alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald Everett, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q Amendment No. 1 of GBS
      Enterprises Incorporated for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q Amendment No.
      1fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of GBS Enterprises
Incorporated.                                                          

|Date: March 11, 2011 | /s/
      Ronald Everett                    
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                     | Ronald Everett                              
|                     | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

---
EXHIBIT 32.2




SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palmdale Executive Homes, Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tricia A. Nickson, Treasurer/Chief Fiancial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: August 16, 2010






By: /s/ TRICIA A. NICKSON


___________________________


Tricia A. Nickson


Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 6 
<CIK> 0000744822
<NAME> Fidelity Investment Trust
<SERIES>
 <NUMBER> 91
 <NAME> Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 year          
 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             oct-31-1997   
 
<PERIOD-END>                  oct-31-1997   
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>         753,041       
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>        492,781       
 
<RECEIVABLES>                 39,113        
 
<ASSETS-OTHER>                14,687        
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>          0             
 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                546,581       
 
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>      42,279        
 
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>       0             
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>     5,134         
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>           47,413        
 
<SENIOR-EQUITY>               0             
 
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>      895,065       
 
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>         48,218        
 
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>         76,044        
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>     0             
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>        (10,148)      
 
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>       (124,069)     
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>      0             
 
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>      (261,680)     
 
<NET-ASSETS>                  499,168       
 
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>             23,658        
 
<INTEREST-INCOME>             1,792         
 
<OTHER-INCOME>                (1,871)       
 
<EXPENSES-NET>                14,198        
 
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>       9,381         
 
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>      26,296        
 
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     (357,059)     
 
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         (321,382)     
 
<EQUALIZATION>                0             
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>     17,985        
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>      0             
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>         0             
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>       20,889        
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>   49,788        
 
<SHARES-REINVESTED>           1,073         
 
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        (763,996)     
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>       0             
 
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>     (149,937)     
 
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>       1,970         
 
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>    0             
 
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>         7,911         
 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            22            
 
<GROSS-EXPENSE>               14,267        
 
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>          1,049,177     
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>         16.610        
 
<PER-SHARE-NII>               .150          
 
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>       (6.170)       
 
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>          .250          
 
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>     0             
 
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>          0             
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>           10.350        
 
<EXPENSE-RATIO>               136           
 
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>        0             
 
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>          0
### L-dC/tr ar de/MsA/At /rW&ffts £/- /&)la<> 

# /?#. Soy /33QB\ (l&PjrrdL ST/4 -/da/, 02-62- JOtS


### •_7" #07 CJj?JTs?\rcj 77/£- CdtC/.O.r O/^ *?/0/*6&CS> ~0_ „E/_fiL/A_0LL7i Z7£T„S;^22/-51_<2^L->^>^

. * 7#-&- CjXsat- o*J 64, th&oct-r /tjy/ty-Zo'*/ /=&sz 4/-c/'&^t=u~r/ne 

### lC^*>£*t--^j^J)-J^jOL-^r&^
AJtlO /fabt&ts T.dXJZ



## ^/5/^^^.Zm^ ^./?</*&31 /13~J?3 '/=-7tc_- /nr^L 

### P./). 3ov ftpoO 

## ^<^^^Z6A/^^K,-^^-S^_3_ COURTOFCRIfBIMALAPPEALS Mi*^/&-l>2£&3^.&&M£- 

# S?J<eusrn/^^z. •/[. £/nj 5<. -&d=£'.£LJ*At±$_A.l.O-/?J?-fY>.er?-. /tQut*s7tfcATtcnO bo^Od? /3y CowostrL, /i3/c/Ai /C&/Z. Ajeuj ~rtuf*c. . •• I 

### _-L y?#s4y TtJ&T TfrerAlters JT &uG/»4TTtid U>&^ /*^e^7j^JSL?b£>„ /4ju£> T/¥r=^ /Z&S/A-L7S &s= /rtSs /<Ou<f>sY) GA-~r4at^ LQJtX< (L^»Q_^^&^^<LjAJTi4^^J^J±C_£#C?£ . ,
/)/^fyw27sM&v-r 7b £&-/ A ~7J£i/G 7?/ne-/^iiJ& a/? &J//6i*J3' l<j/H> ^fo/j/oen (3 /Afe- &£3aLtr-riAv il~ /*/ &tes/&2s j*=&et 35 0200^ Dox^sz&s &ss*nus(T _?/Jc s=*sr.r 7jwrji TUg-Almou^T */? loc^e^t. £/&=- s'u? s^>. J2l.£TjCLL 

### rX)/t y/9iu*u /)/**£ 

# (tybfrt C-K^.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6500

EDWARD HAROLD SAUNDERS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CA-96-468-3-MU)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe

DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Saunders

v. Attorney Gen. of N.C., No. CA-96-468-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 23,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: J. MORONI STOOF AND M-S COMMODITIES, INC. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 187 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 187 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

J. Moroni Stoof 

(Bountiful, Utah) and 

M-S Commodities, Inc. 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that during the period March 15 through March 18, 1971, 

J. Moroni Stoof, a branch office co-manager of M-S Commodities, Inc., converted 

to his own use $ 51,600 which had been received from his employer's customers to 

margin their commodity accounts. As a result of such conversion and the 

commingling by M-S Commodities, Inc. of Mr. Stoof's accounts with those of the 

firm's ordinary customers, it was under-segregated in amounts ranging up to in 

excess of $ 51,000. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, on January 26, 1972, in Salt Lake City, Utah. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of Aftermarket Technology Corp. (the “Company”),hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  March 1,2005

 

 
| /s/ Donald T. Johnson, Jr.                       |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Donald T. Johnson, Jr., Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

 

This certification will not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject tothe liability of that section.  Thiscertification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent thatthe registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
Order filed February 14, 2017 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00995-CR

____________

LEON HARRISON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 635921

ORDER

We direct the district clerk to furnish the clerk’s record to appellant by March 1, 

2017. The clerk shall certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to 

appellant is made. If the record has already been provided to appellant, the clerk shall 

certify the date on which the record was sent as well as the date on which the record was 

delivered to appellant.

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 22, 2001.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. Camden National Corporation, Camden, Maine; to acquire Acadia 
Trust, National Association, Portland, Maine, and thereby engage in 
trust company activities, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(5) of Regulation 
Y, and Gouws Capital Management, Inc., Portland, Maine, and thereby 
engage in investment advisory services, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(6) 
of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 4, 2001.
Robert deV. Frierson
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 01-14366 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
ex10-4.htm



Exhibit 10.4


 


SUPPLEMENT #1 TO MEDOVEX CORP.


 


CONFIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM DATED MARCH 22, 2016







THE DATE OF THIS SUPPLEMENT IS APRIL 18, 2016


 







This Supplement #1 to Confidential Private Placement Memorandum (the “Supplement”) supplements the Confidential Private Placement Memorandum of Medovex Corp. dated as of March 22, 2016, (“PPM”). The purpose of this Supplement is to supplement certain disclosures in the PPM, as more fully described below.


 


This Supplement is incorporated by reference into, and should be read in conjunction with, the PPM. This Supplement is not complete without, and may not be delivered or utilized except in connection with the PPM.







By accepting this Supplement, you agree to hold all information contained herein in the strictest confidence and not to use this information for any purpose other than to analyze an investment in the Company. Failure to comply with this directive can result in a violation of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Any further distribution or reproduction of this Supplement or the PPM, in whole or in part, or the disclosure of any of its contents by an offeree, is unauthorized.







The recipient, by accepting delivery of this Supplement, agrees to return this Supplement and all accompanying or related documents to Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd. if the recipient does not agree to purchase any of the securities offered in the PPM.







Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the PPM.







Except as expressly set forth in this Supplement, the PPM, including all disclosures therein and all exhibits thereto, shall continue unmodified.


 


Repricing of Securities comprising the Units


 


The PPM provided for a price of $100,000 per Unit with each Unit consisting of 83,333 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 41,667 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. The PPM is hereby supplemented to provide that:








	
  

	
1.

	
Each Unit will consist of (i) 86,957 shares of common stock; and (ii) each Warrant will entitle the holder to purchase 43,378 shares of common stock.








	
  

	
2.

	
The Exercise Price shall be reduced from $1.50 per share of common stock to $1.30 per share.







 


[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]






  





  











  






 


IF YOU HAVE ALREADY SUBSCRIBED FOR UNITS IN THE OFFERING AS OF APRIL 8, 2016, AND YOU DO NOT WISH TO REVOKE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, YOU DO NOT NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION.


 


Medovex Corp. hereby agrees to be bound by the terms of this Supplement and agrees that the Units will consist of 86,957 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 43,378 shares of common stock and that the Warrants will have an Exercise Price of $1.30 per share.


 




 



	 	 	
MEDOVEX CORP.


 



By: Jarrett Gorlin            


Jarrett Gorlin, CEO
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norberto QUINONES, a/k/a Jose Rosado, a/k/a J, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-7249.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 14, 2012.

Norberto Quinones, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norberto Quinones appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Quinones,*No. 8:04-cr-00234-RWT-3 (D.Md. Aug. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument *283because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1294 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1294

  Expressing support for designation of the first Saturday in May as 
National Explosive Ordnance Disposal Day to honor those who are serving 
    and have served in the noble and self-sacrificing profession of 
     Explosive Ordnance Disposal in the United States Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2010

Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida (for herself and Mr. Boren) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for designation of the first Saturday in May as 
National Explosive Ordnance Disposal Day to honor those who are serving 
    and have served in the noble and self-sacrificing profession of 
     Explosive Ordnance Disposal in the United States Armed Forces.

Whereas the bomb and mine disposal profession was created in April 1941;
Whereas members of Explosive Ordnance Disposal organizations perform a dangerous 
        and selfless task often without recognition, risking their lives on 
        behalf of the United States;
Whereas the United States will forever be in debt to personnel in the profession 
        of explosive ordnance disposal for their bravery and sacrifice in times 
        of peace and war;
Whereas people in the United States should express their recognition and 
        gratitude for members of the Explosive Ordnance Disposal profession; and
Whereas the first Saturday in May would be an appropriate date to observe as 
        National Explosive Ordnance Disposal Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of National Explosive Ordnance Disposal Day to honor those 
who are serving and have served in the noble and self-sacrificing 
profession of Explosive Ordnance Disposal in the United States Armed 
Forces.
                                 <all>
```
# FCM Data March 2012

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF March 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002012FROM REPORTS FILED BY May 01,&KFF0000 &K0000002012	&P of &N
#### Phil PLEASANT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dick ZAIS and City of Yakima, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-35958.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 6, 2010.

Phil Pleasant, Jr., Phoenix, AZ, pro se.

Kenneth W. Harper, Menke Jackson Beyer Ehlis *&*Harper, LLP, Yakima, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.

*202Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Phil Pleasant, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 action alleging racial discrimination. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Lindsey v. SLT Los Angeles, LLC,*447 F.3d 1138, 1144 (9th Cir.2006). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants because it is undisputed that Pleasant, an independent contractor, did not complete the project that he was hired to perform, and he failed to present evidence showing that the City’s hiring of another contractor to complete the work was based on racial discrimination. *See id.*(plaintiff must satisfy the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of racial discrimination). Accordingly, Pleasant failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendants discriminated against him based on race.

Pleasant’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                              (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Conversion Services International, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), Scott Newman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Scott Newman
-----------------------------
Scott Newman
Chief Executive Officer
May 22, 2006