alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i)

the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                       |  |                                       |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                       |  | MICROCHANNEL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
|                       |  |                                       |  |                                        
|Date:  January 9, 2008 |  | By:                                   |  | /s/ Harmel S. Rayat                    
|                       |  |                                       |  | Harmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 4


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                        TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          CADENCE RESOURCES CORPORATION

     Pursuant to the  provisions of Section  16-10a-1006  and  16-10a-602 of the
Utah Business  Corporation Act, the undersigned  executes the following Articles
of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Cadence  Resources  Corporation
(the  "Corporation"):

     1.   The name of the corporation is Cadence Resources Corporation.

     2.   That  Article IV titled  "Capitalization"  of the of the  Articles  of
          Incorporation  of the  Corporation be amended so that the following is
          added after the first paragraph of such article:

               The Corporation  does hereby provide for the issuance of a series
          of Preferred Stock of the Corporation,  consisting of 2,500,000 shares
          which shall be designated as "Class A Preferred Stock" and does hereby
          fix and determine the powers,  preferences and rights relating to said
          Class A Preferred Stock as hereinafter set forth:

                    The Class A Preferred  Stock (a) is convertible  into common
               stock of the  Corporation  at $1.50 per share,  provided that (i)
               the shareholder has received all the  shareholder's  dividends as
               of the date of the proposed conversion,  (ii) the shareholder has
               held the  shares  for at least  one year,  and (iii) the  closing
               price of the common stock has  exceeded  $3.00 for a period of 20
               trading days,  (b) bears a 15% annual  dividend on the amount the
               shares of Series A  Preferred  Stock  were  purchased  for by the
               shareholder,  paid  quarterly,  and (c) shall be  redeemed by the
               Corporation,  if not  otherwise  converted,  seven years from the
               date of  issuance in cash or common  stock,  at the option of the
               Corporation, in an amount equal to the amount paid for the shares
               by the  shareholder  plus any accrued but unpaid  dividends.  The
               Corporation  may force  conversion of the Class A Preferred Stock
               at $1.50 per share upon all the conditions contained in (a) being
               satisfied. The Class Preferred Stock shall have no voting rights.

     3.   The Board of  Directors  of the  Corporation  unanimously  adopted the
          foregoing  amendment  to the Articles of  Incorporation  on October 3,
          2002 without shareholder action. Shareholder action was not required.

Date: November 7, 2003

                                               Name:  /s/ John P. Ryan
                                                      --------------------------
                                               Title: Secretary
                                                      --------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Boreal Productions Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and Boreal
Productions Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Andrea Fehsenfeld, as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Boreal Productions Inc., hereby
certify that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Boreal Productions Inc.


Dated: February 9, 2010                 /s/ Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated: February 9, 2010                 /s/ Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Andrea Fehsenfeld
                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Robert WALKLIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-10005.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 8, 2008.

Daniel G. Bodgen, Robert L. Ellman, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Monique N. Kirtley, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant>-Appellant.

*562Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Frank Robert Walklin appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for reasonableness, *see United States v. Simtob,*485 F.3d 1058, 1061 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.

Walklin contends that the district court relied upon impermissible sentencing factors in determining the sentence. Sentencing upon revocation of supervised release is guided by the factors set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), which incorporates some of the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), but specifically omits § 3553(a)(2)(A), which provides for consideration of the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment. *See Simtob,*485 F.3d at 1062 (citing *United States v. Miqbel,*444 F.3d 1173, 1181-82 (9th Cir. 2006)). The record shows that the district court based the sentence on the § 3583(e) factors, including the need to protect the public and to afford adequate deterrence. Further, the record shows that the district court properly considered Walklin’s prior conduct pursuant to “a full review of [Walkin’s] history and the ... likelihood of repeating that history.” *See Simtob,*485 F.3d at 1063. We therefore conclude that the sentence is reasonable. *See Miqbel,*444 F.3d at 1182.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Michael CLARK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. SHEPHERD, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-55065.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 5, 2008.

Michael Clark, Folsom, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

*559George H. Williamson, James Conrad Schroeder, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Michael Clark appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging the Governor’s reversal of the California Board of Prison Terms’s decision finding him suitable for parole.

Because Clark’s notice of change of address, received October 5, 2007, indicated that he is no longer incarcerated, he was ordered to move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The order specified that if Clark did not comply, “the appeal may be dismissed without further notice to appellant.”

No response has been filed. We conclude that Clark’s claims are no longer redressable, and we dismiss the appeal as moot. *See Spencer v. Kemna,*523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); *see also Wilson v. Terhune,*319 F.3d 477, 481-83 (9th Cir.2003).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Eduard Musheyev, Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial
Accounting Officer) of CaseyCorp Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies,
under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May 14, 2010By:
            /s/
      Eduard MusheyevName:
            Eduard
      MusheyevTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer
              and
      Principal Financial Accounting
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 4074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-1415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration


Marine Transportation System National Advisory Council

ACTION: National Advisory Council Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Notice of Marine Transportation System National Advisory 
Council Public Meeting which was published in the January 12, 2001 
issue of the Federal Register contains an error. The meeting, scheduled 
for Friday, February 2, 2001, will begin at 8:30 a.m., not 9:00 a.m., 
as originally stated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raymond Barberesi, (202) 366-4357; 
Maritime Administration, MAR 830, Room 7201, 400 Seventh St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20590; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ad8ebf3e7e5e4eea4c8ebf8e8eff8eff9e3cae7ebf8ebeea4eee5fea4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c7e4d5541434248026e4d5e4e495e495f456c414d5e4d4802484358024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    (Authority: 5 U.S.C. App 2, Sec. 9(a)(2); 41 CFR 101-6. 1005; 
DOT Order 1120.3B)

    Dated: January 11, 2001.
Murray A. Bloom,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 01-1415 Filed 1-16-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teen Education Group,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
L. Wilson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 12, 2009



                                        By: /s/ ROBERT L. WILSON
                                            ___________________________
                                                Robert L. Wilson
                                                Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 21


           Principal Subsidiaries of Global Payment Technologies, Inc.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Jurisdiction       Percentage Ownership
                 Name of Subsidiary                             Incorporation        by the Registrant
                 ------------------                             -------------        -----------------
<S>                                                             <C>                       <C>  
Global Payment Technology Holdings (Proprietary) Limited        South Africa              33.3%

Global Payment Technologies Australia Pty. Ltd.                  Australia                  50%

Global Payment Technologies (Europe) Limited                   United Kingdom               70%

CBV China Venture Limited                                        Delaware                   50%
        - Hangzhou CBV Plastics Corp. Ltd.                        China                    100%
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ImmunoBiotics, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Raj , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Vithal J. RajadhyakshaVithal J. Rajadhyaksha

Chief Financial Officer





May 24, 2010
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00507

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E .W.J. AND

L.J., CHILDREN

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF PARKER COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant ’ s “ Motion To Dismiss Appeal .” It is the

court = s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 20 , 2012

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

Voxware, Inc. Hamilton, New Jersey

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-149826, No.
333-27069, No. 333-33342, No. 333-47864, No. 333-124659 and No. 333-135358) the
Registration Statement on Form S-2, as amended by the Post-Effective Amendment
to Form S-2 on Form S-3 (No. 333-128690) of Voxware, Inc. of our report dated
September 28, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which
appear in this Form 10-K.

| |  | /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
| |  | --------------------

Bethesda, Maryland September 28, 2009

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Efrain CISNEROS-VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10512.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 12, 2010.

Cassie Bray Woo, Assistant U.S., United States Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Patrick Edward McGillicuddy, I, Esquire, Law Offices of Patrick E. McGilli-cuddy, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Efrain Cisneros-Valdez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 60-month sentence for re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cisneros-Valdez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. We construe the pro se letter received on June 4, 2010, as a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

We decline to rule on Cisneros-Valdez’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. *See United States v. McKenna,*327 F.3d 830, 845 (9th Cir.2003).

We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).

Cisneros-Valdez’s request for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 630

(October Term, 1930).

#### DeForest Radio Co. *v.*General Electric Co.

October 19, 1931.

Ordered, that the opinion in this case' (283 U. S. 664, 686) be amended as follows:

(1) By substituting for the words “In July, 1912,” in the 12th line of the last paragraph of the opinion, the' following:

> “August 20, 1912, the earliest date claimed for Langmuir, was rejected, rightly, we think, by the District Court, which held that Langmuir was anticipated' by Arnold in November, 1912. But before the earlier date ...”

(2) By substituting for the 3d sentence from the end the following:

> “ By August, 1912, the Telegraph Company used De Forest amplifying audions at 54 volts, and, by November, they were used by another at 67% volts. This was possible only because the tubes had thus been exhausted of gas which would otherwise have ionized with blue glow at from 20 to 30 volts.”

*

 For decisions on applications for certiorari, see *post,*pp. 599, 617.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the |
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION |

In the Matter of the Application of
LatAm SEF, LLC for
Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

ORDER OF REGISTRATION

LatAm SEF, LLC (“LatAm”) has submitted to the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”), pursuant to Section Sh of the Commodity Exchange
Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), an
application for registration as a swap execution facility, which includes submissions dated
September 25, 2013 through January 21, 2016.

Having reviewed LatAm’s application, the Commission HEREBY ORDERS that,
pursuant to Section 5h of the Act and Commission Regulation 37.3(b)(6)(i), LatAm is granted

registration as a swap execution facility, subject to the terms and conditions specified herein:

(1) LatAm shall comply with all representations and submissions made by LatAm in
support of its application for registration as a swap execution facility, as shown in the application

record;

(2) LatAm shall comply with all provisions of the Act and all requirements set forth
in the Commission’s regulations, as may be amended or adopted from time to time, that are |
applicable to swap execution facilities, provided that, as prior relief granted by Commission staff i

pursuant to Commission regulation 140.99 remains in effect:


(a) In lieu of complying with the specific requirements of Commission
Regulations 37,6(b), 37.1000, 37.1001, 45.2(a) and 45.3(a) that are addressed in
CFTC Letter No, 15-25, LatAm shall comply with the terms and conditions of
CFTC Letter No. 15-25, for the duration set forth therein; and

(b) In lieu of complying with the specific requirements of Commission
Regulations 37.205(a) and 37.205(b)(2) that are addressed in CFTC Letter No.
15-68, LatAm shall comply with the terms and conditions of CFTC Letter No, 15-

68, for the duration set forth therein.
Issued in Washington, D.C. on this 22nd day of January, 2016.

By the Commission

se 4 :
LAL | Db sh
Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
BG

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0608

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KAYLA DAWN PENNINGTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including May 7, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 31 2022

03/31/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0608
Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
  By:
    /s/ JEFFREY M. GUTMANJeffrey M. GutmanSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of Oxford Resources GP, LLC (the general
partner of Oxford Resource Partners, LP)
```

[Federal Register: November 29, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 228)]
[Notices]
[Page 66613]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29no99-34]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, December 10, 1999.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-31018 Filed 11-24-99; 12:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----