alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-15334]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 26, 2001 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 33829]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00-AEA-05FR]


Establishment of Class E Airspace, Rome, NY; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error in the geographic coordinates of 
a final rule that was published in the Federal Register on March 28, 
2001 (66 FR 16848), Airspace Docket No. 00-AEA-05FR, which established 
Class E airspace at Griffiss Airpark, Rome, NY.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 6, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Francis T. Jordan, Jr., Airspace 
Specialist, Airspace Branch, AEA-520 F.A.A. Eastern Region, 1 Aviation 
Plaza, Jamaica, NY; 11434-4809; telephone: (718) 553-4521.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    Federal Register document 01-7420, Airspace Docket No. 00-AEA-05FR, 
published on March 28, 2001 (66 FR 16848), established Class E airspace 
at Rome, NY. An error was discovered in the geographic coordinates for 
the Griffiss Airpark, Rome, NY. This action corrects that error.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the 
geographic coordinates for the Griffiss Airpark as published in the 
Federal Register on March 28, 2001 (66 FR 16848), are corrected as 
follows:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

AEA NY E5  Rome, NY [Corrected]

    1. On p. 16849, column 1, in the coordinates under Griffiss 
Airpark, correct ``(Lat. 43 deg.14'04" N/ long. 75 deg.24'43" W)'' to 
read ``(Lat. 43 deg.14'02" N/ long. 75 deg.24'25" W)''.

    Issued in Jamaica, New York on June 1, 2001.
F.D. Hatfield,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 01-15334 Filed 6-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1232

TYRONE E. MURRAY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE STATE OF MARYLAND; LYNDA FOX, Maryland

Department of Human Resources; GLADYS MITCHELL, Baltimore City Office of Child Support

Enforcement; YVONNE GILCHIRST, Director,

Baltimore City Department of Social Services;

KENNETH HENDRICKS, Baltimore City Child Protective Services,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-99-3474-L)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 20, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone E. Murray, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Elise Hee Sook Song,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone E. Murray appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Murray v. Maryland, No.

CA-99-3474-L (D. Md. Jan. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Joe FAULKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy GUILMARTIN, Sergeant; Deputy Cox, Corporal; Deputy Kidd, Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-7472.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 14, 2012.

Joe Faulks, Appellant pro se.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joe Faulks appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Faulks v. Guilmartin,*No. 2:11-cv-00551-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 955 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, Washington, as the ‘‘John 

‘Bud’ Hawk Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2009 

Mr. INSLEE (for himself, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. REICHERT, 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. DICKS, and Mr. BAIRD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, 

Washington, as the ‘‘John ‘Bud’ Hawk Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN ‘‘BUD’’ HAWK POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in 

6 Rollingbay, Washington, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘John ‘Bud’ Hawk Post Office’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 955 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John ‘Bud’ Hawk 

5 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
IV 

House Calendar No. 215 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1455 

[Report No. 111–538] 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives 

copies of certain communications relating to certain recommendations 

regarding administration appointments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2010 

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself and Mr. SENSENBRENNER) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 15, 2010 

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Judiciary, referred to the 

House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House 

of Representatives copies of certain communications relating to certain recommendations regarding administration appointments. 

1 Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to 

2 transmit to the House of Representatives, not later than 

3 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, 

4 copies of any document, record, memo, correspondence, or 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1455 RH 

1 other communication of the Department of Justice, in2 cluding the Office of the Solicitor General, or any portion 

3 of any such communication, that refers or relates to— 

4 (1) any guidance or recommendations made by 

5 the Department since January 20, 2009, regarding 

6 discussions of administration appointments by White 

7 House staff, or persons acting on behalf of White 

8 House staff, with any candidate for public office in 

9 exchange for such candidate’s withdrawal from any 

10 election; or 

11 (2) any inquiry, investigation, or review by the 

12 Department, including appointment of a Special 

13 Counsel, regarding such discussions. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 215 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1455 

[Report No. 111–538] 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the 

regarding administration appointments. munications relating to certain recommendations House of Representatives copies of certain comJULY 15, 2010 

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Judiciary, 

printed referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: CARL D. LEAVEN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 184 

DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 1971 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

Docket No. 184 

Name: Carl D. Leaven 

Effective On or about November 22, 1971 

Effective upon the date of service of this order upon respondents Robert E. 

O'Grady, Carl D. Leaven, Leonard B. Feldman and Time Trading Co., they shall 

cease and desist from: (1) entering into, or offering to enter into, any futures 

transaction subject to the Commodity Exchange Act if such transaction is, is of 

the character of, or is commonly known to the trade as, a "wash sale"; and (2) 

executing any futures transaction subject to the Commodity Exchange Act if such 

transaction is not executed openly and competitively in accordance with section 

1.38 of the regulations issued under the Commodity Exchange Act (17 CFR 1.38). 

Done at Washington, D. C. 

NOV 18 1971 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2 
Page 3
#### Robert HEARD, Appellant v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellee.

No. 10-5154.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2010.

Robert Heard, Wrightsville, GA, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 27, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) appellant’s complaint, which essentially sought mandamus relief in the form of an order compelling the Attorney General to investigate his allegations of prison abuse. Appellant does not have a clear and indisputable right to relief, see *Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.,*485 U.S. 271, 289, 108 S.Ct. 1133, 99 L.Ed.2d 296 (1988), because the Executive Branch has absolute discretion to decide whether to conduct an investigation or prosecute a case. *See United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S.*683, 693, 94 S.Ct. 3090, 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974); see *also Powell v. Katzenbach,*359 F.2d 234 (D.C.Cir.1965) (the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General may not be controlled through mandamus).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                              (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Conversion Services International, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), Mitchell Peipert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Mitchell Peipert
-----------------------------
Mitchell Peipert
Chief Financial Officer
May 22, 2006
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1291 

Expressing support for designation of the week beginning May 9, 2010, 

as National Nursing Home Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2010 

Mr. ARCURI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of the week beginning 

May 9, 2010, as National Nursing Home Week. 

Whereas more than 1,500,000 elderly and disabled individuals receive care daily in the nearly 16,000 nursing facilities in the United States; 

Whereas the annual celebration of National Nursing Home 

Week invites people in communities nationwide to recognize nursing home residents and staff for their contributions to their communities; 

Whereas the theme for National Nursing Home Week in 

2010 is ‘‘Enriching Every Day’’, honoring those who are 

‘‘Enriching Every Day’’ for others, thus adding value to 

life and overcoming many of the infirmities of age and 

disability; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1291 IH 

Whereas nursing homes are intimate communities where acts 

of caring, kindness, and respect are the norm; 

Whereas the positive bond that naturally develops between 

patients and their caregivers is established, patients experience not only better physical care and healing, but also 

enrichment of the mind, heart, and spirit, which is an affirmation of their value; 

Whereas National Nursing Home Week recognizes the people 

who provide care to the Nation’s most vulnerable population; and 

Whereas the week beginning May 9, 2010, would be an appropriate week to designate as National Nursing Home 

Week: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a National 

3 Nursing Home Week; 

4 (2) recognizes that a majority of people in the 

5 United States, because of social needs, disability, 

6 trauma, or illness, will require long-term care serv7 ices at some point in their lives; 

8 (3) honors nursing home patients and the peo9 ple who care for them each day, including family 

10 members, volunteers, and dedicated long-term care 

11 professionals, for their contributions to their commu12 nities and the United States; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1291 IH 

1 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to observe National Nursing Home Week with ap3 propriate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Brown, Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 123]—

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), entered April 19, 2007, as, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In establishing the appropriate risk level determination under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), the People bear the burden of proving the necessary facts by clear and convincing evidence *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v Hardy,*42 AD3d 487 [2007]; *People v Lawless,*44 AD3d 738 [2007]). Here, the defendant contends that the People failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he should be assessed 20 points under risk level factor 4, “Duration of Offense Conduct With Victim” (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary [2006]). We disagree. The People submitted adequate proof that the defendant engaged in two or more acts of sexual contact against the victim, including at least one act of sexual intercourse, separated by at least 24 hours *(see*Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 10 [2006]; *People v Bolton,*50 AD3d 990 [2008]; *People v Taylor,*48 AD3d 775, 776 [2008]; *cf. People v Wright,*53 AD3d 963, 964 [2008]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.
##### 



FORM 10-Q Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encore Wire Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank J. Bilban,
Vice-PresidentFinance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. Date: November 8, 2004 /s/ FRANK J. BILBANFrank J. BilbanVice President  Finance, Chief FinancialOfficer, Treasurer and Secretary
Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-38022 and
333-50500) and on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-65574) of TTR Technologies,
Inc.("TTR") of our report dated February 28, 2002 relating to the financial
statements which appear in TTR's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.


/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.

Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
A member of Deloitte & Touche

Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 27, 2002


                                       25
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1603 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1603

   Expressing support for designation of September 2010 as National 
                     Craniofacial Acceptance Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2010

Mr. Ross submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing support for designation of September 2010 as National 
                     Craniofacial Acceptance Month.

Whereas there are 100,000 children born each year in the United States with a 
        craniofacial anomaly affecting the head, neck, extremities, or organs;
Whereas craniofacial treatment will often last from infancy to adulthood;
Whereas it is not uncommon for one to undergo multiple surgeries before reaching 
        adulthood;
Whereas most craniofacial conditions affect individuals and their families 
        physically, mentally, and socially;
Whereas in the past 30 years, many medical procedures have been developed to 
        help improve the quality of life for those affected by craniofacial 
        anomalies;
Whereas the number of physicians specializing in treating these rare and complex 
        conditions is very small;
Whereas many groups have developed to help advocate on the behalf of those with 
        craniofacial anomalies and to encourage greater acceptance and support 
        of individuals with craniofacial anomalies; and
Whereas September 2010 would be an appropriate month to designate as National 
        Craniofacial Acceptance Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of National Craniofacial Acceptance Month to encourage all 
citizens to become better informed of craniofacial conditions and 
advances in medical treatment.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2
       a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;
 b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 d.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ JOE RAGANJoe RaganSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Nos. 69 and 70.

#### Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, *v.*Schweitzer.

Argued November 21, 1935.

Decided December 9, 1935.

*Assistant Attorney General Wideman,*with whom *Solicitor General Reed*and *Mr. Sewall Key*were on the brief, for petitioner.

*Mr. Hugh 'W. McCulloch*for respondent. By leave of Court, *Mr. Russell L. Bradford*filed a brief as *amicus curiae*supporting the position of respondent.

With him on the brief were *Messrs. George H. Craven*and *Arthur O. Lampland.*

*Per Curiam:*

Decrees reversed. *Douglas*v. *Willcuts, ante,*p. 1.