alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heavy Metal, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated: December 14, 2007
     /s/ David Harapiak
David Harapiak
President, Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer, PrincipalAccounting Officer



---
# C_2010184EN.01000301.xml

| 8.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/3

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations (modified) in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 184/03

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Oban–Coll
  Oban–Colonsay
  Oban–Tiree
  Coll–Tiree |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 2 March 2007 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained | Argyll and Bute Council |
| Council Offices |
| Kilmory |
| Lochgilphead |
| Argyll |
| PA31 8RT |
| Scotland |
| UNITED KINGDOM |
| Tel. +44 1546604141 |
| Fax +44 1546606443 |
| (Contact: Sandy Mactaggart, Development and Infrastructure Services) |
| E-mail: sandy.mactaggart@argyll-bute.gov.uk |

Member State

United Kingdom

Concerned routes

Oban–Coll

Oban–Colonsay

Oban–Tiree

Coll–Tiree

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

2 March 2007

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained

Argyll and Bute Council

Council Offices

Kilmory

Lochgilphead

Argyll

PA31 8RT

Scotland

UNITED KINGDOM

Tel. +44 1546604141

Fax +44 1546606443

(Contact: Sandy Mactaggart, Development and Infrastructure Services)

E-mail: sandy.mactaggart@argyll-bute.gov.uk

---
#### Patsy N. SAKUMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF the TROPICS AT WAIKELE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 05-16940, 06-16121.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006 *.

Filed Dec. 12, 2006.

Patsy N. Sakuma, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Kevin P. Sumida, Esq., Matsui, Chung, Sumida *&*Tsuchiyama, Sidney K. Ayabe, Esq., Ayabe, Chong, Nishimoto Sia *&*Nakamura, Nancy J. Youngren, Esq., Case Lombardi *&*Pettit, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, LEAYY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In No. 05-16940, Patsy N. Sakuma appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her motion for relief from a judgment enforcing a settlement in underlying litigation against the Association of Apartment Owners of the Tropics at Waikele and others. In No. 06-16121, Sakuma appeals from the district court’s imposition of *747sanctions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s ruling on a motion to set aside a judgment as void. *Export Group v. Reef Indus., Inc.,*54 F.3d 1466, 1469 (9th Cir.1995). We review the imposition of sanctions for abuse of discretion. *F.J. Hanshaw Enters., Inc. v. Emerald River Dev., Inc.,*244 F.3d 1128, 1135 (9th Cir. 2001). We affirm.

The district court entered judgment in Sakuma’s case on October 3, 2002. Sakuma, a licensed attorney, filed her motion for relief from judgment on January 26, 2005, more than two years after entry of judgment. To the extent Sakuma’s motion was made on the basis of excusable neglect or fraud and therefore pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) or 60(b)(3), it was untimely, and the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of the motion. *See Nevitt v. United States,*886 F.2d 1187, 1188 (9th Cir.1989) (pending appeal does not toll time for filing a motion under Rule 60(b)(1), (2), or (3)).

To the extent Sakuma’s motion was based on Rule 60(b)(4), the district court properly rejected her contention that its judgment was void because the magistrate judge lacked authority to recommend an order providing that the settlement would be self-executing if Sakuma failed to sign. *See*28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The record also supports the district court’s rejection of Sakuma’s claim that its judgment was void because proceedings in that court had violated her due process rights.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing sanctions for Sakuma’s frivolous motion for relief from a judgment that had already been affirmed by this court. *See generally Gomez v. Vernon,*255 F.3d 1118, 1133-35 (9th Cir.2001) (explaining requirements for imposing sanctions under court’s inherent authority and 28 U.S.C. § 1927).

Sakuma’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EX-10.1



 







EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




          THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) made this 23rd day of March 2005 by
and between Dennis R. Glass, an individual resident of the State of North Carolina (“Glass”), and
Jefferson-Pilot Corporation, a North Carolina corporation (the “Company”).




W I T N E S S E T H:




          WHEREAS, Glass has requested that the Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) dated as of December
6, 2003 between Glass and the Company be amended to extend its term for one year; on March 25, 2005
the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved such request; and the
parties intend that this Amendment shall confirm this extension.




          NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and agreements
contained herein, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:




     1. The date March 1, 2007 each place it appears in the Agreement is amended to read March 1,
2008.



     2. In Section 3.2 of the Agreement, 2009 is added as an additional year, and in Section 4.2,
2008 is added as an additional year.



     3. In Section 3.3(d) and in Section 3.5 of the Agreement, the year 2007 is amended to read
2008.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year
first set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	JEFFERSON-PILOT CORPORATION

	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Hoyt J. Phillips	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Hoyt J. Phillips	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Senior Vice President	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Signed: August 26, 2005	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Dennis R. Glass	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Dennis R. Glass	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Signed: August 26, 2005	 	 






48
#### James Gregg FOUNTAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James PRUETT; Susan Meredith; Internal Revenue Service, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-36043.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006 *.

Filed Dec. 12, 2006.

James Gregg Fountain, Anchorage, AK, pro se.

John B. Snyder, III, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Kenneth L. Greene, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

James Gregg Fountain appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action seeking to require the IRS and its employees to remove a tax lien and return taxes collected by levy on his *720wages. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Steel v. United States,*813 F.2d 1545, 1548 (9th Cir.1987) (dismissal based on sovereign immunity); *Adams v. Johnson,*355 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir.2004) (dismissal of *Bivens*action). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Fountain’s claims against the IRS based on sovereign immunity. *See Gilbert v. DaGrossa,*756 F.2d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir. 1985) (a suit against IRS employees is essentially a suit against the United States). Additionally, Fountain’s requests for injunctive relief were barred by the Anti-Injunction Act. *See*26 U.S.C. § 7421(a) (“no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court by any person”); *Sokolow v. United States,*169 F.3d 663, 664-65 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 77.

#### Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. *v.*Texas et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. T. D. Gresham*and *M. E. Clinton*for petitioner.

*Messrs. William McCraw*and *Scott Gaines*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.
# CE2013056EN.01012701.xml

| 26.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 56/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 56/127

---

Tuesday 27 September 2011Extension of the scope of the regulation on the professional cross-border transport of euro cash by road between euro-area Member States ***

P7_TA(2011)0400

European Parliament legislative resolution of 27 September 2011 on the draft Council regulation concerning the extension of the scope of the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the professional cross-border transport of euro cash by road between euro area Member States (17787/2010 – C7-0025/2011– 2010/0206(APP))

2013/C 56 E/22

(Special legislative procedure – consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council regulation (17787/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council regulation (17787/2010),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0025/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0025/2011),

| — | having regard to Rule 81(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 81(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0077/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0077/2011),

| 1. | Consents to the draft Council regulation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the draft Council regulation;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-6477, 333-22063, 333-25457 and 333-67731 on Form S-3 and No. 333-29447 on
Form S-8 of Globalstar Telecommunications Limited of our reports dated February
16, 1999, on the financial statements of Globalstar Telecommunications Limited
and the consolidated financial statements of Globalstar, L.P. appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Globalstar Telecommunications Limited and
Globalstar, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 1998.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California
March 30, 1999
to

9 k

x OFFICE OF THE AmORNEY GENERAL. OF TEXAS I AUSTIN

Hr. Joe IW.eon ChiefAaoounte8at Roard of colmty and Dietriot Road IndewMdxmss Austin, Teaa

we aokmule

aa to whe%h@r oert pmtiefpate in rhiahrequest i request fir an oplaion ounty are ellglbleto riut Hi@wa~ Fund, (LF aa fol.Larst

truetior&

of road@. th iamwr tore wed tart were oounty

* ’ In J3amlln Countg it is obdorsd that e Highway be deaigmted inrr axi lntammctio8 with U.S. iiy. $59 at $%labee extmM.ng Weet to BP inter8eotion with U.Ss Xy. #69, Boa&h of Bountro,a dietanoeof 

### ~p?a’o%ti1~ate4 t3& mmm; andHr. Jo4 w41son - page @

a 1 Itie further ordered thatStatemal.ntenanaebe aamnnad on the existingrood

oovered by thie designation at suah time aa Rsrdia county shallhave fawnlahhed title to the stats 0r fikws to a R.0.W. a8 may be OCITsldaredneaeamry bg the 8tato Highrrg Engineer UMI on furtheroonrrideration,tht IUrdin Countf shall plaoo thin road in a proper abate of mainteqaoe aeaoptablato the State High- Bnglneor prior to state aerwaptlon of eeme.*

%I view of thu tad, please advim w ir in your opiaion the bomds lamed in 19LB and 1919 ON, el%glble to parti %o P in the County and Road Dirtriot Iilghway

Fund..
Itappurrr iroaathe&ow)quot~dmLnnta of the EQhway Dapartalent

hat the desQgiationor 6.B tile, as h&llway 1~ **a** oonditlonal **detdgnatlon,** and it is not &oun **that** the eondltlonabnposed therefa have ovw been aomp;Uedwith. 2hl6 la a questionof fact that must be dsterm&ed by the Highway Departit.

*All bonds, warrants or other legal raidmom of indsbtedneaa

outetandi~ am of dats OS the designationhuminafter rmfermd to, and %sewd by a aounty or deiinsd rotid dirtriotp&lop %0 Jemnxy 2, l@J9, lnsgfaras anwunta of (191104 were lnawd md the groaeadsactually eqm&d in the construetion o? road8 that have been offiio%ally **designated** aa a part of the statem&way Bpdxtm subsequentt.6Hr. Jo. Belaan, p*ga #8

January 2, lQ3QI @hallbe eligible to part;ipate In the dl8trlbution of the moneys aoxc%ng into aaid Qountyand Road DkstriatHighway pbnd aa of the date ot doaignrtionof said mud as **a** part **of** U3e State Highrcrg Sytit4a The mount of mush bonds, nrraAtl3,or other legal lndebtednesa out8tandSng

a8 of the dak of designationof ruoh **road** aa **II,**part **or the**  state Highway gy8temnhal1 **be** oU.gib1o for partiaipatlonin the aaau~OAMC a8 provided **for other**  bondaunder thb Act."
If the RlghwayConaalr~fon hull detemiPsd that the aondltlonr**Imposed** in Its Rinute Wo. 1T04S3, **duted** Febmmry **lS, l940,**  **have** been oapplied **with, and**  **the state**  **haa taken**  oviw themainteAun00of the soad meA%iOAOd, and further fm thst ~rt.iOM Of 'the f'UAdl3 Of th0 19fjz lLAd 1919 i88u.8
were aatually expended on this partlaulazmud, the bonda of both 188~8 outstanding a8 of the date OS the deslgzxntion o? 8sid road a8 a part of the State Hlghwa SyoWm, insofara8 aaaewere lsauedand the proaeed8 UUL aot yexpoSded In the cOMtl'UOti4Ii Of th. 6.8 mibS oi rwd wntioned in *rid Yhaute lo. 170&5,u-or tn our opinion, eligible to part&alputs in the County and Road Mntrlat Highway Fuud.

-C.F. Gibson Asaistont CFG-a
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-440-000]

Take notice that on May 31, 2001, Kern River Gas Transmission Company (Kern River) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be effective July 1, 2001.

First Revised Sheet No. 178

First Revised Sheet No. 179

First Revised Sheet No. 180

First Revised Sheet No. 181

Original Sheet No. 181-A

Kern River states that the purpose of this filing is to revise Section 22 of Kern River's tariff to increase the scope of the pooling services that Kern River is providing to its customers.

Kern River states that it has served a copy of this filing upon its customers and interested state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14690 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Nos. 291, 292, 293, 294, and 295.

#### Balkwill *v.*Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. W. W. Spalding*and *W. II. Annat*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed,. Assistant Attorney General Wideman,*and *Mr. James W. Morris*for respondent.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register: September 14, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 177)]
[Notices]
[Page 54370]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14se05-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, October 14, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-18335 Filed 9-12-05; 11:52 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
**Exhibit 13.1**

----

**CERTIFICATION OF CARLO BOZOTTI, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF   STMICROELECTRONICS N.V., PASQUALE PISTORIO, FORMER PRESIDENT AND CHIEF   EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V.,AND CARLO FERRO, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V., PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of STMicroelectronics N.V. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify that to thebest of our knowledge:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 23, 2005

|   |   | /s/ Carlo Bozotti |
|--------|--------|-------------------|
|   |   |                   |

|   | Name: | Carlo Bozotti |
|--------|-------|---------------|

|   | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|

Date: March 23, 2005

|   |   | /s/ Pasquale Pistorio |
|--------|--------|-----------------------|
|   |   |                       |

|   | Name: | Pasquale Pistorio |
|--------|-------|-------------------|

|   | Title: | Former President and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|

|   |   | (Retirement effective March 18, 2005) |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|

Date: March 23, 2005

|   |   | /s/ Carlo Ferro |
|--------|--------|-----------------|
|   |   |                 |

|   | Name: | Carlo Ferro |
|--------|-------|-------------|

|   | Title: | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40092 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v. WILLIAM LARRY MILLER, JR.

Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CR-16-ALL

-------------------- December 1, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent William Larry Miller, Jr. has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Miller has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See id. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.