alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-92,045-01
EX P ARTE JOHN HOL T CRAMBELL, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1471924-A IN THE 184TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of ag g rava ted sexual a ssault a nd sentenc ed to twe nty -eig ht y ear s’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Crambell v

. State , No. 01-17- 00331-C R (T ex . Ap p . — Houston [1 Dist.] J une 28, 2018) (not desig nated for publication). st Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk f

orwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. On Fe bruar

y 19, 2020, the trial court enter ed an order desig nating issues. The district cler k proper ly forwa

rded this application to this Court u n d er T ex as Rule of Appellate Procedur e 73.4(b)( 5). Howeve r, the application was forwa rded befor e the trial court made finding s of fac t and
co n cl u s i ons of law. We rema nd this application to the trial court to complete its evident i ar yinvestiga tion and make f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law
. T h e t rial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order
. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections , proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: De cembe r 16, 2020 Do not publish
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 302 AND 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  
 (1)
    
    I have reviewed the report;
 (2)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading:
  (4)
    
    I:
           
 /s/ G. Dale Garlow
    
    /s/ G. Dale GarlowG. Dale Garlow, President
    
    G. Dale Garlow, Chief Financial Officer
Order entered June 16, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00584-CV

WAYNE RAND, Appellant

V.

STEVE MCMASTERS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-13633

ORDER

We GRANT the motion of Toni Reagor, Official Court Reporter for the 68th Judicial 

District Court of Dallas County, Texas, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The 

reporter’s record shall be filed by July 31, 2014.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-4267 DAVID A. RAMEY, JR., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-126) Submitted: October 8, 1999 Decided: November 4, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL John H. Kennett, Jr., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Anthony P. Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM:David A. Ramey, Jr., appeals his conviction for two counts of distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C.§ 841(a)(1) (1994). On appeal, Ramey contends that the twenty-two month delay between the date the indictment was returned and his arrest violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Ramey also contends that the eighteen month delay between the date of the two incidents of drug distribution and the return of the indictment prejudiced his defense. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. We find there was no Sixth Amendment violation. The delay between the date the indictment was returned and Ramey's arrest was long enough to trigger the speedy trial analysis set forth in Barker v. Wingo , 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972). See Doggett v. United States , 505 U.S. 647, 651-52 (1992). While it appears that the Government did not aggressively seek Ramey's arrest after he moved to Pennsylvania,there was no evidence or suggestion that the Government was in possession of information as to Ramey's whereabouts that it disregarded. On the other hand, by waiting several months after learning at the indictment to assert his Sixth Amendment right, Ramey was himself dilatory. Finally, Ramey failed to show how he was prejudiced by the delay. See Barker , 407 U.S. at 530. This factor was highly significant because none of the remaining factors weighed strongly against the Government. Accordingly, we find no infringement of Ramey's right to a speedy trial. We also find that the delay between the distribution incidents andthe return of the indictment did not violate Ramey's right to due process. Ramey's failure to show how he was actually prejudiced by the delay was singularly dispositive of this claim. See Jones v. Angelone , 94 F.3d 900, 905-06 (4th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment of conviction.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,627
<SECURITIES>                                     5,842
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,600
<PP&E>                                             913
<DEPRECIATION>                                     347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,789
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,221
<SALES>                                          7,779
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,779
<CGS>                                              208
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,044)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,044)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,044)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.62)
        


</TABLE>
# FCM Data October 2011

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF October 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002011FROM REPORTS FILED BY November 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002011	&P of &N
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1239 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1239

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 21, 2010.
Whereas, on April 6, 2010, the University of Connecticut Huskies defeated the 
        University of Stanford Cardinal 53 to 47 in the final game of the 
        National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Women's Basketball 
        Tournament in San Antonio, Texas;
Whereas the Huskies were undefeated with a record of 39-0, defeating 38 of their 
        39 opponents by more than 10 points;
Whereas the Huskies have won a record 78 games in a row;
Whereas the Huskies were undefeated for the 4th time since 1994-1995;
Whereas the Huskies have won 7 national titles, second most in NCAA Division I 
        women's basketball history;
Whereas senior center Tina Charles was chosen as the Naismith Award winner, the 
        Wooden Award winner, the United States Basketball Writers Association 
        player of the year, and Associated Press player of the year;
Whereas junior forward Maya Moore was chosen as the State Farm Wade Trophy 
        player of the year and as the Women's Final Four Most Valuable Player;
Whereas Maya Moore and Tina Charles were chosen as first team All-Americans and 
        as members of the Final Four First All Tournament Team;
Whereas Coach Geno Auriemma, who holds the highest winning percentage among 
        active coaches, serves as president of the Women's Basketball Coaches 
        Association and coach of the 2012 United States Olympic team;
Whereas the University of Connecticut Women's Basketball program has a 100 
        percent graduation rate among four-year players, representing the team's 
        commitment to achievement in the classroom as well as on the court;
Whereas each player, coach, athletic trainer, and staff member of the University 
        of Connecticut Huskies dedicated their season and their tireless efforts 
        to their perfect record and the NCAA championship; and
Whereas residents of Connecticut and Huskies fans worldwide are to be commended 
        for their longstanding support, perseverance, and pride in this team: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the University of Connecticut Huskies for their 
        historic win in the 2010 National Collegiate Athletic Association 
        Division I Women's Basketball Tournament;
            (2) recognizes the achievements of the players, coaches, students, 
        and support staff who were instrumental in the Huskies' victory; and
            (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit a 
        copy of this resolution to University of Connecticut President Michael 
        Hogan and head coach Geno Auriemma for appropriate display.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We have issued our report dated March 29, 2011, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of First Community Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of First Community Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-170647, 333-135099, 333-119630 and 333-90603) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-157271).  /s/Elliott Davis, LLCElliott Davis, LLCColumbia, South CarolinaMarch 29, 2011
EXHIBIT32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Kenneth Chahine, Chief Executive
Officer of Avigen, Inc. (the Company), and Andrew A. Sauter, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

**1.**The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008, and to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, (the Annual Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange
Act, and

2.The information contained in the Annual
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

**In Witness
Whereof,**the undersigned have set their
hands hereto as of the 13th day of March, 2009.

| | /s/ KENNETHG. CHAHINE        
| | -----------------------------
| | Kenneth G.
      Chahine     
| | Chief
      Executive Officer
| |                              
| | /s/ ANDREWA. SAUTER          
| | Andrew A.
      Sauter       
| | Chief
      Financial Officer

---
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JON FREEMAN, D/B/A J. F. FREEMAN & CO. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 198 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 198 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Jon Freeman d/b/a 

J. F. Freeman & Co. 

(New York, New York) 

The complaint charges that the respondent currently is acting as a futures 

commission merchant while failing to meet the minimum financial requirements 

prescribed for futures commission merchants and has so acted since July 31, 

1972. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before a referee in New York, 

New York at a date and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of Options Media Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Scott Frohman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2.
The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Scott FrohmanScott Frohman

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: August 13, 2010




















In connection with the quarterly report of Options Media Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Steve Stowell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2.
The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Steve StowellSteve Stowell

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)


Dated: August 13, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel Mentored Scientists Development Award SEP.                    

*Date:*                         June 28, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 11 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7214, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Roy L White, Review Branch, NIH, NHLBI, Rockledge Building II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0291.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 6, 2001.

Laverne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-14962 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

In the Matter of the Application of
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. for
Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

ORDER OF REGISTRATION

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (“CME”) has submitted to the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”), pursuant to Section Sh of the Commodity
Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R.

§ 37.3(b), an application for registration as a swap execution facility, which includes submissions
dated September 17, 2013 through December 18, 2015.

Having reviewed CME’s application, the Commission HEREBY ORDERS that, pursuant
to Section Sh of the Act and Commission Regulation 37.3(b)(6)(i), CME is granted registration
as a swap execution facility, subject to the terms and conditions specified herein:

(1) CME shall comply with all representations and submissions made by CME in
support of its application for registration as a swap execution facility, as shown in the application

record; and



(2) CME shall comply with all provisions of the Act and all requirements set forth in
the Commission’s regulations, as may be amended or adopted from time to time, that are

applicable to swap execution facilities.
Issued in Washington, D.C. on this 22nd day of January, 2016.

By the Commission

Lthe\ Debolfe
Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: PLAINS COTTON COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION AND DAN W. DAVIS 

DOCKET NUMBER: 222; 75-11 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

NOTE: LATER BECAME CFTC DOCKET # 75-11 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D.C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 222 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Plains Cotton Cooperative Association and Dan W. Davis 

(Lubbock, Texas) 

The complaint charges that Plains Cotton Cooperative Association and its 

general manager, Dan W. Davis, manipulated upward the price of the May and July 

1972 cotton futures on the New York Cotton Exchange and the price of spot cotton 

during the period from March 15 to July 7, 1972. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when there has been a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. A determination is considered as having been made when a 

decision of the Administrative Law Judge becomes final or, after appeal, a 

decision is made by the Judicial Officer of the Department. Complaints are 

filed in the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and 

are a matter of public record. Pending disposition of a complaint, it is the 

policy of the CEA not to comment or elaborate on charges contained therein or to 

discuss evidence on which it is based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before the Administrative Law 

Judge at a place, date, and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: August 6, 2008 
Page 2