alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 

# Time and Date:

 10 a.m., Monday, June 11, 2001. 

# Place:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551. 

# Status:

 Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered: 

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees. 

2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Michelle A. Smith, Assistant to the Board; 202-452-3204. 

# Supplementary Information:

 You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting. 

Dated: June 1, 2001. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 01-14226 Filed 6-1-01; 12:17 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Descanso Agency, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Raul
Getino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
4th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Raul Getino
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Norquest  Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for three month period ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Philip  Wainwright,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 5, 2010

                                         By:  /s/ Philip Wainwright
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Philip Wainwright
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-KSB
FOR THE  PERIOD  ENDING  DEC.  31,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,014
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,014
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          195,283
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,003
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,014
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.004)
        


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN BRITO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70263

Agency No. A094-461-353

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 24, 2013** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Martin Brito, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

FILED

SEP 27 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-70263

the agency’s factual findings, Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.

2008), and we deny the petition for review. 

The record does not compel the conclusion that Brito filed his asylum

application within a reasonable period after withdrawal of his temporary protected

status. See id. at 1181-82. Thus, we deny the petition as to his asylum claim. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Brito failed to

establish the incident he experienced in El Salvador rose to the level of

persecution. See Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 339-40 (9th Cir. 1995) (single

incident of detention and beating did not compel finding of past persecution). 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that Brito failed to meet his

burden of proof for withholding of removal because he did not show it is more

likely than not he will be persecuted in El Salvador. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333

F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) (possibility of future persecution too speculative). 

Thus, we deny the petition as to his withholding of removal claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
KIMBERLY LATOSHA HAYGOOD, ) DOC #S43083, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2177 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 18, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE and SALARIO, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-TAA-04482]

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Master Pattern, Inc., Norton Shores, Michigan. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

NAFTA-TAA-04482; Master Pattern, Inc. Norton Shores, Michigan (May 23, 2001)

Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of May, 2001.

Edward A. Tomchick,

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-14420  Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Town and Country Properties, Inc. v. Mark S. Allen

April 16, 1991

Case No. (Law) 93251

By JUDGE THOMAS A. FORTKORT

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts One and Two of plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Judgment. The Court heard oral argument and considered written memorandum. For the following reasons, defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.

The plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment is based on two counts. Plaintiff alleges (1) that the defendant, settlement agent, tortiously interfered with the contractual relationship between Town and Country and the sellers, and (2) that the defendant violated the Virginia Wet Settlement Act, § 6.1-2.10 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended.

The Wet Settlement Act was enacted to insure prompt disbursement of settlement proceeds. The settlement attorney is the attorney in fact for the seller and in this case is contractually bound to honor the seller’s instructions as to who is to receive what amounts of the funds at settlement. The seller may choose to advise the settlement attorney not to distribute funds to anyone. In this event the seller is in default. The settlement attorney has *390no recourse but to protect the proceeds and advise all parties of the seller’s default. The settlement attorney may have an attorney/clienf relationship with the purchaser, lender and seller. *(See*Code of Professional Responsibility Canon 5, DR 5-105(A), (C), and (D). Because of this relationship, he has an ethical duty to follow instructions by the seller in regard to dispersement of funds. He does not have a similar ethical duty to the real estate agent.

Because the settlement attorney in this case complied with the seller’s lawful instructions to escrow Town and Country’s commission, he did not violate the Wet Settlement' Act. Additionally, by his escrowing the funds as instructed by the seller, there is no tortious interference with the contract between the seller and Town and Country. Plaintiff has failed to support his claim that defendant committed any act that could be construed as an intentional interference inducing or causing a breach or termination of the relationship between the sellers and Town and Country.
#### Jesse Van MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael JOHANNS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-16959.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 8, 2008.

*569Jesse Van Myers, Ennis, TX, pro se.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jesse Van Myers appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider its order dismissing his action without prejudice for failure to serve process in a timely fashion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Co.,*452 F.3d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir.2006). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Myers’ motion in light of his failure to explain why he did not comply with the district court’s prior order granting him an additional sixty days to complete service upon the defendants. *See id.*at 1100-04 (discussing the basis for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 333.

#### Woodbury et al. *v.*Commerce Trust Co. et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. E. R. Johnston, I. N. Watson, Henry N. Ess, Armwell L. Cooper,*and *Rees Turpin*for petitioners.

*Messrs. Samuel A. Mitchell*and *H. M. Langworthy*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit' Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1276 

Recognizing the continued importance of volunteerism and national service 

and the anniversary of the signing of the landmark service legislation, 

the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 20, 2010 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California (for himself, Ms. MATSUI, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

HARE, Mr. LOEBSACK, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SERRANO, 

Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. POLIS of Colorado, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. 

TITUS, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. PIERLUISI, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. 

SESTAK, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. RICHARDSON, Mr. CAPUANO, Ms. CLARKE, 

Mr. TONKO, Ms. NORTON, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, and Mr. 

PRICE of North Carolina) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the continued importance of volunteerism and 

national service and the anniversary of the signing of 

the landmark service legislation, the Edward M. Kennedy 

Serve America Act. 

Whereas April 21, 2010, marks the first anniversary of the 

signing of the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act; 

Whereas the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act reauthorized the Corporation for National and Community 

Service and its programs through 2014, expanding opporVerDate Nov 24 2008 03:02 Apr 21, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1276.IH HR1276

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1276 IH 

tunities for millions of people in the United States to 

serve the Nation; 

Whereas the country is experiencing a wave of new innovation 

and collaboration to increase volunteerism; as social entrepreneurs try new approaches, technology increases access and expands service, and corporate volunteers provide pro bono skills to nonprofit organizations; 

Whereas the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act increases volunteer opportunities for people in the United 

States of all ages, with a focus on disadvantaged youth, 

seniors, and veterans; 

Whereas the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act promotes social innovation by supporting and expanding 

proven programs and builds capacity of individuals, nonprofits, and communities to volunteer; and 

Whereas the legislation leverages service to assist in meeting 

challenges in the areas of education, health, clean energy, 

veterans, and economic opportunity: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes that service is of significant value 

3 to the United States; and 

4 (2) recognizes the first anniversary of the Ed5 ward M. Kennedy Serve America Act, and encour6 ages every citizen of the United States to continue 

7 to answer the call to serve. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-K/A of Millennium Bankshares Corporation (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2005, we, Carroll C. Markley, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Dale G. Phelps, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

(a) such Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in such Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of Millennium Bankshares Corporation and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-K.



|                     |  |                            
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: April 27, 2006 |  | /s/ Carroll C. Markley     
|                     |  | Carroll C. Markley         
|                     |  | Principal Executive Officer
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ Dale G. Phelps         
|                     |  | Dale G. Phelps             
|                     |  | Principal Financial Officer
EBS Global Facility Limited - SEF Application –

Exhibit U: Information Subject to Request for Confidential Treatment

U.1

EBS Global Facility Limited - SEF Application 

Exhibit U: Information Subject to Request for Confidential Treatment 
EBS Global Facility Limited - SEF Application –

Exhibit U: Information Subject to Request for Confidential Treatment

U.2

Each of the following exhibits to EBS Global Facility Limited’s Form SEF application is 

subject to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Part 145.9 of the Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission’s regulations: 

Exhibit A Exhibit V-6 Exhibit V-44 

Exhibit B-2 Exhibit V-7 Exhibit V-45 

Exhibit D Exhibit V-8 Exhibit V-46 

Exhibit D-1 Exhibit V-9 Exhibit V-47 

Exhibit D-3 Exhibit V-10 Exhibit V-48 

Exhibit D-4 Exhibit V-11 Exhibit V-49 

Exhibit E Exhibit V-11A Exhibit V-50 

Exhibit F Exhibit V-11B Exhibit V-51 

Exhibit H Exhibit V-12 Exhibit V-52 

Exhibit I Exhibit V-13 Exhibit V-53 

Exhibit J Exhibit V-14 Exhibit V-54 

Exhibit K Exhibit V-15 Exhibit V-55 

Exhibit M-2 Exhibit V-16 Exhibit V-56 

Exhibit N Exhibit V-17 Exhibit V-57 

Exhibit N-1 Exhibit V-17A Exhibit V-58 

Exhibit N-2 Exhibit V-18 Exhibit V-59 

Exhibit N-3 Exhibit V-19 Exhibit V-60 

Exhibit N-4A Exhibit V-20 Exhibit V-61 

Exhibit N-4B Exhibit V-21 Exhibit V-62 

Exhibit N-5A Exhibit V-22 Exhibit V-63 

Exhibit N-5B Exhibit V-23 Exhibit V-64 

Exhibit N-6 Exhibit V-24 Exhibit V-65 

Exhibit N-7 Exhibit V-25 Exhibit V-66 

Exhibit N-8 Exhibit V-26 Exhibit V-67 

Exhibit N-9 Exhibit V-27 

Exhibit N-10 Exhibit V-28 

Exhibit N-11 Exhibit V-29 

Exhibit N-12 Exhibit V-30 

Exhibit O Exhibit V-31 

Exhibit Q Exhibit V-32 

Exhibit S Exhibit V-33 

Exhibit S-1 Exhibit V-34 

Exhibit S-2 Exhibit V-35 

Exhibit S-3 Exhibit V-36 

Exhibit S-4 Exhibit V-37 

Exhibit V Exhibit V-38 

Exhibit V-1 Exhibit V-39 

Exhibit V-2 Exhibit V-40 

Exhibit V-3 Exhibit V-41 

Exhibit V-4 Exhibit V-42 

Exhibit V-5 Exhibit V-43
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provision set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: January 10, 2001.
    Time: 10:30 am to 12:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 45 Natcher Bldg, Rm 5As25u, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Tommy L. Broadwater, PHD, Chief, Grants Review 
Branch, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Natcher Bldg., Room 
5As25U, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4952.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 9, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-1457 Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M