alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6257

DENNIS AYERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.
DARNLEY R. HODGE, Superintendent; MS. BEACH,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00597-JBF-JEB)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 2, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Ayers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Dennis Ayers appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Ayers v. Hodge , No. 2:07-cv-00597-JBFJEB (E.D. Va. Jan. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In re PLUMLY.

(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Submitted January 9, 1922.

Decided June 5, 1922.)

No. 1459.

Patents 1—Application for patent for paper pill box machine denied on ground of public use.

Evidence that the applicant for a patent fdr a machine for making paper pill boxes had operated his machine for at least 12 years before he applied for the patent, that his operatives were under no injunction of secrecy, and that conditions surrounding the operation were such that knowledge of the invention must have become common, sustains the decision of the Patent Office, rejecting the application on the ground of public use for more than 2 years prior to the filing thereof.

<£s»For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes

Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents.

In the matter of the application of Eugene K. Plumly for a patent. From a decision of the Patent Office, refusing to allow the claims, applicant appeals.

Affirmed.

E. H. Fairbanks, of Philadelphia, Pa., for applicant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from á decision of the Patent Office, refusing to allow the claims of appellant’s application on the ground of public use for more than 2 years prior to the filing of the application.

The invention covers a machine for making paper pill boxes, ¿nd, as stated by the tribunals of the Patent Office, is quite easily understood by ony one at all familiar with mechanics or the operation of such machines. This application was in interference with an application of James W. Hughes, and that interference resulted in the rejection of the claims of both parties on the ground of public use. The evidence very clearly shows that Mr. Plumly, the appellant, operated his machine for at least 12 years before he applied for a patent, that his operatives were under no injunction of secrecy, and that conditions surrounding the operation were such that knowledge of the invention must have become common. The tribunals of the Patent Office have reviewed this evidence, and we adopt their reasoning and conclusion. See Andrews v. Hovey, 123 U. S. 267, 8 Sup. Ct. 101, 31 L. Ed. 160; Id.,124 U. S. 694, 8 Sup. Ct. 676, 31 L. Ed. 557.

The decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.
No. 278.

#### Interstate Trust & Banking Co. et al. *v.*Jones County.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. Bert Flanders, Jr.,*and *Walter F. Marcus*for petitioners.

*Mr. John D. Miller*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Tucker, Appellant.

[877 NYS2d 228]

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J., at plea; Richard D. Carruthers, J., at sentence), rendered on or about January 18, 2008), unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur— Saxe, J.P., Buckley, McGuire, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14563]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3339, Amdt. #1]


State of Wisconsin

    In accordance with notices received from the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, dated May 29 and May 30, 2001, the above-numbered 
Declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this 
disaster as occurring between April 10, 2001 and continuing through May 
29, 2001. The above-numbered Declaration is also amended to include 
Washburn County in the State of Wisconsin as disaster areas caused by 
flooding occurring between April 10, 2001 and continuing through May 
29, 2001.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in Rusk County in the State of Wisconsin may be 
filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. 
Any counties contiguous to the above named primary counties and not 
listed here have been previously declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is July 10, 2001 and for 
economic injury the deadline is February 11, 2002.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)



    Dated: June 4, 2001.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-14563 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Wiggins, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 820]—

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 19, 2004 *{People v Wiggins,*6 AD3d 634 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered October 25, 2001.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the *979effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera and Miller, JJ., concur.
CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY

#### Vernon L. Hatton v. Robert L. Markham, Adm’r of the Estate of Charles E. Yates, Sr., et al.

March 13, 1992

Case No. CH90-1443

By Judge Herbert C. Gill, Jr.

The Court has reviewed the memoranda submitted, as well as the facts of this case. The facts appear to be undisputed. Most of the law of the cases appears to be undisputed. The sole legal issue in controversy appears to be whether the legal rate of interest runs against all of the principal balance owed or only one-half in order to coincide with the limited interest of the plaintiff.

Section 8.01-358 of the 1950 Code of Virginia (as amended) seems to be dispositive of this question. The lien attaches as to the equity on the date of bankruptcy, plus accrued interest at the legal rate until paid. The lien is against the whole and not against a one-half undivided interest. The statute provides that it shall be a lien “on all the real estate.” Mr. Hatton has a one-half *undivided*interest in the real property. Therefore, the Court may not proceed to declare the debt “satisfied” under § 8.01-455 of the 1950 Code of Virginia (as amended) until there is proof that the entire judgment has been paid off or discharged. For the Court to order the same would require the Court to modify the terms of the debt (lien). The Court is without authority to modify the lien. *Gurnee v. Johnson,*77 Va. 712 (1883).
H. Res. 1525 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 26, 2010. 

Whereas Nelle Harper Lee was born on April 28, 1926, to 

Amasa Coleman Lee and Frances Finch in Monroeville, 

Alabama; 

Whereas Nelle Harper Lee wrote the novel ‘‘To Kill a Mockingbird’’ portraying life in the 1930s in the fictional 

small southern town of Maycomb, Alabama, which was 

modeled on Ms. Lee’s hometown of Monroeville, Alabama; 

Whereas ‘‘To Kill a Mockingbird’’ addressed the issue of racial inequality in the United States by revealing the humanity of a community grappling with moral conflict; 

Whereas ‘‘To Kill a Mockingbird’’ was first published in 1960 

and was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 1961; 

Whereas ‘‘To Kill a Mockingbird’’ was the basis for the 1962 

Oscar-winning film of the same name starring Gregory 

Peck; 

Whereas ‘‘To Kill a Mockingbird’’ is one of the great American novels of the 20th century, having been published in 

more than 40 languages and having sold over 30 million 

copies; 

Whereas in 2007, Nelle Harper Lee was inducted into the 

American Academy of Arts and Letters; 
2 

•HRES 1525 EH 

Whereas in 2007, President George W. Bush awarded the 

Presidential Medal of Freedom to Nelle Harper Lee for 

her great contributions to literature and observed ‘‘ ‘To 

Kill a Mockingbird’ has influenced the character of our 

country for the better’’ and ‘‘As a model of good writing 

and humane sensibility, this book will be read and studied forever’’; and 

Whereas ‘‘To Kill a Mockingbird’’ is celebrated each year in 

Monroeville, Alabama, through annual public performances featuring local amateur actors: Now, therefore, be 

it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the historic milestone of the 50th anniversary of the publication of ‘‘To Kill a Mockingbird’’; 

and 

(2) honors Nelle Harper Lee for her outstanding 

achievement in the field of American literature in authoring ‘‘To Kill a Mockingbird’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1506 

Encouraging State and local governments to establish plastic bag recycling 

programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2010 

Mrs. LOWEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging State and local governments to establish plastic 

bag recycling programs. 

Whereas it is estimated that residents of the United States 

use approximately 100,000,000,000 plastic bags per year, 

but only an estimated 0.6 percent of such bags will be 

recycled; 

Whereas the production of plastic bags and film plastic 

worldwide uses over 12,000,000 barrels of oil per year, 

accounting for more than 4 percent of the world’s total 

oil production; 

Whereas the Environmental Protection Agency has found 

that the average plastic bag takes up to 1,000 years to 

decompose; and 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1506 IH 

Whereas because plastic bags do not easily biodegrade, such 

bags ultimately break down into smaller pieces that contaminate soil and waterways and cause injury, illness, or 

death to animal and marine life: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes voluntary recycling programs ini3 tiated at retail locations throughout the country and 

4 supports the expansion of such programs; 

5 (2) commends those State and local govern6 ments that have taken steps to establish or require 

7 plastic bag recycling programs; and 

8 (3) encourages State and local governments to 

9 continue to pursue such recycling programs. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Quarterly Report of AMERELITE SOLUTIONS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Knapp, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer f the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 12, 2011
By:
/s/ Robert L. KnappRobert L. KnappPrincipal Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management intends to submit to the Office of Management and Budget a request for clearance of a new information collection. OPM Form 1646, CFC for Federal Retirees Pledge Card, is used to record Combined Federal Campaign pledges from federal retirees.

We estimate 8,300 Form 1646's will be completed annually. Each form takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden is 1,383 hours.

Comments are particularly invited on:

—Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management, and whether it will have practical utility;

—Whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and

—Ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through use of the appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 202/606-8358, or E-mail to                         *mbtoomey@opm.gov.*

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 60 calendar days from the date of this publication.

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to: Curtis Rumbaugh, Office of CFC Operations, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 5450, Washington, DC 20415.

For information regarding administrative coordination contact: Curtis Rumbaugh, Office of CFC Operations, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 5450, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-2564.

Office of Personnel Management.

Steven R. Cohen,

Acting Director.

[FR Doc. 01-15116 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-46-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1353 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1353

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 25, 2010.
Whereas education is the key to a successful future for many people in the 
        United States;
Whereas the ability of some students to attend an institution of higher 
        education is conditional on the availability of student financial 
        assistance;
Whereas the cost of higher education continues to rise for 4-year private 
        colleges and universities, 4-year public colleges and universities, 2-
        year community colleges, and for profit institutions;
Whereas students and families across the United States are making important 
        decisions about financing their education at an institution of higher 
        education;
Whereas efforts to increase awareness about student financial aid options are 
        necessary for students across the United States to receive all of the 
        financial aid available to them;
Whereas increasing awareness about the Free Application for Federal Student Aid 
        (FAFSA) ensures that more eligible students may benefit from Federal 
        financial assistance;
Whereas students must complete and submit a new FAFSA each school year to be 
        considered for all forms of Federal financial aid;
Whereas each year, about 16,000,000 students apply for financial aid by filling 
        out the FAFSA;
Whereas increasing access to Federal financial aid helps reduce students' 
        reliance on costly private loans; and
Whereas Student Financial Aid Awareness Month will help call attention to the 
        critical role financial assistance plays in helping students attending 
        an institution of higher education: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Student Financial Aid Awareness 
        Month;
            (2) encourages students and families across the United States to 
        participate in activities being offered during Student Financial Aid 
        Awareness Month; and
            (3) recognizes the importance of educating students and families 
        about Federal student financial aid.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7416** 

DON BILLUPS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Elizabeth Kay Dillon , District Judge. ( 7:15

- cv - 00597

- EKD

- RSB )

Submitted : December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD , DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Don Billups, Appellant Pro Se
. Susan Elizabeth Baumgartner , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA , Richmond, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Don Billups seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this s tandard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Billups has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
arg ument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VOXWARE,
INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,149                  10,627
<SECURITIES>                                     4,388                   5,842
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,761                   3,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                       507                     400
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,059                  19,600
<PP&E>                                             978                     913
<DEPRECIATION>                                     571                     347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,557                  20,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,316                   2,604
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            13                      13
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,900                  17,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,557                  20,221
<SALES>                                          5,882                   7,779
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,882                   7,779
<CGS>                                              142                     178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      583                     342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,037                  15,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,894)                 (6,864)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,894)                 (6,864)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,894)                 (6,864)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.38                    0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.38                    0.67


</TABLE>
<Page>

          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 18 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (No. 033-63935)
(the "Registration Statement") of our report dated March 31, 2005, relating
to the consolidated financial statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company
(as of September 6, 2005, known as Union Security Insurance Company), which
appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to
us under the heading "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in such
Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 7, 2005