32782 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2001 / Proposed Rules

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as

follows:

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,

CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND

CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;

AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING

POINTS

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40210; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9H,

Airspace Designations and Reporting

Points, dated September 1, 2000, and

effective September 16, 2000, is

amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 General.

* * * * *

ANM WA D Bellingham, WA [Revised]

Bellingham International Airport

(Lat. 48°47′37′′N., long. 122°32′19′′W.)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface to and including 2,700 feet MSL

within a 4-mile radius of Bellingham

International Airport. This Class D airspace

is effective during specific dates and times

established in advance by a Notice to

Airmen. The effective date and time will

thereafter be continuously published in the

Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace consisting

of airspace extending upward from the

surface designated as an extension of Class

D airspace.

* * * * *

ANM WA E4 Bellingham, WA [Revised]

Bellingham International Airport

(Lat. 48°47′37′′N., long. 122°32′19′′W.)

Whatcom VORTAC

(Lat. 48°56′43′′N., long. 122°34′45′′W.)

That airspace extending upward from the

surface within the 1.8 miles each side of the

Whatcom VORTAC 169° radial extending

north from the 4-mile radius of the

Bellingham International Airport to 2.7 miles

south of the VORTAC. This Class E airspace

is effective during specific dates and times

established in advance by a Notice to

Airmen. The effective date and time will

thereafter be continuously published in the

Airport/Facility Directory.

* * * * *

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on May 25,

2001.

Dan A. Boyle,

Assistant Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Northwest Mountain Region.

[FR Doc. 01–15299 Filed 6–15–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG–107101–00]

RIN 1545–AY13

Treaty Guidance Regarding Payments

With Respect to Domestic Reverse

Hybrid Entities; Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),

Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public

hearing on proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This document provides

notice of cancellation of a public

hearing on proposed regulations relating

to payments with respect to domestic

reverse hybrid entities.

DATES: The public hearing originally

scheduled for Tuesday, June 26, 2001, at

10 a.m., is canceled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Guy

R. Traynor of the Regulations Unit,

Office of Special Counsel, (202) 622–

7180 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice

of proposed rulemaking and notice of

public hearing that appeared in the

Federal Register on Tuesday, February

27, 2001 (66 FR 12445), announced that

a public hearing was scheduled for June

26, 2001 at 10 a.m., in the auditorium

of the Internal Revenue Building, 1111

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,

DC. The subject of the public hearing is

proposed regulations under section 894

of the Internal Revenue Code. The

public comment period for these

regulations expired on May 29, 2001.

The notice of proposed rulemaking

and notice of public hearing, instructed

those interested in testifying at the

public hearing to submit a request to

speak and an outline of the topics to be

addressed by June 5, 2001. As of June

12, 2001, no one has requested to speak.

Therefore, the public hearing scheduled

for June 26, 2001, is canceled.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,

Chief, Regulations Unit, Office of Special

Counsel (Modernization & Strategic

Planning).

[FR Doc. 01–15173 Filed 6–15–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[SIP NO. MT–001–0030b; FRL–6985–9]

Clean Air Act Approval and

Promulgation of Air Quality

Implementation Plan; Montana; East

Helena Lead State Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to take

action to approve a State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision

submitted by the State of Montana for

the purpose of making minor

modifications to the control strategy for

the Asarco Lead smelter in the East

Helena Lead SIP. In the ‘‘Rules and

Regulations’’ section of this Federal

Register, EPA is approving the State’s

SIP revision as a direct final rule

without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

SIP revision and anticipates no adverse

comments. A detailed rationale for the

approval is set forth in the preamble to

the direct final rule. If EPA receives no

adverse comments, EPA will not take

further action on this proposed rule. If

EPA receives adverse comments, EPA

will withdraw the direct final rule and

it will not take effect. EPA will address

all public comments in a subsequent

final rule based on this proposed rule.

EPA will not institute a second

comment period on this action. Any

parties interested in commenting must

do so at this time. Please note that if

EPA receives adverse comment on an

amendment, paragraph, or section of

this rule and if that provision may be

severed from the remainder of the rule,

EPA may adopt as final those provisions

of the rule that are not the subject of an

adverse comment.

DATES: Comments must be received in

writing on or before July 18, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be

mailed to Richard R. Long, Director, Air

and Radiation Program, Mailcode 8P–

AR, Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA), Region VIII, 999 18th Street,

Suite 300, Denver, Colorado, 80202.

Copies of the documents relevant to this

action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the Air and Radiation Program,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 300,

Denver, Colorado, 80202. Copies of the

State documents relevant to this action

are available for public inspection at the

Montana Department of Environmental

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2001 / Proposed Rules 32783

Quality, Air and Waste Management

Bureau, 1520 E. 6th Avenue, Helena,

Montana 59620.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kerri Fiedler, EPA, Region VIII, (303)

312–6493 or Laurie Ostrand, EPA,

Region VIII, (303) 312–6437.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the

information provided in the Direct Final

action of the same title which is located

in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section

of this Federal Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Dated: May 16, 2001.

Jack W. McGraw,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region VIII.

[FR Doc. 01–15144 Filed 6–15–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[AZ 063–0024; FRL–6998–4]

Revisions to the Arizona State

Implementation Plan, Pinal County Air

Quality Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing a

simultaneous limited approval and

limited disapproval of revisions to the

Pinal County Air Quality Control

District (PCAQCD) portion of the

Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP)

concerning particulate matter (PM–10)

emissions from visible emissions, from

open burning, and from industrial

processes, and concerning carbon

monoxide (CO) emissions from

industrial processes.

We are also proposing full approval of

revisions to the PCAQCD portion of the

Arizona State SIP concerning PM–10

emissions from visible emissions and

from open burning.

We are proposing action on local rules

that regulate these emission sources

under the Clean Air Act as amended in

1990 (CAA or the Act). We are taking

comments on this proposal and plan to

follow with a final action.

DATES: Any comments must arrive by

July 18, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andrew

Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR–

4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA

94105.

You can inspect copies of the

submitted rule revisions and EPA’s

technical support documents (TSDs) at

our Region IX office during normal

business hours. You may also see copies

of the submitted rule revisions at the

following locations:

Environmental Protection Agency, Air

Docket (6102), Ariel Rios Building,

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20460

Arizona Department of Environmental

Quality, 3033 North Central Avenue,

Phoenix, AZ 85012

Pinal County Air Quality Control

District, Building F, 31 North Pinal

Street (P. O. Box 987), Florence, AZ

85232

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al

Petersen, Rulemaking Office (AIR–4),

Air Division, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA

94105; (415)744–1135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State’s Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

C. What are the changes in the submitted

rules?

II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation

criteria?

C. What are the rule deficiencies?

D. EPA recommendations to further

improve the rules

E. Proposed action and public comment

III. Background information

A. Why were these rules submitted?

IV. Administrative Requirements

I. The State’s Submittal

A. What Rules Did the State Submit?

Table 1 lists the rules proposed for

limited approval and limited

disapproval with the dates that they

were adopted by the local air agency

and submitted by the Arizona

Department of Environmental Quality

(ADEQ).

TABLE 1.—SUBMITTED RULES

Local agency Rule # Rule title Adopted Submitted

PCAQCD ................. 2–8–300 Performance Standards [Visible Emissions] ........................................................ 06/29/93 11/27/95

PCAQCD ................. 3–8–700 General Provisions [Open Burning] ..................................................................... 02/22/95 11/27/95

PCAQCD ................. 5–24–1032 Federally Enforceable Minimum Standard of Performance—Process Particulate Emissions.02/22/95 11/27/95

PCAQCD ................. 5–24–1040 Carbon Monoxide Emissions—Industrial Processes ........................................... 02/22/95 11/27/95

On February 2, 1996, we determined

that the rule submittals in Table 1 met

the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part

51 appendix V, which must be met

before formal EPA review.

Table 2 lists the rules proposed for

full approval with the dates that they

were adopted by the local air agency

and submitted by the Arizona

Department of Environmental Quality

(ADEQ).

TABLE 2.—SUBMITTED RULES

Local agency Rule # Rule title Adopted Submitted

PCAQCD .................. 2–8–280 General [Visible Emissions] .................................................................................. 06/29/93 11/27/95

PCAQCD .................. 2–8–290 Definitions [Visible Emissions] .............................................................................. 06/29/93 11/27/95

PCAQCD .................. 2–8–310 Exemptions [Visible Emissions] ............................................................................ 06/29/93 11/27/95

PCAQCD .................. 2–8–320 Monitoring and Records [Visible Emissions] ......................................................... 06/29/93 11/27/95

PCAQCD .................. 3–8–710 Permit Provisions and Administration [Open Burning] .......................................... 02/22/95 11/27/95