alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: DAVID PETER BAKAS 

DOCKET NUMBER: 224, 75-5 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

NOTE: LATER BECAME CFTC DOCKET # 75-5 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D.C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 224 

(Administrative Hearing Under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Assistant Secretary 

of Agriculture charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

David Peter Bakas 

(Chicago, Illinois) 

The complaint charges that during the period June 1972-September 1973 David 

Peter Bakas acted as futures commission merchant without being so registered. 

It further charges that he converted to his own use money received by him to 

margin his customers' trades. It also charges that he made false statements to 

his customers concerning the trading and profits in their accounts. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when there has been a determination that the evidence substantiates allegations 

in the complaint. A determination is considered as having been made when a 

decision of the Administrative Law Judge becomes final or, after appeal, a 

decision is made by the Judicial Officer of the Department. Complaints are 

filed in the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and 

are a matter of public record. Pending disposition of a complaint, it is the 

policy of the CEA not to comment or elaborate on charges contained therein or to 

discuss evidence on which it is based. 

A public hearing on the complaint will be held before the Administrative Law 

Judge in Chicago, Illinois, at a date and time to be specified at a later date. 

LOAD-DATE: August 6, 2008 
Page 2
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

June 29, 2011

 

Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

Franco Bertone, the Chief Executive Officer and Adrián Calaza, the Chief Financial Officer of Telecom Argentina S.A. (“Telecom”) each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.              this Annual Report on Form 20-F (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.              the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telecom.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Franco Bertone |
|--------|--------|----------------------|
|   |   | Name:                | Franco   Bertone |
|   |   | Title:               | Chief   Executive Officer |

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Adrián Calaza |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                    | Adrián   Calaza |
|   |   | Title:                   | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Tan Duc USA v. Jimmy Tran

Appellate case number: 01-14-00539-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-48243

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

Tan Duc USA has filed a Motion to Extend Time to File Amended Brief. That motion is 

GRANTED to the following extent: Tan Duc USA is ORDERED to file its amended brief 

within 30 days of the date of this order. Due to the previous delays in this appeal, no further 

extensions will be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d). If Tan Duc USA intends to file a 

responsive brief to the brief of Appellant Hoang-Yen Thi Dang filed on July 13, 2015, that 

responsive brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order.

Appellee/Conditional Cross-Appellant Tran has filed a Motion to Adjust Briefing 

Deadlines. That motion is GRANTED to the following extent: Tran’s brief as appellant and 

response to Dang’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order. Tran’s response to 

Tan Duc USA’s amended brief will be due within 30 days of the date that brief is filed.

All relief not expressly granted herein is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: _August 25, 2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-312-038]

Take notice that on January 3, 2001, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing a notice of a change in rates for the October 18, 2000 Negotiated Rate Agreement between Tennessee and Dynegy Energy Marketing and Trade (Dynegy). The notice substitutes a fixed rate in place of a Margin calculation for certain volumes for TGP Service Package No. 35092. The fixed prices are effective from January 2, 2001 through January 31, 2001.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before January 18, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments and protests may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-1421  Filed 1-17-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Lino CORDOVA-ZUNIGA, also known as Jose Hernandez, also known as Jorge Alfred Denova Hernandez, also known as Lino Zuniga, also known as Jorge Alfredo Danova, also known as Jose Lino Zunigo Guerrero, also known as Jose Garcia, also known as Jorge Denova, also known *937as Jose Cordoba, also known as Joselino Zuniga Hernandez, also known as Jose Lino Zuniga-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-51028

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff-Appellee.

Eduardo Solis, Law Offices of Eduardo Solis, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Lino Cordova-Zuniga has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cordova-Zuniga has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Federal Register: January 29, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 19)]

[Notices]

[Page 4432]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr29ja98-46]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION





Sunshine Act Meeting



AGENCY HOLDING the MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.



TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, February 6, 1998.



PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference

Room.



STATUS: Closed.



MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.



CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 98-2343 Filed 1-27-98; 12:07 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                   SUBSIDIARIES OF NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC.
 
Alta Environmental Services, Inc.
Alta Equipment Leasing Co., Inc.
Auburn Placer Disposal Service
B&J Drop Box
Buonaterra, Inc.
Butte Disposal & Recycling, Inc.
City Garbage Company of Eureka
Consolidated Environmental Industries, Inc.
Del Norte Disposal, Inc.
Del Norte Recovery, Inc.
Dixon Sanitary Service
Envirocal, Inc.
Excel Environmental, Inc.
Foothill Disposal Co., Inc.
Golden Gate Disposal & Recycling Company
Integrated Environmental Systems, Inc.
Los Altos Garbage Company
Macor, Inc.
Mason Land Reclamation Company, Inc.
Norcal/San Bernardino, Inc.
Norcal/San Diego, Inc.
Norcal Service Center, Inc.
Norcal Waste Services of Sacramento, Inc.
Norcal Waste Solutions, Inc.
Norcal Waste Systems of Southern California, Inc.
Oroville Solid Waste Disposal, Inc.
San Bruno Garbage Co., Inc.
Sanitary Fill Company
South Valley Refuse Disposal, Inc.
Southern Humboldt Disposal Service, Inc.
Sunset Properties, Inc.
Sunset Scavenger Company
Tri-County Development Co.*
Vacaville Fill*
Vacaville Sanitary Service
Vallejo Garbage Service, Inc.
West Coast Recycling Co.
Western Placer Recovery Company
Yuba Sutter Disposal, Inc.
Zanker Road Resource Management Co.
 
---------------
* Subsidiaries marked with an asterisk are California general partnerships. All
  other subsidiaries are California corporations, with the exception of Mason
  Land Reclamation Company, Inc. (Missouri corporation).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                        1,109,229
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   432,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                      8,807
<INVENTORY>                                     327,404
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,890,320
<PP&E>                                        5,056,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                  793,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                7,109,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,712,035
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                      5,820,514
<OTHER-SE>                                    4,489,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  7,109,821
<SALES>                                       9,802,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              9,802,529
<CGS>                                         3,126,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 6,438,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (205,965)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  37,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     37,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.02)




</TABLE>
30990 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2001 / Notices

[FR Doc. 01–14469 Filed 6–7–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–31–C

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE of PEACE

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace

DATE/TIME: Thursday—June 21, 2001 (4

p.m.–9 p.m.) Friday—June 22, 2001 (9

a.m.–6 p.m.) Saturday—June 23, 2001 (9

a.m.–12 noon)

LOCATION: Westfields Marriott

Conference Center Chantilly, Virginia

STATUS: Open Session—Portions may be

closed pursuant to Subsection (c) of

Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States

Code, as provided in subsection

1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute

of Peace Act, Public Law 98–525.

AGENDA: June 2001 Board Meeting;

Approval of Minutes of the NinetyNinth Meeting (March 22, 2001) of the

Board of Directors; Chairman’s Report;

President’s Report; Review and

Discussion of Individual Grants and

Fellowships; Review Essay Finalists and

Select Winners; Committee Reports;

Discuss Research & Studies project

Reports; Review Fellowship Program;

Report on Peace Scholars; Update on

Training Program; Update on Education

Program; Other General Issues

CONTACT: Dr. Sheryl Brown, Director,

Officer of Communications, Telephone:

(202) 457–1700.

Dated: June 4, 2001.

Charles E. Nelson,

Vice President for Management and Finance

United States Institute of Peace.

[FR Doc. 01–14569 Filed 6–6–01; 10:20 am]

BILLING CODE 6820–AR–M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA—4464]

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act and in accordance with section 250(a), subchapter D, chapter 2, Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2331), an investigation was initiated on January 19, 2001, in response to a worker petition which was filed on behalf of its workers at OEM/Erie Westland L.L.C., Westland, Michigan. The workers produced plastic automotive interior parts.

This case is being terminated because the Department was unable to locate an official of the company to obtain the information necessary to conduct the investigation. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of May, 2001.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 01-15037  Filed 6-13-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                 COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

         The table below provides information regarding the base salary of each
executive officer of GTx, Inc. effective as of January 1, 2006:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                           Base
           Executive Officer                                        Title                              Compensation
           -----------------                                        -----                              ------------
<S>                                      <C>                                                           <C>
Mitchell S. Steiner, M.D., F.A.C.S.      Chief Executive Officer and Vice-Chairman of the Board of
                                         Directors                                                        $425,000
Marc S. Hanover                          President and Chief Operating Officer                            $292,000
Henry P. Doggrell                        Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary                    $253,000
Mark E. Mosteller                        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                       $235,000
Jim Dalton                               Vice President, Preclinical Research & Development               $240,000
K. Gary Barnette                         Vice President, Clinical Research & Development Strategy         $230,000
Gregory A. Deener                        Vice President, Sales & Marketing                                $225,000
</TABLE>
08-4845-ag, 08-5165-ag

NLRB v. Domsey Trading Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A

SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED

BY THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1 AND FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1. 

WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY

MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE

NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY

OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 

At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the

Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York,

on the 30 day of June, two thousand and ten. th

Present: AMALYA L. KEARSE,

RALPH K. WINTER,

ROSEMARY S. POOLER,

Circuit Judges.

_____________________________________________________

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner/Cross-Respondent,

 -v- (08-4845-ag, 08-5165-ag)

DOMSEY TRADING CORPORATION, DOMSEY FIBER CORPORATION and DOMSEY

INTERNATIONAL SALES CORPORATION, A Single Employer,

Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

 

Appearing for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent:

JEFF BARHAM (ROBERT J. ENGLEHART, on the brief) for

RONALD MEISBURG, General Counsel, National Labor

Relations Board, Washington, D.C.

 

Appearing for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner:

PAUL FRIEDMAN (DONALD GAMBURG and ANTHONY A.

MINGIONE, on the brief), Blank Rome LLP, New York, N.Y.
2

Petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”).

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED,

AND DECREED that the NLRB’s petition for enforcement is DENIED and Domsey Trading

Corp.’s petition for review is DISMISSED.

The NLRB seeks an order enforcing a September 30, 2007 decision and order and a

September 25, 2008 decision and order awarding backpay against Domsey Trading Corporation,

Domsey Fiber Corporation and Domsey International Sales Corporation, a single employer

(“Domsey Trading Corp.”). Domsey Trading Corp. has filed a cross-petition for review. In light

of the Supreme Court’s decision in New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board,

No. 08-1457, 2010 WL 2400089 (June 17, 2010), the NLRB’s petition for review is DENIED

and Domsey Trading Corp.’s petition for review is DISMISSED as premature. See NLRB v.

Talmadge Park, No. 09-2601-ag, 2010 WL 2509132 (2d Cir. June 23, 2010). If, after further

proceedings before the NLRB, a new petition for enforcement or petition for review is filed, the

Clerk’s Office shall refer the petition to this panel.

FOR THE COURT:

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
#### UNITED STATES v. ACKER, MERRALL & CONDIT CO. et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 8, 1909.)

No. 244 (5,068).

Customs Duties (§ 43*)' — Classification—Pickled Walnuts — Similitude— “Pickles.”

The provision for “pickles” in Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule G, par. 241, 30 Stat. 170 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1649), covers only vegetables. Pickled walnuts are therefore excluded therefrom, and are classifiable as unenumerated manufactures under section 6, 30 Stat. 205 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1693).

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Customs Duties, Cent. Dig. f 147; Dec. Dig. § 43.*]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

*78The Circuit Court reversed a decision by the Board of United States General Appraisers (G. A. 6,663; T. D. 28,423), which had affirmed the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of New York. The opinion below reads as follows:

PLATT, District. Judge (orally). The merchandise in question consists of pickled walnuts. It was assessed for duty at 40 per cent, ad valorem as “pickles,” under paragraph 241 of the tariff act of 1807 (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule G. 30 Stat. 170 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1649]). The importers claim in their protest that it is dutiable as unshelled walnuts at three cents per pound, under paragraph 270, or, alternatively, as an unenumerated manufactured article, under section 6 of said act. The Board of General Appraisers sustained the collector’s classification, and from that decision the importers have appealed to this court.

Upon the argument importers’ counsel abandoned his claim under paragraph 270, and now relies upon the provision in section 6. An examination of the record does not show that the statement or finding of the Board that this “commodity is the walnut, plucked green, before the shell of the nut has formed,” etc., is supported by any testimony. In order to be dutiable under the provisions of paragraph 241, the article to be assessed must be a vegetable. In re Johnson (C. C.) 56 Fed. 822. In no sense can this walnut be regarded as a vegetable. The merchandise is therefore dutiable at 20 per cent, ad valorem under said section 6.

Decision of the Board reversed.

D. Frank Uoyd, Asst. U. S. Atty.

B. A. Levett, for importers.

Before EACOMBE, WARD, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.

*

For other eases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

Decision affirmed, on the opinion of Platt, District Judge.