alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000863832
<NAME> GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION ENERGY INCOME P-5 LTD PSHP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         252,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  146,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               398,865
<PP&E>                                      10,518,268
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,992,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,924,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,924,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,924,753
<SALES>                                        775,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               806,519
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  485,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                321,057
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            321,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   321,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP99-301-017]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), tendered for filing and approval a Service Agreement between ANR and Dynegy Marketing and Trade (Dynegy) pursuant to ANR's Rate Schedule FSS (the Agreement).

ANR states that the Agreement contains a negotiated rate arrangement between ANR and Dynegy to be effective June 1, 2001 through March 31, 2004 and contains a right to extend the term for one additional year upon specified circumstances. ANR is also tendering for filing Third Revised Sheet No. 14P which is being provided for future use. ANR Requests that the Commission accept and approve the Agreement and tariff sheet effective June 1, 2001. 

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in                           ( print page 32806)                        determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.                

David P. Boergers, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-15230 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 731.

#### Hugh Smith, Inc. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 6th Cir.

*F. E. Hagler*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack*and *Harry Baum*for respondent.

Certiorari denied.
Slip Op. 13-105 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge Court No. 08-00101

JUDGMENT Upon the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal of Count One (Zeroing) of the Complaint (July 10, 2013), ECF No. 193, in accordance with the Opinion and Order issued in this case on November 21, 2011, Slip Op. 11-144, ECF No. 166, upon consideration of all papers and proceedings had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby ORDERED that the Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to Remand (Apr. 11, 2011), ECF No. 143, be, and hereby are, affirmed; and it is further ORDERED that entries of merchandise that are the subject of this litigation shall be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision in this action. /s/ Timothy C. Stanceu Timothy C. Stanceu Judge Dated: August 8, 2013 New York, New York UNION STEEL , Plaintiff,
v. UNITED STATES , Defendant, and UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and NUCOR CORPORATION , Defendant-Intervenors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         373,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,795,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,097,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,589,000
<PP&E>                                       4,480,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,076,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,240,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,479,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,076,000
<SALES>                                     17,431,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,431,000
<CGS>                                       15,008,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,008,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,628,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                795,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   318,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             477,00
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   477,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: EDMUND J. O'CONNOR 

DOCKET NUMBER: STIPULATION 83 

DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1965 

DOCUMENT TYPE: STIPULATION OF COMPLIANCE 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Edmund J. O'Connor 

Stipulation of Compliance Under the Commodity Exchange Act No. 83 

The Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that Edmund J. O'Connor 

has violated the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C., Chapter 1) 

and the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder (17 

CFR, Chapter 1). No complaint with respect to such violations has been issued 

and the said Edmund J. O'Connor is desirous of disposing of the matter by 

entering into a stipulation of compliance as authorized by section 0.4(a) of the 

Rules of Practice under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR, Part 0). Therefore, 

the said Edmund J. O'Connor stipulates the following facts are true: 

(1) Edmund J. O'Connor, an individual whose address is 141 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, is now and was on August 13, 1965, a 

registered floor broker under the Commodity Exchange Act and a member of the 

Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, a duly designated contract market under 

the Commodity Exchange Act. 

(2) On August 13, 1965, Edmund J. O'Connor executed 51 transactions in 

regulated commodity futures on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. 

However, with respect to 49 of such transactions, in each instance he failed to 

prepare a trading card or other record 

clearly identifying the opposite floor broker or other trader with whom such 

transaction was executed. 

The Secretary of Agriculture has advised Edmund J. O'Connor that his failure 

to keep full and complete records of futures transactions, as described above, 

was in violation of section 4g of the Commodity Exchange Act and section 1.35 of 

the regulations under the Commodity Exchange Act. 

The said Edmund J. O'Connor agrees to desist from such acts and practices in 

the future. He further understands and agrees that this stipulation shall be 

admissible as evidence of such acts and practices in any future proceeding based 

upon acts or practices in addition to those referred to herein which may be 

brought against him by the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the 

said act. He also understands that it is the practice of the Commodity Exchange 

Authority to make stipulations of compliance a matter of public record. 

Done at Chicago, Illinois, this 29 day of September 1965 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Witnessed by: 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 
Page 2 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 3
EXHIBIT 24

                       INDUSTRIAL DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                                  (Form 10-KSB)


        WHEREAS, INDUSTRIAL DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") under the Securities Act of 1993, as amended (the "Act"), the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and any supplement or supplements to the Form
10-KSB as may be necessary or appropriate, together with any and all exhibits
and documents related to said Form 10-KSB, in connection with the filing of the
Company's Form 10-KSB, pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

        NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned in his capacity as a director or officer
or both, as the case may be, of the Company does hereby appoint William A.
Coskey and Hulda Coskey, and each of them severally, his true and lawful
attorney or attorneys-in-fact, with power to act with or without the others and
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to execute in his name,
place and stead, in his capacity as a director or officer or both, as the case
may be, of the Company, each such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB referred to
above,, and any and all amendments thereto, and any supplements to the Form
10-KSB as said attorneys-in-fact or any of them shall deem necessary or
appropriate, together with all instruments necessary or incidental in connection
therewith, to file the same or cause the same to be filed with the Commission,
and to appear before the commission in connection with any matter relating
thereto. Each of said attorneys-in-fact shall have full power and authority to
do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all
capacities, every act whatsoever necessary or desirable to be done, as fully and
for all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, the
undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts that said attorneys-in-fact
and each of them may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument this
11th day of April, 1997.

                                                        /s/ ALAN W. HARVEY
                                                        Alan W. Harvey, Director
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Final Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant 
Impact (FNSI) for BRAC 95 Disposal and Reuse of Recreation Center #2, 
Fayetteville, NC

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Public Law 101-510 (as amended), the 
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, the Defense Base 
Closure and Realignment Commission recommended the closure of 
Recreation Center #2.
    The Final EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the disposal 
and subsequent reuse of the 4.35-acre installation. Alternatives 
examined in this EA include no action, unencumbered disposal of the 
property and encumbered disposal of the property. Encumbered disposal 
refers to transfer or conveyance of property having restrictions on 
subsequent use as a result of any Army-imposed or legal restraint. 
Under the no action alternative, the Army would not dispose of 
property, but would maintain it in a caretaker status for an indefinite 
period.

DATES: July 16, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Final EA and FNSI may be obtained by writing 
to Mr. Don Conlon, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers--Mobile District, 
environmental Resources Branch, 109 St. Joseph St., Mobile, Alabama, 
36628-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Conlon via phone at (334) 690-2609 
or by fax at (334) 690-2605.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: While closure of Recreation Center #2 is the 
Army's primary action, the EA also analyzes the potential environmental 
effects of reuse as a secondary impact by means of evaluating 
intensity-based reuse scenarios. The Army's preferred alternative for 
disposal of the Recreation Center #2 is encumbered disposal, with 
encumbrances pertaining to easements, threatened and endangered species 
habitat, lead-based paint and asbestos-containing material.
    A Notice of Intent declaring the Army's intent to prepare an EA for 
the closure of Recreation Center #2 was published in the Federal 
Register (60 FR 49264, September 22, 1995).
    The Final EA and FNSI are available for review at the Corps of 
Engineers, Mobile District; Cumberland County Library, 300 Maiden Lane, 
Fayetteville; and the John L. Throckmorton Library, Building #1-3346, 
Randolph Street, fort Bragg.

    Dated: June 7, 2001.
Raymond J. Fatz,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army, (Environment, Safety and 
Occupational Health) OASA(I&E).
[FR Doc. 01-14948 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [AK-962-1410-HY-P; AA-52323]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, DOI.

# ACTION:

Notice of decision designating lands for conveyance.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that an appealable decision approving lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act will be issued to the Afognak Joint Venture for lands in T. 22 S., R. 18 W., Seward Meridian, Alaska, located on Afognak Island. Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the Kodiak Daily Mirror.

# DATES:

The time limits for filing an appeal are:

1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision shall have until July 16, 2001 to file an appeal.

2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.

Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jerri Sansone (907) 271-3231

Authority: 43 CFR 2650.7(d).

Jerri Sansone,

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. 01-15109 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30750

Conference Calendar

__________________

R. L. HALL AND ASSOC., INC.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. CA-93-CV-455

- - - - - - - - - -

April 18, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

R.L. Hall and Associates, Inc., appeals from the district

court’s dismissal of its Federal Tort Claims Act suit for failure

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The district

court did not err in dismissing the premium-increase claim under

Rule 12(b)(6). See Johnson v. Sawyer, 47 F.3d 716, 727, 729 (5th

Cir. 1995)(en banc) (this court will not fashion new state-law

causes of action).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register: September 23, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 184)]
[Notices]
[Page 51519-51520]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23se99-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, October 8, 1999.


[[Page 51520]]


PLACE:  1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-24926 Filed 9-21-99; 2:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BIN CHEN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney

General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71367

Agency No. A087-807-593

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 23, 2015** 

Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI, IKUTA and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) correctly affirmed the

immigration judge’s adverse credibility determination. The BIA provided four

justifications for its decision. First, the BIA concluded that the immigration

FILED

OCT 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
page 2

judge’s finding that Chen provided inconsistent answers when asked about how his

wife procured a document from the family-planning office was not clearly

erroneous. That finding was supported by the record. Chen originally said that his

wife sent the village cadre to retrieve the document. But, when pressed by the

immigration judge, Chen said that his wife went with the cadre. In addition to

conflicting with his prior testimony, Chen’s statement that his wife voluntarily

went to the family-planning office is difficult to square with his claim that his

family was hiding from the family-planning officials.

Second, the BIA held that the immigration judge didn’t clearly err in finding

that Chen gave conflicting answers when asked whether he was consistently in

hiding from 2003 to 2008. This finding was also supported by the record. Chen

first stated that he was in hiding constantly between 2003 and 2008, but later said

that he sometimes went home during that period.

Third, Chen suggested that his children attended school while the family was

in hiding. The BIA correctly affirmed the immigration judge’s finding that this

account was both improbable and inconsistent with a letter from Chen’s wife. 

Fourth, Chen failed to mention in his application for asylum that he had been

in hiding from 2003 to 2008. The BIA was right to note that this omission

undermines Chen’s credibility, especially in light of his wife’s claim that this
page 3

episode of hiding was the reason that Chen left China.

The adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial evidence.

Given the absence of credible testimony, Chen cannot satisfy his burden of proving

that he is eligible for asylum or withholding of removal. Kin v. Holder, 595 F.3d

1050, 1058 (9th Cir. 2010). Chen’s claim under the CAT is based on the same

testimony that the agency found not credible. Chen doesn’t argue that any other

objective evidence establishes that he will be tortured if he is removed to China. 

Thus, the BIA’s rejection of Chen’s claim under the CAT was supported by

substantial evidence. See Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1048 (9th Cir. 2010).

PETITION DENIED.