alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

May 26, 2016

Alexander Bobinski
Chief Compliance Officer
GTX SEF, LLC

135 Route 202/206
Bedminster, NJ 07921

Re: Application of GX SEF, LLC for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Mr. Bobinski:

By submissions dated September 30, 2013 through April 7, 2016, GTX SEF, LLC
(“GTX”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”), pursuant
to Section Sh of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and Commission Regulation
37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap execution facility (“SEF”),

The Commission has reviewed GTX’s application and has determined to grant GTX
registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying Order of
Registration.

Sincerely,

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
##### 



SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.
CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
  /s/ Jim ShawJim Shaw
Chief Executive Officer
Shaw Communications Inc.




---



##### 



SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.
CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
  /s/ Steve WilsonSteve Wilson
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial OfficerShaw Communications Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.2








SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teen Education Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert L.  Wilson,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: August 13, 2010











By: /s/ ROBERT L. WILSON


___________________________


Robert L. Wilson


Principal Financial Officer
# FCM Data July 2015

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF July 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002015FROM REPORTS FILED BY August 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002015	&P of &N
exv10w2



 






EXHIBIT
10.2




October 11, 2005




Mr. Timothy H. Callahan

10 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 1100

Chicago, IL 60606




Dear Tim:




     Based on our recent discussions, we have agreed to further amend the letter agreement dated
August 14, 2002, as amended by letter dated August 3, 2005, between you and Trizec Properties, Inc.
(the “Company”), pursuant to which you became employed as the President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company (the “Agreement”). This letter shall memorialize our agreement to further amend the
Agreement as follows:




	 	1.	 	The “Term” provisions of the Agreement are hereby amended to provide that the
term commencing on August 15, 2005 and expiring on August 14, 2006 shall be extended
automatically without further action by the Company or you for an additional one year
period, unless written notification of non-renewal is given by either party to the
other by November 8, 2005. This amendment shall affect only the non-renewal
notification period for the one-year renewal term commencing August 14, 2006, and shall
not affect the respective non-renewal notification periods for future renewal terms.
	 
	 	2.	 	It is the intention of you and the Company to negotiate new terms of employment
and a new employment agreement during the period between the date of this letter and
November 8, 2005. The Company agrees to pay the reasonable attorneys’ fees and
expenses incurred by you to the extent your attorney is involved in negotiating the
terms of employment and reviewing, revising and negotiating said new employment
agreement.
	 
	 	3.	 	Except as amended by this letter, the terms and provisions of the Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.





     If this letter accurately reflects our understanding, please so indicate by signing and dating
the enclosed duplicate copy of this letter, and returning it to the Company’s Corporate Secretary.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/
James J. O’Connor
 	 
	 	James J. O’Connor 	 
	 	Chairman, Compensation Committee

Trizec Properties, Inc. 	 
	 



AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED AS OF October 11, 2005:




	 	 	 
	/s/ Timothy H. Callahan
 

      Timothy H. Callahan
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: G. H. MILLER AND COMPANY; GILBERT H. MILLER; HOWARD RANDOLPH, D/B/A 

RANDOLPH AND COMPANY; REFRIGERATED PRODUCTS, INC.; J.W. HARDING; CENTRAL IOWA 

POULTRY AND EGG COMPANY; JOHN H. SNOWGREN; ALLEN HEADLEE, D/B/A HEADLEE PRODUCE 

COMPANY; E.E. HUMMEL AND K. HUMMEL, D/B/A HUMMEL PRODUCE COMPANY; ALBERT SCHIRM, 

D/B/A SCHIRM PRODUCE COMPANY; LEO HAGEN; A.L. MYRICK, D/B/A MARKET PRODUCE 

COMPANY; LEWIS R. VAN SANT AND ROY ROUNTREE, D/B/A DATED EGG COMPANY 

CITATION: 18 Agric. Dec. 338 

DOCKET NUMBER: 60 

DATE: APRIL 9, 1959 

DOCUMENT TYPE: REMOVAL OF STAY ORDER 

ORDER DENYING PETITION TO REOPEN

(No. 5862) 

In re G. H. MILLER AND COMPANY et al. CEA Docket No. 60. Decided April 9, 1959. 

Stay Order Vacated

The stay order of January 8, 1957, is vacated and the orders of September 25 

and December 31, 1955, are reinstated. 

Decision by Thomas J. Flavin, Judicial Officer

REMOVAL OF STAY ORDER

On January 8, 1957 (16 Agric. Dec. 5 (16 A.D. 5)), an order was entered in 

this proceeding under the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. Chapter 1) staying 

the effectiveness of orders entered September 

25 (15 Agric. Dec. 1015 (15 A.D. 1015)) and December 31, 1956 (15 Agric. Dec. 

1296 (15 A.D. 1296)), prescribing sanctions against respondents for violations 

of the act. The stay order was entered because respondents had appealed to the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Court of Appeals 

upheld the decision and order (260 F.2d 286), and on February 24, 1959, the 

United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. 

Accordingly, the stay order of January 8, 1957, is vacated, and the orders of 

September 25 and December 31, 1956, are reinstated (except as to respondent J. 

W. Harding who is deceased) as follows: 

Effective May 15, 1959, the registration of G. H. Miller and Company as a 

futures commission merchant and the registration of Gilbert H. Miller as a floor 

broker are revoked. 

Effective May 15, 1959, all contract markets shall refuse all trading 

privileges, direct or indirect, to G. H. Miller and Company, Gilbert H. Miller, 

Howard Randolph, Randolph and Company, and Refrigerated Products, Inc., for a 

period of one year. 

Effective May 15, 1959, all contract markets shall refuse all trading 

privileges, direct or indirect, to Central Iowa Poultry and Egg Company, John H. 

Snowgren, Allen Headlee, Headlee Produce Company, A. L. Myrick, Market Produce 

Company, Lewis R. Van Sant, Roy Rountree, and Dated Egg Company for a period of 

six months. 
Page 2 

Effective May 15, 1959, all contract markets shall refuse all trading 

privileges, direct or indirect, to E. E. Hummel, K. Hummel, Hummel Produce 

Company, Albert Schirm, Schirm Produce Company, and Leo Hagen for a period of 

sixty days. 

Copies hereof shall be served on the parties or their counsel of record, and 

upon each contract market. 

LOAD-DATE: June 8, 2008 
Page 3
```

[Federal Register: June 16, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 116)]
[Notices]
[Page 34897-34898]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16jn06-56]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, July 7, 2006.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

[[Page 34898]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-5518 Filed 6-14-06; 1:32 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
**Fidelity® Global Strategies Fund**

**Class**/Ticker

**Fidelity Advisor**®**Global Strategies Fund A**/FDASX **T**/FDTSX**B**/FDBSX**C**/FDCSX

**Summary Prospectus**

**July 30, 2014**
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14684]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Bureau of Justice Assistance

[OJP (BJA)-1322]


Announcement of the Availability of the State Criminal Alien 
Assistance Program for FY 2001

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance, 
Justice.

ACTION: Notice of solicitation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Announcement of the availability of the Bureau of Justice 
Assistance (BJA) State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) 
funding for FY2001.

DATES: Applicant account registration through a new Internet-based 
system begins on June 5, 2001 and continues until July 2, 2001. 
Submission of applications begins on June 5, 2001 and ends on July 16, 
2001.

ADDRESSES: Bureau of Justice Assistance, 810 Seventh Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For SCAAP program guidance and 
technical assistance, please log on to the Bureau of Justice Assistance 
Home Page at: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA and select ``SCAAP'' or call 
the Office of Justice Programs Grants Management System Hotline at 1-
888-549-9901, Option #4. For general information about on-line 
application procedures for other solicitations, please call the U.S. 
Department of Justice Response Center at 1-800-421-6770.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority

    This action is authorized under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968, Sections 201-03, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 3721-
23 (1994).

Background

    SCAAP provides Federal assistance to state and local governments 
for costs incurred for the imprisonment of undocumented criminal 
aliens, who are charged or convicted of one felony or two misdemeanor 
offenses. Potential applicants may no longer submit hard copy 
application forms and diskettes. For FY2001, state and local 
governments apply for payment via a paperless, electronic, end-to-end 
distributive, Internet-based web-site application. BJA anticipates 
providing over 420 payments of varying amounts from a FY2001 funding 
total of $551,000,000.
    Potential applicants with questions should call the Office of 
Justice Programs Grants Management System Hotline at 1-888-549-9901, 
Option #4. For access to program guidance and the on-line application, 
connect to http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA and select ``SCAAP.''

Richard Ward,
Acting Director, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
[FR Doc. 01-14684 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
No. 374.

#### Lauro et al. *v.*Barker et al.

Argued January 14, 1937.

Decided January 18, 1937.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellees to affirm the judgment is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. (1) *Bellingham Bay Co.*
      *522v. *New Whatcom,*172 U. S. 314, 318, 319; *Goodrich*v. *Ferris,*214 U. S. 71, 81; *Wick*v. *Chelan Electric Co.,*280 U. S. 108, 110, 111. (2) *Gilfillan*v. *Union Canal Co.,*109 U. S. 401.

*Mr. Henry N. Rapaport,*with whom *Messrs. Irving S. Rapaport*and *Robert S. Garson*were on the brief, for appellants.

*Messrs. Lawrence S. Greenbaum, Benjamin J. Rabin, Theodore S. Jaffin, Benjamin Kaplan,*and *Maurice Finkelstein*were on the brief for appellees.
```

[Federal Register: December 9, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 236)]
[Notices]
[Page 67860-67861]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09de98-48]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to Office of
Management and Budget for Review

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Request for three-year extension of OMB control #3038-0013--
Exemptions from Speculative Limits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has submitted
information collection 3038-0013, Exemptions from Speculative Limits to
OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,
Pub. L. 96-511. The information collected pursuant to this rule is in
the public interest and is necessary for market surveillance.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection
should contact the Desk Officer, CFTC, Office of Management and Budget,
Room 3228, NEOB, Washington, D.C. 20502, (202) 395-3897. Copies of the
submission are available from the CFTC Clearance Officer, (202) 418-
5160.
    Title: Exemptions from Speculative Limits.
    Control Number: 3038-0013.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: Businesses (excluding small business).
    Estimated Annual Burden: 36 total hours.

[[Page 67861]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Estimated No.        Annual      Est. Avg. hours
             Respondents                Regulation (17 CFR)     of respondents     responses       per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Businesses..........................  1.47 & 1.48 and Part                 12               12               36
                                       150.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 3, 1998.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-32672 Filed 12-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 13 , 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00528

- CR

CHAD PROVORSE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1443270

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance . In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for four years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We dismiss the appeal.
The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defe ndant has no2

right of appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports
the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Te x. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally and Wise

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-446-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

June 7, 2001.
    Take notice that on June 4, 2001, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets 
listed on Appendix A to filing, to become effective July 4, 2001.
    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets are being 
filed to make certain tariff modifications necessary to correct and/or 
clarify its Tariff as more fully explained in the filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(A)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14846 Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1151 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1151

   Recognizing and congratulating Apolo Anton Ohno for his historic 
 performances in short track speed skating at the 2002, 2006, and 2010 
 Olympic Winter Games and congratulating him for winning more Olympic 
          Winter Games medals than any other American athlete.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2010

 Mr. McDermott (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, and Mr. Baird) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                   on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing and congratulating Apolo Anton Ohno for his historic 
 performances in short track speed skating at the 2002, 2006, and 2010 
 Olympic Winter Games and congratulating him for winning more Olympic 
          Winter Games medals than any other American athlete.

Whereas short track speed skater Apolo Anton Ohno was born on May 22, 1982, in 
        Seattle, Washington;
Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno's father, Yuki Ohno, a single, Japanese-American 
        parent, never wavered in the support he gave, the sacrifices he made, 
        and the inspiration he provided to help his son Apolo realize the dream 
        of competing in the Olympic Winter Games;
Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno, at the age of 27, is an eight-time Olympic Winter 
        Games medalist, winning two gold, two silver, and four bronze medals in 
        short track speed skating;
Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno has won more Olympic Winter Games medals than any other 
        American athlete;
Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno, just 19 years old at the time, won the gold medal in 
        the 1,500 meters and the silver medal in the 1,000 meters at the 2002 
        Olympic Winter Games in Salt Lake City, Utah;
Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno's gold medal in the 500 meters, bronze medal in the 
        1,000 meters, and bronze medal in the 5,000 meters relay gave him three 
        medals at the 2006 Olympic Winter Games in Turin, Italy, and at the time 
        made him only the fourth American athlete to win three medals at a 
        single Olympic Winter Games; and
Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno's silver medal in the 1,500 meters, bronze medal in the 
        1,000 meters, and bronze medal in the 5,000 meters relay gave him three 
        medals at the 2010 Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver, Canada: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes and 
congratulates Apolo Anton Ohno for--
            (1) his historic performances in short track speed skating 
        at the 2002, 2006, and 2010 Olympic Winter Games; and
            (2) winning more Olympic Winter Games medals than any other 
        American athlete.
                                 <all>
```
#### Steven G. STROWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DOWNEY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-55213.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 9, 2008.

Steven G. Strowski, Norwalk, CA, pro se.

George Roscoe Trindle, III, Esq., Carpenter Rothans & Dumont, Los Angeles, CA, for City of Downey.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ****

Steven G. Strowski appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim, and order requiring Strowski to obtain approval before filing future actions in the district court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the dismissal. *Kildare v. Saenz,*325 F.3d 1078, 1085 (9th Cir.2003). We review for abuse of discretion the imposition of a pre-filing order. *Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.,*500 F.3d 1047, 1056-57 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Strowski’s action because he failed to show that he was denied a constitutionally protected due process interest. *See Kildare,*325 F.3d at 1085 (“Procedural due process claims require [ ] a deprivation of a constitutionally protected liberty or property interest[.]”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing a pre-filing review order after giving Strowski notice and an opportunity to be heard, developing a record for review, making findings of harassment, and narrowly tailoring the remedy. *See Molski,*500 F.3d at 1057 (explaining *610four factors district courts must examine before entering pre-filing review orders).

Strowski’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.