alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6
 
 
 Background
  Purpose
  1.
    
    Recognize and motivate high-potential individuals;2.
    
    Recognize and reward superior performance;3.
    
    Act as a retention incentive; and4.
    
    Align the interests of key employees with those of AmeriGas unitholders.
 Eligibility
   Awards




---



##### 



Maximum Number of Units
  Nomination and Selection
   
    
    CEO of AmeriGas
    
    Vice President Human Resources
    
    At least one other Vice President to be appointed each year by the CEO
  and
 1.
    
    The individual has performed in a manner which demonstrates the potential to make
significant long-term contributions to the Company, or2.
    
    The individual possesses those skills which, upon further development, may qualify
him/her for significant additional responsibilities in the future.
  Vesting
   Distributions
  Payment of Awards




---



##### 



Tax Withholding
  Amendment and Termination
  Transferability of Awards
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 20, 2001.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Governor's House, 1615 Rhode Island Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Contact Person: Melissa Stick, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research, NIDCD/NIH, 6120 Executive Blvd, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
496-8683.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: June 6, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-14958 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JULY 20, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-16073

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00283-CR-1-CG

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEAVIE DALLAS KING, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(July 20, 2010)

Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Elsie Mae Miller, appointed counsel for appellant Leavie Dallas King, III,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of King and filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). King

appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release and subsequent

imposition of a ten month sentence. In her Anders brief, Miller raised four

possible issues for appeal, although after an independent review of the record we

agree with her conclusion that the appeal lacks merit. Miller’s motion to withdraw

is GRANTED, and the revocation of King’s supervised release and his sentence

are AFFIRMED.

2
No. 758.

#### Sgambati *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir.

*Jacob Rassner*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison*and *Paul A. Sweeney*for the United States.

Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-38-001]

Take notice that on May 31, 2001, Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets with an effective date of July 1, 2001:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 314

Third Revised Sheet No. 315

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 316

CIG states that the filing is being made in compliance with the Commission's order issued November 9, 2000 at Docket No. RM96-1-014, et at.

CIG states that the filing revises the imbalance neeting and trading tariff provisions in response to the Commission's order in this proceeding.

CIG states that copies of this filing have been served on CIG's jurisdictional customers and public bodies.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14849  Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
H. Res. 1305 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 29, 2010. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2499) to provide for a federally sanctioned selfdetermination process for the people of Puerto Rico. The first 

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall 

be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour and 30 

minutes, with one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Natural Resources and 30 minutes controlled by Representative Velazquez of New York or her designee. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 

five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 

rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute rec-
2 

•HRES 1305 EH 

ommended by the Committee on Natural Resources now 

printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature 

of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those arising under clause 10 of 

rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no 

amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a 

substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 

Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question. All points of order against 

such amendments are waived except those arising under 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration 

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 
3 

•HRES 1305 EH 

SEC. 2. The Chair may entertain a motion that the 

Committee rise only if offered by the chair of the Committee 

on Natural Resources or his designee. The Chair may not entertain a motion to strike out the enacting words of the bill 

(as described in clause 9 of rule XVIII). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
| Dec. 30, 2014                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| I | Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| **Supplement to the Fidelity Advisor® Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Institutional Class December 30, 2014 Prospectus**Effective July 1, 2015, Institutional Class will be renamed Class I. The features and policies of the class will not change. Effective October 1, 2015, the fund changed its classification from a non-diversified fund to a diversified fund. |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Supplement Text Block.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**fit_SupplementTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**fit_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**dei_DocumentInformationDocumentAxis=fit_InstitutionalClassMember**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
| X                                                                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**dei_LegalEntityAxis=fit_S000034264Member**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
#### Jaswant SINGH, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-70011.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 8, 2008.

Martin Roy Robles, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David J. Kline, Esq., Craig W. Kuhn, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jaswant Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his second motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider, *Lara-*
      *565
      *Torres v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), *amended by*404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA properly construed Singh’s motion to reopen as a motion to reconsider because the motion only alleged legal and factual errors in the IJ’s decision. *See Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 793 (9th Cir.2005); 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(b)(1), (c)(1) (a motion to reconsider specifies errors of fact or law in the prior decision while a motion to reopen presents new evidence). The BIA therefore did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion as untimely because it was filed more than 30 days after the IJ’s August 14, 2002 decision. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(B). Our conclusion is unaffected by the BIA’s erroneous citation of a regulation.

In light of our disposition, we need not reach Singh’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Taurino CERECERES-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-3129.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 2010.

Leon Patton, Kansas City, KS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Alex Scott McCauley, Jenab & McCau-ley, LLP, Olathe, KS, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HARTZ, GORSUCH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

Taurino Cereceres-Morales pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of *349marijuana. The district court sentenced him to sixty months in prison, which was both the statutory mandatory minimum and the sentence the parties had agreed to in their plea agreement. Although the parties’ plea agreement contained an appeal waiver, Mr. Cereceres-Morales appealed.

The government has moved to enforce the agreement pursuant to *United States v. Hahn,*359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir.2004) (en banc) (per curiam). Counsel for Mr. Cereceres-Morales filed a response, citing *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and moved to withdraw. We gave Mr. Cere-ceres-Morales an opportunity to file a pro se response. *See id.*He has done so, and he “waives [his] right to appeal.” Pro se Resp. at 1.

Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal. We DENY the government’s motion to enforce as moot, and we GRANT Mr. Cer-eceres-Morales’s counsel’s motion to withdraw.

*

 This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is *349therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1303/2004

of 15 July 2004         

fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, undenatured and exported in the natural state, are hereby fixed to the amounts shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 July 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

----

ANNEX

REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 16 JULY 2004

----

(1)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 %, the refund amount applicable shall be calculated in accordance with Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 151 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 151

     Honoring the life and expressing condolences of the House of 
           Representatives on the passing of Paul M. Weyrich.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2009

Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin (for himself, Mr. Tiahrt, Ms. Fallin, Mr. Pitts, 
Mr. Harper, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. 
Chaffetz, Mr. Cantor, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, 
 Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Pence, Mr. Cole, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Franks of 
Arizona, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Jordan of Ohio, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, 
   Mr. Burgess, Mr. Akin, Mr. Culberson, Mr. McCotter, Mr. Daniel E. 
    Lungren of California, Mr. Posey, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Petri, and Mr. 
 Sensenbrenner) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Honoring the life and expressing condolences of the House of 
           Representatives on the passing of Paul M. Weyrich.

Whereas Paul Weyrich was born and raised in Racine, Wisconsin, and became 
        enamored with the political system as a student at the University of 
        Wisconsin-Madison;
Whereas, after a short stint as a news reporter, Mr. Weyrich came to Congress in 
        1966 to serve on the staffs of Senators Gordon L. Allot, of Colorado, 
        and Carl T. Curtis, of Nebraska, handling press relations and other 
        assignments;
Whereas, as the original President of the Heritage Foundation, Mr. Weyrich 
        established a respectable and reasoned conservative voice in American 
        public policy and political debates;
Whereas, as a pioneer of the modern conservative movement, Mr. Weyrich stood as 
        a vocal defender of economic and religious freedom, and established the 
        Free Congress Research and Education Foundation to rally conservatives 
        to the defense of traditional Judeo-Christian values;
Whereas Mr. Weyrich was a true visionary in outreach efforts, launching a 
        television network, training grassroots activists, and influencing both 
        politics and policy; and
Whereas Mr. Weyrich's perseverance in the promotion of his philosophy inspired 
        thousands of Americans to dedicate their own cause to protect liberty 
        and secure America's future: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses--
            (1) gratitude to Paul M. Weyrich's for his significant 
        contributions to the conservative movement and for promoting a 
        capitalist, democratic vision for the world; and
            (2) profound sorrow at the death of Mr. Weyrich and 
        condolences to the family, friends, and colleagues of Mr. 
        Weyrich.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)**

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Advisor Series I  (the "Trust") onForm N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of suchofficer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Report.

Dated:	June 29, 2009

Dated:	June 29, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typedform within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.