alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Strategic Storage Trust, Inc., or the Company, hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                                                          
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|November 13, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ H. Michael Schwartz                                  
|Date              |  |  |  |     |  | H. Michael Schwartz                                      
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | President, CEO and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
| **Exhibit 13.1** |
|------------------|

----

**CERTIFICATION OF PASQUALE PISTORIO,      PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. AND CARLO      FERRO, CORPORATE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF STMICROELECTRONICS N.V., PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of STMicroelectronics N.V. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: May 4, 2004 | By:    | /s/     PASQUALE    PISTORIO |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   |                                                       |
|              |   | **Pasquale Pistorio**                                 |

|   |   | **President and Chief Executive Officer** |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: May 4, 2004 | By:    | /s/     CARLO    FERRO |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|              |   |                                                 |

|   |   | **Carlo Ferro      Corporate Vice President          and           Chief Financial Officer** |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

----
```

[Federal Register: March 16, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 51)]
[Notices]
[Page 13587]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16mr06-35]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, April 21, 2006.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th floor Commission
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-2614 Filed 3-14-06; 1:18 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
EXHIBIT
      23.5





**Consent
      of Independent Petroleum Engineers and Geologists**





We
      hereby
      consent to the use of the name Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., the
      reference to our reserve estimate report for Aurora Oil & Gas Corporation
      (f/k/a Cadence Resources Corporation) (the "Company") dated February 6, 2006,
      and the use of information contained therein in the Form 10-K to be filed on
      or
      about March 7, 2008. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
      the Form 10-K containing the foregoing into the Form 3 Registration Statements
      filed by the Company on December 21, 2007 (File Nos. 333-129695 and 333-130769)
      and any amendments to these Form 3 Registration Statements.





Dallas,
      Texas


March
      7,
      2008


NETHERLAND,
                SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC./s/
                C.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.C.H.
                (Scott) Rees III, P.E.President
                and Chief Operating Officer
No. 473.

#### Baker, Ancillary Receiver, *v.*W. J. Kennedy Dairy Co.

October 28, 1935.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth *635Circuit denied. *Mr. Isadore Levin*for petitioner.

*Messrs. James R. Breakey, Frank C. Cook,*and *John P. O’Hara*for respondent.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6454** 

MARK A. BARNES , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. NANCY PARR, Head Commonwealth Attorney; DAVID J. WHITTED, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney; D. J. GEIGER, Deputy Executive Director Virginia Indigent Defense Commission , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 00160

- LM B

- TCB )

Submitted : July 13, 2011 Decided: July 18, 2011

Before DAVIS and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Mark A. Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC , Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee s . Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mark A. Barnes appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint without prejudice
. The district c ourt dismissed the complaint pursuant
to Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994), finding that the complaint challenges the fact or duration of Barnes’ confinement and thus should have been raised in a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 following exhaustio n of state remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Parr , No. 1:11

- cv - 00160

- LMB

- TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument becau se the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Research Laboratory, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability.

      ( print page 30894)    

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Army announces the general availability of exclusive, partially exclusive or non-exclusive licenses relative to a novel optical switching technologies as described in U.S. Patent# 6,075,254, Shen, et al., June 13, 2000, “Polarization Insensitive/Independent Semiconductor Waveguide Modulator Using Tensile Stressors”; U.S. Patent# 5,770,472, Zhou, et al., June 23, 1998, “Method for Making Monolithically Integrated Signal Processing Circuit Having Active and Passive Components”; U.S. patent# 5,930,031, Zhou, et al., July 27, 1999, “Monolithically Integrated Signal Processing Circuit Having Active and Passive Components”. Licenses shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Technology Applications, ATTN: AMSRL-CS-TT/Bldg. 459, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21005-5425, Telephone: (410) 278-5028.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Luz D. Ortiz,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 01-14516 Filed 6-7-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 32635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14838]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4644-N-24]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities to Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 15, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 
20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: June 7, 2001.
John D. Garrity,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 01-14838 Filed 6-14-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 FRED WINTER,

8 Petitioner-Appellant,

9 v. NO. 31,101

10 JUDITH MARIE WINTER,

11 Respondent-Appellee.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

13 Gerard J. Lavelle, District Judge

14 Border Law Office, P.A.

15 Dean E. Border

16 Albuquerque, NM 

17 for Appellant

18 Little, Gilman-Tepper & Batley, P.A.

19 Roberta S. Batley

20 Albuquerque, NM 

21 for Appellee

22 MEMORANDUM OPINION

23 VANZI, Judge.
2

1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 AFFIRMED.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________

7 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________

10 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

11 _________________________________

12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
No. 584.

#### City Bus Co. *v.*Mississippi.

January 18, 1937.

*Messrs. Marcellus Green, Garner W. Green,*and *B. E. Eaton*for appellant.

*Messrs. Greek L. Rice*and *W. W. Pierce*for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The appeal herein is dismissed for failure of the appellant to comply with Rule 12.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaiser Federal Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kay M. Hoveland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results of operations.











Date: February 11, 2011
/s/ K. M. HovelandK. M. HovelandPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### Kathy MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CITY OF HOUSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT; David Swan; Chief Jack Williams, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-20404

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2010.

Kathy Matthews, Alief, TX, pro se.

Timothy James Higley, City of Houston, Legal Department, Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff Kathy Matthews appeals the summary judgment dismissal of her claims for retaliation under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 451.001, *et seq.,*and race, sex, age, and disability discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, *et seq.;*the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621, *et seq.;*and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, *et seq.*

Matthews complains that the district court disregarded her evidence and instead made credibility determinations. She asserts that she provided evidence to support her claims of discrimination. An initial and dispositive problem is that Matthews fails to provide citations to portions of the record to support her assertions. The summary judgment ruling and assertions Matthews raises on appeal involve record-intensive inquiries. By failing to cite to the record, Matthews has waived consideration of her claims and failed to show that the district court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment. *See Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993); *Cf.*Fed. R.App. P. 28(a)(9)(A).

Even if we consider Matthews’ claims, the pleadings and evidence do not raise a genuine issue of material fact. *See Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc.,*101 F.3d 448, 464 (5th Cir.1996); *Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.,*477 U.S. 242, 247-49, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Largely for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s thorough Memorandum and Recommendation, which was adopted by the district court, we conclude that all of Matthews’ claims are time-barred, un*906supported by a *prima facie*case, or lack evidence of a necessary element.

Matthews’ appeal is without arguable merit and, thus, is dismissed as frivolous. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. In light of the foregoing, her motion for the production of transcripts at government expense is denied.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 6

SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

In
connection with the annual report of Shaw Communications Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Brad Shaw, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated at Calgary, Alberta, Canada, this 1stday of December 2014.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Brad Shaw           
|Brad Shaw               
|Chief Executive Officer 
|Shaw Communications Inc.



---

SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

In connection with the annual report of Shaw Communications Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending August 31,
2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rhonda Bashnick, Senior Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated at Calgary, Alberta, Canada, this 1stday of December 2014.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Rhonda Bashnick           
|Rhonda Bashnick               
|Senior Vice President, Finance
|Shaw Communications Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF AUGUST 31, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
AUGUST 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,897
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       61
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,225
<PP&E>                                             999
<DEPRECIATION>                                     390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,756
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                         393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,198
<SALES>                                         19,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,294
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (435)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (54)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (381)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (381)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
No. 207.

#### Industrial Board of New York *v.*Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. Co.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. Joseph A. McLaughlin*and *Henry Epstein*for petitioner.

*Mr. Louis L. Babcock*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department, of the Supreme Court of New York denied.
AEGIS SEF | 2829 Technology Forest Boulevard, Suite 260 | The Woodlands, Texas 77381

Chapter 1138

Natural Gas Basis Swap - Chicago Basis (CAD/MMBtu)

DESCRIPTION

A monthly cash settled swap based upon the settlement price published by NGI for the location 

specified in the Floating Price A less the monthly settlement price published by NYMEX for 

natural gas Henry Hub.

FLOATING PRICE A

The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to the mathematical result of subtracting the 

monthly price published by NYMEX, as defined in Floating Price B, from the monthly price 

published by NGI as defined in Floating Price A.

FLOATING PRICE B

"NATURAL GAS-HENRY HUB-NYMEX" means that the price for a Pricing Date will be that day's 

Specified Price per MMBTU of natural gas on the NYMEX of the Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures 

Contract for the Delivery Date, stated in U.S. Dollars, as made public by the NYMEX on that 

Pricing Date. The Floating Price for each contract month is equal to that day's settlement price 

for the last scheduled trading day of the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract for the 

Delivery Date.

CONTRACT UNIT AND VALUE

The contract quantity shall be in MMBTU. Each contract shall be valued as the contract quantity 

in MMBTU, multiplied by the settlement price.

LISTING CYCLE

Up to 108 consecutive monthly contract periods.

PRICES AND FLUCTUATIONS

Prices shall be quoted in Canadian dollars and cents per MMBTU. The minimum price fluctuation 

shall be $0.001 per MMBTU. The minimum price increment will be $0.0001. There shall be no 

maximum price fluctuation.

TERMINATION OF TRADING

Trading shall cease one Business Days prior to the first calendar day of the Contract Period.

FINAL SETTLEMENT

Delivery under the contract shall be by cash settlement in Canadian Dollars. Final settlement, 

following termination of posting for a contract month, will be based on Floating Price A.

CURRENCY CONVERSION

Daily WRM Noon Rate for CAD per unit of USD as reporting by Refinitiv.