alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14342]



[[Page 30725]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-287-055]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Negotiated Rate

June 1, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 24, 2001, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El 
Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets to become effective 
June 1, 2001:

Thirty-Fourth Revised Sheet No. 30
Twenty-Seventh Revised Sheet No. 31

    El Paso states that the above tariff sheets are being filed to 
implement two new negotiated rate contracts and update a company name 
change pursuant to the Commission's Statement of Policy on Alternatives 
to Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines and 
Regulation of Negotiated Transportation Services of Natural Gas 
Pipelines issued January 31, 1996 at Docket Nos. RM95-6-000 and RM96-7-
000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14342 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>


 COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA NET INCOME PER SHARE

                                                  Year Ended December 31,
                                               --------------------------
                                                    1995          1996
                                               ------------  ------------

Net Income                                       $9,498,569    $16,298,660
                                               ------------  ------------
                                               ------------  ------------

Weighted average common shares outstanding       12,000,000     12,203,021

Net effect of stock options granted during
     the twelve months prior to the
     Company's filing of its initial
     public offering, calculated using the
     treasury stock method at an offering
     price of $13.50 per share, and
     treaded as outstanding for all
     periods presented                              523,772        523,772

Net effect of stock options and warrants
     outstanding, excluding those
     discussed above, calculated using the
     treasury stock method at the average
     price for the period                           317,791      1,242,824

Number of shares of common stock assumed
     to be issued in the Company's initial
     public offering whose net proceeds
     would be used to redeem the
     outstanding preferred stock including
     accrued dividends                            1,774,597      1,948,767
                                               ------------  ------------

                                                 14,616,160     15,918,384
                                               ------------  ------------
                                               ------------  ------------



Pro forma net income per share                    $    0.65      $    1.02
                                               ------------  ------------
                                               ------------  ------------
Opinion filed March 18, 2021

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-21-00022-CV

___________

CHRISTOPHER PERRICONE, Appellant

V.

KATIE BETH PERRICONE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 29th District Court

Palo Pinto County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C49295

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Christopher Perricone, has filed in this court an unopposed motion 

to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, Appellant states that the parties to this appeal 

have resolved their dispute, and he asks that this appeal be dismissed. Appellant has 

certified that counsel for Appellee does not oppose the motion. In accordance with 

Appellant’s request, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
2

Appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

March 18, 2021

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: WILLIAM P. FANNING 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 82 

DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1965 

DOCUMENT TYPE: Stipulation of Compliance 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: William P. Fanning 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 82 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that William P. Fanning 

has violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) 

and the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 

CFR, Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued 

and the said William P. Fanning is desirous of disposing of the matter by 

entering into a stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the 

Rules of Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, 

the said William P. Fanning stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) William P. Fanning, an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was on August 13, 1965, a 

registered floor broker under the Commodity Exchange Act and a member of the 

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, a duly designated contract market under 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) On August 13, 1965, William P. Fanning executed 134 transactions in 

regulated commodity futures on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. 

However, with respect to 127 of such transactions, in each instance he failed to 

prepare a trading card or other record 

clearly identifying the opposite floor broker or other trader with whom such 

transaction was executed. 

The Secretary of Agriculture has advised William P. Fanning that his failure 

to keep full and complete records of futures transactions, as described above, 

was in violation of section 4g of the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.35 of 

the regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said William P. Fanning agrees to desist from such acts and practices in 

the future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation shall be 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 

29 day of September 1965 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Witnessed by: 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 
Page 2 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

LOAD-DATE: March 2, 2009 
Page 3
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Theodore J. Goodlander, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Storage Computer Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the regristrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter. ( the regristerants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect the regristerants internal control over
financial reporting: and



5. The registrants other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):



a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



|                     |  |                           
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2004 |  | /S/ THEODORE J. GOODLANDER
|                     |  | Theodore J. Goodlander    
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         7650086
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               2251105
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   60646731
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        32799686
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          33242473
<LOANS>                                      107062128
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2212740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               222559831
<DEPOSITS>                                   177385865
<SHORT-TERM>                                  14690975
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            4206501
<LONG-TERM>                                     273250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       6069300
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               222559831
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                9659971
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              6526381
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              16186352
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             5898981
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6734193
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          9452159
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   120000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (1463)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1622994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3924472
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2700472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     503000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    209000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2212740
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   511000
<RECOVERIES>                                    520000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# The Attorney General of Texas
April 19, 1978 JOHN L. HILL Attorney General Honorable Joe S.Gonzales, Chairman State Board ofPolygraph Examiners Suite 502, Lamar Crest Office Tower 7701North Lamar Austin, Texas 78752 Opinion No.H- 1156 Re: Whether violation of the Board of Polygraph Examiners’ regulations is a penal offense under article 4413(29cc), section 26, V.T.C.S. Dear Mr. Gonzales: You have requested our opinion as to whether the violation of regulations promulgated by the Board of Polygraph Examiners is a penal offense under section 26ofarticle 4413(29cc), V.T.C.S. That provision states:

[alny person whoviolates any provision ofthis Act
.. . shall be guilty ofa misdemeanor.
. .. Section 6(a) ofarticle 4413(29cc)authorizes the Board to

issue regulations consistent with the provisions of this Act for the administration and enforcement of this Act.
... You ask whether aperson who violates a Board regulation forbidding conduct which isnot prohibited by the statute itself may be prosecuted for violating a provision of the Act. In the present instance, there is little evidence that the Legislature intended to confer upon the Board the power to define substantive crimes. If it had attempted to do so, the attempt would have been invalid. It is well established that article 1,section 28 of the Texas Constitution prohibits the Legislature from delegating its authority to create apenal offense. Dockery v. State, 247 S.W. 508, 509(Tex. Crim. App. 1923);Exparte Leslie, 223S.W. 227, 229(Tex. Crim. App. 1920).

p. 4686Honorable Joe S.Gonzales - Page2 (H-1156)

In Attorney General Opinion O-972 (1939), this Office held that the mere violation ofarule of the State Parks Board could not serve as the predicate for an arrest, unless the act in question was also made a penal offense by statute. See also Attorney General Opinions H-119(1973);05047 (1943). Inour opinion, this view isequally applicable to regulations of the Board of Polygraph Examiners. Accordingly, we believe that the violation of Board regulations which forbid conduct not prohibited by any statute is not a penal offense under section 26 of article 4413(29cc). SUMMARY

The violation of regulations promulgated by the Board of Polygraph Examiners, which regulations prohibit conduct not proscribed by any statute, is not a penal offense under section 26ofarticle 4413(29cc), V.T.C.S.

/

P v truza

JOHN L.HILL Attorney General of Texas APPROVED:

Y32LJLLa DAVIDM.KENDALL, First Assistant

Opinion Committee jst

p. 4687
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT TO SEPARATION AGREEMENT 


 


This Amendment to the Separation Agreement
(this "Amendment") is effective as of the 1st day of January, 2016,
between Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with offices in Piscataway, New Jersey (the "Company"),
and Andrew Rackear (the “Executive").


 


BACKGROUND


 


A.           This
Amendment constitutes the amended agreement between the Company and the Executive concerning certain terms set forth in the Separation
Agreement entered into between the Company and the Executive dated September 27, 2013 (the “Separation Agreement”).


 


B.           The
Company desires to continue to ensure that it can rely on the continued services of the Executive to assist with a transition in
the business of the Company, in order to avoid potentially material liabilities, obligations or losses that might arise from such
transition if the Company is not able to rely on employees who have experience with the operations of the Company.


 


C.           The
Executive desires to continue to assure himself of financial support following the termination of his employment with the Company.


 


TERMS


 


In consideration of the foregoing premises
and for other good and valuable consideration, the Company and Executive agree as follows:


 


1.
  The fee set forth in paragrapgh 5 of the Separation Agreement is changed from $250 per hour to $285 per hour.


 


2.   All other terms and conditions shall
remain the same.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.


 


	 	ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Jennifer McNealey
	 	By: Jennifer McNealey
	 	Dated:
	 	 
	 	/s/ Andrew Rackear
	 	ANDREW RACKEAR
	 	Dated:
EXHIBIT
31.1





SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF DOT VN, INC.





I, Thomas
Johnson, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dot VN, Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and




c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent
functions):




a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and,




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and,




6. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: December 15, 2008
                      /s/ Thomas JohnsonThomas JohnsonChief Executive Officer and principal
                        executive officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: June 15, 2001 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
1. Agenda for future meeting: none
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-364 and 731-TA-711 and 713-716 (Review) (Oil 
Country Tubular Goods from Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and 
Mexico)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary 
of Commerce on June 28, 2001.)
5. Outstanding action jackets: none

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: June 7, 2001.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14747 Filed 6-7-01; 2:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-M
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-39795, 333-72895,
333-77893, 333-54064, 333-54068 and 333-63018) pertaining to the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1998 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option
Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the GeneMedicine 1993 Stock Option Plan, the Non-Plan Option Grants and the 2001 Non-Statutory Plan of Valentis, Inc., and in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-38092 and 333-54066) of Valentis, Inc., of our report dated August 13, 2002 (except for
paragraphs 5 through 10 of Organization and Basis of Presentation in Note 1, and Note 16, as to which the date is September 30, 2002), with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Valentis, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2002.

| |  | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
| |  | ---------------------

Palo
Alto, California
September 30, 2002

---

QuickLinks