alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)**

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Fixed-Income Trust  (the "Trust") onForm N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of suchofficer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Report.

Dated:	October 25, 2006

Dated:	October 25, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typedform within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

            EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements: (i) No. 33-58825 on Form S-8 pertaining to the
Stock Option Plan, (ii) No. 33-58827 on Form S-8 pertaining to the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (iii) No. 33-62459 on Form S-3 pertaining
to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, (iv) No. 333-10853 on Form S-8 
pertaining to the Non-Employee Directors' Compensation Plan and 
(v) No. 333-14935 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Retirement and Savings Plan 
of our report dated March 25, 1997, with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements and schedules of American Financial Group, Inc. 
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 1996.




                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
March 26, 1997


































                               E-5
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice #3523]


Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice; Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State 
Department--Overseas Security Advisory Council on February 13, 14, and 
15, in San Diego, California. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and (4), it has been 
determined the meeting will be closed to the public. Matters relative 
to classified national security information as well as privileged 
commercial information will be discussed. The agenda will include 
updated committee reports, a world threat overview and a round table 
discussion that calls for the discussion of classified and corporate 
proprietary/security information as well as private sector physical and 
procedural security policies and protective programs at sensitive U.S. 
Government and private sector locations overseas.
    For more information contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, Department of State, Washington, D.C. 20522-1003, 
phone: 202-663-0533.

    Dated: January 10, 2001.
Peter E. Bergin,
Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-1517 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
NUMBER 13-20-00399-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

NATALIE MORRIS, Appellant,

v.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND 

SOCIETY, FSB, D/B/A CHRISTIANA

TRUST AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF THE

RESIDENTIAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES TRUST V, Appellees.

 

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant Natalie Morris filed a notice of appeal from a final judgment and order of 

possession signed on August 20, 2020, in trial court cause number 2018CCV-62405-5 in 

the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas. The clerk’s record for the appeal 
2

was filed on December 17, 2020. Appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file her 

brief in this matter which the Court granted until February 18, 2021. Appellant filed a 

second motion for extension of time to file her brief in this matter, which was opposed by 

appellees, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, d/b/a Christiana Trust as Owner 

Trustee of the Residential Credit Opportunities Trust V. The Court granted appellant’s 

second motion for extension of time to file the brief until March 22, 2021. Nevertheless, 

appellant did not file her brief.

On March 24, 2021, the Clerk notified appellant that her brief had not been timely 

filed. The Clerk advised appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of 

prosecution unless, within ten days from the date of this letter, appellant reasonably 

explained the failure and the appellees were not significantly injured by the appellant’s 

failure to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellant did not respond to the 

Clerk’s notice or file a brief in this matter.

Appellate courts possess the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution 

when an appellant in a civil case fails to timely file the appellant’s brief and gives no 

reasonable explanation for the failure. See id. R. 38.8(a)(1); id. R. 42.3(b); Am. Bail Bonds 

v. City of El Paso, 225 S.W.3d 612, 612 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2006, no pet.); Newman v. 

Clark, 113 S.W.3d 622, 623 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003, no pet.) (per curiam). Similarly, 

courts may dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution generally or because the appellant 

has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice 

from the appellate court clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3 (b), (c). 
3

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and 

appellant’s failure to file a brief, is of the opinion that this appeal should be dismissed. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 

(c).

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

3rd day of June, 2021.
AUTOMATED CREEL SYSTEMS, INC., petitioner, v. SHAW INDUSTRIES GROUP, INC., et al.

No. 16-108.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 31, 2016.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>          1
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                        200,020
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        675,175
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                14,457,464
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      2,601,447
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        2,601,447
<LOANS>                                    42,192,721
<ALLOWANCE>                                   556,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             61,815,683
<DEPOSITS>                                 43,577,912
<SHORT-TERM>                                9,900,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           558,776
<LONG-TERM>                                   925,154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    2,192,817
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,661,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             61,815,683
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             3,270,601
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           1,026,234
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            4,296,835
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          2,090,890
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            461,420
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       1,744,525
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   5,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             1,317,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               469,346
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    469,346
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  303,388
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      0
<LOANS-NON>                                   871,490
<LOANS-PAST>                                1,264,071
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              580,358
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  29,028
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             556,329
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        


</TABLE>
H. Res. 1494 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 16, 2010. 

Whereas the Scripps National Spelling Bee is the largest and 

longest-running educational promotion in the United 

States, and is administered by the E.W. Scripps Company of Cincinnati, Ohio; 

Whereas the Scripps National Spelling Bee promotes educational excellence by encouraging students to improve 

their spelling, expand their vocabularies, learn new concepts, and develop a mastery of the English language; 

Whereas the 83rd Annual Scripps National Spelling Bee was 

held in Washington, DC, from June 2 through June 4, 

2010; 

Whereas 273 spellers from across the United States, American Samoa, the Bahamas, Canada, China, Department 

of Defense Schools in Europe, Ghana, Guam, Jamaica, 

Japan, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, South Korea, and the 

United States Virgin Islands all competed for the title; 

Whereas these students had previously qualified for the contest by winning locally sponsored spelling bees and all 

have shown a strong knowledge of the English language; 

Whereas Anamika Veeramani, a 14-year-old resident of 

North Royalton, Ohio, and an 8th grade student at Incarnate Word Academy, achieved the distinct honor of 
2 

•HRES 1494 EH 

becoming the 83rd Annual Scripps National Spelling Bee 

champion; 

Whereas Ms. Veeramani, after finishing in 5th place in the 

2009 National Spelling Bee, earned her right to compete 

in 2010 by winning the Plain Dealer Cuyahoga County 

Scripps Spelling Bee on March 6, 2010, for the second 

consecutive year; 

Whereas Ms. Veeramani won the competition in the 9th 

round by correctly spelling ‘‘stromuhr’’, defined as a tool 

that measures the speed of blood through an artery; 

Whereas Adrian Gunawan of Arlington Heights, Illinois, Elizabeth Platz of Shelbina, Missouri, and Shantanu Srivatsa 

of West Fargo, North Dakota, are recognized for tying 

for second place at the 83rd Annual Scripps National 

Spelling Bee; 

Whereas Mr. Gunawan, Ms. Platz, and Mr. Srivatsa advanced to the 8th round of the competition by correctly 

spelling ‘‘netsuke’’, ‘‘gnocchi’’, and ‘‘infundibuliform’’, respectively; 

Whereas Laura Newcombe of Toronto, Canada, Lanson Tang 

of Potomac, Maryland, Joanna Ye of Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and Andrew Grose of Sheboygan, Wisconsin, are 

recognized for advancing to the 7th round of the 83rd 

Annual Scripps National Spelling Bee, thereby tying for 

5th place in the competition; and 

Whereas all the competitors are deserving of congratulations 

for their hard work and poise demonstrated in this difficult competition: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
3 

•HRES 1494 EH 

(1) congratulates all the contestants of the 83rd 

Annual Scripps National Spelling Bee; and 

(2) recognizes the dedication and achievement of 

competition winner Anamika Veeramani and the other 

finalists Adrian Gunawan, Elizabeth Platz, Shantanu 

Srivatsa, Laura Newcombe, Lanson Tang, Joanna Ye, 

and Andrew Grose. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 15**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-08246 on Form F-3,and No. 333-106837 on Form F-3/S-3 of our report dated 7 October 2005 (which expresses anunqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the nature and effect ofdifferences between accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom and the UnitedStates of America, our audit of the translation of pounds sterling amounts into U.S. dollaramounts) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of British Sky Broadcasting Group plc for theyear ended 30 June 2005.Deloitte & Touche LLPLondon, United Kingdom
#### Virgil A. LESTER v. David MATHEWS, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare.

Civ. A. No. 76-0584.

United States District Court, W. D. Virginia, Abingdon Division.

Jan. 28, 1977.

*103J. D. Morefield, Abingdon, Va., for plaintiff.

Robert S. Stubbs, Asst. U. S. Atty., Roanoke, Va., for defendant.

OPINION AND JUDGMENT

TURK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff has filed this action challenging the final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying his claim for “black lung” benefits under the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended, 30 U.S.C. § 901*et seq.*Jurisdiction of this court is’ pursuant to § 413(b) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. § 923(b), which incorporates § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The only issue to be decided by this court is whether the Secretary’s final decision is supported by “substantial evidence”, and if it is, this court must affirm.

In an opinion eventually adopted as the final decision by the Secretary, an Administrative Law Judge found that Mr. Lester, a miner for in excess of ten years, was not entitled to “black lung” benefits. Implicit in the Law Judge’s determination was the finding that plaintiff was not disabled due to pneumoconiosis (black lung) at any time prior to July 1, 1973, the date on which the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare surrendered jurisdiction of “black lung” claims to the Department of Labor. The court must conclude that the Secretary’s final decision is supported by the evidence of record. Plaintiff produced evidence of the existence of pneumoconiosis in the form of roentgenographic reports dated in 1975. However, other than for a single positive roentgenographic interpretation for film twice reread as negative, all medical evidence dated prior to 1975 proved negative for indications of pneumoconiosis or chronic lung disease. In short, there is insufficient evidence of record which serves as a basis for a relation back of later evidence of lung related disability to a time prior to the jurisdictional cut-off. Clearly, under the Act, Mr. Lester must establish that his condition produced disability at a time prior to the termination of the Secretary’s jurisdiction. *Collins v. Weinberger,*401 F.Supp. 377 (W.D.Va., 1975) vac. on other grounds *sub nom. Talley v. Mathews,*550 F.2d 911 (4th Cir., January 5, 1977).

The court recognizes that pneumoconiosis is a progressive disease. *Collins v. Weinberger, supra.*However, it also follows that the disease cannot be expected to reach disabling proportions until some point after its onset. Given the nature of the evidence in this case, the court must conclude that plaintiff has failed to establish the existence of a disabling impairment existing pri- or to the end of defendant’s “black lung” jurisdiction. Since the court has found “substantial evidence” supporting the final decision of the Secretary, that decision must be affirmed. *Laws v. Celebrezze,*368 F.2d 640 (4th Cir., 1966). The court notes that plaintiff may wish to file a new application under the jurisdiction of the Department of Labor.
No. 362.

#### Short *v.*School Board, Upper Moreland Township, Pennsylvania, et al.

November 18, 1935.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1161/2004

of 24 June 2004         

determining the extent to which applications lodged in June 2004 for import licences under the regime provided for by tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector for the period 1 July 2004 to 30 September 2004 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 of 18 August 2003 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for certain products in the pigmeat sector (1), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2004 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 shall be met as referred to in Annex I.

2.   For the period 1 October to 31 December 2004, applications may be lodged pursant to Regulation (EC) No 1458/2003 for import licences for a total quantity as referred to in Annex II.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 June 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 208, 19.8.2003, p. 3.

----

ANNEX I

----

ANNEX II

----
Exhibit
32.1



Certifications
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), Robert Silzer, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of DSG Global, Inc. (the “Company”),
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | Our
    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
    32.1 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations
    of the Company.                                                                                                             



|Date:
December 20, 2017 | /s/
    Robert Silzer                                  
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Robert
    Silzer                                      
|                        | Chief
    Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|                        | (Principal
    Executive Officer and                   
|                        | Principal
    Financial and Accounting Officer)
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: FOX DELUXE FOODS, INC., ROLAND N. GERGEN, HAROLD W. FOX, AND BERT E. FOX 

DOCKET NUMBER: 74 

DATE: OCTOBER 1, 1959 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STAY ORDER 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re Fox DeLuxe Foods, Inc., Roland N. Gergen, Harold W. Fox, and Bert E. Fox, 

Respondents 

CEA Docket No. 74 

Stay Order 

On September 15, 1959, an order was entered in this proceeding dismissing 

respondents' petition for reconsideration and reinstating the order of June 26, 

1959, prescribing sanctions to become effective on October 15, 1959. 

Respondents have filed an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Seventh Circuit. Accordingly, the order of September 15, 1959, is stayed 

pending the outcome of the court appeal. 

Copies hereof shall be served upon the parties and upon the contract markets. 

Done at Washington, D. C. October 1, 1959 

Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2