alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kenneth M. CASE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant— Appellee, and Social Security Administrative Record, Party in Interest.

No. 08-1018.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 31, 2008.

Decided: Sept. 11, 2008.

Richard J. Paul, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Kevin F. McDonald, Acting United States Attorney, Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert L. Van Saghi, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Regional Chief Counsel, Yvette G. Keesee, Deputy Regional Chief Counsel, Thomas S. Inman, Assistant Regional Counsel, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth M. Case appeals the magistrate judge’s order affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.* We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. *See*42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); *Craig v. Chater,*76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, administrative record, and the materials submitted in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. *See Case v. Astrue,*No. 8:06-cv-02293-BHH (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
```

[Federal Register: December 23, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 246)]
[Notices]
[Page 67054]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23de97-64]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, January 12, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-33634 Filed 12-19-97; 2:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 12 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 6, 2009.
    Resolved, That the following Members are, and are hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on Agriculture-- Mr. Lucas.
     Committee on Appropriations-- Mr. Lewis of California.
     Committee on Armed Services-- Mr. McHugh.
     Committee on the Budget-- Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin.
     Committee on Education and Labor-- Mr. McKeon.
     Committee on Energy and Commerce-- Mr. Barton of Texas.
     Committee on Financial Services-- Mr. Bachus.
     Committee on Foreign Affairs-- Ms. Ros-Lehtinen.
     Committee on Homeland Security-- Mr. King of New York.
     Committee on the Judiciary-- Mr. Smith of Texas.
     Committee on Natural Resources-- Mr. Hastings of Washington.
     Committee on Oversight and Government Reform-- Mr. Issa.
     Committee on Rules-- Mr. Dreier.
     Committee on Science and Technology-- Mr. Hall of Texas.
     Committee on Small Business-- Mr. Graves.
     Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure-- Mr. Mica.
     Committee on Veterans' Affairs-- Mr. Buyer.
    Committee on Ways and Means-- Mr. Camp of Michigan.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# FCM Data January 2011

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF January 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002011FROM REPORTS FILED BY March 04,&KFF0000 &K0000002011	&P of &N
# C_2010205EN.01001101.xml

| 29.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/11

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 205/07

| Member State | United Kingdom |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Stornoway–Benbecula |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 November 2010 until 31 March 2013 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 2 months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained | Comhairle nan Eilean Siar |
| Council Offices |
| Sandwick Road |
| Stornoway |
| Isle of Lewis |
| HS1 2BW |
| Scotland |
| UNITED KINGDOM |
| Tel. +44 1851709403 |
| Fax +44 1851709482 |
| E-mail: mgray@cne-siar.gov.uk |
| (Contact: Murdo J Gray, Depute Director of Technical Services) |

Member State

United Kingdom

Concerned routes

Stornoway–Benbecula

Period of validity of the contract

1 November 2010 until 31 March 2013

Deadline for submission of tenders

2 months after the date of publication of this notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained

Comhairle nan Eilean Siar

Council Offices

Sandwick Road

Stornoway

Isle of Lewis

HS1 2BW

Scotland

UNITED KINGDOM

Tel. +44 1851709403

Fax +44 1851709482

E-mail: mgray@cne-siar.gov.uk

(Contact: Murdo J Gray, Depute Director of Technical Services)

---
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Winesett v. Crowe

May 7, 1991

Case Nos. (Law) 98416 and L98467

By JUDGE JACK B. STEVENS

This matter has been under advisement by the Court to consider the defendant’s demurrer to the claim for punitive damages. The Court has reviewed the arguments of counsel, as well as the principal cases of *Booth v. Robertson,*236 Va. 269, 374 S.E.2d 1 (1988), and *Hack v. Nester,*7 V.L.R. 816 (1990), and for the reasons that follow, overrules the demurrer.

In a personal injury case, an award of punitive damages may be based on a showing of malicious conduct or negligence which is so willful or wanton as to evince a conscious disregard of the rights of others. *Booth,*236 Va. 269, 272, 374 S.E.2d 1. Additionally, the level of a defendant’s intoxication is relevant to a determination of the degree of his negligence; whether ordinary, gross, or wanton. *Id.*at 273, 374 S.E.2d 1. However, intoxication alone, without an "egregious set of facts" is not enough to support a claim for punitive damages. *Hack,*7 V.L.R. 816, 823. Accordingly, whether the negligence in a case rises to the necessary level of wantonness depends on the facts of the case.

*485In *Booth v. Robertson,*a driver with a blood alcohol level of 0.22% drove 0.4 miles in the wrong direction on a divided interstate highway, causing a head-on collision with the plaintiff. In allowing a punitive damage claim, the Court stated:

> The objective fact that the defendant in this case voluntarily consumed enough intoxicants to produce a reading of 0.22% blood alcohol content, causing him to drive as he did on the night in question, provides sufficient proof of his conscious disregard of the rights of others.

*Booth,*236 Va. 269 at 273, 374 S.E.2d 1.

Later in *Hack*v. *Nester,*a claim for punitive damages was denied where a driver had a blood alcohol level somewhere between .09 and .114, was driving with a broken left headlight, and swerved into oncoming traffic while rounding a curve. There, the Court stated:

> Even though this accident produced a more tragic result, the evidence here does not present the "egregious set of facts" presented in *Booth.*

*Hack,*7 V.L.R. 816 at 823. The *Hack*Court distinguished its holding from that in *Booth*by stressing the difference in degree of intoxication in the two cases, as well as the degree of egregious driving behavior immediately prior to collision; *Booth,*involving driving on the wrong side of a divided highway for .4 miles versus *Hack,*involving swerving into the wrong lane while rounding a curve.

In the case at bar, the plaintiff has alleged a blood alcohol level of 0.19%, nearly twice the prohibited statutory level. Additionally, the plaintiff has alleged driving behavior immediately prior to the collision, including driving 80 miles per hour while erratically, dangerously, and repeatedly changing lanes which, if proven, could support a conclusion of conscious disregard. Being compelled to assume the truth of the allegations for the purposes of demurrer, *Duggin*v. *Adams,*234 Va. 221, 223 (1987), the Court concludes that sufficient facts have been alleged to sustain a claim for punitive damages.
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 16

- 00009

- CV

WILLIAM R. AND SUSAN M. KNODERER, Appellant s V. STATE FARM LLOYDS, PENNI PERKINS , AND TOM ROBERTS, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 74,037

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R Court reporter Julie Vrooman recorded the trial proceedings in appellate cause number 06

- 16

- 00009

- CV, styled William R. and Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds , Penni Perkins , and
Tom Roberts , trial court cause number 74,037, on appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court of
Hun t County, Texas. The reporter’s record was originally due in this matter on February 1, 2016. That deadline was extended three times on Vrooman’s requests, resulting in the most recent due date of April 22, 201 6 . Vrooman has now filed a fourth request s eeking an additional fifteen

- day extension of the filing deadline. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(c). The Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, we find we must take steps to ensure that the r ecord in this case is filed in a reasonable amount of
time. Therefore, we overrule Vrooman’s fourth request for an extension of the filing deadline and order her to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06

- 16

- 00009

- CV, styled William R. and
Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds , Penni Perkins , and Tom Roberts , trial court cause number 74,037, on appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court of Hunt County, Texas, to be received by this Court no later than the close of business on Monday, May 9, 2016.3

If the reporter’s record is not received by May 9, we warn Vrooman that we may begin contempt proceedings and order h er to demonstrate why s he should not be held in contempt of this
Cour t for failing to obey its order

. IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT
Date: May 3, 2016
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 121 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services 

in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Mr. SKELTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Armed Services in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Armed Serv4 ices (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $18,014,287 for the One Hundred Eleventh 

9 Congress. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 121 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $8,324,646 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2009, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2010; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,689,641 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2010, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2011. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
! "!#$%&$#'!#(&)*(#"  +(#&"!##,"!# &	"-.#!$%/000000000000000000000000000

&+$!1$#!0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  2%!+$($ 3	 2 3	 34%$(!#5!%,$%%6"7 2%!+3$#-''8""8,,/000000000002%!+3(&.#!

4	292:;94 4%$(!#!%,$%%6".&*'((!7

&+$!1$#!*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

NTPDFC>SE@AC>EBUVW=XYZQ>=[DF\>  GHIJ]ILDM

UVW=X^_>?\>FC`YZQ>=[DF\>   GHIJ]IL[M

 *%*'&(00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000  

64&"*#4%$(!#!%,.&"*#.&*'((!7

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJaLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JadLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFUeDO=QDccGHIJaLTM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJdLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JadLfM

SEP>QW>?APD@AP>g?ETZC@SE@ABACD@AEF  GHIJ]aLDM

UeDOUZf_AccAEFGdhJR

  $%4&"*#$'i0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 

4&"*#&'($!"	!"#!(-.&"*#&%$#"*%($!"*%<'!"'!#(/

=>?@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJKLDM

=>?@ABACD@AEFU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>c   GH]JaHLDM

W>QAc@AF\LSEXO>FVF@>?>c@M   GHIJKLDM

NOO?EPDQ     GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQjDT>NPDAQDfQ>@Ek?DT>W>@>?_AFD@AEF GHIJRLDM

NOO?EPDQU>CZ?A@`bZ@Z?>cGH]JaHLfM

NOO?EPDQN_>FT_>F@c@E>FZ_>?D@>TD\?ACZQ@Z?DQO?ETZC@cGHIJHLDMlGHIJRLDM

mSEFnjD@>?ADQN\?ACZQ@Z?DQYZQ>=[DF\>oGHIJHLfMLRM

SE@ABACD@AEF     GHIJKLTM

  $%$'-(/ 4&"*#-(/< #"i000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

*%*'&(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pqrstuvwsxyqz{{|

}

~qrv|qrvsx



}

{~ss
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David E. Snyder, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 17, 2010



/s/ David E. SnyderDavid E. Snyder
Chief Financial Officer
#### Cheryl McNeil, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Appellants.

[877 NYS2d 351]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated February 5, 2008, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants satisfied their burden of establishing, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345*1019[2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiff relied upon various medical records, as well as the affirmed medical report of Dr. John Murphy, who treated the plaintiff after her accident. The plaintiffs hospital records and EMG testing report from December 22, 2003, were unsworn and therefore without any probative value *(see Sapienza v Ruggiero,*57 AD3d 643 [2008]; *Choi Ping Wong v Innocent,*54 AD3d 384 [2008]), and portions of Dr. Murphy’s affirmed medical report dated November 19, 2007, must similarly be disregarded because they recite unsworn findings of other doctors *(see Sorto v Morales,*55 AD3d 718 [2008]; *Malave v Basikov,*45 AD3d 539 [2007]; *Furrs*v *Griffith,*43 AD3d 389 [2007]; *see also Friedman v U-Haul Truck Rental,*216 AD2d 266, 267 [1995]). Nevertheless, Dr. Murphy found, on the basis of his physical examination of the plaintiff, that she had a decreased range of motion in her lumbar spine following the date of the accident and for four years thereafter. In response to the conclusory statement by the defendant’s orthopedic expert that the plaintiff “[had] significant problems preceding the alleged incident,” and the defendant’s radiologist’s determination that the plaintiff suffers from a chronic degenerative condition of the lumbar spine, Dr. Murphy opined, on the basis of his review of preaccident and post-accident imaging, that the plaintiffs injuries were caused or, at least, aggravated by the accident. Thus, Dr. Murphy’s conclusion that the plaintiff’s injuries constitute a permanent consequential limitation of use of her lumbar spine was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury under the significant limitation of use or the permanent consequential limitation of use category of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Altreche v Gilmar Masonry Corp.,*49 AD3d 479 [2008]; *Nigro v Kovac,*45 AD3d 547-548). Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Covello and Belen, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.10

                                 Lease Agreement

Party A: Shandong Shengwang Pharmaceutical Corporation

Party B: Qufu Natural Green Engineering Co., Ltd (Chinese Traditional Medicine)

This lease agreement is made by and between  Shandong  Shengwang  Pharmaceutical
Corporation  (hereinafter  referred  as to  "party  A") and Qufu  Natural  Green
Engineering Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred as to "party B").

1.   The building and assorted  installation  under this agreement is located at
     No. 6 Youpeng Road; 2. Terms:  from October 1st, 2002 to October 1st, 2012;
     3. Rent and Payments:  Annual rent is RMB 160,000;  Party B pays the annual
     rent at one time every year; Utilities at Party B's expense; 4. Party B can
     not release the building and assorted  installation under this agreement to
     third party without Party A's permission,  reconstruction will be conducted
     with Party A's permission; 5. Party B will take whole responsibility of any
     crime  and  violation  in the term  period;  6. This  agreement  will be in
     effective at the date of both  parties'  signature;  7. Party A and Party B
     will negotiate for new agreement at expiration of this agreement.


Party A:






Party B:






Date: October 1st, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Cause No. DA 22

- 0142

HILLCREST NATURAL AREA FOUNDATION, INC., JOEL E. GUTHALS, ANN M. GUTHALS, MARC VISCHER, ELLEN KNIGHT, ROSS WAPLES, and VIRGINIA WAPLES,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and CITY OF BILLINGS, Respondent and Respondent

Intervenor/Appellees.

GRANT OF UNOPPOSED EXTENSION OF TIME

On Appeal from the Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, Cause No. DV 19

- 0192, The Honorable Collette B. Davies, Presiding

Pursuant to authority granted under Rule 26, M.R.App.P., Appellants’

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time is granted and Appellants may file and

serve their opening brief in this matter on or before Friday, July 1, 2022.

DATED this

____ day of

___ , 2022

.

By:

__________________________ Clerk of Court

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court May 20 2022

05/20/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0142
_____________

No. 96-1596SI

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

James Edward Banks, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

Submitted: September 10, 1996

 Filed: September 19, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, HEANEY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Banks pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of

a firearm. On appeal, Banks contends the district court improperly denied

Banks's motion to suppress. A review of the record and the parties' briefs

show the ruling of the district court was correct. Because the appeal

involves the straightforward application of settled principles of law, an

extended discussion of the issues will serve no useful purpose. We thus

affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.1






SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teen Education
Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter  ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
L.  Wilson,  President of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that, to my
knowledge:




(1)  The Report fully  complies with
the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The  information  contained  in
the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial  condition and results of
operations of the Company.






Date: May 17, 2010








By: /s/ ROBERT L. WILSON


___________________________


Robert L. Wilson


President


(Principal Executive Officer),


and Director