket No. 00-AEA-05FR, which established Class E airspace at Griffiss Airpark, Rome, NY.                    

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

September 6, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Francis T. Jordan, Jr., Airspace Specialist, Airspace Branch, AEA-520 F.A.A. Eastern Region, 1 Aviation Plaza, Jamaica, NY; 11434-4809; telephone: (718) 553-4521.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## History

**Federal Register**                     document 01-7420, Airspace Docket No. 00-AEA-05FR, published on March 28, 2001 (66 FR 16848), established Class E airspace at Rome, NY. An error was discovered in the geographic coordinates for the Griffiss Airpark, Rome, NY. This action corrects that error.                

## Correction to Final Rule

                        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the geographic coordinates for the Griffiss Airpark as published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 28, 2001 (66 FR 16848), are corrected as follows:                    

§ 71.1

## AEA NY E5 Rome, NY [Corrected]

1. On p. 16849, column 1, in the coordinates under Griffiss Airpark, correct “(Lat. 43°14′04″ N/ long. 75°24′43″ W)” to read “(Lat. 43°14′02″ N/ long. 75°24′25″ W)”.

Issued in Jamaica, New York on June 1, 2001.

F.D. Hatfield, 

Manager, Air Traffic Division, Eastern Region.

[FR Doc. 01-15334  Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________ No. 99-30877

____________________ CAROL MARIE MCCOY BOOTH,

Plaintiff - Appellant
v. SAMUEL TIMOTHY MCGRAW, also known as Tim McGraw

Defendant - Appellee

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CV-741

_________________________________________________________________ August 8, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, REYNALDO G. GARZA and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 47.6.
H. Res. 1522 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 15, 2010. 

Whereas it is estimated that 750,000 people in the United 

States carry a gene mutation that causes a predisposition 

to breast and ovarian cancer; 

Whereas approximately 5 to 7 percent of breast cancer and 

10 to 14 percent of ovarian cancers are hereditary; 

Whereas women with these mutations have up to an 84 percent chance of developing breast cancer in their lifetime; 

Whereas women with a BRCA genetic mutation have up to 

a 50 percent lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer; 

Whereas the single greatest ovarian cancer risk factor is a 

family history of the disease; 

Whereas hereditary cancers are often more aggressive than 

other cancers and occur at a younger age, when people 

are less likely to undergo cancer screening; 

Whereas breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death 

in women under the age of 54; 

Whereas ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecologic 

cancer death; 

Whereas individuals with a hereditary risk for cancer require 

different cancer screening and risk management recommendations than the general population; 
2 

•HRES 1522 EH 

Whereas inherited BRCA genetic mutations are found in approximately 1 in 40 Ashkenazi Jews and mutations have 

been found in people of every ethnic group; 

Whereas more than one-third of Jewish women diagnosed 

with ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer at any 

age, or breast cancer before age 40, carry an inherited 

BRCA mutation; 

Whereas African-Americans and Hispanic Americans are less 

likely to have access to hereditary cancer information and 

appropriate health care; 

Whereas children of parents with an inherited predisposition 

to breast and ovarian cancer have a 50 percent chance 

of inheriting the predisposition; 

Whereas among many in the cancer community, a ‘‘previvor’’ 

is a survivor of a predisposition (or increased risk) to 

cancer; 

Whereas genetic counseling and genetic testing can determine 

if an individual is at high risk for breast or ovarian cancer; 

Whereas raising awareness of hereditary cancer and knowledge of a genetic predisposition can directly lead to preventive strategies that can reduce the chance of dying 

from cancer; 

Whereas the last week of September would be an appropriate 

week to designate as National Hereditary Breast and 

Ovarian Cancer Week; and 

Whereas the last Wednesday in September would be an appropriate date to designate as National Previvor Day: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
3 

•HRES 1522 EH 

(1) supports the designation of National Hereditary 

Breast and Ovarian Cancer Week; and 

(2) supports the designation of National Previvor 

Day. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

Corrections Federal Register

18316 

Vol. 72, No. 69 

Wednesday, April 11, 2007 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

17 CFR Parts 1, 3, 4, 15, and 166 

RIN 3038–AC26 

Exemption from Registration for 

Certain Foreign Persons 

Correction 

In proposed rule document 07–1522 

beginning on page 15637 in the issue of 

Monday, April 2, 2007, make the 

following corrections: 

1. On page 15638, in the second 

column, in footnote 6, in the third line, 

‘‘A Wiscope’’ should read ‘‘Wiscope’’. 

2. On the same page, in the same 

column, in the same footnote, in the 

seventh line, ‘‘division’’ should read 

‘‘decision’’. 

3. On the same page, in the same 

column, in footnote 8, in the fifth line, 

‘‘45 FR 80490’’ should read ‘‘45 FR 

80485, 80490’’. 

4. On the same page, in the third 

column, in the last paragraph, in the 

eleventh line, ‘‘participation’’ should 

read ‘‘participants’’. 

5. On page 15640, in the second 

column, in the sixth line from the 

bottom, ‘‘17 CFR Part 5’’ should read 

‘‘17 CFR Part 15’’. 

[FR Doc. C7–1522 Filed 4–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES2
No. 203.

#### Dambrosio *v.*Aderhold, Warden.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Carl*Dambrosio, *pro se.*

No appearance for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and motion for leave to proceed further *in forma pauperis*denied.
```

[Federal Register: October 26, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 206)]
[Notices]
[Page 57108]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26oc98-37]


[[Page 57108]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, November 27, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-28767 Filed 10-22-98; 4:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----