alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Venturevest 4, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, I, Joseph J. Passalaqua, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  February 11, 2008 VENTUREVEST 4, INC. By: /s/ Joseph J. Passalaqua Joseph J. Passalaqua  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Venturevest 4, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, I, Joseph J. Passalaqua, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  February 11, 2008 VENTUREVEST 4, INC. By: /s/ Joseph J. Passalaqua Joseph J. Passalaqua
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Gammon, Appellant.

Submitted October 11, 2011;

decided December 13, 2011

Reported below, 30 Misc 3d 46.

Motion to vacate this Court’s September 21, 2011 preclusion order granted.
Exhibit
10.57




CORPORATE
PROMISSORY NOTE




$25,000
              San
      Diego, California
              December
      11, 2009




For
value received, receipt of which is acknowledged, DotVN, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, (“Maker”) promises to pay to Thomas Johnson, San Diego, California,
(“Payee”), or order, at such place as Payee may designate, the sum of
TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($25,000.00), plus interest at the
rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, on March 11, 2010 (the “Due
Date”).




If action
be instituted on this note, Maker promises to pay such sum as the Court may fix
as attorneys fees.




This note
will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective heirs,
executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Maker and
Payee.




IN
WITNESS THERETO, Maker has affixed its signature by a duly authorized officer
under the seal of this corporation.




DOT
      VN, INC./s/  Lee JohnsonBy:  
      Lee JohnsonIts: 
       President




CORPORATE
PROMISSORY NOTE
```

[Federal Register: August 16, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 159)]
[Notices]
[Page 42998]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16au01-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Friday, September 21, 2001.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 01-20732 Filed 8-14-01; 11:27 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
```

[Federal Register: May 22, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 99)]
[Notices]
[Page 28369]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22my98-61]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, June 26, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-13865 Filed 5-20-98; 12:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
#### O2 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LTD. and O2 Micro Inc., Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Microsemi Corporation, Intervenor.

No. 2010-1482.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 1, 2012.

ORDER

02 Micro International, Ltd. and 02 Micro, Inc. move to withdraw their appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
| (1) | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dot VN, Inc. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: October 6, 2011     | By:    |  /s/ Thomas Johnson                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          |   | Thomas Johnson                                        |   |
|                                          |   | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |
124132587

January 13, 2017

Via Commission Website Portal

Mr. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick

Secretary

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Three Lafayette Centre

155 21st Street, NW

Washington D.C. 20581

Re: LedgerX LLC – Application for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Mr. Kirkpatrick:

LedgerX LLC hereby applies for registration as a swap execution facility pursuant to Section 5h

of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) 

Regulation 37.3(b).

The application consists of this transmittal letter; a table of contents; the attached folders

designated as “Non-Confidential Submission” and “Confidential Submission,” respectively; and 

a petition for confidential treatment, which is being submitted simultaneously to the Assistant 

Secretary of the Commission for Freedom of Information.

Questions regarding this application should be directed to the attention the undersigned at 

(917) 267-0378 or at paul@ledgerx.com.

Sincerely,

Paul Chou

cc: Gary DeWaal

 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
#### John CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lawrence Harvey ZEIGER aka Larry King; Cable News Network LP, LLLP.; Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-56399.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.*

Filed Dec. 8, 2006.

John Clark, Hollywood, CA, pro se.

Alonzo B. Wickers, IV, Esq., Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

John Clark appeals pro se the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his diversity action against Lawrence Harvey Zeiger aka Larry King, Cable News Network, LP, and Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., alleging defamation, libel, slander, assault and interference of judicial processes. For the reasons set forth in Judge Byrne’s order dated August 4, 2005, granting appellees’ motion to dismiss, we affirm.

Clark’s other arguments on appeal are equally meritless. Clark was not entitled to discovery prior to dismissal because it is a purpose of Rule 12(b)(6) to allow a defendant to challenge the legal sufficiency of a complaint’s allegations without first subjecting itself to discovery. *See Rutman Wine Co. v. E. & J. Gallo Winery,*829 F.2d 729, 738 (9th Cir.1987). The Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of Clark’s complaint also did not violate Clark’s right to a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment. *Lies v. Farrell Lines, Inc.,*641 F.2d 765, 771 n. 8 (9th Cir.1981).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *613courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cfte.gov

July 6, 2017

Paul Chou

Chief Executive Officer
LedgerX LLC

152 Madison Avenue
21" Floor

New York, NY 10016

Re: Application of LedgerX LLC for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Mr. Chou:

By submissions dated January 13, 2017 through June 28, 2017, LedgerX LLC
(“LedgerX”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”),
pursuant to Section Sh of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and Commission
Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap execution facility (‘SEF”),

The Commission has reviewed LedgerX’s application and has determined to grant
LedgerX registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying
Order of Registration.

Sincerely,

Bab.) Pbk

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commiss

ion
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David E. Snyder, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  May 13, 2009



/s/ David E. SnyderDavid E. Snyder Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50928

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDUARDO FELICIANO ORTIZ-GRAJEDA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CR-370-ALL-PRM

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eduardo Feliciano Ortiz-Grajeda appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Ortiz-Grajeda argues that his prior removal hearing deprived him

of due process and therefore that the removal may not be used to

establish an element of the charge that he was in the United

States unlawfully after removal. Ortiz-Grajeda also argues that

his sentence violated due process because it exceeded the
No. 03-50928

-2-

statutory maximum sentence for the offense charged in the

indictment. He concedes that his arguments are foreclosed by

Fifth Circuit precedent. Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523

U.S. 224, 235 (1998); United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225

(5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1135 (2003). He raises

these issues solely to preserve them for possible further review. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
No. 413.

#### New York Life Insurance Co. v. Kaufman.

October 21, 1935.

*Messrs. Edwin A. Meserve*and *Louis H. Cooke*for petitioner.

*Mr. Arthur Rosenblum*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ex-10.1



 






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO

CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT



THIS AMENDMENT, made the 16th day of August, 2005, by CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the
“Company”), a North Carolina corporation with its principal office at Concord, North
Carolina, and David Armistead (“Employee”), an employee of the Company.



WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have previously entered into a Change in Control
Agreement dated January 5, 2004 (the “Agreement”); and



WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to provide that any Compensation
payable to the Employee under the terms of the Agreement shall be paid in the form of a
single lump sum.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms contained herein, the Employee’s
employment with the Company, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Employee agree that the
Agreement shall be and hereby is amended by deleting Section IA and substituting therefor
the following:



“A. If a Change in Control (as defined in Section IA(iii) hereof) occurs and if, within
two years following the Change in Control, the employment of the Employee is terminated (A)
by the Company other than for Cause (as defined in Section IA(i) hereof), or (B) by the
Employee for Good Reason (as defined in Section IA(ii) hereof), an amount equal to the
Employee’s Compensation (as defined in Section IA(iv) hereof), less applicable withholdings,
shall be paid by the Company to the Employee in a single lump sum within 30 days of
termination of the Employee’s employment under circumstances entitling the Employee to
Compensation hereunder.”



Except as amended herein, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties hereto effective as
of the day and year first above stated.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ RICHARD L. GARNER, JR.	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	     Richard L. Garner, Jr.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EMPLOYEE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ DAVID ARMISTEAD
	 	(Seal)
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	David Armistead
	 	 






37
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### In re Grievance of George Ashley In re Grievance of John T. Kerns

Case No. (Law) 105945

Case No. (Law) 106267

October 24, 1991

By JUDGE JACK B. STEVENS

This matter has been under advisement for the Court to consider the appeals of George Ashley and John Kerns from a determination by the Acting County Executive that they are not entitled to a final and binding hearing by the Fair-fax County Civil Service Commission because they did not file their respective grievances in a timely manner. The Court has considered the arguments of counsel as stated set forth in the briefs submitted. For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that the issue presented by the appellants is grievable. Accordingly, the decision of the Acting County Executive is reversed.

Section 15.1-7.2(A) of the Code of Virginia, annotated, states as follows:

> A grievance shall be a complaint or dispute by an employee relating to his employment, including but not necessarily limited to . . . (ii) the application of personnel policies, procedures, rules and regulations ....

*360
      *See also*§ 2.1-114.5:1 Va. Code Ann. (1950); and Section 17.3-2(b) of the Fairfax County Personnel Regulations (1990).

Ashley’s and Kerns’s complaints raise the same issue. Both are retired Fairfax County Police Officers who have been hired in other County agencies since their retirement. Both claim that Personnel Regulation § 10.5 entitles them to have prior years of service as police officers included in their total years of service for the purpose of computing the rate at which they accrue annual leave. The resolution of these claims involves the interpretation and application of the Personnel Regulation § 10.5. According to Personnel Regulation § 17.3-2(b), and §§ 15.1-7.2(A) and 2.1-114.5:1 of the Virginia Code, this issue is grievable.

The Court finds that by processing these grievances through the Fourth Step of the Grievance Procedure, without raising the objection to the grievances based on Personnel Regulation $ 17.5-1 requiring a grievance to be brought within fifteen workdays of the occurrence giving rise to the grievance, the County waived this objection.
Exhibit (d)(160)

**FORM OF**

**AMENDMENT TO**

**SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENT**

**between**

**FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS**

**and**

**FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY**

**and**

**FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST ON BEHALF OF FIDELITY NORDIC FUND**

	This Amendment made as of this __ day of _____, 200_, amends the Sub-Advisory Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated March 1, 2001, by and between Fidelity Management & Research Company, a Massachusetts corporation with principal offices at 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts (hereinafter called the "Advisor"); Fidelity International Investment Advisors, a Bermuda company with principal offices at Pembroke Hall, Pembroke,Bermuda (hereinafter called the "Sub-Advisor"); and Fidelity Investment Trust, a Massachusetts business trust, onbehalf of Fidelity Nordic Fund (hereinafter called the "Portfolio").

	WHEREAS the Advisor and Sub-Advisor (the "Parties") wish to clarify their relationship by amending theAgreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment;

	NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

	1.  Paragraph 7 of the Agreement is hereby supplemented as follows:

	Nothing in this Agreement will constitute a partnership between the Advisor, the Sub-Advisor and the Trust.Nothing in this Agreement makes the Sub-Advisor an agent of the Advisor or the Trust and the Sub-Adviserhas no authority whatsoever to exercise discretionary powers over the global portfolios and investmentfunds, except as provided pursuant to paragraph 1(b) herein, of the Advisor and the Trust, or otherwise tobind the Advisor's and the Trust's assets under management.

	The Sub-Advisor shall furnish services as an independent contractor and not as an employee or agent of either the Advisor or the Trust.  The Sub-Advisor has no power or authority to act for, represent, or bind theAdvisor or the Trust or any company affiliated with either of them.

	2.****In all other respects, the Agreement is hereby confirmed and remains in full force and effect.

	This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth ofMassachusetts, without giving effect to the choice of laws provisions thereof.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be signed in their behalf by theirrespective officers thereunto duly authorized, and their respective seals to be hereunto affixed, all as of the datewritten above.

[SIGNATURE LINES OMITTED]
# CE2013051EN.01017002.xml

| 22.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 51/170 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 51/170

---

Tuesday 13 September 2011Agreement between the EU, Iceland and Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway ***

P7_TA(2011)0357

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 September 2011 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway (05307/2010 – C7-0032/2010 – 2009/0192(NLE))

2013/C 51 E/42

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (05307/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (05307/2010),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway (09644/2006), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway (09644/2006),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 82(1), point (d) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0032/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 82(1), point (d) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0032/2010),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0268/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0268/2011),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ERIC WATSON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 210 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ERIC WATSON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 211 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 22nd day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**