★ 

H. Res. 1031 

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

March 11, 2010. 

Impeaching G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., judge of 

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, for high crimes and 

misdemeanors. 

Resolved, That G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., a judge of the 

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and 

that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the 

Senate: 

Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of 

itself and all of the people of the United States of America, 

against G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., a judge in the United 

States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, 

in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him 

for high crimes and misdemeanors. 

ARTICLE I 

G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., while a Federal judge of the 

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Lou-
2 

•HRES 1031 EH1S 

isiana, engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible 

with the trust and confidence placed in him as a Federal 

judge, as follows: 

Judge Porteous, while presiding as a United States district judge in Lifemark Hospitals of Louisiana, Inc. v. 

Liljeberg Enterprises, denied a motion to recuse himself from 

the case, despite the fact that he had a corrupt financial relationship with the law firm of Amato & Creely, P.C. which had 

entered the case to represent Liljeberg. In denying the motion to recuse, and in contravention of clear canons of judicial 

ethics, Judge Porteous failed to disclose that beginning in or 

about the late 1980s while he was a State court judge in the 

24th Judicial District Court in the State of Louisiana, he engaged in a corrupt scheme with attorneys, Jacob Amato, Jr., 

and Robert Creely, whereby Judge Porteous appointed 

Amato’s law partner as a ‘‘curator’’ in hundreds of cases and 

thereafter requested and accepted from Amato & Creely a 

portion of the curatorship fees which had been paid to the 

firm. During the period of this scheme, the fees received by 

Amato & Creely amounted to approximately $40,000, and the 

amounts paid by Amato & Creely to Judge Porteous amounted to approximately $20,000. 

Judge Porteous also made intentionally misleading statements at the recusal hearing intended to minimize the extent 

of his personal relationship with the two attorneys. In so 
3 

•HRES 1031 EH1S 

doing, and in failing to disclose to Lifemark and its counsel 

the true circumstances of his relationship with the Amato & 

Creely law firm, Judge Porteous deprived the Fifth Circuit 

Court of Appeals of critical information for its review of a petition for a writ of mandamus, which sought to overrule 

Judge Porteous’s denial of the recusal motion. His conduct 

deprived the parties and the public of the right to the honest 

services of his office. 

Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after 

the Lifemark v. Liljeberg bench trial, and while he had the 

case under advisement, in that he solicited and accepted 

things of value from both Amato and his law partner Creely, 

including a payment of thousands of dollars in cash. Thereafter, and without disclosing his corrupt relationship with the 

attorneys of Amato & Creely PLC or his receipt from them 

of cash and other things of value, Judge Porteous ruled in 

favor of their client, Liljeberg. 

By virtue of this corrupt relationship and his conduct as 

a Federal judge, Judge Porteous brought his court into scandal and disrepute, prejudiced public respect for, and confidence in, the Federal judiciary, and demonstrated that he 

is unfit for the office of Federal judge. 

Wherefore, Judge G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., is guilty of 

high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from 

office. 
4 

•HRES 1031 EH1S 

ARTICLE II 

G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., engaged in a longstanding 

pattern of corrupt conduct that demonstrates his unfitness to 

serve as a United States District Court Judge. That conduct 

included the following: Beginning in or about the late 1980s 

while he was a State court judge in the 24th Judicial District 

Court in the State of Louisiana, and continuing while he was 

a Federal judge in the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Louisiana, Judge Porteous engaged in a 

corrupt relationship with bail bondsman Louis M. Marcotte, 

III, and his sister Lori Marcotte. As part of this corrupt relationship, Judge Porteous solicited and accepted numerous 

things of value, including meals, trips, home repairs, and car 

repairs, for his personal use and benefit, while at the same 

time taking official actions that benefitted the Marcottes. 

These official actions by Judge Porteous included, while on 

the State bench, setting, reducing, and splitting bonds as requested by the Marcottes, and improperly setting aside or 

expunging felony convictions for two Marcotte employees (in 

one case after Judge Porteous had been confirmed by the 

Senate but before being sworn in as a Federal judge). In addition, both while on the State bench and on the Federal 

bench, Judge Porteous used the power and prestige of his office to assist the Marcottes in forming relationships with 

State judicial officers and individuals important to the 
5 

•HRES 1031 EH1S 

Marcottes’ business. As Judge Porteous well knew and understood, Louis Marcotte also made false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in an effort to assist Judge 

Porteous in being appointed to the Federal bench. 

Accordingly, Judge G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., has engaged in conduct so utterly lacking in honesty and integrity 

that he is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, is unfit 

to hold the office of Federal judge, and should be removed 

from office. 

ARTICLE III 

Beginning in or about March 2001 and continuing 

through about July 2004, while a Federal judge in the 

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., engaged in a pattern of conduct inconsistent with the trust and confidence placed in him 

as a Federal judge by knowingly and intentionally making 

material false statements and representations under penalty 

of perjury related to his personal bankruptcy filing and by repeatedly violating a court order in his bankruptcy case. Judge 

Porteous did so by— 

(1) using a false name and a post office box address 

to conceal his identity as the debtor in the case; 

(2) concealing assets; 

(3) concealing preferential payments to certain 

creditors; 
6 

•HRES 1031 EH1S 

(4) concealing gambling losses and other gambling 

debts; and 

(5) incurring new debts while the case was pending, 

in violation of the bankruptcy court’s order. 

In doing so, Judge Porteous brought his court into scandal and disrepute, prejudiced public respect for and confidence in the Federal judiciary, and demonstrated that he is 

unfit for the office of Federal judge. 

Wherefore, Judge G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., is guilty of 

high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from 

office. 

ARTICLE IV 

In 1994, in connection with his nomination to be a judge 

of the United States District Court for the Eastern District 

of Louisiana, G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., knowingly made material false statements about his past to both the United 

States Senate and to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 

order to obtain the office of United States District Court 

Judge. These false statements included the following: 

(1) On his Supplemental SF–86, Judge Porteous 

was asked if there was anything in his personal life that 

could be used by someone to coerce or blackmail him, or 

if there was anything in his life that could cause an embarrassment to Judge Porteous or the President if publicly known. Judge Porteous answered ‘‘no’’ to this ques-
7 

•HRES 1031 EH1S 

tion and signed the form under the warning that a false 

statement was punishable by law. 

(2) During his background check, Judge Porteous 

falsely told the Federal Bureau of Investigation on two 

separate occasions that he was not concealing any activity or conduct that could be used to influence, pressure, 

coerce, or compromise him in any way or that would impact negatively on his character, reputation, judgment, 

or discretion. 

(3) On the Senate Judiciary Committee’s ‘‘Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees’’, Judge Porteous was 

asked whether any unfavorable information existed that 

could affect his nomination. Judge Porteous answered 

that, to the best of his knowledge, he did ‘‘not know of 

any unfavorable information that may affect [his] nomination’’. Judge Porteous signed that questionnaire by 

swearing that ‘‘the information provided in this statement is, to the best of my knowledge, true and accurate’’. 
8 

•HRES 1031 EH1S 

However, in truth and in fact, as Judge Porteous then 

well knew, each of these answers was materially false because 

Judge Porteous had engaged in a corrupt relationship with 

the law firm Amato & Creely, whereby Judge Porteous appointed Creely as a ‘‘curator’’ in hundreds of cases and thereafter requested and accepted from Amato & Creely a portion 

of the curatorship fees which had been paid to the firm and 

also had engaged in a corrupt relationship with Louis and 

Lori Marcotte, whereby Judge Porteous solicited and accepted numerous things of value, including meals, trips, home repairs, and car repairs, for his personal use and benefit, while 

at the same time taking official actions that benefitted the 

Marcottes. As Judge Porteous well knew and understood, 

Louis Marcotte also made false statements to the Federal 

Bureau of Investigation in an effort to assist Judge Porteous 

in being appointed to the Federal bench. Judge Porteous’s 

failure to disclose these corrupt relationships deprived the 

United States Senate and the public of information that 

would have had a material impact on his confirmation. 
9 

•HRES 1031 EH1S 

Wherefore, Judge G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., is guilty of 

high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from 

office. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Clerk.