alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 13 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 6, 2009.
    Resolved, That pursuant to the Legislative Pay Act of 1929, as amended, the 
six minority employees authorized therein shall be the following named persons, 
effective January 3, 2009, until otherwise ordered by the House, to-wit: Neil 
Bradley, Brian Gaston, Melanie Looney, Danielle Maurer, Nick Shaper, and Russ 
Vought, each to receive gross compensation pursuant to the provisions of House 
Resolution 119, Ninety-fifth Congress, as enacted into permanent law by section 
115 of Public Law 95-94. In addition, the Minority Leader may appoint and set 
the annual rate of pay for up to 3 further minority employees.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel Biomedical Research Technology.                    

*Date:*                         June 29, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 PM to Adjournment.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sybil A. Wellstood, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, One Rockledge Centre, Room 6018, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, (301) 435-0814, wellstoods@ncrr.nih.gov.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 93.371, Biomedical Technology 93.389, Research Infrastructure, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 1, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-14780  Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 6

SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

In connection
with the annual report of Shaw Communications Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Brad Shaw, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated at Calgary, Alberta, Canada, this 28thday of November 2017.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Brad Shaw           
|Brad Shaw               
|Chief Executive Officer 
|Shaw Communications Inc.



---

SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

In connection with the annual report of Shaw Communications Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the
fiscal year ending August 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vito Culmone, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated at Calgary, Alberta, Canada, this 28thday of November 2017.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Vito Culmone                                  
|Vito Culmone                                      
|Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|Shaw Communications Inc.
```

[Federal Register: July 21, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 139)]
[Notices]
[Page 39074]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21jy98-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND PLACE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, August 17, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-19530 Filed 7-17-98; 3:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PowerVerde, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George Konrad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George Konrad      
|George Konrad          
|Chief Executive Officer
|April 15, 2009
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1453 

Celebrating the 29th Congressional Art Competition and commending the 

winners of the Competition on achieving a high level of artistic scholastic 

aptitude. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2010 

Mr. DRIEHAUS (for himself and Mr. CHAFFETZ) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the 29th Congressional Art Competition and 

commending the winners of the Competition on achieving 

a high level of artistic scholastic aptitude. 

Whereas the Congressional Art Competition was initiated by 

Members of the House of Representatives in 1982, led by 

Congressman Jim Jeffords of Vermont and Congressman 

Fred Richmond of New York; 

Whereas the 29th Congressional Art Competition was hosted 

in 2010 by Congressman Steve Driehaus of Ohio and 

Congressman Jason Chaffetz of Utah; 

Whereas the Competition is a nationwide annual art competition that allows high school students from all 50 States, 

the District of Columbia, and United States territories to 

showcase their artistic ability; 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1453 IH 

Whereas over 400 offices participated in this year’s Competition, making it the preeminent and most popular artistic 

event of the second session of this Congress; 

Whereas the winning entries submitted from each district’s 

office are evaluated by an esteemed panel of artistic experts; 

Whereas the reception for this year’s Competition reception 

was held on June 17, 2010; 

Whereas the student winners from each district were invited 

to Washington, DC, and the United States Capitol to celebrate their artistic achievements and participate in the 

opening of the 2010 Congressional Art Competition exhibit; 

Whereas as part of the 2010 Congressional Art Competition 

reception, Tamara Harkavy, the Director of Artworks 

Cincinnati, and Robert Marshall, professional artist and 

former Professor of Art at Brigham Young University, 

led workshops for the student winners on the exceptional 

benefits of art; and 

Whereas the winning artwork from each district will be displayed proudly for a year in a tunnel leading to the 

United States Capitol, serving as a welcome to all those 

who come to Washington, DC, and visit the Capitol, the 

center of government and our Nation: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) celebrates the 29th anniversary of the Con3 gressional Art Competition; and 

4 (2) commends the winners of the Competition 

5 on achieving a high level of artistic scholastic aptiVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:56 Jun 17, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1453.IH HR1453

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1453 IH 

1 tude in their respective Congressional District com2 petitions. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 1

- 0 0 258

- C R

Style: Jeremy Thomas v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : October 2 9 , 201 4

Type of motion: Second and Final Motion f o r E xten sion for 14 Days

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’ s Brief

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: September 11 , 201 4

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: October 29 , 2014

Date Requested: November 1 2

, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: November 1 2 , 2014

 No further extensions of time will be granted

.

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

On October 1 , 2014, the Clerk of this Court granted appellan t ’s first motion for

extension of time to file appellant’s brief with no further extensions to be granted.

Because this case was recently reinstated on August 12, 2014, and appellant states

that this is her final motion and only seeks 14 days, this motion is granted.

Accordingly, the motion is granted with no further extensions, but we inform

counsel that if appellant’s brief i s not filed by November 12, 2014 , we will abate

this case for a hearing under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2).

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Panel consists of

_______________________________________ _____

Date: November 4, 2014
#### In re DAREVSKI.

(District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

June 24, 1909.)

No. 2,739.

Bankruptcy (§ 408*) — Discharge—Grounds por Refusal — Obtaining Property by False Statements.

Where it is clearly shown that a bankrupt obtained goods on credit by means of a statement in writing made for the purpose, and which contained one or more material statements which were false, and known by him to be so, it is the plain duty of the court to refuse him a discharge, under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, §• 14b (3), 30 Stat. 550 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3427) as amended by Act Feb. 5, 1903, c. 487, § 4, 32 Stat. 797 (ü. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 1026).

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. §§ 732-734; Dec. Dig. § 408.*]

In Bankruptcy. On application for discharge.

Jacob Weinstein and Samuel W. Salus, for bankrupt.

George Wentworth Carr, for objecting creditors.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The report of the special referee (Theodore M. Etting, Esq.) shows satisfactorily that the bankrupt obtained goods on credit from one of the objectors by means of a statement in writing made for such purpose, that the creditor relied upon the correctness of the items in such statement, that several of these items were materially false, and that the bankrupt knew of their falsity when he made the statement. This satisfies the most exacting construction of section 14, cl. b (3), of the bankruptcy act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 550 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3427], as amended by Act Feb. 5, 1903, c. 487, § 4, 32 Stat. 797 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 1026]), and requires the court to refuse the discharge. It is sufficient if one of the statements is shown to be materially false, and of this fact there is no reasonable doubt. Indeed, the referee has found that four of the items were false, and I must not be understood as disagreeing with his conclusions in this respect, although I see no need to pass upon the correctness of his report, except as to two of the items, namely, the value of the stock and the amount of the annual sales. Both these items were materially false, and their falsity fully justified the referee in sustaining the objections.

His recommendation is therefore approved, and the clerk is directed to enter an order that the discharge is refused.
**Exhibit 32**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned, M. Dendy Young, Chairman and Chief Executive Officerof GTSI Corp. (“the Company”) and Thomas A. Mutryn, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 0f 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that

 

1.               The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,2005 (“the Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:                    August 8,2005

 

 
| /s/    | M. DENDY YOUNG                       |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | M. Dendy Young                       |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 
| /s/    | THOMAS A. MUTRYN                                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas A. Mutryn                                  |
|   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2456 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2456

  To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq 
                          Resolution of 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2019

Ms. Lee of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq 
                          Resolution of 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST 
              IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002.

    The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 
of 2002 (Public Law 107-243; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohammad Ashraf MOHAMMAD-OMAR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-7068.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.

Mohammad Ashraf Mohammad-Omar, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leis-er, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*227PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Ashraf Mohammad-Omar seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying him leave to amend his previously denied 28 U.S.CA. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mohammad-Omar has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32802-32803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR01-15-000]


Green Canyon Pipe Line Company, L.P.; Notice of Rate Petition

June 12, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 21, 2001, Green Canyon Pipe Line Company, 
L.P. (GCP), formerly Sonat Intrastate-Alabama Inc. (SIA), filed a 
petition pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2) of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA) for 
approval of a maximum system-wide rate for transporting natural gas 
pursuant to Section 311(a)(2) of the NGPA on the former SIA system (SIA 
facilities).
    GCP proposed to retail its current maximum system-wide 
transportation rate of 29.4 cents per MMBtu for the SIA Facilities. GCP 
requests that the Commission approve this rate as fair and equitable 
and not in excess of an amount that is reasonably comparable to the 
rates that intrastate pipelines would be permitted to charge for 
providing similar service.
    Pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2)(ii), of the Commission's 
regulations, if the Commission does not act within 150 days of the date 
of the Petition's filing date, the rates proposed therein will be 
deemed to be fair and equitable and not in excess of an amount that 
interstate pipelines would be permitted to charge for similar services. 
The Commission may within such 150 day period extend the time for 
action or institute a proceeding in which all interested parties will 
be afforded an opportunity for written comments and the oral 
presentation of views, data and arguments.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All motions must 
be filed with the Secretary of the Commission on or before June 27, 
2001. This petition for rate approval is on file with the Commission 
and is available for public inspection. This filing may be viewed on 
the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.200(a)(1)(iii) and the instruction on the Commission's web

[[Page 32803]]

site at http://www.ferc.fed.us.efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-15236 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M