alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: March 3, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 41)]
[Notices]
[Page 10364]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03mr98-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, March 23, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-5623 Filed 2-27-98; 3:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       
<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              This   schedule    contains   summary    financial
                              information    extracted    from   the   financial
                              statements  for the period  ending  March 29, 1997
                              and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                              such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000851478
<NAME>                        BEI ELECTRONICS, INC.
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                         6,347
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    25,235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               57,016
<PP&E>                                         25,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,145
<BONDS>                                        18,615
<COMMON>                                       9
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     55,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,233
<SALES>                                        28,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               28,824
<CGS>                                          17,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                962
<INCOME-TAX>                                   343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            619
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   619
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.09
        


</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY

#### Richard J. Swain v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

December 11, 1990

By Judge Samuel M. Hairston

There is before the Court for decision a special issue raised by the defendant, Burlington Industries, Inc., in its Grounds of Defense, namely, that the plaintiff’s claim is barred because his exclusive remedy is under the Workers’ Compensation Act in that the plaintiff at the time of his injury was a statutory employee of Burlington Industries, Inc.

The Court heard evidence on this issue, and the attorneys have furnished memoranda of law.

The Court is of the opinion that the issue can be decided looking primarily to the cases of *Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.*v. *McReynolds,*216 Va. 897 (1976), *Shell Oil Company*v. *Leftwich,*212 Va. 715 (1972), and *Carmody v. F. W. Woolworth Company,*234 Va. 198 (1987).

As was said in *Carmody, supra,*quoting with approval from Professor Arthur Larson in his work, *The Law of Workmen’s Compensation,*Vol. 1A:

> [T]he test is not one of whether the subcontractor’s activity is useful, necessary, or even absolutely indispensable to the statutory employer’s business, since, after all, this could be said of practically any repair, construction or transportation service. The test (except in cases where the work is obviously a subcontracted fraction of a main contract) is whether this indispensable activity is, in that business, normally carried on through employees, rather than independent contractors.

*537The Court is of the opinion that the issue presented in this case is a mixed question of law and fact and as said in *Carmody, supra,*p. 204, “such a question is not subject to categorical or absolute standards.” This being the case, I see no useful purpose in reciting the facts, and I am of the opinion that upon applying the law to the facts in this case, the work performed by the plaintiff was a part of Burlington’s trade, business, or occupation normally carried on by Burlington through its employees and that the plaintiff was Burlington’s statutory employee at the time he sustained his injury, and therefore, the plaintiff’s action in tort is barred.

If this were a case where Swain was seeking Workers’ Compensation benefits under the Act from Burlington, would it not be held that he was a statutory employee of Burlington? I think so, see *V.P.I.*v. *Frye,*6 Va. App. 589 (1988).
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-920-1320-EL, WYW153467]


Coal Lease Exploration License, WY

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of invitation for coal exploration license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 2(b) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, 
as amended by section 4 of the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 
1976, 90 Stat. 1083, 30 U.S.C. 201(b), and to the regulations adopted 
at 43 CFR 3410, all interested parties are hereby invited to 
participate with Triton Coal Company, LLC on a pro rata cost sharing 
basis in its program for the exploration of coal deposits owned by the 
United States of America in the following-described lands in Campbell 
County, WY:

T. 42 N., R. 70 W., 6th P.M., Wyoming
    Sec. 6: Lots 8-23;
    Sec. 7: Lots 5-14;
    Sec. 8: Lots 1-12, 16;
    Sec. 9: Lots 1-8, 11-14;
T. 43 N., R. 70 W., 6th P.M., Wyoming
    Sec. 31: Lots 13-20;
T. 42 N., R. 71 W., 6th P.M., Wyoming
    Sec. 1: Lots 5-15, 19, 20.

    Containing 2,816.14 acres, more or less.

    All of the coal in the above-described land consists of unleased 
Federal coal within the Powder River Basin Known Recoverable Coal 
Resource Area. The purpose of the exploration program is to obtain data 
on the Wyodak coal seam.

ADDRESSES: The proposed exploration program is fully described and will 
be conducted pursuant to an exploration plan to be approved by the 
Bureau of Land Management. Copies of the exploration plan are available 
for review during normal business hours in the following offices 
(serialized under number WYW153467): BLM, Wyoming State Office, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, WY 82003; and, BLM, Casper 
Field Office, 2987 Prospector Drive, Casper, WY 82604.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of invitation will be published 
in ``The News-Record'' of Gillette, WY, once each week for two 
consecutive weeks beginning the week of June 11, 2001, and in the 
Federal Register. Any party electing to participate in this exploration 
program must send written notice to both the BLM and Triton Coal 
Company, LLC no later than thirty days after publication of this 
invitation in the Federal Register. The written notice should be sent 
to the following addresses: Triton Coal Company, LLC, North Rochelle 
Mine, Attn: Tim L. Thamm, 510 Reno Road, Gillette, WY 82718, and the 
BLM, Wyoming State Office, Branch of Solid Minerals, Attn: Mavis Love, 
P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, WY 82003.
    The foregoing is published in the Federal Register pursuant to 43 
CFR 3410.2-1(c)(1).

    Dated: May 29, 2001.
Phillip C. Perlewitz,
Chief, Branch of Solid Minerals.
[FR Doc. 01-14924 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### Tatiana P. KOZLOVA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 99-70402.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 2006.

Filed Dec. 7, 2006.

Satwant Singh Pandher, Esq., Everett, WA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, OIL, Karen Fletcher Torstenson, Esq., John S. Hogan, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation Washington, DC, WWS-District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Before: ALARCÓN, RYMER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Tatiana Kozlova appeals on behalf of herself and her two children, Alexei Zhouk and Anastasia Zhouk, from the denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of her application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition in part, and deny it in part.

Whether or not admission of the prehearing statement was contrary to former 8 C.F.R. § 3.31(c) (1998), late filing of the statement cannot have prejudiced Kozlova because she had the asylum officer’s statement before the hearing and she had the opportunity to cross-examine him.

Nor was the immigration judge’s (IJ) adverse credibility determination inconsistent with finding good moral character for purposes of voluntary departure. Kozlova could fail to persuade the IJ of her eligibility for asylum based on the implausibility *578of her story, yet still not have had the intent to lie to get relief.

None of the remaining issues raised in Kozlova’s brief was presented to the BIA. Because she failed to exhaust these issues, we lack jurisdiction to consider them. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1).

DISMISSED IN PART; DENIED IN PART.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Cite as 2014 Ark. 529

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CV-14-12

BECKY FURNAS, Individually and as a

Representative of all similarly situated

Taxpayers who Pay Ad Valorem School

Taxes for the Support of the Fountain Lake

School District; FOUNTAIN LAKE

SCHOOL DISTRICT; AL LARSON,

individually and as a Representative of all

similarly situated Taxpayers who Pay Ad

Valorem School Taxes for the Support of the

Eureka Springs School District; and

EUREKA SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT

APPELLANTS

V.

THOMAS W. KIMBRELL; Commissioner

of the Arkansas Department of Education, in

his official capacity only; ARKANSAS

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION;

CHARLES ROBINSON, Treasurer of the

State of Arkansas, in his official capacity only

APPELLEES

Opinion Delivered December 11, 2014

APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CV-2011-2321]

HONORABLE TIMOTHY DAVIS FOX,

JUDGE

SUPPLEMENTAL REBRIEFING

ORDERED

PER CURIAM

By previously issued per curiam opinion handed down on December 4, 2014, we

ordered Appellants to supplement their brief with the prior orders and judgments that related

to our opinion in Kimbrell v. McCleskey, 2012 Ark. 443, 424 S.W.3d 844. Upon further

review, we have determined that the pleadings and motions from the prior appeal are essential

to an understanding of the case in the current appeal. We therefore order appellants to

supplement their addendum with copies of these documents in addition to the documents we
Cite as 2014 Ark. 529

required in the December 4, 2014 per curiam. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8) (2014). 

Appellants’ omission of these items from the addendum renders appellants’ brief deficient, and

we order rebriefing in this case pursuant to Rule 4-2(b)(3). Therefore, in accordance with

Rule 4-2(c)(2), we give appellants fifteen days to submit a conforming brief by filing a

supplemental addendum. 

While we have noted the above-mentioned deficiency, we encourage Appellant’s

counsel to review Rule 4-2 in its entirety as it relates to the abstract and addendum, as well

as the entire record, to ensure that no additional deficiencies are present, as any subsequent

rebriefing order may result in affirmance of the order or judgment due to noncompliance with

Rule 4-2. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (2011); see also Kirkland v. Sandlin, 2011 Ark. 106

(per curiam).

Rebriefing ordered.

Hatfield, Sayre & Brockett, by: Eugene G. Sayre and Christopher D. Brockett, for appellants.

Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Scott P. Richardson, Sr. Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
H. Res. 1465 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 23, 2010. 

Whereas nearly 15,000,000 Colombians participated in the 

first round of Colombia’s presidential elections on May 

30, 2010; 

Whereas no candidate received an outright majority of the 

vote, thereby requiring a runoff election between Juan 

Manuel Santos and Antanas Mockus, the two candidates 

with the highest vote totals; 

Whereas Juan Manuel Santos, of the National Unity Party, 

received 46.7 percent of the votes and Antanas Mockus, 

of the Green Party, received 21.5 percent of the votes; 

Whereas in the second round on June 20, 2010, Juan 

Manuel Santos received 69 percent of the votes and was 

thereby declared President-elect of Colombia; 

Whereas Colombia has overcome tremendous challenges to 

build their democracy; and 

Whereas Colombia remains a vital ally and friend of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) reaffirms the longstanding friendship and alliance between the United States and Colombia; 
2 

•HRES 1465 EH 

(2) recognizes Colombia’s commitment to the democratic process as demonstrated by the free and fair nature of these multiparty, internationally recognized elections; and 

(3) congratulates President-elect Juan Manuel 

Santos on his recent victory in Colombia’s June 20, 

2010, presidential election. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
General Magic, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-12667, 333-33329, and 333-45751) on Form S-8 of General Magic, Inc. of our
report dated January 23, 1998, except for note 12 which is as of March 6, 1998,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of General Magic, Inc. and
subsidiary (a development stage enterprise) as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1997, and for the period from May 1, 1990 (inception) to December
31, 1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997, annual report on Form
10-K of General Magic, Inc.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick

Mountain View, California
April 28, 1998







                                       16
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30176-30177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14009]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD


FOIA Fee Schedule Update

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board is publishing its 
annual update to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Fee Schedule 
pursuant to 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6) of the Board's regulations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth M. Pusateri, General Manager, 
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 
700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (202) 694-7060.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FOIA requires each Federal agency 
covered by the Act to specify a schedule of fees applicable to 
processing of requests for agency records. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(i). On 
March 15, 1991, the Board published for comment in the Federal Register 
its proposed FOIA Fee Schedule. 56 FR 11114. No comments were received 
in response to that notice and the Board issued a final Fee Schedule on 
May 6, 1991.
    Pursuant to 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6) of the Board's regulations, the 
Board's General Manager will update the FOIA Fee Schedule once every 12 
months. Previous Fee Schedule updates were published in the Federal 
Register and went into effect, most recently, on June 6, 2000, 65 FR 
35810.

Board Action

    Accordingly, the Board issues the following schedule of updated 
fees for services performed in response to FOIA requests:

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Schedule of Fees for FOIA 
Services

(Implementing 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6))

Search or Review Charge: $55.00 per hour
Copy Charge (paper): $.04 per page, if done in-house, or generally 
available commercial rate (approximately $.10 per page)

[[Page 30177]]

Copy Charge (3.5" diskette): $5.00 per diskette
Copy Charge (audio cassette): $3.00 per cassette
Duplication of Video: $25.00 for each individual videotape; $16.50 for 
each additional individual videotape
Copy Charge for large documents (e.g., maps, diagrams): Actual 
commercial rates

    Dated: May 31, 2001.
Kenneth M. Pusateri,
General Manager.
[FR Doc. 01-14009 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
Page Left Intentionally Blank





REDACTED BY CFTC
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Robert W. DecherdRobert W. DecherdChairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer May 14, 2009/s/ Alison K. EngelAlison K. EngelSenior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2009
Exhibit 10.23


                  SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE ENGLOBAL 401(K) PLAN

WHEREAS, ENGlobal Engineering, Inc. {the "Employer") adopted a restatement of
the ENGlobal 40l(k) Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of October 1, 2005, and
various subsequent amendments; and

WHEREAS, the employer has (he ability to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 7,1;
and WHEREAS, the Employer now desires to amend the Plan to update the matching
formulas,

NOW. THEREFORE. the Employer hereby amends the Plan in the following respects,
effective as of April 1, 2006:

1. Article 4.1 (b) is amended to read as follows:

                       (b){i) For Participants who are classified on the payroll
               records of the Employer as "regular employees," 50% of elective
               deferrals up to the first 0% of Compensation; and (ii) for all
               other Participants, 33.3% of elective deferrals up to the first
               6% of Compensation. In other words, we are no longer referring to
               contract or project employees, and the match for the first group
               would be a maximum of 3% of pay, and for the second group, a
               maximum of 2% of pay.

2. In all other respects, the terms of this Plan are hereby ratified and
confirmed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Second Amendment, to he
executed I counterparts. each of which shall be considered as an original, as of
the date indicated be


                                              ENGL0BAL ENGINEERING, INC,



 Witness: //s//  Natalie S. Hairston        Signature  //s//  William A. Coskey
                                            Title: CEO
                                            Date: March 29, 2006
```

[Federal Register: November 29, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 228)]
[Notices]
[Page 66613]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29no99-36]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

agency holding the meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

time and date: 11:00 a.m., Thursday, December 23, 1999.

place: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

status: Closed.

matters to be considered: Surveillance Matters.

contact person for more information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-31020 Filed 11-24-99; 12:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF DOT VN, INC.





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dot VN, Inc.
for the quarter ended January 31, 2010, the undersigned, Thomas Johnson, Chief
Executive Officer of Dot VN, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended January 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Dot VN, Inc.





Date:
      March 17, 2010
              /s/
              Thomas JohnsonThomas
      JohnsonChief
      Executive Officer and principal executive
  officer
^WC3o&&^€Mv*i£C&£&\7L<!*UlW b|

*m Dolorosa,5re. 3^T^om^^/sr/i£s Uu,r

ni&V^aBBlviEy W% AbelAcosta nark

sep 29 us *& \epremier ^^%h%^ mmM

W/v noA I/Me£/7j£nsiou$Q.

is*-;..; *!:

CAvss[Ajffom/fas&&&&A T#£'T#MLT&lftsaiiprQt IfPS of cotwttv/u/CATtoAj, Ia/stx /fffjSerm &

rko Se fir 7£(Air nm fltfuJ k/Arf*. g>r ATr^er

exTM**** w #£# frct/u^ j^^fc fa
tM&ffWt
!

^ if

^^

^

P".

'. >4