alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maiden Holdings,      Ltd.; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Based      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this      report; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | The      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant      and have: |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | The      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to      the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent      functions): |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 13,      2009 |   | /s/      ARTURO M.      RASCHBAUM                                           |
|----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |   | Arturo      M. Raschbaum                                                    |
|                             |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      ExecutiveOfficer) |

----
Exhibit 32.2








Certification
by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation
(the “Company”) on the Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, David Gamache, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)
            the
      Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(ii)
            The
      information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      on the dates and for the periods presented
  therein.






MICROCHANNEL
      TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONDate:  January
      12, 2009
                By:
                /s/ David GamacheDavid
      Gamache
                  Chief
      Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
incplan



	EXHIBIT 10.12






Associated Estates Realty Corporation



Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan





	On August 4, 2005, the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
approved and implemented the following long-term incentive ("LTI") compensation structure for key
executives:





PLAN NAME:   




	Associated Estates Realty Corporation Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan.





OBJECTIVE:




	To motivate and reward executives for the achievement of certain milestones linked to
the strategic plan.





TIMING:




	Grants will be delivered annually and each annual grant is tied to a three-year strategic
benchmark that will be determined by the Executive Compensation Committee at the first
meeting of each calendar year.







	Performance against benchmark will be measured at the conclusion of each calendar
year and approved at the first Executive Compensation Committee meeting of the year.





PLAN PARAMETERS AND PARTICIPANTS:




	Target LTI awards will be established for each participant based on the mix of total
compensation.







	Threshold award levels are set at 25% of the total LTI target opportunity.







	Awards are delivered through a mix of non-qualified stock options ("NQSOs") and/or
stock settled appreciation rights ("SARs") and Performance-Contingent Restricted
Shares.





	NQSOs/SARs vest in equal, annual installments over the three-year period.





	The restricted share grant may be accelerated up to the threshold level at the end
of each measurement period based on the achievement of strategic objectives.





	If the overall three-year objective is met, the participants are eligible for the
remaining 50% of the restricted share grant.
			If the overall objective is not met, the unvested portion of the restricted share grant
will be forfeited.
			Participants have the right to receive dividends and vote the shares during the
restricted period.



  		If the overall three-year benchmark is exceeded, the Executive Compensation
Committee may, in its sole discretion, issue awards in excess of target at the end of the
three-year performance period.
# C_2010188EN.01001001.xml

| 13.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/10

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2010/C 188/06

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bicycles | Vietnam | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005 (OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 1) | 15.7.2010 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Bicycles

Vietnam

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005 (OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 1)

15.7.2010

---

(1)  OJ C 70, 19.3.2010, p. 28.

1

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

2

---
No. 123.

#### Feiffer *v.*Mann et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Robert E. Lynch*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Walter C. Clephane, J. Wilmer Latimer,*and *Gilbert L. Hall*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
#### STANDARD GASLIGHT CO. OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. MAYER et al.

(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

July 29, 1909.)

In Equity. Application by a special master for instructions as to the disposition of a fund.

Edward W. Burdick, for complainant.

Robert C. Taylor, George S. Coleman, and Francis K. Pendleton, Corp. Counsel, for defendants.

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Except for a difference in the figures, the situation in the case of this company is the same as that of the Northern Union Company, which is disposed of by memorandum filed to-day. 171 Fed. 002.

A similar disposition will be made of the unclaimed balance in this case.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:August 14, 2018/s/Robert L. ReynoldsRobert L. ReynoldsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated:August 14, 2018/s/Andra BolotinAndra BolotinExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Glenn HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERTSON, Dr.; et al., Defendants — Appellees.

No. 05-56553.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 9, 2008.

*643Glemi C. Henderson, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Glenn Henderson appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his diversity action alleging medical malpractice in 1959 or 1960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Fannucchi & Limi Farms v. United Agri Products,*414 F.3d 1075, 1080 (9th Cir.2005), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Henderson’s action as time-barred because, whether N.C. Gen.Stat. § 1 — 15(c) applies, or Cal. Civ. Proc. § 340.5 applies, according to his own pleadings, Henderson’s action accrued more than the requisite period before he filed his complaint.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Walter Lee WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roderick R. SOWERS, Warden; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 06-6580.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 21, 2006.

Decided: Dec. 29, 2006.

Walter Lee Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Sheldon Oakley, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Lee Wright, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district coart is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wright has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Wright’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Wright’s motion to hold his motion for a certificate of appealability in abeyance, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mark David CLOUD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-50718

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

W.W. Torrey, Cameron, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Mark David Cloud has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cloud has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Cloud’s response discloses no nonfriv-olous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Cloud’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2



Amendment to the Restricted Stock Plan for Outside Directors




The Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Plan for Outside Directors of RGC Resources, Inc. (the "Plan"), is amended to add a new Section 2(m) to read as follows, with the subsequent definitions in Section 2 being re-lettered accordingly:


Family Trust means a trust for which the applicable Participant serves as a trustee and which is for the benefit of family members of the Participant.  


Section 2(o) [formerly 2(n)] of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


Participant means a Member during the Plan Year (including any Family Trust to which Restricted Stock is transferred by him or her in accordance with Section 6 of this Plan).


Section 6 of the Plan is amended to add the following sentence at the end:


Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant may transfer Restricted Stock to a Family Trust.


This Amendment was adopted by the Board of Directors on March 28, 2016.


	
				
	 
	 
	 
	/s/ Paul W. Nester     

	 
	 
	 
	Paul W. Nester

	 
	 
	 
	Secretary
No. 509.

#### Purcell *v.*New York Central R. Co.

See *ante,*p. 545.
HOLDERS OF RECORD
 RESIDENTIAL FUNDING MORTGAGE SECURITITES I, INC.
 FORM 10-K
 PART II, ITEM 5 (B)
 EXHIBIT #4 PROPERTIES.

 SHELF            MORTGAGE POOL                      NUMBER OF HOLDERS OF RECORD




 RASC
                  1996-KS2                                                     3
                  1997-KS1                                                     4
                  1997-KS2                                                     6
                  1997-KS3                                                    12
                  1997-KS4                                                     4
                  1998-KS1                                                     9
                  1998-KS2                                                    18
                  1998-KS3                                                    10
                  1998-KS4                                                     8
                  1998-RS1                                                     3
                  1999-KS1                                                    11
                  1999-KS2                                                    12
                  1999-KS3                                                    12
                  1999-KS4                                                    10
                  1999-RS1                                                     9
                  1999-RS2                                                     9
                  1999-RS3                                                     3
                  1999-RS4                                                     6
                  1999-RS5                                                     8
                  2000-KS1                                                    10
                  2000-KS2                                                    10
                  2000-KS3                                                    10
                  2000-KS4                                                    10
                  2001-KS1                                                     9
                  2001-KS2                                                    18
                  2001-KS3                                                    19
                  2001-KS4                                                     3
                  2002-KS1                                                    12
                  2002-KS2                                                    19
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 31682)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel, Biomedical Research Technology.                    

*Date:*                         July 10, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 PM to Adjournment.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sybil A. Wellstood, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, One Rockledge Centre, Room 6018, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, (301) 435-0814, wellstoods@ncrr.nih.gov.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 1, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-14781 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
General Magic, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
Nos. 33-93648, 333-12667, 333-33329, 333-45751, 333-71781, 333-93479 on Form S-8
and Nos. 333-67683, 333-59723, 333-51685, 333-77369, 333-79857, 33-83075, and
333-90023 on Form S-3 of General Magic, Inc. of our report dated January 28,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of General Magic, Inc. and
subsidiary (a development stage enterprise) as of December 31, 1999 and 1998,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1999, and for the period from May 1, 1990 (inception) to December
31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form
10-K/A of General Magic, Inc.

                                                 /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
April 28, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1482]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

January 10, 2001.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, January 10, 2001.

PLACE: Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Closed [Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10)].

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: It was determined by a unanimous consent vote 
of the Commission that the Commission consider and act upon the 
following in closed session:
    1. Disciplinary Matter, Docket No. D 2000-1.
    2. Disciplinary Matter, Docket No. D 2001-1.
    No earlier announcement of the meeting was possible.

Contact Person for Further Information: Jean Ellen (202) 653-5629/(202) 
708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 01-1482 Filed 1-12-01; 12:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M