alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 195 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1254 

[Report No. 111–480] 

Directing the Secretary of the Interior to transmit to the House of Representatives certain information relating to the Secretary’s Treasured Landscape Initiative, potential designation of National Monuments, and High 

Priority Land-Rationalization Efforts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2010 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of Utah) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources 

MAY 11, 2010 

Additional sponsors: Mr. HERGER, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. 

CHAFFETZ, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. WALDEN, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. REHBERG, 

Mr. FLAKE, Mr. HELLER, and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska 

MAY 11, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of the Interior to transmit to the 

House of Representatives certain information relating to 

the Secretary’s Treasured Landscape Initiative, potential 

designation of National Monuments, and High Priority 

Land-Rationalization Efforts. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1254 RH 

1 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Interior is di2 rected to transmit to the House of Representatives, not 

3 later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this 

4 resolution, copies of all Department of the Interior docu5 ments, maps, records (including electronic records), com6 munications and other information dating from July 1, 

7 2009, and later referring to or relating to— 

8 (1) the document containing ‘‘Attachment 4 

9 Prospective Conservation Designation: National 

10 Monument Designations under the Antiquities Act’’ 

11 and marked ‘‘Internal Draft—NOT FOR RE12 LEASE’’, including that document in full, all at13 tachments in full, and all iterations of that docu14 ment, and related similar documents; and 

15 (2) the Secretary’s Treasured Landscape Initia16 tive, potential designation of National Monuments, 

17 and High Priority Land-Rationalization Efforts, in18 cluding any list of participants in, attendees at, or 

19 invitees to meetings thereon, and any related memo20 randa, notes, and other work products. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 195 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1254 

[Report No. 111–480] 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of the Interior to transmit 

tion Efforts. Monuments, and High Priority Land-Rationalizascape Initiative, potential designation of National tion relating to the Secretary’s Treasured Landto the House of Representatives certain informaMAY 11, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit (d)(157)

**FORM OF**

**AMENDMENT TO**

**SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENT**

**between**

**FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS**

**and**

**FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY**

**and**

**FIDELITY INVESTMENT TRUST ON BEHALF OF FIDELITY CANADA FUND**

	This Amendment made as of this __ day of ______, 200_, amends the Sub-Advisory Agreement (the"Agreement"), dated March 1, 2001, by and between Fidelity Management & Research Company, a Massachusettscorporation with principal offices at 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts (hereinafter called the "Advisor");Fidelity International Investment Advisors, a Bermuda company with principal offices at Pembroke Hall, Pembroke,Bermuda (hereinafter called the "Sub-Advisor"); and Fidelity Investment Trust, a Massachusetts business trust, onbehalf of Fidelity Canada Fund (hereinafter called the "Portfolio").

	WHEREAS the Advisor and Sub-Advisor (the "Parties") wish to clarify their relationship by amending theAgreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment;

	NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

	1.  Paragraph 7 of the Agreement is hereby supplemented as follows:

	Nothing in this Agreement will constitute a partnership between the Advisor, the Sub-Advisor and the Trust.Nothing in this Agreement makes the Sub-Advisor an agent of the Advisor or the Trust and the Sub-Adviserhas no authority whatsoever to exercise discretionary powers over the global portfolios and investmentfunds, except as provided pursuant to paragraph 1(b) herein, of the Advisor and the Trust, or otherwise tobind the Advisor's and the Trust's assets under management.

	The Sub-Advisor shall furnish services as an independent contractor and not as an employee or agent of either the Advisor or the Trust.  The Sub-Advisor has no power or authority to act for, represent, or bind theAdvisor or the Trust or any company affiliated with either of them.

	2.****In all other respects, the Agreement is hereby confirmed and remains in full force and effect.

	This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth ofMassachusetts, without giving effect to the choice of laws provisions thereof.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be signed in their behalf by theirrespective officers thereunto duly authorized, and their respective seals to be hereunto affixed, all as of the datewritten above.

[SIGNATURE LINES OMITTED]
Exhibit
31.2




Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.




I,
Wallace Boyack, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q with financial statements for the period
ended September 30, 2008, of NORTH HORIZON, INC.




2. Based
on my knowledge, this Form does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstance under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period and disclosures covered by this Form.




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in the Form 10-Q, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this Form.




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which the Form 10-Q is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the Form 10-Q
(the “Evaluation Date”); and




c)
presented in the Form 10-Q the conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;




d)
presented in this Form 10-Q our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;






5. The
registrant’s certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s
board of directors (or other persons performing equivalent
functions):




a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and




6. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in the Form 10-Q
whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal control subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date: October
      9, 2008/s/Wallace
      BoyackWallace
      BoyackChief
      Financial Officer
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc. gov

August 23, 2016

Thomas G. Thompson

Chief Compliance Officer

Seed SEF LLC

660 West Lake Street, Suite 300
Chicago, Illinois 60661

Re: Application of Seed SEF LLC for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Mr. Thompson:

By submissions dated January 19, 2016 through August 22, 2016, Seed SEF LLC
(“Seed”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”), pursuant
to Section 5h of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and Commission Regulation
37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap execution facility (“SEF”).

The Commission has reviewed Seed’s application and has determined to grant Seed
registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying Order of
Registration.

Sincerely,

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

FRANCISCO JUNIOR RUIZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-2250

March 1, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Sarasota County, Thomas W. Krug, Judge.

Francisco Ruiz, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the periodic report of China Jo-Jo Drugstores, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lei Liu, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date: February 14, 2011
/s/ Lei LiuLei LiuChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit C

A narrative that sets forth the fitness standards for the Board of Directors and its 

composition including the number and percentage of public directors.

Fitness Standards of the Board of Managers: The Limited Liability Company 

Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”, attached as Exhibit G to this Application) of ICE 

Swap Trade, LLC (the “Company”) and the Company’s Rulebook, which governs the operation 

of the Company’s swap execution facility, sets forth a transparent governance structure that 

includes the Board of Managers. 

The Board of Managers shall (i) be the governing body of the Company (see Operating 

Agreement at Exhibit G to this Application); (ii) designate and authorize specific appointed 

officers to act on behalf of the Board of Managers (see Operating Agreement at Exhibit G to this 

Application); (iii) make and amend the rules of the Company (see Rule 1111); and (iv) have the 

power to act in emergencies (see Rule 208).

Each Manger (as defined below) must be of good repute and possess the requisite skills 

and expertise to fulfill their responsibilities in the management and governance of the Company. 

Each Manager is required to comply with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics 

for Managers. Each Manager is required to submit a certification to the Company that he/she is 

not subject to a statutory disqualification as described in Section 8a(2) of the Act and does not

have a history of disciplinary offenses as defined in CFTC Regulation 1.63(a)(6).

Size and Composition of the Board of Managers: As provided by the Company’s 

Operating Agreement, the management of the Company shall be vested in a Board of Managers 

(the “Board of Managers”) elected by Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc., the sole 

member (the “Member”), of the Company. The initial number of members on the Board of 

Managers (each, a “Manager” and collectively, the “Managers”) shall be six (6) unless 

otherwise fixed at a different number by an amendment to the Operating Agreement or a 

resolution signed by the Member. The Board of Managers shall at all times have at least (i) 35% 

public directors, or (ii) two (2) public directors, whichever results in a higher number of public 

directors. For the purposes of this Exhibit C and as described in the Operating Agreement, a 

“public director” shall mean a Manager that has been found on the record by the Board of 

Managers, to have no material relationship with the Company.

The Company currently has six Managers, three of which satisfy the “public director” criteria, 

and each such Manager is identified on Exhibit B to this Application.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 16

- 3727

_____________________________
T AVARES R UMPH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. January 11, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , O STERHAUS , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Nathan Robert Prince of the Law Office of Nathan Prince, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the Company) on the Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  MICROCHANNEL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONDate:  July 11, 2008By:/s/ Harmel S. RayatHarmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00181-CR

HARRY C. WASHINGTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1501212R)

May 23, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in two of the trial court’s three judgments but that there was no reversible 

error in the remaining judgment. We modify the trial court’s judgments regarding 

counts one and two in cause number 1501212R to reflect that the sentences are to run 

concurrently to each other and we affirm these judgments as modified. We affirm the 

trial court’s judgment regarding count five in cause number 1501212R.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
Exhibit (g)(24)

FORM OF
Exhibit (d)(211)

FORM OF
```

[Federal Register: September 19, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 181)]
[Notices]
[Page 54801]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19se06-25]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date:  11 a.m., Friday, October 6, 2006.

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status:  Closed.

Matters To Be Considered:  Surveillance matters.

For Further Information Contact:  Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-7822 Filed 9-15-06; 3:33 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### William C. WILSON, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Heiskell H. WINSTEAD, Defendant.

No. CIV-2-79-43.

United States District Court, E. D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division.

April 25, 1979.

*219Carleton W. Smith, Greeneville, Tenn., for plaintiff..

Charles R. Terry, Morristown, Tenn. and N. R. Coleman, Jr., Milligan, Coleman, Fletcher, Gaby & Kilday, Greeneville, Tenn., for defendant.

*MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER*

NEESE, District Judge.

The default of the defendant herein was entered on April 6,1979. Rule 55(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On the same day, the plaintiff moved for a default judgment. Rule 55(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On April 9, 1979 the defendant made a motion that such default be set aside and vacated and submitted a proposed answer. Rule 55(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The purport of the defendant’s motion under Rule 55(c), *supra,*is that it is contrary to the “ * * * local custom and practice * * * ” for an attorney to move for the entry of a default without prior notice to adversary counsel. Whatever may be the localized custom and practice in that regard, such is not sanctioned by the rationale of Rule 55(a), *supra.*

The possibility of being held in default acts as a deterrent to those parties resorting to delay as an element of their litigation strategy. *H. F. Livermore Corp. v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder L.,*C.A.D.C. (1970), 139 U.S.App.D.C. 256, 258, 432 F.2d 689, 691. Indeed, the plaintiff who fails to move seasonably for entry of a default is in peril of being confronted with a dismissal of his complaint for his failure to prosecute, *see*Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If it is the practice to give more personalized notice of an intention to seek entry of a default, then counsel should adhere to the local custom and practice.

It is only for good cause that the entry of a default may be set aside. Rule 55(c), *supra.*Defaults are looked upon by this Court with disfavor. *Carol B. Sorrell,*plaintiff, v. *United Inter-Mountain Telephone Company,*defendant, no. CIV—2-74—3, memorandum opinion and order therein of July 18, 1974. Defaults are disfavored especially in certain types of actions, such as, for example, those implicating a public issue. 10 Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure 251: Civil, § 2681. In the matter *sub judice,*public employment by an elected public official is involved.

Although counsel who practice in this Court are cautioned against deeming any localized custom or practice to constitute “good cause” for the setting-aside of an entry of default in this Court, paramount is the consideration that this Court exists to do justice and is reluctant to proceed toward any judgment without a trial of the disputed issues. Possessing discretion to that end, *Federated Mut. Implement & Hardware Ins. Co. v. Prather,*D.C.Tenn. (1971), 343 F.Supp. 819, 822[2], affirmed C.A. 6th (1972) (no. 72-1040), the Court exercises that discretion so as to SET *220ASIDE and VACATE the entry of default of April 6, 1979 herein. Rule 55(c), *supra.*The clerk will file the defendant’s answer; the plaintiff’s motion for a judgment by default is thus rendered MOOT.
| **------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 01--002 | **Request of the               Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) for Approval of its** |
|---------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | **Benzene Futures               Contract** |
|--|---------------------------------------------|

| FR CITE: | 66 FR 11006               (February 21 , 2001) |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------|

| CLOSES: | 3/23/01 |
|---------|---------|

| EXTENDED: | LINK TO FILE: | http://ww |
|-----------|---------------|-----------|

|  | **------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 01--001 | **Request of the               Cantor Exchange (CX) for Approval of its US Treasury** |
|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | **Ten-Year Note               Futures Contract** |
|--|---------------------------------------------------|

| FR CITE: | 66 FR 10273               (February 14 , 2001) |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------|

| CLOSES: | 3/16/01 |
|---------|---------|

| EXTENDED: | LINK TO FILE: | http://ww |
|-----------|---------------|-----------|

|  | **------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

First
Previous
Next
Last