alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        231


        <NAME>      Fidelity United Kingdom Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

year


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

oct-31-1997


<PERIOD-END>

oct-31-1997


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

5,073


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

5,631


<RECEIVABLES>

295


<ASSETS-OTHER>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

5,926


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

100


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

117


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

217


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

4,466


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

402


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

223


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

115


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

0


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

568


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

560


<NET-ASSETS>

5,709


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

229


<INTEREST-INCOME>

16


<OTHER-INCOME>

(23)


<EXPENSES-NET>

101


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

121


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

580


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

250


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

951


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

36


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

55


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

437


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

267


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

8


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

3,053


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

27


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

61


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

0


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

38


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

0


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

198


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

5,117


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

11.890


<PER-SHARE-NII>

 .310


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

2.310


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .130


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

 .200


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

14.210


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

200


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2472

CATHLENA JENKINS BRIGHT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. ( 6:17

- cv - 01431

- CMC )

Submitted : May 9, 2019 Decided: May 16, 2019

Before AGEE and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and DUNCAN , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Cathlena Jenkins Bright , Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellee

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cathlena Jenkins Bright appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) den ial of Bright’s application s for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.

“ In social security proceedings, a court of appeals applies the same standard of review as does the district court. That is, a reviewing court must uphold th e determination when an ALJ has applied correct legal standards and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.” Brown v. Comm’ r Soc. Sec. Admin. , 873 F.3d 251, 267 (4th Cir. 2017) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “Substantial evidence is that which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. It consists of more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be less than a preponderance.” Pearson v. Colvin , 810 F.3d 204, 207 (4th Cir. 2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “In reviewing for substantial evidence, we do not undertake to reweigh conflicting evidence, make credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ. Where conflicting eviden ce allows reasonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is disabled, the responsibility for that decision falls on the ALJ.” Hancock v. Astrue , 667 F.3d 470, 472 (4th Cir. 2012) (brackets, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted). We have re viewed the record and perceive no reversible error. The ALJ applied the correct legal standards in evaluating Bright’s claims for benefits, and the ALJ’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment upholding the denial of benefits. We dispense with oral3 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> EXHIBIT 27 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GOVERNMENT
TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             142
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,607)
<INVENTORY>                                     63,327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               188,703
<PP&E>                                          17,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (8,169)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          158,106
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,142
<SALES>                                        344,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               344,630
<CGS>                                          319,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  319,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies.  Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 13, 2001.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Boston**                     (Richard Walker, Community Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:                

*1.  Danvers Bancorp, Inc.*, Danvers, Massachusetts; to acquire Revere MHC, Revere, Massachusetts, and thereby indirectly acquire RFS Bancorp, Inc., Revere, Massachusetts, and Revere Federal Savings Bank, Revere, Massachusetts, and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to § 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 13, 2001.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 01-15345 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the quarterly Report of
Goldspan Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, David Hedderly-Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James
McLaughlin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    | /s/ David Hedderly-Smith                
|------ | ----------------------------------------
|Name:  | David Hedderly-Smith                    
|Title: | Principal Executive Officer and Director
|Date:  | July 10, 2012                           
|       |                                         
|By:    | /s/ James McLaughlin                    
|Name:  | James McLaughlin                        
|Title: | Principal Financial Officer and Director
|Date:  | July 10, 2012                           















This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Felton R. BERNARD, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 16-5857.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit denied.
----

Corrigendum to Directive 2004/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways

(Official Journal of the European Union L 164 of 30 April 2004)

Directive 2004/51/EC should read as follows:

                        DIRECTIVE 2004/51/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL                     

of 29 April 2004                     

amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 71(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (3),

Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty (4) in the light of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee on 23 March 2004,

Whereas:

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Directive 91/440/EEC is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December 2005 at the latest. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

When Member States adopt these measures they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by the Member States.

Article 3

This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 4

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Strasbourg, 29 April 2004.

For the European Parliament

The President

P. COX                        

For the Council

The President

M. McDOWELL                        

----

(*1)OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 29. Directive as amended by Commission Decision 2002/844/EC (OJ L 289, 26.10.2002, p. 30).’         

----

(1)OJ C 291 E, 26.11.2002, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 61, 14.3.2003, p. 131.

(3)OJ C 66, 19.3.2003, p. 5.

(4)  Opinion of the European Parliament of 14 January 2003 (OJ C 38 E, 12.2.2004, p. 89), Council Common Position of 26 June 2003 (OJ C 270 E, 11.11.2003, p. 1) and Position of the European Parliament of 23 October 2003 (not yet published in the Official Journal). Legislative Resolution of 22 April 2004 and Decision of the Council of 26 April 2004.

(5)OJ L 237, 24.8.1991, p. 25. Directive as amended by Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 1).

(6)  See page 16 of this Official Journal.

(7)  See page 40 of this Official Journal

(8)  See page 3 of this Official Journal

(9)OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 1.

(10)OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 26.

(11)OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 29. Directive as amended by Commission Decision 2002/844/EC (OJ L 289, 26.10.2002, p. 30).

----
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: HENRY S. SHATKIN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 211 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 211 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Henry S. Shatkin 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that on August 26, 1971, Henry S. Shatkin, while 

trading in soybean futures for his own account, purchased 300,000 bushels in 

excess of the speculative trading limit. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before a referee in Chicago, 

Illinois, at a date and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
[931 NE2d 539, 905 NYS2d 555]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ivin Williams, Appellant.

Decided June 17, 2010

*925APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Center for Appellate Litigation,*New York City *(Mark W. Zeno*and *Robert S. Dean*of counsel), for appellant.

*Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney,*New York City *(Matthew C. Williams*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the resentence vacated and the original sentence reinstated.

In June 2001, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted first-degree robbery and was promised a sentence of seven years imprisonment. Postrelease supervision (PRS) was not discussed during the plea proceeding or at sentencing. In November 2008—more than one year after defendant was released from prison—defendant returned to court and Supreme Court, in error, resentenced him, adding a five-year period of PRS. The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Federal Constitution precludes a court from adding PRS to a defendant’s sentence once the defendant has already been released from imprisonment *(see People v Williams,*14 NY3d 198, 217 [2010]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boreal Productions Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and Boreal
Productions Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Andrea Fehsenfeld, as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Boreal Productions Inc., hereby
certify that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Boreal Productions Inc.


Dated: May 11, 2010                     /s/ Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 11, 2010                     /s/ Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                        Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of PowerVerde, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard H. Davis, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The
                                         Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
                                         information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                                         condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/
    Richard H. Davis    | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Richard H. Davis            | 
|Chief Executive
    Officer | 
|February 14, 2014           | 

7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      288467
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1202808
<ALLOWANCES>                                 45000
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1464451
<PP&E>                                      587430
<DEPRECIATION>                              408497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2198927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2207233
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     46243
<OTHER-SE>                                  (54459)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2198927
<SALES>                                    6208792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           6208792
<CGS>                                      4545693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4454963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           2095883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            4911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (428576)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (428576)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (428576)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.11)


</TABLE>