alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: GEORGE S. CASHMAN 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 61 

DATE: AUGUST 15, 1962 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: George S. Cashman 

Stipulation of Compliance under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 61 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that George S. Cashman has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the order of the Commodity Exchange Commission establishing limits on position 

and daily trading in rye for future delivery. (17 CFR 150.3) 

No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued, and the said 

George S. Cashman is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into a 

stipulation of compliance, as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the rules of 

practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR 0.0-0.28). Therefore, the 

said George S. Cashman stipulates the following facts are true: 

1. George S. Cashman, an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago 4, Illinois, is now and was at all times mentioned herein a 

registered floor broker under the Commodity Exchange Act and a member of the 

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. 

2. The transactions herein described were entered into by George S. Cashman 

on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, a duly designated contract market 

under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

3. On July 18, 1962, George S. Cashman made the following speculative 

purchases of rye futures: 

Future Bushels 

July 1962 59,000

September 1962 379,000

December 1962 170,000

March 1963 35,000

May 1963 3,000

Total 646,000

The purchases of rye futures by the said George S. Cashman on July 18, 1962, 

were in excess of the maximum amount of such purchases permitted by the order of 

the Commodity Exchange Commission establishing limits on positions and daily 

trading in rye for future delivery, and therefore such trading was in violation 

of such order and of section 4a of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 6a, 17 

CFR 150.3). Previous transactions by the said George S. Cashman in excess of 

such limits were called to his attention by the Act Administrator in a letter 

dated April 12, 1962. 

The said George S. Cashman agrees to desist from such acts in the future. He 

further understands and agrees that this stipulation is admissible as evidence 

of such acts in any future proceeding based upon acts or practices in addition 

to those referred to herein which may be brought by the Secretary of Agriculture 

against him under the 
Page 2 

provisions of the said act. He also understands that it is the practice of the 

Commodity Exchange Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of 

public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of August 1962. 

/s/ George S. Cashman 

George S. Cashman 

Witnessed by: 

/s/ Robert M. Ollquist 

/s/ Samuel F. Gordon 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
Exhibit 31.2
       a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
 b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ PETER WHITFIELDPeter WhitfieldInterim Chief Financial Officer
Order entered July 7, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00195
- CR
VINCENT BERNARD JENK INS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11
- 53064
- V



### O RDER The reporter’s record and the original plea agreement in this case reflect appellant pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs. On June 3, 2014, this Court ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file a supplementa l record that contained the State’s notice to enhance the punishment range. The District Clerk filed a supplemental record that contained the plea agreement to the probation revocation, but not the notice of intent to enhance punishment.
We ORDER the tria l court to make findings of fact regarding whether the record can be supplemented with the State’s notice to seek enhancement on punishment. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this order.The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplem ental record is received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Frank J. Bilban, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Encore WireCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have;
 a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
22

 

 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 7, 2004     /s/ FRANK J. BILBAN   Frank J. Bilban *Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial* *Officer, Treasurer and Secretary*
23
#### In re Mary K. HAYS.

No. 2006-1311.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 19, 2006.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 16, 2007.

Before RADER, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and MOORE, Circuit Judge.

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Mary K. Hays appeals the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferenees (“the Board”). The Board affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12-14, 16, and 18-20 in U.S. Patent Application No. 10/190,039 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 4,475,676. *Ex parte Hays,*No. 06-0173 (Dec. 22, 2005). Because the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office has conceded that the Board’s decision is in error with respect to the anticipation rejection, we *vacate*and *remand. See In re Gould,*673 F.2d 1385, 1387 (C.C.P.A.1982) (granting a motion for remand where “the Commissioner has informed us, through the solicitor that the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) will enter a new rejection of the sole claim on appeal.. .whenever it regains jurisdiction over the subject application”).
EXHIBIT 32.2

  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section
   1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, I, Robert W. Raiford, hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ENGlobal
Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of ENGlobal Corporation.


Date:  March 16, 2009                           //s// Robert W. Raiford
                                                Robert W. Raiford
                                                Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
----

----

I Kötelezően közzéteendő jogi aktusok

Tanács

----

A TANÁCS 1241/2004/EK RENDELETE

(2004. július 5.)

az egyes ipari, mezőgazdasági és halászati termékek tekintetében a közös vámtarifában rögzített autonóm vámtételek ideiglenes felfüggesztéséről szóló 1255/96/EK tanácsi rendelet módosításáról

AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ TANÁCSA,

tekintettel az Európai Közösséget létrehozó szerződésre és különösen annak 26. cikkére,

tekintettel a Bizottság javaslatára,

mivel:

ELFOGADTA EZT A RENDELETET:

1. cikk

Az 1255/96/EK rendelet melléklete a következőképpen módosul:

2. cikk

E rendelet az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapjában való kihirdetését követő harmadik napon lép hatályba.

Ezt a rendeletet 2004. július 1-jétől kell alkalmazni.

E rendelet teljes egészében kötelező és közvetlenül alkalmazandó valamennyi tagállamban.

Kelt Brüsszelben, 2004. július 5-én.

a Tanács részéről

az elnök

G. ZALM

----

(1)HL L 158., 1996.6.29., 1. o. A legutóbb a 2285/2003/EK rendelettel (HL L 341., 2003.12.30., 1. o.) módosított rendelet.

----

I. MELLÉKLET

----

(1)  E különleges célú felhasználás ellenőrzésének végrehajtása a vonatkozó közösségi rendelkezéseknek megfelelően történik.

----

II. MELLÉKLET

----
Exhibit 31.1

**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, P. Douglas Richard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Community Financial Corporation (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the consolidated
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent of evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: November 12, 2007

/s/ P. Douglas Richard
P. Douglas Richard
President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 136 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 136

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture in 
                   the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2009

Mr. Peterson submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture in 
                   the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture (hereafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the expenses of 
all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 
of the House of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $13,104,587 for the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $6,316,330 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2009, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2010; and
            (2) not more than $6,788,257 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2010, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2011.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 987 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 987

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 601 8th Street in Freedom, Pennsylvania, as the ``John Scott 
                      Challis, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN SCOTT CHALLIS, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 601 8th Street in Freedom, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 
designated as the ``John Scott Challis, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Scott 
Challis, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                                 TOY BIZ, INC.
                               685 Third Avenue
                              New York, NY  10017



August 27, 1997


Mr. William H. Hardie, III
c/o Fleer/Sky Box International, Inc.
1120 Rt. 73, Suite 300
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

Dear Tuck:

It is with great pleasure that I extend our offer to you to join Toy Biz as 
Executive Vice President, Business Affairs. 


     The following confirms our offer with regard to your employment.

     STARTING DATE:    Effective September 1, 1997 or as soon thereafter as
                       practicable.

     TITLE:            Executive Vice President, Business Affairs.

     SALARY:           $250,000 per year.  Your performance will be reviewed
                       annually for merit raise consideration.

     BONUS:            You will be guaranteed a bonus of $25,000 per year.  You
                       will remain eligible to participate in the bonus program
                       established for all Toy Biz senior executive officers.

     RELOCATION        You will be provided with customary relocation benefits
     ASSISTANCE:       under the Company's standard policies.

     BENEFITS:         You will participate in all benefit programs available to
                       Toy Biz employees, a copy of such present programs will
                       be provided to you.

     VACATION:         You will receive three (3) weeks paid vacation annually.

     STOCK OPTIONS:    You will receive an award of shares in an amount to be
                       agreed, in accordance with existing Company policies.
<PAGE>
 
WILLIAM H. HARDIE, III                                          August 27, 1997

     TERM:             This agreement will be for a period of three (3) years.
                       The Company retains the right to terminate this agreement
                       in the case of your gross negligence, willful misconduct
                       or acts of moral turpitude.

     CAR:              You will be entitled to a car allowance of $700 per
                       month.

     SEVERANCE:        The company may terminate employment under this contract
                       at any time. If the contract is terminated, the employee
                       will be entitled to twelve (12) months of salary
                       continuation.

          If this letter accurately summarizes your understanding of our
agreement, please so signify by executing and returning a copy of this letter to
me whereupon it will become a binding agreement among you and the Company.


                                    Very truly yours,

                                    /s/ Joseph M. Ahearn

                                    Joseph M. Ahearn
                                    President and
                                    Chief Executive Officer

Agreed and accepted:

/s/ William H. Hardie, III

H. William Hardie, III

Date:

                                      -2-
DENY and Opinion Filed March 28, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00055-CV 

IN RE ERNESTO CASTILLO, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-17721 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel 

Opinion by Justice Miskel 

In his January 19, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator asks us to vacate 

the trial court’s contempt order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief generally requires relator to demonstrate that the 

trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate remedy by 

appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). 

After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator 

has failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

230055F.P05 

/Emily Miskel/

EMILY MISKEL 

JUSTICE