alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-06477, 333-22063, 333-25457, 333-67731, 333-75677, 333-83239 and 333-96145
on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-29447 and 333-91143 on Form S-8 of Globalstar
Telecommunications Limited of our reports dated February 22, 2000, on the
financial statements of Globalstar Telecommunications Limited, the consolidated
financial statements of Globalstar, L.P. and the balance sheets of Globalstar
Capital Corporation and Loral/Qualcomm Satellite Services, L.P. appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Globalstar Telecommunications Limited and
Globalstar, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 1999.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California
March 28, 2000
# CE2013131EN.01015601.xml

| 8.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 131/156 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 131/156

---

Wednesday 26 October 2011US-EC Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of GALILEO and GPS satellite-based navigation systems ***

P7_TA(2011)0463

European Parliament legislative resolution of 26 October 2011 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of GALILEO and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part (11117/2011 – C7-0185/2011 – 2011/0054(NLE))

2013/C 131 E/24

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (11117/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (11117/2011),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of GALILEO and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part (11575/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of GALILEO and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part (11575/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 171 and 172 and point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 218(6), and Article 218(8), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0185/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 171 and 172 and point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 218(6), and Article 218(8), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0185/2011),

| — | having regard to Rules 81, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A7-0332/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A7-0332/2011),

| 1. | Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United States of America. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United States of America.

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350


(SECTION
906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of, Bella Viagio, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Davis,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May 13, 2008





By:  /s/ Ronald A. Davis


Ronald A.
Davis


President,


Chief
Executive Officer,


Chief
Financial Officer and Director













---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 965 

To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 

continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 

Watertrails Network. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2009 

Mr. SARBANES (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. CASTLE, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. NORTON, Ms. EDWARDS

of Maryland, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. KRATOVIL, 

Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. NYE, and Mr. PLATTS) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to 

provide for the continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake Bay Gate5 ways and Watertrails Network Continuing Authorization 

6 Act’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 965 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 Section 502 of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 

3 1998 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 105–312) is 

4 amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

7 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec8 essary to carry out this section.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


GLOBALSTAR, L.P.

As of February 20, 2001, active subsidiaries, all 100% owned directly or
indirectly (except as noted below) consist of the following:

<TABLE>
<S>                                                         <C>
GLOBALSTAR CAPITAL CORPORATION                                          DELAWARE
GLOBAL TRAK PTY. LTD.                                                  AUSTRALIA
GLOBALSTAR SERVICES COMPANY, INC.                                       DELAWARE
GLOBALSTAR CORPORATION                                                  DELAWARE
GLOBALSTAR OFFSHORE CO                                                 MAURITIUS
GLOBALSTAR, L.L.C.                                                      DELAWARE
GLOBALSTAR INTERNATIONAL SERVICES LTD.                                   HUNGARY
STONESTREET HOLDING N.V.                                    NETHERLANDS ANTILLES
GLOBALSTAR HOLDINGS LTD.                                                  CYPRUS
</TABLE>
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 131 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Financial Services 

in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2009 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Financial Services in the One Hundred Eleventh Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Financial 

4 Services (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $19,224,887.00 for the One Hun9 dred Eleventh Congress. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 131 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $9,322,449.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2009, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2010; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,902,438.00 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2010, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2011. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
#### LGP Foundations, Inc., Respondent, v Bryan Bantry, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 584]-

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), dated September 23, 2008, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“[Licensing statutes are to be strictly construed, and ... an unlicensed contractor forfeits the right to recover damages based either on breach of contract or on quantum meruit, as well as the right to foreclose on a mechanic’s lien” (Callos, *Inc. v Julianelli,*300 AD2d 612, 613 [2002]).

The defendant made a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint by demonstrating that the plaintiff, a home improvement contractor, was not licensed as such by the Town of East Hampton at the time the subject contract was signed or when the relevant work was performed *(id.*at 613). However, in response, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the subject property is “residential property” within the scope of the applicable provisions of the Code of the Town of Easthampton and, therefore, whether the licensure provision of the Town Code applies to this case *(see*Code of Town of Easthampton §§ 156-2, 156-5, 156-10).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Ritter and Miller, JJ, concur.
No. 167.

#### Mallery *v.*Managers Securities Co.

October 14, 1935.

*Mr. Hal H. Smith*for petitioner.

*Mr. Hugh M. Morris*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with this annual report on Form 10-K of Medtronic, Inc. for the fiscal year
ended April 24, 2009, the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as
Chief Financial Officer of Medtronic, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                           
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       
| |     |                                                                                                                                                           
| | (2) | The
 information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,
 the financial condition and results of operations of Medtronic, Inc.

|                     |                           
|-------------------- | --------------------------
|Date: June
 23, 2009 | /s/ Gary L.
 Ellis        
|                     | Gary L.
 Ellis            
|                     | Senior Vice
 President and
|                     | Chief
 Financial Officer  

---
Número Identificador

RES2024_______________

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO

TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES

PANEL IX

ASHFORD RJF, INC.

Recurridos

V.

JOSÉ ALFONSO RAMÍREZ 

DE ARELLANO, su 

esposa MAYRA TERESA 

CARLO y la Sociedad 

Legal de Bienes 

Gananciales 

constituida entre 

ellos 

Peticionarios

KLCE202400288

Certiorari 

procedente del 

Tribunal de 

Primera Instancia, 

Sala Superior de 

San Juan

Civil Núm.:

SJ2023CV00551

Salón de Sesiones: 

603

Sobre:

Cobro de Dinero

Panel integrado por su presidente, el Juez Rodríguez 

Casillas, el Juez Salgado Schwarz y el Juez Ronda Del 

Toro.

Salgado Schwarz, Carlos G., Juez Ponente.

RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 13 de marzo de 2024.

Comparece ante nos el Sr. José Alfonso Ramírez de 

Arellano, Mayra Teresa Carlo, y la Sociedad Legal de 

Bienes Gananciales constituida entre ellos

(Peticionarios) y solicitan que revoquemos una 

Resolución emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, 

Sala Superior de San Juan (TPI o foro primario) el 7 de 

enero de 2024, notificada al día siguiente. Mediante el 

referido dictamen, el TPI declaró No Ha Lugar una Moción 

de Desestimación por Falta de Parte Indispensable. 

Luego de deliberar los méritos del recurso ante 

nos, entendemos procedente no intervenir con la decisión 

recurrida. Si bien este foro apelativo no está obligado 

a fundamentar su determinación al denegar la expedición 
KLCE202400288 2

de un recurso discrecional,1 abundamos sobre las bases 

de nuestra decisión para que las partes no alberguen 

dudas en sus mentes sobre el ejercicio de nuestra 

facultad revisora y su justificación jurídica. 

Conforme a lo anterior, expresamos que no surge del 

expediente de este caso que el TPI actuase mediando 

prejuicio, parcialidad, error manifiesto o mediante 

craso abuso de su discreción.2 Tampoco divisamos 

fundamentos jurídicos que motiven la expedición del auto 

instado al amparo de los criterios dispuestos por la 

Regla 40 del Reglamento de este Tribunal de Apelaciones.3

Basado en lo anterior, denegamos la expedición del 

auto de certiorari ante nuestra consideración.

Notifíquese.

Lo acuerda y manda el Tribunal, y lo certifica la 

Secretaria del Tribunal de Apelaciones.

Lcda. Lilia M. Oquendo Solís 

 Secretaria del Tribunal de Apelaciones

1 32 LPRA Ap. V, R. 52.1.

2 Trans-Oceanic Life Ins. v. Oracle Corp., 184 DPR 689, 709 (2012).

3 4 LPRA Ap. XXII-B, R. 40.
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC.


Alta Environmental Services, Inc.
Alta Equipment Leasing Co., Inc.
Auburn Placer Disposal Service
B&J Drop Box
Buonaterra, Inc.
Butte Disposal & Recycling, Inc.
City Garbage Company of Eureka
Consolidated Environmental Industries, Inc.
Del Norte Disposal, Inc.
Dixon Sanitary Service
Envirocal, Inc.
Foothill Disposal Co., Inc.
Golden Gate Disposal & Recycling Company
Integrated Environmental Systems, Inc.
Los Altos Garbage Company
Macor, Inc.
Mason Land Reclamation Company, Inc.
Norcal/San Bernardino, Inc.
Norcal/San Diego, Inc.
Norcal Service Center, Inc.
Norcal Waste Services of Sacramento, Inc.
Norcal Waste Solutions, Inc.
Norcal Waste Systems of Southern California, Inc.
Oroville Solid Waste Disposal, Inc.
Recycle Central, Inc.
San Bruno Garbage Co., Inc.
Sanitary Fill Company
South Valley Refuse Disposal, Inc.
Sunset Properties, Inc.
Sunset Scavenger Company
Vacaville Fill*
Vacaville Sanitary Service
Vallejo Garbage Service, Inc.
West Coast Recycling Co.
Western Placer Recovery Company
Yuba Sutter Disposal, Inc.

---------------

     * California general partnership. All other subsidiaries are California
corporations, with the exception of Mason Land Reclamation Company, Inc.
(Missouri corporation).
# FCM Data May 2009
No. 515.

#### Koutei Sugaya *v.*Haff, District Director of Immigration.

November 25, 1935.

*Mr. Roger O’Donnell*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Keenan,*and *Messrs. W. Marvin Smith*and *Bart W. Butler*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 3694]

# DEPARTMENT:

United States Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*),Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No.236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Impressionist Still Life,” imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Phillips Collection,Washington, DC from on or about September 22, 2001 to on or about January 13,2002, and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, MA from on or about February 17, 2002 to on and about June 9, 2002 is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, (telephone: 202/619-6981). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: June 1, 2001.

Helena Kane Finn,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State.

[FR Doc. 01-14630 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-U
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly of Kerrisdale Mining Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Huoqi Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Huoqi ChenHuoqi Chen, Chief Financial Officer June 11, 2009
Exhibit 10.19.3


          SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
                             OUTSIDE OF FORMAL PLANS

                        As amended, effective July 1, 2005



ANNUAL RETAINER FEE
On  January 1 of each  year he or she  serves on the  board,  each  non-employee
director  will  receive an annual  retainer  fee of $30,000  cash or 5,000 stock
units. Each  non-employee  director must irrevocably elect by December 31 of the
prior year whether to receive his or her retainer in cash or units.

MEETING FEES AND ANNUAL STIPENDS
Each  non-employee  director will receive $2,000 for his or her participation in
each board and  committee  meeting.  The Chairman of the Board,  each  Committee
Chair and the Lead Director will receive an additional  annual stipend,  payable
in equal  quarterly  installments  on the first  business day of the  succeeding
quarter, in the following amounts:

   Chairman of the Board                                            $30,000
   Lead Director                                                    $15,000
   Audit Committee Chair                                            $25,000
   Compensation Committee Chair                                     $15,000
   Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair               $7,500
   Retirement Plan Committee                                         $5,000

Each  non-employee  director must elect by December 31 of the prior year whether
to receive his or her meeting fees and annual stipend, when applicable,  in cash
or stock units, or a combination of the two forms of compensation.
#### Robert WOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-16417.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.*

Filed Sept. 15, 2008.

Robert Wooten, Stockton, CA, pro se.

Before: PREGERSON, McKEOWN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Upon review of the record and appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief and the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record); *Harris v. Board of Supervisors, LA. County,*366 F.3d 754, 760 (9th Cir.2004) (denial of preliminary injunction reviewed for abuse of discretion).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

l0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

138571 

SHARON LEE SCHELLENBERG, 

and DAVID W. RIGGLE, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 138571 

 COA: 289401 

Leelanau CC: 06-007326-CZ 

BINGHAM TOWNSHIP, and 

ROBERT FOSTER, 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.