alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: December 15, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 240)]
[Notices]
[Page 69059]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15de98-38]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Wednesday, December 30, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-33264 Filed 12-11-98; 11:27 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: May 4, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 85)]
[Notices]
[Page 24531]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04my98-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May 1, 1998.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb. 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-11831 Filed 4-30-98; 10:29 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: October 7, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 194)]
[Notices]
[Page 52326]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07oc97-32]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 1:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 15, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. Lobby Level Hearing Room
located at Room 1000.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    Hearing on the proposed order to Chicago Board of Trade to change
and to supplement CBT's proposal on delivery specifications.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Catherine Dixon, 202-418-5100.
Catherine Dixon,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-26652 Filed 10-3-97; 11:40 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: EDWARD M. HIDDING 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 93 

DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1965 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Edward M. Hidding 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 93 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Edward M. Hidding has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued and 

the said Edward M. 

Hidding is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into a stipulation 

of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of Practice under the 

Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said Edward M. Hidding 

stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) Edward M. Hidding an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was on August 13, 1965, a 

registered floor broker under the Commodity Exchange Act and a member of the 

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, a duly designated contract market under 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) On August 13, 1965, Edward M. Hidding executed 96 transactions in 

regulated commodity futures on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. 

However, with respect to 92 of such transactions, in each instance he failed to 

prepare a trading card or other record 

clearly identifying the opposite floor broker or other trader with whom such 

transaction was executed. 

The Secretary of Agriculture has advised Edward M. Hidding that his failure 

to keep full and complete records of futures transactions, as described above, 

was in violation of section 4g of the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.35 of 

the regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said Edward M. Hidding agrees to desist from such acts and practices in 

the future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation shall be 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 

8 day of October 1965 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Witnessed by: 
Page 2 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1719

PATRICIA G. PLUMMER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00006-RLV-DSC)

Submitted: October 31, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel S. Johnson, North Wilkesboro, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Charlotte, 

North Carolina, Luis Pere, Special Assistant United States 

Attorney, Social Security Administration, Boston, Massachusetts, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Patricia G. Plummer appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the 

Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Plummer

disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to 

deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial 

evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. 

§ 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th 

Cir. 2005) (per curiam). We have thoroughly reviewed the 

parties’ briefs, administrative record, and the materials 

submitted in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See Plummer v. Astrue, No. 5:11-cv00006-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. May 22, 2012). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.4


                          AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO BYLAWS OF
                           SIRROM CAPITAL CORPORATION


       This Amendment No. 2 to the Bylaws of Sirrom Capital Corporation (the
"Corporation") amends the Bylaws of the Corporation, as amended, as set forth
below. Except as modified and amended hereby, the Bylaws of the Corporation
shall remain in full force and effect.

       1. Section 5.5(b) shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

              (b)    PRESIDENT. The President of the Corporation shall assist
                     the Chief Executive Officer in the active management of the
                     business of the Corporation. The President shall have the
                     general powers and duties of supervision and management
                     usually vested in the office of the President of a
                     corporation and shall perform such other duties as the
                     Board of Directors from time to time may prescribe.

       2. Section 5.5 shall be amended to add a new Section 5.5(b) as follows
and renumber the current Sections 5.5(b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) to Sections
5.5(c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h):

              (b)    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. If the Corporation shall establish
                     the office of Chief Executive Officer, then the Chief
                     Executive Officer shall be the Chief Executive Officer of
                     the Corporation and shall have general supervision over the
                     active management of the business of the Corporation. In
                     addition, he shall serve as the Chief Operating Officer of
                     the Corporation until such time as the Corporation selects
                     or appoints another person to serve in that capacity. The
                     Chief Executive Officer shall perform such other duties as
                     the Board of Directors from time to time may prescribe.
**Fidelity**®**Total International Equity Fund**

**Class**/Ticker

**Fidelity Total International Equity Fund**/FTIEX

In this summary prospectus, the term "shares" (as it relates to the fund) means the class of shares offered through this summaryprospectus.

**Summary Prospectus**

**December 29, 2012**
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32395-32396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 01-071]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

DATES:  June 14, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Fein, Patent Counsel, Johnson

[[Page 32396]]

Space Center, Mail Code HA, Houston, TX 77058-3696; telephone (281) 
483-4871, fax (281) 244-8452.

NASA Case No. MSC-22633-2: Growth Stimulation of Biological Cells and 
Tissue By Electromagnetic Fields and Uses Thereof;
NASA Case No. MSC-22936-3: Method for Determining The Three-Dimensional 
Structure of A Protein;
NASA Case No. MSC-22936-4: X-Ray Crystallography Reagent;
NASA Case No. MSC-23029-1: Medium Frequency Pseudo Noise Geological 
Radar;
NASA Case No. MSC-23153-1: Sensor and Method for Detecting A 
Superstrate (combined with MSC-23118).

    Dated: June 4, 2001.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-15014 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50892

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee

v.

JOSE GUADALUPE PEDRIZCO GUTIERREZ, also known as Miguel Rendon

Pedrizco,

Defendant – Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:11-CR-128-1

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Guadalupe Pedrizco Gutierrez appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute at

least 500 grams of methamphetamine. He argues that his trial counsel was

ineffective in that he failed to present mitigating evidence and seek a lesser

sentence on the following grounds: (1) he met the safety valve requirements;

(2) he was willing to stipulate that he was deportable; and (3) the district court

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 17, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-50892 Document: 00511923845 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/17/2012
No. 11-50892

had discretion to impose a sentence below the advisory guidelines range under

Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007), and Spears v. United States, 555

U.S. 261 (2009).

“[T]he general rule in this circuit is that a claim for ineffective assistance

of counsel cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been

raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record

on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091

(5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Because we

conclude that “we cannot fairly evaluate the claim from the record,” we decline

to consider Pedrizco Gutierrez’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim on appeal

without prejudice to his right to raise his claim in a timely 28 U.S.C. § 2255

proceeding. See United States v. Gulley, 526 F.3d 809, 821 (5th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 11-50892 Document: 00511923845 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/17/2012
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: CORN PRODUCTS REFINING COMPANY 

CITATION: 13 Agric. Dec. 1144 

DOCKET NUMBER: 55 

DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1954 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STAY ORDER 

NOTE: ANOTHER VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT THAT WAS NOT REPORTED IN THE AGRICULTURAL 

DECISIONS IS AVAILABLE IN THIS DATABASE 

STAY ORDER

(No. 4120) 

In re CORN PRODUCTS REFINING COMPANY. CEA Docket No. 55. Decided December 

28, 1954. 13 Agric. Dec. 1117 (13 A.D. 1117). Mr. Samuel A. McCain of New York, 

New York, and Mr. Woodson D. Scott of Lord, Day & Lord, of New York, New York, 

for respondent. Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
ex10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1







AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







 


This AMENDMENT, dated May 6, 2016 (this “Amendment”), is by and between BankUnited, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and John A. Kanas (“Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive previously entered into an Employment Agreement, dated February 2, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to make certain changes to the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company and Executive agree as follows:


 


1.  The first sentence of Section 3(c)(i) shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“In each calendar year during the Employment Term (generally expected to occur during the first calendar quarter of the year), Executive shall be eligible to receive, as determined by the Compensation Committee, a grant of restricted stock units in accordance with this Section 3(c)(i) (the “Performance Units”) having a grant date fair value as determined by the Company, with the final value of each award to be determined by the Compensation Committee as soon as reasonably practicable following the end of the applicable Performance Period (and, in the case of the Performance Period ending on the last day of the Employment Term, notwithstanding the expiration of the Employment Term) based on the level of achievement of pre-established performance criteria with respect to the 3 year period beginning on January 1 of the year in with the Performance Units are granted (each such period, a “Performance Period”).”


 


2.  The first sentence of Section 3(c)(ii) shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“In each calendar year during the Employment Term, Executive shall be eligible to receive, as determined by the Compensation Committee, a grant of restricted stock units in accordance with this Section 3(c)(ii) having a grant date fair value as determined by the Company (the “Restricted Stock Units”).”


 


3.  The Employment Agreement, except as expressly modified herein, shall remain in full force and effect.


 


4.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the conflicts of laws principles thereof that would direct the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.


 


[signature page follows]


 






  





  











  








 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have caused this Amendment to the Employment Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the date first written above, to be effective immediately.


 








	  	
BANKUNITED, INC.


	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
/s/ Leslie N. Lunak

	  
	  	
Name:        

	Leslie N. Lunak	  
	  	
Title:

	Chief Financial Officer	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
EXECUTIVE


	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
/s/ John A. Kanas

	  
	  	
John A. Kanas
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1469 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1469

   Providing that the House of Representatives should pass a budget 
      resolution for a fiscal year before the House considers any 
                   appropriation bill for that year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2010

Mr. Campbell submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing that the House of Representatives should pass a budget 
      resolution for a fiscal year before the House considers any 
                   appropriation bill for that year.

Whereas the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 provides for the annual adoption of 
        a concurrent resolution on the budget;
Whereas the congressional budget timetable sets April 15 as a target date for 
        completing action on annual budget resolutions;
Whereas the budget resolution provides Congress a framework for subsequent 
        legislative action on budgetary matters during each session of Congress; 
        and
Whereas the House of Representatives has passed at least one budget resolution 
        every year since 1976: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House that before Congress 
considers any appropriation bill for a particular a fiscal year, the 
House of Representatives should first pass a budget resolution for that 
year.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarter Report of Mantra Venture Group
Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended November 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Larry Kristof, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Larry Kristof

Larry KristofPresident and Chief Executive Officer

  April 21, 2008

---
#### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SOUKSAVATH NOI KEOMISY, also known as Noi, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10715

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern Dis*909trict of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna Marie Hoffmann, Esq., Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Souksavath Noi Keomisy, FCI Three Rivers, Three Rivers, TX, pro se.

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

The attorney appointed to represent Souksavath Noi Keomisy has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Keomisy has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.