30912 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2001 / Notices

facilities and also the modification of

other affected facilities through the

completed projects.

Dated: May 30, 2001.

Michael Stahl,

Director, Office of Compliance.

[FR Doc. 01–14476 Filed 6–7–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–6994–6]

EPA Science Advisory Board; Request

for Nominations for the Arsenic Rule

Benefits Review Panel; and

Notification of Public Advisory

Committee Meetings and Request for

Nominations for the Advisory Council

on Clean Air Compliance Analysis

(Council)

ACTION: Request for nominations to the

Arsenic Rule Benefits Review Panel of

the Environmental Protection Agency’s

(EPA) Science Advisory Board (SAB).

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) Science

Advisory Board is announcing the

formation of an Arsenic Rule Benefits

Review Panel (hereinafter, the ‘‘Panel’’)

and soliciting nominations to this Panel.

The EPA Science Advisory Board was

established to provide independent

scientific and technical advice,

consultation, and recommendations to

the EPA Administrator on the technical

bases for EPA regulations. In this sense,

the Board functions as a technical peer

review panel.

Any interested person or organization

may nominate qualified individuals for

membership on the Panel. Nominees

should be identified by name,

occupation, position, address and

telephone number. To be considered, all

nominations must include a current

resume providing the nominee’s

background, experience and

qualifications.

Background

Following the January 22, 2001

Federal Register promulgation of the

arsenic rule, a number of issues were

raised to EPA by States, public water

systems, and others regarding the

adequacy of science and the basis for

national economic analyses informing

decisions about the rule. Because of the

importance of the arsenic rule and the

national debate surrounding it related to

the science and economic analyses that

inform the decision, EPA’s

Administrator publicly announced on

March 20, 2001, that the Agency would

take additional steps to reassess the

scientific and economic issues

associated with this rule, to gather more

information, and to seek further public

input on each of these important issues.

Consistent with that commitment, the

EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) will

convene a panel of nationally

recognized technical experts to review

the estimates of the benefits associated

with the final arsenic in drinking water

rule.

An important aspect of forming any

panel is the charge that is to be

addressed during their review. At this

time, the EPA charge to the subject

panel has not been received. Once

received, that charge will be placed on

the Science Advisory Board website

which can be found at www.epa.gov/

sab/. Members of the public wishing to

comment on the charge should send

their comments to the Designated

Federal Officer, Mr. Thomas Miller, as

noted below. When the charge is placed

on the SAB website, the date of its

placement will be noted therein and

comments on the charge will be

accepted for ten calendar days following

that date or the date for closing the

nominations process which is the

subject of this notice, whichever is later.

In addition, the membership of the

Panel itself will be posted at the same

SAB website within 15 calendar days of

closure of the nomination period.

The criteria for selecting Panel

members are that Panel members be

recognized experts in their fields; that

Panel members be as impartial and

objective as possible; that Panel

members represent an array of

backgrounds and perspectives (within

the disciplines relevant to this review);

and that the Panel members be available

to participate fully in the review, which

will be conducted over a relatively short

time frame (i.e., within approximately 3

months). Panel members will be asked

to attend at least one public meeting

followed by at least one public

teleconference meeting over the course

of 3 months; they will be asked to

participate in the discussion of key

issues and assumptions at these

meetings, and they will be asked to

review and to help finalize the products

and outputs of the Panel. The Panel will

make recommendations to the Executive

Committee (EC) of the SAB for approval

of the Panel’s report and transmittal to

the Administrator.

Nominations should be submitted to

Mr. Thomas O. Miller, Designated

Federal Officer, EPA Science Advisory

Board, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (1400A), 1200 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460,

telephone (202) 564–4558; FAX (202)

501–0582; or via e-mail at

miller.tom@epa.gov no later than June

18, 2001. The Agency will not formally

acknowledge or respond to

nominations.

Advisory Council on Clean Air

Compliance Analysis (the Council)

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory

Committee Act, Public Law 92–463,

notice is hereby given that the Advisory

Council on Clean Air Compliance

Analysis (the Council) of the EPA

Science Advisory Board (SAB) will meet

on the dates and times noted below. All

times noted are Eastern Daylight

Savings Time. All meetings are open to

the public, however, seating is limited

and available on a first come basis.

Important Notice: Documents that are

the subject of SAB reviews are normally

available from the originating EPA office

and are not available from the SAB

Office—information concerning

availability of documents from the

relevant Program Office is included

below.

1. Advisory Council on Clean Air

Compliance Analysis (Council)—June

22, 2001 Teleconference

The Council will conduct a public

teleconference meeting on Friday, June

22, 2001 between the hours of 1 pm and

3 pm (Eastern Daylight Savings Time).

The meeting will be coordinated

through a conference call connection in

Room 6013 in the USEPA, Ariel Rios

Building North, 1200 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004.

The public is encouraged to attend the

meeting in the conference room noted

above, however, the public may also

attend through a telephonic link if lines

are available. Additional instructions

about how to participate in the

conference call can be obtained by

calling Ms. Diana Pozun one week prior

to the meeting (June 15, 2001) at (202)

564–4544, or via e-mail at

pozun.diana@epa.gov.

Purpose of the Meeting

The purpose of this teleconference

meeting is to begin the Council’s

process of providing advice to the

Agency in developing the third in a

series of statutorily mandated

comprehensive analyses of the total

costs and total benefits of programs

implemented pursuant to the Clean Air

Act. Section 812 of the Clean Air Act

requires the EPA to periodically assess

the effects of the 1990 Clean Air Act

Amendments on the ‘‘public health,

economy and the environment of the

United States’’ and to report the

findings and results of the assessments

to Congress. Section 812 also

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2001 / Notices 30913

established the Advisory Council on

Clean Air Compliance Analysis (the

Council) and gave it the following

mission: ‘‘to review the data and

methodology used to develop the 812

Study and to advise the EPA

Administrator concerning the utility

and relevance of the Study.’’ EPA has to

date completed two assessments and

received the advice of the Council on

them: The Benefits and Costs of the

Clean Air Act: 1970 to 1990 (published,

1997) and The Benefits and Costs of the

Clean Air Act, 1990 to 2010 (published

1999). For copies of these reports, please

visit our website (www.epa.gov/sab)

under the REPORTS subheading.

Council advice to the Agency for the

third 812 Study will begin with the

review of an ‘‘analytical blueprint’’ for

the study. The purpose of this blueprint

is to provide an opportunity for SAB

and public review of the major goals,

objectives, methodologies, and

analytical choices for the study before it

is implemented.

The purpose of the call is to provide

Council members and consultants with

the opportunity to: (1) Clarify the charge

question (see below) related to the

‘‘analytical blueprint’’ for the third

Section 812 Study; (2) request any

supplemental materials from the

Agency; (3) ask questions on materials

already received from the Agency; and

(4) and discuss preparations for a public

meeting of the Council Meeting on

Monday and Tuesday, July 9–10, 2001

in Washington, DC (see below for details

on the July meeting).

Availability of Review Materials

Review materials for the meeting will

include the following: ‘‘Benefits and

Costs of the Clean Air Act 1990–2020:

Draft Analytical Plan for EPA’s Second

Prospective Analysis.’’ The document

will be available upon request from Mr.

Jim DeMocker via telephone (202) 564–

1673, fax (202) 564–1557, or email at

democker.jim@epa.gov.

For Further Information

Any member of the public wishing

further information concerning this

meeting or wishing to submit brief oral

comments must contact Dr. Angela

Nugent, Designated Federal Officer, EPA

Science Advisory Board (1400A), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20460; telephone (202)

564–4562; FAX (202) 501–0582; or via

e-mail at nugent.angela@epa.gov.

Requests for oral comments must be in

writing (e-mail, fax or mail) and

received by Dr. Nugent no later than

noon Eastern Daylight Savings Time on

June 15, 2001.

2. Health and Ecological Effects

Subcommittee (HEES) of the Advisory

Council on Clean Air Compliance

Analysis (Council)—June 25, 2001

Teleconference

The HEES, a subcommittee of the

Council, will conduct a public

teleconference meeting on June 25, 2001

between the hours of 11 am and 1 pm

(Eastern Daylight Savings Time). The

meeting will be coordinated through a

conference call connection in Room

6013 in the USEPA, Ariel Rios Building

North, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20004. The public is

encouraged to attend the meeting in the

conference room noted above, however,

the public may also attend through a

telephonic link if lines are available.

Additional instructions about how to

participate in the conference call can be

obtained by calling Ms. Diana Pozun

one week prior to the meeting (June 22,

2001) at (202) 564–4544, or via e-mail at

pozun.diana@epa.gov

Purpose of the Meeting

The HEES will review the Agency’s

proposed approach to assessment of

health and ecological effects for the

Section 812 Study and develop a draft

response for the July 9–10, 2001 meeting

of the Council to Agency charge

questions on those issues.

Charge to the Subcommittee

To review the Agency’s proposed

analytical methodologies and data

sources for the third Section 812 Study

and provide advice prior to

implementation of those methodologies.

Topics for the AQMS’s advice regarding

analytical methodologies and data

sources include: (1) Health effects

modeling; (2) ecological and welfare

effects modeling; and (3) assessment of

the effects of hazardous air pollutants

Availability of Review Materials

Review materials for the meeting will

include ‘‘Benefits and Costs of the Clean

Air Act 1990–2020: Draft Analytical

Plan for EPA’s Second Prospective

Analysis.’’ The document will be

available upon request from Mr. Jim

DeMocker via telephone (202) 564–

1673, fax (202) 564–1557, or email at

democker.jim@epa.gov.

For Further Information

Any member of the public wishing

further information concerning this

meeting or wishing to submit brief oral

comments (10 minutes or less) must

contact Dr. Angela Nugent, Designated

Federal Officer, EPA Science Advisory

Board (1400A), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460;

telephone (202) 564–4562; FAX (202)

501–0323; or via e-mail at

nugent.angela@epa.gov. Requests for

oral comments must be in writing (email, fax or mail) and received by Dr.

Nugent no later than noon Eastern

Daylight Savings Time on July 2, 2001.

3. Air Quality Modeling Subcommittee

(AQMS) of the Advisory Council on

Clean Air Compliance Analysis

(Council)—July 2, 2001 Teleconference

The AQMS, a subcommittee of the

Council, will conduct a public

teleconference meeting on Monday, July

2, 2001 between the hours of 2 pm and

4 pm (Eastern Daylight Savings Time).

The meeting will be coordinated

through a conference call connection in

Room 6013 in the USEPA, Ariel Rios

Building North, 1200 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004.

The public is encouraged to attend the

meeting in the conference room noted

above, however, the public may also

attend through a telephonic link if lines

are available. Additional instructions

about how to participate in the

conference call can be obtained by

calling Ms. Diana Pozun one week prior

to the meeting (June 22, 2001) at (202)

564–4544, or via e-mail at

pozun.diana@epa.gov

Purpose of the Meeting

The AQMS will review the Agency’s

proposed approach to emission

inventories and air quality modeling

and develop a draft response for the July

9–10, 2001 meeting of the Council to

Agency charge questions on those

issues.

Charge to the Subcommittee

To review the Agency’s proposed

analytical methodologies and data

sources for the third Section 812 Study

and provide advice prior to

implementation of those methodologies.

Topics for the AQMS’s advice regarding

analytical methodologies and data

sources include: (1) Emissions

inventories and (2) air quality modeling.

Availability of Review Materials

Review materials for the meeting will

include the following: ‘‘Benefits and

Costs of the Clean Air Act 1990–2020:

Draft Analytical Plan for EPA’s Second

Prospective Analysis.’’ The document

will be available upon request from Mr.

Jim DeMocker via telephone (202) 564–

1673, fax (202) 564–1557, or email at

democker.jim@epa.gov.

For Further Information

Any member of the public wishing

further information concerning this

meeting or wishing to submit brief oral

30914 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2001 / Notices

comments (10 minutes or less) must

contact Dr. Angela Nugent, Designated

Federal Officer, EPA Science Advisory

Board (1400A), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460;

telephone (202) 564–4562; FAX (202)

501–0323; or via e-mail at

nugent.angela@epa.gov. Requests for

oral comments must be in writing (email, fax or mail) and received by Dr.

Nugent no later than noon Eastern

Daylight Savings Time on July 2, 2001.

4. Special Panel of the Advisory

Council on Clean Air Compliance

Analysis (Council)—July 9–10, 2001

A special panel of the Council, which

will include consultants expert in air

quality modeling and assessment of

health and ecological effects, will meet

on Monday and Tuesday, July 9–10,

2001 in room 6013, USEPA, Ariel Rios

Building North, 1200 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004.

The meeting will begin by 8:30 a.m. and

adjourn no later than 5:30 pm on July

9, 2001 and will begin by 8:30 am and

adjourn no later than 3 pm on July 10,

2001.

Purpose of the Meeting

The special panel of the Council will

review the major goals, objectives,

methodologies, and analytical choices

for the third 812 Study before it is

implemented.

Charge to the Panel

To review the Agency’s proposed

analytical methodologies and data

sources for the third Section 812 Study

and provide advice prior to

implementation of those methodologies.

Topics for the Council’s advice

regarding analytical methodologies and

data sources include: (1) Overall

analytical scope and design; (2) scenario

definition; (3) benefit and cost

disaggregation; (4) cost estimation; (5)

emissions inventories; (6) air quality

modeling; (7) health effects modeling;

(8) ecological and welfare effects

modeling; (9) assessment of the effects

of hazardous air pollutants; (10)

economic valuation; (11) uncertainty

characterization; and (12) results

integration.

Availability of Review Materials

Review materials for the meeting will

include ‘‘Benefits and Costs of the Clean

Air Act 1990–2020: Draft Analytical

Plan for EPA’s Second Prospective

Analysis.’’ The document will be

available upon request from Mr. Jim

DeMocker via telephone (202) 564–

1673, fax (202) 564–1557, or email at

democker.jim@epa.gov.

For Further Information

Any member of the public wishing

further information concerning this

meeting or wishing to submit brief oral

comments (10 minutes or less) must

contact Dr. Angela Nugent, Designated

Federal Officer, EPA Science Advisory

Board (1400A), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460;

telephone (202) 564–4562; FAX (202)

501–0323; or via e-mail at

nugent.angela@epa.gov. Requests for

oral comments must be in writing (email, fax or mail) and received by Dr.

Nugent no later than noon Eastern

Daylight Savings Time on July 2, 2001.

5. Council Contingent Teleconference—

August 9, 2001

The Council, may, depending on

progress achieved in developing its

report from the July 9–10, 2001 meeting,

convene in a public teleconference on

Thursday, August 9, 2001 between 1 pm

and 3 pm. The meeting will be

coordinated through a conference call

connection in Room 6013 in the U.S.

EPA, Ariel Rios Building, 1200

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20004. The public is

encouraged to attend the meeting in the

conference room noted above, however,

a limited number of the public may also

attend through a telephonic link.

Additional instructions about how to

participate in the meeting can be

obtained by calling Ms. Diana Pozun.

prior to the meeting (see contact

information given above).

Purpose of the Meeting

The Council is scheduling this

teleconference on a contingency basis.

The teleconference will be convened

only if, in the opinion of the Chair, it

is needed to address issues that require

further discussion prior to completion

of the Committee’s report. A decision as

whether or not this teleconference will

be convened will be made by close of

business, July 30, 2001, 12 days prior to

the tentatively scheduled date. The

decision on the teleconference will be

posted to the SAB website

(www.epa.gov/sab); or members of the

public may call or email Ms. Diana

Pozun at (202) 564–4544, or via e-mail

at pozun.diana@epa.gov.

Availability of Review Materials

If this teleconference is to be held, a

list of the issues to be discussed, along

with a draft meeting agenda, will be

posted on the SAB website

(www.epa.gov/sab) under the ‘‘Agenda’’

heading on or about April 13, 2001. If

the meeting is canceled, a notice will be

posted on the SAB website to that effect,

as well.

For Further Information

To obtain information concerning this

contingent teleconference, please

contact Dr. Angela Nugent, Designated

Federal Officer (DFO) (telephone (202)

564–4562; FAX (202) 501–0323; or via

e-mail at nugent.angela@epa.gov. To

obtain information about how to

participate in this teleconference, please

contact Ms. Diana Pozun (see contact

information previously given).

Providing Oral or Written Comments at

SAB Meetings

It is the policy of the EPA Science

Advisory Board to accept written public

comments of any length, and to

accommodate oral public comments

whenever possible. The EPA Science

Advisory Board expects that public

statements presented at its meetings will

not be repetitive of previously

submitted oral or written statements.

Oral Comments: In general, each

individual or group requesting an oral

presentation at a face-to-face meeting

will be limited to a total time of ten

minutes. For teleconference meetings,

opportunities for oral comment will

usually be limited to no more than three

minutes per speaker and no more than

fifteen minutes total. Deadlines for

getting on the public speaker list for a

meeting are given above. Speakers

should bring at least 35 copies of their

comments and presentation slides for

distribution to the reviewers and public

at the meeting. Written Comments:

Although the SAB accepts written

comments until the date of the meeting

(unless otherwise stated), written

comments should be received in the

SAB Staff Office at least one week prior

to the meeting date so that the

comments may be made available to the

committee for their consideration.

Comments should be supplied to the

appropriate DFO at the address/contact

information noted above in the

following formats: One hard copy with

original signature, and one electronic

copy via e-mail (acceptable file format:

WordPerfect, Word, or Rich Text files

(in IBM–PC/Windows 95/98 format).

Those providing written comments and

who attend the meeting are also asked

to bring 25 copies of their comments for

public distribution.

Meeting Access

Individuals requiring special

accommodation at these meetings,

including wheelchair access to the

conference room, should contact Dr.

Nugent at least five business days prior

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2001 / Notices 30915

to the relevant meeting so that

appropriate arrangements can be made.

6. Request for Nominations for the

Advisory Council on Clean Air

Compliance Analysis (the Council)

The U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) is soliciting nominations

to the Council, or panels that provide

the Council with detailed technical

advice, for future reviews of the

Agency’s assessments under section 812

of the Clean Air Act Amendments of the

effects of the 1990 Clean Air Act

Amendments on the ‘‘public health,

economy and the environment of the

United States.’’ By Statute, the Council

is composed of ‘‘not less than nine

members * * * in the fields of health

and environmental effects of air

pollution, economic analysis,

environmental sciences, and other fields

that the Administrator determines to be

appropriate.’’ Historically, the Council

has been supported by two

subcommittees, the Health and

Ecological Effects Subcommittee and the

Air Quality Modeling Subcommittees,

which have advised the Council on

technical issues. The EPA is especially

seeking individuals with expertise in

epidemiology related to air pollution

effects, air quality modeling, and cost

and benefit assessment as related to the

effects of control of air pollution.

Any interested person or organization

may nominate qualified individuals for

membership on the subcommittee.

Nominees should be identified by name,

occupation, position, address and

telephone number. To be considered, all

nominations must include a current

resume providing the nominee’s

background, experience and

qualifications.

The criteria for selecting Council

members or members of panels

providing the Council with detailed

technical advice, are that members be

recognized experts in their fields; that

members be as impartial and objective

as possible; that members represent an

array of backgrounds and perspectives

(within their disciplines); and that

members be available to participate

fully in the review, which will be

conducted over a relatively short time

frame. Members will be asked to attend

at least one public meeting followed by

at least one public telephone conference

meeting over the course of 3 months;

they will be asked to participate in the

discussion of key issues and

assumptions at these meetings, and they

will be asked to review and to help

finalize the products and outputs of the

Council or technical panel. Any

technical panel will make

recommendations to the Council for

approval of the Board’s report and

transmittal to the Administrator.

Nominations should be submitted to

Dr. Angela Nugent, Designated Federal

Officer, EPA Science Advisory Board,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(1400A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue,

NW, Washington, DC 20460, telephone

(202) 564–4562; FAX (202) 501–0323; or

via e-mail at nugent.angela@epa.gov no

later than Wednesday, August 1, 2001.

The Agency will not formally

acknowledge or respond to

nominations.

General Information

Additional information concerning

the EPA Science Advisory Board, its

structure, function, and composition,

may be found on the SAB Website

(http://www.epa.gov/sab) and in EPA–

SAB–01–002, Science Advisory Board

FY 2000 Annual Staff Report: Making

Science Real which is available on the

SAB Website or from the SAB

Publications Staff at (202) 564–4533 or

via fax at (202) 501–0256. Committee

rosters, draft Agendas and meeting

calendars are also located on our

website.

Dated: June 4, 2001.

John R. Fowle III,

Acting Staff Director, EPA Science Advisory

Board.

[FR Doc. 01–14479 Filed 6–7–01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6618–8]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared pursuant to the Environmental

Review Process (ERP), under section

309 of the Clean Air Act and section

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental

Policy Act as amended. Requests for

copies of EPA comments can be directed

to the Office of Federal Activities at

(202) 564–7167. An explanation of the

ratings assigned to draft environmental

impact statements (EISs) was published

in FR dated April 14, 2000 (65 FR

20157).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–AFS–L65378–ID Rating

EC2, Clean Slate Ecosystem

Management Project, Aquatic and

Terrestrial Restoration, Nez Perce

National Forest, Salmon River Ranger

District, Idaho County, ID.

Summary: EPA expressed concerns

regarding purpose and need,

alternatives, environmental monitoring,

cumulative impacts, prescribed burning,

and Clean Water Act TMDL protocols.

EPA has requested inclusion of a more

easy to follow statement of overriding

purpose and need; the addition of a nograzing alternative that includes active

habitat restoration; the addition of

specific and enforceable standards;

thresholds and responsible parties for

environmental monitoring; additional

detail on implementation and

contingencies for the prescribed burning

program; additional analysis of

cumulative impacts, and more detail on

the process to be used for addressing

TMDL protocols.

ERP No. D–BLM–G65078–NM Rating

LO, San Felipe Pueblo Land Exchange,

Involves Exchanges Federal Lands to

Private Lands, Acquisition, Sandoval

and Santa Fe Cos. NM.

Summary: EPA has no objection to the

proposed plan of action.

ERP No. D–BLM–K65330–CA Rating

LO, Northern and Eastern Colorado

Desert Plan (Plan), Implementation,

Comprehensive Framework for

Managing Species and Habitats (BLM),

Joshua Tree National Park (JTNP) and

Chocolate Mountains Aerial Gunnery

Range, California Desert, Riverside,

Imperial and San Bernardino Counties,

CA.

Summary: EPA has no objections to

the proposed plan.

ERP No. D–FHW–F40393–MI Rating

EC2, I–96/Airport Area Access Study,

Transportation Improvements,

Surrounding the Gerald R. Ford

International Airport, Kent County, MI.

Summary: EPA expressed concerns

regarding wetlands, woodlands and

water quality impacts to Thornapple

River, Martin and Beck Drain and Little

Plaster Creek.

ERP No. D–FHW–F40394–MI Rating

EO2, I–94/Rehabilitation Project,

Transportation Improvements to a 6.7

mile portion of I–94 from east I–96 west

end to Conner Avenue on the east end,

Funding and NPDES Permit, City of

Detroit, Wayne County, MI.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental objections because of

issues in the following areas: scope of

analysis, purpose and need, alternatives

analysis, air quality, noise, pedestrian

and bicyclist impacts, costs, and

cumulative impacts.

ERP No. D–FHW–G40160–OK Rating

LO, I–40 Crosstown Expressway

Transportation Improvements, From I–

235/I–35 Interchange West to Meridan

Avenue, Funding, Oklahoma City, OK.

Summary: EPA has no objection to the

selection of the preferred alternative.

EPA however asks that additional

information on cultural resource