alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Christopher JOHNSON, Defendant— Appellant.

No. 07-10463.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 9, 2008.

Kirstin M. Ault, Esq., U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Erik G. Babcock, Esq., Law Office of Erick G. Babcock, Oakland, CA, Christopher Johnson, Dublin, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. *616R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*616MEMORANDUM **

Christopher Johnson appeals from the 40-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, and bank fraud, and conspiracy to commit access device and bank fraud. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Johnson contends that the district court erred in imposing a two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 because there was insufficient evidence that he willfully fled from the residential treatment program where he had been ordered to stay pursuant to his pretrial release conditions. The record reflects, however, that Johnson left treatment without permission, and remained at large for six months, during which time he failed to attend two court hearings of which he was notified. *See United States v. Draper,*996 F.2d 982, 987 (9th Cir.1993) (“absconding from pretrial release amounts to escape from custody under the Sentencing Guidelines”); *see also United States v. Petersen,*98 F.3d 502, 508 (9th Cir.1996) (“this court has upheld a § 3C1.1 enhancement where the defendant had already been arrested for the offense, was told he was a suspect in a criminal case, and ‘knew he was expected to surrender himself voluntarily” ”). Therefore, the district court did not clearly err.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Rene Campos, Jimmy Arnold, Chris Robertson

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00247

- CV

Trial court case number: 1156293

Trial court: Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 2 of Harris County

Relators, Rene Campos, Jimmy Arnold, and Chris Robertson, have filed a petition

for writ of mandamus in this C ourt, challenging the trial court ’ s May 10, 2021 order allowing certain discovery

. T he May 10, 2021 order was signed by the Honorable George Barnstone.

Judge Barnstone resigned from the office of judge of Co u nty Civil Court at L aw No. 1 of Harris County, Texas

, effective Jul y 19, 2021

. On September 28, 2021, the mandamus proceeding was abated to allow Judge Barnstone ’ s s uccessor
, the Honorable

Audrie Lawton

- Evans

, to reconsider his order. O n October 2 0, 2021

, Judge L awton

Evans transferred the underlying case to County C ivil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jim F

. Kovach presi ding

. On December 2 1, 2021, this

C ourt lift ed a previously imposed stay to enable Judge Kovach to reconsider the ruling

m ade the basis of relator s ’ petition

. Since then, the parties have advised this Court that

mediation was s cheduled f or April 19, 2022

.
The C ourt asks the p arties to file a n update ad vising whether mediation was

successful and, if no t, whether the trial court has reconsidered the May 10, 2021 order or when a hearing or ruling is anticipated

. Responses should be filed within ten days fr o m the date of this ord er.

I t is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_________ /s/ Julie Countiss

____________ A c ting indivi dually

Dat e: May 5, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         482,357
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,980
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               603,762
<PP&E>                                       2,587,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                 486,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,561,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          503,780
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,839,485
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,561,855
<SALES>                                        697,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               697,581
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,121,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               248,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (672,791)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             272,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (672,791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                               (737,009)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,409,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.16)
        

</TABLE>
1

No. 03-15-00024-CR

In the

COURT OF APPEALS

For the

THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

at Austi

______________________________________

On Appeal from the 368th Judicial District Court of

Williamson County, Texas

Cause Number 13-0686-277

______________________________________

STEVEN ANTHONY ROE, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_____________________________________

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

_____________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF

APPEALS:

After a diligent review of the record, the undersigned has determined that 

there are no points of error which, in good conscience, could be raised in this 

appeal. Therefore, the undersigned has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). For that reason, the undersigned requests 

that she be allowed to withdraw from this case so that Appellant may pursue a pro 

se appeal.

ACCEPTED

03-15-00024-CR

7223903

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

10/5/2015 11:05:11 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/5/2015 11:05:11 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Kristen Jernigan, 

court-appointed counsel for Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause 

respectfully prays that the Court grant this motion to withdraw.

Respectfully submitted,

____/s/ Kristen Jernigan___________

KRISTEN JERNIGAN

State Bar Number 90001898

207 S. Austin Ave.

Georgetown, Texas 78626

(512) 904-0123

(512) 931-3650 (fax)

Kristen@txcrimapp.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Motion to Withdraw as Counsel has been emailed to the Appellate 

Attorney for the Williamson County District Attorney’s Office, John Prezas at 

jprezas@wilco.org on October 5, 2015.

______/s/ Kristen Jernigan_____________

Kristen Jernigan
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Natural Resources Conservation Service 

# AGENCY:

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Field Office Technical Guide. NRCS is also seeking review and comments to the proposed changes. 

# SUMMARY:

It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for Washington State, that changes must be made in the Field Office Technical Guide specifically for the following practice standards: 
      - Nutrient Management, practice code number 590
      - Waste Utilization, practice code number 633
      - Interim standard; Grass Buffer Strips, practice code number 741

Proposed changes are to include new and improved technology. 

# DATES:

Comments will be received for a period of 30 days following the publication date of this notice. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Leonard Jordan, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 316 West Boone Avenue, Suite 450, Spokane, WA, 99201-2348; phone (509) 323-2900; or FAX (509) 323-2909. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

If you would like to review any of the practice standards mentioned, contact Leonard Jordan at the above address or phone number to receive a copy of the draft standards. 

For the next 30 days the NRCS will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 

Following that period a determination will be made by the NRCS regarding disposition of those comments and a final determination of change will be made to the subject standards. 

Dated: May 7, 2001. 

Leonard Jordan, 

State Conservationist, Washington.

[FR Doc. 01-14837 Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
```

[Federal Register: May 6, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 87)]
[Notices]
[Page 25020]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06my98-38]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Thursday, May 28, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-12118 Filed 5-4-98; 10:46 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
Exhibit 10.3 (1 of 2)



LOGO

April 25, 2012

Dr. Juan José Suárez Coppel

Director General

Petróleos Mexicanos

Avenida Marina
Nacional No. 329

Colonia Patróleos Mexicanos C.P. 11311

México

Dear Dr. Suárez Coppel:

We hereby consent to all references to our firm as set forth in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ending December
31, 2011 (the Form 20-F), under the heading Exploration and Production (Reserves), and to the filing of our audit letter dated February 23, 2012, as an exhibit to the Form 20-F. We have audited the estimates of proved oil,
condensate, natural gas, and oil equivalent reserves owned by the United Mexican States (Mexico) as of January 1, 2012, for 28 fields located offshore Mexico in the Northeastern Marine Region. These estimates were prepared by
Pemex-Exploración y Producción in accordance with the reserves definitions of Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



Sincerely,NETHERLAND, SEWELL INTERNATIONAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.By:

LOGORobert C. Barg, P.E.
President


1601 ELM STREET, SUITE 4500 
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201-4754  PH: 214-969-5401  FAX: 214-969-5411



---

Exhibit 10.3 (2 of 2)



LOGO

April 25, 2012

Dr. Juan José Suárez Coppel

Director General

Petróleos Mexicanos

Avenida Marina
Nacional No. 329

Colonia Patróleos Mexicanos C.P. 11311

México

Dear Dr. Suárez Coppel:

We hereby consent to all references to our firm as set forth in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos for the year ending December
31, 2011 (the Form 20-F), under the heading Exploration and Production (Reserves), and to the filing of our audit letter dated February 23, 2012, as an exhibit to the Form 20-F. We have audited the estimates of proved oil,
condensate, natural gas, and oil equivalent reserves owned by the United Mexican States (Mexico) as of January 1, 2012, for 120 fields located onshore Mexico in the Southern Region. These estimates were prepared by
Pemex-Exploración y Producción in accordance with the reserves definitions of Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



Sincerely,NETHERLAND, SEWELL INTERNATIONAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.By:

LOGORobert C. Barg, P.E.
President


1601 ELM STREET, SUITE 4500 
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201-4754  PH: 214-969-5401  FAX: 214-969-5411
**Fidelity® Variable Insurance Products**

**Initial Class, Service Class, and Service Class 2**

**Index 500 Portfolio**

**Summary Prospectus**

**April 30, 2014**

**As Revised October 17, 2014**
Exhibit 21.1


              Subsidiary Companies of Life Sciences Research, Inc.


      Name                                         Jurisdiction
      ----                                         -------------

      Huntingdon Life Sciences Group plc           England & Wales

      Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd.                England & Wales

      Huntingdon Life Sciences Inc.                Delaware, USA

      HIH Capital Ltd.                             Jersey

      HIH Ltd.                                     England & Wales

      HRC Ltd.                                     England & Wales

      Huntingdon Research Centre Ltd.              England & Wales

      Huntingdon Consulting Engineers Ltd.         England & Wales

      Huntingdon LSR Ltd.                          England & Wales

      Paragon Global Services Ltd.                 England & Wales

      Pathfinder Clinical Development Ltd.         England & Wales

      Pathfinder Nominees Ltd.                     England & Wales

      Life Sciences Research Ltd.                  England & Wales

      Aquatox Ltd.                                 England & Wales

      Huntingdon Life Sciences Co., Ltd.           Japan
Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
GreenMan  Technologies,  Inc. on Form S-3 (Nos.  333-22813 and 333-27625) of our
report dated August 26, 1997,  on the  consolidated  balance  sheets of GreenMan
Technologies,  Inc.  as of May 31,  1996 and 1997 and the  related  consolidated
statements of loss, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for
the years ended May 31, 1995,  1996 and 1997,  which report  appears in the Form
10-KSB of GreenMan Technologies, Inc. for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1997.


                                                            Wolf & Company, P.C.

Boston, Massachusetts
September 15, 1997
EXHIBIT 23.4




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors
Global Payment Technologies, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-114529 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-112934 and 333-30829 on Forms S-8 of Global
Payment Technologies, Inc. of our report dated December 19, 2003, with respect
to the statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows of Global
Payment Technologies Pty Limited for the year ended June 30, 2003, which report
appears in the September 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Global Payment
Technologies, Inc.

KPMG


Sydney Australia
December 14, 2005
#### In the Matter of Jada Serenity H., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Clifton H., Appellant; McMahon Services for Children/Good Shepherd Services, Respondent.

[874 NYS2d 113]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. Hoffman, J.), entered on or about February 25, 2008, which terminated respondent father’s parental rights to his daughter after a fact-finding determination that he had permanently ne*470glected the child, and transferred custody and care to the New York City Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Unlike a fact-finding hearing, where the issue of permanent neglect is resolved, a dispositional hearing is concerned only with the best interests of the child (Family Ct Act § 631). There is no presumption that those interests will best be served by return of the child to her parent *(see Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]).

Respondent, who did not challenge the court’s finding of permanent neglect, seeks a suspended judgment based on his progress in remaining drug free for approximately one year and his intention to terminate his relationship with the child’s mother, which in the past was an impediment to his obtaining custody because of the mother’s drug abuse.

The child has been in the same kinship foster home for almost six years, since she was six months old. The court found that her foster mother provided a loving and nurturing home and had met all of the child’s physical, emotional, medical and educational needs for almost her entire life, and that the child lived with her half sister,, who was adopted by the foster mother. The foster mother has expressed a desire to adopt this child.

Despite respondent’s progress in rehabilitating himself, the child should not be denied permanence through adoption in order to provide him with additional time to demonstrate that he can be a fit parent. Unfortunately, his past efforts were not successful and he relapsed into drug abuse.

Termination of parental rights is warranted where the child has lived most of her life with a foster parent with whom she maintains a positive relationship, and who wants to adopt her, even where the parent has made commendable but belated efforts to remain drug free *(see Matter of Roger Guerrero B.,*56 AD3d 262 [2008]; *Matter of Saraphina Ameila S.,*50 AD3d 378, 379 [2008]). The court correctly determined that it was in the child’s best interests to terminate respondent’s parental rights and enable her to be adopted by her foster mother. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

#### Air Power, Inc. v. Kenneth O. Thompson, Trustee, et al.

November 6, 1991

Case No. (Chancery) 30860

By JUDGE RICHARD B. POTTER

Upon review of the case law submitted by counsel, and in consideration of the pleadings filed and argument of counsel, I have concluded that the Demurrer-Plea of Statute of Limitations should be sustained. I have previously found that the beneficiary named in the deed of record, referred to as Ken Thompson Properties Joint Venture or "KTPJV," is a necessary party to the suit, especially as the term "necessary party" is defined in the case of *Mendenhall v.*Cooper, 239 Va. 71, 75 (1990). KTPJV clearly has an interest in the subject matter which likely could be defeated or diminished by the lienor’s claim. *Mendenhall*has also come to stand for the proposition that when an amendment, such as the one in this case, adds a new party into the suit, then the suit must be deemed to have been commenced at the time of the amendments. Consequently, the Bill to Enforce, as amended, was not brought against the new, necessary defendant, within the time required by Code § 43-17. Even though the beneficiary’s interest is limited by the terms of the deed, the Court must reluctantly conclude that the defendant’s Demurrer-Plea of the Statute of Limitations should be sustained without leave to amend by the defendant.
```

[Federal Register: October 6, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 193)]
[Corrections]
[Page 53747]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06oc98-150]



[[Page 53747]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Public Information Collection Requirement

Correction

    In notice document 98-25621 beginning on page 51059, in the issue
of Thursday, September 24, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 51059, in the third column, under the heading DATES, in the
second line, "[]" should read "November 23, 1998".
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
# FCM Data June 2016

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF June 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002016FROM REPORTS FILED BY July 26,&KFF0000 &K0000002016	&P of &N
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14576]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission

TIME AND DATE: June 11, 2001 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000

STATUS: Open to the public

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agenda for future meeting: None
    2. Minutes
    3. Ratification List
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-932 (Preliminary) (Folding Metal Tables and 
Chairs from China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently 
scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on 
June 11, 2001; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be 
transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on June 18, 2001.)
    5. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-926-927 (Preliminary) (Spring Table Grapes from 
Chile and Mexico)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently 
scheduled to transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on 
June 11, 2001; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be 
transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on June 18, 2001.)
    6. Outstanding action jackets:
    (1) Document No. INV-01-076: Concerning Inv. No. TA-204-6 (Certain 
Steel Wire Rod).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: June 4, 2001.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14576 Filed 6-6-01; 10:58 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-U
```

[Federal Register: May 4, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 85)]
[Notices]
[Page 24531]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04my98-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, May 15, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-11829 Filed 4-30-98; 10:29 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----