alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Juan Antonio BELTRAN; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 05-73886, 05-75125.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 8, 2008.

Luis Carlos Ayala, Esquire, Law Offices of Luis Carlos Ayala, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Oluremi Olatokunbo Adalemo, Esquire, Ashley B. Han, Esquire, Linda S. Wendt-land, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, *586Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated petitions for review, Juan Antonio Beltran and his family, natives and citizens of Bolivia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings (No. 05-73886) and its order denying them motion to reconsider (No. 05-75125). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, *Cano-Mer-ida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cm. 2002), we deny the petitions for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the Beltrans’ motion to reopen because the Beltrans failed to provide evidence of changed circumstances in Bolivia. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the Beltrans’ motion to reconsider where they failed to identify an error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior order. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1); *see also Socop-Gonzalez v. INS,*272 F.3d 1176, 1180 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc).

The Beltrans’ “Motion to Request Leave to File Late Reply Brief’ is granted. The Clerk shall file the brief received on November 9, 2007.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: JACK C. FLORA 

DOCKET NUMBER: 174 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 174 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Jack C. Flora 

(Fullerton, California) 

The complaint charges that on March 2, 1970, the respondent, while employed 

by a futures commission merchant, converted to his own use $ 6,000 belonging to 

a regulated commodity customer. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, August 26, 1970, in Los Angeles, California. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1370 

Finding that holding the 2011 Major League Baseball All-Star Game in 

Arizona is at odds with Major League Baseball’s efforts to promote 

diversity and tolerance, and urging Major League Baseball to find a 

more suitable location for the Game. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2010 

Mr. SERRANO (for himself and Mr. MEEKS of New York) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Finding that holding the 2011 Major League Baseball AllStar Game in Arizona is at odds with Major League 

Baseball’s efforts to promote diversity and tolerance, and 

urging Major League Baseball to find a more suitable 

location for the Game. 

Whereas, on April 23, 2010, the Governor of Arizona signed 

Arizona Senate Bill 1070 into law; 

Whereas the Arizona statute has been extremely divisive, and 

has led to protests across the United States and objections from a wide range of individuals and organizations; 

Whereas there are legitimate concerns that the Arizona statute is unconstitutional and will lead to racial profiling by 

law enforcement officers; 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1370 IH 

Whereas the Major League Baseball Players Association has 

condemned the Arizona statute; 

Whereas more than 25 percent of Major League Baseball 

players were born outside of the United States; 

Whereas 48 percent of minor league baseball players were 

born outside of the United States; 

Whereas Major League Baseball has scheduled the 2011 AllStar Game in Phoenix, Arizona on July 11, 2011; 

Whereas Major League Baseball is the premier league of a 

globalized sport; 

Whereas the Major League Baseball All-Star Game is a display of the global reach of baseball; 

Whereas holding the 2011 All-Star Game in Phoenix while 

the Arizona statute remains in effect would diminish 

Major League Baseball’s efforts at expanding the fan 

base and promoting tolerance and diversity; 

Whereas several Major League Baseball players have announced that they would refuse to participate in an AllStar Game held in Arizona unless the statute is repealed; 

and 

Whereas Major League Baseball has an opportunity to make 

a statement in favor of justice and decency by moving the 

2011 All-Star Game from Arizona: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) finds that holding the 2011 All-Star Game 

3 in the State of Arizona while the statute remains in 

4 effect is at odds with Major League Baseball’s well5 known efforts to promote diversity and tolerance; 

6 and 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1370 IH 

1 (2) urges Major League Baseball to find a more 

2 suitable location for such a prestigious event, should 

3 the Arizona statute remain in effect. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
 CORPORATE
EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC.
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 §
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Corporate Equity Investments, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chase
Chandler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, based on my knowledge, that:
  1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  /S/ Chase
Chandler
  Chase
Chandler
 Chief
Financial Officer
 May
15, 2009
  This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)








In connection with the Report of RegalWorks Media, Inc. (f/k/a AmerElite Solutions, Inc.)  (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marcia Allen, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 22, 2013





By: /s/ Marcia Allen


Marcia Allen, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with this Quarterly Report of AMERELITE SOLUTIONS, INC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Knapp, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:   June 4, 2010
By:
/s/ Robert L. KnappPrincipal Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
**Fidelity**®**Overseas Fund**

**Class**/Ticker

**K**/FOSKX

**Summary Prospectus**

**December 30, 2011**

**As Revised February 2, 2012**
No. 126.

#### Mount Vernon Trust Co. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. F. Morse Hubbard*and *Barham R. Gary*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman,*and *Messrs. David*
      *588
      *E. Hudson*and *Sewall Key,*and *Miss Helen R. Carloss*for respondent.

*587Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



I, Scott Longval, Chief Financial Officer of IntriCon Corporation certify that:



1.
        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IntriCon Corporation;




2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
        [Intentionally Omitted];




(c)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
        disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)
        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date: November 9, 2007

/s/
        Scott LongvalScott LongvalChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(principal financial officer)






---
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Greenstar International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas Diemer Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting
officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: December 14, 2007

By: /s/ Thomas Diemer
    -----------------
    Thomas Diemer, Chief Financal Officer
    principal financial and accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         2,727
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                   268
<INVENTORY>                                    3,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,963
<PP&E>                                         887
<DEPRECIATION>                                 427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,955
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       28
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,903
<SALES>                                        16,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,693
<CGS>                                          11,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               434
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                486
<INCOME-TAX>                                   214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            272
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   272
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .10
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
Global Payment Technologies, Inc.


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-3  (No.  333-114529)  and the  Registration  Statements  on Form S-8 (No.
333-112934 and No. 333-30829) of Global Payment Technologies, Inc. of our report
dated January 11, 2007, with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements
and related  schedule of Global  Payment  Technologies,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries
included in this  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  September  30,
2006.


/s/ Eisner LLP
New York, New York
January 11, 2007


                                      119
```

[Federal Register: February 22, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 35)]
[Notices]
[Page 9096]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22fe06-64]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Meetings; Sunshine Act

Agency Holding the Meeting:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date:  11 a.m., Friday, March 3, 2006.

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status:  Closed.

Matters to Be Considered:
    Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-1661 Filed 2-17-06; 11:09 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
(logo) KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
            1600 Market Street
            Philadelphia, PA 19103-7212



                         Independent Accountant's Report

We have  examined  management's  assertion  about the  Electronic  Data  Systems
Corporation - Consumer Asset Management  Division's (the Division's)  compliance
with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP) as of, and for the nine months ending, September 30, 1996 included in the
accompanying management assertion.  Management is responsible for the Division's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on  management's  assertion  about the Division's  compliance
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Division's  compliance with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the Division's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the Division  complied  with the
aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of and for the nine months ending
September 30, 1996 is fairly stated in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Philadelphia, PA
December 23, 1996



(logo) Member Firm of KPMG
#### DOBA v. UNITED STATES.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 8, 1922.)

No. 320.

In Error to the District Court of the United States-for the Eastern District of New York. Peter Doba was convicted of interfering with a federal prohibition agent in the performance of his duty, and he brings error.

Affirmed.

Louis Rothbard, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff in error.

Ralph O. Greene, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Henry J. Walsh, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.

Before ROGERS, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed in open court.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

FINJAN, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2021-2253

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 3:17-cv-05659-WHA, 

Judge William H. Alsup.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

ROGER A. DENNING, Fish & Richardson, PC, San Diego, 

CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by 

JUANITA ROSE BROOKS; MICHAEL JOHN BALLANCO, Washington, DC; ROBERT COURTNEY, Minneapolis, MN. 

 JONATHAN STUART KAGAN, Irell & Manella LLP, Los 

Angeles, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by REBECCA CARSON, Newport Beach, CA. 

 ______________________ 

Case: 21-2253 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 12/12/2022
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

December 12, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-2253 Document: 49 Page: 2 Filed: 12/12/2022
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1398 

Recognizing the contributions of university and college immigrant assistance 

programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2010 

Mr. ACKERMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the contributions of university and college 

immigrant assistance programs. 

Whereas university and college immigrant assistance programs provide critical services to immigrants and to the 

United States; 

Whereas the public servants who dedicate themselves to serving immigrants are to be commended for their dedication 

to improving the lives of others; 

Whereas legal services, citizenship test preparation, assistance with applications for permanent residency, and 

English language courses are some of the invaluable services offered by many universities and colleges to immigrants at no charge; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1398 IH 

Whereas these programs have helped countless immigrants 

make a better life for themselves and their families in the 

United States; and 

Whereas assisting immigrants to become United States citizens helps immigrants obtain a stake in their community 

and promotes civic engagement: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the contributions of universities and colleges in help3 ing immigrants achieve citizenship and pursue the Amer4 ican dream. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit (g)(21)

Form of