30694 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 110 / Thursday, June 7, 2001 / Notices

the profit incurred and realized in

connection with the production and sale

of the foreign like product, and U.S.

packing costs. We used the cost of

materials, fabrication, and G&A

expenses as reported in the CV portion

of the questionnaire response, adjusted

as discussed in the COP section above.

We used the U.S. packing costs as

reported in the U.S. sales portion of the

respondent’s questionnaire responses.

For selling expenses, we used the

average of the selling expenses reported

for home market sales that survived the

cost test, weighted by the total quantity

of those sales. For actual profit, we first

calculated, based on the home market

sales that survived the cost test, the

difference between the home market

sales value and home market COP, and

divided the difference by the home

market COP. We then multiplied this

percentage by the COP for each U.S.

model to derive an actual profit.

Price Comparisons

For price-to-price comparisons, we

based NV on the price at which the

foreign like product is first sold for

consumption in the exporting country,

in the usual commercial quantities and

in the ordinary course of trade, in

accordance with section 773(a)(1)(B)(i)

of the Act. We compared the U.S. prices

of individual transactions to the

monthly weighted-average price of sales

of the foreign like product.

With respect to both CV and home

market prices, we made adjustments,

where appropriate, for inland freight,

inland insurance, duty adjustments, and

discounts. We also reduced CV and

home market prices by packing costs

incurred in the home market, in

accordance with section 773(a)(6)(B)(i)

of the Act. In addition, we increased CV

and home market prices for U.S.

packing costs, in accordance with

section 773(a)(6)(A) of the Act. We made

further adjustments to home market

prices, when applicable, to account for

differences in physical characteristics of

the merchandise in accordance with

section 773(a)(6)(C)(ii) of the Act.

Additionally, pursuant to section

773(a)(6)(C)(iii) of the Act, we made an

adjustment for differences in

circumstances of sale by deducting

home market direct selling expenses

(credit expenses, royalty, and bank

charges) and adding any direct selling

expenses associated with U.S. sales not

deducted under the provisions of

section 772(d)(1) of the Act. Finally, we

made a CEP offset adjustment to account

for comparing U.S. and home market

sales at different levels of trade.

Preliminary Results of Review

As a result of this review, we

preliminarily determine that the

following weighted-average dumping

margins exist for May 1, 1999, through

December 31, 1999:

Manufacturer/exporter Percent

margin

Hyundai Electronic Industries Co.,

Ltd ............................................. 3.01

G5 Corporation ............................. 10.44

Jewon Microelectronics ................ 10.44

Jae Won ....................................... 10.44

Kim’s Marketing ............................ 10.44

Techsan ........................................ 10.44

Wooyang Industry Co., Ltd ........... 10.44

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b), the

Department will disclose to parties to

the proceeding any calculations

performed in connection with these

preliminary results within 5 days of the

date of publication of this notice. Any

interested party may request a hearing

within 30 days of the date of publication

of this notice. Parties who submit

arguments in this proceeding are

requested to submit with each

argument: (1) a statement of the issue

and (2) a brief summary of the

argument. All case briefs must be

submitted within 30 days of the date of

publication of this notice. Rebuttal

briefs, which are limited to issues raised

in the case briefs, may be filed not later

than seven days after the case briefs are

filed. Further, we would appreciate it if

parties submitting written comments

would provide the Department with an

additional copy of the public version of

any such comments on diskette. A

hearing, if requested, will be held two

days after the date the rebuttal briefs are

filed or the first business day thereafter.

The Department will publish a notice

of the final results of this administrative

review, which will include the results of

its analysis of the issues raised in any

written comments or at the hearing,

within 120 days from the publication of

these preliminary results.

The Department will not issue cash

deposit instructions to Customs based

on the results of this review. Since the

revocation is currently in effect, current

and future imports of DRAMs from

Korea shall be entered into the United

States without regard to antidumping

duties. We have already instructed

Customs to liquidate all entries as of

January 1, 2000 without regard to

antidumping duties.

The Department shall determine, and

Customs shall assess, antidumping

duties on all appropriate entries. The

Department will issue appraisement

instructions directly to Customs. The

final results of this review shall be the

basis for the assessment of antidumping

duties on entries of merchandise

covered by the determination. We have

calculated importer-specific ad valorem

duty assessment rates based on the ratio

of the total amount of dumping margins

calculated for the examined sales to the

entered value of sales used to calculate

those duties. These rates will be

assessed uniformly on all entries of each

particular importer made during the

POR.

This notice serves as a preliminary

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR

351.402(f)(2) of the Department’s

regulations to file a certificate regarding

the reimbursement of antidumping

duties prior to liquidation of the

relevant entries during this review

period. Failure to comply with this

requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of double antidumping duties.

This administrative review and this

notice are in accordance with sections

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

Dated: May 31, 2001.

Faryar Shirzad,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 01–14381 Filed 6–6–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–821–807]

Continuation of Antidumping Duty

Order: Ferrovanadium and Nitrided

Vanadium From Russia

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of continuation of

antidumping duty order: ferrovanadium

and nitrided vanadium from Russia.

SUMMARY: On October 10, 2000, the

Department of Commerce (‘‘the

Department’’), pursuant to sections

751(c) and 752 (c) of the Tariff Act of

1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),

determined that revocation of the

antidumping duty order on

ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium

from Russia would be likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of dumping

(65 FR 60168). On May 23, 2001, the

International Trade Commission (‘‘the

Commission’’), pursuant to section

751(c) of the Act, determined that

revocation of the antidumping duty

order on ferrovanadium and nitrided

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 110 / Thursday, June 7, 2001 / Notices 30695

vanadium from Russia would be likely

to lead to continuation or recurrence of

material injury to an industry in the

United States within a reasonably

foreseeable time (66 FR 28540).

Therefore, pursuant to 751(d)(2) of the

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(4), the

Department is publishing this notice of

the continuation of the antidumping

duty order on ferrovanadium and

nitrided vanadium from Russia.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 7, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Martha V. Douthit or James P. Maeder,

Office of Policy for Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone: (202) 482–5050 or (202) 482–

3330, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On June 5, 2000, the Department

initiated (65 FR 35604), and the

Commission instituted (65 FR 35668), a

sunset review of the antidumping duty

order on ferrovanadium and nitrided

vanadium from Russia, pursuant to

section 751(c) of the Act. As a result of

its review, the Department found that

revocation of the antidumping duty

order would be likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of dumping

and notified the Commission of the

magnitude of the margin likely to

prevail were the order revoked. See

Final Results of Expedited Sunset

Review of Antidumping Duty Order,

Ferrovanadium and Nitrided Vanadium

From Russia, 65 FR 60168 (October 10,

2000).

On May 23, 2001, the Commission

determined, pursuant to section 751(c)

of the Act, that revocation of the

antidumping duty order on

ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium

from Russia would be likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of material

injury to an industry in the United

States within a reasonably foreseeable

time. See Ferrovanadium and Nitrided

Vanadium From Russia, 66 FR 28540

(May 23, 2001) and USITC Publication

3420 (May 2001), Investigation No. 731–

TA–702 (Review).

Scope of the Order

The merchandise subject to this order

are ferrovanadium and nitrided

vanadium, regardless of grade,

chemistry, form or size, unless expressly

excluded from the scope of this order.

Ferrovanadium includes alloys

containing ferrovanadium as the

predominant element by weight (i.e.,

more weight than any other element,

except iron in some instances) and at

least 4 percent by weight of iron.

Nitrided vanadium includes compounds

containing vanadium as the

predominant element, by weight, and at

least 5 percent, by weight, of nitrogen.

Excluded from the scope of the order are

vanadium additives other than

ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium,

such as vanadium-aluminum master

alloys, vanadium chemicals, vanadium

waste and scrap, vanadium-bearing raw

materials, such as slag, boiler residues,

fly ash, and vanadium oxides.

The products subject to this order are

currently classifiable under subheadings

2850.00.20, 7202.92.00, 7202.99.50.40,

8112.40.30.00, and 8112.40.60.00 of the

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the

HTSUS subheadings are provided for

convenience and customs purposes, our

written description of the scope is

dispositive.

Determination

As a result of the determination by the

Department, and the Commission, that

revocation of the antidumping duty

order would be likely to lead to

continuation or recurrence of dumping

and material injury to an industry in the

United States, pursuant to section

751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department

hereby orders the continuation of the

antidumping duty order on

ferrovanadium and nitrided vanadium

from Russia. The effective date of

continuation of this order will be the

date of publication in the Federal

Register of this Notice of Continuation.

Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act,

the Department intends to initiate the

next five-year review of this order not

later than May 2006.

Dated: May 31, 2001.

Faryar Shirzad,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 01–14379 Filed 6–6–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–570–851]

Preliminary Results of New Shipper

Review: Certain Preserved Mushrooms

From the People’s Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: In response to a timely

request from Green Fresh Foods

(Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd., on October 2,

2000, the Department of Commerce

published a notice of initiation of a new

shipper review of the antidumping duty

order on certain preserved mushrooms

from the People’s Republic of China

with respect to the above-mentioned

exporter. The period of review is

February 1, 2000, through July 31, 2000.

See Initiation of Antidumping and

Countervailing Duty Administrative

Reviews, 65 FR 58735 (October 2, 2000).

As a result of this review, the

Department of Commerce has

preliminarily determined that a

dumping margin exists for exports of the

subject merchandise for the covered

period.

We invite interested parties to

comment on these preliminary results.

Parties who submit arguments in this

proceeding are requested to submit with

their arguments (1) a statement of the

issues and (2) a brief summary of the

arguments.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 7, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David J. Goldberger or Rebecca Trainor,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4136 or

(202) 482–4007, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (the Act), are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Act by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act. In addition, unless

otherwise indicated, all citations to the

Department of Commerce’s (the

Department’s) regulations are to 19 CFR

part 351 (2000).

Background

On February 19, 1999, the Department

published in the Federal Register (64

FR 8308) an antidumping duty order on

certain preserved mushrooms from the

People’s Republic of China (PRC). On

August 31, 2000, the Department

received a timely request from Green

Fresh Foods (Zhangzhou) Co. (Green

Fresh), in accordance with section

751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR

351.214(c), for a new shipper review of

this antidumping duty order.

On September 22, 2000, the

Department initiated a new shipper

review of the antidumping duty order

on certain preserved mushrooms from

the PRC (see Certain Preserved

Mushrooms from the People’s Republic

of China: Initiation of New Shipper