alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JACK C. FLORA 

DOCKET NUMBER: 174 

DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1970 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

Effective September 16, 1970 Cease and Desist

October 14, 1970 Period of Denial

Order 

(a) The respondent, Jack C. Flora, shall cease and desist from (1) using any 

funds held by any futures commission merchant for any customer, as belonging to 

any person other than the customer for whom such funds are held, and (2) causing 

any futures commission merchant or depository to use any such funds as belonging 

to any person other than the customer for whom such funds are held. 

(b) The respondent, Jack C. Flora, is prohibited from trading on or subject 

to the rules of any contract market for a period of two (2) years, and all 

contract markets shall refuse all trading privileges to the respondent during 

this period, such prohibition and refusal to apply to all trading done and all 

positions held by the respondent, directly or indirectly. 

The cease and desist provisions of this order set forth in paragraph (a) 

above shall become effective upon the date of service of this order upon the 

respondent. 

The period of the denial of trading privileges to the respondent specified in 

paragraph (b) above shall become effective on the thirtieth day after the date 

of entry of this order. 

A copy of this Decision and Order shall be served on each of the parties and 

on each contract market. 

Done at Washington, D. C. 

SEP 14 1970 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
```

[Federal Register: May 20, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 97)]
[Notices]
[Page 27519]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20my99-36]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, June 14, 1999.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-12867 Filed 5-18-99; 1:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
#### Michael R. LADNER, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. HANCOCK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 08-60408

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 11, 2008.

Chester D. Nicholson, Nicholson & Nicholson, Gulfport, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Roderick Mark Alexander, Jr., Balch & Bingham, Gulfport, MS, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before REAYLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Ladner, a teacher and basketball coach, sued Hancock County School District after it decided not to renew his employment contract. Ladner claimed, among other things, that he did not receive proper notice of the School District’s decision. The School District was granted summary judgment and Ladner has appealed. Having carefully reviewed the record, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN . 

• 

TIIE AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN AND 

THE COORDINATION COUNCIL FOR NORTH AMERICAN AFFAIRS 

ON THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION CONCERNING 

COMMODITY FUTURES AND OPTIONS MATTERS 

The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and the Coordination Council for North American 

Affairs (CCNAA) recognize the increasing international activity in futures and options 

markets ("futures markets"), and the corresponding need for mmual cooperanon between 

the regulatory authorities in their respective jurisdictions. 

AlT and CCNAA believe that as international participation in futures markets continues to 

grow, it becomes increasingly important to establish arrangements to exchange supervisory, 

surveillance, and investigatory information in order to assist the regulatory authorities in 

their respective jurisdictions in securing compliance with their laws, rules and regulations 

regarding futures matters, to the extent permitted by the law of each jurisdiction. These 

arrangements should serve to improve the protection of customers, to secure the adequate 

supervision and effective regulation of futures markets and futures businesses, to enhance 

the supervision of cross-border transactions, and to prevent fraudulent and other prohibited 

practices in the futures markets, thus promoting the integrity of the markets. 

For these reasons, AIT and CCNAA agree to facilitate requests made by the regulatory 
authorities in their respective jurisdictions for supervisory, surveillance and investigatory 

information, on a case-by-case basis. In order to ensure the timely processing of such 

' 

requests, AIT and CCNAA appoint the contact persons designated in Appendix A hereto. 

AIT and CCNAA look forward to the productive and efficient facilitation of requests 

received from the regulatory authorities in their respective jurisdictions and agree to 

negotiate in good faith additional measures for the exchange of supervisory, surveillance and 

investigatory information requested by these regulatory authorities should such measures 

prove to be necessary or appropriate. 

Signed at Arlington, Virginia, this 11th day of January, 1993. 

For the American Institute For the Coordination Council 

in Taiwan for North American Affairs 

Natale H. Bellocchi Ding Mou-Shib 

Chairman and Managing Director Representative 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                          13,915
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                       250
<INVENTORY>                                     14,342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,601
<PP&E>                                          89,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,982
<SALES>                                        224,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,817
<CGS>                                          175,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  175,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    43
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,349
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,513
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,513
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.65


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 12, 2011 (the “Report”), I, David Gamache, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April 12, 2011
/s/ David GamacheDavid GamacheChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben COTA-BECERRA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-30338.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 13, 2010.

James Edmund Seykora, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jessica T. Fehr, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, Jason Trinity Holden, Faure Holden Attorneys at Law, P.C., Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

*298Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ruben Cota-Becerra appeals from the 360-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cota-Becerra contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence four levels, under U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(a), for his organizer or leader role in the offense. The record reflects that the district court did not err in finding that Cota-Becerra was an organizer or leader. *See United States v. Garcia,*497 F.3d 964, 969-70 (9th Cir.2007).

Cota-Becerra also contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence two levels, under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, for his obstruction of justice. The district court did not clearly err in determining that Cota-Becerra obstructed justice by threatening his co-conspirator to deter him from testifying. *See*U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 cmt. n. 4; *United States v. Jackson,*974 F.2d 104, 106 (9th Cir.1992).

Cota-Becerra further contends that the district court erred by denying him a two-level downward adjustment, under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, for acceptance of responsibility. The district court did not clearly err in determining that Cota-Becerra had not accepted responsibility based on his obstruction of justice and his testimony at. the sentencing hearing. *See*U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 cmt. n. 1(a), 3-5; *United States v. Thompson,*80 F.3d 368, 370-71 (9th Cir.1996).

Finally, Cota-Becerra contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not procedurally err and the sentence is not unreasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 993-94 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Michael B. MYERS; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. MAILBOX IT STORES OF AMERICA, INC.; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-56399.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 9, 2012.

Michael B. Myers, Victorville, CA, pro se.

Jeanette A. Myers, Victorville, CA, pro se.

Sanjeev Subherwal, Victorville, CA, pro se.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Michael B. Myers, Jeannette A. Myers, and Sanjeev Subherwal appeal pro se from the district court’s order dismissing their diversity action for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s sua sponte dismissal for failure to prosecute. *Oliva v. Sulli*
      *674
      *van,*958 F.2d 272, 274 (9th Cir.1992). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action for failure to prosecute after giving appellants warnings that failure to appropriately respond to its orders to show cause could lead to dismissal. *See id.; Henderson v. Duncan,*779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir.1986) (listing factors to guide the court’s decision whether to dismiss for failure to prosecute).

Appellants’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135521 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly ROBERT S. BECK, Plaintiff-Appellee, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,

v SC: 135521 Justices
COA: 277384 WCAC: 05-000279 TGM BROADBAND CABL E SERVICES and ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellants, and

TGM BROADBAND CABL E SERVICES and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees, and

SECOND INJURY FUND (PERMANENT & TOTAL DISABILITY PROVISIONS), Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 14, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14883]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Office of the National Ombudsman; National Regulatory Fairness 
Board; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of the National 
Ombudsman, National Regulatory Fairness Board will hold a public 
meeting on Monday, June 18, 2001, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. EST and Tuesday 
June 19, 2001, from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. at the Crystal City Marriott 
(1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202) to discuss such 
matters as may be presented by Acting National Ombudsman, Dr. James Van 
Wert, Members of the Regulatory Fairness Board, staff of the Small 
Business Administration or others present. Anyone wishing to make an 
oral presentation to the Board must contact Dr. Van Wert, in writing by 
letter or fax no later than June 15, 2001, in order to be put on the 
agenda. For further information, please write or call James Van Wert, 
Designated Federal Official, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, SW, Seventh Floor, Washington, DC 20416. Telephone number 
(202) 205-7024, Fax (202) 205-6066.

Nancyellen Gentile,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-14883 Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 20273

MICHAEL EUGENE ROBERTS,

Plaintiff

–

Appellant

v.

CITY OF HOUSTON, Houston Police Department; CHANDRA M. FERDINAND, Formerly Houston Police Department Officer #1; KENNETH FEDDERSON, Formerly Houston Police Department Officer #2; DOCTOR NNAKA CHIDI, Formerly G.I. Reisner; CHARLES A. MCCLELLAND, Chief of Po lice,

Defendants

– Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4

- 14

- CV

- 903

Before JONES

, BARKSDALE

, and WILLETT , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Michael Roberts sued the Houston Police Department, the Chief of
Police, some individual officers, and Dr. Nnaka Chidi under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged mistreatment during his arrest, blood draw, and subsequent
medical care. The district court granted summary judgment on all claims to all
Defendants, concluding there were no genuine disputes of material fact.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circum stances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 19, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-20273 Document: 00514649003 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/19/2018No. 17

- 20273

2 Having reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record, we AFFIRM the
judgment of the district cou rt essentially for the reasons given in its thorough
Memorandum Opinion and Order of March 31, 2017. Case: 17-20273 Document: 00514649003 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/19/2018
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the quarterly report of Options Media Group Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Scott Frohman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 14, 2008



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|/s/ SCOTT FROHMAN                                                  
|Scott Frohman
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Procedures for Providing Security Support for NRC Public 
Meetings/Hearings

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is revising its procedures 
for providing security support for all public NRC forums. This revision 
will provide a single set of procedures that will ensure consistency 
and uniformity in providing security support for these meetings. These 
procedures will be used by NRC headquarters and regional staff and are 
applicable to public hearings/meetings held at NRC headquarters 
buildings, other NRC space in the Washington, D.C. area, and/or 
regional locations to include space leased for the occasion. This 
Federal Register notice supersedes the previous Federal Register 
notice, entitled ``Security Support for NRC Meetings/Hearings,'' that 
was published on November 1, 1991 (56 FR 19451).

    In order to balance the orderly conduct of government business with 
the right of free speech, the following procedures regarding attendance 
at NRC public meetings and hearings have been established:

    Visitors (other than properly identified Congressional, press, 
and government personnel) may be subject to personnel screening, 
such as passing through metal detectors and inspecting visitors' 
briefcases, packages, etc.
    Signs, banners, posters and displays will be prohibited from all 
NRC adjudicatory proceedings (Commission and Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board Panel hearings) because they are disruptive to the 
conduct of the adjudicatory process. Signs, banners, posters and 
displays not larger than 18" x 18" will be permitted at all other 
NRC proceedings, but cannot be waved, held over one's head or 
generally moved about while in the meeting room. Signs, banners, 
posters and displays larger than 18" x 18" will not be permitted in 
the meeting room because they are disruptive both to the 
participants and the audience. Additionally, signs, banners, posters 
and displays affixed to any sticks, poles or other similar devices 
will not be permitted in the meeting room.
    The presiding official will note, on the record, any disruptive 
behavior and warn the person to cease the behavior. If the person 
does not cease the behavior, the presiding official may call a brief 
recess to restore order and/or ask one of the security personnel on 
hand to remove the person.

    For Further Information Contact: Calvin O. Byrd, Chief, Physical 
Security Branch, Division of Facilities and Security, Office of 
Administration, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-7402.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of June 2001.
    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Thomas O. Martin,
Director, Division of Facilities and Security, Office of 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-14752 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

% 1975

January 22, 2016

Mr. Douglas Friedman
General Counsel

DW SEF LLC

1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036

Re: Application of DW SEF LLC for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Mr. Friedman:

By submissions dated July 5, 2013 through January 19, 2016, DW SEF LLC (“DW
SEF”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to
Section 5h of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and Commission
Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap execution facility (“SEF”).

The Commission has reviewed DW SEF’s application and has determined to grant DW
SEF registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying
Order of Registration.

Sincerely,

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
Exhibit EX-99.906CERT

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)

In connection with the attached Report of Fidelity Investment Trust  (the "Trust") on
Form N-CSR to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Trust does hereby certify that, to the best of such
officer's knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Report.

Dated:	June 20, 2007

|/s/Kimberley Monasterio
|-----------------------
|Kimberley Monasterio   
|President and Treasurer





Dated:	June 20, 2007



|/s/Joseph B. Hollis    
|-----------------------
|Joseph B. Hollis       
|Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.