alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 52,589
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       2,271,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                           70,930
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    3,130,725
<PP&E>                                              9,788,602
<DEPRECIATION>                                      3,021,916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     11,564,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               6,848,282
<BONDS>                                             5,475,785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         3,200,000
<COMMON>                                              133,482
<OTHER-SE>                                         (1,338,324)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       11,564,139
<SALES>                                            18,051,731
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   18,051,731
<CGS>                                              14,334,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       3,886,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      394,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (960,531)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (735,061)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (735,061)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        (94,469)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (829,530)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.07)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Laurence Stephenson, the President, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of Impala Mineral Exploration Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Impala Mineral Exploration Corp., for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Impala Mineral Exploration Corp.



| | /s/ Laurence StephensonLaurence StephensonPresident, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and a director 
Date:  May 22, 2009
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Impala Mineral Exploration Corp. and will be retained by Impala Mineral Exploration Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1083

Natural Gas Fixed Swap - Malin - Natural Gas Intelligence

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by Natural Gas 

Intelligence for the location specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month will be equal to the Natural Gas Intelligence Malin

published price for the corresponding contract month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be MMBtus (million British thermal units). Each contract shall be valued 

as the contract quantity in MMBtus multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per MMBtu. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per MMBtu. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day prior to the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
#### Douglas S. McGlohon, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DALLAS, Chief of the Dallas Police Department, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-2139.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 2006.

Decided: Dec. 18, 2006.

Douglas S. McGlohon, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Douglas S. McGlohon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the ap*237peal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (I960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 6, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed on October 10, 2006. Because McGlohon failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RANDY EUGENE VANDERPOOL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 749 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of EmoCapital Corp. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 31st,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Juanming Fang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Juanming Fang                                   

Juanming Fang, 

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: December 15th, 2008
No. 128.

#### Linderholm *v.*Kansas.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Justus B. Linderholm, pro se.*No appearance for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas and motion for leave to proceed further *in forma pauperis*denied.
#### Robert Nuzzi et al., Appellants, v Michael P. Gallagher et al., Respondents.

[874 NYS2d 248]—

In an action, inter alia, for the return of a down payment given pursuant to a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated February 25, 2008, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs (hereinafter the purchasers) entered into a contract with the defendants Michael P Gallagher and Valerie Gallagher (hereinafter the sellers) to purchase the sellers’ home and made a down payment in the sum of $ $44,250 (hereinafter the deposit). The contract of sale contained a mortgage contingency clause that authorized the purchasers to cancel the contract and obtain a return of their deposit if they were unable to obtain a mortgage commitment within 45 days of the date the fully-executed contract was given to them (hereinafter the commitment date). To cancel the contract pursuant to this provision, the purchasers were required to give the sellers notice within five business days after the commitment date. The purchasers were unable to obtain a mortgage commitment within the mortgage contingency period or before the scheduled closing date under the contract. Moreover, during the mortgage contingency period, the purchasers neither sought an extension thereof nor availed themselves of their right to cancel the contract. Although the purchasers received a letter from the lender declining their application for financing, it was only after the sellers scheduled a new closing date making time of the essence that the purchasers sought to cancel the contract and demanded a return of their deposit. The sellers refused to refund the deposit and this action ensued.

Upon the defendants’ prima facie showing of entitlement to *654judgment as a matter of law, the purchasers failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Contrary to the purchasers’ contentions, their counsel’s unsubstantiated and vague assertion that, during a telephone conference prior to the expiration of the mortgage contingency period, an unnamed attorney granted the purchasers an indefinite adjournment, particularly in light of the documentary evidence to the contrary, was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to any extension of the mortgage contingency period or waiver of the sellers’ remedies under the contract *(see Mosdos Oraysa, Inc. v Sausto,*13 AD3d 838 [2004]; *Arnold v Birnbaum,*193 AD2d 710, 711 [1993]; *Zahl v Greenfield,*162 AD2d 449 [1990]; *Cortesi v R & D Constr. Corp.,.*137 AD2d 901 [1988], *affd*73 NY2d 836 [1988]).

The purchasers’ remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Balkin and Eng, JJ., concur. *[See*2008 NY Slip Op 30517(11).]
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

January 22, 2016

Ron Steinfeld

Chief Compliance Officer
MarketAxess SEF Corporation
299 Park Avenue, 10" Floor
New York, NY 10171

Re: Application of MarketAxess SEF Corporation for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Mr. Steinfeld:

By submissions dated July 12, 2013 through January 19, 2016, MarketAxess SEF
Corporation (“MarketAxess”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(“Commission”), pursuant to Section 5h of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. §
7b-3, and Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap
execution facility (“SEF”).

The Commission has reviewed MarketAxess’s application and has determined to grant
MarketAxess registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the
accompanying Order of Registration.

Sincerely,

ib-| Pbk

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40092

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

WILLIAM LARRY MILLER, JR.

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:99-CR-16-ALL

--------------------

December 1, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent William

Larry Miller, Jr. has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Miller has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has

not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See id.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Exhibit 10.7

Options Media Group Holdings, Inc.

123 NW 13th Street, Suite 300

Boca Raton, FL 33432



September 25, 2009





Whalehaven Capital Fund Limited

560 Sylvan Avenue

Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632



Re:

Note Amendment



Dear Sir/Madam:



This letter agreement (the Agreement) amends that certain Note dated April 24, 2009 (the Note) between Options Media Group Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), and Whalehaven Capital Fund Limited (the Holder).  In consideration for the Holder (i) extending the maturity date of the Note from August 31, 2009 to December 31, 2009, (ii) waiving its right to the extension fee under the Note in connection with the extension provided by this Agreement, and (iii) waiving its right to charge interest at the default interest rate for any period that the Note was in default prior to the date of this Agreement, the Company shall issue the Holder 50,000 shares of common stock of the Company (the Extension Consideration).



Upon return of your old Note, the Company will deliver you a new Note with the new maturity date, along with a stock certificate representing the Extension Consideration.  All other terms and conditions of the Note remain the same.



If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign in the place indicated below and return an executed copy to us.



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | Very truly yours,      
| |  |                        
| |  |                        
| |  | Scott Frohman          
| |  | Chief Executive Officer



AGREED AND ACCEPTED:



Whalehaven Capital Fund Limited





By:__________________________

__________________, Partner
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1313 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1313

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 2, 2010.
Whereas, in May 1985, the National Child Advocacy Center opened its doors in 
        Huntsville, Alabama;
Whereas there are now more than 900 Child Advocacy Centers in the United States, 
        all based off of the first one in Huntsville, Alabama;
Whereas, in 2009, child advocacy centers served more than 260,000 children;
Whereas services are offered to children who are physically and sexually abused 
        entirely for free to the family;
Whereas child advocacy centers work to streamline the investigation process so 
        that the child may be helped most effectively;
Whereas this is done through a multidisciplinary team managing alleged cases of 
        abuse from the initial investigation all the way through prosecution;
Whereas, during this time, child advocacy centers offer medical, therapeutic, 
        and other support services to victim's and victim's families;
Whereas 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 7 boys will be sexually abused before the age of 
        18;
Whereas child advocacy centers also reach out to the community and sponsor 
        programs that help bring awareness to this problem;
Whereas education and support for communities has proven to be successful in 
        preventing abuse from occurring;
Whereas the United States Department of Health and Human Services sponsored the 
        Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect Report to 
        Congress which found that from 1993 to 2006 there was a 44 percent 
        decrease in the rate of sexual abuse; and
Whereas May would be an appropriate month to designate as ``Child Advocacy 
        Center Month'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Child Advocacy Center Month''; and
            (2) commends the National Child Advocacy Center in Huntsville, 
        Alabama, on their 25th anniversary.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Amendment to Employment Agreement


    
      
         

         

        AMENDMENT
          TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         

         

        AMENDMENT
          (the “Amendment”) dated October 19, 2005 to the Employment Agreement dated as of
          March 28, 2005 (the “Harris Employment Agreement”) by and between Callisto
          Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Pamela
          Harris, an individual (the “Executive”).

        


        WHEREAS,
          the parties desire to amend the Harris Employment Agreement to increase
          the
          amount of compensation to be paid upon termination;

        


        NOW
          THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing facts and mutual agreements
          set
          forth below, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as
          follows:

        


        1.        
          Amendment
          to Harris Employment Agreement. 
          The Harris Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

        


        1.1        
          Section
          4.3 is hereby amended by changing thirty (30) days to ninety (90) days
          in the
          third sentence of Section 4.3. 

        


        2.        
          Ratification. 
          The Harris Employment Agreement is ratified and confirmed and shall continue
          in
          full force and effect as amended hereby. 

        


        3.        
          Headings
          and Captions. 
          The
          headings and captions of the various subdivisions of this Amendment are
          for
          convenience of reference only and shall in no way modify or affect the
          meaning
          or construction of any of the terms or provisions hereof.

        


        4.        
          Counterparts. 
          This
          Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, and by different
          parties
          hereto on separate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,
          but
          all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This
          Agreement may be executed by facsimile with original signatures to
          follow.

        


        
          
             

          

          
             

            
              

            

          

          
             

          

        

         

        IN
          WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment or caused
          this
          Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of
          the date
          first above written. 

         

      

      
        	 	 	 
	 	
                CALLISTO
                  PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

              
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	/s/
                Gary S. Jacob
	 	
                

              
	 	
                Gary
                  S. Jacob

                Chief
                  Executive Officer

              
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Pamela Harris
	 	
                

              
	 	Pamela Harris, M.D.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the
Registrant) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David E. Snyder, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2010



/s/ David E. SnyderDavid E. Snyder
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31-2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is
being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: September 24, 2010
    
    By:
    
    /s/ William McDonald

William McDonald,CFO