alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 1126 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 3, 2010. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

4247) to prevent and reduce the use of physical restraint and 

seclusion in schools, and for other purposes. All points of 

order against consideration of the bill are waived except those 

arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment 

in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee 

on Education and Labor now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against provisions of the bill, as 

amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by 

the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Education and Labor; (2) the amendment printed in part A 

of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

resolution, if offered by Representative George Miller of Cali-
2 

•HRES 1126 EH 

fornia or his designee, which shall be considered as read, 

shall be separately debatable for 10 minutes equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall 

not be subject to a demand for division of the question; (3) 

the amendment printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules, if offered by Representative Flake of Arizona or his designee, which shall be considered as read, shall 

be separately debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and 

controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question; and (4) 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. All points of order against amendments printed 

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

resolution are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 

10 of rule XXI. 

SEC. 3. During consideration of an amendment printed 

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

resolution, the Chair may postpone the question of adoption 

as though under clause 8 of rule XX. 

SEC. 4. It shall be in order at any time through the legislative day of March 4, 2010, for the Speaker to entertain 

motions that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker or 

her designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or his 

designee on the designation of any matter for consideration 

pursuant to this section. 
3 

•HRES 1126 EH 

SEC. 5. The requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for 

a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on 

Rules on the same day it is presented to the House is waived 

with respect to any resolution reported through the legislative 

day of March 4, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1300

Crude Oil Basis Swap - Argus LLS (1st month) - Argus Media

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the mathematical result of *Floating Price A* minus 

*Floating Price B* 

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the Argus Media

Argus LLS (1st month) price for each business day that it is determined during the contract 

month.

FLOATING PRICE B

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the NYMEX WTI 

Crude Oil futures first nearby contract settlement price for each business day that it is 

determined during the contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in U.S. barrels. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity 

multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per barrel. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.01 per barrel. The minimum price increment will be $0.001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         139,743
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  491,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    439,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,151,587
<PP&E>                                       9,582,688
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,271,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,186,159
<BONDS>                                      2,952,803
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,971,764
<OTHER-SE>                                   (770,022)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,271,356
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,720,350
<CGS>                                        4,446,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,138,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              84,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                496,832
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            480,352
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   480,352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1



|                                                                       |                           |  |  |                                            
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|LOGO TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580
1100 LOUISIANA SUITE 4600 |                           |  |  | FAX (713) 651-0849
TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191
|                                                                       | HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5294 | 

April 23, 2015

Mtro. Emilio R. Lozoya Austin

Director General

Petróleos Mexicanos

Av. Marina Nacional No. 329

Col. Petróleos Mexicanos

Torre Ejecutiva Piso 44

11311 México D.F., México

Dear Mtro. Lozoya
Austin,

We hereby consent to the references to Ryder Scott Company, L.P. as set forth under the heading Exploration and Production
(Reserves) in the annual report on Form 20-F of Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex) for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 20-F) and to the filing as an exhibit to the Form 20-F our report, dated
March 6, 2015, describing our review of the estimates of Pemexs proved oil, condensate, natural gas and oil equivalent reserves as of December 31, 2014, for 314 fields located onshore in and offshore from Mexico in the Northern
Region. These estimates were prepared in accordance with the applicable reserves definitions of Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



LOGORYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580




|                                 |  |                             |  |                    |  |                   
|-------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------
|SUITE 600, 1015 4TH STREET, S.W. |  | CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4    |  | TEL (403) 262-2799 |  | FAX (403) 262-2790
|621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550      |  | DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501 |  | TEL (303) 623-9147 |  | FAX (303) 623-4258
I3S/-/6

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 09-15-00286-CR

STYLE: Brian Vanorman v. The State of Texas

TRIAL COURT:

TRIAL COURTS:

TRIAL COURTJUDGE: Judge Lisa Benge Michalk

DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED

221st District Court

15-03-02762 CR

OFFENSE:

PUNISHMENT:

COUNTY:

Miscellaneous/Other Criminal

including Misdemeanor or

Felony

Montgomery

Appellant's MOTION

FOR REHEARING IS: DENIED

DATE: 11-02-16

JUDGE: PER CURIAM

DATE: 09-21-16

JUSTICE: LeanneJohnson

PUBLISH: ~NO

PC NO S YES

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APPBR:

DNP: YES

08-21-16

08-12-15

05-04-16

02-03-16; 06-21-16

SUPPCLKRECORD:

SUPPRPTRECORD:

SUPP BR:

PROSE BR:

I3S/-/6

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

APPELLANTS Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: _

JUDGE:

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

CCA#

Disposition:

PD-1:$81-16

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOF\ STAY 0 F MANDATE IS:

ON

JUDGE:
Supplement to
Order filed August 8, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00409

- CV

____________ CASSIE LANDRUM, INDI VIDUALLY, AND AS PER SONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E ESTATE OF JEFFREY LANDRUM , Appellants

V.

GENERAL SHELTERS OF TEXAS, LTD., ROBERT C. HANC OCK, INDIVIDUALLY, DAWN H ANCOCK, INDIVIDUALLY , AND ROBERT C. HANCOCK AN D DAWN HANCOCK D/B/A THREE

ACES MINI STORAGE, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 344th District Court Chambers County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 18DCV0253



### O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 22, 2019, which became final on order of severance signed February 11, 2019. Appellant timely filed a post

judgment mot i on

. The notice of appeal wa s due May 13, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P.2

26.1. Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on May 15, 2019, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrume nt is filed within 15 days of its due
date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward wi th a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to
fi le the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT
32.1













CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bryan
K. Bedford, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:






(i) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of,
and for the period covered by, the Report.











By:
            /s/ Bryan
      K. BedfordPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the BoardMarch
      16, 2009










A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Global Payment Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-30829) of Global Payment Technologies, Inc. of our report
dated January 10, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Global
Payment Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2002 and the
related consolidated statement of operations, shareholders' equity and
comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows and related schedule for the year
ended September 30, 2002, which report appears in the September 30, 2002 annual
report on Form 10-K of Global Payment Technologies, Inc.

Our report dated January 10, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company's consolidated financial statements have been restated for the
reclassification of certain balance sheet items.


                                                          KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
January 14, 2003
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00113-CR

BYRON DOUGLAS BRIGHAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 31265

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as 

that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security 

number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record includes a social security number. Rule 9.10(b) 

states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the 

contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the 

clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in 

accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: November 6, 2018
Exhibit (m)(31)

DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICE PLAN

FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST: FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14197]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 184-065 California]


El Dorado Irrigation District; Notice of Public Meeting

May 31, 2001.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is reviewing 
the application for a new license for the El Dorado Project (FERC No. 
184), which was filed on February 22, 2000. The El Dorado Project, 
Licensed to the El Dorado Irrigation District (EID), is located on the 
South Fork American River, in El Dorado, Alpine, and Amador counties, 
California. The project occupies lands of the Eldorado National Forest.
    The EID has requested that the commission provide facilitation 
services to assist the parties in arriving at a settlement of all 
issues relevant to this proceeding. Commission staff held a meeting on 
April 3, 2001. The purpose of this second meeting is to continue to 
discuss alternatives for processing the application for relicensing of 
the El Dorado Project, including whether a consensus exists among the 
parties for pursuing settlement options. We invite the participation of 
all interested governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, 
and the general public in this meeting.
    The meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, from 9 a.m. 
until 4 p.m. in the Cal EPA Building (Room 1610-16th floor) located at 
1001 ``I'' Street (10th and I), Sacramento, California.
    For further information, please contact Elizabeth Molloy at (202) 
208-0771 or John Mudre at (202) 219-1208.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14197 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order entered November 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00495-CR

MELQUIADES HERNANDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-55932-H

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On October 24, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record had not been filed. On November 10, 2014, we received the reporter’s record. 

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the October 24, 2014 order 

requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Markus R. Ernst, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 , that:



| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GBS Enterprises Incorporated for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GBS Enterprises Incorporated.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: November 19, 2012 | /s/Markus R. Ernst                          
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                        | Markus R. Ernst                             
|                        | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                        | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP01-442-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

June 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 31, 2001, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets proposed to become effective 
June 1, 2001:

Forty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 8
Forty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 9
Forty-sixth Revised Sheet No. 13
Fifty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 18

    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
to implement recovery of approximately $3.0 million of above-market 
costs that are associated with its obligations to Dakota Gasification 
Company (Dakota). ANR proposes a reservation surcharged applicable to 
its Part 284 firm transportation customers to collect ninety percent 
(90%) of the Dakota costs, and an adjustment to the maximum base tariff 
rates of Rate Schedule ITS and overrun rates applicable to Rate 
Schedule FTS-2, so as to recover the remaining ten percent (10%). ANR 
advises that this filing also includes the annual restatement of the 
Eligible MDQ used to design the reservation surcharge. ANR also advises 
that the proposed changes would decrease current quarterly Above-Market 
Dakota Cost recoveries from $4,003,607 to $2,995,512.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14688 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Alton Edwin HILTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tracy JOHNS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-6346.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 26, 2010.

Alton Edwin Hilton, Appellant Pro Se.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alton Edwin Hilton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying *803relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Hilton v. Johns,*No. 5:09-hc-02029-D (E.D.N.C. March 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*