32660 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices

insufficient, the individual will be

required to submit a request in writing

or in person. If an individual is

requesting information by telephone on

behalf of another individual, the subject

individual must be connected with SSA

and the requesting individual in the

same phone call. SSA will establish the

subject individual’s identity (his/her

name, SSN, address, date of birth and

place of birth along with one other piece

of information such as mother’s maiden

name) and ask for his/her consent in

providing information to the requesting

individual.

If a request for notification is

submitted by mail, an individual must

include a notarized statement to SSA to

verify his/her identity or must certify in

the request that he/she is the person

claimed to be and that he/she

understands that the knowing and

willful request for, or acquisition of, a

record pertaining to another individual

under false pretenses is a criminal

offense. These procedures are in

accordance with SSA Regulations(20

CFR 401.40).

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURE:

Same as notification procedure.

Requesters also should reasonably

specify the record contents they are

seeking. These procedures are in

accordance with SSA Regulations (20

CFR 401.50).

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURE:

Same as notification procedure.

Requesters should also reasonably

identify the record, specify the

information they are contesting, and

state the corrective action sought and

the reasons for the correction with

supporting justification showing how

the record is untimely, incomplete,

inaccurate, or irrelevant. These

procedures are in accordance with SSA

Regulations (20 CFR 401.65).

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

Data contained in the Ticket-to-Work

Program Manager (PM) Management

Information System are obtained from

the Ticket-to-Work and Self-Sufficiency

Program Payment Database, 60–0295,

from ENs and Social Security

beneficiaries with disabilities. Records

from this system are also derived from

the Supplemental Security Income

Record and Special Veterans Benefits,

60–0103, Master Beneficiary Record, 60–

0090, the Disability Determination

Service Processing File, 60–0044 and the

Completed Determination Record—

Continuing Disability Determinations,

60–0050.

SYSTEMS EXEMPT FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF

THE PRIVACY ACT:

None.

[FR Doc. 01–15197 Filed 6–14–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

United States-Israel Free Trade Area

Implementation Act; Designation of

Qualifying Industrial Zones

AGENCY: Office of the United States

Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Under the United States-Israel

Free Trade Area Implementation Act

(IFTA Act), products of qualifying

industrial zones encompassing portions

of Israel and Jordan or Israel and Egypt

are eligible to receive duty-free

treatment. Effective upon publication of

this notice, the United States Trade

Representative, pursuant to authority

delegated by the President, is

designating Zarqa Industrial Zone as a

qualifying industrial zone (QIZ) under

the IFTA Act and expanding the

already-designated QIZ area of the AdDulayl Industrial Park.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Edmund Saums, Director for Middle

East Affairs, (202) 395–4987, Office of

the United States Trade Representative,

600 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC

20508.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to authority granted under section 9 of

the United States-Israel Free Trade Area

Implementation Act of 1985 (IFTA Act),

as amended (19 U.S.C. 2112 note),

Presidential Proclamation 6955 of

November 13, 1996 (61 FR 58761)

proclaimed certain tariff treatment for

goods of the West Bank, the Gaza Strip,

and Qualifying Industrial Zones. In

particular, the Presidential Proclamation

modified general notes 3 and 8 of the

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

United States: (a) To provide duty-free

treatment to qualifying articles that are

the product of the West Bank, the Gaza

Strip or a qualifying industrial zone and

are entered in accordance with the

provisions of section 9 of the IFTA Act;

(b) to provide that articles of Israel may

be treated as though they were articles

directly shipped from Israel for the

purposes of the United States-Israel Free

Trade Area Agreement (‘‘the

Agreement’’) even if shipped to the

United States from the West Bank, the

Gaza Strip, or a qualifying industrial

zone, if the articles otherwise meet the

requirements of the Agreement; and (c)

to provide that the cost or value of

materials produced in the West Bank,

the Gaza Strip, or a qualifying industrial

zone may be included in the cost or

value of materials produced in Israel

under section 1(c)(i) of Annex 3 of the

Agreement and that the direct costs of

processing operations performed in the

West Bank, the Gaza Strip, or a

qualifying industrial zone may be

included in the direct costs of

processing operations performed in

Israel under section 1(c)(ii) of Annex 3

of the Agreement.

Section 9(e) of the IFTA Act defines

a ‘‘qualifying industrial zone’’ as an area

that ‘‘(1) encompasses portions of the

territory of Israel and Jordan or Israel

and Egypt; (2) has been designated by

local authorities as an enclave where

merchandise may enter without

payment of duty or excise taxes; and (3)

has been specified by the President as

a qualifying industrial zone.’’

Presidential Proclamation 6955

delegated to the United States Trade

Representative the authority to

designate qualifying industrial zones.

The United States Trade

Representative has previously

designated qualifying industrial zones

under Section 9 of the IFTA Act on

March 13, 1998 (63 FR 12572), March

19, 1999 (64 FR 13623), October 15,

1999 (64 FR 56015), October 24, 2000

(65 FR 64472), and December 12, 2000

(65 FR 77688).

The Government of Israel and the

Government of the Hashemite Kingdom

of Jordan agreed in a protocol dated

March 1, 2001 to the designation of

Hillwood-Hashemite University LLC,

registered under the name of Global

Investments in Industrial Zones &

Technology Parks Company (‘‘Zarqa

Industrial Zone’’), as a qualifying

industrial zone. The Government of

Israel and the Government of the

Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan also

agreed in a protocol dated March 1,

2001 to the expansion of the alreadydesignated QIZ area of the Ad-Dulayl

Industrial Park. The Government of

Israel and the Government of Jordan

further agreed that merchandise may

enter, without payment of duty or excise

taxes, areas under their respective

customs control in association with the

Zarqa Industrial Zone and Ad-Dulayl

Industrial Park qualifying industrial

zones. Accordingly, the Zarqa Industrial

Zone and Ad-Dulayl Industrial Park

meet the criteria under paragraphs

9(e)(1) and (2) of the IFTA Act.

Therefore, pursuant to the authority

delegated to me by Presidential

Proclamation 6955, I hereby designate

the Zarqa Industrial Zone and the

expanded Ad-Dulayl Industrial Park, as

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 116 / Friday, June 15, 2001 / Notices 32661

established by the March 1, 2001

Amending Protocols to the Agreement

Between the Government of the

Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the

Government of the State of Israel on

Irbid Qualifying Industrial Zone, as

qualifying industrial zones under

section 9 of the IFTA Act, effective upon

the date of publication of this notice,

applicable to goods shipped from these

qualifying industrial zones after such

date.

Robert B. Zoellick,

United States Trade Representative.

[FR Doc. 01–15177 Filed 6–14–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Flight Standards District Office at

Scottsdale and Phoenix, AZ; Notice of

Change

Notice is hereby given that on or

about July 1, 2001, the Flight Standards

District Office located at Scottsdale and

Phoenix, Arizona will be divided into

two independent offices—Scottsdale

Flight Standards District Office and

Phoenix Certificate Management Office.

Services to the public will continue to

be provided at the same locations with

no interruption. This information will

be reflected in the FAA Organization

Statement the next time it is reissued.

(Sec. 313(a), 72 Stat. 752; 49 U.S.C.

1354).

Issued in Los Angeles, CA, on May 25,

2001.

Lynore C. Brekke,

Acting Regional Administrator, WesternPacific Region.

[FR Doc. 01–15172 Filed 6–14–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

Supplemental Environmental Impact

Statement: Lake County, Montana

AGENCY: Federal Highway

Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent.

SUMMARY: The FHWA hereby gives

notice that it intends to prepare a

Supplemental Environmental Impact

Statement (SEIS) for a corridor study to

evaluate proposed development of an

11.2 mile section of U.S. Highway 93

between the Red Horn Road/Dublin

Gulch road intersection (milepost 37.1)

and the Spring Creek/Baptiste Road

intersection (milepost 48.3). Access to

the area is currently provided by US 93

and the study will evaluate proposed

improvements to the existing highway

and all practicable alternatives.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale

Paulson, Program Development

Engineer, Federal Highway

Administration, 2880 Skyway Drive,

Helena, Montana 59602; Telephone:

(406) 449–5302 ext. 239; or Joel M.

Marshik, Manager, Environmental

Services and Tribal Liaison, Montana

Department of Transportation, 2701

Prospect Avenue, Helena, Montana

59602; Telephone: (406) 444–7632; or

Joe Hovenkotter, Confederated Salish

and Kootenai Tribes, PO Box 278, Pablo,

Montana 59855; Telephone: (406) 675–

2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Access

An electronic copy of this document

may be downloaded using a modem and

suitable communications software from

the Government Printing Office’s

Electronic Bulletin Board Service at

(202) 512–1661. Internet users may

reach the Office of the Federal Register’s

home page at: http://www/nara.gov/

fedreg and the Government Printing

Office’s database at: http://

www.access.gpo.gov/.

Background

FHWA, in cooperation with the

Montana Department of Transportation

(MDT), and the Confederated Salish and

Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) prepared a

Final Environmental Impact Statement

(FEIS) and Section 4(f) Evaluation on

June 17, 1996, to describe the proposed

project, alternatives and the social,

economic, and environmental impacts.

The FEIS (FHWA–MT–EIS–95–01–F)

covered the area from Evaro (MP 6.5) to

the north end of Polson at milepost 62.8.

A Record of Decision (ROD) was

prepared on August 12, 1996, and

modified on February 9, 1998, which

selected the existing alignment for

improvements. However, this ROD was

unique in that FHWA deferred making

a decision on lane configurations until

agreement was reached on a number of

issues including design features and

mitigation measures.

FHWA, MDT and CSKT have since

negotiated a Memorandum of

Agreement (MOA) dated December 20,

2000. The MOA lays out a conceptual

lane configuration, design features and

mitigation measures for 30.8 miles of US

93 from Evaro to the Red Horn Road/

Dublin Gulch Road intersection (MP

37.1) and for 10.6 miles of US 93 from

the Spring Creek Road/Baptiste Road

intersection (MP 48.3) to Polson.

Currently a re-evaluation is underway

on the section of US 93 which extends

from Evaro to Polson, with the

exception of the 11.2 mile stretch

between Red Horn Road and Spring

Creek Road, known as the Ninepipe

segment.

Due to extensive environmental and

cultural issues, the segment from the

vicinity of Red Horn Road on the south

to Spring Creek Road on the north was

excepted out of the MOA, as well as the

Re-evaluation. This segment, referred to

as the Ninepipe segment, requires

additional environmental studies.

FHWA, in cooperation with MDT and

CSKT, will prepare a Supplemental

Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS)

to explore alternatives for the Ninepipe

segment, and to evaluate impacts

resulting from new circumstances and

additional information relevant to

environmental and cultural concerns for

this 11.2-mile section of US-93.

The SEIS will evaluate the short and

long-term impacts of a range of

alternatives, including but not limited

to; no-build, upgrading the existing

facility, and construction on a new

alignment. This impact assessment will

include, but not be limited to, impacts

on wetlands, wildlife and fisheries;

social environment; changes in land

use; aesthetics; changes in traffic and

economic impacts. Environmental

Justice (as outlined in Executive Order

12898) will also be addressed as part of

the impact assessment. The SEIS will

also examine measures to mitigate

significant adverse impacts resulting

from the proposed action.

Comments are being solicited from

appropriate federal, state, tribal, and

local agencies and from private

organizations and citizens who have

interest in this proposal. Public

information meetings will be held in the

project area to discuss the potential

alignments. The draft SEIS will be made

available for public and agency review;

and a public hearing will be held to

receive comments. Public notice will be

given of the time and place of all

meetings and hearings.

Comments and/or suggestions from all

interested parties are requested, to

ensure that the full range of all issues,

and significant environmental issues in

particular, are identified and reviewed.

Comments or questions concerning this

proposed action and/or its SEIS should

be directed to FHWA, MDT or CSKT at

the addresses listed previously.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Program Number 20.205, Highway Research,

Planning and Construction. The regulations

implementing Executive Order 12372

regarding intergovernmental consultation on