alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      10.7**


**FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO THE**


**FIRST
      COMMUNITY CORPORATION**


**1999
      STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**





**WHEREAS** ,
      the
      common stock of First Community Corporation (the “Company”) is listed on the
      Nasdaq Small Cap Market (“NASDAQ”);





**WHEREAS** ,
      NASDAQ
      rules require that stock incentive plans containing a formula for automatic
      increases in the number of shares available under the plan must contain a term
      limit of 10 years from the later of the plan’s adoption or the last approval by
      shareholders; and





**WHEREAS** ,
      effective March 15, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the
      following amendment to the First Community 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”);





**NOW,
      THEREFORE** ,
      the
      Plan is hereby amended as follows:





**Section
      1.**  **Amendment
      of the Plan** .





(a)  The
      first
      paragraph of Section 9.1 is amended to read as follows :




Unless
      sooner terminated, the Plan shall terminate on the day before the 10 th anniversary of the date the Plan is adopted by the Board or approved by the
      shareholders of the Company, whichever is later. The Board may at any time
      terminate the Plan; provided, however, that the Board (unless its actions are
      approved or ratified by the shareholders of the Company within twelve months
      of
      the date that the Board amends the Plan) may not amend the Plan to:





**Section
      2. Effect on Plan.** Except
      as otherwise specifically provided herein, the Plan shall not be amended but
      shall remain in full force and effect.





**Section
      3. Headings.** The
      Section headings contained in this Amendment are for reference purposes only
      and
      will not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this
      Amendment.





**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF** ,
      the
      Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of March 15,2005, in
      accordance with the authority provided by the Board of Directors.








**First
      Community Corporation**





By: /S/James
      C. Leventis


Name: James
      C. Leventis


Title: Chairman
      of the Board & Secretary








66
H. Res. 1163 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 15, 2010. 

Whereas Washington State University Honors College was established in 1960, 70 years after the founding of Washington State University; 

Whereas Sidney Hacker, Professor of Mathematics, directed 

the establishment of the Honors program at Washington 

State University; 

Whereas Washington State University, located in Pullman, 

Washington, is the State’s largest land-grant university 

and offers more than 200 areas of study; 

Whereas the Washington State University Honors College offers an enriched 4-year curriculum to highly able students and provides such students with the opportunity to 

challenge themselves; 

Whereas studies at the Washington State University Honors 

College promote the six learning goals of the Honors College, including critical and creative thinking, quantitative 

and symbolic reasoning, information literacy, communication, self in society, and disciplinary knowledge; and 

Whereas Washington State University Honors College is one 

of the most respected programs of its kind nationally: 

Now, therefore, be it 
2 

•HRES 1163 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

Washington State University Honors College for 50 years of 

excellence. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
{"agency":"CFTC","generated":"2017-10-17 11:27:37","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"}],"value":"2017"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"8"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CFTC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["73"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["64"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["15"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2017","quarter":"Q4"}
1 The Court of Appeals' Rules provide: Rule 10. Memorandum Opinion (b) This Court, with the conc urrence of all judges participating in the case, ma y affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memoran dum opinion

it shall be designa

ted "MEM ORANDUM O PINI ON," sha ll not be pub lished, a

nd shall not be cited or relied on for any r

eason in any unr

elated case. 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on

Briefs, Septem

ber 15, 200 3 KASSANDRA GREENE v. TARRY GREENE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Ham ilton County No. 00D2553 Hon. L. Marie Williams, Circuit Judge FILED OCTOBER 22, 2003 No. E2002-02611-COA-R3-CV

The Trial Court granted divorce, divided the marital ass ets, and assigned debts. The husband has appeale d. We aff

irm.
Tenn. R. App. P.3 Appe al as of Right ; Judgme nt of the Cir

cuit Cour

t Affirme d.

H ERSCHEL P ICK

ENS F RANKS , J. delivered the opinion of the court, in which C HARLES D. S USANO , J R ., J., and D. M ICHAEL S WINEY , J., joined.
Tarry L . Greene, Chattanooga, Tennesse e, pro se . Alan R. Beard, Chattanooga, Tenne ssee, for Appellee.

MEMORAN

DUM OP

INION 12 The wife’s s tatement of liabili tie s and a ssets recites that the home, awarded to the wife, belonged to the wife before mar riage. The par

ties own bu siness property on South Hig hland Park which, according to the statement, had no equity value since a

$34,000.0 0 indebte dness was owed on the prop ert y. The wife ’s other debts as stated, were a $5,000.00 student loan and an I nternal Revenue Service debt of $30,000.00.

-2-

In this divorce action the wife was awarde d a divorc e on the g rounds of inapprop riate marital conduct, and the w ife was a warded real es tate of th

e partie s and res ponsib il it y f or all indebted ness on the pro

perty . Each pa

rty was awa rded all personal pr operty, furnishing s and contents in his or he

r possess ion at the

time of the div orce. T

he wife w as held to

be responsible for her student loan and Internal Revenue Servic e obliga

tion, and t

he husba nd was held harmle ss thereon. 2 The husband appeals from the Trial Court’s Judgment, alleging inter alia violation of his constitutional rights in the conduct of the trial..

No transcript of the evidentiary proceedings has been filed in this action, and upon review of the re cord, we

conclude that the is sues rai sed on ap peal we re eithe r not rais ed in

the Trial Court or are factual issues. Since a ny i ssues as to the equitable division of marital property are factua ll y driven, we conclusively pr esume that evidence supports the Trial Court’s division of marital p roperty , since no

evidenti ary

record has been present ed to this Court. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the Judgment of the Trial Court and assess the cost of the appeal to the appellant, Tarry Greene.

_________________________

H ERSCHEL P ICKENS F RANKS , J.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 4, 2020.

________________

No. 3D20-1103

Lower Tribunal No. 20-322

________________

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation,

Appellant,

vs.

Carlyle Towers Inc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Veronica A. Diaz, Judge.

Paul R. Pearcy, P.A., and Maureen G. Pearcy, for appellant.

Kula & Associates, P.A., and Elliot B. Kula, W. Aaron Daniel, and William 

D. Mueller; Ramon, Rodriguez & Blanco-Herrera, LLP, and Daniel J. Rodriguez, 

for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and LOBREE, JJ. 

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.
2

In this first-party insurance dispute over property damage, Citizens Property 

Insurance Corporation appeals the trial court’s order granting Carlyle Towers, Inc.’s 

motion for stay and to compel appraisal. Based upon Appellee’s commendable 

confession of error and a review of the subject insurance policy, we reverse and 

remand for further proceedings. See Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Zunjic, 126 So. 3d 

355, 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Casar, 104 So. 3d 384, 

385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Voxware, Inc. (the
        "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Thomas
        J. Drury, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
        Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Voxware, Inc. and will be retained by Voxware, Inc. and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  
 /s/
                    Thomas J. Drury, Jr.Dated:
                    September 28, 2006
                Thomas
                    J. Drury, Jr.Chief
                    Executive
                    Officer
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Blue Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joel Franklin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Joel Franklin By: Joel Franklin Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: August 22, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
[Federal Register: October 20, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 61659]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20oc04-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, November 12, 2004.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-23569 Filed 10-18-04; 11:51 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### James SALSMAN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 08-74043.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*675Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 14, 2010.

James Salsman, Emeryville, CA, pro se.

Allen M. Brabender, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Maxwell C. Smith, Esquire, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, Karen D. Cyr, Esquire, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of the General Counsel, Rockville, MD, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny Salsman's request for oral argument.

MEMORANDUM **

James Salsman petitions pro se for review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (“NRC”) decision denying his petition for rulemaking to amend NRC’s regulations concerning the environmental and exposure limits for heavy metal ra-dionuclides, and to reclassify uranium solubility. *See*10 C.F.R. Part 20. We dismiss the petition for review for lack of Article III standing because Salsman did not demonstrate that he suffered an “injury in fact” that is concrete and particularized and actual or imminent. *See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife,*504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
H. Res. 1131 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 27, 2010. 

Whereas the National Association of Secondary School Principals and the National Association of Elementary School 

Principals have declared the week of April 18, 2010, 

through April 23, 2010, as National Assistant Principals 

Week; 

Whereas the assistant principal is responsible for establishing 

a positive learning environment and building strong 

school-community relationships; 

Whereas the assistant principal is a member of the school administrative team who interacts with sectors of the school 

community, including support staff, instructional staff, 

students, and parents; 

Whereas assistant principals play a pivotal role in the instructional leadership of the school by conducting instructional supervision, mentoring teachers, recognizing the 

achievements of staff, encouraging collaboration, ensuring 

the implementation of best practices, monitoring student 

achievement goals and progress, facilitating and modeling 

data driven decision-making to inform instruction, and 

guiding the direction of targeted intervention and continual school improvement; 
2 

•HRES 1131 EH 

Whereas the day-to-day logistical operations of schools require assistant principals to monitor and address facility 

needs, attendance, transportation issues, and scheduling, 

as well as supervise extra and co-curricular events; 

Whereas assistant principals are entrusted with maintaining 

an inviting, safe, and orderly school environment that 

supports the growth and achievement of each and every 

student by nurturing positive peer relationships, recognizing student achievement, serving as mediators, analyzing behavior patterns, providing interventions, and 

conducting discipline; 

Whereas the National Association of Secondary School Principals/Virco National Assistant Principal of the Year program began in 2004 to recognize outstanding middle and 

high school assistant principals who have demonstrated 

success in leadership, curriculum, and personalization; 

and 

Whereas the week of April 18, 2010, through April 23, 2010, 

would be an appropriate week to designate as National 

Assistant Principals Week: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the designation of National Assistant 

Principals Week; 

(2) honors and recognizes the contributions of assistant principals to the success of students in schools in 

the United States; and 

(3) encourages the people of the United States to 

observe National Assistant Principals Week with appropriate ceremonies and activities that promote awareness 
3 

•HRES 1131 EH 

of school leadership in ensuring that every child has access to a high-quality education. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-50098

Summary Calendar

____________________

HELEN MYERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KING’S DAUGHTERS CLINIC,

Defendant - Appellee.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

( W-94-CV-260 )

__________________________________________

August 29, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Helen Myers appeals the adverse judgment, following a bench

trial, on her claim that King’s Daughters Clinic failed to give

notice of continuation and conversion rights under COBRA, 29 U.S.C.

§ 1166, upon termination of her employment.

Myers bases error on the district court’s ruling that the

Clinic had satisfied the statute’s notice requirements and on the
- 2 -

court’s application of Texas’s two-year statute of limitations.

For essentially those reasons articulated in the district court’s

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, we conclude that the

notice requirements were met. Therefore, we need not reach the

limitations issue.

Accordingly, the judgment is 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Solutions Holding, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, David V.
DiFelice, Chief Financial/Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.






May 19,
2009




/s/ David V. DiFelice


/s/ David
V. DiFelice


David F.
DiFelice


Chief
Financial/Accounting Officer








- 33
-
```

[Federal Register: June 20, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 119)]
[Notices]
[Page 33605]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20jn97-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, July 25, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-16419 Filed 6-18-97; 3:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 23, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00879

- CR

Matthew Douglas HAYES

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appel lee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10842W

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion to Supplement Clerk ’ s Record is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan, 1996 Stock Option Plan,
Nonstatutory Stock Option, 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, and the 1996 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan of Avigen, Inc. of our report dated August 6, 1999,
with respect to the financial statements of Avigen, Inc. included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1999.

                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Walnut Creek, California
September 27, 1999