alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 241.

#### Pope et al. *v.*Blanton, County Judge, et al.

Argued January 11, 12, 1937.

Decided January 18, 1937.

*Mr. John B. Sutton*for appellants.

*Messrs. W. P. Allen*and *H. E. Carter,*Assistant Attorneys General of Florida, with whom *Mr. Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Mr. W. T. Hendry*were on the brief, for appellees.

*Per Curiam:*

The decree of the District Court is modified and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the bill for want of jurisdiction by reason of the absence of the requisite jurisdictional amount. *McNutt*v. *General Motors Corp.,*298 U. S. 178; *KVOS, Inc.*v. *Associated Press,*299 U. S. 269.
```

[Federal Register: September 14, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 177)]
[Notices]
[Page 54370]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14se05-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, October 28, 2005.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC., 9th Floor Commission
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean A. Webb, (202) 418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-18337 Filed 9-12-05; 11:52 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Mark Simo, the Chief Executive
Officer of Orange 21 Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By

/s/ Mark SimoMark SimoChief Executive OfficerApril 16, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 051501B]


International Whaling Commission: Nominations

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Request for nominations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is a call for nominees for the U.S. Delegation to 
the July 2001 International Whaling Commission (IWC) annual meeting.

DATES: All nominations for the U.S. Delegation to the IWC annual 
meeting must be received by June 22, 2001.

ADDRESSES: All nominations for the U.S. Delegation to the IWC annual 
meeting should be addressed to the U.S. Commissioner to the IWC, and 
sent, via post or fax, to Cathy Campbell at Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East West Highway, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910, (fax) 301-713-0376. Prospective Congressional 
advisors to the delegation should contact the Department of State 
directly.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Campbell, 301-713-2322, 
Extension 141. Fax 301-713-0376.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary of Commerce is charged with 
the responsibility of discharging the obligations of the United States 
under the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, 1946. 
The U.S. commissioner has primary responsibility for the preparation 
and negotiation of U.S. positions on international issues concerning 
whaling and for all matters involving the IWC. He is staffed by the 
Department of Commerce and assisted by the Department of State, the 
Department of the Interior, Marine Mammal Commission, and by other 
agencies. The non-federal representative selected as a result of this 
nomination process is responsible for providing input and 
recommendations to the U.S. IWC Commissioner representing the positions 
of non-governmental organizations. -
    The IWC is hosting its 53rd annual meeting from July 23-27, 2001 in 
London.

    Dated: June 6, 2001.
Wanda L. Cain,
Acting Director, Office of Protected Resouces, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 01-14773 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
No. 363.

#### Levy *v.*Irving Trust Co., Trustee in Bankruptcy.

See *ante,*p. 539.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Skelly, certify that;

(1)         I have reviewed this report on Form10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 of Harborside Ventures, Inc.;

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)         disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:     December 5, 2007.

s/s "*Robert Skelly*"_________________
#### Mark A. Marshak et al., Appellants, v Charles V. Migliore et al., Respondents.

[874 NYS2d 240]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Spinola, J.), dated September 19, 2007, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Mark A. Marshak did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

*648The Supreme Court erred in concluding that the defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Mark A. Marshak (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345, 350-351 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In support of their motion, the defendants relied upon, inter alia, the affirmed medical report of their examining orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Mauro M. Cataletto, dated November 29, 2006. In this report, while Dr. Cataletto set forth range-of-motion findings with respect to the injured plaintiffs lumbar spine as of November 29, 2006, he failed to compare those findings to what is normal *(see Perez v Fugon,*52 AD3d 668, 669 [2008]; *Page v Belmonte,*45 AD3d 825, 825-26 [2007]; *Fleury v Benitez,*44 AD3d 996, 997 [2007]). Moreover, when he set forth the injured plaintiffs supine straight leg raising findings he noted that the injured plaintiff could raise his right leg to 80 degrees and his left leg to only 60 degrees. This noted a clear limitation, the full extent of which is unknown since he failed to compare any of his range of motion findings to what is normal *(see Gaccione v Krebs,*53 AD3d 524, 525 [2008]; *Giammanco v Valerio,*47 AD3d 674, 675 [2008]; *Coburn v Samuel,*44 AD3d 698, 699 [2007]; *Iles v Jonat,*35 AD3d 537, 538 [2006]; *McCrary v Street,*34 AD3d 768, 769 [2006]; *Whittaker v Webster Trucking Corp.,*33 AD3d 613 [2006]; *Yashayev v Rodriguez,*28 AD3d 651, 652 [2006]). Absent such comparative quantification, the Court cannot conclude that the decreased lumbar range of motion noted was mild, minor, or slight so as to be considered insignificant within the meaning of the no-fault statute *(see Webb v Keyspan Corp.,*56 AD3d 464 [2008]; *Yashayev v Rodriguez, 28*AD3d at 652).

Since the defendants failed to satisfy their initial burden on their motion, it is not necessary to consider whether the plaintiffs’ papers in opposition were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Perez v Fugon,*52 AD3d at 669; *Gaccione v Krebs,*53 AD3d at 525; *Coscia v 938 Trading Corp.,*283 AD2d 538 [2001]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Miller, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
 

<CIK>     0000744822


<NAME>      Fidelity Investment Trust


<SERIES>

        <NUMBER>        41


        <NAME>      Fidelity Global Bond Fund


<MULTIPLIER>    1,000


       

<S>

<C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>

6-mos


<FISCAL-YEAR-END>

Dec-31-1997


<PERIOD-END>

Jun-30-1997


<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>

95,453


<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>

92,136


<RECEIVABLES>

5,574


<ASSETS-OTHER>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>

0


<TOTAL-ASSETS>

97,710


<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>

3,441


<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>

0


<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>

1,158


<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>

4,599


<SENIOR-EQUITY>

0


<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>

194,087


<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>

10,038


<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>

11,697


<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>

0


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>

580


<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>

(97,023)


<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>

0


<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>

(3,373)


<NET-ASSETS>

93,111


<DIVIDEND-INCOME>

0


<INTEREST-INCOME>

3,274


<OTHER-INCOME>

0


<EXPENSES-NET>

597


<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>

2,677


<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>

(2,094)


<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>

(2,901)


<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>

(2,318)


<EQUALIZATION>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>

2,684


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>

0


<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>

0


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>

1,282


<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>

3,191


<SHARES-REINVESTED>

250


<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>

(20,520)


<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>

0


<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>

(94,928)


<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>

573


<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>

0


<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>

341


<INTEREST-EXPENSE>

4


<GROSS-EXPENSE>

597


<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>

98,505


<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>

9.710


<PER-SHARE-NII>

 .253


<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>

(.430)


<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>

 .253


<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>

0


<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>

0


<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>

9.280


<EXPENSE-RATIO>

122


<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>

0


<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>

0



        



</TABLE>
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: BECKER BROKERAGE CO., SAMUEL H. BECKER AND PHILIP D. BECKER 

DOCKET NUMBER: 111 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington 25, D. C. 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT -- CEA DOCKET NO. 111 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Becker Brokerage Co., 

Samuel H. Becker and 

Philip D. Becker 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that the respondents, a futures commission merchant and 

its principal officers, deceived and defrauded customers by engaging in a course 

of action whereby a customer who exercised authority over the accounts of other 

customers was allowed to allocate trades so that such accounts suffered 

substantial losses. It also alleges that false information was furnished to U. 

S. Department of Agriculture representatives. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, September 17, 1963, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: EDWARD A. COX, JR. AND GEORGE F. FREY, JR. 

DOCKET NUMBER: 192; 75-16 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

NOTE: LATER BECAME CFTC DOCKET # 75-16 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 192 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

Edward A. Cox, Jr. and 

George F. Frey, Jr. 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges attempted manipulation and manipulation of the price of 

the May 1971 wheat future on the Chicago Board of Trade on May 19, 1971. It 

alleges that the respondents, acting in concert, demanded and received prices 

for the May 1971 wheat future which were arbitrary and artificial. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, on August 9, 1972, in Chicago, Illinois. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
#### THE NEPONSET. Petition of CREW TRANSP. CORPORATION. Appeal of LABATE et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 20, 1922.)

No. 158.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Petition of the Crew Transportation Corporation, as owner of the steam tug Neponset, for limitation of liability. From a cueree absolving the tug from liability for the damage claimed (281 Fed. 409), Mary Labate and another, as administrators, appeal.

Affirmed.

Macklin, Brown, Purdy & Van Y\7yck, of New York City (Pierre M. Brown, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Foley & Martin, of New York City (George V. A. McCloskey, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed. No costs.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

* 1975 *

January 22, 2016

Mr. Wayne Pestone

Chief Compliance Officer
Thomson Reuters (SEF) LLC
1100 13" Street, NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005

Re: Application of Thomson Reuters (SEF) LLC for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Mr. Pestone:

By submissions dated September 9, 2013 through January 19, 2016, Thomson Reuters
(SEF) LLC (“TR SEF”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
(“Commission”), pursuant to Section Sh of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C.
§ 7b-3, and Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap
execution facility (“SEF”).

The Commission has reviewed TR SEF’s application and has determined to grant TR
SEF registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying
Order of Registration.

Sincerely,

Cc. ap | od I i fell
irkpatric

Christopher J
Secretary of the Commission
| **Shareholder Fees - FidelityOverseasFund-KPRO**   | Dec. 30, 2023 USD ($) |
|----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| FidelityOverseasFund-KPRO | Fidelity Overseas Fund |                  |
| **Shareholder Fees:**                              |                  |
| (fees paid directly from your investment)          | none                  |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Other Expenses
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form -Number N-1A -Chapter A -Section 3 -Subsection table -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph 10
+ Details**Name:**rr_ShareholderFeeOther**Namespace Prefix:**rr_**Data Type:**rr:NonNegativeMonetaryType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**rr_ShareholderFeesAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**rr_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**dei_DocumentInformationDocumentAxis=fmr_FidelityOverseasFund-KPROMember**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
| X                                                                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**dei_LegalEntityAxis=fmr_S000007100Member**Namespace Prefix:****Data Type:**na**Balance Type:****Period Type:** |
EXHIBIT 32

<PAGE>

      In connection with the quarterly report of Synergy Resources Corporation,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010 as filed
with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") Ed
Holloway, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Frank L. Jennings,
the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the company.


 April 12, 2010                              /s/ Edward Holloway
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Edward Holloway, Principal
                                                Executive Officer


 April 12, 2010                              /s/ Frank L. Jennings
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Frank L. Jennings, Principal
                                                Financial Officer