alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1353 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Student Financial Aid Awareness Month 

to raise awareness of student financial aid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2010 

Mr. BISHOP of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Student Financial Aid 

Awareness Month to raise awareness of student financial 

aid. 

Whereas education is the key to a successful future for many 

people in the United States; 

Whereas the ability of some students to attend an institution 

of higher education is conditional on the availability of 

student financial assistance; 

Whereas the cost of higher education continues to rise for 4- 

year private colleges and universities, 4-year public colleges and universities, 2-year community colleges, and for 

profit institutions; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1353 IH 

Whereas students and families across the United States are 

making important decisions about financing their education at an institute of higher education; 

Whereas efforts to increase awareness about student financial 

aid options are necessary for students across the United 

States to receive all of the financial aid available to them; 

Whereas increasing awareness about the Free Application for 

Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) ensures that more eligible 

students may benefit from Federal financial assistance; 

Whereas students must complete and submit a new FAFSA 

each school year to be considered for all forms of Federal 

financial aid; 

Whereas each year, about 14,000,000 students apply for financial aid by filling out the FAFSA; 

Whereas increasing access to Federal financial aid helps reduce students’ reliance on costly private loans; and 

Whereas Student Financial Aid Awareness Month will help 

call attention to the critical role financial assistance plays 

in helping students attending an institution of higher 

education: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of Student Fi3 nancial Aid Awareness Month; 

4 (2) encourages students and families across the 

5 United States to participate in Student Financial 

6 Aid Awareness Month; and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1353 IH 

1 (3) recognizes the importance of educating stu2 dents and families about Federal Student Financial 

3 Aid. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1505 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1505

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary 
  of the Navy should name the next appropriate naval ship in honor of 
        World War II Medal of Honor recipient John William Finn.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2010

Mr. Hunter (for himself, Mr. Filner, Mr. Djou, Mr. Issa, Mr. Bartlett, 
Mr. Conaway, and Mr. Bilbray) submitted the following resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary 
  of the Navy should name the next appropriate naval ship in honor of 
        World War II Medal of Honor recipient John William Finn.

Whereas John Finn served in the Navy from 1926 to 1956;
Whereas during the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, John 
        Finn, for more than two hours at an exposed position, directed fire from 
        a .50 caliber machine gun at Japanese planes strafing Kaneohe Bay even 
        after being severely wounded;
Whereas John was hit 21 times by bullet and bomb fragments, and despite his 
        wounds, he returned to the hangars later that day, after receiving 
        medical treatment, and helped arm the remaining American planes;
Whereas for his actions on that unforgettable day, John Finn was awarded the 
        Medal of Honor;
Whereas the Medal of Honor is considered an important part of military history 
        and tradition;
Whereas today there are only 90 living Medal of Honor recipients, with the last 
        person receiving the award for service during Vietnam;
Whereas John Finn, at the time of his death, was the oldest living Medal of 
        Honor recipient and the last living recipient from the attack on Pearl 
        Harbor;
Whereas his legacy will continue inspiring us all while reminding countless 
        Americans about the sacrifices and contributions of the Nation's 
        greatest generation;
Whereas the stories of Medal of Honor recipients inspire the country and 
        individuals, while honoring those men and women who have dedicated 
        themselves to the defense of the country; and
Whereas the Medal of Honor provides the Armed Forces with a tremendous heritage 
        and tradition that motivates generations to greater achievements: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the Secretary of the Navy should name the next appropriate naval ship 
in honor of John William Finn for his service and dedication to the 
United States and to the Navy.
                                 <all>
```
No. 732.

#### Bechtel, Executor, et al. *v.*Thatcher et al.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

*Wayne*
      *919
      *G. Cook*for petitioners.

*918Certiorari denied.

*919
      *H. M. Havner*and *Fred A. Ontjes*for respondents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         270,794
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,474,583
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,011,489
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,025,592
<LOANS>                                     26,988,223
<ALLOWANCE>                                    124,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,506,030
<DEPOSITS>                                  23,119,625
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,200,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            153,624
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,450
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,029,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              30,506,030
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,201,648
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               84,635
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                24,391
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,310,674
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,078,769
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,193,901
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,116,773
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   18,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                871,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                305,321
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     198,784
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   198,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.1
<LOANS-NON>                                    810,484
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               106,063
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              124,063
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           124,063
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-072]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

DATES: June 14, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Kusmiss, Patent Counsel, NASA 
Management Office-JPL, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Mail Stop 180-801, 
Pasadena, CA 91109; telephone (818) 354-7770.
    NASA Case No. NPO-21015-1: High Capacity Electrode Materials for 
Thin Film Batteries Compatible With Integrated Circuit Manufacturing.

    Dated: June 4, 2001.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-15015 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

October 31, 2012

RE: Case No. 01-11-00439-CV

Style: In the Matter of C.L.S.

 

Today the First Court of Appeals issued a dissenting opinion(s) in the 

above-referenced cause.

A copy of the dissenting opinion(s) can be obtained through Case Search on 

our Court’s webpage at:

http://www.1stcoa.courts.state.tx.us/.

T. C. Case # 56309 M. Karinne McCullough, Clerk of the Court

JIMMY PHILLIPS JR.

P.O. DRAWER 29

ANGLETON, TX 77516-0029

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

October 31, 2012

RE: Case No. 01-11-00439-CV

Style: In the Matter of C.L.S.

 

Today the First Court of Appeals issued a dissenting opinion(s) in the 

above-referenced cause.

A copy of the dissenting opinion(s) can be obtained through Case Search on 

our Court’s webpage at:

http://www.1stcoa.courts.state.tx.us/.

T. C. Case # 56309 M. Karinne McCullough, Clerk of the Court

MARY PETER CUDD

229 E. CEDAR

ANGLETON, TX 77515
#### Angelo Lopez, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellants.

[875 NYS2d 467]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Donna M. *530Mills, J.; Robert D. Lippmann, J., at jury trial), entered March 26, 2007, awarding plaintiff $2,100,000 for past pain and suffering and $5,600,000 for future pain and suffering, after adjustment to reflect the jury’s apportionment of responsibility, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the award for future pain and suffering and remand for a new trial on that issue only and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless plaintiff, within 20 days of service of a copy of this order, stipulates to reduce the award for future pain and suffering, after apportionment, to $4,600,000 and to entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith.

Plaintiff was riding his bicycle when it collided with a bus owned and operated by defendants. The jury’s conclusion was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence that, when considered in a light most favorable to plaintiff, was legally sufficient to support the verdict *(see Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493 [1978]). Great deference must be accorded to the fact-finding function of the jury, which had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses and assess their credibility *(see Soto v New York City Tr. Auth.,*6 NY3d 487, 493 [2006]), as well as the weight it gave to conflicting expert testimony. The jury was justified in crediting the opinion of plaintiff’s expert witness that notwithstanding plaintiffs own negligence, the driver of the bus was much more at fault for making no effort to avert the accident *(id.*at 492-493).

The court did not err in permitting the jury to hear that the driver had violated Transit Authority rules by not remaining at the scene of the accident. Although an agency’s internal rules and practices are inadmissible when they require a standard of care transcending that imposed by common law *(see Rahimi v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*43 AD3d 802, 804 [2007]), the bulletin at issue merely declared that incidents involving injury or vehicle damage must be reported as soon as possible, which is no more than what is required under common law *(see Danbois v New York Cent. R.R. Co.,*12 NY2d 234, 240 [1963]). Indeed, the jury was not informed that the Transit Authority had found the driver to be at fault, but was instead accurately advised that he continued without stopping for five blocks after the event.

The amount of damages awarded plaintiff for future pain and suffering deviates materially from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances (CPLR 5501 [c]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1289/2004

of 14 July 2004         

concerning the authorisation for 10 years of the additive Deccox® in feedingstuffs, belonging to the group of coccidiostats and other medicinal substances

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feedingstuffs (1), as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1756/2002 (2), and in particular Article 9g(5)(b) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Chapter I of Annex B to Directive 70/524/EEC shall be amended as follows: the additive decoquinate, belonging to the group ‘Coccidiostats and other medical substances’, shall be deleted.

Article 2

The additive Deccox® belonging to the group ‘Coccidiostats and other medical substances’ listed in the Annex to the present Regulation is authorised for use in animal nutrition under the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 3

A period of six months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation is permitted to use up the existing stocks of decoquinate.

Article 4

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 2004.

For the Commission

David BYRNE            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 14.12.1970, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 265, 3.10.2002, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p. 4.

(5)OJ L 183, 29.6.1989, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter A. Armitage, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 857] —

Appeal from an order of the Ontario County Court (Frederick G. Reed, J.), entered December 18, 2007. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Garni, Green and Pine, JJ.
EXHIBIT 2.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-80797, No. 33-90616, No. 333-06390, No. 333-06862
and No. 333-07226) of STMicroelectronics N.V. of our report dated January 25,
2000 relating to the financial statements, which appears on page 59 of the
Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
January 25, 2000 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Form 20-F.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS N.V.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
June 22, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND>THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           24,163,296
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          29,269,712
<RECEIVABLES>                            0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                       9,412
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                 6,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  29,285,521
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                  0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          438,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                438,170
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                          0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        23,740,935
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>              400,000
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>              400,000
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                   0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                  0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>         5,106,416
<NET-ASSETS>                    28,847,351
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                        0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                  161,304
<OTHER-INCOME>                           0
<EXPENSES-NET>                  (1,816,551)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>         (1,655,247)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>        (1,508,333)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>        2,379,215 
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>             (784,365)
<EQUALIZATION>                           0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                    0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                  0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>              0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                      0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>            (784,365)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              292,496
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                  1,819,793
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            29,239,534
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   67
<PER-SHARE-NII>                         (8)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     59
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                        6.2
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                   0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                     0
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not 
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with 
the Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### Venancio VALDOVINOS-CORONA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-73092.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 1, 2010.

Filed Oct. 6, 2010.

Steven A. Guilin, Escondido, CA, for Petitioner.

CAS-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, John D. Williams, Esq., Jeffrey L. Menkin, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FISHER and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

The Immigration Judge *(“13”)*found Valdovinos inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(E)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i), for knowingly encouraging, inducing, assisting, abetting, or aiding a minor child to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law. After the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirmed the IJ’s decision, Valdovinos filed a motion to reconsider in light of *Altamirano v. Gonzales,*427 F.3d 586 (9th Cir.2005), which clarified that an alien is inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(E)(i) only if he engages in “an affirmative act of help, assistance, or encouragement.” *Id.*at 592. The BIA denied the motion.

Because Valdovinos’s petition for review is timely only with respect to the BIA’s denial of his motion to reconsider, our jurisdiction is limited to reviewing that order. *See Stone v. INS,*514 U.S. 386, *215405-06, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995); *Membreno v. Gonzales,*425 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion. *See Morales Apolinar v. Mukasey,*514 F.3d 893, 895 (9th Cir.2008).

The BIA properly concluded that by providing his car to his domestic partner’s sister as a “favor,” with the intent that she use it to bring the child into the country illegally, Valdovinos acted affirmatively to assist alien smuggling under section 212(a)(6)(E)(i). *See Aguilar Gonzalez v. Mukasey,*534 F.3d 1204, 1208 (9th Cir.2008) (noting *Altamirano’s*reliance on the “well-established meaning of aiding and abetting in the criminal context, which requires the individual to associate himself with the venture, that he participate in it as in something that he wishes to bring about, that he seek *by his action*to make it succeed” (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Valdovinos’s motion to reconsider.

PETITION DENIED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251] 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. James H. Wilson, Generic Issues, Environmental, Financial, and Rulemaking Branch, Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. Mr. Wilson may be contacted at the aforementioned telephone number or e-mail address. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of June, 2001.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

David B. Matthews, 

Director, Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 01-15270 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P