alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Joerg Ott, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GBS Enterprises Incorporated for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GBS Enterprises Incorporated.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: August 19, 2013 | /s/Joerg Ott                 
|--------------------- | -----------------------------
|                      | Joerg Ott                    
|                      | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      | (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1325 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1325

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 19, 2010.
Whereas, May 25, 2010, will be the 28th National Missing Children's Day;
Whereas National Missing Children's Day honors the obligation of the United 
        States to locate and recover missing children by prompting parents, 
        guardians, and other trusted adult role models to make child safety an 
        utmost priority;
Whereas in the United States nearly 800,000 children are reported missing a 
        year, more than 58,000 children are abducted by nonfamily members, and 
        more than 2,000 children are reported missing every day;
Whereas efforts of Congress to provide resources, training, and technical 
        assistance have increased the capabilities of State and local law 
        enforcement to find children and to return them home safely;
Whereas the 1979 disappearance of 6-year-old Etan Patz served as the impetus for 
        the creation of National Missing Children's Day, first proclaimed in 
        1983; and
Whereas Etan's photograph was distributed throughout the United States and 
        appeared in media globally, and the powerful image came to represent the 
        anguish of thousands of searching families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes National Missing Children's Day and encourages all 
        people in the United States to join together to plan events in 
        communities across the United States to raise public awareness of law 
        enforcement and the issue of missing children and the need to address 
        the national problem of missing children;
            (2) recognizes that one of the most important tools for law 
        enforcement to use in the case of a missing child is an up-to-date, good 
        quality photograph of the child and urges all parents and guardians to 
        follow the important precaution of maintaining such a photograph;
            (3) recognizes the vital role of law enforcement and the criminal 
        justice system in preventing kidnappings and abduction of children while 
        also leading efforts to locate missing children; and
            (4) acknowledges that National Missing Children's Day should remind 
        people in the United States not to forget the children who are still 
        missing and not to waver in the efforts of law enforcement to reunite 
        such children with their families.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 4.8


 


STRICTLY
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL


 





 


Marconi
Corporation plc


34 Grosvenor Square


London WIK 2HD


Telephone: +44 (0) 207 493 8484


Fax: +44(0)20 7491 0708


Web site: www.marconi.com


 


Monday,
27th September 2004


 


HSBC
Bank plc


Corporate
Trust and Loan Agency


Corporate,
Investment Banking and Markets


Level
24


8
Canada Square


London
E14 5HQ


 


Attention:
Mr C Merrett


 


Dear
Sirs,


 


£50,000,000 Committed Multicurrency Revolving Facility
Agreement dated 27th March 2003 between
Marconi Corporation plc (the “Company”), Marconi Bonding Limited (the “Applicant”)
the financial institutions referred to therein as Original Issuing Banks and
Original Banks and the various Marconi companies listed therein (the “Original Indemnifying Companies”) (the
“Bonding Facility Agreement”)


 


We
are writing to you in your capacity as Agent and Security Trustee under the
Bonding Facility Agreement


 


The
current Availability Period of the Bonding Facility Agreement is due to expire
on 18 November 2004. In accordance with clause 2.3 of the Bonding Facility
Agreement, the Company hereby requests that you obtain the approval of the
Banks (as defined in the Bonding Facility Agreement) to extend the Availability
Period of the Bonding Facility Agreement to 18 November 2005.


 


The
Company also hereby requests that you grant your consent to the waiver of the
information requirements contained in Clause 21.1 of the Bonding Facility
Agreement (and pursuant to Section 4.20 of the Senior Notes Indenture) for
the remainder of the Bonding Facility Agreement, following the repayment of the
Junior Notes by the Company on 8th March 2004 and the repayment of the
Senior Notes by the Company on 1st September 2004.


 


Yours
faithfully,


 


	
     [ILLEGIBLE]

  	
   

  



For
and on behalf of

Marconi Corporation plc


 


Marconi Corporation plc


Registered in England No. 67307


Registered Office: PO Box 53, New Century Park, Coventry CV3 IHJ
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1213

IsoButane Fixed Swap - Mt. Belvieu Iso-Butane (LDH) - OPIS

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the monthly price published by OPIS for the location 

specified in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the arithmetic average of the OPIS Mt. 

Belvieu Iso-Butane (LDH) price for each business day that it is determined during the contract 

month.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract unit shall be in gallons. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity in 

gallons multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 120 consecutive monthly contract periods

PRICING AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in U.S. dollars and cents per gallon. The minimum price fluctuation shall 

be $0.001 per gallon. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no maximum 

price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Posting of transactions shall cease on the last business day of the contract month.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement. Final settlement, following termination 

of posting for a contract month, will be based on the Floating Price. The final settlement price 

will be the Floating Price calculated for each contract month.
#### Francisco Javier NARANJO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cecilia REYNOLDS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 10-6957.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 20, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 28, 2010.

Francisco Javier Naranjo, Appellant pro se.

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

*835Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Francisco Javier Naranjo seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties ai*e accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on March 17, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed on July 9, 2010. Because Naranjo failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-446-000]

Take notice that on June 4, 2001, Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to filing, to become effective July 4, 2001.

Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets are being filed to make certain tariff modifications necessary to correct and/or clarify its Tariff as more fully explained in the filing.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(A)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14846  Filed 6-12-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Menachem (Mendi) Ze'evi, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pluristem Life Systems Inc.

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to date a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's control over financial reporting; and.

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Date: September 28, 2004

/s/ Menachem (Mendi) Ze'evi
Signature:  Menachem (Mendi) Ze'evi
Title:	  Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 603.

#### Southern Nebraska Power Co. et al. *v.*Nebraska ex rel. Sorensen, Attorney General.

*521Jurisdictional statement distributed January 9, 1937.

Decided January 18, 1937.

*Mr. B. F. Napheys, Jr.,*for appellants.

*Mr. Edwin Vail*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it, *Electric Co.*v. *Dow,*166 U. S. 489, 492, 493; *Pierce*v. *Somerset Railway,*171 U. S. 641, 648; *Leonard*v. *Vicksburg Ry. Co.,*198 U. S. 416, 422, 423; *Gause*v. *Detroit Trust Co.,*297 U. S. 695, (2) in so far as a federal question is sought to be presented, for the want of a substantial federal question, *Zucht*v. *King,*260 U. S. 174, 176; *Sugarman*v. *United States,*249 U. S. 182, 184; *Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.*v. *Texas,*296 U. S. 552.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                RSA Security Inc.
                              List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                         JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----------                                         -----------------------------
<S>                                                <C>
3-G International, Inc. ........................   Delaware
ASR Securities Corp. ...........................   Massachusetts
RSA Investments Inc. ...........................   Massachusetts
RSA Partners I, L.P. ...........................   Delaware
RSA Security (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. ..............   Malaysia
RSA Security (S) PTE Ltd. ......................   Singapore
RSA Security Australia Pty Ltd. ................   Australia
RSA Security B.V. ..............................   Netherlands
RSA Security France SARL .......................   France
RSA Security GmbH ..............................   Germany
RSA Security Holding Limited ...................   Ireland
RSA Security Holdings Inc. .....................   Delaware
RSA Security Ireland Limited ...................   Ireland
RSA Security Japan Ltd. ........................   Japan
RSA Security Massachusetts Corp. ...............   Massachusetts
RSA Security Nordic AS .........................   Norway
RSA Security Products Limited ..................   Cyprus
RSA Security UK Limited ........................   United Kingdom
RSA Ventures I, L.P. ...........................   Delaware
RSA Ventures, Inc. .............................   Delaware
Securant Technologies Pty Ltd. .................   Australia
Securant Technologies, Inc. ....................   California
Security Dynamics Foreign Sales Corp. ..........   Delaware
Sichuan An Cheng Security Technology Company ...   People's Republic of China
Xcert International, Inc. ......................   Delaware
Xcert Software Inc. ............................   British Columbia, Canada
</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: DAVID L. HOFER 

DOCKET NUMBER: 156 

DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1970 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

Docket No. 156 

Name: David L. Hofer 

Effective On or about December 17, 1970 David L. Hofer, shall cease and desist 

from: 

(1) engaging as futures commission merchant within the meaning of the 

Commodity Exchange Act without being registered with the Secretary of 

Agriculture as required by Section 4d(1) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 6d(1)) and the 

Regulations thereunder; 

(2) failing to treat and deal with customers' funds that he receives as such 

futures commission merchant as belonging to such customers as required by 

Section 4d(2) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 6d(2)) and the Regulations thereunder: 

(3) failing to hold his customers' funds in segregated accounts as required 

in Section 4d(2) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 6d(2)) and the Regulations thereunder: 

(4) failing to maintain a daily segregation record of his customers' funds as 

required in Section 4d(2) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 6d(2)) and the Regulations 

thereunder; 

(5) wilfully making any material false or misleading statement in any 

application or report filed with the Secretary of Agriculture under the 

Commodity Exchange Act; and 

(6) wilfully omitting to state any material fact in connection with any such 

application or report. 

Done at Washington, D. C. 

DEC 15 1970 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Thomas J. Flavin 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 123 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 123

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Affairs 
                 in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2009

 Mr. Berman (for himself and Ms. Ros-Lehtinen) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Affairs 
                 in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $21,439,063 for the One Hundred 
Eleventh Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $10,336,207 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2009, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2010; and
            (2) not more than $11,102,856 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2010, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2011.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of OxySure Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Julian T. Ross, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: September 26, 2011




/s/ Julian T. RossJulian T. Ross,President and Chief Financial Officer
5

tfO. \\-\S-co%iX^t

FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

DEC 16 2015

CHRISTOPHER A. PR1NE

CLERK

l)lErr Tywift '&&&, fypeuMKtfoSz

v

The I^Ue o^Texas, ftftPiAW,

Uiw- CootT ouss- *0o. 145547a

1©sa.i ^ 'iJwJr W-i*sr^% Unw ^

!lmeb (kW^ ^W^ fatwty ^bfl^ fyfdW',

(P

5
hkiidJr, Pro S&. uJ«.s- oriciiiwi^ wdw <vi hafjsr<2&#>i3

-hW &*^/ ^'.^Clerk 4d 4^U AjfJ^ *W,

•fUfw yli &> &-. r^4 4U4^ W^

(Vr, ail Sitk,(WTi^sWy ^ docu^h,

ur

w

(P
VaJ+WP^*^^; -Be<£yvirse3^ CbA7^iOG^e/jt "Aopeif^u*^: Qt>%.. prtu/s Udr

jwi **A Copies 6.f aiidccumeJs,

"\o4k^akafc^ta(-tfwA nowW^ &s^?+d be heard on^ls

5W^ 44\is 4-U- —cW| of„ ., do

3^ H-WU!^

£Z_

Q>
Conflscr

X hw^u (?£rhfy4^M dio U&fM^ l2Pfl/5^ d-(rue.

adLtffttdr Cdpf of Aj^WX6 ft) SL Motn^^tfe^f
"" 1

"

Si 4': **fi

S i& tr.

h: $ &

r6

o=>

OS

^4

<±

cTJ

• ^ -4 ?°

CO l£ A

; K'y-^fr.wgtWJiWm

-^A vO

4

p 4.

<u

P

/O

4

09

o

<

£

o

£

^

*->

o

o

rr

P

C

I* i

r-

(M

o

CM

i

CM

O

C3

p..