alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FY05 Discretionary Bonus Payments for Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.8 
  
 Fiscal Year 2005 
 Discretionary Bonus Payments 
 for Sun Microsystems, Inc.’s 
 Named Executive Officers 
  
 For fiscal 2005, Sun did not meet all its performance objectives. However, on July 28, 2005, in recognition of progress made during the past fiscal year and for employee retention purposes, Sun’s management and Board of Directors
approved a broad-based bonus with respect to fiscal 2005 under Sun’s SMI Bonus Plan (the “Discretionary Bonus”). Sun’s named executive officers received the following amounts under the Discretionary Bonus: 
  

						
	 Name

	  	 Position

	  	Amount


	Scott G. McNealy	  	Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer	  	$	1,111,250
			
	Crawford W. Beveridge	  	Executive Vice President, People and Places, and Chief Human Resources Officer	  	$	160,650
			
	Stephen T. McGowan	  	Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Corporate Resources	  	$	177,013
			
	Gregory M. Papadopoulos	  	Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer	  	$	160,650
			
	Jonathan I. Schwartz	  	President and Chief Operating Officer	  	$	280,000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EF01-2021-000]

Take notice that on May 30, 2001, the Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) filed an amendment to its December 14, 2000 filing of its proposed 2002 Transmission and Ancillary Services (2002 Transmission) rates with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission).

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 14, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14710 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Moscow Exchange FBOT Form [Supplement S-1]
APPENDIX 7
[Commitment #2 of the Chairman of the NCC Executive Board]

Please find attached:

MW A certification, signed by the Chairman of the Executive Board of the NCC, that the clearing
system observes (1) the current Recommendations for Central Counterparties that have been
issued jointly by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems and the Technical
Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions, as updated, revised or
otherwise amended, or (2) successor standards, principles and guidance for central
counterparties or financial market infrastructures adopted jointly by the Committee on Payment
and Settlement Systems or the International Organization of Securities Commissions (RCCPs).


Moscow Exchange FBOT Form [Supplement S-1]
APPENDIX 7
[Commitment #2 of the Chairman of the NCC Executive Board]

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick,

The NCC has conducted an in-depth analysis of whether the NCC as a Clearing Organization with
Central Counterparty functions (CCP) complies with the Recommendations for Central Counterparties
CPMI/IOSCO in November 2015. The following areas were assessed internally: regulatory framework
and supervision over the NCC’s operations, requirements for clearing members, efficiency and reliability
of the NCC as the central counterparty.

The analysis and assessments have proved that the NCC complies overall with the CPMI/IOSCO
recommendations and its eligibility to be certified.

Furthermore, after approval of the new standard “Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI)”
by CPMI-IOSCO in April, 2012, the Bank of Russia has developed and adopted their own regulations,
which contain requirements for the activities of Central Counterparties. This document is the Instruction of
the Bank of Russia No.2919-U "On Quality Evaluation of the Credit Organization, functioning as a Central
Counterparty.”

The NCC conducted an internal assessment of compliance with the Instruction in 2013 and filed a petition
to the Bank of Russia to recognize the quality control as satisfactory. The Bank of Russia recognized the
quality control as satisfactory with respect to the NCC on October 18, 2013 based on the results of
Internal Management Quality Assessment, which was prepared by the NCC in accordance with
requirements of the Instruction No.2919-U.

Information on the recognition of the quality management of the NCC as satisfactory was published on
the Bank of Russia web-site, as well as in the Bulletin of the Bank of Russia Ne 59 (1455), on October 31,
2013.

Please find attached Appendix 6 to Supplement S-1 to FBOT Form, Appendix 13 to Supplement S-1 to
FBOT Form, and Appendix 17 to FBOT Form.

Best regards, fo ;
Slee

Alexey Khavin, Chairman of the Executive Board
#### Michael Mulgrew, as President of the United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO, on Behalf of All Represented Employees in the City School District of the City of New York, Appellant, v Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York et al., Respondents. Dow Jones & Company, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Submitted December 27, 2011;

decided February 14, 2012

Reported below, 87 AD3d 506.

Motion by New York State United Teachers for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed, and for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein dismissed as academic.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000860744
<NAME> GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-4
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         532,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  286,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               819,861
<PP&E>                                       8,494,662
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,153,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,161,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,161,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,161,407
<SALES>                                        724,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               725,881
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,059,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (333,991)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (333,991)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (331,991)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION  Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Maurice R. Ferré, M.D., in his capacity as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of MAKO Surgical Corp., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  (i)
     the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and(ii)
     the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MAKO Surgical Corp.
    May 5, 2011
     
     /s/ Maurice R. Ferré, M.D.Maurice R. Ferré, M.D.
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
  This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of MAKO Surgical Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.    24


---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00033

- CV

Amanda Yvonne Cedillo

v. McAllen Independent School District

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CL

- 17

- 1493

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS , having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision cer tified below for observance. August 23, 2018
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APR 5, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-16518

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00077-CR-T-26-MSS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

JESUS LOPEZ RAMIREZ, 

MIGUEL ATILANO GARCIA, 

MANUEL RAMIREZ GARZON, et al.,

Defendants-Appellants. 

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(April 5, 2006)

Before ANDERSON, DUBINA and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

The jurisdictional issue raised by appellants is foreclosed by our recent

opinion in United States v. De La Cruz, ___ F.3d ___, 2006 WL 759777 (11 Cir. 

th

2006). The other arguments of appellants challenging their convictions are

rejected without need for further discussion.

Pursuant to the concession by the government, the sentences of all five

appellants are vacated, and each is remanded for resentencing. 

AFFIRMED as to the convictions; VACATED AND REMANDED as to the

sentences.
#### Luis Mercedes ALEJO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney *129General,1 Respondent.

No. 07-2074-ag.

United States Court *of*Appeals, Second Circuit.

Sept. 11, 2008.

Jorge Guttlein, Guttlein & Associates, New York, N.Y., for Petitioner.

James E. Grimes, Civil Division, Department of Justice, (Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation Counsel, on the brief), Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER, ROBERT D. SACK, and ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

1

. Michael B. Mukasey is automatically substituted as the respondent in this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2).

SUMMARY ORDER

Luis Mercedes Alejo (“petitioner”) seeks review of an April 17, 2007, order and decision of the BIA, affirming the August 26, 2005, order and decision of the Immigration Judge (Vomacka, J.), ordering Alejo removed and denying his application for adjustment of status. Alejo conceded removability as an alien present without having been admitted, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i), but applied for relief from removal in the form of adjustment of status. The sole issue presented by this petition for review is whether the BIA erred in holding that Alejo was ineligible for adjustment of status. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues for review.

In his appeal to the BIA, Alejo conceded that he was convicted in New York state court for “strict possession” of a controlled substance, but contended that he was not convicted for possession with intent to distribute. However, as the BIA correctly noted, a conviction for “strict possession” of a controlled substance renders an alien inadmissible under Section 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II), even if the alien did not intend to distribute the controlled substance. *See Santos-Salazar v. Dep’t of Justice,*400 F.3d 99, 104 (2d Cir.2005) (holding that even “attempted possession of [a controlled substance] ... is squarely covered by § 1182(a)(2)”).

Alejo next argues that because he appealed his controlled substance conviction, and the appeal was still pending in state court at the time he was ordered removed, his conviction was not final for immigration purposes. As we have explained, in 1996, Congress “eliminate[d] the requirement that all direct appeals be exhausted or waived before a conviction is considered final.” *Fuello v. Bureau of Citizenship and Immig. Serv.,*511 F.3d 324, 332 (2d Cir.2007).

We therefore DENY the petition for review. The pending motion for a stay of deportation is DISMISSED as moot.
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Siew Mee Fam                                               |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Siew Mee Fam                                                         |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  January 21, 2010                                                     |
#### In the Matter of Jahquavius W. Orange County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Quanteria H., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.). In the Matter of Jeremiah W. Orange County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Quanteria H., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Submitted November 14, 2011;

decided January 17, 2012

Reported below, 86 AD3d 576.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR) § 500.22 (b) (2).
#### Chaman Lai SHARMA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-75067.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006 *.

Filed Dec. 12, 2006.

Ashwani K. Bhakhri, Esq., Law Offices of Ashwani K. Bhakhri, Burlingame, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Dennis M. Wong, U.S. Dept, of Justice Civil Division, Dublin, CA, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*702MEMORANDUM **

Chaman Lai Sharma and his wife Krishana Devi are natives and citizens of India. They petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision that affirmed the Immigrations Judge’s denial of their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Li v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination based upon an inconsistency regarding the timing and duration of the medical care Sharma received after being mistreated during his third arrest. *Id.*at 964.

Because petitioners failed to satisfy the lower standard of proof for asylum, it necessarily follows that they failed to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Because petitioners’ CAT claim is based on the same testimony that the BIA found not credible, and because they point to no other evidence that the BIA should have considered in making its CAT determination, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief. *See id.*at 1157.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  OCTILLION CORP.Date:  June 2, 2008By:/s/ Harmel S. RayatHarmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANALi_1-FB082022PR22-0005INRETHEMOTIONOFDANIELLECAVALLINIFORADMISSIONTOTHEBAROFTHESTATEOFMONTANAp,,,,,venGreenwoodofSupremeCourtofMontanaORDERDanielleCavallinihasfiledarnotionforadmissiontotheBaroftheStateofMontanapursuanttoRuleVoftheRulesforAdmission,AdmissiononMotion.TheBarAdmissionsAdministratoroftheStateBarofMontanahasinformedtheCourtthattheCommissiononCharacterandFitnesshascertifiedthatCavallinihasprovidedthenecessarydocumentationandhassatisfiedtherequirementsprerequisitetoadmissiononmotionunderRuleV.Therefore,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatuponpaymentofanyapplicationfeesandcompletionofanyotherprocessingrequirementsassetforthbytheBarAdmissionsAdministrator,DanielleCavallinimaybeswornintothepracticeoflawintheStateofMontana.ArrangementsforswearinginmaybemadebycontactingtheofficeoftheClerkoftheMontanaSuprerneCourt.TheClerkisdirectedtoprovidecopiesofthisordertoPetitionerandtotheStateBarofMontana.DATEDthist?..cla;ofFebruary,2022.Chieustice02/08/2022Case Number: PR 22-0005
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31612-31613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1170]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 115 Beaumont, TX Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign Trade Zone of Southeast Texas, Inc., grantee 
of Foreign-Trade Zone 115, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand FTZ 115 to include a site at the Sun Pipe Line 
Company crude oil petroleum terminal (Site 8) in Nederland, Texas 
(including certain areas previously authorized as Subzone 116B), within 
the U.S. Customs Service consolidated port of Port Arthur and Sabine 
(FTZ Docket 67-2000; filed 11/29/00 and amended on 2/7/01).
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (65 F.R. 77560, 12/12/00, and as amended, 66 F.R. 10010, 2/13/
01), the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 115 is approved, subject to the Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.


[[Page 31613]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of May 2001.
Faryar Shirzad,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14799 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P