alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2(2)(b)
 2008 A. H. BELO INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EVIDENCE OF GRANT
    1.
    
    Stock Options.
 Number of shares:
    
    ##,### shares of A. H. Belo Corporation Series B Common
StockOption exercise price:
    
    $X.XX per share (closing market price on grant date)Vesting and
exercise date:
    
    ##,### shares on and after Month/Day/Year (one year
from grant date)Expiration date:
    
    The option will expire on, and may not be exercised
after, Month/Day/Year (ten years from grant date)
  2.
    
    Restricted Stock Units.
 Number of RSUs:
    
    ##,###Vesting:
    
    100% on the date of the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders in Month/Year (one year from grant
date)Payment date:
    
    Within 10 business days following the date of the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders in Year (3 years
from grant date)Form of payment:
    
    60% in shares of A. H. Belo Corporation Series A
Common Stock; 40% in cash
  Change in Control




---



##### 



Termination Reason
    
    Stock Options
    
    Restricted Stock UnitsVoluntary resignation
    
    Unvested options are
forfeited
immediately. Vested
options remain
exercisable for
original term of the
option.
    
    Vesting will be
pro-rated based on
actual service
rendered. Payment is
made on the normal
payment date (date of
Annual Meeting 3 years
from Grant Date).Retirement
    
    Vesting is
accelerated and
options remain
exercisable for
original term of the
option.
    
    Vesting will be
pro-rated based on
actual service
rendered. Payment is
made on the normal
payment date (date of
Annual Meeting 3 years
from Grant Date).Death or Disability
    
    Vesting is
accelerated and
options remain
exercisable for
original term of the
option.
    
    Vesting is accelerated
and RSUs are paid as
soon as practicable.
H. Res. 1036 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 9, 2010. 

Whereas, on January 13, 1903, the arrival of 102 pioneer 

Korean immigrants to the United States marked the first 

chapter of Korean immigration in this country; 

Whereas the Korean War began 60 years ago this June and 

impacted the lives of millions of Koreans; 

Whereas thousands of Koreans, fleeing from war and poverty, 

came to the United States seeking opportunities; 

Whereas Korean Americans, like thousands of immigrants to 

the United States before them, have built strong families 

and contributed to dynamic communities; 

Whereas more than a million people in the United States can 

trace their roots to Korea; 

Whereas the Centennial Committees of Korean Immigration 

and Korean Americans have designated January 13 of 

each year as ‘‘Korean American Day’’ to commemorate 

the first step of the long and prosperous journey of Korean Americans in the United States; and 

Whereas Korean Americans have contributed significantly to 

the development of the arts, sciences, engineering, medicine, government, military, education, and the economy in 

the United States: Now, therefore, be it 
2 

•HRES 1036 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges all 

people in the United States to recognize the invaluable contributions Korean Americans have made to this Nation. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register: October 7, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 194)]
[Notices]
[Page 54621]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07oc99-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Thursday, October 21, 1999.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-26413 Filed 10-5-99; 3:52 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1170/2004

of 24 June 2004         

fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, undenatured and exported in the natural state, are hereby fixed to the amounts shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 June 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 June 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

----

ANNEX

REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 25 JUNE 2004

----

(1)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 %, the refund amount applicable shall be calculated in accordance with Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

----
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: CHARLES B. GRADY 

DOCKET NUMBER: 49 

DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 1948 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

September 7, 1948 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CE-A DOCKET NO. 49 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act 

A complaint and notice of hearing was signed by the Secretary of Agriculture 

on August 31, 1948, charging 

CHARLES B. GRADY of Chicago, Illinois 

with violation of the Commodity Exchange Act. 

Complaints are issued under the Commodity Exchange Act for the purpose of 

notifying respondents that the Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe 

that respondents have violated the Act and to advise them of the time and place 

of hearings to be held to determine whether the charges are correct. The 

issuance of a complaint does not, of course, constitute proof of violation of 

the law. Such violation is established only when the Judicial Officer of the 

Department has made a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. 

Complaints are filed in the office of the hearing clerk of the Solicitor of 

the Department of Agriculture and are thereupon a matter of public record. 

Copies are filed in the Washington office and the field offices of the Commodity 

Exchange Authority. 

In cases where the Judicial Officer determines that a violation has occurred 

the resulting order will be served upon all contract markets and circularized 

among all registered futures commission merchants for their information and 

guidance. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer it is the policy of the 

Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate upon the charges 

contained in complaints or discuss the evidence upon which they are based. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
EXHIBIT
32





Section
1350 Certification





As
Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





Certification
of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer





In
connection with the Form 10-Q of Writers’ Group Film Corp. (the “Company”)
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








August
19, 2008







/s/ Tal L. Kapelner


Tal L.
Kapelner, President


Principal
Executive Officer








/s/
Ariella Kapelner


Ariella
Kapelner, Treasurer


Principal
Financial Officer





This
certification accompanying the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.





www.writersgroupfilmcorp.com*info@writersgroupfilmcorp.com
No. —, original.

#### Ex parte Joseph Lesser.

October 12, 1936.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1329 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1329

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                           May 6, 2010.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 5019) to provide for the establishment of the Home Star Retrofit 
Rebate Program, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill 
for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Energy and Commerce now 
printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in 
the nature of a substitute are waived except those arising under clause 10 of 
rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 
in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question. All points of order against 
such amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 
XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 
shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 
been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 
and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  The Chair may entertain a motion that the Committee rise only if 
offered by the chair of the Committee on Energy and Commerce or his designee. 
The Chair may not entertain a motion to strike out the enacting words of the 
bill (as described in clause 9 of rule XVIII).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1395 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1395

   Urging the people of the United States to observe National Scots, 
                      Scots-Irish Heritage Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2010

 Mr. Kissell submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Urging the people of the United States to observe National Scots, 
                      Scots-Irish Heritage Month.

Whereas the Scottish and Scots-Irish people were among the first to explore 
        North America;
Whereas the contributions of the Scottish and Scots-Irish people have played a 
        vital role in the development of industry, education, medicine, 
        government, and the military in the United States;
Whereas many Scottish and Scots-Irish people immigrated to the 13 American 
        colonies as indentured servants working to gain their freedom;
Whereas the Declaration of Arbroath, in which Scotland declared its independence 
        from England, was a precursor of the Declaration of Independence of the 
        United States;
Whereas almost half of the signers of the Declaration of Independence of the 
        United States and a significant number of the governors of the 13 
        American colonies were of Scottish descent;
Whereas there are many Scottish Highland games and festivals that take place 
        throughout the United States, celebrating all aspects of Scottish and 
        Scots-Irish culture, history, and heritage while educating the general 
        public on such culture, history, and heritage;
Whereas more than 27,000,000 Americans can trace their ancestry to Scotland and 
        Northern Ireland;
Whereas many Scottish and Scots-Irish societies, clans, and organizations, along 
        with various State and local governments, recognize April as National 
        Scots, Scots-Irish Heritage Month; and
Whereas the Scottish and Scots-Irish people have been a part of the governmental 
        institutions of the United States since the inception of the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges the people of the 
United States to observe National Scots, Scots-Irish Heritage Month.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus L. WELTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-3799.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

May 28, 2010.

*556Meredith P. Duchemin, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Erika L. Bierma, Attorney, Federal Defender Services, Madison, WI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge and TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Order

Our prior opinion, 583 F.3d 494 (7th Cir.2009), affirmed Welton’s sentence after concluding that the principle of *Kimbrough v. United States,*552 U.S. 85, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), does not apply to the career-offender Guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. While Welton’s petition for certiorari was pending, we overruled the panel’s opinion in this case. *United States v. Corner,*598 F.3d 411 (7th Cir. 2010) (en banc). The Supreme Court then granted Welton’s petition and remanded with instructions to reconsider in light of *Comer.*No. 09-8367 (U.S. Mar. 20, 2010).

Welton contended in the district court that the principle of *Kimbrough*applies to § 4B1.1, and *Comer*holds that this position is correct. The district court erred in thinking otherwise (though the district judge is not responsible for this error, which was based on earlier decisions that *Comer*overruled). In a post-remand filing under Circuit Rule 54, the United States contends that the judge’s error was harmless. But the burden of demonstrating harmless error is on the prosecutor, and it is not evident to us that the district judge was determined to impose the same sentence without regard to the effect of *Kimbrough*on § 4B1.1.

A remand for resentencing is the best way to find out. If, as the United States contends, *Comer*does not affect Welton’s sentence, the district judge has only to say so. But if it does affect the exercise of discretion in sentencing, Welton is entitled to the benefit.

Welton’s sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing consistent with *Kimbrough*and *Comer.*
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton

SUPER 8 MOTEL AND CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0477-97-3 PER CURIAM JULY 29, 1997 CYNTHIA ROSALIE BREEDEN

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Roya Palmer; Law Offices of Richard A. Hobson, on brief), for appellants. (Terry L. Armentrout; Armentrout & Armentrout, on brief), for appellee.

Super 8 Motel and its insurer (hereinafter collectively referred to as "employer") contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission (commission) erred in reversing the deputy commissioner's credibility determination and finding that Cynthia R. Breeden (claimant) proved she sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment on December 14, 1995. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule

5A:27. On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. Mullins , 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). "In

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 order to carry [the] burden of proving an 'injury by accident,' a claimant must prove that the cause of [the] injury was an identifiable incident or sudden precipitating event and that it resulted in an obvious sudden mechanical or structural change in the body ." Morris v. Morris , 238 Va. 578, 589, 385 S.E.2d 858, 865 (1989). Claimant testified that she slipped on ice and fell on her back at approximately 3:30 a.m. on December 14, 1995 while at work. Her testimony was corroborated by the medical histories and her immediate notification of the accident to her supervisor. Thus, credible evidence supports the commission's finding that claimant sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment on December 14, 1995. That finding is conclusive on this appeal. See James v. Capitol Steel Constr.

Co. , 8 Va. App. 512, 515, 382 S.E.2d 487, 488 (1989). Employer argues that the commission erred in reversing the deputy commissioner's credibility determination. We disagree. If, as in this case, "the deputy commissioner's determination of credibility is based upon the substance of the testimony rather than upon the witness's demeanor, such a finding is as determinable by the full commission as by the deputy." Kroger Co. v. Morris , 14 Va. App. 233, 236, 415 S.E.2d 879, 880 (1992). The deputy commissioner's credibility determination was based on the evidence and the substance of the witnesses' testimony. Therefore, the full commission could make its own credibility3 determination. See id. In its role as fact finder, the commission was entitled to accept claimant's testimony, which was not inherently incredible. For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1


                                   CONSENT OF
                         RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.


     We hereby consent to the use of the name "Ralph E. Davis Associates,  Inc."
and of references to Ralph E. Davis Associates, Inc. and to the inclusion of and
references to our report,  or information  contained  therein,  dated January 9,
2004,  prepared for Cadence  Resources  Corporation in the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of Cadence Resources Corporation for the filing dated on or about January
12, 2004.


Houston, Texas
January 12, 2004

                                         RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                         /s/ Joseph Mustacchia, Jr.
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Joseph Mustacchia, Jr.
                                         Executive Vice-President
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: LOUIS ROMOFF 

CITATION: 30 Agric. Dec. 865 

DOCKET NUMBER: 166 

DATE: JULY 13, 1971 

DOCUMENT TYPE: RULING UPON COMPLAINANT'S PETITION TO REOPEN HEARING 

(No. 14,032) 

In re Louis ROMOFF. CEA Docket No. 166. Decided July 13, 1971. 

Denial of complainant's petition to reopen hearing

Where complainant had adequate opportunity to demonstrate that respondent 

wilfully failed to file reports on numerous occasions and the hearing examiner 

found that complainant had successfully demonstrated such facts, the reopening 

of the hearing to present evidence of additional similar violations would delay 

the proceeding unnecessarily. Complainant's petition to reopen the hearing is 

therefore denied. 

Decision by Donald A. Campbell, Judicial Officer

RULING UPON COMPLAINANT'S PETITION TO REOPEN HEARING

The complainant has petitioned to reopen the hearing to present additional 

evidence which the complainant alleges "has a direct bearing on the wilfulness 

with which the respondent acted in committing the violations alleged in the 

complaint." The complainant states that the new evidence "will show that the 

respondent was in reporting status in pork bellies from March 22, 1971, to June 

25, 1971; that he traded in pork bellies on numerous occasions during that time 

period; and that he failed to report such trades as required by the Commodity 

Exchange Act and regulations issued thereunder." 

The Hearing Examiner found that the respondent failed to file required 

reports on 22 occasions notwithstanding 11 letters (some of which were 

certified) and two telephone conversations with officials of the Commodity 

Exchange Authority. The Hearing Examiner found that the "respondent did not 

even file reports in connection with trades made after the complaint in this 

proceeding was served upon him" (Recommended Decision, p. 12). The Hearing 

Examiner concluded that the respondent's failures to file reports were "willful" 

(Recommended Decision, p. 13). 

The complainant had adequate opportunity to demonstrate that the respondent 

willfully failed to file reports on numerous occasions, even after the filing of 

the complaint, and the Hearing Examiner found that the complainant successfully 

demonstrated such facts. 

In these circumstances, the reopening of the hearing to present evidence of 

additional similar violations would delay the proceeding unnecessarily. The 

additional facts, if proven, would merely confirm what the Hearing Examiner has 

already found to be true. For this reason, the petition is denied without 

considering the effect, if any, of the implications of § 0.5(c) of the Rules of 

Practice. 

LOAD-DATE: June 10, 2008 
Page 2