alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1275/2004

of 12 July 2004         

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2692/89 laying down detailed rules for exports of rice to Réunion as regards the correction to be made to the amount of the subsidy where there is a change in the intervention price for paddy rice at the end of the marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 4(2) and (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2692/89 are hereby replaced by the following:

‘2.   Where the validity of the subsidy document referred to in Article 13 extends beyond the end of the marketing year and where export takes place during the following marketing year, the amount of the subsidy resulting from the procedure provided for in Article 9 shall be adjusted where necessary by subtracting the difference between the intervention price for paddy rice in the previous and the new marketing year, exclusive of any monthly increase.

3.   The adjustment provided for in paragraph 2 shall take account of the conversion rates specified in Article 1 of Regulation No 467/67/EEC. If the amount of the subsidy resulting from this adjustment is below zero, that amount shall be raised to zero.’

Article 2

In Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1878/2003 the date ‘17 June’ is replaced by ‘29 July’.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

(2)OJ L 261, 7.9.1989, p. 8. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1453/1999 (OJ L 167, 2.7.1999, p. 19).

(3)OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 23.

----
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: NEVIN F. HENCH 

DOCKET NUMBER: 230 

DATE: MARCH 4, 1975 

DOCUMENT TYPE: NOTICE OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Nevin F. Hench, Respondent 

CEA Docket No. 230 

Notice of Effective Date of Decision 

The attached Decision which was issued by Administrative Law Judge John G. 

Liebert on January 9, 1975, in this proceeding, has not been appealed to the 

Secretary within the allotted time. 

In accordance with the applicable rules of practice the Decision became final 

on March 3, 1975, and the cease and desist provisions thereof became effective 

on March 3, 1975. The provision and the prohibition of trading and denial of 

trading privileges will become effective on March 23, 1975. 

Dated: March 4, 1975 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Eugene R. Meyer 

Hearing Clerk 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND>THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           22,192,834
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          32,199,129
<RECEIVABLES>                            0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                       5,371
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>             1,242,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  33,447,219
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                  0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>           61,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                 61,436
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                          0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        23,379,488
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>              400,000
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>              400,000
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                   0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                  0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>        10,006,295
<NET-ASSETS>                    33,385,783
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                  280,010
<INTEREST-INCOME>                   44,643
<OTHER-INCOME>                           0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    (669,850)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>           (345,197)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           445,103
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>        4,304,761
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            4,404,667
<EQUALIZATION>                           0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                    0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                  0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>              0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                      0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           4,404,667
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              194,998
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                    671,302
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            31,183,450
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   58
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          0 
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     58
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                        2.2
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                   0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                     0
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not 
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with 
the Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15205]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-076]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Prospective Patent License.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Bioque Technologies, Inc., of 
Blacksburg, VA, has applied for a partially exclusive license to 
practice the invention described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 
6,125,297, entitled ``Body Fluids Monitor,'' which is assigned to the 
United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to 
the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Johnson Space 
Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by August 17, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Cate, Patent Attorney, NASA 
Johnson Space Center, Mail Stop HA, Houston, TX 77058-8452; telephone 
(281) 483-1001.

    Dated: June 11, 2001.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-15205 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: WARD MERCANTILE, INC., AND PHILIP J. FULLERTON 

DOCKET NUMBER: 179 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 179 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Ward Mercantile, Inc., and 

Philip J. Fullerton 

(New York, New York) 

The complaint charges that during the period from August 31, 1970, through 

October 19, 1970, the respondent corporation, while registered as a futures 

commission merchant under the Act, failed to meet minimum financial requirements 

prescribed for futures commission merchants. As of August 31, 1970, the working 

capital insufficiency exceeded $ 33,000. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, October 27, 1971, in New York, New York. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Order entered June 16 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00584
- CV WAYNE RAND, Appellant

V. STEVE MCMASTERS, Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11
- 13633



### O RDER
We GRANT the motion of Toni Reagor, Official Court Reporter for the 68th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed by July 31, 2014

.
/s/ A DA BROWN JUSTICE
```
                                                               Exhibit 32.2

                            **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

         In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2006 (the "Report"), I, J. Richard
Iler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ J. Richard Iler
J. Richard Iler
Chief Financial Officer
May 22, 2006

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```
Liberty Insurance Corporation

and Just in A



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 16, 2015

N o. 04

- 13

- 00614

- CV

Kathryne VAUSE

, Appellant

v.

LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION and Justin A. Smith,

Appellees

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County , Texas

Trial Court No. 07

- 2231

- CV

William Old, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to file Motion for Rehearing is hereby

GRANTED. T ime extended to January 2 0, 2015

.

It is so ORDERED on January 16 th , 2015. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 700.

#### Veatch *v.*Borthwick, Tax Commissioner of Hawaii.

C. A. 9th Cir.

*Melvin M. Belli*for petitioner.

*Walter D. Ackerman, Jr.,*Attorney General of Hawaii, *Rhoda V. Lewis,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Thomas W. Flynn,*Deputy Attorney General, for. respondent.

Certiorari denied.
H. Res. 1333 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 12, 2010. 

Whereas research has indicated that children who are read to 

three or four times a week are more likely to recognize 

the letters of the alphabet, be able to count to 20, and 

write their own names; 

Whereas children’s books are instrumental in teaching children to read by providing simple phrases that promote 

reading techniques, including phonics, and retaining children’s interest; 

Whereas many teachers use children’s books in the classroom 

as a tool to promote and teach literacy to their students; 

Whereas Children’s Book Week has been celebrated nationally since 1919 and is founded on the declaration that a 

‘‘great nation is a reading nation’’; 

Whereas Children’s Book Week highlights the importance of 

parents and guardians taking the time to read with their 

children and encourages libraries, schools, and community organizations to hold events to promote reading; and 

Whereas Children’s Book Week is recognized May 10 to May 

16, 2010: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
2 

•HRES 1333 EH 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of Children’s Book 

Week; and 

(2) encourages parents to read with their children 

and schools, libraries, and community organizations to 

hold events to encourage children and students of all 

ages to read. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This exhibit 27 contains summary financial information extracted from NS
Group, Inc.'s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal
year ended September 25, 1999, included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such consolidated financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000745026
<NAME> NS GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,073
<SECURITIES>                                    30,032
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,611
<ALLOWANCES>                                       687
<INVENTORY>                                     56,659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,781
<PP&E>                                         330,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                 187,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 359,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,208
<BONDS>                                         72,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       257,271
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,119)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   359,795
<SALES>                                        242,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,563
<CGS>                                          262,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  262,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,727)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,553)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,837)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,390)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.26)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration on Aging

[Program Announcement No. AoA-01-06]


Fiscal Year 2001 Program Announcement: Availability of Funds and 
Notice Regarding Applications

AGENCY: Administration on Aging, HHS.

ACTION: Announcement of availability of funds and request for 
applications to establish, or expand and improve, Statewide Senior 
Legal Hotlines whose purpose is to advance the quality and 
accessibility of the legal assistance provided to older people.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Administration on Aging announces that under this program 
announcement it will hold a competition for grant awards for four (4) 
to (5) projects that establish, or expand and improve, Statewide Senior 
Legal Hotlines aimed at advancing the quality and accessibility of the 
legal assistance provided to older people.
    The deadline date for the submission of applications is August 3, 
2001. Eligibility for grant awards is limited to public and/or 
nonprofit agencies, organizations, and institutions experienced in 
providing legal assistance to older persons.
    Application kits are available by writing to the Department of 
Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging, Office of Program 
Development, 330 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 4264, Washington, DC 
20201, by calling 202/619-2987, or on the web at http://www.aoa.gov/t4/fy2001. 

    Dated: June 12, 2001.
Norman L. Thompson,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 01-15203 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154-01-P
SILVER
STAR CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
  CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




I, Cliffe
R. Bodden, solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that the report of Silver Star Capital Holdings, Inc. on
Form10-QSB  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Silver Star Capital Holdings, Inc.




Date: May
12, 2008







/s/
      Cliffe R. Bodden
              Chief
      Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 3.7



[opmg_ex38002.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38004.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38006.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38008.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38010.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38012.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38014.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38016.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38018.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38020.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38022.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38024.gif]



---



[opmg_ex38026.gif]
Exhibit (d)(188)

**Form Of**
#### Maria Barrera, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[876 NYS2d 150]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kerrigan, J.), entered August 20, 2007, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Celina Barrera (hereinafter Celina), an infant, allegedly sustained injuries when she slipped and fell while descending a staircase at her elementary school. Celina’s mother, both on Celina’s behalf and derivatively, commenced this action against the defendants. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint contending, inter alia, that they did not create or have actual or constructive notice of the alleged condition that caused Celina to fall. The Supreme Court granted the motion and we affirm.

Assuming that Celina slipped and fell on cake frosting left on the staircase, as she testified at the hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h, the defendants established, prima facie, that they did not create the alleged hazardous condition or have actual or constructive notice of it *(see Deveau v CF Galleria at White Plains, LP,*18 AD3d 695 [2005]; *Padilla v White*
      *984
      *Plains City School Dist.,*266 AD2d 442 [1999]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. The evidence adduced by the plaintiff failed to show that the condition that Celina allegedly saw earlier on the day of her accident was the same condition which allegedly caused her to fall *(see Waheed v Valley Stream Cent. High School Dist.,*54 AD3d 1028 [2008]; *Frazier v City of New York,*47 AD3d 757 [2008]). Additionally, even if the school held a bake sale on the day of the accident, as the plaintiff alleged at the hearing held pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h, the defendants’ general awareness that bake-sale items might fall on the school premises was insufficient to establish constructive notice of the particular condition which allegedly caused Celina’s fall *(see Berzon v D’Agostino Supermarkets, Inc.,*15 AD3d 600 [2005]). Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2
       a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
 b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ PETER WHITFIELD

Peter WhitfieldSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer