alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF DOT VN, INC.





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dot VN, Inc.
for the quarter ended July 31, 2009, the undersigned, Thomas Johnson, Chief
Executive Officer of Dot VN, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended July 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Dot VN, Inc.





Date:
September 14, 2009





/s/ Thomas JohnsonThomas
      JohnsonChief
      Executive Officer and principal executive
  officer
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  OCTILLION CORP.Date:  April 11, 2008By:/s/ Harmel S. RayatHarmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 114 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 114

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 10, 2009.
Whereas, since 1987, the National Girls and Women in Sports Coalition has 
        declared February 4 as ``National Girls and Women in Sports Day'';
Whereas the House of Representatives has recognized the importance of girls and 
        women in sports through title IX, which governs the overall equity of 
        treatment and opportunity in athletics so that women have equal 
        opportunities to participate in athletics;
Whereas the number of girls playing high school sports has increased from just 
        under 300,000 during the 1971 to 1972 school year to nearly 3,000,000 
        during the 2005 to 2006 school year;
Whereas the number of women playing college sports grew from fewer than 32,000 
        in 1972 to nearly 171,000 from 2005 to 2006;
Whereas, despite great advancement, high school girls still receive 1,300,000 
        fewer participation opportunities than do boys, and the money spent on 
        girls' sports is still far less than that spent on boys' sports;
Whereas high school girls who play sports are more likely to get better grades 
        in school and are more likely to graduate than girls who do not play 
        sports;
Whereas as little as 4 hours of exercise a week may reduce a girl's risk of 
        breast cancer, osteoporosis, and obesity;
Whereas girls and women who play sports have a more positive body image, higher 
        levels of confidence and self-esteem, and experience higher states of 
        psychological well-being than girls and women who do not play sports;
Whereas the celebration of ``National Girls and Women in Sports Day'' would 
        increase awareness of the importance sports play in the lives of girls 
        and women in the United States; and
Whereas February 4, 2009, has been designated as ``National Girls and Women in 
        Sports Day'' by the National Girls and Women in Sports Coalition: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of ``National Girls and Women in 
        Sports Day'', an event sponsored by the National Girls and Women in 
        Sports Coalition to honor the achievements of and encourage 
        participation of girls and women in sports; and
            (2) encourages the continued participation of schools and 
        communities in providing opportunities for girls and women in 
        elementary, secondary, and college sports to promote awareness of the 
        positive influence of sports participation in the lives and health of 
        girls and women, and the continuing struggle for equality and access for 
        women in sports.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

   I, Bradley B. Eavenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Greenstar
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: December 14, 2007

By: /s/ Bradley B. Eavenson
    -----------------------
    Bradley B. Eavenson
    Chief Executive Officer
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

NOV 13 2000

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ARTHUR R. MORALES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LOCKHEED MARTIN

CORPORATION, BOBBIE V.

WILLIAMS, ANTHONY L.

THORNTON, CHARLES E. EMERY,

C. PAUL ROBINSON and

EDWARD D. GRAHAM,

Defendants,

and

SANDIA CORPORATION and

SANDIA NATIONAL

LABORATORIES,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-2029

(D.C. No. CIV-97-350-LH)

(D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BALDOCK , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.
-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

After a trial to the court, the district court determined that appellant Arthur

Morales failed to prove pretext in his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 suit against his employer

for allegedly retaliatory adverse employment actions. Mr. Morales appeals that

judgment and also argues that the district court was biased in this case and that he

should now be granted a jury trial.

We have examined the pleadings, the briefs of the parties, and the record

on appeal. We find no basis upon which to disturb the oral findings of the district

court and the judgment in this case, nor do we find evidence of judicial bias. 

Further, the district court acted well within its discretion in denying Mr. Morales’

untimely request for a jury trial.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of

New Mexico is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14067]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Announcement of Subsistence Resource Commission meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
SUMMARY: The Superintendent of Cape Krusenstern National Monument and 
Kobuk Valley National Park and the Chairpersons of the Subsistence 
Resource Commissions for Cape Krusenstern National Monument and Kobuk 
Valley National Park announce a forthcoming joint meeting of the Cape 
Krusenstern National Monument and Kobuk Valley National Park 
Subsistence Resource Commissions. The following agenda items will be 
discussed:
    (1) SRC Chairs Welcome--Introduction of commission members and 
guests. Review and approve agenda.
    (2) Review and approve minutes from last meeting.
    (3) SRC review of regional issues.
    (4) SRC review Subsistence Hunting Plan/and work session.
    (5) Public and other agency comments.
    (6) Identify agenda topics, set time and place of next SRC meeting.
    (7) Adjournment.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on 
Wednesday June 6 and 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 7. If 
needed, the Chairs may schedule evening sessions.

LOCATION: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service conference room in Kotzebue, Alaska. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service Office in Kotzebue is located at 160 2nd Street, Telephone 
(907) 442-3799.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David W. Spirtes, Superintendent, P.O. 
Box 1029, Kotzebue, Alaska 99752, Telephone (907) 442-3890 or Ken 
Adkisson at (800) 471-2352 or 443-2522.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Subsistence Resource Commissions are 
authorized under Title VIII, section 808, of the Alaska National 
Interest Lands Conservation Act, Public Law 96-487 and operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committees Act.

Robert L. Arnberger,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 01-14067 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 23, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 28549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-13031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Wireless Application Protocol Forum, Ltd.

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 3, 2001, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Wireless Application 
Protocol Forum, Ltd. (``WAP'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, CacheFlow Inc., 
Tokyo, JAPAN; CASIO SOFT CO., LTD., Tokyo, JAPAN; Cellnext Solutions 
Limited, New Delhi, INDIA; Cisco Systems, Inc., Research Triangle Park, 
NC; Finetix Limited, London, England, UNITED KINGDOM; GEO Interactive 
Media Group Ltd., Givataim, ISRAEL; iConverse, Waltham, MA; Interactive 
Trust Network, Inc., Atlanta, GA; Jataayu Software Ltd., Bangalore, 
INDIA; MobiApps, Inc., McLean, VA; Niragongo Inc., Herzliya, ISRAEL; 
Sila Communications Ltd., London, England, UNTIED KINGDOM; 
SingleSignOn.Net Inc., Reston, VA; and ValiCert, Inc., Mountain View, 
CA have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and WAP intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 18, 1998, WAP filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 
31, 1998 (63 FR 72333).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 8, 
2001. A notice for this filing has not yet been published in the 
Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 01-13031 Filed 5-22-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**Exhibit 3.1(ii)**

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT 

TO THE 

AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 

OF 

MUST HAVES, INC. 

Pursuant to Section 607.1006 of the Business Corporation Act of the State of Florida, the undersigned, being the President of MustHaves, Inc., a Florida corporation bearing Document No. P04000041568 (the “Corporation”), does hereby submit these Articles of Amendment to the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as follows: 

FIRST: Article III of the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended by adding the followingparagraph after paragraph (ii): 

“Upon the filing of this Certificate of Amendment tothe Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Effective Time”), each share of the Corporation’s common stock, no par value (the “Old Common Stock”), issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time,will be automatically reclassified as and converted into one fourth ( 1/4th) of a share of common stock, no par value, of the Corporation (the “New Common Stock”). Any stock certificate that immediately prior to the Effective Time represented shares of the OldCommon Stock will, from and after the Effective Time, automatically and without the necessity of presenting the same for exchange, represent the number of shares of the new Common Stock as equals the product obtained by multiplying the number ofshares of Old Common Stock represented by such certificate immediately prior to the Effective Time by one fourth ( 1/4th) (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The Corporation shall not issue fractional shares in connection with the Reverse Stock Split, rather, the holder of each suchfractional share shall be entitled to receive one full share.” 

SECOND: The foregoing amendment was adoptedpursuant to written consent of the sole director dated September 18, 2009, and by written consent of the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock of the Corporation dated September 18, 2009. Therefore,the number of votes cast for the Amendment to the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation was sufficient for approval. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, has executed these Articles of Amendment to the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation this 26th day of October, 2009.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at September 30, 1999 Audited and
the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended September 30, 1999
Audited and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,147
<PP&E>                                         209,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,296,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,603
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       202,995
<OTHER-SE>                                     971,528
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,296,126
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  355,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,635,816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,991,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,991,050)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,991,050)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND

#### Raymond Pierre Lee, Jr. v. John Doe

January 30, 1989

Case No. LM-3323-3

By JUDGE T. J. MARKOW

The court has reviewed Mr. Johnson’s motion to reconsider and has also reviewed the cases attached, as well as § 8.01-262 of the Code of Virginia. The motion to reconsider will be overruled. The case will be transferred as previously indicated.

The court concurs with Judge Harris’s opinion in *Smith*v. *John*Doe, 11 Va. Cir. 288 (1988), and offers this additional rationale in support of the court’s decision.

Section 8.01-262(10) of the Code is specifically structured to cover exactly this type of case. On that I do not believe either of you disagrees. The issue, however, is whether this is the only permissible venue under § 8.01-262.

The only other section that could apply in this case is § 8.01-262(3), which provides permissible venue.

> 3. Wherein the *defendant*regularly conducts affairs or business activity .... (Emphasis added.)

The only defendant in this case is John Doe. The insurance carrier is not a defendant. The uninsured motorists coverage section of the Code which is applicable simply states that service will be made on the carrier *543"as if it were a party defendant." Further, it states that in other respects, it "shall have the right to file pleadings and take other action allowable by *law in the name of John Doe."*Va. Code Ann. § 38.2-2206(E). The legislature makes a distinction between how a carrier is served (as if it were a defendant) and how it otherwise participates (in the name of John Doe). It does not contemplate that the carrier be treated for all purposes as the defendant. Consequently, the carrier is not a defendant, and § 8.01-262(3) is inapplicable.

For this reason, § 8.01-262(10) was enacted and is controlling here.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of M-GAB Development Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on or about the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Carl M. Berg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) Information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  March 30, 2005                     /s/ Carl M. Berg
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           By:  Carl M. Berg
                                           Its:  Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  M-GAB  Development  Corporation  and  will be  retained  by  M-GAB
Development  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Order entered October 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01368-CV

FREDIS BENITEZ, ET AL., Appellants

V.

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-03671

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ October 1, 2013, motion for an extension of time to file a notice 

of appeal. The notice of appeal filed with the trial court on October 1, 2013 is deemed timely for 

jurisdictional purposes.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE