alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        4.28.1

      Generex
        Biotechnology Corporation

      33
        Harbour Square, Suite 202

      Toronto,
        Ontario

      Canada
        M5J 2G2

      


      July
        22,
        2005

      


      Omicron
        Master Trust

      650
        5th
        Ave.,
        24th
        Floor

      New
        York,
        New York

      USA
        10019

      


      


      Dear
        Sirs:

      


      Re: Generex
        Biotechnology Corporation

      -
        Promissory Note & Agreement dated April 4, 2005

      


      We
        make
        reference to the Promissory Note & Agreement (the “Note”)
        dated
        April 4, 2005 in the principal amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000)
        executed and delivered by Generex Biotechnology Corporation (the “Borrower”)
        in
        favour of Omicron Master Trust (the “Holder”),
        as
        the same was amended by letter agreement dated June 7, 2005.

      


      We
        hereby
        confirm the mutual agreement of the Borrower and the Holder to amend the
        terms
        of the Note by extending the interest payment date and the maturity date
        thereof
        from July 22, 2005 to September
        20, 2005.

      


      We
        hereby
        further confirm that, in consideration for the Holder’s agreement to the
        foregoing amendment of the Note, the Borrower will forthwith issue to the
        Holder
        a warrant (the “Amendment
        Warrant”)
        to
        purchase an aggregate of 243,902 shares of the Borrower’s common stock (the
“Amendment
        Warrant Shares”)
        at a
        per-share price of Eighty Two Cents ($0.82), such warrant to expire on July
        20,
        2010.

      


      From
        and
        after the date hereof, the term “Warrant”
        in the
        Note will be deemed to include the Amendment Warrant, and the term “Warrant
        Shares”
        in the
        Note will be deemed to include the Amendment Warrant Shares.

      


      continued............................................................................................................


      
        
          
             

          

           

        

        
           

          
            

          

        

        
           

        

      


      


      In
        all
        other respects, the Note will remain in full force and effect and
        unamended.

      


      Yours
        truly,

      


      Generex
        Biotechnology Corporation

      


      


      /s/
        Rose
        C. Perri

      ____________________________________

      Rose
        C.
        Perri

      Chief
        Financial Officer

      


      AGREED.

      


      Omicron
        Master Trust

      


      /s/
        Bruce
        Bernstein

      ____________________________________

      Bruce
        Bernstein

      Managing
        Partner

      


      
        
           

        

        
          2
#### Estate of Mirco Teta, Respondent, v Mercy Medical Center et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[877 NYS2d 335]

— In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the defendants Mercy Medical Center, Joseph Sciammarella, and Emmanuel Romero appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated April 8, 2008, as denied their cross motion for a protective order regarding certain documents.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the cross motion of the defendants Mercy Medical Center, Joseph Sciammarella, and Emmanuel Romero for a protective order is granted.

The New York Education Law shields from disclosure, among other things, “the proceedings [and] the records relating to performance of a medical or a quality assurance review function” (Education Law § 6527 [3]; *see Kivlehan v Waltner,*36 AD3d 597, 598 [2007]). “The party seeking to invoke the quality assurance privilege bears the burden of demonstrating that the *625documents sought were prepared in accordance with the relevant statutes” *(Kivlehan v Waltner,*36 AD3d at 598).

Here, the appellants satisfied their burden of proof and, therefore, were entitled to the protection of Education Law § 6527 (3) *(see Klingner v Mashioff,*50 AD3d 746, 747 [2008]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the appellants’ cross motion for a protective order.

The plaintiff’s contention regarding the appellants’ alleged waiver of this privilege is improperly raised for the first time on appeal and, in any event, is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

SPENCER LEE KEYS, 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff Below, 

Appellee.

§ 

§ 

§ No. 127, 2021 

§ 

§ Court Below - Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1810001625 (S) 

§ 

§ 

§

Submitted: June 4, 2021 

Decided: June 22, 2021 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, 

Justices. 

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to 

the Court that: 

(1) On April 27, 2021, the appellant, Spencer Lee Keys, filed a notice of 

appeal from his conviction in the Superior Court. The Superior Court sentenced 

Keys on November 13, 2019. Under Supreme Court Rules 6 and 11, a timely notice 

of appeal should have been filed on or before December 13, 2019. 

(2) The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Keys to show cause 

why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. In response to the notice 

to show cause, Keys states that he was unaware of the deadline for filing an appeal. 
2

This Court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal when the notice of appeal is not 

timely filed, unless the appellant can demonstrate that the failure to file a timely 

notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel.1 A notice of appeal must 

be received by the Court within the applicable time period to be effective.2 The 

failure to file a timely appeal in this case is not attributable to court-related personnel. 

Therefore, the appeal must be dismissed. 

(3) Keys also suggests that he is attempting to appeal the Superior Court’s 

order denying his motion for sentence reduction and his motion for postconviction 

relief. Keys did not identify that order in the notice of appeal as the subject of this 

appeal. Nor did Keys file the notice of appeal within the required period with respect 

to that order. The Superior Court order denying the motions for sentence reduction 

and for postconviction relief was dated September 9, 2020 and docketed on 

September 10, 2020. Thus, a timely notice of appeal should have been filed on or 

before October 12, 2020. Keys states that he was unaware that the Superior Court 

had denied his motions until after he requested a copy of the docket on February 5, 

2021, and then requested a copy of the order on March 8, 2021. He admits that he 

received a copy of the order by March 17, 2021. Even assuming that a notice of 

1 Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979). 

2

 DEL. SUPR. CT. R. 10(a). 
3

appeal filed within thirty days of his receipt of the order would be timely, he did not 

file within that period. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), 

that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
#### In the Matter of Charles E. Graham, Jr., Petitioner, v The People of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

*421[874 NYS2d 857]

for an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. All concur. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Catterson J.P., Acosta, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each of the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-71557 and 333-87841) of Medjet Inc. (a
Development Stage Company) of our report dated January 29, 2002 (except for
Restatement note, as to which the date is June 5, 2002) relating to the
financial statements of Medjet Inc., which report appears in this Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A2 of Medjet Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                        /s/Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman & Company

Bridgewater, New Jersey
July 11, 2002
Chang
G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.


t 2667 CAMINO DEL RIO
SOUTH SUITE B t SAN
DIEGO t CALIFORNIA
92108 t


t TELEPHONE (858)722-5953
t FAX (858)
761-0341  t FAX (858)
764-5480


t E-MAIL changgpark@gmail.com t







December
15, 2009




To
Whom It May Concern:





The firm
of Chang G. Park, CPA consents to the inclusion of our report of December 11,
2009 on the reviewed condensed consolidated financial statements of Dot VN, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2009, in any filings that are necessary now
or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.





Very
truly yours,





/s/Chang
      G. Park


Chang G.
Park, CPA





Member
of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants


Registered
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)








In connection with the Report of RegalWorks Media, Inc. (f/k/a AmerElite Solutions, Inc.)  (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dane B. West, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 22, 2013





By: /s/ Dane B. West


Dane B. West, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer
No. 159.

#### Nevius *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Ewing Everett*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman,*and *Mr. Sewall Key*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOE SMALL, III, DOC #309160, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4142 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Margaret O. Steinbeck, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Carol J. Y. Wilson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela Cordova Papasov, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, C.J., and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
#### Robert Hasiholan SIMBOLON, aka Robert Agustinus, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-71209.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 8, 2008.

*595Karen L. Barr, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Lyle Davis Jentzer, Kurt B. Larson, Mona Maria Yousif, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Robert Hasiholan Simbolon, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, we review for substantial evidence, *see Singh v. Ashcroft,*367 F.3d 1139, 1143 (9th Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial record evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that the mistreatment Simbolon suffered during the May 1998 riots did not rise to the level of persecution, *see Prasad v. INS,*47 F.3d 336, 339-40 (9th Cir.1995), and the damage to his farm was not on account of a statutorily protected ground, *see Sangha v. INS,*103 F.3d 1482, 1486-87 (9th Cir. 1997). Substantial record evidence also supports the conclusion that Simbolon did not establish a well-founded fear of future persecution. *See Lolong v. Gonzales,*484 F. 3d 1173, 1181 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc) (requiring some evidence of unique risk of persecution distinct from mere membership in disfavored group).

*596Because Simbolon cannot meet his burden to demonstrate eligibility for asylum, he necessarily fails to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Mansour v. Ashcroft,*390 F.3d 667, 673 (9th Cir.2004).

Moreover, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Simbolon did not establish it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if returned to Indonesia, therefore, we uphold the denial of relief under the CAT. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Donald M. Prest, certify that;

(1)         I have reviewed this report on Form10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 of Bear River Resources, Inc.;

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)         disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:  April 24, 2008
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Murray, Appellant.

[877 NYS2d 228]-

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered on or about September 7, 2005, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Catterson and Renwick, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


International Trade Administration

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce invites U.S. companies to 
participate in the below listed overseas trade missions. For a more 
complete description of each trade mission, obtain a copy of the 
mission statement from the Project Officer indicated for each mission 
below. Recruitment and selection of private sector participants for 
these missions will be conducted according to the Statement of Policy 
Governing Department of Commerce Overseas Trade Missions dated March 3, 
1997.

Information Technology & E-commerce Trade Mission to Southeast Asia 
Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines
    July 31-August 9, 2001

    Recruitment Closes on June 29, 2001.
    For further information contact: Ms. Tu-Trang Phan, U.S. Department 
of Commerce. Telephone 202-482-0480; or e-Mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d597820597f6c636a525d656c634d64796c2369626e236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0a485dda482919e97afa098919eb0998491de949f93de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>

Textile Trade Mission to Mexico, Mexico City and Guadalajara
    September 24-28, 2001

    Recruitment closes on August 10, 2001.
    For further information contact: Ms. Pamela Kirkland, U.S. 
Department of Commerce. Telephone 202-482-3587; or e-Mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c797a6aaa2aba6988caeb5acaba6a9a387aeb3a6e9a3a8a4e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cc9cada1a9a0ad9387a5bea7a0ada2a88ca5b8ade2a8a3afe2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Thomas Nisbet, U.S. Department of 
Commerce. Telephone 202-482-5657, or e-Mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8bdfe4e6d4c5e2f8e9eeffcbe2ffeaa5efe4e8a5ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f0b30320011362c3d3a2b1f362b3e713b303c71383029">[email protected]</span></a>

    Dated: June 1, 2001.
Thomas H. Nisbet,
Director, Promotion Planning and Support Division, Office of Export 
Promotion Coordination.
[FR Doc. 01-14358 Filed 6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ending September      30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ended September 30, 2009, fairly represents in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories,Inc. |

| Date:       November 20, 2009                                                      |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                    |
| Kraig      Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.                                                  |
|                                                                                    |
| By: /s/      Kim      Thompson                            |
| Kim      ThompsonChief      Executive OfficerChief      Financial and AccountingOfficer |
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Creative Host Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I Sayed Ali, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: March 30, 2004                            /s/ Sayed Ali
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Sayed Ali, President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Creative Host Services, Inc. and will be retained by Creative
Host Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.]