alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer ofStorage Computer Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, as of the date of this statement, the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the yearended December 31, 2003. 

 

The purpose of this statement issolely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This statement is not “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Act or any other federal or state law or regulation. 

 

Dated: April 14, 2004 

 

/s/ Theodore J. Goodlander 

Name: Theodore J. Goodlander 

Title: Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: MURLAS BROTHERS COMMODITIES, INC. MURLAS BROTHERS COMPANY, GEORGE J. 

MURLAS, NICHOLAS J. MURLAS, AND HENRY C. GATLIN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 78 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 78 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Murlas Brothers Commodities, Inc. 

Murlas Brothers Company 

110 North Franklin Street 

Chicago, Illinois 

George J. Murlas 

Nicholas J. Murlas 

Lincolnwood, Illinois 

Henry C. Gatlin 

Park Ridge, Illinois 

The complaint charges that the respondents attempted to manipulate the price 

of potato futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange in 1957. The respondents 

purchased cash potatoes and delivered them against their short futures positions 

with the purpose and intent of depressing the price of the May 1957 potato 

future, according to the complaint. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., Central Standard Time, March 18, 1958, in Room 1200, Board of Trade 

Building, 141 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for **

decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

LSS/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID B. JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

M. CRUTCHFIELD; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-16482

D.C. No. 1:05-cv-00351-AWIDLB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner David B. Johnson appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the

FILED

JAN 11 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
LSS/Research 2 08-16482

defendants fired him from his prison job and disciplined him in retaliation for his

grievance activity. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo. Bruce v. Ylst, 351 F.3d 1283, 1287 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Johnson

failed to raise a triable issue as to whether the defendants’ conduct was based on

retaliatory motive, rather than legitimate penological goals. See id. at 1288–89

(setting forth requirements of retaliation claim and noting that the “plaintiff bears

the burden of pleading and proving the absence of legitimate correctional goals for

the conduct of which he complains”) (citation and internal quotation marks

omitted).

Johnson’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
# FCM Data February 2014

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF February 28,&KFF0000 &K0000002014FROM REPORTS FILED BY April 01,&KFF0000 &K0000002014	&P of &N
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sanford Dennis, Appellant.

[882 NYS2d 658]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated September 23, 2008, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in *Doe v Pataki*(3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), pursuant to *Doe v Pataki*(481 F3d 69, 75 [2007]), and upon his consent, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is dismissed as academic.

The appeal must be dismissed because no appeal lies from an order entered on consent of the appellant *(see*CPLR 5511; *People v Welch,*30 AD3d 392 [2006]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Covello, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register: April 6, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 65)]
[Notices]
[Page 17418]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06ap05-53]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Agricultural Advisory Committee; Eleventh Renewal

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has determined to renew
again for a period of two years its advisory committee designated as
the ``Agricultural Advisory Committee.'' The Commission certifies that
the renewal of the advisory committee is in the public interest in
connection with duties imposed on the Commission by the Commodity
Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 1, et seq., as amended.
    The objectives and scope of activities of the Agricultural Advisory
Committee are to conduct public meetings and submit reports and
recommendations on issues affecting agricultural producers, processors,
lenders and others interested in or affected by agricultural
commodities markets, and to facilitate communications between the
Commission and the diverse agricultural and agriculture-related
organizations represented on the Committee. The Committee's membership
represents a cross-section of interested and affected groups including
representatives of producers, processors, lenders and other interested
agricultural groups.
    Interested persons may obtain information or make comments by
writing to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette
Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 31, 2005, by the Commission.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-6779 Filed 4-5-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Investment Trust  (the "Trust") on
Form N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of such
officer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Report.

Dated:	January 5, 2009

|/s/Kenneth B. Robins   
|-----------------------
|Kenneth B. Robins      
|President and Treasurer





Dated:	January 5, 2009



|/s/Christine Reynolds  
|-----------------------
|Christine Reynolds     
|Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 1555 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 26, 2010. 

Resolved, That the Speaker, in consultation with the minority leader, may designate individuals to be admitted to the 

Hall of the House and the rooms leading thereto in order to 

document the improved accessibility of the Hall of the House. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.19


 


Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (the
“Company”)


Schedule of Non-Employee Directors’
Annual Compensation


 


Effective May 19, 2016


 


	Meeting Fees (1)(2)(3)	 	 	 	 
	Per Company Board Meeting	 	$	450	 
	Per Company Committee Meeting	 	$	450	 
	Per EVB Board Meeting	 	$	750	 
	Per EVB Committee Meeting (4)	 	$	450	 



 





	Monthly Retainers	 	 	 	 
	Chairman of the Company’s Audit and Risk Oversight Committee	 	$	450	 
	Other members of the Company’s Audit and Risk Oversight Committee	 	$	300	 
	Chairman of the EVB Board	 	$	750	 



 


	Annual stock grant to non-employee directors (5):	grant of unrestricted shares of common stock on July 1 annually with grant date value of $15,000.


 


(1)     Each director of the Company’s Board of Directors
is also a member of the Board of Directors of EVB. 


(2)     For meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors
and EVB’s Board of Directors, directors are permitted one paid absence per year.


(3)     For joint meetings of the Company’s Board of
Directors and EVB’s Board of Directors, for the Company meeting each director of the Company will receive a fee of $225,
rather than a meeting fee of $450. The Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors may, in his sole discretion, determine
to pay each director of the Company the standard meeting fee of $450, rather than $225. Each member of EVB’s Board of Directors
would still receive an EVB meeting fee of $750.


(4)     Each member of the Loan Committee of EVB receives
$225 for each teleconference of the Loan Committee between regularly scheduled Loan Committee meetings.


(5)     The number of shares granted shall be based on the
closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and prorated to the time served.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Company's form 10-KSB for the twelve month period ended December 31, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          131,078
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   130,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                    103,310
<INVENTORY>                                     146,889
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                397,193
<PP&E>                                        6,716,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                  303,835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                8,449,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,143,937
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          6,097
<OTHER-SE>                                    6,115,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  8,449,410
<SALES>                                         749,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                749,264
<CGS>                                            21,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,579,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (834,522)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (834,522)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (834,522)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.045)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.045)
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE V. WALTER T. RICE 

DOCKET NUMBER: 28 

DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 1941 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

COMMODITY EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

CE-A Docket No. 28 

Secretary of Agriculture, Complainant, v. Walter T. Rice, 141 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, Respondent. 

The following order has been issued in the above-entitled matter: 

ORDER 

IT IS ORDERED that all contracts markets refuse Walter T. Rice all trading 

privileges thereon for a period of ninety days, beginning on the effective date 

of this order. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy hereof be sent by registered mail to the 

respondent and to each contract market, and that this order shall be effective 

10 days after its date. 

(SEAL) 

Done at Washington, D. C., this 24th day of November 1941. Witness my hand 

and the seal of the Department of Agriculture. 

(S) Grover B. Hill 

Assistant Secretary of Agriculture 

LOAD-DATE: June 11, 2008 
Page 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1490 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1490

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 30, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4173) to provide for 
financial regulatory reform, to protect consumers and investors, to enhance 
Federal understanding of insurance issues, to regulate the over-the-counter 
derivatives markets, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the conference report to its adoption without intervening motion 
except: (1) two hours of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: STUART GIMBEL AND GROW INVESTMENTS 

DOCKET NUMBER: 228 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D.C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT -- CEA DOCKET NO. 228 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Stuart Gimbel and Grow Investments 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that on a number of days during December 1969, January 

through March 1970, and June through November 1972, Stuart Gimbel, aided and 

abetted by Grow Investments, of which he was a partner, violated the speculative 

trading limits in shell egg futures contracts. It also charges that in 

connection with such trading Mr. Gimbel failed to file required reports and 

filed false reports. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when there has been a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. A determination is considered as having been made when a 

decision of the Administrative Law Judge becomes final or, after appeal, a 

decision is made by the Judicial Officer of the Department. Complaints are 

filed in the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and 

are a matter of public record. Pending disposition of a complaint, it is the 

policy of the CEA not to comment or elaborate on charges contained therein or to 

discuss evidence on which it is based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before the Administrative Law 

Judge in Chicago, Illinois, at a date and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as 
amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) 
and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of 
Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
License
  No.                            Name/address                                        Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  4619N  Amad Corporation d/b/a Amad Forwarding Corporation, 3550     November 8, 2000.
          N.W. 33rd Street, Miami, FL 33142.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Complaints and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 01-1513 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgemont Mining Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  December 11, 2007





/s/ Dean Rogers

Dean Rogers, President and C.E.O.

(Principal Executive Officer)
# FCM Data December 2009
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 144 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 

the One Hundred Eleventh Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2009 

Mr. CONYERS (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Texas) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

the Judiciary in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary 

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $19,052,900 for the One Hundred Eleventh 

9 Congress. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 144 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $9,336,600 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2009, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2010; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,716,300 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2010, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2011. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1573 

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit bills and 

joint resolutions from containing more than one subject. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2010 

Mr. POLIS of Colorado (for himself and Mr. LAMBORN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

prohibit bills and joint resolutions from containing more 

than one subject. 

1 Resolved, That (a) rule XXI of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

3 following new clause— 

4 ‘‘11.(a) No bill, joint resolution, or amendment to any 

5 bill or joint resolution that contains more than a single 

6 subject may be received or considered in the House. A 

7 question of order on the number of subjects in any such 

8 bill, joint resolution, or amendment thereto, may be raised 

9 at any time. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1573 IH 

1 ‘‘(b) The single subject of any bill or joint resolution 

2 shall be expressed in the title. 

3 ‘‘(c) Paragraphs (a) and (b) do not apply to a bill, 

4 joint resolution, or amendment thereto that complies, con5 solidates, revises, or rearranges the statutory law.’’. 

6 (b) The amendment made by this resolution shall 

7 take effect immediately before noon, January 3, 2011. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS