alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 1429 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 17, 2010. 

Whereas Flag Day is celebrated annually on June 14, the anniversary of the official adoption of the American flag by 

the Continental Congress in 1777; 

Whereas, on June 14, 1777, in order to establish an official 

flag for the new Nation, the Continental Congress passed 

the first Flag Act, which stated, ‘‘Resolved, That the flag 

of the United States be made of thirteen stripes, alternate red and white; that the union be thirteen stars, 

white in a blue field, representing a new Constellation’’; 

Whereas the second Flag Act, signed January 13, 1794, provided for 15 stripes and 15 stars after May 1795; 

Whereas the Act of April 4, 1818, which provided for 13 

stripes and one star for each State, to be added to the 

flag on July 4 following the admission of each new State, 

was signed by President James Monroe; 

Whereas in an Executive order dated June 24, 1912, President William Howard Taft established the proportions of 

the flag and provided for arrangement of the stars in 6 

horizontal rows of 8 each, a single point of each star to 

be upward; 

Whereas in an Executive order dated January 3, 1959, President Dwight D. Eisenhower provided for the arrange-
2 

•HRES 1429 EH 

ment of the stars in 9 rows staggered horizontally and 

11 rows of stars staggered vertically; 

Whereas the first celebration of the American flag is believed 

to have been introduced by Bernard Cigrand, a Wisconsin school teacher, who arranged for his pupils at 

Stony Hill School in Waubeka to celebrate June 14 as 

‘‘Flag Birthday’’ in 1885; 

Whereas, on June 14, 1894, the Governor of New York ordered that the American flag be displayed at all public 

buildings in the State, prompting many State and local 

governments to begin observing Flag Day; 

Whereas President Woodrow Wilson proclaimed the first nationwide Flag Day in 1916; 

Whereas in 1947, President Harry S. Truman signed legislation requesting National Flag Day be observed annually; 

Whereas the United States flag is a symbol of our great Nation and its ideals; 

Whereas in times of national crisis, Americans look to the 

United States flag as a symbol of hope, courage, and 

freedom; 

Whereas the United States flag is universally honored; 

Whereas the United States flag honors the men and women 

of the Armed Forces who have given their life in the defense of the United States; 

Whereas the United States flag serves as a treasured symbol 

of the loss of loved ones to the countless families of those 

who died in defense of our Nation; and 

Whereas June 14, 2010, is recognized as Flag Day: Now, 

therefore, be it 
3 

•HRES 1429 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives celebrates 

the United States flag and supports the goals and ideals of 

Flag Day. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kaiyo Nedd, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  OCTILLION CORP.Date: April 11, 2008By:/s/ Kaiyo NeddKaiyo Nedd
President and Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"agency":"CFTC","generated":"2020-10-21 10:16:00","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2020"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"9"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CFTC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["40"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["43"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["6"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2020","quarter":"Q4"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                         4,416
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (152)
<INVENTORY>                                    2,974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,756
<PP&E>                                         1,615
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (855)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,543
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,706
<SALES>                                        2,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,164
<CGS>                                          1,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,543
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,661)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (134)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,527)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
#### Ted Darnell DANIELS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. O. ALVARADO, Correctional Officer; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-56245.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 10, 2012.

Ted Darnell Daniels, Imperial, CA, pro se.

William N. Frank, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

*700Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ted Darnell Daniels, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district courts’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials used excessive force against him in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *White v. Roper,*901 F.2d 1501, 1503 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants Alvarado and Harris because Daniels failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether these defendants used physical force “maliciously and sadistically to cause him harm” rather than “in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline!.]” *Hudson v. McMillian,*503 U.S. 1, 6-7, 112 S.Ct. 995, 117 L.Ed.2d 156 (1992).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Daniels’s motion for additional time to serve the summons and complaint on defendant Roberts because Daniels failed to show good cause. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (requiring service within 120 days after the complaint is filed); *Oyama v. Sheehan (In re Sheehan),*253 F.3d 507, 511-12 (9th Cir.2001) (setting forth standard of review and discussing factors to establish good cause).

Daniels’s remaining contentions, including those concerning discovery and eviden-tiary issues, are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 24

- 00027

- CV

NAHESI PARMES
v. FIRST CENTRAL CREDIT UNION

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 1 of McLennan County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20221073CV1

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having con sidered this cause on
appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against
appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
March 7, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          23,706
<SECURITIES>                                    44,157
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,575
<PP&E>                                          12,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,905
<BONDS>                                            241
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,936
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,917
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (45,503)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,634)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,634)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.74)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of SiriCOMM, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Matthew R. McKenzie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Matthew R. McKenzie |
|-------------------------|
| Matthew R. McKenzie     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| February 20, 2007       |

 

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of the Rhode Island Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 3:30 p.m. and adjourn at 7 p.m. on July 9, 2001, at the Center for Hispanic Policy & Advocacy, 421 Elmore Avenue, Providence, Rhode Island 02907. The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings from invited community leaders and civil rights advocates, and plan future activities. 

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Chairperson Olga Noguera, 401-462-2130, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, June 1, 2001. 

Edward A. Hailes, Jr. 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 01-14680 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10425

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LYNDELL SIMMONS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CR-81-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

TheFederalPublic Defender appointed to representLyndell Simmons has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Simmons has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 21, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification      of Principal Executive Officer **

| (i)   | the                accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal                year ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (ii) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |                                                     |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   |                                                     |   |
| October                5, 2007 | By:    | /s/ William              J. Garner,              MD |   |
|                                |   | WILLIAM                J. GARNER, MD                     |   |
|                                |   | *President                and Chief Executive Officer*   |   |
|                                |   | *(Principal                Executive Officer)*           |   |
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: LOUIS DREYFUS CORPORATION 

DOCKET NUMBER: 215 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 215 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Louis Dreyfus Corporation 

(New York, New York) 

The complaint charges that during the period from July 7 through October 20, 

1972, Louis Dreyfus Corporation filed inaccurate reports with respect to its 

cash positions in wheat. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before a referee in New York, 

New York, at a date and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
EXHIBIT
      23.2





CONSENT
        OF HEMPSTEAD & CO. INCORPORATED
 
 We
        consent to the use, in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
        ended June 30, 2006, of Voxware, Inc. (the "Company"), of our identity and
        the
        results of our report dated February 16, 2004, used to determine the fair
        value
        of the guarantee made by certain stockholders of the Company in connection
        with
        the Company's credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank, originally filed
        as
        Exhibit 23.3 with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
        year
        ended June 30, 2004, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference in the Annual
        Report.
 
 
 
 Hempstead
        & Company, Inc.
 
 /s/
        Hempstead & Co. Incorporated
 Haddonfield,
        New Jersey
 September
        28, 2006