alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         29,202
<SECURITIES>                                   45,892
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     9,809
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               94,298
<PP&E>                                          8,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                105,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,019
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       86,256
<OTHER-SE>                                      (116)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  105,430
<SALES>                                        55,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               55,467
<CGS>                                          33,836
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  33,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (1,802)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 8,215
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,403
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             5,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    5,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.64
        


</TABLE>
respond to the complaint or appear for the formal hearing.' SCR 105(2).

The issue for this court is whether the recommended discipline is sufficient. 2 The purpose of attorney discipline is to protect the public, the courts, and the legal profession, not to punish the attorney. State Bar of Neu. u. Claiborne, 104 Nev. 115, 213, 756 P.2d 464, 527-28 (1988). In determining the appropriate discipline, this court has considered four factors to be weighed: "the duty violated, the lawyer's mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct, and the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors." In re Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246, 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008).

Having considered the record and the factors for imposing discipline, we approve the recommendation. We hereby suspend Gibson from the practice of law in Nevada• for a period of six months and one day commencing from the date of this order. 2 Also, Gibson shall pay the costs

'The panel found that the State Bar failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that Gibson had violated RPC 5.3 (responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants) and RPC 5.5 (unauthorized practice of law) on the basis that the allegations in the complaint were not sufficient to establish those violations on a default basis.

2 Gibson has not filed an opening brief in this court. This matter therefore stands submitted for decision based on the record. SCR 105(3)(b).

3 Based on the length of the suspension, Gibson will be required to comply with SCR 116 and petition for reinstatement. SCR 116(1), (2).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A ceet(c)of the disciplinary proceeding (excluding bar counsel and staff salaries)

within 30 days of receipt of the State Bar's bill of costs. 

### See SCR 120. Gibson shall comply with SCR 115, and the State Bar shall comply with SCR 121.1. It is so ORDERED.

/ 4.-144-1. bee...sat t , C.J. Hardesty

cc 5 J.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA Parraguirre 

# CI--- >ugl 14=0 Douglas , J.

J. Cherry

.

Gibbons

Pickering cc: Chair, Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board Allen D. Gibson Stan Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Kimberly Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, U.S. Supreme Court Admissions Office

3 (0) 1947A
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Form 10-K of Community Bank Shares of Indiana,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, I, Paul A Chrisco,
Chief Financial Officer of Community Bank Shares of Indiana, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  Such
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)  The
information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.





By:
              /s/ Paul A. ChriscoPaul
      A. ChriscoExecutive
      Vice President,Chief
      Financial Officer





Date:  March
31, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 10.4





SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE




THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE (this "Amendment") is made and entered into as of August 13, 2010 by and between COVENANT GROUP OF CHINA INC., a Nevada corporation (the "Maker"), and SUI GENERIS CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Payee" and, collectively with Maker, the “Parties”).




BACKGROUND




A.           On April 22, 2010, Maker and Payee executed a Promissory Note, whereby Maker promised to repay the principal sum of $120,000 in connection with a Bridge Loan Agreement entered into by the Parties of even date (the "Original Note").




B.           On June 30, 2010 Maker and Payee sought to amend the Original Note and entered into a First Amendment to Promissory Note (“First Amendment”).




C.           Maker and Payee now desire to amend the Original Note as set forth herein.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:




1. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Original Note.




2. The second paragraph of the Original Note reading, “The entire principal balance will be payable in full three (3) months from the date of this Note[,]” is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:




“The entire principal balance will be payable in full three (3) months from August 13, 2010.”





3. Except as expressly modified in this Amendment, all of the remaining terms and conditions of the Original Note and the First Amendment shall continue in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.




[signature page follows]









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the date first written above.






COVENANT GROUP OF CHINA INC.By:
/s/ Justin D.CsikJustin D. Csik, CFO and General Counsel
 SUI GENERIS CAPITAL PARTNERS LLCBy:
/s/ RobertBenedictRobert Benedict, Managing Member
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1298 

Encouraging efforts to reduce the use of paper and plastic bags. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2010 

Mr. MORAN of Virginia (for himself, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. FARR, Mr. RYAN

of Ohio, Mr. HONDA, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. NADLER of New York, Ms. WOOLSEY, Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. BOYD, 

Mrs. CAPPS, Ms. HARMAN, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. 

DEGETTE, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. SCHAUER, Ms. WATSON, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. HINCHEY, and Mr. GARAMENDI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging efforts to reduce the use of paper and plastic 

bags. 

Whereas paper and plastic disposable bags are distributed extensively throughout our society and are typically disposed of after their initial use; 

Whereas the rate of recycling of paper and plastic disposable 

bags is extremely low, accounting for only 1–3 percent of 

plastic bags and only 13–15 percent of paper bags; 

Whereas paper and plastic disposable bags consume valuable 

natural resources in their production, increase waste generation, and contribute to litter; 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 1298 IH 

Whereas plastic bags inflict direct environmental damages to 

communities, making up over half of the plastic in the 

Anacostia River and over 43 percent of litter in the Los 

Angeles River; 

Whereas the impact of single-use retail plastic and paper 

bags imposes a high cost on citizens in terms of recycling, landfill, sewer cleanup costs, and environmental 

damage; 

Whereas legislation that imposes a fee on plastic and paper 

bag consumption in the District of Columbia has drastically reduced disposable bag consumption; 

Whereas United States businesses recognize natural resource 

limitations and the need to design systems and encourage 

practices that minimize the use of and recover these valuable materials; 

Whereas many United States businesses are already establishing programs, including consumer credit programs, 

that promote the use of reusable bags and reduce distribution of plastic and paper bags; and 

Whereas these programs have benefitted businesses, consumers, and the environment, and overall have been highly successful: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that States should take any and all necessary 

3 measures to— 

4 (1) establish targets for businesses to reduce 

5 distribution of plastic and paper bag use by 40 per6 cent over the next 5 years; 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HRES 1298 IH 

1 (2) encourage businesses to adopt consumer 

2 credit programs to promote reusable bag use; 

3 (3) educate the public about using reusable 

4 bags through public-private initiatives, public aware5 ness campaigns, and other methods whenever pos6 sible; and 

7 (4) facilitate the dissemination of best practices 

8 among businesses for reducing single-use retail bag 

9 consumption. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32329-32330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14944]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Military Critical Technical Data 
Agreement; DD Form 2345; OMB Number 0704-0207.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 6,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 6,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 20 Minutes.

[[Page 32330]]

    Annual Burden Hours: 2,000.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
as a basis for certifying individuals or businesses to have access to 
DoD export-controlled military critical technical data subject to the 
provisions of 32 CFR 250. Individuals and enterprises that need access 
to unclassified DoD-controlled militarily critical technical data must 
certify on DD Form 2345 that data will be used only in ways that will 
inhibit unauthorized access and maintain the projection afforded by 
U.S. export control laws. Use of the form permits U.S. and Canada 
defense contractors to certify their eligibility to obtain certain 
unclassified technical data with military and space applications. 
Nonavailability of this information prevents defense contractors from 
accessing certain restricted databases and obstructs conference 
attendance where restricted data will be discussed.
    Affected Public: Business or Other For-Profit; Not-For-Profit 
Institutions.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. David M. Pritzker.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Pritzker at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: June 5, 2001.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 01-14944 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

d0125 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139417 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139417 

 COA: 290730 

Wayne CC: 80-005947 

LOUIS MOORE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-5000 

Facsimile: (202) 418-5521 

www.cftc.gov 

Office of the 

Inspector General 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Mark P. Wetjen, Acting Chainnan 

FROM: A. Roy Lavik, Inspector General ~ 

DATE: February 20, 2014 

SUBJECT: Audit of CFTC Compliance with the Federal Information Security Management 

Act of2002 (FISMA) 

Attached is the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Office of the Inspector General 

(OIG) audit report on the CFTC's compliance with FISMA1 during FY2013. FISMA requires the 

CFTC to develop, document, and implement an agency-wide Infonnation Security Program to 

protect its infonnation and infonnation systems, including those provided or managed by another 

agency, contractor, or source. Additionally, FISMA requires the CFTC to undergo an annual 

independent evaluation of its lnfonnation Security Program and practices, as well as an 

assessment of its compliance with FISMA requirements. 

The CFTC-OIG contracted with an independent public accounting finn, Brown & Company 

CPAs, PLLC to conduct this audit. The OIG concurs with Brown & Company's findings in the 

attached audit report. The findings were discussed with the Chieflnfonnation Officer and staffs, 

their comments are included in the final report. Elements of this audit were included in the annual 

Inspector General template file submitted to the Office of Management and Budget on November 

20,2013. 

Should you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

1 Known as Title Ill of the E-Govemment Act of2002 (E-Gov) (Public Law [P.L.] 107-347, December 17,2002. 
Office of the 

Inspector General 

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 

Three Lafayette Centre 

1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 

Telephone: (202) 418-5000 

Facsimile: (202) 418-5521 

www.cftc.gov 

Content of the FISMA Audit report is not posted on the web due to 

security risk.
```

[Federal Register: March 19, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 53)]

[Notices]

[Page 13395]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr19mr98-44]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION





Sunshine Act Meeting



AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.



TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, April 27, 1998.



PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl., Conference Room.



STATUS: Closed.



MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.



CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 98-7221 Filed 3-16-98; 4:33 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: June 4, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 107)]
[Notices]
[Page 30572]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04jn97-42]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Public Information Collection Requirement

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of intent to renew information collection # 3038-0023,
Regulations and forms relating to registration with the Commission.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is planning to renew
information collection 3038-0023, Regulations and Forms Relating to
Registration with the Commission which is due to expire on August 31,
1997. The Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, requires the registration
of all futures commission merchants, floor traders, floor brokers,
associated persons, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool
operators, introducing brokers, and leverage transaction merchants. In
compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Commission
solicits comments to:

(1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (2) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of
information including the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of the information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 4, 1997.

ADDRESS: Copies of the submission may be obtained from the CFTC
Clearance Officer, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 20581, (202)
418-5160.
    Title: Regulations and Forms Relating to Registration with the
Commission.
    Control number: 3038-0023.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: Commission Registrants.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 27,467 hours.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on May 29, 1997.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-14594 Filed 6-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ John C.      Baird                                             |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  John      C. Baird                                                       |
|  Title:    |  Principal      Executive Officer,Chairman      of the Board and Director |
|  Date:     |  March      16, 2010                                                      |

|   By: |   /s/ Leon M.      Caldwell                          |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Leon      M. Caldwell                                    |
|  Title:    |  Principal      Financial Officer, President and Director |
|  Date:     |  March      16, 2010                                      |
H. Res. 1299 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 11, 2010. 

Whereas there are more than 900,000 sworn law enforcement 

officers in the United States, 12 percent of whom are 

women; 

Whereas law enforcement officers selflessly protect the people 

of the United States and their communities; 

Whereas law enforcement officers serve the country in spite 

of the inherent danger of their service; 

Whereas more than 18,600 law enforcement officers have 

been killed in the line of duty in the United States since 

the first recorded police death in 1792; 

Whereas 72 law enforcement officers were killed while responding to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, 

making that day the deadliest in law enforcement history; 

Whereas 125 law enforcement officers were killed in 2009; 

Whereas, on March 21, 2009, Sergeant Mark Dunakin and 

Officer John Hege and Sergeants Ervin Romans and 

Dan Sakai of the Oakland Police Department in California were shot and killed by the same gunman in two 

separate attacks; 

Whereas, on November 29, 2009, Sergeant Mark Renniger 

and Officers Tina Griswold, Ronald Owens II, and Greg 
2 

•HRES 1299 EH 

Richards of the Lakewood Police Department in the 

State of Washington were shot and killed as they sat in 

a coffee shop; 

Whereas Public Law 87–726 designates May 15th of each 

year as Peace Officers Memorial Day, and the calendar 

week during which that Day occurs as Police Week; 

Whereas section 7(m) of title 4, United States Code, requires 

that the United States flag be flown at half-staff on all 

government buildings on Peace Officers Memorial Day; 

and 

Whereas law enforcement officers deserve the gratitude of the 

people of the United States for their service: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of Peace Officers 

Memorial Day; 

(2) honors Federal, State, and local law enforcement officers who have been killed or disabled in the line 

of duty; and 

(3) calls upon the people of the United States to observe Peace Officers Memorial Day with ceremonies and 

respect befitting those who have risked their lives and 

died in service to their communities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.