alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

|  Name                                         | Jurisdiction      of Incorporation | Name      Under WhichBusiness      is Conducted                                            |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Aaron’s      Automotive Products, Inc.       | Delaware                           | Aaron’s      Automotive Products                                                     |
| ATC      Custom Services, Inc.                     | Delaware                           | Not      Applicable                                                                        |
| ATC      Drivetrain, Inc.                          | Delaware                           | Not      Applicable                                                                        |
| ATC      Logistics & Electronics, Inc.         | Delaware                           | ATC      LogisticsAutocraft      ElectronicsLogistics      ServicesMaterials      Recovery |
| ATC      Information Services, Inc.                | Delaware                           | ATCISATC      Information Services                                                         |
| ATS      Remanufacturing Corp.                     | Delaware                           | Not      Applicable                                                                        |
| Autocraft      Developments Limited                | England                            | Not      Applicable                                                                        |
| Autocraft      Industries CZ s.r.o.                | Czech      Republic                | Not      Applicable                                                                        |
| Autocraft      Industries, Inc.                    | Delaware                           | Autocraft      Industries                                                                  |
| Autocraft      Industries Limited                  | England                            | Not      Applicable                                                                        |
| Autocraft      Remanufacturing Corp.               | Delaware                           | Not      Applicable                                                                        |
| Automotive      Developments Limited               | England                            | Not      Applicable                                                                        |
| Aftermarket      Technology (U.K.) Holding Limited | England                            | Not      Applicable                                                                        |
| Elbar      Industrial Limited                      | England                            | Not      Applicable                                                                        |
| Elbar      Industrial (Trading) Limited            | England                            | Autocraft      UKAutocraft      IndustriesSouth      East Lincs Engineering                |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with this Quarterly Report of AMERELITE SOLUTIONS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Knapp, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 19, 2012
By:
/s/ Robert L. KnappRobert L. KnappPrincipal Executive OfficerPrincipal Financial Officer
{"agency":"CFTC","generated":"2015-01-16 15:56:59","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"}],"value":"2015"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CFTC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["38"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["18"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["39"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2015","quarter":"Q1"}
# FCM Data September 2016

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF September 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002016FROM REPORTS FILED BY October 27,&KFF0000 &K0000002016	&P of &N
#### Tokunbo KUFEJI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-72622.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 25, 2010.*

Filed June 11, 2010.

Vitaly B. Sigal, Liberman & Sigal, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Remi Adalemo, Trial, OIL, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tokunbo Kufeji, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, *Cerezo v. Mukasey,*512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), as well as claims of due process violations, *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

The agency properly denied Kufeji’s application for adjustment of status where he failed to show eligibility for an immigrant visa. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1245.1(a) (applicants for adjustment of status must show they are eligible to receive an immigrant visa). Kufeji’s due process claim therefore fails. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error to prevail on a due process challenge).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Zaraiz Santos et al., Respondents, v Mark A. Rosing, M.D., et al., Defendants, and Frank Allen, M.D., Appellant.

[875 NYS2d 59]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered August 25, 2008, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for reargument, and, upon reargument, denied the motion of defendant Allen Frank, M.D., sued herein as Frank Allen, M.D., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court correctly found, upon reargument of defendant’s motion for summary judgment, that the evidence submitted by plaintiffs raised an issue of fact that precluded summary judgment. The motion was based on defendant’s factual contention that he never provided any prenatal treatment to plaintiff mother and was never consulted by any of the medical personnel who rendered care and treatment to her during her prenatal visits or during her labor and delivery. However, a certified nurse midwife testified that she had consulted and collaborated with the attending physician in the labor and delivery department when plaintiff presented there a week before she experienced placental abruption, and the medical record identifies defendant as the attending physician that day. This evidence raises the issues whether the midwife consulted with defendant concerning the treatment of plaintiff and, if so, whether an implied physician-patient relationship arose from the consultation *(see Raptis-Smith v St. Joseph’s Med. Ctr.,*302 AD2d 246 [2003]; *Cogswell v Chapman,*249 AD2d 865, 866-867 [1998]; *see also*Education Law § 6951).

*501Since defendant’s motion was based solely on his assertion that he did not render any treatment to plaintiff, the burden did not shift to plaintiffs to submit evidence to raise issues of fact as to compliance with the standard of care and proximate cause *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324-325 [1986]). In any event, however, the motion court properly granted reargument to consider plaintiffs’ expert’s affirmation, which had been submitted initially in redacted form *(see Mattis v Keen, Zhao,*54 AD3d 610, 611-612 [2008]), and the affirmation was sufficient to raise said issues of fact *(see Cruz v St. Barnabas Hosp.,*50 AD3d 382 [2008]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it without merit. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Bernard TATE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6727.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 27, 2010.

Joseph Bernard Tate, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Bernard Tate appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for reduction in sentence. Tate sought relief under Amendment 599 to the federal sentencing guidelines, which clarified “under what circumstances defendants sentenced for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) [(2006)] in conjunction with convictions for other offenses may receive weapon enhancements contained in the guidelines for those other offenses.” *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*App. C, Amendment 599 cmt. (backg’d) (Supp.2000). Although the district court incorrectly construed Tate’s motion as seeking reconsideration of the court’s earlier order denying § 3582 relief based on another guidelines amendment, we nevertheless affirm the court’s order on alternative grounds.

Section 3582(c) permits the court to reduce a sentence “in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Amendment 599 was already in effect when Tate was sentenced in 2002, so he is not entitled to § 3582 relief. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

141146 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141146 

 COA: 296233 

Kalamazoo CC: 04-002011-FH 

MARK MATTHEW ROWE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 5, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gary D. MacDonald, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GBS Enterprises Incorporated for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GBS Enterprises Incorporated.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: June  13, 2013 | /s/Gary D. MacDonald           
|-------------------- | -------------------------------
|                     | Gary D. MacDonald              
|                     | Interim Chief Executive Officer
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer)
| **Material Released     Pursuant to FOIA Requests Which** |
|------------------------------------------------------------|

| **has Been, or is Likely     to Be, the Subject of Future** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|

| **FOIA     Requests** |
|------------------------|

| **______________________________________________** |
|----------------------------------------------------|

| Documents which do not have     PDF links are availabe on request to [email protected] by using the |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| electronic request form.     Electronic distribution of the documents is possible, depending on the     requester's |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ability to receive them.     Paper copies of documents are available within the Washington, D.C., area     through |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| the Commission's Public     Reading Room and outside the area through use of the electronic request form. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Fees of 15 cents per page     apply to paper copies |
|------------------------------------------------------|

| **Request Form** | **If you are unfamiliar with PDF files, click here for help** |
|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|

| **______________________________________________** |
|----------------------------------------------------|

| FILE NUMBER: | **RF06-002** | PLACED ON THE PUBLIC     RECORD: | 02/22/2006 | CATEGORY: | **A** |
|--------------|--------------|-----------------------------------|------------|-----------|-------|

| **LIST OF CFTC GOVERNMENT     CREDIT CARD HOLDERS** |
|------------------------------------------------------|

| **______________________________________________** |
|----------------------------------------------------|

| DOCUMENT NUMBER: | 1 |
|------------------|---|

|  | List of CFTC Government     Credit Card Holders |
|--|--------------------------------------------------|

| DATE: | 02/22/2006 | PAGES: | 1 | PDF SIZE: | 48 KB | PDF LINK: | /files/foia/repfoia/foirf060 |
|-------|------------|--------|---|-----------|-------|-----------|------------------------------|

| **------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# CE2012247EN.01004002.xml

| 17.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 247/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 247/40

---

Thursday 24 March 2011EU-Vietnam air services agreement ***

P7_TA(2011)0108

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 March 2011 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on certain aspects of air services (14876/2010 – C7-0366/2010 – 2007/0082(NLE))

2012/C 247 E/13

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (14876/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (14876/2010),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on certain aspects of air services (07170/2009), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on certain aspects of air services (07170/2009),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0366/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0366/2010),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A7-0044/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A7-0044/2011),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam.

---
Appendix B 

to

Cleartrade Exchange Form FBOT Application

CLEARTRADE EXCHANGE MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
# CE2012188EN.01007301.xml

| 28.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 188/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 188/73

---

Tuesday 15 February 2011Agreement between the EU and Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports ***

P7_TA(2011)0050

European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 February 2011 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports (16362/2010 – C7-0399/2010 – 2010/0222(NLE))

2012/C 188 E/23

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (16362/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (16362/2010),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports (13708/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports (13708/2010),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0399/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0399/2010),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(8) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0010/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0010/2011),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Federative Republic of Brazil. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Federative Republic of Brazil.

---
```

[Federal Register: July 21, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 139)]
[Notices]
[Page 38981]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21jy97-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Friday, August 15, 1997.

Place: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-19144 Filed 7-16-97; 4:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----