alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: May 22, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 99)]
[Notices]
[Page 28369]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22my98-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, June 19, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-13866 Filed 5-20-98; 12:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
#### Joga SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-74482.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Filed June 16, 2006.

Joga Singh, El Sobrante, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Greg D. Mack, Esq., Leslie McKay, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Joga Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying as untimely his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion, *see Movsisian v. Ashcroft,*395 *661F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA acted within its discretion in denying Singh’s second motion to reopen, filed more than four years after the BIA’s final deportation order, as both untimely and numerically barred, *see 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (permitting only one motion to reopen to be filed within ninety days of BIA’s decision), where Singh failed to demonstrate changed circumstances in India to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time and numerical limitations, *see 8*C.F.R. § 1003.2(e)(3)(ii).

We are without jurisdiction to review Singh’s challenge to the BIA’s June 6, 2000 dismissal of his appeal on the merits, because this petition for review is not timely as to that decision. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); *Singh v. INS,*315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14780]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel Biomedical Research Technology.
    Date: June 29, 2001.
    Time: 1:00 PM to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, 
6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Sybil A. Wellstood, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Center for Research 
Resources, National Institutes of Health, One Rockledge Centre, Room 
6018, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965, (301) 
435-0814, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d0a1811110e091212190e3d131e0f0f53131415531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d2a3831312e293232392e1d333e2f2f73333435733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333; 
93.371, Biomedical Technology 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 1, 2001.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 01-14780 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of Excaliber Enterprises, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephanie Y. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Matthew L. Jones, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Stephanie Y. Jones

Stephanie Y. Jones

Chief Executive Officer

November 5, 2007





/s/ Matthew L. Jones

Matthew L. Jones

Chief Financial Officer

November 5, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Theodore, Appellant.

Submitted April 19, 2010;

decided June 8, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JENAM TECH, LLC, 

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC, 

Appellee

______________________

2023-1480, 2023-1485, 2023-1486

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-

00627, IPR2021-00628, IPR2021-00630.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 23-1480 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 01/09/2024
2 JENAM TECH, LLC V. GOOGLE LLC

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

January 9, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 9, 2024

Case: 23-1480 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 01/09/2024
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-31081

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PIERO ANGELO MORALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CR-139-3-A

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Piero Angelo Morales pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written

plea agreement, to one count of distribution of cocaine and

ecstasy. The district court sentenced him to 115 months in

prison and a five-year term of supervised release. Morales now

appeals the district court’s judgment. Morales argues that he

was denied the effective assistance of counsel in litigating his

involuntariness claim during sentencing.
No. 02-31081

-2-

As a general rule, this court declines to review claims of

ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, although we

may do so in exceptional cases. See United States v. Higdon, 832

F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987); United States v. Gibson, 55 F.3d

173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995); see also Massaro v. United States, 123

S. Ct. 1690 (2003). This is not the exceptional case. 

Accordingly, we decline to review Morales’ ineffective-assistance

claim in this direct appeal. The judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED.
No. 565.

#### Donahue *v.*Rockwell et al.

December 9, 1935.

*Mr. Samuel Hoffman*for petitioner.

*Messrs.'Hiram C. Todd*and *Wm. Dewey Loucks*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-3280  of  Mississippi  View  Holding  Company  on Form S-8  (filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 1996) of our report dated October
29,  1997  included in this Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of  Mississippi  View
Holding Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997.




/s/Bertram Cooper & Co., LLP
Bertram Cooper & Co., LLP
Waseca, Minnesota
December 22, 1997
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1769** 

JENNIFER MARIE JONES , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. COMSYS IT PARTNERS, INCORPORATED; MICHAEL MUSCATELL, Vice President, Strategic Accounts; KARLA MEADOR, Managing Director; TERRY BELL, Vice President, Human Resources; MICHAEL BARKER, Chief Operating Officer; KEITH MARKHAM, Sr. Regional Vice President , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Max O. Cogburn, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:10

- cv - 00072

- MOC

- DSC )

Submitted : April 23, 2012 Decided: May 8, 2012

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Jennifer Marie Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Quade Cacheris, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jennifer Marie Jones seeks to appeal the district
court’s May 16, 2011 o rder dismissing the individual defendants and denying Jones’s motion to dismiss the counterclaims filed by
COMSYS IT Pa r t n ers , Inc. (“COMSYS”)
. Jones also seeks to appeal the district court’s order refusing to grant her relief from the May 16 order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The orde r s Jones seeks to appeal are neither final order s nor appealable interlocutory or collateral order s . Accordingly, we deny Jones’s motion to compel enforcem ent of the settlement agreement and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Siew Mee Fam                                               |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Siew Mee Fam                                                         |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  July 15, 2010                                                        |
# C_2010057EN.01000801.xml

| 9.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/8

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 57/03

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28.1.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | NN 101/05 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | Abruzzo |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Indennizzo dei danni subiti nel 2004 |
| Legal basis | Leggi regionali n. 1/1984 e n. 6/2005 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Compensation for damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences |
| Form of aid | Direct payment |
| Budget | EUR 300 000 |
| Intensity | 40 % |
| Duration (period) | 2005 |
| Economic sectors | Fisheries |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Direzione Agricoltura, Foreste e Sviluppo Rurale |
| Pescara |
| Abruzzo |
| ITALIA |

Date of adoption of the decision

28.1.2010

Reference number of State Aid

NN 101/05

Member State

Italy

Region

Abruzzo

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Indennizzo dei danni subiti nel 2004

Legal basis

Leggi regionali n. 1/1984 e n. 6/2005

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Compensation for damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences

Form of aid

Direct payment

Budget

EUR 300 000

Intensity

40 %

Duration (period)

2005

Economic sectors

Fisheries

Name and address of the granting authority

Direzione Agricoltura, Foreste e Sviluppo Rurale

Pescara

Abruzzo

ITALIA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
```

[Federal Register: September 15, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 178)]
[Notices]
[Page 49338]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15se98-49]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

"FEDERAL REGISTER" CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 63 F.R. 48199.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 11:00 a.m., Wednesday,
September 30, 1998.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission
changed the meeting to discuss enforcement matters to Monday, September
28, 1998 at 3:00 p.m.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-24778 Filed 9-11-98; 10:40 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
```

[Federal Register: September 10, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 175)]
[CORRECTIONS]
[Page 53430]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10se03-131]



[[Page 53430]]



>COMMODITY> >FUTURES> >TRADING> COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 4

RIN 3038-AB97


Additional Registration and Other Regulatory Relief for >Commodity>
Pool Operators and >Commodity> >Trading> Advisors; Past Performance Issues

Correction

    In rule document 03-20094 beginning on page 47221 in the issue of
Friday, August 8, 2003, make the following correction:

PART 4-->COMMODITY> POOL OPERATORS AND >COMMODITY> >TRADING> ADVISORS

Appendix B to Part 4--[Corrected]

    On page 47236, in appendix B, in the table, in the last line
``&- 1=10%'' should read ``- 1=10%''.

[FR Doc. C3-20094 Filed 9-9-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Timothy J Andriesen, Managing Director, Agricultural Commodities

CME Group

Agricultural Contract Review Process
© 2011 CME Group. All rights reserved

CME Group takes a proactive approach to ensure our 

contracts meet our commercial agricultural hedger’s 

needs by engaging in a regular program of contract 

reviews.

We review all of our major contracts on a regular, 

rotating basis and, if necessary, make adjustment to 

the contract terms

Contract Reviews
© 2011 CME Group. All rights reserved

The Process

3

Issue Identification – CMEG R&PD identifies any potential issues they believe should 

be addressed in the review

Customers Interviews – Staff engages in in-depth interview with key customers to 

identify view around potential issues or other items of concern

Focus Group Discussions – Staff hold focus group discussions to flush out various 

position on the issues

Request for Comments – Staff prepares and distributes potential contract changes or 

follow up questions for broader industry feedback. In some cases, this is in the form of a 

survey.

Change Decision & Submission – Staff decided if changes are needed and if so 

submits changes to the regulator
© 2011 CME Group. All rights reserved

Contracts Under Review

4

Lean Hogs

Status: Completed – No changes anticipated at this time

Corn Futures

Status: Currently assessing data collected in our request for feedback

Key Issues: Quality discounts, Freight differentials, extension of delivery territory 

Feeder Cattle

Status: Currently is in the request for comments stage

Key Issues: Weight range used in the index

Kansas City Wheat

Status: Currently is the request for comments stage

Key Issues: No significant issues however we are exploring load out cadence,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,569
<SECURITIES>                                   107,244
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                       626
<INVENTORY>                                      2,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,012
<PP&E>                                           7,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           362
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,572
<SALES>                                         36,111
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,111
<CGS>                                            7,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   111
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,147
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,454
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 254 

To make technical amendments to chapter 3084 of title 54, United States 

Code, to correct references to the African American Civil Rights Network, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2019 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To make technical amendments to chapter 3084 of title 

54, United States Code, to correct references to the 

African American Civil Rights Network, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO REFERENCES TO 

4 THE AFRICAN AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS NET5 WORK. 

6 (a) CHAPTER AMENDMENTS.—Chapter 3084 of title 

7 54, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘U.S. 

8 Civil Rights Network’’ each place it appears and inserting 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 254 IH

1 ‘‘African American Civil Rights Network’’ (using identical 

2 font as used in the text being replaced). 

3 (b) AMENDMENTS TO LIST OF ITEMS.—The list of 

4 items of title 54, United States Code, is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘U.S. Civil Rights Network’’ each place it appears and 

6 inserting ‘‘African American Civil Rights Network’’ (using 

7 identical font as used in the text being replaced). 

8 (c) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law (other 

9 than in this Act), regulation, document, record, map, or 

10 other paper of the United States to the ‘‘U.S. Civil Rights 

11 Network’’ shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Af12 rican American Civil Rights Network’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00402-CR

JUSTIN DAVID EVANS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 220th District Court

Bosque County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR14935

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Justin Evans attempts to appeal his conviction for possession of a controlled 

substance. The certificate of right to appeal indicates that this is a plea bargain case and 

that Evans waived his right to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, the appeal is 

dismissed.

Notwithstanding that we are dismissing this appeal, Evans may file a motion for 

rehearing with this Court within 15 days after this opinion and judgment are rendered if 
Evans v. State Page 2

he believes this opinion and judgment are erroneously based on inaccurate information 

or documents. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. Moreover, if Evans desires to have the opinion 

and judgment of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that 

petition must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the 

day this Court’s judgment is rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing is

overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2 (a).

For the reasons stated, this appeal is dismissed.

JOHN E. NEILL

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 20, 2019

Do not publish 

[CR25]