alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

#### Jarvis v. Imperial Construction Co., Inc.

October 3, 1991

Case No. (Law) 101786

By JUDGE ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA

This action is currently before the court on the plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the *ad damnum*clause of his Motion for Judgment. The plaintiff in this case filed a Warrant in Debt in Arlington County General District Court which sought recovery of $2,500 from the defendant on the basis of a contract. The case was transferred to the Fairfax County General District Court where the matter was heard and judgment rendered for the plaintiff in the amount of $2,000 with interest at the rate of 8% *per annum.*The defendant then filed an appeal to this Court, and the plaintiff now seeks to amend the *ad damnum*clause to $3,400. Both parties filed motions which were heard in this court on September 6, 1991. For the reasons stated below, the plaintiff’s motion is granted.

In actions appealed from the District Court, Section 16.1-114.1 of the Code of Virginia gives this Court the power "to direct all necessary amendments ... to promote substantial justice to all parties, and to bring about a trial of the merits of the controversy." Va. Code Ann. Section 16.1-114.1 (1988 Repl. Vol.). The statute further provides that "[t]his section shall be liberally construed, to the end that justice is not delayed or denied by reason *251of errors in the pleadings or in the form of the proceedings." *Id.*

This Court’s power of amendment in such cases is restricted by the District Court’s jurisdictional limitations. *Stacy v.*Mullins, 185 Va. 837 (1946); *Addison v. Salyer,*185 Va. 644 (1946). Consequently, this Court cannot permit an amendment which increases the plaintiff’s claim to an amount that exceeds the $7,000 jurisdictional limitation of the District Court. *Stacy v. Mullins,*185 Va. at 844; Va. Code Ann. S 16.1-77 (1988 Repl. Vol.). However, it is clear that an amendment to the *ad damnum*clause may be permitted so long as the amendment does not seek to increase it to an amount beyond the $7,000 jurisdictional limit of the District Court. *Stacy v.*Mullins, 185 Va. at 844; *Serrell*v. *Locke,*18 Va. Cir. 390 (1990).

Here, the plaintiff’s Motion to Amend requests this Court to increase the *ad damnum*clause to $3,400, an amount within the District Court’s jurisdiction. Construing Section 16.1-114.1 liberally to "promote substantial justice to all parties and to bring about a trial of the merits", the plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the *ad damnu'm*clause to $3,400 is granted.
Exhibit (j)(2)

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Prospectuses and Statements ofAdditional Information in Post-Effective Amendment No. 129 to the Registration Statementon Form N-1A of Fidelity Investment Trust: Fidelity Canada Fund, Fidelity China RegionFund, Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund, Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund, Fidelity Europe Fund,Fidelity Japan Fund, Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund, Fidelity Latin America Fund,Fidelity Nordic Fund, Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund, Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund,and Fidelity Overseas Fund of our report dated December 16, 2011; Fidelity InternationalDiscovery Fund of our report dated December 13, 2011; Fidelity International Growth Fundof our report dated December 9, 2011; and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund of ourreport dated December 15, 2011 on the financial statements and financial highlights includedin the October 31, 2011 Annual Reports to Shareholders of the above referenced funds whichis also incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement.

We further consent to the references to our Firm under the headings "Financial Highlights" inthe Prospectuses and "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statements ofAdditional Information.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 -0643 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JENNIFER RENEE SKAW,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 8, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2022

04/29/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0643
# FCM Data June 2012

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF June 30,&KFF0000 &K0000002012FROM REPORTS FILED BY August 1,&KFF0000 &K0000002012	&P of &N
No. 246.

#### Davis, Administratrix, *v.*Louisville & Nashville R. Co.

October 14, 1935.

*Messrs. Albert Williams*and *Edwin F. Hunt*for petitioner.

*Mr. Ed. T. Seay*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32

                Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Payment Technologies, Inc.
("Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Registrant.



                                  s/Stephen Nevitt
                                 ---------------------------------------
                                 Stephen Nevitt
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer


                                 s/William L. McMahon
                                 ---------------------------------------
                                 William L. McMahon
                                 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer







Date: January 12, 2007
      ----------------



A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
has been provided to Global Payment Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Global Payment Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-18495, Form S-8 No. 333-77473 and Form S-8 No. 333-37426)
of Aftermarket Technology Corp. of our report dated February 22, 2001 (except
for Note 22, as to which the date is March 2, 2001) with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Aftermarket Technology
Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 2000.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 2, 2001
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. GT01-25-000]

Take notice that on May 30, 2001, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) filed a service agreement entered into between ANR and Allerton Gas Company (Allerton) under Rate Schedule FTS-1 (the Agreement).

ANR requests that the Commission find that the Agreement does not contain any material deviations from ANR's Form of Service Agreement, and that the Agreement need not be filed pursuant to section 154.112(b) of the Commission's regulations. Alternatively, ANR requests that if the Commission finds that the Agreement contains a material deviation from ANR's Form of Service Agreement, ANR requests that the Commission approve the Agreement and accept Tenth Revised Sheet No. 2, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 190 and Original Sheet No. 191 of ANR's Second Revised Volume No. 1 Tariff that reference the Agreement as a non-conforming agreement. ANR requests an effective date of June 1, 2001 for the Agreement.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 12, 2001. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​efi/​doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 01-14557  Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly of Kerrisdale Mining Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2008 (the "Report"), I, John Yinglong He, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/John Yinglong HeJohn Yinglong He, Chief Financial Officer June 12, 2008
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

The Board of
Directors
Rimage Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement (Nos. 333-147344, 333-34788, 333-53875, 333-69550, 333-106901 and 333-127244)
on Form S-8 of Rimage Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2009, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Rimage Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2008, and the related financial statement schedule, and our report dated March
16, 2009 with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31,
2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Rimage Corporation.

|                        |             
|----------------------- | ------------
|                        | /s/ KPMG LLP
|                        |             
|Minneapolis,
 Minnesota |             
|March 16, 2009          |             

---
#### Naimidii BINDERIYA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-71195.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 2, 2010.*

Filed June 10, 2010.

Patrick Ontiveros Cantor, Esquire, But-tar & Cantor, LLP, Tukwila, WA, for Petitioner.

Donald Anthony Couvillon, Esquire, Luis E. Perez, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Seattle, WA Ronald E. Le-fevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

*607Before: W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and MOSMAN,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Michael W. Mosman, United States District Judge for District of Oregon sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Naimidii Binderiya petitions for review of the denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Binderiya did not establish a well-founded fear of persecution. Bind-eriya experienced past harassment in Mongolia as a result of a lesbian relationship. Substantial evidence supports the conclusion that the harassment was not sufficiently severe to constitute persecution. Even assuming, for the purposes of argument, that the harassment Binderiya described was extreme enough to constitute persecution, Binderiya was targeted as a result of her relationship with a specific woman. The specific relationship that led to the harassment ended voluntarily some time ago, and the person with whom Bind-eriya was in that relationship is no longer in Mongolia. In light of these facts, substantial evidence in the record supports the conclusion that the harassment is unlikely to reoccur. The evidence in the record does not compel the finding that lesbians generally are subject to persecution in Mongolia.

Because the evidence is insufficient to establish a well-founded fear of persecution, it is also insufficient to establish the higher standards for withholding of removal and CAT relief.

Petition DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Unassociated Document


     

    Exhibit
10.12

     

    
      Loan
Agreement

       

       

      Party A:
Guangdong Qingyuan Development Zone Hospital

      Party B:
Guangzhou Dongfang Hospital

       

      


      In
consideration of the related relationship, Party A and Party B agree as
follows:

       

      
        	
                1.

              	
                To
      support Party B’s development and expansion, Party A and Party B agree
      that Party A provides Party B with a loan of RMB1,012,187.13 yuan (one
      million twelve thousand one hundred eighty seven yuan thirteen-three
      cents) during 2008 for the purpose of operative turnover of Party B. In
      consideration of the related relationship, The loan in such period shall
      be interest-free, and paid by Party B in installments in a payment period
      of three years from Dec. 30 2008 to Dec. 31. 2011.

              
	 	 


      

      
        	
                2.

              	
                Party
      A and Party B agree that Party A provide Party B with a maximum of loan
      of  RMB1,378,188.08 yuan (one million three hundred seventy
      eight thousand one hundred eighty eight yuan eight cents) during 2009 for
      the purpose of operative turnover of Party B. In consideration of the
      related relationship, The loan in such period shall be interest-free, and
      paid by Party B in installments in a payment period of three years from
      Dec. 30 2009 to Dec. 31. 2012.

              
	 	 
	3.	The
      effective date of this agreement is Jan., 1,
2008.


      

      


      
         

        
          	Party A: Guangdong
      Qingyuan Development Zone Hospital (seal)	      
                  Party
      B: Guangzhou Dongfang Hospital (seal)

                
	 	 
	Authorized
      representative:	      
                  Authorized
      representative:

                
	      
                  /s/
      Xu Jianhong

                	      
                  /s/
      Ma Yong
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Stacie K. Yamane, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 12, 2008

/s/ Stacie K. YamaneStacie K. YamaneChief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Petróleos Mexicanos, a productive state owned company of the Federal Government of the United Mexican States (the Company),
does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2014 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2015



By:

/s/ EMILIO RICARDO LOZOYA
AUSTINName:

Emilio Ricardo Lozoya AustinTitle:

Director General/Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 30, 2015



By:

/s/ MARIO ALBERTO BEAUREGARD
ÁLVAREZName:

Mario Alberto Beauregard ÁlvarezTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21
----------

           Principal Subsidiaries of Global Payment Technologies, Inc.
           -----------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                 Jurisdiction         Percentage Ownership
Name of Subsidiary                                                                Incorporation         by the Registrant
------------------                                                                -------------         -----------------


<S>                                                                                                                   <C>
Global Payment Technologies Australia Pty. Ltd.                                    Australia                          50%

Ecash Holdings Pty. Ltd.                                                           Australia                          35%

Global Payment Technologies (Europe) Limited                                       United Kingdom                    100%

Evolve Corporation PLC                                                             United Kingdom                   12.5%

Abacus Financial Management Systems Ltd., USA                                      United States                      80%

Global Payment Technologies, Inc.                                                  Russia                            100%
</TABLE>
No. 599.

#### Leahy *v.*State Treasurer et al.

January 6, 1935.

*Mr. C. S. Macdonald*for petitioner.

*Messrs. C. D. Cund*and *C. W. King*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma granted.
**Supplement to the**

**Fidelity**®**Diversified International Fund Class F (FDVFX) and Fidelity Overseas Fund Class F (FFOSX)**

**Funds of Fidelity Investment Trust**

**STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION**

**December 30, 2010**

*The general research services agreement with Fidelity Research & Analysis Company has been terminated on behalf of the funds.*

*The following information supplements the information found in the "Investment Policies and Limitations" section beginning on page3.*

**Investments by Funds of Funds or Other Large Shareholders.**Certain funds and accounts that are managed by FMR or its affiliates(including funds of funds) invest in other funds and may at times have substantial investments in one or more other funds.

A fund may experience large redemptions or investments due to transactions in fund shares by funds of funds, other large shareholders, orsimilarly managed accounts. While it is impossible to predict the overall effect of these transactions over time, there could be an adverse impacton a fund's performance. In the event of such redemptions or investments, a fund could be required to sell securities or to invest cash at a timewhen it may not otherwise desire to do so. Such transactions may increase a fund's brokerage and/or other transaction costs. In addition, whenfunds of funds or other investors own a substantial portion of a fund's shares, a large redemption by a fund of funds could cause actual expensesto increase, or could result in the fund's current expenses being allocated over a smaller asset base, leading to an increase in the fund's expenseratio. Redemptions of fund shares could also accelerate the realization of taxable capital gains in the fund if sales of securities result in capitalgains. The impact of these transactions is likely to be greater when a fund of funds or other significant investor purchases, redeems, or owns asubstantial portion of the fund's shares.

When possible, Fidelity will consider how to minimize these potential adverse effects, and may take such actions as it deems appropriate toaddress potential adverse effects, including redemption of shares in-kind rather than in cash or carrying out the transactions over a period of time,although there can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

```

F-COM10B-11-02		December 1, 2011
1.902959.108
```
# FCM Data December 2011

SELECTED FCM FINANCIAL DATA AS OF December 31,&KFF0000 &K0000002011FROM REPORTS FILED BY February 10,&KFF0000 &K0000002012	&P of &N