alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mantra Venture Group Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Con Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  January 14, 2010




By:       /s/ Con Buckley
Con Buckley
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

p0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146554

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146554

COA: 306574

Wayne CC: 10

- 010956

- FC

DEVI LOREN SMITH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encore Wire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Vincent A. Rego, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

            3.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

            4.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




Date: August 8, 2003






                                                  /s/ FRANK J. BILBAN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                    Frank J. Bilban
                                       Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial
                                           Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palmdale Executive Homes, Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Suzette M. Major, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 16, 2011
By:
/s/SUZETTE M. MAJORSuzette M. MajorPresident and Director
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: CONSOLIDATED GROWERS EXCHANGE, INC. AND HARVEY A. BAUM 

DOCKET NUMBER: 92 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 92 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Consolidated Growers Exchange, Inc. 

and Harvey A. Baum 

(New York, New York) 

The complaint charges improper handling of customers' funds, improper 

recordkeeping and failure to disclose true and correct information concerning 

customers' accounts. It is alleged that funds belonging to customers were 

commingled with those of Consolidated Growers Exchange, Inc., that the firm 

disregarded recordkeeping requirements under the Commodity Exchange Act; and 

that it gave false information concerning certain accounts carried on its books. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, April 19, 1960, in New York, New York. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encore Wire Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Vincent A. Rego, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 7, 2004 /s/ VINCENT A. REGOVincent A. RegoChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
 24
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                                  STATEMENT RE:
                       COMPUTATIONS OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,        NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                         --------------------------------        --------------------------------
                                                             2002                2001                2002                2001
                                                         ------------        ------------        ------------        ------------
<S>                                                      <C>                 <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Numerator:
    Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share
    NET LOSS                                             $ (1,429,551)       $ (1,285,096)       $ (4,415,035)       $ (4,980,417)
                                                         ============        ============        ============        ============

Denominator:
    Denominator for basic loss per share
    Weighted average shares                               158,643,310         111,999,393         142,424,796          99,373,321


   Effect of dilutive securities:
      Stock options and warrants                                   --                  --                  --                  --

   Dilutive potential common shares                                --                  --                  --                  --
                                                         ------------        ------------        ------------        ------------


   Denominator for diluted earnings per share
      Adjusted weighted average shares and
     assumed conversions                                  158,643,310         111,999,393         142,424,796          99,373,321
                                                         ============        ============        ============        ============


BASIC LOSS PER SHARE                                     $      (0.01)       $      (0.01)       $      (0.03)       $      (0.05)
                                                         ============        ============        ============        ============
DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE                                   $      (0.01)       $      (0.01)       $      (0.03)       $      (0.05)
                                                         ============        ============        ============        ============
</Table>


We incurred a net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.
Therefore, we did not make adjustments for potentially dilutive securities as
the adjustments would have been anti-dilutive.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tom TOLLISON, a/k/a Thomas C. Tollison, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-4440.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 21, 2006.

Decided: Dec. 29, 2006.

David B. Betts, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

*303Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tom Tollison appeals his conviction and sentence following a guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine and 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). Tollison’s attorney on appeal has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but raising as a potential issue whether the district court complied with Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 in accepting Tollison’s guilty plea. Tollison was advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done so. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Counsel raises the issue of whether the district court fully complied with Rule 11, but identifies no error in the Rule 11 proceeding and concludes that there was full compliance with the Rule. After a thorough review of the record, we similarly find that the district court complied with the requirements of Rule 11.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Tollison’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.7


                               The State of Texas
                               Secretary of State

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             M L C ENTERPRISES, INC.
                             CHARTER NUMBER 01365098

         THE UNDERSIGNED, AS SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, HEREBY
CERTIFIES THAT THE ATTACHED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION FOR THE ABOVE NAMED
CORPORATION HAVE BEEN RECEIVED IN THIS OFFICE AND ARE FOUND TO CONFORM TO LAW.

         ACCORDINGLY, THE UNDERSIGNED, AS SECRETARY OF STATE, AND BY VIRTUE OF
THE AUTHORITY VESTED IN THE SECRETARY BY LAW, HEREBY ISSUES THIS CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION.

         ISSUANCE OF THIS CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE
USE OF A CORPORATE NAME IN THIS STATE IN VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF ANOTHER
UNDER THE FEDERAL TRADEMARK ACT OF 1946, THE TEXAS TRADEMARK LAW, THE ASSUMED
BUSINESS OR PROFESSIONAL NAME ACT OR THE COMMON LAW.


DATED AUG. 7, 1995

EFFECTIVE AUG. 7, 1995


                      Antonio 0. Garza, Jr., Secretary of State
No. 609, Misc.

#### Blauvelt *v.*Jackson, Warden.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Reg. Nos. 333-12087, 333-68637, 333-94111, 333-42210, 333-56274, 333-90504 and 333-116740) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan, the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, and the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, and Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Reg. Nos. 333-68117, 333-72225, 333-79925, 333-92355, 333-47680, 333-134507, 333-142373 and 333-144153) and in the related Prospectuses of Avigen, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2006, with respect to the 2005 and 2004 financial statements of Avigen, Inc., included in this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

|                      | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|--------------------- | ---------------------
|                     
|Palo Alto, California |                      
|October 23, 2007      |                      

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PowerVerde, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George Konrad, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George Konrad      
|George Konrad          
|Chief Financial Officer
|April 14, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1581 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1581

Honoring eight marines from the 3rd Battalion 1st Marines who fought in 
                  Haditha, Iraq, on November 19, 2005.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2010

 Mr. Rooney submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring eight marines from the 3rd Battalion 1st Marines who fought in 
                  Haditha, Iraq, on November 19, 2005.

Whereas Sergeant Sanick Dela Cruz, Captain Randy Stone, Lance Corporal Justin 
        Sharratt, Captain Lucas McConnell, Lance Corporal Stephen Tatum, 
        Lieutenant Andrew Grayson, Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey Chessani, and 
        Staff Sergeant Frank Wuterich all honorably served the United States;
Whereas these eight men dutifully volunteered to serve their country in the 
        United States Marine Corps;
Whereas these eight marines faced imminent danger in the form of improvised 
        explosive devices and small-arms fire from insurgent forces in Haditha, 
        Iraq;
Whereas these eight marines exhibited extreme bravery and courage to continue 
        performing their duty under the harsh conditions of combat;
Whereas these eight marines underwent the terrible tragedy of losing their 
        friend Lance Corporal Miguel Terrazas;
Whereas these eight marines made difficult real-time decisions under life 
        threatening circumstances;
Whereas these eight marines were wrongly accused of committing war crimes; and
Whereas these eight marines were acquitted of all charges: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the service of Sergeant Sanick Dela Cruz, 
        Captain Randy Stone, Lance Corporal Justin Sharratt, Captain 
        Lucas McConnell, Lance Corporal Stephen Tatum, Lieutenant 
        Andrew Grayson, Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey Chessani, and Staff 
        Sergeant Frank Wuterich in the United States Marine Corps;
            (2) thanks them for their courage and composure under life-
        threatening circumstances; and
            (3) mourns the loss of Lance Corporal Miguel Terrazas.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jorge Toribio BARRIOS-BARRIOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73912.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006 *.

Filed Dec. 12, 2006.

Daniel E. Chavez, Esq., Law Offices of Daniel E. Chavez, Petaluma, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of

Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Kimberly A. Kelly, USF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Toribio Barrios-Barrios, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Barrios-Barrios’s challenge to the denial of CAT relief because he failed to exhaust it before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 over Barrios-Barrios’s remaining claims. Reviewing for substantial evidence, *Ochave v. INS,*254 F.3d 859, 862 (9th Cir.2001), we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that there was no nexus between the harms Barrios-Barrios suffered and a protected ground. *See id.*at 865. There is no evidence in the record that guerrillas imputed a political opinion to Barrios-Barrios during his two encounters with them. *See id.*Additionally, suspected retaliation by a man whom Barrios-Barrios arrested for drunk driving is insufficient to establish a nexus to a protected ground. *See*
      *693
      *Rostomian v. INS, 210*F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir.2000). To the extent that Barrios-Barrios contends he is a member of a social group, those formerly involved with quasi-law enforcement are not a recognized social group. *See Cruz-Navarro v. INS,*232 F.3d 1024, 1028 (9th Cir.2000); *see also Sanchez-Trujillo v. INS,*801 F.2d 1571, 1576-77 (9th Cir.1986).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Barrios-Barrios’s fear of returning to Guatemala lacks a nexus to a protected ground. *See Rostomian, 210*F.3d at 1089.

Because Barrios-Barrios failed to establish that he was eligible for asylum, he necessarily failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. *See Cruz-Navarro v. INS,*232 F.3d 1024, 1031 (9th Cir. 2000).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 388.

#### Triplett et al. *v.*Lowell.

December 9, 1935.

*Mr. Samuel E. Darby, Jr.,*for petitioners.

*Messrs. C. V. Edwards*and *John B. Brady*for respondent.

It is ordered that the petition for rehearing in this case be, and it hereby is, granted. The order heretofore entered on October 14, 1935, *[post,*p. 621] denying the petition for writ of certiorari in this case is vacated, and it is ordered that the petition for writ of certiorari be, and the same hereby is, granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1465 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1465

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 23, 2010.
Whereas nearly 15,000,000 Colombians participated in the first round of 
        Colombia's presidential elections on May 30, 2010;
Whereas no candidate received an outright majority of the vote, thereby 
        requiring a runoff election between Juan Manuel Santos and Antanas 
        Mockus, the two candidates with the highest vote totals;
Whereas Juan Manuel Santos, of the National Unity Party, received 46.7 percent 
        of the votes and Antanas Mockus, of the Green Party, received 21.5 
        percent of the votes;
Whereas in the second round on June 20, 2010, Juan Manuel Santos received 69 
        percent of the votes and was thereby declared President-elect of 
        Colombia;
Whereas Colombia has overcome tremendous challenges to build their democracy; 
        and
Whereas Colombia remains a vital ally and friend of the United States: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) reaffirms the longstanding friendship and alliance between the 
        United States and Colombia;
            (2) recognizes Colombia's commitment to the democratic process as 
        demonstrated by the free and fair nature of these multiparty, 
        internationally recognized elections; and
            (3) congratulates President-elect Juan Manuel Santos on his recent 
        victory in Colombia's June 20, 2010, presidential election.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```