alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS

I, William Tay, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of China Quest
Acquisition Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer
and have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;

   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: July 15, 2008

China Quest Acquisition Corp.


/s/ William Tay
-------------------------------
William Tay, President and CEO
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
No. 435.

#### Ex parte Ilse.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Henry A. Ilse, pro se.*

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and motion for leave to proceed further *in forma pauperis*denied.
Wdesk | Exhibit






MDU Resources Group, Inc. Section 16 Officers and Directors 
with Indemnification Agreements Chart 


Section 16 Officers 


	
			
	Name
	Title
	Date of Agreement

	David L. Goodin
	President and Chief Executive Officer, MDU Resources Group, Inc.
	August 12, 2010,
as amended May 15, 2014 

	Cynthia J. Norland
	Vice President - Administration, MDU Resources Group, Inc.
	August 12, 2010,
as amended May 15, 2014  

	Doran N. Schwartz
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, MDU Resources Group, Inc.
	August 12, 2010,
as amended May 15, 2014  

	Nicole A. Kivisto
	President and Chief Executive Officer, Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., Great Plains Natural Gas Co., Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, and Intermountain Gas Company
	August 12, 2010,
as amended May 15, 2014  

	David C. Barney
	President and Chief Executive Officer, Knife River Corporation
	May 16, 2013,
as amended May 15, 2014

	Jeffrey S. Thiede
	President and Chief Executive Officer, MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.
	May 16, 2013,
as amended May 15, 2014

	Dennis L. Haider
	Executive Vice President – Business Development, MDU Resources Group, Inc.
	June 1, 2013,
as amended May 15, 2014

	Nathan W. Ring
	Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, MDU Resources Group, Inc. through March 18, 2016
	January 3, 2014,
as amended May 15, 2014

	Jason L. Vollmer
	Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer, MDU Resources Group, Inc., effective March 19, 2016
	November 29, 2014



	Patrick L. O’Bryan
	President and Chief Executive Officer, Fidelity Exploration & Production Company through February 29, 2016
	March 1, 2015



	Martin A. Fritz
	President and Chief Executive Officer, WBI Holdings, Inc.
	July 20, 2015

	Anne M. Jones
	Vice President - Human Resources, MDU Resources Group, Inc.
	January 1, 2016

	Daniel S. Kuntz
	General Counsel and Secretary, MDU Resources Group, Inc.
	January 9, 2016

















Directors 


	
			
	Name
	Title
	Date of Agreement

	Harry J. Pearce
	Chairman of the Board of Directors
	August 12, 2010

	David L. Goodin
	Director
	August 12, 2010

	Thomas Everist
	Director
	August 12, 2010

	Karen B. Fagg
	Director
	August 12, 2010

	Mark A. Hellerstein
	Director
	August 1, 2013

	A. Bart Holaday
	Director
	August 12, 2010

	Dennis W. Johnson
	Director
	August 12, 2010

	William E. McCracken
	Director
	August 1, 2013

	Patricia L. Moss
	Director
	August 12, 2010

	John K. Wilson
	Director
	August 12, 2010
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 14, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Meetesh Patel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  July 14, 2009
/s/ Meetesh PatelMeetesh PatelPresident and Chief Executive Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00018

- CV

THOMAS S. RHEMAN

v. DEBORAH RHEMAN
On Appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2019

- DCL

- 02867

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this ca use on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 9, 202 0
H. Res. 108 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 4, 2009. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (S. 352) 

to postpone the DTV transition date. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against the bill are waived. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 

to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 

hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce; and (2) one motion to commit. 

SEC. 2. Section 2 of House Resolution 92 is amended by 

striking ‘‘February 4’’ and inserting ‘‘February 26’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 19, 2005


 Exhibit 10.2 
 CYGNE DESIGNS, INC. 
 11 West 42nd Street 
 New York, New York 10036 
  
 October 19, 2005 
  
 Diversified Apparel Resources, Inc. 
 5804 E. Slauson Ave. 
 Commerce, California 90040 
  
 Gentlemen: 
  
 Reference is made
to that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2005, as amended (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), by and between Cygne Designs, Inc. (“Cygne”) and Commerce Clothing Company LLC (now
known as Diversified Apparel Resources, Inc.) (“Diversified”). 
  
 The parties agree that Section 2(a) of the Registration Rights Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the last sentence of Section 2(a) with the following: 
  
 “The Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause the
Registration Statement and the registration of the Registered Securities thereunder to be declared effective by the Commission no later than December 15, 2005 or such other date as the parties shall mutually agree in writing (the
“Effectiveness Date”).” 
  
 Except as set
forth herein, the Registration Rights Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	 /s/ Bernard Manuel


	Bernard Manuel
	President


  

			
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	
	DIVERSIFIED APPAREL RESOURCES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Hubert Guez


	Name:	 	Hubert Guez
	Title:	 	Manager
	
	215 GZ PARTNERS
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Hubert Guez


	Name:	 	Hubert Guez
	Title:	 	 

  

 - 1 - 








			
	GUEZ LIVING TRUST DATED DECEMBER 6, 1996
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Hubert Guez


	Name:	 	Hubert Guez
	Title:	 	Trustee
	
	GRIFFIN JAMES ARON GUEZ IRREVOCABLE TRUST
	DATED JANUARY 1, 1996
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Marguerite Ester Guez


	Name:	 	Marguerite Ester Guez
	Title:	 	Trustee
	
	STEPHAN AVNER GELIX GUEZ IRREVOCABLE
	TRUST DATED JANUARY 1, 1996
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephan Guez


	Name:	 	Stephan Guez
	Title:	 	Trustee
	
	 /s/ Hubert Guez


	Hubert Guez

  

 - 2 -
#### Keith J. MITAN, Appellant, v. J. Dwight McNIEL; Midwest Intelligence, Inc.; Stephen W. Eoff; D & E Plumbing and Heating, Inc., Appellees.

No. 10-2477.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 26, 2010.

Filed: Oct. 29, 2010.

Keith Joseph Mitán, West Bloomfield, MN, pro se.

Richard E. Davis, Whiteaker & Wilson, Springfield, MO, for Appellees.

*145Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action alleging defamation, Keith Mitán appeals the district court’s1 orders granting two defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Mitan’s motions for leave to amend his complaint, to alter or amend the judgment, for additional time to serve two other defendants, for authorization to serve the Missouri Secretary of State, for discovery, and for service by a United States Marshal.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree with the district court that Mitan’s complaint failed to state a claim based on respondeat superior as to the two defendants who moved to dismiss, *see Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.,*517 F.3d 544, 549 (8th Cir.2008); and we also find that court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mitan’s post-dismissal motion for leave to amend, because he chose to stand on his pleadings in the face of the motion to dismiss, which identified the very deficiency upon which the court dismissed the complaint, *see Hawks v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank,*591 F.3d 1048, 1050-51 (8th Cir.2010). The denial of Mitan’s final attempt to amend, his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion for reconsideration, was also not an abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist.,*440 F.3d 930, 933 (8th Cir.2006).

As to the unserved defendants, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant Mitán additional time to serve after he failed to effectuate service over a period of roughly eight months: among other reasons, he failed to seek the additional extension before the expiration of the first extension. *See Adams v. AlliedSignal Gen. Aviation Avionics,*74 F.3d 882, 887-88 (8th Cir.1996). We conclude as well that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions for discovery, service by a United States Marshal, or leave to serve the Missouri Secretary of State. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
### /

# /~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NATHANIEL SMITH THURSTON, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BARACKHUSSEIN OBAMA, 

### et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No.



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED MAY 1

## 72010 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts torthe 

### Districtof

### Columbia 

# 10 0798

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs application to proceed 

### informapauperis and

### pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed. Plaintiffbrings this action under 42 U.S.c. 

### § 1983, and alleges that he has been convicted and sentenced as a result ofa vast conspiracy among federaljudges and assorted federal government agencies designed to deprive plaintiffofrights protected under the First, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution. In addition to demanding an investigation ofthe allegedly corruptjudicial system, plaintiffdemands monetary damages totalling $204,002,000. Because plaintiffs claims go to the fact ofhis confinement, he cannot recover damages in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.c. § 1983 without showing that his confinement has been invalidated by "revers[al] on direct appeal, expunge[ment] by executive order, declar[ation of invalidity] by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or ... a federal court's issuance ofa writ ofhabeas corpus." 

### Heckv. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); 

### accord White v. 

### Bowie, 194 F.3d 175 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (table). Plaintiffhas not satisfied this prerequisite 

# .3

### and therefore fails to state a claim upon which reliefcan granted. This action will be dismissed under 28 U.S.c. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1). An 

### Order is issued separately.

United States District Judge
{"agency":"CFTC","generated":"2018-07-17 14:15:42","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2018"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"6"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CFTC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["33"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["27"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["35"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2018","quarter":"Q3"}
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Larry Kristof, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mantra Venture Group
      Ltd. for the period ended August 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Mantra Venture Group Ltd.                                                                  

Dated: October 24, 2011

| | /s/
      Larry Kristof                                                                             
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Larry Kristof                                                                                       
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)   
| | MANTRA VENTURE GROUP LTD.                                                                           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Mantra Venture
Group Ltd. and will be retained by Mantra Venture Group Ltd. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of iTrackr
Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2010, I, John Rizzo, Chief
Executive Officer of iTrackr Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2010,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal
quarter ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of iTrackr Systems,
Inc.




Dated:
      October 18, 2010/s/John RizzoJohn
      Rizzo, Chief Executive Officer ofiTrackr
      Systems, Inc.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-12465

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00295-CLS-JEO-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TAVORIS ANDRE TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________

(March 5, 2014)

Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-12465 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Brett L. Wadsworth, counsel for Tavoris Andre Taylor in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that 

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Taylor’s convictions and 

sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-12465 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 11

                           GreenMan Technologies, Inc.

                     Statement Regarding Net Loss per Share

                               September 30, 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Year Ended May 31,      Four Months Ended September 30,
                                             1997           1998           1997          1998
                                         ------------   ------------   ------------   -----------
                                                                        (unaudited)
<S>                                      <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Net loss .............................   $ (7,006,479)  $ (6,324,986)  $ (1,429,015)  $(2,326,086)
                                         ============   ============   ============   ===========

Net loss per share - basic (Note 1) ..   $      (6.24)  $      (2.44)  $      (0.90)  $     (0.37)
                                         ============   ============   ============   ===========

Weighted average shares outstanding ..      1,122,788      2,596,776      1,579,548     6,247,793
                                         ============   ============   ============   ===========
</TABLE>
#### Billy Dean CHAFFINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL-ABINGDON, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11-7145.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 14, 2012.

Billy Dean Chaffins, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy Dean Chaffins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Chaffins v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail,*No. 7:11-cv-00312-JCT (W.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2011). Chaffins’ request for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*