alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1426 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1426

  Urging the Government of the Republic of Rwanda and President Paul 
   Kagame to immediately release human rights lawyer Professor Peter 
    Erlinder from jail and allow him to return to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2010

  Ms. McCollum (for herself and Mr. Ellison) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Urging the Government of the Republic of Rwanda and President Paul 
   Kagame to immediately release human rights lawyer Professor Peter 
    Erlinder from jail and allow him to return to the United States.

Whereas the Constitution of Rwanda, adopted on May 26, 2003, states that Rwanda 
        is ``Resolved to build a State governed by the rule of law, based on 
        respect for fundamental human rights, pluralistic democracy, equitable 
        power sharing, tolerance and resolution of issues through dialogue'';
Whereas there is an increasing pattern of restrictions of free expression in 
        Rwanda ahead of the August presidential elections, including the denial 
        of a work visa to a senior Human Rights Watch researcher and the 
        crackdown of opposition members and journalists;
Whereas the United States Government has provided over $1,034,000,000 billion in 
        United States taxpayer-funded foreign assistance to Rwanda since 2000, 
        and an additional $240,200,000 is proposed in the President's fiscal 
        year 2011 budget;
Whereas Peter Erlinder is a law professor at William Mitchell College of Law in 
        Saint Paul, Minnesota, and has served as a lead defense attorney for the 
        United Nationals International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in Arusha, 
        Tanzania;
Whereas Peter Erlinder was arrested on May 28, 2010, in Kigali, Rwanda, and is 
        currently being detained at Kicukiro Prison on charges of ``genocide 
        ideology'' based in part upon legal arguments made during his work as a 
        defense attorney at the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal 
        for Rwanda; and
Whereas United States Department of State Spokesman P.J. Crowley announced on 
        June 3, 2010, that the United States Government was pressing the 
        Government of Rwanda to ``resolve this case quickly'' and that the 
        Department of State hoped for Peter Erlinder's release on 
        ``compassionate grounds'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges the Government of 
the Republic of Rwanda and President Paul Kagame to immediately release 
Professor Peter Erlinder from jail and allow him to return to the 
United States.
                                 <all>
```
No. 149.

#### Banner Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. *v.*Louisiana.

Jurisdictional statement distributed September 10, 1936.

Decided October 12, 1936.

*Mr. Moses C. Scharff*for appellant.

*Mr. Charles J. Rivet*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. *American Sugar Refining Co.*v. *Louisiana,*179 U. S. 89; *Quong Wing*v. *Kirkendall,*223 U. S. 59, 62, 63; *Tax Commissioners*v. *Jackson,*283 U. S. 527, 537-538.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: REUBEN EARL MCGUIGAN 

CITATION: 11 Agric. Dec. 184 

DOCKET NUMBER: 37 

DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 1952 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER REMOVING SUSPENSION OF TRADING PRIVILEGES 

(No. 3057) 

In re REUBEN EARL MCGUIGAN. CEA Doc. No. 37. Decided February 20, 1952. 

Restoration of Trading Privileges -- Public Interest Not Requiring Further 

Suspension

Where respondent has requested the restoration of his trading privileges, 

stating that he has turned over his interest to his son and will have no further 

connection with the business of market forecasting, his request is granted, 

since respondent's trading privileges have been suspended 

for nearly six years, and the public interest requires no further suspension. 

Mr. Benjamin M. Holstein for Commodity Exchange Authority. Mr. Thomas S. 

Agresta, of Brooklyn, New York, for respondent. 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer

ORDER REMOVING SUSPENSION OF TRADING PRIVILEGES

On April 11, 1946, an order was entered in this proceeding under the 

Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. Chapter 1) directing contract markets to refuse 

the respondent all trading privileges thereon "until further notice by the 

Secretary of Agriculture." The respondent, through counsel, has requested the 

issuance of an order terminating the suspension of his trading privileges. The 

request states that the respondent has turned over his interest in the 

International Market Forecast Bureau to his son and will have no further 

connection with the business of market forecasting. The Commodity Exchange 

Authority has filed an answer to the request stating that it has no objection to 

the restoration of the respondent's trading privileges since the respondent has 

had his trading privileges suspended since May 1946. 

Since the respondent's trading privileges have been suspended for nearly six 

years, the public interest requires no further suspension and the respondent's 

request for restoration is granted. 

Accordingly, all contract markets are hereby notified, as provided by the 

order of April 11, 1946, that they need no longer refuse trading privileges to 

Reuben Earl McGuigan. 

A copy hereof shall be served by registered mail upon the respondent and upon 

all contract markets. 

LOAD-DATE: June 8, 2008 
Page 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 2.19

                       CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE RESOLUTION

         I, MICHAEL L. MOORE, President and Secretary of M L C ENTERPRISES,
INC., a Texas corporation, do hereby certify that said corporation is duly
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas; that all franchise
and other taxes required to maintain its corporate existence have been paid when
due and that no such taxes are delinquent; that it is duly qualified to do
business in the State of Texas and is in good standing in such State; that the
By-Laws attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are the current By-Laws of the
corporation.

         I further certify that the following persons are the officers of M L C
ENTERPRISES, INC, and are the persons authorized to act and sign on behalf of
the corporation:

                  MICHAEL L. MOORE                President

                  MICHAEL L. MOORE                Secretary

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as President and
Secretary, respectively, of said corporation and have attached hereto the
official seal of said corporation, this 13th day of November, 1998.

                                         /s/ Michael L. Moore
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         MICHAEL L. MOORE, President



                                         -------------------------------------
                                         MICHAEL L. MOORE, Secretary

  corporate
   Seal
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 28, 2020

No. 04-20-00234-CV

Kyle BRATTON,

Appellant

v.

HOLT TEXAS, LTD D/B/A Holt CAT and D/B/A Sitech-Tejas,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI05583

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed within fifteen days after the deadline but without a 

motion for extension of time to file the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. On August 17, 

2020, we ordered Appellant to file a written response presenting a reasonable explanation for the 

late notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 

615, 617 (Tex. 1997).

Appellant timely filed a written response explaining the late notice of appeal; our August 

17, 2020 order is satisfied. See Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 774 S.W.2d 668, 670 (Tex. 1989) 

(noting a “reasonable explanation” comprises all but “deliberate or intentional noncompliance”). 

We reinstate the appellate timetable. Appellant’s brief is due on September 16, 2020. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of August, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 2056** 

ALVIN L. SUTHERLIN, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. LIEUTENANT J. W. SMITH; SERGEANT H. S. RICHARDSON; OFFICER N. M. SLOVER; OFFICER M. C. PACE; OFFICER R. C. LANDRUM; OFFICER D. C. LANCASTER; OFFICER W. C. SHIVLEY; OFFICER W. R. MERRILL; OFFICER J. D. DIXON; OFFICER L. D. LAND , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Danville
. Jackso n L. Kiser , Senior District Judge. ( 4:15

- cv - 00037

- JLK

- RSB )

Submitted : January 31, 2017 Decided: February 10, 2017

Before KEENAN and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Alvin L. Sutherlin, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se. Maggy Lewis Gregory , James A. L. Daniel , Tyler Brent Gammon , Martha White Medley , DANIEL, MEDLEY & KIRBY, PC , Danville, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alvin L. Sutherlin, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order s denying his motions to compel, denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint , and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions
. The majority of Sutherlin’s allegations of

e rror on appeal are conclusory and fail to preserve an issue for review. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (directing appellants to present “specific issues and supporting facts and arguments” in informal brief); see also Eriline Co. S.A. v. Johnson , 440 F.3d 648, 653 n.7 (4th Cir. 2006) (finding single, conclusory sentence in brief “insufficient to raise on appeal any merits

- based challenge to the district court’s ruling”); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) ( “Failure to comply with th e specific dictates of [Rule 28] with respect to a particular claim triggers abandonm ent of that claim on appeal.”) . None of Sutherlin’s allegations presents a substantial question sufficient to warrant the preparation of a transcript at Government expense under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2012)
. See Rhodes v. Corps of Eng’rs of U.S. Army , 589 F.2d 358, 359 (8th Cir. 1978) (per curiam) (authorizing preparation of transcript at Government expense when appeal presents substantial question). Therefore, we den y Sutherlin’s motion for the preparation of transcripts at Government expense.3 To the extent that Sutherlin has preserved issues for appeal, w e have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sutherlin v. Smith , No. 4:15

- cv - 00037

- JLK

- RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 5, Aug. 18, & Sept. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument wo uld not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Enrique HUERTA-MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-40800

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2010.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*403Marjorie A Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Enrique Huerta-Miranda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California, 38*6 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Huerta-Miranda has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  112,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (5,843)
<INVENTORY>                                     28,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,208
<PP&E>                                          21,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (9,670)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,137
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,028
<SALES>                                        125,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,549
<CGS>                                          115,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    26
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (565)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,893)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,893)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.20)


</TABLE>
# FCM Data September 2013

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF September 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002013FROM REPORTS FILED BY November 4,&KFF0000 &K0000002013	&P of &N
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Petróleos Mexicanos, a decentralized public entity of the Federal Government of the United Mexican States (the Company), does hereby certify, to
such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the
Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2013



By:

/S/    EMILIO RICARDO LOZOYA
AUSTINName:    Emilio Ricardo Lozoya AustinTitle:    Director General/Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 30, 2013

By:

/S/    MARIO ALBERTO BEAUREGARD
ÁLVAREZName:    Mario Alberto Beauregard ÁlvarezTitle:    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit (m)(31)

FORM OF

DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICE PLAN

FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST: FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-06477, 333-22063, 333-25457, 333-67731, 333-75677, 333-83239 and 333-96145
on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-29447 and 333-91143 on Form S-8 of Globalstar
Telecommunications Limited of our reports dated March 27, 2001 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to going concern), on the financial statements of Globalstar Telecommunications
Limited, the consolidated financial statements of Globalstar, L.P. and the
balance sheets of Globalstar Capital Corporation and Loral/QUALCOMM Satellite
Services, L.P. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Globalstar
Telecommunications Limited and Globalstar, L.P. for the year ended December 31,
2000.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California
March 27, 2001
No. 638.

#### Steelman, Trustee in Bankruptcy, *v.*All Continent Corporation.

January 18, 1937.

The petition for a temporary restraining order and injunction, pending action of this Court upon the petition for a writ of certiorari filed herein, is granted, and

*523
      *Mr. Wm. Elmer Brown, Jr.,*for petitioner.

*Mr. Benjamin Reass*for respondent.

It is ordered that, until this Court acts upon the petition for writ of certiorari, All Continent Corporation, its officers, agents, attorneys, and employees be, and they are hereby, enjoined from proceeding in any manner against the petitioner herein in a suit in equity now pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania entitled *“All Continent Corporation, Plaintiff*v. *John S. Wynn et al., Defendants,”*being cause No. 9533 on the equity docket of said court.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: DAVID L. HOFER 

DOCKET NUMBER: 156 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 156 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

David L. Hofer 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that during the period June 18, 1968, through August 

16, 1968, the respondent was engaged as a futures commission merchant without 

being so registered. It also charges that he willfully made a material false 

statement in his application for registration and that he filed a false 

financial report. The complaint also charges that the respondent failed and 

refused to segregate and account separately for customers' funds, commingled 

such funds with his own, and used customers' funds for his own benefit. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Bearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, December 11, 1968, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: J. H. KENT, THE KENT COMPANY, AND EDWARD C. EPPERSON 

DOCKET NUMBER: 137 

DATE: JUNE 19, 1969 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STAY ORDER 

NOTE: ANOTHER VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS REPORTED IN THE AGRICULTURAL DECISIONS 

AT 28 AGRIC. DEC. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re J. H. Kent, The Kent Company, and Edward C. Epperson, Respondents 

CEA Docket No. 137 

Stay Order 

Respondents have filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth 

Circuit a petition to review the order entered June 6, 1969, directing the 

contract markets to refuse trading privileges to respondents for 90 days. 

Accordingly, the order of June 6, 1969 is stayed pending the outcome of the 

appeal. 

Done at Washington, D. C. 

JUN 19 1969 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      46,498,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,106,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,326,476
<INVENTORY>                                 60,586,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           151,052,040
<PP&E>                                      21,056,671
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,574,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             320,746,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       47,680,912
<BONDS>                                    161,981,356
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    81,549,668
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,282,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               320,746,624
<SALES>                                    272,878,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           274,059,931
<CGS>                                      166,810,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              225,390,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               667,857
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          20,287,419
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             27,713,660
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,415,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         16,298,660
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,298,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>