alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE

#### L. Anne Piner v. Krisch Hotels, Inc., t/a Sheraton Airport Inn

April 30, 1992

Case No. CL89-65

By Judge Diane McQ. Strickland

[In this] petition to intervene, the Court has reviewed the authority submitted on behalf of the intervenor and the plaintiff and writes to issue its ruling.

The background facts are that L. Anne Piner was attending an employment-related meeting at the Sheraton Airport Inn owned by Krisch Hotels on February 3, 1987, when she was injured in a fall. Her employer, the U. S. Chamber of Commerce, voluntarily made workers’ compensation payments. Ms. Piner thereafter filed a claim for additional compensation benefits, which claim was denied based on the statute of limitations, Va. Code §65.1-87 (now § 65.2-601), which denial was affirmed by the Workers’ Compensation Commission. In the case before the Court, Ms. Piner has sought recovery for her injuries from a third party, and her employer has petitioned to intervene to assert a lien pursuant to Va. Code § 65.1-42 (now § 65.2-310) for the payments previously made.

Va. Code § 65.1-42 (now § 65.2-310) provides that:

> In any action by such employee .. . against any person other than the employer, the Court shall, on petition or motion of the employer at any time prior to verdict ascertain the amount of compensation paid and expenses for medical, sur*413gical and hospital attention and supplies . . . incurred by the employer under the provisions of this Act and . . . the Court shall in its order require that the judgment debtor pay such compensation and expenses of the employer, less said share of expenses and attorney’s fees, so ascertained by the Court out of the amount of the judgment, so far as sufficient, and the balance, if any, to the judgment creditor.

The voluntary payments made by Ms. Piner’s employer were made pursuant to the Act for lost wages and medical benefits following her work-related injury. In making these voluntary payments, the employer recognized that the plaintiff had “a lawful claim” against it for compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Act. The fact that the plaintiff’s “lawful claim” was thereafter barred by the statute of limitations does not adversely affect the employer’s right to assert its lien pursuant to § 65.1-41 (now § 65.2-310). To so rule would cause this Court to be in conflict with the position asserted by the Virginia Supreme Court in *Noblin*v. *Randolph Corp.,*180 Va. 345, 23 S.E.2d 209 (1942), that the employee is prohibited from receiving a double recovery from her injuries. It would also require this Court to disregard the mandatory language of Va. Code § 65.1-42 (now § 65.2-306).

Accordingly, this Court grants the U. S. Chamber of Commerce’s petition to intervene in this action to assert its lien pursuant to Va. Code § 65.1-42 (now § 65.2-306).
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Harold M. Stratton II, Chief Executive Officer of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION, certify that:





1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION;





2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





(a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August 27, 2004


/s/ Harold M. Stratton II


________________________________


Harold M. Stratton II,


Chief Executive Officer
No. 445.

#### Geiger, Administratrix, *v.*Merle et al.

October 28, 1935.

*Mr. Russell Whitman*for petitioner.

*Messrs. Charles S. Cutting, Charles LeRoy Brown, William P. Sidley,*and *Kenneth F. Burgess*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1112 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1112

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         March 2, 2010.
Whereas the Penn State IFC/Panhellenic Dance Marathon, known as THON, is the 
        largest student-run philanthropy in the world, with 700 dancers, more 
        than 300 supporting organizations, and more than 15,000 volunteers 
        involved in the annual event;
Whereas student volunteers at the Pennsylvania State University annually collect 
        money and dance for 46 hours straight at the Bryce Jordan Center for 
        THON, bringing energy and excitement to campus for a mission to conquer 
        cancer, and bringing awareness to countless thousands more;
Whereas all THON activities support the mission of the Four Diamonds Fund at 
        Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital, which provides financial and 
        emotional support to pediatric cancer patients and their families and 
        also funds cancer research;
Whereas each year, THON is the single largest donor to the Four Diamonds Fund at 
        Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital, having raised nearly $68.9 
        million since 1977, when the two organizations first became affiliated;
Whereas in 2010, THON set a new fundraising record of over $7.83 million, even 
        after the previous record of $7.5 million was set in 2009;
Whereas THON support has helped more than 2,000 families through the Four 
        Diamonds Fund, is currently helping to build a new Pediatric Cancer 
        Pavilion at Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital, and has helped 
        suppport pediatric cancer research that has caused some pediatric cancer 
        survival rates to increase to nearly 90 percent; and
Whereas THON has inspired similar events and organizations across the Nation, 
        ranging from high schools to colleges and beyond, and continues to 
        encourage students across the country to volunteer and stay involved in 
        great charitable causes in their community: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the Pennsylvania State University IFC/Panhellenic 
        Dance Marathon (THON) on its continued success in support of the Four 
        Diamonds Fund at Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital; and
            (2) commends the Pennsylvania State University students, volunteers 
        and supporting organizations for their hard work putting together 
        another recordbreaking THON.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 6 
<CIK> 0000744822
<NAME> Fidelity Investment Trust
<SERIES>
 <NUMBER> 111
 <NAME> Fidelity Diversified International Fund
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 year          
 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             oct-31-1997   
 
<PERIOD-END>                  oct-31-1997   
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>         1,347,780     
 
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>        1,502,914     
 
<RECEIVABLES>                 63,177        
 
<ASSETS-OTHER>                525           
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>          0             
 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,566,616     
 
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>      40,307        
 
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>       0             
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>     11,982        
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>           52,289        
 
<SENIOR-EQUITY>               0             
 
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>      1,286,021     
 
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>         91,363        
 
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>         46,290        
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>     14,788        
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>        0             
 
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>       58,357        
 
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>      0             
 
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>      155,161       
 
<NET-ASSETS>                  1,514,327     
 
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>             27,305        
 
<INTEREST-INCOME>             5,209         
 
<OTHER-INCOME>                (2,409)       
 
<EXPENSES-NET>                13,623        
 
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>       16,482        
 
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>      60,480        
 
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     84,863        
 
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         161,825       
 
<EQUALIZATION>                0             
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>     7,279         
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>      17,468        
 
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>         0             
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>       113,844       
 
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>   70,453        
 
<SHARES-REINVESTED>           1,682         
 
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        848,835       
 
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>       6,897         
 
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>     25,799        
 
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>       0             
 
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>    0             
 
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>         9,176         
 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0             
 
<GROSS-EXPENSE>               13,877        
 
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>          1,106,386     
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>         14.380        
 
<PER-SHARE-NII>               .240          
 
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>       2.460         
 
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>          .150          
 
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>     .360          
 
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>          0             
 
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>           16.570        
 
<EXPENSE-RATIO>               125           
 
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>        0             
 
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>          0
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Laura Patricia GINEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51360

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 14, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard Gale Ferguson, Waco, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Laura Patricia Ginez-Rodriguez on appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ginez-Rodriguez, who pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting the transportation of an illegal alien for commercial advantage or financial gain, received a copy of counsel’s motion and has not filed a response.

Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no issue of arguable merit for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14959]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Epidemiology and Disease Control Subcommittee 1, June 11, 2001, 9:00 AM 
to June 12, 2001, 4:00 PM, Bethesda Holiday Inn, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD, 20852 which was published in the Federal Register on May 
29, 2001, 66 FR 29160-29163.
    The meeting time has been changed to 8:30 AM to 6:00 PM. The 
meeting dates and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: June 6, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-14959 Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
H. Res. 1337 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 13, 2010. 

Whereas, beginning on May 2, 2010, the State of Tennessee 

was hit by unprecedented rainfall that resulted in the 

massive flooding of areas in and around Nashville; 

Whereas according to the National Weather Service of the 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the 

two-day rainfall totals of 13.53 inches more than doubles 

the previous record of 6.68 inches set in September, 

1979; 

Whereas the storms causing the rainfall claimed the lives of 

dozens of people across Tennessee, Kentucky, and Mississippi; 

Whereas the storms destroyed homes and displaced thousands of people across Tennessee; 

Whereas the flooding affected travel along hundreds of roads 

throughout Tennessee, including interstate highways 40 

and 24; 

Whereas the storms closed schools and universities across the 

region; 

Whereas Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen has worked with 

Federal, State, and local officials and agencies to coordinate rescue and recovery efforts; 
2 

•HRES 1337 EH 

Whereas, on May 3, 2010, Governor Bredesen declared a 

state of emergency for 52 counties, requesting Federal 

assistance for areas that were affected by the storms; 

Whereas, on May 4, 2010, President Obama declared that a 

major disaster exists in the State of Tennessee and directed the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 

work closely with Tennessee to monitor the response efforts relating to the storms and flooding and identify and 

respond to any immediate emergency needs for the citizens and communities of Tennessee that are impacted by 

the devastating floods; 

Whereas citizens and emergency responders of all stripes 

worked together to aid their neighbors after the storm; 

and 

Whereas volunteers are giving their time to help ensure that 

evacuees are sheltered, clothed, fed, and comforted 

through the trauma caused by the storm: Now, therefore, 

be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) offers its deepest sympathy and condolences to 

the families of those who lost their lives as the result of 

flooding beginning on May 2, 2010, in the States of 

Tennessee, Kentucky, and Mississippi; 

(2) expresses its condolences to the families who 

lost their homes and other property in the flooding 

throughout Tennessee, Kentucky, and Mississippi; 

(3) expresses gratitude and appreciation to the people of the State of Tennessee and the surrounding 
3 

•HRES 1337 EH 

States, who continue to work to protect people from the 

floodwaters and aid in the recovery efforts; 

(4) expresses its support as the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency continues its efforts to respond to 

any needs of the citizens and communities affected by 

the flooding and assists in the recovery efforts; and 

(5) honors the emergency responders across Tennessee for their bravery and sacrifice during this tragedy. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
Global Payment Technologies, Inc.


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-3  (No.  333-114529)  and the  Registration  Statements  on Form S-8 (No.
333-112934 and No. 333-30829) of Global Payment Technologies, Inc. of our report
dated January 11, 2007, with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements
and related  schedule of Global  Payment  Technologies,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries
included in this  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  September  30,
2006.




/s/ Eisner LLP
New York, New York
January 11, 2007



                                      115
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: A. E. ALBERT, AND A. E. ALBERT AND SONS, INC. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 64 

DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 1954 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

November 22, 1954 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CE-A DOCKET NO. 64 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging the following respondents with violation of the 

Commodity Exchange Act: 

A. E. Albert, and 

A. E. Albert and Sons, Inc. 

The complaint charges that the respondents on numerous occasions in 1953 and 

1954, when they held net long or short positions in potato futures on the New 

York Mercantile Exchange ranging from 25 to 174 carlots in a single future, 

failed or refused to make reports to the Commodity Exchange Authority in 

violation of section 4i of the Commodity Exchange Act and sections 6.10, 6.11, 

6.12, and 6.21 of the rules and regulations thereunder. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the office of the hearing clerk of the Solicitor of the Department of 

Agriculture and are a matter of public record. Pending disposition by the 

Judicial Officer, it is the policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to 

comment or elaborate on charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence 

on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, December 7, 1954, in Room 202, 44 Beaver 

Street, New York, New York. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: RALPH W. MOORE 

DOCKET NUMBER: 47 

DATE: JUNE 1, 1948 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

June 1, 1948 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CE-A DOCKET NO. 47 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing was signed by the Secretary of Agriculture 

on May 27, 1948, charging 

Ralph W. Moore of Washington, D. C. 

with violation of the Commodity Exchange Act. 

Complaints are issued under the Commodity Exchange Act for the purpose of 

notifying respondents that the Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe 

that respondents have violated the Act and to advise them of the time and place 

of hearings to be held to determine whether the charges are correct. The 

issuance of a complaint does not, of course, constitute proof of violation of 

the law. Such violation is established only when the Judicial Officer of the 

Department has made a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. 

Complaints are filed in the office of the hearing clerk of the Solicitor of 

the Department of Agriculture and are thereupon a matter of public record. 

Copies are filed in the Washington office and the field offices of the Commodity 

Exchange Authority. 

In cases where the Judicial Officer determines that a violation has occurred 

the resulting order will be served upon all contract markets and circularized 

among all registered futures commission merchants for their information and 

guidance. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer it is the policy of the 

Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate upon the charges 

contained in complaints or discuss the evidence upon which they are based. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2