alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2013051EN.01016801.xml

| 22.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 51/168 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 51/168

---

Tuesday 13 September 2011EU-Norway Agreement concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products ***

P7_TA(2011)0353

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 September 2011 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products reached on the basis of Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (14206/2010– C7-0101/2011 – 2010/0243(NLE))

2013/C 51 E/38

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (14206/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (14206/2010),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products reached on the basis of Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (14372/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products reached on the basis of Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (14372/2010),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0101/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0101/2011),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A7-0276/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A7-0276/2011),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Kingdom of Norway. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Kingdom of Norway.

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Vyrex Corporation on Forms S-3(File No. 334-40665) and S-8 (File No. 333-50571) of our report, which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Corporation’s ability to continue as a going concern, dated March 10, 2003 on the financial statements of Vyrex Corporationas of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for the period from January 2, 1991 (date of inception) to December 31, 2002, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. 

 

J.H. COHN LLP 

 

San Diego, California 

March 10, 2003
No. 121.

#### Keithley *v.*Gross et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Edward E. Gann*for petitioner.

No appearance for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Department of the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles, California, denied.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to Section 4 of the Field Office 
Technical Guide

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Field Office 
Technical Guide. NRCS is also seeking review and comments to the 
proposed changes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for 
Washington State, that changes must be made in the Field Office 
Technical Guide specifically for the following practice standards:

<bullet> Nutrient Management, practice code number 590
<bullet> Waste Utilization, practice code number 633
<bullet> Interim standard; Grass Buffer Strips, practice code number 
741

    Proposed changes are to include new and improved technology.

DATES: Comments will be received for a period of 30 days following the 
publication date of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leonard Jordan, State Conservationist, 
Natural Resources Conservation Service, 316 West Boone Avenue, Suite 
450, Spokane, WA, 99201-2348; phone (509) 323-2900; or FAX (509) 323-
2909.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you would like to review any of the 
practice standards mentioned, contact Leonard Jordan at the above 
address or phone number to receive a copy of the draft standards.
    For the next 30 days the NRCS will receive comments relative to the 
proposed changes.
    Following that period a determination will be made by the NRCS 
regarding disposition of those comments and a final determination of 
change will be made to the subject standards.

    Dated: May 7, 2001.
Leonard Jordan,
State Conservationist, Washington.
[FR Doc. 01-14837 Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
No. 446.

#### Choctaw Nation *v.*United States.

November 25, 1935.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the *644Court of Claims denied.

*Messrs. W. F. Semple, B. M. Rainey,*and *Streeter B. Flynn*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Blair,*and *Messrs. George T. Stormont*and *Charles H. Small*for the United States.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: FILOR BULLARD & SMYTH 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 5 

DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1945 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re Filor Bullard & Smyth 

39 Broadway 

New York 6, New York 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 5 

WHEREAS, the Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Filor 

Bullard & Smyth has violated the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and the 

rules and regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder; 

and WHEREAS, no complaint has been filed with respect to [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] 

violation and said Filor Bullard & Smyth desires to enter into a stipulation 

pursuant to the provisions of Sections 0.6 (a) of the rules of practice under 

the Commodity Exchange Act: Now, therefore, the said Filor Bullard & Smyth 

admits that the following facts are true: 

(1) That at all times hereinafter mentioned Filor Bullard & Smyth was a 

partnership engaged in the security brokerage business and on October 17, 1945, 

was composed of the following partners: David W. Smyth, Howard F. Fischer, 

Joseph J. Mulcahy, Samuel W. West and Louie J. Puglies; 

(2) That prior to November 6, 1945, Filor Bullard & Smyth was not registered 

as futures commission merchant under the provisions of the Commodity Exchange 

Act, as amended; 

(3) That on November 5, 1946, Filor Bullard & Smyth filed its application for 

registration as futures commission merchant under the Commodity Exchange Act, as 

amended, and that such registration was affected as of November 6, 1945; 

(4) That on various dates [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] 

(5) That sum of money aggregating as much as $ 20,000 received to [ILLEGIBLE 

TEXT] 

(6) That the commissions charged [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] 

(7) That the commodity futures transactions above referred to wars executed 

for Wool Novelty Company and David [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] as an accommodation in 

consideration of business in securities which Wool Novelty Company and David 

[ILLEGIBLE TEXT] transacted through Filor Bullard & Smyth and on which Filor 

Bullard & Smyth was paid normal brokerage commission. 

In addition to admitting the foregoing facts, Filor Bullard & Smyth agrees to 

discontinue all acts practices which are in violation of the Commodity Exchange 

Act, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and 

further agrees that this stipulation shall be admissible [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] 

evidence of note and practices in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act, as 

amended, and 
Page 2 

the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, in any subsequent proceeding 

brought against it in the enforcement of the provisions of the said act and 

regulations. 

Done at New York, New York, this 10th day of November 1945. 

Filor Bullard & Smyth 

By 

/s/ David W. Smyth 

David W. Smyth 

/s/ Howard F. Fischer 

Howard F. Fischer 

/s/ Joseph J. Mulcahy 

Joseph J. Mulcahy 

/s/ Samuel W. West 

Samuel W. West 

/s/ Louis J. Puglies 

Louis J. Puglies 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JAMES E. BAGGOT, JR., DONALD W. MORRISON, AND BAGGOT AND MORRISON 

DOCKET NUMBER: 93 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 93 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging the following respondents with violation of the 

Commodity Exchange Act: 

James E. Baggot, Jr., 

Donald W. Morrison, and 

Baggot and Morrison 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges the respondents with improper handling of customers' 

funds, alleging that they failed to treat customers' funds as belonging to such 

customers, failed to segregate such funds as required by the act, and used the 

funds of certain customers to margin and guarantee the trades of other 

customers. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, June 23, 1960, in Chicago, Ill. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-92,045-01

EX PARTE JOHN HOLT CRAMBELL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1471924-A IN THE 184TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to twenty-eight years’

imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Crambell v. State, No. 01-17-

00331-CR (Tex. App. — Houston [1 Dist.] June 28, 2018) (not designated for publication). st

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

On February 19, 2020, the trial court entered an order designating issues. The district clerk

properly forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded before the trial court made findings of fact and

conclusions of law. We remand this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiary
investigation and make findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: December 16, 2020

Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2001-43]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption 
part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice 
contains a summary of certain petitions seeking relief from specified 
requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to improve the 
public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA's 
regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the 
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before July 4, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on any petition to the Docket Management 
System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket 
number FAA-2000-XXXX at the beginning of your comments. If you wish to 
receive confirmation that FAA received your comments, include a self-
addressed, stamped postcard.
    You may also submit comments through the Internet to http://dms.dot.gov. You may review the public docket containing the petition, 
any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the 
Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) 
is on the plaza level of the NASSIF Building at the Department of 
Transportation at the above address. Also, you may review public 
dockets on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Forest Rawls (202) 267-8033, Sandy 
Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267-7271, or Vanessa Wilkins (202) 267-8029, 
Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 8, 2001.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2000-8269.
    Petitioner: Helicopter Lift Services, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR Sec. 133.33(d)(1).
    Description of Relief Sought: To permit HLSI to develop, submit, 
and obtain FAA approval on behalf of part 133 operators in helicopter 
lift operations.
[FR Doc. 01-14910 Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: PAUL MAHLER 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 111 

DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1970 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATED DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Paul Mahler 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 111 

The Secertary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Paul Mahler violated 

the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and the 

regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). 

No complaint with respect to such violation has been issued and the said Paul 

Mahler is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into a stipulation of 

compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of Practice under the 

Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said Paul Mahler for 

the purposes of this stipulation of compliance and administrative proceedings 

under the Commodity Exchange Act and for such purposes only, stipulates the 

following facts are true: 

(1) Paul Mahler; an individual whose address is 6 Harrison Street, New York, 

New York 10013, is now and was on May 9, 1969, a registered floor broker under 

the Commodity Exchange Act and a member of the New York Mercantile Exchange. 

(2) The transactions herein described were in Maine potato futures on the New 

York Mercantile Exchange, a duly designated contract market under the Act. 

(3) On May 9, 1969, Paul Mahler, trading for his own account, made the 

following transactions in the May 1969 future: 

Purchases Sales 

No. of contracts Price No. of contracts Price

1 2.63 3 2.52 2 2.65 

16 2.40 16 2.50

Thereafter, with the knowledge and consent of Philip M. Smith, a then 

employee of Evans & Co., Inc., the said Paul Mahler allocated such executions to 

Evans & Co., Inc. 

The Commodity Exchange Authority has advised Paul Mahler that his action as 

described above was in violation of section 1.38 of the regulations under the 

Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said Paul Mahler agrees to desist from such acts in the future. He 

further understands and agrees that this stipulation is admissible as evidence 

of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based upon acts or practices 

in addition to those referred to herein which may be brought by the Secretary of 

Agriculture against him under the provisions of the said Act. He 
Page 2 

also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange Authority to 

issue press releases on stipulations of compliance and to make them a matter of 

public record. 

Done at New York City [ILLEGIBLE TEXT] this 

1 day of December 1970 

Witnessed by: 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
AMENDMENT TO "APPENDIX A" OF THE


ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN












THIS AMENDMENT to "Appendix A" of the Astec Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2008 (the "Plan"), is adopted by Astec Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), effective as of April 28, 2016.







WHEREAS, Article 2 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") to designate participants in the Plan from time to time, whose names and effective dates of participation shall be set forth on Exhibit A to the Plan;







NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends "Appendix A" of the Plan in the form attached hereto, to update the same for changes in Plan participation approved by the Board, by action taken on April 28, 2016.







Except as amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.







ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.







Date: April 28, 2016             By /s/ Stephen C. Anderson 


                    Name Stephen C. Anderson


Title Corporate Secretary
















 



"APPENDIX A"


Each Participant's Date of Participation




 



	
Name of Participant

	 	
Effective Dates of Participation


	
W. Norman Smith

	 	
January 1, 1995


	
Richard Patek

	 	
January 1, 1995


	
Jeff Elliott

	 	
January 1, 2002


	
Tim Gonigam

		
August 1, 2000


	
Richard Dorris

	 	
January 3, 2005


	
Ben Brock

	 	
January 1, 2007


	
Michael A. Bremmer

	 	
January 1, 2007


	
Stephen C. Anderson

	 	
January 1, 2003


	
Lawrence R. Cumming

	 	
January 1, 2008


	
Neil Peterson

	 	
January 1, 2008


	
David C. Silvious

	 	
July 1, 2005


	
Joe Cline

	 	
February 1, 2008


	
Chris Colwell

	 	
May 31, 2011


	
Robin Leffew

	 	
August 1, 2011


	
D. Aaron Harmon

	 	
November 1, 2011


	
Matthew B. Haven

	 	
January 1, 2013


	
Jeff May

	 	
October 1, 2013


	
Malcolm Swanson

	 	
January 1, 2014


	
Tom Wilkey

	 	
January 1, 2014


	
Jeff Schwarz

	 	
July 1, 2014


	
Steven L. Claude

	 	
August 24, 2015


	
John Irvine

	 	
April 28, 2016
# FCM Data September 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Notice is hereby given that on or about July 1, 2001, the Flight Standards District Office located at Scottsdale and Phoenix, Arizona will be divided into two independent offices—Scottsdale Flight Standards District Office and Phoenix Certificate Management Office. Services to the public will continue to be provided at the same locations with no interruption. This information will be reflected in the FAA Organization Statement the next time it is reissued. (Sec. 313(a), 72 Stat. 752; 49 U.S.C. 1354).

Issued in Los Angeles, CA, on May 25, 2001.

Lynore C. Brekke,

Acting Regional Administrator, Western-Pacific Region.

[FR Doc. 01-15172  Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Order entered February 16 , 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00488 - CR JOE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 380 th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380 - 80945 - 2022

O RDER Appellant’s fifth motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is before the Court. Appellant’s brief was originally due November 15, 202 2

. The motions detail appellant’s counsel’s illnesses, professional schedule, and even ballet rehearsal and performance periods. The Court observes that the fourth motion for extension and this motion were both requests for 15 days while the previous extensions were fo r 30 days . The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDER S the brief filed on or before MARCH 1, 2023

. Further extensions willnot be permitted. If the brief is not filed by March 1, 2023, the Court will abate the

case for the trial court to conduct a hearing an d determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed and whether counsel should be removed and new counsel appointed for appellant.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE