alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teen Education Group,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
L. Wilson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 13, 2008



                                        By: /s/ ROBERT L. WILSON
                                            ___________________________
                                                Robert L. Wilson
                                                Principal Financial Officer
| (1)   | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Clear-Lite Holdings, Inc. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: March 22, 2011 |   | /s/ Paul E. Niedermeyer     |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                       |   | Paul E. Niedermeyer         |
|                       |   | Principal Executive Officer |
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2010 (the “Report”), I, David Gamache, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

** **

Date:  July 15, 2010                                                    /s/ David Gamache

                                                                                        David Gamache

                                                                                        Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

----
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of iTrackr
Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I,
John Rizzo, Chief Financial Officer of iTrackr Systems, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:




1. 
         The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of iTrackr Systems,
Inc.




Dated:
May 20, 2010




/s/John
      RizzoJohn
      Rizzo, Chief Financial Officer ofITrackr
      Systems, Inc.
The Attorney General of Texas 

September 23, 1980 

Honorable Evans N. Wentz 

Executw Director 

Texas Commission fcr the Blind 

Austin, Texas 

i 

’ AlBnncd by&?&T 

Opinion No. hB+247 

Re: Whether a terminated employee 

of the State Commission for the Blind 

was entitled to be paid fcr accrued 

sick leave 

Dear Mr. Wentz: 

You have requested our opinion as to whether an employee terminated 

by the State Commission for the Blind on June 25,1979, is entitled to be paid 

for accrued sick leave. We assume that there is no question of wrongful 

termination. 

The 1975-77 General Appropriations Act, which expired on August 31, 

1977, contained a provision requiring that all state employees, lpon 

separation, be paid for are-half of their accrued sick leave. Acts l975,64th 

Leg., ch. 743, art. V, sec. 7(b), at 2850. See Attorney General Opinion H1083 (1977). Neither of the appropriations 3 enacted since 1975, however, 

has contained any provision permitting payment for sick leave. 

The side leave ~provisions of the General Appropriations Act are 

applicable to all employees Paid with funds appropriated thereby. Attorney 

General Opinion H-996 fl977). On June 25, 1979, when the employee of 

whom you inquire was terminated, the 1977-79 General Appropriations Act 

was in effect. That indivi&al’s compensation, as well as that of other 

employees of the Commission for the Blind, was clearly included within the 

agency’s appropriation. Acts l977,65th Leg., ch. 872, art. II, at 2729-34. As 

a result, unlike the situation in Attorney General Opinion H-1083 (1977), 

agency policy regard@ payment of sick leave is irrelevant. The statute 

controls, and therefore, no payment may be made. 

Neither cb we believe that refusal of the Commission to pay this 

employee for accrued sick leave constitutes a violation of the Federal 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29.U.S.C. section 794. The individual has not 

been denied any benefits to which he was lawfully entitled. 

P. 780 
Honorable Evans N. Wentz - Page Two (HN-247) 

SUMMARY 

An employee of the State Commission for the Blind who was 

terminated cn June 25, 1979, is not entitled to be paid for 

accrued sick leave. 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General of Texas 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

RICHARD E. GRAY III 

Executive Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Rick Gilpin 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Susan Garrison, Acting Chairman 

Carla cox 

Rick Gilpin 

Bruce Youngblood 

P. 781
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT In the Interest of Baby Girl P. ) ________________________________ ) ) N.P., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D20-1096 ) AMERICANKIDZ ADOPTION ) SERVICES, INC., ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed September 30, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Kimberly Todd, Judge. Scott L. Robbins, Tampa, for Appellant. Patrick B. Calcutt of Calcutt & Calcutt, P.A., Americus, Georgia, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and STARGEL, JJ., Concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Tanya Montana JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-10678

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2010.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Catherine R. Dunnavant, Dunnavant & Associates, P.L.L.C., Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Tanya Montana Jones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Jones has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Jones’s claim(s) of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claim(s) generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no *435opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” *United States v. Cantwell,*470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Jones’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Jones’s untimely request for appointment of new counsel on appeal is DENIED. *See United States v. Wagner,*158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 10.3

 

AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Program

Summary

 

Revised April 27, 2016

 

Effective January 1, 2017

 

On the first business day of each calendar year, each member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), including directors that are not independent under the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange and Securities and Exchange Commission but excluding those directors that are employed by the Company, its parent company Dalian Wanda Group Co., Ltd., or their affiliates (the “Non-Employee Directors”), will receive the following compensation:

 

·                  an annual cash retainer of $130,000;

 

·                  an annual stock award with a value of $50,000;

 

·                  an annual cash retainer of $5,000 for service on each of the Company’s Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees;

 

·                  an annual cash retainer of $20,000 for service as the chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee; and

 

·                  an annual cash retainer of $10,000 for service as the chairman of each of the Company’s Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees.

 

Stock awards will be made pursuant to the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.  Non-Employee Directors may elect to receive all or a portion of their annual cash retainers in stock.  The number of shares to be awarded will be determined by dividing the award value by the average closing price of the stock for the five trading days prior to the date of the stock award.  Stock awards must be retained until the earlier to occur of (i) the third anniversary of the date of grant or (ii) the departure of the Non-Employee Director from the Board.

 

If a director begins service after January 1, the annual cash retainer and the annual stock award will be prorated for the partial year of service.  Cash retainers for committee service need not be pro-rated in the first year of service.

 

Additionally, the Company shall reimburse the Non-Employee Directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket travel and related expenses incurred in connection with their service on the Board.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1341 

Supporting K–12 geography education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2010 

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting K–12 geography education. 

Whereas Congress is scheduled to reauthorize the Elementary 

and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), commonly known 

as ‘‘No Child Left Behind’’, for the first time in almost 

a decade; 

Whereas geography is one of ten ‘‘core academic subjects’’ 

identified in the ESEA for which specific funding allocations and implementing programs are proposed to further 

its teaching at the K–12 level; 

Whereas geography education is central to preparing students 

to be informed citizens of the United States and economically competitive in a rapidly globalizing world; 

Whereas geotechnologies, such as Geographic Information 

Systems (GIS), GPS, photogrammetry, surveying, mapping, and remote sensing, have been identified by the 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1341 IH 

U.S. Department of Labor as one of the three most important emerging and evolving fields, with job opportunities growing and diversifying rapidly, creating substantial 

workforce growth as these technologies prove their value 

in ever more areas; and 

Whereas employers in all sectors, including private companies, government agencies, and nongovernmental organizations have indicated that there is a pressing need for 

more students graduating today with the geographic 

science and geospatial skills needed to support a rapidly 

growing field: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) urges the Administration to include geog3 raphy and geospatial education in its Science, Tech4 nology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and 

5 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) 

6 Blueprint for Reform proposals; 

7 (2) urges Congress to include authorizations 

8 and appropriations for geography education con9 sistent with other core academic subjects for K–12, 

10 as part of a reauthorized ESEA; and 

11 (3) urges Congress to enhance geography teach12 er training by passing legislation such as the Teach13 ing Geography is Fundamental Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

        (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18,

                               United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Spantel Communications Inc., a Florida corporation ("The Company"),
does hereby certify with respect to the Annual report of the Company on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("the Form 10-KSB/A")that:

      3)    The Form 10-KSB/A fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

      4)    the information contained in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


Dated: July 18, 2005                   /s/ Cesar Martinez
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Cesar Martinez
                                       (Chief Financial Officer)
November 3, 2005

Jaguar Acquisition Corporation
1200 River Road, Suite 1302
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428

                  Re: Jaguar Acquisition Corporation ("Company")
                      ------------------------------------------

Gentlemen:


                  Each of the undersigned hereby waives his/its right to
exercise conversion rights with respect to any shares of the Company's common
stock owned by the undersigned, directly or indirectly, whether owned by him/it
prior to the Company's initial public offering or purchased by him/it in such
offering or in the after market and agrees that he/it will not seek conversion
with respect to such shares in connection with any vote to approve a business
combination (as is more fully described in the Company's Prospectus relating to
the Company's initial public offering).


                               Very truly yours,


                               SAPPHIRE CANYON INVESTMENTS LLC



                       By:   /s/ Jonathan Kalman
                           -------------------------------
                           Name:  Jonathan Kalman
                           Title: President

                           CORL LLC



                       By:   /s/ C. Richard Corl
                           -------------------------------
                           Name:  C. Richard Corl
                           Title: President

                           JSC GROUP HOLDINGS LLC



                       By:   /s/ James S. Cassano
                          --------------------------------
                          Name:  James S. Cassano
                          Title: President

                          FA HOLDINGS, LLC



                       By:   /s/ William J. Westervelt, Jr.
                          --------------------------------
                          Name:  William J. Westervelt, Jr.
                          Title: President

                           /s/ John Hoey
                          ---------------------------
                          John Hoey

                          /s/ David W. Tralka
                          ---------------------------
                          David W. Tralka

                          /s/ Robert Moreyra
                          ---------------------------
                          Robert Moreyra

                          /s/ Peter Collins
                          ---------------------------
                          Peter Collins
Page 1 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

CEA CASES 

NAME: SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, V. CARGILL GRAIN COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, JOHN H. 

MACMILLAN, JR., E.J. GRIMES, JULIUS HENDEL, AND PHILIP C. SAYLES 

CITATION: 1 Agric. Dec. 422 

DOCKET NUMBER: 11 

DATE: JUNE 25, 1942 

DOCUMENT TYPE: NOTICE AND ORDER 

(A. D. 145) 

BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE 

SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, Complainant, v. CARGILL, INC., CARGILL GRAIN COMPANY 

OF ILLINOIS, JOHN H. MACMILLAN, JR., E. J. GRIMES, JULIUS HENDEL, AND PHILIP C. 

SAYLES, Respondents. CE-A Docket No. 11. Notice and Order. 

On March 20, 1942, John H. MacMillan, Jr., one of the respondents in this 

proceeding, filed an application for restoration of the privileges denied him in 

the order of March 6, 1940, herein. He alleged that there is no reason to 

continue that order in effect, the privileges having 

 

 

been denied now for over two years. On June 18, 1942, the Agricultural 

Marketing Administration filed a statement containing its views on the 

application. The statement relates that, after extended hearings, the length of 

which was due largely to respondents' dilatory tactics, respondents stipulated 

that John H. MacMillan, Jr., had directed the activities which were the subject 

of the complaint, and consented to denial of the trading privileges of him and 

Cargill Grain Company of Illinois, upon dismissal as to the other respondents. 

The statement also expresses the opinion that the seriousness of the offenses 

resulting from the respondents' activities has been impressed upon the 

respondents and that the public interest does not require that the trading 

privileges of John H. MacMillan, Jr., be longer denied. 

Upon consideration of the application and statement mentioned, it is 

determined that the order of March 6, 1940, should in no way be disturbed, but 

that further notice by the Secretary of Agriculture, mentioned in that order, 

should be given to the effect that the trading privileges of John H. MacMillan, 

Jr., taken from him for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, need not be 

longer denied. 

Therefore, all contract markets are hereby notified that they need no longer 

refuse trading privileges to John H. MacMillan, Jr. 

A copy hereof shall be served upon John H. MacMillan, Jr., and upon each 

contract market. 

Done at Washington, D. C., this 25th day of June 1942. Witness my hand and 

the seal of the Department of Agriculture. 

[SEAL] 

(S) THOMAS J. FLAVIN 

Assistant to the Secretary of Agriculture.

Acting pursuant to authority delegated by the Secretary of Agriculture under 

the Act of April 4, 1940 (54 Stat. 81; 7 F. R. 2656). 

 
Page 2 

LOAD-DATE: March 12, 2008 
Page 3
EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF DOT VN, INC.





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dot VN, Inc.
for the quarter ended October 31, 2009, the undersigned, Thomas Johnson, Chief
Executive Officer of Dot VN, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended October 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Dot VN, Inc.





Date:
      December 15, 2009
              
              /s/   Thomas
    JohnsonThomas
      JohnsonChief
      Executive Officer and principal executive
  officer
Exhibit 10.8


 


Summary of Horace Mann Educators Corporation


Named Executive Officer Annualized Salaries


 


The table below summarizes
the annualized salaries of Horace Mann Educators Corporation's (the "Company") Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial
Officer and the other three highest compensated Executive Officers, as defined in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders (collectively the "Named Executive Officers"). These salaries may be changed at any time at the
discretion of the Compensation Committee and/or Board of Directors of the Company. These are base salaries and do not include short-term
and long-term incentive compensation amounts, the Company's contributions to defined contribution plans and the Company's contributions
to other employee benefit programs on behalf of these individuals.


 


	Named Executive Officer	Annualized Salary
	Marita Zuraitis

President and Chief Executive Officer	$800,000
	Dwayne D. Hallman

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	$460,000
	William J. Caldwell

Executive Vice President, Property & Casualty	$350,000
	Matthew P. Sharpe

Executive Vice President, Annuity & Life	$400,000
	Kelly J. Stacy

Senior Vice President, Field Operations & Distribution	$300,000


 


Last revision date:
March 1, 2016
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charlie Quintero, Appellant.

[874 NYS2d 372]

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Ambrecht, J.), entered on or about February 13, 2008, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this" Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
No. 647, Misc.

#### Smith *v.*Ragen, Warden.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Certiorari denied.