alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Allied Digital Technologies Corp. and
Subsidiaries as of July 31, 1996 and for the year then ended.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                        830,723
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 23,906,859
<ALLOWANCES>                  1,515,000
<INVENTORY>                   5,374,498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              34,180,958
<PP&E>                        83,845,857
<DEPRECIATION>                (51,620,715)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                (113,877,633)
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         (34,671,984)
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      136,196
<OTHER-SE>                    37,840,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  113,877,633
<SALES>                       163,781,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              163,781,324
<CGS>                         135,101,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 31,279,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              665,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            6,186,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (8,120,307)
<INCOME-TAX>                  (2,534,847)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (5,585,460)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (5,585,460)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        


</TABLE>
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

   EXHIBIT 12 - COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (Dollars in Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Year Ended December 31,
                                               1996       1995      1994        1993        1992
<S>                                        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Pretax income (loss) excluding
  discontinued operations                  $317,574   $247,455   $ 26,376   $257,426   ($144,854)
Minority interest in subsidiaries
  having fixed charges(*)                    46,689     33,190      8,565     34,800      37,685
Less undistributed equity in (earnings)
  losses of investees                        31,353     (1,559)    49,010    (25,067)    376,020
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                           78,048    124,633    114,803    153,836     212,150
  Debt discount (premium) and expense        (1,174)    (1,023)     1,240      5,273       4,698
  One-third of rentals                        9,279      9,471      5,119      5,801      16,341

      EARNINGS                             $481,769   $412,167   $205,113   $432,069    $502,040


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                         $ 78,048   $124,633   $114,803   $153,836    $212,150
  Debt discount (premium) and expense        (1,174)    (1,023)     1,240      5,273       4,698
  One-third of rentals                        9,279      9,471      5,119      5,801      16,341
  Pretax preferred dividend requirements
    of subsidiaries                          27,970     25,376       -          -           -

      FIXED CHARGES                        $114,123   $158,457   $121,162   $164,910    $233,189


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges             4.22       2.60       1.69       2.62        2.15


Earnings in excess of Fixed Charges        $367,646   $253,710   $ 83,951   $267,159    $268,851

</TABLE>

(*)  Amounts include subsidiary preferred dividends and accrued distributions 
     on TOPrS.






                               E-3
EXHIBIT 31.2: Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Ernest Clarke, certify that:

	1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Ultradata
Systems, Incorporated;

	2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

	3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial information included in this report fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

	4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

	a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

	b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

	c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

	5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

	a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuer's  ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  April 7, 2006              /s/ Ernest S. Clarke
                                  --------------------------------------
                                  Ernest Clarke, Chief Financial Officer
No. 409.

#### Peck et al. *v.*Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

October 21, 1935.

*Mr. J. Sterling Halstead*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman,*and *Mr. James W. Morris*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: LAIRD, BISSELL & MEEDS, INC. 

CITATION: 32 Agric. Dec. 1118 

DOCKET NUMBER: 207 

DATE: MAY 17, 1973 

DOCUMENT TYPE: DISMISSAL ORDER 

NOTE: ANOTHER VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT THAT WAS NOT REPORTED IN THE AGRICULTURAL 

DECISIONS IS AVAILABLE IN THIS DATABASE 

(No. 15,221) 

In re LAIRD, BISSELL & MEEDS, INC. CEA Docket No. 207. In order issued May 17, 

1973, by Donald A. Campbell, Judicial Officer. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2
Exhibit 32.1 - President/CFO Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of No Show, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I,
Doreen E. Zimmerman , President/CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Doreen E. Zimmerman
-----------------------
    Doreen E. Zimmerman
    President/CFO


Date  December 11, 2007
      -----------------


<PAGE>
```

[Federal Register: May 28, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 102)]
[Notices]
[Page 29182]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28my98-50]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Financial Products Advisory Committee; Public Meeting

    This is to give notice, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, section 10(a) and 41 CFR 101-
6.1015(b), that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's Financial
Products Advisory Committee will conduct a public meeting in the ground
level hearing room at the Commission's Washington, DC headquarters
located at 1155 21st Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20581, on
June 11, 1998, beginning at 1:00 p.m. and lasting until 4:30 p.m.
    The agenda will consist of:

Agenda

1. Introductory Remarks by Chairperson Brooksley Born.
2. Discussion by members of the Advisory Committee of the following
topics:
    A. Use of notional funds by commodity trading advisors.
    B. Placement of foreign exchange terminals in the United States.
    C. Year 2000 preparations of the futures industry.
3. New developments.

    The purpose of this meeting is to solicit the views of the
Committee on these agenda matters. The Advisory Committee was created
by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for the purpose of advising
the Commission on issues concerning individuals and industries
interested in or affected by financial markets regulated by the
Commission. The purposes and objectives of the Advisory Committee are
more fully set forth in the April 15, 1997 Charter of the Advisory
Committee.
    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairperson of the Advisory
Committee, CFTC Chairperson Brooksley Born, is empowered to conduct the
meeting in a fashion that will, in her judgment, facilitate the orderly
conduct of business. Any member of the public who wishes to file a
written statement with the Advisory Committee should mail a copy of the
statement to the attention of: the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Financial Products Advisory Committee, c/o Ms. Josiane Branch, 1155
21st Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20581, before the meeting.

    Issued by the Commission in Washington, D.C., on May 22, 1998.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-14188 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1292 

Congratulating the Emporia State University Lady Hornets women’s basketball team for winning the 2010 NCAA Division II National Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2010 

Mr. MORAN of Kansas submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Emporia State University Lady Hornets 

women’s basketball team for winning the 2010 NCAA 

Division II National Championship. 

Whereas the Emporia State University (ESU) Lady Hornet 

basketball team defeated the Fort Lewis Skyhawks by a 

score of 65 to 53 to win the 2010 NCAA Women’s Division II National Championship in St. Joseph, Missouri, 

on March 26, 2010; 

Whereas this is ESU’s first ever women’s national basketball 

championship and the first national championship in any 

sport since being crowned the 1984 NCAA NAIA Women’s Softball National Champions; 

Whereas the ESU coaching staff of head coach Brandon 

Schneider and assistant coaches Jory Collins and Kiel 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1292 IH 

Unruh guided the Lady Hornets to a final record of 30 

wins and only 5 losses; 

Whereas the 2010 National Champions consisted of seniors 

Cassondra Boston, Jamie Augustyn, Lacy Corker, and 

Sophia Lenard, juniors Ashley Ferrell, Negesti Taylor, 

Kayla Krueger, Dava Logsdon, and Alli Volkens, sophomores Jessen Tucker and Brittney Miller, and freshmen 

Rachel Hanf, Jocelyn Cummings, and Kelsey Newman; 

Whereas ESU was led by the overall Most Outstanding Player of the tournament, Alli Volkers, who recorded 16 

points, 15 rebounds, and five blocks in the championship 

game; and 

Whereas the students, staff, alumni, and friends of Emporia 

State University along with the city of Emporia, Kansas, 

deserve much credit for their support of the Lady Hornet 

basketball team: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the Emporia State University 

3 Lady Hornet basketball team for winning the 2010 

4 NCAA Division II National Championship; and 

5 (2) recognizes the achievements of all the 

6 team’s players, coaches, and support staff. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: HERALD E. GIBBS 

DOCKET NUMBER: 87 

DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1958 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT 

NOTE: ANOTHER VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS REPORTED IN THE AGRICULTURAL DECISIONS 

AT 17 AGRIC. DEC. 1197 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

In re Herald E. Gibbs, Respondent 

CEA Docket No. 87 

Order Dismissing Complaint 

This proceeding was instituted by the issuance of a complaint as provided 

under Section 6(b) of the Commodity Exchange Act September 2, 1958. The 

complaint charged that the respondent became the buyer with respect to selling 

orders of his principals and the seller with respect to buying orders of his 

principals and executed orders of different principals against each other, all 

in violation of Sections 4b(D) and 4c(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act and 

section 1.38 of the regulations promulgated under the act. 

On December 9, 1958, the complainant filed a motion to dismiss stating: "In 

the light of all the information now available, and after consideration of all 

facts and representations made by the respondent, the complainant is of the 

opinion that further proceedings are not warranted, and therefore moves that the 

complaint be dismissed." 

Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed. 

Done at Washington, D. C., 

Dec. 12, 1958 

/s/ Thomas J. Flavin 

Judicial Officer 

LOAD-DATE: June 12, 2008 
Page 2
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 24 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01291

- CV

ESTATE OF ALBERT G. HILL, JR., DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. PR

- 17

- 04117

- 2



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Osborne

Opinion by Justice Myers

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal. 1 Pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appel late Procedure 42.1 (a)(1) , we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1 ( a)(1).

181291F.P05

1 In the motion, appellant states “he reserves the right” to move to reinstate this appeal should a certain circumstance arise. Any such motion must be filed in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 49. /Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS
JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ESTATE OF ALBERT G. HILL, JR.,
DECEASED

No. 05

- 18

- 01291

- CV On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. PR

- 17

- 04117

- 2. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, Justices Molberg and Osborne participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER appellees Tyree B. Miller and Margaret Kehiler recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Albert G. Hill, III.

Judgment entered this 24 th day of January 2019.
Exhibit (j)(2)

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 101 toRegistration Statement No. 002-90649 on Form N-1A of our reports each dated December21, 2007 relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Fidelity InvestmentTrust, including Fidelity Aggressive International Fund, Fidelity Worldwide Fund, FidelityDiversified International Fund and Fidelity International Small Cap Fund, each of our reportseach dated December 18, 2007 for Fidelity International Value Fund and FidelityInternational Small Cap Opportunities Fund and of our report dated December 20, 2007 forFidelity Advisor Europe Capital Appreciation Fund, appearing in the Annual Report on FormN-CSR of Fidelity Investment Trust for the year ended October 31, 2007, and to thereferences to us under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectuses and"Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statements of AdditionalInformation, which are a part of such Registration Statement.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

December 26, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         June 26-27, 2001.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 AM to 12:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Peter J. Sheridan, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6142, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD  20892-9606, 301-443-1513, psherida@mail.nih.gov.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 5, 2001.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 01-14777  Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# FCM Data July 2009
Delaware

The First State

Page 1

 

5513425 8300 Authentication: 201847300

SR# 20170150246 Date: 01-10-17

You may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml

I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF

DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY "LEDGERX LLC" IS DULY FORMED UNDER THE

LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND IS IN GOOD STANDING AND HAS A

LEGAL EXISTENCE SO FAR AS THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE SHOW, AS OF

THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY, A.D. 2017. 

AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE ANNUAL TAXES HAVE BEEN

PAID TO DATE.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60935

 

DAVID DONNELL JACKSON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ROBERT ARMSTRONG,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:01-CV-584-BN)

_________________________________________________________________

May 23, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

David Donnell Jackson, Mississippi prisoner # 39640, seeks a

certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the district court’s

dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for

failure to exhaust his state remedies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2254(b)(1)(A). To obtain a COA, Jackson must make a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right, which requires him

to show that “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the
petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional

right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether

the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Jackson argues that he should not be required to exhaust

because his state habeas application remains pending and has been

unduly delayed by the Mississippi Supreme Court. However, the

Mississippi Supreme Court clerk’s office confirms that Jackson’s

postconviction motion was denied on April 5, 2002, while the

instant appeal was pending. Because he has now exhausted his state

remedies, COA is GRANTED, the district court’s dismissal is

VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings on the

merits. See Sharpe v. Buchanan, 317 U.S. 238, 238-39 (1942);

Bufalino v. Reno, 613 F.2d 568, 571 (5th Cir. 1980); McDaniel v.

Sheriff of Dallas County, 445 F.2d 851, 852 (5th Cir. 1971).

COA GRANTED; CASE VACATED AND REMANDED