alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2*

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Cognex Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
October 3, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  November 8, 2004


                                       /s/ Richard A. Morin
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Richard A. Morin
                                       Senior Vice President Of Finance,
                                       Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
                                       (principal financial officer)

* This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: WINN & LOVETT GROCERY COMPANY, POTATO DISTRIBUTORS, INC., KWIK CHECK 

WAREHOUSE CORPORATION, WADACA PLANTATION, HILLSBOROUGH WAREHOUSE CORPORATION, 

JAYDEE CORPORATION, JAMES E. DAVIS, A. DARIUS DAVIS, TINE W. DAVIS, BERT L. 

THOMAS, M. AUSTIN DAVIS, AND FRANCIS C. RUEDIGER 

CITATION: 15 Agric. Dec. 898 

DOCKET NUMBER: 68 

DATE: AUGUST 17, 1956 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER REMOVING SUSPENSION OF TRADING PRIVILEGES 

(No. 4766) 

In re WINN & LOVETT GROCERY COMPANY, POTATO DISTRIBUTORS, INC., KWIK CHECK 

WAREHOUSE CORPORATION, WADACA PLANTATION, HILLSBOROUGH WAREHOUSE CORPORATION, 

JAYDEE CORPORATION, JAMES E. DAVIS, A. DARIUS DAVIS, TINE W. DAVIS, BERT L. 

THOMAS, M. AUSTIN DAVIS, and FRANCIS C. RUEDIGER. CEA Docket No. 68. Decided 

August 17, 1956. 

Termination of Suspension of Trading Privileges

Since the trading privileges have been suspended for a year and the public 

interest requires no further suspension, the respondents' request for 

restoration is granted. 

Mr. Theodore R. Finder, of Beekman & Bogue, of New York, New York, for 

respondents. 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer

ORDER REMOVING SUSPENSION OF TRADING PRIVILEGES

On July 14, 1955, an order was entered in this proceeding under the Commodity 

Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. Chapter 1) directing the contract markets to refuse all 

respondents, except Winn & Lovett Grocery Company, all trading privileges 

thereon "until further order of the Secretary of Agriculture." Such respondents, 

through counsel, have requested issuance of an order terminating the suspension 

of their trading privileges. 

Since the trading privileges of the respondents have been suspended for a 

year, the public interest requires no further suspension and the respondents' 

request for restoration is granted. 

Accordingly, all contract markets are hereby notified, as provided by the 

order of July 14, 1955, that they need no longer refuse trading privileges to 

the respondents. 

A copy hereof shall be served by registered mail upon the respondents and 

upon all contract markets. 

LOAD-DATE: June 8, 2008 
Page 2
No. 285.

#### Evans Terry Co. *v.*Mississippi ex rel. Rice, Attorney General, et al.

November 18, 1935.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boreal Productions Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and Boreal
Productions Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Andrea Fehsenfeld, as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Boreal Productions Inc., hereby
certify that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Boreal Productions Inc.


Dated: August 14, 2008                    /s/ Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                          Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August xx, 2008                    /s/ Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-127803, No. 333-113554, and No. 333-105966) on Form S-8 and in the
Registration Statements (No. 333-136830 and No. 333-129336) on Form S-3 of
ENGlobal Corporation of our reports dated March 16, 2009, relating to our audits
of the consolidated financial statements, the financial statement schedule and
internal control over financial reporting, which appear in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of ENGlobal Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008.


/s/ Hein & Associates LLP
-------------------------
Hein & Associates LLP

Houston, Texas
March 16, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: M.J.G., JR., A

MINOR

PETITION OF: A.T., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 285 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 09

- 00229

- CR

EX PARTE DARRYL WILL IAMS

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09

- 9236

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This original proceeding, in which a pro se jailed arrestee seeks pre

- indi ctment,

pretrial habeas corpus relief, is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 1

REX D. DAVIS
Justice

1 The p etition for writ of habeas corpus lacks proof of service on anyone other than this Court. A copy of all documents presented to the Court must be served on all parties ( e.g. , the trial court and the district attorney) and must contain proof of service. T E X

. R. A PP

. P. 9.5 , 52.2 . Proof of service may be in the form of either an acknowledgement of service by the person served or a certificate of service. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.5(d). A certificate of service must be signed by the person who made the service, an d must state (1) the date and manner of service, (2) the name and address of each person served, and (3) if the person served is a party’s attorney, the name of the party represented by that attorney. Id . at (e). To expedite this matter, we implement Rul e of Appellate Procedure 2 to suspend Rule 9.5’s proof

- of

- service requirement.Ex parte Darryl Williams Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna , and

Justice Davis

Petition d ismissed Opinion delivered and filed July 29, 2009

Do n ot p ublish
[ CR25]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1495 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1495

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          July 1, 2010.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5618) to continue Federal unemployment 
programs. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  The requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds vote 
to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented 
to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported through the 
legislative day of July 3, 2010.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Lawrence Larrier et al., Respondents, v Gateway Sherman, Inc., Appellant, and Renaissance Equity Holdings, LLC, Respondent.

[875 NYS2d 267]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Gateway Sherman, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Balter, J.), dated April 16, 2008, which denied its motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

In view of the limited disclosure conducted, triable issues of fact exist as to whether the alleged defective condition existed at the time of the conveyance of the subject property from the appellant to the defendant Renaissance Equity Holdings, LLC (hereinafter Renaissance), and, if so, whether Renaissance, as the new owner of the property, had a reasonable opportunity prior to the accident to remedy that condition *(see Bittrolff v Ho’s Dev. Corp.,*77 NY2d 896, 898 [1991]; *see Kilmer v White,*254 NY 64 [1930]; *Gramazio v 370 Lexington Ave., L.L.C.,*40 AD3d 303 [2007]; *Fisher v Braun,*227 AD2d 586, 587 [1996]; *Farragher v City of New York,*26 AD2d 494, 496 [1966], *affd on op below*21 NY2d 756 [1968]). Accordingly, resolution of these issues must await further discovery. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Miller and Balkin, JJ., concur.
November 7, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HARDAM S. AZAD, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A 5 MILLION SQUARE 

FEET COMPANIES, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00165-CV V.

MRCO, INC. AND COMMERCIAL ROOF CONSULTANTS & CLAIMS 

MANAGEMENT, LLC, Appellees

____________________

This court today heard a motion for rehearing en banc. We order that the 

motion be denied as moot, and that this court’s former judgment of August 29, 

2013, be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s 

memorandum opinion of August 29, 2013, withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, MRCO, INC. 

AND COMMERCIAL ROOF CONSULTANTS & CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, 

LLC, signed December 2, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore 

REVERSE the trial court’s final judgment with respect to the award of damages as 

to MarinaGate, and we RENDER judgment that MRCO and Commercial Roof 

take nothing with respect to lost profits as to MarinaGate. We REVERSE the trial 

court’s final judgment with respect to (1) the award of attorney’s fees; and (2) the 

computation of prejudgment and postjudgment interest, and we REMAND for 

further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We REFORM the final 
judgment to state that the jury’s answer to Question No. 6 is disregarded as 

immaterial. We AFFIRM the trial court’s final judgment in all other respects.

We order that each party shall be responsible for their own costs incurred in 

this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### In the Matter of Javone C., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 63]

— Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Robert R. Reed, J.), entered on or about June 19, 2008, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of reckless endangerment in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it denied appellant’s request for a dismissal of the petition or an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal *(see Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The court properly determined that appellant required supervision *(see*Family Ct Act § 352.1 [1]) and that probation was the least restrictive available alternative *(see*Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2]). Given the gravity of appellant’s acts and his need for psychiatric treatment, the 12-month period of probation supervision is appropriate. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: HENRY S. SHATKIN 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 90 

DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1965 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Henry S. Shatkin 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 90 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Henry S. Shatkin has 

violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) and 

the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 CFR, 

Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued and 

the said Henry S. Shatkin is desirous of disposing of the matter by entering 

into a stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the Rules of 

Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, the said 

Henry S. Shatkin stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) Henry S. Shatkin an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was on August 13, 1965, a 

registered floor broker under the Commodity Exchange Act and a member of the 

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, a duly designated contract market under 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) On August 13, 1965, Henry S. Shatkin executed 223 transactions in 

regulated commodity futures on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. 

However, with respect to 158 of such transactions, in each instance he failed to 

prepare a trading card or other record 

clearly identifying the opposite floor broker or other trader with whom such 

transaction was executed. 

The Secretary of Agriculture has advised Henry S. Shatkin that his failure to 

keep full and complete records of futures transactions, as described above, was 

in violation of section 4g of the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.35 of the 

regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said Henry S. Shatkin agrees to desist from such acts and practices in 

the future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation shall be 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said act. He also understands, that it is the practice of the Commodity 

Exchange Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 

7 day of October 1965 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Witnessed by: 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 
Page 2 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ROY D. SIMMONS 

DOCKET NUMBER: 108 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT -- CEA DOCKET NO. 108 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Roy D. Simmons 

(Oswego, New York) 

The complaint charges that the respondent exceeded the limits on speculative 

trading and positions in egg futures in January 1962. The complaint also 

charged that the respondent filed false reports with the Commodity Exchange 

Authority on certain days in January 1962. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, September 27, 1962, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL WYLES, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant - Appellee. No. 09-35805 D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01395-TSZ
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, Senior District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 2, 2010 Seattle, Washington Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN and BEA, Circuit Judges. Appellant Michael Wyles (“Wyles”) appeals the district court’s decision affirming the denial of his application for social security benefits. Wyles contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ” ) erred by rejecting the opinion of his examining physician, Dr. Richard Was hburn (“Dr. Washburn”), who diagnosed 

# FILED
SEP 22 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 Wyles with impairments that met the requirements in the Listings of Impairments, under 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P, App. 1. We agree. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand to the district court. We review the district court’s judgment de novo to determine whether the ALJ supported his decision with substantia l evidence and applied the correct legal standards. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Tommasetti v. Astrue , 533 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir. 2008). Dr. Washburn determined that Wyles was disabled and unable to work due to his bipolar disorder with major depr ession and psychotic symptoms, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and a non-specific personality disorder. Importantly, Dr. Washburn found that Wyles would remain unable to work for one year—from November 2002 to November 2003—until he became stabilized on medication for these mental illnesses. We therefore remand to the district court for an award of benefits consistent with our holding that Wyles proved he was disabled for that one year: November 2002–November 2003. REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ROCCO G. CANCELLARE 

DOCKET NUMBER: 169 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D.C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 169 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Rocco G. Cancellare 

(New York, New York) 

The complaint charges that the respondent, while acting as a floor broker, 

deceived, cheated and defrauded persons whom he represented. The complaint 

alleges that during the period December 17 through 23, 1968, there was a 

shortage of frozen concentrated orange juice futures available for purchase on 

the Citrus Associates of the New York Cotton Exchange, Inc., due to maximum 

price limitations of exchange rules. As a result, trading was conducted by the 

exchange allocating sell orders to each floor broker seeking to purchase. On 

each day during the period Mr. Cancellare had accepted and held for his 

principals market orders to purchase orange juice futures. When he was 

allocated the sell orders instead of assigning all such purchases to the orders 

he held for his principals, he took some into his own account. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, May 12, 1970, in New York, New York. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Exhibit (d)(174)

**FORM OF**

**SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENT**

**between**

**FIL INVESTMENT ADVISORS**

**and**

**FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY**

**and**

**FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST**