alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14641]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1368-DR]


Illinois; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Illinois (FEMA-1368-DR), dated May 9, 2001, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 29, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3772.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective May 29, 2001.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)


Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 01-14641 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: ROCCO G. CANCELLARE 

DOCKET NUMBER: 169 

DATE: MAY 21, 1970 

DOCUMENT TYPE: CEASE AND DESIST ORDER 

Docket No. 169 

Name: Rocco G. Cancellare 

Effective May 21, 1970 

Effective immediately, the respondent, Rocco G. Cancellare, shall cease and 

desist from allocating commodity futures transactions to his own account when 

such transactions can be allocated to fill customers' orders which he has in 

hand, unless this is done with the prior knowledge and consent of such 

customers. 

Effective on the thirtieth day after the date of entry of this order (1) the 

respondent is prohibited from trading on or subject to the rules of any contract 

market for a period of 20 days, and all contract markets shall refuse all 

trading privileges to the respondent during this period, such prohibition and 

refusal to apply to all trading done and all positions held by the respondent 

directly or indirectly, and (2) the registration of the respondent as floor 

broker under the Commodity Exchange Act is suspended for a period of 20 days. 

A copy of this Decision and Order shall be served on each of the parties and 

on each contract market. 

Done at Washington, D.C. 

MAY 21 1970 

[SEE SIGNATURE IN ORIGINAL] 

Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Barry Buchholtz, theChief Executive Officer of Orange 21 Inc. (the “Company”), certify for thepurposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Codethat, to the best of my knowledge,

 

(i)    theAnnual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December31, 2004 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(ii)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | By                             |   /s/ Barry  Buchholtz |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Barry Buchholtz                |
|   | Chief Executive Officer        |
|   | (Principal Executive  Officer) |
|   | March 30, 2005                 |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the periodic report of China Jo-Jo Drugstores, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"), I, Bennet P. Tchaikovsky,
Chief  Financial  Officer  (Principal  Financial  and Accounting Officer) of the
Company,  hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter  63,  Section  1350  of  the  United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:


     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d),  as  applicable,  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company  at  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  indicated.



Date: August 16, 2010              /s/ Bennet P. Tchaikovsky
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Bennet P. Tchaikovsky
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Freddie Demoris BRADLEY, Petitioner-Appellant v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 08-41334

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 5, 2010.

Freddie Demoris Bradley, Tennessee Colony, TX, pro se.

*374Melissa L. Kelly, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Ap-pellee.

Before BENAVIDES, PRADO and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Freddie Demoris Bradley, Texas prisoner # 1131925, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas relief. Bradley claims that the evidence at trial was legally insufficient to support the jury’s verdict that he was guilty of robbery. Specifically, he asserts that no evidence in the record supports a finding that he “intentionally or knowingly threaten[ed] or place[d] another in fear of imminent bodily injury or death.” *See*Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.02(a)(2).

We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and hold that Bradley failed to meet his burden of establishing that the state court’s adjudication of his claims resulted in a decision that was contrary to federal law. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *Williams v. Taylor,*529 U.S. 362, 402-13, 120 S.Ct. 1495, 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000); *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U.S. 307, 324-25, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); *Wilmeth v. State,*808 S.W.2d 703, 705-06 (Tex.1991). Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 11
                           GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
                     Statement Regarding Net Loss per Share
                               September 30, 2001

                                                    Year Ended     Year Ended
                                                  September 30,   September 30,
                                                       2000           2001
                                                  -----------------------------

Net income (loss): .............................   $  (829,530)    $   803,227
                                                   ===========     ===========

Net income (loss) per share - basic ............   $     (0.07)    $      0.06
                                                   ===========     ===========

Weighted average shares outstanding ............    12,289,300      13,464,943
                                                   ===========     ===========

Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted ..    12,289,300      13,493,165
                                                   ===========     ===========
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 31573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14615]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[MN68-01b; FRL-6991-8]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Minnesota

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
revision for Dakota County, Minnesota, for the control of emissions of 
sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) in the Pine Bend Area of Rosemount. The 
site-specific SIP revision for Koch Petroleum Group, LP (Koch) was 
submitted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on December 20, 
2000, and is approvable because it satisfies the requirements of the 
Clean Air Act. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve into the 
SO<INF>2</INF> SIP Amendment No. 4 to the Administrative Order for 
Koch. In the final rules section of this Federal Register, we are 
approving the SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal, because we view this as a noncontroversial revision amendment 
and anticipate no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the 
approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments 
are received in response to this proposed rule, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If we receive adverse 
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
this proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on 
this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should 
do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 12, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Canton T. Nash, Chief, 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), EPA 
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christos Panos, Regulation Development 
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8328.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the Direct 
Final rule document which is located in the Rules section of this 
Federal Register. Copies of the request and the EPA's analysis are 
available for inspection at the above address. (Please telephone 
Christos Panos at (312) 353-8328 before visiting the Region 5 Office.)

    Dated: May 8, 2001.
Norman Niedergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 01-14615 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 31.1
 Section 302 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of A. H. Belo Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Robert W. DecherdRobert W. DecherdChairman of the Board, President and ChiefExecutive Officer
#### Sonja V. JOHN, Plaintiff, v. The TRANE COMPANY, A DIVISION OF AMERICAN STANDARD INC., Defendant.

No. 91-6590-CIV.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida.

Sept. 17, 1993.

Richard J. Burton, Richard J. Burton & Associates, P.A., Dania, FL, for plaintiff.

John K. Stage, Holland & Knight, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for defendant.

ORDER

GONZALEZ, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE has come before the Court upon the plaintiffs Motion to Compel Response to Request for Production. The mo*856tion has been fully briefed, and is now ripe for ruling.

The plaintiff filed this action against the defendant, her former employer, alleging that she was terminated because she filed charges against them with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In her third request for production, the plaintiff requested a copy of the company’s affirmative action plan. The Trane Company objected to this request, and the plaintiff filed this motion to compel production of the requested plan. In response to this motion to compel, the defendant argues that it should not be required to produce this affirmative action plan, because the plan is protected by a self-evaluation privilege recognized by many courts.

Affirmative action plans are developed by companies pursuant to regulations promulgated under Title VII by the Secretary of Labor. Portions of these plans consist of self-evaluations by companies concerning minority employment and utilization. Although courts are divided on whether these self-evaluative portions of the affirmative action plans are discoverable, no court has held that a company’s entire affirmative action plan is undiscoverable. With regard to the self-evaluative portions of the plans, some courts have refused to recognize any type of privilege, while others have held that protection of these documents is necessary to encourage frank evaluations by employers. 4 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 26.60[3]; *O’Connor v. Chrysler Corp.,*86 F.R.D. 211 (D.Mass.1980); *Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Company,*53 F.R.D. 283 (N.D.Ga.1971).

Florida courts have not yet addressed the issue of whether such a privilege exists in the employment discrimination context. However, they have recognized this type of privilege in the medical peer review context, based upon public policy concerns that self-evaluations be complete and candid. *See Segal v. Roberts,*380 So.2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA1979); *Dade County Medical Association v. Hlis,*372 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA1979).

Accordingly, having reviewed the motion and the record, and being otherwise duly advised, it is hereby:

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the plaintiffs Motion to Compel is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The defendant shall produce a copy of all portions of its affirmative action plan, except those portions which contain subjective evaluations made by the defendant’s management.

DONE AND ORDERED.
No. 265.

#### Lindway *v.*Ohio.

Jurisdictional statement distributed September 10, 1936.

Decided October 12, 1936.

*Mr. Morris H. Wolf*for appellant.

*Mr. Frederick W. Green*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code,.as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
No. 256.

#### Sommer & Maca Glass Machinery Corp. et al. *v.*Johnson et al.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Marshall Solberg*for petitioners.

No appearance for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court, First District of Illinois, denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications

 

I, Francis Mailhot, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oro Valcanico Corp..; 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The Small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s second fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting.  

| Date: June 17, 2008 | /s/ Francis Mailhot                     |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|

|   | Francis Mailhot, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

6
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

        (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18,

                               United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Spantel Communications Inc., a Florida corporation ("The Company"),
does hereby certify with respect to the Annual report of the Company on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("the Form 10-KSB/A")that:

      3)    The Form 10-KSB/A fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

      4)    the information contained in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


Dated: June 15, 2005                   /s/ Cesar Martinez
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Cesar Martinez
                                       (Chief Financial Officer)
```

[Federal Register: September 22, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 183)]
[Notices]
[Page 50556]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22se98-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 a.m., Monday, October 19, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-25428 Filed 9-18-98; 1:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----