alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 1244 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 29, 2010. 

Whereas, on February 27, 2004, and Februray 28, 2004, a 

group of educators, students, and government and industry representatives gathered in San Antonio, Texas, to 

gauge the interest in and support for the establishment 

of regular cyber security exercises for postsecondary students; 

Whereas stakeholders in the cyber security profession sought 

to create a cyber security exercise template for universities nationwide, and to encourage educational institutions to offer students practical experience in information 

assurance; 

Whereas in an effort to develop a regular, national-level cyber 

security exercise, the Center for Infrastructure Assurance 

and Security at the University of Texas at San Antonio 

agreed to host the first Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition (CCDC) for the Southwestern region in April 

2005; 

Whereas the mission of the CCDC system is to provide institutions with an information assurance or computer security curriculum in a controlled, competitive environment 

to assess the student’s depth of understanding and operational competency in managing the challenges inherent 
2 

•HRES 1244 EH 

in protecting corporate network infrastructure and business information systems; 

Whereas the CCDC has attracted participation from institutions of higher education from across the United States; 

Whereas 2010 regional competition hosts include Southwest 

host Texas A&M University, North Central host Dakota 

State University, Northeast host University of Maine, 

Pacific Rim co-hosts University of Washington and 

Highline Community College, Midwest co-hosts Inver 

Hills Community College and Moraine Valley Community 

College, Mid-Atlantic host Community College of Baltimore County, Southeast host Kennesaw State University, 

and West Coast host California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; 

Whereas 2010 regional competition winners include Towson 

University, DePaul University, Montana Tech of the University of Montana, Northeastern University, University 

of Washington, Texas A&M University, University of 

Louisville, and California State Polytechnic University, 

Pomona; and 

Whereas the furtherance and development of cyber security 

academic programs in institutions of higher education 

will help meet the rapidly growing demand for cyber security specialists in the public and private sectors: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

the National Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition for its 
3 

•HRES 1244 EH 

now 5-year effort to promote cyber security curriculum in institutions of higher learning. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
*Miscellaneous Orders.*

No. 535, Misc.

#### Sauerwine *v.*New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Co.

*Melvin L. Griffith*and *Francis H. Monek*for petitioner.

*Harold A. Smith*for respondent.

Motion for leave to file petition for writs of certiorari; prohibition or mandamus denied.
**Fidelity**®**Total International Equity Fund**

**Class**/Ticker

**Fidelity Total International Equity Fund**/FTIEX

In this summary prospectus, the term "shares" (as it relates to the fund) means the class of shares offered through this summaryprospectus.

**Summary Prospectus**

**December 30, 2011**
#### FA CHANG ZHANG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 09-4399-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 7, 2010.

Gary J. Yerman, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Melody K. Eaton, Trial Attorney (for Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, and Aviva L. Poctzer, Senior Litigation Counsel), Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

PRESENT: GUIDO CALABRESI, ROBERT A. KATZMANN and PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Fa Chang Zhang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a September 30, 2009, order of the BIA affirming the March 19, 2008, decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Barbara A. Nelson, which denied Zhang’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). *In re Fa Chang Zhang,*No. [ AXXX XXX XXX ] (BIA Sept. 30, 2009), *aff'g*No. [ AXXX XXX XXX ] (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City Mar. 19, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case.

Under the circumstances of this case, we review the decision of the IJ as supplemented by the BIA. *See Yan Chen v. Gonzales,*417 F.3d 268, 271 (2d Cir.2005). The applicable standards of review are well-established. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); *Xiu Xia Lin v. Mukasey,*534 F.3d 162, 165-66 (2d Cir.2008); *Bah v. Mukasey,*529 F.3d 99, 110 (2d Cir.2008).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination. *See Xiu Xia Lin,*534 F.3d at 165-66. The IJ reasonably relied on petitioner’s omission from his asylum application and his wife’s omission from her first letter of any claim that he was beaten on account of his resistance to China’s family planning policy. Although petitioner argues that he failed to include this information in his application because he thought it was unnecessary, in the circumstances of this case, that argument does not compel us to find error in the IJ’s decision. *Id.*Accordingly, the IJ’s adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial evidence. *See*8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(b)(l)(B)(iii), 1252(b)(4)(B).

Because petitioner’s claims were all based on the same factual predicate, the agency’s adverse credibility determination was a proper basis for denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, *85and CAT relief. *See Paul v. Gonzales,*444 F.3d 148, 156 (2d Cir.2006).

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. As we have completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DISMISSED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34.1(b).
No. 236.

#### Morgan *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. Frank S. Bright*and *H. Stanley Hinrichs*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman,*and *Messrs. Sewall Key*and *Joseph M. Jones*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Mariano LUCERO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 10-958-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 22, 2012.

*73Samuel Iroegbu, Albany, NY, for Petitioner.

Tony West, Assistant Attorney General; Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Assistant Director; Marion E. Guyton, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

PRESENT: ROSEMARY S. POOLER, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, and DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Petitioner Mariano Lucero, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of a February 19, 2010, decision of the BIA denying his motion to reopen. *In re Mariano Lucero,*No. [ AXXX XXX XXX ] (B.I.A. Feb. 19, 2010). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case.

We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. *See Kaur v. BIA,*413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Lucero’s motion to reopen as untimely. As the BIA noted, Lucero’s final order of removal was entered in 2007, but Lucero did not file his motion to reopen until 2009, well beyond the 90-day deadline. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Moreover, the BIA reasonably concluded that Lucero’s purported eligibility to adjust status did not excuse the time limitation for filing his motion to reopen. *See Matter of Yauri,*25 I. & N. Dec. 103, 105 (BIA 2009) (emphasizing “that untimely motions to reopen to pursue an application for adjustment of status ... do not fall within any of the statutory or regulatory exceptions to the time limits for motions to reopen before the Board”) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii)-(iv) and 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)).

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. As we have completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DISMISSED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule *74of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2114-091 Washington]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47910), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County's application for an amendment to temporarily waive for the current year the spill flow requirements applicable to its Priest Rapids Project, located on the Columbia River in Grant, Yakima, Kittitas, Douglas, Benton and Chelan Counties, Washington and has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA). The project occupies 3,051.92 acres of federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management Department of Energy, Department of Army, Bureau of Reclamation, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The EA contains the staff's analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed amendment and alternatives developed by staff and concludes that approval of the staff recommended alternative would not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.

The EA is attached to a Commission order issued on June 1, 2001 for the above application. Copies of the EA are available for review at the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 208-1371. The EA may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call (202) 208-2222 for assistance). 

For further information, contact Charles Hall at (202) 219-2853.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14466 Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1394 

Recognizing and honoring the employees of the Department of Homeland 

Security who lost their lives in the line of duty in 2009 in protecting 

and securing our Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2010 

Mr. CARNEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring the employees of the Department 

of Homeland Security who lost their lives in the line 

of duty in 2009 in protecting and securing our Nation. 

Whereas more than 230,000 employees of the Department of 

Homeland Security work diligently to deter, detect, and 

prevent acts of terrorism and stand ready to respond to 

a terrorist attack, natural disaster, or other emergency; 

Whereas the employees of the Department of Homeland Security are dedicated individuals who rarely receive the 

recognition they deserve; 

Whereas 9 of those dedicated employees sacrificed their lives 

in the line of duty at the Department of Homeland Security in 2009; 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1394 IH 

Whereas 7 of the 9 employees were employed by the Coast 

Guard and lost their lives in a mission off the coast of 

San Clemente Island, California; 

Whereas 2 of the 9 employees were Border Patrol agents in 

the United States Customs and Border Protection and 

lost their lives while patrolling the Southwestern border 

between Mexico and the United States; 

Whereas, as a testament to the bravery and dedication of all 

Department of Homeland Security employees, 2 other 

employees of the Department, one from the Federal 

Emergency Management Agency and one from the 

Transportation Security Administration, lost their lives in 

2009 while serving in combat in Afghanistan during their 

tenure at the Department of Homeland Security and 

should also be recognized for their sacrifice to the Nation; 

Whereas the Nation owes a debt of gratitude to these employees of the Department of Homeland Security and all others for their continued and steadfast efforts to secure the 

homeland; and 

Whereas each of these fallen heroes should be honored and 

recognized for their efforts to keep us safe from harm: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the ultimate sacrifices that 11 dedicated employees 

3 of the Department of Homeland Security made in 2009 

4 as part of their continuous efforts to keep the Nation safe. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1023 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1023

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to remove the 
 authority of the Committee on Rules to waive clause 5 of rule XVI or 
                         clause 9 of rule XXII.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2010

Mr. Lance submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to remove the 
 authority of the Committee on Rules to waive clause 5 of rule XVI or 
                         clause 9 of rule XXII.

    Resolved, That clause 6(c) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 
of Representatives is amended by inserting: ``, or a rule or order that 
would waive clause 5 of rule XVI or clause 9 of rule XXII'' before the 
period at the end.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: IRWIN M. EISEN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 106 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT -- CEA DOCKET NO. 106 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Irwin M. Eisen 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that the respondent willfully entered into a "wash" 

transaction in the December 1961 wheat future on the Chicago Board of Trade on 

December 14, 1961. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, April 24, 1962, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
```

[Federal Register: June 22, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 119)]
[Notices]
[Page 33270]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22jn99-45]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, July 2, 1999.

.PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-15992 Filed 6-18-99; 2:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
EXHIBIT
23.2
 
 
 
 CONSENT
OF HEMPSTEAD & CO. INCORPORATED
 
 We
consent to the use, in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2005, of Voxware, Inc. (the "Company"), of our identity and the
results of our report dated February 16, 2004, used to determine the fair value
of the guarantee made by certain stockholders of the Company in connection with
the Company's credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank, originally filed as
Exhibit 23.3 with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2004, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report.
 
 
 
 Hempstead
& Company, Inc.
 
 /s/
Hempstead & Co. Incorporated
 Haddonfield,
New Jersey
 September
22, 2005
No. 247.

#### Bausch & Lomb Optical Co. et al. *v.*Wahlgren et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. Silas H. Strawn*and *John D. Black*for petitioners.

*Messrs. Charles Hudson*and *Benjamin F. J. Odell*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1321 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1321

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the political 
   situation in Thailand be solved peacefully and through democratic 
                                 means.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2010

Mr. Faleomavaega submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the political 
   situation in Thailand be solved peacefully and through democratic 
                                 means.

Whereas political turmoil in Thailand has led to the most troubled political 
        situation in the country since 1992;
Whereas resulting crisis may have a negative impact on Thailand's people, 
        economy, and society;
Whereas Thailand's rich diversity of cultures and traditions and its proud 
        history are admired throughout the world;
Whereas the United States close relationship and longstanding friendship with 
        Thailand dates back to 1833 when the two countries signed the Treaty of 
        Amity and Commerce;
Whereas the United States and Thailand became alliance partners with the Manila 
        Pact of 1954 and the United States designated Thailand as a major non-
        North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) ally in December 2003;
Whereas with the Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations of 1966, along with 
        burgeoning trade and investment flows, the United States and Thailand 
        share critical economic ties; and
Whereas with more than 200,000 people tracing their ancestry to Thailand, 
        extensive social and cultural links between the United States and 
        Thailand, and shared values, mutual trust, and common interests, the 
        bilateral relationship remains strong and resilient: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) all parties involved in the political crisis in 
        Thailand renounce the use of violence and pledge to resolve the 
        country's political problems peacefully and through democratic 
        means; and
            (2) all parties concerned are encouraged to work 
        assiduously to settle their differences on the basis of the 5-
        point national reconciliation plan proposed by the Prime 
        Minister of Thailand on May 3, 2010, which encompasses 
        upholding the monarchy, instituting political reform, and 
        eradicating injustice.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of Options Media Group Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Scott Frohman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Scott Frohman                                                  
|Scott Frohman
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: November 16, 2009





In connection with the quarterly report of Options Media Group Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Steven Stowell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven Stowell                                                  
|Steven Stowell
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: November 16, 2009