alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-425-003]


Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc.; Notice of Negotiated Rate

June 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 1, 2001, Williams Gas Pipelines Central, 
Inc. (Williams) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective 
June 1, 2001:

Third Revised Sheet No. 1
Sheet No. 7
Original Sheet No. 10
Sheet No. 11

    Williams stated that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the 
new negotiated rate/non-conforming contract in its tariff as required 
in Section 154.112(b) of the Commission's regulations.
    Williams states that copies of the revised tariff sheet is being 
mailed to Williams' jurisdictional customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14696 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order entered April 2 1 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 19
- 01321
- CR No. 05
- 19
- 01 563
- CR DONNIE RAY JONES, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appea l fr om the 292nd Judici al District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F 17
- 71725
- V & F17
- 57638
- V

O RDER
We REINSTATE th es e appeals. We abated for a hearing on why a ppellant ’ s brief had not been filed. On April 16, 2020, appellant filed his b rief and a motion for extension of time

. In the interest of expediting th ese appeal s and because the trial court has not held a hearing, we VACATE that portion of our March 3, 2020 order requiring a hearing and findings.We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORD ER the b rief filed as of the date of

this order.
We DI RECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Brandon Birmingham , Presiding Judge, 292nd Judicial District Court ; to Jeff P.
Buc hwald ; and to the Dallas Count y District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
L1 1

.'‘,1a.-11 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 22-0112 

WATER FOR FLATHEAD'S FUTURE Inc., 

AMY WALLER, STEVEN MOORE, and 

CYNTHIA EDSTROM, 

Plaintiffs and Appellees, 

v. 

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 

Defendant and Appellant 

MONTANA ARTESIAN WATER COMPANY 

Intervenor-Defendant and Appellant. 

FP F:77) 

JUN 2 7 2023 

Bowen Gr enwooci 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

Water for Flathead's Future, Inc., et al. (collectively "WFF") has filed a Petition for 

Rehearing of this Court's Opinion entered May 16, 2023. See Water for Flathead's Future, 

Inc. v. Mont. Dep't of Envtl. Quality, 2023 MT 86, 412 Mont. 258. Both the Department 

of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and Montana Artesian Water Company (Artesian) have 

filed objections to the Petition. 

This Court "will consider a petition for rehearing presented only upon [a showing] 

[t]hat it overlooked some fact material to the decision; [t]hat it overlooked some question 

presented by counsel that would have proven decisive to the case; or [t]hat its decision 

conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed by the supreme court." M. R. 

App. P. 20(1)(a). "A petition for rehearing is not a forum in which to rehash arguments 

made in the briefs and considered by the Court." State ex rel. Bullock v. Philip Morris, 

Inc., 217 P.3d 475, 486, 2009 Mont. LEXIS 443 (citing M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a)). Having 

reviewed the Petition along with DEQ and WFF's responses, we conclude that WFF has 

06/27/2023
not demonstrated the existence any of the criteria which would warrant rehearing. M. R. 

App. P. 20(1)(a)(i)-(iii). 

WFF contends that this Court's discussion of remedies is unnecessary dicta and 

conflicts with § 75-1-201(6)(c)(2), MCA. However, neither of these contentions establish 

a basis for rehearing. The Court did not overlook § 75-1-201(6)(c)(2), MCA, but quoted 

and discussed it in the opinion. And, while the characterization of the discussion as dicta 

may be a basis for argument or comment, it is not grounds for rehearing. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and DISMISSED. 

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel 

of record. 

1 — 

DATED this Z -4-- day of June, 2023. 

hief Justice 

2 

Justices
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Michael Brower, theChief Financial Officer of Orange 21 Inc. (the “Company”), certify for thepurposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Codethat, to the best of my knowledge,

 

(i)    theAnnual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December31, 2004 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(ii)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | By                             |   /s/ Michael  Brower |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael Brower                 |
|   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|   | (Principal Financial  Officer) |
|   | March 30, 2005                 |

 

----
IV 

House Calendar No. 180 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1205 

[Report No. 111–455] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4849) to amend the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax incentives for small business job 

creation, extend the Build America Bonds program, provide other infrastructure job creation tax incentives, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2010 

Mr. CARDOZA, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4849) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax incentives for small business job creation, extend the Build 

America Bonds program, provide other infrastructure job 

creation tax incentives, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 4849) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

4 provide tax incentives for small business job creation, ex5 tend the Build America Bonds program, provide other inVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:22 Mar 22, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1205.RH HR1205

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1205 RH 

1 frastructure job creation tax incentives, and for other pur2 poses. All points of order against consideration of the bill 

3 are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 

4 rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute 

5 recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now 

6 printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in 

7 the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

8 resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 

9 amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

10 against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

11 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

12 bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening mo13 tion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

14 controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

15 the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion 

16 to recommit with or without instructions. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 180 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1205 

[Report No. 111–455] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4849) 

centives, and for other purposes. provide other infrastructure job creation tax ination, extend the Build America Bonds program, provide tax incentives for small business job creto amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

MARCH 22, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 2.4




---



##### 



THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
 RECITALS:
 WHEREAS, pari passu
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 2




---



##### 



WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE, THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH:
  ARTICLE ONE
  Effect of the Indenture
  ARTICLE TWO
  Addition of a Guarantor
 pari passu
 Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationSky In-Home Service Limited
    
    England and Wales
 References in the Indenture
  3




---



##### 



Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationBritish Sky Broadcasting Limited
    
    England and WalesBSkyB Finance UK plc
    
    England and WalesBSkyB Investments Limited
    
    England and WalesBSkyB Publications Limited
    
    England and WalesSky In-Home Service Limited
    
    England and WalesSky Subscribers Services Limited
    
    England and Wales
 ARTICLE THREE
  Effect of Headings
  Governing Law
  Counterparts
  Trustee
  4




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 British Sky Broadcasting Group plcBy:
    
    /s/ Andrew GriffithName:
    
    Andrew GriffithTitle:
    
    DirectorBritish Sky Broadcasting LimitedBy:
    
    /s/ Andrew GriffithName:
    
    Andrew GriffithTitle:
    
    DirectorBSkyB Finance UK plcBy:
    
    /s/ Andrew GriffithName:
    
    Andrew GriffithTitle:
    
    DirectorBSkyB Investments LimitedBy:
    
    /s/ Andrew GriffithName:
    
    Andrew GriffithTitle:
    
    DirectorBSkyB Publications LimitedBy:
    
    /s/ Andrew GriffithName:
    
    Andrew GriffithTitle:
    
    DirectorSky In-Home Service LimitedBy:
    
    /s/ Andrew GriffithName:
    
    Andrew GriffithTitle:
    
    Director
 5




---



##### 



Sky Subscribers Services LimitedBy:
    
    /s/ Andrew GriffithName:
    
    Andrew GriffithTitle:
    
    DirectorThe Bank of New York MellonBy:
    
    /s/ Mark ElsomName:
    
    Mark ElsomTitle:
    
    Assistant Vice President
 6
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of A. H. Belo Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Robert W. Decherd,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alison K. Engel, Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert W. Decherd                        
|Robert W. Decherd                            
|Chairman of the Board, President and         
|Chief Executive Officer                      
|August 1, 2012                               
|                                             
|/s/ Alison K. Engel                          
|Alison K. Engel                              
|Senior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
|August 1, 2012
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Bruce Harmon, Chief Financial Officer of Marizyme, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2020 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NATIONWIDE PROPERTY & § CASUALTY INSURANCE § COMPANY, § No. 99, 2020 § Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § ANGEL IRIZARRY, JR., § C.A. No. N18C-02-167 § Defendant Below, § Appellee. § Submitted: August 12, 2020 Decided: August 25, 2020

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES , Justices. ORDER

This 25 th day of August 2020, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the
final judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its January 31, 2020 memorandum opinion and order.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Mark K. Ryun, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Here Enterprises, Inc. for the period ended August 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Here Enterprises, Inc.  Dated: November 19, 2010/s/ Mark K. RyunMark K. RyunPresident, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal FinancialOfficer, and Principal Accounting Officer)
# FCM Data April 2016

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF April 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002016FROM REPORTS FILED BY June 3,&KFF0000 &K0000002016	&P of &N
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

Jean Ellen (202) 653-5629 / (202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay / 1-800-877-8339 for toll free. 

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 01-14089 Filed 5-31-01; 12:56 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00402

- CR

JUSTIN DAVID EVANS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 220th District Court

Bosque County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR14935

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Justin Evans attempts to appeal his conviction for possession of a controlled

substance . The certificate of right to appeal indicates that this is a plea bargain case and

that Evans waived his right to appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d). Accordingly, the appeal is

dismissed.

Notwithstanding that we are dismissing this appeal, Evans may file a motion for

rehearing with this Court within 15 days after this opinion and judgment are rendered ifE vans v. State Page 2

he believes this opinion and judgment are erroneously based on inaccurate information

or documents. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 49.1. Moreover, if Evans desires to have the opinion

and judgment of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that

petition must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the

day this Court’s judgment is rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing is

o verruled by this Court

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 68.2 (a).

For the reasons sta ted, this appeal is dismissed.

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal dismi ssed

Opinion delivered and filed November 20, 2019

Do not publish

[CR25]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from American
Financial Group, Inc. 10-K for December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         544,408
<SECURITIES>                                10,096,992<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  703,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,953,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        882,063
<COMMON>                                        60,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,379,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,953,870
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,629,609
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               320,737
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                246,919
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,489
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            190,430
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    817
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   191,247
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.88
<FN>
<F1>(1)  Includes an investment in affiliates of $307 million.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[967 NE2d 1198, 944 NYS2d 753]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Latisha Bowden, Appellant.

Decided April 26, 2012

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Legal Aid Society,*New York City *(Michael J. McLaughlin, Richard Joselson*and *Steven Banks*of counsel), for appellant.

*Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney,*Bronx *(Stanley R. Kaplan*of counsel), for respondent.

*981OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not “on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.