alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2


Certification
of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer





Pursuant
to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danvers Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I
hereby certify, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company as of, and for, the period covered by the
      Report.








This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2202, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signal
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








­/s/   James J.
McCarthy________________


James J. McCarthy


Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer
Exhibit (14)(1)

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Proxy Statement and Prospectus(the Proxy/Prospectus) constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form N-14 (the Registration Statement) of Fidelity Investment Trust: Fidelity Europe Fund, of our report dated December 18, 2012, on the financial statements and financial highlights included in the October 31,2012 Annual Report to Shareholders of Fidelity Investment Trust: Fidelity Europe Fund.

We further consent to the references to our Firm under the headings "Experts" and "AdditionalInformation About the Funds" in the Proxy/Prospectus and to the references to our Firm underthe headings "Financial Highlights" in the December 29, 2012 Prospectus and "IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm" in the December 29, 2012 Statement of Additional Information for Fidelity Investment Trust: Fidelity Europe Fund, which are also incorporated by reference into the Proxy/Prospectus.
Exhibit
32.2







Certification






The
undersigned certifies for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code, in his capacity as the chief executive officer of NORTH
HORIZON, INC. (“NORTH HORIZON”) that to his knowledge, the Form 10-Q of NORTH
HORIZON with financial statements for the quarter ended June 30,
2008, fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operation of NORTH HORIZON.






Date: July
      14, 2008/s/
      Wallace BoyackWallace
      BoyackChief Financial
      Officer
H. Res. 1300 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 28, 2010. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 5013) to amend title 10, United States Code, 

to provide for performance management of the defense acquisition system, and for other purposes. The first reading of 

the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined 

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Armed Services. After general debate the bill 

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 

the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 

Committee on Armed Services now printed in the bill. The 
2 

•HRES 1300 EH 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 

considered as read. All points of order against the committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except 

those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding 

clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question. All points 

of order against such amendments are waived except those 

arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion 

of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 

shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall 

be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto 

to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. The Chair may entertain a motion that the 

Committee rise only if offered by the chair of the Committee 

on Armed Services or his designee. The Chair may not enter-
3 

•HRES 1300 EH 

tain a motion to strike out the enacting words of the bill (as 

described in clause 9 of rule XVIII). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17

- 152 V

Filed: August 30, 2017

Not for Publication

*************************************

DENNIS SCH A E FER

, *

*

Petitioner, *

*

v

. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Jeffrey S. Pop

, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.

Claudia B. Gangi , Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On January 31, 2017 , petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine

Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa

- 10

– 34 (2012) alleging that he suffered Guillain

- Barré syndrome

(“GBS”) as a result of his receipt of influenza (“flu”) vaccine on September 22, 2015

. Pet. at 1.

The undersigned held the initial status conference on May 1, 2017. During the status

conference, the u ndersigned ordered respondent to file a status report by June 30, 2017 indicating

his view of the case. After requesting and receiving an extension of time, respondent filed a status

report on July 31, 2017 saying he wanted to file a Rule 4(c) Report. On July 31, 2017 the

undersigned ordered respondent to file his Rule 4(c) Report by August 31, 2017.

On August 30, 2017, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report. On page 1 of his report,

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ we bsite, in accordance w ith the E

- Government Act of 2002

, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)

(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services) . Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that

all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the pub lic unless they contain trade secrets

or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar

information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a

decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the

document ’ s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within

the banned categories listed above, the special master shall re dact such material from public access. Guillain

- Barré syndrome (“GBS”) ; influenza (“flu”) vaccine ;

respondent does not contest

entitlement2 respondent writes “he does not contest entitlement in this matter.” Resp ’t’s Rep. at 1. Because

respondent does not contest entitlement , the undersigned rules that pet itioner is entitled to

damages.

Petitioner made a demand on May 31, 2017. The undersigned will schedule a telephonic

status conference to discuss settlement negotiations.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 30, 2017 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

184 CA 10-01281 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ.

DOMINIC R. PARTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ONONDAGA COUNTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

GORDON J. CUFFY, COUNTY ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (MARY J. FAHEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (AMY M. VANDERLYKE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John C. Cherundolo, A.J.), entered January 6, 2010. The order granted the application of plaintiff for leave to file and serve a late notice of claim.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff’s application seeking leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5). Plaintiff offered a reasonable excuse for failing to serve the notice of claim within the statutory 90-day period ( see § 50-e [1] [a]; see generally Matter of LaMay v County of Oswego , 49 AD3d 1351, 1352, lv denied 10 NY3d 715). Contrary to defendant’s contention, plaintiff “made a persuasive showing that [Onondaga County (defendant)] ‘acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim’ . . .[, and defendant has] made no particularized or persuasive showing that the delay caused [it] substantial prejudice” ( Wetzel Servs. Corp. v Town of Amherst , 207 AD2d 965; see Matter of Rodriguez v Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. , 74 AD3d 1811).

Entered: February 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
H. Res. 1141 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 17, 2010. 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor was born on March 26, 1930, 

in El Paso, Texas and spent most of her childhood on her 

family’s ranch, the Lazy B, located in the high deserts 

outside of Duncan, Arizona; 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor graduated magna cum laude 

from Stanford University in 1950 with a Bachelor of 

Arts degree in economics, and graduated in the top three 

of her class at Stanford University Law School in 1952; 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor married John J. O’Connor 

III, a fellow Stanford Law student, in December 1952 on 

the Lazy B Ranch and raised three children with him in 

Paradise Valley, Arizona; 

Whereas after practicing law in Frankfurt, Germany, and 

Phoenix, Arizona, Sandra Day O’Connor began her career in public service as the Arizona Assistant Attorney 

General in 1965; 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor was appointed to the Arizona 

State Senate in 1969 and was subsequently re-elected; 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor rose to many leadership positions during her 6 years in the legislature, including as 

the first woman State Senate majority leader in the 

United States; 
2 

•HRES 1141 EH 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor was elected judge for Maricopa County Superior Court in 1975; 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor was appointed to the Arizona 

Court of Appeals, the State’s second-highest court, by 

Governor Bruce Babbitt in 1979; 

Whereas Ronald Reagan nominated Sandra Day O’Connor in 

1981 to serve as the first woman on the United States 

Supreme Court, which was swiftly approved by the Senate by unanimous consent, with the strong support of Arizona Senators Barry Goldwater and Dennis Deconcini; 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor was sworn in as a United 

States Supreme Court Justice by Chief Justice Warren 

Burger on September 25, 1981, commencing her 24 

terms on the Supreme Court, a career distinguished by 

her centrist role and commitment to uphold the law and 

the Constitution; 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor’s support for the proposed 

Equal Rights Amendment further strengthened her role 

as a mentor and leader for women of all generations; 

Whereas, on August 12, 2009, President Barack Obama 

awarded Sandra Day O’Connor the Presidential Medal of 

Freedom, the highest honor given to a civilian; 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor has become a nationally recognized leader in the effort to preserve judicial independence through her strong support of selecting judges by 

nonpartisan commissions; 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor continues to honor her commitment to public service, most recently through her webbased education project, Our Courts, which strives to engage young people in civics and the democratic process; 

and 
3 

•HRES 1141 EH 

Whereas Sandra Day O’Connor will turn 80 years old on 

March 26, 2010: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 

achievements and distinguished career of Justice Sandra Day 

O’Connor, and recognizes her impact as an American symbol 

of hard work and rugged individualism. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register: July 1, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 126)]
[Notices]
[Page 35914]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01jy98-61]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Membership of the Commission's Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Membership Change of Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Office of Personnel Management guidance
under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, notice is hereby given that
the following employees will serve as members of the Commission's
Performance Review Board.
    Chairperson: Linda Ferren, Executive Director. Members: Susan G.
Lee, Executive Assistant to the Chairperson; Daniel Waldman, General
Counsel; Steven Manaster, Director, Division of Economic Analysis;
Geoffrey Aronow, Director, Division of Enforcement; I. Michael
Greenberger, Director, Division of Trading and Markets.

DATES: This action will be effective on July 1, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Office of Human
Resources and Support Services, Three Lafayette Centre, Suite 4100,
Washington, D.C. 20581.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ann Linnertz, Director, Office of Human Resources and Support Services,
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Office of Human Resources and
Support Services, Three Lafayette Centre, Suite 4100, Washington, D.C.
20581, (202) 254-3275.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: This action which changes the membership of
the Board supersedes the previously published Federal Register Notice,
September 11, 1997.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on June 24, 1998.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-17498 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========

----
EXHIBIT
23.3





Consent
of Schlumberger DCS





We hereby consent to the use of the
name Data & Consulting Services (DCS) Division of Schlumberger Technology
Corporation, the reference to our reserve estimate report for Aurora Oil &
Gas Corporation (f/k/a Cadence Resources Corporation) (the "Company") dated
February 17, 2009, and the use of information contained therein in the Form 10-K
to be filed on or about March 13, 2009.




We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of the Form 10-K containing the
foregoing into the Form 3 Registration Statements filed by the Company on
December 21, 2007 (File Nos. 333-129695 and 333-130769) and any amendments to
these Form 3 Registration Statements.





Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania


March 12,
2009




SCHLUMBERGER
      DCS/s/ Charles M. Boyer IICharles
      M. Boyer II, P.G.Operations
      ManagerPittsburgh
      Consulting
Services
#### In re MARTINOVSKY.

(District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

July 13, 1909.)

No. 2,163.

Aliens (5 68*) — Naturalization-Statutes.

Naturalization Act (Act Cong. June 29, 1906, c. 3»92, 34 Stat. 506 [Ü. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 421]) § 4, par. 2, requires that the petition for naturalization shall he signed by the applicant in his own handwriting, provided that, if he has filed his declaration before'the passage of the act, he shall not be required to so sign his application. Section 31 declares that the act shall take effect 90 days after its passage, except that certain sections, not including section 4, shall take effect immediately. *Held*that, the act having been passed on June 29, 1906, an alien, who declared his intention to become a citizen on September 8th following, was required to sign his petition in his own handwriting as a condition to naturalization.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Aliens, Doe. Dig. § 68.*]

Application by Andras Martinovsky for Naturalization.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

ORR, District Judge.

It appears in this case that the applicant declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States on September 8, 1906, and at that time he could not sign his name in his own handwriting. It further appears that he cannot sign his name in his own handwriting to-day. The question arises whether or not he should now be naturalized because of the provisions of paragraph *2,*§ 4, of the act of Congress approved June 29, 1906 (34 Stat. 596, c. 3592 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 421]), commonly called the “Naturalization Act.”

That paragraph requires that the petition for naturalization shall be signed by the applicant in his own handwriting, but contains a proviso that if he has filed his declaration before the passage of said act he shall not be required to sign the petition in his own handwriting. Inasmuch as the act was passed on June 29, 1906, and the applicant’s declaration of intention was made September 8, 1906, he should be refused naturalization.

It is true the thirty-first section of the act provides that the act shall take effect and be in force from and after 90 days from the date of its passage, with the proviso that certain sections, not including section 4, should go into effect immediately upon the passage of the act; and it is true that.the declaration of the applicant’s intention was made within the 90 days from the date of the passage of the act. But the act clearly means what it says, and that the declaration of intention was made before the act should take effect, but subsequent to its passage, is no reason why the provisions of the act should be ignored.

Let an order be drawn accordingly.
Exhibit
32.2






Certification






The
undersigned certifies for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code, in his capacity as the chief executive officer of NORTH
HORIZON, INC. (“NORTH HORIZON”) that to his knowledge, the Form 10-Q of NORTH
HORIZON with financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2008,
fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operation of NORTH HORIZON.




Date: October
      9, 2008/s/
      Wallace BoyackWallace
      BoyackChief
      Financial Officer
**CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEDGERX LLC**

# SEF EXHIBIT G

**A copy of the constitution, articles of incorporation or association with all amendments thereto, partnership or limited liability agreements, and existing bylaws, operating agreement, and rules or instruments corresponding thereto, of Applicant. Include any additional governance fitness information not included in Exhibit C. Provide a certificate of good standing dated within one week of this Form SEF.**

Please see Attachment A hereto.

**Attachment A**

1) Delaware Certificate of Formation of LedgerX LLC

2) Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of LedgerX LLC 

3) LedgerX LLC Delaware Good Standing Certificate, dated January 10, 2017

4) LedgerX LLC New York Qualification to Do Business Certificate, dated September 17, 2014

5) Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ledger Holdings Inc.

6) By-Laws of Ledger Holdings Inc.

7) Ledger Holdings Inc. Delaware Good Standing Certificate, dated January 10, 2017

8) Delaware Certificate of Conversion of NYBX Inc**.**

9) NYBX Inc. to Ledger Holdings Inc. Name Change (Delaware)

10) NYBX Inc. to Ledger Holdings Inc. Name Change (New York)

11) Risk Management Committee Charter

12) Regulatory Oversight Committee Charter

13) Nominating Committee Charter

14) Participant Committee Charter

15) Disciplinary Panel Charter

16) Appeals Committee Charter

**[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]**

124095889

124095889
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Lantis Laser Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stanley B. Baron, CEO andCFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Stanley B. Baron

Stanley B. BaronCEO and CFODated: November 11, 2009

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lantis Laser Inc. and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teen Education Group,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter  ending  March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert L. Wilson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 15, 2008



                                        By: /s/ ROBERT L. WILSON
                                            ___________________________
                                                Robert L. Wilson
                                                Principal Financial Officer