alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RT01-34-002]


Southwest Power Pool, Inc.; Notice of Filing

June 6, 2001.
    Take notice that on May 25, 2001, Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) 
submitted the compliance filing required by the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission's March 28, 2001 Order in the proceeding 
captioned above.
    Copies of this filing were served on all parties included on the 
Commission's official service lists established in this proceeding, as 
well as on affected state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 18, 2001. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance). Comments, protests and interventions may be filed 
electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site 
at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 01-14757 Filed 6-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.31


October 19, 1993

Gary J.  Kurtzman, M.D.
24 Campbell Lane
Menlo Park, CA 94025

Dear Gary:

I am pleased to offer you the position of Senior Director of Research, reporting
directly to me. Your starting salary will be $120,000 per year, payable twice
monthly. The effective starting date of this position will be December 13, 1993.

Our employee benefits include a prepaid employee and family dental plan and a
prepaid employee and family medical plan. You will be eligible for three weeks
paid vacation.

You will receive a stock option for 80,000 shares of Avigen common stock priced
on the date of the next meeting of Avigen's Compensation Committee. These
options will have 16 quarterly vesting periods over the next four years.

If you accept the above described offer, please sign and return one copy of this
letter to me. You may keep the second copy for your records.

Gary, I hope that this letter accurately describes our conversations. On behalf
of all of us at Avigen, let me again tell you how much we look forward to having
you join this exciting company.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Monahan
John Monahan, Ph.D.
President and CEO

JM:jd

P.S. Enclosed please find phone numbers of all our Scientific Advisory Board
members. I will contact them this week.

I have read, understand and hereby accept the foregoing terms and conditions of
employment.

NAME: /s/ Gary J. Kurtzman               DATE:  11/15/93
     ---------------------------                ---------------------------





                                       59
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              | IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima |                             |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|              |                                                      |                             |   |
| October 31, 2014. | By:                                                       | /s/ Matías Gaivironsky |   |
|              |                                                      | Matías Gaivironsky          |   |
|              |                                                      | Chief Financial Officer          |   |
|              |                                                      |                             |   |
```

[Federal Register: December 28, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 248)]
[Notices]
[Page 72650]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28de99-78]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, January 14, 2000.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW, Washington, DC, 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 99-33756 Filed 12-23-99; 11:50 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

----

**======== RETURN TO INDEX    ========**

----
H. Res. 1325 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 19, 2010. 

Whereas, May 25, 2010, will be the 28th National Missing 

Children’s Day; 

Whereas National Missing Children’s Day honors the obligation of the United States to locate and recover missing 

children by prompting parents, guardians, and other 

trusted adult role models to make child safety an utmost 

priority; 

Whereas in the United States nearly 800,000 children are reported missing a year, more than 58,000 children are abducted by nonfamily members, and more than 2,000 children are reported missing every day; 

Whereas efforts of Congress to provide resources, training, 

and technical assistance have increased the capabilities of 

State and local law enforcement to find children and to 

return them home safely; 

Whereas the 1979 disappearance of 6-year-old Etan Patz 

served as the impetus for the creation of National Missing Children’s Day, first proclaimed in 1983; and 

Whereas Etan’s photograph was distributed throughout the 

United States and appeared in media globally, and the 

powerful image came to represent the anguish of thousands of searching families: Now, therefore, be it 
2 

•HRES 1325 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes National Missing Children’s Day and 

encourages all people in the United States to join together to plan events in communities across the United 

States to raise public awareness of law enforcement and 

the issue of missing children and the need to address the 

national problem of missing children; 

(2) recognizes that one of the most important tools 

for law enforcement to use in the case of a missing child 

is an up-to-date, good quality photograph of the child 

and urges all parents and guardians to follow the important precaution of maintaining such a photograph; 

(3) recognizes the vital role of law enforcement and 

the criminal justice system in preventing kidnappings 

and abduction of children while also leading efforts to locate missing children; and 

(4) acknowledges that National Missing Children’s 

Day should remind people in the United States not to 

forget the children who are still missing and not to 

waver in the efforts of law enforcement to reunite such 

children with their families. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of International Surf Resorts,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), Eduardo Biancardi, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
International Surf Resorts, Inc., and will be retained by International Surf
Resorts, Inc.,  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.




/s/
      Eduardo BiancardiEduardo
      Biancardi
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  August
      14, 2008
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin GONZALEZ-GARIBAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50415

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 20, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*441Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Martin Gonzalez-Garibay (Gonzalez) appeals his 84-month sentence for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his sentence was unreasonable because the district court failed to weigh properly the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and imposed a term of imprisonment greater than necessary to satisfy the sentencing goals set forth in § 3553(a).

Gonzalez’s sentence was within a properly calculated advisory guideline range and is presumed reasonable. *See United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006). Giving “great deference” to such a sentence, and recognizing that the sentencing court considered all the factors for a fair sentence under § 3553(a), we conclude that Gonzalez has failed to rebut the presumption that his sentence was reasonable. *See id.*

Gonzalez argues, in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), that the 84-month term of imprisonment imposed in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the § 1326(a) offense charged in his indictment. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than as elements of the offense that must be found by a jury.

Gonzalez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although he contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Gonzalez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Page 31244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-14597]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Financial Institution Data Match
    OMB No.: 0970-0196
    Description: Section 466(a)(17) of the Social Security Act (the 
Act), as added by section 372 of Public Law 104-193, requires States to 
establish procedures under which the State child support enforcement 
(IV-D) agency shall enter into agreements with financial institutions 
doing business in the State for the purpose of securing information 
leading to the enforcement of child support orders.
    Respondents: Financial Institutions

                                                  Annual Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                 Number of   Average
                                                                    Number of    responses    burden     Total
                            Instrument                             respondents      per     hours per    burden
                                                                                respondent   response    hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial data match tape........................................        4233            4         .5       8466
Election form....................................................         241            1         .5      120.5
                                                                                                      ----------
    Estimated total annual burden hours..........................  ...........  ..........  .........     8586.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional Information Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office 
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503. Attn: Desk Officer for ACF.

    Dated: June 6, 2001.
Bob Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 01-14597 Filed 6-8-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
OFFICEOFTHEATTORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

&mrahle J., D. Looney 

oount y ,Auditor 

pewi OouAty 

Boston, Texas 

Oplnfon Ho. 0. 

Ee have your favor 0 

opinion on the above satter, 

9, requestlq aA 

eing as Sollowar 

this oSSio8 at 

o? this County 

00rdea S- 30 

ehou that tbs 

moora while 

tually on the 

6OOa OA tb3 

seal was aaroper mh0a 0f 

aeal to this rea8 8asl be added t0 

uld the deed be reaorded 

eord8d should 8 See be eiwr&wb 

person riling the am or 

word the deed gratis to ooruutg Clerks apparent error. 

The general rule is that %n oSSloer may aorreot 

mistakes In his offiolal reoorda, on proper showing@, 36 

Tex. Jur., .8so. 10, p. 407; but 'we fail to find any statute 

or deelslon authoriqing a Bounty clerk to oorreot a mistake 

ma&e by a forner oounty olerk some thirty or iorty years ago, 
Iionorable J. D. Looney, PEi&e 2 

It Is our opinion, therefore, that the present oountg 018x-k 

Would AOt be authorized to oorrast the reoord referred to by 

now showing that the notary’s seal appeared on said deeds. 

‘Ye do not think that it is neoessary for said deede 

to be again recorded, slnoe It has been ect?erally held that 

the mre Sact that same have been heretofore reoorded Is evlaenoe of the Sect that they were exeouted as provided for by 

law, and it would be presumed that the mtarg aiilxed the seal 

to l okncmledgtnente taken by him. 1 Tex. Jur., Sea. 78, pp. 

4864; Alexander v. Houghton, 26 E. %. 1102. Further, under 

the provlalo~s of P.rtioles 3726 end 3726b, it lo our oplnlon 

that. said deeds would be as sffeative '%ltSout having said reaorda oorreoted, or Bald deed& seain reoorded, as they wmld 

be if s-8 ware raoorded, slnae aald titlolss provide that 

where deeds have been OA reoor4 a8 long as tea years It ahall 

be no objaotlon to the admlsslon oi sam, or a oertifted aopp 

thereor, aa mldenoe th,at the of?leer taking the aoknowledgmat or such instrunent harfng an ottfolal seal aid not aVflr 

the mm3 to the certirioate of aokmwledgment, or that the 

notarial seal le not showa OS record, It 1s our OpiniCiA, 

ths?sf'ore,,that If the partlss lntsrastsd ln these deeda desire to ham same again reoorded they should pay the Seee 

requlrea thereror. 

Trusting this satisfactorily answers your Inquiry, 

we are 

Very truly youra 

ATTORNEY f3ZEtPAL 08 TXXAS
Order filed, January 17, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00004-CV

____________

NORTH CYPRESS MEDICAL CENTER OPERATING COMPANY, LTD., 

D/B/A NORTH CYPRESS MEDICAL CENTER AND DR. OZOCHUKWU 

ODILI, Appellant

V.

RANDY WHITE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-14054

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due January 13, 2020. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Amanda Lynn King, the court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1368 

Supporting the goals of National Dairy Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2010 

Mr. COURTNEY (for himself, Mr. NUNES, Mr. WELCH, Mr. WALZ, Mr. PETRI, 

Mr. ROONEY, Mr. TEAGUE, Mr. LEE of New York, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. 

MAFFEI, Mr. CARNEY, Mr. MURPHY of New York, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. 

PINGREE of Maine, Ms. MARKEY of Colorado, Mr. BOYD, Mr. MICHAUD, 

Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. PERRIELLO, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. CAMP, 

Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. COSTA, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. 

BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. KIND, Mr. OBEY, Ms. BALDWIN, Mrs. 

DAHLKEMPER, Mr. LUJA ́N, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. MINNICK, Mr. RYAN of 

Wisconsin, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. ARCURI, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK of Arizona, Mr. TONKO, Mr. HODES, Mr. LOEBSACK, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Ms. MCCOLLUM, 

Mr. STUPAK, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. OWENS, Mr. BARTLETT, 

Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. OLVER, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. BOCCIERI, Mr. KAGEN, Mr. HIGGINS, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. 

SCALISE, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. BLUNT, and Ms. SLAUGHTER) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals of National Dairy Month. 

Whereas since 1939, June has been celebrated as National 

Dairy Month; 

Whereas there are nearly 70,000 dairy farms throughout the 

United States, and approximately 99 percent of these 

farms are family owned; 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1368 IH 

Whereas the dairy industry in the United States produces 

more than 170 billion pounds of milk annually and contributes tens of billions of dollars to the economy; 

Whereas dairy products are an important source of calcium 

and have been long recognized as an integral part of a 

healthy diet for both children and adults; 

Whereas dairy farmers are significant contributors to efforts 

to preserve farmland and the rural character of communities across the country; and 

Whereas the dairy industry has faced significant challenges 

recently due to high production costs and low retail 

prices, which has forced many farms to close: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals of National Dairy 

3 Month; 

4 (2) encourages States and local governments to 

5 observe National Dairy Month with appropriate ac6 tivities and events that promote the dairy industry; 

7 (3) recognizes the important role that the dairy 

8 industry has played in the economic and nutritional 

9 well-being of Americans; 

10 (4) commends dairy farmers for their continued 

11 hard work and commitment to the United States 

12 economy and to the preservation of open space; and 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1368 IH 

1 (5) encourages all Americans to show their con2 tinued support for the dairy industry and dairy 

3 farmers. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: AMERICAN COMMODITY BROKERS, INC., PHYLLIS C. DEMPSTER, AND JOHN WHELAN 

DOCKET NUMBER: 185 

DOCUMENT TYPE: ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Commodity Exchange Authority 

Washington, D. C. 20250 

ISSUANCE OF COMPLAINT - CEA DOCKET NO. 185 

(Administrative Hearing under the Commodity Exchange Act) 

A complaint and notice of hearing has been signed by the Under Secretary of 

Agriculture, charging violation of the Commodity Exchange Act by: 

American Commodity Brokers, Inc., 

Phyllis C. Dempster, 

and John Whelan 

(Monroe, Michigan) 

The complaint charges that as of March 31, 1970, the respondent corporation, 

while registered as a futures commission merchant under the Act, failed to meet 

minimum financial requirements prescribed for futures commission merchants. As 

of March 31, 1970, the working capital insufficiency was approximately $ 84,000. 

In connection with this insufficiency, the complaint alleges that the 

respondents willfully made material false statements to the Authority. The 

complaint also charges other violations relating to the handling of customers' 

funds and recordkeeping. 

The issuance of a complaint under the Commodity Exchange Act does not 

constitute proof of violation of the law. Such violation is established only 

when the Judicial Officer of the Department has made a determination that the 

evidence substantiates allegations in the complaint. Complaints are filed in 

the Office of the Hearing Clerk of the Department of Agriculture and are a 

matter of public record. Pending disposition by the Judicial Officer, it is the 

policy of the Commodity Exchange Authority not to comment or elaborate on 

charges contained in complaints or to discuss evidence on which they are based. 

A public hearing on the complaint is scheduled to be held before a referee at 

10:00 a.m., local time, October 27, 1971, in Monroe, Michigan. 

LOAD-DATE: June 16, 2008 
Page 2