T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. SA U L SO TO - M ELCH O R, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 12- 30254 D. C. No . 2 : 1 2 - c r - 0 0 1 2 1 - J LR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on J a m e s L . R oba rt , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y14, 2013 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , an dM U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S aul S ot o-M el chor appeal s f rom the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm entand chal l enges the 40 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for i l l egal r e e ntrya f

t e rde port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f irm , b u t r e m a n dto c o rr e c t th e ju d g m e n t.



# FI LED MA Y20 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 30254 2 S ot o- M e l c horf

i r s tc ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d by f a i l i ng t o c ons i de rhi s a r gum e nt s r e ga r di ng unw a rr a nt e d s e nt e nc i ng di s pa r i t i e s a nd o th e rm itig a tin g f

a c to r s , a n db yf

a ilin g to e x p la in w h yit r e je c te dth o s e a r g u m e n ts . W e r e v ie w f

o rp la in e rr o r , s e e U

ni te d States v . V

ale nc i a- B arragan , 608 F . 3d 1103, 11 08 (9th C i r. 20 10 ), and fi nd no ne. T he di stri ctcourtl i st ened t o and addres se d S ot o- M e l c hor ’ s ar gum e nt s , a nd a de qua t e l ye xpl a i ne d the s e nt e nc e i m pos e d. S o to - M e lc h o rn e x t c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in im p o s in g S o to - M e lc h o r ’s s e n te n c e . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7). T he w i thi n-G ui del i nes s ent ence i s s ub st ant i vel y r ea sonabl e i n l i gh tof the 18 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(a) se nt enci ng fa ct ors a nd the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t a nc e s , i nc l udi ng S ot o- M e l c hor ’ s hi s t oryof im m ig r a tio n v io la tio n s a n dth e c ir c u m s ta n c e s o f h is a rr e s t. See id . I n a c c or da nc e w i th U

ni ted States v. R i ve ra-San chez , 222 F . 3d 1057, 1062 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , w e r e m a n dth e c a s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt w ith in s tru c tio n s th a t it d e le te f r o m th e ju d g m e n t th e in c o rr e c t r e f e r e n c e to 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 ( b ) ( 2 ) . See U ni ted States v. H

erre ra-B lan co , 232 F . 3d 715, 719 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e m a ndi ng s u as p o n te to d e le te th e r e f e r e n c e to s e c tio n 1 3 2 6 ( b ) ) . A F F IR M E D ; R E M A N D E D to corre ctth e j u d gm en t.