alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: June 16, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 115)]
[Notices]
[Page 35631]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16jn03-36]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m. Friday, July 11, 2003.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

For Further Information Contact: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 03-15230 Filed 6-12-03; 11:08 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit 10.1


 





 


October 1, 2005


 


 


Mr. William
Aliber


Chief
Financial Officer


Crown
Media


6430
South Fiddlers Green Circle


Greenwood
Village, CO  80111


 


Dear
Mr. Aliber:


 


Pursuant
to your request, Hallmark Cards, Incorporated confirms to you that Hallmark Cards
will not instruct its wholly-owned subsidiaries to demand, nor will Hallmark
Cards or any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries demand, payment from Crown Media
on any of the following obligations prior to October 31, 2006:


 


$75.0
million Note payable to HC Crown plus accrued interest thereon;


$400.0
million Note payable to HC Crown plus accrued interest thereon;


$70.0
million payables to Hallmark Entertainment Holdings incurred in conjunction
with the library transaction; and


$133.0
million Note dated October 1, 2005, relating to past due amounts for
license fees payable to Hallmark Entertainment Distribution (HED) plus accrued
interest thereon.


 


Furthermore,
in the event that at any time Crown Media’s banks draw on the Letter of Credit
provided by Citibank N.A. in support of Crown Media’s Revolving Credit
Agreement, Hallmark will not request reimbursement from Crown Media for such
amounts prior to October 31, 2006.


 


It
would be Hallmark’s intent to re-evaluate this repayment schedule if all
or substantially all, the stock or assets of Crown Media were sold to a third
party prior to October 31, 2006.


 


Sincerely,


 


 


Robert
Druten


Chief
Financial Officer


 


 


2501 McGee, Box 419580,
Kansas City, Missouri 64141-6580
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1397 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1397

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 26, 2010.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Critz (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Garamendi).
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Critz (to rank immediately after Mr. Nye).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30943-30944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14504]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor 
Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on 
Thursday, June 21, 2001.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-647. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
resource management plan

[[Page 30944]]

for those lands and waters within the Corridor.
    The meeting will convene at 7 PM at the Corridor Commission Office 
located at One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI for the following reasons:
1. Approval of Minutes
2. Chairman's Report
3. Executive Director's Report
4. Public Input
    It is anticipated that about twenty people will be able to attend 
the session in addition to the Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made 
prior to the meeting to: Michael Creasey, Executive Director, John H. 
Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, 
One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Michael Creasey, Executive Director of the Commission at the 
aforementioned address.

Michael Creasey,
Executive Director BRVNHCC.
[FR Doc. 01-14504 Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8590

RONALD MURPHY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-3367-S)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 7, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Murphy v. Maryland Parole Comm'n, No. CA-95-3367-S (D. Md.

Nov. 14 & 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<Page>

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment
No. 14 to Registration Statement No. 333-20343 of Separate Account A of Union
Security Life Insurance Company of New York (formerly First Fortis Life
Insurance Company), on Form N-4, of our report dated February 24, 2005,
relating to the statements of assets and liabilities of Separate Account A as
of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations for the year
then ended and the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2004, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is incorporated by reference in such
Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Statement of Additional Information.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
November 7, 2005
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2010
    By:
    /s/William McDonaldWilliam McDonald,CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1053 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1053

      Recognizing that women are equally affected by colon cancer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2010

Mrs. Dahlkemper submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Recognizing that women are equally affected by colon cancer.

Whereas in 2009, 54,090 new cases of colorectal cancer occurred in women;
Whereas it is estimated that in 2009, colorectal cancer will cause the deaths of 
        24,680 women, making it the third leading cancer-related cause of death 
        in women nationwide;
Whereas a common perception exists that colon cancer affects only men and not 
        women;
Whereas screening is allowing more colorectal cancers to be found earlier when 
        the disease is easier to cure;
Whereas obesity more than doubles a woman's risk of developing colon cancer or 
        growths that can lead to colon cancer, making it the leading risk factor 
        for women for the disease;
Whereas healthy women face a lower overall mortality rate and a decreased risk 
        of cancer recurrence; and
Whereas regular physical activity lowers the risk of colon cancer: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes that women are equally affected by colon 
        cancer;
            (2) urges women to regularly undergo diagnostic screening 
        for colon cancer as recommended by their doctors;
            (3) recognizes the importance of colon health in women and 
        of detecting colon cancer in its earliest stages; and
            (4) urges women to exercise regularly and to eat a healthy 
        and well-balanced diet to reduce the risk of colon cancer.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of our reports dated November 29, 2013 on the consolidated financial statements of Shaw Communications
Inc. as at August 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the two years ended August 31, 2013, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Shaw Communications Inc. as of August 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.



|                                  |  |  |  |                                            
|--------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|Calgary, Canada November 29,
2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Chartered
Accountants
|                                  |
#### In re: Arthur MORRISON, Petitioner.

No. 10-1667.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P. April 8, 2010.

Filed: June 7, 2010.

Arthur Morrison, Terminal Island FCI, San Pedro, CA, pro se.

Susan J. Steele, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, for Defendant.

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, RENDELL and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Arthur Morrison, a federal prisoner proceeding *pro se,*seeks a writ of *172mandamus compelling the District Court to rule on two of his motions. For the reasons that follow, we will deny the petition.

Morrison was convicted of various crimes in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He was sentenced to 300 months’ imprisonment and is currently incarcerated at FCI-Terminal Island in California.

In November 2008, Morrison filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He also filed a motion seeking release on bail pending resolution of the petition. The District Court dismissed his petition for lack of jurisdiction. In June 2009, the District Court reopened Morrison’s case to address the numerous motions he filed after his petition was dismissed. The District Court then denied Morrison’s pending “motion to correct or modify the record.” In November 2009, Morrison filed a motion to reconsider, which the District Court denied in March 2010. Morrison recently appealed that decision. *See Morrison v. United States,*C.A. No. 10-1891.

On the same day that the District Court denied his motion for reconsideration, Morrison filed the instant mandamus petition. Mandamus is an “extraordinary remedy” that we have discretion to award only when a petitioner demonstrates, among other things, a “clear and indisputable” right to relief. *In re: Pressman-Gutman Co.,*459 F.3d 383, 398-99 (3d Cir.2006). Moreover, mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. *See In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig.,*418 F.3d 372, 379 (3d Cir.2005). Morrison requests that this Court compel the District Court to: (1) dispose of his November 2009 motion to reconsider, and (2) exercise jurisdiction over his application for release on bail.

As to both requests, Morrison’s petition is moot. It appears that the District Court order denying Morrison’s motion to reconsider crossed in the mail with the mandamus petition, as they were both filed on the same day. As to Morrison’s request for release on bail, we understand that motion to have been disposed of when the District Court dismissed the habeas petition in 2008. To the extent that he seeks bail pending his appeal at C.A. No. 10-1891, he should file an appropriate motion in that case. As such, Morrison has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, so we will deny the petition for mandamus. *See In re: Pressman-Gutman Co.,*459 F.3d at 398-99.
EXHIBIT
        10.19

      


      FORM
        OF
        STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY,

      NON-DISCLOSURE
        AND NON-COMPETE

      


      

        
          	
                  Name

                	  

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  Address

                	  

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  City
                    

                	  
	
                  State

                	  
	
                  Zip

                	  

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  Telephone

                	  
	
                  Work

                	  
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  Email
                    Address 

                	  

	 	 


        

      

      
        
          

        

      

       

      Mentor
        Capital Consultants, Inc. (MentorCap) and its subsidiary, AeroGrow
        International, Inc., (AeroGrow) may be sharing critical, confidential, product
        information with you on its products and its marketing/distribution plans
        for
        these products.

      


      Understanding
        this, I, ___________________________________________ and
        my
        successors, employees, officers, affiliated consultants and agents, agree
        to
        respect the confidentiality of AeroGrow's products, product concepts and
        marketing/distribution plans; agreeing not to sell, assign, or disclose any
        confidential information to any other person, organization or corporation
        without our prior written permission.

      


      In
        addition, I agree not to compete directly or indirectly with AeroGrow and
        its
        successors and assigns by owning, managing, operating, consulting or being
        employed in a business substantially similar to, or competitive with, AeroGrow's
        business.

      


      Upon
        request, I agree to immediately return to MentorCap any models, plans,
        prototypes, photos, blueprints or drawings provided by MentorCap.

       

      
        	
                X 
                  

              	 	
                Date

              	  

	
                Consultant

              	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                X 
                  

              	 	
                Date

              	  

	
                Mentor
                  Capital Consultants, Inc.

              	 	 	 
	
                Representative
Order entered October 16, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01003-CR

JOSEPH AARON PEREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F05-26451-M

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written 

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be 

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

NATIONWIDE PROPERTY & § 

CASUALTY INSURANCE § 

COMPANY, § No. 99, 2020 

 § 

 Plaintiff Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court 

 § of the State of Delaware 

 v. § 

 § 

ANGEL IRIZARRY, JR., § C.A. No. N18C-02-167 

 § 

 Defendant Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

 Submitted: August 12, 2020 

 Decided: August 25, 2020 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES,

Justices.

ORDER 

 This 25th day of August 2020, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs 

and the record on appeal, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the 

final judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the 

reasons stated in its January 31, 2020 memorandum opinion and order. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
#### Russell SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Municipal Corporation, individually and in official capacity as Municipal Corporation; Gary D. Maynard, Municipal Corporation Official, individually and in his official capacity as Secretary of Public Safety; Michael J. Stouffer, Municipal Corporation Official, individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner of Corrections; Scott S. Oakley, Municipal Corporation Official, individually and in his official capacity as Executive Director of Inmate Grievance Office, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-7250.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided Feb. 14, 2012.

Russell Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Russell Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Smith v. Dep’t of Pub. Safety,*No. 8:11-cv-02125-PJM (D. Md. filed Aug. 12 & entered Aug. 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*