alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,351

EX PARTE DOUGLAS ALBERTO SANCHEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 997747 IN THE 182

ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to thisCourt this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

sexual assault of a child and sentenced to life imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed

his conviction. Sanchez v. State, No. 01-06-00516-CR (Tex. App. – Houston [1 Dist.], July 6, st

2007). Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed

to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se.

The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel
2

failed to timely notify Applicant of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. See Ex

parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled

to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the

First Court of Appeals in Cause No. 01-06-00516-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No.

997747 from the 182nd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition

for discretionary review with the First Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this

Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: May 19, 2010

Do not publish
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: GEORGE S. CASHMAN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 114 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT -- CEA DOCKET NO. 114 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

George S. Cashman 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that the respondent exceeded the limits on speculative 

trading in rye futures. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture are are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, January 14, 1964, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
# FCM Data November 2016
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ARTHUR N. ECONOMOU AND ARTHUR N. ECONOMOU, INC. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 167 

DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 1973 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

CEA Docket No. 167 

Name: Arthur N. Economou and Arthur N. Economou, Inc. 

Effective on February 21, 1973 

Order 

Effective upon the date of service of this order upon the respondents, Arthur 

N. Economou and Co., Inc., shall cease and desist from operating as a futures 

commission merchant within the meaning of the Commodity Exchange Act while 

failing to meet the minimum financial requirements established by section 4f of 

the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.17 of the regulations issued by the 

Secretary of Agriculture thereunder. 

Respondent Arthur N. Economou shall cease and desist from wilfully, aiding, 

abetting, counseling, commanding, inducing or procuring respondent Arthur N. 

Economou and Co., Inc., or any other futures commission merchant, to engage in 

the practice from which the said firm is directed to cease and desist by this 

order. 

Done at Washington, D. C. 

January 15, 1973 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Donald A. Campbell 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
**Fidelity® Select Portfolios®**

Industrials Sector

**Fund**/Ticker

**Transportation Portfolio**/FSRFX

**Summary Prospectus**

**April 29, 2011**

**As Revised February 2, 2012**
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1354 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1354

    Honoring the John G. Shedd Aquarium on the occasion of its 80th 
  anniversary and the 10th anniversary of its award-winning ``Amazon 
                           Rising'' exhibit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2010

  Mr. Davis of Illinois submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Honoring the John G. Shedd Aquarium on the occasion of its 80th 
  anniversary and the 10th anniversary of its award-winning ``Amazon 
                           Rising'' exhibit.

Whereas, on May 30, 2010, the venerable John G. Shedd Aquarium will celebrate 
        its 80th anniversary as one of the most respected cultural, 
        conservation, and educational institutions in Chicago, Illinois;
Whereas the John G. Shedd Aquarium has welcomed 100,000,000 guests since opening 
        its doors in 1930, making it one of Chicago's most visited cultural 
        attractions and a landmark icon;
Whereas, on June 17, 2010, the John G. Shedd Aquarium will commemorate the 10th 
        anniversary of its award-winning ``Amazon Rising'' exhibit, which 
        connects guests to South America's Amazon River flood plain ecosystem, 
        its animals, and inhabitants;
Whereas the John G. Shedd Aquarium meticulously cares for more than 32,000 
        animals and over 1,500 species; and
Whereas for 80 years, the John G. Shedd Aquarium has educated the children of 
        the United States, protected and preserved the environment, attracted 
        people from around the world to visit the City of Chicago, and has 
        contributed greatly to Chicago's strong economy and job opportunity: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the 
tremendous contributions the John G. Shedd Aquarium has made to the 
State of Illinois as a distinguished cultural, scientific, 
conservation, and educational institution, as well as an economic 
engine for the City of Chicago, the State of Illinois, and the region.
                                 <all>
```
#### Frank J. FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. DAVID, M.D.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-15118.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 12, 2010.

Frank J. Fernandez, Crescent City, CA, pro se.

John P. Devine, Esquire, Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Frank J. Fernandez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

*251The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants on Fernandez’s deliberate indifference claim because he failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether their treatment of his hemorrhoids and bacterial skin infection disregarded a substantial risk of serious harm. *See Estelle v. Gamble,*429 U.S. 97, 105-06, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976) (plaintiff must show that the defendants intentionally disregarded a serious medical need); *Toguchi,*391 F.3d at 1058 (a difference of medical opinion concerning treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference).

Fernandez’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Fernandez’s pending motion, filed on August 6, 2010, is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)**

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Destiny Portfolios  (the "Trust") on Form N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of such officer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Dated:	 May 22, 2015

Dated:	May 22, 2015

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ARTHUR P. GUMZ, DOROTHY GUMZ, FREDRICK D. GUMZ AND PAUL A. GUMZ 

DOCKET NUMBER: 135 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT -- CEA DOCKET NO. 135 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Arthur P. Gumz, 

Dorothy Gumz, 

Fredrick D. Gumz and 

Paul A. Gumz 

(North Judson, Indiana) 

The complaint charges that the respondents, acting pursuant to an agreement 

or understanding, exceeded the limits on speculative positions in potato futures 

during the period from June 30, 1965, through February 28, 1966. The complaint 

also charges that Arthur P. Gumz individually exceeded such limits during the 

period from September 28, 1965, through February 24, 1966. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, May 11, 1966, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
```

[Federal Register: March 19, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 53)]

[Notices]

[Page 13395]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr19mr98-39]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION





Sunshine Act Meeting



AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.



TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, April 17, 1999.



PLACE: 1155 21st St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Conference Room.



STATUS: Closed.



MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.



CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 98-7216 Filed 3-16-98; 4:33 pm]

BILLING CODE 6315-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 27, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                         5,041
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    3,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,275
<PP&E>                                         828
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,422
<BONDS>                                        54
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,328
<SALES>                                        2,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,347
<CGS>                                          1,350
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (563)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (977)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (977)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.13)
        


</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: PHYLLIS C. DEMPSTER 

DOCKET NUMBER: 160 

DATE: JULY 15, 1969 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

Docket No. 160 

Name: Phyllis C. Dempster 

Effective On or about July 15, 1969 

Effective on the date of service of this order upon respondent Phyllis C. 

Dempster, she shall cease and desist from wilfully causing, aiding, abetting, 

counseling, commanding or inducing American Commodity Brokers, Inc., or any 

other futures commission merchant, to engage as futures commission merchant 

without meeting the minimum financial requirements prescribed by section 1.17 of 

the regulation (34 F.R. 599) issued under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

A copy of this Decision and Order shall be served on each of the parties. 

Done at Washington, D. C. 

JUL 9 1969 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: HOWARD RANDOLPH, RANDOLPH FOODS, INC. JAMES P. HOBAN, HOBAN AND COMPANY, 

AND ROBERT M. ZADRA 

DOCKET NUMBER: 100 

DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1961 

DOCUMENT TYPE: MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Howard Randolph, Randolph Foods, Inc. James P. Hoban, Hoban and Company, 

and Robert M. Zadra, Respondents 

CEA Docket No. 100 

Motion to Amend Complaint 

The respondents named above have filed their answers to the complaint. 

Pursuant to the provisions of section 0.5(c) of the rules of practice under the 

Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR 0.5(c)), the complainant hereby moves that the 

complaint be amended to include Carl A. Bergstrom, 1562 Lemoine Avenue, Fort 

Lee, New Jersey, as a party respondent and that such amendment be accomplished 

as follows: 

1. By adding the name "Carl A. Bergstrom" to the list of respondents in the 

caption of the complaint and in the introductory paragraph thereof. 

2. By inserting, immediately after paragraph I, a new paragraph, numbered IA, 

reading as follows: Respondent Carl A. Bergstrom, an individual whose address is 

1562 Lemoine Avenue, Fort Lee, New Jersey, is now and was at all times material 

herein engaged in the egg merchandising and brokerage business. 

3. By amending paragraph V to allege that the order of January 13, 1961, to 

raise the price of Fancy Heavyweight Mixed eggs on the New York Mercantile 

Exchange spot call, was first transmitted by respondent Howard Randolph to 

respondent Carl A. Bergstrom and relayed by respondent Bergstrom to respondent 

Robert M. Zadra for execution. 

4. By amending paragraph VI(a) to allege that the order of January 16, 1961, 

to raise the price of Fancy Heavyweight Mixed eggs on the New York Mercantile 

Exchange spot call, was transmitted by respondent Howard Randolph to respondent 

Carl A. Bergstrom. 

5. By amending paragraph VI(b) to allege that the order of January 16, 1961, 

to raise the price of Fancy Heavyweight Mixed eggs on the New York Mercantile 

Exchange spot call, was transmitted by respondent James P. Hoban to respondent 

Carl A. Bergstrom. 

6. By amending paragraph VI(c) to allege that the said orders of respondents 

Randolph and Hoban were, after receipt by respondent Carl A. Bergstrom, relayed 

by respondent Bergstrom to respondent Robert M. Zadra for execution. 

7. By adding the name "Carl A. Bergstrom" to the names of the other 

respondents charged with manipulation and attempted manipulation in paragraph 

VII. 

The complainant requests that the referee issue an order stating that the 

complaint be considered as amended in accordance with this motion. 
Page 2 

/s/ Benj. M. Holstein 

Benj. M. Holstein, Attorney 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

October 10, 1961 

Approved: 

/s/ John P. Duncan, Jr. 

John P. Duncan, Jr. 

Assistant Secretary 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 3
No. 69471 

# FILED MAY 2 0 2016 TRACIE K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY 

### S' DEPLITERn IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA GARY PIERCE, Petitioner, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA; THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WARDEN BRIAN WILLIAMS; LT. WARD; LT. SPIECE, SENIOR CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LEVITT; AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOGUE, Respondents. 

### ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

On February 2, 2016, this court entered an order regarding filing fee. The order granted an extension of 30 days to submit either the requisite filing fee or a financial certificate from the Department of Corrections. Further, the order cautioned petitioner that failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this petition. To date, petitioner has not paid the filing fee or provided this court with a financial certificate from the Department of Corrections. Accordingly, cause appearing, this petition is dismissed. 1

It is so ORDERED. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN
k BY:

1 

### -This court has reviewed the letter received from petitioner on February 24, 2016, and determined that no action is warranted. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER (0)-1947 K, -1(0023

### cc: Gary Pierce

Attorney General/Carson City

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER 

### 2 (0)-1947
# FCM Data September 2011

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF September 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002011FROM REPORTS FILED BY October 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002011	&P of &N
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


In connection with the Annual Report of TTR Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Frank Galuppo, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





MARCH 29, 2004                                 /s/ FRANK GALUPPO

                                                   Frank Galuppo
                                                   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TTR Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by TTR Technologies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Federal Register: June 16, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 116)]
[Notices]
[Page 34898]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16jn06-59]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, July 14, 2006.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC., 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-5521 Filed 6-14-06; 1:32 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```