alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Regina Carter, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Clover Carter, Deceased, Appellant, v Isabella Geriatric Center, Inc., Respondent.

[875 NYS2d 73]

— Appeal from an order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, *521J.), entered on or about January 10, 2008, which precluded plaintiff from offering expert testimony at trial based on her failure to provide sufficient expert disclosure and, based on that preclusion, dismissed the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The order on appeal, which was issued at a conference, is not appealable as of right because it did not decide a motion made on notice *(see*CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; *Sidelev v Tsal-Tsalko,*52 AD3d 398 [2008]; *Turbel v Societe Generale,*37 AD3d 187 [2007]). We decline to grant leave to appeal *(see*CPLR 5701 [c]) because the record is not sufficiently developed to permit us to consider the issues raised by the parties. Notably, neither party made arguments nor submitted evidence before Supreme Court touching on the fact-based issue of which of plaintiffs claims sound in medical malpractice and which sound in ordinary negligence *(see Weiner v Lenox Hill Hosp.,*88 NY2d 784, 787-788 [1996]). Relatedly, neither party made arguments nor submitted evidence addressing which of plaintiffs claims need to be supported by expert testimony and which do not. Plaintiffs remedy is a motion to vacate the order precluding her from calling expert witnesses and dismissing the complaint. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Gonzalez, Sweeny, McGuire and DeGrasse, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1470 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1470

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 20, 2010.
Whereas William S. Richardson was born on December 22, 1919, and spent most of 
        his childhood in Palama and Kaimuki;
Whereas William S. Richardson was born to a working class family of Hawaiian, 
        Chinese, and Caucasian ancestry;
Whereas William S. Richardson served as a platoon leader in the United States 
        Army during World War II and was later inducted into the Infantry 
        Officer Candidate School Hall of Fame;
Whereas William S. Richardson served as Lieutenant Governor of Hawaii from 1962-
        1966;
Whereas William S. Richardson led the Hawaii Democratic Party from 1956-1962;
Whereas William S. Richardson served as the Chief Justice of the Hawaii Supreme 
        Court from 1966-1982;
Whereas the William S. Richardson School of Law honors his leadership by opening 
        educational and professional avenues for the Islands' most disadvantaged 
        groups;
Whereas William S. Richardson upheld traditional Hawaiian laws and expanded 
        public rights for Native Hawaiians and all people in Hawaii;
Whereas as William S. Richardson was awarded the Spirit of Excellence Award from 
        the American Bar Association; and
Whereas, on June 21, 2010, at the age of 90, William S. Richardson passed away 
        in Honolulu, Hawaii: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the life, achievements, and distinguished career of Chief 
        Justice William S. Richardson;
            (2) emphasizes that, among his judicial accomplishments, Chief 
        Justice William S. Richardson changed the face of higher education in 
        Hawaii by opening avenues for the Islands' most disadvantaged groups and 
        by building a more equitable society for the people of Hawaii; and
            (3) recognizes the William S. Richardson School of Law, the 
        educational institution that bears his name, as a significant part of 
        the legacy of William S. Richardson.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
SEC Exhibit






                                                                                                                                                  Exhibit 10.50












June 18, 2015






Dear Steve:


Mr. Bhattacharya and I are very excited about the future growth and business opportunities that await Novelis over the coming years.  We consider you critical to our ongoing success, particularly in fiscal year 2016 as you have taken on enhanced responsibilities in managing our company’s finances.  Therefore, following the close of FY2016  you  will receive  a special recognition  cash  award  of  $40,000, which  will be added  to your FY2016 calculated Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) cash bonus, provided that you are actively employed by Novelis on March
31, 2016.


Steve, we are very pleased to have you as part of the Novelis team, and congratulations on this recognition award.   The future presents a great opportunity for you, and the success of Novelis will depend on talented employees such as you in key roles.


Sincerely,


   /s/ Steve Fisher


  Steve Fisher
  Interim President & CEO and Senior Vice President and CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,045
<SECURITIES>                                     2,490
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,302
<PP&E>                                          24,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,693
<BONDS>                                          2,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           10,274
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,705
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,484
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,552)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        23
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,575)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,575)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.56)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form
40-F of our reports dated November 23, 2015 on the consolidated financial statements of Shaw Communications Inc. as at August 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the two years ended August 31, 2015, and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of August 31, 2015 of Shaw Communications Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                                  |  |  |  |                           
|--------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------
|Calgary, Canada November 23,
2015 |  |  |  | LOGO Chartered Accountants
|                                  |
Exhibit 31.2
 Section 302 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of A. H. Belo Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Alison K. EngelAlison K. EngelSenior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
**Fidelity Advisor**®**Communications Equipment Fund**

**Summary Prospectus**

**September 29, 2011**

**As Revised February 2, 2012**
·Received CFTC 

Recprds Section 

7/~t//o? · - .r-r· ~·~ <-L·<. '... :.~ .-. '!• I ' \ • • • _/ ~ 

( ,. : .. Industrial Energy Consumers of Amer~c~ 

The Voice of Industrial Energy Consumer 1 

· 

I ' .c.• • l .. .. · ~ 

1155151

h Street, NW, Suite 500 • Washington, D.C. 20005 ._. :: ~; . ·., :· i; .. :. ..: ~~ .:: ·· ..... " 

Telephone 202-223-1661• Fax 202-223-1420 • www.ieca-us.org 

July 23, 2007 

Via Email (secretary@cftc.gov) 

Ms. Eileen Donovan 

Acting Secretary 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

Three Lafayette Centre 

115 5 21st Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20581 

Re: Regulation 18.05 

. Dear Ms. Donovan: 

COMMENt 

In behalf of the Industrial Energy Consumers of America (IECA), I am pleased to 

respond to your proposal to amend Commission Rule 18.05. IECA supports the rule. 

This is a good step but more needs done to ensure that markets are not manipulated. 

)J 

IECA is a national cross industry trade association dedicated to a broad array of 

energy/environment related issues. Corporate board members are top energy 

procurement, environmental, and government affairs managers who are leaders in their 

industry, technical experts, strongly committed to energy efficiency and environmental 

progress. IECA membership represents a diverse set of industries including: plastics, 

cement, paper, food processing, aluminum, chemicals, fertilizer, brick, insulation, steel, 

glass, industrial gases, pharmaceutical, construction products, automotive products, and 

brewing. 

Requiring companies to keep books and records does not prevent market manipulation. 

Books and records help after the manipulation has been done and after markets have been 

damaged. Instead, we need preemptive monitoring of entities with large positions that 

cover both the futures and OTC markets. 

Entities that control large positions in the market should be required to report daily to the 

CFTC. Market participants will likely behave themselves if they know they are being 

monitored daily and subject to significant civil and criminal penalties. We encourage the 

CFTC to show real leadership and support legislation that puts these market protections 

in place. 

Lastly, we believe it is more important than ever to have greater public input at the 

CFTC. We recommend the CFTC support the establislunent of an Advisory Panel on 

I 1. 
Energy Markets that would provide consumers the opportunity to participate. IECA 

would welcome the opportunity to work in partnership with the CFTC. 

~)~ Paul N. Cicio 

President 

I 

I 

I· 

'· 

i 

·! 

i
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C LARENC E B . HIC KM AN, Sr., Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. C OUNTY OF B UTTE; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 14-15517 D.C . No. 2:13-c v-02156-KJM KJN M EM O R ANDUM * Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Kim be rly J. M ue lle r, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2014 ** B e fore : LEAVY, FISHER , a nd N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. C la re nc e B . Hic km an, Sr. a

p pe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dism issing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion without pre j udic e unde r Fe de ra l R

ule of C ivil Proc e dure 41(b) for fa ilure to c om p ly with a c ourt orde r. W e re vie wthe dism issa l for a

n a buse of disc re tion, N

e v ije l v . N . C oast Life Ins. C o . , 651 F.2d 671, 

# FIL ED DEC 1 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).674 (9th C i r. 1981), a nd we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in dism issing Hic km an’ s a c tion following Hic km an’ s fa ilure to file an a ppropria te am e ndm e nt, be c a

use the distric t c ourt spe c ific a lly

wa rne d Hic km an tha

t his a c tion c ould bedism isse d if he fa ile d to file a c om plia nt a m e nde d c om

pla int. Se eid. at 673-74 (a c om pla int whic h fa ils to c om ply with R

ule 8 m a y be dism isse d unde r R

ule 41(b)); se ealso Fe r

dik v . Bonze le t , 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th C i r. 1992) (disc ussing fa c tors re l e va nt for fa ilure to c om

ply with c ourt orde r and e xpla ining tha t, a lthough dism

issa l is a ha rsh pe na lty , distric t c ourt’ s dismissa l should not be disturbe d unle ss the re is a

“ de finite and firm

c onvic tion tha

t the c ourt be low c om

m itte d a c le ar e rror of judgm e nt in thec onc lusion it re a c he d upon a we ighing of the

re le va nt fa c t ors” (c ita tions a nd inte rna l quota

tion m a rks omitte d)). AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 1 5 5 1 7 2
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarter Report of Mantra Venture Group Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Warren, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| 

By: /s/ David Warren
David Warren
Chief Financial Officer
April 21, 2008

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                       638
<INVENTORY>                                     36,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,028
<PP&E>                                          81,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,489
<SALES>                                         63,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,906
<CGS>                                           51,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   175
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,566
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,566
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15291]



[[Page 32809]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6998-8]


Recovery of Past Response Costs Settlement; Economy Plating Co., 
Inc. Site, Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, Ohio

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is provided pursuant to section 122(i) of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 
1980, as amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. U.S. EPA proposes 
settlement of a claim under section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as 
amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 6922(h)(1) with Economy Plating Co, Inc. 
and Dino Land Properties Co., Inc. for recovery of Past Response Costs 
incurred during removal activities at or in connection with the Economy 
Plating Co., Inc. Site in Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, Ohio.
    The settlement requires the settling parties to pay $61,000.00 to 
the Hazardous Substances Superfund for reimbursement of Past Response 
Costs for removal actions taken at the Site. The proposed action is 
being taken to settle all liability related to the Economy Plating Site 
for this Respondent under section 107(a) of CERCLA.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the 
settlement. The Agency will consider all comments received an may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

DATES: Comments on this proposed settlement must be submitted to EPA by 
July 18, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposed settlement should be addressed to: 
Diana Embil, (C-14J), Assistant Regional Council, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590. 
Comments should refer to: In the Matter of: Economy Plating Co., Inc. 
Site Recovery of Past Response Costs Settlement. Please submit an 
original and three copies of any comments, if possible. A copy of the 
proposed settlement may be obtained from the following address for 
review: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V, Office of 
Superfund, 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590. Please 
telephone Diana Embil, at (312) 886-7889, before visiting the Region V 
office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Embil, (C-14J), Assistant 
Regional Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590, (312) 886-7889.

    Dated: June 8, 2001.
William E. Muno,
Director, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. 01-15291 Filed 6-15-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M