alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **Material Released     Pursuant to FOIA Requests Which** |
|------------------------------------------------------------|

| **has Been, or is Likely     to Be, the Subject of Future** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|

| **FOIA     Requests** |
|------------------------|

| **____________________________________________** |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| Documents which do not have     PDF links are availabe on request to [email protected] by using the |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| electronic request form.     Electronic distribution of the documents is possible, depending on the     requester's |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ability to receive them.     Paper copies of documents are available within the Washington, D.C., area     through |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| the Commission's Public     Reading Room and outside the area through use of the electronic request form. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Fees of 15 cents per page     apply to paper copies |
|------------------------------------------------------|

| **Request Form** | **If you are unfamiliar with PDF files, click here for     help** |
|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **____________________________________________** |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| FILE NUMBER: | **RF05-007** | PLACED ON THE PUBLIC     RECORD: | 11/03/2005 | CATEGORY: | **C** |
|--------------|--------------|-----------------------------------|------------|-----------|-------|

| **CARGILL INVESTOR     SERVICES, INC., CFTC FORM 1-FR-FCM FOR THE** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **PERIOD 08/01/2005 -     08/31/2005** |
|-----------------------------------------|

| **____________________________________________** |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT NUMBER: | 1 |
|------------------|---|

|  | Cargill Investor Services,     Inc., Form 1-FR-FCM fo the perion 08/01/2005 - |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 08/31/2005 |
|--|------------|

| DATE: | 08/31/2005 | PAGES: | 13 | PDF SIZE: | 397 KB | PDF LINK: |
|-------|------------|--------|----|-----------|--------|-----------|

| **------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
U.S, COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

% 1976

January 22, 2016

Mr. James F. Cawley

Chief Executive Officer

BGC Derivative Markets, L.P.
199 Water Street

New York, New York 10038

Re: Application of BGC Derivatives Markets, L.P. for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Mr. Cawley:

By submissions dated September 4, 2013 through January 19, 2016, BGC Derivatives
Markets, L.P. (“BGC”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(“Commission”), pursuant to Section Sh of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. §
7b-3, and Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap
execution facility (“SEF”).

The Commission has reviewed BGC’s application and has determined to grant BGC
registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying Order of
Registration.

Sincerely,

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except

under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and

collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation

of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may

be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 1/9/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL G. BROWN, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 95-3167

v. (D.C. No. 93-4219-DES)

YOUTH CENTER AT TOPEKA; STATE

OF KANSAS, Department of

Social and Rehabilitation

Services; DONNA WHITEMAN,

individually and in her

capacity as Secretary of

Kansas Department of Social

and Rehabilitation Services;

HAROLD F. ALLEN, individually

and in his capacity as

Superintendent of the Youth

Center at Topeka; DAVID

HILDERBRAND, individually and

in his capacity as Cottage

Director at the Youth Center

at Topeka; LARRY SCHMIDT,

individually and in his

capacity as Youth Service

Specialist III at Youth Center

at Topeka; WILLIAM VON HEMEL,

individually and in his

capacity as Youth Service

Specialist II at Youth Center

at Topeka, 

(District of Kansas)

Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
2

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the Appellant’s brief and appellate record,

this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would

not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.

R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

We AFFIRM for the reasons given by the district court.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
#### Argentine R. HAIRSTON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. RC MATHENE, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 09-8081.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 3, 2010.

Decided: June 18, 2010.

Argentine R. Hairston, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Argentine R. Hairston seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006).

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedui’al grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hairston has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS  I, Patricia Cooke,
certify that:  1. I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Asia Atlantic Resources;  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.    Date: December 12,
2008   /s/
Patricia Cooke Patricia
Cooke Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director
```

[Federal Register: April 26, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 80)]
[CORRECTIONS]
[Page 22599]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26ap04-152]



[[Page 22599]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Futures Market Self-Regulation

Correction

    In notice document 04-8235 beginning on page 19166 in the issue of
Monday, April 12, 2004 make the following correction:
    On page 19167, in the second column, remove the first two
paragraphs and insert them into footnote 9 of the first column, so that
footnote 9 appears as follows:

    \9\ Originally, Regulation 1.3(ff) defined a DSRO to be an SRO:
 of which [an FCM] is a member or, if the [FCM] is a member of more
than one [SRO] and such [FCM] is the subject of an approved plan
under Sec.  1.52, then [an SRO] delegated the responsibility by such
a plan for monitoring and auditing such [FCM] for compliance with
the minimum financial and related reporting requirements of the
[SROs] of which the [FCM] is a member, and for receiving the
financial reports necessitated by such minimum financial and related
reporting requirements from such [FCM].
43 FR at 39967. Regulation 1.3(ff) subsequently has been amended to
include introducing brokers (``IBs'') and leverage transaction
merchants.


[FR Doc. C4-8235 Filed 4-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
| DOCUMENT NUMBER: | 14 |
|------------------|----|

|  | Governance FitnessInformation for Members of the Board of Directors, Appendix |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | F-3 toApplication |
|--|--------------------|

| DATE: | PAGES: |  | 5 | PDF SIZE: | 71 KB | PDF LINK: |
|-------|--------|--|---|-----------|-------|-----------|

| **---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

FirstPreviousNextLast
#### PARKWOOD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2011-5096.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 13, 2012.

C. Clayton Gill, Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett, Rock & Fields, Chtd., of Boise, Idaho, argued for the plaintiff-appellant.

Shalom Brilliant, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Brian M. Simkin, Assistant Director.

DYK, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Summary of Terms of Employment



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 Summary of Terms of Employment of 
 Timothy G. Frommeyer 
  

  
 Timothy G. Frommeyer became Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer of Nationwide Financial Services, Inc.
(NFS), Nationwide Life Insurance Company and Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company on November 1, 2005. The following is a summary of the material terms of Mr. Frommeyer’s employment: 
  
 Mr. Frommeyer will receive a base salary of $290,000 per year, and he
will be eligible for an annual incentive bonus with a target amount equal to 65% of his base salary. The payout is determined primarily on business unit and individual performance. 
  
 Mr. Frommeyer will receive a long-term incentive award opportunity with a total target opportunity of $371,450 as
follows: (i) non-qualified stock options for NFS Class A Common Stock valued at $185,725, which options will vest one-third on each of the first three anniversary dates of the grant and have a ten-year term and (ii) a Nationwide Value
Added annual target award of $185,725 for 2006. One-third of the actual award earned will be paid in March 2007 if NFS and certain of its affiliates satisfy pre-established economic value creation targets. The remaining two-thirds of the actual
award earned will be carried forward. 
  
 Mr. Frommeyer will
be subject to NFS stock ownership guidelines. These guidelines require that Mr. Frommeyer acquire and hold NFS stock with a minimum value of his base salary within three years, and two to three times his base salary within five years.

  
 Mr. Frommeyer will receive additional benefits comparable
to officers at his level, including financial planning services, participation in the executive physical program and other health and retirement benefits.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 3678]


Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy; Open Meeting 
Notice

    The Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy (ACIEP) 
will meet from 9 am to 12 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2001, in Room 1107, 
U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520. The 
meeting will be hosted by Committee Chairman R. Michael Gadbaw and 
Assistant Secretary of State for Economic and Business Affairs E. 
Anthony Wayne.
    The ACIEP serves the U.S. Government in a solely advisory capacity 
concerning issues and problems in international economic policy. The 
objective of the ACIEP is to provide expertise and insight on these 
issues that are not available within the U.S. Government.
    Topics for the June 12 meeting will be:
    <bullet> A New WTO Round
    <bullet> Responding to the HIV/AIDS Crisis
    <bullet> The International Implications of U.S. Energy Policy
    The public may attend these meetings as seating capacity allows. 
The media is welcome but discussions are off the record. Admittance to 
the Department of State building is by means of a pre-arranged 
clearance list. In order to be placed on this list, please provide your 
name, title, company or other affiliation if appropriate, social 
security number, date of birth, and citizenship to the ACIEP Executive 
Secretariat by fax (202) 647-5936 (Attention: Cecilia Walker) or email: 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7106101d1a140312033102051005145f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ea9d8b86818f988998aa999e8b9e8fc48d859c">[email protected]</span></a>) by October 27th. On the date of the meeting, 
persons who have registered should come to the 23rd Street entrance. 
One of the following valid means of identification will be required for 
admittance: a U.S. driver's license with photo, a passport, or a U.S. 
Government ID.
    For further information about the meeting, contact Deborah Grout, 
ACIEP Secretariat, U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Economic and 
Business Affairs, Room 3526, Main State, Washington, DC 20520. Tel: 
202-647-1826; or Carol Thompson, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#65110d0a0815160a0b06002516110411004b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5c1dddad8c5c6dadbd6d0f5c6c1d4c1d09bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 5, 2001.
Carol E. Thompson,
Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on International, Economic 
Policy, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 01-14622 Filed 6-6-01; 3:01 pm]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Billy G. ASEMANI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES; Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Respondents — Appellees.

No. 07-7734.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 25, 2008.

Decided: Sept. 8, 2008.

*249Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. Asemani seeks a declaration that the Attorney General is the proper respondent in his § 2241 proceedings. In the underlying petition, he requested that the Attorney General notify the Maryland State Division of Corrections that Asemani will not be taken into federal custody for removal purposes following completion of his state sentence because he is a United States national. He denies, however, that his § 2241 petition is an effort to seek review of his removal proceedings, and he seeks no relief from Maryland prison officials. Because the relief sought by Asemani is inextricably intertwined with his removal proceedings, and the district court did not have jurisdiction over those proceedings, it properly declined to issue an advisory opinion regarding the proper respondent or Asemani’s nationality. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Lee DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andre BRUNA, James M. Hughes, Kim M. Parnofiello, D. Miller, Larry Grimm, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-14039

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 5, 2010.

Robin I. Bresky, Boca Raton, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Scott D. Alexander, Johnson Anselmo Murdoch Burke Piper & McDuff, E. Bruce Johnson, Johnson Anselmo Murdoch Burke Piper & Hochman, PA, Ft Lauder-dale, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by Lee Dale from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice against Andre Bruna, et al., six officers of the Sunrise, Florida, police department pertaining to his 2006 arrest. Dale alleges unlawful search and seizure, false arrest and unlawful detainment by the officers for a period of three hours.

Based upon a series of discovery-related problems and chronic noncompliance by Dale, the report and recommendation prepared by the magistrate judge was that Dale’s amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice. This report was adopted in full by the district court, based upon Dale’s unreasonable, defiant conduct, consisting of repeated violations of the Federal Rules and multiple court orders.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the district court order adopting the magistrate judge’s order, the briefs and the arguments of counsel. Finding no error, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23




                      Consents of Independent Accountants



<PAGE>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration  Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-80797, No.
33-90616,  No. 333-06390 and No. 333-06962) of our report dated January 17, 1997
appearing  on  page 59 of the  Annual  Report  to  Shareholders  of  SGS-Thomson
Microelectronics NV for the year ended December 31, 1996 listed under Item 19(a)
of SGS-Thomson Microelectronics NV's Annual Report on Form 20-F. We also consent
to the  application of such report to the Financial  Statement  Schedule for the
year  ended   December  31,  1996  listed   under  Item  19(a)  of   SGS-Thomson
Microelectronics  NV's Annual  Report on Form 20-F when such schedule is read in
conjunction with the financial  statements  referred to in our report. The audit
referred to in such report also included this schedule.



PRICE WATERHOUSE NEDERLAND BV


Amsterdam, The Netherlands
June 25, 1997


<PAGE>


"As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our reports
(and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this 
registration statement."


Amsterdam, The Netherlands
June 25, 1997                           Arthur Andersen & Co.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 01-20298

ASSOCIATED INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,

VERSUS

BOYD BLYTHE; ET AL.,

Defendants, BOYD BLYTHE; CHRISTOPHER SHAWN WOOD, Individually, and as Representative of Slade Zacharia Wood,

Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants.

Appeals from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas, Houston

April 16, 2002 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion March 22, 2002, 5 th Cir., 2002, ____F.3d____) Before DAVIS, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We deny Associated International Insurance Company’s motion for rehearing. In response to Associated’s petition for panel rehearing, we2

substitute the following in place of section IV of the opinion as originally issued:

IV. Based on our review of the case law i n Texas and in other jurisdictions, we conclude that under the allegat ions of Associated’s co mplaint, Blythe was covered under the Associated excess policy as an additional insured and the district court’s judgment denying Blythe’s Partial Motion for Summary Judgment and granting Associate d’s Motion for Summary Judgment on that issue
must be reversed. The district court’s order dismissing Blythe’s and Wood’s extra-contractual claims against Associated solely as a
consequence of the district court’s conclusion on t he coverage issue must also be reversed and those claims remanded for trial. Accordingly, the district court’s j udgment is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.