alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1236 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1236

  Honoring the coal miners who perished in the Upper Big Branch Mine-
South in Raleigh County, West Virginia, extending condolences to their 
  families, and recognizing the valiant efforts of emergency response 
                     workers at the mine disaster.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2010

 Mr. Rahall (for himself, Mr. Mollohan, Mrs. Capito, Mr. George Miller 
  of California, and Ms. Woolsey) submitted the following resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the coal miners who perished in the Upper Big Branch Mine-
South in Raleigh County, West Virginia, extending condolences to their 
  families, and recognizing the valiant efforts of emergency response 
                     workers at the mine disaster.

Whereas coal mining is a time-honored profession and miners and their families 
        have shaped the history and rich culture of West Virginia and the 
        Nation;
Whereas the Nation is greatly indebted to coal miners for the difficult and 
        dangerous work they perform to provide the fuel needed to keep the 
        Nation strong and secure;
Whereas the Nation has long recognized the importance of health and safety 
        protections for miners who labor in extreme and dangerous conditions;
Whereas accidents in the Nation's mines have again and again taken the lives of 
        coal miners;
Whereas 29 West Virginia miners tragically perished in the Upper Big Branch 
        Mine-South following an explosion on April 5, 2010;
Whereas this was the worst coal mining disaster in the Nation over the last 40 
        years;
Whereas Federal, State, and local rescue crews worked tirelessly night and day 
        in courageous rescue and recovery efforts;
Whereas the families of the fallen miners have suffered immeasurable loss; and
Whereas residents of Raleigh County and throughout West Virginia came together 
        to support the miners' families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the ultimate sacrifice made by the 29 coal 
        miners lost at the Upper Big Branch Mine-South, Raleigh County, 
        West Virginia;
            (2) extends the deepest condolences of the Nation to the 
        families of these men;
            (3) recognizes all coal miners for enduring the loss of 
        their coworkers and maintaining courage throughout this ordeal;
            (4) commends the rescue crews for their valiant efforts to 
        find these miners; and
            (5) honors the many volunteers who provided support and 
        comfort for the miners' families during the rescue and recovery 
        operations.
                                 <all>
```
1 Hicks directed his appeal to the Supreme Court, which tra nsferred the matter here. 

## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia
ATLA NTA,

_________________ _ The Court of

Appeals he reby passes

the followi

ng order: A14A2207. RAKEEN RA YNEIL HICKS v. THE ST ATE. In 2012, Rake en Ray

ne il Hicks was convicted of armed robbery and other crim es. We affirm

ed his convic tions on appe al. Hicks v. State , 326 Ga. App. 46 ( 755 SE2d 855) (2014). Hicks thenfiled another notice of appeal, again seeking review of his judg

ment o f convicti on. 1 BecauseHicks has already had a direct appeal, he is not entitled to another appeal from

his judgment. See Jackson v. State , 273 Ga. 320 (540 SE 2d 612) (2001) (defenda nt “not e ntitled to a

nother bite

at the appl e by w ay of a secon d ap peal.”). This appeal is therefor e DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Offi

ce, Atlant a,_______________

___ I certi fy that the above i

s a true extra ct from the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Wit ness my signature a nd the seal of said cour t hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 09/04/2014 September 04, 2014
```

[Federal Register: June 2, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 106)]
[Notices]
[Page 32059]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jn06-39]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Notice of Meeting; Sunshine Act

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 71 FR 30665.

Previously Announced time and Date of the Public Hearing: 10 a.m.,
Tuesday, June 27, 2006.

Changes in the Hearing: The time of the public hearing on the Issue of
What constitutes a Board of Trade Located Outside of the United States
Under Section 4(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act has been changed to 9
a.m.

Changes in the Contact Phone Number: The phone number of Duane Andresen
previously read ``(202) 418-5429'' and should read ``(202) 418-5492''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-5117 Filed 5-31-06; 3:29 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Eduard Musheyev, Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial
Accounting Officer) of CaseyCorp Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”), certifies,
under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 23, 2010By:
                  /s/
      Eduard MusheyevName:
                  Eduard
      MusheyevTitle:
                  Chief
      Executive Officerand
      Principal Financial Accounting
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Thomas W. Casey, the Chief Financial
Officer of Washington Mutual, Inc., does hereby certify that this report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Washington Mutual, Inc.

|Date: February 29, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/THOMAS W. CASEYThomas W. Casey Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
of Washington Mutual, Inc.
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Washington Mutual, Inc. and will be
retained by Washington Mutual, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
CFTC

Division of Market Oversight
CFTC Energy Surveillance Program 

Staff uses data to perform event and position driven analysis, to 

detect instances of manipulation, as well as identify other 

prohibited trading practices. Data includes:

1. Futures Positions: End-of-day positions for 

reportable traders from reporting entities

2. Futures Transactions : Trade Capture Report from 

exchanges

3. Swaps: Part 20 and SDR data

As conditions warrant, staff obtains additional data necessary to 

do a complete review, including issuing special calls to obtain 

books and records from reportable traders.

2
Unique Persons Over % of Proposed Levels

Core references futures contract: NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas

% of level Spot/Physical Spot/Cash Single Month All Months

60 187 236 Fewer than 4 7

80 142 205 Fewer than 4 Fewer than 4

100 83 187 -- Fewer than 4

500 Fewer than 4 46 -- --

2011-2012 = Table 11

Proposed spot month level = 1,000 Proposed single/all month level = 149,600

2013-2014 = Table 11a

% of level Spot/Physical Spot/Cash Single Month All Months

60 177 221 Fewer than 4 5

80 131 183 -- --

100 61 148 -- --

500 -- 35 -- --
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5000
Facsimile: (202) 418-5521
www.cftc.gov

January 22, 2016

Saundra Armstrong

Chief Compliance Officer
LatAm SEF, LLC

115 Broadway, Suite 1302
New York, NY 10006

Re: Application of LatAm SEF, LLC for Registration as a Swap Execution Facility

Dear Ms. Armstrong:

By submissions dated September 25, 2013 through January 21, 2016, LatAm SEF, LLC
(“LatAm”) has applied to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”),
pursuant to Section 5h of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 7b-3, and
Commission Regulation 37.3(b), 17 C.F.R. § 37.3(b), for registration as a swap execution facility
(“SEF”).

The Commission has reviewed LatAm’s application and has determined to grant LatAm
registration as a SEF, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the accompanying Order of
Registration.

Sincerely,

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick
Secretary of the Commission
**Fidelity**®

Investment Grade Bond

**Fund**

**Annual Report**

**August 31, 2006**

**(2_fidelity_logos) (Registered_Trademark)**

Contents
No. 546.

#### Northrop et al. *v.*Beale et al.

Jurisdictional *517statement distributed December 5, 1936.

Decided December 14, 1936.

*Mr. Claudian B. Northrop*for appellants.

*Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney, John S. Flannery,*and *G. Bowdoin Craighill*for appellees.

*Per Curiam:*

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. *Petrie*v. *Nampa Irrigation District,*248 U. S. 154, 157; *McCoy*v. *Shaw,*277 U. S. 302, 303; *Fox Film Corp.*v. *Muller,*296 U. S. 207, 209-210. Insofar as the papers whereon the appeal was allowed seek a review of the rulings of the Court of Appeals of Maryland upon questions of the asserted denial of rights under the Federal Constitution not involving the validity of any statute of the State, such papers are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari, § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 938), and certiorari is denied.
<PAGE>

                                  AMENDMENT OF THE

                           AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF

                            WESTERN STAFF SERVICES, INC.



     Pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors at a regular meeting
held on March 26, 1998, the Amended And Restated Bylaws of the corporation are
further amended as follows:

     All references to the eliminated position of "Chief Administrative
     Officer" are stricken , including those in Article 3, Sections 3.1 and
     3.2, and in Article 6, Sections 6.3 and 6.5; and Article 3, Section
     3.9 in its entirety.



                                   WESTERN STAFF SERVICES, INC.


                                   By:  /s/ Robin A. Herman
                                       ----------------------------------
                                        Robin A. Herman, Secretary
No. 614.

#### Ouachita National Bank *v.*Hamburg Bank et al.

January 6, 1936.

*Mr. F. G. Hudson, Jr.,*for petitioner.

*Mr. J. A. Tellier*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit (d)(176)

**Schedule A**

**Form of**

**Trusts and Portfolios Covered by the Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2008,between**

**Fidelity Management & Research Company**

**and**

**Fidelity Management & Research (Japan), Inc.**
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1398 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1398

   Recognizing the contributions of university and college immigrant 
                          assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2010

Mr. Ackerman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the contributions of university and college immigrant 
                          assistance programs.

Whereas university and college immigrant assistance programs provide critical 
        services to immigrants and to the United States;
Whereas the public servants who dedicate themselves to serving immigrants are to 
        be commended for their dedication to improving the lives of others;
Whereas legal services, citizenship test preparation, assistance with 
        applications for permanent residency, and English language courses are 
        some of the invaluable services offered by many universities and 
        colleges to immigrants at no charge;
Whereas these programs have helped countless immigrants make a better life for 
        themselves and their families in the United States; and
Whereas assisting immigrants to become United States citizens helps immigrants 
        obtain a stake in their community and promotes civic engagement: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the 
contributions of universities and colleges in helping immigrants 
achieve citizenship and pursue the American dream.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Edward FIELDS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-5151.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 13, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 28, 2010.

*822Thomas J. Saunders, Law Office of Thomas J. Saunders, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Christopher J. Romano, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Edward Fields appeals the 188-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006). We affirm.

On appeal, Fields challenges the district court’s consideration of a prior felony conviction when determining his career offender status and criminal history category. However, the sentencing court properly declined to address Fields’ challenge to the validity of a prior state felony conviction, as the federal sentencing proceeding was not the appropriate forum for such a challenge. *See Custis v. United States,*511 U.S. 485, 496-97, 114 S.Ct. 1732, 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994); *United States v. Dean,*604 F.3d 169, 174-75 (4th Cir.2010). Moreover, even if Fields succeeded in invalidating one prior state felony conviction, he had at least two other prior felony convictions qualifying him as a career offender under *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 4B1.1(a) (2007). *United States v. Pettiford,*612 F.3d 270, 276-77 (4th Cir.2010). Furthermore, the court properly calculated Fields’ criminal history category at VI under USSG § 4Bl.l(b).

Accordingly, we affirm Fields’ sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Klem, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 856] —

Appeal from a judgment of the Yates County Court (W. Patrick Falvey, J.), rendered October 24, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of possession of sexual performance by a child in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Present — Hurlbutt, J.P, Martoche, Fahey, Garni and Gorski, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3343] 

Scioto County and the contiguous counties of Adams, Jackson, Lawrence and Pike in the State of Ohio; and Greenup and Lewis Counties in the Commonwealth of Kentucky constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe thunderstorms, high winds and flooding which began on May 17, 2001 and continued through May 26, 2001. Applications for loans for physical damage may be filed until the close of business on August 3, 2001 and for economic injury until the close of business on March 4, 2002 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: 

U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308

                    The interest rates are:                           ( print page 31731)    

### For Physical Damage

                    Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere:                     *6.625%*

                    Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere:                     *3.312%*

                    Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere:                     *8.000%*

                    Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:                     *4.000%*

                    Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere:                     *7.125%*

### For Economic Injury 

                    Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere:                     *4.000%*

The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 334311 for Ohio and 334411 for Kentucky. The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 9L8000 for Ohio and 9L8100 for Kentucky.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: June 4, 2001.

John Whitmore, 

Acting Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 01-14750 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Fidelity® Select Portfolios®**

Industrials Sector

**Fund**/Ticker

**Air Transportation Portfolio**/FSAIX

**Summary Prospectus**

**April 29, 2011**

**As Revised February 2, 2012**
Exhibit No. 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Bradley B. Eavenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Greenstar
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: June 16, 2008

By: /s/ Bradley B. Eavenson
    -----------------------
    Bradley B. Eavenson
    Chief Executive Officer