alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 - President/CFO Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AirtimeDSL (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Ed Heckerson , President/CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ed Heckerson
-----------------------
    Ed Heckerson
    President/CFO


Date  March 13, 2008
      --------------


<PAGE>
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Stillwater Mining Company: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-75404,
333-58251, 333-12455 and 333-12419) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-117927, 333-111989, 333-76314,
333-66364 and 333-70861) on Form S-8 of Stillwater Mining Company and subsidiaries of our reports
dated March 29, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Stillwater Mining Company
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports
appear in the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stillwater Mining Company. Our reports refer to a change in method of accounting for the amortization of capitalized mine
development costs effective January 1, 2004 and to the adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset RetirementObligations, as of January 1, 2003. KPMG LLP Denver, Colorado
March 29, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14680]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Rhode Island Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Rhode Island Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
3:30 p.m. and adjourn at 7 p.m. on July 9, 2001, at the Center for 
Hispanic Policy & Advocacy, 421 Elmore Avenue, Providence, Rhode Island 
02907. The purpose of the meeting is to receive briefings from invited 
community leaders and civil rights advocates, and plan future 
activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Chairperson Olga Noguera, 401-462-
2130, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 202-
376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend 
the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter 
should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days 
before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, June 1, 2001.
Edward A. Hailes, Jr.
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 01-14680 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
No. 160.

#### Harper *v.*Moran, Receiver.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. Ward B. McCarthy, Wm. E. Richardson, Milton D. Campbell, W. W. Millan, Ralph P. Barnard,*and *E. Hilton Jackson*for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia de'nied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certificate
      of Chief Executive Officer as required by 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), of Aurora Oil & Gas Corporation ("Aurora")
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2008, I,
      William W. Deneau, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of
      Aurora, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March
                7, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                William W. DeneauWilliam
                W. DeneauChief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive
                Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been
      provided to Aurora Oil & Gas Corporation and will be retained by Aurora Oil
& Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its staff upon request
# FCM Data June 2009
Exhibit 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration   No. 333-171334, 333-170859 and 333-151761) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-173777, 333-162577 and 333-111591) of Pluristem Therapeutics Inc. of our report dated September 7, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Pluristem Therapeutics, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2011.




/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer

Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer

A member of Ernst & Young Global




Haifa, Israel


September 7, 2011
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joerg Ott, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q Amendment No. 1 of GBS
      Enterprises Incorporated for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q Amendment No.
      1fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of GBS Enterprises
Incorporated.                                                          

|Date: March 11, 2011 | /s/
      Joerg Ott                  
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                     | Joerg Ott                            
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer)        

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1170 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1170

     Congratulating the winners of the Voice of Democracy national 
                          scholarship program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2010

 Mr. Hunter submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Congratulating the winners of the Voice of Democracy national 
                          scholarship program.

Whereas the Voice of Democracy (VOD) scholarship program is an audio-essay 
        contest for high school students in grades 9 through 12 that annually 
        provides more than $3,000,000 in scholarships;
Whereas the Voice of Democracy program is designed to foster patriotism by 
        allowing students the opportunity to voice their opinion in a 3- to 5-
        minute audio essay based on an annual theme;
Whereas the winners of the 2010 Voice of Democracy contest are selected based on 
        the originality, content, and delivery of their audio essay;
Whereas the Veterans of Foreign Wars has sponsored the Voice of Democracy 
        scholarship program since 1947 and has encouraged students to express 
        patriotism since that time;
Whereas the Voice of Democracy program is closely associated with the Patriots 
        Pen program, a youth-essay writing contest for students in grades 6 
        through 8;
Whereas the 2009-2010 Voice of Democracy theme is ``Does America still have 
        heroes?'';
Whereas more than 50,000 American students across the world participated in the 
        Voice of Democracy competition for the 2009-2010 school year; and
Whereas Madison Mullen, Anthony Zendejas IV, and Lena Savell were named the 
        first, second, and third place winners of the 2009-2010 Voice of 
        Democracy scholarship program: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the 
winners of the Voice of Democracy national scholarship program.
                                 <all>
```
#### CATE et al. *v.*BEASLEY et al.

No. 30.

Argued October 19, 1936.

Decided November 9, 1936.

*Mr. Richard W. Stouts*submitted for petitioners.

*Mr. Lloyd G. Owen,*with whom *Messrs. James A. Veasey, Guy H. Woodward,*and *R. J. Roberts*were on the brief, for respondents.

Per Curiam.

John Wadsworth, enrolled as a Seminole Indian, died on August 3, 1907, after selecting his allotment and prior *31to the admission of Oklahoma to statehood. Surviving him were his mother, brothers and sisters, enrolled as Seminóles, and his wife and three children enrolled as Creeks. In an action to quiet title the Supreme Court of Oklahoma affirmed a judgment sustaining demurrers to the petition. 175 Okl. 494; 53 P. (2d) 549. The Court said [pp. 494-495]:

> “For 25 years it has been the settled rule of law in this State, in reliance upon which the stability and dependability of titles has depended, that the allotted land of a Seminole Indian, who died (1) after selecting his allotment, and (2) before statehood, descended to his heirs, in accordance with the Arkansas laws of descent and distribution, without regard to the above limitation to tribal citizens. . . . There is some merit in the assertion of plaintiffs in error that the first pronouncement of that rule, in *Bruner*v. *Sanders,*26 Okl. 673, 110 P. 730, decided in the year 1910, is dictum. Nevertheless, if it was dictum, it was repeatedly followed by subsequent decisions of this court wherein it emerged from the realm of dictum into the point actually decided. Those cases are *HelikerJarvis Seminole Co.*v. *Lincoln,*33 Okl. 425, 126 P. 723, *Thorn*v. *Cone,*47 Okl. 781, 150 P. 701, *Rentie*v. *Rentie,*70 Okl. 103, 172 P. 1083, *Dickinson*v. *Abb,*73 Okl. 322, 176 P. 523, *Lasiter*v. *Ferguson,*79 Okl. 200, 192 P. 197, and *Stewart*v. *Billington,*122 Okl. 9, 250 P. 84.”

In view’ of the long established rule in Oklahoma as to the descent of the allotted land of a Seminole Indian who died after selecting his allotment and before statehood, the judgment is affirmed.

This decision is not to be construed as impairing the authority of our earlier decisions under the agreements made with other Indian tribes or under the Seminole Agreement with respect to a Seminole who died before selecting his allotment. See *Washington*v. *Miller,*235 U. S. 422; *McDougal*v. *McKay,*237 U. S. 372; *Camp*
      *32
      *bell*v. *Wadsworth,*248 U. S. 169; *Grayson*v. *Harris,*267 U. S. 352.

*Affirmed.*

Mr. Justice McReynolds is of opinion that the challenged judgment should be reversed.

Mr. Justice Stone took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
# FCM Data July 2013

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF July 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002013FROM REPORTS FILED BY September 09,&KFF0000 &K0000002013	&P of &N
Delaware

The First State

Page 1

 

5785390 8300 Authentication: 201789242

SR# 20160633502 Date: 02-05-16

You may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml

I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF

DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY "SEED SEF LLC" IS DULY FORMED UNDER THE

LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND IS IN GOOD STANDING AND HAS A

LEGAL EXISTENCE SO FAR AS THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE SHOW, AS OF

THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, A.D. 2016. 

AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE ANNUAL TAXES HAVE BEEN

PAID TO DATE.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation and Benefits



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
  
 NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION 
  
 Non-Employee Director Compensation and Benefits 
  

				
	 Description    

	  	Amount


	 Attendance Fees (per meeting)
	  	 	 
	 Board or Committee Meeting
	  	$	1,500
		
	 Annual Cash Retainer
	  	 	 
	 Payable quarterly in arrears
	  	$	50,000
		
	 Audit Committee Retainer
	  	 	 
	 Payable quarterly in arrears
	  	$	5,000
		
	 Lead Director Retainer
	  	 	 
	 Payable quarterly in arrears
	  	$	5,000
		
	 Annual Award of Common Stock or Director Stock Units
	  	$	75,000

  
 On the day following
election/re-election as a director by the stockholders or on the day following appointment as a director by the Board, each non-employee director shall be entitled to receive Director Stock Units (“DSUs”) with respect to common stock of
Newmont Mining Corporation having a fair market value as of the day following election or appointment of U.S.$75,000. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each non-employee director may elect to receive the award in the form of shares of the
Corporation’s common stock, in lieu of DSUs, in respect of any year upon prior written notice to the Corporation’s Corporate Secretary. Such awards will be made, on terms and conditions as determined by the Board, to those non-employee
directors so elected, re-elected or appointed. 
  
 Committee Chairman Retainers

  
 The Chairman of each standing committee of the Board will
receive an annual cash retainer, paid quarterly in arrears, in the amount of $15,000 for the Chairman of the Audit Committee and $5,000 for the Chairman of each of the other committees. 







 Charitable Gift Programs 
  

			
	Matching Charitable Gift Program	  	 
	 Qualified cultural or charitable organizations or hospitals
	  	$ 2,500 per year
	 Qualified educational organization
	  	$ 5,000 per year
	Non-Matching Charitable Gift Program	  	 
	 Contribution to be made in your name by Newmont to a qualified educational or charitable organization
	  	$ 2,500 per year

  
 Retirement 
  
 On retirement, at any time after attaining age 65, a director who was
serving on the Board on January 27, 1999, and who is not entitled to a pension under Newmont’s pension plan, and who has served for at least ten consecutive years as a director of Newmont Mining Corporation or Newmont Gold Company, is
entitled to be paid an annual sum of $50,000 for life. 
  
 Effective November 1, 2005 
  

 2
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1321 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the political 

situation in Thailand be solved peacefully and through democratic means. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2010 

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the political situation in Thailand be solved peacefully 

and through democratic means. 

Whereas political turmoil in Thailand has led to the most 

troubled political situation in the country since 1992; 

Whereas resulting crisis may have a negative impact on Thailand’s people, economy, and society; 

Whereas Thailand’s rich diversity of cultures and traditions 

and its proud history are admired throughout the world; 

Whereas the United States close relationship and longstanding friendship with Thailand dates back to 1833 

when the two countries signed the Treaty of Amity and 

Commerce; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1321 IH 

Whereas the United States and Thailand became alliance 

partners with the Manila Pact of 1954 and the United 

States designated Thailand as a major non-North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) ally in December 2003; 

Whereas with the Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations 

of 1966, along with burgeoning trade and investment 

flows, the United States and Thailand share critical economic ties; and 

Whereas with more than 200,000 people tracing their ancestry to Thailand, extensive social and cultural links between the United States and Thailand, and shared values, mutual trust, and common interests, the bilateral relationship remains strong and resilient: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) all parties involved in the political crisis in 

4 Thailand renounce the use of violence and pledge to 

5 resolve the country’s political problems peacefully 

6 and through democratic means; and 

7 (2) all parties concerned are encouraged to 

8 work assiduously to settle their differences on the 

9 basis of the 5-point national reconciliation plan pro10 posed by the Prime Minister of Thailand on May 3, 

11 2010, which encompasses upholding the monarchy, 

12 instituting political reform, and eradicating injustice. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime George LUNA, also known as Jaime Luna, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-11122

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2010.

Nancy E. Larson, James Michael Wor-ley, Sr., Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Catherine Ann Rushlow Dunnavant, Dunnavant & Associates, P.L.L.C., Arlington, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jaime George Luna has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Luna has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Luna’s response discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,945
<SECURITIES>                                    11,936
<RECEIVABLES>                                      185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,066
<PP&E>                                           3,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,595
<BONDS>                                            265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,183
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   185
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (9,611)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,602)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,611)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,611)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Nicolas David ANDREAS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Matthew CATE, Defendant, and K. Johnson; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 10-17367.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 10, 2012.

Nicolas David Andreas, lone, CA, pro se.

Ellen Hung, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Nicolas David Andreas appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Wyatt v. Terhune,*315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.

By failing to discuss the issue of exhaustion in his opening brief, Andreas has waived any arguments that the district court erred in dismissing for nonexhaustion. *See Entm’t Research Grp., Inc. v. Genesis Creative Grp., Inc.,*122 F.3d 1211, 1217 (9th Cir.1997) (“We review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief. We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not preserve a claim[.]” (citation omitted)); *Wilcox v. Comm’r,*848 F.2d 1007, 1008 n. 2 (9th Cir.1988) (arguments not raised on appeal by a pro se litigant are deemed abandoned).

Andreas’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.