alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Proposed Collection; Comment Request Review of New Information 
Collection: OPM 1646

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management intends to submit to the Office of Management and 
Budget a request for clearance of a new information collection. OPM 
Form 1646, CFC for Federal Retirees Pledge Card, is used to record 
Combined Federal Campaign pledges from federal retirees.
    We estimate 8,300 Form 1646's will be completed annually. Each form 
takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden 
is 1,383 hours.
    Comments are particularly invited on:

--Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management, and 
whether it will have practical utility;
--Whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection is 
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and
--Ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond, through use of the appropriate 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

    For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 202/
606-8358, or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c7aaa5b3a8a8aaa2be87a8b7aae9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e38e81978c8c8e869aa38c938ecd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 60 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to: Curtis Rumbaugh, Office of CFC 
Operations, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Room 5450, Washington, DC 20415.
    For information regarding administrative coordination contact: 
Curtis Rumbaugh, Office of CFC Operations, U.S. Office of Personnel 
Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 5450, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 
606-2564.

Office of Personnel Management.
Steven R. Cohen,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 01-15116 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-46-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. —, original.

#### Ex parte John Jobissy.

January 11, 1937.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          36,628
<SECURITIES>                                    94,795
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,425
<INVENTORY>                                     17,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,396
<PP&E>                                          48,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,983
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       197,744
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   339,091
<SALES>                                        101,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,553
<CGS>                                           74,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,367)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,367)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,779)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            4184
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              36
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      10948
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            1887
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              1955
<LOANS>                                         159718
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  184484
<DEPOSITS>                                      132800
<SHORT-TERM>                                     18151
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1023
<LONG-TERM>                                      11468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                       21021
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  184484
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  14540
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  608
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   336
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 15089
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                6212
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7537
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             7552
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      270
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   7194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    514
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         538
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.37
<LOANS-NON>                                         18
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1423
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1509
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      210
<RECOVERIES>                                        90
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1659
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1659
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            651
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Meeting of the 
Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal; Cancellation

    The ACRS Subcommittee meeting on Plant License Renewal scheduled to 
be held on June 22, 2001 has been canceled. Notice of this meeting was 
published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, June 6, 2001 (66 FR 
30493).

For further information contact: Mr. Sam Duraiswamy, cognizant ACRS 
staff engineer, (telephone 301/415-7364) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 
p.m. (EDT).

    Dated: June 8, 2001.
James E. Lyons,
 Associate Director for Technical Support ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 01-15268 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### Alfredo CHAVEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-71040.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 6, 2012.

Brenda Diaz, Esquire, Phung, Miyamoto & Diaz, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Bryan Stuart Beier, Senior Litigation Counsel, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alfredo Chavez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de *661novo questions of law, *Pelayo-Garcia v. Holder,*589 F.3d 1010, 1012 (9th Cir.2009), and we grant the petition for review and remand.

Chavez’s 2002 conviction for oral copulation with a minor in violation of California Penal Code § 288a(b)(1), is not categorically an aggravated felony with respect to either of the federal generic definitions we have adopted for “sexual abuse of a minor” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(A), because the statute of conviction lacks the elements of abuse, a four-year age difference between the defendant and the victim, and a victim under the age of 16. *See Rivera-Cuartas v. Holder,*605 F.3d 699, 701-02 (9th Cir.2010); *Estrada-Espinoza v. Mukasey,*546 F.3d 1147, 1159 (9th Cir.2008), *abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Aguilar-Montes de Oca,*655 F.3d 915 (9th Cir.2011) (per curiam). We therefore remand for the BIA to apply the modified categorical approach in the first instance. *See Aguilar-Montes de Oca,*655 F.3d at 928 (proceeding to the modified categorical approach is permissible where the statute of conviction is missing a requisite element).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN
THE  COMPANY'S  FORM  10-K FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  2000,  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          1,935
<SECURITIES>                                   18,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                     932
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               22,734
<PP&E>                                         12,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,781)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,303
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      158,842
<OTHER-SE>                                   (159,006)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,027
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,593
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  26,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,993)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,993)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.42)



</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1207/2004

of 29 June 2004         

amending the import duties in the cereals sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 of 28 June 1996 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 as regards import duties in the cereals sector (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 1114/2004 are hereby replaced by Annexes I and II to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 June 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1104/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 125. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1110/2003 (OJ L 158, 27.6.2003, p. 12).

(3)OJ L 214, 16.6.2004, p. 3. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1189/2004 (OJ L 228, 29.6.2004, p. 3).

----

ANNEX I

Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92

----

(1)  For goods arriving in the Community via the Atlantic Ocean or via the Suez Canal (Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96), the importer may benefit from a reduction in the duty of:

(2)  The importer may benefit from a flat-rate reduction of EUR 24 per tonne, where the conditions laid down in Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96 are met.

----

ANNEX II

Factors for calculating duties

period from 15 June 2004 to 28 June 2004         

1.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:

2.   
Averages over the reference period referred to in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96:
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 21,78 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 31,52 EUR/t.

3.   

----

(*1)  A discount of 10 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*2)  A discount of 30 EUR/t (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*3)  Premium of 14 EUR/t incorporated (Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/96).

(*4)  Fob Duluth.

----
Exhibit No. 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Thomas Diemer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Greenstar
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 14, 2008

By: /s/ Thomas Diemer
    -----------------
    Thomas Diemer, Chief Financial Officer,
    principal accounting and financial officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
                              CERTIFICATION

I, Sayed Ali, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Creative Host Services,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this Report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2004                          /s/ Sayed Ali
                                              ----------------------
                                              Sayed Ali,
                                              Chief Financial Officer
#### ALLERGAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, and Murray A. Johnstone, M.D. and Duke University, Plaintiffs, v. ATHENA COSMETICS, INC., Pharma Tech International, Inc., and Northwest Cosmetic Laboratories, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Cosmetic Alchemy, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, and Nutra-Luxe M.D., Defendant, and Stella International, LLC, Product Innovations, LLC, Movants-Appellees, and Metics, LLC, Movant, and Peter Thomas Roth, Inc. and Peter Thomas Roth Labs LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and Lifetech Resources, LLC and Rocasuba, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Global MDRX, Cosmetic Technologies, Inc., DMI, LA Canada Ventures Inc., and Susan F. Lin, M.D., Defendants.

No. 2010-1394.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 28, 2010.

Before SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Allergan, Inc. moves for summary reversal or, in the alternative, for expedited treatment. Lifetech Resources, LLC et al. oppose. Athena Cosmetics, Inc. et al., Peter Thomas Roth, Inc. et al., Cosmetic Alchemy, LLC, and Stella International, LLC et al. oppose.* Allergan replies.

Allergan has not shown that it is entitled to the relief it seeks. Allergan should include arguments concerning the merits of the case in its briefs.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

The motion is denied. The appellees should calculate the due date for their briefs from the date of filing of this order.

*

 Athena et al.’s opposition indicates that it is also submitted on behalf of Metics, LLC. However, counsel for Metics has not entered an appearance. If Metics intends to participate in this appeal, counsel should enter an appearance promptly.