alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1





FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED ON ASSIGNMENT, INC.
2012 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN


This First Amendment (“First Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated On Assignment, Inc. 2012 Employment Inducement Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of On Assignment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), effective as of June 5, 2015. Capitalized terms used in this First Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the same meanings assigned to them in the Plan.


RECITALS
		
	A. 
	The Company currently maintains the Plan.


		
	B.
	Pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Plan, the Board has the authority to amend the Plan.


		
	C.
	The Board believes it to be in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan to increase the Share Limit.




AMENDMENT
		
	 1.
	The first sentence of Section 3.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


“Subject to Section 3.1(b) and Section 12.2 hereof, the aggregate number of Shares which may be issued or transferred pursuant to Awards under the Plan shall be one million two hundred thirty-five thousand eight hundred sixty-one (1,235,861) (the “Share Limit”).”


This First Amendment shall be and hereby is incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan.  Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this First Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company as of the 5th day of June, 2015.




	
						
	 
	 
	On Assignment, Inc.
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ Peter T. Dameris
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Peter T. Dameris
	 
	 

	 
	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
#### CITY OF OMAHA et al. v. OMAHA WATER CO. CITY OF OMAHA v. SAME.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

May 11, 1909.)

Nos. 2,970, 2,971.

1. Waters and Water Courses (§ 203*) — Supply op Water to City — Contract — Action poe Breach — Defenses.

Evidence *field*not to sustain the defense of a city to an action by a water company to recover hydrant rentals on the ground that the company had failed substantially to perform its contract.

fEd. Note. — For other cases, see Waters and Water Courses, Dec. Dig. § 203.*]

2. Appeal and Error (§ 1047*) — Review—Harmless Error — Order of Introducing Evidence.

The mere admission in rebuttal of evidence necessary to a plaintiff's case in chief is not reversible error.

fEd. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. § 4132; Dec. Dig. § 1047. *]

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

*648John Ree Webster and Carl C. Wright (Harry E. Burnam, on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.

Howard Mansfield and R. S. Hall (Herbert C. Rakin, on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before HOOK and ADAMS, Circuit Judges, and CARRAND, District Judge.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

When these cases, which were consolidated for trial, were here before, we expressed the principles governing the rights of the parties with respect to the hydrant rentals in controversy. Omaha Water Co. v. City of Omaha, 85 C. C. A. 54, 156 Fed. 922. At the second trial the Circuit Court applied those principles, and held there was not sufficient evidence for the consideration of the jury that the water company had, under the facts conceded to- exist or clearly proved, failed in substantially performing its obligations under the ordinance contract. Verdicts against the city were therefore directed. Without restating the record as it was when here before, or mentioning in detail the additional evidence that was received, it is sufficient to say we think the Circuit Court was right. The proof was that the water company had substantially performed its contract. There was no substantial evidence to the contrary.

The contention as to the pleadings is disposed of by our former opinion. The order of the introduction of evidence followed the course of the pleadings; but, were this not so, the mere admission in rebuttal of evidence necessary to a plaintiff’s case in chief is not error. When a defendant is not surprised, and is afforded an opportunity to meet the evidence so admitted, his substantial rights are not prejudiced. We discover no error in the court’s action in the other particulars specified in the assignments.

The judgments are affirmed.
exv10w33



 



Exhibit
10.33


ITC HOLDINGS CORP. EXECUTIVE GROUP

SPECIAL BONUS PLAN




AMENDMENT NO. 1




     Pursuant to Section 9.1 of the ITC Holdings Corp. Executive Group Special Bonus Plan (the
“Plan”), the ITC Holdings Corp. Board of Directors, sitting as the compensation committee of the
Board, hereby amends the Plan, effective as of August 16, 2005, as follows:



     1. Section 6.1 is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of that section:


“Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this section and

without affecting vested rights in other Special Bonus Amounts

credited to him, Mr. Joseph Welch, the President and Chief

Executive Officer of the Company on the date the Plan was adopted,

shall have a vested right in the portion of his Special Bonus

Amounts that are based on grants made to him under the Option Plan

before (and not including) July 25, 2005 as if he were 100% vested

in all such grants.”
No. 724.

#### Kohinoor Coal Co. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 3d Cir;

*James J. Dougherty lot*petitioner.- *Solicitor General*
      *925
      *Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack, Morton K. Rothschild*and *Joseph W. Bishop, Jr.*for respondent.

*924Certiorari denied.
No. 321. No. 322. No. 323. No. 324. *613No. 325. No. 326. No. 327. No. 328.

#### *612Putnam et al. *v.*Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, et al.; Lassig et al. *v.*Same; Dunn et al. *v.*Same; Abbot et al. *v.*Same; *613Hill et al. *v.*Same; Thompson et al. *v.*Same; Hull et al. *v.*Same; and; Fordham et al. *v.*Same.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Raymond M. Hudson*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General*Reed, *Assistant Attorney General Blair,*and *Mr. Edward T. Burke*for respondents.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
Exhibit 10.10(a)


 


HORACE MANN SERVICE CORPORATION

EXECUTIVE CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN


 


SCHEDULE A PARTICIPANTS


 


Note: The effective date of entry shall be subject to Section
4.2(a).


 


	NAME OR TITLE	EFFECTIVE DATE

OF

PARTICIPATION*
	 	 
	TIER I PARTICIPANTS
	President and CEO	May 16, 2013
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	TIER II PARTICIPANTS
	EVP and CFO	**
	EVP, Annuity, Life, Group	February 15, 2012
	EVP, Property & Casualty	July 1, 2015
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	TIER III PARTICIPANTS
	SVP, Field Operations & Distribution	August 13, 2015


 


* Subject to acceptance within 30 days of effective date of
participation


** Subject to Section 4.2(b) of the Plan


 


Last updated: April 11, 2016
```

[Federal Register: October 23, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 205)]
[Notices]
[Page 56914]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23oc98-42]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 28, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-28586 Filed 10-21-98; 12:28 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Con Buckley, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mantra Venture Group
      Ltd. for the period ended August 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Mantra Venture Group Ltd.                                                                  

Dated: October 15, 2010

| | /s/
      Con Buckley                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Con Buckley                                                         
| | Chief Financial Officer                                             
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
| | Mantra Venture Group Ltd.                                           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Mantra Venture
Group Ltd. and will be retained by Mantra Venture Group Ltd. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                                October 19,1999


Charles A. Mele, Esq.
Medical Manager Corporation
669 River Drive
Elmwood Park, NJ 07497

Dear Mr. Mele:

     Reference is made to that certain Registration Rights Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated as of May 16, 1999 and amended on July 23, 1999, by and
among Synetic, Inc. (the predecessor to Medical Manager Corporation), Mr.
Michael A. Singer, Mr. John H. Kang and Mr. Richard W. Mehrlich. Capitalized
terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning given to such
terms in the Agreement.

     Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Agreement, the
undersigned agree that Section 2.02(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by
deleting the words "At any time after the Closing Date but not later than the
date which is ninety (90) days after the Closing Date," and inserting in lieu
thereof the words "At any time after the first anniversary of the Closing Date
but not later than the date which is ninety (90) days after the first
anniversary of the Closing Date."


<PAGE>



charles A. Mele, Esq.
Page 2


     Please call any of us if you have any questions. Best regards.

                                             Very truly yours,


                                             /s/ Michael A. Singer
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Michael A. Singer


                                             -----------------------------------
                                             John H. Kang


                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Richard W. Mehrlich


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

Medical Manager Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, in its capacity as successor to
Synetic, Inc., a Delaware corporation


By: ________________________________________
     Name:
     Title:
EXHIBIT 32.0
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Meridian Interstate
Bancorp as of and for the period covered by the Report.
 Dated:  May 10, 2010
    /s/ Richard J. GavegnanoRichard J. GavegnanoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerDated:  May 10, 2010
    /s/ Mark L. AbbateMark L. AbbateSenior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Goldspan Resources, Inc. for the      quarter ended January 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the      quarter ended January 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Goldspan Resources,      Inc.. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Jeff Wiegel                                                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                            |
| Name:  | Jeff      Wiegel                                                                |
|   |                                                                            |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                            |
| Date:  | March      17, 2008                                                             |
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

         In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Henry P.
Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Henry P. Hoffman
Henry P. Hoffman
Chief Executive Officer
May 22, 2006

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Alan Shinderman                                                         |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                            |
| Name:  | Alan      Shinderman                                                            |
|   |                                                                            |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                            |
| Date:  | May      28, 2009                                                               |
Exhibit 10.2
    (1 of 2)
  June 26,
    2009
           Form 20-F Rules 4-10(a) Regulation S-X
    NETHERLAND, SEWELL INTERNATIONAL,
    S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
  Robert
    C. Barg




---



##### 



Exhibit 10.2
    (2 of 2)
  June 26,
    2009
           Form 20-F Rules 4-10(a) Regulation S-X
    NETHERLAND, SEWELL INTERNATIONAL,
    S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
  Robert
    C. Barg
No. 107.

#### Marshall *v.*South Carolina Tax Commission et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Lionel K. Legge*for petitioner.

*Messrs. John M. Daniel*and *J. Fraser Lyon*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: G. H. MILLER AND COMPANY; GILBERT H. MILLER; HOWARD RANDOLPH, D/B/A 

RANDOLPH AND COMPANY; REFRIGERATED PRODUCTS, INC.; J.W. HARDING; CENTRAL IOWA 

POULTRY AND EGG COMPANY; JOHN H. SNOWGREN; ALLEN HEADLEE, D/B/A HEADLEE PRODUCE 

COMPANY; E.E. HUMMEL AND K. HUMMEL, D/B/A HUMMEL PRODUCE COMPANY; ALBERT SCHIRM, 

D/B/A SCHIRM PRODUCE COMPANY; LEO HAGEN; A.L. MYRICK, D/B/A MARKET PRODUCE 

COMPANY; LEWIS R. VAN SANT AND ROY ROUNTREE, D/B/A DATED EGG COMPANY 

DOCKET NUMBER: 60 

DATE: OCTOBER 4, 1956 

DOCUMENT TYPE: EXTENSION OF TIME AND STAY ORDER 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re G. H. Miller and Company et al., Respondents 

CEA Docket No. 60 

Extension of Time and Stay Order 

Respondents have filed a request for an extension of time for the filing of a 

petition for reconsideration of the decision and order entered September 25, 

1956. Under the rules of practice, such a petition may be filed within 15 days 

after service of a copy of the decision and order. The respondents seek an 

additional 60 days. 

The respondents may file such a petition by November 1, 1956. This extension 

of 15 or 16 days is considered more than reasonable in view of the lengthy and 

exhaustive consideration of the record already had in written and oral argument. 

The effective date for the sanctions imposed by the order of September 25, 1956, 

is postponed pending action upon the petition for reconsideration to be filed. 

Copies hereof shall be served upon the parties or their counsel of record and 

upon the contract markets. 

Done at Washington D. C, this 

4th day of October 1956. 

/s/ Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
# C_2020010EN.01002701.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/27

---

Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 24 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Pesti Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — PannonHitel Pénzügyi Zrt. v WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft.

(Case C-476/18) (1)

(2020/C 10/36)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.

---
H. Res. 1321 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 1, 2010. 

Whereas Thailand became the first treaty ally of the United 

States in the Asia-Pacific region with the Treaty of 

Amity and Commerce, signed at Sia-Yut’hia (Bangkok) 

March 20, 1833, between the United States and Siam, 

during the administration of President Andrew Jackson 

and the reign of King Rama III; 

Whereas the United States and Thailand furthered their alliance with the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty, 

(commonly known as the ‘‘Manila Pact of 1954’’) signed 

at Manila September 8, 1954, and the United States designated Thailand as a major non-North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization (NATO) ally in December 2003; 

Whereas, through the Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations, signed at Bangkok May 26, 1966, along with a diverse and growing trading relationship, the United States 

and Thailand have developed critical economic ties; 

Whereas Thailand is a key partner of the United States in 

Southeast Asia and has supported closer relations between the United States and the Association of Southeast 

Asian Nations (ASEAN); 

Whereas Thailand has the longest-serving monarch in the 

world, His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej, who is 
2 

•HRES 1321 EH 

loved and respected for his dedication to the people of 

Thailand; 

Whereas Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva has issued a 5- 

point roadmap designed to promote the peaceful resolution of the current political crisis in Thailand; 

Whereas approximately 500,000 people of Thai descent live 

in the United States and foster strong cultural ties between the 2 countries; and 

Whereas Thailand remains a steadfast friend with shared values of freedom, democracy, and liberty: Now, therefore, 

be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) affirms the support of the people and the Government of the United States for a strong and vital alliance with Thailand; 

(2) calls for the restoration of peace and stability 

throughout Thailand; 

(3) urges all parties involved in the political crisis 

in Thailand to renounce the use of violence and to resolve their differences peacefully through dialogue; 

(4) supports the goals of the 5-point roadmap of 

the Government of Thailand for national reconciliation, 

which seeks to— 

(A) uphold, protect, and respect the institution 

of the constitutional monarchy; 
3 

•HRES 1321 EH 

(B) resolve fundamental problems of social justice systematically and with participation by all sectors of society; 

(C) ensure that the media can operate freely 

and constructively; 

(D) establish facts about the recent violence 

through investigation by an independent committee; 

and 

(E) establish mutually acceptable political rules 

through the solicitation of views from all sides; and 

(5) promotes the timely implementation of an 

agreed plan for national reconciliation in Thailand so 

that free and fair elections can be held. 

Attest: 

Clerk.