alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1



 




Exhibit 10.1



FRANKLIN BANK CORP.



Summary of Retainer Arrangement for Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors



     On November 1, 2005, the Compensation Committee of Franklin Bank Corp. (the “Company”)
approved a retainer arrangement for Mr. Lewis S. Ranieri, the non-executive Chairman of its Board
of Directors. The retainer is for services in Mr. Ranieri’s capacities as non-executive Chairman
of the Board of Directors of the Company during the twelve months commencing on November 1, 2005.
In payment of the retainer, the Company has granted to Mr. Ranieri, pursuant to the Company’s 2004
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and effective November 1, 2005 (the “Grant Date”), an option
to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock having an exercise price of $17.02 per
share, which was the average of the high and low price of the Company’s common stock on the Grant
Date. The option will (i) vest and become exercisable as to 60% of the shares on the Grant Date,
the remainder of such shares on the fifth annual anniversary of the Grant Date and otherwise in
accordance with the terms of the Plan and the governing stock option agreement, and (ii) expire on
the December 31 following the expiration of seven years from the Grant Date and otherwise in
accordance with the terms of the Plan and the governing stock option agreement. The Plan was filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 on November 14, 2003. The form of stock option
agreement was filed with the SEC as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
May 13, 2005.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 01-11]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 01-11 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: June 5, 2001.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 32334)          ( print page 32335)    

[FR Doc. 01-14982  Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference, constituting a part of the
Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 Registration Statement File No.
33-33342, Form S-2 Registration Statement File No. 33-68646, and Form S-2
Registration Statement File No. 333-81282, of our report dated October 3, 2003,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Voxware, Inc.,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003.

/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, P.C.

Princeton, New Jersey
October 14, 2003
Exhibit 10.1

  Executive Incentive Plan Description
  and Summary Forms of Notice

  Executive Incentive Plan (EIP)

  Effective September 24, 2005

 [ INSERT NAME ]

	
      

    
	
      Total Bonus Opportunity 
          	 
        	       VP/SVP
                  (Non-Variable)  

        
	


        
	 	 	 
	
      Base Salary: 
    	 
        	
      USD 
    
	
      EIP Bonus 
    	 
        	
      USD
    __% - __% of Base Salary   
	 	 	 
	
      On Target Earnings (OTE): 
    	 
        	
      USD 
    
	 
	
    

  
	
      Plan Components 
          	 
        	 

        
	
    

  





	
      I.            	
      Corporate Goals Measurement   
	 	
	

	
      __% - __% of Base Salary  
	 	 	
  > __%
      - __% based on annual corporate results    

      
	 	 	
  > __%
  based on quarterly corporate results
	 	
	

	
      Corporate Results measured 30/70 on Revenue
      / Operating Profit 
	 	
	

	
      No payment on revenue component if operating profit not met       
	 	
	

	
      If both targets are met or exceeded bonus
      is paid at 100% of target  
	 
	
      II.           	
      Individual Goals Measurement  
	 	
	

	
      __% of Base Salary        
	 	
	

	
    Individual goals are approved by the senior
    executive management team at the outset of the measurement period. 
	 	
	

	
      Degree of achievement against individual
      goals will be assessed and  approved by the senior executive management
      team prior to payment. 
	 

















  Executive Incentive Plan (EIP)

  Effective September 24, 2005

 [ INSERT NAME ]

	
      

    
	Total Bonus Opportunity	 	 VP/SVP (Variable)
	
      

    
	 	 	 
	 Base Salary:  	  	 USD  
	 EIP Bonus  	  	 USD  __% of
    Base Salary  
	 	 	 
	 On Target Earnings
        (OTE):  	  	 USD  
	 	 	 
	
      

    
	Plan Components	 	 
	
      

    


	 	 
	Corporate Goals
    Measurement
		

	__% of Base Salary 
	 	> Total bonus based on annual
    corporate results
		

	Corporate Results measured 30/70 on
    Revenue / Operating Profit
		

	No payment on revenue component if operating
    profit not met
	
      	

	If both targets are met
        or exceeded, bonus is paid at 100% of target














  Executive Incentive Plan (EIP)

  Effective September 24, 2005

 [ INSERT NAME ]

	
      

    
	Total Bonus Opportunity	 	 CEO/COO (Non-Variable)
	
      

    
	 	 	 
	 Base Salary:  	  	 USD  
	 EIP Bonus  	  	 USD  __% of
    Base Salary  
	 	 	 
	 On Target Earnings
        (OTE):  	  	 USD  
	 	 	 
	
      

    
	Plan Components	 	 
	
      

    


	 	 
	Corporate Goals
    Measurement
		

	__% of Base Salary 
	 	> __% bonus based on annual
    corporate results
	 	> __% bonus based on quarterly
          corporate results
		

	Corporate Results measured 30/70 on
    Revenue / Operating Profit
		

	No payment on revenue component if operating
    profit not met
	
      	

	If both targets are met
        or exceeded, bonus is paid at 100% of target
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JON F. FREEMAN, D/B/A J.F. FREEMAN & COMPANY 

DOCKET NUMBER: 198 

DATE: JUNE 5, 1973 

DOCUMENT TYPE: SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re: Jon F. Freeman, d/b/a J.F. Freeman & Company, Respondent 

CEA Docket No. 198 

Supplemental Order 

In this administrative proceeding under the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 

Chapter 1), an order was issued on December 22, 1972, suspending the 

respondent's registration as a futures commission merchant for a period of 60 

days and thereafter until he complied fully with the financial requirements 

prescribed by the Act and the regulations. The respondent has requested and the 

complainant has now recommended that a supplemental order be issued terminating 

the suspension of Jon F. Freeman for the reasons that J.F. Freeman & Company is 

not registered as a futures commission merchant for the year 1973, and all 

accounts and balances of J.F. Freeman & Company were transferred to Rosenthal 

and Company as of October 31, 1972. 

Accordingly, the suspension of Jon F. Freeman as provided in the Order of 

December 22, 1972, is hereby terminated. Such order shall remain in full force 

and effect in all other respects. 

Copies hereof shall be served upon the parties. 

Done at Washington, D.C. 

JUN 5 1973 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Order entered May 1 7 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 11
- 01013
- CR
BILLY RAY WILLIAMS , SR., Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10
- 71348
- W


### O RDER Pending before the Court are two motions filed by appellant on February 25, 20 1 3 , and on March 22, 2013 , “For Complete Recordation for a Transcript of All Pre

- Trial Proceedings and for a Daily Transcript of Specified Por tions of the Evidence.” The motions are denied.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
November 7, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HARDAM S. AZAD, INDI VIDUALLY AND D/B/A 5 MILLION SQUARE

FEET COMPANIES , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00165

- CV V.
MRCO, INC. AND COMME RCIAL ROOF CONSULTAN TS & CLAIMS

MANAGEMENT, LLC , Appellees

____________________ This court today heard a motion for rehearing en banc . We order that the
motion be deni ed as moot , and that this court’s former judgment of August 29, 2013, be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this c ourt’s
memorandum opinion of August 29, 2013, withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee s , MRCO, INC.
AND COMMERCIAL ROOF CONSULTANTS & CLAIMS MANAGEMENT,
LLC , signed December 2, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record . We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore
REVERSE the trial court’s final judgment with respect to the award of damages as to MarinaGate, and we RENDER judgment that MRCO and Commercial Roof take nothing with respect to lost profits as to MarinaGate. We REVERSE the trial court’s final judgment with respect to (1) the award of attorney’s fees; and (2) the computation of prejudgment and postjudgment interest, and we REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opini on. We REFORM the finaljudgment to state that the jury’s answer to Question No. 6 is disregarded as

immaterial. We AFFIRM the trial court’s final judgment in all other respects.

We order that each party shall be responsible for their own costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
### STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS 

# NFL

NO. 

### 2023 KW 0996


### JANUARY 22, 

### 2024

In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs,

20th Judicial District Court, Parish of West Feliciana, Nos. 23-WFLN- 87, 

### 23-WFLN- 88, 23-WMSD- 89.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. 

## At the hearing on the motion to suppress, the Officer conceded he 

### initiated the traffic stop at 

## issue solely for the left-hand lane violation. The State concedes the Officer' s 

## testimony concerning respondent 

### driving in the left lane 

### failed to establish probable cause to believe that a traffic violation had occurred, and thus, was 

# insufficientto supportan investigatorystop ofthevehicle. CHH SNM McClendon, J. , 

### concurs and would deny the writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1012 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1012

 Commending the 175th anniversary of The Blade, a newspaper in Toledo, 
                                 Ohio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2010

    Mr. Latta (for himself and Ms. Kaptur) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending the 175th anniversary of The Blade, a newspaper in Toledo, 
                                 Ohio.

Whereas, on December 19, 1835, raw pages of history rolled off a printing press 
        with the publication of No. 1, Vol. 1 of the Toledo Blade;
Whereas a primary reason for the newspaper's establishment was to promote the 
        municipality that resulted when pioneer settlements of Port Lawrence and 
        Vistula were incorporated as Toledo;
Whereas the Toledo Blade's first issue is believed to have been printed on a 
        hand press, possibly in a log cabin, and transported on a wagon over 
        rutted roads;
Whereas the oldest continuous business in Toledo, the Toledo Blade was published 
        on Saturdays until it became a tri-weekly publication in May 1846;
Whereas with the advent of the telegraph, the paper became a daily publication 
        in 1848;
Whereas during all but its first 30 years, the newspaper has been owned and 
        operated by 2 families, the Lockes from 1865 to 1926 and the Blocks from 
        1926 to the present;
Whereas The Blade is known for its long-standing tradition of publishing 
        accurate, truthful stories, and as a result of its credibility, the 
        newspaper is widely respected; and
Whereas historians often use newspapers as a primary source for information 
        about people, places, and events: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends The Blade for 
its 175th anniversary and the important role it serves in reporting 
news events in Northwest Ohio and Southeast Michigan.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Gary D. MacDonald, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the
    quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GBS Enterprises Incorporated for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with
    the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
    information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of GBS Enterprises Incorporated.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: July 1, 2013 | /s/Gary D. MacDonald            | 
|------------------ | ------------------------------- | 
|                   | Gary D. MacDonald               | 
|                   | Interim Chief Executive Officer | 
|                   | (Principal Executive Officer)   |
H. Res. 1375 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 15, 2010. 

Whereas full participatory rights by women are vital to democracy in the United States; 

Whereas the right to vote of all women in the United States 

was not guaranteed for 144 years after the Declaration 

of Independence was signed; 

Whereas the Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca 

Falls, New York, in July 1848, sparking a decades-long 

struggle by women’s rights pioneers to gain the right to 

vote; 

Whereas a constitutional amendment granting women’s suffrage nationwide was first introduced in the United 

States Congress in January 1878; 

Whereas in 1919, the 66th Congress of the United States 

passed a resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution extending the right of suffrage to women; 

Whereas the aforesaid amendment was then ratified by the 

Legislatures of the States of Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Kansas, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Texas, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, Montana, Nebraska, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Utah, California, 

Maine, North Dakota, South Dakota, Colorado, Kentucky, Rhode Island, Oregon, Indiana, Wyoming, Nevada, 
2 

•HRES 1375 EH 

New Jersey, Idaho, Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, 

West Virginia, Washington, and Tennessee; and 

Whereas, on August 18, 1920, the Tennessee General Assembly voted for ratification by a one-vote margin, passing 

the amendment in Nashville, Tennessee, becoming the 

36th and final of the three-fourths of States needed to 

ratify the aforesaid amendment, entering it into the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the 90th anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution; 

(2) honors the contributions and achievements of 

women in United States politics; and 

(3) reaffirms its commitment to pursuing policies 

that achieve true political and social equality for women, 

commensurate with their role in life in the United States 

and society. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1353 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1353

  Supporting the goals and ideals of Student Financial Aid Awareness 
           Month to raise awareness of student financial aid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2010

 Mr. Bishop of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting the goals and ideals of Student Financial Aid Awareness 
           Month to raise awareness of student financial aid.

Whereas education is the key to a successful future for many people in the 
        United States;
Whereas the ability of some students to attend an institution of higher 
        education is conditional on the availability of student financial 
        assistance;
Whereas the cost of higher education continues to rise for 4-year private 
        colleges and universities, 4-year public colleges and universities, 2-
        year community colleges, and for profit institutions;
Whereas students and families across the United States are making important 
        decisions about financing their education at an institute of higher 
        education;
Whereas efforts to increase awareness about student financial aid options are 
        necessary for students across the United States to receive all of the 
        financial aid available to them;
Whereas increasing awareness about the Free Application for Federal Student Aid 
        (FAFSA) ensures that more eligible students may benefit from Federal 
        financial assistance;
Whereas students must complete and submit a new FAFSA each school year to be 
        considered for all forms of Federal financial aid;
Whereas each year, about 14,000,000 students apply for financial aid by filling 
        out the FAFSA;
Whereas increasing access to Federal financial aid helps reduce students' 
        reliance on costly private loans; and
Whereas Student Financial Aid Awareness Month will help call attention to the 
        critical role financial assistance plays in helping students attending 
        an institution of higher education: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Student Financial Aid 
        Awareness Month;
            (2) encourages students and families across the United 
        States to participate in Student Financial Aid Awareness Month; 
        and
            (3) recognizes the importance of educating students and 
        families about Federal Student Financial Aid.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL- OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Xonora~ls%. Riley Texas 2rieon EoarQ Eri%dy %llildhlg 6an antonlo,Tsxes Deeer our.Siyatttft&rabie U. Rile:: 3yat.t -. p*gc 22

~4.tek%'%vl~%m% co5cerr&1~ the conduct of any and all oi~lolalsena araploy%~s of the Texas Prlpon ~a- $%q aad report salB ~oamalttes~~e flnciln@, meether rulth the sobatena%of such eo/dano% awl in the aciamittoe*s oplnlcnRlcht te portfrtsnt to lts flndln@9, . to tha Forty-ninth Le(:lalstum. *saidoomcitteam47 hold Its 5eGGlcns at the CsplWl or at the Stats Penitentiaryst Euntsoillo,or at sny of the Farm8 ooonnaoted ritb the State iJrlso0

SyGtex, **end au17**  **uatu9e** wltassseeto **ap** pear at an7 plaa6rheFe SGid s%selonio are held, and
. . ahallbeentltle~.to 9~. frm the fund h%r%lnett%r set asiaa, for 8311 of Its eatual nsasosarytravrllag ena other erpexmes.

. "T&w% is heraby crpproprlatea out 0r tha, Coitlri~nt

Esp%ns% Fund of the Foity-%l&atbX.%&latam the ltwa

of rtftaerl

IIuRareq

Dollars (gkK!01to 

### meet

ths payment of zmqeseary expmws lmmrr& by Geld oouQnltt~*

l?ousc Biaple R%solutlon.Bo. 311, it ~111 b% neat, 3s not ~1,

broads 61 txm@ohsrtsi~e ut Sancte Reoo-‘ hi&n .srOi.,4

aonsi&eredln oar orIgina opirilon Wo. 0-524s. Th% autharlty expxwmly mnferr%d In th& Hciune ?waolut.ion

1s."wJask@ e tbozwu& lRv%atlga~tim of the Wisce Bptea a& Itao manapaent,~ulth cdtthar- _.

. It.7

to sumuoa wit44eres sna 44lllpal thefr attenaa44e upon it8 ~MS~OIIB,ana tak% waefi48 oonosr~fne the oollduot ot any ma,.m otfl4id4 45a **~107wm** 0r th4 .Texas Prison syatm, 

### end report naid~oarrPlittseta

find- ;

; In&p, togetherwith t$% stabstianao of suah avl&moe ae in the 04waltteots opinionni&ht be petitlnent to Its rinahgtt, to ths Forty-nlnt$ L%&3latum.-
or twurse, this authority lnoluude* i7 iilglrieatSctn ~an7 pmwm leelly lnolaectalto the sapress poskra Pantloned.

xe thlhk an iapllqdautkorltyla airen to th% ceaaoulttee

to employ suok 8t%xio&raphle,.or other h6lp a5a &GSiGtGlltG, 88 Wl?Illa **be M%%QMt#~lp**  **l3%O%S%%S7** to the **taking** of %vla%sim~, end tbe.reportlag

the'oaaislIttee* findings,but beyorla-taathE~oGuEmltte% would. 'hate m authority or lee1 right *to tGlcQwith them a

**pnraon** rho i% not a m%mb%r of either tha oodtt%e **or the**  &%pi%la?4ir%

**and** bestow apon h&z tlm mm% rig&a and privll%gGG* enjoyed by the emmlttee. 53 other w8rd0, this comalttee,as pointsd out In our original ,~opinion,uould hate no panr to de1efGtG any portion of its powers or kaposea &rtl&s‘uponsn]r other person. Phi% %n%wer la neotassarlly gesntela% your ~.: inquiriessre g%lllsr%l. 

### We are 

### not.

aaviwa or the 8~oif10 rti0t or f%at% &rlng.riae to your qa%%tlone,

.. ;;at~myt, 0r aotzr~e, speak 4tih4rv1tss than in gemm-

.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-24-00027-CV

NAHESI PARMES

v.

FIRST CENTRAL CREDIT UNION

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1 of McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20221073CV1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 7, 2024