alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1)   | the              quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Flex Resources Co. Ltd. for the              quarter              ended October 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the              information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the              quarter ended October 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,              the financial condition and results of operations of Flex Resources              Co.              Ltd.. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                  Llorn Kylo                                                                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                |
| Name:  | Llorn                Kylo                                                                           |
|   |                                                                                                |
| Title: | Principal                Executive Officer, Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                                                |
| Date:  | December                17, 2007                                                                    |
# FCM Data January 2012

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF January 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002012FROM REPORTS FILED BY March 5,&KFF0000 &K0000002012	&P of &N
EBS Global Facility Limited- SEF Application - Exhibit T: Clearing Organisations

T.1

EBS Global Facility Limited - SEF Application 

Exhibit T: Clearing Organisations 
EBS Global Facility Limited- SEF Application - Exhibit T: Clearing Organisations

T.2

1 List of Clearing Organisations

LCH.Clearnet Limited* is the only clearing organisation that will be clearing ICAP Global Derivatives 

Limited’s trades. 

*ICAP Global Derivatives Limited has not yet concluded a clearing agreement with 

LCH.Clearnet Limited, but anticipates doing so. 

2 Clearing Guarantee Representations

The clearing members of LCH.Clearnet Limited will be guaranteeing the trades cleared by 

that organization. See LCH.Clearnet Limited Default Fund Rules.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION: 

Notice of meeting.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following meeting:  A Conversation About Cancer Drug Development With Cancer Patient Advocates.  The topics to be discussed are: Fast track, compassionate use, quality of life, the Patient Consultant Program, and other issues as they arise.

*Date and Time*: The meeting will be held on June 29, 2001, 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.                

*Location*:  The meeting will be held at the Westin Fairfax Hotel, Whitehall Room, 2100 Massachusetts Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20008, 202-293-2100.                

*Contacts*:  Patricia C. Delaney and JoAnn M. Minor, Office of Special Health Issues, Cancer Liaison Program, Office of International and Constituent Relations, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4460, FAX: 301-443-4555, or e-mail:  pdelaney@oc.fda.gov and jminor@oc.fda.gov.                

*Registration*: Send registration information (including name, title, firm name, address, telephone, fax number and/or e-mail address) to either contact person by June 22, 2001.                

If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please contact Patricia C. Delaney or JoAnn M. Minor at least 7 days in advance.

Dated: June 8, 2001.

Margaret M. Dotzel,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-14930 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Paul Martin HENRIKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-11059

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2010.

Steven McDonald Sucsy, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Paul Martin Henrikson presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by *United States v. Whaley,*577 F.3d 254, 258-64 (5th Cir.2009), in which this court rejected constitutional challenges to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5tii Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Sail Alberto JOYA-QUINTANILLA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-77238.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*556Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 5, 2008.

Shan D. Potts, Esq., Robert G. Berke, Esq., Berke Law Offices, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Michael P. Lindemann, Esq., Lyle D. Jent-zer, Esq., William C. Peachey, Ethan B. Kanter, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sail Alberto Joya-Quintanilla, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its previous decision and to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider or reopen and review de novo due process claims. *Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), *amended by*404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider as untimely because Joya-Quintanilla filed the motion more than 30 days after the BIA’s final order of removal. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2) (motion to reconsider must be filed within 30 days after the mailing of the BIA’s decision).

The BIA also did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen because Joya-Quintanilla did not establish the prejudice required to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. *See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft,*339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir.2003) (petitioner must show plausible grounds for relief to establish prejudice).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publi*557cation and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SY B. GAIBER & CO., SY B. GAIBER AND MICHAEL R. HEMPEL 

DOCKET NUMBER: 165 

DATE: APRIL 17, 1972 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

Docket No. 165 

Name: Sy B. Gaiber & Co., Sy B. Gaiber and Michael R. Hempel 

Effective On or about April 17, 1972 

The respondents, individually and collectively, shall cease and desist from: 

(1) Engaging as futures commission merchant within the meaning of the 

Commodity Exchange Act without meeting the minimum financial requirements of the 

Act and the regulations thereunder; 

(2) Willfully making any material, false or misleading statement in any 

report or application filed under the Commodity Exchange Act; 

(3) Willfully omitting to state any material fact in connection with any such 

application or report; 

(4) Willfully failing or refusing to furnish true and correct information and 

reports as to the contents and meaning of records of transactions, as required 

under [ILLEGIBLE TEXT]tion 1.35 of the regulations issued under the Commodity 

Exchange Act (17 CFR 1.35); and 

(5) Willfully causing, aiding, counseling, commanding or inducing any person 

to engage in any act or practice from which the respondents are directed to 

cease and desist by this Order. The cease and desist provisions of this Order, 

set forth in the second paragraph of this order, shall become effective upon the 

date of service of this Order upon the respondents. 

A copy of this Decision and Order shall be served on each of the parties and 

on each contract market. 

Done at Washington, D. C., 

April 12, 1972 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Donald A. Campbell 

Judicial Officer 

[ILLEGIBLE TEXT] 

Office of the Secretary 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.c


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
First Bell Bancorp, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of First Bell Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiary, as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of First Bell Bancorp, Inc.'s
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America.  Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of First Bell Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiary as of December 31, 2000, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 23, 2001
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-11-00258-CR

Style: Jeremy Thomas v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: October 29, 2014

Type of motion: Second and Final Motion for Extension for 14 Days

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: September 11, 2014

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: October 29, 2014

Date Requested: November 12, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: November 12, 2014

 No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

On October 1, 2014, the Clerk of this Court granted appellant’s first motion for

extension of time to file appellant’s brief with no further extensions to be granted.

Because this case was recently reinstated on August 12, 2014, and appellant states

that this is her final motion and only seeks 14 days, this motion is granted.

Accordingly, the motion is granted with no further extensions, but we inform 

counsel that if appellant’s brief is not filed by November 12, 2014, we will abate 

this case for a hearing under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: November 4, 2014
mflx-ex1096_355.htm



EXHIBIT 10.96 

Credit Line Contract

Party A:MFLEX Suzhou Co., Ltd.

Principal office address:68 Nanhu Road, Dongwu Industrial Park, Suzhou

 


		
	
Postal code: 215128
	
Legal representative: Lance Jin

	
Fax:
	
Telephone: 0512-65130088




 

Party B: China Construction Bank Suzhou Industry Park Sub-Branch

Principal office address: No. 158 Wang Dun Road, Suzhou Industry Park

 


		
	
Postal code:215021
	
Principal: WEI XIN

	
Fax:0512-62781092
	
Telephone: 0512-65130088




 

Pursuant to the relevant laws and after adequate consultation, Party A and Party B reached and agreed to be bound by the following terms and conditions:

 

Article 1 Amount of Credit Line

Party B hereby provides Party A with a credit line of no more than (in words) RMB Three Hundred Million Yuan Only which can be used for loans in both RMB and any foreign currency, issuance of letters of guarantee, discount and other services with which Party B agrees to Provide Party A.

 

Article 2 Term of Credit Line

The term of the credit line hereunder shall commence on May 6, 2016 and end on May 5, 2017 and the date of expiration of any specific transaction under the credit line is not restricted by fact that such term expires. Upon the expiration of the term, the credit that has not been used will be automatically terminated.

 

Article 3 Use of Credit Line

The execution of this Contract does not constitute a mandatory obligation of Party B to provide the said banking services to Party A. If Party A needs to use the credit line hereunder, Party A shall submit an application therefor within the line on a case-by-case basis. Party B has the right to review the application based on the operation and purpose of Party A to use the funds. If Party B approves the application, the two parties shall sign a separate transaction contract. The dates for commencement and end, amount, interest and interest rate of each single transaction shall be subject to the corresponding transaction contract and vouchers.

 

Article 4 Guarantee Method

In relation to any debt owed by Party A to Party B due to this Contract and any separate agreement, the parties hereto agree with the following method for guarantee:

 

 



Credit

 

Article 5 This Contract shall take effect as of its signature or chop by the legal/authorized representative (person in charge) of Party A and by the person in charge or authorized representative of Party B.

 


		
	
Party A (seal): [MFLEX Suzhou Co., Ltd. seal]

 
	
Party B (seal): [China Construction Bank Suzhou Industry Park Sub-Branch seal]

 

	
Legal representative (signature): /s/ Lance Jin

 
	
Person in charge (signature): /s/ Wei Xin

	
 
	
 

 

 

Date: May 4, 2016




 

2
```

[Federal Register: June 22, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 119)]
[Notices]
[Page 33270]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22jn99-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, July 23, 1999.

.PLACE: 1155 21st St, N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

.CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-15995 Filed 6-18-99; 2:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: December 3, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 232)]
[Notices]
[Page 60202]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03de01-37]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Meeting

    Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
    Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, December 14, 2001.
    Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC., 9th Floor Conference
Room.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.
    Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-29925 Filed 11-28-01; 4:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION
  (i)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of MAKO Surgical Corp.
 August 8, 2008
    /s/ Fritz L. LaPorteFritz L. LaPorteSenior Vice President of Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madison Ave. Media, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, JAMES LINDSEY, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 12th day of July, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ JAMES LINDSEY
 Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: Dorian E. Pfeifer, Susan D. Payne, : Diane Torockio, Richard R. Dailey, :

Susan M. Peterman, Deborah R. Miller, :

and Linda Blackburn Scott, Ruth Ellen : Gallagher, and Judith A. Gallagher :

Appellants :

:

v. : No. 1346 C.D. 2014

: Westmoreland County Tax Claim : Bureau, BP Mineral Holdings III, LLC; :

Somerset Minerals, LP; : BRC Appalachian Minerals I, LLC :

O R D E R

AND NOW

, November 17 , 2015

, it is ordered that the above

- captioned

Memorandum Opinion, filed September 1, 2015 , shall be designated OPINION and

shall be REPORTED.

____ _____________________ _ BERNARD MCGINLEY , Judge
First Amendment To Restated And Amended Purchase Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO RESTATED AND AMENDED PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
  
 This First Amendment to Restated and Amended Purchase Agreement
(“First Amendment”) is effective as of the 15th day of July, 2005, by TRADEMARK PROPERTY
COMPANY, a Texas corporation (“Purchaser”), and THE KIRK & BLUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, an Ohio corporation (“Seller”). 
  
 WITNESSETH: 
  
 WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser entered into that certain Restated and Amended Purchase Agreement dated June 20, 2005 (“Agreement”),
covering the sale of two (2) separate parcels of land, as more particularly described therein; and 
  
 WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser desire to amend the Agreement as set forth below; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration — which the parties acknowledge receiving — Seller and
Purchaser hereby agree to amend Section 2(b) of the Agreement to provide that if Purchaser at any time prior to the Closing of Parcel A discovers groundwater contamination existing in a Class A or Critical Resource aquifer within the Property or
within any other portion of the Millworks development, including land owned by UNOVA and/or Milacron, then notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, Purchaser may terminate the Agreement by written notice to Seller, and in such
event, the Refundable Deposit shall be fully refundable to Purchaser. 
  
 Except as specifically modified by the terms of this First Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and unmodified and are hereby ratified by the parties. All defined terms used
herein will have the same meaning as in the Agreement. 
  
 This
Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, and all of which — when taken together — will constitute one (1) document. Facsimile signatures will be treated as original signatures for all
purposes hereunder. 
  
 EFFECTIVE as of the day and year
first above written. 
  

			
	 THE KIRK & BLUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY,
 an Ohio corporation

		
	By:	 	  


	Name:	 	  


	Its:	 	  


	
	 TRADEMARK PROPERTY COMPANY,
 a Texas
corporation

		
	By:	 	  


	Name:	 	  


	Its:
# FCM Data May 2015

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF May 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002015FROM REPORTS FILED BY June 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002015	&P of &N
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00113

- CR

BYRON DOUGLAS BRIGHAM, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 31265

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 O R D E R Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas R ules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government

- issued personal identification number.”
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record includes a soc ial security number. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A cour t may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in

accor dance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: November 6, 2018