alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-427-000]

      ( print page 30445)    
Take notice that on May 24, 2001, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation (GTN) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1-A, Seventh Revised Sheet No. 90, with an effective date of July 1, 2001.

GTN states that the filing is being made in order to reformat references to capacity release options consistent with GTN's implementation of a new web-based customer interface and capacity release module.

GTN further states that a copy of this filing has been served on GTN's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory agencies.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the  Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm*                     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at                     *http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell/​htm.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14199 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
##### 



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements
  (1)
    
    The Companys periodic report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30,
2006 (the Form 10-K) containing the financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    
    
    
    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/s/ Eugene V. N. Bissell
    
    
    
    /s/ Jerry E. SheridanEugene V.N. Bissell
    
    
    
    Jerry E. SheridanDate: December 8, 2006
    
    
    
    Date: December 8, 2006
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.0

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
 First Bell Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-27443 of First Bell Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated January
23, 1998 (February 24, 1998 as to Note 23), incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Bell Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1997.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

March 30, 1998
#### Michaelene WALLACE, Appellant, v. ALLIANCE NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

No. 05-3363.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2006.

Filed: Dec. 28, 2006.

Michaelene Wallace, Hot Springs, AR, pro se.

Spencer Fox Robinson, Ramsay *&*Bridgforth, Pine Bluff, AR, for Appellee.

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Michaelene Wallace appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on her claims against her former employer alleging unlawful discrimination based on her age and the race of her son, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Title VII. Having carefully reviewed the record, *see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman,*289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (de novo standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 126 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 126

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 
              Labor in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2009

Mr. George Miller of California (for himself and Mr. McKeon) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 
              Labor in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Education and Labor (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $17,792,110 for the One Hundred 
Eleventh Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $8,657,750 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2009, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2010; and
            (2) not more than $9,134,360 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2010, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2011.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Venturevest 6, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, I, Joseph J. Passalaqua, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  February 11, 2008 VENTUREVEST 6, INC. By: /s/ Joseph J. Passalaqua Joseph J. Passalaqua  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Venturevest 6, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, I, Joseph J. Passalaqua, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  February 11, 2008 VENTUREVEST 6, INC. By: /s/ Joseph J. Passalaqua Joseph J. Passalaqua
# FCM Data November 2012

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF November 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002012FROM REPORTS FILED BY January 02,&KFF0000 &K0000002013	&P of &N
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-290-009]


Viking Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 5, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 31, 2001, Viking Gas Transmission Company 
(Viking) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective July 
1, 2001:

Twenty-Fifth Revised Sheet No. 6
Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 6A
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 6B

    Viking states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Offer of Settlement and Stipulation and Agreement (Settlement) filed by 
Viking on March 16, 1999 in the above-referenced docket and approved by 
the Commission by order issued May 12, 1999 by filing to place the 
Stage 3 Settlement Rates into effect in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the Settlement.
    Viking states that copies of this filing have been served on all 
parties designated on the official service list in this proceeding, on 
all Viking's jurisdictional customers and to affected state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 
Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via 
the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's web site at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14551 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
S06A2024.

#### RICE et al. v. GRUBBS.

(641 SE2d 514)

Sears, Chief Justice.

This case involves the trial court’s denial of a writ of prohibition filed by J. Andrew Rice and Kathryn W. Rice in which they contended that Judge Adele Grubbs should be barred from presiding over any case currently pending or pursued in the future by the Rices. Having reviewed the record before us, we find that the trial court did not err in denying the writ of prohibition. In its order denying the writ of prohibition, however, the trial court assessed attorney fees against the Rices without holding a prior hearing on the matter. In order to enter an award of attorney fees, a hearing is required “because an oral hearing gives the party opposing attorney fees an opportunity to confront and challenge testimony with regard to the need for, and value of, legal services.” (Citations omitted.) *Evers v. Evers,*277 Ga. 132 (1) (587 SE2d 22) (2003). Accordingly, we must vacate the award of attorney fees and remand this case to the trial court in order for the requisite hearing to be held.

*Judgment affirmed in part, vacated in part, and case remanded with direction.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*615Decided January 8, 2007

Reconsideration denied February 26, 2007.

J. Andrew Rice, *pro se.*

Kathryn W. Rice, *pro se.*

*Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Dennis R. Dunn, Deputy Attorney General, Stefan E. Ritter, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Rebecca S. Mick, Ann S. Brumbaugh, Assistant Attorneys General,*for appellee.
```

[Federal Register: June 22, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 119)]
[Notices]
[Page 33270]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22jn99-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, July 16, 1999.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-15994 Filed 6-18-99; 2:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Maiden Holdings, Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certifies,
to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 9, 2010
                      By:
                      /s/ ARTURO
      M. RASCHBAUMName:
                      Arturo
      M. RaschbaumTitle:
                      President
      and Chief Executive
Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report.
#### Juan Daniel ZARCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MCQUEEN; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-15159.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 9, 2008.

Juan Daniel Zarco, Corcoran, CA, pro se.

*614Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Daniel Zarco, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.’S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion. *Al-Torki v. Kaempen,*78 F.3d 1381, 1384 (9th Cir.1996). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Zarco’s action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Zarco failed to amend his complaint after the court dismissed his original complaint with instructions to amend, and failed to file objections to the magistrate judge’s report recommending dismissal. See *id.; Ferdik v. Bonzelet,*963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir.1992).

Zarco’s remaining contentions are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IV 

House Calendar No. 165 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1113 

[Report No. 111–421] 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 2701) to authorize 

appropriations for fiscal year 2010 for intelligence and intelligence-related 

activities of the United States Government, the Community Management 

Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability 

System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Mr. CARDOZA, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 2701) 

to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2010 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United 

States Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement 

and Disability System, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That during further consideration of the bill 

2 (H.R. 2701) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 

3 2010 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1113 RH 

1 the United States Government, the Community Manage2 ment Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retire3 ment and Disability System, and for other purposes, pur4 suant to House Resolution 1105, amendment number 1 

5 printed in House Report 111–419 shall be considered as 

6 modified by striking the matter proposed to be inserted 

7 as section 506. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 165 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1113 

[Report No. 111–421] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 

ability System, and for other purposes. tral Intelligence Agency Retirement and DisCommunity Management Account, and the Centivities of the United States Government, the 2010 for intelligence and intelligence-related ac2701) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential

CFTC Technology Advisory Committee Meeting

March 29, 2012
© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential 

Evolution of Automated Trading: 

A Market Maker’s Perspective

2

© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential
© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential 

OUR EARLY YEARS

Pit to Screen

Manual Market Making

© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential
© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential 

4

• Risk transfer is undergoing a longterm shift from analog to digital

• Efficient markets are transparent, 

competitive, and stable

• Efficient markets provide better 

outcomes for investors

WE BELIEVE

© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential
© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential 

OUR AUTOMATED MARKET MAKING

Market Making Technology

Operational Excellence

© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential
© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential 

WHAT HASN’T CHANGED?

6

© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential

Roles of Participants

Uncertainty of Future Prices
© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential 

WHAT HAS CHANGED MOST?

7

© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential

Costs

Transparency
© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential 

8

• The markets will continue to become 

more efficient and automated

• Automation reduces frictional costs 

for average investors and end-users

• Stability and risk management are 

critical and involve everyone

WE BELIEVE

© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential
© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential 

9

THANK YOU

© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential
© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential 

10

GETCO is a global market maker focused on helping 

investors efficiently transfer risk

GETCO’s primary business is electronic market 

making 

GETCO also provides liquidity through its client

services business, GETCO Execution Services

ABOUT GETCO

Employs over 400

people in Chicago, 

New York, Palo Alto, 

London, Singapore 

and Hong Kong

A top participant on 

over 50 leading 

exchanges and trading 

venues around the world

Registered and 

Regulated across the 

globe

© 2012 GETCO Proprietary and Confidential
No. 507.

#### Mobile & Ohio R. Co. *v.*Rogers, Administrator.

November 18, 1935.

*Messrs. Carl Fox*and *Rufus Creekmore*for petitioner.

*Mr. Walter L. Hensley*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
#### PICK MANUFACTURING CO. *v.*GENERAL MOTORS CORP. et al.

No. 12.

Argued October 13, 14, 1936.

Decided October 26, 1936.

*Mr. Carl B. -Rix*for petitioner.

*Mr. John M. Zane,*with whom *Messrs. Franklin D. Trueblood, Thomas Francis Howe,*and *Henry S. Rademacher*were on the brief, for respondents.

Per Curiam.

By this suit petitioner challenged the validity under § 3 of the Clayton Act (38 Stat. 730, 731, 15 U. S. C. 14) of a provision of the contracts made with dealers by selling organizations of the General Motors Corporation. The provision in the contract between the Chevrolet Motor Company and dealers is as follows:

> “Dealer agrees that he will not sell, offer for sale, or use in the repair of Chevrolet motor vehicles and chassis second-hand or used parts or any part or parts not manufactured by or authorized by the Chevrolet Motor Company. It - is agreed that Dealer is not granted any *4exclusive selling rights in genuine new Chevrolet parts or accessories.”

There is a similar provision in contracts made by the Buick company.

The District Court dismissed the bill of complaint for want of equity and its decree was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 80 *F.*(2d) 641. Upon the evidence adduced at the trial the District Court found that the effect of the clause had not been in any way substantially to lessen competition or to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. This finding was sustained by the Circuit Court of Appeals. *Id.,*p. 644.

Under the established rule, this Court accepts the findings in which two courts concur unless clear error is shown. *Stuart*v. *Hayden,*169 U. S. 1, 14; *Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.*v. *Railroad Commission,*232 U. S. 338; *Texas & N. O. R. Co.*v. *Railway Clerks,*281 U. S. 548, 558; *United States*v. *Commercial Credit Co.,*286 U. S. 63, 67; *Continental Bank*v. *Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.,*294 U. S. 648, 678. Applying this rule, the decree is

*Affirmed.*

Mr. Justice Van Devanter, Mr. Justice Stone and Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration and decision of this cause.