alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### No Wibowo HO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-75316.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008 *.

Filed Sept. 4, 2008.

Armin Alexander Skalmowski, Law Office of Armin Skalmowski, Alhambra, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Securi*535ty, San Francisco, CA, Kelly J. Walls, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

No Wibowo Ho, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Ho failed to establish a clear probability of persecution. *See Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s conclusion that the harm Ho experiences in Indonesia including the attacks on homes in his neighborhood, the destruction of his chicken egg farm and the destruction of his brother-in-law’s business do not rise to the level of past persecution. *See Nagoulko,*333 F.3d at 1016-17; *see also Gormley v. Ashcroft,*364 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir.2004). Furthermore, even assuming the disfavored group analysis set forth in *Sael v. Ashcroft,*386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th Cir.2004) applies to withholding of removal, Ho has not demonstrated the requisite level of individualized risk necessary to compel a finding of a clear probability of persecution. *See Hoxha v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 1179, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that it is not more likely than not that Ho will be tortured if returned to Indonesia. *See Singh v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th Cir.2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Cite as 2014 Ark. 529



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No. CV-14-12 BECKY FURNAS, Individually and as a Representative of all similarly situated Taxpayers who Pay Ad Valorem School Taxes for the Support of the Fountain Lake School District; FOUNTAIN LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT; AL LARSON, individually and as a Representative of all similarly situated Taxpayers who Pay Ad Valorem School Taxes for the Support of the Eureka Springs School District; and EUREKA SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
APPELLANTS V. THOMAS W. KIMBRELL; Commissioner of the Arkansas Department of Education, in his official capacity only; ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; CHARLES ROBINSON, Treasurer of the State of Arkansas, in his official capacity only
APPELLEES Opinion DeliveredDecember 11, 2014

APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CV-2011-2321] HONORABLE TIMOTHY DAVIS FOX, JUDGE

SUPPLEMENTAL REBRIEFING ORDERED

PER CURIAM By previously issued per curiam opinion handed down on December 4, 2014, we ordered Appellants to supplement their brief with the prior orders and judgments that related to our opinion in Kimbrell v. McCleskey , 2012 Ark. 443, 424 S.W.3d 844. Upon further review, we have determined that the pleadings and motions from the prior appeal are essential to an understanding of the case in the current appeal. We therefore order appellants to supplement their addendum with copies of these documents in addition to the documents weCite as 2014 Ark. 529

required in the December 4, 2014 per curiam. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8) (2014). Appellants’ omission of these items from the addendum renders appellants’ brief deficient, and we order rebriefing in this case pursuant to Rule 4-2(b)(3). Therefore, in accordance with Rule 4-2(c)(2), we give appellants fifteen days to submit a conforming brief by filing a supplemental addendum. While we have noted the above-mentioned deficiency, we encourage Appellant’s counsel to review Rule 4-2 in its entirety as it relates to the abstract and addendum, as well as the entire record, to ensure that no additional deficiencies are present, as any subsequent rebriefing order may result in affirmance of the order or judgment due to noncompliance with Rule 4-2. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (2011); see also Kirkland v. Sandlin , 2011 Ark. 106 (per curiam). Rebriefing ordered. Hatfield, Sayre & Brockett , by: Eugene G. Sayre and Christopher D. Brockett , for appellants. Dustin McDaniel , Att’y Gen., by: Scott P. Richardson , Sr. Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
H. Res. 1405 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 1, 2010. 

Whereas in the year 2010, 17 African nations will celebrate 

the 50th anniversary of their independence from France, 

Italy, or Great Britain, including Cameroon (January 1, 

1960), Togolese Republic (April 27, 1960), Republic of 

Mali (June 20, 1960), Republic of Senegal (June 20, 

1960), Republic of Madagascar (June 26, 1960), Democratic Republic of the Congo (June 30, 1960), Somalia 

(July 1, 1960), Republic of Benin (August 1, 1960), Republic of Niger (August 3, 1960), Burkina Faso (August 

5, 1960), Republic of Cote d’Ivoire (August 7, 1960), Republic of Chad (August 11, 1960), Central African Republic (August 13, 1960), Republic of the Congo (August 

15, 1960), Gabonese Republic (August 17, 1960), Federal Republic of Nigeria (October 1, 1960), and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania (November 28, 1960); 

Whereas contemporary United States ties with Sub-Saharan 

Africa today far transcend the humanitarian interests 

that have frequently underpinned United States engagement with the continent; 

Whereas there is a growing understanding among foreign policy experts that economic development, natural resource 

management, human security, and global stability are inextricably linked; 
2 

•HRES 1405 EH 

Whereas cooperation between the United States Armed 

Forces and Africa is growing, with United States and African forces routinely conducting joint exercises; 

Whereas African governments are steadily taking a larger 

role in the provision of security and peacekeeping on the 

continent, due in part to United States security assistance and training; 

Whereas Africa’s growing importance is reflected in the intensifying efforts of China, Russia, India, Iran, and other 

countries to gain access to African resources and advance 

their ties to the continent; and 

Whereas a more comprehensive, multi-faceted regional policy 

is essential for the United States to operate effectively in 

this increasingly competitive environment: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the people of the 17 African nations that in 2010 are marking the 50th year of their 

national independence; 

(2) honors the lives of the ten of thousands of patriots, including innocent civilians, who died, were imprisoned, or otherwise dedicated their lives, often at great 

personal sacrifice, to achieving African political independence; 

(3) commends the socioeconomic and political 

progress being made by these nations, while acknowledging the associated challenges that many still face; 
3 

•HRES 1405 EH 

(4) recognizes Africa’s significant strategic, political, economic, and humanitarian importance to the 

United States; and 

(5) renews the commitment of the United States to 

help the people of sub-Saharan Africa to foster democratic rule, advance civic freedom and participation, and 

promote market-based economic growth, and to alleviate 

the burden of poverty and disease that so many in the 

region continue to face. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 281.

#### Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue *v.*Randolph et al., Trustees.

October 14, 1935.

*Solicitor General Reed*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Abraham Lowenhaupt, Stanley S. Waite, F. M. Curlee,*and *Richard S. Doyle*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 302 AND 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (2)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading:
             /s/ G. Dale Garlow
    
    /s/ G. Dale GarlowG. Dale Garlow, President
    
    G. Dale Garlow, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14699]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-200-072]


Reliant Energy Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Negotiated 
Rate

June 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 1, 2001, Reliant Energy Gas Transmission 
Company (REGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective 
June 1, 2001:

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 8G
Original Sheet No. 8AN

    REGT states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the 
revision of an existing negotiated rate contract and the addition a new 
negotiated rate contract.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14699 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  I, Stephen E. Cox, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cox Distributing, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: May 12, 2008  /s/ Stephen E. Cox Stephen E. Cox Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1367-DR]


Iowa; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa, (FEMA-1367-DR), dated May 2, 2001, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 6, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of May 2, 2001:

    Webster County for Individual Assistance (already designated for 
Public Assistance).
    Pottawattamie County for Individual and Public Assistance.
    Muscatine County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance).
    Grundy, Lucas, and Union Counties for Public Assistance.
    Des Moines, Lee, Scott, and Wapello Counties for Categories C 
through G under the Public Assistance program (already designated 
for Categories A and B).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-15263 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
Board of Directors Compensation
(Effective April 21, 2016)
 
	
				
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Cash Compensation
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Annual Board Retainer 
	$
	50,000
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Annual Board Committee Member Retainers:
	 
	 
	 

	Audit Committee
	$
	15,000
	 

	Compensation Committee
	$
	10,000
	 

	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	$
	10,000
	 

	Risk Committee
	$
	10,000
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Annual Committee Chair Retainers:**
	 
	 
	 

	Audit Committee
	$
	15,000
	 

	Compensation Committee
	$
	10,000
	 

	Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	$
	10,000
	 

	Risk Committee 
	$
	10,000 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Annual Lead Director Retainer 
	$
	20,000
	 






 
	
		
	**
	Note: The committee chair will receive both an annual committee member retainer and an annual committee chair retainer.






	
				
	Equity Compensation
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	An award of $55,000 in restricted stock units, which becomes fully vested and transferable upon the earlier to occur of the (x) completion of three years of service and (y) date the holder reaches age 72.
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Director Stock Purchase Plan
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Annual maximum company cash contribution per director participant to company-sponsored open market stock purchase plan, with company’s contribution equal to 15% of director participant’s cash contribution, subject to annual maximum contribution limit by director of $20,000 
	$
	3,000
uhsi_Ex10-1


		
			Exhibit 10.1
		

		
			 
		

		
			AMENDMENT ONE TO THE
		

		
			Employment agreement
		

		
			This is Amendment One to the Employment Agreement between Thomas Leonard (“Executive”) and Universal Hospital Services, Inc. (“UHS”) originally effective April 13, 2015 (“Agreement”). This Amendment One is effective as of the last signature date below.
		

		
			Capitalized terms used in this Amendment have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement, unless otherwise indicated.
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Purpose.  The purpose of this Amendment is to replace the vacation language.




			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			Vacation.  The language in Section Six of the Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:




		
			Executive will be entitled to vacation and sick time consistent with UHS’ executive paid time off policy.    
		

		
			All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged.  To the extent that there is any conflict between this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment will control.

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Thomas Leonard

					
					
						 

					
					
						Universal Hospital Services, Inc.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						6625 West 78th St, Suite 300

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						/s/ Thomas J. Leonard

					
					
						 

					
					
						/s/ James Pekarek

				
	
					
						Thomas J. Leonard

					
					
						 

					
					
						James Pekarek

				
	
					
						Title:  CEO

					
					
						 

					
					
						Title:  CFO

				
	
					
						Date:  March 20, 2016

					
					
						 

					
					
						Date:  March 29, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Clearance of a Revised 
Information Collection: RI 20-1

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a request for clearance of a revised 
information collection. Annuitants who were entitled to minimum annuity 
before the repeal of the minimum annuity provisions on February 27, 
1986, continue to be paid minimum annuity. OPM uses RI 20-1, Minimum 
Annuity Application, to determine if an annuitant qualifies for minimum 
annuity.
    Comments are particularly invited on:
    <bullet> Whether this collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of functions of OPM, and whether it will have 
practical utility;
    <bullet> Whether our estimate of the public burden of this 
collection is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; 
and
    <bullet> Ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection 
of information on those who are to respond, through use of the 
appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.
    Approximately 50 RI 20-1 forms will be completed annually. We 
estimate it takes approximately 15 minutes to complete the form. The 
annual burden is 13 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 
(202) 606-8358, or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d8b5baacb7b7b5bda198b7a8b5f6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6dbd4c2d9d9dbd3cff6d9c6db98d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before August 
6, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Ronald W. Melton, Chief, 
Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. 
Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3349A, 
Washington, DC 20415-3540.
    For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination Contact: 
Donna G. Lease, Team Leader, Forms Analysis and Design, Budget and 
Administrative Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

Office of Personnel Management.
Steven R. Cohen,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 01-14334 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant at the dates and for the periods indicated. No purchaser or seller
of securities shall be entitled to rely on the foregoing statement for any
purpose, and the undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the
foregoing statement except as required by law.

FIRST FEDERAL CAPITAL CORP/s/ Michael W. Dosland
    
    November 12, 2003Michael W. DoslandSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer


36