alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 6

SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

In
connection with the annual report of Shaw Communications Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Brad Shaw, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated at Calgary, Alberta, Canada, this 29thday of November 2012.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Brad Shaw           
|Brad Shaw               
|Chief Executive Officer 
|Shaw Communications Inc.



---

SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

In connection with the annual report of Shaw Communications Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending August 31,
2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve Wilson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated at Calgary, Alberta, Canada, this 29thday of November 2012.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steve Wilson                                 
|Steve Wilson                                     
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Shaw Communications Inc.
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5TH CIR.R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 03-10996

 Summary Calendar

____________

CECIL RAY PATTERSON,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; JOHN

ASHCROFT,

 Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:01-CV-135

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cecil Ray Patterson, Texas state prisoner # 779579, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. §

2241 petition for habeas corpus. Patterson was convicted of both the Texas state charge of

attempted capital murder and the federal charge of felon in possession of a firearm. Patterson argues
2

that the district court erred in finding that the rule against piecemeal incarceration did not prevent his

transfer from federal to state custody before he fully served his federal sentence.

We review the district court’s findings for clear error and its rulings of law de novo. See

Moody v. Johnson, 139 F.3d 477, 480 (5th Cir.1998).

The district court correctlyconcluded that Patterson’stransferto state custodydid not violate

the rule against piecemeal incarceration because the transfer did not result in the lengthening of his

sentence. See Free v. Miles, 333 F.3d 550, 552 (5th Cir. 2003). 

Patterson failed to argue and has therefore abandoned an appeal of the district court’s

determination that it lacked jurisdiction over any § 2255 claimsthat he was attempting to assert. See

Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

Further, Pattersonhasfiled four previousfederalhabeas petitions challenging histransferfrom

federal to state custody. He filed two previous § 2241, one previous § 2254, and one previous §

2255 petition. This is therefore Patterson’s fifth attempt to challenge his transfer. Because this

appeal is a “duplicative action arising from the same series of events and alleging many of the same

facts as an earlier suit” the appeal is DISMISSED as FRIVOLOUS. See Bailey v. Johnson, 846 F.2d

1019, 1021 (5thCir. 1988); Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 512, 219-20 (5thCir. 1983); 5THCIR.R. 42.2.

Patterson is WARNED that any future filings to this court or any court subject to the

jurisdiction of this court that challenge histransfer from federal to state custody will invite sanctions,

which may include monetary fines and/or restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in federal court.

DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
#### Jaswinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-73626.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 4, 2012.

Jaswinder Singh, Elk Grove, CA, pro se.

Craig Alan Newell, Jr., Esquire, Trial, OIL, James Arthur Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jaswinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act, *Shrestha v. Holder,*590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2010), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on Singh’s admission that he filed a false Canadian asylum application, *see Singh v. Holder,*638 F.3d 1264, 1272 (9th Cir.2011) (“[L]ies and fraudulent documents when they are no longer necessary for the immediate escape from persecution do support an adverse inference.”), and multiple unexplained inconsistencies in the record regarding significant aspects of his claim, including his wife’s beating by police, his father’s 2006 arrest, and the number of times police raided his home between June and August 1988, *see Shrestha,*590 F.3d at 1045-48 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the REAL ID Act’s “totality of the circum*613stances”). We lack jurisdiction to consider Singh’s new challenges to the IJ’s adverse credibility determination, because he failed to raise these before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the BIA). In the absence of credible testimony, Singh’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Finally, because Singh s CAT claim is based on the same testimony found to be not credible, and he points to no other evidence that shows it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to India, his CAT claim also fails. *See id.*at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         104,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,047,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,047,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,047,599
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,581
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,796)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,796)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,796)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
{"agency":"CFTC","generated":"2016-10-19 14:41:31","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"}],"value":"2016"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"7"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CFTC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["26"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["66"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["16"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2016","quarter":"Q4"}
**Fidelity® Select Portfolios®**

Industrials Sector

**Fund**/Ticker

**Defense and Aerospace Portfolio**/FSDAX

**Summary Prospectus**

**April 29, 2011**

**As Revised February 2, 2012**
Exhibit 32.1

                             CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                              (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Conversion Services International,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), Scott Newman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Scott Newman
-----------------------------
Scott Newman
Chief Executive Officer
April 12, 2005

<PAGE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: LEE B. STERN 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 92 

DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1965 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Lee B. Stern 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 92 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Lee B. Stern has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued and 

the said Lee B. Stern is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into a 

stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of 

Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said 

Lee B. Stern stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) Lee B. Stern an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was on August 13, 1965, a registered floor 

broker under the Commodity Exchange Act and a member of the Board of Trade of 

the City of Chicago, a duly designated contract market under the Commodity 

Exchange Act. 

(2) On August 13, 1965, Lee B. Stern executed 163 transactions in regulated 

commodity futures on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. However, with 

respect to 158 of such transactions, in each instance he failed to prepare a 

trading card or other record 

clearly identifying the opposite floor broker or other trader with whom such 

transaction was executed. 

The Secretary of Agriculture has advised Lee B. Stern that his failure to 

keep full and complete records of futures transactions, as described above, was 

in violation of section 4g of the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.35 of the 

regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said Lee B. Stern agrees to desist from such acts and practices in the 

future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation shall be 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 

8 day of October 1965 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Witnessed by: 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 
Page 2 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Benigno CAVAZOS-QUINTANILLA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-40035

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Benigno Cavazos-Quintanilla, Eden, TX, pro se.

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Benigno Cavazos-Quintanilla has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cavazos-Quintanilla has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8017

KEITH BARILE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. K. YOUNG; JON MASELLA, on site monitor, Wallens Ridge State Prison; H. JORDAN, R.D.A., Wallens Ridge State Prison, Defendants - Appellees, andRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; JACK TOKARZ, Deputy Commander, Department of Corrections, Defendants.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-706) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Keith Barile, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; David Ernest Boelzner, Heather Marie Kofron, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia; Joseph Patrick Callahan, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Keith Barile appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 2001). Because Appellant did notdemonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the court’s dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Fidelity**®

Equity-Income

**Fund**

**Annual Report**

**January 31, 2003**

**(2_fidelity_logos) (Registered_Trademark)**

Contents
EXHIBIT31.2

Certification

I, Andrew Sauter, certify that:

*1.*I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K/A of Avigen, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.

|April 29,
      2009 |                                                    | /s/ Andrew
      Sauter | 
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------- | 
|                     | Andrew Sauter                                     
|                     | Chief
      Executive Officer, President and Chief
|                     | Financial
      Officer                           
|                     | (Principal
      Financial Officer)               

---
Exhibit (j)(1)

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Prospectuses and Statements ofAdditional Information in Post-Effective Amendment No. 134 to the Registration Statementon Form N-1A of Fidelity Investment Trust: Fidelity Canada Fund, Fidelity China RegionFund, Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund, Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund, Fidelity Europe Fund,Fidelity Japan Fund, Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund, Fidelity Latin America Fund,Fidelity Nordic Fund and Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund, of our report dated December 18,2012; Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund, Fidelity Overseas, Fidelity International Discovery Fund and Fidelity International Growth Fund of our report dated December 14, 2012;Fidelity Series International Growth Fund of our report dated December 18, 2012; FidelityEmerging Markets Discovery Fund and Fidelity Total Emerging Markets Fund of our reportdated December 17, 2012, on the financial statements and financial highlights included in theOctober 31, 2012 Annual Reports to Shareholders of the above referenced funds which isalso incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement.

We further consent to the references to our Firm under the headings "Financial Highlights" inthe Prospectuses and "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statements ofAdditional Information.