alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 95-5649 IVAN DWIGHT WALDON, a/k/a Jive'n Ivan, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, District Judge. (CR-91-188) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: February 2, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELHunt L. Charach, Federal Public Defender, C. Cooper Fulton, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Paul A. Billups, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Ivan Dwight Waldon appeals the district court order revoking his supervised release and imposing a sentence of twenty-one months. Waldon contends that the district court clearly erred when it found that a positive urine screen for cocaine, by itself, was sufficient toestablish knowing possession of a controlled substance during supervised release in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(g) (West Supp. 1995). Finding that the district court's factual determination was not clearly erroneous, we affirm.We have previously held that the determination of whether culpable use is established solely by laboratory tests is properly left to the district courts. United States v. Clark , 30 F.3d 23, 26 n.2 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 63 U.S.L.W. 3421 (U.S. Nov. 28, 1994) (No. 94-6495); see also United States v. Almand , 992 F.2d 316, 318 (11th Cir. 1993) (district court's finding that positive urine test was sufficient to establish possession of drugs under§ 3583(g) was not clearly erroneous). Furthermore, in the instant case, in addition to thepositive drug screen, the Government offered evidence of a continuing pattern of drug abuse by Waldon. Waldon offered no evidence of passive or innocent ingestion of cocaine and did not dispute the results of his urine analysis.Under such circumstances, we cannot find the district court's determination clearly erroneous, and we thus affirm the district court's revocation of supervised release. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Solutions Holding, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Timothy
D. Ringgold, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





November
      23, 2009
              /s/ Timothy D. RinggoldTimothy
      D. RinggoldChief
      Executive Officer
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: GASTON GODOY 

DOCKET NUMBER: 56 

DATE: APRIL 21, 1953 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

April 21, 1953 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CE-A DOCKET NO. 56 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing was signed by the Acting Secretary of 

Agriculture on February 21, 1953, charging 

GASTON GODOY with violation of the Commodity Exchange Act 

Complaints are issued under the Commodity Exchange Act for the purpose of 

notifying respondents that the Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe 

that respondents have violated the Act and to advise them of the time and place 

of hearings to be held to determine whether the charges are correct. The 

issuance of a complaint does not, of course, constitute proof of violation of 

the law. Such violation is established only when the Judicial Officer of the 

Department has made a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. 

Complaints are filed in the office of the hearing clerk of the Solicitor of 

the Department of Agriculture and are thereupon a matter of public record. 

Copies are filed in the Washington office and the field offices of the Commodity 

Exchange Authority. 

In cases where the Judicial Officer determines that a violation has occurred 

the resulting order will be served upon all contract markets and circularized 

among all registered futures commission merchants for their information and 

guidance. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer it is the policy of the 

Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate upon the charges 

contained in complaints or discuss the evidence upon which they are based. 

It will be noted that this complaint states April 3, 1953, as the date of the 

hearing in this matter. Due to delays in effecting service the hearing date has 

been postponed until June 22, 1953. 

LOAD-DATE: June 11, 2008 
Page 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-228V

Filed: July 15, 2016

UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

GARY FRIEDLAND, *

*

Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer;

v. * Influenza;

* Shoulder Injury; SIRVA;

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

John R. Howie, Jr. Howie Law, PC, Dallas TX, for petitioner.

Althea Walker Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On February 16, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury after receiving an 

influenza vaccination on September 19, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to 

the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 15, 2016, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer on Damages

(“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $96,522.75. Proffer at 6. In the 

Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award.

On July 15, 2016, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to 

compensation for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Based 

 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as 

stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner 

a lump sum payment of $96,522.75 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, 

Gary Friedland. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be 

available under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master

 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1253 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1253

  Commemorating the 200th anniversary of the birth of Vermont Senator 
Justin Smith Morrill, who helped create a national system of land-grant 
                               colleges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2010

Mr. Welch submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commemorating the 200th anniversary of the birth of Vermont Senator 
Justin Smith Morrill, who helped create a national system of land-grant 
                               colleges.

Whereas Justin Smith Morrill was born on April 14, 1810, in Strafford, Vermont, 
        and was the son of a blacksmith;
Whereas Justin Smith Morrill left school at the age of 15 and was not able to 
        attend college because his family was unable to afford tuition;
Whereas in 1854, Justin Smith Morrill was elected to represent Vermont's Second 
        Congressional District in the House of Representatives, and served a 
        total of six terms as a Representative;
Whereas in 1857, Justin Smith Morrill introduced a bill in the House of 
        Representatives that changed the course of American higher education by 
        creating a national system of land-grant colleges ``to promote the 
        liberal and practical education of the industrial classes'';
Whereas since the enactment of the Act of July 2, 1862 (commonly known as the 
        ``First Morrill Act'' or the ``Land-Grant College Act''; 7 U.S.C. 301 et 
        seq.), more than 23 million students have graduated from the resulting 
        105 land-grant colleges;
Whereas in 1866, Justin Smith Morrill was elected to the United States Senate, 
        an office to which he was re-elected five times;
Whereas the Justin Smith Morrill Homestead was designated a National Historic 
        Landmark by the Secretary of the Interior in 1960, the first site in 
        Vermont so honored;
Whereas in 1969, the Justin Smith Morrill Homestead was donated to the State of 
        Vermont to be open to the public as a Vermont Historic Site; and
Whereas the 200th anniversary of the birth of Justin Smith Morrill is celebrated 
        on April 14, 2010: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commemorates the 200th 
anniversary of the birth of Justin Smith Morrill.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register: March 3, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 41)]
[Notices]
[Page 10364]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03mr98-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 31, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-5617 Filed 2-27-98; 3:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC  20549


FORM 8-K


CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)     April
20, 2000

NS GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Kentucky            1-9838              61-0985936
(State or other                  (Commission            (IRS
Employer
  jurisdiction of             File No.)       I.D. Number)
  incorporation)

530 West Ninth Street, Newport, Kentucky          41071
(Address of principal executive offices)              (Zip
Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (606)
292-6809

Item 5.     Other Events
On April 19, 2000, the Registrant issued a press release
announcing the election of three directors of the Company.
A copy of such press release is filed as Exhibit 99 hereto
and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 7.     Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial
Information and Exhibits

(c)  Exhibits

99.  Press release dated April 19, 2000





SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly
authorized.

               NS GROUP, INC.
               (Registrant)

Date:  April 24, 2000    By:   /s/ Thomas J. Depenbrock
                    Thomas J. Depenbrock
                    Vice President
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)**

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Investment Trust (the "Trust") onForm N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of suchofficer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Report.

Dated:	December 30, 2011

Dated:	December 30, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typedform within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register: December 2, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 231)]
[Notices]
[Page 63698]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02de97-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 16, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., Lobby Level Hearing Room.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Oral Presentation by the Chicago Mercantile
Exchange on the petition for exemptions for the dual trading
prohibition.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FRDoc.97-31694Filed11-28-97;11:42am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: MARK J. GAMBER 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 94 

DATE: OCTOBER 18, 1965 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Mark J. Gamber 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 94 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Mark J. Gamber has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued and 

the said Mark J. Gamber is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering into 

a stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of 

Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said 

Mark J. Gamber stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) Mark J. Gamber an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was on August 13, 1965, a member of the 

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, a duly designated contract market under 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) On August 13, 1965, Mark J. Gamber executed 94 transactions in regulated 

commodity futures on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. However, with 

respect to 92 of such transactions, in each instance he failed to prepare a 

trading card or other record 

clearly identifying the opposite floor broker or other trader with whom such 

transaction was executed. 

The Secretary of Agriculture has advised Mark J. Gamber that his failure to 

keep full and complete records of futures transactions, as described above, was 

in violation of section 4g of the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.35 of the 

regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said Mark J. Gamber agrees to desist from such acts and practices in the 

future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation shall be 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 

18 day of October, 1965 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Witnessed by: 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 
Page 2 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CODY EDWARD DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3262

[February 1, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Jack S. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CF-001230-

AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. 

Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications

 

I, Francis Mailhot, certifythat:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Oro Volcanico Corp..; 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.  The Small business issuer’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the small business issuer and have:

 a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;

b)  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrols over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s second fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

5.  The issuer’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal controls over financial reporting.  

Date: August 13, 2008    /s/ FrancisMailhot                   

                                       FrancisMailhot, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.3



            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
Global Payment Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statement No.
333-114529 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-112934 and 333-30829 on Forms S-8 of Global
Payment Technologies, Inc. of our report, dated December 29, 2003, with respect
to the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows and related Schedule II of Global Payment
Technologies, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2003, which report appears
in the September 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Global Payment
Technologies, Inc.

KPMG LLP


Melville, New York
December 14, 2005