alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Simon Au, hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Here Enterprises,
      Inc. for the period ended August 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Here Enterprises, Inc.                                                                  

Dated: October 15, 2009

| | /s/
      Simon Au                                     
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Simon Au                                               
| | President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director          
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
| | Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Here
Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Here Enterprises, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Federal Register: January 29, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 19)]

[Notices]

[Page 4432]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr29ja98-47]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION





Sunshine Act Meeting



AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.



TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, February 27, 1998.



PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference

Room.



STATUS: Closed.



MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.



CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 98-2344 Filed 1-27-98; 12:07 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO    INDEX ========**

----
Certain Compensation Arrangements with Directors for 2005



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
  
 RADIAN GROUP INC. 
  
 CERTAIN COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
 WITH DIRECTORS FOR 2005 
  
 (Effective
October 1, 2005) 
  
 Cash Compensation 
  
 All non-employee members of our Board of Directors receive an annual fee for their services
of $32,500. Each non-employee director also receives a $2,000 fee for each board meeting or committee meeting attended. 
  
 In addition to the foregoing, Herbert Wender, our non-executive Chairman of the Board, receives an annual fee of $100,000 for serving as Chairman, and the chairmen of the
following committees are paid the following annual fees: 
  
 Audit and Risk Committee—$12,500 
  
 Compensation
and Human Resources Committee—$7,500 
  
 Credit
Committee—$5,000 
  
 Governance Committee—$5,000

  
 Investment and Finance Committee—$5,000 
  
 All annual fees are paid quarterly in advance and all
meeting fees are payable quarterly in arrears. 
  
 A committee of four
non-employee directors was formed in 2005 in connection with Radian’s search for a new CEO. Three of these directors, Howard Culang, Stephen Hopkins and Jan Nicholson, each received $10,000 for serving on this committee, while the fourth
director, James Jennings, received $15,000 for serving as chairman of this committee. 
  
 Equity Compensation 
  
 All non-employee directors receive an
annual grant of phantom stock, awarded under our Equity Compensation Plan, equal to $115,000 based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of the annual grant. The phantom stock awards are granted on the date of the Board’s first
regular meeting each year. 
  
 Our non-executive Chairman of the Board also
received 2,000 shares of phantom stock in 2005 as compensation for his efforts related to Radian’s CEO transition. 
  
 Radian requires each director to maintain a minimum direct investment in Radian common stock equal to $350,000, on or before the later of January 1, 2007 or four
years from the date that a director’s service on the Board begins. 
  
 Directors who are our employees do not receive additional compensation for their service as directors.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 64
          - [CC Docket Nos. 00-257 and 94-129; FCC 01-156]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Final rule, correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects an error in the docket heading portion of a                         **Federal Register**                         document regarding streamlined waiver procedures that the Commission adopted for the carrier-to-carrier sale or transfer of subscriber basis. The Commission's new procedures provide for an acquiring carrier to simply self-certify to the Commission, in advance of the transfer, that the carrier will follow the required procedures. The summary was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on May 22, 2001.                    

# DATES:

Effective June 6, 2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michele Walters, Associate Division Chief, or Dana Walton-Bradford, Attorney, Common Carrier Bureau, Accounting Policy Division, (202) 418-7400.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This summary contains a correction to the heading portion of a                     **Federal Register**                     summary, 66 FR 28117 (May 22, 2001). The full text of the Commission's Report and Order is available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.                

## Correction

1. On page 28117, in the second column, in the docket heading, “FCC 01-153” is corrected to read “FCC 01-156.”

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14168 Filed 6-5-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
---

Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2011 (the “Report”), I, David Gamache, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January 13, 2011
/s/ David GamacheDavid GamacheChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Rashi’d Qawi’ AL-AMI’N, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 11-6977.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 30, 2012.

Decided: Feb. 10, 2012.

Rashi’d Qawi’ Al-Ami’n, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

Rashi’d Qawi’ Al-Ami’n petitions for panel and en banc rehearing of his appeal. For reasons appearing to the court, we grant panel rehearing and vacate our initial opinion. Al-Ami’n’s petition for en banc rehearing is denied.

Al-Ami’n seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The district court’s order is not ap-pealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Al-Ami’n has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-pealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
No. 132. No. 133. No. 134. No. 135. *589No. 136.

#### *588E. R. Fain *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Mrs. E. R. Fain *v.*Same; Chas. P. McGaha *v.*Same; Mrs. Chas. P. McGaha *v.*Same; and *589L. D. Fain *v.*Same.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. John B. King*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman,*and *Messrs. James W. Morris*and *Lucius A. Buck*for respondent.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
October 17, 2005

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
AND FACSIMILE (310) 752-1486
----------------------------
Digicorp
100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1750
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Attn: William B. Horne, CEO

      Re:   Exchange of Warrants

Dear Will:

      This letter documents the agreement among Bodnar Capital  Management,  LLC
("Bodnar  Capital")  and  Digicorp to cancel  certain  warrants  owned by Bodnar
Capital in exchange for the issuance by Digicorp of a  replacement  warrant,  as
further described below. Pursuant to a Subscription Agreement dated May 18, 2005
between  Digicorp and Bodnar  Capital  (the  "Subscription  Agreement"),  Bodnar
Capital  purchased  2,941,176 shares of Digicorp's common stock ("Common Stock")
and warrants to purchase an  aggregate of 3,000,000  shares of Common Stock with
exercise prices ranging from $0.25 to $1.50 per share (the "May Warrants").

      Bodnar Capital and Digicorp hereby agree to cancel all of the May Warrants
in exchange  for the  issuance  by  Digicorp  to Bodnar  Capital of a warrant to
purchase  500,000  shares of Common  Stock with an  exercise  price of $0.01 per
share  exercisable  for a period of five years (the "October  Warrant").  Bodnar
Capital is  delivering  herewith the original May Warrants for  cancellation  by
Digicorp. Upon receipt of the original May Warrants,  Digicorp shall immediately
issue and deliver the October Warrant to Bodnar Capital.

      Bodnar Capital and Digicorp hereby  represent and warrant that each of the
representations  and warranties of each respective party contained in Articles I
and II of the  Subscription  Agreement  are true  and  correct  in all  material
respects on and as of the date of this letter.

      If you agree with the foregoing,  please indicate your approval of same by
signing this letter in the space provided below.

                                                    Very truly yours,

                                                    /s/ Steven J. Bodnar
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Steven J. Bodnar
                                                    Managing Member

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

Digicorp

/s/ William B. Horne      (10/27/05)
------------------------------------
William B. Horne
Chief Executive Officer
CIRCUIT COURT OF LOUDOUN COUNTY

#### Lindberg v. R. W. DeHart arid Craftsmen, Inc.

April 29, 1992

Case No. (Chancery) 14297

By Judge Thomas D. Horne

The Court will grant the request for a temporary injunction filed in this case. A review of the pleadings and affidavits filed clearly demonstrates that such relief is indicated. The evidence demonstrates that there will be no diminution of the value of the collateral in the event the instant sale is enjoined. Furthermore, the harm to Defendants, should the foreclosure be stayed, pales in comparison to the harm to be suffered by the Complainant. There is no evidence to demonstrate that the payments are in arrears. Furthermore, the pleadings and papers indicate substantial allegations meriting a full development of the record prior to a final disposition. As the Complainant has been unsuccessful in her attempts to refinance the property, a foreclosure at this time would preclude such a fair hearing on the merits. Upon the posting of a bond with surety in the amount of $1000.00 to cover any costs incident hereto, such injunction shall be effective.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1372 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1372

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 27, 2010.
Whereas, on June 10, 1910, the University of Georgia organized its graduate 
        education practices under the guidance of Professor Willis Henry Bocock, 
        who became the first dean of the Graduate School;
Whereas the Graduate School has contributed to elevating and maintaining the 
        University of Georgia as one of the preeminent public universities in 
        the United States;
Whereas these contributions are a reflection of the great leadership of the 
        Graduate School's first dean, Dr. Bocock, and those who succeeded him: 
        R.P. Stephens, George H. Boyd, Gerald B. Huff, Thomas H. Whitehead, 
        Hardy M. Edwards, Jr., John C. Dowling, Gordhan L. Patel, and the 
        present dean, Maureen Grasso;
Whereas the Graduate School has grown from 7 students in 1910 to more than 7,000 
        today;
Whereas the Graduate School has awarded master's, specialist, and doctoral 
        degrees to more than 73,000 individuals who occupy leadership roles in 
        school systems, institutions of higher learning, business, government, 
        and nonprofit organizations;
Whereas the Graduate School includes more than 350 fields of study and 
        contributes to new knowledge and advancements in academic research; and
Whereas Graduate School graduates have made significant contributions to the 
        economic development and competitiveness of the State of Georgia and the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the centennial of the founding and organization of 
        the University of Georgia Graduate School; and
            (2) expresses sincere appreciation to the students and 
        administrators who contribute to the growth and success of the 
        University of Georgia Graduate School.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2136

ALICE L. ROSEBORO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMPORIUM COMMUNICATIONS, Rock Hill Telephone Co; MARY 

GRAVELEY; TIFFANY THOMPSON; LOUIS RIDINGER; FRANK MARSHALL; 

GLEN MCFADDEN; JEFF BUSHARDT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior

District Judge. (0:10-cv-03267-MBS)

Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alice L. Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se. Beverly A. Carroll, 

HAMILTON MARTENS BALLOU & CARROLL, LLC, Rock Hill, South 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alice L. Roseboro appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying 

relief in her employment discrimination action. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Roseboro v. Comporium Commc’ns, No. 0:10-cv-03267-MBS (D.S.C. 

Aug. 29, 2013). Roseboro’s motion to amend is granted. We 

grant dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 157.

#### Eastman *v.*Ohio.

Jurisdictional statement distributed September 10, 1936.

Decided October 12, 1936.

*Messrs. H. W. Fraser, E. R. Eppler,*and *R. H. Baker*for appellant.

*Messrs. Frazier Reams*and *Joel S. Rhinefort*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a final judgment. *Rankin*v. *State,*11 Wall. 380; *Heike*v. *United States,*217 U. S. 423, 432-433.
HOW EXCHANGES DEAL WIT

HOW EXCHANGES DEAL WIT

DISRUPTIONS TO MARKET DISRUPTIONS TO MARKET 

OPERATIONS OPERATIONS

Prepared for CFTC Technology Adviso

Committee Meeting

October 13, 2004

Prepared By

Pat Gamba

New York Board 
INTERNAL MARKET DISRUPTIONS INTERNAL MARKET DISRUPTIONS

• Stop trading• Assess problem and notify industry of action to b

National tragedy Multiple • Major

• Switch to back-up• Potentially stop trading until repaired• If trading floor operable, continue to trade on floo

• Major• Can’t trade

Lose Electronic Trading System Software and/or hardware(ETS)External/Internal

• Move to back-up Trading Floor• Assess problem and notify industry of action to b

• Major• Can’t trade

Lose the building – Any of multiple sourcesExternal/internal

• Move to back-up Trading Floor• Assess problem and notify industry of action to b

• Major• Can’t trade

Lose power – External/Internal Facility/public utility failure

• Switch to back-up• Assess FCMs• If no major problematic conditions exist e.g., ST

management process, continue to trade

• Minor/Minimal• Might delay opening

Lose Clearing system – Software and/or hardwareExternal/Internal

• Switch to back-up• Telephone orders to trading floor facility• If coupled with Electronic Trading System, stop t

Lose EOR – External/Internal Software and/or hardware • Minimal/Major

• Switch to back-up• Move to back-up Trading Floor• Use wallboards (?) • Potentially stop trading until repaired.

Lose video displays - Internal Software and/or hardware • Minimal/Major

• Move to back-up Trading Floor• Assess problem• Notify industry of action to be taken

• Major• Can’t trade

Lose the Trading Floor Facility Any of multiple sourcesExternal/Internal

• Write times on order tickets• Revert to hand signals and PC input

• Minor/Minimal• Potential audit trail problems• Minor• Dissemination of price data impaired

Software and/or hardwareSoftware and/or hardware

Lose time clocks – InternalLose handheld price reporting system - Internal

• Use video displays• Use booth terminals• Potentially stop trading until repaired

Lose wallboards - Internal Software and/or hardware • Minimal/Major

• Switch to back-up. • Use cell phones. • Continue to use EOR process • Potentially stop trading until repaired

• Major• Phone orders don’t reach the floor

Lose telephones on Trading Floor Switch failureInternal

• Phone/Email FCMs to use NYBOT website and/• Potentially stop trading until repaired

• Major• Investors can’t see quote or sales data

Lose ticker to vendors (MDS) Software and/or hardwareExternal/Internal

TYPE CAUSE IMPACT ACTION