alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    The NSF management officials having responsibility for the seven advisory committees listed below have determined that renewing these groups for another two years is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Director, National Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 U.S.C. 1861*et seq.*                    This determination follows consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration.                 

1. Advisory Committee for Small Business Industrial Innovation (#61)

2. Advisory Committee for Biological Sciences (#1110)

3. Advisory Committee for Education & Human Resources (#1119)

4. Advisory Committee for Polar Programs (#1130)

5. Advisory Committee for Engineering (#1170)

6. Alan T. Waterman Award Committee (#1172)

7. Advisory Committee for Geosciences (#1755)

Authority for these Committees will expire on June 30, 2003, unless they are renewed. For more information, please contact Susanne Bolton, NSF, at (703) 292-7488.

Dated: June 5, 2001.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-14501 Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie F. GOMES, Defendant-Appellant, and Patricia Gomes, Gary Gomes, Defendants.

No. 07-15878.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 8, 2008.

Thomas J. Clark, Andrea R. Tebbets, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Adam F. Hulbig, USDOJ — United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gary Rhett Gomes, Lubbock, TX, pro se.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*571MEMORANDUM **

Louie F. Gomes appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the government in its action to reduce to judgment unpaid tax assessments and foreclose federal tax liens on Gomes’ property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Hughes v. United States,*953 F.2d 531, 541 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Gomes failed to refute evidence showing that he was properly assessed for his tax liabilities. The government submitted Certificates of Assessments and Payments to demonstrate that Gomes was properly assessed for his tax liabilities. *See id.*at 535 (holding that Certificates of Assessments and Payments are presumptive proof of a valid tax liability assessment); *see also Arpin v.*Santa *Clara Valley Transp. Agency,*261 F.3d 912, 922 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that eonclusory allegations unsupported by factual data are insufficient to defeat summary judgment). In the absence of contrary proof, the government’s forms establish that the notices and demand for payment of the assessments were made and sent. *See Hughes,*953 F.2d at 535. Accordingly, the district court properly concluded that Gomes’ property could be sold to satisfy his tax debt. *See*26 U.S.C. §§ 7402(a), 7403(a).

We deny the government’s motion for sanctions.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
| (1)   | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Clear-Lite Holdings, Inc. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: January 19, 2011 |   | /s/ Paul E. Niedermeyer     |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                         |   | Paul E. Niedermeyer         |
|                         |   | Principal Executive Officer |
#### Charles J. TITTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-55926.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.*

Filed Dec. 8, 2006.

Charles J. Tittle, Huntington Beach, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jacqueline A. Forslund, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Charles J. Tittle appeals the district court’s decision that it lacked jurisdiction to review the Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s denial of his request to reopen his 1996 application for disability insurance benefits. Tittle also appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner’s denial of his 1999 application for benefits.

Generally, courts do not have jurisdiction to review a decision not to reopen a previously-adjudicated claim. *Krumpelman v. Heckler,*767 F.2d 586, 587-88 (9th Cir.1985). “If, however, a person makes a colorable constitutional claim that the decision not to reopen violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment,” courts have jurisdiction. *Gonzalez v. Sullivan,*914 F.2d 1197, 1202-03 (9th Cir. 1990). Tittle has failed to raise a colorable constitutional claim. Further, Tittle waived the constitutional claim by not bringing it before the district court in the previous proceeding. *See Edlund v. Massanari,*253 F.3d 1152, 1156 (9th Cir.2001). Therefore, the district court properly held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the decision to reopen Tittle’s 1996 application.

Tittle did not present any evidence that his condition worsened from October 7, 1998 to December 31, 1998. He therefore failed to meet his burden that changed circumstances precluded him from performing any substantial gainful activity during that period. *See Schneider v. Commissioner of Social Sec. Admin.,*223 F.3d 968, 973 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, the district court did not err; rather it proper*619ly affirmed the Commissioner’s denial of his 1999 application for benefits.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VOXWARE,
INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,438
<SECURITIES>                                     2,008
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (361)
<INVENTORY>                                        249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,066
<PP&E>                                           1,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (781)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,620
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,592
<SALES>                                          2,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,886
<CGS>                                              429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,740
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,286)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,286)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Robert W. DecherdRobert W. DecherdChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2008 /s/ Alison K. EngelAlison K. EngelSenior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 30473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, ``Medicinal Chemistry-Synthesis of Potential 
Treatment Agents for Cocaine Addiction''.
    Date: June 13, 2001.
    Time: 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Eric Zatman, Contract Review Specialist, Office 
of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National 
Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3158, MSC 
9547, Bethesda, MD 20892-9547, (301) 435-1438.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: May 30, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-14164 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14897]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


National Nuclear Security Administration Advisory Committee

AGENCY: National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Closed Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the National Nuclear 
Security Administration Advisory Committee (NNSA AC). The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Sec. 10(a)(2) requires that 
public notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Tuesday, June 26, 2001, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Wednesday, June 27, 
2001, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of 
Energy, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Leonard (202-586-5555), Staff 
Director of NNSA AC.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Committee: To provide the Administrator of the 
National Nuclear Security Administration with advice and 
recommendations on matters of technology, policy, and operations that 
lie within the mission and responsibilities of the National Nuclear 
Security Administration, as set forth in 50 U.S.C. 20402(b).
    Purpose of the Meeting: To discuss national security research, 
development, and policy programs.
    Closed Meeting: In the interest of national security, the meeting 
will be closed to the public, pursuant to the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 2 Sec. 10 (d), and the Federal Advisory 
Committee Management Regulation, 41 CFR Sec. 101-6.1023, ``Procedures 
for Closing an Advisory Committee Meeting'', which incorporate by 
reference the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b, 
which, at Secs. 552b (c)(1) and (c)(3) permits closure of meetings 
where restricted data or other classified matters are discussed.
    Minutes: Minutes of the meeting will be recorded and classified 
accordingly.

    Issued at Washington, DC on June 9, 2001.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-14897 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### Michael McKNIGHT, a/k/a Michael Tyrell McKnight, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon OZMINT, Director SCDC; Gregory Knowlin, Warden; Linda Bradshaw, Assoc Warden; D. Jones, Sgt, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 10-7167.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 28, 2010.

Michael McKnight, Appellant Pro Se. John Betts McCutcheon, Jr., Lisa Arlene Thomas, Thompson & Henry, P.A., Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael McKnight appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1) (West 2006 & Supp.2010). The magistrate judge recommended that summary judgment be granted to Defendants and advised McKnight that failure to file timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); *see also Thomas v. Am,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). McKnight has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP01-445-000]

Take notice that on June 1, 2001, Trunkline LNG Company (Trunkline LNG) tendered for filing a cost and revenue study.

Trunkline LNG states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with Ordering Paragraph (D) of the Commission's November 3, 1997 Order Issuing Certificate, Trunkline LNG Co., 81 FERC ¶ 61,147 (1997), as clarified by the Commission's February 27, 1998 Order Denying Rehearing, 82 FERC ¶ 61,198 (1998).

Trunkline LNG states that copies of this filing are being served on all customers, the parties to the proceeding and appropriate state regulatory agencies.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14687 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 443.

#### United States *v.*Certain Lands in the City of Louisville et al.

October 28, 1935.

*Solicitor General Reed*for the United States.

*Mr. Charles G. Middleton*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
#### Piedad Del Carmen Perez PERTUZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-74821.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 13, 2010.

Piedad Del Carmen Perez Pertuz, Glendale, CA, pro se.

John D. Williams, Esquire, Julia Tyler, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, HI-District Counsel, Es*291quire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Honolulu, HI, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Piedad del Carmen Perez Pertuz, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Perez Pertuz’s July 3, 2008, motion to reopen as number-barred, *see 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (party may file only one motion to reopen proceedings), and Perez Pertuz has not met any of the exceptions to the number bar, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
|   |  (1) |   |  The      Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,      2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   |  (2) |   |  The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and      results of operations of the Company. |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                    |                                                                      |                         |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                    | CORPORATE EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC.(Registrant)                            |
|                    |                                                                      |                         |
| Date:      May 15, 2008 |  By:                                                                 |  /s/      Luz M. Weigel |
|                    | Luz      M. Weigel                                                        |
|                    | President,      Secretary and Treasurer(Principal      Executive Officer) |